ABSTRACT
As obligate anaerobes, clostridial pathogens depend on their metabolically dormant, oxygen-tolerant spore form to transmit disease. However, the molecular mechanisms by which those spores germinate to initiate infection and then form new spores to transmit infection remain poorly understood. While sporulation and germination have been well characterized in Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus anthracis, striking differences in the regulation of these processes have been observed between the bacilli and the clostridia, with even some conserved proteins exhibiting differences in their requirements and functions. Here, we review our current understanding of how clostridial pathogens, specifically Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium botulinum, and Clostridioides difficile, induce sporulation in response to environmental cues, assemble resistant spores, and germinate metabolically dormant spores in response to environmental cues. We also discuss the direct relationship between toxin production and spore formation in these pathogens.
Notably, different mechanisms exist between these organisms for forming and germinating spores. Some of these differences reflect phylogenetic differences between the Clostridiaceae (represented by C. perfringens and C. botulinum) and the Peptostreptococcaceae (represented by C. difficile) (1). Other differences reflect genetic diversity within each species (2–4). C. botulinum is the most divergent, being divided into four metabolic groups (groups 1 to IV) that effectively represent different species despite their shared production of botulinum toxin (5).
IMPORTANCE OF SPORES TO CLOSTRIDIAL PATHOGENESIS
Disease transmission by clostridial pathogens depends on their ability to form aerotolerant, metabolically dormant spores before exiting their hosts (6). Since spores are highly resistant to extreme temperature and pressure changes, radiation, enzymatic digestion, and oxidizing agents (7), they can persist for long periods of time and serve as environmental reservoirs for these organisms (8). Spores from C. perfringens, C. botulinum, and C. difficile can be isolated from diverse environments, including animal gastrointestinal tracts and carcasses, wastewater, lawns, hospital rooms, and soil (8). Infections by these pathogens typically are initiated upon ingestion of spores, although C. perfringens can also enter the body via contaminating wounds. Upon sensing small-molecule germinants, spores from these pathogens germinate and outgrow into toxin-secreting vegetative cells.
C. perfringens
C. perfringens causes two major human diseases: food poisoning and gas gangrene (also known as clostridial myonecrosis [9]). Clostridial myonecrosis occurs when spores from the soil enter muscle tissue, typically through a wound, while food poisoning arises when spores or vegetative cells in contaminated food are ingested. Unlike most clostridial pathogens, C. perfringens’ vegetative form can initiate infection when present at sufficiently high levels to survive passage through the stomach. C. perfringens causes disease by secreting a number of toxins; C. perfringens strains are subdivided into toxigenic types A to E based on the combination of the alpha-, beta-, epsilon-, and iota-toxins they produce.
C. perfringens spores can be remarkably heat resistant, with some type A strains surviving boiling for >1 h (10, 11). Spores from food-poisoning isolates exhibit greater resistance to heat (∼60-fold), cold, and oxidizing agents (12, 13) than nonfoodborne isolates, suggesting that their resistance properties facilitate their survival in undercooked or improperly held food (10).
C. botulinum
C. botulinum causes a flaccid paralysis known as botulism through the production of the potent neurotoxin, botulinum toxin (BoNT). C. botulinum strains are subdivided based on their production of one or more of seven BoNT types (A to G) (14, 15). Botulism typically results from the ingestion of preformed BoNT in contaminated foods, but ingestion of C. botulinum spores in contaminated foods such as unpasteurized honey can cause infant paralysis, particularly in those <1 year old (16). Even in cases of botulism intoxication, the spore form is critical for contaminating food, where incomplete sterilization or processing, such as during home canning, can create anaerobic environments that allow C. botulinum spores to germinate and form toxin-producing vegetative cells that subsequently intoxicate the food (17).
C. difficile
C. difficile is a leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis worldwide (18, 19). C. difficile-associated disease occurs when spores, ingested by susceptible hosts, germinate in response to specific bile acids sensed in the mammalian gut; the resulting vegetative cells produced secrete glucosylating toxins that are the primary cause of disease symptoms (20). Notably, antibiotic exposure sensitizes individuals to antibiotic-resistant C. difficile by removing the colonization resistance conferred by our gut microflora (21). Spores are critical to this infection process not only because they are essential for transmitting C. difficile infections (6) but also because they are inert to antibiotics and resist many commonly used disinfectants in health care settings (22, 23). Accordingly, spores are easily detected in health care-associated environments (24) in addition to numerous other sites (8).
OVERVIEW OF SPORE FORMATION
The first morphological stage of sporulation is the formation of a polar septum, which generates two morphologically distinct, but genetically identical, cells (Fig. 1) (25). The larger mother cell engulfs the smaller forespore cell, leaving the forespore within the mother cell cytosol surrounded by two membranes. A thick layer of modified peptidoglycan known as the cortex forms between the two membranes, conferring spores with heat and ethanol resistance (26, 27). A series of proteinaceous layers known as the coat assembles around the outer forespore membrane and protects the spore against enzymatic and oxidative insults. In C. difficile, an additional layer known as the exposporium assembles on the coat, but this layer is not present in all spore-forming organisms.
FIGURE 1.

Lifecycle of endospore formers. (A) Sporulation. Upon sensing certain environmental conditions, endospore formers activate Spo0A and initiate sporulation. The first morphological event is the formation of a polar septum, which creates a larger mother cell and smaller forespore. The mother cell engulfs the forespore, and the two cells work together to assemble the dormant spore. Calcium dipicolinic acid (Ca-DPA) is synthesized in the mother cell and transported into the forespore in exchange for water. The cortex is formed between the two membranes, and coat proteins polymerize on the surface of the mother cell-derived membrane. Once the spore is mature, the mother cell lyses and releases the dormant spore into the environment. (B) Germination. Upon sensing the appropriate small molecule germinants, the spore initiates a signaling cascade that leads to activation of cortex hydrolases and core hydration, which is necessary for metabolism to resume in the germinating spore.
The mother cell and forespore also coordinately prepare the forespore for dormancy. The mother cell produces large amounts of dipicolinic acid (pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid) complexed with calcium (Ca-DPA), which it pumps into the developing forespore in exchange for water (28). The resulting partially dehydrated forespore cytosol prevents metabolism. The forespore produces large amounts of small acid-soluble proteins (SASPs), which coat the chromosome, prevent transcription, and protect against DNA damage (26, 28). Once the forespore completes its maturation, the mother cell induces lysis and releases the metabolically dormant spore into the environment.
SPORULATION INITIATION IN CLOSTRIDIAL PATHOGENS
The decision to initiate sporulation requires that vegetative cells recognize specific environmental and nutritional signals and assimilate these cues into a robust response. All sporulating Firmicutes use the conserved transcriptional regulator, Spo0A, as a key checkpoint for integrating these signals. The response regulator Spo0A initiates spore formation by activating or repressing the expression of genes encoding early sporulation regulators (6, 29–34), and its DNA-binding activity is directly controlled by phosphorylation. In the model organism B. subtilis, Spo0A phosphorylation is orchestrated by a complex regulatory network, known as a phosphorelay, which consists of several orphan sensor histidine kinases (KinA-E; orphan refers to histidine kinases that are not encoded beside a response regulator) and two phosphotransfer proteins (Spo0F and Spo0B) (35). The KinA to KinE kinases directly phosphorylate Spo0F, which subsequently transfers the phosphate to Spo0B and finally to Spo0A (Fig. 2) (36). Antikinases and two classes of phosphatases inhibit Spo0A phosphorylation levels by either blocking kinase activity or stripping Spo0A or Spo0F of its phosphate (37). The complexity of this regulatory pathway functions as a noise generator, creating heterogeneous levels of Spo0A phosphorylation within a population such that only a portion of its population commits to sporulation (38–40).
FIGURE 2.

Sporulation initiation via Spo0A phosphorylation. Sigma factors are shown as circles, histidine kinases and phosphatases as hexagons (adapted from Al-Hinai et al. [85]). Positive regulators are shown in green (with the exception of σK, which is shown in purple), and negative regulators are shown in red. In B. subtilis, the KinA-E orphan histidine kinases phosphorylate the phosphotransfer protein Spo0F, the first component in the phosphorelay (25). The Rap phosphatases remove phosphates from phosphorylated Spo0F. The phosphate is transferred from Spo0F to Spo0B to Spo0A. In C. difficile, the orphan histidine kinases CD1579 and CD2492 appear to phosphorylate Spo0A (32), while CD1492 likely dephosphorylates Spo0A (47). A more detailed description of C. difficile Spo0A regulation is shown in Fig. 3. Although all the putative orphan histidine kinases with the potential to phosphorylate Spo0A in C. perfringens and C. botulinum are shown, whether they act as positive or negative regulators remains unstudied. The stationary factor σH activates expression of spo0A in B. subtilis and C. difficile (101), while σK activates spo0A transcription in C. botulinum (74) and possibly C. perfringens, the latter of which induces sporulation during log-phase growth (65).
Notably, the B. subtilis phosphorelay is absent in clostridial pathogens, since clostridia lack orthologs of the Spo0F and Spo0B phosphotransfer proteins (41, 42). Thus, Spo0A appears to be directly phosphorylated by histidine kinases in clostridial organisms (32, 33, 43–46), although the kinases, regulatory pathway, and environmental signals used to control clostridial Spo0A phosphorylation remain largely uncharacterized.
C. difficile
Sporulation initiation has been most extensively studied in C. difficile, where key Spo0A regulatory proteins have been identified (Fig. 3). An initial study identified three orphan histidine kinases with significant homology to the B. subtilis family of sporulation-associated phosphotransfer histidine kinases (32). Loss of one of these putative histidine kinases, CD2492, decreased spore formation ∼3-fold in rich liquid media, while another kinase, CD1579, directly phosphorylated Spo0A in vitro (32). These results suggest that both CD2492 and CD1579 promote Spo0A activation. Loss of the third putative histidine kinase, CD1492, increases sporulation ∼4-fold on solid sporulation media in a manner dependent on its conserved histidine residue (47), suggesting that CD1492 functions as a phosphatase rather than as a kinase.
FIGURE 3.

Regulatory pathway controlling Spo0A activation in C. difficile. Early sporulation factors experimentally determined to function as positive regulators of Spo0A are highlighted in green, and those that inhibit Spo0A are highlighted in red (32, 47, 51, 55, 56, 59, 61, 62, 101). Hexagons indicate histidine kinase/phosphatases, rounded rectangles demarcate transcription factors, and circles highlight sigma factors. Red lines indicate negative regulation, and black lines indicate positive regulation. SinR and SinR′, C. difficile orthologs for regulatory proteins characterized in B. subtilis (gray), were recently shown to promote sporulation (60). Solid lines indicate defined regulatory interactions, and dashed lines suggest proposed, and potentially indirect, regulatory effects. Branched-chain amino acids are a CodY cofactor (59), and their precursors are likely imported primarily through the Opp and App oligopeptide transporters (55, 61). CcpA-independent carbon-specific regulation is not shown (56). The reciprocal transcriptional regulation of early sporulation factors by Spo0A has also been omitted for simplicity (100).
Interestingly, CD2492 does not necessarily always promote sporulation, since a CD2492 mutant exhibits increased sporulation on solid sporulation media independent of its conserved histidine residue (A. Edwards and S. McBride, unpublished data). The discrepancy in CD2492 mutant sporulation phenotypes could be due to differences in growth conditions and/or methods for measuring spore formation. The signals that control kinase versus phosphatase activity of sporulation-associated histidine kinases are largely unknown, even in B. subtilis; thus, the activity observed may depend on the presence or absence of unidentified signals. Indeed, one B. subtilis kinase mutant exhibits varying sporulation phenotypes depending on the growth conditions used (48, 49). This contradiction highlights the importance of assessing sporulation using multiple conditions and verifying spore frequencies with at least two different methods (50).
Notably, sporulation-associated histidine kinases directly control Spo0A phosphorylation through competing kinase and phosphatase activities in C. acetobutylicum and C. thermocellum, where at least one sporulation-associated histidine kinase in each species inhibits sporulation in vivo (44, 45), and a C. acetobutylicum histidine kinase has been shown to dephosphorylate Spo0A in vitro (45). Altogether, clostridial sporulation-associated histidine kinases appear to reversibly regulate Spo0A phosphorylation and thus the onset of sporulation.
Spo0A activity in C. difficile is further modulated by an RRNPP family ortholog, RstA (regulator of sporulation and toxins) (51), which shares homology with the Rap phosphatases that directly dephosphorylate Spo0F in B. subtilis. RRNPP family members have multiple C-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat domains that bind quorum-sensing peptides and regulate the cognate N-terminal helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain and/or Spo0A/Spo0F-binding domain (52, 53). RstA contains these three conserved regulatory domains, and an rstA mutant produces ∼20-fold fewer spores than the wild type, indicating that RstA promotes early sporulation events in C. difficile (29). Although the helix-turn-helix domain appears to be dispensable for RstA to modulate sporulation (29), the putative Spo0A/Spo0F-binding domain may directly bind and control Spo0A phosphorylation and/or dephosphorylation (A. Edwards and S. McBride, unpublished data). Interestingly, in addition to regulating sporulation, RstA represses motility and toxin production (see below) (51). Homologs of RstA are observed in both pathogenic and nonpathogenic clostridial organisms, including C. sordellii, C. perfringens, C. botulinum, and C. acetobutylicum (51).
RRNPP systems in other spore formers use quorum-sensing peptides to control activity of the regulator and, thus, sporulation initiation. For example, B. subtilis Rap phosphatase activity is inhibited by quorum-sensing peptides imported by the conserved oligopeptide permeases Opp and App, promoting sporulation (32, 34–36). Further, C. acetobutylicum sporulation is affected by the deletion or overexpression of genes encoding RRNPP-type regulators, which are located adjacent to putative quorum-sensing peptide genes (54). However, it is unclear whether C. difficile RstA activity is regulated by quorum-sensing peptides. Regardless, peptide transport coordinates the onset of sporulation in C. difficile, since the loss of Opp and App increases C. difficile sporulation ∼20-fold (55). These results suggest that the peptides imported by C. difficile Opp and App serve as nutrients rather than quorum-sensing molecules such that C. difficile opp and app mutants may initiate sporulation earlier due to decreased nutrient acquisition.
Metabolic cues regulate the initiation of C. difficile sporulation because the global regulators CcpA and CodY directly control the expression of genes encoding early sporulation regulators. CcpA senses carbon availability (56, 57), and CodY senses GTP and branched-chain amino acid levels (58, 59). CcpA directly represses the expression of spo0A and the opp and sigF operons (sigF encodes the first sporulation-specific sigma factor to be activated). CcpA also indirectly downregulates transcription of sinR (56), which encodes an early sporulation regulator that enhances sporulation (60). Not surprisingly, sporulation is increased ∼10-fold in a ccpA mutant (56), providing further evidence that C. difficile initiates sporulation in response to nutrient deprivation. Similarly, CodY downregulates transcription of sinR and the opp operon, and a codY mutant exhibits increased sporulation (61). However, CodY’s effect on sporulation is strain specific, given that an R20291 codY mutant produces ∼100-fold more spores than the parent strain, but the equivalent mutant in 630Δerm produces only ∼2-fold more spores (61). Interestingly, the addition of glucose reduces sporulation frequency in a CcpA-independent manner (56), revealing that additional regulatory pathways impact the timing of sporulation in response to nutritional cues.
C. difficile also uses alternative sigma factors to control sporulation initiation. SigH, which controls the transition to stationary phase, is essential for sporulation and directly drives the expression of spo0A, similar to B. subtilis (35), and CD2492, which modulates Spo0A phosphorylation. In contrast, SigB, the general stress response sigma factor, inhibits predivisional sporulation-specific gene expression and decreases spore formation (62). SigB likely decreases Spo0A phosphorylation by reducing transcription of CD1579, which encodes a Spo0A kinase (12), and increasing transcription of CD1492, which encodes a putative Spo0A phosphatase (47).
The C. difficile genome encodes orthologs of additional B. subtilis early sporulation factors, such as SinRI, Spo0J-Soj, Spo0E, and KipI/KipA (see reference 63 for more detail). However, if the trend from recent research holds true, these uncharacterized C. difficile orthologs likely function differently from those in B. subtilis. Indeed, recent analyses indicate that the C. difficile sinR locus encodes two sinR homologs, sinR and sinR′, with SinR′ antagonizing SinR function, analogous to B. subilis SinI’s negative effect on SinR activity. In C. difficile, SinR functions as a DNA-binding transcriptional regulator and enhances sporulation, although the mechanism is unclear. There is some evidence that SinR regulates early sporulation events, because Spo0A-dependent gene expression is significantly decreased in a sinRR′ mutant and is not rescued by spo0A overexpression (60). Furthermore, additional novel C. difficile regulators of sporulation initiation are likely to be discovered given that C. difficile encounters a diverse array of environmental conditions during growth in the gut, which strongly induces sporulation gene expression relative to broth culture growth to promote survival outside of the host (64).
C. perfringens
In contrast to most spore-forming organisms, C. perfringens induces sporulation during the exponential phase (65). Sporulation induction depends in part on sensing cell density through the Agr-like quorum-sensing system because an agrB mutant, which no longer makes a mature quorum-sensing peptide, has reduced Spo0A protein levels and produces ∼1,000-fold fewer spores than the wild type (66). Like C. difficile, C. perfringens CcpA and CodY modulate sporulation (67, 68), although unlike C. difficile, C. perfringens CcpA activates rather than represses sporulation (68), with a C. perfringens ccpA mutant making ∼60-fold fewer spores than the wild type. Nevertheless, similar to C. difficile, glucose strongly reduces C. perfringens sporulation frequency (∼2,000-fold) in a CcpA-independent manner.
CodY regulates C. perfringens sporulation in a strain-specific manner, again analogous to C. difficile. Loss of CodY in the type D strain CN3178 increases spore formation ∼10-fold (67, 68), whereas loss of CodY in the food-poisoning strain SM101 reduces sporulation ∼1,000-fold relative to the wild type (69). CodY likely regulates sporulation by altering expression of abrB, which encodes a negative regulator of sporulation that functions in a strain-specific manner (67). C. perfringens also employs a regulatory RNA, virX, to repress sporulation by decreasing the expression of genes encoding sporulation-specific factors (70).
While the kinases that phosphorylate C. perfringens Spo0A remain unknown, six putative orphan histidine kinases have been identified in BLAST searches (71). Given that the bile acid deoxycholate induces C. perfringens Spo0A phosphorylation and thus sporulation (72), these kinases may specifically respond to this bile acid. Similarly, inorganic phosphate induces C. perfringens sporulation (73) and could stimulate kinase activity.
C. botulinum
Unlike C. perfringens, C. botulinum sporulates during the transition from exponential to stationary phase (74). Like C. perfringens, the Agr-like quorum-sensing system is important for sporulation initiation, with agrB and agrD C. botulinum mutants producing ∼1,000-fold fewer spores (75). While the impact of CcpA and CodY on C. botulinum sporulation remains to be studied, five putative orphan kinases have been identified as possible regulators of Spo0A (33). The CB01120 histidine kinase appears to phosphorylate Spo0A based on the observation that production of CB01120 with wild-type Spo0A, but not with a nonphosphorylatable form of Spo0A, causes lethality when heterologously produced in B. subtilis (33).
THE LINK BETWEEN SPORULATION AND TOXIN GENE EXPRESSION IN C. DIFFICILE
Although most Clostridium species initiate sporulation to survive unfavorable conditions, C. perfringens and C. botulinum directly couple toxin production (10, 30) to sporulation, while C. difficile coordinates these processes in a strain-specific manner (76).
C. perfringens Enterotoxin (CPE)
C. perfringens type A causes food-poisoning and nonfoodborne gastrointestinal disease (3). These diseases are caused by the CPE toxin (13), which is encoded either (cpe) chromosomally or on a large plasmid: most food-poisoning isolates carry chromosomal cpe, while most nonfoodborne isolates carry a plasmid-borne cpe (13, 77, 78). Food poisoning typically occurs when chromosomal cpe isolates are ingested with food, while nonfoodborne disease is primarily acquired by ingesting spores. Regardless, growth of C. perfringens in the small intestine leads to CPE production and thus disease (3).
Numerous studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between spore formation and CPE production (79–82). The first genetic evidence linking C. perfringens sporulation with CPE synthesis came from studies showing that mutants blocked at asymmetric division during sporulation failed to produce CPE, while mutants blocked at later stages of sporulation produced CPE (81). For example, a C. perfringens strain SM101 spo0A mutant cannot produce CPE (29), while inorganic phosphate (Pi) induces both sporulation and CPE production in the wild type (73).
Expression of the cpe gene is induced during sporulation, with the cpe transcript being detected only in sporulating, but not vegetative, C. perfringens cultures (80, 83). cpe is transcribed from three promoters, named P1, P2, and P3, that are either σE- or σK-dependent (83). These promoters induce high levels of CPE production during sporulation, with CPE constituting up to 20% of the total protein present (84). σE and σK are likely mother cell-specific (85), so CPE production appears to be restricted to the mother cell cytoplasm, where it reaches sufficiently high concentrations to induce paracrystalline inclusion body formation (84). However, rather than being secreted from sporulating cells, CPE is released upon mother cell lysis in the late stage of sporulation (84). Accordingly, sigK and sigE mutants of the food-poisoning strain SM101 fail to express cpe (65), while a sigF, but not a sigG, mutant exhibit defects in cpe expression and CPE production based on reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and Western blot analyses (86). Thus, only σF, σE, and σK are necessary for cpe transcription and CPE production (65), even though all four sporulation-specific sigma factors are required for C. perfringens sporulation (10, 65).
Since CPE production is strictly sporulation dependent, factors that regulate early events of C. perfringens sporulation also regulate CPE production. Accordingly, the Agr-like quorum-sensing system in the nonfoodborne strain F5603 and CodY in the food-poisoning strain SM101 both activate CPE production by activating Spo0A and inducing σF production (66, 67). virX, a regulatory RNA that represses sporulation, accordingly reduces cpe expression and CPE production (70). Notably, while sporulation is crucial for CPE production, CPE is not required for sporulation, because cpe mutants sporulate at wild-type levels (13, 87).
C. perfringens TpeL Toxin
Many C. perfringens isolates encode a novel toxin named TpeL, which belongs to the family of large clostridial toxins (88) and is encoded both chromosomally and on plasmids (89–91). While the contribution of TpeL to C. perfringens pathogenesis is unknown, tpeL expression is specifically induced during sporulation based on transcriptional reporter studies (92). The tpeL promoter region contains σE- and σK-dependent sequences, and loss of σE strongly reduces tpeL expression (∼100-fold) (92), indicating that tpeL expression also depends on σE, similar to cpe. More recent analyses indicate that tpeL expression is induced by TpeR, a transcriptional regulator encoded in the same pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) as tpeL; in these analyses, TpeL production was observed under conditions that promote vegetative cell growth (93).
C. botulinum Type Neurotoxin (BoNT)
Toxin production and sporulation coincide during the transition from exponential to stationary phase, suggesting that these processes may be coregulated. The Agr-like quorum-sensing system may coordinate these processes as in C. perfringens, since toxin and spore formation are reduced in agrB and agrD mutants (75). In aquatic C. botulinum type E strains (94, 95), sporulation and BoNT production are directly linked, because loss of Spo0A prevents spore formation and reduces BoNT production >10-fold relative to the wild type (30). Spo0A likely directly regulates toxin production, because Spo0A directly binds the botE promoter in vitro, which contains a Spo0A box (30). Interestingly, Spo0A is the first neurotoxin regulator identified in C. botulinum type E, which does not encode the alternative sigma factor, BotR, which activates botulinum gene expression in other strains (96).
C. difficile Glucosylating Toxins
C. difficile produces two large exotoxins, toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB), which are critical for virulence (97–99). The regulatory links between C. difficile toxin production and sporulation are complex and appear to be strain dependent. Spo0A represses toxin expression in epidemic 027 ribotypes (6, 76), does not impact toxin expression in the emerging 078 ribotype (76), and variably impacts toxin expression in the historic 012 ribotype (6, 31, 32, 76, 100). In the 630 background (012 ribotype), the stationary phase sigma factor, SigH, downregulates toxin gene expression (101), and the phosphotransfer protein, CD1492, positively affects toxin production (47), presumably through indirect means. However, as with sporulation, nutrient availability strongly influences toxin gene expression since amino acids and glucose repress toxin gene expression through the global regulators CodY and CcpA, respectively (57, 59, 102).
The most direct link between toxin gene expression and sporulation is RstA, the RRNPP family member discussed above, which inversely regulates toxin production and sporulation (51). RstA inhibits transcription of tcdA and tcdB by directly binding to the promoters and inhibiting the transcription of tcdR and sigD (29; A. Edwards and S. McBride, unpublished data). tcdR encodes the sigma factor that directly activates toxin gene expression (103), while sigD encodes the flagellar-specific sigma factor that also directs tcdR transcription (104, 105). This multitiered regulation suggests that RstA tightly controls toxin production. While RstA-dependent repression of toxin gene expression requires its DNA-binding domain, its regulation of sporulation does not. Thus, RstA regulates sporulation and toxin gene expression through independent mechanisms (51). However, it remains unclear if this bifunctional protein links sporulation and toxin regulation in the same cell: single-cell analyses would reveal whether toxin-producing cells also sporulate or whether these important processes are asynchronous. Interestingly, the regulatory pathways between sporulation and toxin gene expression may be reciprocal in some C. difficile strains, because TcdR enhances spore formation in R20291 (027 ribotype) but not 630 (106).
Overall, several C. difficile regulators control both sporulation and toxin gene expression, suggesting that the coordinate regulation of both of these processes is important for C. difficile survival.
THE SPORULATION TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROGRAM
Once Spo0A is phosphorylated, it induces asymmetric division, which eventually leads to the activation of four sporulation-specific sigma factors: σF, σE, σG, and σK. These sigma factors are essential for sporulation (25, 85, 107) because they coordinate the activation of distinct transcriptional programs within the mother cell and forespore, respectively, that culminate in the formation of a metabolically dormant spore. While the regulation of sporulation-specific sigma factors has been extensively analyzed in B. subtilis, the conserved sporulation sigma factors exhibit notable differences in their regulation and function in clostridial organisms relative to B. subtilis as well as between clostridial organisms. We first describe the activation and functions of sporulation-specific sigma factors in B. subtilis and then compare these properties with those in C. difficile, C. perfringens, and C. botulinum.
B. subtilis sporulation-specific sigma factors are posttranslationally activated in a compartment-specific and sequential manner. σF is activated in the forespore, followed by σE in the mother cell; σE then activates σG in the forespore, which subsequently activates σK in the mother cell (Fig. 4) (25). Intercompartmental signaling regulates sporulation sigma factor activation and couples it to specific morphological changes (108). Spo0A induces the transcription of sigF and sigE in the predivisional cell such that σF and σE are present in both the mother cell and forespore, although both sigma factors remain inactive until asymmetric division is complete. σF is first activated in the forespore when the preferential activation of the SpoIIE phosphatase in the forespore leads to dephosphorylation of the anti-anti-sigma factor, SpoIIAA (109–111), which antagonizes the anti-sigma factor, SpoIIAB. Inhibition of SpoIIAB frees σF to bind its target promoters, which include sigG and spoIIR. The resulting production of SpoIIR leads to σE activation because SpoIIR activates SpoIIGA, the protease that removes σE’s inhibitory propeptide in the mother cell (112–114).
FIGURE 4.

Diversity in the regulation of the transcriptional programs controlling sporulation in the Firmicutes. The temporal progression of sporulation is shown from top to bottom. Transcription factors and sigma factors are shown in bold, and proteins enclosed in boxes directly participate in signaling between the mother cell and forespore (dashed boxes indicate that trans-septum signaling has not been tested yet). Text color denotes whether the factor has been detected at both the transcript and protein level (black), at either the transcript or protein level (purple), or has not been tested yet at the transcript or protein level (blue). Black arrows delineate transcriptional control of gene expression, red arrows indicate signaling pathways, dashed lines indicate that the regulatory relationship remains unknown, and thick arrows demarcate notable points of divergence from the pathway defined in B. subtilis. AND gates are indicated. The figure is adapted from Fimlaid et al. (137) under Creative Commons BY 4.0.
Activated σE directs the transcription of genes (115) required for the mother cell to (i) engulf the forespore in a phagocytic-like process (spoIID, spoIIP, and spoIIM [116–118]), (ii) localize coat proteins to the forespore (119), (iii) activate σG in the forespore (spoIIIA operon [120]), and (iv) produce and activate σK in the mother cell (sigK, spoIIID, spoIVFA-B, ctpB, and spoIVCA [121–125]). The SpoIIIA proteins form a complex with GerM and the forespore-specific SpoIIQ to form a channel connecting the mother cell and forespore (126–129). This channel, also known as the “feeding tube,” is required to maintain transcriptional potential in the forespore (126) and, thus, σG activity. SpoIIQ also contributes to σG activation by controlling the localization of SpoIIE, which likely antagonizes the σG-specific anti-sigma factor, CsfB (130). Thus, discrete anti-sigma factors control the activation of σF and σG, respectively, in B. subtilis.
Engulfment increases σG activity, which couples its transcriptional program to morphological changes (131). Activated σG directs the transcription of genes in the forespore (132) required to (i) modify the cortex (133), (ii) prepare the forespore for dormancy (7), and (iii) activate σK via regulated proteolysis by the mother cell-localized protease SpoIVFB (125). Thus, proteolytic signaling cascades induced by the forespore activate σE and σK in B. subtilis.
σK production depends on σE because σE activates transcription of spoIIID, which encodes the transcriptional regulator that induces sigK expression (134). σE also controls the expression of spoIVCA, which encodes the site-specific recombinase necessary to mediate excision of the skin element, a 42-kB prophage-like region that disrupts the sigK gene (122). Thus, multiple levels of σK regulation control the precise timing of its activation in B. subtilis to ensure proper spore assembly, since activated σK induces cortex and coat assembly genes (135).
Taken together, B. subtilis sporulation gene expression is tightly controlled both spatially and temporally, with events in the forespore being coupled to events in the mother cell. Sporulation sigma factor activation and function are further controlled by additional feedback and feedforward loops to ensure that the timing of sporulation gene expression is tightly coordinated with morphological changes (136).
Notably, while most of the gene products that control sporulation sigma factor activation in B. subtilis are conserved in the clostridia, the functions of some of these gene products and the timing of their action are not always conserved. Many of the regulatory loops that fine-tune the timing of sporulation sigma factor activation and function in B. subtilis are not conserved in clostridial organisms (42, 71) (Fig. 4), suggesting that (i) sporulation sigma factor activity may not be as tightly regulated in clostridial pathogens relative to B. subtilis and/or (ii) additional regulatory pathways exist. While this review focuses on sporulation sigma factor regulation in pathogenic clostridia, this process has also been examined in detail in C. acetobutylicum, which revealed notable differences in the regulation of these sigma factors relative to B. subtilis (reviewed by Al-Hinai et al. [85]).
C. difficile
Sporulation sigma factor activation has been best studied in C. difficile, where genome-wide transcriptional analyses of sigma factor mutants have defined the regulons of sporulation-specific sigma factors (137, 138). These factors were shown to function in a compartment-specific manner similar to that in B. subtilis (Fig. 4) through the development of SNAP tag-based transcriptional reporter constructs by the Henriques group (139). Specifically, C. difficile σF and σG activity is restricted to the forespore, while σE and σK activity is restricted to the mother cell (139). This regulation resembles B. subtilis (25), with the exception that sigG expression does not require σF and is likely activated by Spo0A (137).
The mechanisms underlying both C. difficile σF and σE activation likely occur through a mechanism similar to that in B. subtilis based on gene conservation. Consistent with this notion, the σF-activating phosphatase, SpoIIE, and the σE-activating protein, SpoIIR, are essential for sporulation based on a transposon screen (140). Similar to B. subtilis, C. difficile SpoIIR is required for pro-σE processing (138). However, unlike B. subtilis, C. difficile σF is not essential for this proteolytic activation event because spoIIR is expressed from both Spo0A-dependent and σF-dependent promoters (138). Thus, C. difficile σE is partially active in a sigF mutant (137, 138).
C. difficile σG and σK activation differs markedly from that in B. subtilis. Whereas σG activation depends on the SpoIIQ-SpoIIIA channel complex in B. subtilis, C. difficile σG is active in the absence of this channel and its associated engulfment defects (141, 142). Notably, σG is present but inactive in the absence of σF (137), indicating that C. difficile σG activity is posttranslationally activated in the forespore through an unknown mechanism.
Unlike most spore-forming organisms, C. difficile σK lacks the N-terminal inhibitory propeptide (143) that tethers B. subtilis pro-σK to the membrane (123). As a result, C. difficile σK is active upon translation, since expression of sigK from a tet-inducible promoter in vegetative C. difficile allows σK-dependent genes to be transcribed in contrast to B. subtilis (144). However, similar to B. subtilis, C. difficile sigK transcription depends on the excision of a large skin element that disrupts the sigK gene (143) and is activated by σE and SpoIIID (138, 144). In contrast to B. subtilis, the gene encoding the excision recombinase, CD1231, is constitutively expressed rather than activated by σE (145). Instead, CD1231 activity is posttranslationally activated by the CD1234 recombination directionality factor, whose production depends on both σE and SpoIIID. Thus, CD1231 and CD1234 control the timing of SigK production and enhance the fidelity of spore assembly (145), similar to B. subtilis (146).
C. difficile sporulation sigma factors generally control morphological processes similar to those in B. subtilis, with σF and σE being required for initiating engulfment, and σE and σK being required for coat assembly (139). Unlike B. subtilis, C. difficile σG, but not σK, is required for cortex production, and C. difficile σG is required for engulfment completion at least during sporulation on solid media (137).
Taken together, C. difficile sporulation sigma factor mutants exhibit less intercompartmental signaling, with the forespore line of gene expression requiring σF and σG, but not σE, and the mother cell line of gene expression requiring σE and σK, but not σG (107, 137–139) (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the timing of sporulation sigma factor activation does not to appear to be as closely coupled to morphological events as in B. subtilis (25, 107).
C. perfringens and C. botulinum
The regulation of sporulation sigma factors in C. perfringens and C. botulinum has not been characterized extensively, although gene conservation analyses indicate that the minimal machinery required for activating these sigma factors is conserved (Fig. 4) (136). C. perfringens σE and σK both undergo proteolytic processing during sporulation, similar to B. subtilis and C. difficile (65). However, in contrast to these organisms, the sigK genes in both C. perfringens and C. botulinum do not contain intervening skin elements. Notably, σK appears to function at two stages during sporulation in both these organisms, with the first stage regulating sporulation initiation. Indeed, sigK mutants in both organisms do not appear to initiate asymmetric engulfment (65, 74), unlike in B. subtilis and C. difficile. Thus, the function of σK as an early and late regulator of sporulation in C. perfringens and C. botulinum exhibits similarities to C. acetobutylicum, which uses σK to initiate sporulation through its activation of spo0A and during late stage sporulation (147).
In C. perfringens, sigK is expressed from two promoters at different stages of sporulation: the upstream CPR_1739 promoter activates transcription during early log phase, in contrast to B. subtilis and C. difficile, while a σE-dependent promoter controls late-stage sporulation gene expression (65), similar to B. subtilis and C. difficile. C. botulinum sigK transcription is similarly biphasic, occurring during late log phase and late-stage sporulation (74). This latter phase of gene expression occurs from σF- and σE-dependent promoters (148). Consistent with σK being required early during sporulation in both these organisms, C. perfringens σK activates sigF and sigE expression (65), and C. botulinum σK activates spo0A and sigF expression (74). Furthermore, sigK mutants in both organisms fail to complete asymmetric engulfment (65, 74), whereas sigE mutants are stalled at this stage (65, 148). While transcriptional analyses indicate that σK acts upstream of σF, Western blot analyses have revealed that σK is not detectable in the absence of σF (86), suggesting that the production (or stability) of these two factors is interdependent.
Another major difference in sporulation gene regulation relative to B. subtilis and C. difficile is that σE does not activate spoIIID expression in C. perfringens and C. botulinum. Instead, C. botulinum spoIIID transcription is σF-dependent (149). Whether σF regulates spoIIID expression in C. perfringens is unclear, but immunoblotting indicates that SpoIIID production does not require σE or σK (65).
These observations raise the possibility that the sporulation sigma factors exhibit differences in their compartment-specific activation in C. perfringens and C. botulinum relative to B. subtilis and C. difficile. Indeed, sigK is transcribed early during sporulation in C. perfringens (65), suggesting that σK may also activate sporulation in predivisional C. botulinum cells. These observations raise the question of whether σK must be proteolytically activated at this early stage. Furthermore, since sigK expression is regulated by both σF and σE in C. botulinum (148), is σF activity (and by extension SpoIIID activity) restricted to the forespore?
Summary of Sporulation Regulation
Clearly, major differences exist in the functions and regulation of conserved sporulation sigma factors in C. difficile, C. perfringens, and C. botulinum relative to the pathways defined in B. subtilis. C. difficile’s regulatory architecture exhibits greater similarity to B. subtilis than to C. perfringens and C. botulinum, which appear relatively similar to each other. Further study of C. perfringens and C. botulinum is needed to define the order of sporulation sigma factor activation, their specific regulons, and the location of their activity. Such studies could provide insight into the evolution of diverse sporulation networks.
SPORE ASSEMBLY
The mechanisms by which spores are physically assembled in clostridial organisms also remain poorly defined, although some progress has been made in C. difficile. This section focuses on factors required for engulfment, coat, and exosporium assembly in C. difficile and the functions of specific coat and exosporium proteins. We also outline the role of the spore-specific small molecule, calcium dipicolonic acid (Ca-DPA), during C. perfringens and C. difficile spore formation.
Engulfment
The second major morphological event after asymmetric division is engulfment, whereby the smaller forespore is encircled by the mother cell, leaving the forespore free-floating in the mother cell cytosol surrounded by two membranes (Fig. 1). In B. subtilis, engulfment is mediated by peptidoglycan synthesis machinery in the inner forespore membrane working in concert with peptidoglycan degradation machinery localized in the mother cell-derived outer forespore membrane (150, 151). The degradation complex consists of the SpoIIP and SpoIID peptidoglycan hydrolases (152, 153) in complex with the transmembrane scaffolding protein, SpoIIM (154). Loss of any of these B. subtilis components prevents engulfment completion and thus heat-resistant spore formation (116–118). Interestingly, C. difficile SpoIIM is largely dispensable for engulfment and heat-resistant spore formation, in contrast to B. subtilis, while C. difficile SpoIIP and SpoIID are critical for these processes, similar to B. subtilis (155, 156) . While it is unclear why SpoIIM is dispensable for C. difficile engulfment, spoIID and spoIIP are expressed in different cellular compartments in C. difficile relative to B. subtilis (156), which may obviate the need for SpoIIM to bring SpoIID and SpoIIP together. C. difficile SpoIIP and SpoIID nevertheless have conserved enzymatic activities relative to B. subtilis (152, 155, 157), although SpoIIP undergoes site-specific cleavage in C. difficile (156), in contrast to B. subtilis (158).
The conserved SpoIIQ-SpoIIIA channel is also required for C. difficile engulfment, unlike in B. subtilis. In B. subtilis, the channel (also known as the “feeding tube”) connects the mother cell and forespore (120, 126, 128) and serves as a back-up mechanism for engulfment (159). However, in both organisms the channel is essential for maintaining forespore health because the forespore becomes deformed on itself in channel mutants (127, 141).
Coat Assembly in C. difficile
The coat consists of ∼80 proteins in B. subtilis (119) that localize to the forespore and form a series of concentric proteinaceous shells around the forespore. However, given that only 25% of these proteins have homologs in C. difficile (160), different pathways likely control coat assembly in these two organisms. Furthermore, C. difficile encodes only two of the nine coat morphogenetic proteins that function to recruit coat proteins to the B. subtilis forespore.
The two coat morphogenetic proteins shared between B. subtilis and C. difficile are SpoVM and SpoIVA. SpoVM functions as a landmark protein in B. subtilis by recognizing the positive curvature of the forespore membrane and embedding itself within this membrane (161, 162). SpoVM recruits SpoIVA to the forespore and is required for SpoIVA to use its ATPase activity (163) to polymerize around the forespore (161). SpoIVA preferentially localizes SpoVM to the outer forespore membrane (164) and recruits the coat morphogenetic protein, SpoVID, to the forespore by binding SpoVID’s C-terminal region A (164). These three proteins form the basement layer of the B. subtilis coat (165). SpoVID in turn recruits the inner coat morphogenetic protein, SafA (166), and outer coat morphogenetic protein, CotE (167). B. subtilis spoIVA and spoVM mutants mislocalize the coat and fail to make cortex, so they cannot produce heat- or chloroform-resistant spores (168–170). Furthermore, spoIVA and spoVM mutants are actively lysed by a bacilli-specific (171) quality control mechanism mediated by CmpA (172).
C. difficile spoIVA mutants resemble a B. subtilis IVA mutant in mislocalizing the coat and failing to produce heat-resistant spores (173, 174). However, in contrast to B. subtilis, C. difficile spoIVA mutants produce cortex (170, 174), consistent with the absence of CmpA in the clostridia (175). Nevertheless, it is unclear why C. difficile spoIVA mutants are heat sensitive, given that they produce visible cortex.
Unlike SpoIVA, C. difficile SpoVM is largely dispensable for spore formation. C. difficile spoVM mutants exhibit an ∼3-fold defect in heat- and chloroform-resistant spore formation, make cortex, and properly localize SpoIVA around the forespore in most cells, in contrast to the 6-log defect in heat and chloroform resistance observed in a B. subtilis spoVM mutant (169, 173). While it is unclear whether SpoVM encases the C. difficile forespore as it does in B. subtilis (161), C. difficile SpoVM directly binds SpoIVA in recombinant coaffinity purification analyses (173), so C. difficile may use a redundant factor to substitute for loss of SpoVM.
While SpoVM is largely dispensable for C. difficile spore formation, the clostridia-specific CD3567 was identified as a coat morphogenetic protein because it is essential for proper coat localization and heat-resistant spore formation but not cortex formation (174). CD3567 was identified based on spore proteomic analyses (176) and targeted mutagenesis (174) and directly binds to SpoIVA through CD3567’s C-terminal LysM domain, so it was renamed SipL (SpoIVA interacting protein L) (174). Fluorescent protein fusion analyses indicate that SipL is necessary for SpoIVA to encase the forespore, while SpoIVA is necessary for SipL to localize to the forespore (M. Touchette and A. Shen, unpublished data). Thus, even though clostridia-specific SipL (174) lacks sequence homology with bacilli-specific SpoVID (41), aside from their C-terminal LysM domains, the two proteins are functional homologs because they directly bind SpoIVA, encase the forespore, and recruit coat proteins to the forespore (164, 174).
C. difficile SpoIVA and SipL likely comprise the coat basement layer (Fig. 5), but the specific coat proteins they recruit to the forespore are unknown. Analyses of SpoIVA and SipL localization in engulfment mutants indicate that SpoIVA and SipL can localize to the forespore membrane in the absence of engulfment (156), while the outer coat protein CotE (CD1433) localizes to the cytosolic polymerized coat visible by phase-contrast microscopy (141). These results indicate that SpoIVA and SipL can adhere to the forespore independent of engulfment but that outer layer coat proteins require engulfment completion to stay associated with the forespore (156).
FIGURE 5.

Spore coat and exosporium structure in C. difficile. (A, B) Transmission electron microscopy sections of C. difficile spores highlighting (from outside to inside) the bumpy, outermost exosporium (Ex) layer with its hair-like projections (HPs), outer coat (OC), inner coat (IC), cortex layer (Cx), germ cell wall (GCW), inner forespore membrane (IM), and spore core (cytosol). (C) Scanning electron microscopy of C. difficile spores reveals the bumpy surface created by the exosporium. Images used without modification from Rabi et al. (280) under Creative Commons BY 4.0. (D) Schematic of spore coat layers highlighting morphogenetic factors identified as being important for the assembly of specific layers. Assembly of the outermost exosporium depends on the BclA collagen-like proteins, which likely create hair-like projections on the spore surface (186, 187), CdeC (185), and CdeM (D. Paredes-Saja, unpublished data). The proteins that make up the outer and inner coat layers are unknown, but CotA and the mucinase, CotE, have been shown to be surface accessible (180, 182). SpoIVA (IVA) and SipL are interacting coat morphogenetic proteins that are essential for recruiting coat proteins to the forespore and forming heat-resistant spores (173, 174). The specific proteins recruited by SpoIVA, SipL, CdeC, and CdeM remain unknown.
Additional coat proteins have been identified in spore proteomic analyses, some of which have been shown to be surface-localized (176–179). While coat proteins are enriched in these analyses, cytosolic contaminants inevitably become encased as the outer layers are assembled in the mother cell cytosol (176–179). The functions of many of these coat proteins have not been determined. CotA has been implicated in spore assembly and heat and ethanol resistance (180). Nevertheless, enzymatic activities have also been determined for several coat proteins (180, 181). For example, alanine racemase interconverts l- and d-alanine (as well as l- and d-serine) and alters the sensitivity of C. difficile spores to the d-alanine cogerminant (181).
C. difficile CotE, which is unrelated to the B. subtilis outer coat morphogenetic protein, CotE (119), degrades mucin and promotes spore binding to intestinal epithelial cells (182). Loss of CotE or its C-terminal mucinase domain reduces virulence in a hamster model of infection, indicating that the spore surface actively regulates C. difficile colonization and disease (182). Given that C. difficile cotE mutant spores do not have obvious ultrastructural or resistance property defects in vitro (180), these analyses highlight the importance of analyzing spore function in the context of infection.
Exosporium Assembly in C. difficile
The C. difficile exosporium layer directly contacts the coat, unlike the exosporium of Bacillus cereus group spores, which have an interspace gap between the exosporium and the coat (160, 183, 184). Since the C. difficile exosporium is closely associated with the spore coat (Fig. 5), it has been challenging to identify specific components. However, by sonicating spores, the Paredes-Sabja lab enriched for exosporium proteins (178) such as the (i) cysteine-rich proteins, CdeC (CD1067) (185), CdeM (CD1581) (64), and CdeA (CD2375) and (ii) the collagen-like proteins, BclA1, BclA2, and BclA3 (186, 187). Traces of coat proteins such as CotA, CotB, CotD, and CotE were also observed, which may indicate that they are part of the coat/exosporium interface (178).
While it is unclear how the C. difficile exosporium is assembled, genetic analyses have identified exosporium morphogenetic proteins. The cysteine-rich proteins, CdeC and CdeM, have been implicated in exosporium morphogenesis (D. Paredes-Sabja, unpublished data). Spores deficient in CdeC have a defective coat that is permeable to lysozyme, have a higher core water content, and are more susceptible to ethanol and heat than wild-type spores (185). Interestingly, cysteine-rich proteins are essential for the morphogenesis of the outer crust of B. subtilis and the exosporium of the B. cereus group (188–190). These Bacillus spp. cysteine-rich proteins self-assemble into two-dimensional crystalline layers (189, 191) that correlate with the two-dimensional crystalline basal layer underneath the hairy nap (extensions) on B. anthracis spores. Both CdeC and CdeM form dimers, trimers, and higher molecular weight complexes (178, 185, 192), suggesting that a similar self-assembly mechanism might govern the assembly of the outer layers of C. difficile spores.
The C. difficile BclA proteins have also been implicated in exosporium assembly: spores lacking either BclA1, BclA2, or BclA3 produce defective exosporiums (186) and exhibit heat-resistance defects (186, 193). The BclA proteins likely compose the hair-like extensions of C. difficile spores (187), since these proteins produce hair like-projections on B. anthracis spores (160). Furthermore, like B. anthracis BclA (194), C. difficile BclA3 is glycosylated (193). C. difficile BclA orthologues also appear to have a topology similar to that of B. anthracis BclA, because both proteins use their N-terminal domains to localize to the spore surface (187).
Exosporium Function in C. difficile
As the outermost layer of C. difficile spores, the exosporium may contact host component(s) that contribute to the persistence of C. difficile spores in the host (195, 196). In transmission electron microscopy analyses of clinically relevant C. difficile strains, the exosporium layer appears as electron-dense “bumps” on the spore surface with hair-like extension (185, 196). Notably, two exosporium morphotypes are observed in clonal populations: thin and thick electron-dense layers, although both have hair-like extensions (197, 198). This observation raises the possibility that the different morphotypes may have different roles during C. difficile infection, such as spore persistence and immune evasion. Consistent with this hypothesis, loss of the exosporium protein, CdeM (CD1581), decreases C. difficile fitness in gnotobiotic mice (64), and loss of individual BclA proteins, particularly BclA1, results in decreased colonization in mice (186).
CLOSTRIDIAL SPORE GERMINATION
Overview of Spore Germination and Outgrowth
During spore germination, metabolically dormant spores lose their resistance properties and transform into metabolically active cells. The low water content of the spore cytosol, known as the core, (∼25 to 40%) is critical to this resistance because it prevents metabolism (7). Ca-DPA transport is essential for dehydrating the core, while the modified peptidoglycan cortex layer is essential for maintaining this partially dehydrated state. Thus, spore germination requires the removal of this cortex layer to allow core hydration and metabolism to resume (28).
Spore germination begins when spores sense small molecules termed germinants, which trigger a signaling cascade that leads to cortex degradation, release of Ca-DPA, core hydration, and degradation of SASPs bound to the chromosome. Although many germination-related proteins are conserved in the clostridial pathogens, notable differences in their function and mechanisms of action have been identified in C. difficile, C. perfringens, and C. botulinum. As discussed below, the order in which cortex hydrolysis and core hydration occurs differs between these species and is even strain-specific in the case of C. botulinum. Furthermore, C. difficile spore germination has several unique features to its signaling pathway that are specific to C. difficile and/or Peptostreptococcaceae family members.
Germinant Sensing and Signaling
Environmental signals
In most spore-forming bacteria, germinants are nutrient signals such as amino acids, monosacharides, nucleosides, salts, and organic acids (28). In contrast, C. difficile responds to cholate-derived bile acids, which are produced exclusively in the mammalian gut (199, 200). Taurocholate is the most potent of the cholate-derived germinants, while chenodeoxycholate is an efficient competitive inhibitor of taurocholate-mediated germination (201). Bile salt-induced spore germination may not be unique to C. difficile, since taurocholate can enrich for clostridial species from fecal samples (202), and spores from Paeniclostridium sordellii, a Peptostreptococcaceae family member, germinate in response to some bile acids (203). Notably, amino acid and calcium ion cogerminants enhance taurocholate-induced C. difficile spore germination, with glycine and calcium ions being the most potent of these small molecules (199, 204, 205).
In C. perfringens and C. botulinum, germinant specificity is species and strain-specific. Universal germinants for C. perfringens food-poisoning and nonfoodborne isolate spores include l-cysteine, l-serine, l-threonine, and a mixture of l-asparagine and KCl, while unique germinants for food-poisoning isolate spores are l-asparagine, l-glutamine, KCl, and the cogerminants Na+ and Pi (206–208). Bicarbonate is a unique cogerminant for nonfoodborne spores (209). l-alanine, l-cysteine, l-methionine, l-serine, l-phenylalanine, and glycine can induce spore germination of group I proteolytic C. botulinum, although l-lactate and bicarbonate ions can act as cogerminants (210, 211). Spores of group II nonproteolytic C. botulinum germinate in response to l-alanine, l-cysteine, l-serine, l-threonine, and glycine, with l-lactate serving as a cogerminant (211, 212).
Germinant selectivity is likely influenced by adaptation to specific environmental niches. For example, the responsiveness of C. perfringens food-poisoning isolate, but not nonfoodborne isolate, spores to KCl or NaPi implies that food-poisoning isolates have adapted to food niches (i.e., processed meat products) where KCl and NaPi are highly abundant (10). Also, the finding that bicarbonate is a unique cogerminant for nonfoodborne spores, which germinate better than food-poisoning isolate spores in the presence of cultured intestinal epithelial cells (196, 210), suggests that nonfoodborne isolate spores are better adapted to germinate in the host’s intestinal epithelium environment, where bicarbonate is more prevalent (213). Similarly, the responsiveness of C. difficile spores to taurocholate may allow C. difficile to sense favorable conditions in the gut, since taurocholate levels are increased in the dysbiotic gut during antibiotic treatment (21).
While classical germinants are directly sensed through germinant receptors, nonnutrient germinants can artificially trigger germination of many bacterial species independent of germinant receptors. These include the cationic surfactant dodecylamine (28, 214), lysozyme (196), and Ca-DPA (215). While Ca-DPA activates Clostridium sporogenes (a proxy for C. botulinum group I [5]) spore germination, it does not activate C. difficile spore germination (205, 216, 217) and is a relatively weak activator of C. perfringens spore germination (218). Interestingly, although high hydrostatic pressure can induce Bacillus spp. spore germination independent of germination receptors, high pressure alone is not sufficient to induce spore germination of C. sporogenes (219), C. perfringens (220), and C. difficile (220). For C. perfringens and C. difficile, the ineffectiveness of high pressure to induce germination is likely due to differences in their germination mechanism relative to Bacillus spp. as discussed below.
Transmembrane germinant receptors in C. perfringens and C. botulinum
Almost all bacterial spores sense environmental signals through germinant receptors localized in the spore’s inner membrane; the exception to this rule is C. difficile as described below. Germinant receptors usually consist of three protein subunits (A, B, and C) encoded in a tricistronic operon (gerABC). GerA and GerB are transmembrane proteins, and GerC is a lipoprotein. Loss of any one of these components generally eliminates germinant receptor function (28, 196).
Many spore-forming bacteria encode multiple tricistronic operons, which are thought to determine the germinant specificity of given strains. While B. subtilis encodes three major germinant receptors, there are diverse arrangements for ger genes and operons in the Bacillales and Clostridiales (see 28, 196). For example, C. perfringens has a monocistronic gerAA that is distant from the gerK locus, which encodes a bicistronic gerKA-KC operon upstream of the oppositely oriented monocistronic gerKB gene (196, 206). While many Clostridium species encode monocistronic germinant receptor genes, studies of C. perfringens provided the first evidence that functional germinant receptors can consist of a single subunit. Indeed, the lipoprotein GerKC is the sole and essential germinant receptor for all known nutrient- and nonnutrient-induced germination of SM101 and F4969 spores (221, 222), in contrast to B. subtilis, in which all three subunits are essential for functional germinant receptor formation. Nevertheless, although GerAA and GerKB can play auxiliary roles in food-poisoning strain SM101 spore germination (206, 222, 223), GerAA is required for nonfoodborne strain F4969 spore germination.
Canonical GerA family germinant receptors localize to the spore’s inner membrane in several species, including B. subtilis (224) and C. botulinum (225). The GerKC subunit is present in the inner membrane of C. perfringens spores at ∼250 molecules/spore (221); the abundance and relative stoichiometry of the GerKA, GerKB, and GerAA subunits is unclear.
gerA family operons can also contain an additional gerAD gene, which encodes a novel protein of 50 to 80 residues with two highly conserved transmembrane sequences in some Bacillales and Clostridiales species (196). Although GerAD is required for functional germinant receptor formation in Bacillus spp. (226, 227), their role in Clostridiales spore germination remains unclear.
Genomic analyses of C. botulinum strains have identified four gerABC subtypes (gerX type1 to 4) (211). gerX indicates that the germinant recognized by the receptor encoded in the locus is unknown. Notably, although group II C. botulinum (gIICb) encodes only one predicted canonical germinant receptor despite being able to respond to many amino acids, deletion of gerBAC from gIICb strain NCTC 11219 does not affect germination in response to nutrient or nonnutrient germinants (228). Thus, unidentified germinant receptors appear to mediate spore germination in gIICb in the absence of gerABC.
Germinant receptor-mediated spore germination is heat-activatable through a mechanism that is thought to involve conformational changes in the inner membrane germinant receptors and that potentiate their activation (28). Accordingly, both C. perfringens and C. botulinum spore germination can be enhanced by a transient heat shock (229, 230). In contrast, C. difficile spore germination is not heat-activatable, consistent with the absence of germinant receptor genes in its genome (217, 231).
A pseudoprotease, CspC, is the bile salt germinant receptor in C. difficile
Since C. difficile lacks germinant receptors, it was unclear how it senses bile salt germinants, which are structurally distinct from the nutritional germinants sensed by germinant receptor-encoding spore-formers. Joseph Sorg’s group identified the elusive C. difficile germinant receptor using a genetic selection for germination-defective mutants (232). This screen identified seven point mutations in cspC, which encodes a pseudoprotease from the subtilisin-like serine protease family, and two nonsense mutations in cspBA, which encodes a fusion protein consisting of CspB and CspA subtilisin-like serine proteases (Fig. 6). While the CspB protease is catalytically active, both C. difficile CspA and CspC are pseudoproteases because they harbor two point mutations in their catalytic triads (233). Subsequent work revealed that CspBA is required for CspC incorporation into spores such that the cspBA nonsense mutations identified in the screen effectively lead to loss of CspC (234, 235).
FIGURE 6.

Putative locations of germination regulators in C. difficile and C. perfringens. Germinant signaling proteins, CspC (pseudoprotease and germinant receptor) and its downstream effectors, the CspB protease, and cortex hydrolase, SleC, are all produced in the mother cell under the control of either σE or σK (137–139). CspB is produced as a fusion to the pseudoprotease, CspA, which is critical for CspC incorporation into mature spores (233–235); all three Csp proteins are incorporated into mature spores. GerG is required for optimal incorporation of CspC, CspB, and CspA into mature spores (253). The GerS lipoprotein (248) is produced in the mother cell and does not directly participate in spore germination (O. Diaz and A. Shen, unpublished data), even though it is required for spore germination to proceed. The ATP/GTP binding protein CD3298 presumably localizes to the cytosolic face of the outer forespore membrane and regulates calcium release and possibly internalization (205). Germinant sensing induces the proteolytic activation of SleC by CspB in both organisms, but CspA and/or CspC can cleave SleC in C. perfringens (marked in brackets) (218, 242, 245), since they are active proteases unlike their cognate partners in C. difficile (233). C. perfringens also produces inner membrane-bound germinant receptors, similar to most spore-forming organisms, in the forespore, in contrast to the soluble CspC protein used by C. difficile to sense germinant. The locations of all proteins in mature spores is putative, with the exception of SleC, which has been shown to localize to the C. perfringens cortex region by immuno-electron microscopy (251).
CspC was further implicated as the direct receptor for bile salts using a second genetic screen for altered spore germinant specificity. By selecting for spores that germinate in response to the germination inhibitor, chenodeoxycholate (201), the Sorg group determined that a single point mutation in CspC (G457R) could change the ability of C. difficile spores to sense cholate versus deoxycholate derivatives (232). Although direct binding of bile acids to CspC has yet to be demonstrated biochemically, germinant binding to germinant receptors has not been established in any organism.
ACTIVATION OF CORTEX HYDROLYSIS IN CLOSTRIDIAL PATHOGENS
Just as clostridial pathogens use two mechanisms for sensing germinants, these organisms use two mechanisms to degrade their cortex: (i) proteolytic activation of the cortex hydrolase, SleC, and (ii) DPA-mediated activation of the cortex hydrolases CwlJ and/or SleB (Fig. 7) (28). C. perfringens and C. difficile use the SleC pathway, while C. botulinum uses either mechanism in a strain-specific manner, with groups I and III using CwlJ/SleB (211, 230, 236) and groups II and IV presumably using the SleC pathway. While cortex hydrolases are thought to specifically recognize the muramic-δ-lactam modification that characterizes cortex peptidoglycan (237), the CspB-SleC cortex hydrolysis pathway is only found in the clostridia, whereas the CwlJ/SleB system is present in the bacilli and some members of the clostridia (196).
FIGURE 7.

Schematic of spore germination signaling pathways. Germinants that are sensed by B. subtilis, C. botulinum, C. perfringens, and C. difficile are shown in dark blue; C. botulinum group I and III germinants are shown in the brackets (and include l-Ala). Amino acid and calcium ion cogerminants are not pictured for C. difficile (199, 204, 205). Germinant receptors are shown in green. The signaling pathway between B. subtilis and C. botulinum groups 1 and III (far left) differs from the other clostridial organisms mainly with respect to cortex hydrolase (shown in orange) activation mechanisms, with SleC being activated by proteolytic cleavage by Csp proteases, and the CwlJ and SleB cortex hydrolases being activated directly or indirectly by DPA release. Accordingly, the order of cortex hydrolysis and DPA release via SpoVAC differs between these two types of mechanisms. C. botulinum groups II and IV encode germinant receptors with variable numbers of A and B components. Adapted from reference 183.
Proteolytic Activation of the SleC Cortex Hydrolase in C. perfringens and C. difficile
SleC was first identified as a cortex hydrolase in biochemical fractionations of germinating C. perfringens exudates (238, 239) and was subsequently shown to have lytic transglycosylase and amidase activities (240). SleC’s long N-terminal predomain acts as an intramolecular chaperone to ensure proper folding of its hydrolase domain (241). The predomain is removed by proteolysis in a YabG-dependent manner (at least in C. difficile [235]) to generate the pro-SleC zymogen. This immature form remains in mature spores until germinant signaling induces the proteolytic removal SleC’s inhibitory propeptide to generate active SleC (242).
The proteases responsible for activating SleC were identified as CspA, CspB, and CspC in biochemical fractionations of C. perfringens strain S40 germinating exudates (242, 243). These three proteases are members of the subtilisin-like serine protease family (243) and are encoded by a tricistronic operon immediately upstream of the sleC gene in C. perfringens strain S40 (244). While nonfoodborne C. perfringens strains encode this tricistronic operon, C. perfringens food-poisoning strain SM101 encodes cspB alone upstream of sleC (4, 245, 246). Genetic analyses in SM101 revealed that C. perfringens CspB is sufficient to proteolytically activate SleC, since cspB mutant spores exhibit 104-fold germination and cortex hydrolysis defects relative to the wild type (245) and fail to process pro-SleC into active SleC in response to germinants (245).
SleC is the major cortex hydrolase in C. perfringens, since sleC mutant spores have a 103 germination defect relative to the wild type (218). The SleM cortex hydrolase (247) functions as an accessory cortex hydrolase, since a sleM mutant exhibits wild-type germination, but a sleC sleM double mutant has a 100-fold more severe germination defect than the sleC single mutant (218).
The CspB protease and SleC cortex hydrolase have similar functions in C. difficile, since loss of CspB leads to an ∼103 to 105 germination defect (233, 234), and complementation with the wild-type cspB, but not a catalytic mutant, restores germination and pro-SleC cleavage (233). Loss of sleC also results in a similar ∼103-fold germination defect relative to the wild type (234) and an inability to hydrolyze cortex (216, 248). However, in contrast with the tricistronic cspA-cspB-cspC operon in some C. perfringens strains, C. difficile strains (and other Peptostreptococcaceae family members) universally encode cspB fused to cspA, with cspC encoded downstream of the cspBA fusion gene (cspBA-cspC) (235).
SleC and Csp proteins are produced in the mother cell of both C. perfringens and C. difficile (137–139, 249). Western blot analyses of spore fractions in C. perfringens and C. difficile indicate that CspB and SleC localize to a coat-extractable fraction (248, 250). However, C. perfringens SleC can be visualized in the cortex region of mature spores using immune-electron microscopy (251), indicating that fractions previously assumed to comprise coat proteins alone extract proteins from the cortex region. Interestingly, neither C. perfringens nor C. difficile SleC harbor signal sequences, raising the question of how they are targeted to the intermembrane space (assuming Csp proteins are targeted to this region).
The crystal structure of C. perfringens CspB revealed that Csp proteins consist of three main domains: a long N-terminal prodomain, a subtilisin fold, and an internal jelly roll domain (233, 243). Like other subtilisin-like proteases, C. perfringens and C. difficile CspB have a catalytic triad consisting of Asp, His, and Ser, and the prodomain undergoes autoprocessing (233, 243). However, unlike almost all previously studied subtilisin-like serine proteases, both C. perfringens and C. difficile CspB remain bound to their prodomain following autoprocessing in vitro (233, 243). The prodomain sterically inhibits recombinant CspB activity (233), but it is unclear whether it stays bound to CspB in mature spores. Regardless, the prodomain presumably must be removed during spore germination to allow CspB to bind its presumed substrate, SleC. The central jelly roll domain within the subtilase domain is another unique feature of CspB; this domain markedly increases the conformational rigidity of CspB in vitro and is necessary for stable CspB production in C. difficile (233).
CspB activity has been proposed to require calcium based on the observation that calcium is a critical cogerminant during taurocholate-induced C. difficile spore germination (205). Depletion of calcium in vitro and in intestinal extracts reduces wild-type C. difficile spore germination and abrogates spore germination in a strain lacking CD3298, an ATP/GTP binding protein required for releasing calcium during germination (205). While these data indicate that calcium is a key adjuvant during C. difficile spore germination, the precise stage regulated by calcium is unclear, since it could affect CspB activity, CspC activation, germinant permeability, or as-yet-unidentified events. Whether calcium is required for C. perfringens spore germination remains to be tested.
Collectively, germinant signaling triggers CspB-dependent processing of inactive pro-SleC into active SleC, which subsequently degrades the cortex in both C. perfringens and C. difficile. It is unclear how germinant signaling leads to CspB activation, especially since these two organisms use different germinant receptors. The topology of these receptors also differs between these organisms, with Ger receptors being embedded in the C. perfringens forespore-derived membrane, and soluble C. difficile CspC being made in the mother cell (Fig. 6) (28, 200). C. difficile CspC has been hypothesized to be transported across the mother cell-derived membrane into the intermembrane space so that it can activate CspB through protein-protein interactions (200, 234, 252, 253). CspB in C. perfringens and C. difficile is presumably also transported into the intermembrane space so that it can activate its substrate SleC, which has been localized to this region in C. perfringens by immuno-electron microscopy (251). Clearly, many questions regarding the molecular details of this process remain to be addressed.
DPA-Mediated Activation of Cortex Hydrolases in Group I C. botulinum
Gene conservation predicts that C. botulinum groups II and IV activate cortex hydrolysis via CspB-mediated proteolytic activation of pro-SleC (211), but group I (and likely group III based on homology) use the partially redundant cortex hydrolases, CwlJ and SleB, to remove their cortex layer (211, 230, 236). Both hydrolases are produced in their mature form, but their activation appears to be tied to Ca-DPA release as observed in B. subtilis (28, 254). C. sporogenes (a proxy for group I C. botulinum) cwlJ mutant spores do not germinate in response to Ca-DPA, unlike sleB mutant spores (230, 255) and similar to analogous mutants in B. subtilis (256). In B. subtilis, SleB activity is directly inhibited by YpeB (254), but the mechanism by which SleB is activated during germination is unknown. C. botulinum group I sleB and ypeB mutants exhibit 2- to 3-log defects in spore germination based on colony forming units, whereas cwlJ mutant spores produce wild-type levels of colonies on rich media (236). In contrast, cwlJ and sleB mutant spores in C. sporogenes have similar germination defects in single-spore germination analyses (230). Regardless, CwlJ and SleB likely have partially overlapping functions during group I C. botulinum spore germination, so a double mutant lacking both enzymes would presumably exhibit a severe germination defect similar to that in B. subtilis (257). Interestingly, both group I and group III C. botulinum spp. can encode multiple SleB homologs (211), suggesting that there may be additional redundancy in regulating cortex hydrolysis.
Ca-DPA and Spore Formation versus Germination
Ca-DPA is a spore-specific molecule that makes up 5 to 15% of spore dry weight (256). It is synthesized in the mother cell from lysine biosynthesis intermediates (258) and transported across the outer and inner forespore membranes by SpoVV (259) and SpoVAC (260, 261), respectively, in exchange for water. While the partial dehydration of the core by Ca-DPA transport into the forespore confers heat resistance to mature spores (256, 261, 262), Ca-DPA is differentially required for spore formation. In B. subtilis, mutants defective in synthesizing or transporting Ca-DPA cannot stably form spores due to premature germination and cortex hydrolase activation (256, 259, 260). Similar to B. subtilis, C. sporogenes spoVA mutants also produce unstable spores, presumably due to premature SleB activation (211). In contrast, C. difficile mutants defective in synthesizing or transporting Ca-DPA can stably form spores, although they are less dense than wild-type spores (261). Interestingly, Ca-DPA synthesis is necessary for C. perfringens spore formation (263), but Ca-DPA transport is not (262). Since Ca-DPA does not strongly induce C. perfringens germination (262), presumably because it uses the CspB-SleC pathway to activate cortex hydrolysis, it is unclear why DPA is required for spore formation in C. perfringens but not in C. difficile. This difference may reflect the different mechanisms used by these organisms to synthesize Ca-DPA. While C. difficile uses dihydro-dipicolinate synthase (DpaAB or SpoVFAB) to produce Ca-DPA, C. perfringens uses an electron transfer flavoprotein, EftA, to make this molecule. Since C. botulinum lacks SpoVFAB homologs and likely uses EftA, DPA-less C. botulinum spores likely will not be stably produced.
Cortex Hydrolysis Precedes Ca-DPA Release in C. difficile
While Ca-DPA release activates cortex hydrolysis in group I C. botulinum and other CwlJ/SleB-controlled systems, cortex hydrolysis is necessary for Ca-DPA release in C. difficile (261). Cortex hydrolysis activates the mechanosensitive SpoVAC channel (264) to release Ca-DPA from the core, since C. difficile spores germinated in high osmolyte solutions degrade their cortex normally but release Ca-DPA more slowly (265). Furthermore, C. difficile sleC mutant spores do not release Ca-DPA (216, 217). A similar mechanosensing phenomenon may occur in C. perfringens, since a sleC-sleM double mutant and a cspB mutant exhibit major defects in Ca-DPA release (218, 245). Thus, the CspB-SleC cortex degradation pathway likely induces Ca-DPA release, while the order of these events is reversed in spores that use CwlJ and SleB to degrade their cortex (28).
Events after Cortex Hydrolysis and Ca-DPA Release
While recent studies have provided critical insight into the early stages of germination in clostridial pathogens, namely germinant sensing, cortex hydrolysis, and Ca-DPA release, little is known about subsequent events. Ca-DPA release in C. difficile leads to core hydration based on the observation that the optical density of germinating dpaAB– and spoVAC– spores decreases by ∼50% relative to the wild type, whereas the optical density of sleC– spores remains unchanged (261). Core hydration allows metabolism to resume, and transcript levels increase within 15 min of germination (231).
In B. subtilis, Ca-DPA release activates the Gpr germination protease (266), which degrades SASPs coating the nucleoid. The amino acids liberated by SASP degradation provide substrates for both catabolism and metabolism (267). It is currently unclear whether Ca-DPA activates Gpr homologs in clostridial pathogens.
Loss of Resistance Properties During Germination
The hydration of the core during spore germination allows metabolism to resume while concomitantly leading to loss of resistance. This is because the resistance properties of spores can largely be attributed to (i) the low water content of metabolically dormant spores and (ii) the coating of the genetic material by SASPs, which collectively prevent metabolic activity in the spore core. Indeed, B. subtilis mutant spores with higher water content or lacking SASP proteins are more sensitive to heat (256, 268) and in the latter case are more sensitive to UV irradiation (269, 270). Although B. subtilis produces three major types of SASP proteins (α, β, and γ), which are encoded by multiple genes (269), SspA and SspB (α and β, respectively) are the major SASPs coating the chromosome and the primary contributors to B. subtilis spores’ resistance to UV and solar radiation (270).
Similar to B. subtilis, C. difficile and C. perfringens mutant spores with higher spore water content are more susceptible to heat (261, 262, 271) and UV irradiation, possibly because increased hydration reduces SASP binding to DNA (262, 271). Consistent with this idea, C. perfringens food-poisoning isolates with extreme resistance properties (e.g., type A chromosomal cpe and type C Darmbrand strains) produce an Ssp4 variant (also known as SASP4) that binds DNA with higher affinity than Ssp4 variants from more heat-sensitive C. perfringens isolates (272, 273). Mutational analyses indicate that this Ssp4 variant is a major determinant controlling the extreme heat resistance of certain food-poisoning strains. Interestingly, Ssp4 exhibits only ∼20% sequence identity relative to the three other SASP proteins (Ssp1 to Ssp3) produced by C. perfringens strains, suggesting that this Ssp4 variant may be a specific adaptation of food-poisoning isolates (e.g., SM101). Indeed, it should be noted that Ssp1 to Ssp3 have been shown to confer UV resistance to C. perfringens food-poisoning strain SM101 spores using antisense RNA silencing methods (274).
C. botulinum encodes four SASPs, CBO1789, CBO1790, CBO3048, and CBO3145. This latter protein exhibits the lowest sequence conservation and is dispensable for resistance to nitrous acid (275) and thus may function similarly to B. subtilis SASP γ in acting as a food source for the outgrowing spore (276). Mutational analyses indicate that CB01789 and CPB01790 are primarily responsible for conferring resistance to nitrous acid, an oxidizing agent (275).
The role of SASPs in conferring resistance to C. difficile spores has not been examined, although RNA-Seq analyses suggest that SspA and SspB are the predominant SASPs produced (137). C. difficile spores are less resistant to heat than B. subtilis and C. perfringens spores, since C. difficile spores are readily killed at temperatures above 80°C (261).
CONCLUSIONS AND UNIQUE FEATURES OF C. DIFFICILE SPORE GERMINATION
Diverse pathways are clearly used by group I C. botulinum, C. perfringens, and C. difficile to mediate spore germination. The pathway used by group I C. botulinum spore germination most resembles Bacillus spp. germination, with germinant receptors sensing amino acids and stimulating Ca-DPA release followed by cortex hydrolysis by CwlJ and SleB (28). While C. perfringens spore germination also uses germinant receptors to sense nutrient germinants such as amino acids, germinant sensing activates the CspB-SleC cortex hydrolysis pathway, after which most Ca-DPA is released. C. difficile spore germination is the most divergent, with its unique germinant receptor, the CspC pseudoprotease, sensing bile acids. Like C. perfringens, germinant sensing activates the CspB-SleC cortex hydrolysis pathway, and the change in pressure caused by the resulting cortex hydrolysis induces SpoVAC to release Ca-DPA.
Although CspA, CspB, and CspC are conserved in many clostridial organisms, they are produced as single protease domains in the Clostridiaceae and Lachnospiraceae families and as a CspB-CspA fusion protein in the Peptostreptococcaceae family (235). Furthermore, CspB is the only active serine protease, with CspC and the CspA domain being pseudoproteases. Since CspA is critical for incorporating the germinant receptor and pseudoproteases, CspC, into mature spores (234, 235), the catalytic site mutations within CspA and CspC, which are largely conserved across Peptostreptococcaceae family members (235), appear to confer unique functions to these proteins.
Recent studies have identified two unique proteins that modulate C. difficile spore germination. GerG (CD0311) is a C. difficile-specific gel-forming protein that is necessary for incorporating CspA, CspB, and CspC into mature spores, while GerS (CD3464) is a Peptostreptococcace family-specific lipoprotein that is necessary for cortex hydrolysis (248) because it is necessary for generating the muramic-δ-lactam required for SleC to recognize its cortex substrate (Diaz and Shen, unpublished data).
While the Csp pseudoproteases, GerG, and GerS are distinguishing features of the C. difficile spore germination pathway, it is likely that additional novel regulators specific to certain clostridial families will be identified as this fascinating developmental process is studied using the genetic tools recently developed for studying clostridial pathogens (140, 277–279).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Research reported in this article was funded by award numbers R21AI126067 and R01AI22232 from the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), award number R01GM108684 from the National Institutes of General Medical Sciences, and a Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences grant from the Pew Charitable Trusts to A.S.; R01 AI116933 from NIAID to A.N.E.; N.L. Tartar Foundation and the Agricultural Research Foundation of Oregon State University to M.R.S; and Fondecyt Regular 1151025 from the Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de Chile to D.P.S.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Pew Charitable Trusts, NIAID, or the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Contributor Information
Aimee Shen, Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University Medical School, Boston, MA.
Adrianne N. Edwards, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
Mahfuzur R. Sarker, Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR Department of Microbiology, College of Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Daniel Paredes-Sabja, Department of Gut Microbiota and Clostridia Research Group, Departamento de Ciencias Biolo gicas, Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Vincent A. Fischetti, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY
Richard P. Novick, Skirball Institute for Molecular Medicine, NYU Medical Center, New York, NY
Joseph J. Ferretti, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK
Daniel A. Portnoy, Department of Molecular and Cellular Microbiology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Miriam Braunstein, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Julian I. Rood, Infection and Immunity Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
REFERENCES
- 1.Yutin N, Galperin MY. 2013. A genomic update on clostridial phylogeny: Gram-negative spore formers and other misplaced clostridia. Environ Microbiol 15:2631–2641. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.He M, Sebaihia M, Lawley TD, Stabler RA, Dawson LF, Martin MJ, Holt KE, Seth-Smith HM, Quail MA, Rance R, Brooks K, Churcher C, Harris D, Bentley SD, Burrows C, Clark L, Corton C, Murray V, Rose G, Thurston S, van Tonder A, Walker D, Wren BW, Dougan G, Parkhill J. 2010. Evolutionary dynamics of Clostridium difficile over short and long time scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:7527–7532 10.1073/pnas.0914322107. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Miyamoto K, Li J, McClane BA. 2012. Enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens: detection and identification. Microbes Environ 27:343–349 10.1264/jsme2.ME12002.[PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Myers GS, Rasko DA, Cheung JK, Ravel J, Seshadri R, DeBoy RT, Ren Q, Varga J, Awad MM, Brinkac LM, Daugherty SC, Haft DH, Dodson RJ, Madupu R, Nelson WC, Rosovitz MJ, Sullivan SA, Khouri H, Dimitrov GI, Watkins KL, Mulligan S, Benton J, Radune D, Fisher DJ, Atkins HS, Hiscox T, Jost BH, Billington SJ, Songer JG, McClane BA, Titball RW, Rood JI, Melville SB, Paulsen IT. 2006. Skewed genomic variability in strains of the toxigenic bacterial pathogen, Clostridium perfringens. Genome Res 16:1031–1040 10.1101/gr.5238106. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Smith TJ, Hill KK, Raphael BH. 2015. Historical and current perspectives on Clostridium botulinum diversity. Res Microbiol 166:290–302 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Deakin LJ, Clare S, Fagan RP, Dawson LF, Pickard DJ, West MR, Wren BW, Fairweather NF, Dougan G, Lawley TD. 2012. The Clostridium difficile spo0A gene is a persistence and transmission factor. Infect Immun 80:2704–2711 10.1128/IAI.00147-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Setlow P. 2014. Spore resistance properties. Microbiol Spectr 2:TBS-0003-2012. 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBS-0003-2012. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Swick MC, Koehler TM, Driks A. 2016. Surviving between hosts: sporulation and transmission. Microbiol Spectr 4:VMBF-0029-2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stevens DL, Aldape MJ, Bryant AE. 2012. Life-threatening clostridial infections. Anaerobe 18:254–259 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.11.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li J, Paredes-Sabja D, Sarker MR, McClane BA. 2016. Clostridium perfringens sporulation and sporulation-associated toxin production. Microbiol Spectr 4:TBS-0022-2015. 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBS-0022-2015. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Deguchi A, Miyamoto K, Kuwahara T, Miki Y, Kaneko I, Li J, McClane BA, Akimoto S. 2009. Genetic characterization of type A enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens strains. PLoS One 4:e5598 10.1371/journal.pone.0005598. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li J, McClane BA. 2006. Further comparison of temperature effects on growth and survival of Clostridium perfringens type A isolates carrying a chromosomal or plasmid-borne enterotoxin gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4561–4568 10.1128/AEM.00177-06. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sarker MR, Shivers RP, Sparks SG, Juneja VK, McClane BA. 2000. Comparative experiments to examine the effects of heating on vegetative cells and spores of Clostridium perfringens isolates carrying plasmid genes versus chromosomal enterotoxin genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3234–3240 10.1128/AEM.66.8.3234-3240.2000. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 14.Peck MW. 2009. Biology and genomic analysis of Clostridium botulinum. Adv Microb Physiol 55:183–265, 320 10.1016/S0065-2911(09)05503-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Peck MW, Smith TJ, Anniballi F, Austin JW, Bano L, Bradshaw M, Cuervo P, Cheng LW, Derman Y, Dorner BG, Fisher A, Hill KK, Kalb SR, Korkeala H, Lindström M, Lista F, Lúquez C, Mazuet C, Pirazzini M, Popoff MR, Rossetto O, Rummel A, Sesardic D, Singh BR, Stringer SC. 2017. Historical perspectives and guidelines for botulinum neurotoxin subtype nomenclature. Toxins (Basel) 9:E38 10.3390/toxins9010038. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Grabowski NT, Klein G. 2017. Microbiology and foodborne pathogens in honey. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 57:1852–1862. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dahlsten E, Lindström M, Korkeala H. 2015. Mechanisms of food processing and storage-related stress tolerance in Clostridium botulinum. Res Microbiol 166:344–352 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.09.011. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lessa FC, Mu Y, Bamberg WM, Beldavs ZG, Dumyati GK, Dunn JR, Farley MM, Holzbauer SM, Meek JI, Phipps EC, Wilson LE, Winston LG, Cohen JA, Limbago BM, Fridkin SK, Gerding DN, McDonald LC. 2015. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med 372:825–834 10.1056/NEJMoa1408913. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nagy E. 2018. What do we know about the diagnostics, treatment and epidemiology of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in Europe? J Infect Chemother 24:164–170 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.12.003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Smits WK, Lyras D, Lacy DB, Wilcox MH, Kuijper EJ. 2016. Clostridium difficile infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2:16020 10.1038/nrdp.2016.20. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Theriot CM, Koenigsknecht MJ, Carlson PE Jr, Hatton GE, Nelson AM, Li B, Huffnagle GB, Z Li J, Young VB. 2014. Antibiotic-induced shifts in the mouse gut microbiome and metabolome increase susceptibility to Clostridium difficile infection. Nat Commun 5:3114 10.1038/ncomms4114. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Edwards AN, Karim ST, Pascual RA, Jowhar LM, Anderson SE, McBride SM. 2016. Chemical and stress resistances of Clostridium difficile spores and vegetative cells. Front Microbiol 7:1698 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01698. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lawley TD, Clare S, Deakin LJ, Goulding D, Yen JL, Raisen C, Brandt C, Lovell J, Cooke F, Clark TG, Dougan G. 2010. Use of purified Clostridium difficile spores to facilitate evaluation of health care disinfection regimens. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:6895–6900 10.1128/AEM.00718-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jou J, Ebrahim J, Shofer FS, Hamilton KW, Stern J, Han JH, Program CDCPE, CDC Prevention Epicenters Program. 2015. Environmental transmission of Clostridium difficile: association between hospital room size and C. difficile infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 36:564–568 10.1017/ice.2015.18. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tan IS, Ramamurthi KS. 2014. Spore formation in Bacillus subtilis. Environ Microbiol Rep 6:212–225 10.1111/1758-2229.12130. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Setlow P. 2006. Spores of Bacillus subtilis: their resistance to and killing by radiation, heat and chemicals. J Appl Microbiol 101:514–525 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02736.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Imae Y, Strominger JL. 1976. Cortex content of asporogenous mutants of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 126:914–918. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Setlow P, Wang S, Li YQ. 2017. Germination of spores of the orders Bacillales and Clostridiales. Annu Rev Microbiol 71:459–477 10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093558. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Huang IH, Waters M, Grau RR, Sarker MR. 2004. Disruption of the gene (spo0A) encoding sporulation transcription factor blocks endospore formation and enterotoxin production in enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens type A. FEMS Microbiol Lett 233:233–240 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2004.tb09487.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mascher G, Mertaoja A, Korkeala H, Lindström M. 2017. Neurotoxin synthesis is positively regulated by the sporulation transcription factor Spo0A in Clostridium botulinum type E. Environ Microbiol 19:4287–4300 10.1111/1462-2920.13892. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rosenbusch KE, Bakker D, Kuijper EJ, Smits WK. 2012. C. difficile 630Δerm Spo0A regulates sporulation, but does not contribute to toxin production, by direct high-affinity binding to target DNA. PLoS One 7:e48608 10.1371/journal.pone.0048608. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Underwood S, Guan S, Vijayasubhash V, Baines SD, Graham L, Lewis RJ, Wilcox MH, Stephenson K. 2009. Characterization of the sporulation initiation pathway of Clostridium difficile and its role in toxin production. J Bacteriol 191:7296–7305 10.1128/JB.00882-09. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wörner K, Szurmant H, Chiang C, Hoch JA. 2006. Phosphorylation and functional analysis of the sporulation initiation factor Spo0A from Clostridium botulinum. Mol Microbiol 59:1000–1012 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04988.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Green BD, Olmedo G, Youngman P. 1991. A genetic analysis of Spo0A structure and function. Res Microbiol 142:825–830 10.1016/0923-2508(91)90061-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sonenshein AL. 2000. Control of sporulation initiation in Bacillus subtilis. Curr Opin Microbiol 3:561–566 10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00141-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Burbulys D, Trach KA, Hoch JA. 1991. Initiation of sporulation in B. subtilis is controlled by a multicomponent phosphorelay. Cell 64:545–552 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90238-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Perego M, Hanstein C, Welsh KM, Djavakhishvili T, Glaser P, Hoch JA. 1994. Multiple protein-aspartate phosphatases provide a mechanism for the integration of diverse signals in the control of development in B. subtilis. Cell 79:1047–1055 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90035-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chastanet A, Vitkup D, Yuan GC, Norman TM, Liu JS, Losick RM. 2010. Broadly heterogeneous activation of the master regulator for sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:8486–8491 10.1073/pnas.1002499107. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mirouze N, Prepiak P, Dubnau D. 2011. Fluctuations in spo0A transcription control rare developmental transitions in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Genet 7:e1002048 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002048. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Russell JR, Cabeen MT, Wiggins PA, Paulsson J, Losick R. 2017. Noise in a phosphorelay drives stochastic entry into sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. EMBO J 36:2856–2869 10.15252/embj.201796988. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Galperin MY, Mekhedov SL, Puigbo P, Smirnov S, Wolf YI, Rigden DJ. 2012. Genomic determinants of sporulation in bacilli and clostridia: towards the minimal set of sporulation-specific genes. Environ Microbiol 14:2870–2890 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02841.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Paredes CJ, Alsaker KV, Papoutsakis ET. 2005. A comparative genomic view of clostridial sporulation and physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:969–978 10.1038/nrmicro1288. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dürre P, Hollergschwandner C. 2004. Initiation of endospore formation in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Anaerobe 10:69–74 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2003.11.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mearls EB, Lynd LR. 2014. The identification of four histidine kinases that influence sporulation in Clostridium thermocellum. Anaerobe 28:109–119 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.06.004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Steiner E, Dago AE, Young DI, Heap JT, Minton NP, Hoch JA, Young M. 2011. Multiple orphan histidine kinases interact directly with Spo0A to control the initiation of endospore formation in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Mol Microbiol 80:641–654 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07608.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Stephenson K, Lewis RJ. 2005. Molecular insights into the initiation of sporulation in Gram-positive bacteria: new technologies for an old phenomenon. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:281–301 10.1016/j.fmrre.2004.10.003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Childress KO, Edwards AN, Nawrocki KL, Anderson SE, Woods EC, McBride SM. 2016. The phosphotransfer protein CD1492 represses sporulation initiation in Clostridium difficile. Infect Immun 84:3434–3444 10.1128/IAI.00735-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Aguilar C, Vlamakis H, Guzman A, Losick R, Kolter R. 2010. KinD is a checkpoint protein linking spore formation to extracellular-matrix production in Bacillus subtilis biofilms. MBio 1:e00035-10 10.1128/mBio.00035-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jiang M, Shao W, Perego M, Hoch JA. 2000. Multiple histidine kinases regulate entry into stationary phase and sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 38:535–542 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02148.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Edwards AN, McBride SM. 2017. Determination of the in vitro sporulation frequency of Clostridium difficile. Bio Protoc 7:e2125 10.21769/BioProtoc.2125. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Edwards AN, Tamayo R, McBride SM. 2016. A novel regulator controls Clostridium difficile sporulation, motility and toxin production. Mol Microbiol 100:954–971 10.1111/mmi.13361. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Neiditch MB, Capodagli GC, Prehna G, Federle MJ. 2017. Genetic and structural analyses of RRNPP intercellular peptide signaling of Gram-positive bacteria. Annu Rev Genet 51:311–333 10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-023507. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rocha-Estrada J, Aceves-Diez AE, Guarneros G, de la Torre M. 2010. The RNPP family of quorum-sensing proteins in Gram-positive bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:913–923 10.1007/s00253-010-2651-y. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kotte A, Severn O, Bean Z, Schwarz K, Minton NP, Winzer K. 2017. RNPP-type quorum sensing regualtes solvent formation and sporulation in Clostridium acetobutylicum. bioRxiv 10.1101/106666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Edwards AN, Nawrocki KL, McBride SM. 2014. Conserved oligopeptide permeases modulate sporulation initiation in Clostridium difficile. Infect Immun 82:4276–4291 10.1128/IAI.02323-14. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Antunes A, Camiade E, Monot M, Courtois E, Barbut F, Sernova NV, Rodionov DA, Martin-Verstraete I, Dupuy B. 2012. Global transcriptional control by glucose and carbon regulator CcpA in Clostridium difficile. Nucleic Acids Res 40:10701–10718 10.1093/nar/gks864. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Antunes A, Martin-Verstraete I, Dupuy B. 2011. CcpA-mediated repression of Clostridium difficile toxin gene expression. Mol Microbiol 79:882–899 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07495.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dineen SS, McBride SM, Sonenshein AL. 2010. Integration of metabolism and virulence by Clostridium difficile CodY. J Bacteriol 192:5350–5362 10.1128/JB.00341-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Dineen SS, Villapakkam AC, Nordman JT, Sonenshein AL. 2007. Repression of Clostridium difficile toxin gene expression by CodY. Mol Microbiol 66:206–219 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05906.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Girinathan BP, Ou J, Dupuy B, Govind R. 2018. Pleiotropic roles of Clostridium difficile sin locus. PLoS Pathog 14:e1006940 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006940. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nawrocki KL, Edwards AN, Daou N, Bouillaut L, McBride SM. 2016. CodY-dependent regulation of sporulation in Clostridium difficile. J Bacteriol 198:2113–2130 10.1128/JB.00220-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kint N, Janoir C, Monot M, Hoys S, Soutourina O, Dupuy B, Martin-Verstraete I. 2017. The alternative sigma factor σB plays a crucial role in adaptive strategies of Clostridium difficile during gut infection. Environ Microbiol 19:1933–1958 10.1111/1462-2920.13696. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Edwards AN, McBride SM. 2014. Initiation of sporulation in Clostridium difficile: a twist on the classic model. FEMS Microbiol Lett 358:110–118 10.1111/1574-6968.12499. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Janoir C, Denève C, Bouttier S, Barbut F, Hoys S, Caleechum L, Chapetón-Montes D, Pereira FC, Henriques AO, Collignon A, Monot M, Dupuy B. 2013. Adaptive strategies and pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile from in vivo transcriptomics. Infect Immun 81:3757–3769 10.1128/IAI.00515-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Harry KH, Zhou R, Kroos L, Melville SB. 2009. Sporulation and enterotoxin (CPE) synthesis are controlled by the sporulation-specific sigma factors SigE and SigK in Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol 191:2728–2742 10.1128/JB.01839-08. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Li J, Chen J, Vidal JE, McClane BA. 2011. The Agr-like quorum-sensing system regulates sporulation and production of enterotoxin and beta2 toxin by Clostridium perfringens type A non-food-borne human gastrointestinal disease strain F5603. Infect Immun 79:2451–2459 10.1128/IAI.00169-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Li J, Freedman JC, Evans DR, McClane BA. 2017. CodY promotes sporulation and enterotoxin production by Clostridium perfringens type A strain SM101. Infect Immun 85:85 10.1128/IAI.00855-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Varga J, Stirewalt VL, Melville SB. 2004. The CcpA protein is necessary for efficient sporulation and enterotoxin gene (cpe) regulation in Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol 186:5221–5229 10.1128/JB.186.16.5221-5229.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Li J, Ma M, Sarker MR, McClane BA. 2013. CodY is a global regulator of virulence-associated properties for Clostridium perfringens type D strain CN3718. MBio 4:e00770-13 10.1128/mBio.00770-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ohtani K, Hirakawa H, Paredes-Sabja D, Tashiro K, Kuhara S, Sarker MR, Shimizu T. 2013. Unique regulatory mechanism of sporulation and enterotoxin production in Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol 195:2931–2936 10.1128/JB.02152-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Talukdar PK, Olguín-Araneda V, Alnoman M, Paredes-Sabja D, Sarker MR. 2015. Updates on the sporulation process in Clostridium species. Res Microbiol 166:225–235 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.12.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yasugi M, Okuzaki D, Kuwana R, Takamatsu H, Fujita M, Sarker MR, Miyake M. 2016. Transcriptional profile during deoxycholate-induced sporulation in a Clostridium perfringens isolate causing foodborne illness. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:2929–2942 10.1128/AEM.00252-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Philippe VA, Méndez MB, Huang IH, Orsaria LM, Sarker MR, Grau RR. 2006. Inorganic phosphate induces spore morphogenesis and enterotoxin production in the intestinal pathogen Clostridium perfringens. Infect Immun 74:3651–3656 10.1128/IAI.02090-05. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kirk DG, Dahlsten E, Zhang Z, Korkeala H, Lindström M. 2012. Involvement of Clostridium botulinum ATCC 3502 sigma factor K in early-stage sporulation. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4590–4596 10.1128/AEM.00304-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Cooksley CM, Davis IJ, Winzer K, Chan WC, Peck MW, Minton NP. 2010. Regulation of neurotoxin production and sporulation by a putative agrBD signaling system in proteolytic Clostridium botulinum. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:4448–4460 10.1128/AEM.03038-09. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mackin KE, Carter GP, Howarth P, Rood JI, Lyras D. 2013. Spo0A differentially regulates toxin production in evolutionarily diverse strains of Clostridium difficile. PLoS One 8:e79666 10.1371/journal.pone.0079666. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Collie RE, McClane BA. 1998. Evidence that the enterotoxin gene can be episomal in Clostridium perfringens isolates associated with non-food-borne human gastrointestinal diseases. J Clin Microbiol 36:30–36. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Sparks SG, Carman RJ, Sarker MR, McClane BA. 2001. Genotyping of enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens fecal isolates associated with antibiotic-associated diarrhea and food poisoning in North America. J Clin Microbiol 39:883–888 10.1128/JCM.39.3.883-888.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Collie RE, Kokai-Kun JF, McClane BA. 1998. Phenotypic characterization of enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens isolates from non-foodborne human gastrointestinal diseases. Anaerobe 4:69–79 10.1006/anae.1998.0152. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Czeczulin JR, Collie RE, McClane BA. 1996. Regulated expression of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin in naturally cpe-negative type A, B, and C isolates of C. perfringens. Infect Immun 64:3301–3309. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Duncan CL, Strong DH, Sebald M. 1972. Sporulation and enterotoxin production by mutants of Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol 110:378–391. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kokai-Kun JF, Songer JG, Czeczulin JR, Chen F, McClane BA. 1994. Comparison of Western immunoblots and gene detection assays for identification of potentially enterotoxigenic isolates of Clostridium perfringens. J Clin Microbiol 32:2533–2539. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zhao Y, Melville SB. 1998. Identification and characterization of sporulation-dependent promoters upstream of the enterotoxin gene (cpe) of Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol 180:136–142. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.McClane BA, Robertson SL, Li J (ed). 2013. Clostridium Perfringens. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Al-Hinai MA, Jones SW, Papoutsakis ET. 2015. The Clostridium sporulation programs: diversity and preservation of endospore differentiation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 79:19–37 10.1128/MMBR.00025-14. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Li J, McClane BA. 2010. Evaluating the involvement of alternative sigma factors SigF and SigG in Clostridium perfringens sporulation and enterotoxin synthesis. Infect Immun 78:4286–4293 10.1128/IAI.00528-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Raju D, Sarker MR. 2005. Comparison of the levels of heat resistance of wild-type, cpe knockout, and cpe plasmid-cured Clostridium perfringens type A strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7618–7620 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7618-7620.2005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Schirmer J, Aktories K. 2004. Large clostridial cytotoxins: cellular biology of Rho/Ras-glucosylating toxins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1673:66–74 10.1016/j.bbagen.2004.03.014. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Chalmers G, Bruce HL, Hunter DB, Parreira VR, Kulkarni RR, Jiang YF, Prescott JF, Boerlin P. 2008. Multilocus sequence typing analysis of Clostridium perfringens isolates from necrotic enteritis outbreaks in broiler chicken populations. J Clin Microbiol 46:3957–3964 10.1128/JCM.01548-08. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Gurjar A, Li J, McClane BA. 2010. Characterization of toxin plasmids in Clostridium perfringens type C isolates. Infect Immun 78:4860–4869 10.1128/IAI.00715-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sayeed S, Li J, McClane BA. 2010. Characterization of virulence plasmid diversity among Clostridium perfringens type B isolates. Infect Immun 78:495–504 10.1128/IAI.00838-09. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Paredes-Sabja D, Sarker N, Sarker MR. 2011. Clostridium perfringens tpeL is expressed during sporulation. Microb Pathog 51:384–388 10.1016/j.micpath.2011.05.006. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Carter GP, Larcombe S, Li L, Jayawardena D, Awad MM, Songer JG, Lyras D. 2014. Expression of the large clostridial toxins is controlled by conserved regulatory mechanisms. Int J Med Microbiol 304:1147–1159 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.08.008. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Hielm S, Hyytiä E, Andersin AB, Korkeala H. 1998. A high prevalence of Clostridium botulinum type E in Finnish freshwater and Baltic Sea sediment samples. J Appl Microbiol 84:133–137 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00331.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Leclair D, Farber JM, Doidge B, Blanchfield B, Suppa S, Pagotto F, Austin JW. 2013. Distribution of Clostridium botulinum type E strains in Nunavik, Northern Quebec, Canada. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:646–654 10.1128/AEM.05999-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Marvaud JC, Gibert M, Inoue K, Fujinaga Y, Oguma K, Popoff MR. 1998. botR/A is a positive regulator of botulinum neurotoxin and associated non-toxin protein genes in Clostridium botulinum A. Mol Microbiol 29:1009–1018 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00985.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Carter GP, Rood JI, Lyras D. 2010. The role of toxin A and toxin B in Clostridium difficile-associated disease: past and present perspectives. Gut Microbes 1:58–64 10.4161/gmic.1.1.10768. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kuehne SA, Cartman ST, Heap JT, Kelly ML, Cockayne A, Minton NP. 2010. The role of toxin A and toxin B in Clostridium difficile infection. Nature 467:711–713 10.1038/nature09397. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Lyras D, O’Connor JR, Howarth PM, Sambol SP, Carter GP, Phumoonna T, Poon R, Adams V, Vedantam G, Johnson S, Gerding DN, Rood JI. 2009. Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile. Nature 458:1176–1179 10.1038/nature07822. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Pettit LJ, Browne HP, Yu L, Smits WK, Fagan RP, Barquist L, Martin MJ, Goulding D, Duncan SH, Flint HJ, Dougan G, Choudhary JS, Lawley TD. 2014. Functional genomics reveals that Clostridium difficile Spo0A coordinates sporulation, virulence and metabolism. BMC Genomics 15:160 10.1186/1471-2164-15-160. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Saujet L, Monot M, Dupuy B, Soutourina O, Martin-Verstraete I. 2011. The key sigma factor of transition phase, SigH, controls sporulation, metabolism, and virulence factor expression in Clostridium difficile. J Bacteriol 193:3186–3196 10.1128/JB.00272-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Karlsson S, Burman LG, Akerlund T. 1999. Suppression of toxin production in Clostridium difficile VPI 10463 by amino acids. Microbiology 145:1683–1693 10.1099/13500872-145-7-1683. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Mani N, Dupuy B. 2001. Regulation of toxin synthesis in Clostridium difficile by an alternative RNA polymerase sigma factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:5844–5849 10.1073/pnas.101126598. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.El Meouche I, Peltier J, Monot M, Soutourina O, Pestel-Caron M, Dupuy B, Pons JL. 2013. Characterization of the SigD regulon of C. difficile and its positive control of toxin production through the regulation of tcdR. PLoS One 8:e83748 10.1371/journal.pone.0083748. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.McKee RW, Mangalea MR, Purcell EB, Borchardt EK, Tamayo R. 2013. The second messenger cyclic Di-GMP regulates Clostridium difficile toxin production by controlling expression of sigD. J Bacteriol 195:5174–5185 10.1128/JB.00501-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Girinathan BP, Monot M, Boyle D, McAllister KN, Sorg JA, Dupuy B, Govind R. 2017. Effect of tcdR mutation on sporulation in the epidemic Clostridium difficile strain R20291. MSphere 2:e00383-16 10.1128/mSphere.00383-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Fimlaid KA, Shen A. 2015. Diverse mechanisms regulate sporulation sigma factor activity in the Firmicutes. Curr Opin Microbiol 24:88–95 10.1016/j.mib.2015.01.006. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Losick R, Stragier P. 1992. Crisscross regulation of cell-type-specific gene expression during development in B. subtilis. Nature 355:601–604 10.1038/355601a0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Eswaramoorthy P, Winter PW, Wawrzusin P, York AG, Shroff H, Ramamurthi KS. 2014. Asymmetric division and differential gene expression during a bacterial developmental program requires DivIVA. PLoS Genet 10:e1004526 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004526. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Feucht A, Magnin T, Yudkin MD, Errington J. 1996. Bifunctional protein required for asymmetric cell division and cell-specific transcription in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev 10:794–803 10.1101/gad.10.7.794. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Duncan L, Alper S, Arigoni F, Losick R, Stragier P. 1995. Activation of cell-specific transcription by a serine phosphatase at the site of asymmetric division. Science 270:641–644 10.1126/science.270.5236.641. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Hofmeister AE, Londoño-Vallejo A, Harry E, Stragier P, Losick R. 1995. Extracellular signal protein triggering the proteolytic activation of a developmental transcription factor in B. subtilis. Cell 83:219–226 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90163-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Karow ML, Glaser P, Piggot PJ. 1995. Identification of a gene, spoIIR, that links the activation of sigma E to the transcriptional activity of sigma F during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:2012–2016 10.1073/pnas.92.6.2012. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Londoño-Vallejo JA, Stragier P. 1995. Cell-cell signaling pathway activating a developmental transcription factor in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev 9:503–508 10.1101/gad.9.4.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Eichenberger P, Jensen ST, Conlon EM, van Ooij C, Silvaggi J, González-Pastor JE, Fujita M, Ben-Yehuda S, Stragier P, Liu JS, Losick R. 2003. The sigmaE regulon and the identification of additional sporulation genes in Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Biol 327:945–972 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00205-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Frandsen N, Stragier P. 1995. Identification and characterization of the Bacillus subtilis spoIIP locus. J Bacteriol 177:716–722 10.1128/jb.177.3.716-722.1995. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Lopez-Diaz I, Clarke S, Mandelstam J. 1986. spoIID operon of Bacillus subtilis: cloning and sequence. J Gen Microbiol 132:341–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Smith K, Bayer ME, Youngman P. 1993. Physical and functional characterization of the Bacillus subtilis spoIIM gene. J Bacteriol 175:3607–3617 10.1128/jb.175.11.3607-3617.1993. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Driks A, Eichenberger P. 2016. The spore coat. Microbiol Spectr 4:TBS-0023-2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Camp AH, Losick R. 2008. A novel pathway of intercellular signalling in Bacillus subtilis involves a protein with similarity to a component of type III secretion channels. Mol Microbiol 69:402–417 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06289.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Kroos L, Kunkel B, Losick R. 1989. Switch protein alters specificity of RNA polymerase containing a compartment-specific sigma factor. Science 243:526–529 10.1126/science.2492118. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Kunkel B, Kroos L, Poth H, Youngman P, Losick R. 1989. Temporal and spatial control of the mother-cell regulatory gene spoIIID of Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev 3:1735–1744 10.1101/gad.3.11.1735. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Lu S, Cutting S, Kroos L. 1995. Sporulation protein SpoIVFB from Bacillus subtilis enhances processing of the sigma factor precursor Pro-sigma K in the absence of other sporulation gene products. J Bacteriol 177:1082–1085 10.1128/jb.177.4.1082-1085.1995. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Pan Q, Losick R, Rudner DZ. 2003. A second PDZ-containing serine protease contributes to activation of the sporulation transcription factor sigmaK in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 185:6051–6056 10.1128/JB.185.20.6051-6056.2003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Cutting S, Roels S, Losick R. 1991. Sporulation operon spoIVF and the characterization of mutations that uncouple mother-cell from forespore gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Biol 221:1237–1256 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90931-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Camp AH, Losick R. 2009. A feeding tube model for activation of a cell-specific transcription factor during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev 23:1014–1024 10.1101/gad.1781709. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Doan T, Morlot C, Meisner J, Serrano M, Henriques AO, Moran CP Jr, Rudner DZ. 2009. Novel secretion apparatus maintains spore integrity and developmental gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Genet 5:e1000566 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000566. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Meisner J, Wang X, Serrano M, Henriques AO, Moran CP Jr. 2008. A channel connecting the mother cell and forespore during bacterial endospore formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:15100–15105 10.1073/pnas.0806301105. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Rodrigues CD, Ramírez-Guadiana FH, Meeske AJ, Wang X, Rudner DZ. 2016. GerM is required to assemble the basal platform of the SpoIIIA-SpoIIQ transenvelope complex during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 102:260–273 10.1111/mmi.13457. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Flanagan KA, Comber JD, Mearls E, Fenton C, Wang Erickson AF, Camp AH. 2016. A membrane-embedded amino acid couples the SpoIIQ channel protein to anti-sigma factor transcriptional repression during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. J Bacteriol 198:1451–1463 10.1128/JB.00958-15. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Regan G, Itaya M, Piggot PJ. 2012. Coupling of σG activation to completion of engulfment during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis survives large perturbations to DNA translocation and replication. J Bacteriol 194:6264–6271 10.1128/JB.01470-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Wang ST, Setlow B, Conlon EM, Lyon JL, Imamura D, Sato T, Setlow P, Losick R, Eichenberger P. 2006. The forespore line of gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Biol 358:16–37 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.01.059. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Fukushima T, Yamamoto H, Atrih A, Foster SJ, Sekiguchi J. 2002. A polysaccharide deacetylase gene (pdaA) is required for germination and for production of muramic delta-lactam residues in the spore cortex of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 184:6007–6015 10.1128/JB.184.21.6007-6015.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Halberg R, Kroos L. 1994. Sporulation regulatory protein SpoIIID from Bacillus subtilis activates and represses transcription by both mother-cell-specific forms of RNA polymerase. J Mol Biol 243:425–436 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1670. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Eichenberger P, Fujita M, Jensen ST, Conlon EM, Rudner DZ, Wang ST, Ferguson C, Haga K, Sato T, Liu JS, Losick R. 2004. The program of gene transcription for a single differentiating cell type during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Biol 2:e328 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.de Hoon MJ, Eichenberger P, Vitkup D. 2010. Hierarchical evolution of the bacterial sporulation network. Curr Biol 20:R735–R745 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.031. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Fimlaid KA, Bond JP, Schutz KC, Putnam EE, Leung JM, Lawley TD, Shen A. 2013. Global analysis of the sporulation pathway of Clostridium difficile. PLoS Genet 9:e1003660 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003660. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Saujet L, Pereira FC, Serrano M, Soutourina O, Monot M, Shelyakin PV, Gelfand MS, Dupuy B, Henriques AO, Martin-Verstraete I. 2013. Genome-wide analysis of cell type-specific gene transcription during spore formation in Clostridium difficile. PLoS Genet 9:e1003756 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003756. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Pereira FC, Saujet L, Tomé AR, Serrano M, Monot M, Couture-Tosi E, Martin-Verstraete I, Dupuy B, Henriques AO. 2013. The spore differentiation pathway in the enteric pathogen Clostridium difficile. PLoS Genet 9:e1003782 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003782. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Dembek M, Barquist L, Boinett CJ, Cain AK, Mayho M, Lawley TD, Fairweather NF, Fagan RP. 2015. High-throughput analysis of gene essentiality and sporulation in Clostridium difficile. MBio 6:e02383 10.1128/mBio.02383-14. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Fimlaid KA, Jensen O, Donnelly ML, Siegrist MS, Shen A. 2015. Regulation of Clostridium difficile spore formation by the SpoIIQ and SpoIIIA proteins. PLoS Genet 11:e1005562 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005562. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Serrano M, Crawshaw AD, Dembek M, Monteiro JM, Pereira FC, Pinho MG, Fairweather NF, Salgado PS, Henriques AO. 2016. The SpoIIQ-SpoIIIAH complex of Clostridium difficile controls forespore engulfment and late stages of gene expression and spore morphogenesis. Mol Microbiol 100:204–228 10.1111/mmi.13311. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Haraldsen JD, Sonenshein AL. 2003. Efficient sporulation in Clostridium difficile requires disruption of the sigmaK gene. Mol Microbiol 48:811–821 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03471.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Pishdadian K, Fimlaid KA, Shen A. 2015. SpoIIID-mediated regulation of σK function during Clostridium difficile sporulation. Mol Microbiol 95:189–208 10.1111/mmi.12856. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Serrano M, Kint N, Pereira FC, Saujet L, Boudry P, Dupuy B, Henriques AO, Martin-Verstraete I. 2016. A recombination directionality factor controls the cell type-specific activation of σK and the fidelity of spore development in Clostridium difficile. PLoS Genet 12:e1006312 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006312. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Ichikawa H, Kroos L. 2000. Combined action of two transcription factors regulates genes encoding spore coat proteins of Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem 275:13849–13855 10.1074/jbc.275.18.13849. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Al-Hinai MA, Jones SW, Papoutsakis ET. 2014. σK of Clostridium acetobutylicum is the first known sporulation-specific sigma factor with two developmentally separated roles, one early and one late in sporulation. J Bacteriol 196:287–299 10.1128/JB.01103-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Kirk DG, Zhang Z, Korkeala H, Lindström M. 2014. Alternative sigma factors SigF, SigE, and SigG are essential for sporulation in Clostridium botulinum ATCC 3502. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:5141–5150 10.1128/AEM.01015-14. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Hosomi K, Kuwana R, Takamatsu H, Kohda T, Kozaki S, Mukamoto M. 2015. Morphological and genetic characterization of group I Clostridium botulinum type B strain 111 and the transcriptional regulator spoIIID gene knockout mutant in sporulation. Anaerobe 33:55–63 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.01.012. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Meyer P, Gutierrez J, Pogliano K, Dworkin J. 2010. Cell wall synthesis is necessary for membrane dynamics during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 76:956–970 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07155.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Ojkic N, López-Garrido J, Pogliano K, Endres RG. 2016. Cell-wall remodeling drives engulfment during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. eLife 5:e18657 10.7554/eLife.18657. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Morlot C, Uehara T, Marquis KA, Bernhardt TG, Rudner DZ. 2010. A highly coordinated cell wall degradation machine governs spore morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev 24:411–422 10.1101/gad.1878110. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Gutierrez J, Smith R, Pogliano K. 2010. SpoIID-mediated peptidoglycan degradation is required throughout engulfment during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. J Bacteriol 192:3174–3186 10.1128/JB.00127-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Chastanet A, Losick R. 2007. Engulfment during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is governed by a multi-protein complex containing tandemly acting autolysins. Mol Microbiol 64:139–152 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05652.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Dembek M, Kelly A, Salgado P. 2016. Structural and functional studies of sporulation determinants in Clostridium difficile. Presented at the 7th European Spores Conference, London, UK, 18 to 20 April 2016 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30066424. [Google Scholar]
- 156.Ribis JW, Fimlaid KA, Shen A. 2017. Differential requirements for conserved components of a conserved peptidoglycan remodeling machine during Clostridium difficile sporulation. ASM General Meeting 2017 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30066347. [Google Scholar]
- 157.Nocadello S, Minasov G, Shuvalova LS, Dubrovska I, Sabini E, Anderson WF. 2016. Crystal structures of the SpoIID lytic transglycosylases essential for bacterial sporulation. J Biol Chem 291:14915–14926 10.1074/jbc.M116.729749. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Rodrigues CD, Marquis KA, Meisner J, Rudner DZ. 2013. Peptidoglycan hydrolysis is required for assembly and activity of the transenvelope secretion complex during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 89:1039–1052 10.1111/mmi.12322. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Broder DH, Pogliano K. 2006. Forespore engulfment mediated by a ratchet-like mechanism. Cell 126:917–928 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.053. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Henriques AO, Moran CP Jr. 2007. Structure, assembly, and function of the spore surface layers. Annu Rev Microbiol 61:555–588 10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093224. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Ramamurthi KS, Clapham KR, Losick R. 2006. Peptide anchoring spore coat assembly to the outer forespore membrane in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 62:1547–1557 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05468.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Ramamurthi KS, Lecuyer S, Stone HA, Losick R. 2009. Geometric cue for protein localization in a bacterium. Science 323:1354–1357 10.1126/science.1169218. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Ramamurthi KS, Losick R. 2008. ATP-driven self-assembly of a morphogenetic protein in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Cell 31:406–414 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.030. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Wang KH, Isidro AL, Domingues L, Eskandarian HA, McKenney PT, Drew K, Grabowski P, Chua MH, Barry SN, Guan M, Bonneau R, Henriques AO, Eichenberger P. 2009. The coat morphogenetic protein SpoVID is necessary for spore encasement in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 74:634–649 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06886.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.McKenney PT, Driks A, Eichenberger P. 2012. The Bacillus subtilis endospore: assembly and functions of the multilayered coat. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:33–44. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Costa T, Isidro AL, Moran CP Jr, Henriques AO. 2006. Interaction between coat morphogenetic proteins SafA and SpoVID. J Bacteriol 188:7731–7741 10.1128/JB.00761-06. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.de Francesco M, Jacobs JZ, Nunes F, Serrano M, McKenney PT, Chua MH, Henriques AO, Eichenberger P. 2012. Physical interaction between coat morphogenetic proteins SpoVID and CotE is necessary for spore encasement in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 194:4941–4950 10.1128/JB.00914-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Cutting S, Anderson M, Lysenko E, Page A, Tomoyasu T, Tatematsu K, Tatsuta T, Kroos L, Ogura T. 1997. SpoVM, a small protein essential to development in Bacillus subtilis, interacts with the ATP-dependent protease FtsH. J Bacteriol 179:5534–5542 10.1128/jb.179.17.5534-5542.1997. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Levin PA, Fan N, Ricca E, Driks A, Losick R, Cutting S. 1993. An unusually small gene required for sporulation by Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 9:761–771 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01736.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Roels S, Driks A, Losick R. 1992. Characterization of spoIVA, a sporulation gene involved in coat morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 174:575–585 10.1128/jb.174.2.575-585.1992. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Ebmeier SE, Tan IS, Clapham KR, Ramamurthi KS. 2012. Small proteins link coat and cortex assembly during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 84:682–696 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08052.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Tan IS, Weiss CA, Popham DL, Ramamurthi KS. 2015. A quality-control mechanism removes unfit cells from a population of sporulating bacteria. Dev Cell 34:682–693 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Ribis JW, Ravichandran P, Putnam EE, Pishdadian K, Shen A. 2017. The conserved spore coat protein SpoVM is largely dispensable in Clostridium difficile spore formation. MSphere 2:e00315-17 10.1128/mSphere.00315-17. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Putnam EE, Nock AM, Lawley TD, Shen A. 2013. SpoIVA and SipL are Clostridium difficile spore morphogenetic proteins. J Bacteriol 195:1214–1225 10.1128/JB.02181-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Decker AR, Ramamurthi KS. 2017. Cell death pathway that monitors spore morphogenesis. Trends Microbiol 25:637–647 10.1016/j.tim.2017.03.005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Lawley TD, Croucher NJ, Yu L, Clare S, Sebaihia M, Goulding D, Pickard DJ, Parkhill J, Choudhary J, Dougan G. 2009. Proteomic and genomic characterization of highly infectious Clostridium difficile 630 spores. J Bacteriol 191:5377–5386 10.1128/JB.00597-09. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Abhyankar W, Hossain AH, Djajasaputra A, Permpoonpattana P, Ter Beek A, Dekker HL, Cutting SM, Brul S, de Koning LJ, de Koster CG. 2013. In pursuit of protein targets: proteomic characterization of bacterial spore outer layers. J Proteome Res 12:4507–4521 10.1021/pr4005629. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Díaz-González F, Milano M, Olguin-Araneda V, Pizarro-Cerda J, Castro-Córdova P, Tzeng SC, Maier CS, Sarker MR, Paredes-Sabja D. 2015. Protein composition of the outermost exosporium-like layer of Clostridium difficile 630 spores. J Proteomics 123:1–13 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.03.035. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Permpoonpattana P, Tolls EH, Nadem R, Tan S, Brisson A, Cutting SM. 2011. Surface layers of Clostridium difficile endospores. J Bacteriol 193:6461–6470 10.1128/JB.05182-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Permpoonpattana P, Phetcharaburanin J, Mikelsone A, Dembek M, Tan S, Brisson M-C, La Ragione R, Brisson AR, Fairweather N, Hong HA, Cutting SM. 2013. Functional characterization of Clostridium difficile spore coat proteins. J Bacteriol 195:1492–1503 10.1128/JB.02104-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Shrestha R, Lockless SW, Sorg JA. 2017. A Clostridium difficile alanine racemase affects spore germination and accommodates serine as a substrate. J Biol Chem 292:10735–10742 10.1074/jbc.M117.791749. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Hong HA, Ferreira WT, Hosseini S, Anwar S, Hitri K, Wilkinson AJ, Vahjen W, Zentek J, Soloviev M, Cutting SM. 2017. The spore coat protein CotE facilitates host colonisation by Clostridium difficile. J Infect Dis 216:1452–1459 10.1093/infdis/jix488. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Paredes-Sabja D, Shen A, Sorg JA. 2014. Clostridium difficile spore biology: sporulation, germination, and spore structural proteins. Trends Microbiol 22:406–416 10.1016/j.tim.2014.04.003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Stewart GC. 2015. The exosporium layer of bacterial spores: a connection to the environment and the infected host. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 79:437–457 10.1128/MMBR.00050-15. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Barra-Carrasco J, Olguín-Araneda V, Plaza-Garrido A, Miranda-Cárdenas C, Cofré-Araneda G, Pizarro-Guajardo M, Sarker MR, Paredes-Sabja D. 2013. The Clostridium difficile exosporium cysteine (CdeC)-rich protein is required for exosporium morphogenesis and coat assembly. J Bacteriol 195:3863–3875 10.1128/JB.00369-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Phetcharaburanin J, Hong HA, Colenutt C, Bianconi I, Sempere L, Permpoonpattana P, Smith K, Dembek M, Tan S, Brisson MC, Brisson AR, Fairweather NF, Cutting SM. 2014. The spore-associated protein BclA1 affects the susceptibility of animals to colonization and infection by Clostridium difficile. Mol Microbiol 92:1025–1038 10.1111/mmi.12611. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Pizarro-Guajardo M, Olguín-Araneda V, Barra-Carrasco J, Brito-Silva C, Sarker MR, Paredes-Sabja D. 2014. Characterization of the collagen-like exosporium protein, BclA1, of Clostridium difficile spores. Anaerobe 25:18–30 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.11.003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Boydston JA, Yue L, Kearney JF, Turnbough CL Jr. 2006. The ExsY protein is required for complete formation of the exosporium of Bacillus anthracis. J Bacteriol 188:7440–7448 10.1128/JB.00639-06. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Jiang S, Wan Q, Krajcikova D, Tang J, Tzokov SB, Barak I, Bullough PA. 2015. Diverse supramolecular structures formed by self-assembling proteins of the Bacillus subtilis spore coat. Mol Microbiol 97:347–359 10.1111/mmi.13030. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Johnson MJ, Todd SJ, Ball DA, Shepherd AM, Sylvestre P, Moir A. 2006. ExsY and CotY are required for the correct assembly of the exosporium and spore coat of Bacillus cereus. J Bacteriol 188:7905–7913 10.1128/JB.00997-06. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Terry C, Jiang S, Radford DS, Wan Q, Tzokov S, Moir A, Bullough PA. 2017. Molecular tiling on the surface of a bacterial spore: the exosporium of the Bacillus anthracis/cereus/thuringiensis group. Mol Microbiol 104:539–552 10.1111/mmi.13650. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Ghose C, Eugenis I, Edwards AN, Sun X, McBride SM, Ho DD. 2016. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of Clostridium difficile spore proteins. Anaerobe 37:85–95 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.12.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Strong PC, Fulton KM, Aubry A, Foote S, Twine SM, Logan SM. 2014. Identification and characterization of glycoproteins on the spore surface of Clostridium difficile. J Bacteriol 196:2627–2637 10.1128/JB.01469-14. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Daubenspeck JM, Zeng H, Chen P, Dong S, Steichen CT, Krishna NR, Pritchard DG, Turnbough CL Jr. 2004. Novel oligosaccharide side chains of the collagen-like region of BclA, the major glycoprotein of the Bacillus anthracis exosporium. J Biol Chem 279:30945–30953 10.1074/jbc.M401613200. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Mora-Uribe P, Miranda-Cárdenas C, Castro-Córdova P, Gil F, Calderón I, Fuentes JA, Rodas PI, Banawas S, Sarker MR, Paredes-Sabja D. 2016. Characterization of the adherence of Clostridium difficile spores: the integrity of the outermost layer affects adherence properties of spores of the epidemic strain R20291 to components of the intestinal mucosa. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6:99 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00099. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Paredes-Sabja D, Setlow P, Sarker MR. 2011. Germination of spores of Bacillales and Clostridiales species: mechanisms and proteins involved. Trends Microbiol 19:85–94 10.1016/j.tim.2010.10.004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Pizarro-Guajardo M, Calderón-Romero P, Castro-Córdova P, Mora-Uribe P, Paredes-Sabja D. 2016. Ultrastructural variability of the exosporium layer of Clostridium difficile spores. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:2202–2209 10.1128/AEM.03410-15. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Pizarro-Guajardo M, Calderón-Romero P, Paredes-Sabja D. 2016. Ultrastructure variability of the exosporium layer of Clostridium difficile spores from sporulating cultures and biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:5892–5898 10.1128/AEM.01463-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Sorg JA, Sonenshein AL. 2008. Bile salts and glycine as cogerminants for Clostridium difficile spores. J Bacteriol 190:2505–2512 10.1128/JB.01765-07. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Bhattacharjee D, McAllister KN, Sorg JA. 2016. Germinants and their receptors in clostridia. J Bacteriol 198:2767–2775 10.1128/JB.00405-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Sorg JA, Sonenshein AL. 2009. Chenodeoxycholate is an inhibitor of Clostridium difficile spore germination. J Bacteriol 191:1115–1117 10.1128/JB.01260-08. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Browne HP, Forster SC, Anonye BO, Kumar N, Neville BA, Stares MD, Goulding D, Lawley TD. 2016. Culturing of ‘unculturable’ human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation. Nature 533:543–546 10.1038/nature17645. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Liggins M, Ramirez N, Magnuson N, Abel-Santos E. 2011. Progesterone analogs influence germination of Clostridium sordellii and Clostridium difficile spores in vitro. J Bacteriol 193:2776–2783 10.1128/JB.00058-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Shrestha R, Sorg JA. 2018. Hierarchical recognition of amino acid co-germinants during Clostridioides difficile spore germination. Anaerobe 49:41–47 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.12.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Kochan TJ, Somers MJ, Kaiser AM, Shoshiev MS, Hagan AK, Hastie JL, Giordano NP, Smith AD, Schubert AM, Carlson PE Jr, Hanna PC. 2017. Intestinal calcium and bile salts facilitate germination of Clostridium difficile spores. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006443 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006443. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Paredes-Sabja D, Torres JA, Setlow P, Sarker MR. 2008. Clostridium perfringens spore germination: characterization of germinants and their receptors. J Bacteriol 190:1190–1201 10.1128/JB.01748-07. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Paredes-Sabja D, Udompijitkul P, Sarker MR. 2009. Inorganic phosphate and sodium ions are cogerminants for spores of Clostridium perfringens type A food poisoning-related isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:6299–6305 10.1128/AEM.00822-09. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Udompijitkul P, Alnoman M, Banawas S, Paredes-Sabja D, Sarker MR. 2014. New amino acid germinants for spores of the enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens type A isolates. Food Microbiol 44:24–33 10.1016/j.fm.2014.04.011. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Alnoman M, Udompijitkul P, Banawas S, Sarker MR. 2018. Bicarbonate and amino acids are co-germinants for spores of Clostridium perfringens type A isolates carrying plasmid-borne enterotoxin gene. Food Microbiol 69:64–71 10.1016/j.fm.2017.06.020. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Alberto F, Broussolle V, Mason DR, Carlin F, Peck MW. 2003. Variability in spore germination response by strains of proteolytic Clostridium botulinum types A, B and F. Lett Appl Microbiol 36:41–45 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01260.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Brunt J, van Vliet AH, van den Bos F, Carter AT, Peck MW. 2016. Diversity of the germination apparatus in Clostridium botulinum groups I, II, III, and IV. Front Microbiol 7:1702 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Plowman J, Peck MW. 2002. Use of a novel method to characterize the response of spores of non-proteolytic Clostridium botulinum types B, E and F to a wide range of germinants and conditions. J Appl Microbiol 92:681–694 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01569.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Herlinger H, Maglinte D, Birnbaum BA. 2001. Clinical Imaging of the Small Intestine. Springer, New York, NY. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Rode LJ, Foster JW. 1961. Germination of bacterial spores with alkyl primary amines. J Bacteriol 81:768–779. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Riemann H, Ordal ZJ. 1961. Germination of bacterial endospores with calcium and dipicolinic acid. Science 133:1703–1704 10.1126/science.133.3465.1703. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Francis MB, Allen CA, Sorg JA. 2015. Spore cortex hydrolysis precedes DPA release during Clostridium difficile spore germination. J Bacteriol 197:2276–2283 10.1128/JB.02575-14. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Wang S, Shen A, Setlow P, Li YQ. 2015. Characterization of the dynamic germination of individual Clostridium difficile spores using Raman spectroscopy and differential interference contrast microscopy. J Bacteriol 197:2361–2373 10.1128/JB.00200-15. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Paredes-Sabja D, Setlow P, Sarker MR. 2009. SleC is essential for cortex peptidoglycan hydrolysis during germination of spores of the pathogenic bacterium Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol 191:2711–2720 10.1128/JB.01832-08. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Ishimori T, Takahashi K, Goto M, Nakagawa S, Kasai Y, Konagaya Y, Batori H, Kobayashi A, Urakami H. 2012. Synergistic effects of high hydrostatic pressure, mild heating, and amino acids on germination and inactivation of Clostridium sporogenes spores. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:8202–8207 10.1128/AEM.02007-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Doona CJ, Feeherry FE, Setlow B, Wang S, Li W, Nichols FC, Talukdar PK, Sarker MR, Li YQ, Shen A, Setlow P. 2016. Effects of high-pressure treatment on spores of Clostridium Species. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:5287–5297 10.1128/AEM.01363-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Banawas S, Paredes-Sabja D, Korza G, Li Y, Hao B, Setlow P, Sarker MR. 2013. The Clostridium perfringens germinant receptor protein GerKC is located in the spore inner membrane and is crucial for spore germination. J Bacteriol 195:5084–5091 10.1128/JB.00901-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Banawas S, Paredes-Sabja D, Setlow P, Sarker MR. 2016. Characterization of germinants and their receptors for spores of non-food-borne Clostridium perfringens strain F4969. Microbiology 162:1972–1983 10.1099/mic.0.000378. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Paredes-Sabja D, Setlow P, Sarker MR. 2009. Role of GerKB in germination and outgrowth of Clostridium perfringens spores. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:3813–3817 10.1128/AEM.00048-09. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Paidhungat M, Setlow P. 2001. Localization of a germinant receptor protein (GerBA) to the inner membrane of Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol 183:3982–3990 10.1128/JB.183.13.3982-3990.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Alberto F, Botella L, Carlin F, Nguyen-The C, Broussolle V. 2005. The Clostridium botulinum GerAB germination protein is located in the inner membrane of spores. FEMS Microbiol Lett 253:231–235 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.09.037. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Gupta S, Zhou KX, Bailey DM, Christie G. 2015. Structure-function analysis of the Bacillus megaterium GerUD spore germinant receptor protein. FEMS Microbiol Lett 362:fnv210 10.1093/femsle/fnv210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Ramirez-Peralta A, Gupta S, Butzin XY, Setlow B, Korza G, Leyva-Vazquez MA, Christie G, Setlow P. 2013. Identification of new proteins that modulate the germination of spores of Bacillus species. J Bacteriol 195:3009–3021 10.1128/JB.00257-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Clauwers C, Lood C, van Noort V, Michiels CW. 2017. Canonical germinant receptor is dispensable for spore germination in Clostridium botulinum group II strain NCTC 11219. Sci Rep 7:15426 10.1038/s41598-017-15839-y. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Wang G, Zhang P, Paredes-Sabja D, Green C, Setlow P, Sarker MR, Li YQ. 2011. Analysis of the germination of individual Clostridium perfringens spores and its heterogeneity. J Appl Microbiol 111:1212–1223 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05135.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Wang S, Brunt J, Peck MW, Setlow P, Li YQ. 2017. Analysis of the germination of individual Clostridium sporogenes spores with and without germinant receptors and cortex-lytic enzymes. Front Microbiol 8:2047 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02047. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Dembek M, Stabler RA, Witney AA, Wren BW, Fairweather NF. 2013. Transcriptional analysis of temporal gene expression in germinating Clostridium difficile 630 endospores. PLoS One 8:e64011 10.1371/journal.pone.0064011. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Francis MB, Allen CA, Shrestha R, Sorg JA. 2013. Bile acid recognition by the Clostridium difficile germinant receptor, CspC, is important for establishing infection. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003356 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003356. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Adams CM, Eckenroth BE, Putnam EE, Doublié S, Shen A. 2013. Structural and functional analysis of the CspB protease required for Clostridium spore germination. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003165 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003165. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Kevorkian Y, Shen A. 2017. Revisiting the role of Csp family proteins in regulating Clostridium difficile spore germination. J Bacteriol 199:199 10.1128/JB.00266-17. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Kevorkian Y, Shirley DJ, Shen A. 2016. Regulation of Clostridium difficile spore germination by the CspA pseudoprotease domain. Biochimie 122:243–254 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.07.023. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Meaney CA, Cartman ST, McClure PJ, Minton NP. 2015. Optimal spore germination in Clostridium botulinum ATCC 3502 requires the presence of functional copies of SleB and YpeB, but not CwlJ. Anaerobe 34:86–93 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Popham DL, Helin J, Costello CE, Setlow P. 1996. Muramic lactam in peptidoglycan of Bacillus subtilis spores is required for spore outgrowth but not for spore dehydration or heat resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:15405–15410 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15405. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Ando Y. 1979. Spore lytic enzyme released from Clostridium perfringens spores during germination. J Bacteriol 140:59–64. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Miyata S, Moriyama R, Sugimoto K, Makino S. 1995. Purification and partial characterization of a spore cortex-lytic enzyme of Clostridium perfringens S40 spores. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 59:514–515 10.1271/bbb.59.514. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Gutelius D, Hokeness K, Logan SM, Reid CW. 2013. Functional analysis of SleC from Clostridium difficile: an essential lytic transglycosylase involved in spore germination. Microbiology 160:209–216. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Okamura S, Urakami K, Kimata M, Aoshima T, Shimamoto S, Moriyama R, Makino S. 2000. The N-terminal prepeptide is required for the production of spore cortex-lytic enzyme from its inactive precursor during germination of Clostridium perfringens S40 spores. Mol Microbiol 37:821–827 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02047.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Shimamoto S, Moriyama R, Sugimoto K, Miyata S, Makino S. 2001. Partial characterization of an enzyme fraction with protease activity which converts the spore peptidoglycan hydrolase (SleC) precursor to an active enzyme during germination of Clostridium perfringens S40 spores and analysis of a gene cluster involved in the activity. J Bacteriol 183:3742–3751 10.1128/JB.183.12.3742-3751.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Shinde U, Thomas G. 2011. Insights from bacterial subtilases into the mechanisms of intramolecular chaperone-mediated activation of furin. Methods Mol Biol 768:59–106 10.1007/978-1-61779-204-5_4. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Miyata S, Moriyama R, Miyahara N, Makino S. 1995. A gene (sleC) encoding a spore-cortex-lytic enzyme from Clostridium perfringens S40 spores; cloning, sequence analysis and molecular characterization. Microbiology 141:2643–2650 10.1099/13500872-141-10-2643. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Paredes-Sabja D, Setlow P, Sarker MR. 2009. The protease CspB is essential for initiation of cortex hydrolysis and dipicolinic acid (DPA) release during germination of spores of Clostridium perfringens type A food poisoning isolates. Microbiology 155:3464–3472 10.1099/mic.0.030965-0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Shimizu T, Ohtani K, Hirakawa H, Ohshima K, Yamashita A, Shiba T, Ogasawara N, Hattori M, Kuhara S, Hayashi H. 2002. Complete genome sequence of Clostridium perfringens, an anaerobic flesh-eater. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:996–1001 10.1073/pnas.022493799. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Chen Y, Miyata S, Makino S, Moriyama R. 1997. Molecular characterization of a germination-specific muramidase from Clostridium perfringens S40 spores and nucleotide sequence of the corresponding gene. J Bacteriol 179:3181–3187 10.1128/jb.179.10.3181-3187.1997. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Fimlaid KA, Jensen O, Donnelly ML, Francis MB, Sorg JA, Shen A. 2015. Identification of a novel lipoprotein regulator of Clostridium difficile spore germination. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005239 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005239. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Urakami K, Miyata S, Moriyama R, Sugimoto K, Makino S. 1999. Germination-specific cortex-lytic enzymes from Clostridium perfringens S40 spores: time of synthesis, precursor structure and regulation of enzymatic activity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 173:467–473 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13540.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Banawas S, Korza G, Paredes-Sabja D, Li Y, Hao B, Setlow P, Sarker MR. 2015. Location and stoichiometry of the protease CspB and the cortex-lytic enzyme SleC in Clostridium perfringens spores. Food Microbiol 50:83–87 10.1016/j.fm.2015.04.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Miyata S, Kozuka S, Yasuda Y, Chen Y, Moriyama R, Tochikubo K, Makino S. 1997. Localization of germination-specific spore-lytic enzymes in Clostridium perfringens S40 spores detected by immunoelectron microscopy. FEMS Microbiol Lett 152:243–247 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10434.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Bhattacharjee D, Francis MB, Ding X, McAllister KN, Shrestha R, Sorg JA. 2015. Reexamining the germination phenotypes of several Clostridium difficile strains suggests another role for the CspC germinant receptor. J Bacteriol 198:777–786 10.1128/JB.00908-15. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Donnelly ML, Li W, Li YQ, Hinkel L, Setlow P, Shen A. 2017. A Clostridium difficile-specific, gel-forming protein required for optimal spore germination. MBio 8:e02085-16 10.1128/mBio.02085-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Li Y, Butzin XY, Davis A, Setlow B, Korza G, Üstok FI, Christie G, Setlow P, Hao B. 2013. Activity and regulation of various forms of CwlJ, SleB, and YpeB proteins in degrading cortex peptidoglycan of spores of Bacillus species in vitro and during spore germination. J Bacteriol 195:2530–2540 10.1128/JB.00259-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Paidhungat M, Ragkousi K, Setlow P. 2001. Genetic requirements for induction of germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis by Ca(2+)-dipicolinate. J Bacteriol 183:4886–4893 10.1128/JB.183.16.4886-4893.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Paidhungat M, Setlow B, Driks A, Setlow P. 2000. Characterization of spores of Bacillus subtilis which lack dipicolinic acid. J Bacteriol 182:5505–5512 10.1128/JB.182.19.5505-5512.2000. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Chirakkal H, O’Rourke M, Atrih A, Foster SJ, Moir A. 2002. Analysis of spore cortex lytic enzymes and related proteins in Bacillus subtilis endospore germination. Microbiology 148:2383–2392 10.1099/00221287-148-8-2383. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Daniel RA, Errington J. 1993. Cloning, DNA sequence, functional analysis and transcriptional regulation of the genes encoding dipicolinic acid synthetase required for sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Biol 232:468–483 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1403. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Ramírez-Guadiana FH, Meeske AJ, Rodrigues CDA, Barajas-Ornelas RDC, Kruse AC, Rudner DZ. 2017. A two-step transport pathway allows the mother cell to nurture the developing spore in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Genet 13:e1007015 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007015. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Vepachedu VR, Setlow P. 2004. Analysis of the germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis with temperature sensitive spo mutations in the spoVA operon. FEMS Microbiol Lett 239:71–77 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.08.022. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Donnelly ML, Fimlaid KA, Shen A. 2016. Characterization of Clostridium difficile spores lacking either SpoVAC or dipicolinic acid synthetase. J Bacteriol 198:1694–1707 10.1128/JB.00986-15. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Paredes-Sabja D, Setlow B, Setlow P, Sarker MR. 2008. Characterization of Clostridium perfringens spores that lack SpoVA proteins and dipicolinic acid. J Bacteriol 190:4648–4659 10.1128/JB.00325-08. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Orsburn BC, Melville SB, Popham DL. 2010. EtfA catalyses the formation of dipicolinic acid in Clostridium perfringens. Mol Microbiol 75:178–186 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06975.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Velásquez J, Schuurman-Wolters G, Birkner JP, Abee T, Poolman B. 2014. Bacillus subtilis spore protein SpoVAC functions as a mechanosensitive channel. Mol Microbiol 92:813–823 10.1111/mmi.12591. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Francis MB, Sorg JA. 2016. Dipicolinic acid release by germinating Clostridium difficile spores occurs through a mechanosensing mechanism. MSphere 1:e00306-16 10.1128/mSphere.00306-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Illades-Aguiar B, Setlow P. 1994. Autoprocessing of the protease that degrades small, acid-soluble proteins of spores of Bacillus species is triggered by low pH, dehydration, and dipicolinic acid. J Bacteriol 176:7032–7037 10.1128/jb.176.22.7032-7037.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Setlow P. 2013. Summer meeting 201--when the sleepers wake: the germination of spores of Bacillus species. J Appl Microbiol 115:1251–1268 10.1111/jam.12343. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Setlow B, Atluri S, Kitchel R, Koziol-Dube K, Setlow P. 2006. Role of dipicolinic acid in resistance and stability of spores of Bacillus subtilis with or without DNA-protective alpha/beta-type small acid-soluble proteins. J Bacteriol 188:3740–3747 10.1128/JB.00212-06. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Mason JM, Setlow P. 1986. Essential role of small, acid-soluble spore proteins in resistance of Bacillus subtilis spores to UV light. J Bacteriol 167:174–178 10.1128/jb.167.1.174-178.1986. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Moeller R, Setlow P, Reitz G, Nicholson WL. 2009. Roles of small, acid-soluble spore proteins and core water content in survival of Bacillus subtilis spores exposed to environmental solar UV radiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5202–5208 10.1128/AEM.00789-09. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Orsburn B, Sucre K, Popham DL, Melville SB. 2009. The SpmA/B and DacF proteins of Clostridium perfringens play important roles in spore heat resistance. FEMS Microbiol Lett 291:188–194 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01454.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Li J, McClane BA. 2008. A novel small acid soluble protein variant is important for spore resistance of most Clostridium perfringens food poisoning isolates. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000056 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000056. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Ma M, Li J, McClane BA. 2012. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Clostridium perfringens isolates from Darmbrand cases in post-World War II Germany. Infect Immun 80:4354–4363 10.1128/IAI.00818-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Raju D, Setlow P, Sarker MR. 2007. Antisense-RNA-mediated decreased synthesis of small, acid-soluble spore proteins leads to decreased resistance of clostridium perfringens spores to moist heat and UV radiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:2048–2053 10.1128/AEM.02500-06. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Meaney CA, Cartman ST, McClure PJ, Minton NP. 2016. The role of small acid-soluble proteins (SASPs) in protection of spores of Clostridium botulinum against nitrous acid. Int J Food Microbiol 216:25–30 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.08.024. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Setlow B, Setlow P. 1994. Heat inactivation of Bacillus subtilis spores lacking small, acid-soluble spore proteins is accompanied by generation of abasic sites in spore DNA. J Bacteriol 176:2111–2113 10.1128/jb.176.7.2111-2113.1994. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.McAllister KN, Bouillaut L, Kahn JN, Self WT, Sorg JA. 2017. Using CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing to generate C. difficile mutants defective in selenoproteins synthesis. Sci Rep 7:14672 10.1038/s41598-017-15236-5. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Ng YK, Ehsaan M, Philip S, Collery MM, Janoir C, Collignon A, Cartman ST, Minton NP. 2013. Expanding the repertoire of gene tools for precise manipulation of the Clostridium difficile genome: allelic exchange using pyrE alleles. PLoS One 8:e56051 10.1371/journal.pone.0056051. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Cartman ST, Kelly ML, Heeg D, Heap JT, Minton NP. 2012. Precise manipulation of the Clostridium difficile chromosome reveals a lack of association between the tcdC genotype and toxin production. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4683–4690 10.1128/AEM.00249-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Rabi R, Turnbull L, Whitchurch CB, Awad M, Lyras D. 2017. Structural characterization of Clostridium sordellii spores of diverse human, animal, and environmental origin and comparison to Clostridium difficile spores. MSphere 2:e00343-17 10.1128/mSphere.00343-17. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
