Abstract
Regulated cell death via apoptosis is important for organismal homeostasis but also serves as an innate defense mechanism. The engulfment of apoptotic infected cells, a process known as efferocytosis, is a common pathway for the destruction of many intracellular bacteria. Some pathogens take advantage of efferocytosis to prevent activation of macrophages and thereby facilitate their dissemination. Conversely, many obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens and some facultative-intracellular bacteria inhibit apoptosis, preventing efferocytosis, and evading innate host defenses. The molecular mechanism of bacterial effectors includes secreted proteins that bind to and inhibit apoptosis cell signaling pathways. We provide an overview of the known bacterial effectors, their host cell targets and their importance for the virulence of human pathogens.
Graphical abstract

Introduction
Certain bacterial species evade humoral immunity by entering a protected niche in an intracellular compartment. Some cell types can destroy non-pathogenic bacilli by intrinsic antimicrobial defenses. However, several bacterial species have developed virulence strategies that prevent, subvert, or overcome these defense mechanisms. Immunity to these pathogenic microbes often requires T cells to accelerate or enhance intrinsic anti-bacterial activities of infected cells. For cells that aren’t able to destroy or contain intracellular infection, an alternative strategy is cell death as an “altruistic death” that can sometimes deprive an intracellular pathogen of a protected niche, interrupt its replicative cycle, and expose it to other components of the immune system. Importantly, while cell death can be detrimental for the pathogen, some pathogens exploit cell death pathways. This host-pathogen interaction is complex both because of the large and growing number of cell death pathways [1], but also because experimental approaches vary in the use of bacterial strains, multiplicity of infection (MOI), host cell type, duration of infection, and other variables. Here we will review the mechanisms by which human bacterial pathogens manipulate host cell apoptosis and the consequences of those interactions on host defense.
Efferocytosis of apoptotic infected cells contributes to host defense
Apoptosis is a form of cell death that is triggered by either an intrinsic (mitochondrial) or extrinsic (cell surface receptors) signaling pathway that leads to the activation of caspase-8 or caspase-9, respectively [2]. Both pathways converge by activating the executioner caspases 3, 6 and 7, which activate substrates that mediate the morphological changes associated with apoptosis (e.g. fragmentation of genomic DNA) [1]. Apoptosis is the dominant form of cell death during organismal development and homeostasis. Early during apoptosis, the plasma membrane remains intact, the cell contents are contained, and damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are not released. Thus, apoptosis is a non-inflammatory death. Although apoptotic cells frequently undergo secondary necrosis in vitro, this is not thought to occur under normal homeostatic conditions because of a second process known as efferocytosis. Efferocytosis is the engulfment of apoptotic cells by phagocytes [1,3–5]. This evolutionarily conserved and constitutive process is one of the chief functions of macrophages. There are a variety of functionally redundant cell surface receptors and adaptors expressed by macrophages that recognize the molecule phosphatidylserine (PS), which is expressed on the cell surface early during apoptosis [1]. It is the specific recognition of PS by phagocytes that distinguishes efferocytosis from phagocytosis, macropinocytosis, or the engulfment of necrotic cells.
During microbial infection, apoptotic cell death is generally beneficial for the host and detrimental for the pathogen. While non-apoptotic cell death potentially allows pathogens to exit the host cell and disperse, apoptosis can have an antimicrobial function. How is the antimicrobial effect of apoptosis mediated? One possibility is that the same activated nucleases and enzymes that lead to the cells’ demise could also help in killing pathogens. However, many pathogens have tremendously stable cell walls and are unlikely to be damaged by the enzymes activated during apoptosis. Instead, it is increasingly recognized that the antimicrobial consequences of apoptosis are secondary to efferocytosis of infected apoptotic cells [6]. As an example of how efferocytosis enhances host defense, we will examine Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the etiological agent of the human chronic lung disease tuberculosis.
We and others have shown that virulent M. tuberculosis predominantly induces both human and murine macrophage necrosis in vitro. It is not precisely known how much of this macrophage cell death is primary necrosis induced by M. tuberculosis, and how much is secondary necrosis due to failure in efferocytosis. What is clear is that in murine macrophages, both apoptotic and necrotic cells are detected following infection with virulent M. tuberculosis. Furthermore, avirulent mutants exist that induce more apoptosis than necrosis, indicating that virulent M. tuberculosis has evolved mechanisms to inhibit macrophage apoptosis. Indeed, apoptotic death of M. tuberculosis infected macrophages, whether secondary to changes in bacterial virulence or in macrophage physiology, improves host resistance. Conversely, shifting the balance of the macrophage death towards necrosis is associated with increased virulence (reviewed in [7,8]). Efferocytosis of infected apoptotic macrophages was shown to synergize with apoptosis to increase host resistance. Thus, bystander macrophages engulf infected apoptotic macrophages, and the ‘efferosomes’ rapidly acquired characteristics of lysosomes and were associated with bacterial killing [9] (Figure 1). Interestingly, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which adheres to apoptotic cells among epithelial monolayers, are engulfed and destroyed by other epithelial cells [10].
Figure 1. Apoptosis and efferocytosis are a linked anti-bacterial host defense mechanism.
A) Infected cells that undergo apoptosis are engulfed by macrophages. Following efferocytosis, most non-pathogenic bacteria are destroyed by the macrophage. However, some human pathogens have adapted and circumvented this defense mechanism, and instead, hijack it to survive and disperse or disseminate. B) The inhibition of cell death (i.e., apoptosis) by bacterial pathogens can impair efferocytosis, and lead to more favorable conditions for bacterial replication.
It is important to recognize that the role of efferocytosis is not limited to bacterial killing. A role of efferocytosis in priming T cells is well-documented. Dendritic cells (DC) take up apoptotic vesicles by efferocytosis, process and present the mycobacterial antigens to T cells [11–13]. This process increases the initial activation of T cells, particularly during infection with M. tuberculosis mutants that are unable to inhibit apoptosis [14], or when the host macrophage is predisposed to an apoptotic death [15]. These observations have important implications both for the developing better vaccines [16,17] and for host directed therapy of infectious disease [18].
If apoptosis and subsequent efferocytosis can eliminate the intracellular niche of microbes, it is not surprising that some have evolved to inhibit apoptosis, the penultimate event leading to efferocytosis. Identifying bacterial strategies to inhibit apoptosis can be tricky as most cells are programmed to undergo apoptosis, and most bacterial infections increase apoptotic cell death compared to uninfected cells. Therefore, it can be difficult to ascertain whether the induction of cell death is truly a bacterial virulence mechanism. To identify if and how a bacterium inhibits apoptosis induction, it is important to compare virulent and non-virulent strains, challenge infected and uninfected cells with pro-apoptotic stimuli and finally, perform genetic screens to identify anti-apoptotic bacterial genes.
Obligate and facultative intracellular bacteria inhibiting host cell apoptosis
The following Gram-negative, obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens are known to inhibit apoptosis (Table 1). Chlamydia trachomatis causes sexually transmitted infections in the female and male genital tract [19]. It was first reported to inhibit apoptosis in epithelial cell lines 20 years ago, which was subsequently confirmed by other investigators [19,20]. Coxiella burnetii causes Q fever after aerosol transmission from contaminated soil or animal products [21]. It infects and inhibits apoptosis in macrophages and epithelial cells [22,23]. Ehrlichia chaffeensis is the causative agent of human monocytic ehrlichiosis [24]. E. chaffeensis is transmitted from its zoonotic reservoir to humans via tick bites, infects mainly mononuclear and polymorphonuclear leukocytes [24], and inhibits apoptosis of neutrophil and monocyte cell lines [25,26]. Anaplasma phagocytophilum is another tick-transmitted pathogen that causes human granulocytic anaplasmosis [27], which inhibits apoptosis in neutrophils [28] and in tick cells [29]. Rickettsia rickettsii is transmitted via infected ticks and causes Rocky Mountain spotted fever [30]. It primarily infects endothelial cells and protects them from apoptosis [30,31].
Table 1:
Inhibition of host cell apoptosis pathways by bacterial pathogens.
| Bacteria | Host cell | Effector | Target | Relevance (in vivo) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salmonella | Epithelial | SopB | Increased Akt activation | sopB mutant is attenuated | [37,38] |
| Mycobacterium | Macrophage | NuoG/NDH-1 | Decreases phagosomal ROS | nuoG mutant is attenuated | [64,65] |
| Mycobacterium | Macrophage | Ndk | Binds to Rac1 | ndk knock-down strain is attenuated | [66] |
| Legionella | Macrophage | LegK1 | Phosphorylate s IκBα, p100 | ? | [61] |
| Legionella | Macrophage | SidF | Binds to and inhibits BNIP3, Bcl-rambo | ? sidF mutant is attenuated in vitro | [62] |
| Chlamydia | Epithelial | Pgp3 | Activates the PI3K/AKT/MD M2/P53 pathway | pgp3 mutant is attenuated | [48,50] |
| Chlamydia | Epithelial, Macrophage | CpoS* | Binds to multiple Rab GTPases, inhibits STING-dependent cell death | cpoS mutant is attenuated | [51] |
| Anaplasma | Neutrophil | Ats-1 | Translocates to mitochondria to inhibit CytC release and PARP cleavage | ? | [52] |
| Ehrlichia | Monocyte | ECH0825 | Increases MnSOD protein levels | ? | [53] |
| Coxiella | Dendritic | AnkG | Binds to p32 | ? | [55] |
| Coxiella | Epithelial | CaeA | Inhibits caspase 7 | ? | [57] |
| Coxiella | Epithelial | CaeB | Inhibits MOMP | ? | [58] |
Facultative intracellular bacteria (Salmonella to Legionella) and obligate intracellular (Chlamydia to Coxiella). Shown are the best-known host cell targets of the bacterial effectors which does not necessary mean that they are directly interacting. Details on the mechanism of inhibition are given in the text.
CpoS does not inhibit a known apoptosis pathway but the mutant does result in attenuation due to abrogated intracellular replication.
Not all of the facultative intracellular pathogens inhibit host apoptosis, most likely since they are less dependent on the host cell survival (Table 1). As discussed, M. tuberculosis is a strict human pathogen that is transmitted via aerosol [32], and there is a direct correlation between virulence of various M. tuberculosis strains and their capacity to inhibit apoptosis of alveolar macrophages [33]. Legionella pneumophila is transmitted via aerosol from a contaminated water source and is the etiologic agent of Legionnaires’ disease [34]. Although early investigations described a pro-apoptotic infection of macrophages and epithelial cells with Legionella [35], more recent studies identify the anti-apoptotic capacity of the bacterium [34,36].
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is the mouse model strain for Salmonella typhi, the cause of typhoid fever in humans. There are numerous studies on the induction of cell death of macrophages, dendritic cells and epithelial cells infected with Salmonella [37]. Nevertheless, there seems to be a brief anti-apoptotic phase during the infection of intestinal epithelial cells with the bacteria [37,38].
Mechanisms of host cell apoptosis inhibition by bacteria
C. trachomatis infection protects cells from extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis pathway induced via specific activators [20], but this initial protection from apoptosis may still allow the cells to undergo necrotic death at a later time [39]. Host mitochondrial proteins are a prominent target for C. trachomatis-mediated apoptosis manipulation by inhibiting pro-apoptotic Bax and Bak proteins [40] and upregulating the anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1 via increased transcription [41] and decreased protein degradation [42]. An siRNA screen identified the transcription factor HIF-1α responsible for the upregulation of Mcl-1 after C. trachomatis infection [43]. Interestingly, Mcl-1 is also exploited by M. tuberculosis to inhibit apoptosis [44] but it is induced by the PPARγ transcription factor [45]. C. trachomatis infection inhibits the extrinsic apoptosis pathway induced via TNF by blocking internalization of TNF-TNF-receptor complexes [46]. M. tuberculosis inhibits TNF signaling by promoting secretion of soluble TNF receptor 2, which neutralizes unbound TNF [47]. The C. trachomatis secreted protein, Pgp3, activates the PI3K/AKT/MDM2/P53 signaling pathway to suppress apoptosis and supports virulence in a mouse model [48–50] (Table 1). Another effector, CpoS was recently identified by a genetic screen in C. trachomatis for death-inducing mutants [51]. CpoS manipulates vesicular trafficking via interaction with host cell small GTPase, which ultimately leads to the activation of a non-apoptotic, STING-dependent cell death pathway [51] (Table 1). A. phagocytophilum manipulates various components of the intrinsic apoptosis pathway to inhibit cell death in mammalian or tick host cells [27]. The type IV secretion system (T4SS) translocates Ats-1 into the host cell cytosol where a mitochondrial targeting signal mediates transport to mitochondria where Ats-1 gets cleaved and then mediates inhibition of cytochrome C (CytC) release by the mitochondria, which is an important pro-apoptosis signaling event [52] (Table 1). E. chaffeensis also uses a T4SS to secrete ECH0825 which translocates into mitochondria to upregulate MnSOD protein levels in the mitochondrial matrix, neutralizing ROS and thereby inhibiting apoptosis [53] (Table 1). A subset of tandem repeat proteins (TRP) secreted by the type I secretion system (T1SS) interact with host cell proteins involved in apoptosis signaling [53]. Finally, C. burnetii activates the PI3K/AKT pathway to upregulate Mcl-1 expression and protect neutrophils from apoptosis [54]. The T4SS substrate AnkG binds to host cell p32 [55] and Importin-α1 [PMID: 27328359] both of which help to translocate AnkG into the host cell nucleus, where it acts to inhibit apoptosis [56] (Table 1). Two additional T4SS substrates, CaeA and CaeB, inhibit the intrinsic apoptosis pathway at the level of the executioner caspases (caspases 3, 6 and 7) [57] or mitochondria [58], respectively (Table 1). R. rickettsii infection suppresses apoptosis via the induction of NF-κB activation, which induces pro-survival genes [30,59], but the bacterial effectors mediating this effect have yet to be identified.
L. pneumophila inhibits apoptosis by the upregulation of anti-apoptosis gene transcription through the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway [60]. L. pneumophila secretes LegK1 into the host cell cytosol via its T4SS to inhibit host cell apoptosis. LegK1 has serine/threonine kinase activity and phosphorylates IκBα and p100 leading to increased NF-κB activation [61] (Table 1). SidF is another translocated L. pneumophila protein which binds to the pro-apoptotic host cell proteins BNIP3 and Bcl-rambo and inhibits their activity to protect cells from intrinsic apoptosis pathway induction [62] (Table 1). Interestingly, the SdhA protein, which was identified as an anti-apoptotic effector, affects the vacuolar stability of L. pneumophila and does not directly manipulate host cell death pathways [63]. Salmonella uses the type III secretion system (SPI1) to translocate the phosphoinositide phosphatase SopB into the host cell cytosol to activate the pro-survival host cell kinase Akt [37,38] (Table 1). AvrA has first been described as a pro-apoptosis effector of Salmonella that mediates its activity by inhibiting NF-κB signaling (PMID: 12218096). Nevertheless, two subsequent studies described an anti-apoptotic role for AvrA via inhibition of JNK signaling (PMID: 18407067; PMID: 21899703). NuoG is one of the 14 M. tuberculosis proteins forming the proton-translocating NADH-dehydrogenase and its deletion leads to a M. tuberculosis mutant that induces more host cell apoptosis and is attenuated in vivo [64]. The mechanism of apoptosis suppression involves the inhibition of reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation in the M. tuberculosis phagosome, which sensitizes cells to TNF-mediated apoptosis induction [65] (Table 1). Interestingly, M. tuberculosis nucleoside diphosphate kinase, Ndk, binds to and inhibits host cell Rac1, which reduces the activation of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase (NOX2) (Table 1). Consequently, less phagosomal ROS is produced and less apoptosis occurs, similar to the results obtained with the nuoG M. tuberculosis mutant [66]. The deletion in M. tuberculosis of the probable membrane transporter Rv2456c leads to the reduced activation of NF-κB signaling and hence increased apoptosis [67], resembling the L. pneumophila legK1 mutant phenotype. Multiple M. tuberculosis genes involved in modulating host cell apoptosis, pyroptosis or necrosis have been described [68,69].
Bacterial avoidance of efferocytosis can be host-detrimental
If, as argued above, M. tuberculosis inhibits apoptosis and induces necrosis as a virulence strategy, how does this benefit bacterial fitness? Human neutrophils undergo necrosis following M. tuberculosis infection by an ESX1-dependent mechanism that triggers host ROS production [70]. When these necrotic, infected neutrophils are engulfed by uninfected macrophages, the bacilli are associated with early phagosomes, where they are competent to grow intracellularly. Similar to neutrophils, M. tuberculosis infected hMDM undergo non-apoptotic cell death in vitro. These highly infected dead macrophages are cytotoxic to the engulfing macrophages leading to a positive feedback loop of M. tuberculosis growth, macrophage death, engulfment, and M. tuberculosis growth [71]. While little is known about the uptake of bacteria associated with cellular debris, there are damage-associated molecular pattern ligands such as F-actin, which can be recognized by cell surface receptors such as DNGR-1 [72]. Thus, in contrast to improved containment of bacilli in apoptotic macrophages, infected necrotic cells not only lead to the dispersal of the bacteria but may promote its subsequent growth. What is the relevance of these in vitro studies to an intact host? First, defective efferocytosis, caused by mutation in a lysosomal cathepsin, leads to increased susceptibility in a zebrafish model of Mycobacterium marinum [73]. In addition, an M. tuberculosis mutant in the transcriptional repressor Rv3167c induces more host cell necrosis and is hypervirulent in mice [74]. Thus, disrupting the apoptosis/efferocytosis cycle contributes to the virulence of M. tuberculosis (Figure 1).
Staphylococcus aureus is a medically important Gram-positive bacterium that is generally known for its extracellular lifestyle but is killed after phagocytosis by neutrophils. However, some S. aureus bacilli can survive in human neutrophils. Human macrophages bind these neutrophils as they begin to undergo apoptosis but do not engulf the infected neutrophils. Instead, the infected neutrophils die in a RIP-1 dependent manner typical of necroptotic cell death, which could lead to bacterial dispersal [75]. The alpha toxin of S. aureus may be responsible for blocking efferocytosis of infected neutrophils by alveolar macrophages in a murine infection model [76]. Such incomplete or “frustrated” efferocytosis also occurs during M. tuberculosis infection, especially at a high MOI, which leads to an atypical form of cell death [77,78].
Cell death induced by Klebsiella pneumoniae is determined by several factors and is strain dependent [79]. One strain of K. pneumoniae (A28006) led to inflammasome activation and induced pyroptosis, where as a second strain (A54970) did neither. Interestingly, A28006 was significantly more attenuated in vivo, and the attenuation was dependent upon caspase 1/11 and inflammasome activation. Following A28006-induced pyroptosis, bystander macrophages took up the cellular debris and bacteria, which inhibited bacterial replication. Although pyroptotic cell engulfment has been referred to as efferocytosis [79,80], it has not been shown to depend on PS recognition. Importantly, A54970 induced IL-10, which inhibited inflammasome activation and pyroptosis. A different strain of K. pneumoniae interferes with apoptosis induction in infected neutrophils by activating necroptosis, which also diminishes engulfment by macrophages [81]. In this case, in vivo treatment with necrostatin-1 (an inhibitor of RIPK-1) significantly reduced the virulence of K. pneumoniae in a mouse model. Thus, some virulent bacterial strains subvert cellular death pathways to avoid innate defenses.
Exploitation of efferocytosis
Just as some pathogens have evolved mechanisms to avoid efferocytosis, some pathogens have evolved counter-strategies that exploit efferocytosis. For example, Yersinia pestis, the etiological agent of plague, is normally thought to be killed by neutrophils. However, Y. pestis grown at the flea temperature of 21°C can survive in human neutrophils, which when they undergo apoptosis, are taken up by macrophages [82]. This “Trojan Horse” mechanism of infecting macrophages reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine production and allows Y. pestis to evade innate immunity. Similarly, M. marinum disseminates after dying infected macrophages are engulfed by motile macrophages, which can lead to the spread of disease beyond the primary granuloma [83]. A “Trojan Horse” model has also been shown for the eukaryotic pathogen Leishmania major in which parenteral entry in the skin and subsequent infection of neutrophils is followed by efferocytosis by myeloid cells. This facilitates L. major dissemination without triggering a danger alarm [84,85]. Finally, Listeria monocytogenes damages not only the phagosomal membrane, which allows it to enter the cytosol, but also the plasma membrane. L. monocytogenes apparently buds from the plasma membrane in host derived PS+ vesicles, which are engulfed by macrophages in a TIM4-dependent mechanism but this does not lead to the killing of the bacteria within the efferosome [86]. Thus, various pathogens are able to exploit efferocytosis to evade innate immunity and spread throughout the host.
Conclusion
Apoptosis was the first regulated cell death pathway identified and it has a crucial role in the development of the immune system and its return to homeostasis after T or B cell responses. Less appreciated is the role that apoptosis plays in the effector arm of immune responses. CD8 T cells kill target cells by activating extrinsic pathways of apoptosis and as reviewed here, different types of cells infected with pathogenic microbes die by apoptosis, which can enhance host resistance. The existence of additional regulated cell death pathways, such as necroptosis and pyroptosis, has provided additional insight into how pathogenic microbes evade host immunity. Here, we present evidence that many bacterial pathogens actively inhibit host cell apoptosis, which enables them to avoid the antibacterial effects of efferocytosis. Unraveling how cell death pathways are manipulated by bacteria provides a greater nuanced understanding of the host-pathogen interaction. There are still knowledge gaps, particularly for obligate intracellular pathogens, some of which are not genetically tractable. Furthermore, how efferocytosis is regulated during infection, which has important roles in anti-bacterial immunity, resolution of inflammation, and tissue remodeling, is incompletely understood. Insight into these pathways is beginning to be exploited for new therapeutic strategies for cancer. It remains to be determined whether they can be similarly manipulated to modify the virulence of bacteria or attenuate the untoward consequences of infection.
Highlights:
Obligate and some facultative intracellular bacterial pathogens inhibit apoptosis
Bacteria inhibit apoptosis by disrupting ROS generation or mitochondrial signaling
Some bacterial effectors activate AKT or NF-κB pro-survival pathways
Bacterial mutants deficient in apoptosis inhibitor genes are attenuated in vivo
Pathogens have evolved to disrupt efferocytosis or to hijack it for their benefit
Acknowledgements
We thank Jinee Lee and Yu Jung Lu for their critical reading of the manuscript.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant numbers R21AIAI139443 (SMB), R01AI139492 and R21AI107377(VB)]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, Alnemri ES, Altucci L, Amelio I, Andrews DW, et al. : Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death & Differentiation 2018, 25:486–541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Taylor RC, Cullen SP, Martin SJ: Apoptosis: controlled demolition at the cellular level. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008, 9:231–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nagata S: Apoptosis and Clearance of Apoptotic Cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2018, 36:489–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Henson PM: Cell Removal: Efferocytosis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2017. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 5.Martinez J: Prix Fixe: Efferocytosis as a Four-Course Meal. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2017, 403:1–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martin CJ, Peters KN, Behar SM: Macrophages clean up: efferocytosis and microbial control. Curr Opin Microbiol 2014, 17:17–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Behar SM, Martin CJ, Booty MG, Nishimura T, Zhao X, Gan HX, Divangahi M, Remold HG: Apoptosis is an innate defense function of macrophages against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mucosal Immunol 2011, 4:279–287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Behar SM, Divangahi M, Remold HG: Evasion of innate immunity by Mycobacterium tuberculosis: is death an exit strategy? Nat Rev Microbiol 2010, 8:668–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Martin CJ, Booty MG, Rosebrock TR, Nunes-Alves C, Desjardins DM, Keren I, Fortune SM, Remold HG, Behar SM: Efferocytosis is an innate antibacterial mechanism. Cell Host Microbe 2012, 12:289–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Capasso D, Pepe MV, Rossello J, Lepanto P, Arias P, Salzman V, Kierbel A: Elimination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa through Efferocytosis upon Binding to Apoptotic Cells. PLoS Pathog 2016, 12:e1006068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Winau F, Weber S, Sad S, de Diego J, Hoops SL, Breiden B, Sandhoff K, Brinkmann V, Kaufmann SH, Schaible UE: Apoptotic vesicles crossprime CD8 T cells and protect against tuberculosis. Immunity 2006, 24:105–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schaible UE, Winau F, Sieling PA, Fischer K, Collins HL, Hagens K, Modlin RL, Brinkmann V, Kaufmann SH: Apoptosis facilitates antigen presentation to T lymphocytes through MHC-I and CD1 in tuberculosis. Nat Med 2003, 9:1039–1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tzelepis F, Verway M, Daoud J, Gillard J, Hassani-Ardakani K, Dunn J, Downey J, Gentile ME, Jaworska J, Sanchez AM, et al. : Annexin1 regulates DC efferocytosis and cross-presentation during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Clin Invest 2015, 125:752–768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hinchey J, Lee S, Jeon BY, Basaraba RJ, Venkataswamy MM, Chen B, Chan J, Braunstein M, Orme IM, Derrick SC, et al. : Enhanced priming of adaptive immunity by a proapoptotic mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Invest 2007, 117:2279–2288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Divangahi M, Desjardins D, Nunes-Alves C, Remold HG, Behar SM: Eicosanoid pathways regulate adaptive immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Immunol 2010, 11:751–758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Farinacci M, Weber S, Kaufmann SH: The recombinant tuberculosis vaccine rBCG DeltaureC::hly(+) induces apoptotic vesicles for improved priming of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. Vaccine 2012, 30:7608–7614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hinchey J, Jeon BY, Alley H, Chen B, Goldberg M, Derrick S, Morris S, Jacobs WR Jr., Porcelli SA, Lee S: Lysine auxotrophy combined with deletion of the SecA2 gene results in a safe and highly immunogenic candidate live attenuated vaccine for tuberculosis. PLoS One 2011, 6:e15857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mayer-Barber KD, Sher A: Cytokine and lipid mediator networks in tuberculosis. Immunological reviews 2015, 264:264–275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bastidas RJ, Elwell CA, Engel JN, Valdivia RH: Chlamydial intracellular survival strategies. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine 2013, 3:a010256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fan T, Lu H, Hu H, Shi L, McClarty GA, Nance DM, Greenberg AH, Zhong G: Inhibition of apoptosis in chlamydia-infected cells: blockade of mitochondrial cytochrome c release and caspase activation. The Journal of experimental medicine 1998, 187:487–496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.van Schaik EJ, Chen C, Mertens K, Weber MM, Samuel JE: Molecular pathogenesis of the obligate intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2013, 11:561–573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Voth DE, Howe D, Heinzen RA: Coxiella burnetii inhibits apoptosis in human THP-1 cells and monkey primary alveolar macrophages. Infection and Immunity 2007, 75:4263–4271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lührmann A, Roy CR: Coxiella burnetii inhibits activation of host cell apoptosis through a mechanism that involves preventing cytochrome c release from mitochondria. Infection and Immunity 2007, 75:5282–5289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rikihisa Y: Molecular Pathogenesis of Ehrlichia chaffeensis Infection. Annual review of microbiology 2015, 69:283–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yoshiie K, Kim HY, Mott J, Rikihisa Y: Intracellular infection by the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent inhibits human neutrophil apoptosis. Infection and Immunity 2000, 68:1125–1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Popov A, Driesen J, Abdullah Z, Wickenhauser C, Beyer M, Debey-Pascher S, Saric T, Kummer S, Takikawa O, Domann E, et al. : Infection of Myeloid Dendritic Cells with Listeria monocytogenes Leads to the Suppression of T Cell Function by Multiple Inhibitory Mechanisms. The Journal of Immunology 2008, 181:4976–4988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Alberdi P, Espinosa PJ, Cabezas-Cruz A, de la Fuente J: Anaplasma phagocytophilum Manipulates Host Cell Apoptosis by Different Mechanisms to Establish Infection. Veterinary sciences 2016, 3:15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Scaife H, Woldehiwet Z, Hart CA, Edwards SW: Anaplasma phagocytophilum reduces neutrophil apoptosis in vivo. Infection and immunity 2003, 71:1995–2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ayllón N, Villar M, Busby AT, Kocan KM, Blouin EF, Bonzón-Kulichenko E, Galindo RC, Mangold AJ, Alberdi P, Pérez de la Lastra JM, et al. : Anaplasma phagocytophilum inhibits apoptosis and promotes cytoskeleton rearrangement for infection of tick cells. Infection and Immunity 2013, 81:2415–2425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Clifton DR, Goss RA, Sahni SK, van Antwerp D, Baggs RB, Marder VJ, Silverman DJ, Sporn LA: NF-kappa B-dependent inhibition of apoptosis is essential for host cellsurvival during Rickettsia rickettsii infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 95:4646–4651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bechelli JR, Rydkina E, Colonne PM, Sahni SK: Rickettsia rickettsii infection protects human microvascular endothelial cells against staurosporine-induced apoptosis by a cIAP(2)-independent mechanism. The Journal of infectious diseases 2009, 199:1389–1398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pai M, Behr MA, Dowdy D, Dheda K, Divangahi M, Boehme CC, Ginsberg A, Swaminathan S, Spigelman M, Getahun H, et al. : Tuberculosis. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2016, 2:16076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Keane J, remold HG, Kornfeld H: Virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains evade apoptosis of infected alveolar macrophages. The Journal of Immunology 2000, 164:2016–2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shin S, Roy CR: Host cell processes that influence the intracellular survival of Legionella pneumophila. Cellular Microbiology 2008, 10:1209–1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kwaik YA: Fatal attraction of mammalian cells to Legionella pneumophila. Molecular microbiology 1998, 30:689–695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Isberg RR, O apos Connor TJ, Heidtman M: The Legionella pneumophila replication vacuole: making a cosy niche inside host cells. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2009, 7:13–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Finn CE, Chong A, Cooper KG, Starr T, Steele-Mortimer O: A second wave of Salmonella T3SS1 activity prolongs the lifespan of infected epithelial cells. PLOS Pathogens 2017, 13:e1006354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Knodler LA, Finlay BB, Steele-Mortimer O: The Salmonella Effector Protein SopB Protects Epithelial Cells from Apoptosis by Sustained Activation of Akt. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2005, 280:9058–9064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sixt BS, Núñez-Otero C, Kepp O, Valdivia RH, Kroemer G: Chlamydia trachomatis fails to protect its growth niche against pro-apoptotic insults. Cell death and differentiation 2018:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.Xiao Y, Zhong Y, Greene W, Dong F, Zhong G: Chlamydia trachomatis infection inhibits both Bax and Bak activation induced by staurosporine. Infection and Immunity 2004, 72:5470–5474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rajalingam K, Sharma M, Lohmann C, Oswald M, Thieck O, Froelich CJ, Rudel T: Mcl-1 is a key regulator of apoptosis resistance in Chlamydia trachomatis-infected cells. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fischer A, Harrison KS, Ramirez Y, Auer D, Chowdhury SR, Prusty BK, Sauer F, Dimond Z, Kisker C, Hefty PS, et al. : Chlamydia trachomatis-containing vacuole serves as deubiquitination platform to stabilize Mcl-1 and to interfere with host defense. eLife 2017, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sharma M, Machuy N, Böhme L, Karunakaran K, Mäurer AP, Meyer TF, Rudel T: HIF-1α is involved in mediating apoptosis resistance to Chlamydia trachomatis-infected cells. Cellular microbiology 2011, 13:1573–1585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sly LM, Hingley-Wilson SM, Reiner NE, McMaster WR: Survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in host macrophages involves resistance to apoptosis dependent upon induction of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family member Mcl-1. The Journal of Immunology 2003, 170:430–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Arnett E, Weaver AM, Woodyard KC, Montoya MJ, Li M, Hoang KV, Hayhurst A, Azad AK, Schlesinger LS: PPARγ is critical for Mycobacterium tuberculosis induction of Mcl-1 and limitation of human macrophage apoptosis. PLOS Pathogens 2018, 14:e1007100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Waguia Kontchou C, Tzivelekidis T, Gentle IE, Häcker G: Infection of epithelial cells with Chlamydia trachomatis inhibits TNF-induced apoptosis at the level of receptor internalization while leaving non-apoptotic TNF-signalling intact. Cellular microbiology 2016, 18:1583–1595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Balcewicz-Sablinska MK, Keane J, Kornfeld H, remold HG: Pathogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis evades apoptosis of host macrophages by release of TNF-R2, resulting in inactivation of TNF-alpha. The Journal of Immunology 1998, 161:2636–2641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu Y, Huang Y, Yang Z, Sun Y, Gong S, Hou S, Chen C, Li Z, Liu Q, Wu Y, et al. : Plasmid-encoded Pgp3 is a major virulence factor for Chlamydia muridarum to induce hydrosalpinx in mice. Infection and Immunity 2014, 82:5327–5335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.González E, Rother M, Kerr MC, Al-Zeer MA, Abu-Lubad M, Kessler M, Brinkmann V, Loewer A, Meyer TF: Chlamydia infection depends on a functional MDM2-p53 axis. Nature communications 2014, 5:5201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zou Y, Lei W, Su S, Bu J, Zhu S, Huang Q, Li Z: Chlamydia trachomatis plasmid-encoded protein Pgp3 inhibits apoptosis via the PI3K-AKT-mediated MDM2-p53 axis. Molecular and cellular biochemistry 2018:1–10. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 51.Sixt BS, Bastidas RJ, Finethy R, Baxter RM, Carpenter VK, Kroemer G, Coers J, Valdivia RH: The Chlamydia trachomatis Inclusion Membrane Protein CpoS Counteracts STING-Mediated Cellular Surveillance and Suicide Programs. Cell Host and Microbe 2017, 21:113–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Niu H, Kozjak-Pavlovic V, Rudel T, Rikihisa Y: Anaplasma phagocytophilum Ats-1 is imported into host cell mitochondria and interferes with apoptosis induction. PLOS Pathogens 2010, 6:e1000774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Liu H, Bao W, Lin M, Niu H, Rikihisa Y: Ehrlichia type IV secretion effector ECH0825 is translocated to mitochondria and curbs ROS and apoptosis by upregulating host MnSOD. Cellular microbiology 2012, 14:1037–1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cherla R, Zhang Y, Ledbetter L, Zhang G: Coxiella burnetii Inhibits Neutrophil Apoptosis by Exploiting Survival Pathways and Antiapoptotic Protein Mcl-1. Infection and Immunity 2018, 86:e00504–00517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lührmann A, Nogueira CV, Carey KL, Roy CR: Inhibition of pathogen-induced apoptosis by a Coxiella burnetii type IV effector protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107:18997–19001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Eckart RA, Bisle S, Schulze-Luehrmann J, Wittmann I, Jantsch J, Schmid B, Berens C, Lührmann A: Antiapoptotic activity of Coxiella burnetii effector protein AnkG is controlled by p32-dependent trafficking. Infection and Immunity 2014, 82:2763–2771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bisle S, Klingenbeck L, Borges V, Sobotta K, Schulze-Luehrmann J, Menge C, Heydel C, Gomes JP, Lührmann A: The inhibition of the apoptosis pathway by the Coxiella burnetii effector protein CaeA requires the EK repetition motif, but is independent of survivin. Virulence 2016, 7:400–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Klingenbeck L, Eckart RA, Berens C, Lührmann A: The Coxiella burnetii type IV secretion system substrate CaeB inhibits intrinsic apoptosis at the mitochondrial level. Cellular microbiology 2013, 15:675–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Joshi SG, Francis CW, Silverman DJ, Sahni SK: Nuclear factor kappa B protects against host cell apoptosis during Rickettsia rickettsii infection by inhibiting activation of apical and effector caspases and maintaining mitochondrial integrity. Infection and Immunity 2003, 71:4127–4136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Losick VP, Isberg RR: NF-kappaB translocation prevents host cell death after low-dose challenge by Legionella pneumophila. The Journal of experimental medicine 2006, 203:2177–2189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ge J, Xu H, Li T, Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Li S, Liu L, Shao F: A Legionella type IV effector activates the NF-kappaB pathway by phosphorylating the IkappaB family of inhibitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106:13725–13730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Banga S, Gao P, Shen X, Fiscus V, Zong W-X, Chen L, Luo Z-Q: Legionella pneumophila inhibits macrophage apoptosis by targeting pro-death members of the Bcl2 protein family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104:5121–5126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Creasey EA, Isberg RR: The protein SdhA maintains the integrity of the Legionella-containing vacuole. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2012, 109:3481–3486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Velmurugan K, Chen B, Miller JL, Azogue S, Gurses S, Hsu T, Glickman M, Jacobs WR Jr., Porcelli SA, Briken V: Mycobacterium tuberculosis nuoG is a virulence gene that inhibits apoptosis of infected host cells. PLoS Pathog 2007, 3:e110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Miller JL, Velmurugan K, Cowan MJ, Briken V: The type I NADH dehydrogenase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis counters phagosomal NOX2 activity to inhibit TNF-alpha-mediated host cell apoptosis. PLoS Pathog 2010, 6:e1000864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sun J, Singh V, Lau A, Stokes RW, Obregón-Henao A, Orme IM, Wong D, Av-Gay Y, Hmama Z: Mycobacterium tuberculosis nucleoside diphosphate kinase inactivates small GTPases leading to evasion of innate immunity. PLOS Pathogens 2013, 9:e1003499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Jurcic Smith KL, Lee S: Inhibition of apoptosis by Rv2456c through Nuclear factor-κB extends the survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. International journal of mycobacteriology 2016, 5:426–436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Mohareer K, Asalla S, Banerjee S: Cell death at the cross roads of host-pathogen interaction in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2018, 113:99–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Srinivasan L, Ahlbrand S, Briken V: Interaction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with host cell death pathways. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2014, 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Dallenga T, Repnik U, Corleis B, Eich J, Reimer R, Griffiths GW, Schaible UE: M. tuberculosis-Induced Necrosis of Infected Neutrophils Promotes Bacterial Growth Following Phagocytosis by Macrophages. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 22:519–530 e513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mahamed D, Boulle M, Ganga Y, Mc Arthur C, Skroch S, Oom L, Catinas O, Pillay K, Naicker M, Rampersad S, et al. : Intracellular growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis after macrophage cell death leads to serial killing of host cells. Elife 2017, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ahrens S, Zelenay S, Sancho D, Hanc P, Kjaer S, Feest C, Fletcher G, Durkin C, Postigo A, Skehel M, et al. : F-actin is an evolutionarily conserved damage-associated molecular pattern recognized by DNGR-1, a receptor for dead cells. Immunity 2012, 36:635–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Berg RD, Levitte S, O’Sullivan MP, O’Leary SM, Cambier CJ, Cameron J, Takaki KK, Moens CB, Tobin DM, Keane J, et al. : Lysosomal Disorders Drive Susceptibility to Tuberculosis by Compromising Macrophage Migration. Cell 2016, 165:139–152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Srinivasan L, Gurses SA, Hurley BE, Miller JL, Karakousis PC, Briken V: Identification of a Transcription Factor That Regulates Host Cell Exit and Virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 2016, 12:e1005652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Greenlee-Wacker MC, Rigby KM, Kobayashi SD, Porter AR, DeLeo FR, Nauseef WM: Phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus by human neutrophils prevents macrophage efferocytosis and induces programmed necrosis. J Immunol 2014, 192:4709–4717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Cohen TS, Jones-Nelson O, Hotz M, Cheng L, Miller LS, Suzich J, Stover CK, Sellman BR: S. aureus blocks efferocytosis of neutrophils by macrophages through the activity of its virulence factor alpha toxin. Sci Rep 2016, 6:35466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Hartman ML, Kornfeld H: Interactions between naive and infected macrophages reduce Mycobacterium tuberculosis viability. PLoS One 2011, 6:e27972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Lee J, Repasy T, Papavinasasundaram K, Sassetti C, Kornfeld H: Mycobacterium tuberculosis induces an atypical cell death mode to escape from infected macrophages. PLoS One 2011, 6:e18367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Codo AC, Saraiva AC, Dos Santos LL, Visconde MF, Gales AC, Zamboni DS, Medeiros AI: Inhibition of inflammasome activation by a clinical strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae impairs efferocytosis and leads to bacterial dissemination. Cell Death Dis 2018, 9:1182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Jorgensen I, Zhang Y, Krantz BA, Miao EA: Pyroptosis triggers pore-induced intracellular traps (PITs) that capture bacteria and lead to their clearance by efferocytosis. J Exp Med 2016, 213:2113–2128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Jondle CN, Gupta K, Mishra BB, Sharma J: Klebsiella pneumoniae infection of murine neutrophils impairs their efferocytic clearance by modulating cell death machinery. PLoS Pathog 2018, 14:e1007338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Spinner JL, Winfree S, Starr T, Shannon JG, Nair V, Steele-Mortimer O, Hinnebusch BJ: Yersinia pestis survival and replication within human neutrophil phagosomes and uptake of infected neutrophils by macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 2014, 95:389–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Davis JM, Ramakrishnan L: The role of the granuloma in expansion and dissemination of early tuberculous infection. Cell 2009, 136:37–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ribeiro-Gomes FL, Peters NC, Debrabant A, Sacks DL: Efficient capture of infected neutrophils by dendritic cells in the skin inhibits the early anti-leishmania response. PLoS Pathog 2012, 8:e1002536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Peters NC, Egen JG, Secundino N, Debrabant A, Kimblin N, Kamhawi S, Lawyer P, Fay MP, Germain RN, Sacks D: In vivo imaging reveals an essential role for neutrophils in leishmaniasis transmitted by sand flies. Science 2008, 321:970–974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Czuczman MA, Fattouh R, van Rijn JM, Canadien V, Osborne S, Muise AM, Kuchroo VK, Higgins DE, Brumell JH: Listeria monocytogenes exploits efferocytosis to promote cell-to-cell spread. Nature 2014, 509:230–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

