Skip to main content
The Journal of International Medical Research logoLink to The Journal of International Medical Research
. 2019 Oct 11;47(11):5767–5776. doi: 10.1177/0300060519877079

Cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix proteins as markers for metastatic triple negative breast cancer

Mohammed Elimam Ahamed Mohammed 1,, Nuha Mohammed Elhassan 2
PMCID: PMC6862895  PMID: 31601144

Short abstract

Objective

This study investigated immunohistochemical staining results of two cytoskeletal proteins (vimentin and cytokeratin-18) and two extracellular matrix proteins (fibronectin-1 and laminin-1 receptor) in different stages of triple negative breast cancer.

Methods

Forty triple negative cancerous breast tissues from patients diagnosed as stage 2A (15), 2B (nine), 3A (10), 3B (four), and 3C (two) were included in this study and were compared with 42 normal breast tissues. Immunohistochemistry results were statistically analyzed using the t-test percent of the StatPac program.

Results

The percentages of positive staining in cancerous tissues for all of the studied parameters were significantly greater than their percentages in normal tissues, except for vimentin. All cancerous tissues from patients diagnosed as stage 3A, 3B, and 3C were positive for both fibronectin-1 and laminin-1 receptor.

Conclusion

Fibronectin-1 and laminin-1 receptor are promising markers for stage 3 triple negative breast cancer.

Keywords: Vimentin, cytokeratin-18, fibronectin-1, laminin-1 receptor, breast cancer tissues, metastasis

Introduction

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an immunohistochemically defined type of breast tumor. It is classified as basal-like breast cancer and is negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor recetor-2 (HER-2). TNBC is associated with BRCA1 mutations and is mostly seen in young black and Hispanic women.1 Incidence-wise, TNBC accounts for approximately 20% of breast cancers in the USA. Clinically, TNBC is characterized by poor prognosis, lack of targeted therapy, and metastasis to the lung, liver, and brain.2

Vimentin is a cytoskeletal protein that is a component of class III intermediate filaments. It consists of two polypeptide chains and 466 amino acids.3,4 Vimentin is synthesized at high concentrations in non-epithelial cells (mesenchymal cells) and in mammary carcinoma cell lines.5,6 Vimentin functions to support the anchoring of organelles within the cytosol and maintains cell shape and cytoplasmic integrity.7 Vimentin is used as a tumor marker for sarcoma, colon, and upper gastrointestinal tract tumors.8,9

Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) is a cytoskeletal protein composed of four polypeptide chains. It is highly expressed in liver, placenta, and colon cells and weakly expressed in the lymph nodes of breast carcinoma.10,11 CK-18 plays a major role in the liver uptake of thrombin-anti thrombin complexes, interleukin-6-mediated immunity, and the reorganization of filaments.1214 CK-18 is also a classic liver cirrhosis marker.15

Fibronectin-1 is a dimer polypeptide with a molecular weight of 220 kDa. It is found in the blood, cell surfaces, and extracellular matrix. It is involved in different vital functions including cell adhesion, blood clotting, immunity, wound healing, and angiogenesis. It has previously been reported that fibronectin-1 is associated with metastasis.1619

Laminin-1 receptor (40S ribosomal protein SA) is a glycoprotein with one polypeptide chain and a molecular weight of 67 kDa. It is the receptor for laminin-1 glycoprotein. Normally, laminin-1 receptor is expressed on the surface of different cell types. It has been reported that the complex of laminin-1 receptor and its binding protein are overexpressed in some cancers, where it plays a role in tumor metastasis.2022

This article reports an investigation of the association of positive staining for vimentin, CK-18, fibronectin-1, and laminin-1 receptor with metastatic triple negative breast cancer.

Materials and methods

Study design

This study is an archival, descriptive, and case control study.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the expression of vimentin, CK-18, fibronectin-1, and laminin-1 receptor in cancerous and normal breast tissues following typical clinical laboratory procedures. The vimentin and CK-18 kits were purchased from DAKO (Glostrup, Denmark; IS630 and IS618, respectively). Fibronectin-1 staining was done using reagents from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Rockford, IL, USA; Rev 120502) and the laminin-1 receptor was stained following the instructions of US Biological Life Sciences (Marblehead, MA, USA; 030235).

Criteria for immunohistochemistry positive results

A tissue was considered positive if a large number of cells (≥100 cells) was stained positive. Tissues that contained small or medium numbers of positively stained cells were considered negative.

Statistical analysis

The obtained data were analyzed using the t-test percent of the StatPac statistics software. The odds ratios, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated manually.

Odd ratios were calculated using following the equation:

Oddsratio=AB\CD

A = the number of cancerous breast tissues positive for the studied parameters

B = the number of normal breast tissues positive for the studied parameters

C = the number of cancerous breast tissues negative for the studied parameters

D = the number of normal breast tissues negative for the studied parameters

Sensitivity is the ratio of the cancerous breast tissues positive for the studied parameters to the total number of positive tissues (cancerous and normal), while specificity is the ratio of normal breast tissues negative for the studied parameters to the number of total negative tissues (cancerous and normal).

Ethical approval

An ethical license was obtained from the Sudan Academy of Sciences (SAS). Informed consent was not obtained from the patients because this study was retrospective; however, permission to use the breast tissues was obtained from the Radiation and Isotope Center in Khartoum (RICK) (Sudan).

Results

Study cohort

The cohort of this study comprised cancerous and normal human breast tissues. Forty triple negative cancerous breast tissues and 42 healthy breast margins were obtained from the archives of the Radiation and Isotope Center in Khartoum (RICK). The breast cancer stage of each tissue sample was retrieved from patient files. Breast cancer stages were routinely determined by imaging techniques such as X-ray, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Staining results of the normal and triple negative cancerous breast tissues

The percentages of positive cancerous breast tissues for CK-18, vimentin, laminin-1 receptor, and fibronectin-1 were 85%, 100%, 87.5%, and 87.5%, respectively, while these percentages among the normal tissues were 14.3%, 92.9%, 35.7%, and 33.3%, respectively (Table 1). The percentage of positive cancerous tissues for CK-18, fibronectin-1, and laminin-1 receptor were significantly higher that their percentages in the normal tissues (p-value ≤0.0001). However, vimentin staining showed an insignificant variation between the normal and cancerous breast tissues (Table 1 and Figure 1 and Figure 2).

Table 1.

Staining results of vimentin, CK-18, fibronectin, and laminin-1 receptor in normal and triple negative breast cancer tissues.


Vimentin

CK-18

Fibronectin-1

Laminin-1 receptor
Control Cancerous Control Cancerous Control Cancerous Control Cancerous
NegativeNo (%) 37.1% 0 3685.7% 615% 2866.7% 512.5% 2764.3% 512.5%
PositiveNo (%) 3992.9% 40100% 614.3% 3485% 1433.3% 3587.5% 1535.7% 3587.5%
Total 42 40 42 40 42 40 42 40
p- value* ≤0.0001 ≤0.0001 ≤0.0001 0.03 ≤0.0001 0.06 ≤0.0001
p- value** 0.08 ≤0.0001 ≤0.0001 ≤0.0001

*p-value for the comparison between the percentages of positive and negative tissues in one group, i.e., normal or cancerous.

**p-value for the comparison between the percentages of positive tissues in normal and cancerous breast tissues.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Staining results of the cytoskeletal proteins cytokeratin-18 and vimentin in cancerous and normal breast tissues.

Cytokeratin 18 staining was positive in 85% of the cancerous breast tissues and in 14.3% of the normal tissues. Vimentin was positively expressed in all cancerous breast tissues and it was positively stained in 92.9% of normal breast tissues.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Staining results of the extracellular matrix proteins laminin-1 receptor and fibronectin-1 in cancerous and normal breast tissues.

In total, 87.5% of cancerous breast tissues and 35.7% of normal breast tissues were positive for laminin-1 receptor staining. Similarly, 87.5% of cancerous breast tissues and 33.3% of normal breast tissues were positive for fibronectin-1 staining.

The odd ratios of breast cancer being positive for the studied parameters

The odd ratios of a Sudanese female with breast cancer were 33.4, 13.9, and 12.3 higher when they were positive for CK-18, fibronectin-1, and laminin-1 receptor, respectively, compared with being negative for these markers (Table 2). The odd ratio of breast cancer positive for vimentin compared with negative for vimentin was not calculated because all cancerous tissues were positive for vimentin (no cancerous breast tissues were negative for vimentin) (Table 2).

Table 2.

The odd ratios of the numerators and denominators of the study.

Vimentin CK-18 Fibronectin-1 Laminin-1 receptor
Numerator
 Cancerous positive 40 34 35 35
 Normal positive 39 6 14 15
 Ratio 1.03 5.67 2.5 2.33
Denominator
 Cancerous negative 0 6 5 5
 Normal negative 3 36 28 27
 Ratio NA 0.17 0.18 0.19
 Odd ratio (OR) NA 33.4 13.9 12.3

The odds of having triple negative breast cancer were 33.4, 13.9, and 12.3 higher if positive for CK-18, fibronectin-1 and laminin-1 receptor, respectively, compared with being negative for the three proteins.

Sensitivity and specificity results of positive and negative breast tissues

The sensitivity test showed that a breast tissue positively stained for vimentin, CK-18, fibronectin-1, and laminin-1 receptor had a 60%, 85%, 71%, and 70% chance of being triple negative breast cancer tissue, respectively (Table 3). Moreover, negative staining in breast tissue for vimentin, CK-18, fibronectin-1, and laminin-1 receptor had a 100%, 86%, 85%, and 84% chance of being normal breast cancer tissue, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3.

Sensitivity and specificity of the studied parameters in triple negative breast cancer.

Vimentin CK-18 Fibronectin-1 Laminin-1 receptor
Positive cancerous tissues 40 34 35 35
Total positive tissues (normal and cancerous) 72 40 49 50
Sensitivity (%) 60 85 71 70
Negative normal tissues 3 36 28 27
Total negative tissues (normal and cancerous) 3 42 33 32
Specificity (%) 100 86 85 84

The highest sensitivity was for CK-18; CK-18 staining was able to detect 85% of triple negative breast cancers, while fibronectin-1 and laminin receptor-1 staining were able to detect 71% and 70% of triple negative breast cancer cases, respectively. If a breast tissue stained negative for vimentin, there was 100% specificity for normal tissue.

Staining results in different stages of triple negative breast cancer

There was an insignificant variation between vimentin staining results in normal and cancerous breast tissues (Table 1). Although all the vimentin staining results were positive in all of the studied breast cancer stages, it was not associated with breast cancer metastasis (Table 4).

Table 4.

Staining results of vimentin, CK-18, fibronectin-1, and laminin-1 receptor in triple negative breast cancer tissues from patients diagnosed as stage 2 and 3.

Parameter Staining results Stage 2ANo (%) Stage 2BNo (%) Stage 3ANo (%) Stage 3BNo (%) Stage 3CNo (%) TotalNo (%)
Vimentin Negative 00% 00% 00% 00% 00% 00%
Positive 15100% 9100% 10100% 4100% 2100% 3280%
Total 15 9 10 4 2 40
p-value
CK-18 Negative 533.3% 00% 0 0% 00% 150% 615%
Positive 1066.7% 9100% 10100% 4100% 150% 3485%
Total 15 9 10 4 2 40
p-value 0.19 1.00 ≤0.0001
Fibronectin-1 Negative 533.3% 00% 0 0% 00% 00% 512.5%
Positive 1066.7% 9100% 10100% 4100% 2100% 3587.5%
Total 15 9 10 4 2 40
p- value 0.19 ≤0.0001
Laminin-1 receptor Negative 320% 222.2% 00% 00% 00% 512.5%
Positive 1280% 777.8% 10100% 4100% 2100% 3587.5%
Total 15 9 10 4 2 40
p-value 0.012 0.08 ≤0.0001

The vimentin positive and negative tissues among the different stages were significantly different but the results were similar to the staining in normal tissues (Table 1). CK-18 can be a marker for stages 2B, 3A, and 3B. Fibronectin can be a marker for stages 2B, 3A, 3B, and 3C, while laminin can be a marker for stage 3.

CK-18 was positively stained in 66.7% and 50% of stages 2A and 3C cancerous breast tissues, respectively. The difference between CK-18 negative and positive percentages in stages 2A and 3C were insignificant (Table 4).

Fibronectin-1 was positively stained in all cancerous breast tissues of stages 2B, 3A, 3B, and 3C. Fibronectin-1 positive staining can be considered a tissue marker for the triple negative breast cancer stages 2B and 3(A, B, and C) (Table 4).

Unlike CK-18 and fibronectin, laminin-1 receptor was positive in 80% and 77.8% of the cancerous breast tissues of stages 2A and stage 2B (p-value = 0.012 and 0.08, respectively). Positive laminin-1 receptor staining may be a tissue marker for stage 3 triple negative breast cancer, as it was positively stained in all cancerous tissues of stage 3(A, B, and C) (Table 4).

Discussion

This study identified that vimentin is expressed in normal and triple negative cancerous breast tissues with insignificant variation; thus, it is not considered a marker for breast cancer metastasis. Positive vimentin staining was associated with a 60% risk of triple negative breast cancer, while negatively stained tissues were associated with 100% of normal breast tissues. Similar to our findings, Heatley et al. concluded that vimentin is not a useful marker for differentiating between benign and malignant breast tumors. However, they found that its expression was significantly correlated with tumor grade.23 Two research groups have stated that vimentin may be a useful tissue marker for the prognosis of breast cancer including triple negative.24,25 This study reported that vimentin cannot be considered a prognostic factor, as it was expressed in all stages of triple negative breast cancer with insignificant variations. Unlike the finding of this study, Vora et al. found that vimentin was expressed in 57% of breast cancer tissues and its expression was an indication of breast cancer aggressiveness.26 Previously, our research group reported that positive vimentin staining was found in all breast cancer tissues compared with 93% of normal breast tissues.27

The results of this study showed that CK-18-positive tissues were significantly more frequent in cancerous than in normal tissues (85% in cancerous tissues versus 14.3% in normal tissues). Positive CK-18 staining was associated with an 85% sensitivity for triple negative breast cancer, while negative CK-18 staining was had an 86% specificity for being normal tissue. However, some previous studies have stated that CK-18 was upregulated in breast cancer tissues, while other studies mentioned that CK-18 was downregulated in breast cancer tissues compared with normal tissues.2629 In this study, all tissues diagnosed as stages 2B, 3A, and 3B were positive for CK-18, while in stage 3C, some tissues were negative and some were positive with insignificant variation. However, different studies have concluded that aggressive or advanced-stage cancers are associated with loss of cytokeratin.26,28,30

The percentages of positive staining for fibronectin-1 in normal and cancerous breast tissues were significantly different, which means that it can be used as a target for breast cancer therapy or as a tumor marker. Positive tissues for fibronectin-1 were associated with a 71% risk of triple negative cancer, while negatively stained tissues had an 85% specificity for normal breast tissues. Regarding fibronectin-1 in the different stages, it was positive in all tissues from breast cancer patients diagnosed as stage 2A and 3(A,B and C), .i.e., it is a good parameter for stage 2B and 3 breast cancer or breast cancer metastasis. Previous studies have shown that fibronectin-1 was positive in 55%, 65.7%, 76.1%, and 81.4% of invasive breast carcinoma.17,3133 Similar to the finding of this study, many studies have stated that fibronectin-1 is highly associated with breast cancer invasion and metastasis.3436

Concerning laminin-1 receptor staining, it was positive in 85.7% of the cancerous breast tissues and in 35.7% of normal breast tissues (p-value ≤0.0001). The sensitivity of positive laminin-1 receptor staining was 70% for triple negative breast cancer and the specificity of negatively stained breast tissues for laminin-1 receptor was 84% for normal breast tissue. All of the breast tissues from breast cancer patients diagnosed as stage 3(A, B, and C) were positive for laminin-1 receptor; thus, it is a useful marker for stage 3 disease. Similar to the results of this study, some previous studies have reported a high percentage of laminin-1 receptor positive cancerous breast tissues compared with low percentages in normal tissues.3739 It has also been reported that laminins and their receptors are involved in breast cancer progression, invasion, and metastasis.16,4042

As this is a descriptive study, it suffers from all the negative aspects of descriptive studies, such as the small number of samples and the inability to determine causes or correlations. However, descriptive studies are useful precursors for future survey studies.

Conclusions

  1. CK-18, fibronectin-1, and laminin receptor-1 may be useful breast cancer markers.

  2. CK-18 may be used as a marker for stages 2B, 3A and 3B.

  3. Fibronectin-1 could be a promising metastasis marker for stages 2B, 3A, 3B, and 3C.

  4. Laminin-1 receptor may be used as a metastasis marker for stage 3 breast cancer.

Author contributions

Mohammed Elimam Ahamed Mohammed designed and supervised the research, performed statistical analyses and wrote the manuscript. Nuha Mohammed Elhassan did the practical work and revised the manuscript.

Declaration of conflicting interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  • 1.Aysola K, Desai A, Welch C, et al. Triple negative breast cancer – an overview. Hereditary Genet 2013; 2013: pii: 001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ballinger T, Kremer J, Miller K. Triple negative breast cancer—review of current and emerging therapeutic strategies. Eur Oncol Haematol 2016; 12: 112–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chang L, Shav-Tal Y, Trcek T, et al. Assembling an intermediate filament network by dynamic cotranslation. J Cell Biol 2006; 172: 747–758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Challa AA, Stefanovic B. A novel role of vimentin filaments: binding and stabilization of collagen mRNAs. Mol Cell Biol 2011; 31: 3773–3789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sommers CL, Walker-Jones D, Heckford SE, et al. Vimentin rather than keratin expression in some hormone-independent breast cancer cell lines and in oncogene-transformed mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res 1989; 49: 4258–4263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Perreau J, Lilienbaum A, Vasseur M, et al. Nucleotide sequence of the human vimentin gene and regulation of its transcription in tissues and cultured cells. Gene 1988; 62: 7–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goldman RD, Khuon S, Chou Y, et al. The function of intermediate filaments in cell shape and cytoskeletal integrity. J Cell Biol 1996; 134: 971–983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Leader M, Collins M, Patel J, et al. Vimentin: an evaluation of its role as a tumor marker. Histopathology 1987; 11: 63–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Helen M. Aberrant vimentin methylation is characteristic of upper GI pathologies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012; 21: 594–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oshima RG, Millan JL, Cecena G. Comparison of mouse and human keratin 18: a component of intermediate filaments expressed prior to implantation. Differentiation 1986; 33: 61–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Leube RE, Bosch FX, Romano V, et al. Cytokeratin expression in simple epithelia. III. Detection of mRNAs encoding human cytokeratins nos. 8 and 18 in normal and tumor cells by hybridization with cDNA sequences in vitro and in situ. Differentiation 1986; 33:69–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ku NO, Omary MB. Identification of the major physiologic phosphorylation site of human keratin 18: potential kinases and a role in filament reorganization. J Cell Biol 1994; 127: 161–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Waseem A, Karsten U, Leigh IM, et al. Conformational changes in the rod domain of human keratin 8 following heterotypic association with keratin 18 and its implication for filament stability. Biochemistry 2004; 43: 1283–1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang L, Srinivasan S, Theiss AL, et al. Interleukin-6 induces keratin expression in intestinal epithelial cells: potential role of keratin-8 in interleukin-6-induced barrier function alterations. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 8219–8227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Toivola DM, Ku NO, Resurreccion EZ, et al. Keratin 8 and 18 hyperphosphorylation is a marker of progression of human liver disease. Hepatology 2004; 40: 459–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Terranova VP, Rao CN, Kalebic T, et al. Laminin receptor on human breast carcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983; 80: 444–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Christensen L, Nielsen M, Andersen J, et al. Stromal fibronectin staining pattern and metastasizing ability of human breast carcinoma. Cancer Res 1988; 48: 6227–6233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sitterley G. Attachment and matrix factors. Life Science BIOFILES 2008; 3. SIGMA- ALDRICH Prints- USA. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.UNIPROT. P02751 (FINC_HUMAN) Fibronectin. Retrieved from: http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P02751. Accessed on 04 Dec 2018 at 10:24.
  • 20.Ferrarini M, Heltai S, Pupa SM, et al. Killing of laminin receptor-positive human lung cancers by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes bearing 78γδ T-cell receptors. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 436–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wewer UM, Taraboletti G, Sobel ME, et al. Role of laminin receptor in tumor cell migration. Cancer Res 1987; 47: 5691–5698. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Berno V, Porrini D, Castiglioni F, et al. The 67 kDa laminin receptor increases tumor aggressiveness by remodeling laminin-1. Endocr Relat Cancer 2005; 12: 393–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Heatley M, Whiteside C, Maxwell P, et al. Vimentin expression in benign and malignant breast epithelium. J Clin Pathol 1993; 46: 441–445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yamashita N, Tokunaga E, Kitao H, et al. Significance of the vimentin expression in triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 1056–1056. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hemalatha A, Suresh TN, Kumar ML. Expression of vimentin in breast carcinoma, its correlation with Ki67 and other histopathological parameters. Indian J Cancer 2013; 50: 189–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vora HH, Patel NA, Rajvik KN, et al. Cytokeratin and vimentin expression in breast cancer. Int J Biol Markers 2009; 24: 38–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hassan NM, Harbi SO, Shomo AI, et al. Cytokeratin-18 and vimentin expression in breast cancer tissues from Sudanese patients. Ann Biol Res 2014; 5: 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ha SA, Lee YS, Kim HK, et al. The prognostic potential of keratin 18 in breast cancer associated with tumor dedifferentiation, and the loss of estrogen and progesterone receptors. Cancer Biomark 2011; 10: 219–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Brotherick I, Robson CN, Browell DA, et al. Cytokeratin expression in breast cancer: phenotypic changes associated with disease progression. Cytometry 1998; 32: 301–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Woelfle U, Sauter G, Santjer S, et al. Down-regulated expression of cytokeratin 18 promotes progression of human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 2670–2674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bae YK, Kim A, Kim MK, et al. Fibronectin expression in carcinoma cells correlates with tumor aggressiveness and poor clinical outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer. Hum Pathol 2013; 44: 2028–2037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Takei H, Iino Y, Horiguchi J, et al. Immunohistochemical fibronectin staining pattern and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma. Oncology 1995; 52: 106–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brown LF, Guidi AJ, Schnitt SJ, et al. Vascular stroma formation in carcinoma in situ, invasive carcinoma, and metastatic carcinoma of the breast. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 1041–1056. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fernandez-Garcia B, Eiró N, Marín L, et al. Expression and prognostic significance of fibronectin and matrix Metalloproteases in breast cancer metastasis. Histopathology 2014; 64: 512–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang JP, Hielscher A. Fibronectin: how its aberrant expression in tumors may improve therapeutic targeting. J Cancer 2017; 8: 674–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang K, Wu F, Seo BR, et al. Breast cancer cells alter the dynamics of stromal fibronectin-collagen interactions. Matrix Biol 2017; 60: 86–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Albrechtsen R, Nielsen M, Wewer U, et al. Basement membrane changes in breast cancer detected by immunohistochemical staining for laminin. Cancer Res 1981; 41: 5076–5081. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Scheiman J, Tseng J, Zheng Y, et al. Multiple functions of the 37/67-kd laminin receptor make it a suitable target for novel cancer gene therapy. Mol Ther 2010; 18: 63–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Castronovo V, Colin C, Claysmith AP, et al. Immunodetection of the metastasis-associated laminin receptor in human breast cancer cells obtained by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Pathol 1990; 137: 1373–1381. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Holler E. Laminin isoform expression in breast tumors. Breast Cancer Res 2005; 7: 166–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Niu Y, Fu X, Lv A, et al. Potential markers predicting distant metastasis in axillary node-negative breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2002; 98: 754–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Qiu X, Tan H, Fu D, et al. Laminin is over expressed in breast cancer and facilitate cancer cell metastasis. J Can Res Ther 2018; 14: 1170–1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of International Medical Research are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES