Skip to main content
Annals of Translational Medicine logoLink to Annals of Translational Medicine
. 2019 Nov;7(22):644. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.10.88

Sleep apnea and risk of traumatic brain injury and associated mortality and healthcare costs: a population-based cohort study

Shih-Yi Lin 1,2, Weishan Chen 3,4, Tomor Harnod 5,6, Cheng-Li Lin 3,4, Wu-Huei Hsu 1,7, Cheng-Chieh Lin 1,8, Yun-Lun Chang 1,2, I-Kuan Wang 1,2, Chia-Hung Kao 1,9,10,11,
PMCID: PMC6944555  PMID: 31930045

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was aimed to investigate whether sleep apnea patients had a higher risk of traumatic brain injury.

Methods

Data were collected from the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database during the period of 2000–2012. The study cohort comprised 6,456 patients aged ≥20 years with a first diagnosis of sleep apnea. The primary outcome was the incidence of traumatic brain injury. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional-hazards modeling were used.

Results

After adjustments for associated comorbidities and hypnotic medications, sleep apnea patients were associated with a 1.19-fold higher risk of traumatic brain injury (95% CI, 1.07–1.33) compared with patients without sleep apnea. Sleep apnea patients who took benzodiazepine (BZD) had a 1.30-fold increased risk of traumatic brain injury compared with patients without sleep apnea (95% CI, 1.14–1.49). However, this risk was not statistically significant, with a 1.03-fold risk of traumatic brain injury in sleep apnea patients without BZD use (95% CI, 0.84–1.25) compared with patients without sleep apnea. Compared with patients without sleep apnea, the risk of traumatic brain injury in sleep apnea patients aged 65–79 years old was higher (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06–1.74).

Conclusions

Sleep apnea patients, regardless of hypnotic use, had a higher risk of traumatic brain injury compared with patients without sleep apnea.

Keywords: Sleep apnea, traumatic brain injury, hypnotic

Introduction

Sleep apnea, a condition characterized by periods of paused or shallow breathing during sleep, affects a large number of the world’s population. Previous research has established that sleep disturbances are associated with an increased risk of acute coronary syndrome (1), stroke (2), neurodegenerative disease (3), type 2 diabetes (4), and obesity (5). The proposed mechanisms underlying this elevated risk include increased oxidative stress (6), brain hypoperfusion (7), endothelial dysfunction (8), chronic elevation of glucocorticoids (9), and elevated plasma levels of homocysteine (10).

However, few studies have investigated the impacts of sleep apnea itself on accidental injuries. Sleep disorders have been linked with daytime impaired attention and even attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults (11,12). However, until now, whether sleep apnea patients experience more hazardous crucial injuries, such as traumatic brain injuries, lacks scientific evidence. Additionally, whether using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the common treatment strategy for sleep apnea, could help alleviate the risk of brain injuries remains unknown. Therefore, we conducted a large nationwide controlled cohort study in Taiwan to investigate the possible risks of traumatic brain injuries in sleep apnea patients.

Methods

Data source

The National Health Insurance program was established in 1995, and it covers more than 99% of Taiwan’s population (13). For this retrospective cohort study, we used a subdatabase of the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) called the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000 (LHID2000). The LHID2000 contains data of 1 million randomly selected patients from the NHIRD.

Ethics statement

The NHIRD encrypts patient personal information to protect privacy and provides researchers with anonymous identification numbers associated with relevant claims information, including sex, date of birth, medical services received, and prescriptions. Therefore, patient consent is not required to access the NHIRD. This study was approved as fulfilling the conditions for exemption by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of China Medical University (CMUH104-REC2-115-CR4). The IRB also specifically waived the consent requirement.

Sampled participants

In this study, patients older than 20 years and with newly diagnosed sleep apnea (ICD-9-CM 327.2, 780.51, 780.53, and 780.57) between 2000 and 2012 in LHID2000 were enrolled. The diagnosis of sleep apnea was defined as two outpatient visits or one inpatient visit for sleep apnea. The coding of sleep apnea in the NHIRD has been used for several investigations, including many previous successfully published publications. Therefore, the coding of sleep apnea could be considered reliable and accurate (14-16). The index date was the date of first sleep apnea diagnosis. We excluded patients with missing information regarding urbanization level or occupation, who had a history of traumatic brain injury (ICD-9-CM 310.2, 800, 801, 803, 804, 850–854, 959.01), or who withdrew from the insurance program before the index date. The control cohort was selected from the patients who had never been diagnosed with sleep apnea and the index date was a randomly assigned date between 2000 and 2012. The exclusion criteria were the same as in the sleep apnea cohort. Then, the cohort without sleep apnea was 4-fold size matched with the sleep disorder cohort by index year, age (every 5 years), and gender. The selection process is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of patient selection.

Outcome and relevant variables

The outcome discussed in this study was traumatic brain injury (ICD-9-CM 310.2, 800, 801, 803, 804, 850–854, and 959.01). The end of the study was defined as occurrence of a traumatic brain injury event, withdrawal from the insurance program, or the end of 2013. We considered patients’ urbanization level and occupation. Urbanization was divided into four levels according to the population density of the residential area, with Level 1 as the most urbanized and Level 4 as the least. The occupations were white collar, blue collar, and other. Patients belonged to the “other” occupation if they were primarily retired, unemployed, belonged to another low-income population. To clarify the association between sleep apnea and brain injuries, we attempted to adjust and control for medical conditions that tend to cause falls in patients (i.e., musculoskeletal disease, including osteoporosis, fracture, and spinal cord injuries; rheumatological disease; internal diseases that cause fragility, including liver disease, renal disease, and factors of metabolic syndrome; common eye disorders, including cataract, presbyopia, myopia, and macular degeneration; and some sedative use). The comorbidities were defined as a diagnosis prior to the endpoint and included diabetes (ICD-9-CM 250 and A181), hypertension (ICD-9-CM 401–405, A260, and A269), hyperlipidemia (ICD-9-CM 272 and A182), spinal cord injury (ICD-9-CM 806 and 952), osteoporosis (ICD-9-CM 733.0), fracture (ICD-9-CM 800–829 and A47X), alcohol-related disease (ICD-9-CM 291, 303, 305.00, 305.01, 305.02, 305.03, 790.3, V11.3, and A215), cirrhosis (ICD-9-CM 571 and A347), cataract (ICD-9-CM 366 and A231), presbyopia or myopia (ICD-9-CM 360.21, 367.1, and 367.4), macular degeneration (ICD-9-CM 362.5), stroke (ICD-9-CM 430–438), chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage renal diseases (ESRD) (ICD-9-CM 580–589 and A350), dementia (ICD-9-CM 290, 294.1, and 331.0), and rheumatoid arthritis (ICD-9-CM 714.0). We also considered patients who received benzodiazepines (BZDs), nonbenzodiazepines (non-BZDs), or antipsychotic medications (17-19) and those who received CPAP treatment (ICD-9-OP 93.90) during the study period.

In addition to evaluating the association between sleep apnea and occurrence of brain injuries, we evaluated the association between sleep apnea and severities of brain injuries. Information regarding Glasgow Coma Scale or IMPACT score (20) was unavailable in the NHIRD. Therefore, we used intensive care unit (ICU) use and mortality following a brain injury episode as our research outcomes.

Data availability statement

The dataset used in this study is held by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW). The MOHW must approve a researcher’s application to access this data. Any researcher interested in accessing this dataset can submit an application form to the MOHW requesting access. Please contact the staff of MOHW (Email: stcarolwu@mohw.gov.tw) for further assistance. Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Address: No.488, Sec. 6, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Nangang Dist., Taipei City 115, Taiwan (R.O.C.). Phone: +886-2-8590-6848. All relevant data are within the paper.

Statistical analysis

Table 1 shows the demographics of patients in sleep apnea cohort and the cohort without sleep apnea. To test the differences in these factors between two groups, the continuous variable was tested using a t test and categorical variables were testing using a Chi-squared test. We estimated the incidence rate and hazard ratio of traumatic brain injury for patients with sleep apnea compared with controls in Table 2. The incidence rate was estimated by the number of events that occurred and person-years. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional-hazard regression models estimated the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of traumatic brain injury between the two groups. Variables found to be statistically significant in the univariable model were further included in the multivariable model. To address the concern of constant proportionality, we examined the proportional-hazard model assumption using a test of scaled Schoenfeld residuals. Results revealed no significant relationship between Schoenfeld residuals for sleep apnea and follow-up time (P=0.70) in the model evaluating traumatic brain injury risk. We also used the Kaplan-Meier survival curve to describe the cumulative incidence of traumatic brain injury in the two groups and the log-rank test to test the differences between the two groups. Table 3 presents the odds ratios of ICU utilization in hospitalized patients for traumatic brain injury between the two groups and estimated using univariable and multivariable unconditional logistic regression. We estimated the odds ratio of mortality for traumatic brain injury patients between the two groups (Table 4). Data were analyzed using SAS statistical software (Version 9.4 for Windows; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The statistical significance of this study was a two-tailed P value of <0.05.

Table 1. Demographic characteristics and comorbidities in cohorts with and without sleep apnea.

Variables Sleep apnea P value*
Yes (n=6,456) No (n=25,824)
n % n %
Gender >0.99
   Male 4,356 67.5 17,424 67.5
   Female 2,100 32.5 8,400 32.5
Age, year >0.99
   20–49 3,607 55.9 14,428 55.9
   50–64 1,968 30.5 7,875 30.5
   65–79 729 11.3 2,916 11.3
   ≥80 152 2.35 608 2.35
   Mean ± SDa 48.3±14.7 48.2±14.7
Urbanization level <0.001
   1 (highest) 2,345 36.3 8,009 31.0
   2 1,958 30.3 7,883 30.5
   3 1,102 17.1 4,608 17.8
   4 (lowest) 1,051 16.3 5,324 20.6
Occupation <0.001
   White collar 4,013 62.2 14,591 56.5
   Blue collar 1,872 29.0 8,954 34.7
   Others 571 8.84 2,279 8.83
Comorbidity
   Diabetes 2,335 36.2 6,370 24.7 <0.001
   Hypertension 3,382 52.4 9,051 35.1 <0.001
   Hyperlipidemia 3,130 48.5 7,775 30.1 <0.001
   Spinal cord injury 59 0.91 168 0.65 0.02
   Osteoporosis 789 12.2 2,200 8.52 <0.0001
   Fracture 1,668 25.8 5,888 22.8 <0.001
   Alcohol-related disease 90 1.39 250 0.97 0.003
   Cirrhosis 2,739 42.4 7,100 27.5 <0.001
   Cataract 1,408 21.8 4,213 16.3 <0.001
   Presbyopia or myopia 351 5.44 748 2.90 <0.001
   Macular degeneration 237 3.67 591 2.29 <0.001
   Stroke 421 6.52 1,211 4.69 <0.001
   CKD or ESRD 822 12.7 1,997 7.73 <0.001
   Dementia 253 3.92 558 2.16 <0.001
   Rheumatoid arthritis 27 0.42 62 0.24 0.01
Medication
   Benzodiazepine 4,291 66.5 11,027 42.7 <0.001
   Non-BZD 2,474 38.3 3,694 14.3 <0.001
   Anti-psychotic 1,121 17.4 2,624 10.2 <0.001

*, Chi-square test; a, t test; , the urbanization level was categorized by the population density of the residential area into four levels, with Level 1 as the most urbanized and level 4 as the least urbanized; , other occupations included primarily retired, unemployed; or low-income populations. CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESRD, end-stage renal disease.

Table 2. Incidence and hazard ratio of traumatic brain injury for patients with sleep apnea compared with controls stratified by gender, age, comorbidity, and medication.

Variables Sleep apnea Compared to control
Yes No Crude Adjusted
Event PY IR Event PY IR HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Overall 465 36,756 12.7 1,554 148,148 10.5 1.21 (1.09–1.34) 0.0004 1.23 (1.11–1.37) 0.001
Gender
   Male 279 24,929 11.2 1,025 99,303 10.3 1.08 (0.95–1.24) 0.23 1.19 (1.03–1.37) 0.02
   Female 186 11,827 15.7 529 48,845 10.8 1.45 (1.23–1.72) <0.0001 1.44 (1.20–1.73) <0.001
   P for interaction 0.007
Age
   20–49 220 21,918 10.0 734 87,917 8.35 1.20 (1.03–1.40) 0.02 1.26 (1.08–1.48) 0.004
   50–64 124 10,641 11.7 451 42,717 10.6 1.10 (0.91–1.35) 0.33 1.17 (0.94–1.44) 0.16
   65–79 100 3,638 27.5 300 15,120 19.8 1.39 (1.11–1.74) 0.004 1.42 (1.11–1.81) 0.006
   ≥80 21 559 37.6 69 2,394 28.8 1.30 (0.80–2.11) 0.30 1.38 (0.80–2.37) 0.25
   P for interaction 0.65
Comorbidity§
   No 49 6,006 8.16 324 47,588 6.81 1.20 (0.89–1.62) 0.24 1.33 (0.97–1.81) 0.07
   Yes 416 30,750 13.5 1,230 100,560 12.2 1.11 (0.99–1.24) 0.08 1.13 (1.01–1.27) 0.04
   P for interaction 0.62
Medication
   Benzodiazepine
      No 121 10,591 11.4 836 74,535 11.2 1.01 (0.84–1.22) 0.90 1.01 (0.83–1.23) 0.95
      Yes 344 26,165 13.1 718 73,613 9.75 1.36 (1.20–1.55) <0.0001 1.31 (1.14–1.49) <0.001
      P for interaction 0.02
   Non-BZD
      No 241 21,743 11.1 1,240 122,918 10.1 1.10 (0.96–1.26) 0.18 1.17 (1.02–1.35) 0.03
      Yes 224 15,013 14.9 314 25,230 12.4 1.23 (1.03–1.46) 0.02 1.23 (1.03–1.46) 0.02
      P for interaction 0.45
   Anti-psychotic
      No 366 29,645 12.3 1,332 130,188 10.2 1.21 (1.07–1.35) 0.002 1.23 (1.09–1.39) 0.001
      Yes 99 7,111 13.9 222 17,960 12.4 1.14 (0.90–1.45) 0.28 1.05 (0.82–1.35) 0.70
      P for interaction 0.60

PY, person-years; IR, incidence rate, per 1,000 person-years; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. Variables found to be statistically significant in the univariable model were further included in the multivariable model. Adjusted for sex, age, diabetes, hypertension, spinal cord injury, osteoporosis, fracture, alcohol-related disease, cirrhosis, cataract, macular degeneration, stroke, CKD or ESRD, dementia, and benzodiazepine, non-benzodiazepine, and antipsychotic medication use. Comorbidity§: patients with any one of the comorbidities were classified into the comorbidity group.

Table 3. Odds ratio of ICU in hospitalized patients with traumatic brain injury between two groups stratified by gender, age, and comorbidity.

Variables ICU Compared to control
In sleep apnea group (N=85) In control group (N=354) Crude Adjusted
OR (95% CI) P value (95% CI) P value
Overall 29 (34.1) 121 (34.2) 1.00 (0.61–1.64) 0.99 0.92 (0.54–1.57) 0.76
Gender
   Male 21 (36.2) 102 (38.2) 0.92 (0.51–1.66) 0.78 0.84 (0.45–1.57) 0.58
   Female 8 (29.6) 19 (21.8) 1.51 (0.57–3.98) 0.41 1.35 (0.47–3.87) 0.58
Age
   20–49 8 (23.5) 40 (29.2) 0.75 (0.31–1.79) 0.51 0.57 (0.21–1.54) 0.27
   50–64 9 (36.0) 44 (38.6) 0.89 (0.36–2.2) 0.81 0.82 (0.31–2.17) 0.69
   65–79 8 (40.0) 31 (37.3) 1.12 (0.41–3.04) 0.83 1.09 (0.39–3.07) 0.87
   ≥80 4 (66.7) 6 (30.0) 0.85 (0.57–1.26) 0.12
Comorbidity§
   No 0 (0.00) 5 (14.3)
   Yes 29 (35.4) 116 (36.4) 0.96 (0.58–1.59) 0.87 1.01 (0.60–1.69) 0.97

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Variables found to be statistically significant in the univariable model were further included in the multivariable model. Adjusted for sex, age, diabetes, and fracture. Comorbidity§: patients with any one of the comorbidities were classified as the comorbidity group.

Table 4. Odds ratio of mortality for traumatic brain injury patients between two groups stratified by gender, age, and comorbidity.

Variables Mortality Compared to control
In sleep apnea group (N=465) In control group (N=1,554) Crude Adjusted
OR (95% CI) P value (95% CI) P value
Overall 6 (1.29) 10 (0.64) 2.02 (0.73–5.58) 0.18 2.56 (0.89–7.41) 0.08
Gender
   Male 4 (1.43) 8 (0.78) 1.85 (0.55–6.19) 0.32 2.30 (0.64–8.23) 0.20
   Female 2 (1.08) 2 (0.38) 2.86 (0.4–20.48) 0.29 3.36 (0.42–26.5) 0.25
Age
   20–49 1 (0.45) 2 (0.27) 1.67 (0.15–18.52) 0.68 2.18 (0.19–24.9) 0.53
   50–64 1 (0.81) 3 (0.67) 1.21 (0.13–11.77) 0.87 1.28 (0.12–13.8) 0.84
   65–79 2 (2.00) 5 (1.67) 1.2 (0.23–6.31) 0.83 1.77 (0.32–9.94) 0.51
   ≥80 2 (9.52) 0 (0)
Comorbidity§
   No 0 (0) 3 (0.52)
   Yes 6 (1.60) 7 (0.71) 2.44 (0.86–6.92) 0.09 2.43 (0.84–7.03) 0.10

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Variables found to be statistically significant in the univariable model were further included in the multivariable model. Adjusted for age and CKD or ESRD. Comorbidity§: patients with any one of the comorbidities were classified as the comorbidity group.

Results

This study included 6,456 sleep apnea patients and 25,824 patients without sleep apnea; no differences in gender and age were observed between the two groups. The mean follow-up rate was more than 93% in both cohorts. The sleep apnea cohort had a higher percentage of patients living in the most urbanized area and a higher percentage of patient occupations were white collar occupations. The sleep apnea cohort had higher proportions of comorbidities and medications used than the cohort without sleep apnea.

The incidence rate of traumatic brain injury for cohorts with and without sleep apnea was 12.7 and 10.5 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Sleep apnea patients were 1.23-fold more likely to develop traumatic brain injury (95% CI, 1.11–1.37) than the control cohort after adjustment for sex, age, diabetes, hypertension, spinal cord injury, osteoporosis, fracture, alcohol-related disease, cirrhosis, cataract, macular degeneration, stroke, CKD or ESRD, dementia, and BZD, non-BZD, and antipsychotic medication use. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve also showed that the sleep apnea cohort had a higher incidence of traumatic brain injury than the cohort without sleep apnea (Figure 2). We then stratified patients by gender, age, comorbidities, and medications. Patients were placed in the comorbidity group if they had any one of the identified comorbidities. Sleep apnea patients exhibited an increased risk of traumatic brain injury (adjusted HR 1.44, 95% CI, 1.20–1.73) among women, and a difference in men between the two groups was noted (adjusted HR 1.19, 95% CI, 1.03–1.37). For age stratifications, we only found groups of patients aged 20–79 and 65–79 where sleep apnea patients had higher risks of traumatic brain injury than patients without sleep apnea (adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI, 1.08–1.48: adjusted HR 1.42, 95% CI, 1.11–1.81). For patients in the comorbidity group, the sleep apnea cohort had a 1.13-fold risk of traumatic brain injury (95% CI, 1.01–1.27). We then considered medication used and found that that patients with sleep apnea had a higher risk of traumatic brain injury than patients without sleep apnea in some stratifications (BZD users: adjusted HR 1.31, 95% CI, 1.14–1.49; non-BZD nonusers: adjusted HR 1.17, 95% CI, 1.02–1.35; antipsychotic nonuser: adjusted HR 1.23, 95% CI, 1.09–1.39).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cumulative incidence of traumatic brain injury in the sleep disorder and non-sleep disorder cohorts.

We then explored the risk of ICU utilization in hospitalized patients with traumatic brain injury between the two groups (Table 3) and found that no statistically significant differences. After adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, and fractures, we determined that the odds ratio (OR) of traumatic brain was not significant for sleep apnea patients with ICU use compared with patients without sleep apnea who utilized the ICU (adjusted OR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.54–1.57). We further discussed the risk of death caused by traumatic brain injury between the two groups. There were 465 and 1,554 patients who experienced traumatic brain injury with and without sleep apnea, respectively. Among them, 6 and 10 patients died of this traumatic brain injury in the cohorts with and without sleep apnea, respectively. The difference in mortality for traumatic brain injury patients was not statistically significant between the two groups.

Compared with individuals in the cohort without sleep apnea, sleep apnea patients with CPAP had a much higher risk of developing head injury (adjusted HR 1.79, 95% CI, 1.27–2.53) (Table 5).

Table 5. Comparisons of incidence and hazard ratios of head injury by treatment of sleep disorders.

Variables N Event IR Crude HR (95% CI) Adjusted HR (95% CI) P value
Control 25,824 1,554 10.5 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Sleep apnea
   Without CPAP 6,153 431 12.2 1.17 (1.05–1.30)** 1.20 (1.08–1.34) 0.001
   With CPAP 303 34 22.7 2.15 (1.53–3.03)*** 1.79 (1.27–2.53) 0.001

IR, incidence rate, per 1,000 person-years; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. Variables found to be statistically significant in the univariable model were further included in the multivariable model. Adjusted for sex, age, diabetes, hypertension, spinal cord injury, osteoporosis, fracture, alcohol-related disease, cirrhosis, cataract, macular degeneration, stroke, CKD or ESRD, dementia, and benzodiazepine, non-benzodiazepine, and antipsychotic medication use. **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001.

Table 6 presents the risk of head injury for different drug exposure durations (cumulative exposure day). Compared with the non-BZD cohort, patients who had received benzodiazepine for <10, 10–50, 50–240, and >240 days exhibited substantially decreased risks of head injury.

Table 6. Incidence and adjusted hazard ratios of head injury stratified by duration of benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine use in study cohort.

Medication N Event Person-year IR Adjusted HR (95% CI)
Without benzodiazepine use 16,362 957 85,125 11.2 1.00
Benzodiazepine
   <10 days 2,112 97 15,062 6.44 0.56 (0.45–0.69)***
   10–50 days 3,691 213 25,451 8.37 0.66 (0.57–0.77)***
   50–240 days 4,089 301 25,937 11.6 0.79 (0.69–0.91)***
   >240 days 5,426 451 33,327 13.5 0.77 (0.68–0.88)***
Without non-BZD 26,112 1,481 144,661 10.2 1.00
Non-BZD
   <10 days 1,075 76 7,409 10.3 0.90 (0.72–1.14)
   10–50 days 1,371 115 10,478 15.1 1.06 (0.87–1.28)
   50–300 days 1,640 158 10,478 15.1 1.17 (0.99–1.38)
   >300 days 2,082 189 13,013 14.5 1.05 (0.90–1.23)

IR, incidence rate, per 1,000 person-years; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. Variables found to be statistically significant in the univariable model were further included in the multivariable model. Adjusted for sex, age, diabetes, hypertension, spinal cord injury, osteoporosis, fracture, alcohol-related disease, cirrhosis, cataract, macular degeneration, stroke, CKD or ESRD, dementia, and benzodiazepine, non-benzodiazepine, and antipsychotic medication use. ***, P<0.001.

Discussion

Our study showed that sleep apnea, whether coupled with sedative or psychiatric medications, was associated with an increased risk of traumatic brain injury. Furthermore, sleep apnea patients aged 65–79 years had the highest risk of traumatic brain injury. It has been previously reported that use of sedative and hypnotic medications was associated with falls, especially in elderly patients (21-23). Avoiding sedatives use in those with high risk of falls appeared to be a protective strategy in decreasing events of accidental falling. In 2015, Jennings and colleagues published a simple screening item to identify high fall-risk groups in hospital settings (24). However, we discovered that sleep apnea was also associated with a higher risk of traumatic brain injury. The mechanism underlying the association between sleep apnea and traumatic brain injury remains to be investigated. Although information regarding etiologies involved in traumatic brain injuries were unavailable in the NHIRD, we proposed several possible explanations for this finding, as the main causes of traumatic brain injuries include falls and traffic accidents. First, sleep apnea is reportedly prevalent among several movement disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease (25). Parkinson’s disease and associated movement disorders can cause imbalance of muscle tone and regulation, which could confer a high risk of falls. Second, sleep disorders, of which insomnia and sleep apnea make up a majority of cases, can cause poor attention and concentration while leading to more accidents in daily activities (26,27). Third, sleep apnea patients might have more medical visits, tend to seek medical service while injured, and have more chances to get the diagnosis of traumatic brain injuries compared with patients without sleep disorders.

In contrast to previous studies that focused on the increased risk of sleep disorders in people who experienced traumatic brain injuries (24-26), we found that sleep apnea patients had a higher risk of traumatic brain injury. Furthermore, we found that irrespective of hypnotic use status, the risk of traumatic brain injuries was nonsignificant in sleep disorder patients. In our study, sleep apnea patients did not have a higher mortality and more ICU hospitalization because of traumatic brain injuries compared with patients without sleep disorders. Additionally, it is noteworthy that sleep apnea patients with CPAP use had a higher risk compared with sleep apnea patients without CPAP use. Karimi et al. reported that CPAP use reduced the risk of motor vehicle accidents, but not the risk of brain injuries (27). Therefore, we propose that CPAP use could be an index for severity of sleep apnea, and patients requiring CPAP might be more vulnerable to brain injuries because of previous long-term nighttime deoxygenating.

Our data may imply an indirect relationship between brain injury and sleep apnea (e.g., through a fall or a driving accident). Notably, these traumatic brain injuries can be preventable in sleep apnea patients if sleep apnea is cured. Because brain injuries are associated with increased medical costs and increased risk of dementia (26), attempting to cure sleep apnea rather than focusing on treating or alleviating its symptoms is clinically valuable.

Burks et al. reported that nonadherence with employer-mandated sleep apnea treatment could be associated with increased risk of serious truck crashes (28). Therefore, alternative strategy, stimulus control, progressive muscle relaxation, paradoxical intention sleep restriction, biofeedback, multifaceted cognitive-behavior therapy for insomnia (29) as well as weight loss, dental devices, and CPAP for sleep apnea might have benefits in reducing the incidence of sleep disorders and associated complications. Additionally, severe sleep apnea patients might need surgical intervention. Further studies are warranted to examine these nonpharmacological treatments in decreasing events of traumatic brain injuries in sleep disorder patients (30).

Several limitations of this study should be mentioned. First, information about personal habits of alcohol consumption, daily sun exposure, daily caffeine intake, vision accuracy, safety of environment, body mass index, obesity, and daily function ability are factors possibly associated with traumatic brain injuries and sleep quality that were unavailable in the NHIRD. We also had no information regarding apnea/hypopnea index, which can be used to classify sleep apnea severity. Therefore, whether the CPAP group differed from the non-CPAP group on severity of sleep apnea was not known. The information regarding etiologies of traumatic brain injuries that are outside of a person’s control, such as assault, pedestrian being struck by a motor vehicle, being struck in the head by an external object were lacking. Therefore, some etiologies may have less to do with cognitive dysfunction resulting from a sleep disorder. Second, we did not adjust medical visits in our study; thus, sleep apnea patients might have had more chances to receive a diagnosis of traumatic brain injury compared with patients without sleep apnea. However, because we recorded these based on emergency room database information, this bias should be minimized. Third, detailed imaging reports and medical records regarding traumatic wounds were also unavailable in the NHIRD. Therefore, we could not classify the severity of traumatic brain injuries. Fourth, CPAP use compliance was not obtainable from the NHIRD, and whether the patients had used concomitant treatment strategies, including losing weight, decreasing alcohol consumption, or quitting smoking were unknown. Finally, the diagnostic rate of obstructive sleep apnea is quite low. Thus, there would be a certain percentage of patients identified as not having sleep apnea who actually had sleep apnea, although undiagnosed at the time. Therefore, the increased risks of traumatic brain injuries in sleep apnea patients compared with patients without sleep apnea would be underestimated in our study and further strengthen our findings that sleep apnea patients had increased risk of traumatic brain injuries. In conclusion, sleep apnea patients are at a higher risk of traumatic brain injuries. Although our data showed an association between CPAP use and higher risk of brain injuries, the causative relationship was not definitively established because of the limitations of this study. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effects of CPAP on incidences of traumatic brain injuries in sleep apnea patients, especially in elderly patients.

Acknowledgments

Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (MOHW108-TDU-B-212-133004), China Medical University Hospital (CMU106-ASIA-12, DMR-107-192); Academia Sinica Stroke Biosignature Project (BM10701010021); MOST Clinical Trial Consortium for Stroke (MOST 107-2321-B-039-004); Tseng-Lien Lin Foundation, Taichung, Taiwan; and Katsuzo and Kiyo Aoshima Memorial Funds, Japan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. No additional external funding received for this study.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. This study was approved as fulfilling the conditions for exemption by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of China Medical University (CMUH104-REC2-115-CR4). The IRB also specifically waived the consent requirement.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Jean-Louis G, Zizi F, Clark LT, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease: role of the metabolic syndrome and its components. J Clin Sleep Med 2008;4:261-72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yaggi HK, Concato J, Kernan WN, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea as a risk factor for stroke and death. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2034-41. 10.1056/NEJMoa043104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Postuma RB, Gagnon JF, Vendette M, et al. Quantifying the risk of neurodegenerative disease in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder. Neurology 2009;72:1296-300. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000340980.19702.6e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vgontzas AN, Liao D, Pejovic S, et al. Insomnia with objective short sleep duration is associated with type 2 diabetes: A population-based study. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1980-5. 10.2337/dc09-0284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liu J, Hay J, Faught BE. The Association of Sleep Disorder, Obesity Status, and Diabetes Mellitus among US Adults-The NHANES 2009-2010 Survey Results. Int J Endocrinol 2013;2013:234129. 10.1155/2013/234129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lavie L. Oxidative stress in obstructive sleep apnea and intermittent hypoxia--revisited--the bad ugly and good: implications to the heart and brain. Sleep Med Rev 2015;20:27-45. 10.1016/j.smrv.2014.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li L, Zhang X, Yang D, et al. Hypoxia increases Abeta generation by altering beta- and gamma-cleavage of APP. Neurobiol Aging 2009;30:1091-8. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Da Luz P, Libby P, Laurindo F, et al. Endothelium and Cardiovascular Diseases. 1st Edition. Vascular Biology and Clinical Syndromes. 19th January 2018. eBook ISBN: 9780128125519.
  • 9.Hargens TA, Kaleth AS, Edwards ES, et al. Association between sleep disorders, obesity, and exercise: a review. Nat Sci Sleep 2013;5:27-35. 10.2147/NSS.S34838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lavie L, Perelman A, Lavie P. Plasma homocysteine levels in obstructive sleep apnea: association with cardiovascular morbidity. Chest 2001;120:900-8. 10.1378/chest.120.3.900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mazza S, Pépin JL, Naëgelé B, et al. Most obstructive sleep apnoea patients exhibit vigilance and attention deficits on an extended battery of tests. Eur Respir J 2005;25:75-80. 10.1183/09031936.04.00011204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Surman CB, Adamson JJ, Petty C, et al. Association between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and sleep impairment in adulthood: evidence from a large controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry 2009;70:1523-9. 10.4088/JCP.08m04514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Database NHIR. Taiwan, Available online: http://nhird.nhri.org.tw/en/index.html
  • 14.Shen TC, Lin CL, Wei CC, et al. Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adult Patients with Asthma: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan. PLoS One 2015;10:e0128461. 10.1371/journal.pone.0128461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang SH, Chen WS, Tang SE, et al. Benzodiazepines Associated With Acute Respiratory Failure in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Front Pharmacol 2019;9:1513. 10.3389/fphar.2018.01513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee YC, Hung SY, Wang HK, et al. Sleep apnea and the risk of chronic kidney disease: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Sleep 2015;38:213-21. 10.5665/sleep.4400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harnod T, Wang YC, Kao CH. Association Between Benzodiazepine Use and Epilepsy Occurrence: A Nationwide Population-Based Case-Control Study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1571. 10.1097/MD.0000000000001571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang WS, Muo CH, Chang SN, et al. Benzodiazepine use and risk of stroke: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2014;68:255-62. 10.1111/pcn.12117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wu CS, Tsai YT, Tsai HJ. Antipsychotic drugs and the risk of ventricular arrhythmia and/or sudden cardiac death: a nation-wide case-crossover study. J Am Heart Assoc 2015;4. doi: . 10.1161/JAHA.114.001568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Egea-Guerrero JJ, Rodríguez-Rodríguez A, Gordillo-Escobar E, et al. IMPACT Score for Traumatic Brain Injury: Validation of the Prognostic Tool in a Spanish Cohort. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2018;33:46-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mendelson WB. The use of sedative/hypnotic medication and its correlation with falling down in the hospital. Sleep 1996;19:698-701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sorock GS, Shimkin EE. Benzodiazepine sedatives and the risk of falling in a community-dwelling elderly cohort. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2441-4. 10.1001/archinte.1988.00380110083017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Riefkohl EZ, Bieber HL, Burlingame MB, et al. Medications and falls in the elderly: a review of the evidence and practical considerations. P and T 2003;28:724-33. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jennings LA, Reuben DB, Kim SB, et al. Targeting a high-risk group for fall prevention: strategies for health plans. Am J Manag Care. 2015;21:e519-26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tan A, Salgado M, Fahn S. Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder preceding Parkinson's disease with therapeutic response to levodopa. Mov Disord 1996;11:214-6. 10.1002/mds.870110216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shively S, Scher AI, Perl DP, et al. Dementia resulting from traumatic brain injury: what is the pathology? Arch Neurol 2012;69:1245-51. 10.1001/archneurol.2011.3747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Karimi M, Hedner J, Häbel H, et al. Sleep apnea related risk of motor vehicle accidents is reduced by continuous positive airway pressure: Swedish traffic accident registry data. Sleep 2015;38:341-9. 10.5665/sleep.4486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Burks SV, Anderson JE, Bombyk M, et al. Nonadherence with Employer-Mandated Sleep Apnea Treatment and Increased Risk of Serious Truck Crashes. Sleep 2016;39:967-75. 10.5665/sleep.5734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Morin CM, Hauri PJ, Espie CA, et al. Nonpharmacologic treatment of chronic insomnia. An American Academy of Sleep Medicine review. Sleep 1999;22:1134-56. 10.1093/sleep/22.8.1134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jullian-Desayes I, Joyeux-Faure M, Tamisier R, et al. Impact of obstructive sleep apnea treatment by continuous positive airway pressure on cardiometabolic biomarkers: a systematic review from sham CPAP randomized controlled trials. Sleep Med Rev 2015;21:23-38. 10.1016/j.smrv.2014.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset used in this study is held by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW). The MOHW must approve a researcher’s application to access this data. Any researcher interested in accessing this dataset can submit an application form to the MOHW requesting access. Please contact the staff of MOHW (Email: stcarolwu@mohw.gov.tw) for further assistance. Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Address: No.488, Sec. 6, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Nangang Dist., Taipei City 115, Taiwan (R.O.C.). Phone: +886-2-8590-6848. All relevant data are within the paper.


Articles from Annals of Translational Medicine are provided here courtesy of AME Publications

RESOURCES