SUMMARY
Alkaline phosphatases (ALP) contribute to immunosuppression in solid tumors, but they, unfortunately, are “undruggable”. Here we report enzyme-instructed assembly of peptides for selectively inhibiting the tumors that overexpress ALP. We developed a precursor with two parts; an amphiphilic, self-assembling peptides joined to a hydrophilic block (i.e., tyrosine phosphate). ALP, overexpressed on and in osteosarcoma cancer cells (e.g., Saos-2), cleaves the phosphates from the tyrosine residue of the precursor and triggers the self-assembly of the resulting peptides. Being selectively formed on and inside the cancer cells, the peptide assemblies induce the cancer cell death and efficiently inhibit the tumor growth in an orthotopic osteosarcoma mice model without harming normal organs. Accordingly, the peptide assemblies significantly improve the survival ratio of metastatic tumor bearing mice. Without relying on inhibiting ALP, this approach integrates enzyme reaction and molecular self-assembly for generating peptide fibrils as potential anticancer therapeutics.
INTRODUCTION
Despite the significant advances cancer immunotherapy based on checkpoint blockade,1 immunosuppressive adenosine2 in tumor microenvironment is a major cause for the patients’ unresponsiveness to the treatment.3 Among the mechanisms for generating extracellular adenosine to suppress anticancer immunity, alkaline phosphatase (ALP)4–6, as an enzymes overexpressed at stem cells7 and certain cancer cells,8 rapidly converts ATP to adenosine (Fig. 1). A conventional strategy to address this problem would be inhibiting ALP activity. ALP, however, is regarded as “undruggable”, though it was identified as a cancer marker over half-century ago.9, 10 It remains a challenge for developing suitable inhibitors11 for ALP without causing harmful side effects because ALP ubiquitously presents in all tissues (especially at liver, bone, intestine, and placenta) and plays a critical role in embryogenesis, bone metabolism, and neuron functions.11, 12 Thus, it would be beneficial to develop an out-of-box approach that kills the ALP-overexpressing cancer cells selectively without relying on ALP inhibition.
Enzyme-instructed assembly13 of peptides turns out to be effective for killing ALP-overexpressing cancer cells.14–17 Bypassing the need of inhibiting ALP, this approach integrates ALP-catalyzed dephosphorylation and self-assembly for generating the fibrils of small molecules (e.g., ultrashort peptides, hexoses, or cholesterols) as the anticancer therapeutics. For example, a precursor has two parts; an amphiphilic, self-assembling peptides joined to a tyrosine phosphate, which renders the precursor water soluble. ALP overexpressed on cancer cells cleaves the phosphate and triggers the self-assembly of the peptides. Being selectively formed on and inside the cancer cells (Fig. 1), the peptides assemblies induce the cancer cell death by activating extrinsic cell death receptors18 and/or generating intracellular cell stresses.14, 17, 19 Besides being applied for imaging the activity of ALP on cell surface,20 this approach has been applied to selectively kill undifferentiated iPS cells in a cell mixture without harming the muscle cells that are differentiated from the iPS cells for a successful transplantation in a murine model.21
Despite the demonstration of ALP-instructed peptide assemblies for selectively inhibiting cancer cells in cell assays, there is, however, a major obstacle for applying this approach in vivo, which is the liver toxicity because the ALP expressed in liver tissue22 would also generate the peptide assemblies. Recently, we have overcome this drawback by developing a precursor that is the substrate of ALP as well as that of carboxylesterase (CES). Being expressed in mammalian liver tissue,23, 24 CES accelerates the disassembly of the peptide assemblies for detoxifying in liver cells.25 This advance confers excellent selectivity to the precursor for killing cancer cells over hepatocytes,25 thus allowing in vivo evaluation of the antitumor efficacy of ALP-instructed assembly of peptides.
To investigate in vivo tumor inhibition by ALP-instructed assembly of peptides, we chose an orthotopic murine model of human metastatic osteosarcoma.26 Metastatic osteosarcoma expresses relatively low level of PD-L127, but very high level of ALP,28 which leads to little improvement in patient survival and regression of osteosarcoma lung metastasis after immunotherapy.27 In addition, the ALP overexpression in osteosarcoma warrants fast dephosphorylation for selective tumor targeting and high anticancer efficacy. We evaluated the precursors using the murine model. Our results validate that ALP instructs the assembly of peptides for effectively inhibiting osteosarcoma tumor in vivo. Specifically, ALP catalytically dephosphorylates the precursors to generate the assemblies of the peptides. Such a multistep molecular process15 efficiently inhibits the tumor growth in an orthotopic osteosarcoma mice model without damaging normal tissues, and significantly improve the survival ratio of metastatic tumor bearing mice. Validating the in vivo anticancer efficacy of enzyme-instructed assembly of peptides for the first time, this work illustrates a fundamentally new way based on kinetics (i.e., enzymatic peptide assembling process) for targeting immunosuppressive cancer cells, and it contributes to use supramolecular for establishing immune normalization in cancer treatment.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Molecular design and self-assembly
The ALP-instructed assembly, involving Nap-ffypeMe2 (1P) and Nap-ffyeMe2 (1) (Fig. 1), selectively and effectively inhibits an osteosarcoma in vitro. We used lower case one-letter codes to refer to D-amino acids here. Consisting of a self-assembling peptide backbone (2-(naphthalen-2-yl)acetyl)-D-phenylalanyl-D-phenylalanine (Nap-ff)), a dephosphorylation site (D-phosphotyrosine (yp)), and an esterase detoxification substrate (dimethyl-D-glutamate (eMe2)), Nap-ffypeMe2 self-assembles to form nanoparticles and/or nanofibrils, depending on its concentrations.29 For example, at 200 μM, it forms a mixture of amorphous solid and scanted numbers of nanofibers. Upon ALP-catalyzed dephosphorylation, the Nap-ffypeMe2 becomes Nap-ffyeMe2, which forms a network of uniform nanofibers with a diameter of 12 ± 2 nm (Fig. 2A). Such a molecular process is rather general because ALP-instructed assembly of analogs of 1P/1 also results in similar morphology transition.29
ALP-instructed assembly in live cells
Saos-2, an osteosarcoma cell line, overexpresses ALP to convert Nap-ffypeMe2 into Nap-ffyeMe2, instructing the assemblies of Nap-ffyeMe2 on and inside Saos-2 cells to result in cell death within half an hour (Fig. 2B). While Nap-ffypeMe2 potently inhibits Saos-2 cells (IC50 = 4 μM), its IC50 on the hepatocyte cells (HepG2) is over two orders of magnitude higher than the IC50 on Saos-2 (Figure 2C). This result is particular important because it indicates that Nap-ffypeMe2 can selectively inhibit the osteosarcoma cells without harming liver cells.
To directly visualize the cellular distribution of the ALP-instructed peptide assemblies, we employed NBD-ffypeMe2 (F1P), a fluorescent analogue of Nap-ffypeMe2. (Fig 2D) We chose environment sensitive fluorescent probe NBD because it exhibits enhanced fluorescence upon the formation of supramolecular assemblies.20 Incubating NBD-ffypeMe2 with Saos-2 cells for 0.5 h results in bright fluorescence in the cytoplasm of Saos-2, together with a few fluorescent puncta on the cell membrane (Fig. 2E and Video S1). This observation confirms that ALPs, on and inside the Saos-2 cells, instruct the assembly of the peptides on the surface and in the cytosol of the cells. Replacing the dimethyl-D-glutamate (eMe2) in NBD-ffypeMe2 with glutamate generates NBD-ffype (F4P). Incubating Saos-2 with NBD-ffype only generates several intracellular fluorescent puncta. These results suggest that the methylation of glutamate significantly enhances the uptake of the precursors by the Saos-2 cells.
ALP-instructed assembly inhibits tumor growth
Nap-ffypeMe2 potently inhibits Saos2-luc and Saos2-lung cells,26 with an IC50 value of 8.4 and 3.2 μM, respectively (Fig. 3A). This result agrees with the slightly lower expression level of ALP on Saso2-luc compared with Saos2-lung cells (Fig. 3B). To establish the orthotopic mouse model of osteosarcoma, we injected luciferase-labeled Saos-2 cells (Saos2-luc) and its highly metastatic subtype (Saos2-lung) cells into the bone marrow cavity of the mouse tibia and started the treatment until tumors had reached 100 mm3 in size.30 After treating the tumor bearing mice with the Nap-ffypeMe2 and saline for four weeks, the mice were sacrificed and the tumor volumes were measured. Treating with Nap-ffypeMe2 results in the 8-fold and 25-fold reduction in tumor volume of Saos2-luc and Saos2-lung, respectively (Fig. 3C, D, S4), indicating that the Nap-ffypeMe2 effectively inhibits the tumor. To monitor the tumor growth in real-time, bioluminescence of tumor cells was measured at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after the treatment (Fig. 3E). The results further confirms that Nap-ffypeMe2 efficiently inhibit the tumor growth of osteosarcoma (Fig. 3F), and exhibit higher efficacy against the metastatic osteosarcoma (Saos2-lung). Moreover, the treatment significantly prolongs the survival time of the osteosarcoma-bearing nude mice (Fig. 3G), confirming the benefits of Nap-ffypeMe2 treatment.
Evaluation of selectivity and systemic toxicity
After treating with Nap-ffypeMe2 or saline for 4 weeks, the mice were sacrificed and the tumor were dissected and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (HE) (Fig. 4A). Compared with the saline group, majority of the cells in the Nap-ffypeMe2 treatment group exhibit nuclear condensation, as well as scattering broken nuclei, indicating that Nap-ffypeMe2 induced tumor apoptosis in vivo. To further validate the tumor apoptosis, we conducted the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. Treating with Nap-ffypeMe2, most of cells in tumor tissue exhibit brown (TUNEL positive) indicative for DNA fragmentation (Fig. 4B), resulting in the 7-fold and 11-fold increase in TUNEL signals of Saos2-luc and Saos2-lung, respectively (Fig. 4C). To evaluate the systemic toxicity of Nap-ffypeMe2, major organs (heart, liver, spleen, kidney, and lung) were prepared for histological analysis after the treatment. As shown in Fig. 4D and Fig. S6, no observable difference was noticed between the Nap-ffypeMe2 treatment group and saline group, indicating excellent biocompatibility of the peptide assemblies.
Structural Analogs for target validation
To validate the target (ALP) through molecular design,31 we synthesized another two ALP cleavage precursors Nap-ffyphR (2P)32 and Npx-ffyphR (3P, Npx is naproxen)33 and evaluated their anticancer activities in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro assay reveals that the anticancer efficacy of the precursors against osteosarcoma cells follows the order of 1P > 2P > 3P (Figs. S7 and S8). Compared with 1P, 2P and 3P exhibit reduced selectivity for targeting osteosarcoma cells over hepatocyte cells (Fig. S8), agreeing with that the esterases in liver cells are unable to act on them. These results address the importance of ester bonds in the molecule design of 1P, which not only increases the efficacy of 1P, but also enables the dissociation of assemblies by esterase in hepatocyte cells to result in minimized cytotoxicity to hepatocyte cells. Although 2P and 3P also inhibit the tumor growth in the orthotopic mouse model of osteosarcoma, their inhibitory efficacies follow the same trend of the in vitro assay (Figs. S9 and 10). These results, nevertheless, indicate that integrating the molecular design of small molecule for instructed-assembly with bioinformatics (e.g., overexpression of CES in liver34) opens a new window for precision medicine and minimizing the side effect.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this work demonstrates enzyme-instructed supramolecular assemblies of peptides to target immunosuppressive tumors in vivo. Although this work used osteosarcoma, the principle demonstrated here should be applicable to any other ALP expressing tumors, like high-grade serous ovarian cancer OVSAHO.25 Since aggregation of small molecules is a general phenomenon35, this work, which relies on assemblies of small molecules, may lead a way to resurrect drug candidates discarded due to aggregations because the formation of in-situ assemblies in tumor could reduce the diffusion and enhance the tumor retention. Moreover, a major obstacle in anticancer nanomedicine is liver accumulation, which currently is circumvented by using cells to carry the nanoparticles.36 The approach in this work allows precursors to be soluble monomers before they reach tumor and form nanofibrils in-situ at the tumor, thus would minimize the liver accumulation.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Full experimental procedures are provided in the Supplemental Information.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was partially supported by NIH (CA142746) to B. X., NSF (DMR-1420382) to B. X. and NIH (F99CA234746) to Z.F. We also want to thank National key R&D program of China (2016YFC1102100) to T. T., National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672205) to T. T. and Innovation Program for PhD students in Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (BXJ201829) to X.H.
Footnotes
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Supplemental Information includes 12 Figures, 1 Video, Experimental Procedures, Synthesis and characterization of the compounds.
COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing financial interests
REFERENCES
- 1.Sanmamed MF, Chen L. (2018). A Paradigm Shift in Cancer Immunotherapy: From Enhancement to Normalization. Cell 175, 313–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Di Virgilio F, Sarti AC, Falzoni S, De Marchi E, Adinolfi E. (2018). Extracellular ATP and P2 purinergic signalling in the tumour microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 601–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vijayan D, Young A, Teng MWL, Smyth MJ. (2017). Targeting immunosuppressive adenosine in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 709–724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rao SR, Snaith AE, Marino D, Cheng X, Lwin ST, Orriss IR, Hamdy FC, Edwards CM. (2017). Tumour-derived alkaline phosphatase regulates tumour growth, epithelial plasticity and disease-free survival in metastatic prostate cancer. Br. J. Cancer 116, 227–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pettengill M et al. (2013). Soluble Ecto-5 ‘-nucleotidase (5 ‘-NT), Alkaline Phosphatase, and Adenosine Deaminase (ADA1) Activities in Neonatal Blood Favor Elevated Extracellular Adenosine. J. Biol. Chem 288, 27315–27326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim SH, Shin K-H, Moon S-H, Jang J, Kim HS, Suh J-S, Yang W-I. (2017). Reassessment of alkaline phosphatase as serum tumor marker with high specificity in osteosarcoma. Cancer Med. 6, 1311–1322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shamblott MJ, Axelman J, Wang SP, Bugg EM, Littlefield JW, Donovan PJ, Blumenthal PD, Huggins GR, Gearhart JD. (1998). Derivation of pluripotent stem cells horn cultured human primordial germ cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 95, 13726–13731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fishman WH. (1987). Clinical and biological significance of an isozyme tumor marker--PLAP. Clin. Biochem 20, 387–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bernhard A, Rosenbloom L. (1953). Ion exchange effect on alkaline phosphatase of serum with reference to cancer. Science 118, 114–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fishman WH, Inglis NR, Green S, Anstiss CL, Gosh NK, Reif AE, Rustigia R, Krant MJ, Stolbach LL. (1968). Immunology and biochemistry of Regan isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase in human cancer. Nature 219, 697–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Millán JL, Mammalian Alkaline Phosphatases: From Biology to Applications in Mdicine and Biotechnology. (John Wiley & Sons, 2006). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fonta C, Négyessy L, Neuronal Tissue-Nonspecific Alkaline Phosphatase (TNAP) Subcellular Biochemistry (Springer, 2015). [Google Scholar]
- 13.He HJ, Xu B. (2018). Instructed-Assembly (iA): A Molecular Process for Controlling Cell Fate. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 91, 900–906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang HM, Feng ZQQ, Wang YZ, Zhou R, Yang ZM, Xu B. (2016). Integrating Enzymatic Self-Assembly and Mitochondria Targeting for Selectively Killing Cancer Cells without Acquired Drug Resistance. J. Am. Chem. Soc 138, 16046–16055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhou J, Du XW, Yamagata N, Xu B. (2016). Enzyme-Instructed Self-Assembly of Small D-Peptides as a Multiple-Step Process for Selectively Killing Cancer Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc 138, 3813–3823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pires RA, Abul-Haija YM, Costa DS, Novoa-Carballal R, Reis RL, Ulijn RV, Pashkuleva I. (2015). Controlling Cancer Cell Fate Using Localized Biocatalytic Self-Assembly of an Aromatic Carbohydrate Amphiphile. J. Am. Chem. Soc 137, 576–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang HM, Feng ZQQ, Wu DD, Fritzsching KJ, Rigney M, Zhou J, Jiang YJ, Schmidt-Rohr K, Xu B. (2016). Enzyme-Regulated Supramolecular Assemblies of Cholesterol Conjugates against Drug-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc 138, 10758–10761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Du XW, Zhou J, Wang HN, Shi JF, Kuang Y, Zeng W, Yang ZM, Xu B. (2017). In situ generated D-peptidic nanofibrils as multifaceted apoptotic inducers to target cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 8, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Feng Z, Wang H, Wang S, Zhang Q, Zhang X, Rodal AA, Xu B. (2018). Enzymatic Assemblies Disrupt the Membrane and Target Endoplasmic Reticulum for Selective Cancer Cell Death. J. Am. Chem. Soc 140, 9566–9573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhou J, Du XW, Berciu C, He HJ, Shi JF, Nicastro D, Xu B. (2016). Enzyme-Instructed Self-Assembly for Spatiotemporal Profiling of the Activities of Alkaline Phosphatases on Live Cells. Chem 1, 246–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kuang Y et al. (2017). Efficient, selective removal of human pluripotent stem cells via ecto-alkaline phosphatase-mediated aggregation of synthetic peptides. Cell Chem. Biol 24, 685–694. e684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kaplan MM. (1972). Alkaline Phosphatase. N. Engl. J. Med 286, 200–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ross MK, Borazjani A, Wang R, Crow JA, Xie SQ. (2012). Examination of the carboxylesterase phenotype in human liver. Arch. Biochem. Biophys 522, 44–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Satoh T, Hosokawa M. (1998). The mammalian carboxylesterases: From molecules to functions. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol 38, 257–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Feng Z, Wang H, Zhou R, Li J, Xu B. (2017). Enzyme-Instructed Assembly and Disassembly Processes for Targeting Downregulation in Cancer Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc 139, 3950–3953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Du L, Fan QM, Tu B, Yan W, Tang TT. (2014). Establishment and characterization of a new highly metastatic human osteosarcoma cell line derived from Saos2. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol 7, 2871–2882. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dhupkar P, Gordon N, Stewart J, Kleinerman ES. (2018). Anti-PD-1 therapy redirects macrophages from an M2 to an M1 phenotype inducing regression of OS lung metastases. Cancer Med. 7, 2654–2664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rodan SB, Imai Y, Thiede MA, Wesolowski G, Thompson D, Barshavit Z, Shull S, Mann K, Rodan GA. (1987). Characterization of a human osteosarcoma cell line (Saos-2) with osteoblastic properties. Cancer Res. 47, 4961–4966. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Feng Z, Wang H, Chen X, Xu B. (2017). Self-Assembling Ability Determines the Activity of Enzyme-Instructed Self-Assembly for Inhibiting Cancer Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc 139, 15377–15384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Han XG, Du L, Qiao H, Tu B, Wang YG, Qin A, Dai KR, Fan QM, Tang TT. (2015). CXCR1 knockdown improves the sensitivity of osteosarcoma to cisplatin. Cancer Lett. 369, 405–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sweis RF. (2015). Target (In)Validation: A Critical, Sometimes Unheralded, Role of Modern Medicinal Chemistry. ACS Med. Chem. Lett 6, 618–621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Feng ZQQ, Wang HM, Wang SY, Zhang Q, Zhang XX, Rodal AA, Xu B. (2018). Enzymatic Assemblies Disrupt the Membrane and Target Endoplasmic Reticulum for Selective Cancer Cell Death. J. Am. Chem. Soc 140, 9566–9573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Feng Z, Wang H, Xu B. (2018). Instructed Assembly of Peptides for Intracellular Enzyme Sequestration. J. Am. Chem. Soc 140, 16433–16437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Uhlen M et al. (2015). Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Irwin JJ, Duan D, Torosyan H, Doak AK, Ziebart KT, Sterling T, Tumanian G, Shoichet BK. (2015). An Aggregation Advisor for Ligand Discovery. J. Med. Chem 58, 7076–7087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tang L et al. (2018). Enhancing T cell therapy through TCR-signaling-responsive nanoparticle drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol 36, 707–716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.