Abstract
The bottom‐up construction of synthetic cells with user‐defined chemical organization holds considerable promise in the creation of bioinspired materials. Complex emulsions, droplet networks, and nested vesicles all represent platforms for the engineering of segregated chemistries with controlled communication, analogous to biological cells. Microfluidic manufacture of such droplet‐based materials typically results in radial or axisymmetric structures. In contrast, biological cells frequently display chemical polarity or gradients, which enable the determination of directionality, and inform higher‐order interactions. Here, a dual‐material, 3D‐printing methodology to produce microfluidic architectures that enable the construction of functional, asymmetric, hierarchical, emulsion‐based artificial cellular chassis is developed. These materials incorporate droplet networks, lipid membranes, and nanoparticle components. Microfluidic 3D‐channel arrangements enable symmetry‐breaking and the spatial patterning of droplet hierarchies. This approach can produce internal gradients and hemispherically patterned, multilayered shells alongside chemical compartmentalization. Such organization enables incorporation of organic and inorganic components, including lipid bilayers, within the same entity. In this way, functional polarization, that imparts individual and collective directionality on the resulting artificial cells, is demonstrated. This approach enables exploitation of polarity and asymmetry, in conjunction with compartmentalized and networked chemistry, in single and higher‐order organized structures, thereby increasing the palette of functionality in artificial cellular materials.
Keywords: 3D‐printed microfluidics, anisotropic materials, artificial cells, biomimetic materials, compartmentalization, droplet interface bilayers, group behavior, lipid bilayers
Polarized artificial cells are created by 3D‐microfluidics. Multi‐material 3D‐printed microfluidics is used to create hierarchical droplet assemblies, where 3D‐channel geometries enable asymmetric and polarized patterning in droplet assemblies. These materials contain lipid‐bilayer‐segregated droplet networks and integrate patterned organic and inorganic components. Polarized patterning with magnetic microparticles bestows directional properties and motion in aqueous environments, with constructs exhibiting simple group‐level behaviors.
1. Introduction
The creation of artificial cells with functional properties, that are analogous to their biological counterparts, is envisaged to give rise to a wealth of opportunities, in a diversity of application areas, in both biotechnology and therapeutics,1, 2, 3, 4, 5 for example, in tumor cell targeted drug delivery6 and artificial kidneys for clinical treatments.7 Imparting functionality to artificial cells is typically underpinned by organization of chemical reactions, with the aim to engineer specific dynamic or responsive behaviors. This itself is enabled by the spatiotemporal organization of chemical reactions, and their selective, controlled communication.8, 9, 10, 11, 12 The aspiration to engineer such chemical models which harness biology, represents a conceptual shift from linear systems with fixed physical‐chemical properties, toward the exploitation of emergent, nonequilibrium, and dynamic properties.13 Such approaches are both inspired by, and become increasingly realizable with, our understanding of biological complexity, and the cell's exploitation of emergent behaviors; for instance, those arising from (i) molecular self‐assembly, (ii) the barrier properties of membranes, (iii) the compartmentalization of multiple chemistries, and (iv) the process of symmetry‐breaking, to develop new properties.14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 In this regard, and of particular interest, is the ability to manufacture miniaturized, asymmetric entities with spatially organized chemistries to dictate functional polarity.23 Such features have been demonstrated to possess emergent and collective properties in solid‐state materials.24, 25 In biological systems, these properties are essential for dictating directional motility,26 governing cellular migration,27 enabling response to external chemical gradients28 and defining directional growth.29, 30 Consequently, there has been significant interest in incorporating such polarizable properties in artificial cells.31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 However, to date, the practical establishment of this has remained limited.39, 40
Despite the importance of discrete chemical organization in artificial cells, the majority of research in bottom‐up synthetic biology, has focused on the development of much simpler models. There has been significant interest in the construction of spontaneous, self‐assembled, artificial cells, in the form of vesicles, colloidosomes, or phase‐separated oil–water, or water–water (coacervate) systems.41, 42, 43, 44, 45 The exploitation of such processes can shed important light on the emergence of early life, and resultant structures may represent minimally complex, artificial cell chassis, often termed “protocells.” However, using these spontaneous self‐assembly processes alone, it is challenging to recapitulate the controlled subcompartmentalization and spatial organization of biological cells, and, therefore, the higher functionality of even simple biological systems. In this regard, it is notable that few biological structures are formed de novo, instead being spatially and temporally constructed, or formed, from existing structures.46 Consequently, droplet microfluidics represents an interesting parallel, where channel architecture and flow provide a route for directing the assembly of compartmentalized, and spatially patterned, chemically organized, soft‐matter materials.22, 47, 48, 49
Beyond these self‐assembled systems, increased structural complexity has been sought in droplet networks50, 51, 52 and compartmentalized vesicles53 to produce interconnected, membrane‐segregated compartments, as artificial cellular systems. Such materials have been constructed manually,18 by the printing or assembly of individual droplet units20 and by using microfluidics54 and demonstrated as networked reactors possessing emergent properties.55, 56 Microfluidic construction of such materials offers the opportunity of scalable production, using massively parallel microfluidics,57, 58 and typically involves their formation from hierarchical water/oil emulsions. Ourselves, and others, have demonstrated the creation of droplet networks, segregated by lipid bilayers using microfluidic approaches.54, 59 By extending this concept to a third phase and forming a triple emulsion, such droplet structures can be effectively encapsulated within a permeable, freestanding, hydrogel shell. This droplet assembly is able to communicate with its external environment and be functionally enhanced by the integration of transmembrane proteins.59
It is notable that the microfluidic formation of such hierarchical droplets, or higher‐order emulsions, requires the integration of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces within the same microfluidic device. This determines the channel wetting properties and governs whether water or oil droplets form at a given junction. Consequently, the requirement to alternate between aqueous and nonaqueous wetting phases represents a fabrication challenge to achieve the integration of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic channels. This may entail the complex assembly of multimaterial, or surface‐functionalized, fluidic channels. Furthermore, traditional planar fabrication tools usually constrain droplet flows to a single plane, which creates 2D axisymmetric morphologies in double and triple emulsions. Consequently, in both lipid bilayer stabilized, and more traditional multiphase emulsions, a number of constraints are placed on the ability to create nonsymmetric droplet structures in a well‐controlled manner.
In this regard, asymmetric droplets, or so‐called Janus droplets, have been explored as a means to break the morphological symmetry in droplets.60, 61, 62 Janus droplets were first reported by Nisisako et al with microfluidic formation of such structures deterministically created in single emulsion laminar flows.63 Janus particles have been used in applications that exploit the particle anisotropy, ranging from chemical sensors64 to electrically activated, reconfigurable displays.63 Double emulsions have also been used as a template to create Janus polymer structures, with the immiscible oil and water volumes templating the synthesis of two conjoined particle hemispheres.65 Double emulsions with a Janus shell have also been reported,66, 67 but the Janus patterning has remained limited to a single phase, and in a single plane. The ability to expand such approaches and combine with droplet interface bilayer networks could provide a means to pattern individual layers of hierarchical, membrane‐based, cellular structures. Further, the ability to create droplet structures with symmetry‐breaking in more than one plane would enable the discrete patterning of each phase, and its orientation, in the droplet hierarchy. As a result, this could produce chemical gradients or polarized phases, and position compartments spatially within the fluidic or soft matrices. This would, therefore, facilitate the construction of synthetic cell chassis, with compartmentalized chemistries, access to membrane biochemistry, with overall spatial control of assembly. Such order would enable control over chemical polarity, and increase the functional complexity of artificial cells.
To realize this, we report here the development of one‐step, multimaterial microfluidic devices with 3D arranged channels, to produce hierarchical droplets with discrete patterning of component liquid phases. Using this approach, we demonstrate the production of symmetry‐breaking droplet structures, incorporating patterned organic and inorganic components, with biological lipid bilayers for the first time. This increases the palette of functionality and afforded assembly control in such chemically organized synthetic cells. We demonstrate the ability to impart polarization‐driven behaviors in the constructs, by creating magnetically polarized, encapsulated droplet networks that can orientate, rotate, and migrate, as well as collectively establish a common orientation, and undergo shared collective motions in larger populations.
2. Results
2.1. Single‐Step 3D‐Printed Microfluidic Devices for the Production of Multiphase Emulsions
The advent of 3D printing has enabled the construction of 3D fluidic architectures.68, 69 In droplet microfluidics, hydrophobic fluidic channels govern the formation of water droplets in a continuous oil flow, and hydrophilic fluidic channels enable the dispersion of oil droplets in continuous water flows. Here, we developed a monolithically constructed, 3D fluidic device, consisting of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic materials, alternately deposited in a single, integrated build process, using a dual‐material printer (Ultimaker 3). This created both hydrophilic and hydrophobic ducts in a single fabrication step, without the requirement for surface modification, or post‐manufacture integration of different substrates. Using this approach, it was possible to produce water droplets in oil using a hydrophobic PLA channel (Figure 1 a), and oil droplets in water, within a more hydrophilic polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) channel (Figure 1b). In Figure 1a,b, the aqueous wetting contact angle of PLA and PVA is depicted, together with the resultant droplet regimes. The increased hydrophilic properties of PVA enable inversion of the usual droplet formation regime to produce oil droplets in water. These material architectures were then combined in a single device to sequentially produce water droplets in oil, followed by oil droplets in water, and finally, the ejection of water droplets from the device, to a collection bath (Figure 1c, and Table S1, Video S1, Supporting Information). This enabled the hierarchal assembly of complex, multiphase emulsions, using the monolithic microfluidic device, which was fabricated in a one‐step process. Figure 1c‐iii demonstrates the production of aqueous droplets (red) encapsulated within an oil droplet (blue), itself encapsulated within an alginate hydrogel shell (colorless) using this approach. These triple emulsions are shown to be sequentially deposited from the fluidic device, in effect, “printing” individual complex emulsion droplets.
2.2. Characterization of Complex Emulsion Formation
The formation of oil droplets in a continuous water phase, without surface modification, is usually challenging, owing to the native preferential hydrophobic wetting of many substrate materials, which favor the formation of water droplets in oil. Consequently, to date, only water droplet formation, in extrusion 3D‐printed microfluidic devices, has been demonstrated.70 We observe that in the formation of complex emulsions, the comparatively hydrophilic PVA junction is capable of operating in two distinct droplet generating regimes for the formation of oil droplets in water. These regimes are essentially, either dripping or jetting (Figure 2 a), both being determined by the combination of input fluid flow rates, and the specific composition of the respective fluid phases (Figure 2b and Table S2, Supporting Information). In the formation of triple emulsions, this results in the formation of either single, or multiple, encapsulated middle phase oil droplets (designated m), containing inner phase aqueous droplets (designated i) in the larger emulsion constructs, under jetting and dripping regimes, respectively. Figure 2b shows the manifestation of this with respect to the relative, and absolute, flow rates of the three input fluid phases, for both a fatty‐acid‐rich sunflower oil, and a hexadecane/silicone oil midphase. The complex interplay of fluid flow properties has been characterized in the determination of droplet formation, by dripping and jetting regimes and their transitions.71 Fluid density, velocity, droplet and channel diameter, surface tension and viscosity, all play an important role, as drag and inertial forces compete with surface tension.72, 73 It is unsurprising that this relationship becomes more complex in triple‐phase systems, where flow rates govern both upstream droplet formation, and also influence linear flow velocity downstream at subsequent encapsulation. The fluid dynamics of droplet formation are additionally perturbed by both internal and external immiscible interfaces.74 New dimensionless numbers have been proposed to describe triple emulsion droplet formation,75 albeit by a different microfluidic method with fluid phases unsuited to the creation of artificial cells. In this work, we take an empirical approach to control the number of inner (i) and middle droplets (m) that are encapsulated in the shell phase, by the tuning of fluid flow rates, to govern the droplet generation frequency of each of the three phases. The output triple emulsion droplets have uniform morphology (Video S1, Supporting Information), and relatively monodisperse size distributions (<4%) for each phase (Figure S1, Supporting Information). The size of the internal and midphase droplets is observed to change with the relative flow rates of the component fluid phases, corresponding to the internal and midphase droplet number. This is further detailed in Figure S2 (Supporting Information).
2.3. 3D Microfluidic Architectures Enable Formation of Asymmetric and Patterned Complex Emulsions, Creating Hierarchal Polarized Structures
The use of 3D printing enables the creation of fully 3D microfluidic architectures, unlike more traditional fabrication approaches, which are usually constrained to machining in a single plane. Using the extra‐dimensionality afforded by 3D printing allowed us to create devices which control the phase orientations and encapsulations within the complex emulsions system, thereby creating patterned and asymmetric droplet structures around different geometric axes (Figure 3 ). The dominance of low Reynolds number flows maintains the laminar streams of fluids, thereby minimizing mixing. Axial symmetry at the droplet generating junctions was used to enable asymmetric fluid additions with respect to the major channel axis. While also creating a symmetric shear force on the disperse (droplet) phase. This maintained the patterning or organization of emulsions, when the dispersed phase was pinched off by the continuous (shell) phase. Complementary computational fluid dynamic modeling finds that the organization within the resultant w/o/w emulsion flow is stabilized in the extended fluidic duct in our experimental conditions (Table S3, Video S2, Supporting Information). We found that, while in flow, the inner aqueous droplets reached their equilibrium positions within the middle oil droplet, without ejection into the continuous hydrogel phase. This process is dominated by the viscous stress, competing with interfacial tension76 (see Discussion, Supporting Information). Similarly, we find internal (i) droplets are constrained within lateral domains of the encapsulating oil droplet, as are differential additions of middle phase (m) oils, thus enabling the maintenance of internal hemispherical patterning and gradients (see Table S4, Supporting Information and Discussion, Supporting Information).
Using this experimental approach, we orientated sequential droplet generating geometries in 3D. This allowed us to spatially pattern the droplet structures with control over the designated patterned phase or phases, and the geometric orientation of patterning. Consequentially, this provided the ability to create both Janus shells, Janus and gradient mid‐droplets (m), and achieve the controlled hemispherical placement of inner droplets (i). These may differ in size and contents, and be located in different regions within the encapsulating droplet (Figure 3). Figure 3a‐i illustrates conceptually how traditional 2.5D channel architectures can be used to create Janus shells with inner droplets as double emulsions. Enabled by 3D fabrication, it becomes possible to rotate the fluid inlets (by 90° in this instance) providing the opportunity to create asymmetric coflows in different orientations with respect to the traditional single fabrication axis. In this way, it becomes possible to combine multiple coflow orientations, creating both Janus shells and Janus interiors, with independent and opposing orientations in both double (Figure 3a‐ii) and triple (Figure 3a‐iii) emulsions. In principle, this process can be extended to increasing hierarchies of droplet structures in complex emulsions.
We also demonstrate that this approach can be extended to the production of differing inner droplets (i) in the triple emulsion, and dictate their location in the final droplet construct. This is achieved by joining two streams of water/oil emulsions at a Y‐shaped junction to form a Janus flow before its breakup into discrete encapsulated droplets (Tables S1 row 3 and S4, Supporting Information). Figure 3a‐iv illustrates the production of inner droplets (i) of two different sizes and contents (red ≈430 µm and yellow ≈125 µm) within a Janus encapsulating oil droplet (m), itself within a hydrogel shell. The smaller (yellow) inner droplets are retained to the right‐hand perimeter of the larger red droplet population. With this approach to spatial patterning, enabled by 3D fabrication, in combination with the flow‐rate controlling size and number of inner and midphase droplets (Figure 3b), we demonstrate that it is possible to produce a complex diversity of spatially compartmentalized and patterned, triple emulsion structures (Figure 3c) from these new 3D‐printed, microfluidic devices. The outer shell phase is gelled on exit from the microfluidic device by the Ca2+ quickly diffusing and crosslinking the alginate shell in the gelling bath. As such, the final droplet structures are freestanding and able to withstand mechanical manipulation (Figure 3d). The alginate shell remains water permeable, thus enabling communicative access from the environment to the internal contents, where inner droplets can be segregated from the hydrogel shell by a biomimetic, lipid bilayer.59
2.4. Functionalized Encapsulated Droplet Interface Bilayers (eDIBs)
In an immiscible, aqueous–oil system, phospholipids may serve as an effective amphiphilic surfactant, stabilizing aqueous droplets in oil through the self‐assembly of lipid monolayers at the water–oil interface. The contacting of two such interfaces leads to the spontaneous creation of a lipid bilayer, resembling the foundational structure of the cell membrane and membrane‐bound organelles.50, 59 In this way, membrane compartmentalized systems can be constructed within hierarchal droplet architectures, where functional membrane proteins can be reconstituted to enable both the communication and transfer between different compartments and between compartments and the environment.59
Expansion of the microfluidic patterning approach described earlier was implemented for the creation of encapsulated, droplet interface bilayer systems with layered hydrogel shells. Within these constructs functional organic and inorganic materials were incorporated alongside lipid bilayers (Figure 4 a and Video S3, Supporting Information). In this way, we produce eDIBs (Figure 4b‐i), with 25 µm chemically exfoliated graphene oxide (GO) sheets incorporated into the outer shell at concentrations of up to 1.44% w/w (Figure 4b‐ii) (GO characterization Figure S2, Supporting Information). GO is an atomically thin 2D, functional nanomaterial that has attractive mechanical, electrical, chemical, and photonic properties.77 GO has been used to nonspecifically bind proteins and peptides,78 thus it may be possible to serve as a protective shell layer to protect lipid bilayers from destabilizing peptides and proteins, while retaining the capacity for water and small molecular diffusion to the lipid bilayer. At higher concentrations, the presence of GO increased the viscosity of the hydrogel phase. While this did not hamper the microfluidic formation of the hierarchical droplet assemblies, the slower surface‐tension‐driven relaxation of the outer droplet to a spherical shape during gelation resulted in the gelation of tear‐drop, or ovoid‐shaped, outer shells.
We also produced eDIBs with a functionally inert inner shell of osmotically matched buffer, followed by a second Janus outer shell, containing embedded, 2 µm porous magnetic silica microparticles. In this way, a thin protective inner hydrogel region could serve as a spacer, in effect, isolating larger silica particles from direct contact with the lipid bilayers, but maintaining aqueous and diffusive continuity of the shell with the membrane. Silica particles have been reported to disrupt artificial bilayers79 and we observed results consistent with this in the absence of the additional inner hydrogel layer. By the creation of two‐layered shells, we could produce stable particle‐laden encapsulated bilayer systems, with polarized properties, such as a Janus shell (Figure 4b‐iii), or an asymmetric encapsulated droplet network (Figure S3, Supporting Information). In these systems with inner (i) aqueous droplets containing fluorophore sulforhodamine B, fluorescent imaging 3 d following manufacture demonstrated that the lipid bilayer networks remained intact (Figure S4, Supporting Information). The modulation of salt conditions of the alginate phase to avoid excessive osmotic stress on the assembled lipid bilayers was also observed to slow the alginate gelation processes, giving rise to some shape fluctuation in the shell of the final constructs, as they gel on entry to the gelling bath, usually giving rise to slight elongation of the overall structure. It should be possible to expand our reported microfluidic methodology to employ in‐channel gelation,59 to facilitate gelation while maintaining sphericity within the in‐channel flow. The methodology reported here provides a route for the fabrication of artificial cell chassis containing both lipid membranes and functional nano‐ and microparticulate materials in spatially organized architectures. By using controlled spatial organization, these materials may, therefore, harness the functionality of both the biological and nonbiological components, while circumventing the physical incompatibilities that would otherwise hamper realization. In this way, designer hierarchical droplet structures could be created to control bio, chemical, and physical properties.
2.5. Polarization‐Induced Properties of Artificial Cell Chassis
The particle‐containing encapsulated bilayer systems can gain specific functionality from patterned and encapsulated components. Here, we demonstrate the polarization‐induced functional properties of the eDIBs complete with an outer Janus shell of embedded, paramagnetic, silica microparticles. The incorporation of paramagnetic particles enables the manipulation of the eDIBs, by an external magnetic field, enabling mobility and orientational control, in aqueous environments (Video S4, Supporting Information). These artificial cell chassis can be moved individually in an aqueous environment (Figure 5 a). In a rotating magnetic field, individual constructs orientate with respect to the magnetic field and to the polarity of their Janus shell, thereby providing a directionality to the droplet structure. These behaviors could be combined in an aqueous pool, where Janus shell eDIBs could seek, orientate, move, and submerge to interface with a static magnetic target placed beneath the Petri dish. The preferred orientation of the construct is governed by the polarized patterning of the eDIB structure (Figure 5c). Such polarization‐induced properties, created by the ability to spatially organize and pattern eDIBs, provide the opportunity to recapitulate biological and biological‐like behaviors. These may include the harnessing of polarization in directional control, polarized chemical organization, or the exploitation of anisotropy, for example, in the self‐organization of higher‐order assemblies or artificial tissues. Figure 5d shows a population of core–shell Janus magnetic architectures in an aqueous environment under a rotating magnetic field. All constructs are observed to spontaneously orientate such that their hemispherical division is in the vertical plane. Individual constructs are observed to migrate clockwise, while simultaneously rotating about their own central axis. This is a consequence of both the overall, and locally polarized, magnetic properties of each construct. Colliding constructs are observed to temporarily comigrate with inhibited rotational velocity, before separation and recovery of rotational motion (Figure 5d‐ii and Table S4, Supporting Information, correlation test). The orientation of individual constructs may all be unified with this type of patterning, and their motion within a larger population may influence others within the group.25 Such mobility synchronization results in the emergence of simple, group level behaviors. Thus, these principles may serve to pave the way for the design and programming of more sophisticated, population level behaviors, governed by polarized or directional functionality, in membrane‐based artificial cell communities.
3. Discussion
In summary, we have demonstrated the feasibility of a new, simple, one‐step process that uses 3D printing to fabricate monolithic, dual‐material, microfluidic devices, which are able to produce both water‐in‐oil and oil‐in‐water droplet emulsions without the need of surface modification. With this approach to device fabrication, we demonstrate the sequential operation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic droplet generating geometries to create hierarchal droplet structures, where flow rates determine the mode of operation, and, govern the number of encapsulated inner and midphase droplets. By exploiting the ability to completely fabricate manifolds in three dimensions, we are able to generate triple emulsions with 3D‐patterned morphologies. This provides the capability to produce not only Janus shell materials but also hierarchical double‐Janus (shell and midphase) droplets with independent control of the hemispherical orientations. These features can be combined with inner droplet populations of differing size, number, and hemispherical location, alongside the ability to create layered and patterned shells. These droplet templates are able to incorporate lipid bilayers, providing membranes between neighboring aqueous droplets, and between inner droplets and their contact of the midphase‐and‐hydrogel interface. This provides the opportunity to harness lipid membrane, and membrane protein biochemistry, together with biochemical compartmentalization and environmental communication. We are able to combine the presence of lipid membranes with the integration of functional organic and inorganic materials, patterned within the same hydrogel matrix shell. The hydrogel encapsulation provides mechanical rigidity and aqueous compatibility, while microfluidic manufacture provides a potential means to scale manufacture through parallelization of capillary structures.57, 58 3D microfluidic architectures constructed from dual hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials enable the control of the landscape of hierarchal droplet construction and provides the ability to pattern the morphologies of the droplet hierarchies and break axial symmetry. This enables the creation of polarized droplet structures, which can be further used to impart additional functionality. This is demonstrated here for the first time, via the construction of hemispherically magnetic, encapsulated droplet interface bilayers, enabling controlled orientation, locomotion, and rotation.
The rapid, dual‐material, fabrication process means that device designs can be rapidly iterated and customized for different desired droplet arrangements. Something not previously possible. This in effect creates the possibility of disposable devices for complex emulsion production, or even use as cartridges for droplet printing. Using 3D channel fabrication techniques, it is conceivable that nonhomogeneous, but spherically centrosymmetric, droplet hierarchies may be produced via a radial array of droplet inlet channels into the pre‐encapsulating flow. Current work is directed toward improved understanding of precise inner‐droplet arrangements to further increase design control. In the reported work, the new use hydrophilic PVA serves to demonstrate feasibility of the dual‐material approach, reporting the creation of complex emulsions using a fused‐filament 3D‐printed device for the first time. However, ultimately, the hydrophilic PVA material is nonoptimum, as it is partially soluble in aqueous media, in this case the hydrogel shell phase, over prolonged periods of use. In the immediate term, this time‐limited use may be offset by the rapidity of device manufacture. While the current commercial palette of printable polymeric materials is limited, it is rapidly growing.80 Therefore, the prospect of further hydrophilic polymer substrate materials is promising, as 3D printing enjoys continued growth across ever widening application areas. Similarly, advances in printer resolution can be expected to facilitate the production of narrower channel architectures, thereby enabling the miniaturization of patterned emulsions. With the growing interest in 3D printing of soft materials,81 the ability to deposit stable patterned, complex emulsions from a 3D‐printed device, as demonstrated here, may serve as the basis for the 3D printing of large‐scale materials, with complex emulsions or artificial cells as the constituent building blocks. This may find use in bioprinting applications, or in the construction of increasingly complex artificial tissues made from populations of synthetic cells, affording increased material complexity, in comparison to single‐phase droplet printing.20 The reported spatial patterning of complex emulsions could be applied with incorporated living cells, enabling the concept of biohybrid materials, which could combine membrane‐bound droplets and cells,82 or the integration of cells into hydrogels.70, 83 The ability to impart polarization or directional preferences in cell‐laden constructs may find use in the self‐organization of 3D tissue engineering and repair systems. The engineering of orientation‐dictated, higher‐order assembly of artificial tissues from component cells holds significant promise. Likewise, polarizable artificial cells may take advantage of directional‐specific behaviors, analogous to phototropic or gravitropic behavior in plants, albeit by alternative mechanisms. The ability to create soft‐matter Janus materials with integrated biological components also paves the way for applied uses similar to their solid‐state counterparts, such as in sensing or displays, but with integrated biochemical capabilities.
Droplets, lipid bilayers, soft‐matter compartmentalized structures and functional nano‐ and micromaterials are all the subject of great interest as building blocks of bioinspired engineered materials. The ability to create spatially organized and patterned droplet structures, comprising all these elements within the same entity, will likely serve to increase the sophistication of artificial cell models, as functional materials combining biological, organic, and inorganic material properties. The ability to impart asymmetric, polarized, or gradient patterning on such hierarchal droplets in any desired orientation, at their formation, through the use of 3D‐printed microfluidics, affords a new level of control in the design and functional utility of these materials. Biology routinely exploits the emergent functionality of the barrier properties of membranes, in combination with chemical gradients and polarization, to impart directional or symmetry‐breaking properties in cells, and enable subsequent individual and collective functionality. This serves as inspiration for the next generation of dynamic, functional, synthetic materials, built using these approaches. The data presented here demonstrate the capability to engineer chemical patterning and impart such properties in aqueous compatible, hydrogel‐encapsulated, membrane‐bound droplet networks. This holds significant promise for the advancement of behaviors and functionalities that more closely mimic the sophisticated functionality of biological cells. These patterned, hierarchal droplet materials are operational in aqueous environments, in which they remain freestanding, and retain diffusive communication between the environment and internal membrane‐bound architectures. This renders them promising candidates for applications across the life sciences, both within and outside the laboratory, such as for responsive drug delivery, self‐repairing and reconfigurable materials, and biochemical computation.
4. Experimental Section
Chemicals and Components: Alginic acid sodium salt, calcium chloride, sodium chloride, silicone oil AR20, hexadecane, chloroform, Oil Blue N, PVA powder, tween 20, and span 80 were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich. Sunflower oil (pure) was purchased from Sainsbury's. Hydrophilic, magnetic silica microparticle (SiMAG/MP‐DNA 2.0um) was purchased from Chemicell. 1,2‐Diphytanoyl‐sn‐glycero‐3‐phosphocholine (DPhPC) lipid was purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids. Sulforhodamine B was purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Neodymium magnets were purchased from RS Components. Large flake size of graphene oxide suspension was synthesized using a method previously reported by Rocha et al. elsewhere.84 The concentration of GO in the water (1.44 wt%) was calculated by weight difference after freezing and freeze drying (48 h) 4–6 g of suspension. Triple emulsion templates are shown in Table S1 (Supporting Information). The preparations of the precursor for the eDIBs formation were as in a previous work.59 Calcium chloride solution (0.5 m) was prepared for the outer alginate matrix gelation. To prepare the microparticle containing alginate solutions, the original particle‐containing solution was diluted in deionized water (1% v/v for SiMAG/MP‐DNA, and up to 1.44 wt% for GO slurry), and the alginate powder was added to prepare a 3 wt% alginate solution using a magnetic stirrer (IKA RCT basic safety control) agitated at 800 rpm and 50 °C for 4 h. The solution was stored at 4 °C.
Triple Emulsion Construct Materials: Internal aqueous phase contained 0.5 m NaCl with 100 × 10−3 m sulforhodamine B (pink) for observation. The oil midphase for eDIB formation was formulated as hexadecane and silicone oil AR20 (1:2 v/v) with DPhPC 8.33 mg mL−1 for droplet network production. The oil phase for non‐bilayer constructs was formulated with either sunflower oil, or mineral oil, with surfactant (see Table S2, Supporting Information). Oil Blue N was added at 0.05 wt% for visualization, to demonstrate liquid Janus cores, visualize internal concentration gradients, and their persistence throughout and beyond the microfluidic production process. Shell phases were formulated with 3% alginate solution, containing additional 0.5 m NaCl (for the eDIB inner alginate shell to osmotically match the internal aqueous phase droplet), or GO or silica nanoparticles (for the eDIB outer alginate shell patterning) as described in the text. The gelling bath contained 0.5 m CaCl2 solution.
Microfluidics: Microfluidics devices were designed and modeled with COMSOL Multiphysics (the dimensions of tubular channels are in the range of 240–1200 µm diameter), and were printed using fused filament fabrication printers (Ultimaker 3) with PLA filaments and PVA filaments (Ultimaker), using 0.4 mm AA and 0.4 mm BB print‐cores. The print g‐codes were programmed using Cura (version 3.3.1) software with customized settings (Figure S1, Supporting Information). The layer height was controlled at 0.06 mm, and the printing speed was tuned at 100 mm s−1 with default printing temperatures (200 °C for PLA filaments and 215 °C for PVA filaments). The printed parts were treated with chloroform vapor within an enclosed metal box for 8 min, and the treated pieces were left in a fume cupboard for 2 h before use.70 Precursors were loaded in syringes (5 mL, gas‐tight, SGE Analytical Science), and were delivered to the microfluidic devices at a constant flowrate, through PEEK and PFA interconnects and FEP tubing, using syringe displacement pumps (KD Scientific, model 789200L). Details of the controlled sequential emulsification using multiphase microfluidics are given in a previous work.22
Experiments and Measurements: General images and videos were taken using a 12MP digital camera with mounted zooming lenses on 3D‐printed stands. Epifluorescence and light microscopy images were captured using a modified Nikon Eclipse Ti‐U inverted microscope and Andor iXon ultra 897 EMCCD camera. For white light images, illumination was provided by the microscopes integrated 100 W halogen lamp, while a Shanghai Dream Lasers 532 nm DPSS laser with a power output of 100 mW was utilized for epifluorescence illumination. Laser coupling into the microscope was achieved via a custom‐built optical circuit utilizing components sourced from Thorlabs Chroma and Semrock followed by a single mode fiber‐optic launch. A low magnification 1× (Nikon Plan UW) objective was used in all acquisitions. Excitation and emission fluorescence wavelengths were separated using a 532 nm edge dichroic mirror combined with a 542 nm edge long‐pass filter and a 565–615 nm bandpass filter. Two‐color overlays were generated using the FIJI distribution of ImageJ. Particle coordinates data were collected and analyzed by Vernier Video Physics (version 3.0.5). Image processing was performed using ImageJ. Computational fluid dynamic modeling was done in COMSOL Multiphysics (version 5.4), using moving mesh method.
Data Analysis: See the Supporting Information for GO characterization data and methods.
Droplet Rotation Analysis: The raw data of the moving droplets were evaluated and processed using IBM SPSS software. The linear relationships of the droplets' angular displacement profiles were analyzed using a Pearson product‐moment correlation test.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Acknowledgements
J.L., D.A.B., and O.K.C. conceived the research. J.L. designed and performed all the experiment. D.K.B. contributed to the eDIB formation experiments. W.D.J. conducted the fluorescence imaging. V.G.R contributed the graphene oxide synthesis, modification and characterisation. W.X contributed to the SPSS data analysis. J.L., D.A.B. and O.K.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. This work was primarily supported by an MRC P2D award (MC_PC_16069) to O.K.C. who led the research. O.K.C. also acknowledges funding from Wellcome Trust (ISSF 204824‐Z‐16‐Z) in support of D.K.B. and W.D.J.. V.G.R acknowledges the EPSRC Grant Graphene 3D Networks (EP/K01658X/1) and would like to thank the European Commission (FP7—Marie Curie Intra‐European Fellowship GRAPES). X‐ray photoelectron spectra were obtained at the National EPSRC XPS Users' Service (NEXUS) at Newcastle University, an EPSRC Mid‐Range Facility. The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. I. J.Villar‐Garcia support on XPS data processing and analysis. The authors would like to thank Dr. W. N. Arye (School of Dentistry, Cardiff University) for access to contact angle measurement equipment. The authors would like to thank Dr. P. Watson (School of Bioscience, Cardiff University) for access to additional 3D printers to perform parallel 3D printing.
Li J., Baxani D. K., Jamieson W. D., Xu W., Rocha V. G., Barrow D. A., Castell O. K., Formation of Polarized, Functional Artificial Cells from Compartmentalized Droplet Networks and Nanomaterials, Using One‐Step, Dual‐Material 3D‐Printed Microfluidics. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1901719 10.1002/advs.201901719
Contributor Information
David Anthony Barrow, Email: barrow@cardiff.ac.uk.
Oliver Kieran Castell, Email: castello@cardiff.ac.uk.
References
- 1. Powell K., Nature 2018, 563,172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Xu C., Hu S., Chen X., Mater. Today 2016, 19, 516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Chang T. M. S., in Biomaterials Science, 3rd ed. (Eds: Ratner B., Hoffman A., Schoen F., Lemons J.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands: 2013, pp. 811–827. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Butler K. S., Durfee P. N., Theron C., Ashley C. E., Carnes E. C., Brinker C. J., Small 2016, 12, 2173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kauffman S. A., Life 2011, 1, 34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fang R. H., Hu C. M. J., Luk B. T., Gao W., Copp J. A., Tai Y., O'Connor D. E., Zhang L., Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chang T. M., Malave N., Ther. Apheresis 2000, 4, 108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Karzbrun E., Tayar A. M., Noireaux V., Bar‐Ziv R. H., Science 2014, 345, 829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kamat N. P., Katz J. S., Hammer D. A., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 1612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hanczyc M. M., Fujikawa S. M., Szostak J. W., Science 2003, 302, 618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Joesaar A., Yang S., Bögels B., van der Linden A., Pieters P., Kumar B. P., Dalchau N., Phillips A., Mann S., de Greef T. F., Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14, 369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Booth R., Qiao Y., Li M., Mann S., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2019, 58, 9120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Filisetti A., Serra R., Carletti T., Villani M., Poli I., Eur. Phys. J. B 2010, 77, 249. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Miller D. M., Gulbis J. M., Life 2015, 5, 1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Qiao Y., Li M., Booth R., Mann S., Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Liu X., Pei Z., Huang Y., Li M., Huang X., Mann S., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Xu J., Sigworth F. J., LaVan D. A., Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Villar G., Heron A. J., Bayley H., Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Booth M. J., Schild V. R., Box S. J., Bayley H., Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Villar G., Graham A. D., Bayley H., Science 2013, 340, 48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Schoonen L., van Hest J. C., Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Li J., Barrow D. A., Lab Chip 2017, 17, 2873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kamiya K., Kawano R., Osaki T., Akiyoshi K., Takeuchi S., Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Bricard A., Caussin J. B., Desreumaux N., Dauchot O., Bartolo D., Nature 2013, 503, 95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Xie H., Sun M., Fan X., Lin Z., Chen W., Wang L., Dong L., He Q., Sci. Rob. 2019, 4, eaav8006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Emmert M., Witzel P., Heinrich D., Soft Matter 2016, 12, 4287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Jiang X., Bruzewicz D. A., Wong A. P., Piel M., Whitesides G. M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Neumüller R. A., Knoblich J. A., Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 2675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Li R., Bowerman B., Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a003475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bryant D. M., Mostov K. E., Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Pohorille A., Deamer D., Trends Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hordijk W., Naylor J., Krasnogor N., Fellermann H., Life 2018, 8, 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Nagy K., Ábrahám Á., Keymer J. E., Galajda P., Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Villani M., Filisetti A., Graudenzi A., Damiani C., Carletti T., Serra R., Life 2014, 4, 837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Luo A. C., Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2009, 14, 1901. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Shklyaev O. E., Shum H., Sen A., Balazs A. C., Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1501835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Parrilla‐Gutierrez J. M., Tsuda S., Grizou J., Taylor J., Henson A., Cronin L., Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Tian L., Martin N., Bassindale P. G., Patil A. J., Li M., Barnes A., Drinkwater B. W., Mann S., Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Buddingh B. C., van Hest J. C., Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Yewdall N. A., Mason A. F., Van Hest J. C., Interface Focus 2018, 8, 20180023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Bissette A. J., Odell B., Fletcher S. P., Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Points L. J., Taylor J. W., Grizou J., Donkers K., Cronin L., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kumar B. P., Fothergill J., Bretherton J., Tian L., Patil A. J., Davis S. A., Mann S., Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 3594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Nichols M. K., Kumar R. K., Bassindale P. G., Tian L., Barnes A. C., Drinkwater B. W., Patil A. J., Mann S., Small 2018, 14, 1800739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Trantidou T., Dekker L., Polizzi K., Ces O., Elani Y., Interface Focus 2018, 8, 20180024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Chernomordik L. V., Zimmerberg J., Kozlov M. M., J. Cell Biol. 2006, 175, 201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Weiss M., Frohnmayer J. P., Benk L. T., Haller B., Janiesch J. W., Heitkamp T., Börsch M., Lira R. B., Dimova R., Lipowsky R., Bodenschatz E., Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Theberge A. B., Courtois F., Schaerli Y., Fischlechner M., Abell C., Hollfelder F., Huck W. T., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Wang J. T., Wang J., Han J. J., Small 2011, 7, 1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Bayley H., Cronin B., Heron A., Holden M. A., Hwang W. L., Syeda R., Thompson J., Wallace M., Mol. BioSyst. 2008, 4, 1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Maglia G., Heron A. J., Hwang W. L., Holden M. A., Mikhailova E., Li Q., Cheley S., Bayley H., Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Leptihn S., Castell O. K., Cronin B., Lee E. H., Gross L. C., Marshall D. P., Thompson J. R., Holden M., Wallace M. I., Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Elani Y., Law R. V., Ces O., Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Stanley C. E., Elvira K. S., Niu X. Z., Gee A. D., Ces O., Edel J. B., Demello A. J., Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Nguyen M. A., Srijanto B., Collier C. P., Retterer S. T., Sarles S. A., Lab Chip 2016, 16, 3576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Booth M. J., Schild V. R., Downs F. G., Bayley H., Mol. BioSyst. 2017, 13, 1658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Riche C. T., Roberts E. J., Gupta M., Brutchey R. L., Malmstadt N., Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Strniša F., Urbič T., Žnidaršič‐Plazl P., Plazl I., Comput.‐Aided Chem. Eng. 2019, 46, 1801. [Google Scholar]
- 59. Baxani D. K., Morgan A. J., Jamieson W. D., Allender C. J., Barrow D. A., Castell O. K., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Prasad N., Perumal J., Choi C. H., Lee C. S., Kim D. P., Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 1656. [Google Scholar]
- 61. Maeda K., Onoe H., Takinoue M., Takeuchi S., Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Hayakawa M., Onoe H., Nagai K. H., Takinoue M., Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Nisisako T., Torii T., Takahashi T., Takizawa Y. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 1152. [Google Scholar]
- 64. Kang D. H., Jung H. S., Ahn N., Yang S. M., Seo S., Suh K. Y., Chang P., Jeon N. L., Kim J., Kim K., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 10631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Chen C. H., Shah R. K., Abate A. R., Weitz D. A., Langmuir 2009, 25, 4320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Pang Y., Du Y., Wang J., Liu Z., Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2019, 113, 199. [Google Scholar]
- 67. Lee T. Y., Choi T. M., Shim T. S., Frijns R. A., Kim S. H., Lab Chip 2016, 16, 3415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Morimoto Y., Kiyosawa M., Takeuchi S., Sens. Actuators, B 2018, 274, 491. [Google Scholar]
- 69. Ji Q., Zhang J. M., Liu Y., Li X., Lv P., Jin D., Duan H., Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Morgan A. J., San Jose L. H., Jamieson W. D., Wymant J. M., Song B., Stephens P., Barrow D. A., Castell O. K., PLoS One 2016, 11, e0152023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. De Menech M., Garstecki P., Jousse F., Stone H. A., J. Fluid Mech. 2008, 595, 141. [Google Scholar]
- 72. Nunes J. K., Tsai S. S. H., Wan J., Stone H. A., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2013, 46, 114002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Utada A. S., Chu L. Y., Fernandez‐Nieves A., Link D. R., Holtze C., Weitz D. A., MRS Bull. 2007, 32, 702. [Google Scholar]
- 74. Abate A. R., Weitz D. A., Small 2009, 5, 2030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Nabavi S. A., Vladisavljević G. T., Bandulasena M. V., Arjmandi‐Tash O., Manović V., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 505, 315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Li J., Lindley‐Start J., Porch A., Barrow D., Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Dreyer D. R., Park S., Bielawski C. W., Ruoff R. S., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Zhang Y., Wu C., Guo S., Zhang J., Nanotechnol. Rev. 2013, 2, 27. [Google Scholar]
- 79. de Planque M. R., Aghdaei S., Roose T., Morgan H., ACS Nano 2011, 5, 3599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Ngo T. D., Kashani A., Imbalzano G., Nguyen K. T., Hui D., Composites, Part B 2018, 143, 172. [Google Scholar]
- 81. Grigoryan B., Paulsen S. J., Corbett D. C., Sazer D. W., Fortin C. L., Zaita A. J., Greenfield P. T., Calafat N. J., Gounley J. P., Ta A. H., Johansson F., Science 2019, 364, 458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Elani Y., Trantidou T., Wylie D., Dekker L., Polizzi K., Law R. V., Ces O., Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. San Jose L. H., Stephens P., Song B., Barrow D., Tissue Eng., Part C 2018, 24, 158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Picot O. T., Rocha V. G., Ferraro C., Ni N., D'Elia E., Meille S., Chevalier J., Saunders T., Peijs T., Reece M. J., Saiz E., Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.