Skip to main content
Frontiers in Pediatrics logoLink to Frontiers in Pediatrics
. 2019 Oct 24;7:436. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00436

The Evidence for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Congenital Neutrophil Disorders: A Comprehensive Review by the Inborn Errors Working Party Group of the EBMT

Shahrzad Bakhtiar 1,, Bella Shadur 2,3,4,, Polina Stepensky 2,*
PMCID: PMC6821686  PMID: 31709206

Abstract

Congenital disorders of the immune system affecting maturation and/or function of phagocytic leucocytes can result in severe infectious and inflammatory complications with high mortality and morbidity. Further complications include progression to MDS/AML in some cases. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the only curative treatment for most patients with these diseases. In this review, we provide a detailed update on indications and outcomes of alloHSCT for congenital neutrophil disorders, based on data from the available literature.

Keywords: neutrophils, neutropenia, leukemia, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Introduction

Congenital neutrophil disorders as a category of primary immunodeficiency (PID) can be classified in many ways, but a key point of distinction is whether the disorder is quantitative, or qualitative (1). The 2017 International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS) Phenotypic Classification for Primary Immunodeficiencies divides neutrophil disorders into four broad categories: congenital neutropenia associated with or without syndromic disease, and functional neutrophil defects with or without syndromic disease (2). Affected patients can present with variable symptoms including recurrent infections, failure to thrive, and overwhelming septic episodes leading to high morbidity and mortality. Early and severe respiratory infections (e.g., Burkholderia cepacia, Aspergillus spp.), visceral abscesses, cellulitis, lymphadenitis, and granulomatous lesions are observed in patients suffering from CGD (3, 4). Some patients develop severe autoinflammatory complications underlining the role of neutrophils in autoinflammatory processes beyond microbial defense (5, 6). In many of these diseases there is a recognized risk of progression to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (1, 2, 7, 8). Treatment for neutrophil disorders classically comprises anti-microbial therapy, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) (8).

In this review we provide an update on the evidence, indications and modalities of alloHSCT for the various congenital neutrophil disorders based on data from the available literature, excluding CGD which will be discussed elsewhere in this special edition. Also beyond the scope of this manuscript is neutropenia that features in predominantly lymphocyte immune deficiencies (e.g., some forms of severe combined immune deficiency, CD40L deficiency, etc.).

Materials and Methods

We used the 2017 IUIS Phenotypic Classification for Primary Immunodeficiencies as the basis for this review (2). Data were gathered via an English-language Pubmed literature search whereby the name of each disorder in figure five of the IUIS classification was searched individually, and together with the terms “alloHSCT” and “transplantation.” We searched for case reports and case series on each disorder, focusing on the question of treatability of the disease by alloHSCT.

Results

Group 1: Syndrome-Associated Neutropenia

This group of diseases is dominated by conditions defined by bone marrow failure (BMF), predisposition to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as well as additional non-hematological manifestations such as neurodevelopmental delay (Table 1). Disease control can be achieved for some patients with G-CSF in combination with antibiotic prophylaxis (40, 41). However, the refractoriness of the disease and the predisposition to myeloid malignancies raise the question of if and when curative treatment by alloHSCT is indicated. A lack of evidence regarding long-term outcomes both with and without transplantation, the lack of genotype-phenotype correlation, and the persistence of neurodevelopmental disorders, make recommendations difficult for many of these diseases (Table 1). In some cases only case reports are available, such as in the case of successful transplant of Glycogen Storage Disease type 1b using reduced intensity conditioning (18, 42). On the contrary, more data is available on Schwachman Diamond Syndrome and deficiency of VPS45 protein, and is presented here (43).

Table 1.

Syndrome-associated neutropenia.

Disease Gene chromosome inheritance Clinical features G-CSF responsive Risk of progression to MDS/AML Evidence of successful HSCT References
Schwachman Diamond Syndrome (SDS) SBDS
7q11.21
AR
Bone marrow failure
Exocrine pancreas dysfunction
Malabsorption
Skeletal abnormalities
Neurocognitive deficit
Recurrent infections (9)
Yes Yes
15–30% progress to MDS
Yes (see text) (1014)
G6PC3 deficiency G6PC3
17q21
AR
SCN
Intermittent thrombocytopenia
Congential heart disease
Urogenital anomalies
Dysmorphism
Growth and developmental delay
Gastrointestinal disease (Crohn's Disease, chronic diarrhea with steatorrhea)
Yes Yes Yes (1517)
Glycogen storage disease type 1b G6PT1
11q23
AR
Neutropenia
Hypoglycemia
Recurrent infections
Inflammatory bowel disease
Liver diseases and hepatosplenomegaly
Hypertriglyceridemia
Yes Yes Yes (18, 19)
Cohen syndrome VPS13B (also called COH1)
8q22.2
AR
Decreased fetal activity and low birth weight
Neutropenia/SCN
Obesity (truncal with normal BMI)
Hypotonia
Dysmorphisms, dental anomalies, poor vision, and limb abnormalities
Intellectual disability (severe in 22% of cases)
Yes None reported No (20)
Barth syndrome TAZ
Xq28
X-linked
Neutropenia (fluctuating) with occasional monocytosis
Dilated cardiomyopathy and rhythm abnormalities
Skeletal myopathy
Growth delay
Developmental delay
Hypoglycemia
Early death
Yes None reported No (2123)
Clericuzio syndrome (Poikiloderma with neutropenia) USB1
16q21
AR
Inflammatory eczematous rash (6–12 months)
Post-inflammatory Poikiloderma (>2 years)
Neutropenia
Recurrent sinopulmonary infections and bronchiectasis
Nail dystrophy, palmar/plantar hyperkeratosis
Reactive airway disease
Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
Mid-facial retrusion
Calcinosis cutis
Non-healing skin ulcers
Yes Yes No (24, 25)
VPS45 deficiency (See text) VPS45
1q21-22
AR
BMF
Neutropenia non-responsive to G-CSF
Recurrent, severe bacterial, and fungal infections
Extramedullary hematopoiesis with hepatosplenomegaly
Nephromegaly
No Unknown Yes (see text) (2630)
P14/LAMTOR2 LAMTOR2/MAPBPIP
3′ UTR p14
AR
SCN
Partial albinism
B-cell deficiency
CD8 deficiency
Coarse facial features
Yes None reported No (31)
JAGN1 JAGN1
3p25.3
AR
SCN with increased apoptosis of neutrophils (variable)
Recurrent infections
Bone, dental, pancreatic insufficiency
Failure to thrive
Developmental delay
Variable Yes Yes (conditioning regimen not specified in literature) (32, 33)
3-methylglutaconic acid CLBP
11q13.4
AR
SCN
Recurrent infections
Progressive brain atrophy with intellectual disability
Movement disorder
Cataracts
Movement disorder
Yes Yes No (34)
SMARCD2 SMARCD2
17q23.3
AR
Neutropenia
Delayed separation of the umbilical cord
Recurrent infection
Chronic diarrhea
Developmental delay
Dysmorphic features
No Yes No (35)
WDR1 WDR1
AR
4p16.1
Neutropenia with impaired lymphoid function
Mild learning disability
Aphthous stomatitis and skin ulcers
Pneumonia
Gout
Pancreatitis
Glioblastoma
Dysmorphic features in some patients
Unclear Yes No (3638)
HYOU HYOU1
AR
11q23.3
Neutropenia
Recurrent oral herpes infection
Hypoglycemia
Autoimmunity
Yes None reported No (39)

Schwachman Diamond Syndrome (SDS)

Schwachman Diamond Syndrome is caused by mutations in the SBDS gene at chromosome 7q11.21. Mutations in this gene lead to impaired RNA metabolism and ribosomal function, with clinical features as described in Table 1 (10). One third of patients develop major hematological complications (9), and alloHSCT is indicated in cases of bone marrow failure (with subsequent transfusion-dependent anemia, bleeding and severe, recurrent infections), MDS, or AML (11, 12, 44, 45). Numerous studies have shown that alloHSCT is able to correct hematological abnormalities in patients with SDS, however most studies are limited by small sample numbers and/or short follow-up time. A 2005 study by Cesaro et al. (44) reviewed 26 patients with SDS who underwent alloHSCT and demonstrated overall survival of 64.5% at 1 year follow-up. Fifty-six percent of patients who were transplanted following the development of MDS/AML died post-transplant, compared to 19% who were transplanted for BMF, although the difference was not statistically significant. Patients transplanted with total body irradiation (TBI) appeared to do worse than those transplanted with busulfan and fludarabine conditioning, with 67 vs. 20% mortality (P = 0.03) (44). In 2002 Hsu reviewed 15 cases of SDS alloHSCT patients and found that transplantation following the development of MDS/AML was associated with a worse outcome; overall survival in this series was 40% (12).

A 2005 review of French registry data found 10 patients who had been transplanted for SDS, five because of bone marrow failure (BMF) and five following development of MDS/AML. They found a 5 years event-free survival of 60% with two patients failing to engraft, one dying 17 months post-HSCT from a respiratory illness, and one death from relapsed MDS. This study noted that patients transplanted prior to the development of malignancy had improved transplant outcomes, and that patients transplanted for BMF demonstrated sustained engraftment with myeloablative regimens based on busulfan and cyclophosphamide. The authors felt that more intense conditioning for BMF-SDS is not warranted, but reduced intensity conditioning for patients with MDS/AML would be insufficient (45). In contrast, Burroughs et al. document three SDS patients transplanted from matched unrelated donors (MUD) with treosulfan and fludarabine conditioning regimens and no serotherapy; these patients underwent transplantation for BMF and achieved sustained engraftment with acute graft vs. host disease (GvHD) developing in two of the three (13).

Thus, for patients with SDS, alloHSCT can correct the hematopoietic aspects of the disease with improved outcomes if transplantation is undertaken prior to development of MDS/AML. Regular monitoring for cytogenetic abnormalities is thus recommended, although some appear to be indolent or transient and are not an automatic indication for HSCT [e.g., i7(q10) and del(20q)]. Larger studies are required before recommendations can be made regarding ideal conditioning regimens (treosulfan or busulfan) and need for serotherapy (particularly when using MUDs) (12, 13, 44, 45).

Deficiency of VPS45 Protein

Deficiency of VPS45 protein leads to impaired trafficking of endosomes and lysosomes, with impaired degranulation, release of inflammatory mediators, and neutrophil migration. Patients present very early in life (before 1 year of age) with severe, recurrent, deep-seated bacterial and fungal infections, and a severe neutropenia unresponsive to G-CSF therapy. Bone marrow biopsy classically demonstrates primary myelofibrosis with a dry tap (2629). HSCT is indicated for severe neutropenia unresponsive to G-CSF and for recurrent, severe infections (27, 30). alloHSCT should be undertaken as early as possible with a myeloablative regimen including busulfan (27). A total of nine transplants have been performed for children with biallelic mutations in the VPS45 gene, with three deaths and six patients surviving. Surviving patients were transfusion-independent with resolution of the extramedullary hematopoiesis if full donor chimerism was achieved (27).

Group 2: Neutropenia Without Syndromic Disease

This group includes congenital neutropenia caused by mutations in ELANE, GFI1, HAX1, WAS (X-linked neutropenia), CSF3R, and SRP54 genes (Table 2) (40, 43, 46). Several reports on successful alloHSCT are available for both reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), and myeloablative conditioning (MAC) transplantation for this group of diseases (Table 2) and patients younger than 10 years of age appear to have favorable outcomes (7).

Table 2.

Neutropenia without syndromic disease.

Disease Gene chromosome inheritance Clinical features G-SCF responsive Risk of progression to MDS/AML Evidence of successful HSCT References
Severe congential neutropenia 1 (SCN1) ELANE
19p13.3
AD
Neutropenia
Recurrent bacterial skin infections
Abscess formation
Gingivitis
Failure to thrive
Can also cause cyclic neutropenia
Yes No Yes (indicated if high doses of GCSF needed) (see text) (43)
Severe congential neutropenia 2 (SCN2) GFI1
1p22.1
AD
Recurrent bacterial skin infections
Abscess formation
Gingivitis
Failure to thrive
Mild lymphopenia
Yes None reported Not reported (40, 46, 47)
Severe congenital neutropenia 3 (SCN3) HAX1
1p22.1
AR
Neutropenia
Recurrent bacterial skin infections
Gingivitis
Failure to thrive
Abscess formation
Neurological impairment
Yes Yes Yes (43, 4850)
X-linked neutropenia WAS GOF
Xp11.23
X-linked
Neutropenia
Bacterial infections
Lymphopenia and monocytopenia
Autoimmune enteropathy
Yes Possible (myelodysplasia noted in some patients) Not reported (43, 5153)
G-SCF receptor deficiency CSF3R
1p34.3
AR/acquired in cases of SCN
Cases of acquired somatic mutation in AML/MDS No Yes Annual mutational screening of CSF3R and consideration of HSCT if a mutation was detected. (43)
Neutropenia with combined immune deficiency MKL1
22q13.1-q13.2
AR
Severe bacterial and fungal infections
BCG-related disease
Abscess formation
Mild thrombocytopenia
Failure to thrive
Not reported Not reported Not reported (54)

Severe infections are seen in ELANE and HAX1 mutations, thus alloHSCT is indicated in these patients, particularly if they require high-dose G-CSF to maintain their neutrophil count, or progress to MDS/AML (it has been found that patients who require more than 8 mcg/kg/day of G-CSF to maintain a neutrophil count above 0.5 × 109/L have an increased risk of sepsis and MDS/AML) (43, 46, 55). With regard to HAX1, patients with mutations in exon 2 encoding isoform A develop isolated congenital neutropenia, whereas other mutations encoding both isoform A and B cause hematological and neurological manifestations (neurological delay, epilepsy). Thus, the degree of neurological impairment should be taken into account when considering alloHSCT (48, 49). Patients with GFI1 and WAS gain of function (GOF) mutations are very rare and seem to present with mild to moderate neutropenia, and there are no reports on alloHSCT in these patients (40, 47). WAS GOF (X-linked neutropenia) is a distinct clinical entity from Wiskott Aldrich Syndrome (caused by WAS loss of function) with male patients exhibiting variable neutropenia, recurrent infections, and lymphopenia, with normal platelet counts and no eczema. Transient myelodysplastic changes have been seen in the bone marrow of some patients, resolving in most cases but progressing to AML at an elderly age in one case (5153). In contrast, patients with acquired mutations in CSF3R present very often with MDS/AML, therefore yearly screening for receptor mutations is indicated, as is pre-emptive alloHSCT (Table 2) (43).

Group 3: Phagocyte Function With Syndromic Disease

This group of disease is characterized by defective neutrophil function with normal or elevated neutrophil numbers that is part of a broader syndrome (Table 3). For patients with Papillon-Lefevre, localized juvenile periodontitis, and ß-ACTIN-deficiency there is no need and no evidence for alloHSCT. Patients suffering from leucocyte adhesion deficiencies I and III (LAD) can be cured by alloHSCT, however patients with LADII are not candidates for transplantation. For patients with LADI and III, it appears preferable to transplant early, prior to the development of life-threatening infections. Both RIC and MAC regimens have been successful, although it appears myeloablative reduced toxicity regimens (fludaribine-based, combined with treosulfan, or targeted busulfan dosing) are preferable, with RIC regimens more suitable for sicker patients with reduced Lansky score (6165). However, a recent study of the EBMT/IEWP on 83 transplanted LAD patients shows no significant benefit in patients receiving MAC vs. non-myeloablation. Furthermore, regardless of the conditioning regimen, a relatively high frequency of severe inflammatory complications (graft rejection and severe aGVHD) during alloHSCT was observed. This cohort included a few LAD III patients, and their outcome was not significantly different from that of the LAD I patients. Early transplantation using anti-inflammtory treatment pre-alloHSCT and the additional use of thiotepa in the conditioning protocol might be beneficial [unpublished data of author SB, (66)]. Following on from successful gene therapy trials for other primary immune deficiencies, a gene therapy phase I/II trial for LAD-1 has been announced for the end of 2019 whereby autologous CD34+ stem cells of patients with LAD1 will be transduced using a lentiviral vector; stem cells successfully transduced will be transplanted following conditioning with a low dose of busulfan (Rocket Pharma, USA; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03812263, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03825783) (67).

Table 3.

Phagocyte dysfunction with syndromic disease.

Disease Gene chromosome inheritance Clinical features G-SCF responsive Risk of progression to MDS/AML Evidence of successful HSCT References
Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)—dependent Leukocyte adhesion deficiency type IV (LAD IV) CFTR
7q31.2
AR
Clinical features of cystic fibrosis No No No (56, 57)
Papillon-Lefevre CTSC
11q14.2
AR
Palmoplantar keratoderma
Periodontitis
Premature loss of dentition
Liver abscesses
Pneumonia
Unknown No No (58)
Localized juvenile periodontis FPR-1
11q14.1
AR
Palmoplantar keratoderma
Periodontitis
Premature loss of dentition
Liver abcess
Yes No No (59)
ß-ACTIN ACTB
7p22.1
AD
Developmental delay
Recurrent infections
Photosensitivity
Thrombocytopenia
Stomatitis
Unknown Unkown No (60)
Leukocyte adhesion deficiency type I (LAD I) ITGB
12q13.13
AR
Severe leucocytosis
Severe recurrent bacterial infections impaired pus formation
Delayed wound healing
Delayed umbilical cord detachment
No No Yes
Complicated by aGVHD
Indicated in young patients with MSD, RIC/MAC both used Additional Thiotepa beneficial
(6163)
Leukocyte adhesion deficiency type II (LAD II)
Also known as CDG2C
SLC35C1
11p11.2
AR
Severe leucocytosis
Recurrent bacterial infection
Moderate to severe psychomotor retardation
Mild to severe dysmorphism
Impaired neutrophil motility
Bombay blood group
No No No (6163)
Leukocyte adhesion deficiency type III (LAD III) FERMT3
11q13.1
AR
Severe leucocytosis
Recurrent bacterial infection
Bleeding tendency
No No Yes
Complicated by aGVHD, good in young patients with MSD, RIC/MAC both used, additional thiotepa indicated
(6164)

Group 4: Phagocyte Dysfunction Without Syndromic Disease

Excluding CGD, the only disease in this group with evidence of successful bone marrow transplantation is MonoMAC (monocytopenia and mycobacterial infections syndrome) (Table 4). This disease is characterized by profoundly decreased or absent monocytes, B lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, and circulating and tissue dendritic cells (DCs), with little, or no effect on T-lymphocyte numbers. Patients are susceptible to mycobacterial, viral and opportunistic fungal infections. Bone marrow dysfunction is prominent and variable with progressive aplastic and dysplastic changes. Stem cell transplantation is curative and can be performed pre-emptively in cases where a matched donor is available (68). Anti-inflammatory pre-treatment and proper infection control might result in lower transplant related mortality in these patients.

Table 4.

Phagocyte dysfunction without syndromic disease (excluding CGD).

Disease Gene chromosome inheritance Clinical features G-SCF responsive Risk of progression to MDS/AML Evidence of successful HSCT References
MonoMac GATA2
3q21.3
AD
Infections
Cytopenia (including monocytopenia)
Lymphedema
Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis
Deafness
Predisposition to mycobacteria
No Yes Yes (43, 68)
Specific granule deficiency CEBPE
14q11.2
AR
SMARCD2
SMARCD2
17q23.3AR
Recurrent infections, neutropenia, Dysmorphic features, developmental delay No Yes No (1517, 35, 69, 70)
Neutrophil immune deficiency
Syndrome
RAC2
22q13.1
AD
Severe bacterial infection
Poor wound healing
Absence of pus
Unclear No No (70, 71)
G6PD deficiency class I G6PD
Xq28
X-linked
Severe hemolytic anemia in response to specific medications and fava beans
Chronic anemia
No No No (72)

Discussion

The list of neutrophil disorders is varied and expanding rapidly with the increasing availability of next generation gene sequencing. As our ability to establish a genetic diagnosis is improved, the challenge of linking genotype to phenotype arises, a challenge that is made difficult by the small numbers of patients diagnosed with each individual disease. There is much we still do not understand about the pathomechanism of these diseases, and this makes prognostication and treatment decisions difficult. Serious infectious complications and neutropenia are life threatening but can be treated with anti-microbial therapy and G-CSF, respectively, however inflammatory complications of these diseases are likely underappreciated and undertreated (5, 6). Furthermore, the decision to undertake alloHSCT, with all its inheritent risks and potential complications, is made difficult by the lack of published data for most diseases.

In 2015, the EBMT and SCETIDE released the findings of the largest retrospective cohort of patients with severe congenital neutropenia to undergo alloHSCT. The 136 patients in that study demonstrated an overall 3 years survival of 82%, with transplant related mortality at 17%. It concluded that transplantation should be considered in patients with severe infections or unresponsiveness to G-CSF or requiring high doses of G-CSF (over 8 mcg/kg/day to maintain an absolute neutrophil count over 0.5 × 109/L). Both MAC and RIC conditioning was effective and transplant outcomes were improved if patients were transplanted before 10 years of age and before the development of MDS/AML (7). Despite the wide range of disease we have covered in this review, those findings appear to hold true, although in diseases where evidence is lacking family choice and center-specific expertise must also be taken into account.

In diseases where the need to transplant has been established (e.g., deficiency of VPS45 protein, LAD, SDS), there is little to guide decision making as to the method of transplantation. The need to achieve stable myeloid engraftment, often into an impaired bone marrow environment, may well call for the use of toxicity reduced MAC over the RIC regimens that have become established practice for PIDs characterized by loss-of-function lymphoid deficiencies (e.g., severe combined immunodeficiency, or SCID) (27). Again, evidence is lacking regarding side effects, long-term outcomes, and the degree of chimerism required to maintain cure. Secondary graft failure or graft insufficiency in the case of mixed chimerism with a reappearance of post-transplant neutropenia has been reported in the literature and observed by the authors in some of the quantitative phagocytic disorders (7375).

We recommend that all physicians treating patients with neutrophil disorders submit their data to the EBMT and SCETIDE, as it is only through the ordered collection of data that clinical experience can be gathered, studied and shared. It is our hope that in the coming years many disease mechanisms will be uncovered and long-term treatment data accumulated, which will be of great benefit to physicians, patients, and their families.

Author Contributions

SB, BS, and PS designed the study, collected data, performed review, wrote the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor, AG, declared a collaboration with one of the authors, SB.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our patients and their families, as well as departmental nursing and administrative staff for their tireless commitment to patient care. We would also like to thank Prof. Zeev Rotstein, Director of The Hadassah Medical Center for his support of the department and the patients.

Glossary

Abbreviations

AD

Autosomal Dominant

aGVHD

Acute Graft vs. Host Disease

alloHSCT

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

AML

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

AR

Autosomal Recessive

BMF

Bone Marrow Failure

CGD

Chronic Granulomatous Disease

cGVHD

Chronic Graft vs. Host Disease

CHD

Congenital Heart Disease

EBMT

European Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation

ESID

European Society for Immunodeficiencies

G-CSF

Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor

GOF

Gain of Function

GVHD

Graft vs. Host Disease

HSCT

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

IEWP

Inborn Errors Working Party

IUIS

International Union of Immunological Studies

LAD

Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency

MAC

Myeloablative Conditioning

MDS

Myelodysplastic Syndrome

MUD

Matched Unrelated Donor

PID

Primary Immune Deficiency

RIC

Reduced Intensity Conditioning

SAA

Severe Aplastic Anemia

SCETIDE

Stem Cell Transplant for Immunodeficiencies in Europe

SCN

Severe Congenital Neutropenia

SDS

Schwachman Diamond Syndrome

TBI

Total Body Irradiation.

Footnotes

Funding. BS position was supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship and Hadassah Australia. PS was supported by DFG grant W-A 1597/4-2.

References

  • 1.Sullivan K. Neutropenia as a sign of immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2019) 143:96–100. 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.09.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bousfiha A, Jeddane L, Picard C, Ailal F, Gaspar H, Al-Herz W, et al. The 2017 IUIS phenotypic classification for primary immunodeficiencies. J Clin Immunol. (2018) 38:129–43. 10.1007/s10875-017-0465-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Adinoff A, Johnston R, Dolen J, South M. Chronic granulomatous disease and pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Pediatrics. (1982) 69:133–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arnold D, Heimall J. A review of chronic granulomatous disease. Adv Ther. (2017) 34:2543–57. 10.1007/s12325-017-0636-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Henrickson S, Jongco A, Thomsen K, Garabedian E, Thomsen I. Non-infectious manifestations and complications of chronic granulomatous disease. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. (2018) 7(S1):S18–24. 10.1093/jpids/piy014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosales C. Neutrophil: a cell with many roles in inflammation or several cell types? Front Physiol. (2018) 9:113 10.3389/fphys.2018.00113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fioredda F, Iacobelli S, van Biezen A, Gaspar B, Ancliff P, Donadieu J, et al. Stem cell transplantation in severe congential neutropenia: an analysis from the European Society for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation. Blood. (2015) 126:1885–92. 10.1182/blood-2015-02-628859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Newburger P. Disorders of neutrophil number and function. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. (2006) 2006:104–10. 10.1182/asheducation-2006.1.104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Donadieu J, Fenneteau O, Beaupain B, Beaufils S, Bellanger F, Mahlaoui N, et al. Classification of and risk factors for hematologic complications in a French national cohort of 102 patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. Haematologica. (2012) 97:1312–9. 10.3324/haematol.2011.057489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huang J, Shimamura A. Clinical spectrum and molecular pathophysiology of Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. Curr Opin Hematol. (2011) 18:30–5. 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32834114a5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Alter B. Inherited bone marrow failure syndromes: considerations pre-and posttransplant. Blood. (2017) 130:2257–64. 10.1182/blood-2017-05-781799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hsu J, Vogelsang G, Jones R, Brodsky R. Bone marrow transplantation in shwachman-diamond syndrome. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2002) 30:255–8. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Burroughs L, Shimamura A, Talano J, Domm J, Baker K, Delaney C, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation using treosulfan-based conditioning for treatment of marrow failure disorders. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. (2017) 23:1669–77. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.06.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bezzerri V, Vella A, Di Gennaro G, Ortolani R, Nicolis E, Cesaro S, et al. Peripheral blood immunophenotyping in a large cohort of patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. Pediatr Blood Cancer. (2019) 66:e27597. 10.1002/pbc.27597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Boztug K, Appaswamy G, Ashikov A, Schaffer A, Salzer U, Diestelhorst J, et al. A novel syndrome with congenital neutropenia caused by mutations in G6PC3. N Engl J Med. (2009) 360:32–43. 10.1056/NEJMoa0805051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Desplantes C, Fremond M, Beaupain B, Harousseau J, Buzyn A, Pellier I, et al. Clinical spectrum and long-term follow-up of 14 cases with G6PC3 mutations from the French severe congenital neutropenia registry. Orph J Rare Dis. (2014) 9:183. 10.1186/s13023-014-0183-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Notarangelo L, Savoldi G, Cavagnini S, Bennato V, Vasile S, Pilotta A, et al. Severe congenital neutropenia due to G6PC3 deficiency: early and delayed phenotype in two patients with two novel mutations. Italian J Pediatrics. (2014) 40:80. 10.1186/s13052-014-0080-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mehyar L, Abu-Arja R, Rangarajan H, Pai V, Bartholomew D, Rose M, et al. Matched unrelated donor transplantation in glycogen storage disease type 1b patient corrects severe neutropenia and recurrent infections. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2018) 53:1076–8. 10.1038/s41409-018-0147-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dale D, Bolyard A, Marrero T, Kelley M, Makaryan V, Tran E, et al. Neutropenia in glycogen storage disease 1b: outcomes for patients treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Curr Opin Hematol. (2019) 26:16–21. 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rodrigues J, Fernandes H, Caruthers C, Braddock S, Knutsen A. Cohen syndrome: review of the literature. Cureus. (2018) 10:e3330. 10.7759/cureus.3330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Steward C, Groves S, Taylor C, Maisenbacher M, Versluys B, Newbury-Ecob R, et al. Neutropenia in Barth syndrome: characteristics, risks, and management. Curr Opin Hematol. (2019) 26:6–15. 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rigaud C, Lebre A, Touraine R, Beaupain B, Ottolenghi C, Chabli A, et al. Natural history of Barth Syndrome: a national cohort study of 22 patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2013) 8:70. 10.1186/1750-1172-8-70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Saric A, Andreau K, Armand A, Moller I, Petit P. Barth syndrome: from mitochondrial dysfunctions associated with aberrant production of reactive oxygen species to pluripotent stem cell studies. Front Genet. (2016) 6:359. 10.3389/fgene.2015.00359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Patiroglu T, Akar H. Clericuzio-type poikiloderma with neutropenia syndrome. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. (2015) 14:331–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang L, Clericuzio C, Larizza L. Poikiloderma with neutropenia. In: Adam M, Ardinger H, Pagon R, Wallace S, Bean L, Stephens K, et al. editors. GeneReviews. Seattle, WA: University of Washington; (2017). p. 1993–2019. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meerschaut I, Bordon V, Dhooge C, Delbeke P, Vanlander A, Simon A, et al. Severe congenital neutropenia with neurological impairment due to a homozygous VPS45 p.E238K mutation: a case report suggesting a genotype–phenotype correlation. Am J Med Genet Part A. (2015) 167A:3214–8. 10.1002/ajmg.a.37367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shadur B, Asherie A, Newburger P, Stepensky P. How we approach: severe congeital neutropenia and myelofibrosis due to mutations in VPS45. Pediatr Blood Cancer. (2019) 66:e27473. 10.1002/pbc.27473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stepensky P, Saada A, Cowan M, Tabib A, Fischer U, Berkun Y, et al. The Thr224Asn mutation in the VPS45 gene is associated with the congenital neutropenia and primary myelofibrosis of infancy. Blood. (2013) 121:5078–87. 10.1182/blood-2012-12-475566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vilboux T, Lev A, Malicdan M, Simon A, Jarvinen P, Racek T, et al. A congenital neutrophil defect syndrome associated with mutations in VPS45. NEJM. (2013) 369:54–65. 10.1056/NEJMoa1301296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stepensky P, Simanovsky N, Averbuch D, Gross M, Yanir A, Mevorach D, et al. VPS45-associated primary infantile myelofibrosis - successful treatment with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. (2013) 17:820–5. 10.1111/petr.12169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bohn G, Allroth A, Brandes G, Thiel J, Glocker E, Schaffer A, et al. A novel human primary immunodeficiency syndrome caused by deficiency of the endosomal adaptor protein p14. Nat Med. (2007) 13:38–45. 10.1038/nm1528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Boztug K, Jarvinen P, Salzer E, Racek T, Monch S, Garncarz W, et al. JAGN1 deficiency causes aberrant myeloid cell homeostasis and congenital neutropenia. Nat Gent. (2014) 46:1021–7. 10.1038/ng.3069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Baris S, Karakoc-Aydiner E, Ozen A, Delil K, Kiykim A, Ogulur I, et al. JAGN1 deficient severe congenital neutropenia: two cases from the same family. J Clin Immunol. (2015) 35:339–43. 10.1007/s10875-015-0156-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wortmann S, Zietkiewicz S, Kousi M, Szklarczyk R, Haack T, Gersting S, et al. CLPB mutations cause 3-methylglutaconic aciduria, progressive brain atrophy, intellectual disability, congenital neutropenia, cataracts, movement disorder. Am J Hum Genet. (2015) 96:245–57. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.12.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Witzel M, Petersheim D, Fan Y, Bahrami E, Racek T, Rohlfs M, et al. Chromatin-remodeling factor SMARCD2 regulates transcriptional networks controlling differentiation of neutrophil granulocytes. Nat Genet. (2017) 49:742–52. 10.1038/ng.3833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kuhns D, Fink D, Choi U, Lau K, Priel D, Riva D, et al. Cytoskeletal abnormalities and neutrophil dysfunction in WDR1 deficiency. Blood. (2016) 128:2135–43. 10.1182/blood-2016-03-706028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kile B, Panopoulos A, Stirzaker R, Hacking D, Tahtamouni L, Willson T, et al. Mutations in the cofilin partner Aip1/Wdr1 cause autoinflammatory disease and macrothrombocytopenia. Blood. (2007) 110:2371–80. 10.1182/blood-2006-10-055087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pfajfer L, Mair N, Jimenez-Heredia R, Genel F, Gulez N, Ardeniz O, et al. Mutations affecting the actin regulator WD repeat-containing protein 1 lead to aberrant lymphoid immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2018) 142:1589–604. 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.04.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chinen J, Cowan M. Advances and highlights in primary immunodeficiencies in 2017. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2018) 142:1041–51. 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.08.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Donadieu J, Fenneteau O, Beaupain B, Mahlaoui N, Chantelot C. Congenital neutropenia: diagnosis, molecular bases and patient management. Orph J Rare Dis. (2011) 6:26. 10.1186/1750-1172-6-26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rosenberg P, Alter B, Bolyard A, Bonilla M, Boxer L, Cham B, et al. The incidence of leukemia and mortality from sepsis in patients with severe congenital neutropenia receiving long-term G-CSF therapy. Blood. (2006) 107:4628–35. 10.1182/blood-2005-11-4370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pierre G, Chakupurakal G, Mckiernan P, Hendriksz C, Lawson S, Chakrapani A. Bone marrow transplantation in glycogen storage disease type 1b. J Pediatr. (2008) 152:286–8. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.09.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Donadieu J, Beaupain B, Fenneteau O, Bellanne-Chantelot C. Congenital neutropenia in the era of genomics: classification, diagnosis, and natural history. Br J Haematol. (2017) 179:557–74. 10.1111/bjh.14887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cesaro S, Oneto R, Messina C, Gibson B, Buzyn A, Steward C, et al. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for Shwachman-Diamond disease: a study from the European Group for blood and marrow transplantation. Br J Haematol. (2005) 131:231–6. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05758.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Donadieu J, Michel G, Merlin E, Bordigoni P, Monteux B, Beaupain B, et al. Hematooietic stem cell transplantation for shwachman-diamond syndrome: experience of the french neutropenia registry. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2005) 36:787–92. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Skokowa J, Dale D, Touw I, Zeidler C, Welte K. Severe congenital neutropenias. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2017) 3:17032. 10.1038/nrdp.2017.32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Person R, Li F, Duan Z, Benson K, Wachsler J, Papadaki H, et al. Mutations in proto-oncogene GFI1 cause human neutropenia and target ELA2. Nat Genet. (2003) 34:308–12. 10.1038/ng1170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Germeshausen M, Grudzien M, Zeidler C, Abdollahpour H, Yetgin S, Rezaei N, et al. Novel HAX1 mutations in patients with severe congenital neutropenia reveal isoform-dependent genotype-phenotype associations. Blood. (2008) 111:4954–7. 10.1182/blood-2007-11-120667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Boztug K, Ding X-Q, Hartmann H, Ziesenitz L, Schaffer A, Diestelhorst J, et al. HAX1 mutations causing SCN and neurological disease lead to microstructural abnormalities revealed by quantitative MRI. Am J Med Genet. (2010) 152A:3157–63. 10.1002/ajmg.a.33748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Klein C. Kostmann's disease and HCLS1-associated protein X-1 (HAX1). J Clin Immunol. (2017) 37:117–22. 10.1007/s10875-016-0358-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Devriendt K, Kim A, Mathijs G, Frints S, Schwartz M, Van den Oord J, et al. Constitutively activating mutation in WASP causes X-linked severe congential neutropenia. Nat Genet. (2001) 27:313–7. 10.1038/85886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ancliff P, Blundell M, Cory G, Calle Y, Worth A, Kempski H, et al. Two novel activating mutations in the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein result in congenital neutropenia. Blood. (2006) 108:2182–9. 10.1182/blood-2006-01-010249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Beel K, Cotter M, Blatny J, Bond J, Lucas G, Green F, et al. A large kindred with X-linked neutropenia with an I294T mutation of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome gene. Br J Haematol. (2008) 144:120–6. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07416.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Record J, Malinova D, Zenner H, Plagnol V, Nowak K, Syed F, et al. Immunodeficiency and severe susceptibility to bacterial infection associated with a loss-of-function homozygous mutation of MKL1. Blood. (2015) 126:1527–35. 10.1182/blood-2014-12-611012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rosenberg P, Zeidler C, Bolyard A, Alter B, Bonilla M, Boxer L, et al. Stable long-term risk of leukaemia in patients with severe congenital neutropenia maintained on G-CSF therapy. Br J Haematol. (2010) 150:196–9. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08216.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sorio C, Montresor A, Bolomini-Vittori M, Caldrer S, Rossi B, Dusi S, et al. Mutations of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene cause a monocyte-selective adhesion deficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2016) 193:1123–33. 10.1164/rccm.201510-1922OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fan Z, Ley K. Leukocyte adhesion deficiency IV. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2016) 193:1075–7. 10.1164/rccm.201512-2454ED [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sreeramulu B, Shyam N, Ajay P, Suman P. Papillon-Lefevre syndrome: clinical presentation and management options. Clin Cosmet Invest Dent. (2015) 7:75–81. 10.2147/CCIDE.S76080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Maney P, Walters J. Formylpeptide receptor single nucleotide polymorphism 348T>C and its relationship to polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemotaxis in aggressive periodontitis. J Periodontol. (2009) 80:1498–505. 10.1902/jop.2009.090103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nunoi H, Yamazaki T, Tsuchiya H, Kato S, Malech H, Matsuda I, et al. A heterozygous mutation of B-actin associated with neutrophil dysfunction and recurrent infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1999) 96:8693–8. 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Almarza N, Kasbekar S, Thrasher A, Kohn D, Sevilla J, Nguyen T, et al. Leukocyte adhesion deficiency-1: a comprehensive review of all published cases. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. (2018) 6:1418–20. 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hirikoshi Y, Umeda K, Imai K, Yabe H, Sasahara Y, Watanabe K, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for leukocyte adhesion deficiency. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. (2018) 40:137–40. 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Qasim W, Cavazzana-Calvo M, Davies E, Davis J, Duval M, Earmes G, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for leukocyte adhesion deficiency. Pediatrics. (2009) 123:836–40. 10.1542/peds.2008-1191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Stepensky P, Wolach B, Gavrieli R, Rousso S, Ben Ami T, Goldman V, et al. Leukocyte adhesion deficiency type III: clinical features and treatment with stem cell transplantation. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. (2015) 37:264–8. 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.van de Vijver E, van den Berg T, Kuijpers T. Leukocyte adhesion deficiencies. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. (2013) 27:101–16. 10.1016/j.hoc.2012.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of RP-L201 in Subjects With Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency-I. Clinical Trial Rocket Pharmaceuticals;ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03812263. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Qasim W, Gennery A. Gene therapy for primary immunodeficiencies: current status and future prospects. Drugs. (2014) 74:963–9. 10.1007/s40265-014-0223-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Parta M, Shah N, Baird K, Rafei H, Calvo K, Hughes T, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for GATA2 deficiency using a busulfan-based regimen. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. (2018) 24:1250–9. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.01.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gombart A, Shiohara M, Kwok S, Agematsu K, Komiyama A, Koeffler H. Neutrophil-specific granule deficiency: homozygous recessive inheritance of a frameshift mutation in the gene encoding transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-epsilon. Blood. (2001) 97:2561–7. 10.1182/blood.V97.9.2561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ambruso D, Knall C, Abell A, Panepinto J, Kurkchubasche A, Thurman G, et al. Human neutrophil immunodeficiency syndrome is associated with an inhibitory Rac2 mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2000) 97:4654–9. 10.1073/pnas.080074897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Williams D, Tao W, Yang F, Kim C, Gu Y, Mansfield P, et al. Dominant negative mutation of the hematopoietic-specific Rho GTPase, Rac2, is associated with a human phagocyte immunodeficiency. Blood. (2000) 96:1646–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Luzzatto L, Seneca E. G6PD deficiency: a classic example of pharmacogenetics with on-going clinical implications. Br J Haematol. (2014) 164:469–80. 10.1111/bjh.12665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hashem H, Abu-Arja R, Auletta J, Rangarajan H, Varga E, Rose M, et al. Successful second hematopoietic cell transplantation in severe congenital neutropenia. Pediatr Transplant. (2018) 22:e13289. 10.1111/petr.13078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Markel M, Haut P, Renbarger J, Robertson K, Goebel W. Unrelated cord blood transplantation for severe congenital neutropenia: report of two cases with very different transplant courses. Pediatr Transplant. (2008) 12:896–901. 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2008.00951.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Oshima K, Hanada R, Kobayashi R. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with severe congenital neutropenia: an analysis of 18 Japanese cases. Pediatr Transplant. (2010) 14:657–63. 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01319.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES