DNA-dependent protein kinase regulates end processing for homologous recombination.
Abstract
The repair of DNA double-strand breaks occurs through nonhomologous end joining or homologous recombination in vertebrate cells—a choice that is thought to be decided by a competition between DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) and the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complex but is not well understood. Using ensemble biochemistry and single-molecule approaches, here, we show that the MRN complex is dependent on DNA-PK and phosphorylated CtIP to perform efficient processing and resection of DNA ends in physiological conditions, thus eliminating the competition model. Endonucleolytic removal of DNA-PK–bound DNA ends is also observed at double-strand break sites in human cells. The involvement of DNA-PK in MRN-mediated end processing promotes an efficient and sequential transition from nonhomologous end joining to homologous recombination by facilitating DNA-PK removal.
INTRODUCTION
DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) consists of a catalytic kinase subunit (DNA-PKcs) and the DNA end-binding heterodimer of Ku70 and Ku80 (Ku). Together, these proteins form an end recognition complex (DNA-PK) that binds to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) within seconds of break formation (1). DNA-PK promotes the ligation of two DNA ends by ligase IV, aided by accessory factors, and in some cases, accompanied by limited end processing (1, 2). The recognition and repair of DNA breaks by the DNA-PK–associated nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) machinery is generally considered to be the first and rapid phase of DNA repair, occurring within ~30 min of DNA damage, while homologous recombination is specific to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle and occurs over a longer time frame (3, 4). DNA-PK is present at micromolar concentrations in cells (5) and binds DNA ends in all cell cycle phases, even during S phase at single-ended breaks (6).
The Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complex regulates the initiation of DNA end processing before homologous recombination by catalyzing the initial 5′ strand processing at blocked DNA ends and by recruiting long-range nucleases Exo1 and Dna2 (4, 7). At single-ended breaks during replication, the nuclease activity of Mre11 was shown to be important for removal of Ku (6), suggesting that MRN catalytic processing of ends during S phase is important for recombination-mediated repair of single-ended breaks. In addition, the presence of protein blocks on DNA ends has been shown to stimulate MRN(X) endonuclease activity in vitro (8–12), consistent with the idea that chromatin-bound proteins stimulate MRN activities. Here, we considered the possibility that the presence of DNA-PK on DNA ends might regulate MRN-dependent end processing and that this interaction may be a critical component of the choice between NHEJ and homologous recombination pathways in human cells.
RESULTS
To test for the effect of DNA-PKcs on end processing by the MRN complex, we performed a nuclease assay with purified human MRN, CtIP, Ku, and DNA-PKcs (fig. S1) on a 197–base pair (bp) linear double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) containing a single radiolabel at the end of one of the 5′ strands. Addition of all the protein complexes together to this substrate resulted in the appearance of a single major cleavage product approximately 45 nucleotides (nt) in length (Fig. 1A, lane 2). We previously reported MRN-mediated removal of the Ku heterodimer alone, showing that MRN makes an endonucleolytic cleavage at approximately 30 bp from the DNA end (13); here, we observe that the inclusion of DNA-PKcs in the reaction increases the efficiency of the cutting by approximately 50-fold as well as changing the position of the nuclease cleavage site to a location approximately 45 nt from the end (Fig. 1A, lanes 2 and 3). Efficient formation of the cleavage product requires CtIP, which is essential for DNA end resection in human cells (14). Mre11 nuclease activity in vitro is strictly manganese dependent (8, 15, 16); however, Mre11/Rad50 (MR) complexes from archaea and from T4 bacteriophage also exhibit nuclease activity in the absence of manganese when physiologically relevant protein cofactors are present (17, 18). Here, we observe that human MRN makes endonucleolytic cuts in magnesium-only conditions and that this requires the presence of both Ku and DNA-PKcs (Fig. 1A, lane 10). Because human cells do not contain high levels of manganese (19), we conclude that the physiologically relevant endonuclease activity of MRN is thus dependent on DNA-PK.
Mre11 and CtIP both exhibit endonucleolytic activity (8, 20, 21), so we asked which protein is responsible for the catalysis. We found that substituting wild-type Mre11 with a nuclease-deficient form of Mre11, H129N (22, 23), completely abolished DNA-PK–dependent cutting by MRN, whereas we observed robust activity with nuclease-deficient N289A/H290A CtIP (Fig. 1B, lanes 4 and 5); thus, we conclude that the processing is done by the catalytic activity of Mre11.
We previously observed that adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) binding by Rad50 promotes Nbs1-dependent endonucleolytic cutting by Mre11 (8, 15). Exclusion of ATP or substitution of the nonhydrolyzable adenylyl-imidodiphosphate (AMP-PNP) analog for ATP blocks MRN nuclease activity in the presence of DNA-PK (Fig. 1B, lanes 6 and 7), suggesting that ATP hydrolysis by Rad50 is critical for DNA-PK–promoted MRN nuclease activity. We also tested MRN complexes containing Rad50 K42A and D1231A proteins with mutations in the Walker A and Walker B ATP-binding motifs, respectively, that are deficient in ATP hydrolysis (24). Both complexes failed to support MRN endonuclease activity (Fig. 1C), confirming the requirement for Rad50 catalytic activity.
Phosphorylation of Ku has been shown to result in the removal of Ku from DNA (25) and autophosphorylation of DNA-PKcs also removes DNA-PKcs from the Ku-DNA complex (26–30); therefore, in reactions shown in Fig. 1 (A and B), we have also included an inhibitor of DNA-PKcs, NU7441, to block its kinase activity. Removal of the inhibitor reduced the efficiency of the reaction (Fig. 1B, lane 8), suggesting that reduced stability of DNA-PK on DNA reduces the nuclease activity of MRN on the DNA-PK–bound substrate. However, the endonucleolytic product is still observed in the absence of the inhibitor (also see fig. S2); thus, blocking DNA-PKcs phosphorylation is not absolutely essential.
Small-molecule inhibitors that specifically block either the exonuclease (PFM39) or the endonuclease (PFM01 and PFM03) activity of Mre11 have been developed (30). We found that PFM01 and PFM03 reduced MRN endonuclease activity by 60 and 98%, respectively, compared to 25% inhibition by PFM39 (Fig. 1, D and E). Efficient inhibition by PFM03 and PFM01 is consistent with Mre11 endonucleolytic activity acting on DNA ends bound by DNA-PK in this assay.
CtIP is phosphorylated by several different kinases in human cells (Fig. 2A) (31). Some of these phosphorylation events have been shown to promote DNA end resection (8, 9, 32–38), most notably the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)–dependent phosphorylation of T847. In addition, Ataxia telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) and Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) phosphorylation of T859 also plays an important role in CtIP binding to chromatin and CtIP-mediated resection (38, 39). To test the function of CtIP phosphorylation in the MRN endonuclease assay, we purified recombinant CtIP proteins containing phospho-blocking or phospho-mimic mutations at the T847 and T859 sites (fig. S1). Addition of these mutant proteins to the MRN endonuclease assay with DNA-PK shows that T847 and T859 phosphorylation are critical, as the phospho-deficient T847A and T859A mutants resulted in loss of CtIP stimulation (15- and 3-fold stimulation of MRN, respectively, compared to 43-fold by wild type) [Fig. 2, B (lanes 5 to 10) and C]. We know that there is substantial constitutive phosphorylation of CtIP expressed and purified from insect cells (20) and infer from this result that T847/T859 phosphorylated species in the recombinant protein preparation are essential for stimulation of the MRN endonuclease activity. In contrast to these sites, phosphorylation at S327 or the ATM sites S231, S664, and S745 appears not to be important for the endonucleolytic activity (Fig. 2B, lanes 11 to 13). We previously reported that the ATM phosphorylation sites are important for CtIP intrinsic nuclease activity (21). Here, we show that these sites do not regulate DNA-PK–dependent Mre11 endonuclease activity, consistent with our observation that the N289A/H290A mutations that reduce CtIP nuclease activity also do not affect Mre11 function in this assay.
While mutation of the CtIP T847 residue to phospho-blocking alanine inhibited its stimulation of Mre11 nuclease activity, the phospho-mimic T847E mutant completely restored this ability in vitro (Fig. 2B, lane 6). This is important, as the T847E allele of CtIP was previously shown to restore localization of CtIP to sites of DNA damage as well as the resection of DSBs and promoted efficient CDK-dependent processing of these breaks (36). Thus Mre11 endonuclease activity is linked with the cell cycle–dependent processing of DNA damage via the phosphorylation of T847 in CtIP and will therefore only occur efficiently during the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. The T859E phospho-mimic version of CtIP only partially restores Mre11 activity (Fig. 2B, lane 8), also consistent with the initial study of T859 phosphorylation by ATR in Xenopus extracts, which reported that T859E (T818E in Xenopus CtIP) is only weakly active in supporting DSB resection in CtIP-depleted extracts (39). Overall, however, the combined data suggest that CDK- and ATR/ATM-mediated phosphorylation of CtIP on T847 and T859 is critical for stimulation of MRN endonuclease activity on DNA-PK–bound ends.
Exo1 is one of the critical long-range exonucleases that perform DNA end resection in human cells (4), and we have previously shown a positive effect of MRN on Exo1-mediated degradation of DNA (13, 41, 42). Despite the well-known importance of CtIP in resection in human cells, however, we have not observed any effects of recombinant CtIP on Exo1 activity in previous experiments. Here, we examined the effect of CtIP on Exo1 on a plasmid DNA substrate in the presence of MRN and DNA-PK (Fig. 2D). As expected, Exo1 is substantially blocked by the presence of DNA-PK in the reaction, an inhibition that is relieved by the inclusion of MRN and requires CtIP (Fig. 2D, lanes 4 to 6). This finding that CtIP stimulates the activity of Exo1 sevenfold in the presence of DNA-PK is consistent with the effect of CtIP on Mre11 nuclease activity we observe on the labeled substrates (Fig. 1).
We recently showed that MRN can remove DNA end blocks by sequential endo-exo-endo activities, generating a DSB adjacent to the block (8, 13), a model first suggested by processing of meiotic DNA breaks (43). In the presence of DNA-PK bound to DNA ends, we found that the MRN complex executes similar end processing of the radiolabeled substrate to generate a new DSB. We detected a ~45-bp dsDNA product using native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) (Fig. 2E, lane 2), corresponding to the major product seen on denaturing gels (Fig. 1). This activity was dependent on MRN and was enhanced when both Ku and DNA-PKcs were present in the reaction (Fig. 2E, lane 2). However, the formation of the dsDNA product was less efficient (approximately 1 to 2% of the substrate cleaved at site proximal to the radiolabel) compared to the single-strand endonucleolytic product seen on denaturing gels (approximately 27 to 34% of the substrate cleaved adjacent to the labeled 5′ end) (Fig. 1, A and B).
The unexpected dependence of Mre11 endonuclease activity on DNA-PK suggests that there may be specific protein-protein interactions underlying the cooperative behavior. We tested this by immobilizing purified, human CtIP on magnetic beads and monitoring binding of DNA-PK or MRN. Both MRN and DNA-PK bound to CtIP in an ATP-independent manner (Fig. 2F). Binding analysis of Ku and DNA-PKcs separately showed that each of the components of DNA-PK has affinity for CtIP (Fig. 2G). Binding of Nbs1 (added to this reaction separately from the MR complex) to CtIP is mostly independent of DNA-PK, while binding of MR to CtIP improves seven- to eightfold with DNA-PK present. Addition of EtBr or benzonase to the reaction did not affect the interaction, confirming that the binding is independent of DNA (fig. S3A). Although the stimulation of Mre11 nuclease activity requires CtIP phosphorylation on T847 and T859, we did not observe any obvious deficiency in binding between CtIP, MRN, and DNA-PK with the T847A/T859A CtIP mutant protein (fig. S3B); thus, the effect of the phosphorylation does not appear to be manifested through CtIP association with the other factors.
Single-molecule observations show MRN/CtIP-mediated removal of DNA-PK and MRN from DNA ends
To examine the interactions between DNA-PK and the MRN complex in greater detail, we turned to single-molecule microscopy. In this “DNA curtains” assay, arrays of lambda DNA molecules (~48 kb long) are attached via a biotin-streptavidin linkage to a microfluidic flow cell that is also passivated with a fluid lipid bilayer (Fig. 3A) (44). Microfabricated barriers align the DNA molecules and organize them for high-throughput analysis of bound proteins, which we have previously used to examine the interplay between the MRN complex and Ku at individual DNA ends (13). Here, we adapted this assay to observe the behavior of the DNA-PK complex, with DNA-PKcs labeled using a DNA-PKcs–specific antibody. Injection of fluorescently labeled DNA-PKcs led to only transient association with the DNA, as indicated by nonspecific sliding in the direction of buffer flow and subsequent release from the DNA ends [half-life (t1/2) = 5 ± 3 s, N = 17; Fig. 3, B and C]. Given that formation of the DNA-PK complex requires Ku and DNA (45), we considered that preloaded Ku may stabilize DNA-PKcs on the DNA ends. To test this, we injected hemagglutinin (HA)–tagged Ku heterodimer onto the DNA curtains, labeled with anti-HA antibody. As we observed previously, Ku bound only to DNA ends and did not slide on the DNA with buffer flow (13). Subsequent injection of DNA-PKcs did result in more stable association of the kinase with the Ku-bound ends; however, the inclusion of ATP in the buffer promoted rapid loss of ~80% of the bound Ku molecules (Fig. 3, D to F). These are single-turnover reactions that we observe with constant buffer flow, so even transient release of DNA-PKcs from the DNA results in loss of association. We considered that the ATP-dependent release might be associated with the phosphorylation of Ku70 by DNA-PKcs, which inhibits DNA binding by Ku (25). To prevent Ku phosphorylation and release by DNA-PKcs, we purified a phospho-blocking mutant of Ku(T305A/S306A/T307A/S314A/T316A, “5A”), which inhibits DNA-PKcs–induced release of Ku (25). Ku(5A) bound to DNA for >2000 s, consistent with our previous observations of extremely stable binding of wild-type Ku (Fig. 3, E and F) (13). Ku(5A) stabilized DNA-PKcs at the DNA ends even in the presence of ATP (Fig. 3, D to F), confirming that phosphorylation of the Ku70 S/TQ 305–316 cluster controls the association of DNA-PK with DNA ends.
We next observed the interplay between MRN and DNA-PK [DNA-PKcs with Ku(5A)] using the DNA curtains platform. Consistent with our ensemble biochemical assays (fig. S2), injection of dark (unlabeled) MRN and CtIP onto DNA curtains with both fluorescent DNA-PKcs and fluorescent Ku in the presence of a physiologically relevant cleavage buffer (5 mM Mg2+) led to removal of both DNA-PKcs and Ku from the ends (Fig. 4A).
To probe the dynamics of this activity, we used fluorescently labeled MRN complex together with fluorescent DNA-PKcs (Ku is unlabeled in this case) and measured the occupancy of DNA-PK on ends that are also bound by MRN. Injection of MRN alone led to stable colocalization of the two complexes (DNA-PK t1/2, >2000 s), but injection of MRN and CtIP together led to removal of both Ku and DNA-PKcs from the DNA ends (t1/2 = 324 ± 15 s, N = 37; Fig. 4, B to D). In contrast, an MRN nuclease–deficient mutant (H129N) with CtIP did not remove DNA-PK; neither did CtIP added in the absence of MRN. Furthermore, injection of MRN with CtIP containing phospho-blocking mutations T847A and T859A also failed to remove DNA-PK (Fig. 4, B to D). These data suggest that colocalization of MRN with the DNA-PK complex is not sufficient to facilitate removal and that, consistent with our ensemble assays, phosphorylated CtIP is required for DNA-PK removal by MRN nuclease activity. It is notable that the rate of DNA-PK removal by MRN/CtIP under these conditions (t1/2 = 324 ± 15 s) is faster than the removal of Ku by DNA-PK–mediated phosphorylation (t1/2 = 780 ± 30 s); thus, the MRN-mediated pathway is likely to occur in a time frame comparable to other pathways of Ku removal in cells.
Our previous studies showed that MRN could remove Ku from DNA ends via a manganese-dependent reaction (8, 13). Here, we observe approximately the same kinetics of DNA-PK release catalyzed by MRN and CtIP as we did previously for Ku, but in magnesium-only conditions (all of the single-molecule experiments shown here were performed in the absence of manganese). These results demonstrate that DNA-PK stimulates Mre11 nuclease activity in the absence of manganese in physiologically relevant conditions and that CtIP is an essential component of this reaction.
These observations suggest a conserved mechanism for removal of blocks from DNA ends by the MRN complex (model in Fig. 4E). At two-ended DSBs, NHEJ would first engage the ends, and in cases where the ends are compatible, the ends would undergo productive end-joining. In situations where NHEJ fails and the DNA-PK complex remains at the DSB ends, Ku could be removed by DNA-PK–mediated phosphorylation (25). Alternatively, MRN can remove the complex through endonucleolytic processing, a reaction that is greatly enhanced by phosphorylated CtIP and is dependent on DNA-PK, as we show in this study. MRN activity nicks either one or both the strands close to the DNA-PK complex in a sequential or simultaneous manner. The nicked or freed end is then used for extensive 5′ to 3′ resection by exonucleases, allowing damage repair through homologous recombination or homology-dependent mechanisms.
MRN nuclease–mediated cutting of DNA-PK–bound ends occurs in human cells
To determine whether nucleolytic removal of DNA-PK occurs in human cells, we performed a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay using the inducible AsiSI restriction enzyme system in U2OS osteosarcoma cells (46). We modified the standard ChIP protocol (fig. S4) by reducing the duration of formaldehyde crosslinking and eliminating the extensive sonication used to fragment DNA. This gentle lysis procedure, which we are naming “Gentle Lysis And Size Selection-ChIP,” or GLASS-ChIP, allowed us to specifically separate small (50 to 300 bp) DNA-PK–associated DNA fragments from the bulk chromatin. The fragments were then further purified and used for quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis. We monitored four genomic AsiSI sites (47) and found that this procedure generated DNA-PK–associated DNA fragments at all four sites that were strongly dependent on 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) addition (Fig. 5A).
When cells were exposed to the DNA-PKcs inhibitor NU7441 during AsiSI induction, quantitation of DNA located very close (~30 nt) to the AsiSI genomic sites showed a 25- to 250-fold increase over background levels (i.e., levels of product formed with NU7441 but in the absence of 4-OHT induction) (Fig. 5A), consistent with the nucleolytic removal of DNA-PK–bound DNA ends we observed in vitro. These levels dropped substantially when measuring sites located farther away (~300 nt) from the AsiSI cut site (fig. S5), and no signals above background were observed at representative locations distant from AsiSI sites. With a DNA-PKcs inhibitor present as it is here, we expect that NHEJ is blocked and MRN cleavage of DNA-PK–bound ends is maximal, as we observed in purified protein reactions (Figs. 1 and 2).
Induction of AsiSI with 4-OHT in the absence of a DNA-PKcs inhibitor also generated DNA in the GLASS-ChIP assay, approximately 3- to 160-fold higher than background depending on the site, measured with primers 30 nt from the AsiSI location (Fig. 5A, inset). Under these conditions, NHEJ is not blocked; thus, the release of DNA-PKcs with associated DNA is expected to occur only as a consequence of DSB processing. The observation of these products in the absence of a DNA-PKcs inhibitor shows that processing of DNA-PKcs–bound ends occurs in human cells under normal physiological conditions.
To determine whether the DNA-PK–bound products arise through Mre11 nuclease activity, we treated the cells with the endonuclease inhibitor PFM03 based on our in vitro observations (Fig. 1, D and E). In preliminary experiments, we found that addition of 4-OHT to induce AsiSI activity in cells also exposed to PFM03 (100 μM) and the DNA-PKcs inhibitor NU7441 resulted in complete cell death within 1.5 hours. To circumvent this, we limited the treatment with 4-OHT and both DNA-PKcs and Mre11 inhibitors to 1 hour. In the absence of the Mre11 inhibitor, we observed short DNA fragments at three of four of the genomic loci tested that were dependent on 4-OHT (Fig. 5B), albeit at 10- to 20-fold reduced levels compared to the 4-hour 4-OHT induction (Fig. 5A). With the addition of PFM03, there was a significant reduction in the recovery of these fragments, indicating that Mre11 nuclease activity is responsible for the creation of DNA-PK–bound DSB products (Fig. 5B).
DISCUSSION
Here, we have shown that DNA-PK plays an important role in DNA end processing through its stimulation of Mre11 endonuclease activity. The extremely high concentration of DNA-PK in mammalian cells, particularly in human cells (5), and the high affinity of Ku for DNA ends (48) mean that DSB ends will be immediately bound by DNA-PK (see model in Fig. 4E). Removal of this block can be promoted by several distinct mechanisms: DNA-PKcs phosphorylation of Ku70, which reduces its DNA binding affinity (25); ubiquitination of Ku and degradation by proteasome-dependent or proteasome-independent mechanisms (49–51); or single-strand or double-strand endonucleolytic incision of DNA by MRN, as we show in this study. Single-strand DNA cutting by Mre11 followed by 3′ to 5′ Mre11 exonuclease activity was demonstrated as a mechanism for Spo11 removal by Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX) in yeast (43).
We also demonstrate in this work that double-strand DNA cutting by MRN is promoted by stable occupancy of DNA-PK on the ends, as shown by the increased efficiency of MRN cleavage in the presence of the DNA-PK inhibitor in vitro and by our observation of the release of DNA-PK–bound DNA fragments in human cells. This requirement for stable occupancy of DNA-PK ensures that MRN does not cleave ends that are undergoing successful end-joining, as this outcome also leads to DNA-PKcs dissociation (1). DNA-PK and MRN have often been viewed as competitors for DNA ends, but the data presented here show that these complexes are linked in an ordered pathway (Fig. 4E), consistent with cytological observations (52). The dual roles of DNA-PKcs ensure rapid repair by NHEJ as well as an efficient transition to homologous recombination by promoting MRN-dependent initiation of end processing.
Loss of DNA-PKcs in mice results in radiosensitivity as well as immunodeficiency due to a failure to complete V(D)J recombination, and naturally occurring mutations in the gene have generated viable but immunocompromised animals (53). In contrast, no human patients have been identified with complete loss of DNA-PKcs, and human cell lines lacking the protein exhibit a severe growth deficit in addition to DNA damage sensitivity, extreme genomic instability, and telomere shortening (54). Similarly, Ku70- and Ku80-deficient mice are radiosensitive but viable, yet deletion of Ku subunits in human cells generates spontaneous DNA breaks, telomere defects, and cell lethality within several divisions (55). This combined set of observations shows that DNA-PK plays many roles in human cells and is more essential for the maintenance of genomic stability in human cells compared to rodents or other mammals. The function of DNA-PKcs in regulating MRN/CtIP-mediated end processing that we describe in this work is likely an important component of the responsibilities of DNA-PKcs in genome maintenance. Further structural analysis is necessary to fully understand how phosphorylated CtIP enables the MRN complex to breach the otherwise impenetrable block that DNA-PK creates on DNA ends and how the many posttranslational modifications on CtIP, MRN, and other factors present at ends can modulate these outcomes. The extreme sensitivity of U2OS cancer cells to simultaneous use of DNA-PKcs and Mre11 inhibitors points toward a potential use of these small molecule inhibitors in treatment of cancers with active homologous recombination pathways.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plasmid, strains, and protein purification
Recombinant human proteins [MRN wild-type, M(H129N)RN, MR, MR(K42A), MR(D1231A), Nbs1, CtIP wild type, and CtIP mutants] were expressed and purified from Sf21 insect cells as described previously (8, 21, 24). 3XFLAG-MRN, 3XHA-Ku70/80 heterodimer, and Exo1-biotin were made as described previously (13). DNA-PKcs from human cells was purified as described previously (56). The Ku70(5A) mutant (T305A/S306A/T307A/S314A/T316A) was made from the baculovirus transfer vector containing wild-type Ku70 by QuikChange mutagenesis (Stratagene) to create the 5A mutant expression plasmid pTP4143 and the corresponding bacmid pTP4177, which was used with wild-type Ku80 baculovirus to infect Sf21 cells and purify Ku(5A).
DNA substrates
TP542 (GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTG) was 5′ [32P] radiolabeled using T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs) and purified (New England Biolabs Nucleotide Removal Kit). The 197-bp DNA substrate labeled on the 5′ end was created by PCR using 5′ [32P] radiolabeled TP542 (GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTG) and TP4373 (TGGGTCAACGTGGGCAAAGATGTCCTAGCAATGTAATCGTCTATGACGTT) with pTP3718 followed by purification on a native 0.7% agarose gel as described previously (8). The DNA substrate used in Fig. 2A was made by digesting pCDF-1b plasmid with SspI to create a 3.6-kb linear DNA with blunt ends and was used without further purification. The lambda DNA substrate used in single-molecule studies was prepared as described previously (13).
Nuclease assays
Ten microliters of nuclease assays contained Ku70/80 (10 nM), DNA-PKcs (10 nM), hMR (50 nM), Nbs1 (50 nM), and CtIP (80 nM) unless indicated otherwise in figure legends. Reactions were performed with 0.1 nM DNA in 25 mM 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) (pH 7.0), 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 80 mM NaCl, 8% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM ATP, 0.2 mM NU7441, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) (0.2 mg/ml), with additions or exceptions as noted in the figures and legends. hMR and Nbs1 were preincubated (10 min at 4°C) before addition to reactions, and Ku and DNA-PKcs were allowed to bind DNA in the presence of NU7441 for 5 min at 25°C followed by the addition of other components. Assays were carried out in Protein LoBind Eppendorf tubes (Millipore) at 37°C for 30 min. Reactions were stopped with 0.2% SDS and 10 mM EDTA, lyophilized, dissolved in formamide, boiled at 100°C for 4 min, loaded on denaturing polyacrylamide gels containing 16% acrylamide, 20% formamide, and 6 M urea, and separated at 40 W for 1.5 hours, followed by phosphorimager analysis. Mre11 inhibitors were added at final concentrations of 25, 50, and 100 μM in assay reactions. Mre11 inhibitor dilutions were made in 20% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in buffer A, which results in 6% DMSO in these assay reactions, and an equivalent concentration of DMSO was used in control reactions. For the detection of dsDNA products, reactions were treated with 10 μg of proteinase K at 37°C for 1 hour after stopping the nuclease reaction. The samples were then separated using 12% native PAGE in 1× tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer at 150 V followed by phosphorimager analysis.
DNA resection assays on plasmid substrates were carried out similarly using 0.1 nM 3.6-kb pCDF-1b plasmid linearized with Ssp I and 1 nM Exo1 in the presence of the DNA-PKcs inhibitor NU7026 (200 μM). Reactions were stopped with 0.2% SDS and 10 mM EDTA, and 1.5 μg of proteinase K was added and incubated at 37°C for 90 min followed by 10-min incubation at 50°C. These reactions were separated in a 0.7% native agarose gel in 1× TBE buffer, stained with SYBR Green, and visualized with a ChemiDoc gel imager (Bio-Rad).
Protein-protein interactions
IP assays were performed with anti-CtIP antibody (Active Motif 14E1) in Protein LoBind Eppendorf tubes (Millipore). In a 40-μl reaction volume, 20 nM Ku70/80, 20 nM DNA-PKcs, 25 nM hMR, 25 nM Nbs1, and 16 nM CtIP were incubated as indicated in the absence of DNA in 25 mM Mops (pH 7.0), 20 mM tris (pH 8.0), 80 mM NaCl, 8% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, 0.2 mM NU7441, 5 mM MgCl2, and BSA (0.2 mg/ml) at 37°C for 10 min. The reaction was then incubated with 2 μg of anti-CtIP antibody, 0.4% CHAPS, and 2 μl of protein A/G magnetic beads (Pierce) at 37°C for 30 min with shaking. Beads were isolated using a magnet and washed three times with wash buffer {buffer A [25 mM tris (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol] containing 0.4% CHAPS and BSA (0.1 mg/ml)}. Tubes were changed at the third wash step, and proteins bound to the beads were eluted with 1× SDS-PAGE loading dye prepared in wash buffer. Samples were heated at 100°C for 5 min and separated by 8% SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting. Because Mre11 and Ku80 migrate very close to each other, blots were developed sequentially—first for FLAG-tagged CtIP, Nbs1, and Mre11, then for DNA-PKcs and His-tagged Rad50 and Ku70, and lastly for biotin-tagged Ku80. Proteins were detected using rabbit anti-FLAG (Cell Signaling), rabbit anti–DNA-PKcs (Bethyl Laboratories), and mouse anti-His (GenScript) antibodies as well as streptavidin–Alexa Fluor 680 conjugate (Invitrogen) using an Odyssey imager (Li-Cor).
Single-molecule experiments
Single-molecule DNA curtains were performed as previously described (13). For labeling of DNA-PKcs, 400 nM anti-mouse secondary QDots (Thermo Fisher) were incubated with 360 nM anti–DNA-PKcs antibody (Abcam ab44815) on ice for 10 min in 5 μl of DNA-PKcs loading buffer [40 mM tris-HCl (pH 8.0), BSA (0.2 mg/ml), 2 mM MgCl2, and 2 mM DTT]. DNA-PKcs was added to this mixture to a final concentration of 267 nM QDots, 240 nM antibody, and 167 nM DNA-PKcs in 7.5 μl for another 10 min on ice. This mixture was diluted to a final volume of 200 μl (10 nM Qdots, 9 nM antibody, and 6.25 nM DNA-PKcs). Ku(5A) was loaded on DNA curtains essentially as described previously for wild-type Ku (13). Next, DNA-PKcs was injected onto DNA curtains from a 100-μl loop at 200 μl/min in DNA-PKcs loading buffer. For MRN cleavage experiments, after DNA-PKcs loading, the buffer was switched to MRN cleavage buffer [40 mM tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 60 mM NaCl, BSA (0.2 mg/ml), 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, and 2 mM DTT]. After buffer switch, mixtures of 3 nM MRN, 14 nM CtIP, or both were loaded as previously described (13).
GLASS-ChIP assay
Human U2OS cells with inducible AsiSI (46) were grown to 50 to 60% confluency in 150-mm dishes and treated with 600 nM 4-OHT for 4 hours at 37°C. When used, 10 μM NU7441 was added 1 hour before 4-OHT addition. After 4-OHT treatment, cells were fixed with 1% formaldehyde for 7 min at room temperature (RT) with gentle rotation. Crosslinking was stopped by addition of 125 mM glycine for 5 min, washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline, harvested, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C.
For the ChIP assay, we modified a standard protocol (Abcam) with a gentle lysis procedure and minimal, low-level sonication to rupture cells without extensive DNA damage. The formaldehyde-fixed cells were thawed at RT for 5 min, resuspended in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer [50 mM tris-HCl (pH8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA (pH8.0), 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS] with 1× protease inhibitors (Pierce, A32955), and sonicated using a QSonica sonicator at low power (amplitude 20) for 10 s, followed by 10 pulses after a 20-s interval. Cell lysates were then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 3 min at RT to remove the bulk of chromatin. The supernatant was then incubated with 1.6 μg of anti–DNA-PKcs pS2056 antibodies (Abcam 124918) overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with 25 μl of protein A/G magnetic beads (Pierce) at RT for 2 hours. Beads were then washed sequentially once in low-salt wash buffer [0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and 150 mM NaCl], once in high-salt wash buffer [0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and 500 mM NaCl], and once in LiCl wash buffer [0.25 M LiCl, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, and 10 mM tris-HCl (pH 8.0)]. Beads were then resuspended in TE buffer [10 mM tris (pH 8.0) and 1 mM EDTA] and transferred to a fresh tube and finally eluted with 100 μl of elution buffer (1% SDS and 100 mM NaHCO3). Crosslinks were reverted for the elutions (65°C for 24 hours). DNA fragments <300 bp from ChIP elutions were separated by pulling down larger fragments using paramagnetic AMPure XP beads: 65 μl of AMPure XP beads was added to the uncrosslinked ChIP elution and mixed thoroughly. After 10-min incubation at RT, beads were isolated using a magnet. The supernatant was collected, and 25 μl of fresh AMPure XP beads was added and mixed thoroughly. After 10 min at RT, beads were separated and the supernatant was cleaned using a Qiagen Nucleotide Cleanup kit. At the final step, DNA was eluted in 60 μl of elution buffer and used for qPCR. Four different AsiSI sites were monitored using upstream and downstream primers within 40 to 52 bp from the AsiSI cut site (table S1). %DNA was calculated using the following equation: 2[Ct(input) – Ct(test)] × 100%. DNA values obtained for IP in the absence of antibodies were subtracted from the values obtained in the presence of antibody and used for plotting the graphs in Fig. 5. To monitor the Mre11 nuclease dependence, we treated the human U2OS cells expressing inducible AsiSI with 10 μM NU7441, 100 μM PFM03, and 600 nM 4-OHT simultaneously for 1 hour at 37°C before harvesting cells.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank D. Moiani and J. Tainer for the Mre11 inhibitors and members of the Paull laboratory for useful discussions and for critical reading of the manuscript. Funding: This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH (GM120554 to I.J.F.), the National Cancer Institute of the NIH (CA092584 to I.J.F. and S.P.L.-M.), CPRIT (R1214 to I.J.F. and RP110465 to T.T.P.), and the Welch Foundation (F-l808 to I.J.F.). I.J.F. is a CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research. L.R.M. is supported by the National Cancer Institute of the NIH (F99CA212452). M.M.S. is supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship, PF-17-169-01-DMC, from the American Cancer Society. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Author contributions: R.A.D., L.R.M., and M.M.S. conceived and performed experiments and contributed to writing and editing of the manuscript. N.M., L.L., and S.P.L.-M. provided essential reagents for the experiments and contributed to the editing of the manuscript. I.J.F. and T.T.P. contributed to the ideas underlying the experiments and to the writing and editing of the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.Jette N., Lees-Miller S. P., The DNA-dependent protein kinase: A multifunctional protein kinase with roles in DNA double strand break repair and mitosis. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 117, 194–205 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chang H. H. Y., Pannunzio N. R., Adachi N., Lieber M. R., Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 495–506 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goodarzi A. A., Jeggo P. A., The repair and signaling responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Adv. Genet. 82, 1–45 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Symington L. S., Mechanism and regulation of DNA end resection in eukaryotes. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 51, 195–212 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Blunt T., Finnie N. J., Taccioli G. E., Smith G. C., Demengeot J., Gottlieb T. M., Mizuta R., Varghese A. J., Alt F. W., Jeggo P. A., Jackson S. P., Defective DNA-dependent protein kinase activity is linked to V(D)J recombination and DNA repair defects associated with the murine scid mutation. Cell 80, 813–823 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chanut P., Britton S., Coates J., Jackson S. P., Calsou P., Coordinated nuclease activities counteract Ku at single-ended DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Commun. 7, 12889 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Aparicio T., Baer R., Gautier J., DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice and cancer. DNA Repair 19, 169–175 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Deshpande R. A., Lee J. H., Arora S., Paull T. T., Nbs1 converts the human Mre11/Rad50 nuclease complex into an endo/exonuclease machine specific for protein-DNA adducts. Mol. Cell 64, 593–606 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Anand R., Ranjha L., Cannavo E., Cejka P., Phosphorylated CtIP functions as a co-factor of the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 endonuclease in DNA end resection. Mol. Cell 64, 940–950 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Reginato G., Cannavo E., Cejka P., Physiological protein blocks direct the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 and Sae2 nuclease complex to initiate DNA end resection. Genes Dev. 31, 2325–2330 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang W., Daley J. M., Kwon Y., Krasner D. S., Sung P., Plasticity of the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2-Sae2 nuclease ensemble in the processing of DNA-bound obstacles. Genes Dev. 31, 2331–2336 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Anand R., Jasrotia A., Bundschuh D., Howard S. M., Ranjha L., Stucki M., Cejka P., NBS1 promotes the endonuclease activity of the MRE11-RAD50 complex by sensing CtIP phosphorylation. EMBO J. 38, e101005 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Myler L. R., Gallardo I. F., Soniat M. M., Deshpande R. A., Gonzalez X. B., Kim Y., Paull T. T., Finkelstein I. J., Single-molecule imaging reveals how Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 initiates DNA break repair. Mol. Cell 67, 891–898.e4 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sartori A. A., Lukas C., Coates J., Mistrik M., Fu S., Bartek J., Baer R., Lukas J., Jackson S. P., Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 450, 509–514 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Paull T. T., Gellert M., Nbs1 potentiates ATP-driven DNA unwinding and endonuclease cleavage by the Mre11/Rad50 complex. Genes Dev. 13, 1276–1288 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Paull T. T., Gellert M., The 3’ to 5’ exonuclease activity of Mre 11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 1, 969–979 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Herdendorf T. J., Albrecht D. W., Benkovic S. J., Nelson S. W., Biochemical characterization of bacteriophage T4 Mre11-Rad50 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 2382–2392 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hopkins B., Paull T. T., The P. furiosus Mre11/Rad50 complex promotes 5’ strand resection at a DNA double-strand break. Cell 135, 250–260 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bowman A. B., Aschner M., Considerations on manganese (Mn) treatments for in vitro studies. Neurotoxicology 41, 141–142 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Makharashvili N., Tubbs A. T., Yang S.-H., Wang H., Barton O., Zhou Y., Deshpande R. A., Lee J.-H., Lobrich M., Sleckman B. P., Wu X., Paull T. T., Catalytic and noncatalytic roles of the CtIP endonuclease in double-strand break end resection. Mol. Cell 54, 1022–1033 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang H., Li Y., Truong L. N., Shi L. Z., Hwang P. Y.-H., He J., Do J., Cho M. J., Li H., Negrete A., Shiloach J., Berns M. W., Shen B., Chen L., Wu X., CtIP maintains stability at common fragile sites and inverted repeats by end resection-independent endonuclease activity. Mol. Cell 54, 1012–1021 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moreau S., Ferguson J. R., Symington L. S., The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 556–566 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Buis J., Wu Y., Deng Y., Leddon J., Westfield G., Eckersdorff M., Sekiguchi J. M., Chang S., Ferguson D. O., Mre11 nuclease activity has essential roles in DNA repair and genomic stability distinct from ATM activation. Cell 135, 85–96 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Deshpande R. A., Lee J. H., Paull T. T., Rad50 ATPase activity is regulated by DNA ends and requires coordination of both active sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 5255–5268 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lee K. J., Saha J., Sun J., Fattah K. R., Wang S. C., Jakob B., Chi L., Wang S. Y., Taucher-Scholz G., Davis A. J., Chen D. J., Phosphorylation of Ku dictates DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway choice in S phase. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 1732–1745 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Block W. D., Yu Y., Merkle D., Gifford J. L., Ding Q., Meek K., Lees-Miller S. P., Autophosphorylation-dependent remodeling of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit regulates ligation of DNA ends. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 4351–4357 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Reddy Y. V., Ding Q., Lees-Miller S. P., Meek K., Ramsden D. A., Non-homologous end joining requires that the DNA-PK complex undergo an autophosphorylation-dependent rearrangement at DNA ends. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 39408–39413 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ding Q., Reddy Y. V., Wang W., Woods T., Douglas P., Ramsden D. A., Lees-Miller S. P., Meek K., Autophosphorylation of the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase is required for efficient end processing during DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 5836–5848 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chan D. W., Chen B. P., Prithivirajsingh S., Kurimasa A., Story M. D., Qin J., Chen D. J., Autophosphorylation of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit is required for rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks. Genes Dev. 16, 2333–2338 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Uematsu N., Weterings E., Yano K., Morotomi-Yano K., Jakob B., Taucher-Scholz G., Mari P. O., van Gent D. C., Chen B. P., Chen D. J., Autophosphorylation of DNA-PKCS regulates its dynamics at DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 177, 219–229 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shibata A., Moiani D., Arvai A. S., Perry J., Harding S. M., Genois M. M., Maity R., van Rossum-Fikkert S., Kertokalio A., Romoli F., Ismail A., Ismalaj E., Petricci E., Neale M. J., Bristow R. G., Masson J. Y., Wyman C., Jeggo P. A., Tainer J. A., DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice is directed by distinct MRE11 nuclease activities. Mol. Cell 53, 7–18 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Makharashvili N., Paull T. T., CtIP: A DNA damage response protein at the intersection of DNA metabolism. DNA Repair 32, 75–81 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Aparicio T., Baer R., Gottesman M., Gautier J., MRN, CtIP, and BRCA1 mediate repair of topoisomerase II-DNA adducts. J. Cell Biol. 212, 399–408 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nakamura K., Kogame T., Oshiumi H., Shinohara A., Sumitomo Y., Agama K., Pommier Y., Tsutsui K. M., Tsutsui K., Hartsuiker E., Ogi T., Takeda S., Taniguchi Y., Collaborative action of Brca1 and CtIP in elimination of covalent modifications from double-strand breaks to facilitate subsequent break repair. PLOS Genet. 6, e1000828 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Polato F., Callen E., Wong N., Faryabi R., Bunting S., Chen H.-T., Kozak M., Kruhlak M. J., Reczek C. R., Lee W.-H., Ludwig T., Baer R., Feigenbaum L., Jackson S., Nussenzweig A., CtIP-mediated resection is essential for viability and can operate independently of BRCA1. J. Exp. Med. 211, 1027–1036 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Huertas P., Jackson S. P., Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 9558–9565 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yun M. H., Hiom K., CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand-break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle. Nature 459, 460–463 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Barton O., Naumann S. C., Diemer-Biehs R., Kunzel J., Steinlage M., Conrad S., Makharashvili N., Wang J., Feng L., Lopez B. S., Paull T. T., Chen J., Jeggo P. A., Löbrich M., Polo-like kinase 3 regulates CtIP during DNA double-strand break repair in G1. J. Cell Biol. 206, 877–894 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Peterson S. E., Li Y., Wu-Baer F., Chait B. T., Baer R., Yan H., Gottesman M. E., Gautier J., Activation of DSB processing requires phosphorylation of CtIP by ATR. Mol. Cell 49, 657–667 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang H., Shi L. Z., Wong C. C., Han X., Hwang P. Y., Truong L. N., Zhu Q., Shao Z., Chen D. J., Berns M. W., Yates J. R. III, Chen L., Wu X., The interaction of CtIP and Nbs1 connects CDK and ATM to regulate HR-mediated double-strand break repair. PLOS Genet. 9, e1003277 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Myler L. R., Gallardo I. F., Zhou Y., Gong F., Yang S. H., Wold M. S., Miller K. M., Paull T. T., Finkelstein I. J., Single-molecule imaging reveals the mechanism of Exo1 regulation by single-stranded DNA binding proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E1170–E1179 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nicolette M. L., Lee K., Guo Z., Rani M., Chow J. M., Lee S. E., Paull T. T., Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 and Sae2 promote 5’ strand resection of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1478–1485 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Garcia V., Phelps S. E., Gray S., Neale M. J., Bidirectional resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 and Exo1. Nature 479, 241–244 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gallardo I. F., Pasupathy P., Brown M., Manhart C. M., Neikirk D. P., Alani E., Finkelstein I. J., High-throughput universal DNA curtain arrays for single-molecule fluorescence imaging. Langmuir 31, 10310–10317 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gottlieb T. M., Jackson S. P., The DNA-dependent protein kinase: Requirement for DNA ends and association with Ku antigen. Cell 72, 131–142 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Iacovoni J. S., Caron P., Lassadi I., Nicolas E., Massip L., Trouche D., Legube G., High-resolution profiling of gammaH2AX around DNA double strand breaks in the mammalian genome. EMBO J. 29, 1446–1457 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Aymard F., Bugler B., Schmidt C. K., Guillou E., Caron P., Briois S., Iacovoni J. S., Daburon V., Miller K. M., Jackson S. P., Legube G., Transcriptionally active chromatin recruits homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 366–374 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Blier P. R., Griffith A. J., Craft J., Hardin J. A., Binding of Ku protein to DNA. Measurement of affinity for ends and demonstration of binding to nicks. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 7594–7601 (1993). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Postow L., Destroying the ring: Freeing DNA from Ku with ubiquitin. FEBS Lett. 585, 2876–2882 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jiang N., Shen Y., Fei X., Sheng K., Sun P., Qiu Y., Larner J., Cao L., Kong X., Mi J., Valosin-containing protein regulates the proteasome-mediated degradation of DNA-PKcs in glioma cells. Cell Death Dis. 4, e647 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.van den Boom J., Wolf M., Weimann L., Schulze N., Li F., Kaschani F., Riemer A., Zierhut C., Kaiser M., Iliakis G., Funabiki H., Meyer H., VCP/p97 extracts sterically trapped Ku70/80 rings from DNA in double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell 64, 189–198 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kim J.-S., Krasieva T. B., Kurumizaka H., Chen D. J., Taylor A. M. R., Yokomori K., Independent and sequential recruitment of NHEJ and HR factors to DNA damage sites in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 170, 341–347 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Taccioli G. E., Amatucci A. G., Beamish H. J., Gell D., Xiang X. H., Torres Arzayus M. I., Priestley A., Jackson S. P., Marshak Rothstein A., Jeggo P. A., Herrera V. L., Targeted disruption of the catalytic subunit of the DNA-PK gene in mice confers severe combined immunodeficiency and radiosensitivity. Immunity 9, 355–366 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ruis B. L., Fattah K. R., Hendrickson E. A., The catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase regulates proliferation, telomere length, and genomic stability in human somatic cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 6182–6195 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Li G., Nelsen C., Hendrickson E. A., Ku86 is essential in human somatic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 832–837 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chan D. W., Mody C. H., Ting N. S., Lees-Miller S. P., Purification and characterization of the double-stranded DNA-activated protein kinase, DNA-PK, from human placenta. Biochem. Cell Biol. 74, 67–73 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.