Herpesviruses are ubiquitous pathogens that cause lifelong latent infections and that are characterized by multiple entry pathways. We propose that herpes simplex virus (HSV) gC plays a selective role in modulating HSV entry, such as entry into epithelial cells, by a low-pH pathway. gC facilitates a conformational change of the main fusogen gB, a class III fusion protein. We propose a model whereby gC functions with gB, gD, and gH/gL to allow low-pH entry. In the absence of gC, HSV entry occurs at a lower pH, coincident with trafficking to a lower pH compartment where gB changes occur at more acidic pHs. This report identifies a new function for gC and provides novel insight into the complex mechanism of HSV entry and fusion.
KEYWORDS: herpesviruses, herpes simplex virus, viral entry, viral glycoproteins
ABSTRACT
Herpes simplex viruses (HSVs) cause significant morbidity and mortality in humans worldwide. Herpesviruses mediate entry by a multicomponent virus-encoded machinery. Herpesviruses enter cells by endosomal low-pH and pH-neutral mechanisms in a cell-specific manner. HSV mediates cell entry via the envelope glycoproteins gB and gD and the heterodimer gH/gL regardless of pH or endocytosis requirements. Specifics concerning HSV envelope proteins that function selectively in a given entry pathway have been elusive. Here, we demonstrate that gC regulates cell entry and infection by a low-pH pathway. Conformational changes in the core herpesviral fusogen gB are critical for membrane fusion. The presence of gC conferred a higher pH threshold for acid-induced antigenic changes in gB. Thus, gC may selectively facilitate low-pH entry by regulating conformational changes in the fusion protein gB. We propose that gC modulates the HSV fusion machinery during entry into pathophysiologically relevant cells, such as human epidermal keratinocytes.
IMPORTANCE Herpesviruses are ubiquitous pathogens that cause lifelong latent infections and that are characterized by multiple entry pathways. We propose that herpes simplex virus (HSV) gC plays a selective role in modulating HSV entry, such as entry into epithelial cells, by a low-pH pathway. gC facilitates a conformational change of the main fusogen gB, a class III fusion protein. We propose a model whereby gC functions with gB, gD, and gH/gL to allow low-pH entry. In the absence of gC, HSV entry occurs at a lower pH, coincident with trafficking to a lower pH compartment where gB changes occur at more acidic pHs. This report identifies a new function for gC and provides novel insight into the complex mechanism of HSV entry and fusion.
INTRODUCTION
Herpesviruses contain multicomponent fusion complexes and commandeer diverse entry pathways to enter target cells (1–5). Intracellular low pH facilitates entry of several herpesviruses in a cell-specific manner, a concept that was first demonstrated for herpes simplex virus (1, 6–13). HSV, the prototype alphaherpesvirus, utilizes distinct cellular routes to infect its main target cells in the human host (6, 8). HSV enters epithelial cells, the sites of lytic replication by a low-pH mechanism, and neurons, the sites of latent infection, via a pH-neutral one. HSV entry into human keratinocyte cell lines HaCaT and HEKa and into model CHO-HVEM (CHO-herpesvirus entry mediator) cells is inhibited by lysosomotropic agents that elevate the normally low pH of endosomes (Table 1). In contrast, entry into human neural cells IMR-32 and SK-N-SH and into model Vero cells is not blocked by lysosomotropic agents (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Cell | Type | Low-pH-dependent entry of HSVa |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|
CHO-HVEM | Chinese hamster ovary cell expressing HVEM | Yes | 6 |
HaCaT | Human epidermal keratinocyte | Yes | 8 |
HEKa | Primary adult human epidermal keratinocyte | Yes | 8, this study |
IMR-32 | Human neuroblastoma | No | 8 |
SK-N-SH | Human neuroblastoma | No | 8 |
Vero | African green monkey kidney | No | 35 |
Inhibited by ammonium chloride, bafilomycin A1, or monensin.
The cellular triggers of herpesvirus entry, including intracompartmental pH, remain incompletely understood. HSV entry requires a host cell receptor that binds to viral glycoprotein D, such as HVEM or nectin-1 (14–16), but additional virus-host interactions are likely critical for entry. HSV particles contain at least 12 different virus-encoded envelope proteins. HSV entry into all cells requires gB, gD, and gH/gL. However, the majority of the remaining viral envelope proteins are not thought to be required for entry via either low-pH or pH-neutral routes (17). Envelope proteins specific for a given HSV entry pathway have not been identified.
Glycoprotein B is conserved among herpesviruses and is a member of the class III fusion protein family. Unlike other class III fusion proteins such as vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G and baculovirus gp64, herpesviral gB alone is not sufficient for fusion and requires additional viral proteins, most commonly gH/gL (18). Activation and regulation of the fusion function of gB are incompletely understood. The gH/gL complex is thought to positively regulate gB (19–21). HSV-1 gB undergoes conformational changes during fusion and entry (22, 23). Low pH specifically induces reversible changes in gB domains I and V, which comprise a functional region containing hydrophobic fusion loops (22). Acid-triggered changes in specific gB epitopes correlate with fusion activity as follows: (i) HSV particles entering by endocytosis have reduced reactivity with gB domain I antibody (Ab) H126, and elevation of endosomal pH blocks this change (22); (ii) irreversible acid-triggered changes in the H126 epitope coincide with irreversible acid inactivation of HSV fusion and entry (24); and (iii) a hyperfusogenic form of gB has reduced reactivity with domain I and domain V antibodies, similarly to low-pH-treated gB (25). Thus, the acidic milieu of endosomes may serve as a host cell trigger of gB function.
HSV-1 gC, a 511-amino-acid, type I integral membrane glycoprotein, mediates HSV-1 attachment to host cell surface glycosaminoglycans. This interaction is not essential for HSV entry (26–28). Here, we report that gC regulates low-pH viral entry independently of its known role in cell attachment. We demonstrate that gC facilitates low-pH-induced antigenic changes in gB and that gC enhances the ability of HSV to enter and infect cells by a low-pH pathway. The results are consistent with the following model: in the absence of gC, HSV entry occurs at a lower pH, coincidently with trafficking to a lower pH compartment where gB changes occur at more-acidic pHs. We propose that gC modulates HSV entry mediated by gB, gD, and gH/gL into physiologically relevant cell types, such as human keratinocytes.
RESULTS
HSV-1 gC facilitates entry and infectivity of cells that support a low-pH entry mechanism.
HSV envelope glycoproteins gB, gD, and gH/gL are required for entry into all cell types regardless of whether intracellular pH is important for entry in a particular cell type (7, 29–32). A survey of seven additional viral envelope proteins indicated that HSV gE, gG, gI, gJ, gM, UL45, and Us9 are dispensable for entry mediated by either low-pH or pH-neutral pathways (17). In this study, we probed the role of gC in low-pH entry by employing an HSV-1 KOS strain with the gC gene deleted (HSV-1 ΔgC2-3 or ΔgC) and a repaired version of this virus containing the wild-type gC gene (HSV-1 gC2-3R or gCR) (33).
HSV-1 gC is widely recognized to initiate the viral entry process by attaching to host cell surface glycosaminoglycans, principally heparan sulfate proteoglycans (28, 34). When gC-negative HSV-1 is added to cells, there is a delay in entry from 20 to 60 min postinfection (p.i.) relative to wild-type HSV-1 (26). However, by 90 min p.i., the levels of penetration of wild-type and gC-null viruses are indistinguishable. HSV-1 lacking gC has a 1 log defect in infectivity (26). Thus, while gC is dispensable in cell culture, it remains important for the viral replicative cycle.
The contribution of gC to entry of HSV-1 by a low-pH pathway was evaluated. HSV entry into CHO receptor cells and human keratinocytes proceeds via a low-pH endocytic pathway and is well characterized (Table 1) (6, 8). The efficiency of HSV-1 ΔgC infection of CHO-HVEM cells and primary human keratinocytes (HEKa) was compared to the levels seen with Vero and IMR-32 cells, which support pH-neutral entry via penetration at the plasma membrane (8, 35, 36). To control for attachment, virus was first added to cells at 4°C for 1 h. Following a shift to 37°C for 6 h, the percentage of viral antigen-positive cells was determined. The levels of efficiency of HSV-1 gCR entry into each of the four cell types were similar under the conditions tested (Fig. 1A). In contrast, entry of HSV-1 ΔgC into CHO-HVEM and HEKa cells was ∼50% and 35% less efficient than entry into Vero and IMR-32 cells, respectively (Fig. 1B). This suggests that gC contributes to entry of HSV into CHO-HVEM cells and primary human keratinocytes.
gC contributes to HSV plating efficiency on cells that support a low-pH entry pathway.
To confirm and extend this observation using an alternative approach, the plating efficiency of HSV-1 ΔgC on different human cell lines was tested. The neuroblastoma SK-N-SH line supports pH-neutral entry of HSV, and HaCaT epidermal keratinocytes (EK) support low-pH entry (Table 1) (8). Titers of identical preparations of HSV-1 ΔgC and gCR were determined. The levels of gCR plating efficiency on SK-N-SH and HaCaT cells were similar (Fig. 2A). HSV-1 ΔgC showed ∼1 log lower plating efficiency on HaCaT cells than on SK-N-SH cells (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2B). This suggests that gC is specifically important for HSV infectivity of HaCaT cells.
To investigate a potential mechanism of the involvement of gC in low-pH entry, we determined whether ectopic expression of gC restored the infectivity defect of HSV-1 ΔgC in HaCaT cells. SK-N-SH or HaCaT cells were transfected with gC or gD plasmids, and then the plating efficiency of HSV-1 gCR or ΔgC was determined. Cellular expression of gC had no effect on the infectivity of HSV-1 gCR or ΔgC (Fig. 2C and D). Cell-expressed gD reduces HSV entry and infectivity by competing with virion gD for receptor binding (37). As expected, ectopic expression of gD in either of the cell types reduced infectivity of both HSV-1 gCR and HSV-1 ΔgC (Fig. 2C and D).
gC has no detectable effect on the protein composition of HSV particles.
To address the possibility that deletion of gC might affect the incorporation of gB or other viral proteins into the HSV particle, the protein composition of HSV-1 ΔgC was compared to that of gCR. The absence of gC from virions did not measurably alter the protein composition of particles as measured by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and protein staining (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). Envelope proteins gB, gD, gE, and gH were detected at equivalent levels in the two viruses by Western blotting (Fig. S1B) (38). As expected, gC was not detected in HSV-1 ΔgC virions. The rescuant gCR contains an amount of gC equivalent to that measured for the wild-type KOS parent (33) (data not shown). These results suggest that the defective phenotypes of HSV-1 ΔgC are not explained by indirect effects of the incorporation of gB, gD, or gH into viral particles and are consistent with gC playing a specific role in low-pH entry and infectivity of HSV.
Effect of ammonium chloride on low-pH entry of ΔgC HSV.
The members of the quartet of gB, gD, and gH/gL are essential for pH-neutral and low-pH entry. gC is dispensable for pH-neutral entry (39). To determine whether gC is essential for low-pH-dependent entry of HSV, we tested the effect of ammonium chloride treatment of CHO-HVEM, HaCaT, and HEKa cells on HSV-1 ΔgC entry using a reporter assay for entry. Ammonium chloride blocks wild-type HSV entry into these cells (Table 1). Ammonium chloride inhibited HSV-1 ΔgC entry into CHO-HVEM, HaCaT, and HEKa cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3D to F). HSV-1 gCR was similarly inhibited. Together, the results suggest that gC contributes to initial infection of cells that support a low-pH entry pathway (Fig. 1 and 2) but is not by itself a viral determinant of pathway selection (Fig. 3). Ammonium chloride had little to no inhibitory effect on HSV-1 gCR entry into Vero, SK-N-SH, or IMR-32 cells (Fig. 3A to C), which is consistent with pH-neutral entry of wild-type HSV in these cells (Table 1). Entry of HSV-1 ΔgC into Vero, SK-N-SH, or IMR-32 cells was similarly unaffected by ammonium chloride (Fig. 3A to C), consistent with the notion that gC is dispensable for pH-neutral entry of HSV (39).
gC does not contribute to viral attachment under the conditions tested.
The experiments described in this report were designed to exclude or limit the contribution of viral attachment to the entry and infectivity results. We assessed the role of gC in HSV-1 attachment to each of the cell types under the experimental conditions used in this study. HSV-1 ΔgC or gCR was added to Vero, CHO-HVEM, SK-N-SH, HaCaT, IMR-32, or HEKa cells on ice for 1 h at 4°C. Cell-attached HSV-1 levels were analyzed by quantitative PCR (qPCR). HSV-1 ΔgC attached to all cells in a manner similar to that seen with HSV-1 gCR (Fig. 4). CHOpgs745 cells lack a gene required for heparan sulfate biosynthesis. Both viruses exhibited defective attachment to control CHOpgs745 cells (Fig. 4). These results suggest that the altered entry and infectivity phenotypes of HSV-1 ΔgC seen under the conditions tested here cannot be explained by a defect in HSV-1 attachment.
gC drives the kinetics of viral penetration from acidic vesicles following intracellular transport of endocytosed HSV.
To probe further the role of gC in low-pH entry, we monitored the kinetics of intracellular transport of HSV-1 (7). Virus was attached to cells at 4°C for 1 h. Cultures were then shifted to 37°C, and at different times postinfection (p.i.), the remaining extracellular virions were inactivated by citrate treatment, and cells were lysed by two freeze-thaw cycles. Titers of lysates were determined on Vero cells. The detection of infectious HSV in cell lysates reflects the presence of enveloped HSV within cellular endocytic compartments. As expected, HSV uptake into vesicles was rapid. At 10 min p.i. in CHO-HVEM cells, there was a peak of intracellular, infectious gCR virus (Fig. 5A). Following endocytic uptake, HSV fuses rapidly with the endosomal membrane and releases its capsid into the cytosol (7). This was reflected in the sharp decrease in the level of infectious enveloped gCR recovered by 20 min p.i. (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, ∼50% of infectious, intracellular HSV-1 ΔgC was recovered as late as 40 min p.i., suggesting a delay in HSV fusion with endocytic compartments in the absence of gC (Fig. 5A). Analysis of HSV-1 gCR and ΔgC trafficking in HEKa cells yielded results similar to those seen with CHO-HVEM cells (Fig. 5B). For HSV-1 ΔgC entry into the primary human keratinocytes, there was an ∼40-min lag in the intracellular transport and exit of HSV relative to HSV-1 gCR (Fig. 5B). The results presented in Fig. 5 suggest an important postattachment role for gC in the first ∼20 min of wild-type infection. The absence of gC appears to have been overcome by ∼60 to 120 min p.i., perhaps reflecting the reason that gC is not absolutely essential for low-pH entry when longer-term assays are employed. An alternative possibility is that gC-null viruses lose recoverable infectivity because they are degraded whereas wild-type and rescue HSVs lose recoverability because they complete the fusion process. Together, the results suggest that gC mediates rapid intracellular transport of enveloped HSV or may aid in rapid exit of HSV from acidic intracellular vesicles.
gC positively regulates low-pH-induced antigenic changes in gB.
To further delineate the mechanism underlying the role of gC in low-pH entry, the effect of gC on low-pH-triggered antigenic changes in gB was assessed. The prefusion conformation of gB in the virion envelope undergoes low-pH-triggered changes in gB domains I and V (22). These changes are at least partially reversible (22, 40, 41) and are thought to be important for membrane fusion (22, 24, 25). Domain I of gB contains internal hydrophobic fusion loops that are critical for membrane fusion (42, 43). HSV-1 ΔgC or gCR virions were treated with a range of mildly acidic pHs (5.0 to 7.3) and blotted immediately to nitrocellulose membrane. Blots were probed at neutral pH with nine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to distinct epitopes in gB, and antibody reactivity was detected and quantitated (Fig. 6). Results of a single representative dot blot experiment representing one antibody to each of six gB structural domains are shown in Fig. S2.
As a reference for comparing HSV-1 ΔgC to HSV-1 gCR, the pH treatment that reduced MAb reactivity by >50% is indicated (Fig. 6). Domain I MAb H126 showed reduced reactivity with gB from HSV-1 gCR that had been subjected to acid treatment but, interestingly, exhibited little reduction with gB from HSV-1 ΔgC that had been similarly treated (Fig. 6). Using 50% reactivity as a reference point, in the absence of gC, the pH at which changes in the accessibility of the H126 gB epitope occurred was reduced by at least 0.6 pH units (Fig. 6). Similar results were obtained with SS55, another MAb to gB domain I. For SS55, the pH of gB conformational change in HSV-1 ΔgC was reduced by ∼0.5 pH units relative to gCR (Fig. 6). We have not previously examined the effect of low pH on gB domain II. Interestingly, MAbs to domain II, namely, H1781 and H1838, showed reduced binding to gCR virions that had been treated with mildly acidic pH, suggesting that gB domain II undergoes pH-triggered conformational change (Fig. 6; see also Fig. S2). The pH of antigenic change in both of the domain II epitopes tested was decreased in the absence of gC (Fig. 6). H1838 reactivity with gB in the ΔgC virus was particularly resistant to low pH; treatment with pH 5.0, the lowest pH tested, still resulted in >50% reactivity, suggesting that gC alters the pH of antigenic change in the H1838 epitope of gB by >0.7 pH units (Fig. 6). Domain III MAb H1359 had >50% reduced reactivity only with gB from HSV-1 gCR that had been treated under the most acidic condition tested, i.e., pH 5.0. The H1359 epitope in HSV-1 ΔgC was more resistant to pH 5.0 treatment than that in HSV-1 gCR.
Acidic pH triggers specific but not global changes in gB conformation, as low pH does not induce changes in the SS10 (domain IV) or H1817 (domain VI) epitopes of gB (16). The SS10 and H1817 epitopes in both gCR and ΔgC viruses were not altered by pH (Fig. 6). In contrast, gB domain V from wild-type HSV is known to undergo pH-induced conformational change. Following pH 5.0 treatment, domain V MAbs SS106 and SS144 showed a >50% reduction in reactivity with gB from both HSV-1 gCR and HSV-1 ΔgC, but gB from HSV-1 ΔgC was more resistant. This suggests that gC has an effect on low-pH-triggered change in gB domain V (Fig. 6).
A control deletion of a viral envelope glycoprotein gene other than the gC gene did not alter the pH of gB antigenic change of a representative epitope (Fig. S3). The gB H126 epitope (domain I) in HSV that lacks gE (HSV-1 F-gE/GFP [green fluorescent protein]) underwent pH-induced changes similar to those shown by gB from wild-type virus strain F. As a control, the H1817 (domain VI) epitope was unaffected by low pH regardless of the presence of gE (Fig. S3). Together, the results suggest that HSV-1 gC specifically increases the pH threshold of gB conformational change, particularly in domains I and II. This is consistent with gC facilitating low-pH entry and infectivity of HSV (Fig. 1, 2, and 5), possibly at the level of fusion with an endosomal membrane. Cargo transiting the host lysosome-terminal endocytosis pathway is subjected to decreasing pH (from ∼6.5 to 4.5). HSV colocalizes with endocytosis markers, but the specific fusion compartment involved has not been identified (8, 44). Intracellular transport of gC-negative HSV may be delayed because transit to a lower pH compartment is necessary for fusion-associated changes in gB.
The pH threshold of reversibility of conformational changes in gB.
Reversibility of pH-triggered changes is a hallmark of gB and other class III fusion proteins (22, 45, 46). Prefusion and postfusion forms of class III proteins are proposed to exist in a pH equilibrium that is shifted to the postfusion state by acidic pH (47). During HSV egress, reversibility may allow gB on progeny virions to avoid nonproductive activation during transport through low-pH secretory vesicles. The pH threshold of initiation of gB conformational change is ∼6.2 to 6.4 (22). The pH at which acid-treated gB reverts to a pH-neutral conformation is not known. To determine this, virions were treated with pH 5 or maintained at pH 7.3 for 10 min at 37°C. The pH 5-treated samples were subjected to different target pHs for 10 min at 37°C to determine the pH at which reversibility occurs. Samples were then blotted to membrane and probed with representative MAbs to gB (Fig. 7). Upon treatment with a low pH of 5, there was reduced reactivity of MAb H126 (domain I) (Fig. 7A), H1781 (domain II) (Fig. 7B), and SS144 (domain V) (Fig. 7C) but not of MAb H1817 (domain VI) (Fig. 7D). Consistent with the data shown in Fig. 6, the reduction of gB antibody reactivity with HSV-1 ΔgC was less pronounced. Upon increasing the pH of gCR from 5.0 to 5.6, there was a partial restoration of gB antibody reactivity. Increasing the pH to 6.2 to 6.6 resulted in restoration of >80% of the reactivity measured at pH 7.3. This suggests that the threshold of reversibility of HSV gB conformational change is between pH 5.0 and 5.6. gB appears to be conformationally labile in this pH range.
To assess the influence of gC on the reversibility of gB conformational changes, ΔgC virions were tested for the reversibility of pH-triggered changes in the H126, H1781, SS144, and H1817 epitopes of gB. The results suggest that gC had little influence on the reversibility of gB conformational changes as measured here (Fig. 7A to C); rather, gC had a greater impact on the initial low-pH-induced antigenic changes in gB (Fig. 6; see also Fig. S2).
Mildly acidic pH changes in gB oligomeric conformation are independent of gC.
An independent indicator of pH-induced alterations in gB is a shift to a lower-density gB oligomer in response to acid treatment (22). The role of gC in gB oligomeric changes was tested with MAb DL16, which recognizes an oligomer-specific epitope within gB domain V (48). When either HSV-1 ΔgC or gCR was pretreated with low pH, the levels of DL16 reactivity were similarly reduced (Fig. 8A), distinguishing the DL16 epitope on gB from the other acid-sensitive epitopes (Fig. 6). This result signifies acid-triggered change in the oligomeric conformation of gB (Fig. 8A) regardless of the presence or absence of gC. This outcome was confirmed by an independent measure of gB oligomeric conformation. When HSV is first treated with low pH and then subjected to 1% SDS and native PAGE, the slower-migrating, higher-molecular-weight (HMW) species of gB oligomer disappears, suggesting a change in gB oligomeric conformation (22). Using this approach, the HMW gB oligomer from HSV-1 ΔgC disappeared in a manner similar to that seen with gB from the control rescuant virus gCR (Fig. 8B). Although gC regulates low-pH induced antigenic changes in gB (Fig. 6), it does not appear to affect acid-triggered alterations in the gB oligomer. This is consistent with the notion that similarly low pH levels trigger both antigenic and oligomeric alterations in gB but that these changes are experimentally separable and not identical (24).
Since the changes in gB oligomeric conformation did not require gC, we expected that their reversibility would also be independent of gC. This was indeed the case. Acid-induced reduction of reactivity with the oligomer-specific MAb DL16 was partially reversible in both ΔgC and gCR viruses (Fig. 8C). Likewise, the susceptibility of low-pH-treated gB oligomer to disruption by 1% SDS was also reversible, regardless of the presence or absence of gC (Fig. 8D). Thus, the reversibility of low-pH-triggered conformational changes in the gB oligomer is independent of gC.
DISCUSSION
Knowledge of the mechanisms underlying how herpesviruses traverse distinct cellular entry pathways is paramount for our understanding of these important pathogens. The experiments described here reveal a selective role for HSV-1 gC in low-pH entry. HSV-1 gC confers an infectivity advantage in cells that support low-pH entry of HSV-1, such as human keratinocytes. There is a lag in the exit of enveloped gC-negative particles from endocytic compartments, which may reflect a role for gC in optimal virus trafficking or low-pH fusion. Low-pH-triggered antigenic changes in gB domains I, II, and V are thought to be critical for fusion (22, 40, 41, 49–51) (Fig. 6; see also Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). gC facilitates pH-induced gB conformational changes, increasing the pH of antigenic change by as much as 0.4 to 0.7 pH units. The reduced entry of gC-negative HSV may be explained by the role of gC in facilitating fusion-associated conformational changes in gB, which result in optimal penetration from an endocytic compartment. Importantly, in the absence of gC, HSV still uses a low-pH pathway to enter and infect cells, likely mediated in part by changes in gB that occur in the absence of gC, albeit at a lower pH.
We very recently demonstrated that HSV-1 gC protects gB from neutralizing antibodies (38). HSV-1 gC also binds to complement component C3b and inhibits complement-mediated immunity (52). When HSV particles were treated with soluble heparin in a cell-free assay, the UL16 tegument protein was rearranged in a gC-dependent manner (53). The role of gC in entry mediated by an acidic endosomal pathway as described here is independent of its role in attachment to cell surface heparan sulfate.
Viral envelope glycoprotein B (gB) is highly conserved among all subfamilies of the Herpesviridae. Current models of HSV-1 entry posit that (i) gC (and, to a lesser extent, gB) mediates viral attachment to host cell surface glycosaminoglycans and that (ii) gD binds to a cognate host cell receptor such as HVEM or nectin-1, resulting in pH-independent conformational change in gD; this is thought to (iii) transmit a signal to gH/gL and (iv) culminate in the execution of membrane fusion by gB. Thus, gB, unlike other members of the class III fusion protein family, does not mediate fusion on its own. In addition to pH-triggered changes in gB domains I and V, we show here that acid-induced antigenic changes also occur in domain II (Fig. 6; see also Fig. S2).
There is structure-based evidence that gB can exist in multiple conformations. The postfusion structure of gB is known, and distinct, membrane-associated nonpostfusion forms that may reflect the prefusion conformation have also been resolved (54–56). MAbs that bind specifically to either prefusion or postfusion gB have not been identified. Antibody binding to prefusion gB present in virions that are pretreated with low pH does not disappear completely; instead, there are decreases in antibody reactivity. Low pH causes gB to assume a nonprefusion form but is likely not sufficient to shift gB to the postfusion form. In the absence of gC, the pH threshold for gB conformational changes, particularly in domain I and II, is lower by 0.4 to 0.7 pH units (Fig. 6). In comparison, variants and mutants of influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) exhibit an approximately 0.2 to 0.6 shift in the pH associated with both conformational change and fusion (57, 58). The H126 epitope in the fusion domain of gB might be particularly important for the pH activation of fusion (24). In the absence of gC, a more acidic pH is required to trigger changes in the accessibility of the H126 epitope.
The cell tropism of herpesvirus entry and infection is influenced by subfamily-specific viral proteins. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) gp42 is required for fusion and entry in B cells but not epithelial cells (59–63). The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) pentamer complex of envelope proteins is necessary for endosomal entry into epithelial and endothelial cells but not for pH-neutral entry into fibroblasts (10, 11, 64–66). However, the details of the mechanism underlying the role of EBV gp42 or the HCMV pentamer in selection of the entry pathway are not known. Alphaherpesvirus-specific protein gC is the first HSV envelope protein to have been reported to selectively participate in endocytic entry. Here, we suggest that gC is important for HSV-1 epithelial infection but is less so for neuronal entry. The results are consistent with a mechanism whereby gC acts to ensure that gB undergoes optimal conformational change to mediate fusion with an appropriate endosomal compartment.
The results suggest a functional interaction between gC and gB. Direct interaction between gC and gB has not been detected by coimmunoprecipitation approaches at different pHs (data not shown). Low-affinity or transient interactions may not be captured, or gC may exert an indirect effect on gB through another viral or host factor. Physical interactions between HSV-1 gB and gH have also been difficult to detect, despite previous demonstrations of functional interactions (20, 21, 67). Future investigation of gC-gB interactions could include split-fluorescent protein, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), or proximity ligation approaches. We propose a model whereby gC aids gB and, together with gD and gH/gL, allows rapid entry of HSV-1 into epithelial cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells and viruses.
Human HaCaT epithelial keratinocytes and Vero cells were propagated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Atlanta Biologicals). Nondifferentiated human SK-N-SH and IMR-32 neuroblastoma cells (ATCC) were propagated in Eagle’s minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, and Earle’s salts (Invitrogen). CHO-HVEM (M1A) cells (68) (provided by R. Eisenberg and G. Cohen, University of Pennsylvania) are stably transformed with the human HVEM gene and contain the Escherichia coli lacZ gene under the control of the HSV-1 ICP4 gene promoter. CHO-HVEM cells were propagated in Ham’s F-12 nutrient mixture (Gibco/Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FBS, 150 μg of puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)/ml, and 250 μg of G418 sulfate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA)/ml. Cells were subcultured in nonselective medium prior to use in all experiments. Primary human epidermal keratinocytes (HEKa) (ATCC) were maintained up to passage 8 in dermal cell basal medium (ATCC) supplemented with a keratinocyte growth kit (ATCC) and penicillin-streptomycin-amphotericin B solution (ATCC). CHOpgs745 cells (ATCC), which lack a gene required for heparan sulfate biosynthesis, were propagated in Ham’s F-12 nutrient mixture supplemented with 10% FBS.
HSV-1 strain KOS and all viruses in this study were propagated and titers were determined on Vero cells. HSV-1 genome copy numbers were determined by qPCR (69). HSV-1 (KOS) ΔgC2-3 or HSV-1 ΔgC is HSV-1 KOS in which most of the gC gene was deleted and replaced by lacZ (33); this virus is considered a gC-negative HSV-1 strain. HSV-1 (KOS) gC2-3Rev virus or HSV-1 gCR is a recombinant in which HSV-1 (KOS) ΔgC2-3 was rescued by insertion of the wild-type gC gene (33). Both viruses were obtained from C. Brandt, University of Wisconsin—Madison. The viral genomes have not been sequenced. However, HSV-1 gCR and the parental KOS strain are indistinguishable in terms of specific infectivity, cell attachment, heparan sulfate binding, and infectivity. Their genomes are similar as measured by restriction enzyme analysis and Southern blotting (33). In addition, the phenotypes attributed to HSV-1 gCR in this study are similar to those previously reported for HSV-1 wild-type strain KOS (6–8, 22, 24, 70, 71). HSV-1 F-gE/GFP (obtained from D. Johnson, Oregon Health Sciences University) lacks the gE gene (72).
Antibodies.
Anti-gB mouse monoclonal antibodies H126 (domain I), H1359 (domain III), and H1817 (domain VI) were from Virusys. Anti-gB monoclonal antibodies DL16 (oligomer specific; domain V), SS10 (domain IV), SS55 (domain I) (73), SS106 (domain V), and SS144 (domain V) (48) were provided by G. Cohen and R. Eisenberg, University of Pennsylvania. Anti-gB monoclonal antibodies H1838 and H1781 (domain II) were provided by L. Pereira, University of California, San Francisco (74).
Immunofluorescence assay of HSV entry and infectivity.
Equivalent amounts of HSV-1 ΔgC or gCR were added to cells grown on coverslips in 24-well plates in triplicate. Cells were incubated at 4°C for 1 h and then washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cultures were then shifted to 37°C in normal culture medium for 6 h and then fixed with 100% ice-cold methanol. Primary antibody H1A021 to HSV-1 ICP4 (Virusys) was then added, followed by Alexa Fluor-488-labeled secondary antibody. Nuclei were counterstained with 12.5 ng/ml 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Approximately 500 cells per well were counted and scored for successful infection.
HSV-1 plating efficiency.
Ten-fold dilutions of HSV-1 stock were added to SK-N-SH or HaCaT cells at 37°C. At 18 to 20 h p.i., cells were fixed with ice-cold methanol and acetone (2:1 ratio) for 20 min at −20°C and air-dried. Titers were determined by a limiting dilution, immunoperoxidase plaque assay with rabbit polyclonal antibody to HSV, HR50 (Fitzgerald Industries, Concord, MA). Following three washes with 0.5% Tween 20–PBS, a 1:200 dilution of goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added for 2 h at room temperature. Following three washes with 0.5% Tween 20–PBS, 4-chloro-1-naphtol (Sigma) substrate was added. Plaques were visualized with a Leica stereoscope, and titers were calculated.
Ectopic expression of HSV-1 gC.
Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in serum-free Opti-MEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to transfect cells with plasmids encoding gC (pSH140; obtained from G. Cohen and R. Eisenberg [75]) or gD (pPEP99; obtained from P. Spear [76]) or with empty vector for 48 h at 37°C. Transfected cells were infected with 10-fold dilutions of HSV-1. At 18 h p.i., titers were determined by plaque assay.
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.
HSV-1 was boiled in Laemmli buffer containing 200 mM dithiothreitol for 5 min. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE on Tris-glycine gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For protein staining, gels were then fixed and stained with 0.025% Coomassie brilliant blue (J. T. Baker Chemical Co., Philipsburg, NJ), 40% methanol (Baker Chemical), and 10% glacial acetic acid (Baker Chemical), followed by destaining with 30% methanol and 7% glacial acetic acid (71). Gels were dried and imaged with a Gel Doc XR imager (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). For Western blotting, following transfer to nitrocellulose, membranes were blocked and incubated with HSV polyclonal antibodies R68 (anti-gB), R47 (anti-gC) (77), R2 (anti-gD) (78), R137 (anti-gH), or anti-gD monoclonal antibody DL6 (79), which were gifts from G. Cohen and R. Eisenberg; with HSV-1 gE monoclonal antibody H1A054-100 (Virusys); or with monoclonal antibody H1A021 to VP5 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX). After incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, enhanced chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce) was added, and membranes were exposed to X-ray film (Kodak).
Effect of ammonium chloride on HSV entry and infectivity.
Cells grown in 24-well plates were treated with medium containing ammonium chloride for 1 h at 37°C. Virus was added in the continued presence of the agent for 6 h. The medium was then removed and replaced with complete DMEM. At 16 h p.i., a plaque assay was performed to measure infectivity. CHO-HVEM cells grown in 96-well plates were treated with medium containing ammonium chloride for 20 min at 37°C. Virus was added (multiplicity of infection [MOI] of 5) in the continued presence of the agent, and the beta-galactosidase activity of cell lysates was measured at 6 h p.i.
Attachment of HSV-1 to the cell surface.
Cells grown in 96-well plates were prechilled in carbonate-free, serum-free medium supplemented with 20 mM HEPES and 0.2% bovine serum albumin (binding medium) at 4°C on ice for 20 min. Extracellular preparations of approximately 106 genome copies of HSV-1 ΔgC or gCR in ice-cold binding medium were added to 3.4 × 104 to 7 × 104 cells at 4°C on ice for 1 h. Cultures were washed twice with ice-cold PBS. Cells were trypsinized, and cell-associated HSV-1 DNA was isolated with a QIAamp DNA blood minikit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Attached (cell-associated) HSV-1 was quantitated by qPCR as previously described (17, 69).
Intracellular tracking of enveloped, infectious HSV.
HSV-1 ΔgC or gCR was added to confluent cell monolayers (MOI of 8) on ice at 4°C for 2 h. Cultures were washed with PBS and shifted to 37°C. At the indicated times p.i., extracellular virus was inactivated by adding sodium citrate buffer (pH 3.0) for 1 min at 37°C (6). Monolayers were immediately put on ice and washed with cold PBS. One milliliter of Ham’s F12 medium mixed with 20 mM HEPES and 1% FBS was added, and cells were lysed by two cycles of freezing and thawing. Titers of lysates were determined on Vero cells.
Dot blot analysis of HSV-1 gB.
Extracellular preparations of HSV-1 were diluted in serum-free, bicarbonate-free DMEM with 0.2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 5 mM (each) HEPES, MES (morpholineethanesulfonic acid), and sodium succinate. Virions were adjusted with HCl to achieve pHs ranging from 5.0 to 7.3. Approximately 107 genome copies of HSV-1 were incubated at 37°C for 10 min and were then either blotted directly to a nitrocellulose membrane using a Minifold dot blot system (Whatman) or were first neutralized by addition of pretitrated amounts of 0.05 N NaOH (80). Virus-dotted nitrocellulose membranes were blocked and then incubated with antibodies to gB at neutral pH. After incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, enhanced chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added, and blots were exposed to X-ray film (Genesee Scientific). Densitometry was performed with ImageJ.
Analysis of gB oligomeric structure by PAGE.
Extracellular preparations of HSV were diluted in the same medium as was used for dot blot analysis. Virus samples were adjusted to the indicated pHs with pretitrated amounts of 0.05 N HCl for 10 min at 37°C. To test for reversibility of conformational change, samples were then neutralized by addition of pretitrated amounts of 0.05 N NaOH for 10 min at 37°C. SDS (1%) was then added. Laemmli sample buffer containing 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) with no reducing agent (81) was added. Samples were not heated, and proteins were resolved by PAGE. After transfer to nitrocellulose, membranes were blocked and incubated with gB monoclonal antibody H1359. After incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, enhanced chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Fisher) was added and membranes were exposed to X-ray film (Genesee Scientific).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Ryan Manglona, Erik Walker, George Wudiri, and Youki Yamasaki for early contributions to this work. We are grateful to Curtis Brandt, Gary Cohen, Roselyn Eisenberg, David Johnson, Lenore Pereira, and Patricia Spear for providing reagents.
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01 AI119159 (A.V.N.) and NIH training grant T32 GM008336 (T.K.S., D.J.W., and K.A.G.).
REFERENCES
- 1.Nicola AV. 2016. Herpesvirus entry into host cells mediated by endosomal low pH. Traffic 17:965–975. doi: 10.1111/tra.12408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sathiyamoorthy K, Chen J, Longnecker R, Jardetzky TS. 2017. The COMPLEXity in herpesvirus entry. Curr Opin Virol 24:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2017.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Krummenacher C, Carfi A, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH. 2013. Entry of herpesviruses into cells: the enigma variations. Adv Exp Med Biol 790:178–195. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7651-1_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Weed DJ, Nicola AV. 2017. Herpes simplex virus membrane fusion. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 223:29–47. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-53168-7_2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Campadelli-Fiume G, Menotti L, Avitabile E, Gianni T. 2012. Viral and cellular contributions to herpes simplex virus entry into the cell. Curr Opin Virol 2:28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2011.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nicola AV, McEvoy AM, Straus SE. 2003. Roles for endocytosis and low pH in herpes simplex virus entry into HeLa and Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Virol 77:5324–5332. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.9.5324-5332.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nicola AV, Straus SE. 2004. Cellular and viral requirements for rapid endocytic entry of herpes simplex virus. J Virol 78:7508–7517. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.14.7508-7517.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nicola AV, Hou J, Major EO, Straus SE. 2005. Herpes simplex virus type 1 enters human epidermal keratinocytes, but not neurons, via a pH-dependent endocytic pathway. J Virol 79:7609–7616. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.12.7609-7616.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Akula SM, Naranatt PP, Walia NS, Wang FZ, Fegley B, Chandran B. 2003. Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (human herpesvirus 8) infection of human fibroblast cells occurs through endocytosis. J Virol 77:7978–7990. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.14.7978-7990.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ryckman BJ, Jarvis MA, Drummond DD, Nelson JA, Johnson DC. 2006. Human cytomegalovirus entry into epithelial and endothelial cells depends on genes UL128 to UL150 and occurs by endocytosis and low-pH fusion. J Virol 80:710–722. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.2.710-722.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang D, Yu QC, Schroer J, Murphy E, Shenk T. 2007. Human cytomegalovirus uses two distinct pathways to enter retinal pigmented epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:20037–20042. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709704104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gianni T, Campadelli-Fiume G, Menotti L. 2004. Entry of herpes simplex virus mediated by chimeric forms of nectin1 retargeted to endosomes or to lipid rafts occurs through acidic endosomes. J Virol 78:12268–12276. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.22.12268-12276.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Finnen RL, Mizokami KR, Banfield BW, Cai GY, Simpson SA, Pizer LI, Levin MJ. 2006. Postentry events are responsible for restriction of productive varicella-zoster virus infection in Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Virol 80:10325–10334. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00939-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Geraghty RJ, Krummenacher C, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ, Spear PG. 1998. Entry of alphaherpesviruses mediated by poliovirus receptor-related protein 1 and poliovirus receptor. Science 280:1618–1620. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5369.1618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Spear PG, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH. 2000. Three classes of cell surface receptors for alphaherpesvirus entry. Virology 275:1–8. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Campadelli-Fiume G, Cocchi F, Menotti L, Lopez M. 2000. The novel receptors that mediate the entry of herpes simplex viruses and animal alphaherpesviruses into cells. Rev Med Virol 10:305–319. doi:. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Komala Sari T, Pritchard SM, Cunha CW, Wudiri GA, Laws EI, Aguilar HC, Taus NS, Nicola AV. 2013. Contributions of herpes simplex virus 1 envelope proteins to entry by endocytosis. J Virol 87:13922–13926. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02500-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Baquero E, Albertini AA, Gaudin Y. 2015. Recent mechanistic and structural insights on class III viral fusion glycoproteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 33:52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chowdary TK, Cairns TM, Atanasiu D, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ, Heldwein EE. 2010. Crystal structure of the conserved herpesvirus fusion regulator complex gH-gL. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:882–888. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Atanasiu D, Whitbeck JC, Cairns TM, Reilly B, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ. 2007. Bimolecular complementation reveals that glycoproteins gB and gH/gL of herpes simplex virus interact with each other during cell fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:18718–18723. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707452104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Avitabile E, Forghieri C, Campadelli-Fiume G. 2007. Complexes between herpes simplex virus glycoproteins gD, gB, and gH detected in cells by complementation of split enhanced green fluorescent protein. J Virol 81:11532–11537. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01343-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dollery SJ, Delboy MG, Nicola AV. 2010. Low pH-induced conformational change in herpes simplex virus glycoprotein B. J Virol 84:3759–3766. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02573-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gallagher JR, Atanasiu D, Saw WT, Paradisgarten MJ, Whitbeck JC, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH. 2014. Functional fluorescent protein insertions in herpes simplex virus gB report on gB conformation before and after execution of membrane fusion. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004373. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Weed DJ, Pritchard SM, Gonzalez F, Aguilar HC, Nicola AV. 14 February 2017, posting date Mildly acidic pH triggers an irreversible conformational change in the fusion domain of herpes simplex virus 1 glycoprotein B and inactivation of viral entry. J Virol doi: 10.1128/JVI.02123-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Roller DG, Dollery SJ, Doyle JL, Nicola AV. 2008. Structure-function analysis of herpes simplex virus glycoprotein B with fusion-from-without activity. Virology 382:207–216. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Herold BC, WuDunn D, Soltys N, Spear PG. 1991. Glycoprotein C of herpes simplex virus type 1 plays a principal role in the adsorption of virus to cells and in infectivity. J Virol 65:1090–1098. doi: 10.1128/JVI.65.3.1090-1098.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.WuDunn D, Spear PG. 1989. Initial interaction of herpes simplex virus with cells is binding to heparan sulfate. J Virol 63:52–58. doi: 10.1128/JVI.63.1.52-58.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shukla D, Spear PG. 2001. Herpesviruses and heparan sulfate: an intimate relationship in aid of viral entry. J Clin Invest 108:503–510. doi: 10.1172/JCI13799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cai WH, Gu B, Person S. 1988. Role of glycoprotein B of herpes simplex virus type 1 in viral entry and cell fusion. J Virol 62:2596–2604. doi: 10.1128/JVI.62.8.2596-2604.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ligas MW, Johnson DC. 1988. A herpes simplex virus mutant in which glycoprotein D sequences are replaced by beta-galactosidase sequences binds to but is unable to penetrate into cells. J Virol 62:1486–1494. doi: 10.1128/JVI.62.5.1486-1494.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Forrester A, Farrell H, Wilkinson G, Kaye J, Davis-Poynter N, Minson T. 1992. Construction and properties of a mutant of herpes simplex virus type 1 with glycoprotein H coding sequences deleted. J Virol 66:341–348. doi: 10.1128/JVI.66.1.341-348.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Roop C, Hutchinson L, Johnson DC. 1993. A mutant herpes simplex virus type 1 unable to express glycoprotein L cannot enter cells, and its particles lack glycoprotein H. J Virol 67:2285–2297. doi: 10.1128/JVI.67.4.2285-2297.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Herold BC, Visalli RJ, Susmarski N, Brandt CR, Spear PG. 1994. Glycoprotein C-independent binding of herpes simplex virus to cells requires cell surface heparan sulphate and glycoprotein B. J Gen Virol 75:1211–1222. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-75-6-1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Campadelli-Fiume G, Stirpe D, Boscaro A, Avitabile E, Foa-Tomasi L, Barker D, Roizman B. 1990. Glycoprotein C-dependent attachment of herpes simplex virus to susceptible cells leading to productive infection. Virology 178:213–222. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(90)90396-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Koyama AH, Uchida T. 1987. The mode of entry of herpes simplex virus type 1 into Vero cells. Microbiol Immunol 31:123–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1987.tb03075.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wittels M, Spear PG. 1991. Penetration of cells by herpes simplex virus does not require a low pH-dependent endocytic pathway. Virus Res 18:271–290. doi: 10.1016/0168-1702(91)90024-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Johnson RM, Spear PG. 1989. Herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D mediates interference with herpes simplex virus infection. J Virol 63:819–827. doi: 10.1128/JVI.63.2.819-827.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Komala Sari T, Gianopulos KA, Nicola AV. 11 December 2019, posting date Glycoprotein C of herpes simplex virus 1 shields glycoprotein B from antibody neutralization. J Virol doi: 10.1128/JVI.01852-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Holland TC, Homa FL, Marlin SD, Levine M, Glorioso J. 1984. Herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein C-negative mutants exhibit multiple phenotypes, including secretion of truncated glycoproteins. J Virol 52:566–574. doi: 10.1128/JVI.52.2.566-574.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Siekavizza-Robles CR, Dollery SJ, Nicola AV. 2010. Reversible conformational change in herpes simplex virus glycoprotein B with fusion-from-without activity is triggered by mildly acidic pH. Virol J 7:352. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-7-352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dollery SJ, Wright CC, Johnson DC, Nicola AV. 2011. Low-pH-dependent changes in the conformation and oligomeric state of the prefusion form of herpes simplex virus glycoprotein B are separable from fusion activity. J Virol 85:9964–9973. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05291-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hannah BP, Heldwein EE, Bender FC, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ. 2007. Mutational evidence of internal fusion loops in herpes simplex virus glycoprotein B. J Virol 81:4858–4865. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02755-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hannah BP, Cairns TM, Bender FC, Whitbeck JC, Lou H, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH. 2009. Herpes simplex virus glycoprotein B associates with target membranes via its fusion loops. J Virol 83:6825–6836. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00301-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Clement C, Tiwari V, Scanlan PM, Valyi-Nagy T, Yue BY, Shukla D. 2006. A novel role for phagocytosis-like uptake in herpes simplex virus entry. J Cell Biol 174:1009–1021. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200509155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhou J, Blissard GW. 2006. Mapping the conformational epitope of a neutralizing antibody (AcV1) directed against the AcMNPV GP64 protein. Virology 352:427–437. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.04.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gaudin Y, Tuffereau C, Segretain D, Knossow M, Flamand A. 1991. Reversible conformational changes and fusion activity of rabies virus glycoprotein. J Virol 65:4853–4859. doi: 10.1128/JVI.65.9.4853-4859.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gaudin Y. 2000. Reversibility in fusion protein conformational changes. The intriguing case of rhabdovirus-induced membrane fusion. Subcell Biochem 34:379–408. doi: 10.1007/0-306-46824-7_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bender FC, Samanta M, Heldwein EE, de Leon MP, Bilman E, Lou H, Whitbeck JC, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH. 2007. Antigenic and mutational analyses of herpes simplex virus glycoprotein B reveal four functional regions. J Virol 81:3827–3841. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02710-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cairns TM, Whitbeck JC, Lou H, Heldwein EE, Chowdary TK, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH. 2011. Capturing the herpes simplex virus core fusion complex (gB-gH/gL) in an acidic environment. J Virol 85:6175–6184. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00119-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Stampfer SD, Lou H, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ, Heldwein EE. 2010. Structural basis of local, pH-dependent conformational changes in glycoprotein B from herpes simplex virus type 1. J Virol 84:12924–12933. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01750-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Muggeridge MI. 2012. Glycoprotein B of herpes simplex virus 2 has more than one intracellular conformation and is altered by low pH. J Virol 86:6444–6456. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06668-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Friedman HM, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ, Seidel CA, Cines DB. 1984. Glycoprotein C of herpes simplex virus 1 acts as a receptor for the C3b complement component on infected cells. Nature 309:633–635. doi: 10.1038/309633a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Meckes DG Jr, Wills JW. 2008. Structural rearrangement within an enveloped virus upon binding to the host cell. J Virol 82:10429–10435. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01223-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Heldwein EE, Lou H, Bender FC, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ, Harrison SC. 2006. Crystal structure of glycoprotein B from herpes simplex virus 1. Science 313:217–220. doi: 10.1126/science.1126548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Fontana J, Atanasiu D, Saw WT, Gallagher JR, Cox RG, Whitbeck JC, Brown LM, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH. 22 August 2017, posting date The fusion loops of the initial prefusion conformation of herpes simplex virus 1 fusion protein point toward the membrane. mBio doi: 10.1128/mBio.01268-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zeev-Ben-Mordehai T, Vasishtan D, Hernández Durán A, Vollmer B, White P, Prasad Pandurangan A, Siebert CA, Topf M, Grünewald K. 2016. Two distinct trimeric conformations of natively membrane-anchored full-length herpes simplex virus 1 glycoprotein B. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:4176–4181. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523234113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Daniels RS, Downie JC, Hay AJ, Knossow M, Skehel JJ, Wang ML, Wiley DC. 1985. Fusion mutants of the influenza virus hemagglutinin glycoprotein. Cell 40:431–439. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90157-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Doms RW, Gething MJ, Henneberry J, White J, Helenius A. 1986. Variant influenza virus hemagglutinin that induces fusion at elevated pH. J Virol 57:603–613. doi: 10.1128/JVI.57.2.603-613.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang X, Hutt-Fletcher LM. 1998. Epstein-Barr virus lacking glycoprotein gp42 can bind to B cells but is not able to infect. J Virol 72:158–163. doi: 10.1128/JVI.72.1.158-163.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang X, Kenyon WJ, Li Q, Mullberg J, Hutt-Fletcher LM. 1998. Epstein-Barr virus uses different complexes of glycoproteins gH and gL to infect B lymphocytes and epithelial cells. J Virol 72:5552–5558. doi: 10.1128/JVI.72.7.5552-5558.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Miller N, Hutt-Fletcher LM. 1992. Epstein-Barr virus enters B cells and epithelial cells by different routes. J Virol 66:3409–3414. doi: 10.1128/JVI.66.6.3409-3414.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nemerow GR, Cooper NR. 1984. Early events in the infection of human B lymphocytes by Epstein-Barr virus: the internalization process. Virology 132:186–198. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(84)90102-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Connolly SA, Jackson JO, Jardetzky TS, Longnecker R. 2011. Fusing structure and function: a structural view of the herpesvirus entry machinery. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:369–381. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wang D, Shenk T. 2005. Human cytomegalovirus UL131 open reading frame is required for epithelial cell tropism. J Virol 79:10330–10338. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.16.10330-10338.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wang D, Shenk T. 2005. Human cytomegalovirus virion protein complex required for epithelial and endothelial cell tropism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:18153–18158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509201102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Vanarsdall AL, Johnson DC. 2012. Human cytomegalovirus entry into cells. Curr Opin Virol 2:37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Vanarsdall AL, Howard PW, Wisner TW, Johnson DC. 2016. Human cytomegalovirus gH/gL forms a stable complex with the fusion protein gB in virions. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005564. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Montgomery RI, Warner MS, Lum BJ, Spear PG. 1996. Herpes simplex virus-1 entry into cells mediated by a novel member of the TNF/NGF receptor family. Cell 87:427–436. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81363-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Walker EB, Pritchard SM, Cunha CW, Aguilar HC, Nicola AV. 2015. Polyethylene glycol-mediated fusion of herpes simplex type 1 virions with the plasma membrane of cells that support endocytic entry. Virol J 12:190. doi: 10.1186/s12985-015-0423-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Delboy MG, Siekavizza-Robles CR, Nicola AV. 2010. Herpes simplex virus tegument ICP0 is capsid associated, and its E3 ubiquitin ligase domain is important for incorporation into virions. J Virol 84:1637–1640. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02041-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wudiri GA, Schneider SM, Nicola AV. 2017. Herpes simplex virus 1 envelope cholesterol facilitates membrane fusion. Front Microbiol 8:2383. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Farnsworth A, Goldsmith K, Johnson DC. 2003. Herpes simplex virus glycoproteins gD and gE/gI serve essential but redundant functions during acquisition of the virion envelope in the cytoplasm. J Virol 77:8481–8494. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.15.8481-8494.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bender FC, Whitbeck JC, Lou H, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ. 2005. Herpes simplex virus glycoprotein B binds to cell surfaces independently of heparan sulfate and blocks virus entry. J Virol 79:11588–11597. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.18.11588-11597.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Pereira L, Ali M, Kousoulas K, Huo B, Banks T. 1989. Domain structure of herpes simplex virus 1 glycoprotein B: neutralizing epitopes map in regions of continuous and discontinuous residues. Virology 172:11–24. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90102-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Hung SL, Srinivasan S, Friedman HM, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH. 1992. Structural basis of C3b binding by glycoprotein C of herpes simplex virus. J Virol 66:4013–4027. doi: 10.1128/JVI.66.7.4013-4027.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Pertel PE, Fridberg A, Parish ML, Spear PG. 2001. Cell fusion induced by herpes simplex virus glycoproteins gB, gD, and gH-gL requires a gD receptor but not necessarily heparan sulfate. Virology 279:313–324. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Eisenberg RJ, Ponce de Leon M, Friedman HM, Fries LF, Frank MM, Hastings JC, Cohen GH. 1987. Complement component C3b binds directly to purified glycoprotein C of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2. Microb Pathog 3:423–435. doi: 10.1016/0882-4010(87)90012-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Isola VJ, Eisenberg RJ, Siebert GR, Heilman CJ, Wilcox WC, Cohen GH. 1989. Fine mapping of antigenic site II of herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D. J Virol 63:2325–2334. doi: 10.1128/JVI.63.5.2325-2334.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Eisenberg RJ, Long D, Ponce de Leon M, Matthews JT, Spear PG, Gibson MG, Lasky LA, Berman P, Golub E, Cohen GH. 1985. Localization of epitopes of herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein D. J Virol 53:634–644. doi: 10.1128/JVI.53.2.634-644.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sari TK, Gianopulos KA, Nicola AV. 2020. Conformational change in herpes simplex virus entry glycoproteins detected by dot blot. Methods Mol Biol 2060:319–326. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9814-2_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Cohen GH, Isola VJ, Kuhns J, Berman PW, Eisenberg RJ. 1986. Localization of discontinuous epitopes of herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D: use of a nondenaturing (“native” gel) system of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis coupled with Western blotting. J Virol 60:157–166. doi: 10.1128/JVI.60.1.157-166.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kousoulas KG, Huo B, Pereira L. 1988. Antibody-resistant mutations in cross-reactive and type-specific epitopes of herpes simplex virus 1 glycoprotein B map in separate domains. Virology 166:423–431. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(88)90513-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Cairns TM, Fontana J, Huang ZY, Whitbeck JC, Atanasiu D, Rao S, Shelly SS, Lou H, Ponce de Leon M, Steven AC, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH. 2014. Mechanism of neutralization of herpes simplex virus by antibodies directed at the fusion domain of glycoprotein B. J Virol 88:2677–2689. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03200-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.