Significance
This report describes an opportunity for the bacterial cellulose nanofiber (BCNF) membrane, which has recently been attracting much attention due to its sustainability and high thermal stability, as a “single-layer,” good alternative membrane to the existing chemical-derived one in batteries, and thus allows us to find possible solutions to the environmental and safety issues. We achieved highest BCNF yield ever reported so far and fabricated a cylindrical lithium ion battery (LIB) by roll-to-roll process to realize remarkable cycle stability with 80% capacity retention even after 1,000 cycles, which is comparable to those of commercialized batteries. Finally, we introduced a Lewis base to improve thermal safety of the battery to a level comparable to that of a commercial ceramic-coated separator.
Keywords: bacterial cellulose, lithium batteries, cellulose separator, gene engineering
Abstract
Bacterial cellulose nanofiber (BCNF) with high thermal stability produced by an ecofriendly process has emerged as a promising solution to realize safe and sustainable materials in the large-scale battery. However, an understanding of the actual thermal behavior of the BCNF in the full-cell battery has been lacking, and the yield is still limited for commercialization. Here, we report the entire process of BCNF production and battery manufacture. We systematically constructed a strain with the highest yield (31.5%) by increasing metabolic flux and improved safety by introducing a Lewis base to overcome thermochemical degradation in the battery. This report will open ways of exploiting the BCNF as a “single-layer” separator, a good alternative to the existing chemical-derived one, and thus can greatly contribute to solving the environmental and safety issues.
Safety and environmental issues associated with the large-scale battery are becoming a major public concern (1–3). A separator is one of the most crucial components of a battery that is closely related with these aspects (4). Recently, cellulose materials have received tremendous attention as an alternative to the polyolefin-based separators, owing to their high thermal stability and excellent electrolyte wettability as well as natural abundance (5–13). The separator in a lithium ion battery (LIB) should facilitate fast Li ion transport in the liquid electrolyte. Therefore, it should have a porous structure for ion transfer as well as excellent mechanical strength and thermal stability. Bacterial cellulose nanofiber (BCNF) membrane is highly porous, hydrophilic, and has a 3D network structure cross-linked with hydrogen bonding between the hydroxyl groups of cellulose nanofiber; as a result, pure BCNF shows superior physicochemical properties such as high tensile strength and high thermal stability (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). Although they have been extensively investigated in energy applications (14–17), the studies on their use as separators are limited to small-scale batteries, and they reportedly show an intrinsically low thermal shrinkage rate (7–9). Moreover, the yield of BCNF is still limited for successful commercialization (18).
Here, we report the development and in-depth characterization of the battery full cell composed of the entire process of BCNF production, including the genetic modification of the strain, mass fermentation, and large-area membrane preparation, and its integration into a battery via the roll-to-roll manufacture process. We demonstrate battery full cell with the BCNF separator showing remarkable cycle stability with 80% capacity retention even after 1,000 cycles that is available for commercial use (19, 20). Furthermore, we present the highest BCNF yield per glucose (31.5%) reported so far, by increasing the metabolic flux toward BCNF formation. Notably, we found that the high thermal stability of the BCNF is not fully implemented in a full-cell battery. It was identified that the structure of BCNF is thermochemically degraded by acidic gases produced by the decomposition of the lithium salt LiPF6, used in the battery. This issue was overcome by including a Lewis base such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) to maintain the structure and improve the safety of the battery.
Fig. 1A schematizes the preparation of BCNFs and manufacture of an 18650 LIB, which is cylindrical battery with a diameter of 18 mm and a length of 65 mm. Wild-type bacterial strains, Komagataeibacter xylinus DSM 2325 (Koma), which produce cellulose nanofibers (CNFs), were obtained from the Leibniz Institute DSMZ (German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures). After constructing a metabolically modified strain, we produced large quantities of BCNF using a series of 30-L fermenters. The BCNF was further fibrillated for disentanglement and homogenization using a high-pressure homogenizer. Subsequently, a thin membrane was prepared by adding propylene carbonate as a pore-making agent and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) to control the air permeability. Finally, we successfully manufactured a cylindrical battery via a continuous roll-to-roll process (Fig. 1A).
BCNF is produced through energy metabolism in a bacterial strain, with glucose as the carbon source. Furthermore, with genome sequencing and analysis, we reconstructed a genome-scale metabolic network of Koma (Fig. 1B). Particularly, glucose-6-phosphate (g6p) dehydrogenase (G6PD), which is sensitive to adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and associated with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), is a key branch-point for increasing the CNF yield (21–23). When ATP levels increase, the activity of G6PD is inhibited, and thus, the metabolic flux enters g6p to produce CNF. Glucose metabolism is the main energy source of ATP production. Interestingly, in most of the CNF-producing bacteria, glucose is metabolized through the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway and not the Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas (EMP) pathway, because of a lack of the pfkA gene, which is encoded with phosphofructokinase (24–26). The absence of the pfkA gene is a very well-known genotypic feature of the Komagataeibacter species, but the gene expression effect has not been studied well until now. Through simulated flux balance analysis with an additional reaction catalyzed by pfkA gene, we found that the expression of the pfkA gene is more beneficial for both the CNF production rate and specific growth rate (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). This could be because of the production of additional moles of ATP through the intact glycolysis upon the expression of the pfkA gene. The simulations suggest that using Komagataeibacter mutant with the pfkA gene expressed as a base production strain could be advantageous for further engineering of the process to optimize the CNF production. Thus, we introduced the Escherichia coli pfkA gene into the Koma (S.Koma-pfkA) to increase the intracellular ATP level (Fig. 1C and SI Appendix, Fig. S3A), thus achieving enhanced production and yield of CNF (Fig. 1 D and E). These results suggest that the recovery of the EMP pathway is important for enhancing the BCNF production and yield. To further increase the metabolic flux of EMP pathway, several genes (pgi, pgk, fba, tpi, gap, gpm, pck, and mae) were constitutively expressed in S.Koma-pfkA under the control of the tac promoter. However, the production and yield of BCNF did not increase significantly. Previously, Deng et al. (27) reported that the cAMP receptor protein (crp) deletion mutant does not produce any CNFs and regulates the expression of other genes involved in the cellulose biosynthesis. The CRP, a major global regulator in E. coli controlling the transcription initiation of genes, is mainly involved in the catabolism of alternate carbon sources and central carbon metabolism (28). Moreover, the CRP positively regulates the expression of fba, glk, pck, and pgi genes in E. coli. Thus, we constructed the S.Koma-pfkA/crp strain under the control of the tac promoter (SI Appendix, Methods and Tables S1–S5). Compared with Koma, the S.Koma-pfkA/crp strain showed increased cellulose production (∼1.3 times higher from 3.5 to 4.5 g/L) and a high increase in yield (∼3 times higher from 9.5 to 28.4%) (Fig. 1 D and E). Surprisingly, the S.Koma-pfkA/crp strain showed a sharp decrease in the yield of gluconic acid (GA) (from 64.8 to 39.2%), which is the main by-product in the production of BCNF (Fig. 1E). These results suggest that CRP plays a role in regulating the multiple gene expression, not only EMP pathway-related genes to produce BCNF, but also glucose dehydrogenase (gdh) gene to prevent by-product.
In this study, we have constructed the genome-scale metabolic network and identified that introduction of pfkA gene is a critical point for improving the CNF yield. Previous studies were shown that the addition of ethanol results in a metabolic flux of g6p to CNF biosynthesis through the inhibition of G6PD enzyme activity by the increased levels of ATP (22, 23). Our simulation results shows that pfkA gene is not only increased the ATP flux-sum to 35.45 mmol/grams dry cell weight (gDCW)/h from 19.16 mmol/gDCW/h, but also central metabolic fluxes, such as glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (pgi), fructose bisphosphate aldolase (fba), triosephosphate isomerase (tpi), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gap), and enolase (eno). However, overexpression of these genes was not significantly beneficial to production of CNF and yield for glucose in Koma. Interestingly, S.Koma-pfkA strain only enhanced the intracellular ATP level, thus achieving improved production and yield of BCNF (Fig. 1 C–E). It suggests that the reaction to fructose-1,6-phosphate from fructose-6-phosphate by phosphofructokinase (pfk) is irreversible step in EMP pathway. Although S.Koma-pfkA strain still produced the high yield of GA (65%), these observations suggest that recovery of EMP pathway through pfkA gene may contribute to the energy metabolism for production of BCNF. To fully elucidate the effect of pfkA gene, further studies are underway.
To optimize the fermentation process, we used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) (Materials and Methods) to predict the turbulent energy (TE) and shear stress (SS) for various impeller types (Rushton, pitch-blade), agitation speeds (50 to 350 rpm), and viscosities (1 to 40 cP) (Fig. 2A). By optimizing the impeller configuration (pitch-type, 60°, blade number 2), we obtained higher TE/SS ratio and mass transfer coefficient (kLa), which increased the dissolved oxygen content (Fig. 2B). We further optimized the process with a higher dried cell mass (0.96 g/L at pH 5.0) from a high seed cell process (SI Appendix, Fig. S3B) and optimal oxygen composition (25%). Thus, for the S.Koma-pfkA/crp, with these optimized conditions (pitch-type-60°-blade impeller 2; seed pH, 5.0; 25% oxygen), we finally achieved higher BCNF productivity than wild-type Koma (from 0.16 to 0.29 gBCNF/L/h). In addition, we obtained the highest BCNF yield reported so far (from 9.5 to 31.5% gBCNF per g glucose) (Fig. 2C and SI Appendix, Fig. S3C and Table S6). It is necessary to further improve the BCNF’s productivity and minimize the accumulation of the GA in the industrial aspects, although our study exhibited advanced results compared to the previous. The continuous process is considered as the promising strategy compared to the batch fermentation. Main barriers in the continuous fermentation are Koma cell-based genetic instability due to long-term shear stress exposure and CNF aggregation. Currently, further studies are being conducted for optimized CNF continuous fermentation process to solve the related problems. Finally, we successfully mass-produced BCNF using a series of 30-L fermentation reactors using the optimized conditions (SI Appendix, Fig. S4).
We fabricated 15-μm-thick BCNF nonwoven membranes, consisting of stacked layers with a small diameter of 21.5 ± 12 nm on average, with many open pores and investigated their properties (Fig. 3 A and B and SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). Then, we successfully fabricated a large-area BCNF separator that can be applied in a continuous roll-to-roll process for producing a cylindrical battery (Fig. 3C). The properties of separator were optimized with tensile strength of ∼60 MPa and air permeability of 200 s/100 cm−3, which is sufficient for commercial use (4). Moreover, BCNF separator exhibited high wettability and thermal resistivity compared to commercial polyolefin and ceramic-coated separators (CCSs) (SI Appendix, Fig. S1 B–E). We confirmed that the BCNF can tolerate severe thermal stress up to 338 °C via thermomechanical analysis (TMA) (Fig. 3D). Moreover, the BCNF membrane does not shrink and maintains its shape at 300 °C; in contrast, the CCS shrunk at 160 °C and the deformation began in a fixed frame (Fig. 3D, Inset). Therefore, in order to verify how those superior properties of BCNF affect the electrochemical performance in the actual battery, we evaluated the full cell battery performance. The cylindrical 18650 battery (500 mA⋅h) with the BCNF separator showed remarkably better cycle performance than the commercial CCS (Fig. 3E); it retained 80% of the initial capacity even after 1,000 cycles, which implies that it is comparable for commercial batteries (19, 20). The relative direct current–internal resistance (DC-IR) increase ratios of the BCNF battery increased by 9% after 300 cycles, which is comparable to that of the CCS battery (Fig. 3E, Inset). The superior electrochemical performance of the BCNF battery is presumably owing to its cross-linked 3D network structure, which leads to high porosity, high crystallinity, low membrane resistance, and excellent electrolyte wettability.
After confirming the excellent battery performance of BCNF, in order to find out whether the high thermal stability of the BCNF is implemented in the actual full cell, we first investigated the thermal behavior of the BCNF separator via the hot-box test under rather harsh conditions at 170 °C. Consequently, the BCNF separator, even as a single-layer membrane, showed higher thermal stability than a commercial polyolefin separator (Fig. 4A). However, in order to clarify the reason why the excellent thermal stability of the BCNF (SI Appendix, Fig. S1 D and E) is not fully implemented in the full cell battery, we further investigated the effect of the actual battery environment on the BCNF membrane. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis revealed many LiF, C–Fx, P–O, and C–O species on the surface of BCNF after heat exposure (SI Appendix, Fig. S5), which implies that chemicals, including F species, are deposited on the surface. A battery contains various chemical components such as electrodes, binders, conducting agents, and electrolytes. Such a chemical environment might cause complex chemical reactions with the BCNF, and thus significantly affect its safety performance. Among various battery components, an electrolyte containing lithium salts and carbonate-based solvents is the most likely candidate that can react with the BCNFs because of its relatively high chemical reactivity. We performed differential scanning calorimetry to find that each of the carbonate solvents such as ethylene carbonate (EC), ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), dimethyl carbonate (DMC), and vinylene carbonate (VC) reacts with the BCNF at a relatively high temperature (>280 °C) (SI Appendix, Fig. S6A). In contrast, in the presence of lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6), an exothermic reaction occurred below 200 °C (SI Appendix, Fig. S6B). Interestingly, ex situ hot-box test with heat exposure (170 °C for 1 h) revealed that the BCNF is carbonized to a dark material at high temperatures, with significant deterioration of its mechanical strength, only when an electrolyte containing LiPF6 was used (Fig. 4 B–D). We observed various anions such as F−, PF6−, and PO43− on the carbonized BCNF (SI Appendix, Fig. S6C). Moreover, the crystallinity of the BCNF decreased (11) and the Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) intensity of the C–O bonds caused by the decomposition of the cellulose structure increased as the temperature increased from 25 to 170 °C (SI Appendix, Fig. S6 D and E), implying that the BCNF could pyrolyse into levoglucosenone much more easily at higher temperatures (SI Appendix, Fig. S6 F and G).
It is well known that LiPF6 decomposes into strong Lewis acids, such as LiF and PF5, at elevated temperatures that could chemically attack the BCNF (29, 30). Therefore, to reduce the effect of these Lewis acids, we introduced a Lewis base such as PEG to maintain the cellulose structure and enhance the thermal stability of the battery. Indeed, the carbonization of BCNF could be mitigated by introducing PEG into the electrolyte (SI Appendix, Fig. S7A). Therefore, we intended to insert PEG directly into the BCNF (SI Appendix, Fig. S7 B and C). Consequently, we demonstrated the improved thermal safety of the battery in full-cell level (Fig. 4E). This implies that the outstanding safety performance, which is comparable to that of commercialized CCS, can be obtained by the BCNF membrane as a “single-layer” separator system without any support layers.
We confirmed the disappearance of the C–C bond at 1,580 cm−1 through Raman spectroscopy (SI Appendix, Fig. S7D), and the structural deterioration of the BCNF was also mitigated (SI Appendix, Fig. S7E). FTIR spectral analysis confirmed a drastic decrease in the intensity of the C–O peak owing to the collapse of the cellulose structure (Fig. 4F). Interestingly, there was no PF5 gas generation upon the introduction of PEG, whereas POF3 and PF5 gases were generated when only BCNF was used (Fig. 4G). In the 13C cross-polarization/magic angle spinning (CP/MAS) NMR spectrum (Fig. 4H), the BCNF containing PEG shows NMR peaks with the structural characteristics of cellulose maintained, which is mainly attributed to the effective reduction of the Lewis acids in the presence of PEG. Based on our findings, we could further improve thermal safety of BCNF through further safety-enhancing research, and thus the BCNF membrane could be an outperforming next-generation separator for sustainability, thermal safety, and battery performance.
In summary, we presented the entire process for the production of sustainable BCNF and battery manufacturing. A maximum BCNF yield was achieved through the genetic manipulation of the strain and optimal fermentation based on the understanding of their complex metabolic flux system. We demonstrated a large-capacity battery, showing superior cycle life compared to the commercialized battery, by installing a large-scale fermentation reactor and fabrication of a uniform large-area BCNF membrane using CFD and pore-forming controls. In particular, we improved their safety performance by introducing a Lewis base such as PEG to maintain the CNF structure, based on the identification of the BCNF’s degradation mechanism through the thermochemical reaction with the electrolyte component in the actual battery system. The results obtained in this study suggest that the BCNF membrane, which has intrinsically high thermal stability, can be a promising alternative to the chemical-derived membrane, as a sustainable safety-enhanced separator for the next generation of batteries.
Materials and Methods
Details of bacterial culture, construction of plasmids, genome sequencing of Koma, and construction of metabolically engineered strains and plasmids appear in SI Appendix. CFD method, fermentation procedure, preparation and characterization of the BCNF separator, 18650 cell preparation, and electrochemical analysis are also in SI Appendix.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. We thank Sungwoo Hwang from Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., for his valuable comments and discussion.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. Y.C. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1905527116/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Armand M., Tarascon J. M., Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652–657 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Larcher D., Tarascon J. M., Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. Nat. Chem. 7, 19–29 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang J., et al. , Renewable and superior thermal-resistant cellulose-based composite nonwoven as lithium-ion battery separator. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 128–134 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Arora P., Zhang Z. J., Battery separators. Chem. Rev. 104, 4419–4462 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Iguchi M., Yamanaka S., Budhiono A., Bacterial cellulose—a masterpiece of nature’s arts. J. Mater. Sci. 35, 261–270 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Esa F., Tasirin S. M., Rahman N. A., Overview of bacterial cellulose production and application. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2, 113–119 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xu Q., et al. , A bacterial cellulose/Al2O3 nanofibrous composite membrane for a lithium-ion battery separator. Cellulose 24, 1889–1899 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jiang F., Yin L., Yu Q., Zhong C., Zhang J., Bacterial cellulose nanofibrous membrane as thermal stable separator for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 279, 21–27 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xiao W., Liu J., Yan C., Nanofiber/ZrO2-based mixed matrix separator for high safety/high-rate lithium–ion batteries. Chem. Phys. Lett. 686, 134–139 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moon R. J., Martini A., Nairn J., Simonsen J., Youngblood J., Cellulose nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 3941–3994 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Poletto M., Ornaghi H. L., Zattera A. J., Native cellulose: Structure, characterization and thermal properties. Materials (Basel) 7, 6105–6119 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang J., et al. , Sustainable, heat-resistant and flame-retardant cellulose-based composite separator for high-performance lithium ion battery. Sci. Rep. 4, 3935 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim J.-H., et al. , Functionalized nanocellulose-integrated heterolayered nanomats toward smart battery separators. Nano Lett. 16, 5533–5541 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ko Y., et al. , Flexible supercapacitor electrodes based on real metal-like cellulose papers. Nat. Commun. 8, 536 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Song J., et al. , Processing bulk natural wood into a high-performance structural material. Nature 554, 224–228 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang S., et al. , Transparent, anisotropic biofilm with aligned bacterial cellulose nanofibers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1707491 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Galland S., et al. , Cellulose nanofibers decorated with magnetic nanoparticles—synthesis, structure and use in magnetized high toughness membranes for a prototype loudspeaker. J. Mater. Chem. C 1, 7963–7972 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hwang J. W., Yang Y. K., Hwang J. K., Pyun Y. R., Kim Y. S., Effects of pH and dissolved oxygen on cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum BRC5 in agitated culture. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 88, 183–188 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mulder G., et al. , Comparison of commercial battery cells in relation to material properties. Electrochim. Acta 87, 473–488 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nitta N., Wu F., Lee J. T., Yushin G., Li-ion battery materials: Present and future. Mater. Today 18, 252–264 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ross P., Mayer R., Benziman M., Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 55, 35–58 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Naritomi T., Kouda T., Yano H., Yoshinaga F., Effect of ethanol on bacterial cellulose production from fructose in continuous culture. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 85, 598–603 (1998). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yunoki S., Osada Y., Kono H., Takai M., Role of ethanol in improvement of bacterial cellulose production: Analysis using 13C-labeled carbon sources. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 10, 307–313 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang H., et al. , Complete genome sequence of the cellulose-producing strain Komagataeibacter nataicola RZS01. Sci. Rep. 7, 4431 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Prust C., et al. , Complete genome sequence of the acetic acid bacterium Gluconobacter oxydans. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 195–200 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Illeghems K., De Vuyst L., Weckx S., Complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of Acetobacter pasteurianus 386B, a strain well-adapted to the cocoa bean fermentation ecosystem. BMC Genomics 14, 526 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Deng Y., Nagachar N., Xiao C., Tien M., Kao T. H., Identification and characterization of non-cellulose-producing mutants of Gluconacetobacter hansenii generated by Tn5 transposon mutagenesis. J. Bacteriol. 195, 5072–5083 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shimada T., Fujita N., Yamamoto K., Ishihama A., Novel roles of cAMP receptor protein (CRP) in regulation of transport and metabolism of carbon sources. PLoS One 6, e20081 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yang H., Zhuang G. V., Ross P. N. Jr, Thermal stability of LiPF6 salt and Li-ion battery electrolytes containing LiPF6. J. Power Sources 161, 573–579 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lux S., et al. , The mechanism of HF formation in LiPF6 based organic carbonate electrolytes. Electrochem. Commun. 14, 47–50 (2012). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.