Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD)-associated synaptic dysfunction drives the progression of pathology from its earliest stages. Amyloid β (Aβ) species, both soluble and in plaque deposits, have been causally related to the progressive, structural and functional impairments observed in AD. It is, however, still unclear how Aβ plaques develop over time and how they progressively affect local synapse density and turnover. Here we observed, in a mouse model of AD, that Aβ plaques grow faster in the earlier stages of the disease and if their initial area is >500 µm2; this may be due to deposition occurring in the outer regions of the plaque, the plaque cloud. In addition, synaptic turnover is higher in the presence of amyloid pathology and this is paralleled by a reduction in pre- but not post-synaptic densities. Plaque proximity does not appear to have an impact on synaptic dynamics. These observations indicate an imbalance in the response of the pre- and post-synaptic terminals and that therapeutics, alongside targeting the underlying pathology, need to address changes in synapse dynamics.
Subject terms: Alzheimer's disease, Spine structure
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the world’s leading cause of dementia and is thought to be primarily a synaptopathy1,2. Indeed, synapse loss and altered connectivity occurs in the earliest stages of AD, preceding its histopathological hallmarks and possibly driving the progression of cognitive decline3–6. Mutations in the gene encoding the amyloid precursor protein (APP) carry the greatest incidence of early-onset familial AD (FAD), along with presenilin 1 and 27. APP is widely expressed in neurons and is thought to be responsible for synapse formation and repair8. Animal models with human APP mutations exhibit synapse loss9 and dysfunction10, gliosis11, cognitive impairments12 and, in some cases, neuron loss10 alongside the progressive accumulation of pathogenic Aβ species13.
To further understand synapse dynamics in amyloidopathy, we used the J20 mouse model, which has human APP mutations consistent with FAD14,15. In this model, soluble Aβ is apparent at 2 months of age, with the first plaques forming in the 5th month, in some animals, and in all animals by the 10th month16. From the moment Aβ plaques start to appear, pathogenic amyloid species are not uniformly distributed across the brain parenchyma. Consequently, there may be differing effects on synapse structure and function in relation to their proximity to plaques9. Previous observations identified an inverse relationship between dendritic spine density and amyloid plaque pathology9,17.
As Aβ deposits represent a reservoir of pathogenic amyloid species, we first investigated plaque growth rates in relation to their initial area, plaque region and animal’s age in vivo, using the amyloid-binding dye methoxy-XO418, which labels both condensed cores and the surrounding fibrillar Aβ subspecies19, referred to here as the cloud. In addition, we hypothesized that synapse density and turnover in the neocortex are altered in the presence of Aβ plaques between 7 and 10 months of age and are differentially affected by plaque proximity.
Results
To measure synapse dynamics in relation to plaque deposition in AD-associated amyloidopathy, we used in vivo two-photon imaging of methoxy-XO4-labelled plaques and GFP-expressing pyramidal neurons in the somatosensory cortex (SSC) of J20 mice and wild-type (WT) littermate controls (Fig. 1a). The same regions of interest were imaged longitudinally on a weekly basis. We studied two groups of J20 animals at different ages ranging from early (30–42 weeks/7–10 months old) to late stages (49–61 weeks/11–14 months old) (Fig. 1b) of the disease. WT littermates were used as a negative control cohort for the younger age-point (30–42 weeks/old) only. Both of the stages evaluated were characterized by the presence of pathogenic Aβ species and synapse loss in transgenic animals16,20.
Amyloid plaque growth-rate is faster in younger animals and for larger plaques
The total area of Aβ plaques increased in both the early and late cohorts (Fig. 1c and S.Fig. 1, early p = 0.0002 and 1b late p = 0.0002). The plaque-to-plaque average growth rate (Rate of Rise: RoR, units: µm2/week) was measured as the slope of a linear function fit for each plaque’s surface area over time. We observed that Aβ plaques grew faster in younger animals (Fig. 1c right, p < 0.0001). As the plaques were not homogenous in size, we separated them into three groups, based on the initial raw total area: small (<300 µm2) medium (300–500 µm2) and large (>500 µm2). Plaques that are initially large and those found in younger animals grew faster (Fig. 1d, p = 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively); in addition, age and plaque initial size interact in affecting plaque growth rate (Fig. 1d, p = 0.0016). For the complete set of pairwise comparisons, see SI-Table 1.
We separately investigated the growth rate of the plaque’s dense core and surrounding cloud, across the two age-points (Fig. 1e). We observed that the age-point and the plaque region both affected and interacted with each other in relation to plaque growth rate (See insert in Fig. 1e for F and P values): the cloud grew faster than the core at both the early (p < 0.0001) and late (Bonferroni’s corrected unpaired t-test; p = 0.008) groups. While, the core’s growth rate was not different (Bonferroni’s corrected unpaired t-test; p = 0.542), the cloud’s growth rate was faster in the early group, compared to the late group (p < 0.0001). For the complete set of pairwise comparisons, see SI-Table 2. From these results, we can conclude that plaques grow faster in younger animals and if they have a large cloud surrounding the core. This is presumably due to Aβ aggregation occurring quicker at the level of the plaque cloud.
Axonal terminaux boutons but not dendritic spines are reduced in J20 transgenic mice
Hippocampal synapse loss has been observed in the J20 model as early as 3 months20. However, the subtle differences between pre- and post-synaptic components have not been elucidated in relation to significant levels of amyloid, or in the cortex. Therefore, we examined whether the pre- and post-synaptic components (axonal terminaux boutons (TBs) and dendritic spines, respectively) of cytosolic GFP-transduced cortical pyramidal neurons, were altered in the J20 model, in an age range exhibiting significant plaque accumulation (between 7 and 10 months/30 and 42 weeks), compared to WT littermates (Fig. 2a). There was no overall observable difference in spine density (Fig. 2b, p = 1), however, there was a significant decrease in the density of TBs in J20s compared to WT controls in the SSC (Fig. 2c, p = 0.04).
The stability of dendritic spines and axonal boutons is altered in J20 transgenic mice
Continual addition and loss of synapses is thought to underlie the fine tuning of neuronal function to match cognitive demands21–24. Disruption of synapse turnover or stability is thought to occur in disease, potentially indicative of the early stages of dementia25–27. Thus, to further examine how synapse dynamics are altered in our model of amyloidopathy, spine and TB survival, as a fraction of the first-time point, were initially analyzed. There was a significant decrease in the survival fraction of both spines and TBs compared to WT control animals (Fig. 3a, spines p = 0.04 and TBs p < 0.001). The turnover ratio (TOR) was also disrupted, as there was a significant increase in the TOR for both dendritic spines and TBs in the J20 group (Fig. 3c, spines p = 0.04 and TBs p < 0.001). In addition, comparing the turnover of spines and TBs, as an average of all the time points, indicated a significantly higher turnover of TBs compared to spines in J20s (Fig. 3e, p = 0.01). On further analysis, this disruption in turnover was driven by an increase in gained spines while the number of lost spines was unaffected (Fig. 3f, gains p = 0.02 losses p = 0.06). The increased turnover of axonal TBs was driven by both gained and lost boutons (Fig. 3g, gains p = 0.02 losses p = 0.004). These observations reveal that, in the J20 model, both spines and TBs are less stable and the balance of turnover is significantly disrupted at the level of both the pre- and post-synapse.
Alterations in synapse density and stability is not affected by plaque proximity
As previously shown, synapse density is negatively correlated to the proximity of amyloid plaques in the Tg2576 (APP Swedish mutation) Aβ overexpressing transgenic mouse28.Thus, we aimed to assess this in the J20 amyloid model. The proximity of the nearest plaque was measured for each axon or dendrite (Fig. 4a). Neurites were considered close to a plaque if the nearest plaque was within 300 µm. The densities of both axonal and dendritic synapse components were not differentially affected if the nearest plaque was less than 300 µm away when compared to those without a plaque nearby at any time point (Fig. 4b, p = 0.5 and c, p = 0.2). Notably, new plaques appeared during our longitudinal imaging periods, meaning plaques were at different stages of maturity and of different sizes. Consequently, we decided to consider a neuronal process as close to a newly formed plaque at five weeks post-plaque appearance. However, newly formed plaque distance did not significantly correlate with the spine or TB density (Fig. 4e, p = 0.7 and p = 0.2, respectively). The stability (Fig. 4e, spine p = 0.7 and TB p = 0.08) and turnover (Fig. 4f, spine p = 1 and TB p = 0.2) of spines and TBs was also unaffected by their proximity to the nearest plaque. Post-mortem evaluation of synaptophysin and PSD-95 puncta close to plaques confirmed that, even within 50 µm of plaques (Fig. 4g), pre-synaptic terminals (Fig. 4h, p < 0.001) were lost compared to WTs whereas post-synaptic spines were unaffected (Fig. 4i, p > 0.05).
Discussion
The loss of synapses in AD has been observed in humans and several mouse models2,29,30, however, the specific, time-dependent dynamics of synaptic alterations warrants further investigation. Further, while the growth of amyloid plaques has been previously characterized in vivo30–34, their growth dynamics, as a function of size and age, and the relationship between plaque growth and synapse dynamics still remains to be determined. Subtle changes in fine plaque and synaptic detail, and their interactions over time, captured here using in vivo multiphoton imaging, cannot readily be studied using conventional post-mortem analyses.
In this current study, we present three main findings: firstly, amyloid plaques grow at a faster rate if they are large and in young animals, secondly axonal boutons, but not dendritic spines, are lost in amyloidopathy and thirdly, the stability of both synaptic structures is compromised in the J20 transgenic model. The age- and size-dependent differences in plaque growth rate in J20 mice may be due to deposition dynamics occurring in the plaque cloud, rather than the dense core. This suggests that the main area of plaque growth may be the cloud: the slow growth of small plaques may be due to the reduced extension of the cloud. Age, plaque size and extension of the cloud, may be important for developing drug interventions35.
Whilst we characterized the growth of individual plaques in this study, the overall density of plaques in the SSC also increased over this time period16. The growth of individual plaques was affected by the initial size, especially in the younger animals. The higher density of plaques in the older animals (late group) may account for the reduced growth with age31, contrary to what was seen by Hefendehl and colleagues in the APPPS1 model. This finding is largely consistent with Meyer-Luehmann and colleagues, who show that younger (and therefore smaller) plaques had an initial rapid increase in size before their growth rate slowed32. Another possibility is that larger plaques are formed by the clustering of small plaques34. In this study, whilst we often saw plaques relatively close to each other (within a few hundred micrometers, although not as close as reported by McCarter and colleagues), we did not observe any plaques merging. There is a possibility that this had occurred before our imaging began, especially as we observed some larger plaques with two-lobed cores, so we cannot completely rule this out. Whilst it is possible that the different groups may have differing rates of Aβ production, the aggregated Aβ in both groups would be deposited either as a new plaque or join an existing plaque. In young animals, where more new plaques are developing33, Aβ would join the relatively few existing plaques, reflected by a higher rate of growth in these plaques, especially in the plaque cloud. However, in older animals, where there are more plaques, new Aβ would be distributed amongst the many plaques present so each plaque would show a slower, possibly saturated, rate of growth. We hypothesize that the cloud consists of loosely packed fiber-like structures that extend outward from the densely packed core, as described previously19. Recent literature has proposed a link between plaque compaction and microglial-dependent plaque interactions that have a direct effect on the degree of neurite damage36. Indeed, a study by Condello and colleagues has shown that rapidly growing plaques are associated with greater levels of local neuronal dystrophy and that this damage plateaus as plaque growth rate slows37. Of further note, microglia have been shown to form a physical ‘barrier’ around plaques, limiting their expansion resulting in smaller, more compact plaques38. This could explain the heterogeneity in plaque growth, where the growth rate of smaller plaques might be limited by microglia. It should be noted that the older group of animals received a control compound in a drug discovery study, which was not found to have an effect on amyloid pathology, although other more subtle effects cannot be ruled out. Finally, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) has been reported to occur in J20 mice39,40. This is of relevance as the accumulation and growth of Aβ plaques is driven by both increased Aβ peptide production and decreased degradation and perivascular drainage, in both sporadic and FAD41. Teasing out the interplay of effects of Aβ toxic species on both vascular and neuronal function, will be of key importance in order to clarify the pathogenesis of AD. Although CAA was observed in these animals, we were careful to image plaques away from blood vessels to avoid it being a confounding factor in the parenchymal Aβ accumulation. To address the vascular effects of Aβ accumulation, we have recently investigated the function of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in J20 mice and did not observe any differences between WTs and J20 animals (data not shown).
This is the first study of its kind to quantify the growth of different components of amyloid plaques (specifically comparing the cloud and the dense core), at different time points, using this temporal resolution. Overall, these observations help us to understand how amyloid pathology progresses over time and may help to identify patients for newly developed therapies. This could potentially be achieved by the validation of the detection of single Aβ plaques in the retina as a selective and specific diagnostic tool for AD42. Aβ plaque number, growth rate (both in number and size), cloud: core surface ratio and the correlation of these parameters with the cognitive state of the patient, may provide vital information on the progression of the disease and what therapeutic strategy may be the most effective, for individual patients.
To date, very few studies have looked at dendritic spine density in the J20 model. A 36% reduction was observed in the hippocampus at 11 months43, however, equivalent measurements were not made in the cortex. Interestingly, Hong and colleagues reported a significant decrease in hippocampal PSD-95 puncta in J20 mice, at 3 months of age, without a change in synaptophysin staining in ex vivo sections20. However, Mucke and colleagues16, who originally characterized the J20 model, reported a loss of synaptophysin terminals not correlated with plaque load, suggesting that plaques are not the cause of synapse loss, consistent with our findings. In the Tg2576 model, Spires and colleagues reported a decrease in cortical spines9 and Bittner and colleagues showed a decrease in cortical and hippocampal spines in 3xTg mice (both within and >50 µm from plaques, but only from 13 months of age onwards)17. Here we show that dendritic spine density was unaffected in the cortex (both in vivo and by post-mortem analysis), possibly due to differences in AD models, brain region and/or plaque proximity. This finding was consistent with a previous study30 reporting changes in spine density within 50 µm of plaques. However, we did observe a reduction in their survival and a change to their turnover, regardless of plaque proximity. The J20 model has not been reported to exhibit significant levels of neurodegeneration; in line with this we did not observe any dystrophic neurites. Other studies have shown dystrophic neurites and dramatic synapse loss around plaques, however, these occurred within 15 µm of a plaque44. Here, neurites were imaged 50–200 µm from the nearest plaque edge, which would explain why no dystrophic neurites were observed. Therefore, axonal bouton loss was on cells that did not degenerate during the experimental time frame.
This study presents novel in vivo measurements of axonal bouton density, revealing a significant reduction in TBs. This is consistent with a loss of synaptophysin staining found here (Fig. 4h) and in other similar studies9,45. However, Liebscher and colleagues did not show any change in bouton density either close to (<50 µm) or further from plaques (>50 µm) in male APPPS1 mice. Changes in turnover were only seen <50 µm from plaques30. Liebscher and colleagues used a Thy-1 GFP-M model, which, they say, mainly labels cortical layer 5 cells. Their axonal morphology looks consistent with layer 5 labelling due to the high density of en passant boutons and fewer TBs46. Using a virally targeted method, we observed staining in all cortical layers, however, most of the axonal labelling appeared to be from layer 6, due to the higher density of TBs, which are highly plastic46. An explanation for the disparity in pre- and post-synaptic regulation could be that bouton loss occurs prior to spine loss in the cortex, where spines are subsequently upregulated to compensate for this, at least in the earlier stages of the disease. This ability may be lost in older animals and, thus, could explain the differences observed in the above-mentioned studies and our findings, with regards to spine density. Another explanation could be that axonal boutons are upregulated due to dendritic spine instability, but over compensation by the axons results in TB loss. Or, as a recent study has shown47, Aβ is enriched only at the pre- and not at the post-synapse, which may also explain why, in our study, axonal boutons are more affected than dendritic spines. In addition, it is becoming clear that there are potential sex differences in these models, as seen in a recent report in the 5xFAD model of AD48.
Further, the imbalance between the pre- and post-synaptic components, seen here, is consistent with what we have reported in the Tg4510 model of tauopathy27. Whilst this mismatch may be explained in tauopathy by the movement of pathological tau to the somatodendritic compartment49, the mechanisms of how Aβ causes synapse loss are less clear. Several studies have proposed candidate Aβ receptors such as p75NTR50, Frizzled51 and LilrB2/ PirB52, all of which have been implicated in altered synaptic plasticity, but mainly on the post-synaptic side51–53. Presumably, there is a soluble Aβ gradient, where synapses close to amyloid plaques are more likely to be lost through the toxic effects of soluble Aβ. Aside from this there could be a component of glial regulation implicated in this imbalance. Indeed, Hong and colleagues have shown that local activation of the innate immune system, via the glial complement system, mediates early synaptic loss in AD, before apparent plaque formation, and importantly, inhibiting this response ameliorates synapse loss20. This highlights the importance of both astrocytes and microglia in AD-related synapse loss.
Another novel finding in this study was that, despite their stability, dendritic spine survival was significantly reduced. On the other hand, spine turnover, driven by the formation of newly formed spines, was increased, presumably leading to the maintenance of stable spine density. Conversely, the significant reduction in TB density was paralleled by the highly significant reduction in survival fraction and loss of TBs, with only a modest, but significant, increase in gained TBs, which was not sufficient to maintain a stable TB density. The loss of presynaptic boutons, but persistence of spine levels, would be sufficient to account for the decline in input-output relationships observed in multiple neurophysiological studies of synaptic transmission in murine models of amyloidopathy (reviewed in8), although other explanations are feasible, for example, changes in action potential waveforms54.
In conclusion, our study reveals the unique, long-term growth dynamics of individual amyloid plaques and how this changes with disease progression. This is of particular importance when considering treatments that target amyoidopathy. In addition, our findings are consistent with previous work showing that synapses are targeted in amyloidopathy and we have shown, for the first time, that altered synapse dynamics leads to unstable synapses. Whilst studies are underway that seek to address the underlying pathology in AD and halt the disease, synaptic loss would still remain and continue to cause cognitive deficits. Thus, synaptic loss and instability would need to be addressed, alongside understanding the underlying mechanisms, for cognitive benefits in AD.
Materials and Methods
Animals
The J20 Aβ-overexpressing line carries a PDGF-β promoter-driven transgene for human APP, with Indiana (V717F) and Swedish (K670M – N671L) mutations. Both mutations are associated with FAD14,15. Adult female mice of the J20 line (n = 15 animals) and WT littermate controls (n = 15 animals) were used from 7 months (27 weeks) of age. Adult female mice from 11 months (45 weeks) (n = 14 animals) were also used for plaque analysis. This second set of animals was administered with a control vehicle for a drug discovery study, however, it was confirmed, with post-mortem immunohistochemistry, that this had no effect on measures of amyloid pathology (data not shown). All mice were given ad libitum access to food and water and maintained in a 12-hour light-dark cycle. All procedures were conducted by researchers holding a UK personal license and experimental protocols were approved and conducted in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and subject to internal ethical review (Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board at Lilly UK).
Surgery
Cranial windows were surgically implanted over the SSC as previously described27. Briefly, mice were anaesthetized with isofluorane and administered dexamethasone (30 mg/kg) to limit brain swelling and the analgesic, buprenorphine (5 mg/kg), pre-operatively. The skull was exposed and a 5 mm diameter craniotomy drilled over the SSC. AAV (serotype 2) expressing cytosolic enhanced-GFP was stereotaxically injected into the SSC, ~300 µm below the dura. A glass coverslip was placed over the craniotomy and sealed with glue and dental cement. A screw was placed in the skull on the contralateral side for added stability. The whole skull was subsequently covered in dental cement and a metal bar placed on top to allow head fixation at the two-photon microscope. Mice were allowed to recover for 3 weeks before imaging began. It was confirmed, by immunohistochemistry, that the cranial window did not cause an increase in amyloid pathology or microgliosis in any of the groups (data not shown).
Imaging
5 mg/kg methoxy-XO4 (45% PBS, 45% propylene glycol, 10% DMSO) (2.9 mM) was injected intraperitoneally 24 hours prior to two-photon imaging to label the fibrillary beta sheet deposits of amyloid plaques. 25 μl of dextran-Texas red was injected intravenously immediately prior to imaging to visualize blood vessels in some imaging sessions. A purpose built two-photon microscope equipped with a tunable coherent Ti:Sapphire laser (MaiTAI, SpectraPhysics) and PrairieView acquisition software was used for all imaging experiments. Mice were anaesthetized with isofluorane and secured to the microscope via the metal bar attached to the skull and a custom-built fixed support. Lacri-lube was applied to the eyes to prevent dehydration and temperature of >34 °C maintained by a heating blanket and rectal thermal probe. An Olympus 10X objective (NA = 0.3) was used to identify characteristic blood vessels to reliably relocate regions-of-interest (ROIs) at each imaging time point. In each animal an Olympus 40× (NA = 0.8) water immersion objective was used to acquire several ROI stacks (300 µm × 300 µm, 512 × 512 pixels, z-step size = 3 µm for plaques or 75 µm × 75 µm, 512 × 512 pixels, z-step size = 0.5 µm for neurites). A pulsed 910 nm wavelength laser beam was used with a typical power at the sample of 35 mW.
Analysis
Two-photon images were converted into stacks with ImageJ and the StackReg plugin was used to align the GFP stacks in case of any movement. The GFP stacks were deconvolved with Huygens Deconvolution software using a quick maximum likelihood estimation with an experimentally-defined point-spread-function. The red channel stacks (with methoxy-X04 signal) were left unprocessed. Plaque images were denoised and maximum projections created. Plaque area was measured by manually outlining the total plaque and subsequently the core and measuring the area in ImageJ. Only plaques >20 µm in diameter were analysed to avoid the possibility of noise/ debris being included. More specifically, the core was defined as the inner part of the plaque, characterized by a continuous perimeter and a higher, more compact fluorescence intensity. The cloud was defined as the area surrounding the core, characterized by a discontinuous (hazy) perimeter and a lower, less compact fluorescence intensity. Initial, pilot experiments found the core fluorescence intensity to be approximately double the cloud intensity and the cloud fluorescence intensity to be approximately three times higher than the background; although these parameters were not routinely measured in the final analyses. The cloud area was calculated by subtracting the core area from the total plaque area. Prior to this all images were blinded using a custom ImageJ plugin so that time points were unknown at the point of analysis. The average rate of rise (RoR; µm2/week) of each plaque, was measured as the slope of a linear function interpolated for the plaque-to-plaque surface value in time (weeks). For dendritic spine and axonal bouton analysis each time-point was registered to the second imaging session using MIPAV and converted to a 4D stack using a custom ImageJ macro. Each neurite to be analyzed was traced and the length measured using another custom macro. Subsequently, the spines or boutons were manually counted using the cell counter ImageJ plugin. Spines/boutons were counted in 3D image stacks while maximum projections are shown in the figures. Only TBs, not en passant boutons, were counted and identified as protrusions emanating from side of the axon with a head and neck. From this the density (μm−1) and TOR (survival, as a fraction of the first time-point) were calculated. Statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism 7 or Sigma Plot 13. RM ANOVA comparisons (with Holm-Sidak method post-test) were utilized where multiple comparisons were made, unless otherwise stated.
Research data
Due to confidentiality agreements with research collaborators, supporting data can only be made available to bona fide researchers subject to a non-disclosure agreement. Details of the data and how to request access are available on request to the corresponding author.
CLARITY staining
Transcardiac perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde was performed in a separate cohort of J20 animals at 10 months of age. Brains were sliced in 1 mm sections (Brain matrix, Alto) after 1 to 5 days incubation in 4% paraformaldehyde. To preserve molecular information and structural integrity brain slices were incubated with a hydrogel solution (4% acrylamide and 0.25% VA-044 in 1X PBS). Therefore, the tubes were degassed and the hydrogel was allowed to polymerise for 3 h at 37 °C. The slices were transferred into clearing solution (SDS, sodium borate) at 37 °C using the X-CLARITY system (Logos Biosystems). The slices were placed in a tube containing 1 ml of 5% BSA. The required amount of primary antibody was pipetted directly in the BSA solution and incubated for 4 days at 37 °C. Excess of antibody was washed away with PBS for 3 × 2 h at 37 °C. Secondary antibodies diluted in 5% BSA were incubated for 4 days at 37 °C and excess removed by washing the slices with PBS for 3 × 2 h at 37 °C. Concentric circles 5 µm apart were drawn on maximum projection images around the plaque and the mean fluorescence measured radiating out from the edge of the plaque.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by Eli Lilly and Company and grants from the Medical Research Council and the Alzheimer’s Society (to F.T. and A.R.).
Author Contributions
J.S.J., F.T., A.R., M.L.H. and M.J.O.N. designed the study, T.S. analysed the in vivo data; F.T., J.S.J. and T.S. carried out the in vivo experiments; J.P. carried out the CLARITY experiments; K.S., J.H., A.O.-E., T.K.M. and Z.A. characterized the model; A.R., M.J.O.N., J.S.J. jointly supervised the project.
Data Availability
Due to confidentiality agreements with research collaborators, supporting data can only be made available to bona fide researchers subject to a non-disclosure agreement. Details of the data and how to request access are available on request to the corresponding author.
Competing Interests
This work was conducted at Eli Lilly’s research laboratories and several authors are/were employees of Eli Lilly.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Terri-Leigh Stephen and Francesco Tamagnini contributed equally.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-50781-1.
References
- 1.Kerrigan TL, Randall AD. A new player in the “synaptopathy” of Alzheimer’s disease - arc/arg 3.1. Front Neurol. 2013;4:9. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Selkoe DJ. Deciphering the genesis and fate of amyloid beta-protein yields novel therapies for Alzheimer disease. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:1375–1381. doi: 10.1172/JCI16783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Canuet L, et al. Network Disruption and Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid-Beta and Phospho-Tau Levels in Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Neurosci. 2015;35:10325–10330. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0704-15.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jackson J, et al. Targeting the Synapse in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:735. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Scheff SW, Price DA, Schmitt FA, Mufson EJ. Hippocampal synaptic loss in early Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27:1372–1384. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jack CR, Jr., et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:119–128. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lanoiselee HM, et al. APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 mutations in early-onset Alzheimer disease: A genetic screening study of familial and sporadic cases. PLoS Med. 2017;14:e1002270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Randall AD, Witton J, Booth C, Hynes-Allen A, Brown JT. The functional neurophysiology of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing pathway. Neuropharmacology. 2010;59:243–267. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Spires TL, et al. Dendritic spine abnormalities in amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice demonstrated by gene transfer and intravital multiphoton microscopy. J Neurosci. 2005;25:7278–7287. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1879-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hsia AY, et al. Plaque-independent disruption of neural circuits in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:3228–3233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Oakley H, et al. Intraneuronal beta-amyloid aggregates, neurodegeneration, and neuron loss in transgenic mice with five familial Alzheimer’s disease mutations: potential factors in amyloid plaque formation. J Neurosci. 2006;26:10129–10140. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1202-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Olesen LO, et al. Behavioural Phenotyping of APPswe/PS1deltaE9 Mice: Age-Rrelated Changes and Effect of Long-Term Paroxetine Treatment. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0165144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sasaguri H, et al. APP mouse models for Alzheimer’s disease preclinical studies. EMBO J. 2017;36:2473–2487. doi: 10.15252/embj.201797397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mullan M, et al. A pathogenic mutation for probable Alzheimer’s disease in the APP gene at the N-terminus of beta-amyloid. Nat Genet. 1992;1:345–347. doi: 10.1038/ng0892-345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Murrell J, Farlow M, Ghetti B, Benson MD. A mutation in the amyloid precursor protein associated with hereditary Alzheimer’s disease. Science. 1991;254:97–99. doi: 10.1126/science.1925564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mucke L, et al. High-level neuronal expression of abeta 1-42 in wild-type human amyloid protein precursor transgenic mice: synaptotoxicity without plaque formation. J Neurosci. 2000;20:4050–4058. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-11-04050.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bittner T, et al. Multiple events lead to dendritic spine loss in triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mice. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Klunk WE, et al. Imaging Abeta plaques in living transgenic mice with multiphoton microscopy and methoxy-X04, a systemically administered Congo red derivative. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002;61:797–805. doi: 10.1093/jnen/61.9.797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang Y, et al. TREM2-mediated early microglial response limits diffusion and toxicity of amyloid plaques. J Exp Med. 2016;213:667–675. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hong S, et al. Complement and microglia mediate early synapse loss in Alzheimer mouse models. Science. 2016;352:712–716. doi: 10.1126/science.aad8373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Trachtenberg JT, et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex. Nature. 2002;420:788–794. doi: 10.1038/nature01273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Holtmaat A, Wilbrecht L, Knott GW, Welker E, Svoboda K. Experience-dependent and cell-type-specific spine growth in the neocortex. Nature. 2006;441:979–983. doi: 10.1038/nature04783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Majewska AK, Newton JR, Sur M. Remodeling of synaptic structure in sensory cortical areas in vivo. J Neurosci. 2006;26:3021–3029. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4454-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grillo FW, et al. Increased axonal bouton dynamics in the aging mouse cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E1514–1523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218731110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cruz-Martín A, Crespo M, Portera-Cailliau C. Delayed stabilization of dendritic spines in fragile X mice. J Neurosci. 2010;30:7793–7803. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0577-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Murmu RP, Li W, Holtmaat A, Li JY. Dendritic spine instability leads to progressive neocortical spine loss in a mouse model of Huntington’s disease. J Neurosci. 2013;33:12997–13009. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5284-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jackson JS, et al. Altered Synapse Stability in the Early Stages of Tauopathy. Cell Rep. 2017;18:3063–3068. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dong H, Martin MV, Chambers S, Csernansky JG. Spatial relationship between synapse loss and beta-amyloid deposition in Tg2576 mice. J Comp Neurol. 2007;500:311–321. doi: 10.1002/cne.21176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Walsh DM, Selkoe DJ. Deciphering the molecular basis of memory failure in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 2004;44:181–193. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liebscher S, et al. Chronic gamma-secretase inhibition reduces amyloid plaque-associated instability of pre- and postsynaptic structures. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:937–946. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Burgold S, Filser S, Dorostkar MM, Schmidt B, Herms J. In vivo imaging reveals sigmoidal growth kinetic of beta-amyloid plaques. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014;2:30. doi: 10.1186/2051-5960-2-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Meyer-Luehmann M, et al. Rapid appearance and local toxicity of amyloid-beta plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2008;451:720–724. doi: 10.1038/nature06616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hefendehl JK, et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of beta-amyloid plaque appearance and growth in a mouse model of cerebral beta-amyloidosis. J Neurosci. 2011;31:624–629. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5147-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.McCarter JF, et al. Clustering of plaques contributes to plaque growth in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126:179–188. doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1137-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Demattos RB, et al. A plaque-specific antibody clears existing beta-amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease mice. Neuron. 2012;76:908–920. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yuan P, et al. TREM2 Haplodeficiency in Mice and Humans Impairs the Microglia Barrier Function Leading to Decreased Amyloid Compaction and Severe Axonal Dystrophy. Neuron. 2016;90:724–739. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Condello C, Schain A, Grutzendler J. Multicolor time-stamp reveals the dynamics and toxicity of amyloid deposition. Sci Rep. 2011;1:19. doi: 10.1038/srep00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Condello C, Yuan P, Schain A, Grutzendler J. Microglia constitute a barrier that prevents neurotoxic protofibrillar Abeta42 hotspots around plaques. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6176. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mann AP, et al. Identification of a peptide recognizing cerebrovascular changes in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature communications. 2017;8:1403. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01096-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Thanopoulou K, Fragkouli A, Stylianopoulou F, Georgopoulos S. Scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) regulates perivascular macrophages and modifies amyloid pathology in an Alzheimer mouse model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107:20816. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005888107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Banerjee G, et al. The increasing impact of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: essential new insights for clinical practice. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2017;88:982–994. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jiang J, Wang H, Li W, Cao X, Li C. Amyloid Plaques in Retina for Diagnosis in Alzheimer’s Patients: a Meta-Analysis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:267. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Moolman DL, Vitolo OV, Vonsattel JP, Shelanski ML. Dendrite and dendritic spine alterations in Alzheimer models. J Neurocytol. 2004;33:377–387. doi: 10.1023/B:NEUR.0000044197.83514.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Koffie RM, et al. Oligomeric amyloid beta associates with postsynaptic densities and correlates with excitatory synapse loss near senile plaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:4012–4017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811698106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sze CI, et al. Loss of the presynaptic vesicle protein synaptophysin in hippocampus correlates with cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997;56:933–944. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199708000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.De Paola V, et al. Cell type-specific structural plasticity of axonal branches and boutons in the adult neocortex. Neuron. 2006;49:861–875. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yu Yang, Jans Daniel C, Winblad Bengt, Tjernberg Lars O, Schedin-Weiss Sophia. Neuronal Aβ42 is enriched in small vesicles at the presynaptic side of synapses. Life Science Alliance. 2018;1(3):e201800028. doi: 10.26508/lsa.201800028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Stephen TL, et al. APOE genotype and sex affect microglial interactions with plaques in Alzheimer’s disease mice. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7:82. doi: 10.1186/s40478-019-0729-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hoover BR, et al. Tau mislocalization to dendritic spines mediates synaptic dysfunction independently of neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2010;68:1067–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Knowles JK, et al. The p75 neurotrophin receptor promotes amyloid-beta(1-42)-induced neuritic dystrophy in vitro and in vivo. J Neurosci. 2009;29:10627–10637. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0620-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.McLeod F, et al. Wnt Signaling Mediates LTP-Dependent Spine Plasticity and AMPAR Localization through Frizzled-7 Receptors. Cell Rep. 2018;23:1060–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kim T, et al. Human LilrB2 is a beta-amyloid receptor and its murine homolog PirB regulates synaptic plasticity in an Alzheimer’s model. Science. 2013;341:1399–1404. doi: 10.1126/science.1242077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zagrebelsky M, et al. The p75 neurotrophin receptor negatively modulates dendrite complexity and spine density in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9989–9999. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2492-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Brown JT, Chin J, Leiser SC, Pangalos MN, Randall AD. Altered intrinsic neuronal excitability and reduced Na+ currents in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32:2109 e2101–2114. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Due to confidentiality agreements with research collaborators, supporting data can only be made available to bona fide researchers subject to a non-disclosure agreement. Details of the data and how to request access are available on request to the corresponding author.