Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Clinical Medicine
. 2019 Aug 22;8(9):1283. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091283

Acute Severe Asthma in Adolescent and Adult Patients: Current Perspectives on Assessment and Management

Eirini Kostakou 1,, Evangelos Kaniaris 1,, Effrosyni Filiou 1, Ioannis Vasileiadis 1, Paraskevi Katsaounou 2, Eleni Tzortzaki 3, Nikolaos Koulouris 1, Antonia Koutsoukou 1, Nikoletta Rovina 1,*
PMCID: PMC6780340  PMID: 31443563

Abstract

Asthma is a chronic airway inflammatory disease that is associated with variable expiratory flow, variable respiratory symptoms, and exacerbations which sometimes require hospitalization or may be fatal. It is not only patients with severe and poorly controlled asthma that are at risk for an acute severe exacerbation, but this has also been observed in patients with otherwise mild or moderate asthma. This review discusses current aspects on the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of acute severe asthma exacerbations and provides the current perspectives on the management of acute severe asthma attacks in the emergency department and the intensive care unit.

Keywords: acute severe asthma exacerbation, near fatal asthma

1. Introduction

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways, a common and potentially serious chronic disease that is associated with variable expiratory flow, airway wall thickening, respiratory symptoms, and exacerbations (flare-ups), which sometimes require hospitalization and may be fatal [1]. In reference to asthma, an exacerbation is defined as an event characterized by change from the patient’s previous status, including a progressive increase in relevant symptoms and a decrease in respiratory function. The latter can be quantified by respiratory function measurements such as peak expiratory flow (PEF), and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), which when compared with the patient’s previous or predicted values, reflect the deterioration in expiratory airflow, the prominent pathophysiological effect of an asthma attack.

The most common causes of these exacerbations are exposure to external agents, such as indoor and outdoor allergens [2,3,4], air pollutants [5], and respiratory tract infections (primarily viral mainly human rhinovirus (HRV) [6,7]. The mechanisms by which these environmental stimuli and viruses initiate asthma or cause worsening of the disease are under research.

Asthma exacerbations may also be triggered by exercise [8], weather changes [9], foods [10,11], additives, drugs [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14], and extreme emotional expressions [15,16]. The physiological hallmarks of asthma are airway inflammation, airway remodeling and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) [17]. Exposure to the above-mentioned external stimuli and specifically to inhaled allergens is capable of inducing an inflammatory response in sensitized individuals and as a result to lead to exacerbations [18,19]. A hypothesis explaining this fact is that the inflammatory response resulting from inhaled allergen may drive BHR directly, or induce structural changes in the airway leading to persistent BHR [17,20]. Experimental mouse models of asthma have shown that allergen exposure protocols induce immune-mediated airway inflammation defined by: elevated levels of asthma biomarkers (IgE, the T-helper cell 2 (Th2) cytokines, interleukins (IL)-4, -5 and -13, and eosinophils), induction of airway remodeling (increases in airway smooth muscle, collagen deposition and goblet cell hyperplasia), and BHR that is sustained after the resolution of eosinophilic inflammation [21,22,23].

Other factors that may cause exacerbations are rhinitis [24] or sinusitis [25], polyposis [26], gastroesophageal reflux [27], menstruation [28,29], or even pregnancy [30,31]. They can happen either to patients with known asthma of any level of severity, or less frequently as a first presentation. Exacerbations vary in severity, as well as in response to therapy. This has led to an effort of categorize the severity of these exacerbations. The most frequently proposed categories include elements of the clinical presentation of the asthma patient, as well as a measurement of their respiratory function at the time of the exacerbation. It is of paramount importance for the clinician to distinguish the severe exacerbations, because these are the ones that correlate with worse consequences.

2. Definition of Acute Severe Asthma

The Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines refers to a severe asthma exacerbation describing a patient who talks in words, leans forward, is agitated, uses accessory respiratory muscles, has a respiratory rate > 30/min, heart rate > 120/min, O2 saturation on air < 90% and PEF ≤ 50% of their best or predicted value [1]. According to the 2014 British Guidelines for Asthma, acute severe asthma is defined as the asthma exacerbation that presents with any of the following: PEF 33–50% best or predicted, respiratory rate ≥ 25/min, heart rate ≥ 110/min and inability to complete sentences in one breath [32]. The ATS/ERS task force defines a severe asthma exacerbation by the fact that they require urgent action in order to prevent a serious outcome, such as hospitalization or death from asthma [33]. This task force recommends that the definition of a severe asthma exacerbation for clinical trials should include at least one of the following: (a) use of systemic corticosteroids (tablets, suspension, or injection), or an increase from a stable maintenance dose, for at least three days; and (b) a hospitalization or emergency department visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Although these definitions are not identical, the point remains that identifying this condition is important as it is correlated with worse outcomes and greater risk of needing mechanical ventilation.

There are other entities similar but not identical to that of acute severe asthma that also require precise definitions. Kenyon et al. proposed the term Critical Asthma Syndromes (CAS) to identify any child or adult who is at risk of fatal asthma [34]. This term includes acute severe asthma, refractory asthma, status asthmaticus, and near fatal asthma, all of them conditions that can lead to respiratory exhaustion and arrest. Refractory asthma is, according to a definition set by the Unbiased Biomarkers for the Prediction of Respiratory Disease Outcomes (U-BIOPRED) consortium in 2011, patients with asthma in whom after excluding any alternative diagnoses, after treating comorbidities and removing trigger factors cannot maintain good asthma control, despite high-intensity treatment and confirmed compliance with treatment. These patients have frequent severe exacerbations (≥2 per year), or can only be well when receiving systemic corticosteroids [35]. Near fatal asthma (NFA) is defined as an asthma exacerbation resulting in respiratory arrest requiring mechanical ventilation or a pCO2 ≥ 45 mm Hg. Some writers tend to recognize status asthmaticus and acute severe asthma as the same condition and define it mainly by its response to treatment, thus referring to it as an exacerbation that does not respond to repeated courses of β2-agonist therapy [36].

3. Epidemiology

According to the Global Asthma Report, approximately 334 million people in the world suffer from asthma, thus being the most prevalent chronic respiratory disease, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affecting only half of the aforementioned number of people [37]. However, according to Eurostat [38], in most European countries age standardized asthma admission rates declined from 2001–2005 to 2011–2015, with an over two-fold reduction in some countries. (Figure 1) The latest World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, released in December 2016, present that there were 383,000 deaths due to asthma in 2015. There has been a decrease of almost 26% in the asthma deaths, when comparing 2015 to 1990 [37]. However, international mortality statistics for asthma are limited to those countries reporting detailed causes of death. Figure 2 depicts the age-standardized mortality rates for asthma among countries reporting asthma separately in two recent five-year periods (2001–2005 and 2011–2015) [38].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Age-standardized admission rates for asthma (all ages) in 30 European countries in two time periods: 2001–2005 and 2011–2015. Source: Eurostat updated from ec.europa.eu/Eurostat/web/health/health-care/data/database (version dated November 2017).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Age-standardized mortality rates for asthma (all ages) by country in two time periods: 2001–2005 and 2011–2015. Source: Eurostat updated from ec.europa.eu/Eurostat/web/health/health-care/data/database (version dated November 2017).

Although asthma is a disease not only of low- and lower-middle-income countries, most asthma-related deaths occur in those areas [38]. There is an established connection between asthma deaths and the Socio-Demographic Index (SDI), but interestingly not with SDI and asthma prevalence. A recent study in Brazil demonstrated that urbanization has affected public health, resulting in higher asthma related morbidity and mortality, despite the fact that the urbanized population now has improved access to the health system [39]. There are no accurate figures describing the rate of acute severe asthma, but there are sufficient data regarding the asthma related hospitalizations and asthma related mortality. Recent studies estimate the risk of death of the patients who are hospitalized as a result of asthma exacerbation as less than 0.5% [40,41]. That risk is greater when the patient requires intubation and mechanical ventilation, which underlines the importance of identifying and promptly treating acute severe asthma. Four percent of asthma related hospitalizations result in mechanical ventilation. There is a substantial economic burden associated with asthma hospitalizations, and it has been demonstrated that in the US in 2012 the overall cost was more than 2 billion dollars, which is a significant percentage (more than 1/3) of the annual asthma related expenditure [41]. Middle aged women are more likely to get hospitalized with asthma related morbidities [41].

With regards to the identified phenotypes of asthma, data from a recent cluster analysis from Japan revealed a wide heterogeneity among asthma patients who presented and were admitted with severe and life-threatening asthma in 17 institutions across the country [42]. Another recent group-based trajectory analysis on patients with problematic and uncontrolled asthma, showed that near fatal events were noted in all groups, but were more frequent in patients with persistent frequent exacerbations [43]. It is not only patients with severe and poorly controlled asthma who are at risk for having an acute severe asthma exacerbation, but this has been observed as well in patients with otherwise mild or moderate asthma. The current literature describes two distinct clinico-pathophysiological entities of acute severe asthma attacks that present at the emergency department: the slow onset, late arrival and the sudden onset fatal asthma. It has been estimated that the majority (80–85%) of asthma-related fatalities belong to the slow onset group. These patients may have symptoms and uncontrolled disease for several days prior to the presentation with acute severe asthma. Sudden onset has been defined as severe airflow obstruction established after 1–3 h of symptom presentation. Barr et al. reported that patients presenting with sudden onset asthma, were more likely to have been exposed to an exacerbation trigger such as a respiratory allergen, exercise and psychosocial stress and less often respiratory infection and had greater improvement when compared with the slow onset cohort [44]. A retrospective cohort study in the United States demonstrated evidence that the sudden-onset patients were older, were more likely to present during the night and early morning hours at the emergency department, more often required intubation and mechanical ventilation, and had higher rate of ICU admission, but, on the other hand, had shorter hospital stay [45]. In this study the sudden onset cohort was only 6% of 1260 patients in 30 hospitals.

4. Risk Factors for Asthma Exacerbations

Many factors have been studied regarding their correlation with acute severe asthma and asthma related death (Table 1). In adults, asthma exacerbations are more often in females [46,47]. This is difficult to be explained since female asthmatics have lower levels of total serum IgE [48] and the incidence of atopy is actually lower in comparison to males [49]. A possible explanation could have to do with the connection between asthma worsening and the menses, which is a recognized contributing factor of asthma worsening [50]. Furthermore, pregnancy in asthmatic women is a condition that requires special considerations, considering the effect of the disease, as well as the medication on the mother and the fetus. Pregnancy is not always correlated with worse asthma control, although there seems to be a correlation between asthma severity and morbidities and exacerbations during pregnancy [51]. There has been reported a cluster of obese females with late-onset corticosteroid asthma with frequent exacerbations although they preserve a relatively good baseline lung function [52].

Table 1.

Risk factors for fatal asthma exacerbations.

A History of Near Fatal Asthma Requiring Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation
Hospitalization or emergency care visits for asthma in the past year
Currently using or having recently stopped using oral steroids
Not currently using inhaled steroids
SABA over-use (more than one canister of salbutamol/month (or equivalent))
History of psychiatric disease or psychosocial problems
Female Sex
Age > 40 years
Smoking history
Poor perception of airflow limitation
Hyperinflation in chest radiograph
Poor adherence with asthma medications and/or poor adherence
(or lack of) with a written asthma action plan
Food allergy

SABA, short acting beta agonist. Adapted from Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines 2018 [1].

Obesity per se has also been correlated with worse asthma control, as well as more frequent and severe exacerbations. This correlation is strengthened by the apparent effect of weight loss and bariatric surgery on better control and less exacerbations and hospitalizations [53].

Ethnicity and socioeconomic status [54,55] are robust determinants of asthma exacerbation rates. African Americans have 4.2- and 2.8-fold higher rates of emergency room visits and hospitalizations for asthma exacerbation, respectively, compared to Caucasians, followed by Hispanics [39]. A possible explanation for these differences could be the poorer adherence to treatment [56] and the poorer quality of healthcare in ethnic minorities [57]. A significant genetic component might also contribute, since an increased risk of exacerbations has been documented in males with African ancestry [58].

Severe exacerbations may occur in patients with mild or well controlled asthma [59,60]. However, poor asthma control is an independent risk factor for future acute exacerbations [61,62,63,64,65]. A history of a recent exacerbation is the strongest predictor of future exacerbations in children and adults with asthma [66,67,68,69]. A small percentage of asthmatics exhibit severe disease exacerbations, despite the fact that they are already under treatment with high doses of inhaled and/or systemic corticosteroids [70,71]. These patients suffering from severe asthma (SA) that is poorly controlled and in some cases life-threatening [34,35], although comprising a small percentage of the total asthma population (5–10%), they denote 50% of total healthcare costs, rendering SA a substantial health and socio-economic burden [36,37].

Finally, poor perception of airflow limitation may affect patients with a history of near-fatal asthma and appears to be more common in males [72,73]. On the other hand, regular or overuse of short acting beta agonists (SABA) causes down regulation of beta receptors and leads to lack of response, leading in turn to overuse [74]. Overuse may also be habitual. Dispensing ≥3 SABA canisters/year (average 1.5 puffs/day or more) is associated with increased risk of emergency department visits or hospitalizations no matter what the severity of asthma is [75], while dispensing ≥12 canisters/year (1/month) increases the risk of death [76]. Incorrect inhaler technique (seen in up to 80% of asthma patients) [77], as well as suboptimal adherence to treatment (seen in up to 75% of patients) are important modifiable factors contributing to symptoms and exacerbations [77].

There has been a lot of interest regarding the effect of psychological factors on the risk for fatal or near fatal asthma, this however has not been established, as shown in a 2007 systematic review by Alvarez et al. [78]. Anxiety, depression and socio-economic problems are very common in patients with difficult to treat asthma and contribute to poor symptom control, poor adherence to treatment and impaired quality of life [79].

Obesity and other comorbidities other than the psychiatric conditions already mentioned that contribute to persistent symptoms, exacerbations and poor quality of life include chronic rhinosinusistis [80], inducible laryngeal obstruction (often referred as vocal cord dysfunction, VCD), gastroesophageal regurgitation disorder (GERD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obstructive sleep apnea, bronchiectasis, cardiac disease, and kyphosis due to osteoporosis (followed by corticosteroid overuse) [80].

5. Factors that Trigger Asthma Exacerbations

Severe exacerbations usually occur in response to a variety of external agents (e.g., respiratory pathogens, allergens, air pollutants, smoke, and cold or dry air).

5.1. Respiratory Pathogens

Viral respiratory infections are the most common triggers for a severe asthma exacerbation, comprising up to 76–80% of the causes of an acute asthma exacerbation in adults [81]. Human rhinovirus (RV) (types A and C), influenza virus (types A and B), para-influenza virus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are frequent causes of an acute exacerbation and hospitalization [56,82]. Coronaviruses, meta-pneumoviruses, bocaviruses, and adenoviruses may also trigger a severe acute exacerbation, however to a lesser extent [57]. During the 2009 H1N1 influenza A pandemic, mortality and admissions to the ICU with H1N1 infections were frequently associated with asthma [82,83]. In contrast to other respiratory viruses (i.e., RSV and Influenza Virus), RV does not exert a definite cytopathic effect [84]; instead, it compromises the function of the epithelial barrier through the release of reactive oxygen species during viral replication [85]. During this process, the induction of immune and adaptive immune response activates the synthesis and early secretion of IFNs and other pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-10, IL-6, IL-8, RANTES, and ENA-78) [86], which play a significant role in the protective mechanisms against viral infection [87,88]. There is evidence that in asthmatic patients there is dysregulated immune response against RV [89]. Several studies have demonstrated the implication of interferons in the susceptibility to asthma exacerbations in children and adults in the context of a viral respiratory infection. Miller et al. [90] showed that RV was related to asthma exacerbation with the implication of IFN III. Similarly, Jones et al. [91] documented an increased susceptibility to severe respiratory viral infections during the first years of life through dysregulated type III IFN responses, while recent studies [92,93] document a varying susceptibility to asthma exacerbations depending on the type and level of expression of cytokines and IFNs upon viral infection. Finally, Fedele et al. [94] documented that RV infection more frequently induces a Th2-mediated immune response than RSV infection, justifying the higher incidence of asthma prevalence after RV infections.

Bacterial infections may also trigger acute exacerbations, usually on the basis of impaired anti-bacterial defense after a viral respiratory infection [95]. There are bidirectional interactions between viruses and bacteria that seem to have an impact on the severity of asthma as well as the likelihood of an acute exacerbation. Viral infections facilitate the disruption of airway epithelial layers and the expression of airway receptors that bacteria use in order to invade [96]. Furthermore, in the presence of co-infection, an increased release of inflammatory cytokines and mediators is induced, heightening the burden of inflammation and predisposing to a higher risk of exacerbations [97]. Specifically, co-infections of respiratory viruses and Moraxella catarrhalis, Hemophilus influenza, and/or Streptococcus pneumonia have a greater impact on the risk for more severe acute asthma exacerbations [97]. The clarification of the mechanisms implicate the case of co-infections on inter-relationship for providing evidence for potential novel therapeutic targets that may prevent acute asthma exacerbations.

5.2. Allergen Sensitization and Viral Infections

Evidence support the theory that allergic sensitization increases the susceptibility for viral infections and probably their ability to provoke further inflammation [98].

For example, it has been shown that the combination of RV infection and direct exposure to allergens cause epithelial cell production of IL-25 and IL-33 in the airways, mediators involved in Th2 type inflammation and remodeling [99,100]. Moreover, in a murine model of asthma RV infection acquired in early life stages in mice induced an IL-13- and IL-25-mediated Th2 immune response with parallel suppression of IFN-γ, IL-12, and TNF-α [101], with detrimental changes in airway homeostasis, consisting of innate lymphoid cell expansion, mucous hypersecretion, and airway responsiveness. Furthermore, recurrent RV infections stimulate airway remodeling by upregulating molecules such as VEGF and TGF-β, as well as chemoattractants for airway smooth muscles (i.e., CCL5, CXCL8, and CXCL10) [102,103].

Other data show that the occupancy of the IgE membrane receptors inhibits antiviral induction of interferon-a from plasmacytoid dendritic cells leading to subsequent increased susceptibility to viral infections and asthma exacerbations. It is noteworthy that an inverse correlation between interferon levels and airway eosinophilia, IL-4 levels, and total serum IgE was observed [104].

5.3. Allergen Exposure, Tobacco Smoke, and Environmental Pollutants

Indoor or outdoor exposure to allergens may lead to poor asthma control and severe asthma exacerbations in sensitized patients [105,106,107,108,109]. Allergens activate mast cells to release histamine, prostaglandin D2, and cysteinyl leukotrienes. These induce inflammatory responses, airway smooth muscle constriction, increased microvascular permeability, and mucus secretion, diminishing at the same time the innate immune responses and subsequently increasing the susceptibility to viral infections [106,107]. Of great importance is the mold sensitization, which has been associated with the phenotype of severe asthma and with severe asthma attacks. High airborne concentrations of mold have been associated with increased emergency visits for asthma exacerbations [108]. Specifically, Alternaria is associated with highly increased risk (almost 200-fold) of severe exacerbations and need for ICU admittance in both children and adults [109]. Furthermore, cockroach and mouse antigens are associated with early wheeze and atopy in an inner-city birth cohort [110].

Exposure to multiple allergens has been documented as being a common feature in several studies of indoor exposure [111,112]. Salo et al. [112] showed that more than 50% of subjects were sensitized at least to six detectable allergens, while 45% were sensitized at least to three allergens. In a study from China, Kim et al. [111] showed sensitization to one or more allergens in almost 50% of the subjects with most common sensitizers being shellfish, dust mites, and cockroaches. However, less than 1% of these subjects had clinically important food allergy or asthma.

Indoor exposure to endotoxin and pollutants (such as particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide) has also been found to increase the risk of severe exacerbations in children with asthma and the use of particulate filters seem effective in reducing exposure levels and therefore, asthma control [113,114]. Differences in allergic sensitizations by race and genetic ancestry have also been documented [115], and along with the location of residence seem to be more important predictors of allergic sensitization than genetic ancestry. This fact points out the hypothesis that disparities in allergic sensitization by race may be observed as an effect of environmental rather than genetic factors.

Tobacco smoke remains one of the most significant triggers of disease, despite increased public awareness of the detrimental effects of smoking. Asthma patients who smoke have more frequent emergency department visits and hospitalizations for an exacerbation than asthma patients who do not smoke [116]. Several studies of patients with allergic rhinitis have shown the significant effect of smoking on the development of asthma. Polosa et al. [117] showed that in a 10-year period smoking had a dose-related effect on the development of asthma in allergic rhinitic patients resulting in an odds ratio of 2.05 for incident asthma for smoking 10 pack-years, and 3.7 and 5.05 for 11–20 and >20 pack-years, respectively.

Second-hand smoke is also associated with deteriorated lung function, poor treatment response, and frequent emergency department visits for asthma [118,119,120]. The measurement and monitoring of cotinine levels in serum, urine, and saliva have become a useful tool in determining passive smoke exposure as well as in evaluating uncontrolled asthma. Hassanzad et al. demonstrated that higher cotinine levels were associated with a higher risk for severe asthma. [121]. Increasing interest has also raised on the potential hazards of third-hand smoke (THS) in children. THS is residual nicotine and other chemical pollutants remaining in the indoor environment and on household surfaces for weeks to months after active tobacco smoking has stopped. It seems that young children may be more susceptible to the adverse effects of THS exposure since they crawl and tend to ingest several items from the surrounding [122]. However, more research is needed to assess the real extent of the hazards arising from THS.

Environmental pollutants, such as particulate matter, ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and diesel exhaust, may act synergistically with viral infections to cause asthma exacerbations [123] The effects of air pollution on severe asthma exacerbations may be affected by other exposures, such as stress, vitamin D insufficiency, and seasonality [4,5]. This was demonstrated in a study of children aged 0–18 years in California, where particulate matter (size, 2.5 mm; PM2.5) and ozone were associated with severe asthma exacerbations in the warm season, while in the cool season exacerbations were associated with articulate matter of PM2.5, carbon monoxide, and NOx (NO1NO2) [124,125].

6. Genetic Associations with Asthma Exacerbations

Genome-wide association studies of asthma in children and adults have identified polymorphisms for IL33, IL1RL1/IL18R1, HLA-DQ, SMAD3, and IL2RB9 and the locus on chromosome 17q21 including the genes ZPBP2, GSDMB, and ORMDL3 that are implicated in epithelial barrier function and innate and adaptive immune responses in asthma [126,127]. Genetic variants in the class I major histocompatibility complex-restricted T cell-associated molecule gene (CRTAM) was associated with an increased rate of asthma exacerbations in children with low circulating vitamin D levels [128]. One of the most well replicated genetic regions affecting asthma risk is the 17q12–21 locus, which includes ORMDL3 and GSDMB. The TT allele at rs7216389 is associated with an odds ratio of 1.6 of having an asthma exacerbation when compared with the CC allele [129].

Furthermore, polymorphisms for FCER2 have been associated with decreased FCER2 gene expression, increased serum IgE levels and risk of severe exacerbations [130]. Association was also found between variants in chitinase 3-like 1 (CHI3L1; YKL-40) and asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations [131,132]. Specifically, studies in murine models of asthma implicate YKL-40 in IgE induction, antigen sensitization, dendritic cell accumulation and activation, and alternative macrophage activation [133], while purified YKL-40 induces interleukin-8 secretion in bronchial epithelial cells [134].

7. Pathogenesis-Immunobiology

Asthma is a heterogeneous condition with complex observable characteristics (phenotype) and their underlying mechanisms (endotype), resulting from complex host–environment interactions (Figure 3). Usually, inflammatory cells are present and activated in the airways of severe asthmatics and persist despite treatment, but their relevance to lack of control and disease severity is largely unknown. These cells include not only eosinophils and neutrophils, but also T-lymphocytes, mast cells, macrophages and airway structural cells which are also crucially involved in the inflammatory reaction and remodeling in asthma. Although it is well accepted that asthma is characterized by eosinophilic infiltration, inflammatory phenotypes of severe asthma can be characterized by persistence of eosinophilic or neutrophilic infiltration, as well as by absence of inflammatory infiltration (paucigranulocytic) [135,136]. Depending on the type of immune cell responses implicated in disease pathogenesis, asthma endotypes are categorized as type 2 asthma, characterized predominantly by T helper type 2 (Th2) cell-mediated inflammation and non-type 2 asthma, associated with Th1 and/or Th17 cell inflammation [137,138]. Eosinophilic, Th2 airway inflammation is present in around 50% of adults with asthma, and is estimated to be higher in the absence of corticosteroids [139].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Pathogenesis of acute exacerbations in asthma.

Th2 mediated airway inflammation plays a central role in the pathophysiology of allergic eosinophilic asthma. The allergic sensitization of dendritic cells (DCs) in the presence of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), induces Th2 lymphocytes to produce cytokines such as interleukins IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 [140]. Chemokines such as eotaxin 1, 2, 3 (CCL11, CCL24 and CCL26, respectively) induce through their receptors (chemokine receptor 3, CCR3) [141] and other chemoattractant agents, such as mast cell derived prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) eosinophil recruitment in the mucosa. Furthermore, IL-4 and IL-13 activate B lymphocytes to produce allergen specific IgE, which binds to the high affinity mast cell receptors, leading to their activation [140].

In non-allergic eosinophilic asthma, airway epithelial damage caused by pollution and pathogens leads to IL-5 and IL-13 production by innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s), in response to PGD2, TSLP, IL-25 and IL-33 [142]. ILC2s and Th2 cells are a significant source of type 2 cytokines and play a role in eosinophilic inflammatory response, allergy and remodeling in asthma [143,144]. Increased circulating and sputum IL-5 and IL-13-producing ILC2s were detected in severe asthma compared to mild asthma patients [145]. Furthermore, increased numbers of IL-5+ and IL-13+ ILC2s were found in sputum after allergen challenge in asthma patients [146]. IL-13-expressing ILC2 and Th2 cells are also responsible for bronchial epithelial tight junction barrier leakiness in asthma patients [147,148].

Chronic inflammation that characterizes severe asthma leads to tissue remodeling, fixed airway obstruction, and no response to bronchodilatory treatment [149]. It seems that chronic persistent inflammation and the release of a plethora of cytokines (IL-5, IL-9, IL-13, osteopontin, and activin-A9), chemokines (CCR3 dependent) and growth factors (TGF-β1 and VEGF) from inflammatory and epithelial cells play a central role in the establishment of airway remodeling [150].

Physiologically, airway inflammation is counteracted by inhibitory molecules and suppressor cells including CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) [151,152] which becomes visible upon Treg depletion which causes spontaneous asthma-like airway pathology [153]. Patients suffering from allergic asthma have reduced numbers of Tregs that furthermore show impaired suppressive capacity [154,155,156,157]. Some currently applied therapies aim at enhancing Treg cell number and function [154,158], whereas adoptive transfer of Tregs can suppress both the priming and the effector phase of allergic airway inflammation in experimental models of murine asthma [159,160,161].

Mixed eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation of the airways are commonly found in severe asthma [162] and this mixed inflammatory pattern can be a biomarker of the most severe types of the disease [163]. Elevated sputum neutrophil counts were found to be associated with more severe asthma phenotypes and with poor response to treatment with steroids in a cluster analysis from the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP) [164]. Airway neutrophilia has been associated with persistent airflow obstruction in patients with refractory asthma and a progressive loss of lung function [165] Furthermore, it is associated with higher bronchial hyperresponsiveness independent of eosinophilia [166].

It is suggested that increased neutrophil counts in peripheral blood and sputum could be secondary to the treatment with corticosteroids, since the anti-apoptotic effect of corticosteroids on neutrophils is well established [167]. However, neutrophilic inflammation may be observed regardless of corticosteroid treatment in patients with refractory asthma or in patients experiencing acute severe exacerbations [168,169,170].

Neutrophil recruitment and activation into the airways have been associated with stimulation of toll-like receptors (TLR) signaling and activation of innate immunity, causing a shift toward Th1 and Th17 responses. This process leads to increased production of interleukin (IL)-8, IL-17A, neutrophil elastase, and matrix metalloproteinase 9 [171]. Neutrophils are triggered by IL-8 to produce enzymes and other factors that contribute to eosinophil activity [171]. Evidence suggests that neutrophil subsets may mediate differential effects on immune surveillance and microbial killing. A variety of epithelial insults (ozone, bacteria, and viruses) induce secretion of chemokines and cytokines that promote neutrophil trafficking. Neutrophils primarily traffic to inflamed sites and then secrete granular enzymes, reactive oxygen species, and proteins to eliminate invading bacteria, fungal elements, and viruses. Undoubtedly, neutrophils play pivotal roles in innate immunity [172]. During asthma exacerbations, the presence of chemokines and cytokines (IL-8 and IL-17A) prolongs neutrophils’ lifespan thus enabling them to migrate from tissue to the systemic circulation or to lymph nodes to modulate adaptive immune responses, Figure 4. The combined functions of these cytokines and activated enzymes promote airway structures to contribute to the lower FEV1, remodeling and fixed airway obstruction seen in adult patients with severe neutrophilic asthma [173].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The role of the neutrophil in modulating local inflammatory responses.

8. Biomarkers Correlating with Risk of Asthma Exacerbations

The better understanding of the pathophysiology of asthma has led to the recognition of biomarkers with a potential to predict severe exacerbations. Among T2-high asthma biomarkers sputum and blood eosinophil count, serum IgE, serum periostin levels, and levels of nitric oxide in exhaled breath (FeNO) seem to associate with the severity of asthma and the rate and severity of exacerbations.

Sputum eosinophils have been correlated with increased asthma severity and airway responsiveness. Increased sputum eosinophil counts have been used as a measure of better response to corticosteroid treatment, in terms of reducing exacerbations. In the systematic review by Petsky et al. [174] it was demonstrated that asthma treatment guided by sputum eosinophil counts led to a significant reduction in the exacerbation rate. In children, elevated blood eosinophil count is associated with persistent asthma symptoms, and responsiveness to treatment can be predicted by the number of eosinophils without having set though a validated cut-off point [175]

Baseline blood eosinophil count is being used as a biomarker that predicts the clinical efficacy of anti-IL5 therapy in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma with a history of exacerbations [176,177,178], with eosinophil cut-offs set to ≥150 to ≥300 cells/μL [179] in mepolizumab trials. It has been demonstrated, however, that higher eosinophil counts than these cut-offs are associated with poor asthma control and more severe exacerbations [180]. In the study of Zieger et al. [181], a blood eosinophil count > 400 cells/μL was found to be an independent risk factor for exacerbations, emergency department visits or hospitalizations for asthma. Although blood eosinophil count levels predict the rate of exacerbations, this is not the case with sputum eosinophil count [179,182].

Total serum IgE level is a biomarker used in severe allergic asthma for the treatment with anti-IgE antibody (omalizumab). In association with elevated levels of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) (>19.5 parts per billion) and blood eosinophil count (>260/μL), it significantly predicts which patients with severe allergic asthma will respond to omalizumab, reducing the exacerbation rate [183].

The production of nitric oxide in the airways indicates Th2 type inflammation [184,185] and FeNO is a noninvasive biomarker of eosinophilic airway inflammation. There are contradictory data on whether FeNO has the ability to classify asthma severity [186,187,188]. Studies have shown that FeNO can predict accelerated decline of lung function [189], asthma relapse after corticosteroid treatment discontinuation [184], and degree of airway inflammation [190]. However, its ability to be used as a biomarker to predict exacerbations seems to be limited, even when combined with clinical features [191]. In the study by van der Valk et al. [192], repeated measurements of FENO predicted moderate asthma exacerbations (not requiring systemic corticosteroids or hospitalizations) but not severe asthma exacerbations.

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) has been used in assessing exacerbations. Low EBC pH, various cytokines, chemokines, NO-related products, leukotrienes, and volatile organic compounds, better in combination, have been used as biomarkers associated with clinical characteristics and exacerbations [193].

Serum periostin is a biomarker of allergic eosinophilic asthma and has been used in the identification of patients who will respond to Th2-directed therapies [194]. However, limited data suggest that the serum periostin level predicts asthma exacerbations [195]. Sputum periostin, on the other hand, is associated with persistent airflow limitation, eosinophilic asthma refractory to ICS [196], while it is a potential marker for airway remodeling, as well [197,198].

There is an increasing need for developing biomarkers that will guide clinicians in the management of asthma, in terms of better and easier phenotyping asthma, predicting exacerbations, and treatment response.

9. Pathophysiology

Acute severe asthma commonly presents with abnormal arterial gas exchange. Arterial hypoxemia is largely attributed to ventilation/perfusion mismatch (V/Q mismatch). Hypercapnia, on the other hand, is not only present due to V/Q mismatch, but also due to respiratory muscle fatigue leading to alveolar hypoventilation. Trying to assess the exact profile of the V/Q mismatch that characterizes acute severe asthma, studies have demonstrated that although in asthma patients there is a wide spectrum of V/Q abnormalities, the most common in acute severe asthma (ASA) patients is having increased blood flow, in the context of high cardiac output, distributed in alveolar spaces with low ventilation and remarkably low V/Q ratios [199]. The pattern of ventilation-perfusion is bimodal in acute severe asthma, ranging from normally perfused areas to areas of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction.

With regards to the mechanics of the respiratory system, acute asthma exacerbation is characterized by reversible bronchoconstriction and increased airway resistance, followed by low flow rates, premature small airway closure, decreased elastic recoil, pulmonary hyperinflation and increased work of breathing. There is a substantial decrease in the FEV1 and the PEF of the patients, whereas the residual volume may increase as much as 400% of the normal and the functional residual capacity may even reach double the normal values [199]. In severe asthma exacerbations, total lung capacity (TLC) is also increasing. These changes in lung volumes help constricted airways remain open. During passive expiration of the lungs, the driving forces of the respiratory system are the elastic forces. The lower the elastic forces are, or the higher the resistive forces, the longer will the time needed to full expiration of the inspired tidal volume be, characteristic that may be quantified by a long expiratory time constant of the respiratory system. Incomplete exhalation of delivered tidal volume makes inspiration begin at a volume at which respiratory system exhibits a positive recoil pressure. The presence of flow at the end of the expiration is due to the presence of positive alveolar pressure at the end of expiration. This process is called dynamic hyperinflation and the positive end-expiratory alveolus pressure associated with higher relaxation volume is called intrinsic (auto) Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) [200] (Figure 5). Dynamic hyperinflation depends on the expiratory time constant, expiratory flow limitation, expiratory time, inspiratory muscle activity during exhalation, tidal volume, and external flow resistance [201]. Although this initially may act in favor of the patient, by reducing the resistive work of breathing, the thorax and lungs increase in volume, length–tension relationships of the respiratory muscles shorten and the strength of contraction eventually diminishes. As the severe exacerbation remains unresponsive, expiratory and accessory muscles become active, the work of breathing increases and fatigue is a serious and potentially fatal possibility, as it further compromises respiratory function and deteriorates respiratory failure. Bronchospasm and increased resistance, mucous and compression of the peripheral airways from auto-PEEP, lead to significant heterogeneity of the lung. Normal lung units coexist with pathological lung units creating a variety of many different time constants across the lung.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Dynamic hyperinflation during exacerbation.

Hemodynamic compromise is another important feature of a severe asthma attack that leads to significant dynamic hyperinflation. The development of positive intrathoracic pressures lead to decrease of the right heart output by decreasing right heart preload (venous return and end–diastolic volume of the right heart) and increasing right heart afterload (vascular pulmonary resistance). The decreased right heart output in parallel with the diastolic dysfunction of the left heart (caused by shifting the intraventricular septum towards the left ventricle) and its incomplete filling, lead to a significant reduction of the arterial systolic pressure in inspiration and the presence of pulsus paradoxus sign [202] (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Pathophysiological changes due to dynamic hyperinflation.

Thus, due to uncontrolled or difficult to treat dynamic hyperinflation, a patient with asthma can be drowsy, confused or agitated, or may present with paradoxical thoracic-abdominal movement, with absent of wheeze in lung auscultation, bradycardia or with pulsus paradoxus. This patient is near respiratory arrest status and endotracheal intubation. Mechanical ventilation and admission to an ICU may be imminent [203].

10. Clinical Assessment

Identification of severe asthma exacerbations is of outmost importance, as they are related with worse outcomes and require close observation and aggressive management. A brief interview with the patient is necessary to determine certain features in the patient’s history that need to be looked into closely, because current literature identifies them as factors that increase asthma-related death. Hospital and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, as well as mechanical ventilation due to an asthma exacerbation has been shown to significantly increase the risk for a new episode of near fatal and fatal asthma [204]. It is also very important to obtain a detailed description of the patient’s medication history. Medications that play a significant role in the prediction of asthma related morbidities and death are inhaled and systematic corticosteroids, as well as the use of beta agonists. In this context, not currently using inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), currently using or having recently discontinued treatment with oral corticosteroids (OCS), as well as documented overuse of short acting β agonists (SABAs) are all factors related with an increased risk for asthma associated morbidity and mortality [205,206]. Elements from the medication history may also conceal clues that may suggest inadequate treatment, or even poor adherence to a prescribed treatment plan. The lack of a written asthma plan and socioeconomic factors are also associated with a greater risk for a severe exacerbation [207].

Patients suffering from an asthma exacerbation may present with a variety of signs and symptoms [208] (Figure 7). Dyspnea, chest tightness, cough and wheezing are few of those, but there is wide heterogeneity in the asthmatic patient presentation. Features that characterize acute severe asthma are agitation, drowsiness or signs of confusion, significant breathlessness at rest, with the patient talking in words, tachypnea of more than 30 breaths per minute, use of accessory respiratory muscles, tachycardia of >120 beats per minute and pulsus paradoxus. Moreover, it is crucial to identify signs that indicate an imminent respiratory arrest, such as paradoxical thoraco-abdominal movement, silent chest with absence of wheeze, bradycardia, while the absence of pulsus paradoxus might imply muscle fatigue [208]. Upon examining the patient with acute severe asthma, apart from recognizing the signs that indicate severity, it is imperative to diagnose any pathology that might attenuate the exacerbation and requires specific treatment. Such entities are pneumothorax and pneumo-mediastinum, and pneumonia. At the same time, the clinician needs to exclude conditions that may mimic the symptoms of an asthma attack, such as cardiogenic pulmonary edema, exacerbation of chronic obstructive disease, airway obstruction caused by a foreign body or an intraluminal mass, pulmonary embolism, hyperventilation syndrome and vocal cord dysfunction [209,210,211].

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommendations for the management of asthma exacerbations in acute care facility. PEF: Peak expiratory flow; FEV1: Forced expiratory volume in one second; SABA, short acting beta 2 agonists; ICU, Intensive Care Unit.

Although lung function measurements are less sensitive than the history of symptoms, during an asthma exacerbation, serial PEF and FEV1 measurements are more objective and reliable indicators of severity and should remain part of the initial assessment of an asthma patient presenting to the emergency department according to current guidelines [1,2]. Regarding PEF, the cut-off value of 50% of the patient’s best or predicted value is within the definition of an acute severe asthma episode, and requires greater attention and action. Moreover, a value of less than 33% of their best or predicted value is an indicator of life-threatening asthma. Serial monitoring of PEF may also assist the decision of either discharging the patient, should this be accompanied with a clinical improvement, or for ICU referral if the values are continuously deteriorating despite initial appropriate treatment. There is certainly a concern regarding the safety of this test in the setting of an acute exacerbation in the emergency department, and it should be performed with caution and continuous observation of the patient.

Further laboratory testing is not necessary for every patient that presents to the emergency department with an exacerbation. Chest radiographs are advised when the clinician needs to exclude conditions such as pneumonia, pneumothorax or atelectasis, but not for all patients. Arterial blood gas analysis should be performed on all patients that are critically ill, and/or are desaturating less than 92% despite treatment [212]. By performing arterial blood gas analysis, the clinician will be able to assess not only hypoxemia and the trend of PaCO2, but also acid base disturbances, such as respiratory acidosis and lactic acidosis which are common on acute severe asthma [213]. Further investigations may include total white blood cell count, to evaluate the potential of infection, levels of brain natriuretic peptide to exclude the presence of congestive heart failure and electrolyte level measurement.

11. Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Management

Most current guidelines regarding asthma exacerbations highlight the necessity of supplying the asthma patient with a written plan of action appropriate for their level of control, which will lead to early recognition and management of their exacerbations [1,2]. It is of outmost importance that the patients become educated on when to seek help, during the event of an acute exacerbation. In primary care and further in the emergency department or the hospital ward, a severe asthma attack needs to be identified within a short time period in order for the correct action to be taken. A severe exacerbation of asthma is a life-threatening medical emergency, thus being crucial to transfer the patient to an acute care facility, once such a condition is identified, ensuring the patient’s safety. During the transfer, it is required to provide controlled oxygen therapy, inhaled SABA, ipratropium bromide, and systemic corticosteroids. In the emergency department the pharmacological therapy of acute severe asthma should consist of SABA, ipratropium bromide, systemic corticosteroids (oral or iv), controlled oxygen therapy, and the clinician should consider the use of iv magnesium sulfate and high dose ICS [1]. (Figure 7, Table 2)

Table 2.

Pharmacological management of patients with acute severe exacerbation in the emergency department.

Medication Dosing References
Salbutamol (albuterol) solution for nebulization: single dose 2.5 mg/2.5 mL Continuous nebulization for an hour and re-assess clinical response [214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,223]
Ipratropium bromide Nebulization of 0.5 mg/2.5 mL/4–6 h in combination with salbutamol (same nebulizer) [61,62,63,224]
Corticosteroids Methylprednisolone iv infusion of 40 mg or hydrocortisone iv, 200 mg or oral prednisone 40 mg [65,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232]
Magnesium sulfate Single iv infusion of 2 gr/20 min [233,234,235,236,237,238]
Methylxanthines Not recommended as first line; poor response and potential serious adverse events [239,240]
Leukotriene receptor antagonists Single iv infusion of 7–14 mg over 5 min [241,242,243]
Epinephrine (adrenaline) 0.3–0.4 mL sc of a 1:1000 (1 mg/mL) solution/20 min for 3 doses in case of no response [222]
Terbutaline (1 mg/mL) 0.25 mg sc/20 min for 3 doses in case of no response (preferred in pregnancy) [221,223]
Heliox Helium/oxygen mixture in a 80:20 or 70:30 ratio [247,248,249]

iv, intravenous; sc, subcutaneous.

11.1. β2-Adrenergic Receptor Agonists

The cornerstones of acute asthma medication are bronchodilators and especially short acting beta agonists (SABA). It is recommended that in acute severe asthma SABAs are administered repetitively or continuously. These substances activate the β2 adrenoreceptors (β2ARs), which are located mainly on the smooth airway muscle cells, but are also found on other airway cells even on the inflammatory cells. Their very important characteristic is that they have a rapid onset of action, while at the same time being well tolerated, despite high doses. Although the β2 AR agonists are substances known for centuries, the great challenge remains improving their selectivity, in order to benefit from their desired effect, while at the same time reducing their adverse effects. All current asthma guidelines introduce short acting β2 agonists (SABAs), as the first line treatment for acute severe asthma. In the first steps of escalating therapy during an exacerbation, the patient is advised to increase their use “as needed”. That is also the recommendation for the primary care setting, as well as for the emergency department, where repeated inhaled administration of SABA is advised. Studies on the efficacy of nebulizers vs. metered dose inhalers (MDIs) have not proven superiority of nebulized administration. In a recent review, nebulized delivery did not improve hospital admission, length of stay in the emergency department or pulmonary function [214]. According to GINA 2018, the preferred method of administration is with strong evidence (Evidence A) pMDI with a spacer [1]. This evidence becomes less strong when referring to severe and near fatal asthma. Although continuous nebulization of SABAs was initially a very promising perspective, several studies and meta-analyses have failed to clearly demonstrate strong evidence on favor of continuous nebulized SABAs for acute asthma. Rodrigo et al. in 2002 performed a systematic review and meta-analysis that showed no difference in respiratory function measured in the first hours of administration or on the rate of hospital admissions [215]. A Cochrane systematic review on the subject, including few more studies, showed significant difference on both respiratory function and hospital admissions, in favor of the continuous use of SABA, while at the same time demonstrating a good tolerance from the patients who did not present more adverse effects with this method of administration [216]. The most commonly used SABA is salbutamol or albuterol as named in the United States, which has an onset of action of less than 10 min and duration of approximately 6 h. Lebalbuterol is a recent addition to the choices of SABAs, with its benefit of a lower than salbutamol dose that provides similar effect. There is currently evidence about its efficacy in acute severe asthma as an intermittent regimen, but not as a continuous nebulization strategy [217,218]. Continuous intravenous infusion of β2 agonists has also been proposed as a therapy, especially in patients who did not respond to intensive bronchodilation. There is no evidence to support the use of intravenous β2 agonists [219,220] or the method of continuous, subcutaneous infusions of terbutaline [221]. Epinephrine has been studied, as a nebulized, subcutaneous, intramuscular and intravenous administration, but, in current guidelines, its use is restricted for acute asthma related with anaphylaxis and angioedema [1,222,223].

11.2. Anticholinergics

Anticholinergic agents act as inhibitors of acetylcholine at the muscarinic cholinergic receptor. Therefore, they inhibit parasympathetic nerve impulses and they produce a beneficial effect in acute asthma, by causing airway smooth muscle relaxation. Furthermore, they enhance β2-agonist-induced bronchodilation via intracellular processes and they prolong their bronchodilator effect [61,224]. The anticholinergic agent used primarily is ipratropium bromide due to its selectivity for airway smooth muscle receptors, which reduces the systemic adverse effects. Their use is included in current guidelines for moderate to severe acute and life-threatening asthma, as well as for patients who show poor response to initial SABA therapy [1,2]. It is not recommended to use anticholinergics as a single therapy for acute asthma. It has been demonstrated that the addition of inhaled ipratropium bromide to therapy with SABAs improve hospitalization rates, relapse rates and are associated with lung function improvement [62,63,64]. This combination therapy benefit is greater for the patients who present with acute severe asthma and are at a higher risk of hospitalization. There is an increased rate of adverse effects, which are of mild nature, such as mouth dryness and tremor.

11.3. Corticosteroids

Within the asthma setting, it has been well established that inhaled corticosteroids reduce the rates of hospitalization and mortality for patients with asthma [65,225]. In the event of acute exacerbation, there is a different approach of their use. Current recommendations suggest that high dose ICS given within the first hour of the patient’s presentation in the emergency department, reduce the rate of hospital admissions, for patients who are not on systemic corticosteroid therapy [1]. Recent evidence however seems to be conflicting regarding their performance without the use of systemic corticosteroids, when rate of hospital admissions or changes in lung function has been studied [226,227].

Systemic corticosteroids, due to their significant anti-inflammatory properties, have a fundamental role in the management of acute asthma, and particularly for patients who present with exacerbation while receiving oral corticosteroids (OCS), or have previous history of exacerbation that required use of OCS. They are also recommended for patients who did not respond to initial SABA therapy with a prolonged effect. Apart from their role against asthma associated inflammation, they seem to increase the number and sensitivity of β-adrenergic receptors, and also restrain the migration and function of eosinophils and other inflammatory cells. On the other hand, their lack of bronchodilatory effects prohibits their use for acute asthma as a monotherapy [74]. A recent multi-center study showed that there is a significant percentage of patients who get admitted to hospital with acute asthma and do not receive systemic corticosteroids, despite the clear suggestion of current guidelines [228]. With regards to the root of administration, intravenous administration seems to not provide additional efficacy to the use of oral therapy [229,230]. Intramuscular regimens seem to be as effective as oral in reducing the risk for relapse [231]. The oral route is better tolerated and preferred, because it is quicker and less expensive. Identifying groups of patients where intravenous administration could be more beneficial is a recent field of study, and guidelines support that they should be considered for patients who may be unable to swallow due to breathlessness, or may not absorb efficiently the medication due to gastro-enteral disturbances, such as vomiting [1]. There is a lack of robust evidence to clarify the superiority of longer or higher dose OCS, thus the literature suggests a 5–7-day regimen of 50 mg prednisolone as a single dose, or 200 mg hydrocortisone in divided doses [1,2,232].

11.4. Magnesium Sulfate

Magnesium has been proven to be an important co-factor in enzymatic reactions and changes of its concentrations may result in different response from the smooth muscles. Hypomagnesemia may cause contraction, whereas hypermagnesemia causes relaxation of the smooth muscles and bronchodilation, possibly through inhibition of calcium influx into the muscles.

Recent recommendations include magnesium sulfate, at dose of 2 g infused over 20 min, as a second line intervention for acute severe asthma exacerbation [1,233]. It has been shown to reduce the rate of hospitalization in adults with FEV1 of 25–30% at presentation and those who are unresponsive to initial treatment, and have persistent hypoxemia, and correlates with improvement in lung function [234,235]. Its infusion has not been correlated with severe adverse events; it is however contra-indicated for patients with renal insufficiency, hypermagnesemia and myasthenia Gravis. Magnesium has also been tried in its nebulized form for asthma exacerbation, with very few data to support it. A recent systematic review, which examined the efficacy and safety of inhaled administration of magnesium, concluded that, although safe, it has not shown significant benefits when compared with the first line inhaled agents, thus it is not routinely recommended [236]. The current literature is reluctant to fully support the use of magnesium, mainly because of the heterogeneity of the severity of asthma attacks it has been used on in trials, especially in the context of optimized first line treatment with β2-agonists and corticosteroids [237]. A 2014 randomized controlled trial failed to show any evidence of clear benefit in the use of either intravenous or inhaled magnesium [238]. Further prospective trials are necessary to provide accurate evidence on this treatment option.

11.5. Methylxanthines

On the ground of their anti-inflammatory properties, methylxanthines (aminophylline and theophylline) used to be included in the primary treatment for acute asthma. Their poor safety profile, which includes significant side effects, in combination with the inability to provide evidence of improved outcomes, such as improved pulmonary function or rate of hospitalization when given for severe acute asthma, has excluded them from current guidelines [1,239]. A more recent review and meta-analysis, however, has supplied some evidence of aminophylline’s efficacy, when combined with other bronchodilators, but more data are needed on this direction [240].

11.6. Leukotriene Modulators

Although leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) are included as a controller agent in the asthma management, there are limited data on the efficacy of intravenous or oral antileukotriene drugs in acute asthma. Montelukast and zafirlukast were studied on patients with acute asthma and demonstrated some evidence of lung function improvement [241,242]. A review of the literature, however failed to provide robust evidence of the effectiveness of this medication category on lung function or on the outcomes of the patients [243].

11.7. Oxygen Supply

Although asthma exacerbations are not usually accompanied with severe hypoxemia, acute severe asthma often presents with arterial PO2 derangements, due to extensive V/Q mismatch as explained above. Oxygen should be administered via nasal cannula or mask, with a target of arterial oxygen saturation of 93–95%, or to those patients where saturation monitoring is not available [1]. Although not all guidelines agree on the level of the desirable target saturation, studies have shown that, in severe acute asthma, oxygen therapy with controlled low flow administration, with a target SpO2, is correlated with better outcomes than the use of per se high flow 100% oxygen delivery, as it has been shown to correlate with increases in PaCO2, as well as with decreased values of PEF [244,245]. There is also some evidence about the use of oxygen driven nebulization with SABAs, because of the pulmonary vasodilation caused by the β2-agonist, which results in increasing perfusion of poorly ventilated areas, thus resulting in deterioration of the V/Q abnormalities [246].

11.8. Heliox

Heliox is a mixture of helium (70–80%) with oxygen (20–30%). Heliox can be used for severe asthma exacerbations that are unresponsive to standard therapy or in patients having an upper airway obstruction component. Heliox, with density less than air, leads to lower Reynolds number, thus decreasing resistance to airflow under conditions of turbulent flow, as are prominent in the central airways and at the branch points. This effect can potentially decrease the work of breathing and improve ventilation. On the contrary, airflow in smaller airways, which are mainly affected during an asthma exacerbation, will not improve with heliox, as it is typically laminar, depending on gas viscosity rather than density.

Despite the theoretical benefits of heliox, and while a few case series have suggested a beneficial effect in acute asthma, no studies in adults have demonstrated an advantage of heliox above and beyond standard oxygen therapy. In asthma exacerbation either without or with intubation, heliox has not demonstrated consistent benefit [247,248].

Heliox has demonstrated greatest benefit for improving symptoms when used as a nebulizing gas for a beta-2 agonist medication. Benefit is generally seen within minutes after the initiation of therapy [247]. Another study has shown that using heliox as a carrier gas increase gas delivery up to 50% in a mechanical model for both MDIs and nebulizers [249]. Given that its effect is based on the percentage of helium, it should not be administrated to patients requiring FiO2 > 40%.

11.9. Ketamine

Ketamine is well known drug that has been in use since circa 1960. It is a dissociative anesthetic drug that has the potential to have different actions, depending on the dose used. It may work as a potent analgesic and as an anesthetic agent, but may also have secondary effects as a bronchodilator, while at the same time preserving airway reflexes and sympathetic nervous system tone, with no effects on the cardiovascular system. A dose of 1–2 mg/kg dose has been described as an inductive agent in rapid sequence intubation (RSI) of asthma patients [250]. In doses lower than this it does not have sedative effects, whereas in higher doses it can cause laryngospasm and apnea. Its psychoactive effects make it even less popular for use. In the context of asthma, there are no large randomized trials to examine its effect. There is some evidence of its bronchodilatory effect, especially in mild and moderate asthma exacerbations, and in doses lower than 1 mg/kg, but larger trials would be necessary to establish its role for asthma [251,252].

11.10. Antibiotics

There is no evidence supporting the use of antibiotics per se for severe acute asthma, unless the patient’s history and clinical assessment indicate the presence of infection. In a recent retrospective cohort study, it has been demonstrated that, in patients hospitalized with acute asthma and receiving OCS, antibiotic use was associated with longer hospital length of stay and hospital cost, whereas it held similar risk of treatment failure [253]. In a previous study in the US, 60% of the patients who were admitted to hospital with asthma exacerbation, received antibiotics, with no clear indication accompanying this decision [254]. Current guidelines suggest against their use and that they should be considered after optimizing other treatment options and when there is clear evidence of infection [1].

11.11. Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Although the benefits of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) are well recognized in the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary edema, its usage for asthma exacerbation remains controversial. Despite the lack of supporting evidence, NIMV is commonly used in patients with severe asthma exacerbation as a mean to obviate the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation and its detrimental effects.

In the absence of clinical guidelines that recommend the use of NIMV for the management of acute asthma, evidence suggests that a trial of NIMV (for one or two hours) may be beneficial for a low risk group of patients [255], particularly those unresponsive to medical therapy. Prolonged trials of NIMV are not recommended. Suggested criteria for an NIMV trial include RR > 25 breaths per minute, heart rate > 110 beats per minute, hypoxemia with PaO2/FiO2 ratio greater than 200, hypercapnia with PaCO2 < 60 mmHg, FEV1 < 50% less than predicted and use of accessory respiratory muscles. A trial of NIMV should not be undertaken if there is any absolute criterion for endotracheal intubation (respiratory arrest, hemodynamic instability or shock, GSC < 8), excessive respiratory secretions and risk of aspiration, severe agitation and poor patient collaboration and any cause that precludes the right mask fitting (facial surgery) [256].

In a trial of 30 patients who presented to the emergency department with a severe asthma exacerbation that was not responding to inhaled bronchodilator therapy, NIMV was associated with reduction in the rate of hospitalization and increased lung function. Improvements in respiratory rate and dyspnea appear to be influenced by the amount of pressure support above expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) provided. The use of NIMV has been associated with reduction in endotracheal intubation, improvement in oxygenation, decrease in carbon dioxide retention, and improvement in airflow obstruction. Studies are controversial regarding the mortality and ICU length stay [86]. NIMV can also be used in the asthmatic patients who are at risk for intubation, following extubation [257].

11.12. Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

The decision to intubate and mechanically ventilate a near-fatal asthma patient is considered a challenging task and should be based primary on a series of clinical evaluations. Major indications for initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are: (1) cardiac arrest; (2) respiratory arrest or bradypnea; (3) respiratory insufficiency with PaO2 < 60 mmHg on 100% FiO2 and PaCO2 > 50 mmHg; (4) physical exhaustion; and (5) compromised level of consciousness. Relative indications for IMV are: (1) hypercapnia PaCO2 > 50 mmHg or PaCO2 increased by 5 mmHg per hour; (2) worsening respiratory acidosis;, (3) inability to treat patient appropriately; (4) failure to improve with proper therapy; and (5) clinical signs of deterioration and respiratory fatigue such as tachypnoea of >40 breaths per minute, severe hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency, hemodynamic instability, paradoxical thoracic movement, and silent chest [258].

The decision to intubate and mechanically ventilate a patient with acute asthma exacerbation is a clinical one and may be made urgently. When the clinician decides that respiratory failure is progressing, and is unlikely to be reversed by further pharmacologic therapy, intubation should be performed as quickly as possible by a skilled intensivist or anesthesiologist, who has extensive experience in intubation and airway management, using rapid sequence intubation (RSI) protocol suitable for asthmatic patients (good preparation, sufficient pre-oxygenation, suitable induction to anesthesia agents suitable for asthma, and placement of the endotracheal tube) [259]. Regarding the preferred method of intubation, oral endotracheal intubation is preferred, although the literature also includes awake nasotracheal intubation, which may be complicated by the fact that many asthmatic patients also have nasal polyps [203]. Additionally, oral intubation allows the use of an endotracheal tube of a larger diameter, facilitating secretion removal and bronchoscopy, if needed, while at the same time decreasing inspiratory airway resistance. It should be noted that unlike other conditions in which intubation and mechanical ventilation can solve problems, the dynamic hyperinflation that mechanical ventilation can create or even exacerbate can have devastating consequences for a severe asthmatic patient, such as cardiovascular collapse and/or barotrauma and ventilator induced lung injury. Therefore, there are certain considerations to be made before and during RSI. During RSI in such patients one should anticipate rapid oxygen desaturation despite maximal effort at pre-oxygenation especially in those patients who do not achieve a SpO2 above 93%, so adequate pre-oxygenation is advised. Bag mask ventilation should be done using small tidal volume and high inspiratory flow rate with a prolonged expiratory phase, attempting with this way to mimic the approach used during mechanical ventilation. Excessive mag mask ventilation should be avoided because of the risk of pneumothorax [260,261]. Manipulation of the airway can cause laryngospasm and worsening of bronchoconstriction, so one could consider the use of atropine to attenuate vagal reflexes [203]. The literature suggests the bolus use of intravenous ketamine for RSI taking advantage of its bronchodilatory effect, while propofol is also considered a safe approach. Opiates and barbiturates should be avoided due to the risk of histamine release that can exacerbate bronchoconstriction [262]. If muscle relaxants are needed, non-depolarizing muscle relaxants (except maybe atracurium and mivacurium) and succinylcholine are suitable in asthmatic patients [263].

11.13. Goals of Mechanical Ventilation

Near fatal asthma is characterized by severe dynamic hyperinflation of the lung with severe respiratory and circulatory consequences. The aim of mechanical ventilation is to maintain adequate oxygenation, to reduce the work of breathing and to prevent and confront further hyperinflation without any circulatory compromise or ventilator induced lung injury [264]. The intubation and post-intubation period is often complicated with severe cardio-respiratory derangement. Hypotension, the most common post-intubation complication, may be caused due to dynamic hyperinflation and auto-PEEP, and can be aggravated by dehydration, sedatives and neuromuscular blocking agents. Arrhythmias, barotraumas, laryngospasm or even seizures have also characterized the post-intubation period [265,266]. Phenomena such as hypercapnia, hypoxemia and acidemia, as well as ventilatory lung injury and life threatening pneumotrauma (pneumothorax and pneumo-mediastinum), may also complicate the post-intubation period. Reasons for the aforementioned may be the severity and non-responsiveness of the disease, but may also be the result of inadequate sedation or patient–ventilator desynchrony. Wrong and harmful initial ventilator settings may also result in providing too little or too excessive minute ventilation, potentially deteriorating the already very fragile asthmatic patient [267].

Management of the asthmatic patient post intubation starts with ensuring adequate sedation in order to achieve the desirable patient–ventilator synchronization. Sedation and analgesia will also decrease the metabolic rate, oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. Dexmedetominide, propofol and remifentanyl are the appropriate drugs for sedation and analgesia. Their usage has been associated with shorter length of ICU stay, shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and improved long term neurocognitive outcomes when compared to benzodiazepines [266,268]. It is important to use agents that accomplish deep sedation, while at the same time allow rapid awakening, should the patient improve quickly, which is common in the asthma cases (Table 3).

Table 3.

Sedation, analgesia and paralysis in patients with acute severe asthma exacerbation requiring intubation.

Medication Dosing Side Effects References
Midazolam 0.03–0.1 mg/kg bolus iv infusion, followed by an infusion of 3–10 mg/h Hypotension [268,269]
Propofol Infusion of 60–80 mg/min initially, up to 2 mg/kg. Continue with iv infusion of 5–10 mg/kg/h as needed, and for sedation on mechanical ventilation 1–4 mg/kg/h Hypotension, seizures, hyperlipidemia [262,268]
Fentanyl 50–100 μg/kg bolus iv infusion, followed by infusion of 50–100 μg/h Bradycardia, histamine release [268,269]
Remifentanyl Initial dose of 1 μg/kg iv infusion, followed by an infusion of 0.25–0.5 μg/kg/min (up to 2 μg/kg/min) Bradycardia, hypotension [268,269]
Ketamine 1 mg/mL bolus iv infusion, followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.1–0.5 mg/min Sympatheticomimetic effects, delirium [250,251,252]
Dexmedetomidine Initial loading dose of 1 μg/kg, iv over 10–30 min, followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.2–0.7 μg/kg/h Hypotension, bradycardia [68,269]
Cis-atracurium 0.1–0.2 mg/kg bolus iv infusion, followed by infusion in a rate of 3 μg/kg/min (up to 10 μg/mL/min) Bronchospasm [269,270]

Patients with severe asthma with persistently dangerous levels of hypercapnia and arterial hypoxemia, and extreme patient–ventilatory asynchrony may require paralysis in addition to sedation. The preferred paralytic, non-depolarizing agent is cis-atracurium, as it is eliminated by esterase degradation and spontaneous breakdown in the serum. Paralytic agents can be administered either intermittently through bolus injections, or by continuous intravascular infusion. Its duration must be as short as possible, because concomitant use of intravascular corticosteroids and paralytic neuromuscular agents increases the incidence of critical illness myopathy [269,270].

To avoid the hemodynamic effects of dynamic hyperinflation, once the patient is intubated, it is advised to perform a brief discontinuation (60–90 s) from the ventilation (apnea test), a slowly bagged ventilation and to administer fluids (1–2 L or more) and vasopressors. Although there is no clear evidence to support the volume-preset over the pressure-preset modes, the preferred ventilator modes for the asthmatic patient are the volume-limited ones [263]. Barotrauma seems to occur regardless of the mode of ventilation. Volume-limited modes of ventilation are usually used for near death asthmatic patients at their entrance in the ICU. It is essential to closely monitor the Peak inspiratory and Plateau pressures, to early detect any change in resistance and compliance, and this is easily achievable when using volume modes (Figure 8). Although high inspiratory flow rates of 80 L/min up to 100 L/min and square waveforms shorten inspiratory time and increase expiration time, thus reducing hyperinflation, it has been shown that this may not have a significant impact to the degree of hyperinflation once the minute ventilation has been limited by high peak inspiratory pressure [271]. Minute ventilation should be set at a level of less than 115 mL/kg/min (less than 10 L/min) with a respiratory rate of 10–12 breaths/min and a prolonged expiratory time by decreasing I:E ratio (1:3 or 1:4 up to 1:5) [263,266]. Tuxen and Lane showed a remarkable increase in hyperinflation when using higher levels of minute ventilation [120]. The fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) should be titrated to maintain the pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) above 90% (up to 94%) or the arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) above 60 mmHg. One should avoid SpO2 > 96% due to oxygen toxicity (Table 4).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Flow time tracing of a patient with persistence of flow at the end of expiration which indicates dynamic hyperinflation and pressure time tracing with a slope increase indicative of over-distension.

Table 4.

Initial ventilator settings in intubated patients with acute severe asthma exacerbation.

Mode Settings
Tidal volume 6 mL/kg ideal bodyweight
Respiratory rate 8–10/min
Minute ventilation <10 L/min
Inspiratory flow rate 60–80 L/min
Inspiratory to expiratory ratio >1:3
Inspiratory wave form Decelerated waveform
Expiratory time 4–5 s
Plateau pressure <30 cm H2O
PEEP 0 cm H2O
FiO2 100% initially and titrate to maintain SaO2 > 90%

SaO2: Oxygen saturation; Peep: positive end expiratory pressure.

Limited data exist about the use of external PEEP when ventilating a patient with severe asthma. The use of progressively higher external PEEP from 5 to 15 cmH2O has been shown to have a deteriorating effect both in respiratory (deterioration of the end-inspiratory volume, the functional residual capacity and plateau pressure) and circulatory system (decrease of systolic arterial pressure and cardiac output) [271]. In one prospective study of patients undergoing control mode of ventilation, external PEEP worsened hyperinflation and had serious hemodynamic effects by worsening gas trapping [272]. On the other hand, other studies have shown that the application of external PEEP, may produce a paradoxical lung deflation by reducing lung volumes and airway pressures and increasing lung homogeneity [273]. In the case of assist mode of mechanical ventilation, the application of external PEEP at a value less than 80% of the intrinsic PEEP, or 5 cm H2O if intrinsic PEEP is <10 cm H2O can counterbalance the endogenous peep and reduce the work of breathing [274]. A trial of stepwise increase in PEEP can be used and terminated when indications of worsening of dynamic hyperinflation it is shown.

11.14. Permissive Hypercapnia

Hypercapnia is a common fact during mechanical ventilation of asthmatic patients. PaCO2 levels up to 60 mmHg and pH values less than 7.20 are common on the first day of mechanical ventilation even with increased minute ventilation. The term permissive hypercapnia is a ventilating strategy that can be applied to mechanically ventilated asthma patients, that emphasizes on giving priority to the reduction of hyperinflation rather than normal minute ventilation. The reduction of minute ventilation through reduction of tidal volume and respiratory rate is used to decrease pulmonary hyperinflation. PaCO2 levels should rise gradually during mechanical ventilation rather than rapidly, preferably at a rate of <10 mmHg per hour or even slower if the PaCO2 exceeds 80 mmHg. Generally, a pH level of 7.20–7.25 is accepted, but the literature has failed to demonstrate a benefit from using alcalotic agents, such as bicarbonate infusion to accomplish that [274].

11.15. Additional and Unconventional Therapies for Acute Severe Asthma

11.15.1. Oxygen Delivery by High Flow Nasal Canula

Oxygen delivery via high flow nasal canula (HFNC) can be used to hypoxemic patients who are not expected to respond to conventional therapies. HFNC with flow up to 60 L/min of warmed and humidified oxygen, decreases inspiratory resistance, as well as the work of breathing, can wash out carbon dioxide, thus decreasing the anatomic dead space and may also produce a positive end expiratory pressure (up to 5 mmHg) by increasing the end expiratory lung volume. The role of HFNC in asthmatic adults is unknown. Studies in children have shown that its use reduces respiratory distress in moderate and severe asthma exacerbations and also reduces the need for intubation [275,276].

11.15.2. Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS)

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an invasive therapy, in which oxygenation and carbon dioxide removal are performed through an artificial membrane. Although evidence based on clinical trials for the use of ECMO in asthmatic patients is lacking [277,278], there is growing evidence on the subject, supporting the use of ECLS for patients receiving mechanical ventilation due to an asthmatic exacerbation. A 2009 review by Mikkelsen et al. has demonstrated that, when ECLS is used for status asthmaticus, it correlates with better outcomes in comparison to its use for other causes of respiratory failure [279]. In this study, they used data from the multicenter Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), but included only a small number of patients. In 2017, there was another review of the same database, confirming that the use of ECMO is an acceptable option, and resulted in acceptable survival rates, although it is necessary to understand and reduce the ECMO related complications [280]. Di Lascio et al., using ECMO for asthmatic patients receiving IMV, showed that it could provide adjunctive pulmonary support for patients who remain severely acidotic and hypercapnic despite aggressive conventional therapy [281]. The writers conclude that ECMO should be considered as an early treatment in patients with status asthmaticus whose gas exchange is not satisfactory despite using conventional therapy, aiming to provide adequate gas change and to prevent ventilator induced lung injury.

A modified ECMO technique such as extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) may also play an important role in severe asthmatic patient in mechanical ventilation. In a difficult to safely ventilate asthmatic patient, due to extremely high airway pressures, hypoventilation and persistent severe respiratory acidemia are common issues. The usage of ECCO2R, considering the reversibility of the pathophysiology of asthma, provide the opportunity for more protective ventilation and more time for the bronchodilator agents to act and reverse inflammation and hyperinflation. There is no sufficient evidence to support a clear role of this technique in asthmatic patients, but there seems to be a growing interest on the subject [282,283]. Schneider et al. even presented a case where ECCO2R was used in an “awake” patient with a near fatal asthma attack, refractory to the use of pharmacological intervention and NIMV, resulting in avoidance of intubation [284]. However, more data are needed to establish an indication for this intervention in the context of an acute severe asthma exacerbation.

11.15.3. Anesthetic Agents

Some inhalational anesthetic agents such as halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane act as bronchodilators, probably not only through a direct relaxation effect on airway smooth muscles but also by attenuating cholinergic tone [285,286]. This characteristic may have favorable effects in patients with refractory to conventional and optimized bronchodilatory therapy. Case report studies have indicated a positive effectiveness with halothane, but also with isoflurane and sevoflurane but with several limitations. Hypotension, myocardial depression, increased ventricular irritability especially in the presence of acidosis, beta-agonists and theophylline have been reported [287,288,289]. In addition, factors such as the expense of inhalational treatment, the need of a bedside anesthesiologist, the practical issues concerning the equipment for delivering the inhalational agents, the short time of duration of bronchodilation (immediate return of bronchoconstriction after discontinuation), and, finally, the absence of randomized trials to evaluate and confirm their efficacy in near-death adult asthmatic patients make the usage of anesthetic agents a last resort as a non- conventional bronchodilatory therapy for refractory near death asthma exacerbations [290,291].

11.15.4. Enoximone

Enoximone is an intravenous bronchodilatory agent that can be used in severe asthma exacerbation in adults. Enoximone, a selective phosphodiasterase inhibitor III, was tested in a study by Beute et al. on eight patients with status asthmaticus, six of whom had a respiratory arrest or hypercapnia [292]. The bronchodilatory effect was immediate. Even if the intravenous administration bypasses inhalation incapability in severe asthma, and no side-effects were observed in this study, phosphodiesterase inhibitors in general are associated with ventricular and atrial arrhythmias, hypotension, and hepatotoxicity. Further studies are needed to confirm enoximone efficacy and safety in patients with acute exacerbations of asthma that are refractory to conventional therapies.

12. Prognosis

Asthmatic patients who require mechanical ventilation, not only have increased hospital mortality (7%), but also long-term mortality [40,293]. Most of the long-term mortality is attributed to recurrent asthma [294]. Psychological disturbances such as depression and denial are also common features of asthmatic patients who survived a near fatal episode. Anxiety seems to be more common among close family members than the patients themselves [295]. Smoking cessation is one of the recognized factors that improves survival [151].

13. Prevention and Risk Reduction

GINA recommends that all adults and adolescents with asthma should receive ICS-containing controller treatment, either as-needed (in mild asthma) or daily, in order to reduce their risk of serious exacerbations and to control symptoms, [1] (Figure 9). Asthma treatment should be optimized in patients continuing having poor symptom control and/or exacerbations, even though Step 4 and Step 5 treatments and contributing factors should be assessed, in order to treat modifiable risk factors that compromise disease stability (smoking, environmental exposures, allergen exposure (if sensitized on skin prick testing or specific IgE), and medications such as beta-blockers and NSAIDs) (Table 5). It is imperative to optimize the inhaler technique and adherence to treatment, as well as overuse of SABAs, and medication side effects. Furthermore, comorbidities should be assessed including obesity, GERD, chronic rhinosinusitis, obstructive sleep apnea, anxiety, depression, and social difficulties. Non-pharmacological interventions (e.g., smoking cessation, exercise, weight loss, mucus clearance, and influenza vaccination) should also be recommended where indicated.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Personalized management for adults and adolescents to control symptoms and minimize future risk [1].

Table 5.

Modifiable risk factors that have to be treated in order to reduce exacerbations.

Risk Factor Treatment Strategy Evidence
Any patient with 1 risk
factor for exacerbations
(including poor symptom control)
  • Ensure patient is prescribed an ICS-containing controller

A
  • Ensure patient has a written action plan appropriate for their health literacy

A
  • Review patient more frequently than low-risk patients

A
  • Check inhaler technique and adherence frequently

A
≥1 severe exacerbation
in last year
  • Consider alternative controller regimens to reduce exacerbation risk, e.g., ICS-formoterol maintenance and reliever regimen

A
  • Consider stepping up treatment if no modifiable risk factors

A
  • Identify any avoidable triggers for exacerbations

C
Exposure to tobacco
smoke
  • Encourage smoking cessation by patient/family; provide advice and resources

A
  • Consider higher dose of ICS if asthma poorly-controlled

B
Low FEV1, especially
if <60% predicted
  • Consider trial of 3 months of treatment with high-dose ICS and/or 2 weeks of OCS

B
  • Exclude other lung disease, e.g., COPD

D
  • Refer for expert advice if no improvement

D
Obesity
  • Strategies for weight reduction

B
  • Distinguish asthma symptoms from symptoms due to deconditioning, mechanical restriction, and/or sleep apnoea

D
Major psychological
problems
  • Arrange mental health assessment

D
  • Help patient to distinguish between symptoms of anxiety and asthma; provide advice about management of panic attacks

D
Major socioeconomic
problems
  • Identify most cost-effective ICS-based regimen

D
Confirmed food allergy
  • Appropriate food avoidance; injectable epinephrine

A
Allergen exposure if
sensitized
  • Consider trial of simple avoidance strategies; consider cost

C
  • Consider step up of controller treatment

D
  • Consider adding SLIT in symptomatic adult HDM-sensitive patients with allergic rhinitis despite ICS, provided FEV1 is >70% predicted

B
Allergen exposure if
sensitized
  • Increase ICS dose independent of level of symptom control

A

FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; HDM, house dust mite; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; OCS, oral corticosteroids; SLIT, sublingual immunotherapy.

If the problems continue after having optimized all the above parameters, patients should refer to a specialist center for phenotypic assessment and consideration of add-on therapy including biologics (Figure 10). The prevalence of severe, refractory asthma is generally estimated to be 5–10% of the total asthma population [77,151]. It is important to distinguish between asthma that is difficult to control and asthma that is truly severe. Severe asthma is defined by the joint European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) guidelines according to the following criteria [151]:

  • Requirement for treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and a second controller (and/or systemic corticosteroids) to maintain control.

  • Refractory to the treatment mentioned above.

  • Incomplete management of comorbidities such as severe sinus disease or obesity.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Criteria for the choice of biologic as add on treatment in Th2 driven severe asthma.

The GINA 2019 guidelines for adolescents and adults with difficult-to-treat and severe asthma [77] recommend that assessment of the severe asthma phenotype should be done during high dose ICS treatment (or lowest possible dose of OCS), and biological treatment should be chosen accordingly (Figure 8). Where relevant, test for parasitic infection should precede and be treated if present, before commencing Type 2 targeted treatment. The currently approved add-on biological treatments for severe asthma include anti-IgE treatment for severe allergic asthma (omalizumab), anti-IL5 or anti-IL5R for severe eosinophilic (mepolizumab, benralizumab, and reslizumab), and anti-IL4R for severe eosinophilic/Type 2 asthma or patients requiring maintenance OCS asthma (dupilumab) (Table 6).

Table 6.

Currently available biologics: indications and adverse effects.

Medication Use Adverse Effects
Anti-IgE
(omalizumab, SC, ≥6 years)
An add-on option for patients with severe allergic asthma uncontrolled on high dose ICS-LABA. elf-administration may be permitted Reactions at the site of injection are common but minor. Anaphylaxis is rare.
Anti-IL5/anti-IL5R
(anti-IL5 mepolizumab (SC, ≥12 or ≥6 years), reslizumab (IV, ≥18 years) or anti-IL5 receptor benralizumab (SC, ≥12 years))
Add-on options for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma uncontrolled on high dose ICS-LABA Headache and reactions at injection site are common but minor.
Anti-IL4R
(dupilumab, SC, ≥12 years)
An add-on option for patients with severe eosinophilic/Type 2 asthma uncontrolled on high dose ICS-LABA, or requiring maintenance OCS. It is also approved for treatment of moderate-severe atopic dermatitis. Self-administration may be permitted Reactions at injection site are common but minor. Blood eosinophilia occurs in 4–13% of patients.

14. Conclusions

Severe asthma exacerbations are a major cause of disease morbidity, functional impairment, increased healthcare costs, and increased risk of mortality. Asthma patients experience exacerbations irrespective of underlying disease severity, phenotype, or despite optimal guideline-directed treatment, as a result of the ongoing inflammatory processes and loss of the disease control. Patients with frequent emergency department visits, patients requiring hospitalization, and, more importantly, patients intubated for an asthma exacerbation are at significantly increased risk for future severe exacerbations. It is evident that prevention of exacerbations remains a major unmet need in asthma management. The identification of patients at risk to have severe exacerbations is of paramount importance. Patient education and written plans of management, control of triggering/risk factors and co-morbid conditions, monitoring of asthma control and pulmonary function as well as optimal pharmacotherapy are needed to prevent and/or decrease exacerbations. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of asthma exacerbations will ultimately lead to better strategies and the development of novel treatments in the pursuit of preventing and treating severe asthma exacerbations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: N.R.; Literature search and data extraction: E.K. (Eirini Kostakou), E.K. (Evangelos Kaniaris), and N.R.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation: I.K., E.K. (Evangelos Kaniaris), and N.R.; Writing, Review and Editing: E.K. (Eirini Kostakou), E.K. (Evangelos Kaniaris), E.F., P.K., E.T., I.V., and N.R.; and Supervision: A.K., N.K, and N.R.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention (2019 Update) [(accessed on 6 August 2019)]; Available online: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cin20&A.N.=118972966&site=ehost-live.
  • 2.Teach S.J., Gill M.A., Togias A., Sorkness C.A., Arbes S.J., Jr., Calatroni A., Wildfire J.J., Gergen P.J., Cohen R.T., Pongracic J.A., et al. Preseasonal treatment with either omalizumab or an inhaled corticosteroid boost to prevent fall asthma exacerbations. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015;136:1476–1485. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Trasande L., Thurston G.D. The role of air pollution in asthma and other pediatric morbidities. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2005;115:689–699. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rosser F., Brehm J.M., Forno E., Acosta-Pérez E., Kurland K., Canino G., Celedón J.C. Proximity to a major road, vitamin D insufficiency, and severe asthma exacerbations in Puerto Rican children. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2014;190:1190–1193. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201408-1568LE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shmool J.L., Kubzansky L.D., Newman O.D., Spengler J., Shepard P., Clougherty J.E. Social stressors and air pollution across New York City communities: A spatial approach for assessing correlations among multiple exposures. Environ. Health. 2014;13:91. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-13-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Johnston S.L., Pattemore P.K., Sanderson G., Smith S., Lampe F., Josephs L., Symington P., O’Toole S., Myint S.H., Tyrrell D.A.J., et al. Community study of role of viral infections in exacerbations of asthma in 9–11 year old children. BMJ. 1995;310:1225–1229. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6989.1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jackson D.J., Johnston S.L. The role of viruses in acute exacerbations of asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010;125:1178–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jayasinghe H., Kopsaftis Z., Carson K. Asthma Bronchiale and Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction. Respiration. 2015;89:505–512. doi: 10.1159/000433559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.D’Amato M., Molino A., Calabrese G., Cecchi L., Annesi-Maesano I., D’Amato G. The impact of cold on the respiratory tract and its consequences to respiratory health. Clin. Transl. Allergy. 2018;8:20. doi: 10.1186/s13601-018-0208-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Berns S.H., Halm E.A., Sampson H.A., Sicherer S.H., Busse P.J., Wisnivesky J.P. Food allergy as a risk factor for asthma morbidity in adults. J. Asthma. 2007;44:377–381. doi: 10.1080/02770900701364031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vogel N.M., Katz H.T., Lopez R., Lang D.M. Food allergy is associated with potentially fatal childhood asthma. J. Asthma. 2008;45:862–866. doi: 10.1080/02770900802444195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Williams W.R. Asthma exacerbation by aspirin and chemical additives: Use of a nucleotide template model to investigate potential mechanisms. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 2018;37:461–468. doi: 10.4149/gpb_2018003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lee H.Y., Ye Y.M., Kim S.H., Ban G.Y., Kim S.C., Kim J.H., Shin Y.S., Park H.S. Identification of phenotypic clusters of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs exacerbated respiratory disease. Allergy. 2017;72:616–626. doi: 10.1111/all.13075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ledford D.K., Wenzel S.E., Lockey R.F. Aspirin or other nonsteroidal inflammatory agent exacerbated asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2014;2:653–657. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Plourde A., Lavoie K.L., Raddatz C., Bacon S.L. Effects of acute psychological stress induced in laboratory on physiological responses in asthma populations: A systematic review. Respir. Med. 2017;127:21–32. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lavoie K.L., Cartier A., Labrecque M., Bacon S.L., Lemière C., Malo J.L., Lacoste G., Barone S., Verrier P., Ditto B. Are psychiatric disorders associated with worse asthma control and quality of life in asthma patients? Respir. Med. 2005;99:1249–1257. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.O’Byrne P.M., Inman M.D. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Chest. 2003;123:411S–416S. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.3_suppl.411S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wills-Karp M. Immunologic basis of antigen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1999;17:255–281. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gauvreau G.M., El-Gammal A.I., O’Byrne P.M. Allergen-induced airway responses. Eur. Respir. J. 2015;46:819–831. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00536-2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Laprise C., Laviolette M., Boutet M., Boulet L.P. Asymptomatic airway hyperresponsiveness: Relationships with airway inflammation and remodelling. Eur. Respir. J. 1999;14:63–73. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14a12.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Leigh R., Ellis R., Wattie J., Southam D.S., De Hoogh M., Gauldie J., O’Byrne P.M., Inman M.D. Dysfunction and remodeling of the mouse airway persist after resolution of acute allergen-induced airway inflammation. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2002;27:526–535. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2002-0048OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Southam D.S., Ellis R., Wattie J., Inman M.D. Components of airway hyperresponsiveness and their associations with inflammation and remodeling in mice. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007;119:848–854. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.12.623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Leigh R., Ellis R., Wattie J.N., Hirota J.A., Matthaei K.I., Foster P.S., O’Byrne P.M., Inman M.D. Type 2 cytokines in the pathogenesis of sustained airway dysfunction and airway remodeling in mice. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004;169:860–867. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200305-706OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brożek J.L., Bousquet J., Agache I., Agarwal A., Bachert C., Bosnic-Anticevich S., Brignardello-Petersen R., Canonica G.W., Casale T., Chavannes N.H., et al. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines-2016 revision. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017;140:950–958. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dixon A.E., Kaminsky D.A., Holbrook J.T., Wise R.A., Shade D.M., Irvin C.G. Allergic rhinitis and sinusitis in asthma: Differential effects on symptoms and pulmonary function. Chest. 2006;130:429–435. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.2.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Martínez-Rivera C., Crespo A., Pinedo-Sierra C., García-Rivero J.L., Pallarés-Sanmartín A., Marina-Malanda N., Pascual-Erquicia S., Padilla A., Mayoralas-Alises S., Plaza V., et al. Mucus hypersecretion in asthma is associated with rhinosinusitis, polyps and exacerbations. Respir. Med. 2018;135:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ayres J.G., Miles J.F. Oesophageal reflux and asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 1996;9:1073–1078. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09051073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pereira Vega A., Sánchez Ramos J.L., Maldonado Pérez J.A., Alvarez Gutierrez F.J., Ignacio García J.M., Vázquez Oliva R., Romero P.P., Bravo N.J.M., Sánchez R.I., Gil M.F. Variability in the prevalence of premenstrual asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2010;35:980–986. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00045109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martinez-Moragón E., Plaza V., Serrano J., Picado C., Galdiz J.B., López-Viña A., Sanchis J. Near-fatal asthma related to menstruation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004;113:242–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cohen J.M., Bateman B.T., Huybrechts K.F., Mogun H., Yland J., Schatz M., Wurst K.E., Hernandez-Diaz S. Poorly Controlled Asthma During Pregnancy Remains Common in the United States. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.To T., Feldman L.Y., Zhu J., Gershon A.S. Asthma health services utilisation before, during and after pregnancy: A population-based cohort study. Eur. Respir. J. 2018;51:1800209. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00209-2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.British Thoracic Society. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network . British Guideline on the Management of Asthma-QRG. Royal College of Physicians; London, UK: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Reddel H.K., Taylor D.R., Bateman E.D., Boulet L., Boushey H.A., Busse W.W., Casale T.B., Chanez P., Enright P.L., Gibson P.G., et al. American Thoracic Society Documents an Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Asthma Control and Exacerbations. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009;180:59–99. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200801-060ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kenyon N., Zeki A., Albertson T.E., Louie S. Definition of Critical Asthma Syndromes. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2015;48:1–6. doi: 10.1007/s12016-013-8395-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bel E.H., Sousa A., Fleming L., Bush A., Chung K.F., Versnel J., Wagener A.H., Wagers S.S., Sterk P.J., Compton C.H., et al. Diagnosis and definition of severe refractory asthma: An international consensus statement from the Innovative Medicine Initiative (IMI) Thorax. 2011;66:910–917. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.153643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shah R., Saltoun C.A. Acute severe asthma (status asthmaticus) Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012;33:47–50. doi: 10.2500/aap.2012.33.3547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Soriano J.B., Abajobir A.A., Abate K.H., Abera S.F., Agrawal A., Ahmed M.B. Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Respir. Med. 2017;5:691–706. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30293-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Eurostat (Version Dated November 2017) [(accessed on 6 August 2019)]; Available online: www.ec.europa.eu/Eurostat/web/health/health-care/data/database.
  • 39.Vieira E., Alvaro P., Rodrigo A.C., Regina A., Fernandes F.L.A., Barreto M.L., Stelmach R. Urbanization is associated with increased asthma morbidity and mortality in Brazil. Clin. Respir. J. 2018;12:410–417. doi: 10.1111/crj.12530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Krishnan V., Diette G.B., Rand C.S., Bilderback A.L., Merriman B., Hansel N.N., Krishnan J.A. Mortality in Patients Hospitalized for Asthma Exacerbations in the United States. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006;174:633–638. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200601-007OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zein J.G., Udeh B.L., Teague W.G., Koroukian S.M., Schlitz N.K., Bleecker E.R., Busse W.B., Calhoun W.J., Castro M., Count S.A., et al. Impact of Age and Sex on Outcomes and Hospital Cost of Acute Asthma in the United States, 2011–2012. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0157301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sekiya K., Nakatani E., Fukutomi Y., Kaneda H., Iikura M., Yoshida M., Takahashi K., Tomii K., Nishikawa M., Kaneko N., et al. Severe or life-threatening asthma exacerbation: Patient heterogeneity identified by cluster analysis. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2016;46:1043–1055. doi: 10.1111/cea.12738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yii A., Tan J., Lapperre T. Long-term future risk of severe exacerbations: Distinct 5-year trajectories of problematic asthma. Allergy. 2017;72:1398–1405. doi: 10.1111/all.13159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Barr R.G., Woodruff P.G., Clark S., Camargo C.A. Sudden-onset asthma exacerbations: Clinical features, response to therapy, and 2-week follow-up. Eur. Respir. J. 2000;15:266–273. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15b08.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ramnath V.R., Clark S., Camargo C.A.J. Multicenter Study of Clinical Features of Sudden-Onset Versus Slower-Onset Asthma Exacerbations Requiring Hospitalization. Respir. Care. 2007;52:1013–1020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Skobeloff E.M., Spivey W.H., St Clair S.S., Schoffstall J.M. The influence of age and sex on asthma admissions. JAMA. 1992;268:3437–3440. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490240045034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tattersfield A.E., Postma D.S., Barnes P.J., Svensson K., Bauer C.A., O’Byrne P.M., Lofdahl C.G., Pauwels R.A., Ullman A. Exacerbations of asthma: A descriptive study of 425 severe exacerbations. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999;160:594–599. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.9811100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Borish L., Chipps B., Deniz Y., Gujrathi S., Zheng B., Dolan C.M., TENOR Study Group Total serum IgE levels in a large cohort of patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005;95:247–253. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61221-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Leynaert B., Sunyer J., Garcia-Esteban R., Svanes C., Jarvis D., Cerveri I., Dratva J., Gislason T., Heinrich J., Janson C., et al. Gender differences in prevalence, diagnosis and incidence of allergic and nonallergic asthma: A population-based cohort. Thorax. 2012;67:625–631. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Redmond A.M., James A.W., Nolan S.H., Self T.H. Premenstrual asthma: Emphasis on drug therapy options. J. Asthma. 2004;41:687–693. doi: 10.1081/JAS-200027986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Guy E.S., Kirumaki A., Hanania N.A. Acute asthma in pregnancy. Crit. Care Clin. 2004;20:731–745. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2004.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Moore W.C., Meyers D.A., Wenzel S.E., Teague W.G., Li H., Li X., D’Agostino R., Jr., Castro M., Curran-Everett D., Fitzpatrick A.M., et al. Identification of asthma phenotypes using cluster analysis in the Severe Asthma Research Program. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2010;181:315–323. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200906-0896OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Peters U., Dixon A.E., Forno E. Obesity and asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018;141:1169–1179. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Eisner M.D., Katz P.P., Yelin E.H., Shiboski S.C., Blanc P.D. Risk factors for hospitalization among adults with asthma: The influence of sociodemographic factors and asthma severity. Respir. Res. 2001;2:53–60. doi: 10.1186/rr37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Griswold S.K., Nordstrom C.R., Clark S., Gaeta T.J., Price M.L., Camargo C.A., Jr. Asthma exacerbations in North American adults: Who are the ‘frequent fliers’ in the emergency department? Chest. 2005;127:1579–1586. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.5.1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Falsey A.R., Hennessey P.A., Formica M.A., Cox C., Walsh E.E. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly and high-risk adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:1749–1759. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yoo J.K., Kim T.S., Hufford M.M., Braciale T.J. Viral infection of the lung: Host response and sequelae. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013;132:1263–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rumpel J.A., Ahmedani B.K., Peterson E.L., Wells K.E., Yang M., Levin A.M., Yang J.J., Kumar R., Burchard E.G., Williams L.K. Genetic ancestry and its association with asthma exacerbations among African American subjects with asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012;130:1302–1306. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Reddel H., Ware S., Marks G., Salome C., Jenkins C., Woolcock A. Differences between asthma exacerbations and poor asthma control. Lancet. 1999;353:364–369. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)06128-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pauwels R.A., Pedersen S., Busse W.W., Tan W.C., Chen Y.Z., Ohlsson S.V., Ullman A., Lamm C.J., O’Byrne P.M., START Investigators Group Early intervention with budesonide in mild persistent asthma: A randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2003;361:1071–1076. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12891-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rodrigo G.J. Anticholinergics for asthma. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018;18:38–43. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kirkland S., Vandenberghe C., Voaklander B. Combined inhaled beta-agonist and anticholinergic agents for emergency management in adults with asthma (Review) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017;1:CD001284. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001284.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gottlieb M., Kuhns M.J. Do Inhaled Anticholinergic Agents in Addition to β; -Agonists Improve Outcomes in Acute Asthma Exacerbations? Ann. Emerg. Med. 2017;70:421–422. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bobrovitz N., Heneghan C., Onakpoya I., Fletcher B., Collins D., Tompson A., Lee J., Nunan D., Fisher R., Scott B., et al. Medications that reduce emergency hospital admissions: An overview of systematic reviews and prioritisation of treatments. BMC Med. 2018;16:115. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1104-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Suissa S., Ernst P. Inhaled corticosteroids: Impact on asthma morbidity and mortality. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2001;107:937–944. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.115653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Miller M.K., Lee J.H., Miller D.P., Wenzel S.E. Recent asthma exacerbations: A key predictor of future exacerbations. Respir. Med. 2007;101:481–489. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Covar R.A., Szefler S.J., Zeiger R.S., Sorkness C.A., Moss M., Mauger D.T., Boehmer S.J., Strunk R.C., Martinez F.D., Taussig L.M., et al. Factors associated with asthma exacerbations during a long-term clinical trial of controller medications in children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008;122:741–747. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Haselkorn T., Fish J.E., Chipps B.E., Miller D.P., Chen H., Weiss S.T. Effect of weight change on asthma related health outcomes in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. Respir. Med. 2009;103:274–283. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chipps B.E., Zeiger R.S., Borish L., Wenzel S.E., Yegin A., Hayden M.L., Miller D.P., Bleecker E.R., Simons F.E.R., Szefler S.J., et al. Key findings and clinical implications from The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012;130:332–342. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wenzel S. Severe asthma: From characteristics to phenotypes to endotypes. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2012;42:650–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03929.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wenzel S.E. Asthma phenotypes: The evolution from clinical to molecular approaches. Nat. Med. 2012;18:716–725. doi: 10.1038/nm.2678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Killian K.J., Watson R., Otis J., St Amand T.A., O’Byrne P.M. Symptom perception during acute bronchoconstriction. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000;162:490–496. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.2.9905079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Magadle R., Berar-Yanay N., Weiner P. The risk of hospitalization and near-fatal and fatal asthma in relation to the perception of dyspnea. Chest. 2002;121:329–333. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.2.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hancox R.J., Cowan J.O., Flannery E.M., Herbison G.P., McLachlan C.R., Taylor D.R. Bronchodilator tolerance and rebound bronchoconstriction during regular inhaled beta-agonist treatment. Respir. Med. 2000;94:767–771. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Stanford R.H., Shah M.B., D’Souza A.O., Dhamane A.D., Schatz M. Short-acting β-agonist use and its ability to predict future asthma related outcomes. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;109:403–407. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Suissa S., Ernst P., Benayoun S., Baltzan M., Cai B. Low-dose inhaled corticosteroids and the prevention of death from asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;343:332–336. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008033430504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Adolescents and Adults with Difficult-to-Treat and Severe Asthma. [(accessed on 6 August 2019)]; Available online: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cin20&A.N.=118972966&site=ehost-live.
  • 78.Alvarez G.G., FitzGerald J.M. A systematic review of the psychological risk factors associated with near fatal asthma or fatal asthma. Respiration. 2007;74:228–236. doi: 10.1159/000097676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Foster J.M., McDonald V.M., Guo M., Reddel H.K. “I have lost in every facet of my life”: The hidden burden of severe asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2017;50:1700765. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00765-2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Denlinger L.C., Phillips B.R., Ramratnam S., Ross K., Bhakta N.R., Cardet J.C., Castro M., Peters S.P., Phipatanakul W., Aujla S., et al. Inflammatory and Comorbid Features of Patients with Severe Asthma and Frequent Exacerbations. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017;195:302–313. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0419OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Grissell T.V., Powell H., Shafren D.R., Boyle M.J., Hensley M.J., Jones P.D., Whitehead B.F., Gibson P.G. Interleukin-10 gene expression in acute virus-induced asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005;172:433–439. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200412-1621OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Libster R., Bugna J., Coviello S., Hijano D.R., Dunaiewsky M., Reynoso N., Cavalieri M.L., Guglielmo M.C., Areso M.S., Gilligan T., et al. Pediatric hospitalizations associated with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in Argentina. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:45–55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.O’Riordan S., Barton M., Yau Y., Read S.E., Allen U., Tran D. Risk factors and outcomes among children admitted to hospital with pandemic H1N1 influenza. Cmaj. 2010;182:39–44. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Winther B., Gwaltney J.M., Hendley J.O. Respiratory virus infection of monolayer cultures of human nasal epithelial cells. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1990;141:839–845. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/141.4_Pt_1.839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Unger B.L., Ganesan S., Comstock A.T., Faris A.N., Hershenson M.B., Sajjan U.S. Nod-like receptor X-1 is required for rhinovirus-induced barrier dysfunction in airway epithelial cells. J. Virol. 2014;88:3705–3718. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03039-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Jacobs S.E., Lamson D.M., St George K., Walsh T.J. Human rhinoviruses. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013;26:135–162. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00077-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ritchie A.I., Jackson D.J., Edwards M.R., Johnston S.L. Airway epithelial orchestration of innate immune function in response to virus infection. A focus on asthma. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2016;13:S55–S63. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201507-421MG. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Fensterl V., Sen G.C. Interferons and viral infections. Biofactors. 2009;35:14–20. doi: 10.1002/biof.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Makris S., Johnston S. Recent advances in understanding rhinovirus immunity. F1000Research. 2018;24:7. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15337.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Miller E.K., Hernandez J.Z., Wimmenauer V., Shepherd B.E., Hijano D., Libster R., Serra M.E., Bhat N., Batalle J.P., Mohamed Y., et al. A mechanistic role for type, III IFN-_1 in asthma exacerbations mediated by human rhinoviruses. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2012;185:508–516. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201108-1462OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Jones A.C., Anderson D., Galbraith S., Fantino E., Gutierrez Cardenas D., Read J.F., Serralha M., Holt B.J., Strickland D.H., Sly P.D., et al. Personalised transcriptomics reveals heterogeneous immunophenotypes in children with viral bronchiolitis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019;199:1537–1549. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201804-0715OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Khoo S.K., Read J., Franks K., Zhang G., Bizzintino J., Coleman L., McCrae C., Öberg L., Troy N.M., Prastanti F., et al. Upper airway cell transcriptomics identify a major new immune, logical phenotype with strong clinical correlates in young children with acute wheezing. J. Immunol. 2019;202:1845–1858. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Turi K.N., Shankar J., Anderson L.J., Rajan D., Gaston K., Gebretsadik T., Das S.R., Stone C., Larkin E.K., Rosas-Salazar C., et al. Infant viral respiratory infection nasal immune-response patterns and their association with subsequent childhood recurrent wheeze. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018;198:1064–1073. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201711-2348OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Fedele G., Schiavoni I., Nenna R., Pierangeli A., Frassanito A., Leone P., Petrarca L., Scagnolari C., Midulla F. Analysis of the immune response in infants hospitalized with viral bronchiolitis shows different Th1/Th2 profiles associated with respiratory syncytial virus and human rhinovirus. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2018;29:555–557. doi: 10.1111/pai.12919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Oliver B.G., Lim S., Wark P., Laza-Stanca V., King N., Black J.L., Roth M., Johnston S.L. Rhinovirus exposure impairs immune responses to bacterial products in human alveolar macrophages. Thorax. 2008;63:519–525. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.081752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Harford C.G., Leidler V., Hara M. Effect of the lesion due to influenza virus on the resistance of mice to inhaled pneumococci. J. Exp. Med. 1949;89:53–68. doi: 10.1084/jem.89.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kloepfer K.M., Lee W.M., Pappas T.E., Kang T.J., Vrtis R.F., Evans M.D., Gangnon R.E., Bochkov Y.A., Jackson D.J., Lemanske R.F., Jr., et al. Detection of pathogenic bacteria during rhinovirus infection is associated with increased respiratory symptoms and asthma exacerbations. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014;133:1301–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.02.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Papadopoulos N.G., Stanciu L.A., Papi A., Holgate S.T., Johnston S.L. Rhinovirus-induced alterations on peripheral blood mononuclear cell phenotype and costimulatory molecule expression in normal and atopic asthmatic subjects. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2002;32:537–542. doi: 10.1046/j.0954-7894.2002.01313.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Jackson D.J., Makrinioti H., Rana B.M., Shamji B.W., Trujillo-Torralbo M.B., Footitt J., Del-Rosario J., Telcian A.G., Nikonova A., Zhu J., et al. IL-33-dependent type 2 inflammation during rhinovirus-induced asthma exacerbations in vivo. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2014;190:1373–1382. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201406-1039OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Beale J., Jayaraman A., Jackson D.J., Macintyre J.D.R., Edwards M.R., Walton R.P., Zhu J., Ching Y.M., Shamji B., Edwards M., et al. Rhinovirus-induced, IL-25 in asthma exacerbation drives type 2 immunity and allergic pulmonary inflammation. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014;6:256ra134. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Hong J.Y., Bentley J.K., Chung Y., Lei J., Steenrod J.M., Chen Q., Sajjan U.S., Hershenson M.B. Neonatal rhinovirus induces mucous metaplasia and airways hyperresponsiveness through, IL-25 and type 2 innate lymphoid cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014;134:429–439. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Shariff S., Shelfoon C., Holden N.S., Traves S.L., Wiehler S., Kooi C., Proud D., Leigh R. Human rhinovirus infection of epithelial cells modulates airway smooth muscle migration. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2017;56:796–803. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0252OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Leigh R., Oyelusi W., Wiehler S., Koetzler R., Zaheer R.S., Newton R., Proud D. Human rhinovirus infection enhances airway epithelial cell production of growth factors involved in airway remodeling. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008;121:1238–1245. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.01.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Djukanovic R., Harrison T., Johnston S.L., Gabbay F., Wark P., Thomson N.C., Niven R., Singh D., Reddel H.K., Davies D.E., et al. The effect of inhaled, I.F.N-beta on worsening of asthma symptoms caused by viral infections. A randomized trial. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2014;190:145–154. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201312-2235OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Sporik R., Holgate S.T., Platts-Mills T.A., Cogswell J.J. Exposure to house-dust mite allergen (Der p I) and the development of asthma in childhood. A prospective study. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990;323:502–507. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199008233230802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Zureik M., Neukirch C., Leynaert B., Liard R., Bousquet J., Neukirch F. Sensitisation to airborne moulds and severity of asthma: Cross sectional study from European Community respiratory health survey. BMJ. 2002;325:411–414. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7361.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Message S.D., Laza-Stanca V., Mallia P., Parker H.L., Zhu J., Kebadze T., Contoli M., Sanderson G., Kon O.M., Papi A., et al. Rhinovirus-induced lower respiratory illness is increased in asthma and related to virus load and Th1/2 cytokine and, IL-10 production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:13562–13567. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804181105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Rosas I., McCartney H.A., Payne R.W., Calderon C., Lacey J., Chapela R., Ruiz-Velazco S. Analysis of the relationships between environmental factors (aeroallergens, air pollution, and weather) and asthma emergency admissions to a hospital in Mexico City. Allergy. 1998;53:394–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03911.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Downs S.H., Mitakakis T.Z., Marks G.B., Car N.G., Belousova E.G., Leuppi J.D., Xuan W., Downie S.R., Tobias A., Peat J.K., et al. Clinical importance of Alternaria exposure in children. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001;164:455–459. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.3.2008042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Donohue K.M., Al-alem V., Perzanowshi M.S., Chew G.L., Johnson A., Divjan A., Kelvin E.A., Hoepner L.A., Perera F.P., Miller R.L. Anti-cockroach and anti-mouse IgE are associated with early wheeze and atopy inan inner-city birth cohort. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008;122:914–920. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.08.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Kim J.S., Ouyang F.X., Pongracic J.A., Fang Y.P., Wang B.Y., Liu X., Xing H., Caruso D., Liu X., Zhang S., et al. Dissociation between the prevalence of atopy and allergic disease in rural China among children and adults. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008;122:929–935. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Salo P.M., Arbes S.J., Crockett P.W., Thorne P.S., Cohn R.D., Zeldin D.C. Exposure to multiple indoor allergens in, U.S. homes and its relationship to asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008;121:678–684. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.12.1164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Kanchongkittiphon W., Mendell M.J., Gaffin J.M., Wang G., Phipatanakul W. Indoor environmental exposures and exacerbation of asthma: An update to the 2000 review by the Institute of Medicine. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015;123:6–20. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Matsui E.C. Environmental exposures and asthma morbidity in children living in urban neighborhoods. Allergy. 2014;69:553–558. doi: 10.1111/all.12361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Yang J.J., Burchard E.G., Choudhry S., Johnson C.C., Ownby D.R., Favro D., Chen J., Akana M., Ha C., Kwok P.-Y., et al. Differences in allergic sensitization by self-reported race and genetic ancestry. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008;122:820–827. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.07.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Thomson N.C., Chaudhuri R., Livingston E. Asthma and cigarette smoking. Eur. Respir. J. 2004;24:822–833. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00039004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Polosa R., Knoke J.D., Russo C., Piccillo G., Caponnetto P., Sarva M., Proietti L., Al-Delaimy W.K. Cigarette smoking is associated with a greater risk of incident asthma in allergic rhinitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008;121:1428–1434. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.02.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Quinto K.B., Kit B.K., Lukacs S.L., Akinbami L.J. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure in children aged 3–19 years with and without asthma in the United States, 1999–2010. NCHS Data Brief. 2013;126:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.McCarville M., Sohn M.W., Oh E., Weiss K., Gupta R. Environmental tobacco smoke and asthma exacerbations and severity: The difference between measured and reported exposure. Arch. Dis. Child. 2013;98:510–514. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Vargas P.A., Brenner B., Clark S., Boudreaux E.D., Camargo C.A., Jr. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke among children presenting to the emergency department with acute asthma: A multicenter study. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2007;42:646–655. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Hassanzad M., Khalilzadeh S., Eslampanah Nobari S., Bloursaz M., Sharifi H., Mohajerani S.A., Nejad S.T., Velayati A.A. Cotinine level is associated with asthma severity in passive smoker children. Iran. J. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;14:67–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Ferrante G., Simoni M., Cibella F., Liotta G., Malizia V., Corsello G., Viegi G., La Grutta S. Third-hand smoke exposure and health hazards in children. Monaldi Arch. Chest Dis. 2013;79:38–43. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2013.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Samoli E., Nastos P.T., Paliatsos A.G., Katsouyanni K., Priftis K.N. Acute effects of air pollution on pediatric asthma exacerbation: Evidence of association and effect modification. Environ. Res. 2011;111:418–424. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Gasana J., Dillikar D., Mendy A., Forno E., Ramos Vieira E. Motor vehicle air pollution and asthma in children: A meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 2012;117:36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2012.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Delfino R.J., Wu J., Tjoa T., Gullesserian S.K., Nickerson B., Gillen D.L. Asthma morbidity and ambient air pollution: Effect modification by residential traffic-related air pollution. Epidemiology. 2014;25:48–57. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Moffatt M.F., Kabesch M., Liang L., Dixon A.L., Strachan D., Heath S., Depner M., von Berg A., Bufe A., Rietschel E., et al. Genetic variants regulating, ORMDL3 expression contribute to the risk of childhood asthma. Nature. 2007;448:470–473. doi: 10.1038/nature06014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Portelli M.A., Hodge E., Sayers I. Genetic risk factors for the development of allergic disease identified by genome-wide association. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2015;45:21–31. doi: 10.1111/cea.12327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Du R., Litonjua A.A., Tantisira K.G., Lasky-Su J., Sunyaev S.R., Klanderman B.J., Celedon J.C., Avila L., Soto-Quiros M.E., Weiss S.T., et al. Genome-wide association study reveals class I M.H.C-restricted T cell-associated molecule gene (CRTAM) variants interact with vitamin D levels to affect asthma exacerbations. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012;129:368–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.09.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Tavendale R., Macgregor D.F., Mukhopadhyay S., Palmer C.N. A polymorphism controlling, ORMDL3 expression is associated with asthma that is poorly controlled by current medications. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008;121:860–863. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Tantisira K.G., Silverman E.S., Mariani T.J., Xu J., Richter B.G., Klanderman B.J., Litonjua A.A., Lazarus R., Rosenwasser L.J., Fuhlbrigge A.L., et al. FCER2: A pharmacogenetics basis for severe exacerbations in children with asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007;120:1285–1291. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Chupp G.L., Lee C.G., Jarjour N., Shim Y.M., Holm C.T., He S., Dziura J.D., Reed J., Coyle A.J., Kiener P., et al. A chitinase-like protein in the lung and circulation of patients with severe asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;357:2016–2027. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Cunningham J., Basu K., Tavendale R., Palmer C.N., Smith H., Mukhopadhyay S. The CHI3L1 rs4950928 poly morphism is associated with asthma-related hospital admissions in children and young adults. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011;106:381–386. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Lee C.G., Hartl D., Lee G.R., Koller B., Matsuura H., Da Silva C.A., Sohn M.H., Cohn L., Homer R.J., Kozhich A.A., et al. Role of breast regression protein 39 (BRP-39)/chitinase 3-like-1 in Th2 and, IL-13-induced tissue responses and apoptosis. J. Exp. Med. 2009;206:1149–1166. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Tang H., Sun Y., Shi Z., Huang H., Fang Z., Chen J., Xiu Q., Li B. YKL-40 induces, IL-8 expression from bronchial epithelium via, MAPK. (JNK and, ERK) and, NF-kB pathways, causing bronchial smooth muscle proliferation and migration. J. Immunol. 2013;190:438–446. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Russell R.J., Brightling C. Pathogenesis of asthma: Implications for precision medicine. Clin. Sci. 2017;131:1723–1735. doi: 10.1042/CS20160253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Rovina N., Baraldo S., Saetta M. Severe asthma: Inflammation. Pneumon. 2011;24:306–313. [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Robinson D., Humbert M., Buhl R., Cruz A.A., Inoue H., Korom S., Hanania N.A., Nair P. Revisiting Type 2-high and Type 2-low airway inflammation in asthma: Current knowledge and therapeutic implications. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2017;47:161–175. doi: 10.1111/cea.12880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Santus P., Saad M., Damiani G., Patella V., Radovanovic D. Current and future targeted therapies for severe asthma: Managing treatment with biologics based on phenotypes and biomarkers. Pharmacol. Res. 2019;146:104296. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Kulkarni N.S., Hollins F., Sutcliffe A., Saunders R., Shah S., Siddiqui S., Gupta S., Haldar P., Green R., Pavord I., et al. Eosinophil protein in airway macrophages: A novel biomarker of eosinophilic inflammation in patients with asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010;126:61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.03.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Papi A., Brightling C., Pedersen S.E., Reddel H.K. Asthma. Lancet. 2017;391:783–800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33311-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Lambrecht B.N., Hammad H. The immunology of asthma. Nat. Immunol. 2015;16:45–56. doi: 10.1038/ni.3049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Xue L., Gyles S.L., Wettey F.R., Gazi L., Townsend E., Hunter M.G., Pettipher R. Prostaglandin D2 causes preferential induction of proinflammatory Th2 cytokine production through an action on chemoattractant receptor-like molecule expressed on Th2 cells. J. Immunol. 2005;175:6531–6536. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.10.6531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Doherty T.A., Broide D.H. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells: New players in human allergic diseases. J. Investig. Allergol. ClinImmunol. 2015;25:1–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Aron J.L., Akbari O. Regulatory T cells and type 2 innate lymphoid cell-dependent asthma. Allergy. 2017;72:1148–1155. doi: 10.1111/all.13139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Sokolowska M., Chen L.Y., Liu Y., Martinez-Anton A., Logun C., Alsaaty S., Cuento R.A., Cai R., Sun J., Quehenberger O., et al. Dysregulation of lipidomic profile and antiviral immunity in response to hyaluronan in patients with severe asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017;139:1379–1383. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Chen R., Smith S.G., Salter B., El-Gammal A., Oliveria J.P., Obminski C., Watson R., O’Byrne P.M., Gauvreau G.M., Sehmi R., et al. Allergen-induced Increases in Sputum Levels of Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells in Subjects with Asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017;196:700–712. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201612-2427OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Sugita K., Steer C.A., Martinez-Gonzalez I., Altunbulakli C., Morita H., Castro-Giner F., Kubo T., Wawrzyniak P., Ruckert B., Sudo K., et al. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells disrupt bronchial epithelial barrier integrity by targeting tight junctions through, IL-13 in asthmatic patients. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018;141:300–310. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Wawrzyniak P., Wawrzyniak M., Wanke K., Sokolowska M., Bendelja K., Ruckert B., Globinska A., Jakiela B., Kast J.I., Idzko M., et al. Regulation of bronchial epithelial barrier integrity by type 2 cytokines and histone deacetylases in asthmatic patients. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017;139:93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.03.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Pascual R.M., Peters S.P. Airway remodeling contributes to the progressive loss of lung function in asthma: An overview. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2005;116:477–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Doherty T., Broide D. Cytokines and growth factors in airway remodeling in asthma. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2007;19:676–680. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Chung K.F., Wenzel S.E., Brozek J.L., Bush A., Castro M., Sterk P.J., Adcock I.M., Bateman E.D., Bel E.H., Bleecker E.R., et al. International, ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2014;43:343–373. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00202013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Strickland D.H., Holt P.G. T regulatory cells in childhood asthma. Trends Immunol. 2011;32:420–427. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Josefowicz S.Z., Niec R.E., Kim H.Y., Treuting P., Chinen T., Zheng Y., Umetsu D.T., Rudensky A.Y. Extrathymically generated regulatory T cells control mucosal, TH2 inflammation. Nature. 2012;482:395–399. doi: 10.1038/nature10772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Hartl D., Koller B., Mehlhorn A.T., Reinhardt D., Nicolai T., Schendel D.J., Griese M., Krauss-Etschmann S. Quantitative and functional impairment of pulmonary, C.D.4+C.D.25hi regulatory T cells in pediatric asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007;119:1258–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Smyth L.J., Eustace A., Kolsum U., Blaikely J., Singh D. Increased airway T reg-ulatory cells in asthmatic subjects. Chest. 2010;138:905–912. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-3079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Ling E.M., Smith T., Nguyen X.D., Pridgeon C., Dallman M., Arbery J., Carr V.A., Robinson D.S. Relation of, CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell suppression of allergen-driven T-cell activation to atopic status and expression of allergic disease. Lancet. 2004;363:608–615. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15592-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Nguyen K.D., Vanichsarn C., Fohner A., Nadeau K.C. Selective deregulation in chemokine signaling pathways of, CD4+CD25(hi)C.D.127(lo)/(-) regulatory T cells in human allergic asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009;123:933–939. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.11.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Akdis C.A., Akdis M. Mechanisms and treatment of allergic disease in the big picture of regulatory T cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009;123:735–746. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Kearley J., Barker J.E., Robinson D.S., Lloyd C.M. Resolution of airway inflam-mation and hyperreactivity after in vivo transfer of, CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells is interleukin 10 dependent. J. Exp. Med. 2005;202:1539–1547. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Xu W., Lan Q., Chen M., Chen H., Zhu N., Zhou X., Wang J., Fan H., Yan C.-S., Kuang J.-L., et al. Adoptive transfer of induced-Treg cells effectively attenuates murine airway allergic inflammation. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e40314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Kearley J., Robinson D.S., Lloyd C.M. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells reverse established allergic airway inflammation and prevent airway remodeling. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008;122:617–624. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.05.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Bobolea I., Barranco P., Del Pozo V., Romero D., Sanz V., Lopez-Carrasco V., Canabal J., Villasante C., Quirce S. Sputum periostin in patients with different severe asthma phenotypes. Allergy. 2015;70:540–546. doi: 10.1111/all.12580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Wu W., Bleecker E., Moore W., Busse W.W., Castro M., Chung K.F., Calhoun W.J., Erzurum S., Gaston B., Israel E., et al. Unsupervised phenotyping of Severe Asthma Research Program participants using expanded lung data. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014;133:1280–1288. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Moore W.C., Hastie A.T., Li X., Li H., Busse W.W., Jarjour N.N., Wenzel S.E., Peters S.P., Meyers D.A., Bleecker E.R., et al. Sputum neutrophil counts are associated with more severe asthma phenotypes using cluster analysis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014;133:1557–1563. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Shaw D.E., Berry M.A., Hargadon B., McKenna S., Shelley M.J., Green R.H., Brightling C.E., Wardlaw A.J., Pavord I.D. Association between neutrophilic airway inflammation and airflow limitation in adults with asthma. Chest. 2007;6:1871–1875. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Douwes J., Gibson P., Pekkanen J., Pearce N. Non-eosinophilic asthma: Importance and possible mechanisms. Thorax. 2002;57:643–648. doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.7.643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Berry M., Morgan A., Shaw D.E., Parker D., Green R., Brightling C., Bradding P., Wardlaw A.J., Pavord I.D. Pathological features and inhaled corticosteroid response of eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic sthma. Thorax. 2007;62:1043–1049. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.073429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Bullens D.M., Truyen E., Coteur L., Dilissen E., Hellings P.W., Dupont L.J., Ceuppens J.L. IL-17 mRNA in sputum of asthmatic patients: Linking T cell driven inflammation and granulo cytic influx? Respir. Res. 2006;7:135. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-7-135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Manni M.L., Trudeau J.B., Scheller E.V., Mandalapu S., Elloso M.M., Kolls J.K., Wenzel S.E., Alcorn J.F. The complex relationship between inflammation and lung function in severe asthma. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7:1186–1198. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Besnard A.G., Togbe D., Couillin I., Tan Z., Zheng S.G., Erard F., Le Bert M., Quesniaux V., Ryffel B. Inflammasome-IL-1-Th17 response in allergic lung inflammation. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;4:3–10. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjr042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Krishnaswamy J.K., Chu T., Eisenbarth S.C. Beyond pattern recognition:NOD-like receptors in dendritic cells. Trends Immunol. 2013;34:224–233. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2012.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Bruijnzeel P.L., Uddin M., Koenderman L. Targeting neutrophilic inflammation in severe neutrophilic asthma: Can we target the disease-relevant neutrophil phenotype? J. Leukoc. Biol. 2015;4:549–556. doi: 10.1189/jlb.3VMR1214-600RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Simpson J.L., Grissell T.V., Douwes J., Scott R.J., Boyle M.J., Gibson P.G. Innate immune activation in neutrophilic asthma and bronchiectasis. Thorax. 2007;3:211–218. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.061358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Petsky H.L., Cates C.J., Lasserson T.J., Li A.M., Turner C., Kynaston J.A., Chang A.B. A systematic review and meta-analysis: Tailoring asthma treatment on eosinophilic markers (exhaled nitric oxide or sputum eosinophils) Thorax. 2012;67:199–208. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.135574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Gaillard E.A., McNamara P.S., Murray C.S., Pavord I.D., Shields M.D. Blood eosinophils as a marker of likely corticosteroid response in children with preschool wheeze: Time for an eosinophil guided clinical trial? Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2015;45:1384–1395. doi: 10.1111/cea.12535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Bleecker E.R., FitzGerald J.M., Chanez P., Papi A., Weinstein S.F., Barker P., Sproule S., Gilmartin G., Aurivillius M., Werkstrom V., et al. Efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with severe asthma uncontrolled with high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists (SIROCCO): A randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2115–2127. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31324-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Ortega H.G., Liu M.C., Pavord I.D., Brusselle G.G., FitzGerald J.M., Chetta A., Humbert M., Katz L.E., Keene O.N., Yancey S.W., et al. Mepolizumab treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;371:1198–1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Ortega H.G., Yancey S.W., Mayer B., Gunsoy N.B., Keene O.N., Bleecker E.R., Brightling C.E., Pavord I.D. Severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab stratified by baseline eosinophil thresholds: A secondary analysis of the DREAM and MENSA studies. Lancet Respir. Med. 2016;4:549–556. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30031-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Katz L.E., Gleich G.J., Hartley B.F., Yancey S.W., Ortega H.G. Blood eosinophil count is a useful biomarker to identify patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2014;11:531–536. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201310-354OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Price D.B., Rigazio A., Campbell J.D., Bleecker E.R., Corrigan C.J., Thomas M., Wenzel S.E., Wilson A.M., Small M.B., Gopalan G., et al. Blood eosinophil count and prospective annual asthma disease burden: A UK cohort study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2015;3:849–858. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00367-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Zeiger R.S., Schatz M., Dalal A.A., Chen W., Sadikova E., Suruki R.Y., Kawatkar A.A., Qian L. Blood eosinophil count and outcomes in severe uncontrolled asthma: A prospective study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2017;5:144–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Woodruff P.G., Modrek B., Choy D.F., Jia G., Abbas A.R., Ellwanger A., Koth L.L., Arron J.R., Fahy J.V. T-helper type 2-driven inflammation defines major subphenotypes of asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009;180:388–395. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200903-0392OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.FitzGerald J.M., Bleecker E.R., Nair P., Korn S., Ohta K., Lommatzsch M., Ferguson G.T., Busse W.W., Barker P., Sproule S., et al. Benralizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody, as add-on treatment for patients with severe, uncontrolled, eosinophilic asthma (CALIMA): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2128–2141. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31322-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Hanania N.A., Wenzel S., Rosen K., Hsieh H.J., Mosesova S., Choy D.F., Lal P., Arron J.R., Harris J.M., Busse W. Exploring the effects of omalizumab in allergic asthma: An analysis of biomarkers in the EXTRA study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013;187:804–811. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1414OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Bjermer L., Alving K., Diamant Z., Magnussen H., Pavord I., Piacentini G., Price D., Roche N., Sastre J., Thomas M., et al. Current evidence and future research needs for FeNO measurement in respiratory diseases. Respir. Med. 2014;108:830–841. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Dweik R.A., Sorkness R.L., Wenzel S., Hammel J., Curran-Everett D., Comhair S.A., Bleecker E., Busse W., Calhoun W.J., Castro M., et al. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Severe Asthma Research Program. Use of exhaled nitric oxide measurement to identify a reactive, at-risk phenotype among patients with asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2010;181:1033–1041. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200905-0695OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Gemicioglu B., Musellim B., Dogan I., Guven K. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNo) in different asthma phenotypes. Allergy Rhinol. 2014;5:157–161. doi: 10.2500/ar.2014.5.0099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Sippel J.M., Holden W.E., Tilles S.A., O’Hollaren M., Cook J., Thukkani N., Priest J., Nelson B., Osborne M.L. Exhaled nitric oxide levels correlate with measures of disease control in asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2000;106:645–650. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.109618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.van Veen I.H., Ten Brinke A., Sterk P.J., Sont J.K., Gauw S.A., Rabe K.F., Bel E.H. Exhaled nitric oxide predicts lung function decline in difficult-to-treat asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2008;32:344–349. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00135907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Jones S.L., Kittelson J., Cowan J.O., Flannery E.M., Hancox R.J., McLachlan C.R., Taylor D.R. The predictive value of exhaled nitric oxide measurements in assessing changes in asthma control. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001;164:738–743. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.5.2012125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Van Vliet D., Alonso A., Rijkers G., Heynens J., Rosias P., Muris J., Jobsis Q., Dompeling E. Prediction of asthma exacerbations in children by innovative exhaled inflammatory markers: Results of a longitudinal study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0119434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Van der Valk R.J., Baraldi E., Stern G., Frey U., de Jongste J.C. Daily exhaled nitric oxide measurements and asthma exacerbations in children. Allergy. 2012;67:265–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02734.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Robroeks C.M., van Vliet D., Jobsis Q., Braekers R., Rijkers G.T., Wodzig W.K., Bast A., Zimmermann L., Dompeling E. Prediction of asthma exacerbations in children: Results of a one-year prospective study. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2012;42:792–798. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2012.03992.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Song J.S., You J.S., Jeong S.I., Yang S., Hwang I.T., Im Y.G., Baek H.S., Kim H.Y., Suh D.I., Lee H.B., et al. Serum periostin levels correlate with airway hyper-responsiveness to methacholine and mannitol in children with asthma. Allergy. 2015;70:674–681. doi: 10.1111/all.12599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Wedes S.H., Wu W., Comhair S.A., McDowell K.M., DiDonato J.A., Erzurum S.C., Hazen S.L. Urinary bromotyrosine measures asthma control and predicts asthma exacerbations in children. J. Pediatr. 2011;159:248–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.01.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Kimura H., Suzuki M., Konno S., Nishimura M., Bobolea I., Barranco P., Del Pozo V., Romero D., Sanz V., López-Carrasco V., et al. Sputum periostin in patients with different severe asthma phenotypes. Allergy. 2015;70:884–885. doi: 10.1111/all.12639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Hoshino M., Ohtawa J., Akitsu K. Association of airway wall thickness with serum periostin in steroid-naive asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2016;37:225–230. doi: 10.2500/aap.2016.37.3945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Sabiner U., Birben E., Erzurum S. Oxidative Stress in Asthma: Part of the puzzle. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2018;29:789–800. doi: 10.1111/pai.12965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Rodriguez-Roisin R. Acute severe asthma: Pathophysiology and pathobiology of gas exchange abnormalities. Eur. Respir. J. 1997;10:1359–1371. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10061359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Brochard L. Intrinsic (or auto-) PEEP. during controlled mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2012;28:1376–1378. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1438-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Adams J.Y., Sutter M.E., Albertson T.E. The patient with asthma in the emergency department. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2012;43:14–29. doi: 10.1007/s12016-011-8273-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Pepe P.E., Marini J.J. Occult Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated, PA tients with Airflow Obstruction. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1982;126:166–170. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.1.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Brenner B., Corbridge T., Kazzi A. Intubation and mechanical ventilation of the asthmatic patient in respiratory failure. J. Emerg. Med. 2009;37:S23–S34. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.06.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Alvarez G.G., Schulzer M., Jung D., Fitzgerald J. A systematic review of risk factors associated with near-fatal and fatal asthma. Can. Respir. J. 2005;12:265–270. doi: 10.1155/2005/837645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Suissa S., Blais L., Ernst P. Patterns of increasing beta-agonist use and the risk of fatal or near-fatal asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 1994;7:1602–1609. doi: 10.1183/09031936.94.07091602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.FitzGerald J.M., Tavakoli H., Lynd L.D., Al Efraij K., Sadatsafavi M. The impact of inappropriate use of short acting beta agonists in asthma. Respir. Med. 2017;131:135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Hodder R., Lougheed M.D., Rowe B.H., FitzGerald J.M., Kaplan A.G., McIvor R.A. Management of acute asthma in adults in the emergency department: Nonventilatory management. CMAJ. 2010;182:E55–E67. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Fergeson J.E., Patel S.S., Lockey R.F. Acute asthma, prognosis, and treatment. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017;139:438–447. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.06.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Lockey R.F., Ledford D.K. Asthma: Comorbidities, Coexisting Conditions, and Differential Diagnosis. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2014. pp. 231–367. [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Fretzayas A., Moustaki M., Loukou I., Douros K. Differentiating vocal cord dysfunction from asthma. J. Asthma Allergy. 2017;10:277–283. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S146007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Keeley D., Osman L. Dysfunctional breathing and asthma. It is important to tell the difference. BMJ. 2001;322:1075–1076. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Carruthers D.M., Harrison B.D. Arterial blood gas analysis or oxygen saturation in the assessment of acute asthma? Thorax. 1995;50:186–188. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.2.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Vasileiadis I., Alevrakis E., Ampelioti S., Vagionas D., Rovina N., Koutsoukou A. Acid-Base Disturbances in Patients with Asthma: A Literature Review and Comments on Their Pathophysiology. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8:563. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Cates C., Welsh E., Rowe B. Holding chambers (spacers) versus nebulisers for beta-agonist treatment of acute asthma (Review) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;13:CD000052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000052.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Rodrigo G.J., Rodrigo C. Continuous vs intermittent beta-agonists in the treatment of acute adult asthma: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Chest. 2002;122:160–165. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.1.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Camargo C.J., Spooner C., Rowe B. Continuous versus intermittent beta-agonists for acute asthma (Review) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2003;4:CD001115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Wilkinson M., Bulloch B., Garcia-Filion P., Keahey L. Efficacy of racemic albuterol versus levalbuterol used as a continuous nebulization for the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations: A randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. J. Asthma. 2011;48:188–193. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.554939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Nowak R., Emerman C., Hanrahan J.P., Parsey M.V., Hanania N.A., Claus R., Schaefer K., Baumgartner R.A., XOPENEX Acute Severe Asthma Study Group A comparison of levalbuterol with racemic albuterol in the treatment of acute severe asthma exacerbations in adults. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2006;24:259–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Tobin A. Intravenous salbutamol: Too Much of a Good Thing? Crit. Care Resusc. 2005;7:119–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Travers A.H., Milan S.J., Jones A.P., Camargo C.A., Jr., Rowe B.H. Addition of intravenous β2 -agonists to inhaled β2 -agonists for acute asthma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012;12:CD010179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Jones G.H., Scott S.J. Continuous infusions of terbutaline in asthma—A review. J. Asthma. 2011;48:753–756. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.613509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Rodrigo G.J., Nannini L.J. Comparison between nebulized adrenaline and β2 agonists for the treatment of acute asthma. A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2006;24:217–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Gosens R., Gross N. The mode of action of anticholinergics in asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2018;52:1701247. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01247-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Vogelberg C. Anticholinergics in asthma: Are we utilizing asthma therapies effectively? Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019;15:405–408. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S190363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Edmonds M., Milan S., Camargo C.A., Jr., Pollack C.V., Rowe B.H. Early use of inhaled corticosteroids in the emergency department treatment of acute asthma (Review) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012;12:CD002308. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002308.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Rowe B.H., Vethanayagam D. The role of inhaled corticosteroids in the management of acute asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2007;30:1035–1037. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00119907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Craig S., Kuan W.S., Kelly A.M., Van Meer O., Motiejunaite J., Keijzers G., Jones P., Body R., Karamercan M.A., Klim S., et al. Treatment and outcome of adult patients with acute asthma in emergency departments in Australasia, South East Asia and Europe: Are guidelines followed? AANZDEM/EuroDEM study. Emerg. Med. Australas. 2019 doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13242. (Epub ahead of print) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Rowe B.H., Edmonds M.L., Spooner C.H., Diner B., Camargo C.A. Corticosteroid therapy for acute asthma. Respir. Med. 2004;98:275–284. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Fulco P.P., Lone A.A., Pugh C.B. Intravenous versus oral corticosteroids for treatment of acute asthma exacerbations. Ann. Pharmacother. 2002;36:565–570. doi: 10.1345/aph.1A107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Kirkland S., Campbell S., Villa-Roel C., Rowe B. Intramuscular versus oral corticosteroids to reduce relapses following discharge from the emergency department for acute asthma (Review) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018;2018:CD012629. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012629.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Normansell R., Kew K., Mansour G. Different oral corticosteroid regimens for acute asthma (Review) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016;5:CD011801. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011801.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Rowe B., Bretzlaff J., Bourdon C., Bota G., Blitz S., Camargo C.A., Jr. Magnesium sulfate for treating exacerbations of acute asthma in the emergency department. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2000;2:CD001490. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Kew K., Kirtchuk L., Michell C. Intravenous magnesium sulfate for treating adults with acute asthma in the emergency department (Review) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014;5:CD010909. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Green R.H. Asthma in adults (acute): Magnesium sulfate treatment. BMJ Clin. Evid. 2016;1:1513. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Knightly R., Milan S., Hughes R., Knopp-sihota J., Rowe B., Normansell R., Powell C. Inhaled magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute asthma (Review) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017;11:CD003898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003898.pub6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Javor E., Grle S.P. Limitations of the results from randomized clinical trials involving intravenous and nebulised magnesium sulphate in adulta with severe acute asthma. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019;55:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2019.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Goodacre S., Cohen J., Bradburn M., Stevens J., Gray A., Benger J., Coats T., 3Mg Research Team The 3Mg trial: A randomised controlled trial of intravenous or nebulised magnesium sulphate versus placebo in adults with acute severe asthma. Health Technol. Assess. 2014;18:1–168. doi: 10.3310/hta18220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Nair P., Milan S., Rowe B. Addition of intravenous aminophylline to inhaled β2—Agonists in adults with acute asthma (Review) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012;12:CD002742. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002742.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Mahemuti G., Zhang H., Li J. Efficacy and side effects of intravenous theophylline in acute asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2018;12:99–120. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S156509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Silverman R.A., Chen Y., Bonuccelli C.M., Simonson S.G. Zafirlukast improves emergency department outcomes after an acute asthma episode. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1999;34:S1. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(99)80088-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Camargo C.A.J., Smithline H.A., Malice M.-P., Green S.A., Reiss T.F. A randomized controlled trial of intravenous montelukast in acute asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003;167:528–533. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200208-802OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Watts K., Chavasse R. Leukotriene receptor antagonists in addition to usual care for acute asthma in adults and children (Review) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012;5:CD006100. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006100.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Perrin K., Wijesinghe M., Healy B., Wadsworth K., Bowditch R., Bibby S., Baker T., Weatherall M., Beasley R. Randomised controlled trial of high concentration versus titrated oxygen therapy in severe exacerbations of asthma. Thorax. 2011;66:937–941. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.155259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Rodrigo G.J., Verde M.R., Peregalli V. Effects of Short-term 28% and 100% Oxygen on Pa, CO2 and Peak Expiratory Flow Rate in Acute Asthma—A randomized trial. Chest. 2003;124:1312–1317. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.4.1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Inwald D., Roland M., Kuitert L., Mckenzie S.A., Petros A., Inwald D. Oxygen treatment for acute severe asthma. BMJ. 2001;323:98–100. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Rodrigo G.J., Castro-Rodriguez J.A. Heliox-driven β2 -agonists nebulization for children and adults with acute asthma: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014;112:29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Rodrigo G.J., Rodrigo C., Pollack C.V., Rowe B., Em C. Use of Helium-Oxygen Mixtures in the Treatment of Acute Asthma a Systematic Review. Chest. 2003;123:891–896. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.3.891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.El-Khatib M., Jamaleddine G., Kanj N. Effect of Heliox- and Air-Driven Nebulized Bronchodilator Therapy on Lung Function in Patients with Asthma. Lung. 2014;192:377–383. doi: 10.1007/s00408-014-9570-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.L’Hommedieu C.S., Arens J.J. The use of ketamine for the emergency intubation of patients with status asthmaticus. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1987;16:568–571. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(87)80688-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Goyal S., Agrawal A. Ketamine in status asthmaticus: A review. Indian J. Crit. Care Med. 2013;17:154–161. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.117048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Esmailian M., Esfahani M.K., Heydari F. The Effect of Low-Dose Ketamine in Treating Acute Asthma Attack; A Randomized Clinical Trial. Emergency. 2018;6:e21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Stefan M.S., Shieh M.S., Spitzer K.A., Pekow P.S., Krishnan J.A., Au D.H., Lindenauer P.K. Association of Antibiotic Treatment with Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for an Asthma Exacerbation Treated with Systemic Corticosteroids. JAMA Intern. Med. 2019;179:333–339. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Lindenauer P.K., Stefan M.S., Feemster L.C. Use of antibiotics among patients hospitalized for exacerbations of asthma. JAMA Intern. Med. 2016;176:1397–1400. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Stefan M.S., Nathanson B.H., Lagu T., Priya A., Pekow P.S., Steingrub J.S., Hill N.S., Goldberg R.J., Kent D.M., Lindenauer P.K. Outcomes of Noninvasive and Invasive Veltilation in Patients Hospitalized with Asthma Exacerbation. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2016;13:1096–1104. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201510-701OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Pallin M., Naughton M.T. Noninvasive ventilation in acute asthma. J. Crit. Care. 2014;29:586–593. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Burns K.E.A., Meade M.O., Premji A. Noninvasive ventilation as a weaning strategy for mechanical ventilation in adults with respiratory failure: A Cochrane systematic review. CMAJ. 2014;186:E112–E122. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Wu R.S.C., Wu K.C., Wong T.K.M., Tsai Y.H., Cheng R.K.S., Bishop M.J., Tan P.P. Effects of fenoterol and ipratropium on respiratory resistance of asthmatics after tracheal intubation. Br. J. Anaesth. 2000;84:358–362. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Davidson C., Banham S., Elliott M. BTS/ICS Guideline for the Ventilatory Management of Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure in Adults. Thorax. 2016;71:ii1–ii35. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Davidson C., Banham S., Elliott M., Kennedy D., Gelder C., Glossop A., Church A.C., Creagh-Brown B., Dodd J.W., Felton T., et al. Guideline for the ventilatory management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in adults. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2016;14:e000133. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Davis D.P., Hwang J.Q., Dunford J.V. Rate of decline in oxygen saturation at various pulse oximetry values with prehospital rapid sequence intubation. Prehosp. Emerg. Care. 2008;12:46–51. doi: 10.1080/10903120701710470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Eames W., Rooke G., Wu R., Bishop M. Comparison of the effects of Etomidate, Propofol, and Thiopental on respiratory resistance asther tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:1307–1311. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199606000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Laher A., Buchanan S. Mechanically Ventilating the Severe Asthmatic Mechanically Ventilating the Severe Asthmatic. J. Intensive Care Med. 2018;33:491–501. doi: 10.1177/0885066617740079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Laghi F., Goyal A. Auto-PEEP in respiratory failure. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:201–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Williams T.J., Tuxen D., Scheinkestel C.D., Czarny D., Bowes G. Risk Factors for Morbidity in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Acute Severe Asthma 1, 2. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1992;146:607–615. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/146.3.607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Leatherman J. Mechanical ventilation for severe asthma. Chest. 2015;147:1671–1680. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Kollef M.H. Lung hyperinflation caused by inappropriate ventilation resulting in electromechanical dissociation: A case report. Heart Lung. 1992;21:74–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Riker R.R., Shehabi Y., Bokesch P.M., Ceraso D., Wisemandle W., Whitten P., Margolis B.D., Byrne D.W., Ely E.W., Rocha M.G., et al. Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation of Critically Ill Patients. JAMA. 2009;301:489–499. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Burburan S.M., Xisto D.G., Rocco P.R.M. Anaesthetic management in asthma. Minerva Anestesiol. 2007;73:357–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Behbehani N.A., Al-Mane F., D’yachkova Y., Pare P., FitzGerald J.M. Myopathy following mechanical ventilation for acute severe asthma: The role of muscle relaxants and corticosteroids. Chest. 1999;115:1627–1631. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.6.1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Tuxen D., Lane S. The Effects of Ventilatory Pattern on Hyperinflation, Airway Pressures, and Circulation in Mechanical Ventilation of Patients with Severe Air-Flow. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1987;136:872–879. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/136.4.872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Tuxen D.V. Detrimental Effects of Positive End-expiratory Pressure during Controlled Mechanical Ventilation of Patients with Severe Airflow Obstruction. Am. Rev. 1989;140:5–9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/140.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Caramez M., Borges J., Tucci M., Okamoto V. Paradoxical responses to positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with airway obstruction during controlled ventilation. Crit. Care Med. 2005;33:1519–1528. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000168044.98844.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Stather D.R., Stewart T.E. Clinical review: Mechanical ventilation in severe asthma. Crit. Care. 2005;9:581–587. doi: 10.1186/cc3733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Baudin F., Buisson A., Vanel B., Massenavette B., Pouyau R., Javouhey E. Nasal high flow in management of children with status asthmaticus: A retrospective observational study. Ann. Intensive Care. 2017;7:55. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0278-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Pilar J., Modesto I., Alapont V., Lopez-Fernandez Y.M., Lopez-Macias O., Garcia-Urabayen D., Amores-Hernandez I. High-flow nasal cannula therapy versus non-invasive ventilation in children with severe acute asthma exacerbation: An observational cohort study. Med. Intensiva. 2017;41:418–424. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2017.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Chang C.L., Yates D.H. Use of Early Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (E.C.M.O.) for Severe Refractory Status Asthmaticus. J. Med. Cases. 2011;2:124–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Alzeer A.H., Otair H.A.A., Khurshid S.M., Badrawy S.E., Bakir B.M. Case Report A case of near fatal asthma: The role of ECMO as rescue therapy. Ann. Thorac. Med. 2015;10:89–91. doi: 10.4103/1817-1737.152461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Mikkelsen M.E., Woo Y.J., Sager J.S., Fuchs B.D., Christie J.D. Outcomes using extracorporeal life support for adult respiratory failure due to status asthmaticus. ASAIO J. 2009;55:47. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181901ea5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Yeo H.J., Kim D., Jeon D., Kim Y.S., Rycus P., Cho W.H. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for life-threatening asthma refractory to mechanical ventilation: Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Crit. Care. 2017;21:297. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1886-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Di Lascio G., Prifti E., Messai E., Peris A., Harmelin G., Xhaxho R., Fico A., Sani G., Bonacchi M. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for life-threatening acute severe status asthmaticus. Perfusion. 2017;32:157. doi: 10.1177/0267659116670481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Lobaz S., Carey M. Case reports Rescue of acute refractory hypercapnia and acidosis secondary to life-threatening asthma with extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) Case report. J. Intensive Care Soc. 2011;12:140–142. doi: 10.1177/175114371101200210. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Brenner K., Abrams D.C., Agerstrand C.L., Brodie D. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for refractory status asthmaticus: Experience in distinct exacerbation phenotypes. Perfusion. 2014;29:26–28. doi: 10.1177/0267659113494964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Schneider T., Bence T., Brettner F. “Awake” ECCO2R superseded intubation in a near-fatal asthma attack. J. Intensive Care. 2017;5:53. doi: 10.1186/s40560-017-0247-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Tobias J.D. Inhalational Anesthesia: Basic Pharmacology, End Organ Effects, and Applications in the Treatment of Status Asthmaticus. J. Intensive Care Med. 2009;24:361–371. doi: 10.1177/0885066609344836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Vaschetto R., Bellotti E., Turucz E., Gregoretti C., Corte F.D., Navalesi P. Inhalational Anesthetics in Acute Severe Asthma. Curr. Drug Targets. 2009;10:826–832. doi: 10.2174/138945009789108747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Rosseel P., Lauwers L.F., Baute L., Care I., Stuivenberg A.Z. Halothane treatment in life-threatening asthma. Intensive Care Med. 1985;11:241–246. doi: 10.1007/BF00260352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Bierman M., Brown M., Muren O. Prolonged isoflurane anesthesia in status asthmaticus. Crit. Care Med. 1986;14:832–833. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198609000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Schutte D., Zwitserloot A.M., Houmes R., Hoog M.D., Draaisma J.M., Lemson J. Sevoflurane therapy for life-threatening asthma in children. Br. J. Anaesth. 2013;111:967–970. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Ng E., Fahimi J., Hern H. Sevoflurane administration initiated out of the, ED for life-threatening status asthmaticus. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2015;33:e3–e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Ruszkai Z., Bokretas G., Bartha P. Sevoflurane therapy for life-threatening acute severe asthma: A case report. Can. J. Anesth. 2014;61:943–950. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0213-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Beute J. Emergency treatment of status asthmaticus with enoximone. Br. J. Anaesth. 2014;112:1105–1108. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Nanchal R., Kumar G., Majumdar T., Taneja A., Patel J., Dagar G., Jacobs E.R., Whittle J. Utilization of mechanical ventilation for asthma exacerbations: Analysis of a national database. Respir. Care. 2014;59:644–653. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Marquette C.H., Saulnier F., Leroy O., Wallaert B., Chopin C., Demarcq J.M., Durocher A., Tonnel A.B. Long-term prognosis of near-fatal asthma. A 6-year follow-up study of 145 asthmatic patients who underwent mechanical ventilation for a near-fatal attack of asthma. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1992;146:76–81. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/146.1.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Yellowlees P.M., Ruffin R.E. Psychological defenses and coping styles in patients following a life-threatening attack of asthma. Chest. 1989;95:1298–1303. doi: 10.1378/chest.95.6.1298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Lemmetyinen R.E., Karjalainen J.V., But A., Renkonen R.L.O., Pekkanen J.R., Toppila-Salmi S.K., Haukka J.K. Higher mortality of adults with asthma: A 15-year follow-up of a population-based cohort. Allergy. 2018;73:1479–1488. doi: 10.1111/all.13431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES