Abstract
Frogs must have sharp hearing abilities during the warm summer months to successfully find mating partners. This study aims to understand how frog hair cell ribbon-type synapses preserve both sensitivity and temporal precision during temperature changes. Under room (∼24°C) and high (∼32°C) temperature, we performed in vitro patch-clamp recordings of hair cells and their afferent fibers in amphibian papillae of either male or female bullfrogs. Afferent fibers exhibited a wide heterogeneity in membrane input resistance (Rin) from 100 mΩ to 1000 mΩ, which may contribute to variations in spike threshold and firing frequency. At higher temperatures, most fibers increased their frequency of spike firing due to an increase in spontaneous EPSC frequencies. Hair cell resting membrane potential (Vrest) remained surprisingly stable during temperature increases, because Ca2+ influx and K+ outflux increased simultaneously. This increase in Ca2+ current likely enhanced spontaneous EPSC frequencies. These larger “leak currents” at Vrest also lowered Rin and produced higher electrical resonant frequencies. Lowering Rin will reduce the hair cells receptor potential and presumably moderate the systems sensitivity. Using membrane capacitance measurements, we suggest that hair cells can partially compensate for this reduced sensitivity by increasing exocytosis efficiency and the size of the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles. Furthermore, paired recordings of hair cells and their afferent fibers showed that synaptic delays shortened and multivesicular release becomes more synchronous at higher temperatures, which should improve temporal precision. Together, our results explain many previous in vivo observations on the temperature dependence of spikes in auditory nerves.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The vertebrate inner ear detects and transmits auditory information over a broad dynamic range of sound frequency and intensity. It achieves remarkable sensitivity to soft sounds and precise frequency selectivity. How does the ear of cold-blooded vertebrates maintain its performance level as temperature changes? More specifically, how does the hair cell to afferent fiber synapse in bullfrog amphibian papilla adjust to a wide range of physiological temperatures without losing its sensitivity and temporal fidelity to sound signals? This study uses in vitro experiments to reveal the biophysical mechanisms that explain many observations made from in vivo auditory nerve fiber recordings. We find that higher temperature facilitates vesicle exocytosis and electrical tuning to higher sound frequencies, which benefits sensitivity and selectivity.
Keywords: auditory nerve, Ca2+ current, EPSP, exocytosis, hair cell synapse, membrane resistance
Introduction
Bullfrogs that jump into a cold pond must adapt quickly to a sudden temperature shift. Indeed, frogs adapt to a wide range of physiological body temperatures (Lillywhite, 1970). In summer, male frogs gather together and chorus to attract female frogs (Capranica, 1965). To successfully find mating partners, their hearing abilities must be sharp during the warm summer months. Bullfrog vocalization is composed of low- to mid-frequency sounds (200–2000 Hz) (Capranica, 1965; Smotherman and Narins, 2000; Simmons, 2004). In addition, hearing is also critical for hunting insects and for territorial behaviors (Emlen, 1968; Wiewandt, 1969). Insects flap their wings at frequencies ranging from 330 Hz (house flies) to 600 Hz (mosquitos), and can even reach 1040 Hz (small biting midges). All these sound frequencies are detected and transduced by one frog hearing organ, the amphibian papilla (van Dijk et al., 2011). Accordingly, recordings of spikes in bullfrog amphibian papilla auditory nerve fibers display tuning curves with greatest sensitivity and best frequencies (or lowest sound level thresholds) ∼500–650 Hz (Feng et al., 1975; Heffner and Heffner, 2007).
Hair cells transduce sound vibrations into graded electrical signals, which are then sent to the brain via all-or-none action potential (AP) spikes in the afferent fibers. At higher temperatures, in vivo single afferent fiber recordings have revealed an increase in spontaneous spike rates, a decrease in sound intensity threshold, a reduced latency of response to sound, and higher vector strength (or better phase-locking precision) (Stiebler and Narins, 1990; van Dijk et al., 1990). This indicates that the hearing organ of frogs transmit more sound information with higher sensitivity, shorter reaction times, and greater temporal precision at higher temperatures. What are the cellular and synaptic mechanisms that explain these in vivo observations?
Hair cells detect and transduce three aspects of sound: intensity, phase, and frequency. Information on the rapid onset and offset of sound transients must also be faithfully transmitted to the auditory nerves at ribbon-type synapses (Rutherford, 2015; Coate et al., 2019). Indeed, hair cells express ion channels with some of the fastest activation and deactivation kinetics (Engel, 2008; Heil and Peterson, 2017; Pangrsic et al., 2018). Sound signals are conveyed via transduction currents (I) mediated by K+ influx at the stereocilia bundles, resulting in graded receptor membrane potential (Vm) changes. The detection of low-level sounds is facilitated if hair cells have a large input resistance (Rin), given that Vm = Rin × I. However, phase-locking to higher frequency sounds with fine temporal precision requires shorter membrane time constants (τm = Rin × Cm, where Cm is the hair cell membrane capacitance), which requires a small Rin. How does the hair cell cope with these conflicting demands on its biophysical properties? Does hair cell Rin decrease when temperature increases, as observed in other bullfrog neurons (Santin et al., 2013)? If so, how do auditory hair cells and their synapses compensate for temperature-dependent changes in Rin to maintain both sound sensitivity and temporal fidelity?
To answer these questions, we performed in vitro voltage-clamp and current-clamp recordings from single hair cells and their afferent fibers in bullfrog amphibian papillae under both room (23°C–25°C) and high (30°C–33°C) temperature. Our results suggest that larger amplitudes and faster Ca2+ and K+ current kinetics lead to higher hair cell intrinsic electrical resonance frequencies, whereas shorter synaptic delays, more synchronous multivesicular release, and decreased Rin at high temperature contributes to more precise phase locking to sound signals. Moreover, we propose that hair cells compensate for lower Rin at high temperature by increasing the size of the readily releasable pool (RRP) of vesicles and the efficiency of exocytosis, resulting in an enhancement of sound sensitivity.
Materials and Methods
Animal care and tissue preparation.
Adult bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana; Rana Ranch) of both sexes were used for experiments. Protocols for animal care and anesthesia were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Oregon Health and Science University. Bullfrogs were sedated in 7°C–10°C water bath for ∼5–10 min, anesthetized by isoflurane (0.025 ml/g body weight) absorbed through the skin, and then double-pitched and decapitated. Amphibian papillae were carefully dissected, and the connection of hair cells and afferent fibers was exposed via a spit-open procedure as described previously (Keen and Hudspeth, 2006; Li et al., 2009).
Experimental design.
The acutely split-open tissue preparation was placed in a recording chamber perfused with artificial perilymph containing the following (in mm): 95 NaCl, 2 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 25 NaHCO3, 3 glucose, 1 creatine, and 1 sodium pyruvate, pH 7.30 (osmolarity 235 mOsm) at 1–2 ml/min, bubbling with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. Reagents and salts were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, if not specified otherwise. Temperature was adjusted by heating the bath perfusion with a temperature controller (Warner Instruments), which changed bath temperature between room (23°C–25°C) and high (30°C–33°C) temperatures. Tissue temperature was measured continuously by a miniature thermistor placed close to the perfused amphibian papillae preparation during patch-clamp recordings.
The semi-intact preparation of hair cells and their connecting afferent fibers was placed on an upright microscope with a 60× water-immersion objective (Olympus, BX51WI) and digital CCD camera (QImaging). Whole-cell patch recordings were performed with an EPC-10/2 (HEKA) patch-clamp amplifier controlled by PatchMaster software (HEKA). Recording pipettes were pulled on a PP-830 vertical puller (Narishige) from borosilicate glass pipettes (1B150F-4, World Precision Instruments). Patch pipettes were pulled to resistances of 5–7 mΩ for hair cells. Pipettes were filled with the intracellular solution containing the following (in mm): 77 Cs-gluconate, 20 CsCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 TEA-Cl, 10 HEPES, 2 EGTA, 3 Mg-ATP, 1 Na-GTP, and 5 Na2-phosphocreatine, adjusted to pH 7.3 with CsOH. We used 2 mm EGTA as the mobile internal Ca2+ buffer of hair cells (Frank et al., 2009; Johnson et al., 2017). The pH-independent Ca2+ buffer BAPTA (2 mm) and another pH buffer MOPS (10 mm) were also used in some experiments (see Fig. 9). To measure resting membrane potential (see Fig. 5A), outward potassium current (see Fig. 5B,D), membrane input resistance (see Fig. 6), and resonant frequency (see Fig. 7), we used a more physiological K+-based internal solution containing the following (in mm): 77 K-gluconate, 30 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 2 EGTA, 3 Mg-ATP, 1 Na-GTP, and 5 Na2-phosphocreatine, adjusted to pH 7.3 with KOH. To preserve a more intact hair cell intracellular milieu, we also performed perforated-patch recordings using an internal solution with gramicidin (40–50 μg/ml; see Figs. 5A, 6) plus a fluorescent dye (AlexaFluor-488 Hydrazide; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Hair cells containing dye in their cytoplasm were excluded from analysis.
In voltage clamp, hair cells were held at a membrane potential of −90 mV. Membrane potentials were corrected for a liquid junction potential of 10 mV. In current clamp, hair cells were held at zero current. Whole-cell calcium currents (ICa) were leak-subtracted using a P/4 protocol. The uncompensated series resistances (Rs) in whole-cell recordings were 10.5 ± 0.4 mΩ for hair cells (n = 36). The uncompensated average Rs in perforated-patch recordings was 40.1 ± 1.3 mΩ (n = 9).
We used membrane capacitance (Cm) measurements to monitor exocytosis (vesicle fusion). Patch pipettes were coated with dental wax to minimize their stray capacitance. The Cm from hair cells was measured under whole-cell voltage-clamp conditions using the “Sine + DC” method (Lindau and Neher, 1988; Moser and Beutner, 2000). A 2 kHz sinusoidal command voltage of 50 mV peak-to-peak magnitude was superposed on the hair cell holding potential of −90 mV. The resulting current response was used to calculate Cm via a software emulator of a lock-in amplifier (Gillis, 2000). The increase of Cm (ΔCm) evoked by membrane depolarization was measured as ΔCm = Cm(response) − Cm(resting). Here Cm(resting) and Cm(response) were obtained by averaging capacitance data points before and after the depolarizing steps using Igor Pro 6.0 (WaveMetrics) software. We excluded recordings in which the uncompensated series resistance was >15 mΩ or the holding current was >100 pA. The thin steriocelia of hair cells may not be under full space clamp, so their contribution to resting Cm may be underestimated (Breneman et al., 2009).
Afferent fibers were patched with 8–10 mΩ patch pipette filled with the K+-based internal solution, as described above. Membrane potentials were corrected for a liquid junction potential of 10 mV. Spontaneous EPSCs were recorded from the voltage-clamped afferent fibers held at −90 mV. Spontaneous EPSPs were recorded in current-clamp mode from afferent fibers with zero current injection. The uncompensated Rs in whole-cell recordings of afferent fibers was 27.9 ± 3.2 mΩ (n = 8). An excessively high series resistance can reduce and filter large EPSC events because of significant voltage-clamp errors (Li et al., 2009). Therefore, we excluded afferent fibers with uncompensated series resistance >50 mΩ from analysis, and we electronically compensated afferent fiber whole-cell recordings up to 35% depending on the uncompensated series resistance to maintain a constant series resistance throughout the recordings.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 6 (GraphPad Software) and Excel (Microsoft). Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = number of cells). If not specified, statistical significance was determined using paired Student's t test. We chose p < 0.05 to be the criterion for statistical significance.
Data analyses and curve fitting were performed using Igor Pro 6.0. The threshold of an AP was defined as membrane potential (Vm) when the slope of Vm versus time started to increase compared with that of preceding EPSP. Our estimation was consistent with the threshold estimated by phase plots, which plot membrane potential slope (dVm/dt) versus Vm (Yang et al., 2016). Biophysical properties of spontaneous EPSCs and EPSPs (i.e., amplitude, frequency, rise time, and τdecay) were analyzed using a customized protocol written by Dr. Owen Gross. The rise time was calculated as the interval between 10% and 90% of the peak amplitude relative to baseline. The τdecay of averaged EPSCs or EPSPs was estimated by a single exponential fit using the equation:
where I(t) is the current as a function of time, A is the amplitude at time 0, τ is the time constant, and Iss is the steady-state current amplitude. The temperature coefficient (Q10) is the coefficient by which a quantity increases after a change of 10°C. Q10 values for amplitude, frequency, rise time, and time constant of decay as well as ΔCm were calculated using the following equation:
where FL and FH are factors of interest measured at room (23°C–25°C) and high (30°C–33°C) temperature, respectively, and ΔT is the absolute value of the temperature difference.
Results
Most afferent fibers fire more spikes at higher temperature
To determine the temperature dependence of spontaneous spikes at hair cell afferent fibers, we recorded spontaneous potential changes in afferent fibers using whole-cell current clamp with zero current injection. At 23.7 ± 0.2°C, the frequency of spikes was 2.0 ± 0.64 Hz, amplitude was 51.9 ± 6.8 mV, threshold was −51.0 ± 2.0 mV, and resting membrane potential (Vrest) of afferent fibers was −66.9 ± 2.1 mV (n = 18). Among these fibers, seven of them displayed big spikes that overshot 0 mV with higher threshold (Fig. 1A1). The amplitude of these big spikes was 85.7 ± 5.7 mV (n = 6), whereas the amplitude of spikes that did not overshoot was 35.0 ± 4.8 mV (n = 12, p < 0.0001). The threshold of the big spikes was −44.1 ± 2.4 mV (n = 6), whereas the threshold of small spikes was −54.8 ± 2.1 mV (n = 12, p = 0.0063, unpaired t test). There was no statistical difference between these two groups in frequency (overshooting: 2.02 ± 0.56 Hz vs nonovershooting: 1.99 ± 0.94 Hz, p = 0.98, unpaired t test) and Vrest (overshooting: −64.1 ± 4.6 mV vs nonovershooting: −68.3 ± 2.3 mV, p = 0.37).
For 7 of these 18 fibers, we successfully recorded spikes at both room and high temperature. Five of them fired more spikes at high temperature (Table 1; Fig. 1A1–A4). We called these fibers “thermal-positive fibers.” The temperature coefficient (Q10) of spontaneous spiking rate was 4.0 ± 1.2 (n = 5), which was similar to that found in rat fibers (median Q10 = 6.6) (Wu et al., 2016). Although threshold for firing an AP at high temperature (−58.6 mV) was lower than that at room temperature (−53.9 mV, n = 5, p = 0.0158), spike probability rates remain the same throughout temperature change: at room temperature, 25.8% of EPSPs evoked a spike; and at high temperature, 25.4% of EPSPs evoked a spike (n = 5, p = 0.97). A decrease in afferent fiber membrane input resistance at high temperature results in faster EPSP decay (see Fig. 4), making it more difficult for them to summate, which counteracts the potential increase in spike probability caused by lower thresholds. By contrast, in mammalian cochlear spiral ganglion neurons, 80%–97% of EPSPs evoke a spike under room temperature (Rutherford et al., 2012). The low spike failure rate of EPSPs in mammalian fibers may result from the smaller surface area and high input resistance of the mammalian postsynaptic bouton (Rutherford et al., 2012). In bullfrog amphibian papilla, each hair cell connects with 3–6 large claw-like afferent fiber endings and each fiber receives multiple ribbon synapses (Graydon et al., 2014), while each mammalian afferent fiber only connects with just one single synaptic ribbon (Liberman, 1980; Rutherford, 2015).
Table 1.
Thermal positive fiber (n = 5) | 23.7 ± 0.5°C | 31.1 ± 0.4°C | p | Q10 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency (Hz) | 4.4 ± 1.9 | 9.4 ± 3.5 | 0.047 | 4.0 ± 1.2 |
Amplitude (mV) | 75.7 ± 16.0 | 44.8 ± 11.1 | 0.075 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
Threshold (mV) | −53.9 ± 4.3 | −58.6 ± 4.0 | 0.016 | 1.1 ± 0.03 |
Resting potential (mV) | −70.1 ± 3.7 | −70.7 ± 3.4 | 0.55 | 1.0 ± 0.02 |
Thermal negative fiber (n = 2) | 24.2 ± 0.3°C | 31.7 ± 0.4°C | ||
Frequency (Hz) | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | ||
Amplitude (mV) | 46.8 ± 3.1 | 47.6 ± 8.4 | ||
Threshold (mV) | −48.6 ± 3.1 | −43.4 ± 4.5 | ||
Resting potential (mV) | −66.1 ± 8.0 | −65.1 ± 5.9 |
Values are mean ± SEM.
The other two fibers fired less spikes at high temperature (Table 1; Fig. 1B1–B4), and we called these “thermal-negative fibers.” The thermal-negative fibers had low spontaneous spiking rate (<1 Hz; Table 1). In rat auditory nerve, spontaneous spiking rate increases during maturation of the cochlear from 3.87 Hz at P15–P17 to 12.85 Hz at P29–P32 (Wu et al., 2016). It is possible that some low-frequency spiking fibers in the frog may receive synaptic release from some immature hair cells at the edge of the amphibian papilla (Lewis and Li, 1975).
Frequencies of spontaneous EPSCs and EPSPs are enhanced at high temperature
To examine how temperature affects hair cell spontaneous release, we recorded spontaneous EPSCs from afferent fibers without voltage-clamping their presynaptic hair cells under room (black traces) and high (red traces) temperature (Fig. 2A1,B1). The frequency of the EPSCs increased from 78.2 ± 9.5 Hz at room temperature to 115.2 ± 9.7 Hz at high temperature (n = 18, p = 0.0097; Table 2). The EPSC amplitude distribution of an afferent fiber in Figure 2A2 also shows that more EPSCs occurred under high temperature. The EPSC amplitude distribution was fit well with a Gaussian function (Fig. 2A2: R2 = 0.96 at 22°C; R2 = 0.93 at 32°C). The peaks of Gaussian fits fell at 93.5 pA at 22°C and at 89.7 pA at 32°C (Fig. 2A2), suggesting that the average EPSC amplitude did not increase at high temperature. Most afferent fibers (12 of 18) did not show an increase in EPSC amplitude at high temperature, and the average of EPSC amplitude remained the same as temperature changed (p = 0.61; Table 2). In Figure 2A3, average EPSCs were normalized to their peak values, and a single exponential function was used to fit the decay phase of EPSCs and determine the time constant of decay (τdecay). The 10%–90% rise time and τdecay of EPSCs were 223 ± 13 μs and 617 ± 36 μs (n = 18; Table 2) at room temperature, which are faster than that measured in immature rat afferent fibers (Yi et al., 2010) but similar to that measured in the afferent fibers of adult turtle (Schnee et al., 2013) and hearing rats (Grant et al., 2010). Elevating temperature decreased both 10%–90% rise time and τdecay of EPSCs with Q10 values of 1.7 and 1.8, respectively (Table 2). This is consistent with our previous findings showing that decreasing temperature from 25°C to 15°C slows down activation and decay of EPSCs in bullfrog afferent fibers (Li et al., 2009). Similarly, in rat AII amacrine cells, increasing temperature from 26°C to 34°C decreases both rise time and τdecay of mEPSCs with Q10 values of 1.3 and 1.5, respectively (Veruki et al., 2003). Calculating the integrals of EPSCs, we found that the postsynaptic charge transfer was decreased at high temperature (Table 2), which may be due to faster activation and deactivation (Fig. 2A3,B3) of postsynaptic AMPA receptors and faster glutamate transporter activity at high temperature (Auger and Attwell, 2000).
Table 2.
EPSC (n = 18) | 23.4 ± 0.1°C | 31.1 ± 0.1°C | p | Q10 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Amplitude (pA) | 80.5 ± 6.8 | 77.7 ± 7.4 | 0.61 | 1.1 ± 0.2 |
Frequency (Hz) | 78.2 ± 9.5 | 115.2 ± 9.7 | 0.0097 | 3.2 ± 1.1 |
Rise time (μs) | 223 ± 13 | 150 ± 6 | <0.0001 | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
τdecay (μs) | 617 ± 36 | 400 ± 24 | <0.0001 | 1.8 ± 0.1 |
Charge transfer (fC) | −71.3 ± 5.2 | −47.9 ± 3.4 | <0.0001 | |
EPSP (n = 19) | 23.4 ± 0.1°C | 31.5 ± 0.1°C | p | Q10 |
Amplitude (mV) | 3.9 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.1 ± 0.2 |
Frequency (Hz) | 40.4 ± 6.1 | 56.9 ± 7.0 | 0.003 | 2.1 ± 0.5 |
τdecay (ms) | 3.50 ± 0.69 | 1.67 ± 0.38 | <0.0001 | 2.7 ± 0.4 |
Values are mean ± SEM.
Among all the afferent fibers recorded, 5 of 18 (28%) exhibited double peaks in the EPSC amplitude distribution at both room and high temperatures. Figure 2B1 shows EPSCs recorded from an afferent fiber that had a double-peak distribution (Fig. 2B2). Double- or triple-peak EPSC amplitude distributions have been observed previously in afferent fibers of mature rats (Grant et al., 2010) and turtle (Schnee et al., 2013). We divided EPSCs into two groups according to their amplitude: small EPSCs with amplitude <150 pA and large EPSCs with amplitude >150 pA. The frequency distributions of EPSC amplitude in each group were fit well with a Gaussian function (small events: R2 = 0.94 at 23°C, R2 = 0.93 at 31°C; large events: R2 = 0.93 at 23°C, R2 = 0.97 at 31°C). Under 23°C, the first and the second peak of the Gaussian fits were 78 and 292 pA, respectively. Under 31°C, the first and the second peak were 89 and 279 pA, respectively. Under 23°C, there were 65% of EPSCs >150 pA. The group of large EPSCs increased to 74% at 31°C.
Spontaneous EPSPs were also recorded from afferent fibers using whole-cell current clamp with 0 pA holding current. Consistent with EPSCs, the frequency of EPSPs increased from 40.4 Hz at 23.4°C to 56.9 Hz at 31.5°C (n = 19, p = 0.003; Table 2). However, the response of EPSP amplitudes was variable: 58% (11 of 19) of the fibers showed a reduced average EPSP amplitude at high temperature. This could be caused by a strong activation of K+ currents in the afferents that blunts the EPSP amplitude at higher temperatures. However, averaging the entire dataset revealed no statistical difference in the amplitude of EPSPs between room and high temperature (3.9 ± 0.3 mV vs 3.8 ± 0.4 mV, respectively; n = 19, p = 0.8; Table 2).
Figure 3A shows one example with decreased EPSP amplitude at high temperature, and Figure 3B shows another example with increased EPSP amplitude at high temperatures. The EPSP amplitude distribution is shown in Figure 3A2, where 1250 and 1817 EPSPs events were counted from an afferent fiber at 23°C and 31°C, respectively. The amplitude distributions of EPSPs were fit well with a Gaussian function (Fig. 3A2: R2 = 0.89 at 23°C; R2 = 0.97 at 31°C). The peaks of the Gaussian fit are 5.7 mV at 23°C and 2.7 mV at 31°C. The single-exponential fit to the decay phase of averaged EPSPs (Fig. 3A3) showed that τdecay was 2.7 ± 0.4 ms at room temperature (n = 19; Table 2). This is faster than that found in afferent fibers of immature rat (Yi et al., 2010). EPSPs shown in Figure 3B1 were recorded from the same afferent fiber with double-peak EPSC amplitude distribution as shown in Figure 2B2. During 30-s-long recordings, 1054 and 1581 EPSPs were recorded from another afferent fiber under room and high temperature, respectively (Fig. 3B2). The frequency distribution of EPSP amplitudes shown in Figure 3B2 also had double peaks at high temperature, but not under room temperature. Under 23°C, the peak of the Gaussian fit was 2.7 mV (R2 = 0.87). Under 31°C, the first and the second peak were 3.4 mV (R2 = 0.85) and 7.3 mV (R2 = 0.81), respectively. In addition, the Vrest of the afferent fiber was slightly depolarized from −74.0 ± 0.7 mV at 23°C to −71.2 ± 0.8 mV at 32°C (p = 0.0012, n = 19).
Afferent fiber membrane input resistance at high temperature
The τdecay of EPSPs decreased at high temperature in all of the fibers recorded (Fig. 3B3; Table 2), which may due to lower membrane input resistance (Rin) at high temperature. We thus estimated Rin of the afferent fibers using current clamp: Rin = ΔV/ΔI, where ΔV was the change in membrane potential induced by a 100 pA current injection (Fig. 4A). The Rin of afferent fibers decreased from 557 ± 128 mΩ at 22.0 ± 0.1°C to 395 ± 85 mΩ at 32.0 ± 0.2°C (n = 5, p = 0.027). In this group of fibers, τdecay of EPSPs was 6.5 ± 2.7 ms and 3.3 ± 1.7 ms at room and high temperature, respectively (n = 5, p = 0.041). The τdecay was positively correlated with afferent fiber Rin (linear regression slope = 0.018 ± 0.003, R2 = 0.79, p = 0.0006; Fig. 4B, blue line).
An afferent fiber is composed of two compartments: a calyx-type ending that contacted the hair cell and a long, thin fiber cable. We thus fit the decay phase of membrane potential change to a step current with a double exponential function (gray dashed lines superimposed over Vm trace; Fig. 4A, gray dashed lines superimposed over Vm trace) as follows:
We can then calculate a weighted mean time constant τmean using the following:
The value of τmean was shorter at high temperature (4.8 ± 1.5 ms) than that at room temperature (7.8 ± 1.5 ms, n = 5, p = 0.0014). The τ1 at room and high temperature was 3.2 ± 1.2 ms and 2.5 ± 1.5 ms, respectively, and the τ2 at room and high temperature was 10.3 ± 1.3 ms and 6.0 ± 1.7 ms, respectively. The fact that a double exponential function with both fast (τf) and slow (τs) time constants is required to fit the voltage responses indicates that the afferent fiber is not isopotential (Golowasch et al., 2009), unlike the hair cell (see Fig. 6). Since the afferent axon has a cutoff end, due to the amphibian papilla isolation process, it can be modeled as a finite cable with an electrotonic length given by the following (Rall, 1969):
We thus find that L = 2.1 for 22°C and L = 2.6 for 32°C for the afferent fibers. This is a relatively large value compared with hippocampal neurons where L = 0.9 (Brown et al., 1981), suggesting a strong attenuation of the voltage from the postsynaptic calyx terminal to the tip of the cutoff and sealed afferent axon. Therefore, the cluster of Na+ channels at the first axonal heminode must be fairly close to the calyx terminal to trigger a spike (Kim and Rutherford, 2016). By contrast, EPSP amplitude did not change significantly with temperature for this dataset (6.5 ± 0.7 mV vs 9.3 ± 2.2 mV at 22.1 ± 0.2°C and 32.0 ± 0.1°C, respectively; n = 5, p = 0.3). The linear regression of EPSP amplitude and Rin also did not show a significant difference (slope = −0.0016 ± 0.005, R2 = 0.013, p = 0.76). In conclusion, the Rin of afferent fibers exhibits significant heterogeneity from 100 mΩ to 1000 mΩ, which could contribute to the in vivo variation in spontaneous spike rates and afferent fiber thresholds to sound stimulation (Stiebler and Narins, 1990; Shrestha et al., 2018).
Changes in Rin with temperature are also important because of membrane potential noise considerations (Fatt and Katz, 1952; Johnson, 1987). The mean square membrane voltage is given by the Nyquist theorem as follows:
here kB is Boltzmann constant, T the temperature in degrees Kelvin (T = 273 + temperature in Celsius), Rin the membrane input resistance, Ra the axial cable resistance and Δf the noise frequency bandwidth. The frequency bandwidth is inversely proportional to the membrane time constant, which determines the cell cutoff frequency, and will thus increase at higher temperatures. The decrease in Rin with increasing temperature is thus important because it counteracts the increase in noise bandwidth with temperature. This helps to keep the membrane potential in a stable sub-threshold level.
Resting membrane potential of hair cells
The increase in EPSC frequency at high temperature suggests more spontaneous vesicle release from hair cells, which may be due to a depolarization of Vrest at high temperature. We thus measured hair cell Vrest under whole-cell current clamp with a holding current at 0 pA. Unexpectedly, whole-cell recordings revealed that Vrest hyperpolarized from −65.0 ± 1.8 mV at 23.2 ± 0.3°C to −70.1 ± 2.3 mV at 31.2 ± 0.3°C (p = 0.006, n = 15; Fig. 5A, black circles). To prevent the dialysis of the hair cell constituents through the patch pipette, we also performed perforated-patch recordings using gramicidin (40–50 μg/ml). The perforated patch clamp showed that Vrest did not change at high temperatures (Vrest = −62.8 ± 1.3 mV at 23.4 ± 0.5°C and Vrest = −62.7 ± 1.5 mV at 31.6 ± 0.2°C, p = 0.88, n = 9; Fig. 5A, blue dots).
Hair cell potassium and calcium currents at high temperature
Under voltage clamp and with a K+-based internal pipette solution, we determined the voltage-dependent currents that are activated by a step-depolarization from −90 to −60 mV. A rapidly activating inward current was followed by a rapid and large outward current (Fig. 5B). The inward current was a Ca2+ current that is activated more quickly at higher temperatures in frog hair cells (Hudspeth and Lewis, 1988). Using Cs+-TEA-based or K+-based internal solutions, we recorded the I–V curves of Ca2+ currents (Fig. 5C) and the overall K+ + Ca2+ currents (Fig. 5D), respectively. Both types of currents increased in amplitude at high temperature. Importantly, the slope of voltage-dependent Ca2+ current was greater at high temperature, making Ca2+ influx more sensitive to small membrane potential changes. The increase in whole-cell outward K+ + Ca2+ current at high temperature explains the decrease in Vrest with temperature (Fig. 5A, black circles). In perforated patch recordings, a lack of change in Vrest could be due to a simultaneous and more compensatory increase in inward Ca2+ current and outward K+ current as temperature increases.
Hair cell membrane input resistance decreases at high temperature
At high temperature, an increase in Ca2+ and K+ currents around Vrest should result in a decrease in membrane input resistance (Rin). To check this, we performed whole-cell voltage and current-clamp recordings from hair cells. In voltage clamp, hyperpolarizing hair cells from −90 mV to −95 mV or −100 mV for 10 ms elicited small inward currents (Fig. 6A1). Rin was calculated from Ohm's law (Rin = ΔV/ΔI). Rin of hair cells decreased at high temperature (659.7 ± 54.3 mΩ at 23.2 ± 0.2°C and 343.7 ± 34.7 mΩ at 31.4 ± 0.2°C, p = 0.0006, n = 7; Fig. 6A2). Under current clamp, injection of −20 pA or −30 pA hyperpolarized the cells (Fig. 6B1). Current clamp also showed a decrease in Rin at high temperature (640.3 ± 56.4 mΩ at 23.2 ± 0.2°C and 389.3 ± 28.2 mΩ at 31.2 ± 0.2°C, p = 0.0023, n = 7; Fig. 6B2). Changes in current or membrane potential were determined by calculating the differences between baseline and plateau (Fig. 6A1, dashed lines, B1). There was no statistically significant difference in Rin measured with voltage clamp or current clamp at either room (p = 0.2598) or high (p = 0.7016) temperature (n = 7).
Some hair cells tend to be leakier toward the end of whole-cell recordings, and this may affect Rin (Ceballos et al., 2017). To control for this possibility, we first recorded Rin at room temperature and then heated the solution to high temperature. Rin decreased from 578.8 ± 49.8 mΩ at 24.0 ± 0.2°C to 315.8 ± 33.3 mΩ at 31.5 ± 0.2°C (p = 0.0001, n = 8). We then recorded from a distinct group of cells, first at high temperature and then at room temperature. Rin was also lower at high temperature (600.2 ± 38.2 mΩ at 24.1 ± 0.1°C and 277.6 ± 34.0 mΩ at 31.9 ± 0.1°C, p = 0.0146, n = 3). Thus, the order of recording did not affect Rin measured at either room (p = 0.81) or high (p = 0.53) temperature. This suggests that the decrease in Rin at high temperature was not due to hair cells becoming leakier toward the end of the recordings, but due to an increase in cell membrane conductance at high temperature (Fig. 5B).
Using current-clamp data, we also calculated the membrane time constant (τ). We fitted a single exponential to a 40 ms time window of the voltage response following the initial current injection (Fig. 6B1, superimposed blue dashed line). The time constant was 8.50 ± 0.73 ms at 23.2 ± 0.2°C and 5.67 ± 0.61 ms at 31.2 ± 0.2°C (p < 0.0001, n = 7; Fig. 6B3). We next determined the membrane capacitance (Cm) using the equation Cm = τ/Rin. The average value of Cm remained the same regardless of temperature changes (13.5 ± 0.9 pF at 23.2 ± 0.2°C and 14.6 ± 1.2 pF at 31.2 ± 0.2°C, p = 0.2506, n = 7; Fig. 6B4). This value of Cm is similar to previous whole-cell recordings in voltage clamp of Cm in bullfrog hair cells (Li et al., 2009). This agreement between voltage and current-clamp values for Rin and Cm is expected only for isopotential cells (Golowasch et al., 2009).
Electrical resonant frequency increases at high temperature
Unlike mechanical tuning in the mammalian cochlea, amphibian papilla hair cells in frogs are electrically tuned (Smotherman and Narins, 2000). Electrical resonance of amphibian papilla hair cells matches the characteristic (best) frequencies of the afferent fibers (Smotherman and Narins, 1999). The electrical resonance is a result of the interplay of voltage-gated ion channels and membrane capacitance (Crawford and Fettiplace, 1981; Art and Fettiplace, 1987; Hudspeth and Lewis, 1988). Since the conductance of voltage-gated calcium and potassium channels are temperature-dependent as shown in Figure 5, we expect electrical resonance to be temperature-sensitive. To elicit electrical ringing around resting membrane potentials, hair cells were injected a current step from zero current under whole-cell (Fig. 7A) or perforated patch clamp (Fig. 7B). Resonant frequency was estimated by fitting the first 20 ms of the damped oscillation in membrane voltage with a sine wave function (Li et al., 2014). In a previous study (Smotherman and Narins, 1999), it was shown that resonant frequency increases as larger depolarizing current steps are applied to the cell. Consistently, depolarizing hair cells with 100 pA current steps elicited a resonant frequency of 236 ± 26 Hz, while 200 pA current steps elicited a higher resonant frequency of 283 ± 31 Hz at room temperature (p = 0.0038, n = 4; Fig. 7A,C). To compare the resonant frequency measured with whole-cell recordings to perforated patch recordings, we chose the larger 200 pA current steps. The resonant frequency increased from 283 ± 31 Hz at 21.8 ± 0.4°C to 472 ± 56 Hz at 31.4 ± 0.6°C (p = 0.017, n = 4; Fig. 7D, black circle). Similarly, perforated patch recordings revealed that resonant frequency increased from 362 ± 50 Hz at 24.8 ± 2.1°C to 597 ± 19 Hz at 31.5 ± 0.3°C (p = 0.025, n = 3; Fig. 7D, blue dots). There was no statistical difference in resonant frequency measured by whole-cell recording and perforated patch at either room (p = 0.22, unpaired t test) or high (p = 0.13, unpaired t test) temperatures.
Hair cell resonant frequency also increases when resting membrane potential is depolarized (Hudspeth and Lewis, 1988; Smotherman and Narins, 1999). However, the resting membrane potential did not change for the whole-cell recordings of Figure 7A (−65.2 ± 0.5 mV at room temperature vs −63.8 ± 0.8 mV at high temperature, p = 0.23, n = 4). Similarly, resting membrane potential did not change with temperature for the perforated patch data (−66.0 ± 2.7 mV at room temperature vs −65.2 ± 2.6 mV at high temperature, p = 0.51, n = 3). Therefore, the increases of resonant frequency at high temperature are not due to changes in resting membrane potential. Instead, they are caused by faster activation and larger conductance of Ca2+ and K+ channels upon depolarization at high temperature (Hudspeth and Lewis, 1988; Smotherman and Narins, 1999). The resonant frequency measured at room temperature matches the results of in vitro whole-cell recordings of hair cells from amphibian papilla using a ZAP protocol (Frolov and Li, 2017). The Q10 of resonant frequency of amphibian papilla hair cells (1.7 ± 0.1, n = 4 for whole cell; 1.9 ± 0.08, n = 3 for perforated patch) are similar to that recorded from frog saccular hair cells (Smotherman and Narins, 1998). This temperature-dependent shift in hair cell resonant frequency may be responsible for the temperature-induced shifts of best frequency observed at in vivo amphibian papilla auditory nerve fiber recordings (Stiebler and Narins, 1990).
Release efficiency increases at high temperature
A lower Rin at high temperature results in smaller membrane potential changes, which will decrease hair cell sensitivity to low-level sounds. To explore whether hair cells compensate for this putative loss in sensitivity, we studied the temperature dependence of vesicle exocytosis from hair cells using time-resolved membrane capacitance measurements (Lindau and Neher, 1988; Gillis, 2000). Changes in Cm (ΔCm) were evoked by depolarizing voltage steps. We first used 20 ms depolarizing steps from a holding potential of −90 to −30 mV to evoke fast release that depletes the RRP consisting of vesicles docked near the clustered Ca2+ channels (Graydon et al., 2011) (Fig. 8A1). The depolarization triggered a larger Ca2+ current (Fig. 8A1) under high temperature than under room temperature (p < 0.0001, n = 7): Ca2+ charge transfer (QCa) was 11.9 ± 1.3 pC at 23.3 ± 0.2°C and 15.9 ± 1.7 pC at 32.0 ± 0.3°C. The Q10 of 20 ms pulse-evoked QCa was 1.5 ± 0.05 (n = 7). Average resting membrane capacitance measured at high temperature (16.9 ± 0.7 pF) was similar to that measured at room temperature (15.7 ± 0.6 pF, p = 0.0841, n = 7). The ΔCm increased from 27.2 ± 4.7 fF at room temperature to 51.6 ± 6.0 fF at high temperature (p = 0.0006, n = 7). The Q10 of 20 ms pulse-evoked ΔCm was 2.4 ± 0.4 (n = 7).
Here, Q10 is the ratio of the reaction rates for TL = 296°K (23°C) and for TH = TL + 10°K = 306°K as follows:
where kB ≈ 8.3 J/mol°K (Boltzmann constant) and Ea is the reaction activation energy barrier. From this equation, we obtain Ea = (lnQ10)·75.2kJ/mol. The Ea for evoked exocytosis was thus 65.8 ± 10.0 kJ/mol ≈ 26.8 kBT (n = 7), which was calculated from the Q10 of 20 ms depolarizing pulses. This is within the Ea estimated for vesicle exocytosis mediated by SNAREpin and synaptotagmin molecules (20–140 kBT) (Zhang and Jackson, 2008; Schotten et al., 2015; Mostafavi et al., 2017), although exocytosis in hair cells is mediated by otoferlin (Michalski et al., 2017).
Depolarizations from −90 to −30 mV for 200 ms (Fig. 8B1) not only depletes the RRP but also evokes sustained release of vesicles replenishing to the RRP (Graydon et al., 2011). QCa evoked by the 200 ms depolarizing pulse was 99.7 ± 8.0 pC at 23.1 ± 0.2°C and 126.3 ± 9.7 pC at 31.3 ± 0.2°C (p < 0.0001, n = 15). ΔCm evoked by 200 ms depolarizing steps increased from 109.8 ± 9.1 fF at room temperature to 192.1 ± 21.2 fF at high temperature (p < 0.0001, n = 15). The Q10 of QCa and ΔCm evoked by a 200 ms pulse was 1.3 ± 0.04 and 2.0 ± 0.1 (n = 15), respectively. The Q10 of exocytosis from bullfrog hair cells is close to that found in mouse inner hair cells using capacitance measurements (Q10 = 2.1) (Nouvian, 2007) and in rat hippocampal neurons using FM1-43 destaining methods (Q10 = 2.5) (Yang et al., 2005).
Plotting ΔCm versus the corresponding QCa2+, we obtained the efficiency of exocytosis as the ratio of ΔCm/QCa2+, which for 20 ms pulses increased from 3.0 ± 0.8 fF · pC−1 at room temperature to 4.7 ± 1.0 fF · pC−1 at high temperature (p = 0.0043, n = 7; Q10 = 1.9 ± 0.3; Fig. 8A2). The ratio of ΔCm/QCa2+ for responses to 200 ms pulses increased from 1.2 ± 0.1 fF · pC−1 at room temperature to 1.6 ± 0.2 fF · pC−1 at high temperature (p = 0.0013, n = 15; Fig. 8B2). Recordings from mouse IHC also find that higher temperatures enhance Ca2+ influx and increase ΔCm/QCa2+ elicited by 20 ms depolarizing pulses, but not for sustained exocytosis (Nouvian, 2007). By contrast, our results with bullfrog hair cells indicate that the efficiency of both fast and sustained exocytosis increased under high temperature.
To further demonstrate that the increase in exocytosis is facilitated beyond a mere increase of Ca2+ influx under high temperature, we reduced Ca2+ influx using smaller depolarizing potentials at high temperature and measured ΔCm jumps. We also used the pH-insensitive Ca2+ buffer BAPTA (Tsien, 1980) and a different pH buffer MOPS, which has similar temperature dependence with HEPES (Ellis and Morrison, 1982). A depolarization from −90 mV to a potential that varied from −46 to −56 mV (average: −50.6 ± 1.8 mV, n = 9) for 20 ms at 32°C elicited similar or less Ca2+ influx (6.4 ± 0.8 pC) to that triggered by 20 ms depolarization to −30 mV at 23°C (8.7 ± 1.2 pC, p = 0.0059, n = 9; Fig. 9A). However, even when Ca2+ influx was reduced, hair cells were still able to release more vesicles upon depolarization at high temperature (Fig. 9A). ΔCm increased from 10.3 ± 1.3 fF at room temperature to 19.2 ± 2.6 fF at high temperature (p = 0.0028, n = 9; Fig. 9B). Consistent with previous results using internal EGTA and HEPES, exocytosis efficiency increased from 1.3 ± 0.2 at room temperature to 3.7 ± 0.8 at high temperature (p = 0.0042, n = 9; Fig. 9C). The results indicate that high temperature facilitates synaptic vesicle exocytosis, even when Ca2+ influx is reduced. Moreover, the effect is not due to temperature-dependent changes in cellular pH-dependent Ca2+ buffering.
RRP size is larger at high temperature
To compare the maximum size of hair cell RRP under room and high temperature, we used a dual-pulse protocol (Gillis et al., 1996). Two pulses of 100 ms duration are given with a 25 ms interval (Fig. 10A). The short 25 ms interval results in depression in the second release. Ca2+ current can also decline during the dual pulse due to inactivation. To avoid differences in QCa during the first and second depolarization, the potentials of the first pulses are adjusted (Fig. 10A). The average of the first depolarizing potentials was −41.1 ± 0.7 mV (n = 11). The intervals between pulse pairs was 60–90 s to allow for full recovery. Under 23°C, the Ca2+ influx during the first and second depolarizing pulses was 31.8 ± 6.8 and 31.7 ± 6.8 pC, respectively (n = 4, p = 0.93; Fig. 10A,C). Under 31°C, the Ca2+ influx during the first and second depolarizing pulses was 62.8 ± 3.8 and 63.3 ± 3.1 pC, respectively (n = 7, p = 0.69; Fig. 10A,C). Consistently, both the first (p = 0.0019) and the second (p = 0.0009; Fig. 10C) pulses triggered more Ca2+ influx under high temperature. ΔC1 and ΔC2 were capacitance jumps triggered by the first and second depolarization. The maximum size of the RRP (Bmax) was calculated according to the following:
This equation from Gillis et al. (1996) is derived based on the assumption that the same fraction of the pool is released with each pulse. If there is a larger fraction of release during the second pulse (e.g., due to residual Ca2+ from the first pulse) or significant numbers of vesicles have been refilled during the second pulse, then Bmax will overestimate the actual initial pool size. Therefore, the actual pool size lies between ΔC1 and Bmax. In the example of Figure 10A, the Bmax increased from 143 pF at 23°C to 175 pF at 31°C. On average, the Bmax increased from 83 ± 20 fF (n = 4) at room temperature to 246 ± 47 fF at high temperature (n = 7, p = 0.0351, unpaired t test; Fig. 10B). These results showing an increase in RRP size with increasing temperature are similar to those reported for chromaffin cell exocytosis (Dinkelacker et al., 2000). In addition, the paired-pulse ratio ΔC2/ΔC1 did not change significantly upon temperature shift: 0.46 ± 0.19 at room temperature (n = 4) versus 0.69 ± 0.05 at high temperature (n = 7, p = 0.18; unpaired t test). This suggests that evoked release probability does not change with temperature shifts.
Ultrafast Ca2+ currents and short synaptic delays at high temperature
In vivo recordings of the auditory nerve fibers of two different species of frogs, Hyla regilla and Eleutherodactylus coqui, showed that the latencies of the first spike after the onset of a sound stimulus decreased when increasing temperature from 12°C to 25°C (Stiebler and Narins, 1990). To determine the temperature dependence of the synaptic delay at the hair cell afferent synapse, we performed paired recordings. We depolarized hair cells with two 20 ms depolarizing steps from −90 to −30 mV with 50 ms intervals (Fig. 11A) and recorded evoked EPSCs mediated by activation of AMPA receptors in the afferent fiber. After depolarization, Ca2+ ions entered into hair cells and triggered glutamate release (Fig. 11A). Due to EPSC rundown in some paired recordings, we only included the first trial from each pair in our analysis. Therefore, the data obtained at room and high temperatures were from two different groups of pairs. The average of EPSCs recorded at 22°C (n = 3) and 31°C (n = 6) is shown in black and red, respectively (Fig. 11A). Synaptic delay was measured from the onset of the pulse until the EPSC reached 10% of its maximum (Fig. 11C). The synaptic delay of the first EPSC (Fig. 11C) decreased from 2.03 ± 0.16 ms at room temperature (n = 3) to 1.28 ± 0.15 ms at high temperature (n = 6, p = 0.0183, unpaired t test; Fig. 11E). The synaptic delay of the second EPSC (Fig. 11C) shortened from 1.26 ± 0.10 ms at room temperature (n = 3) to 0.72 ± 0.05 ms at high temperature (n = 6, p = 0.001, unpaired t test; Fig. 11E). The first synaptic delay was longer than the second one under both room (n = 3, p = 0.008) and high (n = 6, p = 0.0206) temperature (Fig. 11D,E). The synaptic delay we measured from adult frog hair cell synapses is much shorter than that of the immature rat inner hair cell synapse (Goutman and Glowatzki, 2011).
Shorter synaptic delay is partially due to faster activation of Ca2+ current at high temperature. To determine the effect of temperature on the activation of ICa, we used P/4 leak subtraction to eliminate the capacitive transient. The Ca2+ current was evoked by a 20 ms depolarizing step from −90 to −30 mV (Fig. 11B). By fitting the activation phase of the Ca2+ current with a single exponential function (Fig. 11B, dashed lines), we calculated the time constant of activation: 377 ± 30 μs at 23.9 ± 0.1°C and 219 ± 19 μs at 31.5 ± 0.3°C (p < 0.0001, n = 8). The corresponding Q10 was 2.2 ± 0.2 (n = 8), which is similar to the Q10 of L-type Ca2+ channels activation in chick sensory neurons (Acerbo and Nobile, 1994), but higher than the Q10 of gerbil inner hair cells (Johnson and Marcotti, 2008). The results indicate that high temperature speeds up the activation of Ca2+ channels and thus contributes to shortening the synaptic delay.
Paired-pulse ratio calculated from the charge transfer of EPSCs (EPSC2/EPSC1) was 1.00 ± 0.05 at room temperature (n = 3) and 0.92 ± 0.02 at high temperature (n = 6, p = 0.25, unpaired t test). Together with the paired-pulse ratio ΔC2/ΔC1, this suggests that high temperature does not affect overall release probability. However, high temperature improves temporal precision by shortening the synaptic delay; and under both temperatures, hair cell synapses exhibit pronounced short-term facilitation (Goutman and Glowatzki, 2011; see also Cho et al., 2011). Interestingly, these results differ greatly from those found in a conventional active zone synapse, the calyx of Held synapse, where synaptic delay of the second pulse was longer and EPSCs exhibit pronounced short-term depression (Wu and Borst, 1999).
Discussion
Temperature-dependent changes in EPSC, EPSP, and spike rates
Our in vitro whole-cell recordings of afferent fibers show that the frequencies of EPSCs and EPSPs increased at higher temperatures. This should produce an increase in AP spikes at higher temperatures. Indeed, afferent fiber spike rates mostly increased at higher temperatures (Fig. 1). In vivo single auditory nerve fiber recordings also show that spontaneous spike rates in the bullfrog amphibian papilla fibers increase at higher body temperatures (van Dijk et al., 1990). However, ∼30% of our recordings of afferent fibers decreased their spike rate at higher temperatures. We do not know the reasons for this heterogeneity. The underlying mechanisms that trigger spikes in the different afferent fibers require additional studies to explain the wide range of membrane input resistance (Fig. 4B). Interestingly, mammalian auditory nerve fibers also exhibit a heterogeneity in spike rates, gene expression, and membrane properties (Rutherford et al., 2012; Heil and Peterson, 2017; Shrestha et al., 2018).
What are the mechanisms that produce an increase in EPSC frequency? One obvious possibility we explored was a depolarization of the hair cell Vrest. Surprisingly, during whole-cell current-clamp recordings, the Vrest of hair cells hyperpolarized significantly (Fig. 5A). Vrest also hyperpolarizes in snail neurons at higher temperatures due to increased Na+/K+-ATPase activity (Gorman and Marmor, 1970). However, perforated patch recordings, which do not disturb the intracellular milieu, showed no significant change. The Vrest we observed in perforated patch mode was ∼−63 mV (Fig. 5A). Previous, sharp conventional electrode recordings of Vrest of turtle and frog hair cells reported values ∼−55 mV (Crawford and Fettiplace, 1980; Pitchford and Ashmore, 1987). At these membrane potentials, a small inward Ca2+ current is induced (Fig. 5C). This resting Ca2+ current increases at higher temperatures, which probably increases release probability and spike rates (Trapani and Nicolson, 2011). The frequency of spontaneous mEPSCs also increases at high temperature at the calyx of Held synapse (Kushmerick et al., 2006; Postlethwaite et al., 2007) and hippocampal synapses (Kim and Connors, 2012). However, unlike bullfrog hair cells, Vrest of the calyx of Held nerve terminal depolarizes when temperature increases from 24°C to 32°C (Kim and von Gersdorff, 2012). Finally, we note that our amphibian papilla hair cells are bathed in high external Ca2+, which blocks transduction channels; and recently, it was found that sudden heat rises can soften gating springs and open mechanotransduction channels on the stereocilia bundles of bullfrog sacculus hair cells (Azimzadeh et al., 2018). Therefore, we may be underestimating the physiological effects of temperature shifts on the hair cell, and Vrest may be more depolarized under in vivo conditions.
We found out that the average amplitude of the spontaneous EPSCs from bullfrog afferent fibers did not change at higher temperature (Fig. 2; Table 2). This differs from observations made in mammalian synapses where elevating temperature increases spontaneous mEPSC amplitude (Veruki et al., 2003; Kushmerick et al., 2006; Postlethwaite et al., 2007). Interestingly, we previously observed that a decrease in temperature from room temperature to 15°C resulted in a decrease in EPSC amplitude (Li et al., 2009). Spontaneous EPSC amplitudes may thus be saturated at room temperature. The average EPSP amplitude also did not change with temperature (Table 2). However, in 13 fibers where both EPSCs and EPSPs were recorded, EPSCs remained the same (p = 0.45), whereas EPSP amplitude decreased (p = 0.049, n = 13) at high temperature. This could result from a decrease in afferent fiber Rin at high temperature. Both EPSC and EPSP events increased in frequency at high temperature (Table 2). This can lead to greater summation of EPSPs, making them more likely to reach AP threshold. However, EPSP decay was also significantly faster at higher temperatures (Fig. 2A3,B3), which tends to reduce summation of noncoincident EPSPs. Therefore, it is possible that higher temperatures may reduce spike rates, as shown in Figure 1B. Both presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms may thus explain the heterogeneity in spike frequency changes with temperature seen in Figure 1.
Temperature-dependent changes in spike threshold may also explain the heterogeneity shown in Figure 1. Thermo-positive fibers fire more spikes spontaneously at high temperature with threshold decreasing by ∼5 mV, whereas thermo-negative fibers fire less spontaneous spikes at high temperature with threshold increasing by 5 mV (Table 1). Heterogeneity in the types and densities of voltage-gated Na+ and K+ channels among different fibers may explain these differences (Kim and Rutherford, 2016). Together, the temperature-dependent changes of spiking rates is due to presynaptic changes in hair cell exocytosis and postsynaptic changes in afferent fiber excitability.
Synaptic delay and phase locking at high temperature
Recordings of single frog auditory nerve fibers show that spike onset delay to sound stimulus decreased as temperature increased with Q10 values of 1.6–2.5 (Stiebler and Narins, 1990; van Dijk et al., 1990). We performed paired recordings from hair cell to afferent fiber and revealed a shortening of synaptic delay at high temperature (Fig. 11E). This shorter synaptic delay was due in part to a faster activation kinetics of Ca2+ current at high temperature (Fig. 11B). In addition, the time constant of lipid membrane fusion is inversely correlated to temperature (Schotten et al., 2015), which may also contribute to the shorter synaptic delay at high temperature. A shorter synaptic delay will improve the spike phase-locking of the fibers because evoked EPSPs and spikes will be more phase-locked to the hair cell Ca2+ current activation. This may explain why in vivo recordings from single auditory nerve fibers indicate that vector strength increases at higher temperatures (Stiebler and Narins, 1990; van Dijk et al., 1990).
Higher temperatures and synaptic facilitation tend to synchronize depolarization-evoked multivesicular release (Fig. 11). Synaptic facilitation revealed by paired-pulse depolarization also reduced synaptic delays in both bullfrog hair cell synapses (Cho et al., 2011) and rat inner hair cell synapses (synaptic delay was 1.5 ms at room temperature) (Goutman and Glowatzki, 2011). Likewise, we measured here synaptic delays of 1.3 ms at 23°C and 0.7 ms at 31°C (Fig. 11E).
Electrical resonance at high temperature
The lowering of Rin at high temperature reduces the membrane time constant, allowing hair cells to better follow rapid membrane potential changes (Fig. 6). The intrinsic electrical resonant frequency of hair cells increased with temperature (Fig. 7), as expected from an increase in Ca2+ and K+ current amplitudes (Fig. 5B). We observed a large change in average resonant frequency from 320 to 530 Hz (Fig. 7D). These changes increase the dynamic range of frequency tuning of amphibian papilla hair cells and their connected afferent fibers. Indeed, in vivo recordings of frog auditory nerve fibers show higher characteristic frequencies (tuning curve tip or best frequency) at higher temperature (Stiebler and Narins, 1990).
Exocytosis efficiency and vesicle pool size at high temperature
Smaller Rin will inevitably result in smaller membrane potential changes (Vm = Rin × I) induced by the opening of mechanosensitive channels in the stereocilia. This predicted loss of sensitivity to sound signals is not observed in vivo. Indeed, the contrary is observed: the threshold for sound triggered spikes is reduced at high temperature (Stiebler and Narins, 1990). How can we explain this increase in fiber sensitivity?
First, we found that the steepness of the Ca2+ current I–V curve (Fig. 5C) increased at high temperature making Ca2+ influx more sensitive to membrane potential fluctuations around Vrest. The enlarged Ca2+ current could result from an increase in L-type Ca2+ channel open probability (Po) and/or conductance (Lux and Brown, 1984; Klöckner et al., 1990; Acerbo and Nobile, 1994; Peloquin et al., 2008). The Q10 of single L-type channel conductance in smooth muscle cells and retina is 1.6 and 3.0, respectively (Klöckner et al., 1990; Peloquin et al., 2008). Second, at hair cell synapses, a cluster of L-type Ca2+ channels is located within nanometers from docked vesicles under the synaptic ribbon (Brandt et al., 2005; Nouvian et al., 2006; Graydon et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2013). Fast activation of this cluster of Ca2+ channels produces a highly synchronous and fast multiquantal EPSC (Fig. 11D) (Grabner et al., 2016), which may help to explain the short latency and low jitter of the sound evoked first-spike in the auditory nerve (Wittig and Parsons, 2008).
We also observed an increase in exocytosis efficiency, which indicates the exocytosis increase is not proportional to the increase of Ca2+ current. A nonlinear power law dependence of exocytosis on free Ca2+ ion concentration could potentially explain our results of a high Q10 = 2.4 for exocytosis elicited by 20 ms depolarizing pulses (Cho and von Gersdorff, 2012; Quiñones et al., 2012). However, a linear dependence of exocytosis on Ca2+ current charge has been found for mid-frequency tuned bullfrog hair cells (Keen and Hudspeth, 2006; Cho et al., 2011). Thus, vesicle fusion efficiency must be intrinsically higher at high temperature, as shown in Figure 9C. In addition to Ca2+ influx through L-type Ca2+ channels in the plasma membrane, Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release from intracellular stores can also be involved in nonlinear vesicle recruitment at auditory hair cells (Castellano-Muñoz et al., 2016).
Release probability increases at high temperature for some central synapses (Hardingham and Larkman, 1998; Volgushev et al., 2004), although we did not observe changes in release probability using a paired-pulse stimulation protocol (Figs. 10, 11). However, we did observe a significant increase in the RRP size at high temperature (Fig. 10). In addition to facilitating spontaneous vesicle fusion, temperature also facilitates sustained exocytosis by accelerating vesicle replenishment of the RRP (Pyott and Rosenmund, 2002; Kushmerick et al., 2006). Moreover, synaptic vesicle endocytosis is also highly temperature-sensitive (Fernández-Alfonso and Ryan, 2004; Micheva and Smith, 2005; Renden and von Gersdorff, 2007; Delvendahl et al., 2016). The kinetics of endocytosis may thus be rate limiting for prolonged exocytosis and requires further studies at hair cell synapses.
Footnotes
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant DC004274 to H.v.G. We thank Jutta Engel for conversations that inspired this study; Karina Leal, Geng-Lin Li, and Owen Gross for data analysis assistance; and Chad Grabner for very insightful discussions.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
- Acerbo P, Nobile M (1994) Temperature dependence of multiple high voltage activated Ca2+ channels in chick sensory neurones. Eur Biophys J 23:189–195. 10.1007/BF01007610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Art JJ, Fettiplace R (1987) Variation of membrane properties in hair cells isolated from the turtle cochlea. J Physiol 385:207–242. 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Auger C, Attwell D (2000) Fast removal of synaptic glutamate by postsynaptic transporters. Neuron 28:547–558. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00132-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Azimzadeh JB, Fabella BA, Kastan NR, Hudspeth AJ (2018) Thermal excitation of the mechanotransduction apparatus of hair cells. Neuron 97:586–595.e4. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brandt A, Khimich D, Moser T (2005) Few CaV1.3 channels regulate the exocytosis of a synaptic vesicle at the hair cell ribbon synapse. J Neurosci 25:11577–11585. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3411-05.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Breneman KD, Highstein SM, Boyle RD, Rabbitt RD (2009) The passive cable properties of hair cell stereocilia and their contribution to somatic capacitance measurements. Biophys J 96:1–8. 10.1529/biophysj.108.137356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown TH, Fricke RA, Perkel DH (1981) Passive electrical constants in three classes of hippocampal neurons. J Neurophysiol 4:812–827. 10.1152/jn.1981.46.4.812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Capranica RR. (1965) The evoked vocal response of the bullfrog: a study of communication by sound (Monograph 33). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [Google Scholar]
- Castellano-Muñoz M, Schnee ME, Ricci AJ (2016) Calcium-induced calcium release supports recruitment of synaptic vesicles in auditory hair cells. J Neurophysiol 115:226–239. 10.1152/jn.00559.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ceballos CC, Roque AC, Leão RM (2017) The role of negative conductances in neuronal subthreshold properties and synaptic integration. Biophys Rev 9:827–834. 10.1007/s12551-017-0300-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cho S, von Gersdorff H (2012) Ca2+ influx and neurotransmitter release at ribbon synapses. Cell Calcium 52:208–216. 10.1016/j.ceca.2012.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cho S, Li GL, von Gersdorff H (2011) Recovery from short-term depression and facilitation is ultrafast and Ca2+ dependent at auditory hair cell synapses. J Neurosci 31:5682–5692. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5453-10.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coate TM, Scott MK, Gurjar M (2019) Current concepts in cochlear ribbon synapse formation. Synapse 73:e22087. 10.1002/syn.22087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crawford AC, Fettiplace R (1980) The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibers and hair cells in the cochlea of the turtle. J Physiol 306:79–125. 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crawford AC, Fettiplace R (1981) An electrical tuning mechanism in turtle cochlear hair cells. J Physiol 312:377–412. 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delvendahl I, Vyleta NP, von Gersdorff H, Hallermann S (2016) Fast, temperature-sensitive and clathrin-independent endocytosis at central synapses. Neuron 90:492–498. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dinkelacker V, Voets T, Neher E, Moser T (2000) The readily releasable pool of vesicles in chromaffin cells is replenished in a temperature-dependent manner and transiently overfills at 37°C. J Neurosci 20:8377–8383. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-22-08377.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellis KJ, Morrison JF (1982) Buffers of constant ionic strength for studying pH-dependent processes. Methods Enzymol 87:405–426. 10.1016/S0076-6879(82)87025-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emlen ST. (1968) Territoriality in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Copeia 1968:240–243. 10.2307/1441748 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Engel J. (2008) Gerbils can tune in. J Physiol 586:919. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.150409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fatt P, Katz B (1952) Spontaneous subthreshold activity at motor nerve endings. J Physiol 117:109–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng AS, Narins PM, Capranica RR (1975) Three populations of primary auditory fibers in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana): their peripheral origins and frequency sensitivities. J Comp Physiol 100:221–229. 10.1007/BF00614532 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fernández-Alfonso T, Ryan TA (2004) The kinetics of synaptic vesicle pool depletion at CNS synaptic terminals. Neuron 41:943–953. 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00113-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frank T, Khimich D, Neef A, Moser T (2009) Mechanisms contributing to synaptic Ca2+ signals and their heterogeneity in hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:4483–4488. 10.1073/pnas.0813213106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frolov D, Li GL (2017) Probing electrical tuning of hair cells with a zap current method in the intact amphibian papilla of bullfrogs. Synapse 71:e21942. 10.1002/syn.21942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillis KD. (2000) Admittance-based measurement of membrane capacitance using the EPC-9 patch-clamp amplifier. Pflugers Arch 439:655–664. 10.1007/s004249900173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillis KD, Mossner R, Neher E (1996) Protein kinase C enhances exocytosis from chromaffin cells by increasing the size of the readily releasable pool of secretory granules. Neuron 16:1209–1220. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80147-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Golowasch J, Thomas G, Taylor AL, Patel A, Pineda A, Khalil C, Nadim F (2009) Membrane capacitance measurements revisited: dependence of capacitance value on measurement method in nonisopotential neurons. J Neurophysiol 102:2161–2175. 10.1152/jn.00160.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gorman AL, Marmor MF (1970) Contributions of the sodium pump and ionic gradients to the membrane potential of a molluscan neurone. J Physiol 210:897–917. 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goutman JD, Glowatzki E (2011) Short-term facilitation modulates size and timing of the synaptic response at the inner hair cell ribbon synapse. J Neurosci 31:7974–7981. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0604-11.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grabner CP, Ratliff CP, Light AC, DeVries SH (2016) Mechanism of high-frequency signaling at a depressing ribbon synapse. Neuron 91:133–145. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.05.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grant L, Yi E, Glowatzki E (2010) Two modes of release shape the postsynaptic response at the inner hair cell ribbon synapse. J Neurosci 30:4210–4220. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4439-09.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graydon CW, Cho S, Li GL, Kachar B, von Gersdorff H (2011) Sharp Ca2+ nanodomains beneath the ribbon promote highly synchronous multivesicular release at hair cell synapses. J Neurosci 31:16637–16650. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1866-11.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graydon CW, Cho S, Diamond JS, Kachar B, von Gersdorff H, Grimes WN (2014) Specialized postsynaptic morphology enhances neurotransmitter dilution and high-frequency signaling at an auditory synapse. J Neurosci 34:8358–8372. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4493-13.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hardingham NR, Larkman AU (1998) The reliability of excitatory synaptic transmission in slices of rat visual cortex in vitro is temperature dependent. J Physiol 507:249–256. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.249bu.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heffner HE, Heffner RS (2007) Hearing ranges of laboratory animals. J Am Assoc Lab Animal Sci 46:20–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heil P, Peterson AJ (2017) Spike timing in auditory-nerve fibers during spontaneous activity and phase locking. Synapse 71:5–36. 10.1002/syn.21925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hudspeth AJ, Lewis RS (1988) Kinetic analysis of voltage- and ion-dependent conductances in saccular hair cells of the bull-frog, Rana catesbeiana. J Physiol 400:237–274. 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson HA. (1987) Thermal noise and biological information. Q Rev Biol 62:141–152. 10.1086/415403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson SL, Marcotti W (2008) Biophysical properties of Cav1.3 calcium channels in gerbil inner hair cells. J Physiol 586:1029–1042. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.145219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson SL, Olt J, Cho S, von Gersdorff H, Marcotti W (2017) The coupling between Ca2+ channels and the exocytotic Ca2+ sensor at hair cell ribbon synapses varies tonotopically along the mature cochlea. J Neurosci 37:2471–2484. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2867-16.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keen EC, Hudspeth AJ (2006) Transfer characteristics of the hair cell's afferent synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:5537–5542. 10.1073/pnas.0601103103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim JA, Connors BW (2012) High temperatures alter physiological properties of pyramidal cells and inhibitory interneurons in hippocampus. Front Cell Neurosci 6:27. 10.3389/fncel.2012.00027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim JH, von Gersdorff H (2012) Suppression of spikes during posttetanic hyperpolarization in auditory neurons: the role of temperature, I(h) currents, and the Na+-K+-ATPase pump. J Neurophysiol 108:1924–1932. 10.1152/jn.00103.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim KX, Rutherford MA (2016) Maturation of NaV and KV channel topographies in the auditory nerve spike initiator before and after developmental onset of hearing function. J Neurosci 36:2111–2118. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3437-15.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim MH, Li GL, von Gersdorff H (2013) Single Ca2+ channels and exocytosis at sensory synapses. J Physiol 591:3167–3178. 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klöckner U, Schiefer A, Isenberg G (1990) L-type Ca-channels: similar Q10 of Ca-, Ba- and Na-conductance points to the importance of ion-channel interaction. Pflugers Arch 415:638–641. 10.1007/BF02583518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kushmerick C, Renden R, von Gersdorff H (2006) Physiological temperatures reduce the rate of vesicle pool depletion and short-term depression via an acceleration of vesicle recruitment. J Neurosci 26:1366–1377. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3889-05.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis ER, Li CW (1975) Hair cell types and distributions in the otolithic and auditory organs of the bullfrog. Brain Res 83:35–50. [Google Scholar]
- Li GL, Keen E, Andor-Ardó D, Hudspeth AJ, von Gersdorff H (2009) The unitary event underlying multiquantal EPSCs at a hair cell's ribbon synapse. J Neurosci 29:7558–7568. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0514-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li GL, Cho S, von Gersdorff H (2014) Phase-locking precision is enhanced by multiquantal release at an auditory hair cell ribbon synapse. Neuron 83:1404–1417. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liberman MC. (1980) Morphological differences among radial afferent fibers in the cat cochlea: an electron-microscopic study of serial sections. Hear Res 3:45–63. 10.1016/0378-5955(80)90007-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lillywhite HB. (1970) Behavioral temperature regulation in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Copeia 1970:158–168. 10.2307/1441983 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lindau M, Neher E (1988) Patch-clamp techniques for time-resolved capacitance measurements in single cells. Pflugers Arch 411:137–146. 10.1007/BF00582306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lux HD, Brown AM (1984) Patch and whole cell calcium currents recorded simultaneously in snail neurons. J Gen Physiol 83:727–750. 10.1085/jgp.83.5.727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michalski N, Goutman JD, Auclair SM, Boutet de Monvel J, Tertrais M, Emptoz A, Parrin A, Nouaille S, Guillon M, Sachse M, Ciric D, Bahloul A, Hardelin JP, Sutton RB, Avan P, Krishnakumar SS, Rothman JE, Dulon D, Safieddine S, Petit C (2017) Otoferlin acts as a Ca2+ sensor for vesicle fusion and vesicle pool replenishment at auditory hair cell ribbon synapses. eLife 6:e31013. 10.7554/eLife.31013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Micheva KD, Smith SJ (2005) Strong effects of subphysiological temperature on the function and plasticity of mammalian presynaptic terminals. J Neurosci 25:7481–7488. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1801-05.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moser T, Beutner D (2000) Kinetics of exocytosis and endocytosis at the cochlear inner hair cell afferent synapse of the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:883–888. 10.1073/pnas.97.2.883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mostafavi H, Thiyagarajan S, Stratton BS, Karatekin E, Warner JM, Rothman JE, O'Shaughnessy B (2017) Entropic forces drive self-organization and membrane fusion by SNARE proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:5455–5460. 10.1073/pnas.1611506114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nouvian R. (2007) Temperature enhances exocytosis efficiency at the mouse inner hair cell ribbon synapse. J Physiol 584:535–542. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.139675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nouvian R, Beutner D, Parsons TD, Moser T (2006) Structure and function of the hair cell ribbon synapse. J Membr Biol 209:153–165. 10.1007/s00232-005-0854-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pangrsic T, Singer JH, Koschak A (2018) Voltage-gated calcium channels: key players in sensory coding in the retina and the inner ear. Physiol Rev 98:2063–2096. 10.1152/physrev.00030.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peloquin JB, Doering CJ, Rehak R, McRory JE (2008) Temperature dependence of Cav1.4 calcium channel gating. Neuroscience 151:1066–1083. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.11.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pitchford S, Ashmore JF (1987) An electrical resonance in hair cells of the amphibian papilla of the frog Rana temporaria. Hear Res 27:75–83. 10.1016/0378-5955(87)90027-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Postlethwaite M, Hennig MH, Steinert JR, Graham BP, Forsythe ID (2007) Acceleration of AMPA receptor kinetics underlies temperature-dependent changes in synaptic strength at the rat calyx of held. J Physiol 579:69–84. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.123612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pyott SJ, Rosenmund C (2002) The effects of temperature on vesicular supply and release in autaptic cultures of rat and mouse hippocampal neurons. J Physiol 539:523–535. 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quiñones PM, Luu C, Schweizer FE, Narins PM (2012) Exocytosis in the frog amphibian papilla. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 13:39–54. 10.1007/s10162-011-0304-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rall W. (1969) Time constants and electrotonic length of membrane cylinders and neurons. Biophys J 9:1483–1508. 10.1016/S0006-3495(69)86467-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Renden R, von Gersdorff H (2007) Synaptic vesicle endocytosis at a CNS nerve terminal: faster kinetics at physiological temperatures and increased endocytotic capacity during maturation. J Neurophysiol 98:3349–3359. 10.1152/jn.00898.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rutherford MA. (2015) Resolving the structure of the inner ear ribbon synapses with STED microscopy. Synapse 69:242–255. 10.1002/syn.21812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rutherford MA, Chapochnikov NM, Moser T (2012) Spike encoding of neurotransmitter release timing by spiral ganglion neurons of the cochlea. J Neurosci 32:4773–4789. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4511-11.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santin JM, Watters KC, Putnam RW, Hartzler LK (2013) Temperature influences neuronal activity and CO2/pH sensitivity of locus coeruleus neurons in the bullfrog, Lithobates catesbeianus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 305:R1451–R1464. 10.1152/ajpregu.00348.2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schnee ME, Castellano-Muñoz M, Ricci AJ (2013) Response properties from turtle auditory hair cell afferent fibers suggest spike generation is driven by synchronized release both between and within synapses. J Neurophysiol 110:204–220. 10.1152/jn.00121.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schotten S, Meijer M, Walter AM, Huson V, Mamer L, Kalogreades L, ter Veer M, Ruiter M, Brose N, Rosenmund C, Sørensen JB, Verhage M, Cornelisse LN (2015) Additive effects on the energy barrier for synaptic vesicle fusion cause supralinear effects on the vesicle fusion rate. Elife 4:e05531. 10.7554/eLife.05531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shrestha BR, Chia C, Wu L, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC, Goodrich LV (2018) Sensory neuron diversity in the inner ear is shaped by activity. Cell 174:1229–1246.e17. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simmons AM. (2004) Call recognition in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana: generalization along the duration continuum. J Acoust Soc Am 115:1345–1355. 10.1121/1.1643366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smotherman MS, Narins PM (1998) Effect of temperature on electrical resonance in leopard frog saccular hair cells. J Neurophysiol 79:312–321. 10.1152/jn.1998.79.1.312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smotherman MS, Narins PM (1999) The electrical properties of auditory hair cells in the frog amphibian papilla. J Neurosci 19:5275–5292. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-13-05275.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smotherman MS, Narins PM (2000) Hair cells, hearing and hopping: a field guide to hair cell physiology in the frog. J Exp Biol 203:2237–2246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiebler IB, Narins PM (1990) Temperature dependence of auditory nerve response properties in the frog. Hear Res 46:63–81. 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90140-K [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trapani JG, Nicolson T (2011) Mechanism of spontaneous activity in afferent neurons of the zebrafish lateral-line organ. J Neurosci 31:1614–1623. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3369-10.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsien RY. (1980) New calcium indicators and buffers with high selectivity against magnesium and protons: design, synthesis, and properties of prototype structures. Biochemistry 19:2396–2404. 10.1021/bi00552a018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Dijk P, Lewis ER, Wit HP (1990) Temperature effects on auditory nerve fiber response in the American bullfrog. Hear Res 44:231–240. 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90083-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Dijk P, Mason MJ, Schoffelen RL, Narins PM, Meenderink SW (2011) Mechanics of the frog ear. Hear Res 273:46–58. 10.1016/j.heares.2010.02.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Veruki ML, Mørkve SH, Hartveit E (2003) Functional properties of spontaneous EPSCs and non-NMDA receptors in rod amacrine (AII) cells in the rat retina. J Physiol 549:759–774. 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.039982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Volgushev M, Kudryashov I, Chistiakova M, Mukovski M, Niesmann J, Eysel UT (2004) Probability of transmitter release at neocortical synapses at different temperatures. J Neurophysiol 92:212–220. 10.1152/jn.01166.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiewandt TA. (1969) Vocalization, aggressive behavior, and territoriality in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Copeia 1969:276–285. 10.2307/1442074 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wittig JH Jr, Parsons TD (2008) Synaptic ribbon enables temporal precision of hair cell afferent synapse by increasing the number of readily releasable vesicles: a modeling study. J Neurophysiol 100:1724–1739. 10.1152/jn.90322.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu JS, Young ED, Glowatzki E (2016) Maturation of spontaneous firing properties after hearing onset in rat auditory nerve fibers: spontaneous rates, refractoriness, and interfiber correlations. J Neurosci 36:10584–10597. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1187-16.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu LG, Borst JG (1999) The reduced release probability of releasable vesicles during recovery from short-term synaptic depression. Neuron 23:821–832. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80039-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang XF, Ouyang Y, Kennedy BR, Rothman SM (2005) Cooling blocks rat hippocampal neurotransmission by a presynaptic mechanism: observations using 2-photon microscopy. J Physiol 567:215–224. 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.088948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Y, Ramamurthy B, Neef A, Xu-Friedman MA (2016) Low somatic sodium conductance enhances action potential precision in time-coding auditory neurons. J Neurosci 36:11999–12009. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1475-16.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yi E, Roux I, Glowatzki E (2010) Dendritic HCN channels shape excitatory postsynaptic potentials at the inner hair cell afferent synapse in the mammalian cochlea. J Neurophysiol 103:2532–2543. 10.1152/jn.00506.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Z, Jackson MB (2008) Temperature dependence of fusion kinetics and fusion pores in Ca2+-triggered exocytosis from PC12 cells. J Gen Physiol 131:117–124. 10.1085/jgp.200709891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]