Abstract
The assessment and management of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is often complex, yet no standardised approach exists, and evidence for the clinical care of patients, including those with critical illness, is limited. The roles of proformas and checklists are increasing in medicine; proformas provide a framework for a thorough approach to patient care, whereas checklists offer a priority-based approach that may be applied to deteriorating patients in time-critical situations.
We aimed to develop a comprehensive assessment proforma and an accompanying ‘priorities’ checklist for patients with TBM, with the overriding goal being to improve patient outcomes. The proforma outlines what should be asked, checked, or tested at initial evaluation and daily inpatient review to assist supportive clinical care for patients, with an adapted list for patients in critical care. It is accompanied by a supporting document describing why these points are relevant to TBM. Our priorities checklist offers a useful and easy reminder of important issues to review during a time-critical period of acute patient deterioration. The benefit of these documents to patient outcomes would require investigation; however, we hope they will promote standardisation of patient assessment and care, particularly of critically unwell individuals, in whom morbidity and mortality remains unacceptably high.
Keywords: Tuberculous meningitis, critical care, checklist, proforma
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors. Publication in Wellcome Open Research does not imply endorsement by Wellcome.
Abbreviations
AFB, acid-fast bacilli; ALT, alanine transaminase; ART, anti-retroviral therapy; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BCG, Bacillus Calmette Guerin; CO 2, carbon dioxide; CBF, cerebral blood flow; CPP, cerebral perfusion pressure; CRP, C-reactive protein; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CSW, cerebral salt wasting; CT, computed tomography; CVP, central venous pressure; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; ETCO 2, end-tidal carbon dioxide; ETV, endoscopic third ventriculostomy; EVD, external ventricular drainage; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ICP, intracranial pressure; ICU, intensive care unit; INR, international normalised ratio; IVC, inferior vena cava; MAP, mean arterial pressure; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NIRS, near-infrared spectroscopy; ONSD, optic nerve sheath diameter; PbtO2, brain tissue oxygen tension monitoring; SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate diuretic hormone secretion; TB, tuberculosis; TBI, traumatic brain injury; TBM, tuberculous meningitis; TCD, transcranial Doppler; VP, ventriculoperitoneal
Introduction
Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most severe form of tuberculosis (TB) and causes critical illness from direct neurological injury or complications from the infection, treatment, or prolonged hospitalisation.
Due to serious complications, the management of TBM is complex, and includes supportive medical and neurosurgical measures. Currently there are no guidelines or standardised approach for the assessment and management of TBM. This is due to limited literature to develop an evidence-based approach, and because each TBM patient is unique. However, common themes exist, and a comprehensive proforma to guide patient assessment could be the first step towards standardised management.
Checklists can be powerful tools to focus attention 1 and their use in the medical field is growing 2– 4. We aimed to develop a comprehensive proforma for the assessment and management of TBM as well as a priorities checklist for the decompensating patient. The document cannot account for every scenario, but is designed to identify priorities; i.e. potentially reversible factors that contribute to morbidity and mortality. Local modifications to increase uptake and tailor use to suit local needs are encouraged.
Accompanying our proforma and checklist is the rationale for why these assessments may be important. Importantly, this article is not a guideline and does not make recommendations for care. It is not intended to replace a comprehensive ward round, nor to increase the clinical workload. Instead, it should provide a framework to highlight vital components during different stages of TBM care, with many complications overlapping throughout illness. We acknowledge that investigations and procedures will not be available at all centres.
Comprehensive proforma
The comprehensive proforma is split into initial evaluation ( Table 1), daily inpatient review ( Table 2), and critical care in the intensive care unit (ICU) ( Table 3). However, as elements can occur at any time, the rationale is grouped by themes within sections titled “General supportive and critical care” and “Neurocritical care”.
Table 1. Initial evaluation.
| Category | Specific question or assessment | ✓ |
|---|---|---|
| History | ||
| Age | ||
| Presenting complaints and duration (i.e., headache, irritability, vomiting, fever, neck stiffness, seizures,
altered consciousness, lethargy, developmental regression, weight loss, night sweats, cough |
||
| Other respiratory symptoms | ||
| Previous treatment for tuberculosis | ||
| BCG immunisation | ||
| History of recent TB contact | ||
| Other previous illnesses or comorbidities | ||
| If HIV positive:
- Date of diagnosis, treatment history, treatment adherence, recent CD4 and HIV viral load values |
||
| General clinical examination | ||
| Weight and nutritional status | ||
| Vital signs (i.e., oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, temperature) | ||
| Hydration status (i.e., fluid input and output, clinical signs of dehydration) | ||
| Evidence of tuberculosis elsewhere (e.g., lung, lymph nodes) | ||
| BCG scar | ||
| Neurological examination | ||
| Level of consciousness (i.e., GCS, modified for infants) | ||
| Pupillary exam (shape, size and reaction to light) | ||
| Assess for papilloedema by fundoscopy | ||
| Focal neurological deficits (i.e., cranial nerve palsies, hemiplegia, paraplegia, tetraplegia, urinary
retention) |
||
| Head circumference and fontanelle in children | ||
| CSF examination (lumbar or ventricular) | ||
| Opening pressure (immediately with needle insertion at lumbar puncture) | ||
| General appearance (i.e. colour, turbidity) | ||
| Laboratory tests (CSF) | ||
| Lumbar or ventricular? | ||
| AFB smear | ||
| NAAT (e.g., GeneXpert) | ||
| Mycobacterial culture and drug susceptibility testing | ||
| White cell count (i.e., total and cell differential) | ||
| Protein | ||
| Glucose (paired with blood glucose) | ||
| Lactate | ||
| Laboratory tests (blood) | ||
| Full blood count (i.e., haemoglobin, white blood cell count, platelets) | ||
| Non-specific inflammatory markers (i.e., ESR, CRP) | ||
| Electrolyte and renal function panel (i.e., sodium, potassium, glucose, creatinine, urea) | ||
| Liver function panel (i.e., ALT, AST, bilirubin) | ||
| Coagulation panel (i.e., INR, PTT) | ||
| HIV test (if positive, CD4 count and HIV viral load) | ||
| Serum osmolality (if hyponatraemia) | ||
| Laboratory tests (urine) | ||
| Urine sodium (if hyponatraemia) | ||
| Urine osmolality (if hyponatraemia) | ||
| Imaging | ||
| Chest X-ray | ||
| Brain and/or spine (i.e. CT or MRI) | ||
| Intracranial pressure measurement | ||
| Intermittent measurements (i.e., lumbar puncture) | ||
| Continuous measurements (i.e., invasive monitoring with/ without drain) | ||
| Assessment for communicating hydrocephalus with air encephalogram or column test | ||
| Non-invasive estimates of ICP | ||
AFB, acid-fast bacilli; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BCG, Bacillus Calmette Guerin; CRP, C-reactive protein; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CT, computed tomography; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; INR, international normalised ratio; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test; PTT, prothrombin time; TB, tuberculosis.
‘✓’ can be selected when a proforma question has been answered, or a proforma point has been reviewed or tested.
Table 2. Daily inpatient review.
| Category | Specific question or assessment | ✓ |
|---|---|---|
| General clinical examination | ||
| Weight and nutritional status (i.e., use of oral feeds, intravenous fluids, etc.) | ||
| Monitor for vomiting/inability to take drugs orally | ||
| Monitor for gastrointestinal bleeding | ||
| Vital signs (i.e., oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, temperature) | ||
| Hydration status (i.e., fluid input and output, clinical signs of dehydration, CVP, IVC ultrasound) | ||
| Medication evaluation | ||
| Have any doses of anti-TB chemotherapy been missed? | ||
| Monitor for side effects from anti-TB chemotherapy | ||
| Check drug susceptibility testing results. Are changes to anti-TB chemotherapy required? | ||
| Monitor recent liver function and renal function panels for medication toxicity | ||
| Repeat liver function and renal function panels if toxicity concerns remain | ||
| Check corticosteroid dose | ||
| Schedule corticosteroid taper (i.e., when to reduce the dose) | ||
| Neurological examination | ||
| Level of consciousness (i.e., GCS, modified for infants) | ||
| Assess for papilloedema by fundoscopy | ||
| Focal neurological deficits (i.e., cranial nerve palsies, hemiplegia, paraplegia, tetraplegia,
urinary retention) |
||
| Has there been a change in examination since last review? If so, what is the suspected cause? | ||
| Does the patient need repeat neuroimaging? | ||
| Laboratory tests (blood) | ||
| Repeat complete full blood count and inflammatory markers (i.e., if concern for other infection) | ||
| Repeat electrolyte and renal function panel (i.e., sodium, potassium, glucose, creatinine, urea)
if change in hydration status |
||
| Repeat liver function panel (i.e., ALT, AST, bilirubin) if change in medications | ||
| Repeat serum osmolality if change in hydration status or new/worsening hyponatraemia | ||
| Laboratory tests (urine) | ||
| Urine sodium if change in hydration status | ||
| Urine osmolality if change in hydration status | ||
ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CVP, central venous pressure; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; IVC, inferior vena cava; TB, tuberculosis.
‘✓’ can be selected when a proforma question has been answered, or a proforma point has been reviewed or tested.
Table 3. Critical care.
| Category | Specific question or assessment | ✓ |
|---|---|---|
| General clinical examination | ||
| Weight and nutritional status (i.e., use of oral feeds, intravenous fluids, etc.) | ||
| Monitor for vomiting/inability to take drugs orally | ||
| Monitor for gastrointestinal bleeding | ||
| Vital signs (i.e., oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, temperature) | ||
| Hydration status (i.e., fluid input and output, clinical signs of dehydration) | ||
| Monitor skin for pressure damage | ||
| Medication evaluation | ||
| Have any doses of anti-TB chemotherapy been missed? | ||
| Monitor for side effects from anti-TB chemotherapy | ||
| Check drug susceptibility testing results. Are changes to anti-TB chemotherapy
required? |
||
| Monitor recent liver function and renal function panels for medication toxicity | ||
| Repeat liver function and renal function panels if toxicity concerns remain | ||
| Check corticosteroid dose | ||
| Schedule corticosteroid taper (i.e., when to reduce the dose) | ||
| Vascular access | ||
| Is central venous access still needed? | ||
| Is central venous access functioning properly? | ||
| Are there signs/symptoms of central line-associated blood stream infection? | ||
| Is invasive blood pressure monitoring (arterial line) still needed? | ||
| Urinary catheter | ||
| Is the urinary catheter still needed? | ||
| Are there signs/symptoms of catheter-associated urinary tract infection? | ||
| Respiratory examination | ||
| Monitor respiratory examination | ||
| Monitor ventilation with end tidal CO2 monitoring (if available) | ||
| Monitor ventilation and oxygenation with arterial blood gas sampling (if
available) |
||
| Monitor and adjust mechanical ventilation settings/modes | ||
| Are there signs/symptoms of ventilator-associated pneumonia? | ||
| Repeat chest X-ray if ventilator-associated pneumonia suspected | ||
| Can removal of endotracheal tube be considered? | ||
| Neurological examination | ||
| Follow up neurosurgical consultation (if applicable) | ||
| Level of consciousness (i.e., GCS, modified for infants) – is sedation required? | ||
| Has there been a change in examination since last review? | ||
| Assess for papilloedema by fundoscopy | ||
| Focal neurological deficits (i.e., cranial nerve palsies, hemiplegia, paraplegia,
tetraplegia, urinary retention) |
||
| Is repeat neuroimaging needed? | ||
| Intracranial pressure optimisation | ||
| Optimise head-of-bed elevation | ||
| Ensure appropriate sedation/analgesia | ||
| Check for fevers (if applicable, treat) | ||
| Check for appropriate blood pressure to determine cerebral perfusion pressure
(if ICP is known) |
||
| Is continuous monitoring required (i.e., continuous parenchymal ICP or EVD)? | ||
| Consider non-invasive measures for evaluating ICP and brain perfusion | ||
| Post-operative neurosurgical management | ||
| Monitor for changes in neurological exam | ||
| Monitor surgical wound for infection | ||
| Is repeat neuroimaging required (to check VP shunt or EVD placement)? | ||
| Plan for suture removal | ||
| If an EVD is in situ, check the level and check the drainage | ||
| Laboratory tests (blood) | ||
| Repeat complete full blood count and inflammatory markers (i.e., if concern for
other infection) |
||
| Repeat electrolyte and renal function panel (i.e., sodium, potassium, glucose,
creatinine, urea) if change in hydration status |
||
| Repeat liver function panel (i.e., ALT, AST, bilirubin) if change in medications | ||
| Repeat serum osmolality if change in hydration status or new/worsening
hyponatraemia |
||
| Laboratory tests (urine) | ||
| Urine sodium if change in hydration status | ||
| Urine osmolality if change in hydration status | ||
ALT, Alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CBF, cerebral blood flow; EVD, external ventricular drain; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; ICP, intracranial pressure; TB, tuberculosis; VP, ventriculoperitoneal.
‘✓’ can be selected when a proforma question has been answered, or a proforma point has been reviewed or tested.
General supportive and critical care
History of present illness
Obtaining a thorough history of the patient’s signs and symptoms is paramount ( Table 1 and Box 1).
Box 1. Key predictors of poor outcome in tuberculous meningitis.
Increased Medical Research Council TBM disease severity 5– 8
Hydrocephalus and raised ICP 8, 10, 11
Multidrug resistant, or isoniazid mono-resistant, disease 15
Lower body weight 5
General clinical examination and monitoring
General assessment and non-invasive monitoring of vital signs may be the only tools available to guide patient management in many centres. These provide valuable information in all care settings, and are mentioned in Table 1– Table 4.
Table 4. Priorities checklist for the acutely deteriorating patient with TBM.
| Reviewed | |
|---|---|
| Reduced consciousness | |
| - Has the patient developed hydrocephalus, infarcts or possible mass effect from tuberculomas or TB abscesses?
(consider repeat brain imaging, ICP monitoring) |
|
| - Is the EVD or VP shunt working? (if applicable check EVD drainage, consider repeat imaging for VP shunt) | |
| - Is urgent neurosurgery required? | |
| - Have seizures been excluded? | |
| - Does serum glucose need correcting? | |
| - Does serum sodium need correcting? | |
| - Is there hypotension? | |
| Systemically unwell | |
| - Is supplemental oxygen required? | |
| - Are serum liver function tests elevated? | |
| - Do large urine outputs suggest hypovolaemia? | |
| - Is there gastrointestinal bleeding? | |
| - Are there signs of new infection? |
EVD, external ventricular drain; ICP, intracranial pressure; TBM, tuberculous meningitis; VP, ventriculoperitoneal.
Check box for each checklist question when that question has been reviewed.
Respiratory monitoring. A change in neurological status may cause hypoxia due to airway compromise, and pulse oximetry may raise the alarm. Chest X-rays can help diagnose pulmonary TB, and other complications such as pneumothorax (especially in Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia co-infected TBM patients with HIV).
Heart rate monitoring. Bradycardia may be caused by raised intracranial pressure (ICP) or brainstem ischaemia, and the development of tachycardia or bradycardia could indicate new infection or hypovolemia.
Blood pressure monitoring. Blood pressure monitoring may detect septic shock or cerebral salt wasting (CSW)-associated hypotension. It may also help calculate cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP).
Temperature monitoring. Fever is associated with worse outcomes in neurocritical care and an increased one-year mortality in HIV-uninfected individuals with TBM 9. Pyrexia may indicate superimposed bacterial infection.
Medication evaluation and management
Important characteristics to monitor for anti-TB chemotherapy are described below and in Table 2.
Anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy. The optimum delivery of essential anti-TB chemotherapy is a priority, but optimal doses and administration routes are unknown 17. Prompt treatment and avoidance of therapy interruptions are essential to reduce mortality, and in unconscious patients, crushed medication administered via nasogastric tube, or intravenous therapy, may be considered 17, 18.
Anti-TB chemotherapy can change during the long duration of treatment. Regimen modifications may be necessitated by drug resistance, changes in weight, interactions with cytochrome P450-inhibiting anti-retroviral therapy (ART), and drug side effects, many of which cause and exacerbate critical illness 17. Rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and fluoroquinolones can cause liver injury; therefore, regular monitoring of alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and bilirubin is important. Optimal management of drug-induced liver injury in TBM is unknown and is currently being studied 19, 20.
Nutrition and the gastrointestinal tract
TB causes a chronic catabolic illness and patients commonly present with weight loss or failure to thrive in children. Additionally, TBM patients are at risk of the negative consequences of the catabolic stress of critical illness 21. Controlling glycaemia may be complicated by corticosteroids, which increase serum glucose. Nutrition in TBM often requires nasogastric tube placement when consciousness is reduced. Maintaining adequate nutrition is important to provide substrate for healing. Early feeding and avoidance of hypoglycaemia may improve outcomes after acute brain injury 22, but has not been studied in TBM.
Multidrug regimens, corticosteroids and anti-platelet drugs can lead to gastrointestinal intolerance and bleeding 23. Gastrointestinal bleeding may cause hypovolaemia and exacerbate reduced cerebral perfusion. Nausea and vomiting, common side effects of anti-TB chemotherapy, may further contribute to hypovolaemia. Aspiration of vomited gastric contents is a risk when consciousness is impaired. See Table 1 and Table 2.
Kidney function, fluid balance, and electrolytes
Kidney function. Acute dehydration may place patients at risk for hypovolemia and prerenal acute kidney injury. Chronic use of anti-TB chemotherapy may be nephrotoxic 24, 25. Obtaining baseline kidney function tests, including creatinine and urea, may identify those at risk of acute or chronic kidney injury. Changes in urine output or fluid balance may precede laboratory abnormalities. See Table 1 and Table 2.
Hyponatraemia and fluid balance. Fluid balance is an important distinguishing parameter between the causes of hyponatremia (sodium <135mmol/L). Central venous pressure (CVP) reflects the intravascular volume and helps determine hydration status. CVP can be measured continuously or intermittently from a central venous catheter most often placed in the internal jugular vein or femoral vein if they are available. CSW is often characterised by high volume urine output, hypovolemia with low CVP, clinical signs of dehydration (dry mucous membranes, delayed capillary refill time, tachycardia, and hypotension) and haemoconcentrated laboratory parameters (elevated haematocrit, haemoglobin or urea) 26. Conversely, the syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone (SIADH) lacks a high volume urine output, and patients are usually euvolaemic with a normal CVP, and no clinical signs of dehydration 26. Fluid balance charts may help identify these fluid shifts. Despite these distinguishing features, CSW and SIADH can be difficult to diagnose and other laboratory tests, such as serum and urinary osmolality and urinary sodium, may help further identify the aetiology, which is critical due to their divergent management approaches.
Hypokalaemia. Hypokalaemia may be a result of drugs or of poor nutrition, whereas hyperkalaemia may be due to hypoadrenalism either directly from TB or from withdrawal of corticosteroids. Monitoring low serum potassium and replacement requires an environment capable of close monitoring. The use of hypertonic saline, fludrocortisone and acetazolamide, individually or in combination, may rapidly shift electrolytes.
Risks of prolonged critical care admission
Pressure ulcers are common in immobile individuals requiring prolonged care. Nosocomial infections occur due to changes in patients’ immune system and placement of foreign objects, such as a central venous line, arterial line, urinary catheter or endotracheal tube. Urinary tract infections may occur secondary to urinary catheters. Further, impaired consciousness may require prolonged intubation and mechanical ventilation 27, which may be associated with a higher risk for gastrointestinal haemorrhage, septicaemia and pressures ulcers 28. Prolonged recovery and slow ventilator wean may involve tracheostomy placement.
Neurocritical care
In addition to general and critical care management, specific neurocritical care may assist in TBM management.
Neurological examination
Level of consciousness. The Glasgow coma scale (GCS) assesses level of consciousness. It can be confounded by intubation, sedatives, and pre-existing neurological conditions 17, 29. For paediatrics, modified GCS versions have been developed, but are used variably 29. Decreased GCS (<15) could be due to irreversible neurological injury and also reversible factors including electrolyte disturbances, raised ICP, seizures, and medication. Consequently, the GCS one week post-admission may be a stronger prognostic marker 30. A deteriorating GCS may signal worsening hydrocephalus, poorly controlled ICP, and progressive ischaemia.
Focal neurological deficits. Palsies commonly involve cranial nerves II, III and VI and can denote nerve arachnoiditis, ischaemia, a mass lesion, or hydrocephalus 31. Motor weakness and abnormalities may be due to ischaemia, infarction or brain shift.
Cranial examination. An enlarging head may signify subacute or chronic development of hydrocephalus in young children if their sutures are not fused.
General monitoring in neurocritical care
Blood pressure and cerebral perfusion. Maintaining normotension is important for adequate CPP, defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) minus ICP, which reflects the pressure gradient that drives cerebral blood flow (CBF) 32. Current treatment guidelines in traumatic brain injury (TBI) recommend maintaining age-appropriate CPP and MAP 32– 35. Hydration status and overall fluid balance, often compromised by CSW or poor oral intake, can affect MAP and subsequently CPP. TBM-specific goals for CPP and MAP are not established.
Ventilation and oxygenation. Oxygen administration may increase cerebral oxygenation and possibly reverse brain hypoxia 36. Oxygen and carbon dioxide (CO 2) levels also affect CBF and ICP. Decreased arterial oxygen and increased CO 2 both dilate cerebral vessels, which may increase cerebral blood volume and ICP 37. Conversely, aggressive hyperventilation may constrict cerebral vessels and cause ischaemia from decreased CBF 37. Therefore, tight control of end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2) is crucial to control raised ICP but avoid ischaemia and is an important parameter in TBI management guidelines, although the target level for TBM in unknown 33, 38. Both oxygenation and ventilation can be monitored noninvasively with pulse oximetry and ETCO 2 or invasively with arterial blood gases.
Temperature. Hyperthermia may increase cerebral metabolic rate and CBF, which can further increase ICP in a swollen brain 39. Induced hypothermia is experimentally neuroprotective but is associated with poorer outcomes in TBI 33, 34, 38. The target temperature in TBM is not established.
Head-of-bed elevation. Elevating the head end of a bed lowers ICP through improved venous drainage and extracranial shift of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). However, the MAP may also fall. In non-TBM pathology, studies suggest a beneficial or non-detrimental role of head-of-bed elevation to 30° 40– 42.
Neuroimaging
Infarcts may not be visible on admission computed tomography (CT) scans 43, 44, but diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is sensitive to acute/evolving infarcts 45, 46. Follow-up imaging is important to detect new infarcts 43, 44, 47 and, although there are little data on the temporal profile of infarct development, patients appear to be at greatest risk during the acute phase (first month).
Hydrocephalus is the commonest cause of increased ICP in TBM 44, 48. The communicating nature of hydrocephalus has implications for the safety of lumbar punctures and the method of treatment. However, communication cannot be determined from standard imaging 49 and lumbar exudate can confound determination of the level of CSF obstruction. ICP cannot be estimated from ventricular size alone on imaging 47. Hydrocephalus may persist or develop de novo over the first six months after treatment initiation; therefore, repeat neuroimaging may be warranted 10, 50.
Tuberculomas and TB abscesses occasionally complicate the management of TBM if they cause local mass effect 51 and precipitate CSF obstruction, focal deficits or seizures 44, 47, 52, 53. During treatment, paradoxical enlargement of established tuberculomas or development of new tuberculomas may necessitate follow-up imaging 44, 52, 54– 56.
Repeat neuroimaging can be used to monitor disease progression, evaluate deteriorating patients, and confirm the placement of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt or an external ventricular drain (EVD). The ideal timing of follow up imaging is unclear in stable patients.
Raised intracranial pressure
Raised ICP is a key factor precipitating adverse outcomes. Firstly, it reduces CPP and exacerbates existing cerebral ischaemia due to vasculitis. Secondly, generalised or compartmentalised increased ICP causes brain shift and consequent neural injury. ICP monitoring is useful; non-invasive monitoring techniques may be used when gold-standard invasive monitoring is unavailable. New monitoring techniques have potential for improving patient care, yet these are not widely available. Important points for the monitoring and optimisation of ICP are shown in Table 3 and Table 4.
Non-invasive intracranial pressure measurement and monitoring
Fundoscopy
Optic disc swelling can indicate raised ICP. However, fundoscopy is challenging to perform and highly operator dependent, and the development of papilloedema can be delayed.
Optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound
Changes in optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) due to raised ICP occur rapidly and can be measured using ultrasound 57. ONS ultrasound is quick, easy, and reproducible, and correlates with ICP 58, 59, although evidence for its use in TBM is limited 60– 62.
Compromised cerebral perfusion
Various neuromonitors have been used in non-TBM pathologies, to detect ischaemic brain injury 63– 65. These measure various facets of brain perfusion and each have strengths and limitations.
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound
Transcranial Doppler (TCD) can be used to measure flow velocity in basal vessels and detect vasculopathy; however, it may not detect mild-moderate ICP changes, is limited to flow in the major cerebral vessels, and is technically challenging 17, 66.
Non-invasive cerebral oxygenation monitoring: near-infrared spectroscopy. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a non-invasive monitor that uses optical technology to continuously assess brain oxygenation 67, 68. NIRS is limited by superficial penetration of cortex, distortion by the skull, CSF and oedema 67, 69, 70 and poor long term monitoring.
Invasive cerebral oxygenation monitoring: partial pressure of brain tissue oxygen tension. The partial pressure of brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO2) monitor is a thin parenchymal catheter that offers continuous monitoring of brain oxygenation 65, 71. Normal values have not been established; however, the risk of poor outcome increases with PbtO2 <20mmHg 72, especially <10mmHg 63, 71, 73, 74.
Invasive intracranial pressure measurement and monitoring. CSF opening pressure may be measured from the ventricles with an EVD or via lumbar puncture (when safe) 75. CSF drainage allows simultaneous ICP monitoring and treatment. Continuous monitoring is possible with a parenchymal probe.
Post-operative neurosurgery management. This includes wound review, suture removal, and clinical monitoring for signs of treatment failure. Repeat imaging can check treatment success. EVDs must be carefully managed to avoid life-threatening complications (infection and overdrainage-related intracranial haemorrhage). VP shunts are permanent and therefore complication rates must be viewed over the full lifetime of the patient.
Management of acutely decompensating patients
Causes for acute neurological decompensation include raised ICP, metabolic disturbances (i.e., hyponatremia, hypoglycaemia), stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) and seizures. Table 4 outlines a priorities-based checklist approach to the acutely decompensating patient. The rationale for this checklist is described below, unless already discussed.
Seizures
Clinical and subclinical seizures can increase ICP due to the increased cerebral metabolic demand and resultant increased CBF. Hydrocephalus, infarcts, tuberculomas, and electrolyte imbalance can all precipitate seizures. Anti-convulsants that induce cytochrome P450 enzymes, or are susceptible to enzyme induction by rifampicin, may complicate management.
Hyperosmolar treatment
Intravenous administration of a hyperosmolar solution creates an osmotic gradient, removing water from the brain and decreasing ICP 76. Hypertonic saline may lower ICP faster, further, and for longer than mannitol 17; however, no trials have directly compared these agents in TBM.
Raised intracranial pressure surgical management
Hydrocephalus
VP shunting has long been standard practice for hydrocephalus but may be associated with complications 77, 78. EVD may be used for temporary drainage of CSF, and to assess the benefit of a VP shunt in patients with an altered sensorium. With endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), CSF is drained internally by connecting the ventricles with the subarachnoid space via a stoma in the floor of the third ventricle. ETV is particularly challenging in TBM and experience is required 79, 80.
Mass lesions
Surgical excision for tuberculomas is uncommon but may be indicated depending on their size, location, expansion, and clinical consequences. Surgery is more commonly needed for TB abscesses (drainage and/or excision).
Data availability
No data are associated with this article.
Acknowledgements
Tuberculous Meningitis International Research Consortium
Rob E. Aarnoutse; Suzanne T. B. Anderson; Nathan C. Bahr; Nguyen D. Bang; David R. Boulware; Tom Boyles; Lindsey H. M. te Brake; Satish Chandra; Felicia C. Chow; Fiona V. Cresswell; Reinout van Crevel; Angharad G. Davis; Sofiati Dian; Joseph Donovan; Kelly E. Dooley; Anthony Figaji; A. Rizal Ganiem; Ravindra Kumar Garg; Diana M. Gibb; Raph L. Hamers; Nguyen T. T. Hiep; Darma Imran; Akhmad Imron; Sanjay K. Jain; Sunil K. Jain; Byramee Jeejeebhoy; Jayantee Kalita; Rashmi Kumar; Vinod Kumar; Arjan van Laarhoven; Rachel P-J. Lai; Abi Manesh; Suzaan Marais; Vidya Mave; Graeme Meintjes; David B. Meya; Usha K. Misra; Manish Modi; Alvaro A. Ordonez; Nguyen H. Phu; Sunil Pradhan; Kameshwar Prasad; Alize M. Proust; Lalita Ramakrishnan; Ursula Rohlwink; Rovina Ruslami; Johannes F. Schoeman; James A. Seddon; Kusum Sharma; Omar Siddiqi; Regan S. Solomons; Nguyen T. T. Thuong; Guy E. Thwaites; Ronald van Toorn; Elizabeth W. Tucker; Sean A. Wasserman; Robert J. Wilkinson.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust through an Investigator Award to Professor Guy Thwaites [110179]. This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust through funding to the Tuberculous Meningitis International Research Consortium.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Contributor Information
Tuberculous Meningitis International Research Consortium:
Rob E. Aarnoutse, Rob E. Aarnoutse, Suzanne T. B. Anderson, Suzanne T. B. Anderson, Nathan C. Bahr, Nguyen D. Bang, David R. Boulware, Tom Boyles, Lindsey H. M. te Brake, Satish Chandra, Felicia C. Chow, Fiona V. Cresswell, Reinout van Crevel, Angharad G. Davis, Sofiati Dian, Joseph Donovan, Kelly E. Dooley, Anthony Figaji, A. Rizal Ganiem, Ravindra Kumar Garg, Diana M. Gibb, Raph L. Hamers, Nguyen T. T. Hiep, Darma Imran, Akhmad Imron, Sanjay K. Jain, Sunil K. Jain, Byramee Jeejeebhoy, Jayantee Kalita, Rashmi Kumar, Vinod Kumar, Arjan van Laarhoven, Rachel P-J. Lai, Abi Manesh, Suzaan Marais, Vidya Mave, Graeme Meintjes, David B. Meya, Usha K. Misra, Manish Modi, Alvaro A. Ordonez, Nguyen H. Phu, Sunil Pradhan, Kameshwar Prasad, Alize M. Proust, Lalita Ramakrishnan, Ursula Rohlwink, Rovina Ruslami, Johannes F. Schoeman, James A. Seddon, Kusum Sharma, Omar Siddiqi, Regan S. Solomons, Nguyen T. T. Thuong, Guy E. Thwaites, Ronald van Toorn, Elizabeth W. Tucker, Sean A. Wasserman, and Robert J. Wilkinson
References
- 1. Kramer HS, Drews FA: Checking the lists: A systematic review of electronic checklist use in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2017;71S:S6–12. 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Semrau KEA, Hirschhorn LR, Marx Delaney M, et al. : Outcomes of a Coaching-Based WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program in India. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(24):2313–24. 10.1056/NEJMoa1701075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. : A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491–9. 10.1056/NEJMsa0810119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. : An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725–32. 10.1056/NEJMoa061115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Thao LTP, Heemskerk AD, Geskus RB, et al. : Prognostic Models for 9-Month Mortality in Tuberculous Meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(4):523–32. 10.1093/cid/cix849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kalita J, Misra UK: Outcome of tuberculous meningitis at 6 and 12 months: a multiple regression analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999;3(3):261–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chiang SS, Khan FA, Milstein MB, et al. : Treatment outcomes of childhood tuberculous meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(10):947–57. 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70852-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Modi M, Sharma K, Prabhakar S, et al. : Clinical and radiological predictors of outcome in tubercular meningitis: A prospective study of 209 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017;161:29–34. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. van Laarhoven A, Dian S, Ruesen C, et al. : Clinical Parameters, Routine Inflammatory Markers, and LTA4H Genotype as Predictors of Mortality Among 608 Patients With Tuberculous Meningitis in Indonesia. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(7):1029–39. 10.1093/infdis/jix051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Raut T, Garg RK, Jain A, et al. : Hydrocephalus in tuberculous meningitis: Incidence, its predictive factors and impact on the prognosis. J Infect. 2013;66(4):330–7. 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Cag Y, Ozturk-Engin D, Gencer S, et al. : Hydrocephalus and vasculitis delay therapeutic responses in tuberculous meninigitis: Results of Haydarpasa-III study. Neurol India. 2016;64(5):896–905. 10.4103/0028-3886.190258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Brancusi F, Farrar J, Heemskerk D: Tuberculous meningitis in adults: a review of a decade of developments focusing on prognostic factors for outcome. Future Microbiol. 2012;7(9):1101–16. 10.2217/fmb.12.86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Misra UK, Kumar M, Kalita J: Seizures in tuberculous meningitis. Epilepsy Res. 2018;148:90–5. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Thwaites GE, Duc Bang N, Huy Dung N, et al. : The influence of HIV infection on clinical presentation, response to treatment, and outcome in adults with Tuberculous meningitis. J Infect Dis. 2005;192(12):2134–41. 10.1086/498220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Heemskerk AD, Nguyen MTH, Dang HTM, et al. : Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Drug-Resistant Tuberculous Meningitis Treated With an Intensified Antituberculosis Regimen. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(1):20–8. 10.1093/cid/cix230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Yaramiş A, Gurkan F, Elevli M, et al. : Central nervous system tuberculosis in children: a review of 214 cases. Pediatrics. 1998;102(5):E49. 10.1542/peds.102.5.e49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Donovan J, Figaji A, Imran D, et al. : The neurocritical care of tuberculous meningitis. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(8):771–83. 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30154-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wilkinson RJ, Rohlwink U, Misra UK, et al. : Tuberculous meningitis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(10):581–98. 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Donovan J, Phu NH, Mai NTH, et al. : Adjunctive dexamethasone for the treatment of HIV-infected adults with tuberculous meningitis (ACT HIV): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:31. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14006.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Donovan J, Phu NH, Thao LTP, et al. : Adjunctive dexamethasone for the treatment of HIV-uninfected adults with tuberculous meningitis stratified by Leukotriene A4 hydrolase genotype (LAST ACT): Study protocol for a randomised double blind placebo controlled non-inferiority trial [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:32. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14007.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, et al. : Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(2):159–211. 10.1177/0148607115621863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Vavilala MS, Kernic MA, Wang J, et al. : Acute care clinical indicators associated with discharge outcomes in children with severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(10):2258–66. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Narum S, Westergren T, Klemp M: Corticosteroids and risk of gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e004587. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kwon SH, Kim JH, Yang JO, et al. : Ethambutol-induced acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(5):1335–6. 10.1093/ndt/gfh166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Sakashita K, Murata K, Takahashi Y, et al. : A Case Series of Acute Kidney Injury During Anti-tuberculosis Treatment. Intern Med. 2019;58(4):521–7. 10.2169/internalmedicine.0813-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Misra UK, Kalita J, Bhoi SK, et al. : A study of hyponatremia in tuberculous meningitis. J Neurol Sci. 2016;367:152–7. 10.1016/j.jns.2016.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Verdon R, Chevret S, Laissy JP, et al. : Tuberculous meningitis in adults: review of 48 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(6):982–8. 10.1093/clinids/22.6.982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Misra UK, Kalita J, Betai S, et al. : Outcome of tuberculous meningitis patients requiring mechanical ventilation. J Crit Care. 2015;30(6):1365–9. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.08.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F, et al. : The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):844–54. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70120-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. van Toorn R, Springer P, Laubscher JA, et al. : Value of different staging systems for predicting neurological outcome in childhood tuberculous meningitis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16(5):628–32. 10.5588/ijtld.11.0648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. van Laarhoven A, Dian S, Aguirre-Gamboa R, et al. : Cerebral tryptophan metabolism and outcome of tuberculous meningitis: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(5):526–35. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30053-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kochanek PM, Carney N, Adelson PD, et al. : Guidelines for the acute medical management of severe traumatic brain injury in infants, children, and adolescents--second edition. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012;13 Suppl 1:S1–82. 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31823f435c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kochanek PM, Tasker RC, Carney N, et al. : Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, Executive Summary. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(6):1169–78. 10.1093/neuros/nyz051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. McHugh GS, Engel DC, Butcher I, et al. : Prognostic value of secondary insults in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):287–93. 10.1089/neu.2006.0031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Spaite DW, Hu C, Bobrow BJ, et al. : The Effect of Combined Out-of-Hospital Hypotension and Hypoxia on Mortality in Major Traumatic Brain Injury. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69(1):62–72. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Figaji AA, Sandler SIJ, Fieggen AG, et al. : Continuous monitoring and intervention for cerebral ischemia in tuberculous meningitis. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9(4):e25–30. 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318172e8b7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Gibbs F, Gibbs EL, Lennox WG: Changes in human cerebral blood flow consequent on alterations in blood gases. Am J Physiol Content. 1935;111(3):557–63. 10.1152/ajplegacy.1935.111.3.557 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, et al. : Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(1):6–15. 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Schwarz S, Hafner K, Aschoff A, et al. : Incidence and prognostic significance of fever following intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2000;54(2):354–361. 10.1212/wnl.54.2.354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Feldman Z, Kanter MJ, Robertson CS, et al. : Effect of head elevation on intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and cerebral blood flow in head-injured patients. J Neurosurg. 1992;76(2):207–11. 10.3171/jns.1992.76.2.0207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Durward QJ, Amacher AL, Del Maestro RF, et al. : Cerebral and cardiovascular responses to changes in head elevation in patients with intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg. 1983;59(6):938–44. 10.3171/jns.1983.59.6.0938 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Mahfoud F, Beck J, Raabe A: Intracranial pressure pulse amplitude during changes in head elevation: a new parameter for determining optimum cerebral perfusion pressure? Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010;152(3):443–50. 10.1007/s00701-009-0520-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Rohlwink UK, Kilborn T, Wieselthaler N, et al. : Imaging Features of the Brain, Cerebral Vessels and Spine in Pediatric Tuberculous Meningitis With Associated Hydrocephalus. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016;35(10):e301–10. 10.1097/INF.0000000000001236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Thwaites GE, Macmullen-Price J, Tran TH, et al. : Serial MRI to determine the effect of dexamethasone on the cerebral pathology of tuberculous meningitis: an observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(3):230–6. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70034-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Misra UK, Kalita J, Maurya PK: Stroke in tuberculous meningitis. J Neurol Sci. 2011;303(1–2):22–30. 10.1016/j.jns.2010.12.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Andronikou S, Wieselthaler N, Smith B, et al. : Value of early follow-up CT in paediatric tuberculous meningitis. Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35(11):1092–9. 10.1007/s00247-005-1549-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Schoeman JF, Van Zyl LE, Laubscher JA, et al. : Serial CT scanning in childhood tuberculous meningitis: prognostic features in 198 cases. J Child Neurol. 1995;10(4):320–9. 10.1177/088307389501000417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Rohlwink UK, Donald K, Gavine B, et al. : Clinical characteristics and neurodevelopmental outcomes of children with tuberculous meningitis and hydrocephalus. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(5):461–8. 10.1111/dmcn.13054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Figaji AA, Fieggen AG, Peter JC: Air encephalography for hydrocephalus in the era of neuroendoscopy. Child’s Nerv Syst. 2005;21(7):559–65. 10.1007/s00381-004-1119-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Chan KH, Cheung RT, Fong CY, et al. : Clinical relevance of hydrocephalus as a presenting feature of tuberculous meningitis. QJM. 2003;96(6):643–8. 10.1093/qjmed/hcg108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Rajshekhar V: Surgery for brain tuberculosis: a review. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157(10):1665–78. 10.1007/s00701-015-2501-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Ravenscroft A, Schoeman JF, Donald PR: Tuberculous granulomas in childhood tuberculous meningitis: radiological features and course. J Trop Pediatr. 2001;47(1):5–12. 10.1093/tropej/47.1.5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Patwari AK, Aneja S, Ravi RN, et al. : Convulsions in tuberculous meningitis. J Trop Pediatr. 1996;42(2):91–7. 10.1093/tropej/42.2.91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Farinha NJ, Razali KA, Holzel H, et al. : Tuberculosis of the central nervous system in children: a 20-year survey. J Infect. 2000;41(1):61–8. 10.1053/jinf.2000.0692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Anuradha HK, Garg RK, Sinha MK, et al. : Intracranial tuberculomas in patients with tuberculous meningitis: predictors and prognostic significance. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15(2):234–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Shah I, Borse S: Paradoxical tuberculomas after completion of antituberculous treatment. Trop Med Health. 2012;40(1):15–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Rajajee V, Vanaman M, Fletcher JJ, et al. : Optic nerve ultrasound for the detection of raised intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(3):506–15. 10.1007/s12028-011-9606-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Dubourg J, Javouhey E, Geeraerts T, et al. : Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(7):1059–68. 10.1007/s00134-011-2224-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Robba C, Santori G, Czosnyka M, et al. : Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(8):1284–94. 10.1007/s00134-018-5305-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Godara SC, Srivastava VK, Godara S, et al. : Role of optic nerve sheath diameter measured by ultrasonography in the detection of increased intracranial tension in patients with tuberculous meningitis. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol. 2015;16(3):548–50. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 61. Bhatt S, Sangani S, Roberts J, et al. : The Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Cerebral Infections. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(4 Supplement):S92 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.07.285 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Sangani S, Parikh S: Can sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter be used to detect raised intracranial pressure in patients with tuberculous meningitis? A prospective observational study. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2015;25(2):173–6. 10.4103/0971-3026.155869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Figaji AA, Zwane E, Thompson C, et al. : Brain tissue oxygen tension monitoring in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Relationship with clinical, physiological, and treatment factors. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009;25(10):1325–43. 10.1007/s00381-009-0821-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Stiefel MF, Spiotta A, Gracias VH, et al. : Reduced mortality rate in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated with brain tissue oxygen monitoring. J Neurosurg. 2005;103(5):805–11. 10.3171/jns.2005.103.5.0805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Lang EW: Systematic and Comprehensive Literature Review of Publications on Direct Cerebral Oxygenation Monitoring. Open Crit Care Med J. 2013;6:1–24. 10.2174/1874828701306010001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Mayer SA, Chong JY: Critical Care Management of Increased Intracranial Pressure. J Intensive Care Med. 2002;17(2):55–67. 10.1046/j.1525-1489.2002.17201.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Smith M, Elwell C: Near-infrared spectroscopy: shedding light on the injured brain. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(4):1055–7. 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819a0301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Kurth CD, McCann JC, Wu J, et al. : Cerebral oxygen saturation-time threshold for hypoxic-ischemic injury in piglets. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(4):1268–77. 10.1213/ane.0b013e318196ac8e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Diedler J, Czosnyka M: Merits and pitfalls of multimodality brain monitoring. Neurocrit Care. 2010;12(3):313–6. 10.1007/s12028-010-9350-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Knirsch W, Stutz K, Kretschmar O, et al. : Regional cerebral oxygenation by NIRS does not correlate with central or jugular venous oxygen saturation during interventional catheterisation in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(10):1370–4. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01703.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Lang EW, Mulvey JM, Mudaliar Y, et al. : Direct cerebral oxygenation monitoring--a systematic review of recent publications. Neurosurg Rev. 2007;30(2):99–106; discussion 106–7. 10.1007/s10143-006-0062-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Valadka AB, Gopinath SP, Contant CF, et al. : Relationship of brain tissue PO2 to outcome after severe head injury. Crit Care Med. 1998;26(9):1576–81. 10.1097/00003246-199809000-00029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Wartenberg KE, Schmidt JM, Mayer SA: Multimodality monitoring in neurocritical care. Crit Care Clin. 2007;23(3):507–38. 10.1016/j.ccc.2007.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, et al. : X. Brain Oxygen Monitoring and Thresholds. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(Supplement 1):S-65–S-70. 10.1089/neu.2007.9986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Schoeman J, Donald P, van Zyl L, et al. : Tuberculous hydrocephalus: comparison of different treatments with regard to ICP, ventricular size and clinical outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1991;33(5):396–405. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1991.tb14899.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Ropper AH: Management of raised intracranial pressure and hyperosmolar therapy. Pract Neurol. 2014;14(3):152–8. 10.1136/practneurol-2014-000811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Rizvi I, Garg RK, Malhotra HS, et al. : Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt surgery for tuberculous meningitis: A systematic review. J Neurol Sci. 2017;375:255–63. 10.1016/j.jns.2017.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Lamprecht D, Schoeman J, Donald P, et al. : Ventriculoperitoneal shunting in childhood tuberculous meningitis. Br J Neurosurg. 2001;15(2):119–25. 10.1080/02688690020036801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Figaji AA, Fieggen AG, Peter JC: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in tuberculous meningitis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19(4):217–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Figaji AA, Fieggen AG, Peter JC: Endoscopy for tuberculous hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23(1):79–84. 10.1007/s00381-006-0195-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
