Abstract
Nanoparticles of cerium oxide CeO2 are important nanomaterials with remarkable properties for use in both industrial and non-industrial fields. In a general way, doping of oxide nanometric with transition metals improves the properties of nanoparticles. In this study, nickel- doped cerium oxide nanoparticles were synthesized from Stevia rebaudiana extract. Both doped and non-doped nanoparticles were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy, Energy Dispersive X-ray, Raman spectroscopy, and Vibrating-Sample Magnetometry analysis. According to X-ray diffraction, Raman and Energy Dispersive X-ray crystalline and single phase of CeO2 and Ni doped CeO2 nanoparticles exhibiting fluorite structure with F2g mode were synthesized. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy shows that CeO2 and Ni doped nanoparticles have spherical shape and sizes ranging of 8 to 10 nm. Ni doping of CeO2 results in an increasing of magnetic properties. The enhancement of ultraviolet protector character via Ni doping of CeO2 is also discussed.
Keywords: Ni-doped CeO2 nanoparticles, Stevia rebaudiana, UV protection, VSM
1. Introduction
Nowadays, research and development of products in the nanotechnology field has been steadily increased, in specific due to innovative and beneficial properties of materials at the nanoscale. Furthermore, nanotechnology as a flexible tool can be applied in electrical devices, construction of composite materials, catalysts and antibacterial coatings [1]. Nanoparticles constitute the fundamental structures of nanotechnology [2]. A most relevant feature of nanoparticles stems from their large ratio surface-to-volume ratios [2]. Nanoparticles provide a higher surface area-to-volume ratio through reduction of their particle size, which increases their efficacy in biological media. Among oxide type nanomaterials, cerium oxide nanoparticles can be utilized in sensors, catalysts, sunscreens, ultraviolet physical absorbers and sun cells [3,4], because of their high thermal stability, wide band-gap and rapid changing of oxidation states between Ce (III) and Ce (IV) [3].
The human skin acts as an effective barrier against the harmful effects of environmental substances [5]. In addition, exposure to ultraviolet radiation is a key factor to human skin problems such as cracks, burns, immunosuppression, wrinkles, dermatitis, inflammation, aging, hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation and skin cancers [6]. Sunscreens are one of the most common options for sunlight protection because of their ease of use and higher effectiveness in radiation protection [7]. Mineral sunscreens contain inorganic UV filters, ultraviolet absorbers, like titanium dioxide TiO2 and zinc oxide ZnO, which have been safe and effective [8]. Oxides of the zinc oxide, cerium oxide; titanium dioxide and iron oxide type are UV light absorbers. Some previous studies involving nanoparticles for UV protection have shown that the absorber efficiency of the oxide depends in a major part on the particle size [9]. In addition to the conventional TiO2 and ZnO filters, the development of new filters has also been carried out to find new consumer products. The next-generation sunscreen filters with advanced features should be more efficient and safer for the health of users and the environment, replacing TiO2 and/or ZnO. At the moment seems that cerium oxide nanoparticles are a promising mineral for use as a UV filter in sunscreen cosmetics [10]. Several methods of chemical synthesis such as sol-gel, precipitation, thermal decomposition have been employed to attain cerium oxide nanoparticles [11,12,13,14]. However, a major part of these synthesis methods are not environmentally friendly, making green chemistry methods like the biosynthesis of nanoparticles using plants and plant products fundamental as a function of benefits such as low cost, safe and environmental security [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. In this sense, Stevia rebaudiana (Asteraceae) is a promising plant to support biosynthesis. It is a shrub with a height of one meter. The plant has small leaves that alternate on the stem [26]. The leaves of this plant have diterpene glucosides, which are naturally sweet. Its sweet components are stevioside, steviol bioside, ribodiazide and dalcoside [27]. Recent investigations have shown that this plant has the ability to prepare in a fast and non-toxic way chemically stable iron oxide, zinc oxide and zinc sulfide nanoparticles [28,29,30,31,32,33].
In this study, a biosynthesis method based on aqueous extract of Stevia to prepare functional nanoparticles was implemented. Syntheses of CeO2 oxide and of Ni-doped CeO3 solid solutions were carried out. UV protection of the resulting products was measures as Sun Protection Factor (SPF).
2. Results and Discussion
The X-ray diffraction curves of CeO2 and Ni-doped CeO2 powder are shown in Figure 1. According to JCPDS file 43-1002, all detected diffraction lines correlated to the following Müller indices (111), (200), (220) and (311), ascribed to the fluorite cubic structure. A specific broadening of diffraction lines presents at all diffraction lines indexed was attributed to the nanometric scale of the particles. A slight shift in the angle position of the (111) diffraction line was identified for all diffraction lines of the CeO2 structure doped with Ni. The crystallite size was estimated using Scherrer equation D = 0.89λ/βcosθ; where D is the crystallite size of a particle, λ is X-ray wavelength, β is full width at half maximum height and θ is the angle of diffraction. All synthesized powders are nanometric in size, being the CeO2 average crystallite size equal to 10.56 nm. The crystallite size as a function of Ni doping level show that crystallite size decreased with increasing of Ni concentration in the cubic structure of CeO2.
Raman spectroscopy is a powerful tool for characterizing molecular fingerprints and monitoring changes in molecular bond characteristics and their effects on the crystalline structure e.g., stresses and/or strains, crystalline form and crystallinity. CeO2 has a single active mode type F2g that is usually positioned at around 463.08 cm−1 [34]. This vibrational mode is related to the structure of fluorite, and any type of changes in the ions in this structure changes the intensity and vibrational position of this mode. The Raman spectrum of cerium oxide nanoparticles (Figure 2) shows the F2g mode is positioned at 458 cm−1, which indicates the fluorite structure for these nanoparticles, as discussed in the XRD analysis section. The development of solid solutions via Ce substitution by nickel ions into fluorite structure of CeO2 changed the position and intensity of this mode.
With the increase of doped nickel content, the mode position shifted to lowest values, while its intensity decreased in a substantial way [35]. These find are in accordance with the discussion in the X-ray diffraction section that showed a decrease of crystallinity accompanied of an increase of microstrain level and a decrease in crystallite size.
FESEM images of CeO2 and Ni-doped CeO2 nanoparticles are shown in Figure 3. The spherical shape of the synthesized particles can be seen. The FESEM images further indicate that the size of particles was decreased as a function of the increased percentage of Ni doping of the crystal structure. The same conclusion is reached in the XRD discussion.
Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) is an analytical technique used for the elemental analysis or chemical characterization of a sample. This analysis was used to determine the presence of nickel in the structure of cerium oxide nanoparticles. As shown in Figure 4E–H, elemental nickel is clearly observed in the EDX graphs of doped CeO2 nanoparticles, which confirms the presence of nickel ion in the CeO2 nanoparticles.
The magnetic properties of synthesized nanoparticles of CeO2 and Ni-doped CeO2 are shown in Figure 4. The magnetic moment (magnetization) as a function of an applied magnetic field exhibited a paramagnetic-type behavior. However, a close inspection of the curves shows that a slight hysteresis exists and that the hysteresis area is proportional to the Ni cation doping level. Thus, the synthesis procedure allows modulating the magnetic features of nanoparticles. The doping effect on the magnetic properties of nanoparticles is enhanced and gradual increase of the weak ferromagnetic behavior is seen. As shown in Figure 4, the small area of the hysteresis loop of the synthesized nanoparticles is further indicative of a weak ferromagnetic material. This behavior can be understood as a function of the double valence of cerium cations, in addition to Ni cation insertion in the crystalline lattice of CeO2. In two separate studies, Coey and Sundaresan suggested that increased oxygen vacancies due to the development of reduced cerium Ce+3 from Ce+4 of lattice can increase the interactions between unpaired spins and thus increase the ferromagnetic behavior of CeO2 nanoparticles [36,37].
Sun Protection Factor (SPF) is a standard measurement of the ability of sunscreens to absorb UV rays. By using the spectrophotometric method and Mansur (Equation (1)), one can estimate the value of the SPF parameter for a sample [38]:
SPF = CF × Σ EE(λ) × I(λ) × Abs(λ) | (1) |
where the correction factor (CF) is 10, EE(λ) is the erythema effect, I(λ) is the intensity of sunlight and abs(λ) is the wavelength absorption. For ease of calculation in this equation, Sayre et al. calculated and presented values of EE(λ) × I(λ) at 290 to 320 nm of wavelength as numbers (Table 1).
Table 1.
Wavelength (nm) | 290 | 295 | 300 | 305 | 310 | 315 | 320 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EE × I (Normalized) | 0.0150 | 0.0817 | 0.2874 | 0.3278 | 0.1864 | 0.0837 | 0.0180 |
After calculation at 10,000 μg/mL concentration, the SPF values were derived as being equal to 38.98, 40.15, 42.54 and 43.47 for non-doped, 1, 3 and 5% Ni-doped CeO2, respectively (see Figure 5). Mineral filters suitable for sunscreens should exhibit particles with two major features, which include particle size and band-gap. As a matter of fact, a smaller particle size and a larger band-gap are better for a UV absorber. According to previous studies, the band-gap of CeO2 nanoparticles is larger than that of titanium oxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles, and the synthesized nanoparticles have 8–10 nm size, so the synthesized nanoparticles can be a better choice for use in sunscreens [39].
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Chemicals
The nickel (II) nitrate hexahydrate (Ni(NO3)2·6H2O,) and cerium nitrate hexahydrate Ce(NO3)3·6H2O (50 mL, 99.99%) were prepared from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany.
3.2. Nanoparticle Synthesis
S. rebaudiana extract acts as a capping and stabilizing agent for the synthesis of nanoparticles, because of the compounds such as terpenoids, alkaloids, and tannins in its leaves. Hence, cerium species can be stabilized by S. rebaudiana extract and form nanoparticles. S. rebaudiana leaves were collected, dried and crushed. Powder plant was soaked in distilled water (1:10 ratio). Then, the mixture was centrifuged at 150 rpm for 24 h and filtered via Whatman paper. In the nanoparticle synthesis, Stevia extract (10 mL) was diluted with distilled water (50 mL), and 0.1 M cerium nitrate hexahydrate Ce(NO3)3·6H2O (50 mL) was added to the solution. Then 0, 1, 3 and 5% w/w of Ni to CeO2 was synthesised adding nickel (II) nitrate hexahydrate (Ni(NO3)2·6H2O) to the same solution, using individual baths. The solutions were heated up to 80 °C for 5 h. In the last step, the mixture was dried at 90 °C giving the precursor powders, which were calcined at 400 °C during 2 h, in an air atmosphere, using a conventional furnace. A schematic diagram of the major steps of synthesis is show in Figure 6. Nanoparticles of CeO2 and Ni doped CeO2 was synthesized by using S. rebaudiana extract.
3.3. Characterization
The synthesized nanoparticles were characterized through X-ray diffraction on an X’Pert PRO MPD system (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands), by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) using a model MIRA3 instrument (Tescan, Czech Republic), a Raman model Takram P50C0R10 (Teksan, Tehran, Iran) at 532 nm leaser wavelength, a model Tensor27 FT-IR instrument (Bruker, Optics GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) and a model 1800 UV-Vis spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
3.4. Ultraviolet Protection Level of CeO2 and Ni Doped CeO2 Nanoparticles
The survey of UV protection of nanoparticles was done by using Sun Protection Factor (SPF) determination in vitro. For purpose the synthesized sample (1 g) was dissolved using ethanol by ultrasonic irradiation for 15 min, then the prepared solution (5 mL) diluted using ethanol (50 mL). In following, this solution (5 mL) was diluted using 25 mL of ethanol. Absorption values were measured through spectrophotometry in the 290 to 320 nm range [31].
4. Conclusions
Nanometric particles of CeO2 and Ni-doped CeO2 solid solutions were synthesized via a green chemistry route using S. rebaudiana extract. Doping of CeO2 nanoparticles leads to the development of ferromagnetic properties. Also, the UV protection property of the CeO2 nanoparticles improved and increased by doping Ni into the fluorite structure of these nanoparticles, making Ni-doped CeO2 nanoparticles a suitable choice for use in sunscreens.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank from Hajar Alijani and Iraj Sharifi for their helps.
Author Contributions
M.K. and M.S. conducted experiments, performed data analysis and interpretation, and wrote the paper; M.S., M.A.L.N., and A.I. conceived and designed the study; M.R. conducted experiments; M.A.-A. performed data analysis and interpretation; F.M. wrote the paper and provided technical support; F.B. conceived and designed the study, performed data analysis and interpretation, and gave final approval of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the paper.
Funding
“This research was funded by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Bam University of Medical Sciences, grant number 98 (M. Khatami Grant)”
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
References
- 1.Ferin J., Oberdörster G., Penney D.P., Soderholm S.C., Gelein R., Piper H.C. Increased pulmonary toxicity of ultrafine particles I. Particle clearance, translocation, morphology. J. Aerosol Sci. 1990;21:381–384. doi: 10.1016/0021-8502(90)90064-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lalitha A., Subbaiya R., Ponmurugan P. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from leaf extract Azhadirachta indica and to study its anti-bacterial and antioxidant property. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2013;2:228–235. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ramasamy V., Mohana V., Suresh G. The synthesis and characterization of undoped and Ni doped CeO2 nanoparticles using sol-gel method. Int. J. Mater. Sci. 2017;12:79–88. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zholobak N.M., Ivanov V.K., Shcherbakov A.B., Shaporev A.S., Polezhaeva O.S., Baranchikov A.Y., Spivak N.Y., Tretyakov Y.D. UV-shielding property, photocatalytic activity and photocytotoxicity of ceria colloid solutions. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 2011;102:32–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Marionnet C., Tricaud C., Bernerd F. Exposure to non-extreme solar UV daylight: Spectral characterization, effects on skin and photoprotection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014;16:68–90. doi: 10.3390/ijms16010068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Berwick M., Pestak C., Thomas N. Sunlight, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2014. Solar ultraviolet exposure and mortality from skin tumors; pp. 342–358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Horsham C., Auster J., Sendall M.C., Stoneham M., Youl P., Crane P., Tenkate T., Janda M., Kimlin M. Interventions to decrease skin cancer risk in outdoor workers: Update to a 2007 systematic review. BMC Res. Notes. 2014;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mishra A.K., Mishra A., Chattopadhyay P. Herbal cosmeceuticals for photoprotection from ultraviolet B radiation: A review. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2011;10:351–360. doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v10i3.7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dao N.N., Dai Luu M., Nguyen Q.K., Kim B.S. UV absorption by cerium oxide nanoparticles/epoxy composite thin films. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2011;2:045013. doi: 10.1088/2043-6262/2/4/045013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hoang B.T., Popa I.U. Innovation in inorganic UV filters in sunscreen. H&PC Today. 2014;9:35–39. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Iranmanesh T., Foroughi M.M., Jahani S., Zandi M.S., Nadiki H.H. Green and facile microwave solvent-free synthesis of CeO2 nanoparticle-decorated CNTs as a quadruplet electrochemical platform for ultrasensitive and simultaneous detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine, uric acid and acetaminophen. Talanta. 2020;207:120318. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Darroudi M., Hakimi M., Sarani M., Kazemi Oskuee R., Khorsand Zak A., Gholami L. Facile synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of neurotoxicity effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 2013;39:6917–6921. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.02.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Darroudi M., Sarani M., Oskuee R.K., Khorsand Zak A., Hosseini H.A., Gholami L. Green synthesis and evaluation of metabolic activity of starch mediated nanoceria. Ceram. Int. 2014;40:2041–2045. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.07.116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Miri A., Darroudi H.O.S., Sarani M. Biosynthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles and its cytotoxicity survey against colon cancer cell line. App. Organomet. Chem. 2020;1:1–8. doi: 10.1002/aoc.5308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Miri A., Sarani M., Hashemzadeh A., Mardani Z., Darroudi M. Biosynthesis and cytotoxic activity of lead oxide nanoparticles. Green Chem. Let. Rev. 2018;11:567–572. doi: 10.1080/17518253.2018.1547926. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Miri A., Vahed H.O.S., Sarani M. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles and their role in photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2019;9:164–171. doi: 10.1007/s11164-018-3529-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Khatami M., Alijani H.Q., Fakheri B., Mobasseri M.M., Heydarpour M., Farahani Z.K., Khan A.U. Super-Paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs): Greener synthesis using Stevia plant and evaluation of its antioxidant properties. J. Clean Prod. 2019;208:1171–1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.182. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Karthik K., Nikolova M.P., Phuruangrat A., Vijayalakshmi S., Mahdizadeh H., Radhika D., Ojiaku A., Rherari V., Revathi V., Verma U. Microwave-assisted bioengineered CdS nanoparticles for photocatalytic and biological applications. Catalytica. 2019;1:40–50. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Karthik K., Shashank M., Revathi V., Tatarchuk T. Facile microwave-assisted green synthesis of NiO nanoparticles from Andrographis paniculata leaf extract and evaluation of their photocatalytic and anticancer activities. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2019;673:70–80. doi: 10.1080/15421406.2019.1578495. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ahmad A., Wei Y., Syed F., Tahir K., Rehman A.U., Khan A., Ullah S., Yuan Q. The effects of bacteria-nanoparticles interface on the antibacterial activity of green synthesized silver nanoparticles. Microb. Pathog. 2017;102:133–142. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shams S., Khan A.U., Yuan Q., Ahmad W., Wei Y., Khan Z.U.H., Shams S., Ahmad A., Rahman A.U., Ullah S. Facile and eco-benign synthesis of Au@ Fe2O3 nanocomposite: Efficient photocatalytic, antibacterial and antioxidant agent. J. Photochem. Photobio. B: Bio. 2019;199:111632. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.111632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nasiri A., Tamaddon F., Mosslemin M.H., Amiri-Gharaghani M., Asadipour A. Magnetic nano-biocomposite CuFe2O4@ methylcellulose (MC) prepared as a new nano-photocatalyst for degradation of ciprofloxacin from aqueous solution. Environ. Health Eng. Manag. J. 2019;6:41–51. doi: 10.15171/EHEM.2019.05. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Malakootian M., Mahdizadeh H., Dehdarirad A., Amiri-Gharghani M. Photocatalytic ozonation degradation of ciprofloxacin using ZnO nanoparticles immobilized on the surface of stones. J. Disper. Sci. Technol. 2019;40:846–854. doi: 10.1080/01932691.2018.1485580. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dağlıoğlu Y., Öztürk B.Y. A novel intracellular synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Desmodesmus sp. (Scenedesmaceae): Different methods of pigment change. Rend. Lincei. Sci. Fis. Nat. 2019;30:611–621. doi: 10.1007/s12210-019-00822-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Minhas F.T., Arslan G., Gubbuk I.H., Akkoz C., Ozturk B.Y., Asıkkutlu B., Arslan B., Ersoz M. Evaluation of antibacterial properties on polysulfone composite membranes using synthesized biogenic silver nanoparticles with Ulva compressa (L.) Kütz. and Cladophora glomerata (L.) Kütz. extracts. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;107:157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Khandannasab N., Sabouri Z., Ghazal S., Darroudi M. Green-based synthesis of mixed-phase silver nanoparticles as an effective photocatalyst and investigation of their antibacterial properties. J. Mol. Struct. 2019;36:3–10. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rahmani R., Gharanfoli M., Gholamin M., Darroudi M., Chamani J., Sadri K., Hashemzadeh A. Plant-mediated synthesis of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) using Aloe vera and flaxseed extracts and evaluation of their cellular toxicities. J. Clean Prod. 2020;46:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ajdari M.R., Tondro G.H., Sattarahmady N., Parsa A., Heli H. Phytosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Myrtus communis L. Leaf Extract and Investigation of Bactericidal Activity. J. Electron. Mater. 2017;46:6930. doi: 10.1007/s11664-017-5784-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Khatami M., Iravani S., Varma R.S., Mosazade F., Darroudi M., Borhani F. Cockroach wings-promoted safe and greener synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their insecticidal activity. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2019;42:2007–2014. doi: 10.1007/s00449-019-02193-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Singh H., Du J., Singh P., Yi T.H. Role of green silver nanoparticles synthesized from Symphytum officinale leaf extract in protection against UVB-induced photoaging. J. Nanostructure Chem. 2018;3:359–368. doi: 10.1007/s40097-018-0281-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Miri A., Sarani M. Biosynthesis, characterization and cytotoxic activity of CeO2 nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 2018;4:12642–12647. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Abbas F., Jan T., Iqbal J., Ahmad I., Naqvi M.S.H., Malik M. Facile synthesis of ferromagnetic Ni doped CeO2 nanoparticles with enhanced anticancer activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015;357:931–936. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.229. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sathyamurthy S., Leonard K.J., Dabestani R.T., Paranthaman M.P. Reverse micellar synthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. 2005;16:1960–1964. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/16/9/089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Murugan R., Vijayaprasath G., Mahalingam T., Ravi G. Enhancement of room temperature ferromagnetic behavior of rf sputtered Ni-CeO2 thin films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016;390:583–590. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Coey J.M.D., Venkatesan M., Stamenov P., Fitzgerald C.B., Dorneles L.S. Magnetism in hafnium dioxide. Phys. Rev. B. 2005;72:024450. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.024450. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sundaresan R., Bhargavi N., Rangarajan U., Siddesh C.N.R. Ferromagnetism as a universal feature of nanoparticles of the otherwise nonmagnetic oxides. Phys. Rev. B. 2006;74:161306. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.161306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Donglikar M.M., Deore S.L. Sunscreens: A review. Pharm. J. 2016;8:171–179. doi: 10.5530/pj.2016.3.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Boutard T., Rousseau B., Couteau C., Tomasoni C., Simonnard C., Jacquot C.L.J., Coiffard M., Konstantinov K., Devers T., Roussakis C. Comparison of photoprotection efficiency and antiproliferative activity of ZnO commercial sunscreens and CeO2. Mater. Lett. 2013;108:13–16. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.06.085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jose J., Netto G. Role of solid lipid nanoparticles as photoprotective agents in cosmetics. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2019;18:315–321. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]