The protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica, which causes amebiasis and affects over 50 million people worldwide, contains an important RNAi pathway for gene silencing. Gene silencing via the RNAi pathway is mediated by the Argonaute (Ago) proteins. However, we lack knowledge on Ago function(s) in this nonmodel system. In this paper, we discovered that three E. histolytica Ago proteins (EhAgo2-1, EhAgo2-2, and EhAgo2-3) all bind 27-nt small RNAs and have distinct subcellular localizations, which change in response to stress conditions. The EhAgos bind small RNA populations via their PAZ domains. An unusual repetitive DR-rich motif region is identified in EhAgo2-2 that functions as a nuclear localization signal. Our results show for the first time an active nuclear transport process of the EhAgo2-2 RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) in this parasite. These data add to the novel observations that can be made when studies of the RNAi pathway are extended to nonmodel systems.
KEYWORDS: Argonaute proteins, Entamoeba, RNA interference, gene expression, transcriptional regulation
ABSTRACT
The RNA interference (RNAi) pathway regulates gene expression in many eukaryotic organisms. Argonaute (Ago) proteins, together with bound small RNAs (sRNAs), are key effectors that mediate gene silencing function. However, there is limited knowledge of Ago proteins and their functions in nonmodel systems. In the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica, RNAi is a robust means for stable gene silencing mediated via large populations of antisense sRNAs. Here, we report functional characterization of three Ago proteins in E. histolytica (EhAgo2-1, EhAgo2-2, and EhAgo2-3). Our data show that each EhAgo protein has a distinct subcellular localization and binds 27-nucleotide (nt) sRNAs and that the localization of EhAgo proteins is altered in response to stress conditions. Via mutagenesis analyses, we demonstrated that the Ago PAZ (Piwi/Argonaute/Zwille) domain in all three EhAgos is essential for sRNA binding. With mutation of the PAZ domain in EhAgo2-2, there was no effect on the nuclear localization of the protein but a strong phenotype and a growth defect. We further show that EhAgo2-2 contains an unusual repetitive DR-rich (aspartic acid, arginine-rich) motif region which functions as a nuclear localization signal (NLS) and is both necessary and sufficient to mediate nuclear localization. Overall, our data delineate the localization and sRNA binding features of the three E. histolytica Ago proteins and demonstrate that the PAZ domain is necessary for sRNA binding. The repetitive DR-rich motif region in EhAgo2-2 has not previously been defined in other systems, which adds to the novel observations that can be made when studies of the RNAi pathway are extended to nonmodel systems.
IMPORTANCE The protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica, which causes amebiasis and affects over 50 million people worldwide, contains an important RNAi pathway for gene silencing. Gene silencing via the RNAi pathway is mediated by the Argonaute (Ago) proteins. However, we lack knowledge on Ago function(s) in this nonmodel system. In this paper, we discovered that three E. histolytica Ago proteins (EhAgo2-1, EhAgo2-2, and EhAgo2-3) all bind 27-nt small RNAs and have distinct subcellular localizations, which change in response to stress conditions. The EhAgos bind small RNA populations via their PAZ domains. An unusual repetitive DR-rich motif region is identified in EhAgo2-2 that functions as a nuclear localization signal. Our results show for the first time an active nuclear transport process of the EhAgo2-2 RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) in this parasite. These data add to the novel observations that can be made when studies of the RNAi pathway are extended to nonmodel systems.
INTRODUCTION
Argonaute (Ago) proteins and their bound small RNAs (sRNAs) are central to the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway, which mediates both posttranscriptional and transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS/TGS) in many eukaryotes (1–3). The RNAi pathway involves an sRNA-guided Ago complex, i.e., RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), to target mRNA for degradation (small interfering RNA [siRNA]-based function), translational repression (microRNA [miRNA]-based function), or chromatin modification (epigenetic silencing function) (4). The complexity and plasticity of RNAi pathways have been demonstrated in higher eukaryotes, which often contain multiple Ago proteins with different sRNA classes (siRNA, miRNA, Piwi-interacting RNA [piRNA], secondary siRNA, etc.) (5). For example, there are eight Ago proteins in Homo sapiens, 10 Ago proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana, and 27 Ago proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans (6). In contrast, single-celled eukaryotes often show a simplified RNAi pathway with fewer Ago proteins. As an example, the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe has a single Ago protein (7), whereas no RNAi pathway is found in the related yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (7). Among the unicellular protists, the RNAi pathway is often less well studied; Ago proteins exist in Trypanosoma brucei (two Ago proteins), Toxoplasma gondii (three Ago proteins), Giardia lamblia (one Ago protein), and Trichomonas vaginalis (two Ago proteins) but are absent in Plasmodium and Trypanosoma cruzi (6, 8). Small RNA sequencing and experimental data for these organisms revealed functional RNAi pathways for retrotransposon control, gene regulation, and antigenic variation (6, 8).
The protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica causes amebiasis and is a major health concern in developing countries (9, 10). The parasite has two life stages: a dormant cyst form and an infective and invasive trophozoite form. The E. histolytica genome encodes several key RNAi machinery components, including three Ago proteins (EhAgo2-1 [EHI_186850], EhAgo2-2 [EHI_125650], and EhAgo2-3 [EHI_177170]), three RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRPs) (EHI_139420, EHI_179800, and EHI_086260), and one protein (EHI_068740) with a single RNase III domain that has double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) cleavage activity but without a dsRNA binding domain (dsRBD) or other domains typically found in canonical Dicer enzymes (11, 12). We have previously reported that E. histolytica EhAgo2-2 has nuclear localization and binds to an atypical 27-nucleotide (nt) sRNA population that has 5′-polyphosphate (polyP) structure (13). We further linked these 27-nt sRNAs with endogenous gene silencing and developed an RNAi-based trigger method to silence genes of interest in this parasite (14). We demonstrated that RNAi-induced TGS in E. histolytica is established via histone modification at H3K27 and with the association of EhAgo2-2 protein (15). Furthermore, 27-nt sRNAs in Entamoeba are involved in regulation of strain-specific virulence genes but do not appear to regulate stage conversion between the trophozoite and cyst stages or the amebic stress response to heat shock or oxidative stress (16, 17). Our attempts using an RNAi-based trigger method to silence the three EhAgo genes failed to downregulate any of these transcripts, despite the fact that antisense sRNAs could be detected in parasites (18), suggesting that these genes may be essential and/or resistant to RNAi-mediated gene silencing. As to EHI_068740, our attempts using an in vitro dsRNA cleavage assay failed to show cleavage activity of this protein under standard experimental conditions (11). However, it partially contributes gene silencing in a heterologous system (S. cerevisiae) along with ScaAgo1 (11).
In this study, we have further characterized the three Ago proteins in E. histolytica. We demonstrated that the three EhAgo proteins have distinct subcellular localizations and all bind 27-nt sRNAs. We showed that expression and localization of EhAgo proteins change in response to two stress conditions, indicating a possible role for gene regulation under these conditions. We dissected the PAZ domain function in EhAgo by mutational analysis and demonstrated that EhAgo binding to sRNA was abolished/severely affected upon PAZ mutations; lack of sRNA binding in turn altered cellular localization of EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-3 but not EhAgo2-2. Furthermore, we identified an unusual repetitive DR-rich motif region in EhAgo2-2, not previously seen in other systems, which is necessary and sufficient to mediate nuclear localization. Our data provide the first functional analyses of the three E. histolytica Ago proteins, including the novel nuclear localization signal (NLS) function of the repetitive DR-rich motif region in EhAgo2-2, which adds to the known diversity of the structural and functional roles of Ago family proteins.
RESULTS
EhAgo proteins have conserved structural PAZ and PIWI domains.
RNAi gene regulation pathways and Ago proteins have been found across most eukaryotes (19). Ago proteins are generally conserved for four structural domains (the N terminus, PAZ, middle, and PIWI domains) (20). The E. histolytica genome contains genes encoding three Ago family proteins, EhAgo2-1 (EHI_186850), EhAgo2-2 (EHI_125650), and EhAgo2-3 (EHI_177170) (21), with all three Ago proteins showing the conserved PAZ and PIWI domains (Fig. 1). Although the PAZ Superfam domain is annotated for all three EhAgos, the PAZ Pfam PF02170 domain is not identified for EhAgo2-3, probably due to its sequence divergence. Our phylogenetic analysis using the current genomic data set of AmoebaDB for species including Entamoeba moshkovskii, Entamoeba dispar, Entamoeba nuttalli, and Entamoeba invadens indicates that all three EhAgos are conserved among these amebic species, and each EhAgo forms its own cluster. E. moshkovskii and E. invadens are more divergent than the other three species within each cluster (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Evolutionary loss of RNAi can occur in some eukaryote taxa, such as yeast Saccharomyces castellii (Ago and RNAi positive) versus S. cerevisiae (Ago and RNAi negative) (7) and T. brucei (Ago and RNAi positive) versus T. cruzi (Ago and RNAi negative) (22). Our analysis of current genomes of ameba species indicated that the RNAi pathway(s) is well conserved in these amebic species. Thus, elucidation of biological functions of Ago proteins is important to understanding the biology and pathogenesis of this unicellular parasite.
The three EhAgo proteins have distinct subcellular localizations.
Previously, we have reported that EhAgo2-2 is localized in the nucleus (23). To characterize EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-3, we generated custom-made polyclonal antibodies using selected N-terminal peptide sequences (Fig. 1). The antibodies were first tested by Western blot analysis using total cell lysates from wild-type and Myc-tagged overexpressing cell lines. The expected band size of each Ago was detected (Fig. 2A). However, due to low endogenous expression of both EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-3 (based on three published data sets using Affymetrix microarray [24, 25] or transcriptome sequencing [RNA-seq] [26], both EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-3 mRNA expression levels are detectable but are significantly lower than that of EhAgo2-2), they could not be detected in wild-type cell lysates but only in lysates from overexpressing cell lines (Fig. 2A). We then performed immunostaining of trophozoites using these antibodies along with their preimmune sera. Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) with preimmune sera showed no specific signal at the background level (data not shown), but IFA with EhAgo2-1 antibody revealed two predominant subcellular localizations, perinuclear ring and cell surface membrane; staining with EhAgo2-3 antibody shows intense signal in both perinuclear and cytosolic localizations (Fig. 2B). Anti-EhFibrillarin is used to label the nucleolus, which was shown to be located at the nuclear periphery in E. histolytica (27). Localization of EhAgo2-2 has been previously shown to be in the nucleus (23) and is included for comparison.
In model systems, Ago proteins are found to be localized to many cellular loci depending on their biological functions, including cytoplasm (P-bodies and stress granules) for their PTGS-related functions and perinuclear regions or nucleus for TGS-related functions (20). In Neurospora crassa, RNAi components including RdRP, Dicer, and Ago are localized in the perinuclear region, where they function in meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA events (28, 29). In C. elegans, Ago proteins CSR-1, WAGO-1, and PRG-1 are localized to germ line perinuclear nuage, where epigenetic inheritance factors interact with Ago and RdRP (30, 31). Our results show that the three EhAgo proteins cover all major loci (cytoplasm, nucleus, and perinucleus), and each EhAgo has a unique localization, indicating that Entamoeba could possess diverse RNAi-related roles with each EhAgo protein having a unique function in the different aspects of RNAi.
Expression and localization of EhAgo proteins change in response to stress conditions.
In human cells, hAgo2 is localized mainly in the cytoplasm and concentrated in P-bodies and is rapidly distributed to stress granules upon stresses (32), indicating a dynamic intracellular localization change of Ago with stresses. In E. histolytica, both cytoplasmic granules under stress condition and P-body-like structures have been reported (33, 34), and our previous transcriptional profiling showed high-level gene expression changes in E. histolytica after heat shock and oxidative stress (35, 36). We therefore used fluorescence microscopy to study accumulation/loss of expression of the three EhAgos under two conditions (42°C for 1 h or 1 mM H2O2 for 1 h).
The overall changes to the localization of endogenous EhAgo proteins under these conditions are shown in Fig. 2. For EhAgo2-1, the perinuclear ring in untreated cells was almost lost under H2O2 treatment but was unchanged with heat shock. With EhAgo2-2, the nuclear localization remained for both untreated and stress-treated cells; however, signal was greatly increased throughout the cytoplasm under stress conditions compared to almost no cytoplasmic signal in untreated cells (Fig. 2C). There are also some distinct punctate dots with induction of oxidative stress, similar to the stress granules reported earlier for E. histolytica (33). However, due to the lack of a marker for these granules, we cannot definitively say if the EhAgo staining overlaps. To provide confirmation for the increased EhAgo2-2 protein levels in the cytoplasm upon stress, we performed cell fractionation for nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins based on an earlier method (37). Western blot analysis using anti-EhAgo2-2 showed increased cytoplasmic signal compared with untreated cells (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). For EhAgo2-3, the perinuclear localization in untreated cells was completely lost under both stress conditions, and the majority of staining was in the cytoplasm. RNAi machinery and its gene regulation mechanism have been indicated for many biological events (38), and Ago can interact with diverse proteins and protein complexes, including RNA processing, maturation, and transport and the regulation of RNA stability and translation (2). Our data indicated that RNAi machinery actively responds to stresses in amebae. However, earlier sequencing of 27-nt sRNA libraries for parasites under these two conditions showed rather similar profiles of sRNA species (17). This may indicate that EhAgo localization changes help mediate changes in gene expression as a response to stress.
The three EhAgo proteins show specific sRNA binding that is abolished/severely degraded by YY-to-AA mutation in the PAZ domain.
Phylogenic analyses for eukaryotic Ago proteins have divided all Ago proteins into three clades: the Ago-like, the Piwi-like, and the WAGO subfamilies (6, 19, 39). Amebozoan Ago proteins are placed into a PIWI-like clade (6, 19). In order to identify conserved residues, we aligned three EhAgo PAZ and PIWI domains with human HIWI and Drosophila PIWI domain sequences using the Clustal Omega tool (Fig. S3). It is well documented that the PAZ domain binds the 3′ end of sRNAs with some highly conserved residues, the so-called R/K-F-Y signature sites (20). The alignment of three EhAgo PAZs showed that these signature residues are conserved for EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-2 as highlighted in the red box in Fig. S3, but not for EhAgo2-3, for which the residues are W-K-Y (of note, two FF residues are right next to K, which may indicate that EhAgo2-3 could have W-F-Y residues). In addition, the mutation of the two tyrosine residues in PAZ was shown to abolish sRNA binding in C. elegans (40). We therefore selected these two residues for mutagenesis as indicated in Fig. 1.
One characteristic of Ago proteins is the ability to bind sRNAs. We reported earlier that EhAgo2-2 binds antisense 27-nt small RNAs and is linked to TGS in E. histolytica (13, 14). To check if sRNAs are also bound to EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-3, we overexpressed Myc-tagged protein for EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-3 using the same vector that was used for EhAgo2-2 (13). Additionally, based on the sequence alignment of PAZ, we mutated the conserved YY to AA and generated stable overexpression transfectants for Myc-EhAgo2-1 PAZmut and Myc-EhAgo2-3 PAZmut mutants. We were not able to generate Myc-EhAgo2-2 PAZmut-stably transfected parasites after multiple attempts. We speculated that the overexpression of Myc-EhAgo2-2 PAZmut could be harmful to parasite growth and viability. Thus, to minimize the potential toxicity of Myc-EhAgo2-2 PAZmut, we used a protein destabilization domain approach (41) to establish dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR)-Myc-EhAgo2-2 PAZmut in parasites. The induction of DHFR-Myc-EhAgo2-2 PAZmut protein was detected upon addition of a stabilizing agent (Fig. S4).
We used the cell lines described above to determine sRNA binding. For all three EhAgo Myc-tagged overexpressed cell lines and their PAZ mutants, we performed anti-Myc immunoprecipitation (IP) using whole-cell lysate. Both IP RNA and IP protein were collected; IP RNA was labeled by radioactive labeling after RNA separation on a denaturing gel; IP proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis. The data demonstrate that for Myc-EhAgo2-1, the bound sRNAs form a smear at the 20- to 27-nt range, which disappears in the PAZ mutant (Fig. 3A). For Myc-EhAgo2-2, a distinct 27-nt sRNA population is shown, as we previously observed (13); the PAZ mutation of EhAgo2-2 shows no intact 27-nt sRNA but a severely degraded pattern of sRNA down to 18 nt. For Myc-EhAgo2-3, there appear to be two sRNA populations at 27 nt and a smear of 20 to 24 nt, and upon generation of a PAZ mutant, there is no bound sRNA. Western blotting of IP proteins in the lower panels in Fig. 3A shows that wild-type and mutant lines pulled down similar levels of protein, indicating that the sRNA difference is not due to differences in IP efficiency or protein expression level. In conclusion, the Myc IP for three PAZ mutant EhAgo lines failed to pull down specific sRNAs in EhAgo2-1 and in EhAgo2-3 mutants and severely degraded sRNA in the EhAgo2-2 mutant, indicating that the PAZ domain provides both binding and protection for sRNA, possibly on its 3′ end. Without it, sRNA is subjected to exonucleases for either complete degradation (in the case of EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-3 PAZ mutants) or partial degradation (in the case of the EhAgo2-2 PAZ mutant). These data confirm that PAZ RNA recognition is well conserved, and the binding mechanism of the 3′ end of sRNA of EhAgos likely uses the same mechanism as all other Agos in model systems (42).
Further, we performed fluorescence microscopy assay for these cell lines and observed a significant change in the localization of mutant proteins in Myc-EhAgo2-1 PAZmut and Myc-EhAgo2-3 PAZmut. The perinuclear localization of both Myc-EhAgo2-1 and Myc-EhAgo2-3 was absent in both PAZmut mutants (Fig. 3B and D). However, in DHFR-Myc-EhAgo2-2 PAZmut, the nuclear localization was unchanged compared to wild-type parasites (Fig. 3C). These data indicate that the PAZ domain is critical for sRNA binding for each of the three EhAgo proteins and that the protein/sRNA binding appears to affect localization for EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-3 but not for EhAgo2-2. As sRNA is a guide for RISC to find its target in different subcellular compartments, this may explain how PAZ mutants of EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-3 lost their specific protein localization. However, localization of the EhAgo2-2 PAZ mutant is unchanged despite severely degraded sRNA, indicating that either severely degraded sRNA can still function as a guide for RISC or/and there is a specific nuclear importing process for this protein that functions through the NLS pathway.
The EhAgo2-2 PAZ mutant has a growth defect.
Given that we could not establish an EhAgo2-2 PAZ mutant without using the destabilization domain approach, we wondered whether the EhAgo2-2 PAZ mutation conferred a growth disadvantage on the parasites. The protein destabilization domain approach provides a way to study protein function for a short period of time upon adding a stabilizing agent. In order to identify the effect of the PAZ mutation on cell growth, we monitored the growth kinetics for the DHFR-Myc-EhAgo2-2 PAZmut cell line upon adding the stabilizing agent trimethoprim (TMP) and inducing the PAZ mutant protein. We observed a significant reduction in the growth rate of the DHFR-Myc-EhAgo2-2 PAZmut cell line at days 4 and 5 compared to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) controls (Fig. 3E). Of note, the stabilization of EhAgo2-2 PAZ mutant protein is in the context of endogenous wild-type EhAgo2-2 expression. We have extensively tested TMP on parasite growth on different lines of culture and found no/minimal growth reduction (41); thus, the growth phenotype indicates that DHFR-Myc-EhAgo2-2 PAZmut may be functioning in a dominant negative manner when overexpressed. Further characterization of the amebic RISC will shed light on the mechanistic action of EhAgo2-2 function.
EhAgo2-2 has an unusual repetitive DR-rich motif that mediates nuclear localization.
An interesting structural difference between EhAgos and model system human HIWI and DmPIWI is the presence in EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-2 of extended long tail sequences (∼200 amino acids [aa]) after the PIWI domain (Fig. 4A). While a BLAST search for EhAgo2-1 tail sequences failed to show any meaningful homologous hits, the EhAgo2-2 C-terminal tail sequence is strikingly DR rich and comprises 12 repeats of RRDDR motif sequences (Fig. 4A). Searches using both AmoebaDB and the NCBI BLAST tool found that this structure is not recognized as any known annotated functional domain; instead, it was designated a low-complexity segment. In E. histolytica, a single additional protein with this repeat was found, a U1 snRNA protein with likely nuclear localization (EHI_153670). Performing BLASTP on all eukaryotic genomes, we identified ∼200 hits with ≥5 repeats of the RRDDRD motif (Table S3). Interestingly, most of these hits are from nonmodel systems, and Gene Ontology (GO) analysis indicated that many are either nuclear or RNA binding (Table S2). Out of all published Agos, there is only one hypothetical Piwi protein (EGT41773) from Caenorhabditis brenneri, with the DR-rich motif stretch appearing before the Piwi domain (Table S3).
We further used several online NLS prediction programs (see Materials and Methods) and found a weak NLS sequence (GGRGFGGG) at the EhAgo2-2 C terminus, which is embedded within a stretch of sequences with a possible RGG/RG motif (Fig. 4A). This RGG/RG motif involves protein methylation at arginine (R), which is important for protein functioning in signaling, sorting, and transport and transcription activation (43). In order to study the function of this putative NLS and the DR-rich motif, we generated two deletion mutants: EhAgo2-2 DR-deletion and EhAgo2-2 NLS-DR-deletion (Fig. 4A). We overexpressed Myc-tagged protein for both deletion cell lines and used Western blotting to detect the predicted protein size (Fig. S5). Both deletion mutant proteins of EhAgo2-2 localized to the cytoplasm (Fig. 4B). IFAs using anti-EhAgo2-2 antibody showed that localization of endogenous EhAgo2-2 is unaffected (Fig. S6). As the EhAgo2-2 DR-deletion cell line still contains the predicted NLS sequence, it indicates that deletion of the DR-rich motif itself is sufficient to direct the change of EhAgo2-2 localization and does not require the predicted weak NLS sequence.
We reasoned that EhAgo2-2 could use its DR-rich tail region for nuclear localization. In order to test this idea, we made a chimeric EhAgo2-3 protein with the tail region from EhAgo2-2 fused to its C terminus (Fig. 4A), thus achieving a similar layout structure as in EhAgo2-2. IFA shows that the EhAgo2-3 chimeric protein is now localized to the entire nucleus (instead of its wild-type location in the perinuclear and cytosolic region) (Fig. 4C). This nuclear localization is similar to the localization for EhAgo2-2, indicating that the fused tail region of EhAgo2-2 is sufficient to localize another Ago protein to the nucleus. Last, we checked sRNA binding using anti-Myc IP for these deletion mutants and the chimeric protein of EhAgo2-3. The data show that both EhAgo2-2 deletion mutant proteins bind 27-nt sRNA comparably to the wild-type EhAgo2-2 (Fig. 4D). However, EhAgo2-3 chimeric protein shows a slightly different pattern; the 20- to 24-nt smear sRNA is no longer as obvious as its wild-type counterpart, possibly due to an exonuclease environment change of its changed localization.
In Entamoeba, molecular determinants for the protein trafficking into the nucleus are not well studied (44). The typical classical nuclear localization sequences (NLS of the simian virus 40 [SV40] large T antigen) do not appear to work for amebic parasites (reference 44 and data not shown). The previously described NLS from an E. histolytica protein, EhNCABP166 (45), did not work for several proteins in our experience (data not shown). Our data on the EhAgo2-2 tail region and its resulting NLS effect indicate that nuclear transport pathways are active in E. histolytica and that small regulatory RNAs and RISC are transported to the nucleus.
EhAgo2-2 PIWI mutants have no effect on protein localization and sRNA binding.
The PIWI domain folds like RNase H and has endonucleolytic activity in some Agos for target mRNA cleavage (39). The crystal structure of Ago proteins further reveals a D-D-X triad motif (where X is D/E/H/K) for Ago-based Slicer. However, the EhAgo PIWI domain sequences appear to be very divergent, and the alignment of EhAgo PIWI domain with model systems shows that none have a complete D-D-X catalytic triad (Fig. S7), suggesting that all three EhAgos are likely non-Slicer Agos. The only partially aligned triad position for EhAgo2-2 is D-G-N, which we analyzed by mutagenesis as indicated in Fig. 1.
We generated three cell lines, EhAgo2-2 PIWID545A, EhAgo2-2 PIWIN747A, and EhAgo2-2 PIWID545A;N747A. All Myc-tagged mutants were checked by Western blotting for expression, and the sRNA binding profile was detected by radioactive pCp labeling of RNA prepared from anti-Myc IP samples. Analysis of Ago-bound sRNAs revealed that the 27-nt sRNA population is associated with both the wild type and PIWI mutants, indicating that sRNA binding is intact in these mutants (Fig. 5A). IFAs of these mutants using anti-Myc antibody further showed almost exclusively nuclear localization, similar to the wild-type parasites (Fig. 5B). These results indicate that EhAgo2-2 appears to be tolerant in terms of sRNA binding and localization on its PIWI mutants, implying that EhAgo2-2 may be indeed a non-Slicer.
DISCUSSION
The RNAi pathway regulates gene expression and is mediated by Ago and its bound small RNAs. Here, we report functional characterization of three Ago proteins in E. histolytica, EhAgo2-1, EhAgo2-2, and EhAgo2-3. We have defined their subcellular localization and showed how environmental stress impacts their localization. Mutagenesis analyses of the EhAgo proteins demonstrated that the PAZ domain is essential for EhAgo sRNA binding, indicating a conserved role of the PAZ domain in sRNA loading in this organism. We further dissected the functional role of an EhAgo2-2 repetitive DR-rich motif and found that this region can function as a nuclear localization signal and is sufficient to mediate nuclear localization of another Ago protein (EhAgo2-3). The DR-rich motif region in EhAgo2-2 has not previously been defined in other systems and adds to the novel observations that can be made when studies of the RNAi pathway are extended to nonmodel systems.
Our data revealed that EhAgo proteins have distinct localizations: the nucleus (EhAgo2-2), perinuclear ring (EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-3), cytosol (EhAgo2-3), and cell surface membrane (EhAgo2-1). The nucleus and perinuclear ring localizations are indicative of cellular locations for the TGS pathway that we and the others reported earlier in this parasite (14, 46–48). Whether or not cytoplasmic EhAgo2-3 has a functional role in the PTGS process in this organism is currently unknown. The apparent cell surface membrane localization of EhAgo2-1 is quite interesting, as some Agos in model systems have been reported to be present in both soluble and membrane fractions. Membrane-bound Ago proteins are often found either in the vicinity of the Golgi complex and endoplasmic reticulum or at endosomes/multivesicular bodies (MVBs), and their functions are thought to be related to sRNA loading or RISC assembly (49). Recently, studies on exosomes have shown that they contain cargos including Ago and a specific subset of miRNAs and mediate cell-to-cell communication or host-pathogen interaction (50). Thus, localization of EhAgo to the membrane could indicate that this parasite can use a similar strategy to assemble RISC or to release exosomes to deliver nucleic acid to surrounding parasites or to host cells. Future efforts will be important to pursue this avenue of investigation.
Our data also indicated that three EhAgos undergo localization changes in response to stress conditions. E. histolytica survives under harsh environmental conditions as well as inside host tissues, and previous studies revealed genome-wide gene regulation changes under stress conditions (35, 37, 51). In E. histolytica, two cytoplasmic granules, P‐bodies and stress granule-like structures, have been reported (33, 34), and these organelles have previously been shown as important sites for some RNAi pathways in model systems (2). We speculate that the parasite may use a dynamic network of EhAgo complexes, which vary in composition and localization at distinct cellular sites of action under different cellular stimuli. Further determination of how the induction of cell stress can lead to altered Ago-containing complexes and the biological consequences of these changes is needed.
Our mutagenesis analysis results are summarized in Table 1. For EhAgo PAZ domains, all three EhAgo proteins abolished/severely degraded sRNA binding upon mutations on the conserved residues in the PAZ domain, confirming a conserved role of binding the 3′ end of RNA among all Ago proteins (19). The PAZ mutants also altered the perinuclear ring localization for EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-3 but did not alter EhAgo2-2 nuclear localization. We have also identified an unusual DR-rich motif in EhAgo2-2 which appears to control the localization of this protein to the nucleus; two deletion mutants indicated that the DR-rich motif does not alter sRNA binding but is sufficient to mediate nuclear localization of another EhAgo protein. These findings are suggestive that this DR-rich motif may serve as an NLS. For EhAgo PIWI domains, PIWI mutants of EhAgo2-2 did not affect sRNA binding or localization; thus, the exact role of the PIWI domain of EhAgos needs further future study. Future studies using these mutants for an in vitro Slicer activity assay will help to elucidate specific PIWI domain function and determine if any of the EhAgos contain Slicer function in this organism.
TABLE 1.
Cell line | Mutation(s) | Protein localization | sRNA binding |
---|---|---|---|
Wild type | |||
Myc-EhAgo2-1 | None | Cytoplasm/perinuclear ring | Yes |
Myc-EhAgo2-2 | None | Nucleus | Yes |
Myc-EhAgo2-3 | None | Cytoplasm/perinuclear ring | Yes |
PAZ mutants | |||
Myc-EhAgo2-1PAZ-mut | Y267A, Y268A | Cytoplasm | No |
DHFR-Myc-EhAgo2-2PAZ-mut | Y267A, Y268A | Nucleus | No |
Myc-EhAgo2-3PAZ-mut | Y259A, Y260A | Cytoplasm | No |
EhAgo2-2 C-terminal mutants | |||
Myc-EhAgo2-2ΔDR | 783–937 deletion | Cytoplasm | Yes |
Myc-EhAgo2-2ΔNLS-DR | 761–937 deletion | Cytoplasm | Yes |
EhAgo2-2 PIWI mutants | |||
Myc-EhAgo2-2D545A | D545A | Nucleus | Yes |
Myc-EhAgo2-2N747A | N747A | Nucleus | Yes |
Myc-EhAgo2-2D545A;N747A | D545A, N747A | Nucleus | Yes |
Chimeric protein | |||
Myc-EhAgo2-3 plus C-terminal tail region of EhAgo2-2 |
Full-length EhAgo2-3 fused with EhAgo2-2 tail (761–937) |
Nucleus | Yes |
Listed are cell lines, specific mutations, protein localizations determined by anti-Myc IFA, and sRNA binding ability determined by anti-Myc IPs and pCp labeling of sRNAs.
With the data presented in this paper as well as previous work (13–15, 23), including a strong growth defect shown by a PAZ mutant of EhAgo2-2, a working model for the mechanism of TGS in E. histolytica is proposed (Fig. 6). In this model, the polyP 27-nt sRNAs (probably generated by RdRP using a low level of mRNA as the template) are loaded into EhAgo2-2, which needs the PAZ domain for sRNA 3′-end binding and provides full protection of sRNA. After sRNA loading, the RISC is translocated into the nucleus, using the tail region with the DR-rich motif as an NLS. The RISC targets specific loci for TGS using sRNA as a base-pairing guide, which leads to specific histone H3 modification for long-term silencing; we have previously shown that gene silencing in amebae is linked to a histone H3K27Me2 marker at both episomal and chromosomal loci through EhAgo2-2 (15). A similar pathway was also observed in C. elegans, where the Ago protein (NRDE3) uses a bipartite NLS that actively transports siRNAs from the cytoplasm to the nucleus for targeting nascent RNA transcripts and building repressive chromatin marks (40, 52). At present, we do not know the exact roles of EhAgo2-1 and EhAgo2-3 other than their localization and sRNA binding abilities. What small RNAs they bind and whether they also participate in this working model or possess their own pathways need to be further studied.
Overall, our data provide the first comprehensive functional analyses of the three E. histolytica Ago proteins. Identification of the unique DR-rich domain in EhAgo2-2 that functions as an NLS adds to the mechanisms of protein localization. Future studies on identification of the sRNAs that bind to the three EhAgo proteins and the Ago protein silencing complex components will give more insights on the specific roles of the Ago proteins in amebic biology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Parasite culture and cell lines.
E. histolytica trophozoites (HM-1:IMSS) were grown axenically under standard conditions (in glass culture tubes with TYI-S-33 medium at 36.5°C) as described previously (13, 53). Three EhAgo cell lines constitutively overexpressing N-terminally Myc-tagged Ago protein were made by using the plasmid pKT3M as a backbone and cloned full-length sequences of the three Ago genes (EHI_186850, EHI_125650, and EHI_177170). The PCR products of three Ago genes were amplified from genomic DNA using primers listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material and cloned with SmaI and XhoI sites. The resulting constructs are pKT3M-Myc-EhAgo2-1, pKT3M-Myc-EhAgo2-2 (reported in reference 13 and used as a control), and pKT3M-Myc-EhAgo2-3. To make EhAgo PAZ and PIWI domain mutants, we used the NEB Gibson assembly cloning kit (New England Biolabs). The two fragments were PCR amplified for each EhAgo using primers listed in Table S1 and assembled with pKT3M-Myc backbone using protocols provided in the kit; the resulting constructs are pKT3M-Myc-EhAgo2-1PAZ-mut, pKT3M-Myc-EhAgo2-2PAZ-mut, and pKT3M-Myc-EhAgo2-3PAZ-mut. To make the EhAgo2-2PAZ-mut destabilization domain construct, we inserted the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene in-frame at the SmaI site between 3×Myc and EhAgo2-2PAZ-mut based on pKT3M-Myc-EhAgo2-2PAZ-mut plasmid, resulting in pKT3M-Myc-DHFR-EhAgo2-2PAZ-mut. To make EhAgo2-2 C-terminal deletion mutant constructs, we used the forward primer of EhAgo2-2 and the reverse primers of del-DR and del-NLS-DR as listed in Table S1; the resulting constructs are pKT3M-Myc-EhAgo2-2 DR-deletion and pKT3M-Myc-EhAgo2-2 NLS-DR-deletion; the primer sets amplify EhAgo2-2 for amino acids 1 to 783 and 1 to 761, respectively. To make EhAgo2-3 plus the DR-rich motif region of EhAgo2-2, we first performed site-directed mutagenesis on pKT3M-Myc-EhAgo2-2 using the QuikChange Lightning kit (Agilent) to generate a unique AvrII site at amino acid position 762 before the DR-rich motif region, and then full-length EhAgo2-3 was subjected to PCR using primers (forward primer of EhAgo2-3 and its AvrII reverse primer). The PCR product was cloned using SmaI and AvrII sites. The three EhAgo2-2 PIWI mutants were also constructed using the NEB Gibson assembly cloning kit (New England Biolabs) using primers listed in Table S1. All plasmid constructs were confirmed by sequencing, and parasite transfectants were maintained at 6 μg/ml G418.
Polyclonal antibody production and immunofluorescence assays.
EhAgo polyclonal antibodies were generated in rabbits. The antigen peptide used for EhAgo2-2 was reported in reference 23. For EhAgo2-1, peptide sequence C-KKPLYDLYTQQYSFITNYFE-NH2, corresponding to the N-terminal amino acids 31 to 50 of EhAgo2-1, was used. For EhAgo2-3, peptide sequence C-DDPYPKEFTDLIPQYEDVDD-NH2, corresponding to the N-terminal amino acids 25 to 44 of EhAgo2-3, was used. The antibodies were affinity purified on a peptide column (Open Biosystems). For IFA, we fixed cells using methanol-acetone (1:1) and followed previously reported protocols (23). Primary antibody (custom-made polyclonal antibodies for three EhAgos and anti-Ehfibrillarin [27] [a gift from Sudha Bhattacharya] or commercial anti-Myc) was used at a 1:250 dilution and incubated at 4°C overnight. Alexa 488 (anti-rabbit or anti-mouse) (Molecular Probes) was used as secondary antibody at a 1:1,000 dilution. Slides were mounted with Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Inc.), and images were collected using a Leica CTR6000 microscope using a BD CARVII confocal unit.
Stress stimuli and conditions.
Both stress conditions were the same as previously published, H2O2 stress (1 mM H2O2 for 1 h) (35) and heat shock (42°C for 1 h) (36). We used E. histolytica HM-1:IMSS culture tubes for stress treatments. After treatment, tubes were shaken gently on the rim of an ice bucket to release any remaining attached cells, and the cells were collected by spinning at 1,000 rpm for 5 min and washed once with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The cells were then transferred to Eppendorf tubes for methanol-acetone (1:1) fixation, followed by incubation of primary and secondary antibodies as described above; after a final wash, cells were mounted on the coverslip for imaging.
Cell fractionation for cytoplasmic and nuclear lysates.
We followed the same protocol used in the lab (37). Briefly, both untreated and stress-treated cells were collected; resuspended in buffer A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, and 0.6% Igepal) with protease inhibitors, 1 μm leupeptin, 1 μm E-64-d, and 1× HALT protease inhibitor mixture (Pierce); and incubated on ice for 20 min. After low-speed centrifugation for 10 min at 1,000 × g at 4°C, the supernatant was collected as cytoplasmic fraction lysate. The pellet was then washed and resuspended in buffer C (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 420 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM EGTA supplemented with the same protease inhibitor mixture) on ice for 30 min. The supernatant from the last centrifugation at 18,000 × g for 20 min was collected as nuclear fraction lysate.
Cell lysate, immunoprecipitation (IP), and RNA isolation.
We used a protocol similar to that in reference 54 with modifications. The lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 1 mM MgCl2, 10% [vol/vol] glycerol, and 50 mM NaCl) contained 0.5% (vol/vol) Nonidet P-40 (NP-40), plus 1 mM NaF, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 2× of 100× Halt EDTA-free protease inhibitors (100× stock diluted to 2× as final concentration; Thermo Scientific), and 1× RNase inhibitor, 1 U/ml. The cells from one T25 flask were lysed in 600 μl of lysis buffer and incubated on ice for 15 min. Lysate was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 30 min in a benchtop centrifuge at 4°C, and supernatant was saved at −80°C.
For IP with anti-Myc beads (Thermo Scientific), 20 μl packed beads was rinsed twice with cold 1× Dulbecco PBS (DPBS) with 0.01% Tween 20. After washing, 500 μl whole-cell lysate (1 to 2 μg/μl) was added and incubated for 2 h with rotation at 4°C, and the beads were then pelleted and washed six times (5 min each) under low-stringency conditions in basic lysis buffer containing PMSF, 0.1% (vol/vol) Tween 20, and 0.1% (vol/vol) NP-40 at 4°C. We collected both IP RNA and IP protein samples for each IP sample by splitting the bead-wash mixture at the last wash step. The IP RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Invitrogen) reagent according to standard protocol, and the IP proteins were released by adding 30 μl 1× reducing lane marker buffer (Thermo Scientific) and heated at 95°C for 5 min.
RNA pCp labeling.
We followed similar procedures as in reference 13 for RNA labeling at 3′ termini. Typically, 2 μl RNA was ligated to [α-32P]pCp using T4 RNA ligase (New England Biolabs), and the reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The ligation reaction mixture was resolved directly on a denaturing 7 M urea-containing 15% polyacrylamide gel, and signal was exposed to a phosphor screen and imaged on a Personal molecular imager (Bio-Rad).
Western blot analysis.
Standard Western blotting technique was used. We used 5% milk as a blocking reagent, and primary antibody was used at a 1:1,000 dilution, with incubation at 4°C overnight. The appropriate secondary antibody was used at a 1:10,000 dilution and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Signal was developed with ECL+ (GE Healthcare, USA) and detected by the Kodak Image Station 4000R (Kodak, USA) or with a film processor (GE Healthcare). Antibodies used in Western blot analysis were anti-Myc antibody (Cell Signaling), anti-actin antibody (Cell Signaling), and the custom-made EhAgo polyclonal antibodies.
Protein stabilization conditions and growth kinetics.
For Western blot analysis, trophozoites expressing Myc-DHFR-EhAgo2-2PAZ-mut were collected after adding stabilization compound (10 μM TMP) for 24 h, and protein lysates were made and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-Myc antibody (Cell Signaling). For determination of growth kinetics, parasites were seeded at 40,000 cells/tube, no-drug control along with stabilizing compound (10 μM TMP) was set up in duplicate, and the number of parasites was counted every 24 h for 5 consecutive days after exposure to stabilizing compound.
Sequence alignment, phylogenetic analysis, and motif search.
The three EhAgo sequences and their annotations, including Superfamily and Pfam domain regions, are based on www.amoebadb.org/amoeba. To search for orthologs in other ameba species, we used the orthology and synteny functional tab that is a built-in function for each gene in AmoebaDB. We then used full sequences to build a phylogenetic tree using a web tool (www.phylogeny.fr/). The Clustal Omega tool was used for PAZ and PIWI alignment analysis (www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). For NLS prediction, we used several online tools, including NLS mapper (http://nls-mapper.iab.keio.ac.jp/cgi-bin/NLS_Mapper_form.cgi), PredictProtein (www.predictprotein.org), and NucPred (https://nucpred.bioinfo.se/nucpred/). For motif search, we used the built-in motif search function in AmoebaDB and NCBI BLASTP. The RRDDRDR motif was used to search all eukaryotic proteins with the following parameters: E value, 1,000; word size, 2; window size, 40. Proteins with 5 or more copies of the repeat were identified, and conserved domains were identified (http://pfam.xfam.org).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to all members of the Singh lab for scientific discussions. We thank Sudha Bhattacharya for providing anti-Ehfibrillarin antibody.
The work was supported by NIH grant R01 AI121084 to U.S.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hauptmann J, Meister G. 2013. Argonaute regulation: two roads to the same destination. Dev Cell 25:553–554. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Meister G. 2013. Argonaute proteins: functional insights and emerging roles. Nat Rev Genet 14:447–459. doi: 10.1038/nrg3462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kuhn CD, Joshua-Tor L. 2013. Eukaryotic Argonautes come into focus. Trends Biochem Sci 38:263–271. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wilson RC, Doudna JA. 2013. Molecular mechanisms of RNA interference. Annu Rev Biophys 42:217–239. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ghildiyal M, Zamore PD. 2009. Small silencing RNAs: an expanding universe. Nat Rev Genet 10:94–108. doi: 10.1038/nrg2504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Batista TM, Marques JT. 2011. RNAi pathways in parasitic protists and worms. J Proteomics 74:1504–1514. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Drinnenberg IA, Weinberg DE, Xie KT, Mower JP, Wolfe KH, Fink GR, Bartel DP. 2009. RNAi in budding yeast. Science 326:544–550. doi: 10.1126/science.1176945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ullu E, Tschudi C, Chakraborty T. 2004. RNA interference in protozoan parasites. Cell Microbiol 6:509–519. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00399.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Haque R, Mondal D, Kirkpatrick BD, Akther S, Farr BM, Sack RB, Petri WA Jr. 2003. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of acute diarrhea with emphasis on Entamoeba histolytica infections in preschool children in an urban slum of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Am J Trop Med Hyg 69:398–405. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2003.69.398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stanley SL., Jr 2003. Amoebiasis. Lancet 361:1025–1034. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12830-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pompey JM, Foda B, Singh U. 2015. A single RNaseIII domain protein from Entamoeba histolytica has dsRNA cleavage activity and can help mediate RNAi gene silencing in a heterologous system. PLoS One 10:e0133740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yu X, Li X, Zheng L, Ma J, Gan J. 2017. Structural and functional studies of a noncanonical Dicer from Entamoeba histolytica. Sci Rep 7:44832. doi: 10.1038/srep44832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang H, Ehrenkaufer GM, Pompey JM, Hackney JA, Singh U. 2008. Small RNAs with 5’-polyphosphate termini associate with a Piwi-related protein and regulate gene expression in the single-celled eukaryote Entamoeba histolytica. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000219. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Morf L, Pearson RJ, Wang AS, Singh U. 2013. Robust gene silencing mediated by antisense small RNAs in the pathogenic protist Entamoeba histolytica. Nucleic Acids Res 41:9424–9437. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Foda BM, Singh U. 2015. Dimethylated H3K27 is a repressive epigenetic histone mark in the protist Entamoeba histolytica and is significantly enriched in genes silenced via the RNAi pathway. J Biol Chem 290:21114–21130. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.647263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang H, Ehrenkaufer GM, Hall N, Singh U. 2013. Small RNA pyrosequencing in the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica reveals strain-specific small RNAs that target virulence genes. BMC Genomics 14:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang H, Ehrenkaufer GM, Manna D, Hall N, Singh U. 2015. High throughput sequencing of Entamoeba 27nt small RNA population reveals role in permanent gene silencing but no effect on regulating gene expression changes during stage conversion, oxidative, or heat shock stress. PLoS One 10:e0134481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pompey JM, Morf L, Singh U. 2014. RNAi pathway genes are resistant to small RNA mediated gene silencing in the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica. PLoS One 9:e106477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Swarts DC, Makarova K, Wang Y, Nakanishi K, Ketting RF, Koonin EV, Patel DJ, van der Oost J. 2014. The evolutionary journey of Argonaute proteins. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21:743–753. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hock J, Meister G. 2008. The Argonaute protein family. Genome Biol 9:210. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang H, Pompey JM, Singh U. 2011. RNA interference in Entamoeba histolytica: implications for parasite biology and gene silencing. Future Microbiol 6:103–117. doi: 10.2217/fmb.10.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kolev NG, Tschudi C, Ullu E. 2011. RNA interference in protozoan parasites: achievements and challenges. Eukaryot Cell 10:1156–1163. doi: 10.1128/EC.05114-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang H, Alramini H, Tran V, Singh U. 2011. Nucleus-localized antisense small RNAs with 5’-polyphosphate termini regulate long term transcriptional gene silencing in Entamoeba histolytica G3 strain. J Biol Chem 286:44467–44479. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.278184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ehrenkaufer GM, Haque R, Hackney JA, Eichinger DJ, Singh U. 2007. Identification of developmentally regulated genes in Entamoeba histolytica: insights into mechanisms of stage conversion in a protozoan parasite. Cell Microbiol 9:1426. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00882.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gilchrist CA, Houpt E, Trapaidze N, Fei Z, Crasta O, Asgharpour A, Evans C, Martino-Catt S, Baba DJ, Stroup S, Hamano S, Ehrenkaufer G, Okada M, Singh U, Nozaki T, Mann BJ, Petri WA Jr. 2006. Impact of intestinal colonization and invasion on the Entamoeba histolytica transcriptome. Mol Biochem Parasitol 147:163–176. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hon CC, Weber C, Sismeiro O, Proux C, Koutero M, Deloger M, Das S, Agrahari M, Dillies MA, Jagla B, Coppee JY, Bhattacharya A, Guillen N. 2013. Quantification of stochastic noise of splicing and polyadenylation in Entamoeba histolytica. Nucleic Acids Res 41:1936–1952. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jhingan GD, Panigrahi SK, Bhattacharya A, Bhattacharya S. 2009. The nucleolus in Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba invadens is located at the nuclear periphery. Mol Biochem Parasitol 167:72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shiu PK, Zickler D, Raju NB, Ruprich-Robert G, Metzenberg RL. 2006. SAD-2 is required for meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA and perinuclear localization of SAD-1 RNA-directed RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:2243–2248. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508896103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Decker LM, Boone EC, Xiao H, Shanker BS, Boone SF, Kingston SL, Lee SA, Hammond TM, Shiu PK. 2015. Complex formation of RNA silencing proteins in the perinuclear region of Neurospora crassa. Genetics 199:1017–1021. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.174623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Billi AC, Fischer SE, Kim JK. 2014. Endogenous RNAi pathways in C. elegans. WormBook doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.170.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ishidate T, Ozturk AR, Durning DJ, Sharma R, Shen EZ, Chen H, Seth M, Shirayama M, Mello CC. 2018. ZNFX-1 functions within perinuclear nuage to balance epigenetic signals. Mol Cell 70:639–649.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Detzer A, Engel C, Wunsche W, Sczakiel G. 2011. Cell stress is related to re-localization of Argonaute 2 and to decreased RNA interference in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 39:2727–2741. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Katz S, Trebicz-Geffen M, Ankri S. 2014. Stress granule formation in Entamoeba histolytica: cross-talk between EhMLBP, EhRLE3 reverse transcriptase and polyubiquitinated proteins. Cell Microbiol 16:1211–1223. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.López-Rosas I, Orozco E, Marchat LA, García-Rivera G, Guillen N, Weber C, Carrillo-Tapia E, Hernández de la Cruz O, Pérez-Plasencia C, López-Camarillo C. 2012. mRNA decay proteins are targeted to poly(A)+ RNA and dsRNA-containing cytoplasmic foci that resemble P-bodies in Entamoeba histolytica. PLoS One 7:e45966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hackney JA, Ehrenkaufer GM, Singh U. 2007. Identification of putative transcriptional regulatory networks in Entamoeba histolytica using Bayesian inference. Nucleic Acids Res 35:2141–2152. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vicente JB, Ehrenkaufer GM, Saraiva LM, Teixeira M, Singh U. 2009. Entamoeba histolytica modulates a complex repertoire of novel genes in response to oxidative and nitrosative stresses: implications for amebic pathogenesis. Cell Microbiol 11:51–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01236.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pearson RJ, Morf L, Singh U. 2013. Regulation of H2O2 stress-responsive genes through a novel transcription factor in the protozoan pathogen Entamoeba histolytica. J Biol Chem 288:4462–4474. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.423467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ketting RF. 2011. The many faces of RNAi. Dev Cell 20:148–161. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tolia NH, Joshua-Tor L. 2007. Slicer and the argonautes. Nat Chem Biol 3:36–43. doi: 10.1038/nchembio848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Guang S, Bochner AF, Pavelec DM, Burkhart KB, Harding S, Lachowiec J, Kennedy S. 2008. An Argonaute transports siRNAs from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Science 321:537–541. doi: 10.1126/science.1157647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liu YC, Singh U. 2014. Destabilization domain approach adapted for regulated protein expression in the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Int J Parasitol 44:729–735. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ma JB, Ye K, Patel DJ. 2004. Structural basis for overhang-specific small interfering RNA recognition by the PAZ domain. Nature 429:318–322. doi: 10.1038/nature02519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Thandapani P, O’Connor TR, Bailey TL, Richard S. 2013. Defining the RGG/RG motif. Mol Cell 50:613–623. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gwairgi MA, Ghildyal R. 2018. Nuclear transport in Entamoeba histolytica: knowledge gap and therapeutic potential. Parasitology 145:1378–1387. doi: 10.1017/S0031182018000252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Uribe R, Almaraz Barrera MDJ, Robles-Flores M, Mendoza Hernández G, González-Robles A, Hernández-Rivas R, Guillen N, Vargas M. 2012. A functional study of nucleocytoplasmic transport signals of the EhNCABP166 protein from Entamoeba histolytica. Parasitology 139:1697–1710. doi: 10.1017/S0031182012001199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Huguenin M, Bracha R, Chookajorn T, Mirelman D. 2010. Epigenetic transcriptional gene silencing in Entamoeba histolytica: insight into histone and chromatin modifications. Parasitology 137:619–627. doi: 10.1017/S0031182009991363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bracha R, Nuchamowitz Y, Mirelman D. 2003. Transcriptional silencing of an amoebapore gene in Entamoeba histolytica: molecular analysis and effect on pathogenicity. Eukaryot Cell 2:295–305. doi: 10.1128/ec.2.2.295-305.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Khalil MI, Foda BM, Suresh S, Singh U. 2016. Technical advances in trigger-induced RNA interference gene silencing in the parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Int J Parasitol 46:205–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2015.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gibbings DJ, Ciaudo C, Erhardt M, Voinnet O. 2009. Multivesicular bodies associate with components of miRNA effector complexes and modulate miRNA activity. Nat Cell Biol 11:1143–1149. doi: 10.1038/ncb1929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Penfornis P, Vallabhaneni KC, Whitt J, Pochampally R. 2016. Extracellular vesicles as carriers of microRNA, proteins and lipids in tumor microenvironment. Int J Cancer 138:14–21. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Naiyer S, Kaur D, Ahamad J, Singh SS, Singh YP, Thakur V, Bhattacharya A, Bhattacharya S. 2019. Transcriptomic analysis reveals novel downstream regulatory motifs and highly transcribed virulence factor genes of Entamoeba histolytica. BMC Genomics 20:206. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5570-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Guang S, Bochner AF, Burkhart KB, Burton N, Pavelec DM, Kennedy S. 2010. Small regulatory RNAs inhibit RNA polymerase II during the elongation phase of transcription. Nature 465:1097–1101. doi: 10.1038/nature09095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Diamond LS, Harlow DR, Cunnick CC. 1978. A new medium for the axenic cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica and other Entamoeba. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 72:431–432. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(78)90144-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lee SR, Collins K. 2007. Physical and functional coupling of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and Dicer in the biogenesis of endogenous siRNAs. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14:604–610. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.