Abstract
Background
Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) are essential cellular components in inflammatory joint diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the growing use of FLS isolated from OA and RA patients, a detailed functional and parallel comparison of FLS from these two types of arthritis has not been performed.
Methods
In the present study, FLS were isolated from surgically removed synovial tissues from twenty-two patients with OA and RA to evaluate their basic cellular functions.
Results
Pure populations of FLS were isolated by a sorting strategy based on stringent marker expression (CD45−CD31−CD146−CD235a−CD90+PDPN+). OA FLS and RA FLS at the same passage (P2-P4) exhibited uniform fibroblast morphology. OA FLS and RA FLS expressed a similar profile of cell surface antigens, including the fibroblast markers VCAM1 and ICAM1. RA FLS showed a more sensitive inflammatory status than OA FLS with regard to proliferation, migration, apoptosis, inflammatory gene expression and pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion. In addition, the responses of OA FLS and RA FLS to both the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and the anti-inflammatory drug methotrexate (MTX) were also evaluated here.
Conclusion
The parallel comparison of OA FLS and RA FLS lays a foundation in preparation for when FLS are considered a potential therapeutic anti-inflammatory target for OA and RA.
Keywords: OA, RA, FLS, Isolation, Characterization
Background
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease, and the inflammatory synovium is full of hyperplastic fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) [1]. Moreover, many patients with osteoarthritis (OA) also develop low-grade synovitis, and there is growing evidence that synovitis affects symptoms and the rate of cartilage degeneration in patients with OA. Synovial infiltration by FLS and other immune cells has been demonstrated in the different stages of OA [2].
FLS stem from the mesenchymal lineage and exhibit aggressive and invasive cellular characteristics, secreting a range of cytokines and matrix factors that recruit other immune cells to the inflammatory synovium, eventually leading to cartilage injury and bone erosion [3–5]. Therefore, FLS are targets for disease-modifying drugs and anti-inflammatory drugs, which has resulted in a substantial body of work characterizing these cells and examining their contribution to human disease using conventional methods of isolation, such as differential plating of dissected tissues or magnetic bead isolation [6, 7]. However, the low efficiency of these methods and the lack of knowledge regarding parallel comparison of OA FLS and RA FLS hinders research utilizing these cells in vitro to delineate the pathology of different arthritis joint diseases.
The aims of this study were to comprehensively characterize and compare the cellular function and inflammatory phenotype of FLS from the synovium of OA and RA patients by using a stringent sorting method. In particular, we were interested in investigating the proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and expression and production of inflammatory markers as well as in determining how this inflammatory phenotype is maintained over prolonged cell culture (P2-P4) and in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines and anti-inflammatory drugs.
Methods
Clinical specimens
Synovial tissues were obtained from OA and RA patients (all Chinese) upon joint replacement or synovectomy at the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC and the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC and the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. The informed consent was signed by each of the patients and their guardians. All RA patients (n = 23) include in this study were diagnosed with RA according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria [8]. The diagnosis of primary knee OA (n = 23) conformed to the criteria from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) [9], radiographic changes were grade III or IV according to the Kellgren and Lawrence classification method [10]. RA and OA patients induced by trauma, inflammation, tuberculosis, or sepsis were excluded.
Isolation and in vitro culture of cells from OA and RA synovia
The method used for the isolation of FLS from synovial tissues was modified from a method previously described [11]. The synovium was removed in joints of patients with OA and RA. Removed hyperplastic synovial tissues were washed and minced in DMEM (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, Grand Island, USA), penicillin and streptomycin (Gibco, Grand Island, USA). Dissected synovial tissues were digested in culture media containing 1 mg/ml collagenase IV (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 0.1 mg/ml deoxyribonuclease I (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and then it was incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. Tissues were then vortexed and resuspended in fresh media. The media containing the digested tissues was centrifuged, and the cell pellet was resuspended in fresh media for cell sorting. The sorted OA FLS and RA FLS were cultured at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Culture media were replenished every 2 days, and cells were subcultured when they reached 90% confluence.
Flow cytometry
OA and RA FLS were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-, phycoerythrin (PE)- or allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated antibodies at 37 °C for 1 h: CD45-FITC (5 μg/test), CD31-FITC (5 μg/test), CD146-FITC (5 μg/test), CD235a-FITC (5 μg/test), PDPN-PE (2 μg/test), CD90-APC (2 μg/test), CD106 (VCAM1)-FITC (5 μg/test), CD54 (ICAM1)-PE (2 μg/test). All flow antibodies were from Miltenyi Biotechnology Company (Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). After 3 times of washing by pre-cooled PBS, the cells were analysed by flow cytometer (BD FACSAria II) and BD FACSDiva software. For each test, 2 × 108 total synovial cells from RA and OA synovium were used. It’s around (1.3 ± 0.4) × 108 and (1.0 ± 0.3) × 108 total count (events) in gate P4 for RA samples and OA samples. Isotype controls were included in the FACS detection for those proteins with relatively low expression (IgG1-FTIC for CD146, and REA control-FITC for CD31 and CD235a, Additional file 1: Figure S1). Unlabelled cells were used in other FACS assays as negative controls.
H&E staining, Masson staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC)
OA and RA synovial tissues were fixed with acetone for 15 min, washed twice with PBS, and then incubated for 1 h in a humid chamber with primary antibodies (PCNA, Santa Cruz Biotec, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; VCAM-1, Santa Cruz Biotec; ICAM-1, Santa Cruz Biotec). The synovial tissues were then washed 3 times with PBS and incubated for an additional hour with an isotype-matched horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (anti-rat IgG, Santa Cruz Biotec). After 3 additional washes, the HRP reaction was developed with diaminobenzidine (DAB) per the manufacturer’s instructions.
Paraffin-embedded OA and RA synovial tissues were sliced and then blocked with 5% goat serum for 30 min. The tissues were incubated in primary anti-PCNA (Santa Cruz Biotec), anti-CD90 (Santa Cruz Biotec), anti-ICAM1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or anti-VCAM1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) antibodies overnight at 4 °C. IHC staining was generally performed as previously reported. The primary antibody was omitted in negative controls. H&E staining and Masson staining were performed according to standard protocols.
Proliferation
The proliferation abilities of OA and RA FLS were evaluated by CCK-8 assay (Bestbio, Nanjing, China) and Ki-67 staining (Miltenyi Biotec). All procedures were performed according to standard protocols.
Migration
Transwell (Costar) cell culture plates were used for migration and invasion assays. A total of 5 × 104 FLS were seeded into the upper chamber in serum-free medium, and serum-containing medium was added into the lower wells. After 24 h or 48 h, the upper chamber was washed with PBS twice and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min, and then 1% crystal violet was used to stain the invasive cells.
Apoptosis
Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) staining was performed for the detection of apoptotic cells. After the desired treatment, 1 × 106 cells were collected and washed twice with ice-cold PBS. The cells were then stained using the Alexa Fluor®488 Annexin V/Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit with Alexa Fluor 488 annexin V and PI (Miltenyi Biotec) for flow cytometry according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The untreated cells served as a negative control for double staining.
Western blot
OA and RA FLS were lysed in SDS buffer. The protein concentrations were determined via a BCA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Equal amounts of cell lysates were run on a gel, transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), and probed with the following primary antibodies: interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) (1:200, Santa Cruz Biotec), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotec) and GAPDH (1:4000, Abcam). GAPDH served as a loading control. After incubation with secondary antibodies, signals were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (GE system).
Elisa
A total of 2 × 105 cells were seeded in a 12-well plate for 48 h. Supernatants were collected to measure the amounts of secreted IL-6 and TNF-α. IL-6 and TNF-α were detected via a human IL-6 ELISA kit and a human TNF-α ELISA kit (Miltenyi Biotec), respectively.
qRT-PCR
Cultures of OA and RA FLS were grown to confluence in 6-well culture plates. Cells were treated for 24 h with TNF-α (20 ng/ml) or Methotrexate (MTX, 100 μM). Twelve hours after stimulation, whole-cell RNA was collected by TRIzol (Life Technologies), and it was analysed by qRT-PCR for gene expression. GAPDH was used as an endogenous control. A reverse transcription kit and qRT-PCR dye were obtained from Takara Biomedical Technology Company (Shiga, Japan).
Statistics
The error bars mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM) of six independent experiments. *, ** and *** indicate P < 0.05, P < 0.01 and P < 0.0001, respectively (Student’s t-test).
Results
Twenty-three joint synovium biopsies from OA and RA patients were used in this experiment. H&E staining showed the typical pathological status of OA and RA hyperplastic synovial tissues (Fig. 1a). Masson staining validated that hyperplastic fibroblasts are more prominent in an RA synovium than an OA synovium (Fig. 1b). To isolate homogenous FLS from RA and OA synovial tissues, we readily identified CD45−CD31−CD146−CD235a−CD90+PDPN+ FLS [12] after collagenase/ deoxyribonuclease digests of patient tissues. The ratio of isolated RA FLS in total synovial cells was significantly higher than that of OA FLS (Fig. 1c, RA FLS 46.5% ± 6.9% and OA FLS 37.2% ± 8.6%), suggesting that the hyperplasticity in the synovium of RA patients is at least partially due to FLS hyper-proliferation. For characterization the cells, only those that actively proliferated from passage 2 to passage 4 were used. Both OA and RA FLS showed a typical spindle shape and formed clusters at confluency (Fig. 1d). In addition, qRT-PCR was performed to compare some common fibroblast markers in OA FLS and RA FLS (Fig. 1e), including Prolyl-4-hydroxylase (P-4-H), Vimentin, procollagen I (COL1A1) and procollagen III (COL3A1). Among them, the expression of P-4-H and Vimentin were lower in RA FLS than in OA FLS, and the expression of procollagen I and procollagen III were up-regulated in RA FLS compared to that in OA FLS. After short-term in vitro culture, ICAM1 was found by FACS analysis to be expressed in nearly all OA and RA FLS (Fig. 2a and b), while VCAM1 expression was much higher in OA FLS (~ 60.9%) than in RA FLS (~ 52.4%) (Fig. 2a and b), which was validated by the IHC staining for CD90, ICAM1 and VCAM1 in OA and RA synovial tissues (Fig. 2c).
Hyperplastic FLS are a key feature of arthritis, especially RA. Therefore, the proliferative ability of OA and RA FLS were initially evaluated by CCK-8 assay and Ki-67 staining. The results showed that RA FLS had a more rapid proliferative ability than OA FLS (Fig. 3a and b). PCNA staining in OA and RA synovial tissues further validated that the percentage of infiltrated PCNA+ cells was higher in RA synovial tissues than in an OA synovial tissues (Fig. 3c). In addition, examination of invasive behaviour in FLS revealed that both OA and RA FLS migrated through the Matrigel-coated insert, and RA FLS showed a more aggressive migrating nature than the OA FLS (Fig. 3d).
Analysis of gene expression in cells by qRT-PCR identified mRNA expression for inflammatory IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α and CCL2 markers in the FLS from 6 OA and RA patients. All inflammatory genes were more highly expressed in RA FLS than they were in OA FLS (Fig. 3e). Moreover, supernatants from OA and RA FLS were also collected to analyse pro-inflammatory cytokine production. The results demonstrated that two pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-6 and TNF-α, were significantly up-regulated in the culture supernatant from RA FLS (Fig. 3f), suggesting that RA FLS show more inflammatory characteristics than do OA FLS.
Moreover, OA and RA FLS were examined in response to treatment with the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α or the anti-inflammatory drug MTX to determine the inflammatory phenotype these cells. Treatment with TNF-α (20 ng/mL) resulted in a significant increase in the proliferation of both OA and RA FLS, and the inductive effect in RA FLS was greater (Fig. 4a and b). Treatment with MTX (100 μM) resulted in a decrease in proliferation of RA FLS but did not show any repressive effect on OA FLS (Fig. 4a and b). In addition, Matrigel-treated transwells were also used to evaluate the effects of TNF-α or MTX on the invasive capabilities of OA FLS and RA FLS. The results showed that TNF-α or MTX treatments could induce and inhibit the invasive abilities of OA and RA FLS, respectively (Fig. 4c). Annexin V/PI staining was used to compare the effect of MTX on apoptosis in OA and RA FLS. MTX induced apoptosis of both OA and RA FLS, and the OA FLS were more sensitive to the apoptosis-inducing effects of MTX when compared to RA FLS (Fig. 4d). The pro-inflammatory gene expression in OA and RA FLS were also evaluated in TNF-α or MTX treatment conditions. Although TNF-α could induce all four genes in both OA and RA FLS, the inductive effects of TNF-α on RA FLS were much more obvious than they were in the OA FLS (Fig. 4e and f). Similarly, the response of RA FLS showed that they were more sensitive to the anti-inflammatory drug MTX than the OA FLS were (Fig. 4e and f). Western blot results validated the effects of TNF-α and MTX on the protein expression of IL-1 and IL-6 from OA and RA FLS in vitro (Fig. 4g and h). Accordingly, IL-6 is also significantly up-regulated in TNF-treated RA FLS (Fig. 4i). In addition, MTX could inhibit IL-6 production from OA and RA FLS. The inhibitory effect of MTX on IL-6 secretion is much greater in RA FLS.
Discussion
For inflammatory joint diseases such as OA and RA, FLS are an essential part of inflammation and joint erosion [13]. Human FLS isolated from the synovial tissues of OA and RA patients has been extensively used in many studies. These cells have been well characterized in multiple disease states, including RA and OA [7, 14]. However, the isolation efficiency of FLS from these studies, which use methods such as the differential plating of dissected tissues or magnetic bead isolation, is quite low. Moreover, significant contamination in FLS primary cultures was also observed. Therefore, a strict sorting strategy was used in the current study to isolate FLS from OA and RA synovial tissues by removing the main contaminating cell types (macrophages and endothelial cells). We successfully isolated FLS from RA and OA synovial tissues by combining enzyme digestion (collagenase IV/ deoxyribonuclease I digestion and red cell lysis buffer/FcR blocker buffer) and following a stringent flow sorting method (CD45−CD31−CD146−CD235a−CD90+PDPN+). OA FLS and RA FLS were compared and characterized based on multiple criteria to provide optimal confirmation of their origin and purity. The markers used in the FLS sorting strategy included general stromal fibroblast markers such as PDPN and CD90 [15] and more specific FLS markers such as ICAM1 and VCAM1 [16]. The analysis of PDPN/CD90/VCAM1/ICAM1 expression allowed us to better understand and distinguish OA FLS and RA FLS.
In addition to surface markers of FLS, the present study also performed side-by-side comparisons of some basic cellular features of OA FLS and RA FLS, analysing proliferation, migration, expression/secretion of inflammatory cytokines, and response to pro-inflammatory cytokines and anti-inflammatory drugs. In general, RA FLS shows more aggressive cellular behaviour compared to OA FLS, including a more rapid proliferation rate, stronger invasive ability, and higher expression and secretion of inflammatory cytokines. These observations are consistent with our knowledge of the arthritis features exhibited by OA and RA. Moreover, higher expression of inflammatory markers, such as CCL2, IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α, were also observed in RA FLS when compared to FLS isolated from the less inflamed OA synovium. OA FLS and RA FLS also show different responses to the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α or the anti-inflammatory drug MTX. TNF-α could induce proliferation/migration of both OA FLS and RA FLS, while the inductive effect on proliferation was more obvious in RA FLS. In contrast, MTX could inhibit RA FLS proliferation but did not affect the proliferation of OA FLS in vitro. The different responses to MTX were further investigated with apoptosis experiments: MTX greatly induced apoptosis of RA FLS and induced less apoptosis in OA FLS. However, low concentrations of MTX (10 μM) only slightly promoted apoptosis of RA FLS and OA FLS (data not shown). The high dose of MTX can induce a series of severe side effects [17], which is one of the main drawbacks to the clinical use of MTX to treat RA. However, after TNF-α or MTX treatment, the amount of IL-6 secreted by RA FLS was significantly induced or repressed, respectively. However, TNF-α did not affect IL-6 secreted by OA FLS, and MTX only slightly decreased IL-6 production from OA FLS. These results suggest that the response to and the underlying mechanism for MTX is different between OA FLS and RA FLS.
MTX also inhibited up-regulated inflammatory markers [18]. TNF-α significantly induced RA FLS [19–21] and modulated a panel of pro-inflammatory cytokines that act as an essential promoter of inflammation [22]. TNF-α depleting antibodies have also been shown to be an effective treatment for RA. In response to TNF-α, some pro-inflammatory markers were greatly up-regulated. In the current study, RA FLS were more sensitive to TNF-α and MTX, suggesting that RA FLS have a more inflammatory status than OA FLS. In RA, FLS-secreted IL-6 could drive the differentiation of T helper (Th) 17 cells [5]. Our results confirmed that IL-6 was significantly induced in RA FLS at both the mRNA and protein levels. In addition, IL-6 was more sensitive to pro- (TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory (MTX) treatment; therefore, IL-6 is a valuable marker of inflammation in RA FLS. With the pro-inflammatory genes used in this study, IL-6 will provide a standard to compare and distinguish FLS biology to distinguish OA and RA patients.
Although these inflammatory genes and markers have been previously validated with mice FLS culture in vitro [11], it is unknown how the human FLS compare to FLS isolated from other arthritis models such as collagen antibody-induced arthritis (CIA) and antigen-induced arthritis (AA). Therefore, in the future, it will be of great interest to compare the cellular features of human FLS and arthritis mouse models.
In summary, we characterized FLS isolated by collagenase digestion of synovial tissues from OA and RA patients by using a strict sorting strategy. The main cellular features were compared between OA FLS and RA FLS here. The current report provides an isolation and characterization standard for future research on human OA and RA FLS.
Conclusion
By using a stringent sorting strategy, we comprehensively characterized and compared the cellular function and inflammatory phenotype (proliferation, migration, apoptosis, expression and production of inflammatory markers and response to pro-inflammatory cytokines and anti-inflammatory drugs) of FLS from the synovium of OA and RA patients in vitro. The parallel comparison of OA FLS and RA FLS lays a foundation for when FLS are considered potential therapies for anti-inflammatory treatment of OA and RA.
Additional file
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the patients enrolled in the study.
Abbreviations
- AA
Antigen-induced arthritis
- ACR
American College of Rheumatology
- APC
Allophycocyanin
- CCK-8
Cell Counting Kit-8
- CIA
Collagen antibody-induced arthritis
- DAB
Diaminobenzadine
- DMEM
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium
- EULAR
European League Against Rheumatism
- FACS
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting
- FBS
Fetal bovine serum
- FITC
Fluorescein isothiocyanate
- FLS
Fibroblast-like synoviocytes
- H&E
Hematoxylin-eosin
- HRP
Horseradish peroxidase
- IHC
Immunohistochemistry
- IL-1β
Interleukin-1 beta
- IL-6
Interleukin-6
- MTX
Methotrexate
- OA
Osteoarthritis
- PBS
Phosphate buffered saline
- PE
Phycoerythrin
- PI
Propidium iodide
- qRT-PCR
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
- RA
Rheumatoid arthritis
- SEM
Standard Error of Mean
- TNF-α
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
Authors’ contributions
CZ conceived the study. WH and LLZ performed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. CC, WSS, RXM, ZSY and CZ revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81871788) and Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2019B328, 2019B302). The funding body had no role in the design, data collection, analysis, interpretation or the writing of the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
The raw data will be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC and the First affiliated hospital of Anhui Medical University. The informed consent was written by each of the patients and their guardians.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Wei Huang and Linlin Zhang contributed equally to this work.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12891-019-2977-2.
References
- 1.McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(23):2205–2219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1004965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Geyer M, Schonfeld C. Novel insights into the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2018;14(2):98–107. doi: 10.2174/1573397113666170807122312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mor A, Abramson SB, Pillinger MH. The fibroblast-like synovial cell in rheumatoid arthritis: a key player in inflammation and joint destruction. Clin Immunol (Orlando, Fla) 2005;115(2):118–128. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2004.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Muller-Ladner U, Kriegsmann J, Franklin BN, Matsumoto S, Geiler T, Gay RE, Gay S. Synovial fibroblasts of patients with rheumatoid arthritis attach to and invade normal human cartilage when engrafted into SCID mice. Am J Pathol. 1996;149(5):1607–1615. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McInnes IB, Schett G. Cytokines in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(6):429–442. doi: 10.1038/nri2094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rosengren S, Boyle DL, Firestein GS. Acquisition, culture, and phenotyping of synovial fibroblasts. Methods Mol Med. 2007;135:365–375. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-401-8_24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zimmermann T, Kunisch E, Pfeiffer R, Hirth A, Stahl HD, Sack U, Laube A, Liesaus E, Roth A, Palombo-Kinne E, et al. Isolation and characterization of rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts from primary culture--primary culture cells markedly differ from fourth-passage cells. Arthritis Res. 2001;3(1):72–76. doi: 10.1186/ar142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Funovits J, Aletaha D, Bykerk V, Combe B, Dougados M, Emery P, Felson D, Hawker G, Hazes JM, Huizinga T, et al. The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European league against rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: methodological report phase I. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(9):1589–1595. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.130310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, Greenwald R, Hochberg M, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and therapeutic criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29(8):1039–1049. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494–502. doi: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hardy RS, Hulso C, Liu Y, Gasparini SJ, Fong-Yee C, Tu J, Stoner S, Stewart PM, Raza K, Cooper MS, et al. Characterisation of fibroblast-like synoviocytes from a murine model of joint inflammation. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15(1):R24. doi: 10.1186/ar4158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mizoguchi F, Slowikowski K. Functionally distinct disease-associated fibroblast subsets in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):789. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-02892-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Buckley CD. Why does chronic inflammation persist: an unexpected role for fibroblasts. Immunol Lett. 2011;138(1):12–14. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2011.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Elliott MJ, Maini RN, Feldmann M, Long-Fox A, Charles P, Katsikis P, Brennan FM, Walker J, Bijl H, Ghrayeb J, et al. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with chimeric monoclonal antibodies to tumor necrosis factor alpha. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36(12):1681–1690. doi: 10.1002/art.1780361206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Saalbach A, Kraft R, Herrmann K, Haustein UF, Anderegg U. The monoclonal antibody AS02 recognizes a protein on human fibroblasts being highly homologous to Thy-1. Arch Dermatol Res. 1998;290(7):360–366. doi: 10.1007/s004030050318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gkretsi V. A standardized protocol for the isolation and culture of normal and arthritogenic murine synovial fibroblasts. 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang W, Zhou H, Liu L. Side effects of methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Eur J Med Chem. 2018;158:502–516. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Firestein GS, Paine MM, Boyle DL. Mechanisms of methotrexate action in rheumatoid arthritis. Selective decrease in synovial collagenase gene expression. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37(2):193–200. doi: 10.1002/art.1780370207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee JW, Lee J, Um SH, Moon EY. Synovial cell death is regulated by TNF-alpha-induced expression of B-cell activating factor through an ERK-dependent increase in hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(4):e2727. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xie Z, Qu Y, Shen P, Wang B, Wei K, Du B. PU.1 attenuates TNFalphainduced proliferation and cytokine release of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblastlike synoviocytes by regulating miR155 activity. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(6):8349–8356. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Filer A, Parsonage G, Smith E, Osborne C, Thomas AM, Curnow SJ, Rainger GE, Raza K, Nash GB, Lord J, et al. Differential survival of leukocyte subsets mediated by synovial, bone marrow, and skin fibroblasts: site-specific versus activation-dependent survival of T cells and neutrophils. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(7):2096–2108. doi: 10.1002/art.21930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brennan FM, Chantry D, Jackson A, Maini R, Feldmann M. Inhibitory effect of TNF alpha antibodies on synovial cell interleukin-1 production in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet (London, England) 1989;2(8657):244–247. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)90430-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw data will be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.