The discovery of novel antibiotics to tackle the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance is impeded by difficulties in accessing the full biosynthetic potential of microorganisms. The development of new tools to unlock the biosynthesis of cryptic bacterial natural products will greatly increase the repertoire of natural product scaffolds. Here, we report a strategy for the ectopic expression of pathway-specific positive regulators that can be rapidly applied to activate the biosynthesis of cryptic lanthipeptide biosynthetic gene clusters. This allowed the discovery of a new lanthipeptide antibiotic directly from the native host and via heterologous expression.
KEYWORDS: lantibiotic, lanthipeptide, plant-ant, Saccharopolyspora, cinnamycin
ABSTRACT
Most clinical antibiotics are derived from actinomycete natural products discovered at least 60 years ago. However, the repeated rediscovery of known compounds led the pharmaceutical industry to largely discard microbial natural products (NPs) as a source of new chemical diversity. Recent advances in genome sequencing have revealed that these organisms have the potential to make many more NPs than previously thought. Approaches to unlock NP biosynthesis by genetic manipulation of strains, by the application of chemical genetics, or by microbial cocultivation have resulted in the identification of new antibacterial compounds. Concomitantly, intensive exploration of coevolved ecological niches, such as insect-microbe defensive symbioses, has revealed these to be a rich source of chemical novelty. Here, we report the new lanthipeptide antibiotic kyamicin, which was generated through the activation of a cryptic biosynthetic gene cluster identified by genome mining Saccharopolyspora species found in the obligate domatium-dwelling ant Tetraponera penzigi of the ant plant Vachellia drepanolobium. Transcriptional activation of this silent gene cluster was achieved by ectopic expression of a pathway-specific activator under the control of a constitutive promoter. Subsequently, a heterologous production platform was developed which enabled the purification of kyamicin for structural characterization and bioactivity determination. This strategy was also successful for the production of lantibiotics from other genera, paving the way for a synthetic heterologous expression platform for the discovery of lanthipeptides that are not detected under laboratory conditions or that are new to nature.
IMPORTANCE The discovery of novel antibiotics to tackle the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance is impeded by difficulties in accessing the full biosynthetic potential of microorganisms. The development of new tools to unlock the biosynthesis of cryptic bacterial natural products will greatly increase the repertoire of natural product scaffolds. Here, we report a strategy for the ectopic expression of pathway-specific positive regulators that can be rapidly applied to activate the biosynthesis of cryptic lanthipeptide biosynthetic gene clusters. This allowed the discovery of a new lanthipeptide antibiotic directly from the native host and via heterologous expression.
INTRODUCTION
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is arguably the greatest health threat facing humanity in the 21st century (1–3). It is predicted that without urgent action, infectious disease will become the biggest killer of humans by 2050 (1). The majority of clinically used antibiotics are based on microbial natural products, isolated mostly from soil-dwelling Streptomyces species and other filamentous actinomycete bacteria, and these organisms remain a promising source of new antibiotics. Although the discovery pipeline began to dry up in the 1960s, blighted by the rediscovery of known compounds, we know from large-scale genome sequencing that up to 90% of microbial natural products are not produced under laboratory conditions (4). Thus, there exists a wealth of novel chemistry waiting to be discovered by mining the genomes of these organisms. Bearing in mind that >600 Streptomyces species and many other so-called “rare” actinomycetes have been described, thousands of potentially useful but “cryptic” bioactive compounds are waiting to be discovered, even from well-characterized strains (5, 6). Several approaches have been taken to activate cryptic pathways, including the heterologous expression of entire biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) in optimized Streptomyces host strains and the rewiring of BGCs to bypass their natural regulatory mechanisms (7). The knowledge that we have barely sampled the biosynthetic capabilities of known strains, and that even well-explored environments such as soil have been undersampled for antibiotic-producing microbes, provides a much-needed opportunity for the development of new natural product-based antibiotics.
Searching symbiotic niches for new actinomycete strains also shows great promise for discovering new natural products (8–11). We previously described the formicamycins, new polyketides with potent Gram-positive antibacterial activity produced by a new Streptomyces species that we named Streptomyces formicae KY5 (12). This species was isolated from a phytoecious ant species, Tetraponera penzigi, whose colonies inhabit the African ant plant Vachellia (Acacia) drepanolobium. The ants were collected in Kenya, hence the KY strain designation (13). These ants live in symbiosis with their host plants, the “whistling thorn acacias,” that have evolved specialized hollow stipular thorns called domatia to house the ants (14). In return for housing, plant ants protect their hosts against attack by large herbivores, including elephants (15), and recent reports have suggested that they grow specialized fungal communities inside their domatia, possibly as a food source for their larvae (16, 17). The external cuticular microbiome of T. penzigi ants is heterogeneous, and unbiased methods have shown that it is dominated by members of the phyla Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, with Actinobacteria forming a minor component (13). This contrasts with the better-studied fungus-farming leafcutter ants of the tribe Attini, which are dominated by actinobacteria, specifically, by a single strain of Pseudonocardia that can be vertically transmitted by the new queens (18, 19). Leafcutter ants feed cut plant material to their symbiotic food fungus Leucoagaricus gongylophorus and use antifungals made by their Pseudonocardia symbionts to defend their food fungus against fungal parasites in the genus Escovopsis (20–22). Despite the low abundance of Actinobacteria, we isolated several strains, including three from the rare actinomycete genus Saccharopolyspora, which, despite the modest number of described species, is the origin of the medically and agriculturally important natural products erythromycin and spinosyn. Erythromycin is a well-established clinical antibiotic that inhibits protein synthesis through binding to the 50S subunit of the ribosome (23). The spinosyns are structurally unique insecticides used for the control of insect pests and the protection of grain products. They derive from the fermentation of Saccharopolyspora spinosa and have potent activity and low environmental effect (24).
Genome mining of the isolated Saccharopolyspora strains identified a conserved BGC encoding a putative cinnamycin-like lanthipeptide antibiotic (lantibiotic) (25), although no products for this BGC could be identified from the wild-type isolates. Cinnamycin is a class II type B lantibiotic produced by Streptomyces cinnamoneus DSM 40005 which destabilizes the cytoplasmic membrane by binding phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) (25–27). Lanthipeptides belong to the ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptide (RiPP) family of natural products (28, 29), and cinnamycin is the founding member of a subgroup of lanthipeptide RiPPs with antibacterial activity that includes cinnamycin B (30), duramycin (31), duramycin B and C (32), and mathermycin (33) (Fig. 1A). These molecules are produced by actinomycetes and comprise 19 amino acid residues, several of which are modified to generate lanthionine or methyllanthionine cross-links (28, 29). Additional modifications include β-hydroxylation of the invariant aspartic acid residue at position 15 and formation of an unusual lysinoalanine cross-link between the serine residue at position 6 and lysine residue at position 19 (34–36). The interaction of these molecules with PE has therapeutic potential: duramycin binds to human lung epithelial cell membranes leading to changes in the membrane or its components, promoting chloride ion secretion and clearance of mucus from the lungs (27). On this basis, duramycin entered phase II clinical trials for the treatment of cystic fibrosis (37).
Here, we describe activation of the cryptic Saccharopolyspora lanthipeptide BGCs and the characterization of their product, a new class II lantibiotic that we called kyamicin. We also exemplify a heterologous expression platform for lanthipeptide production that may be particularly useful for strains that are refractory to genetic manipulation. The methodologies reported should be applicable for the activation of cryptic BGCs from a wide range of actinomycetes.
(This article was submitted to an online preprint archive [38].)
RESULTS
Origin, characteristics, and genome sequencing of Saccharopolyspora strains.
The Saccharopolyspora strains were isolated from ants taken from the domatia of T. penzigi plant ants collected in two locations in Kenya (13) and named KY3, KY7, and KY21. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified and Sanger sequenced using universal primers (GenBank accession numbers JX306001, JX306003, and JX306004, respectively). Alignments show that KY3 and KY7 are identical across the sequenced 16S rRNA gene region, while KY21 differs by a single base pair (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Further analysis showed that all three strains share 99% sequence identity with Saccharopolyspora 16S rRNA gene sequences in public databases. High-molecular-weight genomic DNA was isolated from each strain, sequenced at the Earlham Institute (Norwich, UK) using SMRT sequencing technology (Pacific Biosciences RSII platform), and assembled using the HGAP2 pipeline as described previously (39). This gave three circular chromosomes of approximately 6.33 Mbp, the full analysis of which will be reported separately. Alignment of the KY3 and KY7 genome sequences using RAST SEED Viewer and BLAST dot plot revealed a full synteny along their genomes with 99% to 100% sequence identity at the nucleotide level, suggesting KY3 and KY7 are the same strain and differ from KY21.
Identification of a conserved cinnamycin-like BGC.
The biosynthetic potential of all three strains was probed using the genome mining platform antiSMASH (40). The three genomes each harbor approximately 25 BGCs with significant overlap. Among these was a BGC for a cinnamycin-like lanthipeptide. The BGCs from strains KY3 and KY7 were identical and share 98% identity with that from KY21. They have an identical propeptide sequence encoded by the precursor peptide gene, suggesting they all encode the same molecule which we named kyamicin (Fig. 1B). The sequence and annotations for these three BGCs have been deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers MK251551 (KY3) and MK251553 (KY21).
Through comparison to the cinnamycin BGC (26) and cinnamycin biosynthesis (34), we assigned roles to each of the genes in the kyamicin (kya) BGC (Table 1). The kya BGC is more compact than the cinnamycin one, and the genes missing from the kyamicin BGC are dispensable for cinnamycin production (41). The cinorf11 gene is not required for cinnamycin production, but a homologue is present in the kyamicin cluster. While cinorf11 lacks a plausible stop codon and its reading frame extends 570 bp into the cinR1 gene, its homologue, kyaorf11, has a stop codon and does not run into the kyaR1 gene, suggesting it may encode a functional protein.
TABLE 1.
Kyamicin BGC (no. of aa) | Cinnamycin BGC (no. of aa) | Duramycin BGC (no. of aa) | Proposed function |
---|---|---|---|
KyaN (123) | CinN (119) | DurN (119) | Formation of lysinoalanine bridge |
KyaA (78) | CinA (78) | DurA (77) | Precursor peptide |
KyaM (1,065) | CinM (1,088) | DurM (1,083) | Formation of lanthionine residues |
KyaX (302) | CinX (325) | DurX (327) | Hydroxylation of Asp15 |
KyaT (327) | CinT (309) | DurT (352) | Export |
KyaH (294) | CinH (290) | DurH (290) | Export |
Not present | CinY | DurY | Not essential |
Not present | CinZ | DurZ | Not essential |
Not present | Cinorf8 | Durorf8 | Not essential |
Not present | Cinorf9 | Not present | Not essential |
KyaR (216) | CinR (216) | DurR (216) | Regulation |
KyaK (372) | CinK (354) | DurK (349) | Regulation |
KyaL (226) | CinL (236) | DurL (235) | Immunity |
Kyaorf11 (295) | Cinorf11 (396) | Durorf11 (396) | Not essential |
KyaR1 (260) | CinR1 (261) | DurR1 (261) | Regulation |
To detect production of kyamicin, we grew all three strains on a range of 13 liquid media (see Table S1) and collected extracts after 4, 5, 6, and 7 days of growth by using (individually) methanol and ethyl acetate. Analysis of the extracts using ultraperformance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) failed to identify the anticipated product (the methods were validated using authentic duramycin). This was consistent with parallel bioassays which failed to show any antibacterial activity for the extracts against Bacillus subtilis EC1524, which is sensitive to cinnamycin (26). Similarly, no activity was observed in overlay bioassays.
Activation of the kyamicin BGC.
Cinnamycin production and immunity ultimately rely on two gene products (41). The transcription of the biosynthetic genes is driven by CinR1, one of the Streptomyces antibiotic regulatory proteins (SARP) (which usually act as pathway-specific transcription activators), and immunity is conferred by a methyltransferase (CinL) that modifies PE in the membrane to prevent binding of cinnamycin. We reasoned that transcription of the homologues of these two genes (kyaR1 and kyaL, respectively), driven by a constitutive promoter, would circumvent the natural regulatory mechanism and initiate production of kyamicin. To achieve this, we made a synthetic construct, pEVK1, containing kyaR1-kyaL (in that order) (see Fig. S2A). The kyaR1-kyaL cassette was cloned into pGP9 (42) to yield pEVK4, which was introduced into the three Saccharopolyspora strains by conjugation. This resulted in single copies of the plasmid integrated at the φBT1 phage integration site of each strain. Exconjugants were assayed by overlaying with B. subtilis EC1524, revealing zones of clearing for all three strains containing pEVK4 (Fig. 2A; see also Fig. S3). For the KY21 exconjugant, agar plugs were taken from the zone of clearing, extracted with 5% formic acid, and analyzed by UPLC-MS (Fig. 2A). In contrast to the relevant controls, an ion at m/z 899.36 was observed corresponding to the expected [M + 2H]2+ ion of kyamicin (Table 2).
TABLE 2.
Compound | Formula | [M + 2H]2+
m/z |
Error (ppm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Calculated | Observed | |||
Kyamicin | C76H108N20O25S3 | 899.3551 | 899.3553 | 0.22 |
Deoxykyamicin | C76H108N20O24S3 | 891.3576 | 891.3557 | −2.13 |
Partially reduced kyamicin | C76H110N20O25S2 | 884.3768 | 884.3767 | −0.11 |
Partially reduced kyamicin | C76H112N20O25S | 869.3987 | 869.3990 | 0.35 |
Reduced kyamicin | C76H114N20O25 | 854.4204 | 854.4202 | −0.23 |
Duramycin | C89H125N23O25S3 | 1,006.9262 | 1,006.9232 | −2.98 |
Deoxyduramycin | C89H125N23O24S3 | 998.9287 | 998.9253 | −3.40 |
Heterologous expression of the kyamicin BGC.
Attempts to scale up cultures of Saccharopolyspora sp. KY21/pEVK4 to generate sufficient material for further study were not successful due to low titers and poor growth of the strain. Consequently, we attempted heterologous expression of the kya BGC in the well-established host Streptomyces coelicolor M1152 (43). To achieve this, we cloned kyaR1L as an NdeI/HindIII fragment into pIJ10257 (44); this yielded pEVK6, which has the constitutive ermE* promoter driving expression of kyaR1L. We then commissioned a synthetic operon containing the regions harboring kyaN to kyaH plus the upstream promoter region of kyaN as an EcoRI/XbaI fragment (Fig. S2B). This was cloned into pSET152 (45) to give pWDW63, which integrates into the S. coelicolor chromosome at the φC31 integration site, conferring apramycin resistance. pEVK6 and pWDW63 were then introduced sequentially into S. coelicolor M1152 via conjugation, and apramycin- plus hygromycin-resistant exconjugants were grown on R5 agar and overlaid with B. subtilis EC1524. In contrast to the control strains, these gave a pronounced zone of clearing. Agar plugs were taken from the zone of clearing, extracted, and analyzed by UPLC-MS, revealing the expected [M + 2H]2+ ion for kyamicin which was not present in the controls (Fig. 2B). In addition to kyamicin, a second minor new compound was observed with an m/z value of 891.36, consistent with the production of a small amount of deoxykyamicin, presumably reflecting incomplete β-hydroxylation of the aspartic acid residue at position 15 (Table 2 and Fig. S4).
Having established the production of kyamicin in the M1152 heterologous host, we used this system to better understand how each gene product contributes to the activation of kyamicin biosynthesis. We cloned kyaL and kyaR1 separately into pIJ10257 to give pEVK12 and pEVK13, respectively. Each plasmid was then introduced into M1152 alongside pWDW63, and doubly antibiotic-resistant exconjugants were selected. These were grown on R5 agar plates and overlaid with B. subtilis EC1524; agar plugs were extracted from the resulting bioassay plates as before. For M1152/pEVK12 (kyaL only) no growth inhibition of the bioassay strain was observed and we could not detect kyamicin or deoxykyamicin using UPLC-MS. For M1152/pEVK13 (kyaR1 only), we observed a zone of inhibition which was approximately three times smaller than for the M1152/pEVK6 (kyaR1L) positive control. UPLC-MS analysis of the M1152/pEVK13 strain detected only deoxykyamicin (Fig. S4). No significant change in overall titers was observed between these strains, and we ruled out the possibility of suppresser mutations in kyaX (encoding the hydroxylase) by PCR amplification and sequencing of the DNA encoding this gene and the surrounding region (data not shown). This is consistent with previous work which reported that deoxy versions of lantibiotics have lower biological activity (46).
Isolation, structure elucidation, and bioactivity.
To isolate and verify the structure of kyamicin, growth of S. coelicolor M1152/pEVK6/pWDW63 was scaled up in liquid culture, and the cell pellet was extracted with 50% methanol. Crude extracts were further purified using semipreparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to yield pure kyamicin (2.5 mg).
As the methyllanthionine bridges of kyamicin limit the ability to induce fragmentation in tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) experiments, the lantibiotic was subjected to chemical reduction with NaBH4-NiCl2 using a procedure published previously for the related molecule cinnamycin B (30). This leads to removal of the methyllanthionine bridges, and as anticipated, UPLC-MS of the product molecule showed an [M + 2H]2+ ion at m/z 854.42 corresponding to the loss of three sulfur atoms and gain of six hydrogen atoms (Table 2 and Fig. 3). Tandem MS experiments were carried out using both electrospray ionization (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) methods. While ESI gave a complex mixture of fragmentation ions, for MALDI-TOF, the y ion (NH3+) series could be clearly observed, with fragmentation at the lysinoalanine bridge appearing to occur via a rearrangement to give a glycine residue at position 6 and N=CH2 at the end of the lysine side chain (see Fig. S5). The connectivity of the peptide was consistent with the primary sequence of kyamicin predicted by our bioinformatics analysis.
The chemical structure was further examined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments comprising 1H, heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) spectroscopy, total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY), and nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) analyses. Overall, 14 spin systems were partially or completely identified in the TOCSY spectrum. These were putatively assigned based on their spatial relationship determined from the NOESY spectrum. Coupling in the HSQC spectrum then allowed identification of several C atoms in the molecule. Spectra and assignments can be found in Fig. S6 and Table S2.
The bioactivity of the purified compound was compared with cinnamycin and duramycin using the spot-on-lawn method. The MIC of kyamicin against B. subtilis EC1524 was 128 μg/ml, whereas duramycin inhibited at 32 μg/ml and cinnamycin at 16 μg/ml, representing 4- and 8-fold MIC increases, respectively (Fig. 4).
Cross-species activation of the duramycin BGC.
Many cinnamycin-like BGCs can be identified in the published sequence databases, but their products remain cryptic. Thus, the potential of the kyaR1-kyaL construct to induce expression of other cinnamycin-like lantibiotics was explored.
The BGC for duramycin was cloned previously from Streptomyces cinnamoneus ATCC 12686 (Fig. 5A), but attempts to produce the lantibiotic heterologously failed. Consequently, the duramycin BGC was reconfigured in pOJKKH, which contains all the biosynthetic genes but lacks immunity and regulatory genes and has a SARP binding site upstream of durN that is similar to that upstream of kyaN (Fig. 5B) (41). pOJKKH and pEVK6 were introduced sequentially into S. coelicolor M1152 via conjugation and the resulting exconjugants assessed for duramycin production. Overlay bioassays using B. subtilis EC1524 indicated the production of an antibacterial molecule by S. coelicolor M1152/pOJKKH/pEVK6 (Fig. 6). Agar within the growth inhibition zone was extracted and the resulting sample analyzed by UPLC-MS. An ion at m/z 1,006.92 was observed, corresponding to the expected [M + 2H]2+ ion for duramycin (Table 2). The production of duramycin was confirmed by comparison to an authentic standard. A deoxy derivative was also detected with an m/z of 998.93 (Table 2), typically at ∼30% the level of duramycin. Expression of pOJKKH alone or in conjunction with the empty pIJ10257 vector did not result in duramycin biosynthesis, demonstrating that expression of both kyaR1 and kyaL is required to induce heterologous duramycin biosynthesis in S. coelicolor M1152. Thus, we have shown that the SARP and immunity genes from a cinnamycin-like BGC from a Saccharopolyspora species can be used to activate a cinnamycin-like BGC from a Streptomyces species, a cross-genus activation.
DISCUSSION
Three isolates from the rare actinomycete genus Saccharopolyspora were isolated from the external microbiome of T. penzigi plant ants collected at two locations in Kenya more than 50 km apart (13). Despite this geographical separation, their genomes were extremely similar, and analysis using antiSMASH identified almost identical biosynthetic capabilities. Among the conserved BGCs was one encoding a cinnamycin-like lantibiotic, which we named kyamicin.
Despite culturing on a wide range of media, we were unable to elicit production of kyamicin in the wild-type Saccharopolyspora strains. The production of cinnamycin in S. cinnamoneus DSM 40005 requires the expression of two key genes, cinR1 and cinL, encoding a pathway-specific regulatory protein (a SARP) and an immunity protein (a PE methyltransferase), respectively (41). As the kya BGC contains homologues of these genes, we expressed them constitutively in the three Saccharopolyspora strains, which led to activation of the BGC and production of kyamicin. Since we were unable to isolate enough kyamicin from these strains for further study, a heterologous production platform was developed using S. coelicolor M1152, which allowed us to confirm the structure of kyamicin and assess its antibacterial activity. The chemical structure of kyamicin differs from that of cinnamycin and duramycin at 6 of the 19 amino acid residues but not at any involved in formation of the lanthionine or lysinoalanine bridges.
Having demonstrated the utility of a constitutively expressed SARP/immunity cassette for driving expression of the otherwise silent kya BGC, we utilized this knowledge to activate duramycin production in a heterologous host. Contemporaneous with our experiments, the duramycin BGC was also identified by genome sequencing of S. cinnamoneus ATCC 12686 (35). This analysis described the same genomic region containing durN to durH and surrounding genes (Table 1) but failed to reveal putative regulatory and immunity genes. Coexpression of durA, durM, durN, and durX in Escherichia coli was sufficient to direct the biosynthesis of duramycin A, and the functions of DurA, DurM, DurN, and DurX were confirmed by detailed biochemical analyses. Our subsequent bioinformatic analysis of the published genome sequence identified homologs of the immunity genes cinL and kyaL and the regulatory genes cinRKR1 and kyaRKR1 in the region from bp 54637 to 59121 of contig MOEP01000113.1 from the deposited genome sequence (accession no. NZ_MOEP00000000). This region is separated from the dur biosynthetic genes by a section of DNA with low GC content, the analysis of which suggests that a phage or other mobile element may have inserted between durZ and durorf8 (Fig. 5). Thus, it appears likely that the immunity and regulatory mechanisms described previously for the control of cinnamycin biosynthesis are conserved for duramycin biosynthesis in S. cinnamoneus ATCC 12686.
Given the potential utility of cinnamycin-like class II lanthipeptides in several therapeutic contexts, the ability to generate analogues of these compounds with modified properties and in sufficient quantity for preclinical assessment is of significant value. The methods described here provide a platform for the identification of additional natural lanthipeptides whose biosynthesis cannot be detected in the host strain and for the diversification of their chemical structures to generate new-to-nature molecules.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.
All bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 3. Saccharopolyspora and Streptomyces strains were grown on soya flour-mannitol (SFM) agar medium with appropriate antibiotics at 30°C unless otherwise stated. E. coli and B. subtilis EC1524 strains were grown on lysogeny broth (LB) medium with appropriate antibiotics at 37°C. R5 agar (47) was used for bioassay plates.
TABLE 3.
Strain or plasmid | Description | Reference or source |
---|---|---|
Strains | ||
Saccharopolyspora sp. | ||
KY3 | Strain from the cuticles of Tetraponera penzigi | This work |
KY3/pGP9 | KY3 strain carrying the empty pGP9 plasmid | This work |
KY3/pEVK4 | KY3 strain carrying pEVK4, which activates kyamicin production | This work |
KY7 | Strain from the cuticles of Tetraponera penzigi | This work |
KY7/pGP9 | KY7 strain carrying the empty pGP9 plasmid | This work |
KY7/pEVK4 | KY7 strain carrying pEVK4, which activates kyamicin production | This work |
KY21 | Strain from the cuticles of Tetraponera penzigi | This work |
KY21/pGP9 | KY21 strain carrying the empty pGP9 plasmid | This work |
KY21/pEVK4 | KY21 strain carrying pEVK4, which activates kyamicin production | This work |
Streptomyces coelicolor | Non-antibiotic-producing superhost, Δact Δred Δcpk Δcda rpoB(C1298T) | 43 |
M1152/pEVK6 | M1152 carrying pEVK6 | This work |
M1152/pWDW63 | M1152 carrying the kyamicin biosynthetic genes | This work |
M1152/pEVK6/pWDW63 | M1152 carrying the kyamicin biosynthetic genes and pEVK6, which activates kyamicin production | This work |
M1152/pWDW63/pEVK12 | M1152 carrying the kyamicin biosynthetic genes pEVK12 for constitutive expression of kyaL | This work |
M1152/pWDW63/pEVK13 | M1152 carrying the kyamicin biosynthetic genes pEVK13 for constitutive expression of kyaR1 | This work |
M1152/pOJKKH | M1152 carrying the duramycin biosynthetic genes | This work |
M1152/pEVK6/pOJKKH | M1152 carrying the duramycin biosynthetic genes and pEVK6, which activates duramycin production | This work |
Bacillus subtilis EC1524 | Bioassay strain; trpC2, subtilin BGC deleted | 26 |
Plasmids | ||
pGP9 | pSET152-derived φBT-based integrative expression vector | 42 |
pIJ10257 | oriT, φBT1 attB-int, Hygr, ermEp* | 44 |
pSET152 | ϕC31 attP-conjugative vector | 45 |
pEVK1 | pUC57/R1L Synthetic construct with kyaR1L genes | GenScript |
pEVK4 | pGP9/R1L for constitutive expression of kyaR1L in Saccharopolyspora | This work |
pEVK6 | pIJ10257/R1L for constitutive expression of kyaR1L in S. coelicolor | This work |
pEVK12 | pIJ10257/L for constitutive expression of kyaL in S. coelicolor | This work |
pEVK13 | pIJ10257/R1 for constitutive expression of kyaR1 in S. coelicolor | This work |
pWDW60 | pUC57/Kya synthetic construct with the kyamicin biosynthetic genes kyaN to kyaH | GenScript |
pWDW63 | pSET152/Kya for constitutive expression of the kyamicin biosynthetic genes in S. coelicolor | This work |
pOJKKH | pOJ436-based plasmid carrying the duramycin biosynthetic genes durN to durZ | This work |
DNA extraction and genomic analysis.
The salting-out method (47) was used to extract genomic DNA. The DNA was sequenced at the Earlham Institute (Norwich, UK) using SMRT sequencing technology (Pacific Biosciences RSII platform) and assembled using the HGAP2 pipeline (39).
Overlay bioassays.
For each strain to be tested, a streak from a spore stock was applied in the center of an R5 agar plate and left to grow for 7 days. B. subtilis EC1524 was grown from a single colony overnight and then diluted 1:20 in fresh medium and grown until an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.4 to 0.6. The exponential culture was mixed with 1:100 molten soft nutrient agar (SNA) (47), and the mixture was used to overlay the plate (5 ml SNA mixture/agar plate). The plate was incubated at room temperature overnight.
Extractions from overlay bioassays.
Plugs of agar 6.35 mm in diameter were taken adjacent to the streaked actinomycete strain on an overlay bioassay plate, corresponding to the zone of growth inhibition where one was observed. Agar plugs were frozen at −80°C for 10 min and thawed, and then 300 μl of 5% formic acid was added. This was vortexed briefly and shaken for 20 min. After centrifugation (15,682 × g for 15 min), the supernatant was collected and filtered using a filter vial (HSTL Labs) prior to UPLC-MS analysis.
UPLC-MS.
Data were acquired with an Acquity UPLC system (Waters) equipped with an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column, 1.7 μm, 1 mm by 100 mm (Waters), connected to a Synapt G2-Si high-resolution mass spectrometer (Waters). For analytical UPLC, 5.0 μl of each sample was injected and eluted with mobile phases A (water-0.1% formic acid) and B (acetonitrile-0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 80 μl/min. Initial conditions were 1% B for 1.0 min, ramped to 40% B within 9.0 min, ramped to 99% B within 1.0 min, held for 2 min, returned to 1% B within 0.1 min, and held for 4.9 min.
MS spectra were acquired with a scan time of 1.0 s in the range of m/z 50 to 2,000 in positive-resolution mode. The following parameters were used: capillary voltage, 3.0 kV; cone voltage, 40 V; source offset, 80 V; source temperature, 130°C; desolvation temperature, 350°C; desolvation gas flow, 700 liters/h. A solution of sodium formate was used for calibration. Leucine encephalin peptide (H2O-methanol [MeOH]-formic acid [49.95:49.95:0.1]) was used as lock mass (556.2766 m/z) and was injected every 30 s during each run. The lock mass correction was applied during data analysis.
Design of kya BGC activation and immunity plasmids.
pEVK1, a pUC57 derivative, contains the synthetic kyaR1 and kyaL (GenScript) arranged as an operon. pEVK1 has an NdeI site overlapping the start codon of kyaR1 and a HindIII site immediately after the stop codon of kyaL, with the two genes separated by a short intergenic region containing a ribosome binding site (RBS) designed from the RBS of cinN (chosen because its sequence is most similar in the BGC to that of an ideal RBS) (see Fig. S2A in the supplemental material). The NdeI-HindIII kyaR1L fragment from pEVK1 was cloned into pGP9 (42) to give pEVK4, and into pIJ10257, a φBT1-based integrative expression vector with a hygromycin resistance marker (44), to give pEVK6. kyaR1 and kyaL were amplified individually as NdeI-HindIII-compatible fragments using the primers AmplkyaR1-F (GCGCAAGCTTCTACGACGCGGTGTGA) and AmplkyaR1-R (GCGCGCCATATGAAACCGCTGTCGTTCC) for kyaR1, and AmplkyaL-F (GCGCGCCATATGGATCCAGTACAGACCA) and AmplkyaL-R (GCGCAAGCTTTCAGCGGTCCTCCGCC) for kyaL; they were cloned as NdeI-HindIII fragments into pIJ10257 to yield pEVK12 and pEVK13, respectively. PCR-generated fragments were verified by Sanger sequencing.
Cloning the duramycin BGC from Streptomyces cinnamoneus ATCC 12686.
The cloning of an ∼5-kb BglII fragment of chromosomal DNA to create pIJ10100 was described previously (26). This plasmid has a KpnI site in the middle of durX. KpnI fragments upstream and downstream of this KpnI site were identified by Southern blotting and isolated by creating a minilibrary of KpnI fragments in pBluescriptIIKS followed by colony hybridization to give pDWCC2 and pDWCC3, respectively. Analysis of the sequence of these plasmids identified 15 genes (shown in Fig. 5). A plasmid carrying the duramycin biosynthetic genes but not the putative phage DNA was prepared by digesting pDWCC3 with XhoI and HindIII (site is in the multiple cloning site of pBluescript II KS) removing the 5′ end of durZ and the putative phage DNA. This region was replaced with a XhoI- and HindIII-cut PCR fragment that reconstituted the portion of durZ removed in the previous step and introduced a HindIII site upstream of the durZ start codon. The 666-bp PCR fragment was generated using the primers BK10 (GAGCTTGACGCCGCCGAAGTAGC) and Hindprim (GCGGCGAAGCTTGAGGTGGCCTCCTCCACGAAGCCA) with pDWCC3 as the template and was cut with XhoI plus HindIII to give a 363-bp fragment. The resulting plasmid was then digested with KpnI plus XbaI (the XbaI site is in the multiple cloning site of pBluescript II KS), and the fragment carrying putative duramycin genes was cloned into KpnI-plus-XbaI-cleaved pOJ436 to give pOJKH. The KpnI fragment from pDWCC2 was then cloned into pOJKH cut with KpnI to give pOJKKH, which was verified by BglII digestion, thus restoring the original gene context.
Isolation and purification of kyamicin.
S. coelicolor M1152/pWDW63/pEVK6 was grown in tryptic soy broth (12 2.5-liter Erlenmeyer flasks, each containing 500 ml) and incubated at 28°C and 200 rpm on an orbital shaker for 7 days. The cells were harvested and extracted with methanol-water (1:1,500 ml) with ultrasonication for 2 h and subsequent shaking for 16 h. After centrifugation, the supernatant was filtered and concentrated under vacuum, giving 613 mg of crude material, which was then purified by semipreparative HPLC. Chromatography was achieved over a Phenomenex Gemini-NX reversed-phase column (C18, 110 Å, 150 mm by 21.2 mm) using a Thermo Scientific Dionex UltiMate 3000 HPLC system. A gradient was used with mobile phases A (H2O with 0.1% formic acid) and B (methanol): 0 to 1 min, 10% B; 1 to 35 min, 10% to 85% B; 35 to 40 min, 85% to 100% B; 40 to 45 min, 100% B; 45 to 45.1 min, 100% to 10% B; 45.1 to 50 min, 10% B; flow rate, 20 ml/min; injection volume, 1,000 μl. Absorbance was monitored at 215 nm, and fractions (20 ml) were collected and analyzed by UPLC-MS. Kyamicin was observed in fractions 22 to 25, which were combined and concentrated to yield an off-white solid (2.5 mg).
MIC determination.
The spot-on-lawn method was used to determine lantibiotic MICs. A 1,000-μg/ml stock solution of each lantibiotic was prepared using sterile water, along with serial dilutions from 256 to 8 μg/ml. B. subtilis EC1524 was grown and mixed with molten SNA as described above to create a lawn of bacterial growth. Once set, 5 μl of each dilution was applied directly to the agar and incubated overnight at room temperature. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration for which a clear zone of inhibition was observed.
Chemical reduction of kyamicin.
Kyamicin (1 mg) was dissolved in methanol (0.5 ml) and added to an aqueous solution of NiCl2 (20 mg/ml; 0.5 ml). The solution was mixed with solid NaBH4 (5 mg), resulting in the generation of hydrogen gas and the formation of a black Ni2B precipitate. The tube was immediately sealed, and the mixture was stirred at 55°C. The reaction progress was monitored by UPLC-MS as described above, for which a peak with an m/z of 899.36 was observed for kyamicin ([M + 2H]2+). The successive formation of peaks with the following masses was observed: m/z 884.38, 869.40, and 854.42, corresponding to the successive reduction of the three thioether bridges. After 5 h, only the ion with m/z 854.42 was observed, indicating that the starting material had been completely reduced. The precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 15,682 × g for 10 min. As the reaction supernatant contained only trace amounts of the desired product, a fresh solution of MeOH-H2O (1:1; 0.5 ml) was added to the precipitate and it was subjected to ultrasonication for 30 min. Reduced kyamicin was then detected in sufficient quantity for MS/MS experiments to confirm the peptide sequence.
MS analysis of reduced kyamicin.
For ESI-MS/MS analysis, the mass of interest (854.42) was selected using an inclusion list and fragmented using data-directed analysis (DDA) with the following parameters: top3 precursor selection (inclusion list only); MS2 threshold, 50,000; scan time, 0.5 s without dynamic exclusion. Collision energy (CE) was ramped between 15 and 20 at low mass (50 m/z) and 40 to 100 at high mass (2,000 m/z). Further increase of the CE from 20 to 30 and from 60 to 120 led to complete fragmentation.
For MALDI-TOF-MS, the samples were mixed with α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid as matrix and analyzed on an Autoflex Speed MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics GmbH). The instrument was controlled by a flexControl (version 3.4; Bruker) method optimized for peptide detection and calibrated using peptide standards (Bruker). For sequence analysis, fragments produced by post-source decay (PSD) were measured using the LIFT method (Bruker). All spectra were processed in flexAnalysis (version 3.4; Bruker).
NMR experiments.
NMR measurements were performed on a Bruker Avance III 800-MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to the solvent residual peak of DMSO-d6 (1H: 2.50 ppm, quintet; 13C: 39.52 ppm, septet).
Data availability.
The sequence and annotations for these three BGCs have been deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers MK251551 (KY3) and MK251553 (KY21).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) via Institute Strategic Program BB/P012523/1 to the John Innes Centre (JIC), by research grants BB/P021506/1 to B.W. and 208/P08242 to M.J.B, NPRONET Proof of Concept award BB/L013754/1 to B.W. and M.I.H., and research grants NE/M015033/1 and NE/M014657/1 from the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) to M.I.H. and B.W. E.V. was supported by a Norwich Research Park (NRP) studentship and the BBSRC NRP Doctoral Training Partnership grant BB/M011216/1. We acknowledge the Earlham Institute (Norwich, UK) for sequencing and assembly of the Saccharopolyspora sp. KY3, KY7 and KY21 genomes, which was funded by a Norwich Research Park Translational Award to B.W. and M.I.H. D.J.M.’s work on ants in Kenya is supported by the National Geographic Society, Nature Kenya, and the National Commission of Science Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI permit number MOST13/001/35C136).
We thank Juan Pablo Gomez-Escribano (JIC) for valuable input with analysis of the Saccharopolyspora sp. KY3, KY7, and KY21 genomes. We also thank Lionel Hill and Gerhard Saalbach (JIC) for excellent metabolomics support and Jesus Angulo and Ridvan Nepravishta (UEA) for their assistance with NMR data acquisition.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
REFERENCES
- 1.O’Neill J, Davies S, Rex J, White L, Murray R. 2016. Review on antimicrobial resistance, tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. Wellcome Trust and UK Government, London, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Harbarth S, Mendelson M, Monnet DL, Pulcini C, Kahlmeter G, Kluytmans J, Carmeli Y, Ouellette M, Outterson K, Patel J, Cavaleri M, Cox EM, Houchens CR, Grayson ML, Hansen P, Singh N, Theuretzbacher U, Magrini N, WHO Pathogens Priority List Working Group. 2018. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis 18:318–327. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30753-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Talkington K, Shore C, Kothari P. 2016. A scientific roadmap for antibiotic discovery. The Pew Charitable Trust, Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Doroghazi JR, Albright JC, Goering AW, Ju KS, Haines RR, Tchalukov KA, Labeda DP, Kelleher NL, Metcalf WW. 2014. A roadmap for natural product discovery based on large-scale genomics and metabolomics. Nat Chem Biol 10:963–968. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kämpfer P, Glaeser SP, Parkes L, van Keulen G, Dyson P. 2014. The family Streptomycetaceae, p 889–1010. In Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Thompson F, Stackebrandt E, Lory S. (ed), The prokaryotes: Actinobacteria. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nouioui I, Carro L, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Pukall R, Klenk H-P, Goodfellow M, Göker M. 2018. Genome-based taxonomic classification of the phylum Actinobacteria. Front Microbiol 9:2007. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rutledge PJ, Challis GL. 2015. Discovery of microbial natural products by activation of silent biosynthetic gene clusters. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:509. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.van der Meij A, Worsley SF, Hutchings MI, van Wezel GP. 2017. Chemical ecology of antibiotic production by actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:392–416. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Adnani N, Rajski SR, Bugni TS. 2017. Symbiosis-inspired approaches to antibiotic discovery. Nat Prod Rep 34:784–814. doi: 10.1039/c7np00009j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Van Arnam EB, Currie CR, Clardy J. 2018. Defense contracts: molecular protection in insect-microbe symbioses. Chem Soc Rev 47:1638–1651. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00340d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Molloy EM, Hertweck C. 2017. Antimicrobial discovery inspired by ecological interactions. Curr Opin Microbiol 39:121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Qin Z, Munnoch JT, Devine R, Holmes NA, Seipke RF, Wilkinson KA, Wilkinson B, Hutchings MI. 2017. Formicamycins, antibacterial polyketides produced by Streptomyces formicae isolated from African Tetraponera plant-ants. Chem Sci 8:3218–3227. doi: 10.1039/c6sc04265a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Seipke RF, Barke J, Heavens D, Yu DW, Hutchings MI. 2013. Analysis of the bacterial communities associated with two ant-plant symbioses. Microbiologyopen 2:276–283. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Young TP, Stubblefield CH, Isbell LA. 1996. Ants on swollen-thorn acacias: species coexistence in a simple system. Oecologia 109:98–107. doi: 10.1007/s004420050063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Riginos C, Karande MA, Rubenstein DI, Palmer TM. 2015. Disruption of a protective ant-plant mutualism by an invasive ant increases elephant damage to savanna trees. Ecology 96:654–661. doi: 10.1890/14-1348.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Blatrix R, Djieto-Lordon C, Mondolot L, La Fisca P, Voglmayr H, McKey D. 2012. Plant-ants use symbiotic fungi as a food source: new insight into the nutritional ecology of ant-plant interactions. Proc Biol Sci 279:3940–3947. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Baker CC, Martins DJ, Pelaez JN, Billen JP, Pringle A, Frederickson ME, Pierce NE. 2017. Distinctive fungal communities in an obligate African ant-plant mutualism. Proc Biol Sci 284:20162501. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Currie CR. 2001. A community of ants, fungi, and bacteria: a multilateral approach to studying symbiosis. Annu Rev Microbiol 55:357–380. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Andersen SB, Hansen LH, Sapountzis P, Sørensen SJ, Boomsma JJ. 2013. Specificity and stability of the Acromyrmex–Pseudonocardia symbiosis. Mol Ecol 22:4307–4321. doi: 10.1111/mec.12380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Barke J, Seipke RF, Gruschow S, Heavens D, Drou N, Bibb MJ, Goss RJ, Yu DW, Hutchings MI. 2010. A mixed community of actinomycetes produce multiple antibiotics for the fungus farming ant Acromyrmex octospinosus. BMC Biol 8:109. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-8-109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cafaro MJ, Poulsen M, Little AE, Price SL, Gerardo NM, Wong B, Stuart AE, Larget B, Abbot P, Currie CR. 2011. Specificity in the symbiotic association between fungus-growing ants and protective Pseudonocardia bacteria. Proc Biol Sci 278:1814–1822. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Heine D, Holmes NA, Worsley SF, Santos ACA, Innocent TM, Scherlach K, Patrick EH, Yu DW, Murrell JC, Vieria PC, Boomsma JJ, Hertweck C, Hutchings MI, Wilkinson B. 2018. Chemical warfare between leafcutter ant symbionts and a co-evolved pathogen. Nat Commun 9:2208. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04520-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lohsen S, Stephens DS. 2019. Current macrolide antibiotics and their mechanisms of action, p 97–117. In Capelo-Martinez J-L, Igrejas G (ed), Antibiotic drug resistance. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dripps JE, Boucher RE, Chloridis A, Cleveland CB, DeAmicis CV, Gomez LE, Paroonagian DL, Pavan LA, Sparks TC, Watson GB. 2011. Chapter 5. The spinosyn insecticides, p 163–212. Green trends in insect control. The Royal Society of Chemistry, London, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Benedict RG, Dvonch W, Shotwell OL, Pridham TG, Lindenfelser LA. 1952. Cinnamycin, an antibiotic from Streptomyces cinnamoneus nov. sp. Antibiot Chemother (Northfield) 2:591–594. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Widdick D, Dodd H, Barraille P, White J, Stein T, Chater K, Gasson M, Bibb M. 2003. Cloning and engineering of the cinnamycin biosynthetic gene cluster from Streptomyces cinnamoneus cinnamoneus DSM 40005. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:4316–4321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0230516100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Iwamoto K, Hayakawa T, Murate M, Makino A, Ito K, Fujisawa T, Kobayashi T. 2007. Curvature-dependent recognition of ethanolamine phospholipids by duramycin and cinnamycin. Biophys J 93:1608–1619. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.101584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Arnison PG, Bibb MJ, Bierbaum G, Bowers AA, Bugni TS, Bulaj G, Camarero JA, Campopiano DJ, Challis GL, Clardy J, Cotter PD, Craik DJ, Dawson M, Dittmann E, Donadio S, Dorrestein PC, Entian K-D, Fischbach MA, Garavelli JS, Göransson U, Gruber CW, Haft DH, Hemscheidt TK, Hertweck C, Hill C, Horswill AR, Jaspars M, Kelly WL, Klinman JP, Kuipers OP, Link AJ, Liu W, Marahiel MA, Mitchell DA, Moll GN, Moore BS, Müller R, Nair SK, Nes IF, Norris GE, Olivera BM, Onaka H, Patchett ML, Piel J, Reaney MJT, Rebuffat S, Ross RP, Sahl H-G, Schmidt EW, Selsted ME, et al. . 2013. Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide natural products: overview and recommendations for a universal nomenclature. Nat Prod Rep 30:108–160. doi: 10.1039/c2np20085f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chatterjee C, Paul M, Xie L, van der Donk WA. 2005. Biosynthesis and mode of action of lantibiotics. Chem Rev 105:633–684. doi: 10.1021/cr030105v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kodani S, Komaki H, Ishimura S, Hemmi H, Ohnishi-Kameyama M. 2016. Isolation and structure determination of a new lantibiotic cinnamycin B from Actinomadura atramentaria based on genome mining. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 43:1159–1165. doi: 10.1007/s10295-016-1788-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shotwell OL, Stodola FH, Michael WR, Lindenfelser LA, Dworschack RG, Pridham TG. 1958. Antibiotics against plant disease. III. Duramycin, a new antibiotic from Streptomyces cinnamomeus forma azacoluta. J Am Chem Soc 80:3912–3915. doi: 10.1021/ja01548a029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Marki F, Hanni E, Fredenhagen A, van Oostrum J. 1991. Mode of action of the lanthionine-containing peptide antibiotics duramycin, duramycin B and C, and cinnamycin as indirect inhibitors of phospholipase A2. Biochem Pharmacol 42:2027–2035. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(91)90604-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen E, Chen Q, Chen S, Xu B, Ju J, Wang H. 2017. Mathermycin, a lantibiotic from the marine actinomycete Marinactinospora thermotolerans. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e00926-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00926-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ökesli A, Cooper LE, Fogle EJ, van der Donk WA. 2011. Nine post-translational modifications during the biosynthesis of cinnamycin. J Am Chem Soc 133:13753–13760. doi: 10.1021/ja205783f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Huo L, Okesli A, Zhao M, van der Donk WA. 2017. Insights into the biosynthesis of duramycin. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e02698-16. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02698-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Xie L, van der Donk WA. 2004. Post-translational modifications during lantibiotic biosynthesis. Curr Opin Chem Biol 8:498–507. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Oliynyk I, Varelogianni G, Roomans GM, Johannesson M. 2010. Effect of duramycin on chloride transport and intracellular calcium concentration in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis epithelia. APMIS 118:982–990. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02680.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vikeli E, Widdick DA, Batey SF, Heine D, Holmes NA, Bibb MJ, Martins DJ, Pierce NE, Hutchings MI, Wilkinson B. 2019. In situ activation and heterologous production of a cryptic lantibiotic from a plant-ant derived Saccharopolyspora species. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/733808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Holmes NA, Devine R, Qin Z, Seipke RF, Wilkinson B, Hutchings MI. 2018. Complete genome sequence of Streptomyces formicae KY5, the formicamycin producer. J Biotechnol 265:116–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Blin K, Wolf T, Chevrette MG, Lu X, Schwalen CJ, Kautsar SA, Suarez Duran HG, de Los Santos ELC, Kim HU, Nave M, Dickschat JS, Mitchell DA, Shelest E, Breitling R, Takano E, Lee SY, Weber T, Medema MH. 2017. antiSMASH 4.0—improvements in chemistry prediction and gene cluster boundary identification. Nucleic Acids Res 45:W36–W41. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.O'Rourke S, Widdick D, Bibb M. 2017. A novel mechanism of immunity controls the onset of cinnamycin biosynthesis in Streptomyces cinnamoneus DSM 40646. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 44:563–572. doi: 10.1007/s10295-016-1869-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Andexer JN, Kendrew SG, Nur-e-Alam M, Lazos O, Foster TA, Zimmermann A-S, Warneck TD, Suthar D, Coates NJ, Koehn FE, Skotnicki JS, Carter GT, Gregory MA, Martin CJ, Moss SJ, Leadlay PF, Wilkinson B. 2011. Biosynthesis of the immunosuppressants FK506, FK520, and rapamycin involves a previously undescribed family of enzymes acting on chorismate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:4776–4781. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015773108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gomez-Escribano JP, Bibb MJ. 2011. Engineering Streptomyces coelicolor for heterologous expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters. Microb Biotechnol 4:207–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00219.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hong H-J, Hutchings MI, Hill LM, Buttner MJ. 2005. The role of the novel Fem protein VanK in vancomycin resistance in Streptomyces coelicolor. J Biol Chem 280:13055–13061. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413801200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bierman M, Logan R, O'Brien K, Seno ET, Rao RN, Schoner BE. 1992. Plasmid cloning vectors for the conjugal transfer of DNA from Escherichia coli to Streptomyces spp. Gene 116:43–49. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90627-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lopatniuk M, Myronovskyi M, Luzhetskyy A. 2017. Streptomyces albus: a new cell factory for non-canonical amino acids incorporation into ribosomally synthesized natural products. ACS Chem Biol 12:2362–2370. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hopwood DA, Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Chater KF. 2000. Practical Streptomyces genetics. John Innes Foundation, Norwich, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The sequence and annotations for these three BGCs have been deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers MK251551 (KY3) and MK251553 (KY21).