Presence of Carotid Plaque Is Associated with Rapid Renal Function Decline in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Normal Renal Function

Da Hea Seo; So Hun Kim; Joon Ho Song; Seongbin Hong; Young Ju Suh; Seong Hee Ahn; Jeong-Taek Woo; Sei Hyun Baik; Yongsoo Park; Kwan Woo Lee; Young Seol Kim; Moonsuk Nam; on Behalf of the KNDP Study Group

doi:10.4093/dmj.2018.0186

. 2019 Mar 12;43(6):840–853. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0186

Presence of Carotid Plaque Is Associated with Rapid Renal Function Decline in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Normal Renal Function

Da Hea Seo ^1,^*, So Hun Kim ^1,^*, Joon Ho Song ², Seongbin Hong ¹, Young Ju Suh ³, Seong Hee Ahn ¹, Jeong-Taek Woo ⁴, Sei Hyun Baik ⁵, Yongsoo Park ⁶, Kwan Woo Lee ⁷, Young Seol Kim ⁴, Moonsuk Nam ^1,^✉; on Behalf of the KNDP Study Group

PMCID: PMC6943261 PMID: 30877715

Abstract

Background

Recent evidences indicate that early rapid renal function decline is closely associated with the development and progression of diabetic kidney disease. We have investigated the association between carotid atherosclerosis and rapid renal function decline in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and preserved renal function.

Methods

In a prospective, multicenter cohort, a total of 967 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and preserved renal function were followed for 6 years with serial estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements. Common carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and presence of carotid plaque were assessed at baseline. Rapid renal function decline was defined as an eGFR decline >3.3% per year.

Results

Over a median follow-up of 6 years, 158 participants (16.3%) developed rapid renal function decline. While there was no difference in CIMT, the presence of carotid plaque in rapid decliners was significantly higher than in non-decliners (23.2% vs. 12.2%, P<0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, presence of carotid plaque was an independent predictor of rapid renal function decline (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.48 to 3.68; P<0.0001) after adjustment for established risk factors. The model including the carotid plaque had better performance for discrimination of rapid renal function decline than the model without carotid plaque (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.772 vs. 0.744, P=0.016).

Conclusion

Close monitoring of renal function and early intensive management may be beneficial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and carotid plaques.

Keywords: Carotid stenosis; Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Diabetic nephropathies

INTRODUCTION

The population of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) continues to rise around the world. DKD leads to excess morbidity and premature mortality and is a great socioeconomic burden in patients with diabetes [1]. Traditionally, microalbuminuria has been known as an early predictor of the onset of DKD. However, recent studies have demonstrated that a substantial number of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) exhibited no albuminuria, challenging the traditional concept of the natural history of DKD that is closely linked to the progression of albuminuria [2,3].

A decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was initially considered to occur only in patients with albuminuria [4]. However, recent studies in type 1 diabetes mellitus explored trajectories of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline and found that there is a subset of patients with early progressive rapid renal function decline which occurs while patients have preserved renal function and continues to progress until they reach end stage renal disease (ESRD) [5,6]. Interestingly, this rapid renal function decline may sometimes precede the onset of albuminuria [2,3,7]. It is also suggested that rapid renal function decline is another strong predictor of progression to ESRD [7,8]. Many observational studies have investigated potential clinical risk factors contributing to rapid renal function decline in diabetes. However, the results have been somewhat inconsistent due to various definitions of rapid renal function decline and heterogeneous patient populations [2,5,7,8,9,10]. Furthermore, literature relevant to rapid renal function decline in T2DM and preserved kidney function is limited [8,9,10]. Measurements of urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) and eGFR have been current standard of care to diagnose diabetic nephropathy. However, they have limited utility distinguishing early renal function decliners from non-decliners. Currently, there is a lack of effective prognostic markers that can identify decliners in T2DM. As early implementation of intensive therapy in those patients at risk of developing rapid renal function decline would result in better outcomes than treating them late during the course [11], identification of diagnostic markers of rapid renal function decline is crucial.

Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and carotid plaque (CP) are non-invasive measurement of carotid atherosclerosis and are reliable markers of early systemic atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk [12]. Kidney dysfunction even in the earliest stage is closely linked to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [13]. DKD and CVD also share many risk factors [9]. Previous studies have shown that increased CIMT was associated with low eGFR [14] and progression to CKD in T2DM [15]. However, these studies were relatively small in size and the association between early rapid renal function decline and CP was not assessed. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to investigate the association between carotid atherosclerosis including CP and early rapid renal function decline in a prospective observational cohort study of patients with T2DM and preserved renal function.

METHODS

Study population

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of each institution (IRB 2006-67) and all participants provided written informed consent prior to participation. Subjects were participants in the Korean National Diabetes Program (KNDP), a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study of patients with T2DM who were recruited to understand the characteristics of Koreans with T2DM. ClinicalTrials. gov identifier was NCT01212198. The details of the KNDP cohort have been described previously [16]. Briefly, subjects were eligible to participate in the study if the patient was diagnosed with T2DM according to the American Diabetes Association criteria and/or was being treated with oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin for known T2DM [17].

A total of 4,324 patients with T2DM were enrolled from 12 academic medical centers of Korea during the period from May 2006 to July 2009 and then followed up until March 2014. Of these subjects, patients with diabetes duration <1 year, those with an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² and those who had <6 annual GFR measurements during the follow-up were excluded. Finally, 967 patients with preserved renal function met the inclusion criteria and were included in the current analysis.

Demographic, physical, and laboratory measurements

Information on medical history was obtained from all patients during interviews by trained personnel. Height and weight were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm and 0.1 kg, respectively. Body mass index was defined as weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared. Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lower borders of the rib cage and the iliac crest. Blood pressure was measured after the subject had rested for at least 10 minutes in a sitting position. Diabetic retinopathy was diagnosed based on fundoscopic examinations [18]. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg or any antihypertensive drug treatment. CVD was defined as presence of ischemic heart diseases including stable angina, acute coronary syndrome and myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation.

Blood samples were collected after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours and stored at −70℃ for subsequent assays. Serum triglycerides and high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were determined enzymatically using a chemistry analyzer (Hitachi 747; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were calculated using the Friedewald formula [19]. A glucose oxidase method was employed to measure plasma glucose, and an electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used to measure insulin levels. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance levels were calculated by dividing the product of fasting insulin (IU/mL) and fasting glucose (mmol/L) concentrations by 22.5 [20]. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured using high performance liquid chromatography (Bio-Rad Variant II; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). A random urine sample was obtained for albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) measurements. Urinary creatinine and albumin were measured using a turbidimetric assay (Cobas Integra; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Normoalbuminuria was defined as a spot UACR <30 µg/mg Cr, microalbuminuria as UACR ≥30 and <299 µg/mg Cr, and macroalbuminuria as UACR ≥300 µg/mg Cr [21].

Renal function measurement

The eGFR values were calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation [22]: it was calculated as eGFR=141×min(Scr/κ,1)^α×max(Scr/κ, 1)^−1.209×0.993^Age×1.018 (if female) (where Scr is serum creatinine in mg/dL; κ is 0.7 for females and 0.9 for males; α is −0.329 for females and −0.411 for males; min is the minimum of Scr/κ or 1; and max is the maximum of Scr/κ or 1). Annual eGFR decline was calculated as follows. For each patient, a linear regression model of time on eGFR (least-squares method) was created, and the slope of the regression line was used to estimate the patient's changes in eGFR over time. The eGFR slope was expressed as percentage per year by dividing the slope by the baseline eGFR value [10]. Rapid renal function decline was defined as eGFR decline >3.3%/year, which is in accordance with previous studies [7,8].

CIMT and CP assessment

CIMT and presence of CP were measured in the right and left common carotid arteries (CCAs) by high resolution B-mode ultrasonography as previously described [23]. Sonographers that were unaware of subjects' characteristics scanned bilateral CCAs, the carotid bulb, and the proximal portions of the internal and external carotid arteries in two planes (anterior oblique and lateral), and then focused on the interfaces required to measure intima-media thickness (IMT) and on any areas of focal plaque. CP was defined as a focal structure encroaching into the arterial lumen with a thickness >1.2 mm [24]. Measurements from the left and right CCAs were made at the far walls of the 20-mm segment distal to the carotid bulbs. Reading and analysis of images were done by a single well-trained physician who was blinded to the identity of the patient. The mean value of left and right CCAs IMT was used as the mean CIMT. Computer-assisted acquisition, processing, storage of B-mode images, and CIMT calculations were performed using Intima Scope software (MediaCross, Tokyo, Japan). To measure reader reproducibility, IMT for the first 122 subjects were measured repeatedly, and the results indicated that there was a 0.00±0.03 difference in the mean IMT. To minimize inter-measurer errors, workshops were conducted for ultrasound measurers from all participating institutions before study initiation and then annually during the study, and inter-measurer reproducibility was measured for the reference. During the entire period, intra-class correlation for ultrasound measurers was 0.97 to 0.99 for the mean IMT.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean±standard deviation and frequencies. Skewed variables were logarithmically transformed to improve normality before analysis (ACR, mean CIMT). The t-test (for continuous variables) and the chi-square test (for categorical variables) were used to analyze the differences among the baseline characteristics of participants stratified by presence or absence of rapid renal function decline or CP. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to examine the associations between variables at baseline and the development of rapid renal function decline. Area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristics analysis was estimated to evaluate the discriminatory performance for the multivariable logistic regression model on the rapid renal function decline adjusting for clinical risk factors and CP. The difference between AUC estimates between the models with (i=1) and without CP (i=2) was tested using the Wald statistic:

Z = \frac{\hat{A_{1}} - \hat{A_{2}}}{\sqrt{{S E (\hat{A_{1}})}^{2} + S E {(\hat{A_{2}})}^{2} - 2 r S E (\hat{A_{1}}) S E (\hat{A_{2}})}}

for an estimated AUC $\hat{A_{1}}$ in the model i and correlation coefficient r between two $\hat{A_{1}}$ , which asymptotically follows a standard normal distribution [25]. These clinical risk factors were chosen on the basis of their significance in multivariable logistic analysis or on the basis of their biologic plausibility. All analyses were done with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the level of significance was determined at P<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 19.0 statistical package software (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

A total of 967 patients with T2DM (mean age 53.7±9.4 years; 57.4% men) were included in the present study. Mean duration of diabetes was 5.4±5.8 years and mean HbA1c was 7.7%±1.8%. Baseline eGFR was 95.6±14.6 mL/min/1.73 m². Six hundred and fifty-five patients (67.7%) had normoalbuminuria, 191 (19.8%) had microalbuminuria, and 23 (2.4%) had macroalbuminuria. Four hundred and forty-three (45.8%) had hypertension, 107 (1.1%) had previous history of CVD, and 315 (32.6%) had CP.

All patients had at least six annual measurements of eGFR with a median follow-up duration of 6 years (range, 5 to 6 years). Annual eGFR decline (%) of the whole cohort was −1.1%±2.6%/year. The decline was more rapid in female (−2.1%±2.5%/year) than male (−0.4%±2.4%/year; P<0.001) (Supplementary Table 1). During the follow-up period, 158 patients (16.3%) showed rapid decline of eGFR, as defined as >3.3%/year. Mean annual eGFR decline was −5.2%±1.9%/year in rapid decliners and −0.4%±1.9%/year in non-decliners (P<0.001). One patient developed ESRD at the end of follow-up. In a sub-analysis of females, the proportion of rapid decliners was marginally higher in postmenopausal women compared to premenopausal women (19.9% vs. 28.8% in premenopausal women and postmenopausal women respectively, P=0.051) (Supplementary Table 2).

Baseline characteristics of rapid decliners and non-decliners are summarized in Table 1. Rapid decliners were significantly older, tended to be females, and exhibited a longer duration of diabetes. They also had a higher prevalence of hypertension, CVD and CP but there was no significant difference in CIMT between groups. Patients with rapid renal function decline had higher level of HbA1c and UACR at baseline. However, the majority of the rapid decliners showed normoalbuminuria at baseline (71.0%), which was comparable to 76.2% of non-decliners. The presence of diabetic retinopathy did not differ between two groups.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of participants stratified by renal function decline status.

Characteristic	Total (n=967)	Non-decliners (n=809)	Rapid decliners (n=158)	P value
Age, yr	53.7±9.4	53.4±9.3	56.0±9.9	0.002^a
Male sex	555 (57.4)	500 (61.8)	55 (34.8)	<0.001^a
Diabetes duration, yr	5.4±5.8	5.1±5.7	7.0±6.0	<0.001^a
BMI, kg/m²	25.4 ±3.2	25.4±3.2	25.3±3.1	0.765
WC, cm	88.3±8.1	88.5±8.2	87.4±7.6	0.132
SBP, mm Hg	125.8±14.6	125.5±14.7	127.1±14.3	0.219
DBP, mm Hg	78.7±9.3	78.7±9.4	78.7±9.2	0.985
Hypertension	443 (45.8)	346 (42.7)	97 (61.4)	<0.001^a
Current smoker	194 (20.1)	173 (21.4)	21 (13.3)	1.000
Dyslipidemia	314 (32.5)	263 (33.6)	51 (33.6)	1.000
CVD	107 (11.1)	80 (9.9)	27 (17.1)	0.011^a
Diabetic retinopathy	147 (15.2)	118 (14.6)	29 (18.4)	0.209
Mean CIMT, mm	0.7 (0.6–0.9)	0.7 (0.6–0.9)	0.7 (0.6–0.9)	0.661
Carotid plaque (+)	315 (32.6)	242 (29.9)	73 (46.2)	<0.001^a
HbA1c, %	7.7±1.8	7.6±1.8	8.0±1.8	0.018^a
Fasting glucose, mg/dL	143.5 ±52.4	143.3±53.3	144.0±48.2	0.891
PP2 glucose, mg/dL	262.2±93.8	261.7±92.6	264.9±100.2	0.746
HOMA-IR, units	3.0±3.1	3.0±2.9	3.1±3.8	0.582
hsCRP, mg/dL	1.8±7.5	1.9±7.9	1.4±2.1	0.388
TG, mg/dL	159.8±121.4	160.8±126.8	154.6±88.0	0.480
HDL-C, mg/dL	47.3±12.1	47.0±11.9	49.4±12.8	0.033^a
LDL-C, mg/dL	103.1±36.2	103.7±36.6	100.3±33.7	0.316
Albuminuria				0.277
Normoalbuminuria	655 (67.7)	552 (76.2)	103 (71.0)
Microalbuminuria	191 (19.8)	152 (21.0)	39 (26.9)
Macroalbuminuria	23 (2.4)	20 (2.8)	3 (2.1)
UACR, mg/g	11.8 (5.7–29.0)	11.2 (5.5–27.4)	15.6 (6.2–34.3)	0.018^a
Creatinine, mg/dL	0.8±0.2	0.8±0.2	0.7±0.2	0.006^a
eGFR at baseline, mL/min/1.73 m²	95.6±14.6	96.0±14.6	93.8±14.8	0.089
eGFR at the end of FU, mL/min/1.73 m²	84.34±17.2	88.0±14.9	64.9±15.6	<0.001^a
eGFR slope, %/year	–1.1±2.6	–0.4±1.9	–5.2±1.9	<0.001^a
Diabetes medications
Sulfonylurea	212 (21.9)	169 (20.9)	43 (27.2)	0.098
Metformin	299 (30.9)	240 (33.4)	59 (37.3)	0.069
Insulin	71 (7.3)	58 (7.2)	13 (8.2)	0.764
Use of ACEi/ARB	236 (24.4)	88 (10.9)	48 (30.4)	0.070

Open in a new tab

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation, number (%), or median (interquartile range). P values refer to the unpaired t-test or the chi-square test (for categorical variables).

BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; PP2, 2-hour post prandial; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; UACR, urinary albumin creatinine ratio; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FU, follow-up; ACEi, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II-receptor blocker.

^aStatistical significance.

When stratified by the presence of CP (Table 2), patients with CP were significantly older, exhibited longer duration of diabetes, higher SBP, and lower baseline eGFR. They also had a higher prevalence of hypertension and CVD, and were treated more frequently with metformin, sulfonylurea, and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARB). They had a higher proportion of patients with rapid renal function decline and showed greater annual mean eGFR decline (%). UACR was not different between groups and 72.7% of patients with CP had normoalbuminuria at baseline.

Table 2. Comparison of baseline characteristics stratified by the presence of carotid plaque.

Characteristic	Carotid plaque (−) (n=484)	Carotid plaque (+) (n=315)	P value
Age, yr	52.1±9.5	56.9±8.7	<0.001^a
Male sex	266 (55.0)	195 (61.9)	0.062
Diabetes duration, yr	4.9±5.5	6.3±6.0	0.001^a
BMI, kg/m²	25.3±3.2	25.4±3.1	0.764
WC, cm	88.2±8.5	88.8±7.6	0.312
SBP, mm Hg	124.5±14.2	128.0±15.0	0.001^a
DBP, mm Hg	78.6±9.3	78.8±9.2	0.781
Hypertension	198 (41.2)	167 (53.5)	0.001^a
Current smoker	106 (44.7)	63 (39.9)	0.395
Dyslipidemia	153 (33.0)	104 (34.0)	0.847
CVD	39 (8.1)	43 (13.7)	0.016^a
Diabetic retinopathy	67 (17.0)	49 (19.4)	0.500
HbA1c, %	7.8±1.9	7.6±1.6	0.051
Fasting glucose, mg/dL	148.6±60.1	139.7±44.0	0.019^a
PP2 glucose, mg/dL	273.9±94.9	251.0±95.8	0.008^a
HOMA-IR, units	3.1±3.4	3.0±3.0	0.769
hsCRP, mg/dL	2.1±9.4	1.5±3.9	0.332
TG, mg/dL	167.9±130.0	143.3±90.6	0.002^a
HDL-C, mg/dL	48.4±12.1	47.6±11.5	0.427
LDL-C, mg/dL	101.6±35.4	103.0±39.8	0.649
Albuminuria			0.414
Normoalbuminuria	345 (76.8)	216 (72.7)
Microalbuminuria	93 (20.7)	71 (23.9)
Macroalbuminuria	11 (2.4)	10 (3.4)
UACR, mg/g	11.5 (5.4–27.4)	13.1 (6.2–32.6)	0.118
Creatinine, mg/g	0.78± 0.2	0.81±0.2	0.030^a
eGFR at baseline, mL/min/1.73 m²	96.7±14.5	92.6±13.6	<0.001^a
eGFR at the end of FU, mL/min/1.73 m²	86.2±16.1	78.8±17.4	<0.001^a
Sulfonylurea	93 (19.2)	93 (29.5)	0.001^a
Metformin	132 (27.3)	118 (37.5)	0.003^a
Insulin	38 (7.9)	22 (7.0)	0.751
Use of ACEi/ARB	100 (20.7)	100 (31.7)	0.001^a
eGFR slope, %/year	–0.9±2.4	–1.6±2.6	<0.001^a
Rapid decliners	59 (12.2)	73 (23.2)	<0.001^a

Open in a new tab

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation, number (%), or median (interquartile range). P values refer to the unpaired t-test or the chi-square test (for categorical variables).

BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; PP2, 2-hour post prandial; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; UACR, urinary albumin creatinine ratio; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FU, follow-up; ACEi, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II-receptor blocker.

^aStatistical significance.

The presence of CP was associated with rapid renal function decline after adjustment for potential confounders including age, sex, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, baseline eGFR, UACR, previous history of CVD and hypertension (Table 3). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for rapid renal function decline with the presence of CP was 2.33 (95% CI, 1.48 to 3.68; P<0.0001). Other significant predictors of rapid renal function decline were female sex (OR, 3.46; 95% CI, 2.19 to 5.47; P<0.0001), hypertension (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.80; P=0.012), and higher HbA1c (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.31; P<0.012) at baseline. In a sub-analysis of females, stratified by menopause status, the presence of CP was an independent risk factor for postmenopausal women (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.06 to 4.25; P=0.034) while no association was found in premenopausal women (Supplementary Table 3). The discriminatory ability of the model with CP on rapid renal function decline was compared by the AUC estimates (Fig. 1). For the model with clinical risk factors only (age, sex, duration of diabetes, hypertension, CVD, diabetic retinopathy, use of ACEi/ARB, baseline eGFR, HbA1c, and UACR) of rapid renal function decline, the estimated AUC to discriminate rapid renal function decline was 0.744 (95% CI, 0.690 to 0.797; P<0.001). After the addition of CP in the model, the discriminatory performance was significantly improved for rapid renal function decline (0.772; 95% CI, 0.722 to 0.822; P<0.001). The P value for the comparison in AUCs for the models with and without CP was 0.016.

Table 3. Clinical predictors for progression of rapid renal function decline.

Variable	Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
Variable	OR (95% CI)	P value	OR (95% CI)	P value	OR (95% CI)	P value
Carotid plaque	1.97 (1.29–3.00)	0.002^a	1.87 (1.21–2.87)	0.004^a	2.33 (1.48–3.68)	<0.001^a
Age, yr	1.01 (0.99–1.04)	0.662	1.01 (0.98–1.03)	0.535	0.99 (0.96–1.02)	0.686
Diabetes duration, yr	1.04 (1.01–1.08)	0.007^a	1.03 (1.00–1.07)	0.079	1.03 (0.99–1.07)	0.100
HbA1c, %	1.15 (1.03–1.28)	0.016^a	1.17 (1.05–1.31)	0.006^a	1.16 (1.03–1.31)	0.012^a
Baseline eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m²	0.99 (0.98–1.01)	0.480	1.00 (0.98–1.02)	0.856	1.00 (0.98–1.01)	0.686
UACR^b, mg/g	1.00 (1.00–1.00)	0.620	1.00 (1.00–1.07)	0.656	1.00 (1.00–1.00)	0.371
CVD	-	-	1.49 (0.82–2.70)	0.187	1.59 (0.86–2.95)	0.140
Hypertension	-	-	1.75 (1.13–2.71)	0.012^a	1.78 (1.14–2.80)	0.012^a
Female sex	-	-	-	-	3.46 (2.19–5.47)	<0.001^a

Open in a new tab

Model 1 was adjusted for age, diabetes duration, HbA1c, baseline eGFR, and UACR. Model 2 included all variables in Model 1 plus presence of CVD and hypertension. Model 3 included all variables in Model 2 plus sex.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; eGRF, estimated glomerular filtration rate; UACR, urinary albumin creatinine ratio; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

^aStatistical significance, ^bLogarithm-transformed values were used for analysis.

DISCUSSION

In this prospective, multicenter observational cohort followed over 6 years, we observed for the first time that the presence of CP was an independent predictor of early progressive rapid renal function decline in patients with T2DM and preserved renal function. Rapid renal function decline occurred in 16.3% (n=158) of patients over 6 years in our cohort and the presence of CP was one of the powerful risk factors for rapid renal function decline, even after adjusting for established clinical risk factors and confounders. Other independent clinical predictors for rapid renal function decline were female sex, hypertension, and higher HbA1c at baseline.

Non-invasive measurement of carotid atherosclerosis, including measurement of CIMT and CP allows monitoring of the presence and progression of atherosclerosis [24,26]. In the current study, CP was associated with rapid renal function decline in patients with T2DM, while CIMT did not show any significant association. This may be due to the fact that CIMT and CP represent different stages of the atherosclerotic process. CIMT likely reflects earlier stages of atherogenesis, mainly a hypertrophic response of arterial intimal and medial cells to lipid infiltration or hypertension. In contrast, CP may represent a later stage of atherogenesis related to inflammation, oxidation, endothelial dysfunction, and smooth muscle cell proliferation [27,28].

There have been various studies examining the association between carotid atherosclerosis and renal function decline. In a multi-center study with non-diabetic population, kidney function was measured using cystatin C, which was significantly associated with both CIMT thickening and CP. However, another prospective study with healthy individuals showed that there was no independent relationship between ageing-related decline in kidney function and CIMT [29]. Takenouchi et al. [15] investigated the association between CKD and CIMT in a prospective study with T2DM and found that maximum CIMT was one of the significant predictors of CKD deterioration (hazard ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.1 to 14,226.7; P=0.03) independent of other clinical risk factors including age. However, they included those patients with CKD at baseline and their sample size was rather small. We believe that inconsistent results are most likely due to differences in the study population and and the definition of the primary end point. As the early rapid renal function decline is the process that occurs during the preserved renal function, it may occur in those patients with higher vascular burden/risk, in this case, those with CP.

The present study suggests that subclinical atherosclerosis is strongly associated with rapid renal function decline independent of other clinical risk factors in patients with T2DM and preserved renal function. Although exact causation between atherosclerosis and rapid renal function decline needs to be further elucidated, we can speculate that ischemic renal changes caused by atherosclerosis of the intrarenal arteries may have resulted in rapid GFR decline even in the absence of albuminuria [30,31]. Furthermore, it was reported that the renal resistive index (RI), a reliable marker of renal atherosclerosis, is significantly elevated in patient with diabetic nephropathy and correlated with creatinine clearance [32]. Given previously reported correlation between renal RI and carotid atherosclerosis [33], these findings may implicate that intrarenal vascular resistance or renal atherosclerosis precedes classical pathophysiologic process of diabetic glomerulosclerosis in early renal function decline. Therefore, detection of CP by B-mode ultrasonography may be an easy, non-invasive method for the early detection of those patients at risk for early rapid renal function decline [34].

In agreement with previous publications, we also found that hypertension was closely associated with rapid renal function decline [10,35]. Hypertension is a well-established risk factor for CVD as well as CP formation. Our study also showed a higher incidence of rapid renal function decline with greater annual eGFR decline (%) in women compared to men during 6 years of follow-up. Although estrogen is known to have renoprotective effects by alteration of renin-angiotensin system, reduction in mesangial collagen synthesis, and upregulation of nitric oxide synthesis in kidney [36], diabetes itself alters sex hormone production in both women and men [37] and the effect of alteration in sex hormone levels in DKD remains controversial. Many recent studies have demonstrated that women with T2DM are at greater risk for accelerated GFR decline in the absence of proteinuria [38,39] which is consistent with our study. Moreover, the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and Swedish National Diabetes Register cohort have shown that women were at increased risk for developing renal insufficiency while men were at increased risk for developing progressive albuminuria among T2DM patients with preserved renal function and normoalbuminuria [2,40]. Although the mechanism of higher incidence of accelerated GFR decline in females is not clear, animal studies using insulin resistant animals also support these findings. Renal failure occurs earlier in female than in male animals in obese Zucker rats [41] and estrogen has been associated with accelerated renal damage in female obese Zucker rats [42].

Only one-third of the patients who developed rapid renal function decline in our study had increased albuminuria at baseline; thus, 60% to 70% of patients who developed rapid renal function decline did not have increased albuminuria preceding renal function decline. In a cross-sectional analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, one-third of patients with T2DM with DKD did not exhibit albuminuria [3]. Similarly in the UKPDS, a prospective cohort study over 15 years, 51% of T2DM patients who developed renal impairment did not have preceding albuminuria [2]. Although albuminuria has traditionally been used as an indicator for development of DKD [4], recent evidences indicate that the presence of microalbuminuria may not always accompany renal structural abnormalities and does not always precede worsening of renal function [43]. It also has been recognized that the progression to microalbuminuria is not a unidirectional process but it may spontaneously regress to normoalbuminuria [7]. Recently, extensive studies in Joslin Clinic have demonstrated that predominant clinical feature of DKD is progressive renal function decline, not progressive albuminuria [7]. Progressive renal function decline is a unidirectional process that develops while patients have preserved renal function, which sometimes precedes the onset of microalbuminuria, and as it continues, it increases the risk of proteinuria.

In the current study, baseline HbA1c level predicted the development of rapid renal function decline in T2DM and preserved renal function. Many evidences indicate that the risk of a rapid decline of glomerular function increases with higher HbA1c and hyperglycemia [44]. Similar finding was also noted in Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, where a positive association between HbA1c and CKD was observed in patients with T2DM, even in the absence of albuminuria [45]. In a prospective study in Taiwan, higher HbA1c at baseline was independently associated with rapid decline in eGFR [46].

The strength of this study includes the prospective design with ≥6 consecutive annual measurements of kidney function to accurately estimate annual eGFR decline. We confined the subjects to those with preserved renal function to assess predictive role of CP in development of early rapid renal function decline, allowing us to find early detectable risk factors for the development and progression of DKD. Also, our cohort consists of a large number of participants from a homogeneous population and the follow-up period was over 6 years. This is the first study to demonstrate association between CP at baseline and early rapid renal function decline in patients with T2DM and preserved baseline renal function.

The present study has some limitations. First, because our cohort comprises of Korean patients with T2DM who were followed at tertiary-level, university-affiliated hospitals, our results may not represent general T2DM populations. Second, there was no direct measurement of GFR but we employed CKD-EPI equations, which have been widely used in many studies. It is established that eGFR at higher levels is associated with greater variability, which could lead to misclassification of hyperfiltration and normofiltration, and may bias our study results. However, we have measured serial values over time to identify the rate of decline in eGFR that was approximated using linear slopes, and the use of such slopes likely smoothed out variability in individual GFR estimates and measurements. Lastly, there may have been inter- and intra-observer variability in measurement of IMT as it was performed by multiple observers. To minimize inter-observer variability, workshops were conducted for ultrasound observers from all participating institutions before initiation of the study and then annually thereafter during the entire study period.

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the presence of CP, a marker of atherosclerosis, predicts rapid renal function decline in patients with T2DM and preserved renal function independent of established risk factors. Close monitoring of renal function and implementation of early intensive treatment are warranted in patients with T2DM and CP. The impact of atherosclerosis on rapid renal function decline needs to be further clarified in future studies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the NRF (2017R1D-1A1B03034581), Republic of Korea and the Inha University Research Grant. There was no involvement of the funding source in the conduct of the research and/or preparation of the article.

Footnotes

Parts of this study were presented in abstract form at the 78th Scientific Session of the American Diabetes Association, Orlando, FL, 22 to 26 June 2018.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS:

Conception or design: D.H.S., S.H.K.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: D.H.S., S.H.K., Y.J.S.
Drafting the work or revising: D.H.S., S.H.K., J.H.S., S.H., S.H.A., J.T.W., S.H.B., Y.P., K.W.L., Y.S.K.
Final approval of the manuscript: M.N.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary materials related to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/dmj.2018.0186.

Supplementary Table 1

Comparison of annual eGFR decline (%/year) according to various clinical parameters after adjusting for age

dmj-43-840-s001.pdf^{(35.2KB, pdf)}

Supplementary Table 2

Baseline characteristics of participants stratified by menopause status in female

dmj-43-840-s002.pdf^{(37.9KB, pdf)}

Supplementary Table 3

Clinical predictors for progression of rapid renal function decline in women according to menopause status

dmj-43-840-s003.pdf^{(33.3KB, pdf)}

References

1.Martinez-Castelao A, Navarro-Gonzalez JF, Gorriz JL, de Alvaro F. The concept and the epidemiology of diabetic nephropathy have changed in recent years. J Clin Med. 2015;4:1207–1216. doi: 10.3390/jcm4061207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Retnakaran R, Cull CA, Thorne KI, Adler AI, Holman RR UKPDS Study Group. Risk factors for renal dysfunction in type 2 diabetes: U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 74. Diabetes. 2006;55:1832–1839. doi: 10.2337/db05-1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Kramer HJ, Nguyen QD, Curhan G, Hsu CY. Renal insufficiency in the absence of albuminuria and retinopathy among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2003;289:3273–3277. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.24.3273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Mogensen CE, Christensen CK. Predicting diabetic nephropathy in insulin-dependent patients. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:89–93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198407123110204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Perkins BA, Ficociello LH, Ostrander BE, Silva KH, Weinberg J, Warram JH, Krolewski AS. Microalbuminuria and the risk for early progressive renal function decline in type 1 diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:1353–1361. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006080872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Tsalamandris C, Allen TJ, Gilbert RE, Sinha A, Panagiotopoulos S, Cooper ME, Jerums G. Progressive decline in renal function in diabetic patients with and without albuminuria. Diabetes. 1994;43:649–655. doi: 10.2337/diab.43.5.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Krolewski AS. Progressive renal decline: the new paradigm of diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:954–962. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Pavkov ME, Knowler WC, Lemley KV, Mason CC, Myers BD, Nelson RG. Early renal function decline in type 2 diabetes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:78–84. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07610711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Sheen YJ, Sheu WH. Risks of rapid decline renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes. World J Diabetes. 2014;5:835–846. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v5.i6.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Zoppini G, Targher G, Chonchol M, Ortalda V, Negri C, Stoico V, Bonora E. Predictors of estimated GFR decline in patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved kidney function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:401–408. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07650711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Krolewski AS, Skupien J, Rossing P, Warram JH. Fast renal decline to end-stage renal disease: an unrecognized feature of nephropathy in diabetes. Kidney Int. 2017;91:1300–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.10.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Chambless LE, Folsom AR, Clegg LX, Sharrett AR, Shahar E, Nieto FJ, Rosamond WD, Evans G. Carotid wall thickness is predictive of incident clinical stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:478–487. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Culleton BF, Larson MG, Wilson PW, Evans JC, Parfrey PS, Levy D. Cardiovascular disease and mortality in a community-based cohort with mild renal insufficiency. Kidney Int. 1999;56:2214–2219. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00773.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Ito H, Komatsu Y, Mifune M, Antoku S, Ishida H, Takeuchi Y, Togane M. The estimated GFR, but not the stage of diabetic nephropathy graded by the urinary albumin excretion, is associated with the carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Takenouchi A, Tsuboi A, Kurata M, Fukuo K, Kazumi T. Carotid intima-media thickness and visit-to-visit HbA1c variability predict progression of chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetic patients with preserved kidney function. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:3295747. doi: 10.1155/2016/3295747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Rhee SY, Chon S, Kwon MK, Park IeB, Ahn KJ, Kim IJ, Kim SH, Lee HW, Koh KS, Kim DM, Baik SH, Lee KW, Nam MS, Park YS, Woo JT, Kim YS. Prevalence of chronic complications in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus based on the Korean national diabetes program. Diabetes Metab J. 2011;35:504–512. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2011.35.5.504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26 Suppl 1:S5–S20. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Targher G, Bertolini L, Zenari L, Lippi G, Pichiri I, Zoppini G, Muggeo M, Arcaro G. Diabetic retinopathy is associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 2008;25:45–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02327.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–419. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Inker LA, Astor BC, Fox CH, Isakova T, Lash JP, Peralta CA, Kurella Tamura M, Feldman HI. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63:713–735. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.01.416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, 3rd, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, Coresh J CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–612. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Hong SB, Lee JJ, Kim SH, Suh YJ, Han JY, Kim YS, Nam M. The effects of adiponectin and inflammatory cytokines on diabetic vascular complications in obese and non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;111:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Ebrahim S, Papacosta O, Whincup P, Wannamethee G, Walker M, Nicolaides AN, Dhanjil S, Griffin M, Belcaro G, Rumley A, Lowe GD. Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: the British Regional Heart Study. Stroke. 1999;30:841–850. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.4.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839–843. doi: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Inaba Y, Chen JA, Bergmann SR. Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2012;220:128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.06.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Spence JD, Hegele RA. Noninvasive phenotypes of atherosclerosis: similar windows but different views. Stroke. 2004;35:649–653. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000116103.19029.DB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Kim SH, Kang ES, Hur KY, Lee HJ, Han SJ, Kwak JY, Nam CM, Ahn CW, Cha BS, Lee HC. Adiponectin gene polymorphism 45T>G is associated with carotid artery plaques in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism. 2008;57:274–279. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2007.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Han L, Bai X, Lin H, Sun X, Chen XM. Lack of independent relationship between age-related kidney function decline and carotid intima-media thickness in a healthy Chinese population. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:1859–1865. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Yamashita T, Makino H, Nakatani R, Ohata Y, Miyamoto Y, Kishimoto I. Renal insufficiency without albuminuria is associated with peripheral artery atherosclerosis and lipid metabolism disorders in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2013;20:790–797. doi: 10.5551/jat.15669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Mazzucco G, Bertani T, Fortunato M, Bernardi M, Leutner M, Boldorini R, Monga G. Different patterns of renal damage in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicentric study on 393 biopsies. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:713–720. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.31988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Ohta Y, Fujii K, Arima H, Matsumura K, Tsuchihashi T, Tokumoto M, Tsuruya K, Kanai H, Iwase M, Hirakata H, Iida M. Increased renal resistive index in atherosclerosis and diabetic nephropathy assessed by Doppler sonography. J Hypertens. 2005;23:1905–1911. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000181323.44162.01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Ishimura E, Nishizawa Y, Kawagishi T, Okuno Y, Kogawa K, Fukumoto S, Maekawa K, Hosoi M, Inaba M, Emoto M, Morii H. Intrarenal hemodynamic abnormalities in diabetic nephropathy measured by duplex Doppler sonography. Kidney Int. 1997;51:1920–1927. doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Qian Y, Feldman E, Pennathur S, Kretzler M, Brosius FC., 3rd From fibrosis to sclerosis: mechanisms of glomerulosclerosis in diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 2008;57:1439–1445. doi: 10.2337/db08-0061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Lorenzo V, Saracho R, Zamora J, Rufino M, Torres A. Similar renal decline in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with comparable levels of albuminuria. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:835–841. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Yu MK, Lyles CR, Bent-Shaw LA, Young BA Pathways Authors. Risk factor, age and sex differences in chronic kidney disease prevalence in a diabetic cohort: the pathways study. Am J Nephrol. 2012;36:245–251. doi: 10.1159/000342210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Vryonidou A, Paschou SA, Muscogiuri G, Orio F, Goulis DG. Mechanisms in endocrinology: metabolic syndrome through the female life cycle. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173:R153–R163. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Porrini E, Ruggenenti P, Mogensen CE, Barlovic DP, Praga M, Cruzado JM, Hojs R, Abbate M, de Vries AP ERA-EDTA diabesity working group. Non-proteinuric pathways in loss of renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3:382–391. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00094-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Dwyer JP, Parving HH, Hunsicker LG, Ravid M, Remuzzi G, Lewis JB. Renal dysfunction in the presence of normoalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes: results from the DEMAND study. Cardiorenal Med. 2012;2:1–10. doi: 10.1159/000333249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Afghahi H, Cederholm J, Eliasson B, Zethelius B, Gudbjornsdottir S, Hadimeri H, Svensson MK. Risk factors for the development of albuminuria and renal impairment in type 2 diabetes: the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR) Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:1236–1243. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Johnson PR, Stern JS, Horwitz BA, Harris RE, Jr, Greene SF. Longevity in obese and lean male and female rats of the Zucker strain: prevention of hyperphagia. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:890–903. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/66.4.890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Gades MD, Stern JS, van Goor H, Nguyen D, Johnson PR, Kaysen GA. Estrogen accelerates the development of renal disease in female obese Zucker rats. Kidney Int. 1998;53:130–135. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00746.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Fioretto P, Mauer M, Brocco E, Velussi M, Frigato F, Muollo B, Sambataro M, Abaterusso C, Baggio B, Crepaldi G, Nosadini R. Patterns of renal injury in NIDDM patients with microalbuminuria. Diabetologia. 1996;39:1569–1576. doi: 10.1007/s001250050616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Nosadini R, Tonolo G. Blood glucose and lipid control as risk factors in the progression of renal damage in type 2 diabetes. J Nephrol. 2003;16 Suppl 7:S42–S47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Bash LD, Selvin E, Steffes M, Coresh J, Astor BC. Poor glycemic control in diabetes and the risk of incident chronic kidney disease even in the absence of albuminuria and retinopathy: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:2440–2447. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.22.2440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Sheen YJ, Lin JL, Li TC, Bau CT, Sheu WH. Peripheral arterial stiffness is independently associated with a rapid decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with type 2 diabetes. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:309294. doi: 10.1155/2013/309294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1

Comparison of annual eGFR decline (%/year) according to various clinical parameters after adjusting for age

dmj-43-840-s001.pdf^{(35.2KB, pdf)}

Supplementary Table 2

Baseline characteristics of participants stratified by menopause status in female

dmj-43-840-s002.pdf^{(37.9KB, pdf)}

Supplementary Table 3

Clinical predictors for progression of rapid renal function decline in women according to menopause status

dmj-43-840-s003.pdf^{(33.3KB, pdf)}

[B1] 1.Martinez-Castelao A, Navarro-Gonzalez JF, Gorriz JL, de Alvaro F. The concept and the epidemiology of diabetic nephropathy have changed in recent years. J Clin Med. 2015;4:1207–1216. doi: 10.3390/jcm4061207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B2] 2.Retnakaran R, Cull CA, Thorne KI, Adler AI, Holman RR UKPDS Study Group. Risk factors for renal dysfunction in type 2 diabetes: U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 74. Diabetes. 2006;55:1832–1839. doi: 10.2337/db05-1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B3] 3.Kramer HJ, Nguyen QD, Curhan G, Hsu CY. Renal insufficiency in the absence of albuminuria and retinopathy among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2003;289:3273–3277. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.24.3273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B4] 4.Mogensen CE, Christensen CK. Predicting diabetic nephropathy in insulin-dependent patients. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:89–93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198407123110204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B5] 5.Perkins BA, Ficociello LH, Ostrander BE, Silva KH, Weinberg J, Warram JH, Krolewski AS. Microalbuminuria and the risk for early progressive renal function decline in type 1 diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:1353–1361. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006080872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B6] 6.Tsalamandris C, Allen TJ, Gilbert RE, Sinha A, Panagiotopoulos S, Cooper ME, Jerums G. Progressive decline in renal function in diabetic patients with and without albuminuria. Diabetes. 1994;43:649–655. doi: 10.2337/diab.43.5.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B7] 7.Krolewski AS. Progressive renal decline: the new paradigm of diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:954–962. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B8] 8.Pavkov ME, Knowler WC, Lemley KV, Mason CC, Myers BD, Nelson RG. Early renal function decline in type 2 diabetes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:78–84. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07610711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B9] 9.Sheen YJ, Sheu WH. Risks of rapid decline renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes. World J Diabetes. 2014;5:835–846. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v5.i6.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B10] 10.Zoppini G, Targher G, Chonchol M, Ortalda V, Negri C, Stoico V, Bonora E. Predictors of estimated GFR decline in patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved kidney function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:401–408. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07650711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B11] 11.Krolewski AS, Skupien J, Rossing P, Warram JH. Fast renal decline to end-stage renal disease: an unrecognized feature of nephropathy in diabetes. Kidney Int. 2017;91:1300–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.10.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B12] 12.Chambless LE, Folsom AR, Clegg LX, Sharrett AR, Shahar E, Nieto FJ, Rosamond WD, Evans G. Carotid wall thickness is predictive of incident clinical stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:478–487. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B13] 13.Culleton BF, Larson MG, Wilson PW, Evans JC, Parfrey PS, Levy D. Cardiovascular disease and mortality in a community-based cohort with mild renal insufficiency. Kidney Int. 1999;56:2214–2219. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00773.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B14] 14.Ito H, Komatsu Y, Mifune M, Antoku S, Ishida H, Takeuchi Y, Togane M. The estimated GFR, but not the stage of diabetic nephropathy graded by the urinary albumin excretion, is associated with the carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B15] 15.Takenouchi A, Tsuboi A, Kurata M, Fukuo K, Kazumi T. Carotid intima-media thickness and visit-to-visit HbA1c variability predict progression of chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetic patients with preserved kidney function. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:3295747. doi: 10.1155/2016/3295747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B16] 16.Rhee SY, Chon S, Kwon MK, Park IeB, Ahn KJ, Kim IJ, Kim SH, Lee HW, Koh KS, Kim DM, Baik SH, Lee KW, Nam MS, Park YS, Woo JT, Kim YS. Prevalence of chronic complications in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus based on the Korean national diabetes program. Diabetes Metab J. 2011;35:504–512. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2011.35.5.504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B17] 17.Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26 Suppl 1:S5–S20. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B18] 18.Targher G, Bertolini L, Zenari L, Lippi G, Pichiri I, Zoppini G, Muggeo M, Arcaro G. Diabetic retinopathy is associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 2008;25:45–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02327.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B19] 19.Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B20] 20.Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–419. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B21] 21.Inker LA, Astor BC, Fox CH, Isakova T, Lash JP, Peralta CA, Kurella Tamura M, Feldman HI. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63:713–735. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.01.416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B22] 22.Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, 3rd, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, Coresh J CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–612. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B23] 23.Hong SB, Lee JJ, Kim SH, Suh YJ, Han JY, Kim YS, Nam M. The effects of adiponectin and inflammatory cytokines on diabetic vascular complications in obese and non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;111:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B24] 24.Ebrahim S, Papacosta O, Whincup P, Wannamethee G, Walker M, Nicolaides AN, Dhanjil S, Griffin M, Belcaro G, Rumley A, Lowe GD. Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: the British Regional Heart Study. Stroke. 1999;30:841–850. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.4.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B25] 25.Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839–843. doi: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B26] 26.Inaba Y, Chen JA, Bergmann SR. Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2012;220:128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.06.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B27] 27.Spence JD, Hegele RA. Noninvasive phenotypes of atherosclerosis: similar windows but different views. Stroke. 2004;35:649–653. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000116103.19029.DB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B28] 28.Kim SH, Kang ES, Hur KY, Lee HJ, Han SJ, Kwak JY, Nam CM, Ahn CW, Cha BS, Lee HC. Adiponectin gene polymorphism 45T>G is associated with carotid artery plaques in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism. 2008;57:274–279. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2007.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B29] 29.Han L, Bai X, Lin H, Sun X, Chen XM. Lack of independent relationship between age-related kidney function decline and carotid intima-media thickness in a healthy Chinese population. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:1859–1865. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B30] 30.Yamashita T, Makino H, Nakatani R, Ohata Y, Miyamoto Y, Kishimoto I. Renal insufficiency without albuminuria is associated with peripheral artery atherosclerosis and lipid metabolism disorders in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2013;20:790–797. doi: 10.5551/jat.15669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B31] 31.Mazzucco G, Bertani T, Fortunato M, Bernardi M, Leutner M, Boldorini R, Monga G. Different patterns of renal damage in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicentric study on 393 biopsies. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:713–720. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.31988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B32] 32.Ohta Y, Fujii K, Arima H, Matsumura K, Tsuchihashi T, Tokumoto M, Tsuruya K, Kanai H, Iwase M, Hirakata H, Iida M. Increased renal resistive index in atherosclerosis and diabetic nephropathy assessed by Doppler sonography. J Hypertens. 2005;23:1905–1911. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000181323.44162.01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B33] 33.Ishimura E, Nishizawa Y, Kawagishi T, Okuno Y, Kogawa K, Fukumoto S, Maekawa K, Hosoi M, Inaba M, Emoto M, Morii H. Intrarenal hemodynamic abnormalities in diabetic nephropathy measured by duplex Doppler sonography. Kidney Int. 1997;51:1920–1927. doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B34] 34.Qian Y, Feldman E, Pennathur S, Kretzler M, Brosius FC., 3rd From fibrosis to sclerosis: mechanisms of glomerulosclerosis in diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 2008;57:1439–1445. doi: 10.2337/db08-0061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B35] 35.Lorenzo V, Saracho R, Zamora J, Rufino M, Torres A. Similar renal decline in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with comparable levels of albuminuria. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:835–841. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B36] 36.Yu MK, Lyles CR, Bent-Shaw LA, Young BA Pathways Authors. Risk factor, age and sex differences in chronic kidney disease prevalence in a diabetic cohort: the pathways study. Am J Nephrol. 2012;36:245–251. doi: 10.1159/000342210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B37] 37.Vryonidou A, Paschou SA, Muscogiuri G, Orio F, Goulis DG. Mechanisms in endocrinology: metabolic syndrome through the female life cycle. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173:R153–R163. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B38] 38.Porrini E, Ruggenenti P, Mogensen CE, Barlovic DP, Praga M, Cruzado JM, Hojs R, Abbate M, de Vries AP ERA-EDTA diabesity working group. Non-proteinuric pathways in loss of renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3:382–391. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00094-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B39] 39.Dwyer JP, Parving HH, Hunsicker LG, Ravid M, Remuzzi G, Lewis JB. Renal dysfunction in the presence of normoalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes: results from the DEMAND study. Cardiorenal Med. 2012;2:1–10. doi: 10.1159/000333249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B40] 40.Afghahi H, Cederholm J, Eliasson B, Zethelius B, Gudbjornsdottir S, Hadimeri H, Svensson MK. Risk factors for the development of albuminuria and renal impairment in type 2 diabetes: the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR) Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:1236–1243. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B41] 41.Johnson PR, Stern JS, Horwitz BA, Harris RE, Jr, Greene SF. Longevity in obese and lean male and female rats of the Zucker strain: prevention of hyperphagia. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:890–903. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/66.4.890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B42] 42.Gades MD, Stern JS, van Goor H, Nguyen D, Johnson PR, Kaysen GA. Estrogen accelerates the development of renal disease in female obese Zucker rats. Kidney Int. 1998;53:130–135. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00746.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B43] 43.Fioretto P, Mauer M, Brocco E, Velussi M, Frigato F, Muollo B, Sambataro M, Abaterusso C, Baggio B, Crepaldi G, Nosadini R. Patterns of renal injury in NIDDM patients with microalbuminuria. Diabetologia. 1996;39:1569–1576. doi: 10.1007/s001250050616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B44] 44.Nosadini R, Tonolo G. Blood glucose and lipid control as risk factors in the progression of renal damage in type 2 diabetes. J Nephrol. 2003;16 Suppl 7:S42–S47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B45] 45.Bash LD, Selvin E, Steffes M, Coresh J, Astor BC. Poor glycemic control in diabetes and the risk of incident chronic kidney disease even in the absence of albuminuria and retinopathy: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:2440–2447. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.22.2440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B46] 46.Sheen YJ, Lin JL, Li TC, Bau CT, Sheu WH. Peripheral arterial stiffness is independently associated with a rapid decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with type 2 diabetes. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:309294. doi: 10.1155/2013/309294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Presence of Carotid Plaque Is Associated with Rapid Renal Function Decline in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Normal Renal Function

Da Hea Seo

So Hun Kim

Joon Ho Song

Seongbin Hong

Young Ju Suh

Seong Hee Ahn

Jeong-Taek Woo

Sei Hyun Baik

Yongsoo Park

Kwan Woo Lee

Young Seol Kim

Moonsuk Nam

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

INTRODUCTION

METHODS

Study population

Demographic, physical, and laboratory measurements

Renal function measurement

CIMT and CP assessment

Statistical analysis

RESULTS

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of participants stratified by renal function decline status.

Table 2. Comparison of baseline characteristics stratified by the presence of carotid plaque.

Table 3. Clinical predictors for progression of rapid renal function decline.

Fig. 1. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the models with or without carotid plaque. AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.

DISCUSSION

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Footnotes

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases