Abstract
Background
Cytochrome P450 1b1 (Cyp1b1) deletion and dietary retinol deficiency during pregnancy (GVAD) affect perinatal liver functions regulated by Srebp. Cyp1b1 is not expressed in perinatal liver but appears in the E9.5 embryo, close to sites of retinoic acid (RA) signaling.
Hypothesis
Parallel effects of Cyp1b1 and retinol on postnatal Srebp derive from effects in the developing liver or systemic signaling.
Approach
Cluster postnatal increases in hepatic genes in relation to effects of GVAD or Cyp1b1 deletion. Sort expression changes in relation to genes regulated by Srebp1 and Srebp2.Test these treatments on embryos at E9.5, examining changes at the site of liver initiation. Use in situ hybridization to resolve effects on mRNA distributions of Aldh1a2 and Cyp26a1 (RA homeostasis); Hoxb1 and Pax6 (RA targets). Assess mice lacking Lrat and Rbp4 (DKO mice) that severely limits retinol supply to embryos.
Results
At birth, GVAD and Cyp1b1 deletion stimulate gene markers of hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation but also suppress Hamp. These treatments then selectively prevent the postnatal onset of genes that synthesize cholesterol (Hmgcr, Sqle) and fatty acids (Fasn, Scd1), but also direct cholesterol transport (Ldlr, Pcsk9, Stard4) and retinoid synthesis (Aldh1a1, Rdh11). Extensive support by Cyp1b1 is implicated, but with distinct GVAD interventions for Srebp1 and Srebp2. At E9.5, Cyp1b1 is expressed in the septum transversum mesenchyme (STM) with β-carotene oxygenase (Bco1) that generates retinaldehyde. STM provides progenitors for the HSC and supports liver expansion. GVAD and Cyp1b1-/- do not affect RA-dependent Hoxb1 and Pax6. In DKO embryos, RA-dependent Cyp26a1 is lost but Hoxb1 is sustained with Cyp1b1 at multiple sites.
Conclusion
Cyp1b1-/- suppresses genes supported by Srebp. GVAD effects distinguish Srebp1 and Srebp2 mediation. Srebp regulation overlaps appreciably in cholesterol and retinoid homeostasis. Bco1/Cyp1b1 partnership in the STM may contribute to this later liver regulation.
1. Introduction
Cytochrome P450 1b1 (Cyp1b1) has a major influence on obesity and genes that have been linked to Type 2 diabetes [1–3]. Such changes may be initiated during pregnancy [4, 5]. Cyp1b1 exhibits diverse expression in mouse embryo mesenchymal progenitor cells [6–8] and vascular cells [9, 10]. Expression is high in the E9.5 embryo, at sites associated with retinoic acid (RA) activity, including in the foregut region, where liver and pancreas first develop [11, 12]. Transfection of mouse Cyp1b1 into the neural tube at this stage reproduces site- and time-specific effects associated with RA activity [13].
A functional link between Cyp1b1 and dietary retinol has been discovered from shared perinatal effects on hepatic gene regulation provided by gestational vitamin A deficiency (GVAD) and Cyp1b1 deletion. Each deliver coordinated, but distinct suppression of genes in two pathways that convert acetate to, respectively, oleoyl-CoA and cholesterol [4, 5]. One possibility is that these effects arise through earlier events in liver development. Cyp1b1/RA crosstalk at birth precedes these lipogenic effects, as shown by effects on Hamp and collagen genes [5]. We employ a three-step developmental model to examine effects of Cyp1b1 and retinol on postnatal liver lipogenesis. Importantly, we show that Rdh11 and Aldh1a1, genes that appreciably determine liver retinaldehyde fate, fit within this network.
Cyp1b1 is absent from mouse hepatocytes, but has low expression in liver stellate cells, which store retinyl esters [14–16], and in adipose progenitors [17, 18]. This flexibility of expression is explained by a core promoter that depends on dual Sp1 complexes and several multi-element enhancers that respond to developmental regulators, such as Ah receptor (AhR), SF1 and Pax6 [19]. In mesenchymal progenitors, Cyp1b1 is induced during adipogenesis, in parallel with PPARγ [18].
Cyp1b1 metabolizes diverse natural substrates in different cell types, including estradiol in vascular cells [20, 21], arachidonic acid in macrophage [22] and natural ligands for the AhR [23, 24]. Cyp1b1 also functions to suppress H2O2 signaling in vascular and mesenchymal cells [25]. In vitro, Cyp1b1 slowly converts retinol to retinaldehyde and then to RA, but evidence for such activity in vivo is based on gene responses rather than chemical analysis [13, 26]. Cyp1b1 deletion changes gene expression in the liver in ways that mimic estradiol activation effects on growth hormone and leptin signaling [1, 2]. This signaling is realized in the hypothalamus at birth [20, 21].
The studies presented here focus on when and where Cyp1b1 expression starts to impact liver regulation. The extensive Cyp1b1 expression at E9.5 parallels early development of both brain and liver [27, 28]. Deficits in Cyp1b1 disrupt eye development in humans [29], mice [30] and zebrafish [31], but retinoid metabolism is not the source. The diversity of substrates provides many options for Cyp1b1 participation both in embryos and in the perinatal period.
During mouse embryogenesis at E9.5, the placenta delivers abundant retinol and retinyl esters, from the stores in the maternal liver [32]. However, the GVAD protocol has only a small effect on embryo levels at E14.5 [33]. Transfer of maternal retinoids begins to surge at approximately E7.5, before declining after E11.5 [34]. The expression of Cyp1b1 in r4 of the hindbrain is second only to Hoxb1, a transcription factor that mediates hindbrain development [35] but remains unexplained. Hoxb1 regulates heart development [36] and is a potential regulator of adjacent liver budding through the foregut endoderm. These cells transform into hepatoblasts, which migrate into the supporting septum transversum mesenchyme (STM) [11, 12, 37, 38]. Here, we show that Cyp1b1 is located in the STM, co-expressed with Bco1, an oxygenase that delivers retinaldehyde from β-carotene [39, 40]. Liver budding has been resolved into anterior stimulation of hepatoblasts by Fgf forms, and posterior stimulation by Bmp4 from the STM [41, 42].
In the mouse embryo, vitamin A/retinol from the diet delivers RA through a two-step process, involving a reversible alcohol dehydrogenase step (Rdh10 and Dhrs9) that is followed by an aldehyde dehydrogenase step (Aldh1a 1–3) [43–45]. The multiple forms of Rdh, classic alcohol dehydrogenases, and Aldh1a, evidently contribute selectively to RA synthesis according to their respective location [46–49]. At E9.5, in the region of the developing hindbrain, Aldh1a2 establishes a gradient of RA anterior to r8 due to metabolism by Cyp26 forms. Cyp1b1 and Hoxb1 are co-expressed exclusively in r4, at the end of the RA gradient. Only double deletion of Cyp26a1 and Cyp26c1 affects this gradient, thus indicating their strong cooperation [50]. Deletions in Rdh10 and Aldh1a2 produce extensive losses in posterior RARE-lacZ activity [51] and shifts in rhombomere positioning [52, 53]. Additional Cyp1b1 deletion does not add to the effects of this Rdh10 deletion on RARE-lacZ [44].
We have looked for fetal effects of Cyp1b1 deletion and GVAD by first examining the expression of RA-regulated Hoxb1 expression in E9.5 embryos. We have also enhanced retinoid deficiency by means of the double deletion of retinol binding protein (Rbp4) and lecithin:retinol acyltransferase (Lrat) (Lrat-/-Rbp-/-; DKO). Delivery of retinol to the embryo is compromised, particularly in combination with the GVAD protocol [33]. Malformations that are evident in combination with GVAD appear in the head at E14.5 [33] and are similar to those in Rdh10-/- embryos [52, 53]. Here, we examine these DKO embryos for the first time at E9.5. We examine how this depletion of retinol affects Cyp26a1 and Hoxb1 expression, as measures of local functional RA, in relation to expression of Cyp1b1, as a potential contributor to either RA synthesis or activity.
Cyp1b1, Hoxb1, and Aldh1a2 also appear in close proximity in the foregut. In the perinatal mouse liver, Rdh11 and Aldh1a1 replace Rdh10 and Aldh1a2 as the most highly expressed genes metabolizing, respectively, retinol and retinaldehyde. The potential link between the steps in liver initiation and the changes in stellate cells 8 days later are of particular interest. The co-expression of Cyp1b1 with Bco1 in the STM provides a connection with effects of GVAD and Cyp1b1 deletion in stellate cells at birth, which derive from the STM. These parallel effects on stellate cells provide a potential developmental link to neonatal transcription changes in Rdh11 and Aldh1a1. These genes function in the liver in retinaldehyde homeostasis in place of Rdh10 and Aldh1a2 in the E9.5 embryo.
2. Materials and methods
Animal ethics statement
This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. Mice were maintained in an AAALAC-accredited University of Wisconsin animal care facility. Experimental protocols were approved by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC; Protocol Number: M005625). Mice were provided food and water ad libitum and maintained in a controlled 12-hour light/dark cycle. Pregnant dams were housed singly with paper nestlets and red igloos, in accordance with approved protocols. The approved protocols were designed to minimize animal pain and discomfort. Dams were euthanized at E9.5 with metered CO2 asphyxiation in accordance with ACUC-approved protocols.
2.1 Animal care and husbandry
Wild type (WT) C57Bl/6J (Jackson Labs, Bar Harbor, ME) and Cyp1b1-/- [4] dams were maintained on standard breeder diet (2019, Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI) prior to mating and until dietary administration. Nulliparous females aged 8–12 weeks were time mated, such that the presence of a vaginal plug was designated embryonic day (E)0.5. Pregnant dams were administered purified diets at E4.5 that comprised either a vitamin A-sufficient (TD.07291, Harlan Teklad) (Suff) or a vitamin A-deficient (TD.07655, Harlan Teklad) (GVAD) diet. The purified vitamin A-deficient diet contained 0.220 IU/g of retinyl palmitate as a vitamin A source, compared to the purified sufficient diet containing 24 IU/g and 15 IU/g retinyl palmitate as in the standard breeder chow.
The Teklad 2019 and both TD diets differ in their caloric proportions of fat/carbohydrate/protein (2019, 22/58/20; TD, 12/58/20). The content of flavonoids in these diets is very low. These diets have been described previously with respect to their different content and breeding characteristics [4, 5]. The TD Suff and GVAD diets resemble the equivalent from Research Diets (D12450, 10/60/20 ratio) in lacking the three-fold iron breeder supplement. We have referred to the TD.07655 Suff diet as LF12 [4, 5].
The stage of development was assessed for each by somite number. The somite counts were rarely outside the 20–30 somite range that is expected of E9.5 staging. However, we show a wide range of embryo sizes, even with similar somite counts (S3 Fig). The three-fold variation in size within an E 9.5 treatment group with similar somite count derives from growth differences probably resultant from variation in nutrient transfer.
Lrat-/-Rbp4-/- (DKO) embryos from homozygous matings were provided by Dr. Loredana Quadro and maintained under previously described conditions [33]. The vitamin A-sufficient DKO dams were maintained on standard breeder chow [Prolab Isopro RMH3000 5p75; 18 IU of retinyl palmitate/g of diet; manufactured by LabDiet (W. F. Fisher and Son, Inc.)]. The vitamin A-deficient dietary regimen of a purified diet with less than 0.2IU/g vitamin A (Research Diets) for the DKO dams was initiated at E0.5. The vitamin A-deficient dietary regimen of the dams is abbreviated as GVAD, whether it was initiated at E0.5 or at E.4.5. These diets are distinct from those used for WT and Cyp1b1-/- studies but are breeder diets similar to Teklad 2019. Their use with WT mice has been previously described in detail [33]. The maternal vitamin A-deficient diets were initiated 5 days prior to E9.5, the start of peak maternal retinoid transfer to the fetus [32].
Embryos were isolated at E9.5 in phosphate-buffered saline within an hour. For WT and Cyp1b1-/- mice, somite number was counted (21–29 somites) to establish the developmental stage. DKO embryos were isolated at 9.5 days post coitum, regardless of developmental age. Each embryo was individually fixed in ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hours at 4°C. Embryos were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of methanol and stored at -20°C in 100% methanol until use.
2.2 In situ hybridization
Whole-mount in situ hybridization (ISH) was performed as previously described [54]. Unless otherwise stated, at least three fetuses, representing at least three independent litters, were processed concurrently using the same reagents and incubations times, such that unbiased comparisons could be made between groups. Stained embryos were oriented on 1% agarose platforms and immersed in phosphate-buffered saline for imaging. Embryos were imaged using the same lighting, objective, and magnification. The number of embryos in each treatment group are shown in supplement S1 Table.
To determine the average domain size of ISH stains (average of measurements per embryo), raw images were loaded into ImageJ [55] and the stained areas determined using the relative area tool. The stained areas were normalized to the total embryo area.
2.3 Mouse liver retinoid content at birth
For liver analyses, weaning pups were euthanized by metered CO2, while birth pups were decapitated on the day of birth. Liver was collected and pooled by litter, flash frozen and stored at -80°C until use. The HPLC analyses were carried out as previously described [4]. Retinol and retinyl ester peaks were resolved on a Waters HPLC system (717 autosampler, 996 UV-Visable detector, 1525 binary pump) with a C18 reverse-phase column (C18/5 micrometer, 3.9 x 300 mm column, Milford, MA). Solvent A consisted of 92.5:7.5 (v:v) acetonitrile:water and solvent B consisted of 85:10:5 (v:v) acetonitrile:methanol:dichloroethane, each with 0.05% triethylamine as a modifier.
2.4 Microarray analysis of liver at birth and weaning
For weaning analyses, control samples (WT/Suff) were generated from four livers from pups of different litters. Triplicate samples obtained for each treatment group were generated from pooling mRNA from two different mice. Each of three array slides were normalized by including the reference mRNA and one mRNA from each of the other three treatment groups (WT GVAD; Cyp1b1-/- Suff and Cyp1b1-/- GVAD).
For birth studies, pups were sacrificed in the PM of the first day after birth (designated 0.5). Birth liver samples are composed of two pooled litters (WT and Cyp1b1-/-, each from Suff and GVAD maternal diets). Samples were comprised of equal concentrations of pooled biological replicates. The EDGE program was used to generate sample/WT-Suff ratios for each of these comparisons.
Frozen liver was thawed in RNAlater Ice according to manufacturer’s instructions (Ambion, Foster City, CA). Total RNA was isolated from tissue by RNeasy Mini Kit accompanied by Qiashredder columns (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was spectrophotometrically measured for quantity and purity by A260/A280 and A260/230 on a Nanodrop, followed by visual inspection by gel electrophoresis.
RNA analyses used the Agilent Technologies 4x44k platform. Samples were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions for one-color labeling, including sample preparation, hybridization, and scanning. All samples were Cy3-labeled. Data was deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus and can be accessed through GEO Series Accession Number GSE87844.
2.5 Statistical analysis
In our studies of the ISH imaging in E9.5 embryos, we have examined over 250 embryos that were staged by somite number. For WT mice on Suff and GVAD diets, 7 and 9 litters were used, respectively, each producing somewhat different ranges of somite numbers, corresponding to typical variation in developmental timing centered on E9.5 (range E9 to E10). For each ISH probe and treatment, we examined at least 3 embryos selected from different dams.
Comparisons of embryo cross-sectional areas and of individual mRNA in situ image intensities were measured as stated above and analyzed using one-way ANOVA with a Tukey post-test to determine individual p-values, where applicable. Correlation data was analyzed by two-tailed linear regression analysis. Data were graphed using GraphPad Prism (versions 5.0 and 7.0) and are represented as mean ± SEM, n = 3–6 litters/condition.
Agilent microarray data was analyzed by the EDGE3 software using the Limma analysis, which assesses significance based on ANOVA statistics [56].
3. Results
3.1 Earlier development as a source of postnatal effects of Cyp1b1 and dietary retinol
The experiments shown in Fig 1A address a possible inter-dependence between Cyp1b1 and retinoic acid in early liver development. Lipogenic genes that convert acetate to oleoyl CoA and cholesterol surge between birth and weaning. At birth, stellate cells play important roles in liver development and storage of retinyl esters. We recently found that the postnatal increase of oleate and cholesterol pathway genes is similarly blocked by both deficiency of retinol in the maternal diet (GVAD) and in Cyp1b1-/- mice [4, 5]. This change is preceded by activation of the stellate cells by both treatments at birth (PN0.5). Here, we have tested whether these effects of Cyp1b1 deletion and dietary retinol depletion extend to retinyl esters.
This connection between stellate cells at birth and postnatal lipogenesis also raises the possibility of earlier regulatory changes in the fetus (Fig 1B). Thus, we have used ISH to examine GVAD and Cyp1b1 deletion in embryos at E9.5 and the effect on RA activity in the foregut at the time of liver budding. Since the liver is controlled by neuroendocrine effects from the brain, effects on Cyp1b1 expression and genes that control RA synthesis and responses elsewhere in the embryo remain relevant.
In these studies of vitamin A/retinol deficiency (GVAD), the matching sufficient diet (LF12-Suff) differed from the standard Teklad breeder diet (lower fat/carbohydrate ratio and iron content). Litter sizes were unaffected, but body weights at weaning were approximately 10 percent smaller.
3.2 Retinol depletion and Cyp1b1-/- produce overlapping effects in the perinatal liver
In a previous paper, we reported that multiple genes involved in fatty acid synthesis and cholesterol biosynthesis are suppressed in Cyp1b1-/- mice at weaning and are variously sensitive to dietary retinol deficiency (GVAD) [5]. A more complete analysis shows that about 500 genes exhibit increased expression between birth and weaning (>3fold, p< 0.01), many of which function in lipogenesis. Suppression effects of GVAD at weaning are only seen with 30 genes (p<. 02), each of which is among these 500 genes that surge after birth. All of these retinol-sensitive increases are also suppressed in Cyp1b1-/- pups. The nine oleate pathway genes, therefore, represent almost a quarter of this GVAD-Cyp1b1-/- cluster. These genes are each Srebp-1c regulated. The effects for Acss2, the first gene in the pathway, and for Scd1, the terminal gene, are shown in Table 1. The shared suppressions in Cyp1b1-/- pups are typically larger than for GVAD maternal diet, as seen for Acss2 and Scd1. There is no effect of either the diet or gene deletion at birth. Therefore, these changes are suppressing the postnatal expression surge by 85–95 percent. We have designated this response pattern as typical of Srebp-1.
Table 1. Shared postnatal effects on oleate and cholesterol pathways in GVAD-treated and Cyp1b1-/- pups extend to retinoic acid homeostasis.
Gene | PN21/Birth | Regulator Patterna | WT GVAD/WT Suff | Cyp1b1-/- Suff/WT Suff | Cyp1b1-/- GVAD/ WT Suff |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lipogenesis | |||||
Acss2 | 8.6** | Srebp1 | -3.5** | -7.0** | -3.0* |
Scd1 | 87.0** | Srebp1 | -4.3** | -12.2** | -6.5** |
Hmgcr | 4.0** | Srebp2 | NS | -6.4** | -1.5 |
Sqle | 2.4* | Srebp2 | -2.2* | -23.0** | NS |
Pcsk9 | 7.3** | Srebp2 | NS | -4.7** | NS |
Stard4 | 1.6 | Srebp2 | NS | -2.3** | NS |
Ldlr | 2.8** | Srebp2 | NS | -1.9** | NS |
Retinoid | |||||
Aldh1a1 | 15** | Srebp2 | NS | -2.7** | NS |
Rdh11 | 2.4* | Srebp1 | -2.1** | -5.0** | -2.0** |
Rdh10 | 0.75 | none | NS | 1.7* | NS |
Dhrs3 | 1.5 | none | NS | NS | NS |
Negative sign indicates upper condition is suppressed.
**p<0.01
*p<0.05, nd-not detected, NS-response not significant.
aSrebp-1, pattern shown by oleate pathway genes that are mediated by Srebp-1c, distinguished by direct suppression by GVAD; Srebp2; pattern shown by cholesterol pathway genes that are mediated by Srebp2, No inhibition by GVAD, reversal of Cyp1b1-/- effects by GVAD. The pattern does not prove involvement of these mediators for genes not previously studied.
Cyp1b1-/- pups show large suppression effects for an additional 50 genes that are scarcely affected by GVAD in the WT pups. Cholesterol pathway genes, which comprise an appreciable proportion of these genes, are each regulated by Srebp2 and show a different response pattern. The early rate limiting regulatory gene, HmgCoA Reductase (Hmgcr), and the late regulatory gene, squalene epoxidase (Sqle), are shown in Table 1. We previously showed that this Srebp2 pattern is seen for a total of twelve genes in the cholesterol pathway [4]. Typically, genes in this cluster show appreciable expression at birth, which is also insensitive to both GVAD and Cyp1b1 deletion. However, the suppressions at weaning in Cyp1b1-/- pups leaves expression at a much lower level than at birth.
Cholesterol pathway genes regain full WT expression when the GVAD diet is applied to the Cyp1b1-/- litters (Table 1). This change in effect corresponds to a loss of Cyp1b1 participation when dietary retinol is low. An equivalent change is seen for the oleate pathway genes for this GVAD-Cyp1b1-/- combination. Acss2 and Scd1 each show an elevated expression in the GVAD-Cyp1b1-/- pups that now correspond to the suppression in the GVAD-WT pups. Thus, the participating genes lose dependence on Cyp1b1 when the diet is deficient in retinol.
In Table 1, we show that the dual effects of retinol and Cyp1b1 extend to Aldh1a1 and Rdh11, two genes that play important roles in retinoid homeostasis [57, 58]. Aldh1a1 shows one of the larger increases between birth and weaning but loses over 60 percent of this increase in Cyp1b1-/- pups. Like Sqle, this loss is completely removed when GVAD is applied to the Cyp1b1-/- dam. Rdh11 shows an expression pattern that is very similar to that of Acss2.
Aldh1a1 is the major form in liver for the synthesis of RA. Aldh1a2 and Aldh1a3 are expressed in the embryo but were scarcely detected in these neonatal livers. Similarly, Rdh10 is the major form in the embryo but has lower expression than Rdh11 in the neonatal liver [47, 57]. In the embryo, Rdh10 also combines with Dhrs3 to function as a reductase [58]. Rdh11, however, functions alone as an NADPH retinaldehyde reductase [57, 58]. Rdh10 is increased in Cyp1b1-/- pups, thereby becoming the major form. Dhrs3 may become functionally important by partnering with Rdh10 when Rdh11 is not the dominant form. The functional significance of Rdh11 has been shown in Rdh11-/- mice through diminished generation of retinyl esters, particularly when β–carotene is the dietary source [57].
Retinoid homeostasis has been shown to be highly integrated with cholesterol homeostasis [59]. Here, we show that this pattern of change is very specific. For example, ACAT forms 1 and 2 [60], which control the formation of cholesterol oleate do not show such changes. However, Ldlr, Pcsk9 and StARd4 share this pattern and have previously been linked to Srebp2 [61–63] (Table 1). They each play roles in cholesterol transport. Pcsk9 is an inactivator of Ldl receptor protein [61], which delivers ApoE-cholesterol ester to the endosome network. Stard4 distributes cholesterol between different membrane sites [62, 63].
We used PCR to compare the expression of these genes in the same individual pups. Each treatment group was comprised of all male pups from three separate litters. In WT mice, the expression level for Scd1 was closely correlated with body weight (BW; r2 = 0.73). The link for Hmgcr in WT mice was relatively weak (r2 = 0.33) (Fig 2B). The intra-litter variations in BW were appreciable for the three litters used for these groups. In contrast to WT pups, Cyp1b1-/- expression of Scd1 was independent of body weight. Based on the plots shown in Fig 2B, there are no differences for Scd1 expression between WT and Cyp1b1-/- for small pups (BW< 7 g). However, divergence becomes substantial as BW increases, leading to the overall significant difference shown in Fig 2A.
Like Hmgcr, the expression levels of Aldh1a1 and Rdh11 were independent of BW in these same WT mice (Fig 2). When all the WT and Cyp1b1-/- pups were compared, the differences were highly significant for Scd1, Hmgcr and Rdh11, despite the large BW variation for WT pups. For Aldh1a1, the difference indicated by the array data did not reach full significance. The array design used pooled livers for each of triplicate samples and the more powerful normalization provided by the EDGE processing algorithm.
3.3 Suppression of retinoids in perinatal livers by GVAD is associated with stellate cell activation, which is also sensitive to Cyp1b1
Stellate cells play an important role in liver development by providing extracellular matrix proteins [64]. In adult livers, retinyl esters are primarily stored in stellate cells, which comprise about five percent of liver cells [14]. Liver retinol and retinyl esters were extensively suppressed by GVAD at birth and weaning/PN21 (Fig 2C and 2D). The liver retinyl esters are nearly four times lower at birth than at weaning and over 10 times lower than in adults [5]. Cyp1b1 deletion doubled PN21 retinyl esters (p<0.01) but with only a small effect on retinol. There was no significant difference in the liver retinol levels on the Suff diet between birth and weaning/PN21. This consistency is indicative of an effective homeostasis for liver retinol at both times, even as the stored retinyl esters increase from birth to weaning. This homeostasis is evidently disrupted at both times by the suppression effected by GVAD (Fig 2D). The serum retinol level is unaffected by either GVAD or Cyp1b1-/-. In adult mice, the retinyl esters are mostly stored in stellate cells.
In view of these substantial changes in liver retinol and the shared effects of the GVAD diet and Cyp1b1 deletion at weaning, we looked for equivalent effects on transcription immediately after birth. We focused on the iron sensor, Hamp, which shows dual effects at weaning and searched for other genes that showed dual GVAD-Cyp1b1 sensitivity. We also probed genes that are known to participate in liver retinoid homeostasis. In WT offspring, GVAD suppressed transcription of Hamp. Cyp1b1 deletion resulted in a still larger suppression. Hamp is the only gene that retains a parallel effect of GVAD and Cyp1b1-/- from birth to weaning.
GVAD produced a very limited group of fifteen stimulations that reached the two-fold threshold with significance (p<0.05). Cyp1b1-/- offspring produced a parallel set of very similar expression increases for these GVAD-responsive genes. However, overall there were substantially more stimulations in Cyp1b1-/- pups than for the GVAD treatment of WT pups. Despite the large decrease in liver retinol produced by GVAD, none of the genes typically associated with retinoid homeostasis was significantly affected (Table 2).
Table 2. Stellate cell markers are elevated in liver at birth by GVAD and Cyp1b1 deletion.
Fold Change | Relative Expression (Cy3 x103) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Upper vs. | WT GVAD | Cyp1b1-/- Suff | Birth | Weaninga | Adulta |
Lower | WT Suff | WT Suff | |||
Hepatocyte | Expressed | ||||
Hamp | -2.5* | -8.8** | 31.0 | 4.5 | 17.6 |
Stellate | Expressed | ||||
Acta2 | 1.7 (p = .07) | 2.2* | 0.35 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
Col1a1 | 3.4** | 3.9* | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.1 |
Col1a2 | 2.6* | 4.6** | 4.7 | 7.0 | 1.5 |
Col3a1 | 2.8* | 2.5 | 2.9 | 4.2 | 0.5 |
Fibulin2 | 2.5* | 2.0* | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
Lumican | 2.4* | 2.0* | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
Caveolin1 | 2.5** | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.08 |
Timp1 | 2.0* | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Timp2 | 1.7* | 1.9* | 2.4 | 2.9 | 2.0 |
Tgfb3 | 1.8* | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.09 |
Fxyd6 | 2.1* | 4.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.07 |
Cyp2s1 | 2.6 ** | 1.5 | 0.15 | 0.3 | 0.04 |
Mesothelin | 2.6** | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.08 |
Retinoid | Homeostasis | ||||
Stellate | |||||
Lrat | -1.5 0.1 | -1.5 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
Cyp26b1 | ns | ns | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
Bco1 | n.s. | n.s. | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
Hepatocyte | |||||
Dhrs3 | n.s | n.s | 5.0 | 2.3 | 7.0 |
Rdh10 | n.s | n.s | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Rdh11 | n.s | n.s | 1.3 | 3.1 | 1.9 |
Rdh12 | n.s. | -2.5** | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
Aldh1a1 | n.s. | -2.0* | 0.8 | 13.0 | 61.3 |
Cyp26a1 | n.s. | 1.7* | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.5 |
Rbp4 | n.s. | n.s. | 288 | 257 | 250 |
Crbp1 | n.s | n.s | 25.7 | 8.7 | 2.2 |
Crbp2 | n.s | -4.5** | 0.5 | < .01 | < .01 |
a Weaning: pnd 21; Adult: pnd 98.
*p-value ≤ 0.05
** p-value ≤ 0.01
01 p = 0.1
Remarkably, the GVAD-induced increases were mostly associated with the expression of mRNA that produce matrix proteins and other genes associated with activated stellate cells. There are increases in three forms of collagen along with three other matrix proteins: fibulin, mesothelin, and Fxyd6 (Table 2) [14]. Other increases include the membrane regulator, caveolin 1, the oxygenase, Cyp2s1, smooth muscle actin (Sma/Acta2), Timp1, Timp2 and Tgfb3. Application of the GVAD treatment to Cyp1b1-/- had no further effect on elevated expression of these genes (not shown). This study provided ten samples of liver mRNA, corresponding to four treatment groups, with each sample corresponding to livers pooled from pups comprising a separate litter. The respective gene expression levels, based on array binding (Cy3) for the individual samples, were correlated to expression levels for Col1a1 for the same samples. The closest match to Col1a1 is seen for Acta2 (r2 = 0.87), the classic marker for stellate cells. The pairwise correlations with Col1a1 are shown in the Table accompanying Fig 2E. All but Cyp2s1 and Msn appreciably exceed the correlation between Col1a1 stimulation and Hamp suppression (r2 = 0.5).
The basal expression for most of these stellate activation markers at birth and weaning is 3–5 times higher than in adult livers (Table 2). By contrast, the expression of Lrat and Cyp26b1, which are each involved in retinol and RA homeostasis in stellate cells, are lower at birth. This trend extends to genes that control retinoid homeostasis in hepatocytes. Thus, Aldh1a1 and Cyp26a1, which, respectively, generate and metabolize RA, are 50 times lower at birth than in the adult, with weaning levels intermediate. Aldh forms 1a2 and 1a3, which sustain RA in the embryo, have very low expression in the liver. However, the major intracellular retinol transfer protein, CRBP1 (RBP1), is highest at birth. Rbp4, which sequesters retinol in the blood, remains constant at very high levels of expression, consistent with the maintenance of constant serum retinol levels.
This shift in gene expression from transfer to synthesis is consistent with the maternal diet and liver functioning as the near exclusive source of retinoids for the fetus. Homeostasis in the face of diet changes provided by the GVAD protocol is determined by the maternal liver. In addition, the changes effected in the livers of Cyp1b1-/- progeny are small compared to changes conferred by development. Other retinoids and pathways may be more important at birth. Thus, Bco1, which generates retinaldehyde from β-carotene, locates to stellate cells and is higher at birth [39, 40, 57]. Other potential participants may be more important at birth, including RXR ligands. The retinol saturase (Resat) and the phosphatidyl choline transfer protein (Pctp/Stard2) are each highly expressed at birth and decline significantly by with GVAD [65–67].
Stellate cells release signaling proteins that participate in injury repair [64] and may play an important role in the liver adaptation at birth. In the livers at birth, the low expression of genes associated with retinoid synthesis and the low levels of retinyl ester storage contrast with the high expression of proteins associated with retinol binding.
Crbp1 is also expressed in stellate cells but hepatocyte expression predominates in liver. The large increases in stellate activation markers point to an appreciable change in the regulation of stellate cells at birth. These effects of GVAD on the liver may be directed locally within the liver but this is unlikely for Cyp1b1, which is scarcely detectable in liver. We have looked for potential sources of this partnership at E9.5, which corresponds to a time very soon after the initiation of liver budding.
3.4 The impact of the GVAD diet and Cyp1b1 deletion on embryo development at E9.5
To test whether GVAD and Cyp1b1 deletion produce shared effects earlier in development, we examined embryos at E9.5 with the same four treatment groups (Fig 3A). E9.5 represents a time when retinoid transfer from dam to embryos is at a peak [32]. After this surge, at E14.5, the GVAD diet completely removes stored retinyl esters from the liver of the dam, but only halves levels in the embryo (Fig 3B) [33].
At E14.5, serum retinol was only decreased by 40 percent in the dam and not in the embryo. In later experiments, we examine embryos carrying a double deletion of Lrat and Rbp4 (DKO) that disrupts this homeostasis [33] (Fig 3A). DKO dams show a halving of serum retinol at E14.5 when using a Suff diet, which, however, does not extend to the embryos (Fig 3B).
GVAD and Cyp1b1 deletion have no effect on survival to weaning (PN21, 6–7 pups/litter), on body weight [5] or on the male to female ratio (data not shown). The stage of development was rarely outside the 20–30 somite range expected of E9.5 staging (Suff mean was 23 somites; GVAD mean was 25 somites). Occasional outliers were not further examined (34 pregnancies, 36/250 embryos). Somite numbers from embryos of a single dam were closely clustered, varying more between litters.
The sizes of the WT embryos showed a three-fold range for both Suff and GVAD diets, despite the narrow somite range (Fig 3C). Somewhat higher somite numbers were prevalent with larger embryos, but appreciable size differences were seen with similar somite numbers, especially in comparisons between litters. Growth differences can separate from development stage to affect size. DKO embryos at E9.5 also showed a three-fold size range that was appreciably lower than for WT embryos. The ISH imaging with staging markers, such as Pax6 and Hoxb1, show that DKO embryos are smaller on average that WT embryos, even when reaching the full E9.5 stage of development. Delayed development was also seen as a contributor to lower body weight. The GVAD DKO embryos produced fewer embryos per dam because of enhanced resorption [33]. There were also more malformed embryos that were not assessed for size.
3.5 Location of Cyp1b1 at E9.5 in relation to retinoid producing genes
The whole mount ISH probing of the mRNA expression compares Cyp1b1 patterning to the distributions of mRNA from 8 genes that are directly associated with RA homeostasis, either through synthesis (three Aldh1a forms and Bco1) or metabolism (two Cyp26 forms). To gauge local RA responses, we examined Hoxb1, which is remarkably sensitive to RA in hindbrain r4 and foregut, along with Pax6, which provides a constraint on RA activity [68]. In S1 Table, we show the number of embryos that were staged and imaged by ISH. The WT Suff and GVAD were taken from, respectively, 7 and 9 dams.
Fig 4A shows the distribution of Cyp1b1 mRNA at E9.5 at multiple sites. Here, two embryos differ in dorsal area by roughly three-fold yet retain a similar distribution of Cyp1b1 between the different expression sites. Cyp1b1 is highly expressed, specifically in r4 neural crest cells of the hindbrain and in the three branchial arches. These structures derive from cells that migrate from specific rhombomeres of the neural crest (r4 to Ba2; r5 to Ba3; r7 to Ba4). The third major site of expression is the foregut, more specifically the STM, which participates in liver bud expansion [42]. Cyp1b1 mRNA is present in caudal somites, notably with clear left/right polarization. There is also localized expression of Cyp1b1 in the eye, which functions independent of RA [31].
Cyp1b1 expression in the hindbrain, branchial arches, foregut and somites is mostly linked to specific sites of RA synthesis derived from Aldh1a2 expression (Fig 4B). Aldh1a1 is positioned upstream of Cyp1b1 (at r6/r7) in the RA hindbrain gradient and in the foregut/STM region [69]. The r4 and r6/r7 provide sites from which neural crest cells migrate to the branchial arches 2–4. Aldh1a2 is expressed more extensively than Cyp1b1 in the somites and appears at foregut sites. Bco1, an oxygenase, which generates retinaldehyde from β-carotene is expressed close to Cyp1b1 in the STM [40]. Thus, if Cyp1b1 participates in RA activity, Aldh1a1, Aldh1a2 and Bco1 are well positioned as partners.
3.6 Spatial resolution of Cyp1b1, Cyp26c1, Hoxb1, and Pax6 in the foregut in relation to hindbrain and branchial arches
To better address whether Cyp1b1 has an impact on RA activity at E9.5, we examined the expression of RA–associated genes in relation to apparently conserved sites of expression in the hindbrain, branchial arches and foregut (Fig 5A, lateral; S1A Fig, dorsal). Hoxb1 and Cyp26 forms each have high affinity responses to RA [27, 28, 35, 50]. Pax6 has a more complex dependence on RA but also exhibits regulation of Cyp1b1 [19, 68]. Hoxb1 has precise location in r4 and in the ventral endoderm of the foregut close to the site of initial liver budding. Hoxb1 is absent from the three branchial arches but is necessary to initiate the migration of neural crest cells to these sites [69, 70]. A common feature of these regulatory processes that has been extensively studied in the hind brain is the spatial separation of RA synthesis (Aldh1a2), metabolism (Cyp 26 forms) and function (Hoxb1).
Classic RA synthesis functions through NAD(P)+ dehydrogenases [43–46], whereas Cyp1b1 in vitro converts retinol and retinaldehyde to RA via NADPH-POR reactions, which have very different metabolic and oxygen requirements [8, 19, 23] that are appreciably shared by the RA-clearance mediated by Cyp26 forms [50]. Cyp1b1 additionally suppresses oxygen stress in vascular and mesenchymal cells [9, 10, 25]. These considerations provide a flexibility to RA homeostasis that we probe here by introducing more extreme metabolic restrictions on the limiting maternal transfer of retinol. This impact of limiting maternal transfer been established at E14.5 [33] but has not previously been examined at E9.5, when previous effects of embryo RA synthesis disruption has been examined [43, 44, 46]. The retinol transfer is particularly critical at this early time [32].
High expression of Cyp26c1 maintains low RA in r2, r4, r6 and r8, each from the dorsal side, perhaps to minimize effects on the ventral migration of neural crest cells to the branchial arches. There is low dispersed expression in the posterior embryo apart from high expression at the expanding tip. Cyp26a1 has high complementary expression in r3, r5 and r7 but is essentially absent from the posterior embryo apart from the tip of the tail (Fig 6G).
The separation of Cyp1b1 from Hoxb1, Pax6 and Cyp26c1 within r4 is highlighted in the enlarged r4 dorsal views (S1B Fig). In r4, the lateral view, dorsal Hoxb1 is mostly separated from the more ventral Cyp1b1. The dorsal view shows that the split in the Hoxb1 zone produced by the neural groove is absent for Cyp1b1-/-. Pax6, which does not segregate expression between the different hindbrain rhombomeres (r3-8), is positioned on the dorsal side of Cyp1b1. Pax6 exerts constraints on the rhombomere boundaries [68]. In S1C Fig, we have diagrammed the spatial relationship and distribution around the neural groove of the four genes in the r4 region that are shown in S1B Fig. Cyp26c1 and Cyp1b1 are appreciably separated on either side of Hoxb1 in r4.
Fig 5B shows the spatial relationship between Cyp1b1 and Hoxb1 in the foregut region at E9.5 in relation to Adlh1a2 and Bco1 (Figs 4B and 5A). These liver progenitor cells (hepatoblasts), which are controlled by Hnf4a [11, 42, 64, 71], are jointly activated by Fgf forms from cardiac mesoderm and by BMP4 from the STM [25]. RA can intervene by stimulating the Hoxb1 effects on Fgf forms [35, 41, 42] or by enhancing Bmp4 effects [72]. Potential RA contributions are again spatially and metabolically separated. Aldh1a2, which receives retinaldehyde from Rdh10, locates close to Hoxb1 in the foregut endoderm. The STM expresses Bco1, which generates retinaldehyde from dietary β-carotene and is co-expressed with Cyp1b1, a further potential source of RA. These foregut RA processes are substantially different from those in the hindbrain because of the much lower RA clearance activity provided by near absence of Cyp26a1 and the relatively low Cyp26c1 presence.
In addition to the hindbrain and foregut, Hoxb1 is expressed close to Cyp1b1 in the somites (Fig 7B), again adjacent to Aldh1a2 as a prime source of RA generation. Aldh1a2 also overlaps with Cyp1b1 and Hoxb1 in the somites (Fig 6C).
3.7 Maternal GVAD does not alter distribution of retinoid metabolism genes at E9.5
Local concentrations of RA are determined by the balance between Aldh1a-mediated retinaldehyde dehydrogenase activity and RA removal by Cyp26-mediated 4-hydroxylation. At E14.5, the GVAD diet removes all retinyl esters from the dams and about half of the esters from the embryos (Fig 3B) but has no effect on any of the Aldh1a forms. Aldh1a2 is the main form in the embryo [47]. Aldh1a3 is specific to the optic vesicle (Fig 6E and 6F).
Aldh1a1, which is the major source of RA generation in the liver, has specific expression sites, presumably to provide local RA. Aldh1a1 is expressed adjacent to Cyp1b1 both in the brain (r6/7) and in the foregut [44] and is, therefore, a source of RA at these sites.
These two Cyp26 forms effectively metabolize RA but are also highly dependent on transcriptional stimulation by RA, thereby providing homeostatic control [73]. Cyp26a1 is expressed in alternate rhombomeres (r1, r3, r5 and r7) with Cyp26c1 (r2, r4, and r6) (Fig 6G–6J). Cyp26a1 has minimal expression outside the hindbrain apart from the posterior tip. Cyp26c1 has broader expression, particularly at sites close to Cyp1b1, including r4, the foregut and somites. Cyp26b1, which is not probed here, is the main form in the liver at birth (Table 1). GVAD at E9.5 also has no effect on Cyp26a1 and Cyp26c1.
3.8 Absence of an effect of Cyp1b1 deletion and GVAD diet on Hoxb1 and Pax6 expression at E9.5
Fig 7A–7C shows the impact of lowering dietary retinol through GVAD and DKO manipulations on the expression patterns. We show expression of Cyp1b1 and two RA-responsive genes, Hoxb1 and Pax6. Cyp1b1 sustains remarkably constant expression ratios for the various sites (hindbrain (r4), branchial arches, foregut and somites) for size matched WT and DKO embryos, irrespective of GVAD treatment (Figs 4A, 7C and S3A). The positioning of Hoxb1 on the dorsal side of r4 and spatially extended Pax6 expression function as precise markers of E9.5 staging. The larger Suff DKO embryo shows more extensive expression of Pax6, indicative of full E9.5 staging.
Neither Cyp1b1 deletion with the Suff diet nor application of the GVAD protocol to either WT or Cyp1b1-/- dams impacts Hoxb1 or Pax6 in the hindbrain. A consistent Pax6 pattern is also seen, irrespective of appreciable differences in embryo size (Fig 7A and 7B and S2 Fig). For Hoxb1, the key sites of expression in the foregut and the somites are similarly retained. The size variation of these embryos occurs with retention of patterning for Aldh1a2, Pax6 and Hoxb1 (S2 Fig). Again, there is no effect of Cyp1b1 deletion or the GVAD deficiency on either this patterning or the embryo size.
The dorsal r4 images for Hoxb1 and Cyp1b1 provide specific areas to link their relative expressions as a function of growth or projected dorsal body area (S4 Fig). For WT and DKO embryos with Suff and GVAD treatments, this r4 Hoxb1 area decreased 2.5-fold in direct proportion to the embryo size across all treatments (r2 = 0.9) (Fig 7D). Cyp1b1 expression declines much less for the same treatment groups, although with steeper decline for the DKO embryos. The Cyp1b1 in r4, branchial arches, and foregut/STM occupies a larger proportion of the embryo for small embryos than for large embryos, irrespective of treatment (S3 and S4 Figs). In contrast to the chick model, which is reported to be RA-dependent [13], mouse Cyp1b1 has distal Hox and Pax6 elements, but no evidence for direct RA dependence [19].
3.9 DKO embryos show site selective effects on Hoxb1 suppression
The drastic decrease in retinol supply to DKO embryos at E9.5 produces a size range that overlaps with the smaller WT embryos, although the average size is smaller (Fig 3C). In the Suff DKO embryos, Hoxb1 is sustained in r4, but lost in somites and the ventral foregut endoderm, the site of liver budding (Figs 7B and S3B). The pair of GVAD DKO embryos completely loses foregut Hoxb1 expression, even though they are larger than the Suff DKO.
GVAD also interacts with the DKO genotype to decrease lateral forebrain evagination, a characteristic feature of E9.5 embryos (n = 114) (DKO 71% Suff, 87% GVAD; WT 19% Suff, 27% GVAD) [74].
3.10 DKO embryos adapt with lower hindbrain Cyp26a1, but increased foregut Bco1
Decreased expression of Cyp26a1 and Cyp26c1 can accommodate a large decrease in RA transfer into the hindbrain gradient due to the diminished transplacental retinol transfer for GVAD DKO embryos [33]. Removal of posterior synthesis genes (Aldh1a2 and Rdh10 deletion) produces similar hindbrain effects from decreased posterior RA synthesis [44]. Cyp26a1, which is potently induced by RA [73], is almost completely depleted from r3 and r5 in DKO embryos with either Suff or GVAD diets, even though expression in the posterior site of somite expansion is unaffected (Fig 8A). A net decrease in Cyp26a1 expression in GVAD DKO embryos is also shown by qPCR at E14.5 [33]. This extensive hindbrain decrease in Cyp26a1 induction is consistent with a decline in hindbrain RA. This lowering of RA metabolism appears to be sufficient to maintain the normal RA gradient to r4 and the associated morphogenesis. This loss of Cyp26a1 places these embryos close to the limit of RA homeostasis adjustment. The morphological changes in some DKO embryos, including the delayed forebrain evagination, particularly on the GVAD diet, support this perspective.
Bco1, which can supply retinaldehyde to the foregut region [60], is enhanced in DKO embryos, including in a normal embryo from the GVAD diet (Fig 8B, S3 Fig). The low expression of the mitochondrial form, Bco2, also increases in the ventral foregut (Fig 8C). The robust expression of Bco1 provides a means to accommodate diminished vitamin A/retinol through metabolism of dietary β-carotene [75].
4. Discussion
4.1 Cyp1b1–deficiency and retinol deficiency in E9.5 embryos
This research started from the finding that expression of mouse Cyp1b1 in an RA-deficient quail development model generated specific effects of RA [13]. Others studying the families of genes that metabolize retinol and retinaldehyde (Aldhs, Radhs, Raldhs) had also found that deletions of the major genes left residual RA activity in the hindbrain at mid-gestation (E9.5). A double deletion of Raldh10 and Cyp1b1 showed that Cyp1b1 did not account for this residual activity [44]. More extensive probing presented here establishes that Hoxb1, which is selectively sensitive to RA, is unaffected by deletion of Cyp1b1, even in combination with severe depletion of retinol. During pregnancy in mice, this deficiency (GVAD) only starts to produce retinol deficiency in the late fetal stage. We show that at E9.5, Hoxb1 and Pax6, another RA-sensitive gene, retain their E9.5 patterning in surviving mice with Lrat/Rbp4 double deletions (DKO) [33]. However, Cyp1b1 expression in this model is highly persistent, retaining all sites of expression. This leaves the question of the function of this conserved Cyp1b1 expression.
4.2 Cyp1b1 and dietary retinol selectively support postnatal increases in gene expression and also stellate and Hamp changes at birth
At birth, GVAD treatment lowers liver retinoids, severely depleting retinol in the postnatal period (Fig 2C and 2D). The Cyp1b1-/- genotype and retinol depletion indeed show overlapping effects on many genes that increase in response to the postnatal rise in Igf1 [76]. Particularly affected are those previously linked to either Srebp-1c (9 oleate pathway genes) or Srebp2 (12 cholesterol pathway genes) [4]. These Srebp-1c-regulated genes are among only 30 that are suppressed in WT mice after GVAD. These Srebp-2-regulated genes are among about 50 genes for which the postnatal increase depends on Cyp1b1, but not retinol. Instead, GVAD fully restores WT Srebp2 activity to Cyp1b1-/- pups. Thus, about 80 of these 500 increases depend almost completely on Cyp1b1, but with distinct modes of retinol participation typical of either Srebp-1c or Srebp2 regulation [77,78] that encompass both cholesterol and retinoid homeostasis [79,80]
Earlier, at birth, liver gene expression shows only two effects of GVAD, but again, each is shared with Cyp1b1 deletion: stimulation of the markers of stellate cell activation [14] (Table 2, Fig 2E) and suppression of the iron regulatory gene, Hamp. Srebp 1c contributes to Hamp expression [81]. Activation of stellate cells is also integrated with Srebp regulation [82, 83]. Srebp regulation may in some way connection to Cyp1b1 and retinol. Although Hamp retains this connection up to weaning, Srebp regulation of lipogneic genes is seen only for the postnatal stimulation.
4.3 Do perinatal effects of Cyp1b1 deletion arise from expression earlier in development?
The liver is targeted extensively by Cyp1b1, even though expression is scarcely detectable. Earlier expression of Cyp1b1 in the developing liver provides one source for disruption of participation, since this occurs close to sites of RA synthesis in the foregut site of liver initiation. However, GVAD-and Cyp1b1-/- changes do not affect the patterning of RA-responsive genes, including Hoxb1 [35] (Fig 7B and 7C). High local expression of Cyp26 forms a1 and c1 adjust RA deficiencies and can obscure removal of Cyp1b1 contributions, since complete deletion of either form is insufficient to affect RA activity [50, 84]. Suppressed maternal retinoid transfer in the Lrat/Rbp4 DKO model is sufficient to remove hindbrain Cyp26a1 and probably RA-dependent Cyp26c1. RA selectivity is such that residual RA is sufficient to sustain Hoxb1 expression (Fig 8), which correlates closely with embryo size (r2 = 0.9) (Fig 7D). Cyp1b1 expression is, however, sustained at all sites (Fig 7D). With near absence of countering Cyp26 metabolism, a low Cyp1b1 contribution may be sufficient to maintain the RA-sensitive Hoxb1 [35].
Cyp1b1 has notably strong expression in the STM, which supports liver budding [41, 42]. This expression is located close to Bco1, an oxygenase that generates retinaldehyde from β-carotene. Bco1 is particularly evident in DKO embryos. Aldh1a1, which is also present, and Cyp1b1 provide alternative conversions of retinaldehyde to RA that depend on, respectively, NADP+ and NADPH (Fig 5).
Liver budding requires a partnership between Bmp4 from the STM and Fgf forms from the cardiac mesoderm [41–43]. At E9.5, hepatoblasts, sustained by Hnf4a, expand with proliferative stimuli provided by Fgf, with support from RA via Aldh1a2 and dietary retinol. Penetration into the STM is promoted by Bmp4, which is commonly supported by RA. Here, Bco1 and, potentially, Cyp1b1 may deliver this support. STM also provides the source of stellate cells that exhibit dual retinol–Cyp1b1 regulation in the liver at birth [38].
4.4 A systems approach to GVAD-Cyp1b1 regulation
Key differences between Srebp-1c and Srebp-2, with respect to retinol participation, have been identified. Genes regulated by Srebp-1c show suppression by GVAD in the WT litters, while genes regulated by Srebp 2 resist this effect. Signaling by each transcription factor is largely removed in Cyp1b1-/- pups but is reversed to WT levels by GVAD. Fig 9 shows pathways that are linked to these factors (A) and a network model to account for Srebp-1/Srebp-2 differences (B). Additional genes show expression signatures typical of the Srebp-1 (Lpin1, Gaddd45g) or Srebp2 (Insig1, Thrsp2). These signatures have diverse roles in lipogenic processes [85–89], but Srebp participation remains to be determined for many of these genes.
Postnatal gain in body weight in WT pups increases in proportion to activation of Srebp-1c genes, but not in Cyp1b1-/- pups or for Srebp2 genes (Fig 2). This selectivity points to important links to energy regulation. Srebp forms are retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by a complex with the cholesterol sensor, Scap. This complex transfers to the Golgi for cleavage to the active nuclear form when cholesterol becomes depleted [90]. Srebp activation is also stimulated via the multi-protein mTORC1 complex, a sensor of metabolic homeostasis [76, 91, 92]. mTORC1 transmits insulin and Igf1 signaling to phosphorylation of Srebp, subject to the various sensor modulations [93]. Insig enhances cholesterol-dependent resistance to Scap-Srebp activation, which is also removed by insulin or Igf1. AMPK, which is activated when ATP declines, inhibits both Srebp activation processes and connects Srebp regulation to systemic signaling that appears to be Cyp1b1 sensitive [85, 91, 94]. Thus, Cyp1b1 metabolizes estradiol, and many features of the adult Cyp1b1-/- phenotype parallel increased effects of estradiol and changes in the hypothalamus [2]. Estradiol enhancement of leptin signaling, transmitted through the sympathetic nervous system, elevates inhibitory liver AMPK [95–97].
4.5 Conclusions and Key questions
Srebp-supported gene expression is comprehensively suppressed in perinatal Cyp1b1-/- pups. Srebp1 and Srebp2 mRNA are unaffected, indicating that their post-translational regulation is targeted. These same genes are substantially affected by a retinol-depleted maternal diet (GVAD) that lowers liver retinol. At birth, GVAD and Cyp1b1 deletion each suppress the iron regulator, Hamp, while also increasing multiple stellate activation markers, each a likely target of Srebp control [82, 83]. The low presence of Lrat and retinyl esters and enrichment of activated stellate markers suggests an altered basal state that may be more sensitive to these changes [14]. Postnatal increases in Igf1 expression [98] parallel the major increases in hepatocyte gene expression, including the 15 percent that depend on Cyp1b1 and retinol, which include the Srebp1-stimulated lipogenic genes. The links to synthesis of fatty acids, cholesterol and retinoids emphasizes their integrated homeostasis [79] (Fig 9A). The control of Scap-Srebp complexes, through mTORC1, Insig and AMPK provide multiple ways for interventions by Cyp1b1 and retinol (Fig 9B).
Cyp1b1 is not expressed in perinatal or adult hepatocytes, thus requiring indirect activity through metabolism at remote sites connected through developmental programs or systemic signaling. We show that Cyp1b1 appears at sites of mid-gestation liver budding. Cyp1b1 deletion and GVAD manipulations of pregnancy have no effect on RA-sensitive Hoxb1 at this site or in the hindbrain. Nevertheless, co-expression of Cyp1b1 with Bco1 and Aldh1a1 in foregut STM, provide possibilities for a Cyp1b1-retinol connection to stellate cells and postnatal Srebp regulation.
Cyp1b1 has multiple substrates and, therefore, several ways to partner retinol [9, 13, 20, 22]. However, delivery of retinoids from the mother and protective Cyp26 metabolism may obscure limiting Cyp1b1 activity. The DKO model minimizes the difficulties of surplus dietary retinol and the buffering effects of Cyp26. In near absence of Cyp26a1, Cyp1b1 expression and RA-dependent Hoxb1 are conserved in proximity, suggesting conditions for testing their relationship, including assessing local retinoid levels. These DKO embryos survive to adult life [33] and, therefore, the impact of these interventions on neonatal liver adaptations in relation to adult Srebp regulation can be tested. The alternative intervention of Cyp1b1 in systemic inhibitory signaling to Srebp (Fig 9B) is also being tested.
Highlights
Multiple stellate activation markers are equally stimulated at birth by retinol deprivation and Cyp1b1 deletion.
Postnatal liver pathways mediated by Srebp forms depend on Cyp1b1 and retinol; extend to Aldh1a1 and Rdh11.
Cyp1b1 deletion, even with dietary retinol depletion, does not decrease RA-dependent processes in E9.5 embryos.
Lrat/Rbp4 deletions (DKO) remove hindbrain Cyp26a1, but retain Hoxb1 and Cyp1b1, including in the foregut.
During foregut liver budding, associated mesenchyme (STM) co-expresses Cyp1b1 and Bco1, a stellate marker that forms retinaldehyde.
Summary
Removal of Cyp1b1 or liver retinoids stimulates perinatal stellate activation, with subsequent losses in Srebp-mediated transcription involved in oleate, cholesterol and retinoic acid synthesis. Earlier at E9.5, exceptional lowering of dietary retinol by deletions of both Lrat and Rbp4 (DKO) removes Cyp26a1, which metabolizes RA. Cyp1b1 and Hoxb1 retain adjacent expression in the foregut that is sufficient for normal liver initiation. Co-expression of Cyp1b1 and Bco1 in local mesenchyme suggests cooperation in RA synthesis that supports BMP4 effects on liver budding, but also regulates stellate cells seen at birth.
Supporting information
Abbreviations
- Cyp1b1
cytochrome P450 1b1
- RA
retinoic acid
- GVAD
protocol consisting of maternal early-gestational initiation of a VA-deficient diet
- STM
septum transversum mesenchyme
- POR
NADPH P450 oxidoreductase
- DKO
Lrat-/-Rbp-/-
- WT
wild type, C57Bl/6J mice
- E
embryonic day
- Suff
indicating administration of a VA-sufficient diet
- ISH
in situ hybridization
- NC
neural crest
- Ba
branchial arch
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health: R01 DK090249 (CRJ), T32 HD041921 (MM), NIH U54DK104310 (CV), R01ES001332 (CV), R01DK099328 (CV), R01HD083331 (LQ), R01EY027405 (LQ) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Larsen MC, Bushkofsky JR, Gorman T, Adhami V, Mukhtar H, Wang S, et al. Cytochrome P450 1B1: An unexpected modulator of liver fatty acid homeostasis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2015;571:21–39. 10.1016/j.abb.2015.02.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bushkofsky JR, Maguire M, Larsen MC, Fong YH, Jefcoate CR. Cyp1b1 affects external control of mouse hepatocytes, fatty acid homeostasis and signaling involving HNF4alpha and PPARalpha. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2016;597:30–47. 10.1016/j.abb.2016.03.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li F, Zhu W, Gonzalez FJ. Potential role of CYP1B1 in the development and treatment of metabolic diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;178:18–30. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.03.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Maguire M, Larsen MC, Foong YH, Tanumihardjo S, Jefcoate CR. Cyp1b1 deletion and retinol deficiency coordinately suppress mouse liver lipogenic genes and hepcidin expression during post-natal development. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;454:50–68. 10.1016/j.mce.2017.05.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maguire M, Bushkofsky JR, Larsen MC, Foong YH, Tanumihardjo SA, Jefcoate CR. Diet-dependent retinoid effects on liver gene expression include stellate and inflammation markers and parallel effects of the nuclear repressor Shp. J Nutr Biochem. 2017;47:63–74. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2017.04.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Savas U, Bhattacharyya KK, Christou M, Alexander DL, Jefcoate CR. Mouse cytochrome P-450EF, representative of a new 1B subfamily of cytochrome P-450s. Cloning, sequence determination, and tissue expression. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(21):14905–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pottenger LH, Jefcoate CR. Characterization of a novel cytochrome P450 from the transformable cell line, C3H/10T1/2. Carcinogenesis. 1990;11(2):321–7. 10.1093/carcin/11.2.321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Choudhary D, Jansson I, Schenkman JB, Sarfarazi M, Stoilov I. Comparative expression profiling of 40 mouse cytochrome P450 genes in embryonic and adult tissues. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003;414(1):91–100. 10.1016/s0003-9861(03)00174-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Palenski TL, Gurel Z, Sorenson CM, Hankenson KD, Sheibani N. Cyp1B1 expression promotes angiogenesis by suppressing NF-kappaB activity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2013;305(11):C1170–84. 10.1152/ajpcell.00139.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tang Y, Scheef EA, Gurel Z, Sorenson CM, Jefcoate CR, Sheibani N. CYP1B1 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase combine to sustain proangiogenic functions of endothelial cells under hyperoxic stress. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010;298(3):C665–78. 10.1152/ajpcell.00153.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zaret KS. From Endoderm to Liver Bud: Paradigms of Cell Type Specification and Tissue Morphogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016;117:647–69. 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.12.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grindheim JM, Nicetto D, Donahue G, Zaret KS. Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 Proteins EZH1 and EZH2 Regulate Timing of Postnatal Hepatocyte Maturation and Fibrosis by Repressing Genes With Euchromatic Promoters in Mice. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(6):1834–48. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chambers D, Wilson L, Maden M, Lumsden A. RALDH-independent generation of retinoic acid during vertebrate embryogenesis by CYP1B1. Development. 2007;134(7):1369–83. 10.1242/dev.02815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.D'Ambrosio DN, Walewski JL, Clugston RD, Berk PD, Rippe RA, Blaner WS. Distinct populations of hepatic stellate cells in the mouse liver have different capacities for retinoid and lipid storage. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24993 10.1371/journal.pone.0024993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Piscaglia F, Knittel T, Kobold D, Barnikol-Watanabe S, Di Rocco P, Ramadori G. Cellular localization of hepatic cytochrome 1B1 expression and its regulation by aromatic hydrocarbons and inflammatory cytokines. Biochemical Pharmacology. 1999;58(1):157–65. 10.1016/s0006-2952(99)00066-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Blaner WS, O'Byrne SM, Wongsiriroj N, Kluwe J, D'Ambrosio DM, Jiang H, et al. Hepatic stellate cell lipid droplets: a specialized lipid droplet for retinoid storage. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2009;1791(6):467–73. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2008.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Alexander DL, Ganem LG, Fernandez-Salguero P, Gonzalez F, Jefcoate CR. Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor is an inhibitory regulator of lipid synthesis and of commitment to adipogenesis. J Cell Sci. 1998;111 (Pt 22):3311–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cho YC, Zheng W, Yamamoto M, Liu X, Hanlon PR, Jefcoate CR. Differentiation of pluripotent C3H10T1/2 cells rapidly elevates CYP1B1 through a novel process that overcomes a loss of Ah Receptor. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2005;439(2):139–53. 10.1016/j.abb.2005.04.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zheng W, Tong T, Lee J, Liu X, Marcus C, Jefcoate CR. Stimulation of mouse Cyp1b1 during adipogenesis: characterization of promoter activation by the transcription factor Pax6. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2013;532(1):1–14. 10.1016/j.abb.2013.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pingili AK, Davidge KN, Thirunavukkarasu S, Khan NS, Katsurada A, Majid DSA, et al. 2-Methoxyestradiol Reduces Angiotensin II-Induced Hypertension and Renal Dysfunction in Ovariectomized Female and Intact Male Mice. Hypertension. 2017;69(6):1104–12. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dempsie Y, MacRitchie NA, White K, Morecroft I, Wright AF, Nilsen M, et al. Dexfenfluramine and the oestrogen-metabolizing enzyme CYP1B1 in the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Cardiovasc Res. 2013;99(1):24–34. 10.1093/cvr/cvt064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lefevre L, Authier H, Stein S, Majorel C, Couderc B, Dardenne C, et al. LRH-1 mediates anti-inflammatory and antifungal phenotype of IL-13-activated macrophages through the PPARgamma ligand synthesis. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6801 10.1038/ncomms7801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Larsen MC, N'Jai AU, Alexander DL, Rondelli CM, Forsberg EC, Czuprynski CJ, et al. Cyp1b1-mediated suppression of lymphoid progenitors in bone marrow by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons coordinately impacts spleen and thymus: a selective role for the Ah Receptor. Pharmacology research & perspectives. 2016;4(4):e00245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Seok SH, Ma ZX, Feltenberger JB, Chen H, Chen H, Scarlett C, et al. Trace derivatives of kynurenine potently activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR). J Biol Chem. 2018;293(6):1994–2005. 10.1074/jbc.RA117.000631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhao Y, Wang S, Sorenson CM, Teixeira L, Dubielzig RR, Peters DM, et al. Cyp1b1 mediates periostin regulation of trabecular meshwork development by suppression of oxidative stress. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(21):4225–40. 10.1128/MCB.00856-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen H, Howald WN, Juchau MR. Biosynthesis of all-trans-retinoic acid from all-trans-retinol: catalysis of all-trans-retinol oxidation by human P-450 cytochromes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2000;28(3):315–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Choe SK, Zhang X, Hirsch N, Straubhaar J, Sagerstrom CG. A screen for hoxb1-regulated genes identifies ppp1r14al as a regulator of the rhombomere 4 Fgf-signaling center. Dev Biol. 2011;358(2):356–67. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.05.676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Studer M, Gavalas A, Marshall H, Ariza-McNaughton L, Rijli FM, Chambon P, et al. Genetic interactions between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 reveal new roles in regulation of early hindbrain patterning. Development (Cambridge, England). 1998;125(6):1025–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhao Y, Sorenson CM, Sheibani N. Cytochrome P450 1B1 and Primary Congenital Glaucoma. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2015;10(1):60–7. 10.4103/2008-322X.156116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Libby RT, Smith RS, Savinova OV, Zabaleta A, Martin JE, Gonzalez FJ, et al. Modification of ocular defects in mouse developmental glaucoma models by tyrosinase. Science. 2003;299(5612):1578–81. 10.1126/science.1080095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Williams AL, Eason J, Chawla B, Bohnsack BL. Cyp1b1 Regulates Ocular Fissure Closure Through a Retinoic Acid-Independent Pathway. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(2):1084–97. 10.1167/iovs.16-20235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Satre MA, Ugen KE, Kochhar DM. Developmental changes in endogenous retinoids during pregnancy and embryogenesis in the mouse. Biol Reprod. 1992;46(5):802–10. 10.1095/biolreprod46.5.802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim YK, Wassef L, Hamberger L, Piantedosi R, Palczewski K, Blaner WS, et al. Retinyl ester formation by lecithin: retinol acyltransferase is a key regulator of retinoid homeostasis in mouse embryogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(9):5611–21. 10.1074/jbc.M708885200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sirbu IO, Gresh L, Barra J, Duester G. Shifting boundaries of retinoic acid activity control hindbrain segmental gene expression. Development. 2005;132(11):2611–22. 10.1242/dev.01845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Huang D, Chen SW, Gudas LJ. Analysis of two distinct retinoic acid response elements in the homeobox gene Hoxb1 in transgenic mice. Dev Dyn. 2002;223(3):353–70. 10.1002/dvdy.10057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Roux M, Laforest B, Capecchi M, Bertrand N, Zaffran S. Hoxb1 regulates proliferation and differentiation of second heart field progenitors in pharyngeal mesoderm and genetically interacts with Hoxa1 during cardiac outflow tract development. Dev Biol. 2015;406(2):247–58. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kolterud A, Wandzioch E, Carlsson L. Lhx2 is expressed in the septum transversum mesenchyme that becomes an integral part of the liver and the formation of these cells is independent of functional Lhx2. Gene Expr Patterns. 2004;4(5):521–8. 10.1016/j.modgep.2004.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Asahina K, Zhou B, Pu WT, Tsukamoto H. Septum transversum-derived mesothelium gives rise to hepatic stellate cells and perivascular mesenchymal cells in developing mouse liver. Hepatology. 2011;53(3):983–95. 10.1002/hep.24119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kim YK, Zuccaro MV, Costabile BK, Rodas R, Quadro L. Tissue- and sex-specific effects of beta-carotene 15,15' oxygenase (BCO1) on retinoid and lipid metabolism in adult and developing mice. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2015;572:11–8. 10.1016/j.abb.2015.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Amengual J, Widjaja-Adhi MA, Rodriguez-Santiago S, Hessel S, Golczak M, Palczewski K, et al. Two carotenoid oxygenases contribute to mammalian provitamin A metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(47):34081–96. 10.1074/jbc.M113.501049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang J, Rhee S, Palaria A, Tremblay KD. FGF signaling is required for anterior but not posterior specification of the murine liver bud. Dev Dyn. 2015;244(3):431–43. 10.1002/dvdy.24215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Palaria A, Angelo JR, Guertin TM, Mager J, Tremblay KD. Patterning of the hepato-pancreatobiliary boundary by BMP reveals heterogeneity within the murine liver bud. Hepatology. 2018;68(1):274–88. 10.1002/hep.29769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Duester G. Retinoic acid synthesis and signaling during early organogenesis. Cell. 2008;134(6):921–31. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cunningham TJ, Brade T, Sandell LL, Lewandoski M, Trainor PA, Colas A, et al. Retinoic Acid Activity in Undifferentiated Neural Progenitors Is Sufficient to Fulfill Its Role in Restricting Fgf8 Expression for Somitogenesis. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137894 10.1371/journal.pone.0137894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Napoli JL. Physiological insights into all-trans-retinoic acid biosynthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1821(1):152–67. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Duester G, Mic FA, Molotkov A. Cytosolic retinoid dehydrogenases govern ubiquitous metabolism of retinol to retinaldehyde followed by tissue-specific metabolism to retinoic acid. Chemico-biological interactions. 2003;143–144:201–10. 10.1016/s0009-2797(02)00204-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Molotov A, Duester G. Genetic evidence that Retinaldehyde Dehydrogenase (Raldh1) functions downstrean of Alcohol Dehydrogenase (Aldh1) in metabolism of retinol to retinoic acid. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:36085–36090. 10.1074/jbc.M303709200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ang HL, Duester G. Stimulation of premature retinoic acid synthesis in Xenopus embryos following premature expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase ALDH1. European journal of biochemistry. 1999;260(1):227–34. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00139.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Napoli JL. Cellular retinoid binding-proteins, CRBP, CRABP, FABP5: Effects on retinoid metabolism, function and related diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;173:19–33. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.01.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Uehara M, Yashiro K, Mamiya S, Nishino J, Chambon P, Dolle P, et al. CYP26A1 and CYP26C1 cooperatively regulate anterior-posterior patterning of the developing brain and the production of migratory cranial neural crest cells in the mouse. Dev Biol. 2007;302(2):399–411. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.09.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Molotkov A, Molotkova N, Duester G. Retinoic acid generated by Raldh2 in mesoderm is required for mouse dorsal endodermal pancreas development. Dev Dyn. 2005;232(4):950–7. 10.1002/dvdy.20256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Strate I, Min TH, Iliev D, Pera EM. Retinol dehydrogenase 10 is a feedback regulator of retinoic acid signalling during axis formation and patterning of the central nervous system. Development. 2009;136(3):461–72. 10.1242/dev.024901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rhinn M, Schuhbaur B, Niederreither K, Dolle P. Involvement of retinol dehydrogenase 10 in embryonic patterning and rescue of its loss of function by maternal retinaldehyde treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(40):16687–92. 10.1073/pnas.1103877108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Keil KP, Mehta V, Abler LL, Joshi PS, Schmitz CT, Vezina CM. Visualization and quantification of mouse prostate development by in situ hybridization. Differentiation. 2012;84(3):232–9. 10.1016/j.diff.2012.07.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rasband WS. ImageJ Bethesda, Maryland, USA: U. S. National Institutes of Health; 1997. –2016 [Available from: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Vollrath AL, Smith AA, Craven M, Bradfield CA. EDGE(3): a web-based solution for management and analysis of Agilent two color microarray experiments. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:280 10.1186/1471-2105-10-280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Belyaeva OV, Wu L, Shmarakov I, Nelson PS, Kedishvili NY. Retinol dehydrogenase 11 is essential for the maintenance of retinol homeostasis in liver and testis in mice. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(18):6996–7007. 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Adams MK, Belyaeva OV, Wu L, Kedishvili NY. The retinaldehyde reductase activity of DHRS3 is reciprocally activated by retinol dehydrogenase 10 to control retinoid homeostasis. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(21):14868–80. 10.1074/jbc.M114.552257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Huq MD, Tsai NP, Gupta P, Wei LN. Regulation of retinal dehydrogenases and retinoic acid synthesis by cholesterol metabolites. The EMBO journal. 2006;25(13):3203–13. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ohshiro T, Ohtawa M, Nagamitsu T, Matsuda D, Yagyu H, Davis MA, et al. New pyripyropene A derivatives, highly SOAT2-selective inhibitors, improve hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis in atherogenic mouse models. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 2015;355(2):299–307. 10.1124/jpet.115.227348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zaid A, Roubtsova A, Essalmani R, Marcinkiewicz J, Chamberland A, Hamelin J, et al. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9): hepatocyte-specific low-density lipoprotein receptor degradation and critical role in mouse liver regeneration. Hepatology. 2008;48(2):646–54. 10.1002/hep.22354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Soccio RE, Adams RM, Maxwell KN, Breslow JL. Differential gene regulation of StarD4 and StarD5 cholesterol transfer proteins. Activation of StarD4 by sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2 and StarD5 by endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(19):19410–8. 10.1074/jbc.M501778200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Iaea DB, Mao S, Lund FW, Maxfield FR. Role of STARD4 in sterol transport between the endocytic recycling compartment and the plasma membrane. Molecular biology of the cell. 2017;28(8):1111–22. 10.1091/mbc.E16-07-0499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yin C, Evason KJ, Asahina K, Stainier DY. Hepatic stellate cells in liver development, regeneration, and cancer. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2013;123(5):1902–10. 10.1172/JCI66369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pang XY, Wang S, Jurczak MJ, Shulman GI, Moise AR. Retinol saturase modulates lipid metabolism and the production of reactive oxygen species. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2017;633:93–102. 10.1016/j.abb.2017.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.de Lera AR, Krezel W, Ruhl R. An Endogenous Mammalian Retinoid X Receptor Ligand, At Last! ChemMedChem. 2016;11(10):1027–37. 10.1002/cmdc.201600105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Nicholls HT, Hornick JL, Cohen DE. Phosphatidylcholine transfer protein/StarD2 promotes microvesicular steatosis and liver injury in murine experimental steatohepatitis. American journal of physiology Gastrointestinal and liver physiology. 2017;313(1):G50–g61. 10.1152/ajpgi.00379.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kayam G, Kohl A, Magen Z, Peretz Y, Weisinger K, Bar A, et al. A novel role for Pax6 in the segmental organization of the hindbrain. Development (Cambridge, England). 2013;140(10):2190–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.McLennan R, Kulesa PM. Neuropilin-1 interacts with the second branchial arch microenvironment to mediate chick neural crest cell dynamics. Dev Dyn. 2010;239(6):1664–73. 10.1002/dvdy.22303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Rossel M, Capecchi MR. Mice mutant for both Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 show extensive remodeling of the hindbrain and defects in craniofacial development. Development. 1999;126(22):5027–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Grindheim JM, Nicetto D, Donahue G, Zaret KS. PRC2 proteins EZH1 and EZH2 Regulate Timing of Postnatal Hepatocyte Maturation and Fibrosis by Repressing Gene Expression at Promoter Regions in Euchromatin in Mice. Gastroenterology. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kamarudin TA, Bojic S, Collin J, Yu M, Alharthi S, Buck H, et al. Differences in the Activity of Endogenous Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling Impact on the Ability of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Differentiate to Corneal Epithelial-Like Cells. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio). 2018;36(3):337–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ross AC, Zolfaghari R. Cytochrome P450s in the regulation of cellular retinoic acid metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. 2011;31:65–87. 10.1146/annurev-nutr-072610-145127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Brown NA. Routine assessment of morphology and growth: Scoring systems and measurements of size In: Copp AJ, Cockroft DL, editors. Postimplantation Mammalian Embryos: A Practical Approach. Oxford, UK: IRL Press; 1990. p. 93–108. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kim YK, Wassef L, Chung S, Jiang H, Wyss A, Blaner WS, et al. beta-Carotene and its cleavage enzyme beta-carotene-15,15'-oxygenase (CMOI) affect retinoid metabolism in developing tissues. FASEB J. 2011;25(5):1641–52. 10.1096/fj.10-175448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Griffiths B, Lewis CA, Bensaad K, Ros S, Zhang Q, Ferber EC, et al. Sterol regulatory element binding protein-dependent regulation of lipid synthesis supports cell survival and tumor growth. Cancer and Metabolism. 2013;1: 3–23. 10.1186/2049-3002-1-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Flowers MT, Ntambi JM. Role of stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase in regulating lipid metabolism. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2008;19(3):248–56. 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3282f9b54d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Horton JD, Shimomura I, Brown MS, Hammer RE, Goldstein JL, Shimano H. Activation of cholesterol synthesis in preference to fatty acid synthesis in liver and adipose tissue of transgenic mice overproducing sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2. J Clin Invest. 1998;101(11):2331–9. 10.1172/JCI2961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Huq MDM, Tsai NP, Gupta P, Wei LN. Regulation of retinal dehydrogenases and retinoic acid synthesis by cholesterol metabolites. EMBO J. 2006;25: 3203–3213. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Thomas SE, Harrison EH. Mechanisms of selective delivery of xanthophylls to retinal pigment epithelial cells by human lipoproteins. J Lipid Res. 2016;57: 1865–1878. 10.1194/jlr.M070193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ziaoli AM, Song Z, Yang F. Lipogenic SREBP-1a/c transcription factors activate expression of the iron regulator hepcidin, revealing cross-talk between lipid and iron metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2019;294: 12743–12753. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Maiers JL, Malhi H. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in metabolic liver diseases and hepatic fibrosis. Semin Liver Dis. 2019;39: 235–248. 10.1055/s-0039-1681032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Liu Z, Li C, Kang N, Malhi H, Shah VH, Maiers JL. Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) cross-talk with the unfolded protein response is critical for hepatic stellate cell activation. J Biol Chem. 2019;294: 3137–3151. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.005761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ribes V, Otto DM, Dickmann L, Schmidt K, Schuhbaur B, Henderson C, et al. Rescue of cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (Por) mouse mutants reveals functions in vasculogenesis, brain and limb patterning linked to retinoic acid homeostasis. Dev Biol. 2007;303(1):66–81. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.10.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Han Y, Hu Z, Cui A, Liu Z, Ma F, Xue Y, et al. Post-translational regulation of lipogenesis via AMPK-dependent phosphorylation of insulin-induced gene. Nature Communications. 2019;10: 623–636. 10.1038/s41467-019-08585-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Romani P, Brian I, Santinon G, Pocaterra A, Audano M, Pedretti S, et al. Extracellular matrix mechanical cues regulate lipid metabolism through Lipin-1 and SREBP. Nature Cell Biol 2019;21: 338–347. 10.1038/s41556-018-0270-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Seo K, Shin SM. Induction of Lipin-1 by ROS-dependent SREBP-2 activation. Toxicol Res 2017;33: 219–224. 10.5487/TR.2017.33.3.219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Rouschop SH, Karl T, Risch A, van Ewijk PA, Schrauwen-Hinderling VB, et al. Gene expression and DNA methylation as mechanisms of disturbed metabolism in offspring after exposure to a prenatal HF diet. J Lipid Res 2019;60: 1250–1259. 10.1194/jlr.M092593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Xu G, Zhang L, Ma A, Qian Y, Ding Q, et al. SIP1 is a downstream effector of GADD45G in senescence induction and growth inhibition of liver tumor cells. Oncotarget 2015;6: 33636–33647. 10.18632/oncotarget.5602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Su L, Zhao L, Chen FJ, Wang H, Qian H, et al. Cideb controls sterol-regulated ER export of SREBP/SCAP by promoting cargo loading at ER exit sites. EMBO J 2019;38: e100156 10.15252/embj.2018100156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Rabanal-Ruiz Y, Korolchuk VI. mTorc1 and nutrient homeostasis: The central role of the lysosome. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19: 818–841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Shen K, Sabatini DM. Ragulator and SLC38A9 activate the Rag GTPases through noncanonical GEF mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA. 2018;115: 9545–9550. 10.1073/pnas.1811727115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Dong Q, Majumdar G, O’Meally RN, Cole RN, Elam MB, Raghow R. Insulin-induced de novo lipid synthesis occurs mainly via mTOR-dependent regulation of proteostasis of SREPB-1c. Mol Cell Biochem. 2019; 10.1007/s11010-019-03625-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Deng X, Dong Q, Bridges D, Raghnow R, Park EA, Elam MB. Docosahexaenoic acid inhibits proteolytic processing of steroyl regulatory element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1C) via activation of AMP-activated kinase. Biochem Biophys Acta. 2015;1851: 1521–1529. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2015.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Miyamoto L, Ebihara K, Kusakabe T, Aotani D, Yamamoto-Kataoka S, et al. Leptin activates hepatic 5’-AMP-activated Protein Kinase through Sympathetic Nervous System and α1-Adrenergic Receptor. 2012;287: 40441–40447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Bless EP, Yang J, Acharya KD, Nettles SA, Vassoler FM, et al. Adult neurogenesis in the female mouse hypothalamus: Estradiol and high-fat diet alter the generation of newborn neurons expressing Estrogen Receptor α. eNeuro. 2016;3: 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Saito K, He Y, Yang Y, Zhu L, Wang C, et al. PI3K in the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus mediates estrogenic actions on energy expenditure in female mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6: 23459–23469. 10.1038/srep23459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Guo L, Costanzo-Garvey DL, Smith DR, Zavorka ME, Venable-Kang M, et al. Cell non-autonomous regulation of hepatic IGF-1 and neonatal growth by Kinase Suppressor of Ras 2 (KSR2). Sci Rep. 2016;6: 32093–32104. 10.1038/srep32093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper.