Abstract
Background: Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) has been found to play a crucial role in carcinogenesis and in evaluating prognosis of multiple neoplasms. PANDAR (promoter of CDKN1A antisense DNA damage activated RNA), a newly discovered cancer-associated RNA is abnormally expressed in a wide variety of tumors. Expression and the functional role of PANDAR in human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), however, needs to be completely elucidated. Methods: Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was applied to detect expression levels of lncRNA PANDAR in OSCC tissues and corresponding paracancerous normal tissues in 92 OSCC patients, four OSCC cell lines, and a normal oral keratinocytes cell line. Association between expression of PANDAR and clinicopathological features of OSCC patients was also analyzed. For analysis of overall survival data, Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed. The prognostic value of PANDAR was examined by Cox regression analysis. PANDAR levels were knocked down in OSCC cell line Tca8113 by using PANDAR siRNA. Function of PANDAR on tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion was further evaluated by MTT and Transwell assays in vitro. Results: PANDAR was highly expressed in OSCC tissues and cell lines (P < 0.05) and its high expression level was found to be closely associated with advanced TNM stage (P = 0.004) and positive distant metastasis (P = 0.001). Furthermore, overall survival rate of OSCC patients with high PANDAR expression was poorer than patients with low PANDAR expression (P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed that expression level of PANDAR can be used as an independent prognostic indicator for OSCC. Functionally, knockdown of PANDAR can inhibit proliferation, invasion, and migration of OSCC cells. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that PANDAR may serve as a promising prognostic biomarker and a new molecular target for new therapies for OSCC patients.
Keywords: Oral squamous cell carcinoma, lncRNA, PANDAR, prognosis
Introduction
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in oral and maxillofacial regions. OCC incidence rate estimates it to be the ninth most common cancer all over the world [1]. Numbers of OSCC cases are increasing in recent years. Causes of OSCC are complex and diverse, including genetic factors and other environmental factors such as such as smoking, alcoholism, and betel quid chewing [2]. Despite considerable progress that has been made over past decades in diagnosis and therapeutic strategies, 5 year survival of OSCC patients is still quite low [3]. Thus, an exploration of the molecular pathogenesis of OSCC and new molecular targets may play a significant role in control of this disease.
Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) is a class of transcripts of whose length is greater than 200 nucleotides and does not have the function of coding protein [4,5]. Recently, large-scale studies have suggested that lncRNAs participate in a variety of biological processes such as embryogenesis, cell growth, apoptosis, and immune response [6-8]. Dysregulation of some lncRNAs has been implicated in occurrence and progression of various human cancers, including OSCC [9]. Some lncRNAs, such as HOTAIR [10], TUG1 [11], MEG3 [12], and MALAT1 [13], have been proven to contribute to occurrence and development of OSCC.
PANDAR (promoter of CDKN1A antisense DNA damage activated RNA), a newly discovered lncRNA, is located on 6p21.2 with a length of 1506 bp. Recently, PANDAR has been identified as a candidate oncogene [14]. High PANDAR expression has been found in a number of cancers such as gastric cancer [15], colorectal cancer [16], and bladder cancer [17]. However, its association with OSCC is still unclear. Hence, this study aimed to examine whether PANDAR can be used as an independent prognostic factor of OSCC and explore the role of PANDAR in the pathogenesis of OSCC through in vitro experiments.
Materials and methods
Patients and samples
Ninety-two patients with OSCC, that were diagnosed for the first time and underwent surgery at Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanchang University from May 2010 to April 2012, were selected for this study. No chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine was carried out in these patients before surgery. All clinicopathological data including patient age, gender, location, size, grade of tumor, distant metastasis, and TNM stage were recorded in detail (Table 1). OSCC tissues and paired para-cancerous tissues were collected from these patients, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C for preservation after surgery. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanchang University and written informed consent was obtained from each patient.
Table 1.
Correlation between expression levels of lncRNA PANDAR with clinicopathological features in OSCC patients
| Characteristics | Total | PANDAR expression | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| High | Low | ||||
| Gender | Male | 54 | 27 | 27 | 0.805 |
| Female | 38 | 20 | 18 | ||
| Age (years) | < 60 | 50 | 28 | 22 | 0.306 |
| ≥ 60 | 42 | 19 | 23 | ||
| Tumor location | Tongue | 36 | 20 | 16 | 0.854 |
| Floor of mouth | 5 | 1 | 4 | ||
| Buccal mucosa | 20 | 8 | 12 | ||
| Hard palate | 7 | 4 | 3 | ||
| Upper or lower gingival | 24 | 14 | 10 | ||
| Tumor size | T1-T2 | 56 | 31 | 25 | 0.309 |
| T3-T4 | 36 | 16 | 20 | ||
| Tumor grade | G1 | 38 | 16 | 22 | 0.150 |
| G2/G3 | 54 | 31 | 23 | ||
| Distant metastasis | Yes | 35 | 26 | 9 | 0.001 |
| No | 57 | 21 | 36 | ||
| TNM stage | I-II | 41 | 14 | 27 | 0.004 |
| III-IV | 51 | 33 | 18 | ||
Cell lines and cell culture
Human normal oral keratinocytes cell line (hNOK) and OSCC cell lines (SCC9, SCC15, SCC25, and Tca8113) were purchased from the Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). All cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Life Technologies Inc., CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, USA) and 2 mM L-glutamine (Life Technologies Inc., CA, USA). All cells were placed into an incubator (Thermo Scientific, DE, USA) containing 5% CO2 and cultivated at 37°C.
Cell transfection
Human OSCC cell lines Tca8113 were used in this study. For gene knockdown, Tca8113 cells were seeded overnight and transfected with PANDAR-siRNA (si-PANDAR) or scrambled negative control siRNA (si-NC) using LipofectamineTM 2000 (Invitrogen, CA, USA), according to manufacturer protocol. si-NC and si-PANDAR were synthesized by GenePharma (Shanghai, China). Sequence of PANDAR targeting siRNA was: 5’-GCAATCTACAACCTGTCTT-3’.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis
Total RNA from 92 paired OSCC tissues or four OSCC cell lines was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA), in accordance with instructions. Reverse transcription for mRNA was performed using Primer-Script™ one-step qRT-PCR kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). qRT-PCR was performed using SYBR Green Mix kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) in a ABI 7500 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The results were consistent with expression of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The primers used in qRT-PCR for GAPDH and PANDAR were as follows: GAPDH forward primer: 5’-GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC-3’, and reverse primer: 5’-TGGTGAAGACGCCAGTGGA-3’; PANDAR forward primer: 5’-CTGTTAAGGTGGTGGCATTG-3’ and reverse primer: 5’-GGAGGCTCATACTGGCTGAT-3’. Data were analyzed by 2-ΔΔCt method.
Cell proliferation assays
Proliferation capacity of Tca8113 cells after transfection with si-PANDAR was detected by MTT Kit (Sigma, USA), according to the manufacturer instructions. Briefly, Tca8113 cells, after siRNA transfection for 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours, were plated in each well of a 96-well plate. For each well, 20 μl MTT solution (5 mg/ml, Sigma, USA) and 150 μl dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma, USA) was added in order. OD value of each group at 490 nm wavelength was detected every 24 hours by ELISA. The assay was independently replicated 3 times.
Cell migration and invasion assays
Cell migration and invasion assays were performed using 24-well transwell plates with 8-μm pore size polycarbonate inserts (BD Biosciences, USA). Tca8113 cells, transfected with either si-PANDAR or si-NC, were collected and carried out in in serumfree medium. For migration assays, 5 × 104 cells were placed into the upper chamber of an insert. For invasion assays, 1 × 105 cells were placed into the upper chamber of an insert coated with Matrigel (Sigma, USA). We added the DMEM medium, containing 10% FBS, to the lower chamber. After 24 hours of incubation, residual cells in the upper chamber were removed by cotton wool while migratory and invasive cells getting through the cell membrane were fixed by methanol. 0.1% hematoxylin was then used to stain these cells. A digital microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) helped to count numbers of stained invasive cells. The assay was independently repeated three times.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 17.0 software was used to analyze experimental data. Student’s t-test, Fisher’s exact test, or Chi-square method was used for comparisons between groups. Association between clinicopathological characteristics and PANDAR expression was evaluated by Chi-square method. Overall survival of OSCC patients was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic values were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) from at least three independent experiments. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
PANDAR levels were upregulated in OSCC
To explore the role of lncRNA PANDAR in OSCC, our study detected expression levels of PANDAR in 92 paired OSCC tissues, adjacent normal tissues, four OSCC cell lines (SCC9, SCC15, SCC25, and Tca8113), and a normal oral keratinocytes cell line (hNOK). qRT-PCR analysis declared that expression of PANDAR was statistically upregulated in OSCC tissues compared with paired para-cancerous tissues (P < 0.01, Figure 1A). Additionally, compared with normal oral keratinocytes hNOK, PANDAR expression was significantly upregulated in all four OSCC cell lines (SCC9, SCC15, SCC25 and Tca8113) (P < 0.05, Figure 1B).
Figure 1.

lncRNA PANDAR expression levels in OSCC tissues and cell lines. A. PANDAR expression was significantly higher in cancer tissues than in adjacent normal tissues; B. PANDAR was increased in OSCC cell lines compared with normal oral keratinocytes cell line hNOK. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM for three replicate determination, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Correlation between PANDAR expression level and clinicopathological characteristics in OSCC patients
We next calculated correlation between lncRNA PANDAR expression in OSCC tissues and clinicopathological features of 92 OSCC patients. According to the median expression level of PANDAR in OSCC tissues, PANDAR expression was divided into a relatively high expression group and relatively low expression group. As shown in Table 1, PANDAR level was significantly correlated to distant metastasis (P = 0.001) and TNM stage (P = 0.004). However, there was no significant correlation between PANDAR expression and gender, age, tumor location, tumor size, and tumor grade (P > 0.05).
High levels of PANDAR is predictive of poor prognosis of OSCC patients
When linked to prognosis, our data showed that OSCC patients with high PANDAR expression had significantly shorter overall survival than those with low levels of PANDAR (log-rank test, P = 0.004, Figure 2). Univariate analysis data showed that tumor grade, distant metastasis, TNM stage, and PANDAR expression were correlated with overall survival of OSCC patients. Moreover, multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that expression level of PANDAR could serve as an independent risk factor which influences prognosis of OSCC patients (P < 0.001, Table 2). The above contents indicate that upregulation of PANDAR expression may be of great importance in occurrence and development of OSCC.
Figure 2.

Overall survival analysis for patients with OSCC. OSCC patients with high PANDAR expression showed a significantly poorer prognosis than those with low PANDAR expression (log-rank test, P = 0.004).
Table 2.
Cox regression analysis for prognosis in OSCC patients
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P value | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P value | |
| Gender | 0.875 | 0.584-1.361 | 0. 653 | - | - | - |
| Age | 0.914 | 0.598-1.405 | 0.582 | - | - | - |
| Tumor location | 0.972 | 0.813-1.849 | 0.403 | - | - | - |
| Tumor size | 1.146 | 0.701-2.145 | 0.354 | - | - | - |
| Tumor grade | 2.305 | 1.548-4.836 | 0.018 | 2.479 | 1.303-5.483 | 0.009 |
| Distant metastasis | 3.894 | 1.935-7.204 | < 0.001 | 3.346 | 1.671-6.955 | < 0.001 |
| TNM stage | 2.589 | 1.610-5.718 | 0.004 | 2.886 | 1.485-6.074 | < 0.001 |
| PANDAR expression | 3.026 | 1.732-6.085 | < 0.001 | 2.937 | 1.533-6.307 | < 0.001 |
Effects of PANDAR downregulation on proliferation, invasion, and migration of Tca8113 cells in vitro
We further investigated the function of PANDAR in OSCC cells. PANDAR-siRNA was designed, synthesized, and transfected into Tca8113 cells to determine its effect on the ability of proliferation, invasion, and migration of OSCC cells in vitro. As shown in Figure 3A, compared with cells transfected with si-NC, si-PANDAR transfected cells significantly reduced PANDAR expression (P < 0.01). MTT assay results showed that knockdown of PANDAR by siRNA effectively inhibited cell proliferation (Figure 3B). In addition, we observed reduced cell invasion/migration in Tca8113 cells after si-PANDAR transfection (Figure 3C, 3D).
Figure 3.

Knockdown of PANDAR inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion in Tca8113 cells. A. PANDAR expression was suppressed by si-PANDAR in Tca8113 cells. B. In vitro viabilities of Tca8113 cells were decreased in PANDAR-suppressed cells by MTT assay. C. Transwell migration assays showed enhanced migration capacities of Tca8113 cells following suppression of PANDAR. D. Suppressed PANDAR expression inhibited invasiveness of Tca8113 cells. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Discussion
In recent years, although great progress has been made in early diagnosis, surgical techniques, and radiation and chemotherapy in OSCC, the prognosis of patients with OSCC has remained unsatisfactory [18]. Values of traditional biomarkers are limited in diagnosis and prognosis due to absence of specific symptoms in the early stage and characteristics of metastasis and invasion of OSCC. Therefore, understanding epigenetic alterations associated with OSCC and screening new valuable biomarkers for its diagnosis and prognosis will be of great importance in reducing mortality and improving the quality of life of patients with OSCC.
With the deepening of genomics research, abnormal expression of many lncRNAs has been reported to play significant regulatory roles in occurrence and development in a variety of human tumors [19-21]. Some lncRNAs which are closely related to OSCC have been investigated and their clinical significance and biological functions have also been largely revealed. For example, Zhang et al. found that lncRNA FTH1P3 was overexpressed in OSCC and decreased survival rate of OSCC patients, as a competitive endogenous RNA by sponging miR-224-5p and modulating expression of fizzled 5 [22]. Liu et al. reported that lncRNA HOTAIR was increased in OSCC tissues and accelerated proliferation and invasion of OSCC cells. They also reported that high HOTAIR expression could serve as an eligible molecular marker for OSCC prognosis determination [10]. Zhu et al. showed that lncRNA HAS2-AS1 was increased in OSCC and in vitro analysis revealed that HAS2-AS1 accelerates tumor growth and metastasis by mediating hypoxia-induced epithelial mesenchymal transition inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) via stabilizing HAS2 [23]. All of this evidence suggests that lncRNAs may have potential to be biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of OSCC.
PANDAR, a newly identified lncRNA, has been shown to be upregulated and predict poor prognosis of multiple cancers [24]. For example, elevated PANDAR expression has been found in gastric cancer tissues and patients with low PANDAR expression showed better prognosis than those with high expression [15]. In addition, PANDAR was overexpressed in breast cancer tissues and cell lines and regulated G1/S transition of breast cancer cells by affecting p16 (INK4A) expression via regulating recruitment of Bmi1 to the promoter of p16 (INK4A) [25]. Besides, PANDAR is known to play a key role in mediating EMT. Knockdown of PANDAR expression arrests cell cycle, represses cell growth, inhibits invasion, and inhibits metastasis by affecting the EMT and promoting apoptosis in colorectal cancer [16]. However, to our knowledge, the roles of PANDAR in carcinogenesis of OSCC remain unclear.
In this present study, our results showed that expression of PANDAR was increased in OSCC tissues compared with para-cancerous tissues. Similarly, the level of PANDAR was upregulated in OSCC cell lines when compared to human normal oral keratinocyte cell line hNOK. We also revealed that high expression level of PANDAR was associated with advanced TNM stage and positive distant metastasis of OSCC patients. Furthermore, we evaluated the prognostic value of PANDAR for OSCC by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. These revealed that overall survival rate of OSCC patients with higher expression levels of PANDAR was lower. Based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, high expression of PANDAR was a potential independent prognostic factor for OSCC. In order to further investigate the mechanism of PANDAR in progression of OSCC, we reduced expression of PANDAR in vitro and found that proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of Tca8113 cells were inhibited. These findings emphasize the role of PANDAR in development of OSCC and imply its potential significance in predicting progression and prognosis of OSCC.
In conclusion, this study confirms elevated PANDAR expression in OSCC tissues and cell lines. Furthermore, we also demonstrated that high PANDAR levels are correlated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in OSCC patients. Moreover, silencing of PANDAR expression of OSCC cells evidently inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. These results suggest that PANDAR may be a promising biomarker for prognosis of OSCC and a potential target for OSCC therapy.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81460100).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Keshavarzi M, Darijani M, Momeni F, Moradi P, Ebrahimnejad H, Masoudifar A, Mirzaei H. Molecular imaging and oral cancer diagnosis and therapy. J Cell Biochem. 2017;118:3055–3060. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.De Paz D, Kao HK, Huang Y, Chang KP. Prognostic stratification of patients with advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Curr Oncol Rep. 2017;19:65. doi: 10.1007/s11912-017-0624-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Necsulea A, Soumillon M, Warnefors M, Liechti A, Daish T, Zeller U, Baker JC, Grützner F, Kaessmann H. The evolution of lncRNA repertoires and expression patterns in tetrapods. Nature. 2014;505:635–640. doi: 10.1038/nature12943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gao S, Guo J, Li F, Zhang K, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Guo Y. Long non-coding RNA lncTCF7 predicts poor prognosis and promotes tumor metastasis in osteosarcoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017;10:10918–10925. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang Z, Luo Q, Yao F, Qing C, Ye J, Deng Y, Li J. Identification of differentially expressed long non-coding RNAs in polarized macrophages. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19705. doi: 10.1038/srep19705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li Y, Chen X, Sun H, Wang H. Long non-coding RNAs in the regulation of skeletal myogenesis and muscle diseases. Cancer Lett. 2017;417:58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen YG, Satpathy AT, Chang HY. Gene regulation in the immune system by long noncoding RNAs. Nat Immunol. 2017;18:962–972. doi: 10.1038/ni.3771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gomes CC, de Sousa SF, Calin GA, Gomez RS. The emerging role of long noncoding RNAs in oral cancer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123:235–241. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2016.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu H, Li Z, Wang C, Feng L, Huang H, Liu C, Li F. Expression of long non-coding RNA-HOTAIR in oral squamous cell carcinoma Tca8113 cells and its associated biological behavior. Am J Transl Res. 2016;8:4726–4734. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yang YT, Wang YF, Lai JY, Shen SY, Wang F, Kong J, Zhang W, Yang HY. Long non-coding RNA UCA1 contributes to the progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma by regulating the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway. Cancer Sci. 2016;107:1581–1589. doi: 10.1111/cas.13058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu Z, Wu C, Xie N, Wang P. Long non-coding RNA MEG3 inhibits the proliferation and metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma by regulating the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:4053–4058. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chang SM, Hu WW. Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 promotes oral squamous cell carcinoma development via microRNA-125b/STAT3 axis. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:3384–3396. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li J, Li Z, Zheng W, Li X, Wang Z, Cui Y, Jiang X. PANDAR: a pivotal cancer-related long non-coding RNA in human cancers. Mol Biosyst. 2017;13:2195–2201. doi: 10.1039/c7mb00414a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ma P, Xu T, Huang M, Shu Y. Increased expression of LncRNA PANDAR predicts a poor prognosis in gastric cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2016;78:172–176. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lu M, Liu Z, Li B, Wang G, Li D, Zhu Y. The high expression of long non-coding RNA PANDAR indicates a poor prognosis for colorectal cancer and promotes metastasis by EMT pathway. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143:71–81. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2252-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhan Y, Lin J, Liu Y, Chen M, Chen X, Zhuang C, Liu L, Xu W, Chen Z, He A, Zhang Q, Sun X, Zhao G, Huang W. Up-regulation of long non-coding RNA PANDAR is associated with poor prognosis and promotes tumorigenesis in bladder cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2016;35:83. doi: 10.1186/s13046-016-0354-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sinevici N, O’sullivan J. Oral cancer: deregulated molecular events and their use as biomarkers. Oral Oncol. 2016;61:12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li Y, Jiang H. Up-regulation of long non-coding RNA HOXA-AS2 in non-small cell lung cancer is associated with worse survival outcome. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017;10:9690–9696. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chen L, Dzakah EE, Shan G. Targetable long non-coding RNAs in cancer treatments. Cancer Lett. 2018;418:119–124. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Slaby O, Laga R, Sedlacek O. Therapeutic targeting of non-coding RNAs in cancer. Biochem J. 2017;474:4219–4251. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20170079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang CZ. Long non-coding RNA FTH1P3 facilitates oral squamous cell carcinoma progression by acting as a molecular sponge of miR-224-5p to modulate fizzled 5 expression. Gene. 2017;607:47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhu G, Wang S, Chen J, Wang Z, Liang X, Wang X, Jiang J, Lang J, Li L. Long noncoding RNA HAS2-AS1 mediates hypoxia-induced invasiveness of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 2017;56:2210–2222. doi: 10.1002/mc.22674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ma PJ, Guan QK, Xu DW, Zhao J, Qin N, Jin BZ. LncRNA PANDAR as a prognostic marker in Chinese cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;475:172–177. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sang Y, Tang J, Li S, Li L, Tang X, Cheng C, Luo Y, Qian X, Deng LM, Liu L, Lv XB. LncRNA PANDAR regulates the G1/S transition of breast cancer cells by suppressing p16 (INK4A) expression. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22366. doi: 10.1038/srep22366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
