Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2019 Oct 31;29(24):126757. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.126757

Novel benzimidazole phosphonates as potential inhibitors Of protein prenylation

Nazmul H Bhuiyan a, Michelle L Varney b, David F Wiemer a,c, Sarah A Holstein b,d
PMCID: PMC6911684  NIHMSID: NIHMS1544396  PMID: 31699606

Abstract

Benzimidazole carboxyphosphonates and bisphosphonates have been prepared and evaluated for their activity as inhibitors of protein prenylation or isoprenoid biosynthesis. The nature of the phosphonate head group was found to dictate enzyme specificity. The lead carboxyphosphonate inhibits geranylgeranyl transferase II while its corresponding bisphosphonate analogue potently inhibits farnesyl diphosphate synthase. The most active inhibitors effectively disrupted protein prenylation in human multiple myeloma cells.

Keywords: Benzimidazole, farnesyl diphosphate synthase, geranylgeranyl transferase II, inhibition, isoprenoid biosynthesis, carboxyphosphonate, bisphosphonate

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1544396-f0001.jpg


The enzyme geranylgeranyl transferase II (GGTase II) is a member of the protein prenyltransferase family that includes farnesyl transferase (FTase) and GGTase I.1 GGTase II is responsible for the post-translational modification of the Rab family of small GTPases. Rabs regulate intracellular trafficking events, facilitating vesicle budding, motility, docking, and fusion.2 Mutant forms of Rabs unable to be geranylgeranylated have been shown to be mislocalized and nonfunctional.3 Agents that disrupt Rab geranylgeranylation, either via direct inhibition of GGTase II4 or by diminishing the synthesis of the isoprenoid substrate geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGDP),5-9 induce multiple myeloma cell death by disrupting monoclonal protein trafficking and inducing the unfolded protein response pathway.10,11 The development of inhibitors of Rab geranylgeranylation is therefore of relevance from a therapeutic perspective for multiple myeloma and other malignancies characterized by abnormal protein secretion.12,13

Risedonate, minodronate, and zoledronic acid are all farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FDPS) inhibitors, with IC50’s of 10 nM, 3 nM, and 3 nM, respectively.14 These agents are used clinically for osteoporosis and other bone disorders.15 A carboxyphosphonate analogue of the bisphosphonate risedronate (1), 3-PEHPC (2) (Figure 1), was unexpectedly found to inhibit GGTase II and disrupt Rab prenylation.16,17 3-PEHPC is a specific inhibitor of GGTase II, although its potency is low (reported IC50 range from ~32 to ~600 μM),17-19 and high concentrations (>5 mM) are required to yield cellular effects in myeloma cells.20 While synthesis of several PEHPC analogues has been reported,4 no increase in potency has been achieved. More promising is an analogue of the bisphosphonate minodronate (3), 3-IPEHPC (4), which is 25-fold more potent than 3-PEHPC as a GGTase II inhibitor.18 The (+)-enantiomer of 3-IPEHPC 4 is ~60-fold more active than the (−)- enantiomer, but also appears to weakly inhibit another enzyme in the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway, possibly geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase (GGDPS).18,19,21 Finally, a carboxyphosphonate analogue (6) of the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (5), has been reported to disrupt Rab prenylation in cells at concentrations as low as 25 μM.22 While an IC50 for this compound in an in vitro enzyme assay has not been reported, the authors did report an IC50 of 360 μM for a cell-based FRET assay which detects membrane anchorage of lipid-modified proteins.22

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Bisphosphonates and carboxyphosphonates with activity against enzymes involved in isoprenoid synthesis or protein prenylation.

Recently, a number of other imidazole derivatives have been reported, including compounds modified at the alpha position of the carboxyphosphonates (e.g. 7)22 but still N-substituted, and others where the polar head group has been C-linked (e.g. 8).23 Some of these compounds have activity in the 10 micromolar range for GGTase II inhibition in HeLa cells,23,24 but compounds with activity at clinically more attractive levels have proven elusive.

Given the activity of various nitrogen heterocycle bearing the carboxyphosphonate head group, we have explored the synthesis of novel benzimidazole carboxyphosphonates as potential GGTase II inhibitors. In addition, we have prepared the corresponding bisphosphonates and assessed their activity as inhibitors of FDPS and other key enzymes in isoprenoid biosynthesis. In this paper we report the synthesis and biological activity of these new compounds.

Several benzimidazole-based carboxyphosphonates (compounds 11ac, Scheme 2) have been synthesized by conjugate addition of the benzimidazoles 10ac to the vinyl carboxyphosphonate 9a25 through a procedure analogous to that used to prepare imidazole derivatives.22,23 The corresponding bisphosphonates 11df have been prepared following a parallel reaction sequence with the vinyl bisphosphonate 9b.9,26 Flash chromatography was employed if required to purify the esters using a silica column and 5% ethanol in dichloromethane, but then they were carried to the next step as quickly as possible because they undergo a retro-Michael reaction even when stored in a freezer. Two of the benzimidazole-based esters, compounds 11a and 11d, were methylated at the α-position through reaction with NaH and methyl iodide, to give the products 12a and 12b in modest yields. It is probable that the methylation step was achieved only in modest yields due to the retro-Michel reaction. In each case a substantial amount of N-methylbenzimidazole was isolated, which unexpectedly had a similar Rf value as the product carboxyphosphonate. Finally, all eight of the esters, compounds 11af and 12ab were cleaved to the parent acids by treatment with concentrated (~12 M) hydrochloric acid at 110 °C. Experimental details and spectra can be found in the supplemental information.

The eight new benzimidazoles 1320 were tested for their ability to impair protein prenylation in both in vitro enzyme assays and cell-based assays. Of the four carboxyphosphonates, only compounds 13 and 14 were found to have cellular activity (Table 1). As shown in Figure 2, the pattern of activity for compound 13 is consistent with GGTase II inhibition: while compound 13 did not cause disruption of H-Ras (a representative farnesylated protein) or Rap1a (a representative substrate for GGTase I) prenylation, it did cause both a decrease in membrane-bound Rab6 levels as well as an increase in intracellular light chain levels, both of which are markers for disruption of Rab geranylgeranylation.20 Lovastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, was included as a positive control, as it disrupts all prenylation.20 Consistent with the cellular data, the enzymatic data revealed that compound 13 inhibits GGTase II in a range similar to other reported GGTase II inhibitors,4,17-19 but does not inhibit GGTase I or the synthases. Compound 13 also inhibited FTase in the enzyme assay, but there was no evidence that this inhibition was potent enough to disrupt protein farnesylation in cells (Fig 2A). Modification of this core structure at the α-carbon diminished activity (compound 14) while modification at the 5 and 6 positions (compounds 15 and 16) on the benzimidazole completely abrogated the inhibitory activity.

Table 1.

Summary of bioassay data for the novel benzimidazole phosphonates

Compound GGTase II
(IC50)
(μM)
GGTase I
(IC50)
(μM)
FTase
(IC50)
(μM)
FDPS
(IC50) (μM)
GGDPS
(IC50)
(μM)
Selectivity
for FDPS
relative to
GGDPS
Cellular
LEC1
13 198 ± 86 > 1000 125 ± 49 >100 > 100 -- 1 mM
14 810 ± 214 > 1000 > 1000 >100 > 100 -- 5 mM
15 >1000 145 ± 32 450 ± 70 >100 > 100 -- NA at ≤ 5 mM
16 >1000 > 1000 > 1000 >100 > 100 -- NA at ≤ 5 mM
17 >1000 > 1000 830 ± 50 0.024 ± 0.007 20.5 ± 4.3 854 25 μM
18 >1000 > 1000 > 1000 1.00 ± 0.11 > 100 >100 NA at ≤ 1 mM
19 738 ± 112 122 ± 13 340 ± 40 0.15 ± 0.015 87 ± 22 580 0.5 mM
20 534 ± 133 > 1000* > 1000 0.69 ± 0.29 41 ± 29 59 NA at ≤ 1 mM
1

Cellular LEC (lowest effective concentration) for FDPS inhibitors is defined as the lowest concentration for which an unmodified Rap1a band is visible in the immunoblot and a statistically significant increase in intracellular lambda light chain is observed in the ELISA. Cellular LEC for GGTase II inhibitors is defined as the lowest concentration for which there is a statistically significant increase in intracellular lambda light chains and a ≥20% decrease in Rab6 levels in the detergent fraction as assessed by immunoblot analysis.

*

A concentration-dependent increase in GGTase I activity was observed with enzyme activity of 560% relative to control at 1000 μM.

Abbreviation: NA, no activity

Figure 2. Cellular activity of compound 13 is consistent with GGTase II inhibition.

Figure 2.

RPMI-8226 cells were incubated for 48 hours in the presence or absence of lovastatin (10 μM, Lov) or varying concentrations of compound 13. A) Cells were lysed using RIPA buffer to generate whole cell lysate or with Triton X-114 to generate a detergent (membrane) fraction and immunoblot analysis was performed for H-Ras, Rap1a (antibody detects only unmodified protein), and Rab6. β-Tubulin and calnexin were used as loading controls for the whole cell lysate and detergent fractions, respectively. Densitometric analysis of Rab6 (normalized to calnexin) for the treated cells normalized to untreated (control) cells is shown as relative intensity (Rel. Int.). The gels are representative of three independent studies. B) Intracellular lambda light chain concentrations were determined via ELISA. Data are expressed as percentage of control (mean ± SD, n=3). The * denotes p<0.05 per t-test and compares treated cells to untreated control cells.

Analysis of the benzimidazole bisphosphonates revealed that compound 17 is a potent FDPS inhibitor. As shown in Figure 3, compound 17 globally disrupts protein prenylation, as evidenced by accumulation of unmodified Ras and Rap1a as well as intracellular lambda light chain. The enzyme assays demonstrated that compound 17 is a selective inhibitor of FDPS, with ~850-fold selectivity for FDPS compared to GGDPS and no appreciable activity against any of the prenyltransferases (Table 1). Compound 19, the difluoro-substituted analogue also displayed cellular activity, albeit at a 20-fold higher concentration than the parent compound (Table 1). Consistent with the cellular data, the enzymatic assay data revealed that compound 19 is a less potent inhibitor of FDPS than the parent compound 17. In addition, compound 19 lacked specificity, with weak FTase, GGTase I and GGTase II inhibitory activity in vitro (Table 1). Cellular activity of compound 19 was observed at a concentration 20-fold higher than that of compound 17 (data not shown). While the remaining two bisphosphonates (18 and 20) did inhibit FDPS in the in vitro enzyme assay, no detectable impairment of protein prenylation was observed in the cellular assays (data not shown). Interestingly, compound 20 was noted to inhibit GGTase II but enhance GGTase I activity in enzyme assays (Table 1). As previous studies have demonstrated enhanced activity of FDPS inhibitors when used in combination with HMG CoA reductase inhibitors,27-29 combination studies were performed. As shown in Figure 3, a low concentration of lovastatin (0.5 μM), which by itself only minimally impairs protein prenylation, enhanced the impairment of protein prenylation induced by compound 17.

Figure 3. Cellular activity of compound 17 is enhanced upon co-incubation with lovastatin.

Figure 3.

RPMI-8226 cells were incubated for 48 hours in the presence or absence of lovastatin (0.5 μM, Lov) or varying concentrations of compound 17. A) Immunoblot analysis of H-Ras, Rap1a (antibody detects only unmodified protein) and β-tubulin (as a loading control) was performed. B) Intracellular lambda light chain concentrations were determined via ELISA. Data are expressed as percentage of control (mean ± SD, n=3). The * denotes statistical significance as determined by t-testing comparing treatments with and without lovastatin.

In summary, these studies are the first to utilize a benzimidazole carboxyphosphonate core in the development of GGTase II inhibitors. The most potent of this series, compound 13, has enzymatic and cellular activity that is comparable to other reported GGTase II inhibitors. However, the addition of substituents at either the α-carbon position or at the 5 and 6 positions does not enhance the potency. The nature of the phosphonate head group dictates enzyme specificity such that the carboxyphosphonate 13 is a GGTase II inhibitor while the bisphosphonate version 17 is a FDPS inhibitor that has enzymatic and cellular activity that is comparable to clinically utilized FDPS inhibitors. Further structure-function work is needed to better understand the interactions between these benzimidazole phosphonates and the isoprenoid enzymes, particularly as several of the bisphosphonate derivatives displayed a lack of specificity. It is likely that factors such as isoprenoid pool sizes, flux through the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway and hierarchical preservation of prenylation play roles in determining the impact of these inhibitors in cells. The mechanism underlying the observed increase in GGTase I activity induced by compound 20 needs to be further explored. GGTase II remains a challenging enzyme for which to develop inhibitors that are sufficiently potent to be of clinical relevance.

Supplementary Material

1

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Benzimidazole carboxyphosphonates and bisphosphonates

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Roy J. Carver Charitable Trust (01-224), the National Institutes of Health (R01CA172070, P30 CA036727) and the University of Nebraska Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

Supplementary data

Supplementary data (representative experimental procedures, NMR spectra, and bioassay protocols) associated with this article can be found in the online version, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.126757

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and notes

  • (1).Leung KF; Baron R; Seabra MC J Lipid Res 2006; 47: 467–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Grosshans BL; Ortiz D; Novick P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 11821–11827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Gomes AQ; Ali BR; Ramalho JS; Godfrey RF; Barral DC; Hume AN; Seabra MC Mol Biol Cell 2003; 14: 1882–1899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Zhou X; Born EJ; Allen C; Holstein SA; Wiemer DF Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2015; 25: 2331–2334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Zhou X; Ferree SD; Wills VS; Born EJ; Tong H; Wiemer DF; Holstein SA Bioorg Med Chem 2014; 22: 2791–2798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Wills VS; Allen C; Holstein SA; Wiemer DF ACS Med Chem Lett 2015; 6: 1195–1198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Foust BJ; Allen C; Holstein SA; Wiemer DF Bioorg Med Chem 2016; 24: 3734–3741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Wills VS; Metzger JI; Allen C; Varney ML; Wiemer DF; Holstein SA Bioorg Med Chem 2017; 25: 2437–2444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Matthiesen RA; Varney ML; Xu PC; Rier AS; Wiemer DF; Holstein SA Bioorg Med Chem 2018; 26: 376–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Holstein SA; Hohl RJ Leukemia Res. 2011; 35: 551–559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Born EJ; Hartman SV; Holstein SA Blood Cancer Journal 2013; 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Haney SL; Varney ML; Chhonker YS; Shin S; Mehla K; Crawford AJ; Smith HJ; Smith LM; Murry DJ; Hollingsworth MA; Holstein SA Oncogene 2019; 38: 5308–5320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Haney SL; Chhonker YS; Varney ML; Talmon G; Smith LM; Murry DJ; Holstein SA J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2019; in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Dunford JE; Thompson K; Coxon FP; Luckman SP; Hahn FM; Poulter CD; Ebetino FH; Rogers MJ J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001; 296: 235–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Nuti R Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism 2014; 11: 208–214. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Coxon FP; Ebetino FH; Mules EH; Seabra MC; McKenna CE; Rogers MJ Bone 2005; 37: 349–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Coxon FP; Helfrich MH; Larijani B; Muzylak M; Dunford JE; Marshall D; McKinnon AD; Nesbitt SA; Horton MA; Seabra MC; Ebetino FH; Rogers MJ J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 48213–48222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Baron RA; Tavare R; Figueiredo AC; Blazewska KM; Kashemirov BA; McKenna CE; Ebetino FH; Taylor A; Rogers MJ; Coxon FP; Seabra MC J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 6861–6868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).McKenna CE; Kashemirov BA; Blazewska KM; Mallard-Favier I; Stewart CA; Rojas J; Lundy MW; Ebetino FH; Baron RA; Dunford JE; Kirsten ML; Seabra MC; Bala JL; Marma MS; Rogers MJ; Coxon FP Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2010; 53: 3454–3464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Holstein SA; Hohl RJ Leuk Res 2011; 35: 551–559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Blazewska KM; Ni F; Haiges R; Kashemirov BA; Coxon FP; Stewart CA; Baron R; Rogers MJ; Seabra MC; Ebetino FH; McKenna CE Eur J Med Chem 2011; 46: 4820–4826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Coxon FP; Joachimiak L; Najumudeen AK; Breen G; Gmach J; Oetken-Lindholm C; Way R; Dunford JE; Abankwa D; Blazewska KM Eur J Med Chem 2014; 84: 77–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Joachimiak L; Marchwicka A; Gendaszewska-Darmach E; Blazewska KM ChemMedChem 2018; 13: 842–851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Kazmierczak A; Kusy D; Niinivehmas SP; Gmach J; Joachimiak L; Pentikainen OT; Gendaszewska-Darmach E; Blazewska KM J Med Chem 2017; 60: 8781–8800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Semmelhack MF; Tomesch JC; Czarny M; Boettger SJ Org. Chem 1978; 43: 1259–1262. [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Degenhardt CR; Burdsall DC Journal of Organic Chemistry 1986; 51: 3488–3490. [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Schmidmaier R; Simsek M; Baumann P; Emmerich B; Meinhardt G Anticancer Drugs 2006; 17: 621–629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Varela I; Pereira S; Ugalde AP; Navarro CL; Suarez MF; Cau P; Cadinanos J; Osorio FG; Foray N; Cobo J; de Carlos F; Levy N; Freije JM; Lopez-Otin C Nat Med 2008; 14: 767–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Gobel A; Thiele S; Browne AJ; Rauner M; Zinna VM; Hofbauer LC; Rachner TD Cancer Lett 2016; 375: 162–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES