Abstract
Resistance of breast cancer to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) inhibitors involves reprogramming of the kinome through HER2/HER3 signaling via the activation of multiple tyrosine kinases and transcriptional upregulation. The heterogeneity of induced kinases prevents kinase targeting by a single kinase inhibitor and presents a major challenge to the treatment of therapeutically recalcitrant HER2-positive breast cancers (HER2+ BCs). As a result, there is a critical need for effective treatment that attacks the aberrant kinome activation associated with resistance to HER2-targeted therapy. Here, we describe a novel treatment strategy that targets cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) in HER2 inhibitor-resistant (HER2iR) breast cancer. We show that both HER2 inhibitor-sensitive (HER2iS) and HER2iR breast cancer cell lines exhibit high sensitivity to THZ1, a newly identified covalent inhibitor of the transcription regulatory kinase CDK7. CDK7 promotes cell cycle progression through inhibition of transcription, rather than via direct phosphorylation of classical CDK targets. The transcriptional kinase activity of CDK7 is regulated by HER2, and by the receptor tyrosine kinases activated in response to HER2 inhibition, as well as by the downstream SHP2 and PI3K/AKT pathways. A low dose of THZ1 displayed potent synergy with the HER2 inhibitor lapatinib in HER2iR BC cells in vitro. Dual HER2 and CDK7 inhibition induced tumor regression in two HER2iR BC xenograft models in vivo. Our data support the utilization of CDK7 inhibition as an additional therapeutic avenue that blocks the activation of genes engaged by multiple HER2iR kinases.
Subject terms: Diagnostic markers, Breast cancer
Introduction
The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, also known as ERBB2) [1, 2] is constitutively activated by overexpression or gene amplification in ~15–20% of human breast cancers [3]. HER2 serves as a bona fide oncogene that confers a more aggressive tumor phenotype and is associated with an increased rate of recurrence and mortality [1]. Trastuzumab (Herceptin) and lapatinib, two approved therapies for HER2-positive breast cancers (HER2+ BCs), have significantly improved the outcomes for HER2+ BC patients and have opened up an era of cancer treatment in this disease via targeted therapy [2, 3]. Unfortunately, nearly all patients either fail to respond to targeted therapies or have an initial response followed by the ultimate development of resistance. Diverse intrinsic or acquired mechanisms of resistance to HER2-targeted therapy have been described, such as the activation of parallel signaling pathways, hyperactivation of the downstream phosphoinositide 3-kinase-protein kinase B (PI3K-AKT) pathway, and adaptive kinome reprogramming [4–14]. As such, the use of targeted therapeutic agents that inhibit any single pathway would be undermined by activation of compensatory pathways [15]. Thus, a strategy that targets the transcription of key resistance elements in a more general manner might be more effective in HER2 inhibitor-resistant (HER2iR) breast cancers.
The cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) is the catalytic subunit of the well-known CDK-activating kinase (CAK), a kinase complex that catalyzes phosphorylation of the T-loops and thereby activating multiple cyclin-associated kinases including CDK1, CDK2, CDK4, and CDK6. CAK also complexes with the core human transcription factor II (TFIIH) basal transcription complex and activates RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) by serine phosphorylation of the repetitive C-terminal domain (CTD) of its largest subunit. This phosphorylation permits RNA Pol II escape from promoters, thus facilitating the subsequent elongation of the resulting transcripts [5]. In addition, CDK7 has been shown to specifically modulate estrogen receptor (ER) activity through serine 118 (Ser118) phosphorylation [16]. THZ1, a relatively selective covalent inhibitor of CDK7, effectively inhibits the growth of several cancer types such as T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma, and small cell lung cancer [17–19]. More recently, THZ1 was shown to inhibit the growth of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and ER+ BC) cells by inhibiting phosphorylation of the RNA Pol II CTD [20] and Ser118 of the ER [21, 22], respectively. The function of this kinase in other subtypes of breast cancer has not yet been elucidated. We previously reported the overexpression of genes regulating the cell division cycle in HER2+ mammary tumors results in resistance to HER2-targeted therapy. Blockage of cell cycle progression by CDK4/6 inhibitors resensitizes these cells to HER2 inhibitors [9], raising the question of whether inhibition of CDK7, a CDK4 activator, might overcome resistance to HER2 inhibitors. Here, we show that dual treatment combining HER2-targeted therapy with the CDK7 inhibitor THZ1 strongly inhibits HER2+ BC cell growth and increases apoptosis in cancer cells that exhibit resistance to HER2-targeted therapies. Unexpectedly, CDK7 inhibition does not appear to promote cell cycle progression through phosphorylation of CDKs in these cells. Rather, our data indicates that CDK7 primarily functions as a TFIIH-associated kinase in HER2+ BC. We also show that SHP2, and PI3K/AKT, key downstream signaling components of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), regulate the phosphorylation of RNA pol II CTD via activation of CDK7, suggesting that targeting CDK7 may provide an elegant mechanism by which to block reactivation of multiple kinase pathways in breast cancer resistant to HER2-targeted therapies.
Results
HER2+ breast cancer cells are susceptible to CDK7 inhibition independent of hormone receptor status
We first investigated whether CDK7 inhibition affected the viability of HER2+ tumors cells with differing ER and progesterone receptor (PR) status. Cell lines tested included two HER2 inhibitor-sensitive (HER2iS) cell lines (SKBR3 and BT474) and four HER2iR cell lines (MDAMB453, HCC1954, HCC1569, and MDAMB361). BT474 and MDAMB453 cells were positive for both HER2 and either ER or PR [7, 9]. We also included two TNBC cell lines (MDAMB468, SUM149) and four ER/PR+ breast cancer cell lines (BT483, CAMA-1, MCF7, and T47D) as controls for the response to THZ1 [19, 20, 22]. TNBC cells were previously reported to be more sensitive to THZ1 treatment than ER/PR cells [20]. All HER2+ BC cell lines tested demonstrated high susceptibility to THZ1, with cell viability effectively suppressed at low nanomolar concentrations (average IC50 = 60 nM), similar to the effects seen in TNBC (Fig. 1a). ER/PR+ cells were less sensitive to THZ1, (average IC50 > 1 μM), consistent with a previous report [20]. We further evaluated the effect of THZ1 on long-term colony formation in HER2+ BC cells chronically exposed to a low dose (40 nM) of THZ1 (Fig. 1b). THZ1 efficiently inhibited colony formation in all HER2+ cells, but not in ER/PR+ MCF7 cells. Flow cytometric analyses of the cell cycle showed that, in contrast to TNBC and ER/PR cells [20], HER2+ cells treated with THZ1 arrested the G2/M phase of the cell cycle at 24 h of treatment (Fig. 1c). Moreover, THZ1 treatment led to profound induction of apoptosis in HER2+ cells, but not in ER/PR cells (MCF7) (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. S1). Together, these data indicate that THZ1 is highly cytotoxic not only in TNBC cells, but also in HER2+ BC cells, regardless of their sensitivity to HER2 inhibitors and ER/PR status.
Inhibition of CDK7 impacts transcription and cell cycle progression in HER2+ breast cancer cells
CDK7 regulates RNA Pol II-mediated transcriptional initiation and pausing, in addition to its effects on transcript elongation through its CAK activity working via other transcriptional CDKs [23–25]. We observed a decrease in the initiation-associated phosphorylation of serine 5/7 (S5, S7) and in the elongation-associated phosphorylation of S2 of Pol II in both HER2+ and ER/PR+ cells treated with THZ1. The decrease in Pol II phosphorylation following THZ1 treatment in HER2+ cells was associated with increased levels of cleaved poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP), a marker of apoptotic cell death (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. S2a, b). CDK7 also stimulates cell cycle progression by activating CDK1 and CDK2 through its T-loop phosphorylation function [26]. However, we did not observe a time-dependent decrease in T-loop phosphorylation of CDK1, CDK2, or other proteins involved in cell cycle regulation (pRB and E2F) in HER2+ cells (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. S2c). Consistent with these results, the Pol II inhibitor triptolide appeared to show selectivity for HER2+ cells compared with purvalanol, which primarily targets cell cycle CDKs (Fig. 2b, c). Changes in phosphorylation of ER (Ser118) previously reported upon treatment with THZ1 were not observed in two HER2+/ER+ cell lines (BT474 and MDAMB453, Supplementary Fig. S2d). Thus, THZ1 appears to exert its cytotoxic effects through inhibition of transcription rather than via phosphorylation of classic CDKs or ER, suggesting that CDK7 plays a primary role in transcription in HER2+ BC cells.
Modulation of CDK7/RNA pol II activity by HER2 signaling pathways
Based on the hypersensitivity of HER2+ BC cells to THZ1, we next investigated whether HER2 expression affects CDK7 activity tumor cells. Ectopic expression of human wild-type HER2 increased protein levels of both CDK7 and RNA Pol II, and phosphorylation of RNA Pol II CTD in immortalized human mammary epithelial (HMEC) cells (Fig. 3a). Consistent with these findings, de-induction of HER2 expression in HER2+ mouse mammary tumors derived from MMTV-rtTA-TetO HER2 transgenic mice [9] resulted in a dramatic loss of CDK7 expression and decreased phosphorylation of RNA Pol II CTD (Fig. 3b). Inhibition of HER2 activity by lapatinib, a dual HER2/EGFR kinase inhibitor, decreased both phosphorylation and expression of CDK7, and phosphorylation of RNA Pol II CTD in the HER2+ BC cell line SKBR3 (Fig. 3c). Taken together, these results suggest that HER2 might regulate the expression and activity of the CDK7/RNA Pol II and may, as a result, mediate CDK7-dependent RNA Pol II phosphorylation and transcriptional initiation.
Given the role of CDK7 in phosphorylation of the RNA Pol II CTD at active genes [19, 23, 27], we hypothesized that a critical set of HER2 regulated genes (regulons) may confer sensitivity to CDK7 inhibition in HER2+ cells. We therefore first compared changes in the transcriptomes of two HER2+ BC cell lines (SBKR3 and BT474) after treatment with the HER2/EGFR inhibitor lapatinib or the CDK7 inhibitor THZ1. Gene expression profiling indicated that 14–20% and 24–28% of the transcriptome was modulated after 6 h treatment with lapatinib or THZ1, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S3a, b and Table S1). We expected that the CDK7 inhibitor THZ1 would disrupt a significant portion of the gene expression that is inhibited by lapatinib. Indeed, THZ1 treatment led to a reduction in steady-state mRNA levels in these two breast cancer cell lines and affected 37.5% (377/1005) of the genes that were downregulated by lapatinib treatment (Supplementary Fig. S3c). We thus identified a subset of genes showing sensitivity to both HER2 and CDK7 inhibitors.
In parallel, we also analyzed how many HER2 regulons were perturbated by CDK7 inhibition. We compared the transcriptional changes in HMEC-HER2 cells, which ectopically express human HER2 in an HMEC cell background (Fig. 3a), with vector control HMEC-pBABE cells. We found that 2367 genes (FDR < 0.1, p < 0.05) were differently modulated by overexpression of HER2 in HMEC cells. Gene ontology analyses of these HER2 regulons showed significant enrichment in the pathways of cytokine–receptor interaction, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) and NOD-like receptor signaling. (Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Fig. S4a). The 1274 genes were upregulated by HER2 overexpression in HEMC cells. 11.1% (141/1274) were inhibited by the CDK7 inhibitor THZ1 in HER2+ BC cell lines SKBR3 and BT474 (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Table S2). These HER2 regulons inhibited by THZ1 included a substantial number of signaling molecules and transcription factors (Fig. 3e). Overall 11.8% (151/1274) of these genes that were suppressed by lapatinib mainly function as enzyme regulator activity and ATPases (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. S4b). Only 43 HER2 up-regulons were inhibited both THZ1 and lapatinib (Fig. 3d). In this subset of genes, we confirmed three genes with established roles in breast cancer, including HES4 [28], CCND1 [9], IGFBP3 [29], with quantitative RT-PCR analyses. mRNA levels of these genes were increased in HMEC-HER2 cells, compared the vector control cell HMEC-pBABE, and decreased by treatment with both lapatinib and THZ1 in SKBR3 and BT474 cells (Fig. 3f–h). Thus, the 141-gene set in HER2+ cells may collectively represent a HER2-specific vulnerability, which mediated by CDK7 inhibition in breast cancers.
CDK7/RNA Pol II activity regulated by RTKs and downstream signaling pathways confers resistance to HER2 inhibitors
One of the dominant mechanisms of intrinsic and acquired resistant to HER2-targeted therapies is the activation of compensatory signaling pathways. Multiple RTKs, including ERBB3, PDGFRB, EPHA2, TYRO3, FGFR2, and ROR2, have been reported to mediate the therapeutic resistance of HER2+ BC [30–32]. To explore whether these RTKs also promote the activity of CDK7, we established multiple cell models that stably overexpressed each HER2 inhibitor-resistant RTK (HER2iR RTK) using pWZL retroviral transduction in a HMEC cell line. All HER2iR RTKs tested induced the expression of both CDK7 and RNA Pol II and enhanced their activity by increasing phosphorylation levels (Fig. 4a).
The nonreceptor protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2, which lies downstream of many RTKs, functions as an oncogenic tyrosine phosphatase. Inhibition of SHP2 selectively inhibits cancers driven by RTKs [33], suggesting that SHP2 serves as a central node downstream of RTK signaling. We showed that the dual SHP2 inhibitor PHPS1 [34] effectively sensitized human HER2iR breast cancer cells to lapatinib (Supplementary Fig. S5a–d), suggesting that aberrant SHP2 signaling may confer resistance to HER2 inhibitors in HER2+ BC cells. Indeed, we recently discovered a novel mutant form of SHP2 (A465T) in mouse HER2iR mammary tumors by RNA-seq analysis [9]. Ectopic expression of human analogous SHP2 (A461T) increased RNA Pol II phosphorylation through CDK7 by activating both ERK and AKT signaling pathways in HMECs (Fig. 4b), similar to previous findings with the WT protein and active E76A mutant [35]. These results suggest that SHP2 (A461T) is an active mutant form of the SHP2 protein and activation of SHP2 confers the resistance to HER2 inhibition in HER2+ BC cells.
Activation of PI3K signaling downstream of HER2 is one mechanism that may provide the progrowth and prosurvival signaling necessary to overcome HER2 inhibition in tumors. Expression of mutant PIK3CA or loss of PTEN in breast cancer cell lines is associated with resistance to HER2-targeted therapies [6, 36, 37]. We ectopically activated PI3K signaling by stably expressing oncogenic PI3KCA or AKT1 in HMEC cells. Overexpression of mutant PIKCA or wild-type AKT1 increased the phosphorylation and activity of RNA Pol II by increasing the expression of CDK7 (Fig. 4c). Taken together, our results suggest that the expression and activity of CDK7 is modulated by HER2iR RTKs and their downstream signaling kinases (Fig. 4d).
CDK7 induces aberrant gene upregulation that confers resistance to HER2 inhibition
We further interrogated the role of CDK7 in the regulons of HER2iR kinases. We utilized our HEMC cell models and analyzed the alteration of the transcriptome driven by activation of PI3K or SHP2, two core intracellular kinases downstream of RTKs [33, 38]. We compared the transcriptomic changes of either HMEC-PIK3CAH1047R or HMEC-SHP2E76A to their vector control cells HMEC-pBABE. A total of 10908 genes and 7282 genes (FDR < 0.1, p < 0.05) were differentially expressed in HEMC-PIK3CAH1047R cells or HEMC-SHP2E76A cells, respectively, compared with HEMC-pBABE cells. Activation of PI3K by PIK3CAH1047R enriched genes in the pathways of DNA replication, cellular senescence, cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction and PI3K-AKT signaling (Supplementary Fig. S6a). Activation of SHP2 regulated genes that were mainly involved in cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction and PI3K-AKT signaling pathway (Supplementary Fig. S6b), 67.8% (4936/7282) of SHP2 regulons are synchronously regulated by PI3K. Of these, 68.4% (2407/3519) of SHP2 up-regulons were upregulated by PI3K. These results further confirmed that PI3K is dominant downstream of SHP2 signaling in breast cells [35]. Nine percent (217/2407) PI3K/SHP2 up-regulons were inhibited by the CDK7 inhibitor THZ1 in HER2+ BC cell lines (Fig. 4e). These genes are enriched in transcriptional regulators, including TWIST and MYC, that are known to mediate HER2 inhibitor resistance [39, 40]. Quantitative RT-PCR analyses confirmed that mRNA levels of TWIST and MYC were increased in both HMEC-PIK3CAH1047R and HEMC-SHP2E76A HER2 cells, compared the vector control HMEC-pBABE cells. mRNA levels of these two genes were decreased by treatment with THZ1, but mostly not by lapatinib, in the HER2iR cell lines HCC1569, HCC1954, and MDAMB453 (Fig. 4f–i). Taken together, these results suggest that CDK7 mediates gene transcription engaged by multiple HER2iR kinase pathways. This subset of genes encoding transcriptional regulators and signaling factors in HER2-positive cells may partially represent a HER2iR vulnerability, which is mediated by CDK7 in breast cancers.
Combined HER2-CDK7 inhibition synergistically suppresses tumor cell proliferation
Inhibition of CDK7 was reported to suppress an adaptive response to lapatinib via transcription repression in gastric and esophageal cancer cell models [41]. We asked if this also holds true in breast cancer cells. In HER2+ BC cells SKBR3 and BT474, THZ1 not only inhibited a set of genes that were downregulated by lapatinib (Supplementary Fig. S3c), but also suppressed the expression of a large number of genes that were upregulated by lapatinib. A total of 814 genes that were commonly upregulated by lapatinib in both SKBR3 and BT474 cells (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. S7a). Gene ontology terms showed that these genes were enriched in gene functioning in the regulation of transcription, kinase activity, and protein ubiquitination (Supplementary Fig. S7b), including SMAD2/3 signaling, FOXO signaling, and the HIF1-alpha transcription factor network (Supplementary Fig. S7c). Among these genes, 174 (21.3%) were inhibited by THZ1 in both cell lines, suggesting inhibition of CDK7 contributes to suppressing aberrant activation of transcriptome caused by lapatinib.
We then ask if inhibition of CDK7 resensitizes breast cancer cells to lapatinib, a HER2-targeted agent commonly used in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Specifically, we tested whether inhibition of CDK7 restored the sensitivity of three HERiR tumor cell lines HCC1569, HCC1954, and MDAMB453, which are intrinsically resistant to HER2 blockade. We used the Chou–Talalay method for drug combination studies [42] and determined the dose-response curves of lapatinib and THZ1 individually and in combination at a constant potency ratio. For each of the cell lines, we observed the single-agent activity of lapatinib and THZ1 and a remarkably potent synergistic inhibition of cell viability after combined treatment. The calculated combination index (CI) values for HCC1569, HCC1954, and MDAMB453 cells at doses that reduced cell viability by 50% were 0.44, 0.74, and 0.52, respectively (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. S8a–f).
To examine the long-term effects of HER2 and CDK7 inhibition, we determined the effects of lapatinib and THZ1 on clonogenic growth of these three cell lines. Cells were exposed to low doses of lapatinib (0.25 or 0.5 μM) and THZ1 (5 or 10 nM) individually or in combination for up to 2 weeks. Although treatment with THZ1 alone suppressed clonogenic growth, combined THZ1 and lapatinib treatment were more effective (Fig. 5b). Quantitation of colonies revealed a greater reduction in the number of colonies after combined treatment with THZ1 and lapatinib than with the individual inhibitors (Fig. 5c).
We next assessed the activities of CDK7/RNA Pol II complex in response to lapatinib and THZ1 alone or in combination in these three cell lines. Unlike in HER2iS cell line SKBR3 (Fig. 3c), lapatinib did not obviously suppressed the expression and phosphorylation of CDK7 in all three HER2iR cell lines. THZ1 not only suppressed phosphorylation of RNA Pol II, but also disrupted mRNA and protein levels of HER2 (Fig. 5d, Supplementary Fig. S9a, b), subsequently resulting in reduced phosphorylated HER2 in these cells (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. S9c). Combined treatment with CDK7 and lapatinib greatly inhibited both HER2 activation and RNA Pol II phosphorylation and enhanced tumor cell apoptosis as assessed by increased levels of the active form of PARP (Fig. 5d). Therefore, CDK7 inhibition restores sensitivity of HER2iR tumor cells to the effects of HER2 inhibitors through decreased cell proliferation and increased induction of apoptotic cell death.
The effects of combined CDK7 and HER2 inhibition on tumors in vivo
Last, we tested if CDK7 could resensitize HER2iR breast cancer cells to lapatinib in vivo. NCI nude mice bearing palpable HCC1569 or HCC1954 xenografts were treated with lapatinib and THZ1 alone or in combination. Lapatinib alone resulted in marginal inhibition of tumor growth, whereas THZ1 alone significantly impaired tumor growth (Fig. 6a, b and Supplementary Fig. S10a, b). Combined HER2/CDK7 inhibition resulted in durable tumor regression in the HCC1569 and HCC1954 xenograft tumor models. Together, these data suggest that although CDK7 is a good target to overcome resistance to HER2 therapy in HER2+ BCs, combined inhibition of HER2 and CDK7 offers maximal cell growth inhibition and durable tumor regression.
To evaluate signaling and pharmacodynamic responses of HCC1569 and HCC1954 xenografts during inhibitor treatment we isolated tumors 72 h after drug administration and analyzed molecular markers. Dual HER2 and CDK7 inhibition decreased RNA Pol II phosphorylation, suppressed cell proliferation, and induced apoptosis (Fig. 6c–f). These results establish that CDK7 primarily exerts its transcriptional kinase activity by mediating signaling through HER2 and other RTKs in HER2+ breast tumors.
Discussion
Here we show that a CDK7 inhibitor, THZ1, strongly inhibited HER2+ BC cell growth and increased apoptosis, even in cancer cells that exhibited resistance to HER2-targeted therapy. Unexpectedly, CDK7 did not promote cell cycle progression directly through phosphorylation of CDKs and ER, indicating that CDK7 plays its primary role in transcription in these cells. Using HMEC cell models, we demonstrated that the transcriptional activity of CDK7 was modulated by HER2, other RTKs and their downstream PI3K and SHP2 signaling nodes. Our studies also demonstrated a novel codependency of HER2 and CDK7 that might be exploited in therapeutically recalcitrant HER2+ BC. Our results also suggest that patients with HER2+ BC may have a durable response to combined inhibition of HER2 and CDK7.
Multiple kinases can contribute to escape from lapatinib-mediated growth inhibition, consistent with a shift in dependency to alternative signaling nodes in addition to HER2. This prevents their targeting by a single kinase inhibitor and underscores the difficulty in choosing the most effective kinase inhibitor combinations to treat HER2+ tumors. We approached this problem with the hypothesis that lapatinib would have a more durable effect in inhibiting HER2+ cell growth if we could block the signaling of multiple HER2iR kinases. We therefore targeted proteins involved in transcriptional regulation of RTKs that drive the signaling networks responsible for lapatinib resistance. CDK7 functions as a core transcriptional kinase that mediates the activity of multiple RTKs capable of generating resistance to HER2-targeted therapies. By inhibiting signaling of multiple RTKs through CDK7 inhibition we could achieve durable growth inhibition and potentially block the adaptive responses seen to a single RTK inhibitor.
TNBC and ER+ BC cells have been reported to respond to CDK7 inhibition through different mechanisms [20, 22]. TNBC cells depend on the transcriptional role of CDK7 and possess a cluster of TNBC-specific genes that are especially sensitive to CDK7 inhibition, whereas in ER+ cells THZ1 blocks phosphorylation of mutant ER at Ser118 and inhibits cell growth. We analyzed EGFR, another HER family member frequently overexpressed in TNBCs, and found that, similar to HER2 case, there was activation of the CDK7/RNA pol II complex by two active mutants, EGFRL858R [43] and EGFRDel [43], in our HEMC cell system (Supplementary Fig. S11), suggesting that EGFR signaling drives CDK7 mediated transcription in TNBCs.
Our finding that both HER2 inhibitor-sensitive and -resistant breast cancer cell lines became highly sensitized to THZ1 and exhibited a similar response to THZ1 to that of TNBC, could be attributed to CDK7-dependent transcriptional inhibition[7]. We examined the role of CDK7 in gene transcription, cell cycle activation, and ER phosphorylation in two HER2+/ER+ cell lines (BT474 and MDAMB453), showed that CDK7 primarily functions in gene transcription. It is worth noting that the cell cytotoxicity induced by CDK7 inhibition affects the growth of HER2+ BC cells in a HER2-dependent and -independent manner. In HER2iS cells, CDK7 mainly mediates gene transcription activated by HER2 signaling (Fig. 3d), whereas in HER2iR cells CDK7 plays a critical role in halting gene transcription activated by intrinsic and acquired signaling through multiple dominant HERiR kinases (Fig. 5d). We extended our study to other cancer models with a second kinase driven lineage, which exhibited resistance to a primary targeted kinase inhibitor. We tested the sensitivity of lung cancer cell lines PC9 and PC9GR4 to THZ1. PC9 cells are known to contain a deletion in exon 19 (DelE746A750) of EGFR, while PC9GR4 cells were obtained by chronic exposure to the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib and feature both activation of the FGF2-FGFR1 signaling pathway, as well as harboring an additional EGFR mutant, T790M, that is resistant to gefitinib [44]. Both PC9 and PC9GR4 exhibited a high sensitivity to THZ1 with low IC50 values (Supplementary Fig. S12a). We also examined a melanoma cell line A375MEK1Q56P, which exhibits resistance to BRAF inhibitors [45]. A375MEK1Q56P showed less response to THZ1 treatment compared with the parental cell A375 with BRAFV600E (Supplementary Fig. S12b). These results suggest inhibition of CDK7 may serve as an additional therapeutic avenue that prevents reactivation of multiple RTKs, but is not capable of silencing all the nodes of downstream intracellular signaling. Further experimentation in this area will be required.
Aberrant activation of SHP2 has been implicated in several human diseases and malignancies [46]. Although somatic SHP2 mutations are rare in solid tumors [47], aberrant activation of upstream RTKs, such as the overexpression of HER2 in breast cancer [48] and EGFR in colon cancer [49], has been shown to activate SHP2 to promote cancer development, progression, and resistance to targeted therapies. Here, we provide the first evidence that aberrant activation of SHP2 mediates resistance of breast cancer cells to HER2 blockade and this resistance can be overcome by inhibition of CDK7. In HER2+ BC, both PI3K and MAPK can mediate resistance of cancer cells to HER2-targeted therapy [7, 9]. PI3K and MAPK signaling pathways are dominantly active in TNBC; nearly 80% of TNBCs have potential MAPK/ERK pathway activation and 90% exhibit PI3KCA pathway activation [50]. Thus, it is not surprising that 15% (9/60) of the CDK7-sensitive Achilles cluster of genes in TNBCs [20] are also inhibited by THZ1 in HER2+ BC cells (SKBR3 and BT474) (Supplementary Table 1). To explore the role of SHP2, PI3K, and ERK signaling in the resensitization of HER2iR cells to lapatinib by the addition of THZ1, we examined the activity and expression of SHP2, and downstream PI3K/AKT and ERK signaling by western blotting in three HER2iR cell lines HCC1569, HCC1954, and MDAMB453. PI3K and ERK signaling, independent of SHP2, played roles in the two cell lines HCC1569 and HCC1954 treated by THZ1, while, noncanonical signaling downstream of SHP2, rather than PI3K and ERK signaling, appears to mediate resensitization to lapatinib by THZ1 in MDAMB453 cells. These results suggest that specific dominant HER2iR RTKs or their downstream signaling nodes control the activity of CDK7/RNA pol II complex and drive CDK7 mediated transcription activation in each individual HER2iR breast cancer cell line (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. S13). The HER2 regulon cyclin D1 is chiefly regulated via both the MAPK/ERK and PI3K pathways[51, 52]. We recently reported that a high level of cyclin D1 confers resistance to HER2 pathway blockade [9]. Here, we show that inhibition of CDK7 efficiently decreases the mRNA levels of CCND1 in HE2iR breast cancer cells (Supplementary Fig. S14). Taken together, these data suggest that CDK7 regulates HERiR-related transcriptomic changes activated by multiple kinase signaling pathways.
In summary, our data identify CDK7 as a new therapeutic target to improve the treatment and survival of patients with HER2+ BC and reveal how CDK7 acts as a transcriptional kinase in these cancers. This study provides the first demonstration that targeting CDK7-dependent transcription is an effective method to globally suppress the multiple kinase-activated genes that are critical for proliferation and viability of HER2+ BC cells. We show that CDK7 inhibition decreases transcriptional levels of multiple genes engaged by RTKs and downstream PI3K/AKT and SHP2 signaling. Combined inhibition of HER2 and CDK7 maximally abrogated RNA Pol II activation and induced a durable tumor response. Our findings reveal a novel codependency of HER2 and CDK7 that can be exploited in therapeutically recalcitrant HER2+ BC.
Materials and methods
The following methods are detailed in Supplementary Information, including the source of cell culture and reagents, transfection of siRNA and plasmids, cell viability assay, cell cycle analysis and annexin V staining, western blotting, Gene expression profiling by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray, immunofluorescence, quantitative real-time PCR, mouse xenotransplantation experiments, histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC), and data statistical analyses.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by pilot research funding form an American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant awarded to the Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina (ACS_IRG IRG-97-219-14, QW); Supported in part by the Genomic Shared Resource, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina (P30 CA138313); NIH grants R01 CA187305 (ESY), R35 CA210057 CA187918 (TMR and JJZ), 1P50CA168504 (TMR and JJZ); the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (JJZ); Rosanna’s Rush for Research (JJZ). We also like to thank Dr Stephen Ethier (Medical University of South Carolina, SC, USA) for providing cell line Sum149.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Change history
5/29/2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41388-024-02999-1
Supplementary information
The online version of this article (10.1038/s41388-019-0953-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.Stuhlmiller T, Earp H, Johnson G. Adaptive reprogramming of the breast cancer kinome. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95:413–5. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2014.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stuhlmiller TJ, Miller SM, Zawistowski JS, Nakamura K, Beltran AS, Duncan JS, et al. Inhibition of lapatinib-induced kinome reprogramming in ERBB2-positive breast cancer by targeting BET family bromodomains. Cell Rep. 2015;11:390–404. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hynes NE, Lane HA. ERBB receptors and cancer: the complexity of targeted inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:341–54. doi: 10.1038/nrc1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Berns K, Horlings HM, Hennessy BT, Madiredjo M, Hijmans EM, Beelen K, et al. A functional genetic approach identifies the PI3K pathway as a major determinant of trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. Cancer cell. 2007;12:395–402. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Moasser MM, Krop IE. The evolving landscape of HER2 targeting in breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:1154–61. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nagata Y, Lan KH, Zhou X, Tan M, Esteva FJ, Sahin AA, et al. PTEN activation contributes to tumor inhibition by trastuzumab, and loss of PTEN predicts trastuzumab resistance in patients. Cancer Cell. 2004;6:117–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang Q, Liu P, Spangle JM, Von T, Roberts TM, Lin NU et al. PI3K-p110alpha mediates resistance to HER2-targeted therapy in HER2+, PTEN-deficient breast cancers. Oncogene. 2016;35:3607–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Storniolo AM, Rugo H, Sledge G, Koehler M, et al. Randomized study of Lapatinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab in women with ErbB2-positive, trastuzumab-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1124–30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goel S, Wang Q, Watt AC, Tolaney SM, Dillon DA, Li W, et al. Overcoming therapeutic resistance in HER2-positive breast cancers with CDK4/6 Inhibitors. Cancer Cell. 2016;29:255–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Loi S, Michiels S, Salgado R, Sirtaine N, Jose V, Fumagalli D, et al. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are prognostic in triple negative breast cancer and predictive for trastuzumab benefit in early breast cancer: results from the FinHER trial. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:1544–50. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lu Y, Zi X, Zhao Y, Mascarenhas D, Pollak M. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signaling and resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin) J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1852–7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.24.1852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Musolino A, Naldi N, Bortesi B, Pezzuolo D, Capelletti M, Missale G, et al. Immunoglobulin G fragment C receptor polymorphisms and clinical efficacy of trastuzumab-based therapy in patients with HER-2/neu-positive metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1789–96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Scaltriti M, Eichhorn PJ, Cortes J, Prudkin L, Aura C, Jimenez J, et al. Cyclin E amplification/overexpression is a mechanism of trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:3761–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014835108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Scaltriti M, Rojo F, Ocana A, Anido J, Guzman M, Cortes J, et al. Expression of p95HER2, a truncated form of the HER2 receptor, and response to anti-HER2 therapies in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:628–38. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mayer IA, Abramson VG, Lehmann BD, Pietenpol JA. New strategies for triple-negative breast cancer-deciphering the heterogeneity. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:782–90. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen D, Washbrook E, Sarwar N, Bates GJ, Pace PE, Thirunuvakkarasu V, et al. Phosphorylation of human estrogen receptor α at serine 118 by two distinct signal transduction pathways revealed by phosphorylation-specific antisera. Oncogene. 2002;21:4921. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Christensen CL, Kwiatkowski N, Abraham BJ, Carretero J, Al-Shahrour F, Zhang T, et al. Targeting transcriptional addictions in small cell lung cancer with a covalent CDK7 inhibitor. Cancer cell. 2014;26:909–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chipumuro E, Marco E, Christensen CL, Kwiatkowski N, Zhang T, Hatheway CM, et al. CDK7 inhibition suppresses super-enhancer-linked oncogenic transcription in MYCN-driven cancer. Cell. 2014;159:1126–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kwiatkowski N, Zhang T, Rahl PB, Abraham BJ, Reddy J, Ficarro SB, et al. Targeting transcription regulation in cancer with a covalent CDK7 inhibitor. Nature. 2014;511:616–20. doi: 10.1038/nature13393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang Y, Zhang T, Kwiatkowski N, Abraham BJ, Lee TI, Xie S, et al. CDK7-dependent transcriptional addiction in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell. 2015;163:174–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Harrod A, Fulton J, Nguyen VT, Periyasamy M, Ramos-Garcia L, Lai C-F, et al. Genomic modelling of the ESR1 Y537S mutation for evaluating function and new therapeutic approaches for metastatic breast cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36:2286. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jeselsohn R, Bergholz JS, Pun M, Cornwell M, Liu W, Nardone A, et al. Allele-specific chromatin recruitment and therapeutic vulnerabilities of ESR1 activating mutations. Cancer cell. 2018;33:173–86. e175. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Glover-Cutter K, Larochelle S, Erickson B, Zhang C, Shokat K, Fisher RP, et al. TFIIH-associated Cdk7 kinase functions in phosphorylation of C-terminal domain Ser7 residues, promoter-proximal pausing, and termination by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:5455–64. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00637-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Larochelle S, Amat R, Glover-Cutter K, Sanso M, Zhang C, Allen JJ, et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase control of the initiation-to-elongation switch of RNA polymerase II. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19:1108–15. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Palancade B, Bensaude O. Investigating RNA polymerase II carboxyl‐terminal domain (CTD) phosphorylation. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270:3859–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03794.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Larochelle S, Merrick KA, Terret M-E, Wohlbold L, Barboza NM, Zhang C, et al. Requirements for Cdk7 in the assembly of Cdk1/cyclin B and activation of Cdk2 revealed by chemical genetics in human cells. Mol cell. 2007;25:839–50. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Akhtar MS, Heidemann M, Tietjen JR, Zhang DW, Chapman RD, Eick D, et al. TFIIH kinase places bivalent marks on the carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell. 2009;34:387–93. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stoeck A, Lejnine S, Truong A, Pan L, Wang H, Zang C, et al. Discovery of biomarkers predictive of GSI response in triple-negative breast cancer and adenoid cystic carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:1154–67. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Julovi SM, Martin JL, Baxter RC. Nuclear insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 as a biomarker in triple-negative breast cancer xenograft tumors: effect of targeted therapy and comparison with chemotherapy. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:120. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Alexander PB, Chen R, Gong C, Yuan L, Jasper JS, Ding Y, et al. Distinct receptor tyrosine kinase subsets mediate anti-HER2 drug resistance in breast cancer. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:748–59. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.754960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hanker AB, Garrett JT, Estrada MV, Moore PD, Ericsson PG, Koch JP, et al. HER2-overexpressing breast cancers amplify FGFR signaling upon acquisition of resistance to dual therapeutic blockade of HER2. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4323–34. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhuang G, Brantley-Sieders DM, Vaught D, Yu J, Xie L, Wells S, et al. Elevation of receptor tyrosine kinase EphA2 mediates resistance to trastuzumab therapy. Cancer Res. 2010;70:299–308. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen Y-NP, LaMarche MJ, Chan HM, Fekkes P, Garcia-Fortanet J, Acker MG, et al. Allosteric inhibition of SHP2 phosphatase inhibits cancers driven by receptor tyrosine kinases. Nature. 2016;535:148. doi: 10.1038/nature18621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hellmuth K, Grosskopf S, Lum CT, Würtele M, Röder N, von Kries JP, et al. Specific inhibitors of the protein tyrosine phosphatase Shp2 identified by high-throughput docking. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:7275–80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710468105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang SQ, Tsiaras WG, Araki T, Wen G, Minichiello L, Klein R, et al. Receptor-specific regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase activation by the protein tyrosine phosphatase Shp2. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:4062–72. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.12.4062-4072.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hanker AB, Pfefferle AD, Balko JM, Kuba MG, Young CD, Sanchez V, et al. Mutant PIK3CA accelerates HER2-driven transgenic mammary tumors and induces resistance to combinations of anti-HER2 therapies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:14372–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303204110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Eichhorn PJ, Gili M, Scaltriti M, Serra V, Guzman M, Nijkamp W, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase hyperactivation results in lapatinib resistance that is reversed by the mTOR/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor NVP-BEZ235. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9221–30. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu P, Cheng H, Roberts TM, Zhao JJ. Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:627. doi: 10.1038/nrd2926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Oliveras-Ferraros C, Corominas-Faja B, Cufi S, Vazquez-Martin A, Martin-Castillo B, Iglesias JM, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) confers primary resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin) Cell Cycle. 2012;11:4020–32. doi: 10.4161/cc.22225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dueck AC, Reinholz MM, Geiger XJ, Tenner K, Ballman K, Jenkins RB, et al. Impact of c-MYC protein expression on outcome of patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer treated with adjuvant trastuzumab NCCTG (alliance) N9831. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:5798–807. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rusan M, Li K, Li Y, Christensen CL, Abraham BJ, Kwiatkowski N, et al. Suppression of adaptive responses to targeted cancer therapy by transcriptional repression. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:59–73. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chou T-C. Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism and antagonism in drug combination studies. Pharmacol Rev. 2006;58:621–81. doi: 10.1124/pr.58.3.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Greulich H, Chen T-H, Feng W, Jänne PA, Alvarez JV, Zappaterra M, et al. Oncogenic transformation by inhibitor-sensitive and-resistant EGFR mutants. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ercan D, Zejnullahu K, Yonesaka K, Xiao Y, Capelletti M, Rogers A, et al. Amplification of EGFR T790M causes resistance to an irreversible EGFR inhibitor. Oncogene. 2010;29:2346. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Emery CM, Vijayendran KG, Zipser MC, Sawyer AM, Niu L, Kim JJ, et al. MEK1 mutations confer resistance to MEK and B-RAF inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106:20411–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905833106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Neel BG, Gu H, Pao L. The ‘Shp'ing news: SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatases in cell signaling. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003;28:284–93. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00091-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bentires-Alj M, Paez JG, David FS, Keilhack H, Halmos B, Naoki K, et al. Activating mutations of the noonan syndrome-associated SHP2/PTPN11 gene in human solid tumors and adult acute myelogenous leukemia. Cancer Res. 2004;64:8816–20. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bentires-Alj M, Gil SG, Chan R, Wang ZC, Wang Y, Imanaka N, et al. A role for the scaffolding adapter GAB2 in breast cancer. Nat Med. 2006;12:114. doi: 10.1038/nm1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Prahallad A, Heynen GJ, Germano G, Willems SM, Evers B, Vecchione L, et al. PTPN11 is a central node in intrinsic and acquired resistance to targeted cancer drugs. Cell Rep. 2015;12:1978–85. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Network CGA. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61. doi: 10.1038/nature11412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Diehl JA, Cheng M, Roussel MF, Sherr CJ. Glycogen synthase kinase-3β regulates cyclin D1 proteolysis and subcellular localization. Genes Dev. 1998;12:3499–511. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.22.3499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. Living with or without cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases. Genes Dev. 2004;18:2699–711. doi: 10.1101/gad.1256504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.