Abstract
Studies of ciliopathies have served in elucidating much of our knowledge of structure and function of primary cilia. We report humans with Bardet-Biedl syndrome who display intellectual disability, retinitis pigmentosa, obesity, short stature and brachydactyly, stemming from a homozyogous truncation mutation in SCAPER, a gene previously associated with mitotic progression. Our findings, based on linkage analysis and exome sequencing studies of two remotely related large consanguineous families, are in line with recent reports of SCAPER variants associated with intellectual disability and retinitis pigmentosa. Using immuno-fluorescence and live cell imaging in NIH/3T3 fibroblasts and SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell lines over-expressing SCAPER, we demonstrate that both wild type and mutant SCAPER are expressed in primary cilia and co-localize with tubulin, forming bundles of microtubules. While wild type SCAPER was rarely localized along the ciliary axoneme and basal body, the aberrant protein remained sequestered to the cilia, mostly at the ciliary tip. Notably, longer cilia were demonstrated both in human affected fibroblasts compared to controls, as well as in NIH/3T3 cells transfected with mutant versus wildtype SCAPER. As SCAPER expression is known to peak at late G1 and S phase, overlapping the timing of ciliary resorption, our data suggest a possible role of SCAPER in ciliary dynamics and disassembly, also affecting microtubule-related mitotic progression. Thus, we outline a human ciliopathy syndrome and demonstrate that it is caused by a mutation in SCAPER, affecting primary cilia.
Subject terms: Genetics research, Genetics
Introduction
Diseases of ciliary function (ciliopathies) affect motile cilia, immotile cilia, or both of these microtubule-based structures [1]. The immotile primary cilium functions as a cellular sensor for mechanical and chemical environmental cues, and is subjected to dynamic regulation during cell cycle progression [2]. Gaps remain in understanding ciliopathies and the proteins involved, and new core or regulatory players are yet to be identified [1]. Ciliopathies described to date include, among others, polycystic kidney disease, Meckel-Gruber syndrome, Joubert syndrome, Nephronophthisis, Alstrom syndrome, and Bardet–Biedl syndrome (BBS) [1]. BBS is phenotypically heterogeneous [3–5] and exhibits genetic heterogeneity, with 21 BBS genes known to date and others yet to be identified [6–9]. The Bedouin community of southern Israel, in which several BBS mutations have been discovered [6], has high rates of consanguinity culminating in many inherited diseases arising from founder mutations [10, 11]. High prevalence of BBS among this cohort (1:13,500) has been noted, compared to 1:1,60,000 in north Europeans [4, 12]. We now describe a consanguineous Bedouin kindred with multiple individuals affected by BBS, and demonstrate that the disease is caused by a mutation in SCAPER, localized in cell culture to primary cilia.
Materials and methods
The study was approved by the Soroka Medical Center institutional review board (approval #5071G). DNA samples, RNA samples and skin punch biopsies were obtained following written informed consent. Detailed methods are given in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
Linkage analysis
Genome-wide linkage analysis was performed using Illumina Omni Express Beadchip with >700 K SNP loci per sample (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), as previously described [13]. Homozygosity mapping analysis was carried out using Homozygosity-Mapper [14], and Multipoint Logarithm of Odds (LOD) score for the pedigree P1 (Fig. 1a) was calculated via SUPERLINK ONLINE SNP 1.1 [15]. Copy number variations (CNVs) were analyzed using microarrays’ log R ratio (PARTEK®).
Sequence analysis
Whole exome sequencing (WES) of DNA samples of individuals P1:V6 and P1:V7 (Fig. 1a) was performed as previously described [13, 16] at a mean coverage of 30-fold and 68.8-fold, respectively; accordingly, 85% and 97.5% of all exonic nucleotides and splice junctions were covered by >10 reads. Sequences with low reads (<5×) in the WES data within the disease-associated chromosome 15 locus (Fig. 1b) were re-sequenced by Sanger sequencing. The SCAPER variant was further assayed through restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) using NlaIV endonuclease analysis and multiple sequence alignment (further expanded in Supplementary Materials and Methods).
Quantitative reverse transcription PCR
RNA was extracted from fresh peripheral blood leukocytes of patients P2:IV1, P2:III1, and P2:III2 (Fig. 1a). PCR primers were designed to amplify cDNA rather than genomic DNA of human SCAPER and of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) housekeeping gene as a control. After amplification, sequences were validated through Sanger sequencing.
Plasmid constructs
Plasmid pCBF-FLAG-SCAPER, harboring the SCAPER long isoform driven by a CMV promoter, was a kind gift of William Tsang (Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal; IRCM) [17, 18]. In-vitro mutagenesis, inserting the human SCAPER mutation (c.2806delC; p.(L936*), NM_020843.2), was done using primers 5′-GATCGGACCTAGGAGAGAT-3′ and 5′-CTCTCCTAGGTCCGATCCAA-3′, and Q5® High-Fidelity DNA polymerase, creating the pCBF-FLAG-mutSCAPER. Mock pCBF plasmid (pCBF-FLAG) was produced by restriction using NsiI and EcoRV (cutting out the entire SCAPER gene from pCBF-FLAG-SCAPER), following blunting and ligation, expressing only FLAG followed by 20 amino acids until reading-frame termination. Sequences of the wild type (WT) and mutated plasmids were validated by Sanger sequencing. SCAPER cDNA was next sub-cloned to C1-mCherry plasmids from pCBF-FLAG-SCAPER, and pCBF-FLAG-mutSCAPER (c.2806delC; p.(L936*)), using restriction endonucleases XhoI and EcoRV, following blunting and ligation. Plasmids C1 mCherry-WT-SCAPER, C1 mCherry-MUT-SCAPER and C1 mCherry (mCherry-mock) sequences were validated using restriction endonucleases and through Sanger sequencing for having SCAPER long isoform, N′ tagged with mCherry with a linker of 6 amino acids, driven by CMV promoter. Next, SCAPER cDNA was subcloned to mEGFP-C1 (EGFP with p.(A206K) substitution), using restriction endonucleases BspEI and Acc65I for mEGFP-C1, and SgrAI and Acc65I for the mCherry-SCAPER WT and MUT plasmids, creating mEGFP-WT-SCAPER, and mEGFP-MUT-SCAPER. The constructs were validated using restriction endonucleases and Sanger sequencing for having long isoform of SCAPER (WT or MUT), preceded by a mEGFP and linker of 9 amino acids. N′ tagging of SCAPER was preferred, as a C′ terminus ER-retrieval signal may be essential [17]. Plasmid GFP-α-tubulin, containing the full-length human α-tubulin cloned into pEGFP-C1 was used as previously described [19].
Cell culture and transfection
HeLa, SH-SY5Y and primary fibroblasts were grown in standard media. NIH/3T3 cells were grown in low glucose (1 g/L d-Glucose) DMEM with sodium pyruvate, supplemented with 10% newborn calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, 10,000 U/ml penicillin, and 10 mg/mL streptomycin. Transfections were carried out using linearized polyethylenimine (PEI; Polysciences Inc., USA) or Lipofectamine® 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), employing standard techniques. A 4-mm human skin punch biopsy was dissected and prepared of for derivation of fibroblast culture, following standard methods [20].
Western blot analysis
HeLa cells were plated in 12-well plates and transfected using PEI with plasmid DNA: pCBF-FLAG-SCAPER, pCBF-MOCK, or p.(L936*) pCBF-FLAG-mutSCAPER. Thirty-six to 48 h after PEI transfection, cells were harvested and total protein samples were resolved on 7% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and subjected to western blot analysis.
Immunostaining and live cell imaging
For immuno-staining of ciliated cells, low passage NIH/3T3 were seeded on coverslips in 12-well plates, and transfected the following day (at 40–60% confluence) with mCherry-WT-SCAPER, mCherry-MUT-SCAPER, C1-mCherry (mCherry-mock), mEGFP-WT-SCAPER, mEGFP-MUT-SCAPER or C1-mEGFP (mEGFP-mock). For live-cell imaging, cells were directly seeded on 4 wells µ-slides (ibidy GmbH, Germany) and transfected in wells the following day with one of the following: mEGFP-WT-SCAPER, mEGFP-MUT-SCAPER, C1-mEGFP (without further fixation and immunostaining); or with one of the following: mCherry-WT-SCAPER, mCherry-MUT-SCAPER, mCherry-mock, co-transfected with GFP–α-tubulin. Sixteen to thirty hours following transfection, cells were washed, fixed, stained, mounted and visualized using LSM880 microscope with 20×/0.8 and 60×/1.4 objectives (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Germany). Primary cilia were immuno-stained using primary antibodies which mark the axoneme and adjacent basal body: for the axoneme, anti acetylated alpha tubulin antibody (ab24610, mouse monoclonal Ab to acetylated alpha tubulin [6-11B-1], Abcam, UK); for the basal body, anti-gamma tubulin antibody (ab11317, rabbit polyclonal to gamma tubulin, Abcam, UK). Both were used as primary antibodies alone or together. For live cell imaging and mEGFP plasmids-transfected cells, Fast-Airy-Scan mode in LSM880 was used. Same lenses and parameters (such as master gain, digital gain, digital offset, and pinhole size) were used in all experiments (and within Airy-Scan experiments separately), after ensuring there was no leakage of emitted light between the 3 or 4 different fluorophores used in all experiments. All pictures represent maximum intensity projection of all planes (about 9–14 for each field, and 18–25 for the live cells), generated using ZEN 2.3 (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Germany). Fields were selected randomly and counted manually. Only cells having one easily defined protruding cilium, preferably marked with anti-gamma-tubulin on one end, were counted as ciliated. Of note: in Fig. 3c–e represent transfections with both mCherry and mEGFP conjugated fluorophores, and at least 4 biological replicates of those cells, fixed 24 h post transfection, grown and transfected at similar conditions. p value was calculated from observed (counted) vs predicted tables using χ2 test between each two populations for panels c and d, and t-test (2 tails, unequal variance) for panels e and f. In graphs e and f, cilia measurements were calculated with ZEN 2.3 (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Germany), using only photos taken with a 60×/1.4 objective.
Primary fibroblasts and scanning electron microscope (SEM)
Cells derived from an affected patient (P2:IV1) and an age and ethnicity-matched control individual, at a similar passage, were seeded on coverslips and grown to confluency. After additional 48 h serum-starvation, cells were washed, fixed, stained, mounted and visualized using LSM880 microscope with 60×/1.4 objectives as previously described (for confocal microscopy), or fixed with warm glutaraldehyde, treated with Osmium tetroxide, critical-point dried and gold-coated, before observing using SEM (further elaborated in the supplementary methods). For cilia length quantification, maximum intensity projections of 40 images, representing large fields randomly selected from three different experiments (technical replicates), were analyzed using ZEN 2.3 (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Germany).
Results
Delineation of the disease phenotype
Twenty individuals, of two consanguineous Bedouin families of the same tribe in southern Israel, were recruited for this study (Fig. 1a). The clinical phenotype is delineated in Fig. 1; Table 1: all eight affected individuals (ages 10–48 years) exhibited developmental delay/intellectual disability, with severe speech delay, speaking only few words beyond 10 years of age. All adult patients had short stature and obesity (apart from one patient that was overweight—BMI 28). Brachydactyly with tapering fingers were evident in all of the patients, and six had genu valgum or varum (Fig. 1h). None of the patients had microcephaly or facial dysmorphism. Four patients exhibited inappropriate behavior (mental confusion, inappropriate affect, inability to comply with simple instructions). Three patients had unstable gait and two of them were wheelchair-ridden. None had clinical evidence of polydactyly, diabetes, anosmia, hypogonadism, or kidney abnormalities (per ultrasound and blood creatinine levels). Seven of the affected individuals, 17 years of age or older, were diagnosed with severe retinitis pigmentosa (RP), with initial evidence of RP in the youngest (10 years old) patient (Table 1 and S1 Table). In both families, progressive loss of night vision began in the first or second decade of life, followed by difficulties in daytime vision as well. Visual acuity ranged from 6/10 in the youngest patient to only light perception in the oldest (Table 1 and Table S1). Affected individuals older than 30 years of age had severe visual handicap and were not able to ambulate without assistance. Four patients had strabismus (exotropia). Refractive errors included mild myopia and astigmatism. In five older patients, cataract was demonstrated (posterior sub-capsular in most). Fundoscopy revealed bone-corpuscular pigmentation typical of RP in all but one patient (Fig. 1c–f). In three of the older patients, optic atrophy, narrow retinal vessels and gray retinal discoloration were also detected. Two patients of Pedigree 2 had also severe maculopathy as demonstrated by fundus photography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging of the retina of patient P2:III2 (Fig. 1f, g). Electroretinography (ERG), performed on two patients (P1:V5 and P1:V6) aged 25 and 17 years, showed extinguished retinal responses from both eyes at dark-adapted and light-adapted conditions, even with higher than standard light stimuli. Flash visual evoked potentials (VEP) testing of patient P1:V5 elicited increased-latency responses. In the youngest patient, P2:IV1, age 10 years, it was technically impossible to assess vision; his fundus exam showed mild optic disk pallor and gray retinal discoloration, suggesting possible retinal dystrophy.
Table 1.
Patient ID | P1:V5 | P1:V6 | P1:V7 | P1:V8 | P2:III1 | P2:III2 | P2:III7 | P2:IV1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient age (years)/sex | 34/F | 28/M | 24/M | 17/M | 48/F | 47/F | 29/F | 10/M |
Retinitis pigmentosa HP:0000580 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | Suspected |
Intellectual disability HP:0010864Ia | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Severe | Severe | Severe | Moderate |
Short stature HP:0004322 (height, cm OR percentile) | +(145) | +(157) | +(163) | +(155) | +(146) | +(149) | +(132) | Percentile 3–5% (129) |
Weight (kg) | 78 | 78 | 98 | 92 | 86.6 | 62 | 57.8 | 29.5 (percentile 25–50%) |
Obesity HP:0001513 (calculated BMI kg/m2) | +(37.1) | +(31.6) | +(36.9) | +(38.3) | +(40.6) | -Overweight (27.9) | +(33.2) | BMI-for-age at the 68th percentileb |
Genu Valgum HP:0002857/Genu Varum HP:0002970 | + | + | + | + | ? | + | ? | + |
Speech Delay HP:0002167 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Brachydactyly HP:0001156 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
aA formal IQ test could not be done due to low compliance. We have estimated the level of ID based on basic daily skills and the intensity of support needed either observed or when not available for clinical appreciation-based on medical records (as DSM V assesses the level of severity based on adaptive functioning and not IQ score)
bAccording to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)—BMI percentile calculator for child and teen
Aside from the phenotypes shared by all or most patients, single patients had additional unique findings—not necessarily related to the familial syndrome: one patient in family P1 also suffered from epilepsy and facial nerve palsy and one had congenital heart defects (tetralogy of Fallot). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was diagnosed in an affected individual in family P2. Brain computed tomography (CT) of this patient (P2:IV1) at the age of 8 months showed enlarged 3rd and 4th ventricles, rounding of sub-arachnoid spaces and borderline white matter abnormality; more recent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (age 10 years) revealed mild enlarged lateral ventricles and several loci of irregular signal in the brain parenchyma above the tentorium, in the posterior white matter and along the ependyma (Fig. 1i, j).
Identification of the SCAPER mutation
Patients’ karyotypes and chromosomal microarray analyses were normal (data not shown). Analysis of whole-exome sequencing (WES) data of individuals P1:V6 and P1:V7 identified no mutations in known ciliopathy-related genes, including all BBS genes. Genome-wide homozygosity mapping, analyzing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data of all available subjects in family P1, identified a single homozygosity segment shared exclusively by all affected individuals (Fig. 1b). This chromosome 15 locus (between SNPs rs8040073 and rs4886566, positioned respectively at 70,760,574 and 78,563,652 in the GRCh37/Hg19 assembly) segregated within the kindred as expected for autosomal recessive heredity. Maximal multipoint LOD score was 3.88 (Fig. 1b). Sanger sequencing was done for all exons and exon-intron boundaries within the locus whose coverage in the WES was insufficient (<5×). Notably, no sequence variations were found within BBS4 (NM_033028.4) and SIN3A (NM_015477.2) within this locus—genes whose mutations are known to cause overlapping phenotypes [21, 22]. Five rare variants were found within this locus, in UACA, THSD4, C15ORF39, TMEM266, and SCAPER. Three of the variants (in UACA, C15ORF39, and TMEM266) were ruled out as being associated with the disease: the UACA (NM_001008224.2) c.3113T>C, p.(I1038T) (rs150879212) variant is a common polymorphism (4.375%) in our local Bedouin cohort of 160 ethnically-matched controls, and was previously identified in a homozygous state in an apparently healthy individual (reported in ExAC and gnomAD as not affected by severe pediatric disease; last accessed at 28th of July 2018, encompassing 123,136 exome sequences and 15,496 whole-genome sequences) [23–25]. The TMEM266 (NM_152335.2) c.1343C>T, p.(S448L) (rs368038771) variant, with prevalence of 1.875% in our Bedouin cohort, represents a multi-allelic nucleotide, and is predicted to be a benign polymorphism (as the same amino acid substitution is common in some other mammals). The C15ORF39 (NM_015492.4) variant c.610T>G, p.(S204A) (chr15:75498999), predicted to be a benign polymorphism by both PolyPhen-2 [26] and MutationTaster2 [27], with normal inferred activity in Ingenuity®, is the least conserved amino acid within the variants being studied, and is located in an area of relatively low WES coverage as seen in ExAC and gnomAD (the SNP was reported only in gnomAD database, at a low allele frequency of 0.003%, of 30,860 alleles sequenced (representing only whole genome sequencing data)). Thus, only two variants passed our filtration cascade and were predicted as possibly affecting function: THSD4 (NM_001286429.1) c.1414G>A, p.(E472K) (chr15:72050319) missense variant, and SCAPER (NM_020843.2) c.2806delC; p.(L936*) (chr15:76866531) nonsense variant (Fig. 2a). The SCAPER variant was not found in our cohort or in allele frequency community (AFC, a freely accessible “opt-in” community resource designed to facilitate sharing of anonymized, pooled allele frequency statistics among laboratories, which already includes over 130,000 exomes/genomes; ca. May 2016, accessed at 12th of March 2017) [28]. Whereas the THSD4 variant was more common (0.002% in AFC and 0.625% in our cohort) and multi-allelic, as another rare SNP (rs770207993; minor allele frequency 0.00003/4, ExAC) affects the same codon p.(E472G). Moreover, THSD4 (also called ADAMTSL6) variants were previously related to aberrant pulmonary function and regulation of connective tissue [29, 30], not seen on our patients. Notably, mass spectrometry analysis of tissues, summarized in the ProteomicsDB database [31], originally from The Human Proteome Map (HPM) [32, 33], demonstrates that SCAPER protein is expressed in brain and retinal tissue, whereas there is no evidence of retinal expression of THSD4 (Fig. 2b). Thus, the THSD4 variant is likely a polymorphism not associated with the disease phenotype. In contrast, the p.(L936*) (NM_020843.2) SCAPER variant is predicted to truncate the last third of the mature evolutionary-conserved protein (1400 amino acids) and to affect both validated transcripts of the mature mRNA (Fig. 2c). This transcript (named also ENST00000563290.5, translated to ENSP00000454973.1) appears as possibly cilia-related per the CilDB database [34] (database dedicated to proteins involved in centrioles, centrosomes, basal bodies, cilia and flagella in eukaryotes), as its homologs’ contributing peptides were detected in the centrosome proteome of D. melangoster [35], and in the cilium proteome (comprised of both cytoskeleton and photosensory-cilium) of M. musculus [36]. Furthermore, recent reports associated SCAPER sequence variants with autosomal-recessive intellectual disability, retinitis pigmentosa, ADHD and delayed motor development and cataracts, mostly in consanguineous families [37–40]. Thus, the disease phenotype likely stems from the SCAPER mutation.
Verification of mutations identified and population screening
Through RFLP (validated by Sanger sequencing) we demonstrated that the c.2806delC (NM_020843.2) SCAPER variant segregated within both affected families as expected for recessive heredity, with homozygosity in the eight affected individuals of families P1 and P2. Testing 325 individuals within the specific Bedouin tribe (225 of whom were specifically of the same clan of the affected families, predicted to demonstrate high similarity of prevalence of SNPs found, as it is a closed community), we could not rule-out either of the THSD4, C15ORF39 and SCAPER variants, as they reside within the same haplotype, found as a homozygous stretch (between SNPs rs8040073 and rs4886566) only in the affected individuals. In all Bedouin controls tested, we found 2.8% heterozygous carriers of the SCAPER variant. It is noteworthy, that in highly inbred populations it is quite common to see 2.8% (and even more) heterozygotes for a possibly pathogenic mutation [41].The THSD4 and C15ORF39 variants were also found at a heterozygous state, in 5.26% and 2.6%, respectively. No homozygotes for any of the variants were found in the controls. It is noteworthy that the THSD4 variant was the only one found outside the clan, in the larger tribe (found at the frequency of 0.625% in our in-house dataset, and validated using RFLP to exist at a heterozygous state apart from the other variants, in three additional related individuals), further suggesting that it is a benign polymorphism.
The SCAPER mutation does not cause NMD
To test whether the SCAPER mutation causes nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and as commercial anti SCAPER antibodies failed to effectively detect endogenous SCAPER protein, we analyzed cDNA from fresh peripheral blood leukocytes of patient P2:IV1 and his parents (P2:III8 and P2:III9), testing quantitative expression levels of patients’ RNA. Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) for SCAPER showed no significant change in transcript normalized concentration within affected individual’s derived cDNA. Two heterozygotes tested showed values of 0.63 and 1.14 (calibrated to control cDNA), and the homozygous mutant showed a value of 0.63 (data not shown). Thus, despite the putative disruptive nature of the c.2806delC; p.(L936*) variant and the new premature stop codon, no significant NMD was noted.
SCAPER protein expression
As the clinical phenotype of the affected individuals was very much reminiscent of that of ciliopathies such as BBS, we set out to test a possible role of SCAPER in primary cilia. Using two existing commercial anti-SCAPER antibodies, endogenous SCAPER protein could not be detected in untransfected (naïve) HeLa cells (Fig. 2d). Hence, the endogenous SCAPER expression level is below the detection level of the commercial antibody. Therefore, to study both WT and mutant SCAPER, we transfected with FLAG-tagged SCAPER constructs: WT pCBF-FLAG-SCAPER, mutant (truncated) pCBF-FLAG-mutSCAPER or a control mock plasmid, pCBF-FLAG. In HeLa cells transfected with the three constructs, the p.(L936*) mutant FLAG-tagged SCAPER (pCBF-FLAG-mutSCAPER) was observed ~50 kDa smaller than the WT, consistent with a C-terminally truncated protein (Fig. 2d, e). These findings were consistent when using either anti-FLAG (Fig. 2e) or polyclonal anti-SCAPER (Fig. 2d) antibodies. Although the transfection protocol was identical for all constructs, densitometry for WT SCAPER and its mutant counterpart (normalized to total lane protein) showed marked ten-fold decrease in mutant protein level (n = 2) (Fig. 2f), suggesting that the truncated protein is unstable.
To test possible expression of SCAPER in primary cilia, we went on to study protein localization in two cell lines: the primary cilia-expressing NIH/3T3 fibroblasts and the disease-relevant SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell lines, transfected with either WT or p.(L936*) truncated mutant SCAPER (Figs. 3a–e, 4). To ensure that the intracellular localization is not affected by the tag, experiments were repeated with SCAPER constructs with either mEGFP or mCherry tags.
In NIH/3T3 cells fixed 16–24 h post transfection, the mEGFP/mCherry-WT-SCAPER protein was observed mostly diffusive in the cytoplasm of most cells (Fig. 3a, b). While most of those transfected cells did not demonstrate easily defined protruding cilium, naïve (un-transfected cells within the same randomly selected fields) did demonstrate high level of ciliation. Within this population of ciliated transfected cells, SCAPER could be found as a dense spot in and near the basal body or along the primary cilia and its tip (Fig. 3a, b). The truncated mEGFP/mCherry-MUT-SCAPER also showed mostly diffuse cytoplasmic pattern and similar percentage of ciliation (Fig. 3c); however, in contrast with the over-expressed WT protein, the mutant protein was constantly observed in the primary cilia (Fig. 3d), mostly at the tip of the cilia, distal from the basal body. Mock mEGFP/mCherry did not present any specific pattern of localization, with diffuse expression throughout the cytoplasm and the nucleus (Fig. 3a, b). Mock transfected cells also demonstrated reduced level of ciliation in comparison to the naïve (un-transfected cells) within same fields (Fig. 3b, c), but were never found localized on the primary cilia in our experiments. The intracellular localization phenotype above was seen mostly in cells with low expression levels of the fluorescently tagged proteins. In contrast, mostly aggregated fluorescent-tagged protein was seen in cells with high expression levels of both the transfected mEGFP and mCherry-tagged WT and mutant SCAPER plasmids at the time of fixation. We noticed fibrillar pattern seldom in some of the formalin fixed cells, more common in the mEGFP tagged WT/Mut- SCAPER (data not shown).
In an effort to study (cilia) dynamics, we went on to do live imaging of non-fixed cells in the first 8–24 h after transfection with WT or mutant mCherry or mEGFP fluorescent-tagged SCAPER. As seen in Fig. 4, at 12 h post-transfection, both WT and mutant SCAPER (yet not the mock transfection) were evident as a prominent fluorescently-tagged fibrillar structure. A dense spot or two close dense spots were seen in most cells, with possibly borderline thicker fibrillar structure with the mutant protein. Similar results were obtained with different cell lines (Fig. 4a, b). Co-localization of mCherry-tagged MUT SCAPER with another exogenous fluorescent-tagged protein, eGFP-alpha tubulin, suggested that the tubular structure is composed of microtubules (Fig. 4c, d). The cellular organization of both WT and mutant SCAPER in tubular structure was more prominent in the less ciliated and rapidly dividing SH-5YSY cells than in NIH/3T3 cells. Unfortunately, we could not follow ciliary or cell cycle dynamics, as most transfected cells rapidly progressed to apoptosis/ necrosis, with no evident progress in cell cycle.
As SCAPER was evident at the tip of cilia, we investigated a possible effect of the SCAPER mutation on cilia length: as seen in Fig. 3e, NIH/3T3 cells transfected with mutant SCAPER had longer cilia than those transfected with WT SCAPER. This was further corroborated through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of primary, non-transfected, skin fibroblasts of an affected individual versus a non-affected control: SEM of 6 cilia of an affected individual and of 6 cilia of a control demonstrated no structural differences. However, cilia length seemed longer in the mutants (supplementary figure 1). To quantify a possible difference in cilia length in naïve human mutant versus control fibroblasts, confocal microscopy was used to assess cilia length (see methods), testing a total of 232 cilia (119 wild type, 113 mutant). As seen in Fig. 3f, cilia in naïve affected (homozygous mutant) human fibroblasts were significantly longer than those in the naïve control fibroblasts (p = 0.00019), in line with the findings in transfected NIH/3T3 cells.
Discussion
The affected individuals in our study presented with a combination of phenotypes characteristic of ciliopathies (with some overlap with BBS) [3, 5], including photoreceptor degeneration, obesity, intellectual disability, speech impediment, developmental delay and behavioral abnormalities, as well as phenotypes found in BBS at a lesser frequency, such as brachydactyly, ataxia, and cataracts (Table 1 and S1 Table). Through homozygosity mapping and whole exome sequencing, we demonstrated that the disease is caused by a SCAPER truncation mutation.
SCAPER was previously associated with certain aspects of the studied phenotype: a single homozygous SCAPER mutation was implicated in causation of non-syndromic familial mental retardation in three children (age was unspecified) [38]. In a genome wide association study (GWAS), SCAPER was shown to have statistically significant association with low general cognitive ability [40]. Recently, in a large whole genome sequencing study of RP patients [37] a single individual was shown to have compound heterozygous mutations in SCAPER. The patient was described as having multiple phenotypes, perhaps being syndromic (no further information was available). Moreover, a very recent study, conducted parallel to and unrelated to our study, demonstrated bi-allelic mutations in SCAPER as the cause for autosomal recessive RP with intellectual disability and attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder, in four patients of three unrelated families [39].
Although demonstrated before to endogenously exist within human and mouse cell-lines (using non-commercial antibody) [17], the endogenous SCAPER protein levels were un-demonstrable using commercial antibodies. We therefore transfected HeLa cells with plasmids expressing either the WT or the mutant protein conjugated to FLAG. The mutant transcript did not undergo significant NMD and the encoded protein was shown to be ~50 kD smaller than its WT counterpart.
Next, through transfection with mCherry-SCAPER and mEGFP-SCAPER plasmids in parallel to immunostaining with markers of primary cilia in NIH/3T3 fibroblasts, we demonstrated that both WT and mutant SCAPER localize to the primary cilia, mostly at their tip. While mutant SCAPER was persistently localized to the cilia, its WT counterpart was missing from the cilia in most ciliated cells. It should be noted that while most non-transfected cells were ciliated, cilia were significantly less evident in cells transfected with WT SCAPER, or to a lesser degree—in cells transfected with mutant SCAPER. As a similar effect (though to lesser degree) was seen with the mock transfection, this lower level of ciliation within transfected cells could be attributed at least in part to the transfection event itself (as it is more common in dividing, thus un-ciliated cells), to aggregation created or due to cellular toxicity. However, as the effect was most noticeable in WT SCAPER transfectants, the reduced ciliation in the SCAPER-transfected cells might be at least in part due to a change in cilia formation/preservation/resorption, or in cell-cycle progression dynamics, as SCAPER is known to affect cell cycle distribution; notably, Tsang et al. demonstrated that SCAPER over-expression results in M phase delay, and their data suggest that the delay may occur in the prophase stage of mitosis [17].
In cells with high levels of expression of either mutant or WT SCAPER, SCAPER was evident (localized) in microtubule-like, as well as cilia-like or basal body-like organelle. The same phenomenon was seen with both mCherry and mEGFP conjugates, and was even more evident in live cell imaging (12 h post-transfection) of non-fixated cells, and in SH-SY5Y cells. Co-expressing mutant SCAPER protein with fluorescently tagged alpha-tubulin (live imaging), revealed the microtubule-like bundles to be indeed microtubule structures, suggesting that SCAPER is a microtubule related protein. Our findings regarding expression of SCAPER are similar to those observed with overexpression of other microtubule-related proteins. Furthermore, the pattern of localization of SCAPER on microtubules and the cilia, especially their tip, resembles that of proteins regulating microtubule dynamics, such as KIF7 [42]. Moreover, studies of SCAPER’s homolog in D. melangoster, SSP3, suggested that it is part of the centrosome proteome [35], functionally affecting microtubules during mitosis [43]; furthermore, the ortholog of SCAPER in M. musculus is part of the cilium proteome (both the cytoskeleton and photosensory-cilium) [36], further supporting our in-vitro observations. Overall, our data show that SCAPER has affinity to microtubules, mostly ciliary axoneme and the basal body.
Although we have demonstrated SCAPER expression in primary cilia in cell culture, and that the SCAPER mutation affects cilia length, it should be noted that overexpression of proteins in cells, and especially with a large tag that may alter protein folding, may lead to altered localization and does not always reflect the endogenous location. Thus, at this point one cannot determine with full certainty that SCAPER is indeed a ciliary protein in H. Sapiens.
SCAPER has been previously shown to be specifically associated with the cyclin A/Cdk2 (CCNA2/CDK2) complex: in the absence of SCAPER, the CCNA2/CDK2 complex is almost nonexistent in the cytoplasm, while when SCAPER is over-expressed, the complex is abundant in the cytoplasm, suggesting that SCAPER plays a role in the complex’s exiting the nucleus or remaining there [17, 18]. Outside the nucleus, the Cyclin A/CDK2 complex regulates centrosome activation, a function essential for the duplication/replication of the centrosome [17, 44]. In fact, the CCNA2/CDK2 complex is essential for centrosome duplication in somatic cells and controls nuclear mitotic events [44, 45].
Aside from its association with the CCNA2 / CDK2 complex, SCAPER was shown to complex also with MOZART1 [46], a protein necessary for the formation of the gamma tubulin ring [47], which forms the basis for the nucleation of the microtubules of the primary cilia [48]. As SCAPER expression is known to be cell-cycle dependent, and was previously shown to affect cell-cycle progression in a timely manner, it may possess a different role and location during meiosis and mitosis. SCAPER expression peaks at late G1 and S phase [17, 18], overlapping the timing of ciliary resorption [49], comprises part of the cilia proteome and affects mitotic spindle assembly [35, 36, 43]. Put together with our demonstration that it is likely a ciliary protein, these facts suggest a role of SCAPER in ciliary dynamics, affecting microtubule-related mitotic progression. Notably, longer cilia were demonstrated both in human affected fibroblasts compared to controls, as well as in NIH/3T3 cells transfected with mutant versus wildtype SCAPER, implying a possible role of WT SCAPER specifically in restricting cilia elongation or enhancing cilia resorption.
Overall, we outline a human ciliopathy syndrome and demonstrate that it is caused by a mutation in SCAPER, affecting primary cilia. While we have shown that SCAPER is expressed in-vitro in primary cilia and that the ciliopathy-causing mutation affects this expression and cilia length, future studies are needed to elucidate possible roles of SCAPER in cell cycle progression and in primary cilia function and dynamics.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The studies were funded by the Israeli Ministry of Health grant number 3-11799, awarded to OSB, and supported through the National Knowledge Center for Rare/Orphan Diseases sponsored by the Israel ministry of Science, Technology and Space. We thank Merav Saroussy-Levy for secretarial assistance and Dr. Uzi Hadad, of the Ilse Katz Institute for Nanoscale Science & Technology at BGU, for technical assistance.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version of this article (10.1038/s41431-019-0347-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.Reiter JF, Leroux MR. Genes and molecular pathways underpinning ciliopathies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18:533–47. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Plotnikova OVOV, ENEN Pugacheva. Golemis EAEA. Primary cilia and the cell cycle. Methods Cell Biol. 2009;94:137–60. doi: 10.1016/S0091-679X(08)94007-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Waters AM, Beales PL. Ciliopathies: an expanding disease spectrum. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011;26:1039–56. doi: 10.1007/s00467-010-1731-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zaghloul Na, Katsanis N. Science in medicine mechanistic insights into Bardet-Biedl syndrome, a model ciliopathy. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:428–37. doi: 10.1172/JCI37041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Beales PL, Elcioglu N, Woolf AS, Parker D, Flinter FA. New criteria for improved diagnosis of Bardet-Biedl syndrome: results of a population survey. J Med Genet. 1999;36:437–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Erickson Robert P., Wynshaw-Boris Anthony J., editors. Epstein's Inborn Errors of Development. 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Heon E, Kim G, Qin S, et al. Mutations in C8ORF37 cause Bardet Biedl syndrome (BBS21) Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:2283–94. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Khan AO, Decker E, Bachmann N, Bolz HJ, Bergmann C. C8orf37 is mutated in Bardet-Biedl syndrome and constitutes a locus allelic to non-syndromic retinal dystrophies. Ophthalmic Genet. 2016;37:290–3. doi: 10.3109/13816810.2015.1066830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lindstrand A, Frangakis S, Carvalho CMB, et al. Copy-number variation contributes to the mutational load of Bardet-Biedl syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99:318–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.04.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Markus B, Alshafee I, Birk OS. Deciphering the fine-structure of tribal admixture in the Bedouin population using genomic data. Heredity. 2014;112:182–9. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Na’amnih W, Romano-Zelekha O, Kabaha A, et al. Prevalence of consanguineous marriages and associated factors among Israeli Bedouins. J Community Genet. 2014;5:395–8. doi: 10.1007/s12687-014-0188-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Farag TI, TEEBI AS. Bardet‐Biedl and Laurence‐Moon syndromes in a mixed Arab population. Clin Genet. 1988;33:78–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1988.tb03414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yogev Yuval, Perez Yonatan, Noyman Iris, Madegem Anwar Abu, Flusser Hagit, Shorer Zamir, Cohen Eugene, Kachko Leonid, Michaelovsky Analia, Birk Ruth, Koifman Arie, Drabkin Max, Wormser Ohad, Halperin Daniel, Kadir Rotem, Birk Ohad S. Progressive hereditary spastic paraplegia caused by a homozygous KY mutation. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2017;25(8):966–972. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Seelow D, Schuelke M, Hildebrandt F, Nürnberg P. HomozygosityMapper—an interactive approach to homozygosity mapping. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:593–9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Silberstein M, Weissbrod O, Otten L, et al. A system for exact and approximate genetic linkage analysis of SNP data in large pedigrees. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:197–205. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Volodarsky M, Markus B, Cohen I, et al. A deletion mutation in TMEM38B associated with autosomal recessive osteogenesis imperfecta. Hum Mutat. 2013;34:582–6. doi: 10.1002/humu.22274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tsang WY, Wang L, Chen Z, Sánchez I, Dynlacht BD. SCAPER a novel cyclin A-interacting protein that regulates cell cycle progression. J Cell Biol. 2007;178:621–33. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200701166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tsang WY, Dynlacht BD. Double identity of SCAPER: a substrate and regulator of cyclin A/Cdk2. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:702–5. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.6.5611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Goliand I, Nachmias D, Gershony O, Elia N. Inhibition of ESCRT-II-CHMP6 interactions impedes cytokinetic abscission and leads to cell death. Mol Biol Cell. 2014;25:3740–8. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e14-08-1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vangipuram M, Ting D, Kim S, Diaz R, Schüle B. Skin punch biopsy explant culture for derivation of primary human fibroblasts. J Vis Exp. 2013. 10.3791/3779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Witteveen JS, Willemsen MH, Dombroski TCD, et al. Haploinsufficiency of MeCP2-interacting transcriptional co-repressor SIN3A causes mild intellectual disability by affecting the development of cortical integrity. Nat Genet. 2016;48:877–87. doi: 10.1038/ng.3619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mykytyn K, Braun T, Carmi R, et al. Identification of the gene that, when mutated, causes the human obesity syndrome BBS4. Nat Genet. 2001;28:188–91. doi: 10.1038/88925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.ExAC Browser. http://exac.broadinstitute.org/. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
- 24.gnomAD browser. http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
- 25.Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016;536:285–91. doi: 10.1038/nature19057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7:248–9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods. 2014;11:361–2. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.AFC. http://www.allelefrequencycommunity.org/. Accessed 12 Mar 2017.
- 29.Saito M, Kurokawa M, Oda M, et al. ADAMTSL6β protein rescues fibrillin-1 microfibril disorder in a Marfan syndrome mouse model through the promotion of fibrillin-1 assembly. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:38602–13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.243451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Repapi E, Sayers I, Wain LV, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five loci associated with lung function. Nat Genet. 2010;42:36–44. doi: 10.1038/ng.501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wilhelm M, Schlegl J, Hahne H, et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature. 2014;509:582–7. doi: 10.1038/nature13319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim MS, Pinto SM, Getnet D, et al. A draft map of the human proteome. Nature. 2014;509:575–81. doi: 10.1038/nature13302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Human Proteome Map. http://www.humanproteomemap.org/. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
- 34.Arnaiz O, Cohen J, Tassin AM, Koll F. Remodeling Cildb, a popular database for cilia and links for ciliopathies. Cilia. 2015 doi: 10.1186/2046-2530-4-S1-P21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Müller H, Schmidt D, Steinbrink S, et al. Proteomic and functional analysis of the mitotic Drosophila centrosome. EMBO J. 2010;29:3344–57. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu Q, Tan G, Levenkova N, et al. The proteome of the mouse photoreceptor sensory cilium complex. Mol Cell Proteom. 2007;6:1299–317. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700054-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Carss KJ, Arno G, Erwood M, et al. Comprehensive rare variant analysis via whole-genome sequencing to determine the molecular pathology of inherited retinal disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100:75–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Najmabadi H, Hu H, Garshasbi M, et al. Deep sequencing reveals 50 novel genes for recessive cognitive disorders. Nature. 2011;478:57–63. doi: 10.1038/nature10423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tatour Y, Sanchez-Navarro I, Chervinsky E, et al. Mutations in SCAPER cause autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa with intellectual disability. J Med Genet. 2017;54:698–704. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hill W.D., Davies G., Liewald D.C., Payton A., McNeil C.J., Whalley L.J., Horan M., Ollier W., Starr J.M., Pendleton N., Hansel N.K., Montgomery G.W., Medland S.E., Martin N.G., Wright M.J., Bates T.C., Deary I.J. Examining non-syndromic autosomal recessive intellectual disability (NS-ARID) genes for an enriched association with intelligence differences. Intelligence. 2016;54:80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Alkuraya FS. Discovery of mutations for Mendelian disorders. Hum Genet. 2016;135:615–23. doi: 10.1007/s00439-016-1664-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.He M, Subramanian R, Bangs F, et al. The kinesin-4 protein Kif7 regulates mammalian Hedgehog signalling by organizing the cilium tip compartment. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:663–72. doi: 10.1038/ncb2988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Goshima G, Wollman R, Goodwin SS, et al. Genes required for mitotic spindle assembly in drosophila S2 cells. Science (80-) 2007;316:417–21. doi: 10.1126/science.1141314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.De Boer L, Oakes V, Beamish H, et al. Cyclin A/cdk2 coordinates centrosomal and nuclear mitotic events. Oncogene. 2008;27:4261–8. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Meraldi P, Lukas J, Fry AM, Bartek J, Nigg EA. Centrosome duplication in mammalian somatic cells requires E2F and Cdk2-cyclin A. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:88–93. doi: 10.1038/10054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hein MY, Hubner NC, Poser I, et al. A human interactome in three quantitative dimensions organized by stoichiometries and abundances. Cell. 2015;163:712–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Masuda H, Mori R, Yukawa M, Toda T. Fission yeast MOZART1/Mzt1 is an essential -tubulin complex component required for complex recruitment to the microtubule organizing center, but not its assembly. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24:2894–906. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e13-05-0235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kollman JM, Merdes A, Mourey L, Agard DA. Microtubule nucleation by γ-tubulin complexes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12:709–21. doi: 10.1038/nrm3209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sánchez I, Dynlacht BD. Cilium assembly and disassembly. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18:711–7. doi: 10.1038/ncb3370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.