Skip to main content
Medical Archives logoLink to Medical Archives
. 2019 Dec;73(6):421–424. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2019.73.421-424

A Brief Review of the Degenerative Intervertebral Disc Disease

Natasa Kos 1,2, Lidija Gradisnik 2,3, Tomaz Velnar 2,4
PMCID: PMC7007629  PMID: 32082013

Abstract

Introduction:

The degenerative processes of the intervertebral disc represent an important cause of morbidity in everyday clinical practice, exerting burden on patients and clinicians treating them. Numerous factors may initiate degenerative processes, which most commonly affect the nucleus pulposus and ultimately influence the biomechanics of the whole spine.

Aim:

This paper provides an overview from the literature about the process, causes and mechanisms of disc degeneration and the associated factors.

Methods:

The scientific literature was reviewed through PubMed, Medline and Science Direct. The articles were chosen in correlation with the study objective and their scientific relevance.

Results:

Many mechanical factors, such as mechanical, traumatic, genetic and nutritional, may affect the integrity of the intervertebral disc. The degenerative processes involve the structural damage of the intervertebral disc and the changes in number and composition of cells. The main factor in the degeneration of the intervertebral disc is the loss of proteoglycans. Degenerative changes of the disc are connected to damage of adjacent structures, leading to functional changes, higher susceptibility to injuries and clinical signs and symptoms.

Conclusions:

Degenerative disease of the intervertebral disc remains a significant health problem. Besides standard conservative and surgical treatment, techniques of regenerative therapy are becoming very promising, although still in the experimental phase.

Keywords: intervertebral disc, fibrous annulus, nucleus pulposus, degenerative disease, spine

1. INTRODUCTION

The degenerative disease of the intervertebral disc and back pain are chronic conditions that are caused by several factors and represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality in everyday clinical practice (1).

During the clinical examination, the disease may present as axial back pain, spinal stenosis, myelopathy or radiculopathy. The consequences of the degenerative disease of the intervertebral disc are among the main initiative factors for chronic instability of the diseased segments of the spine and for functional disability among both sexes, which significantly affects living quality, especially in young and active population (1-3).

2. AIM

This paper provides an overview from the literature about the processes, causes and mechanisms of disc degeneration.

The associated factors are briefly described, as well as the epidemiology and clinical symptoms.

3. METHODS

Literature search was conducted for this review. The data about intervertebral disc structure, degeneration and its consequences was collected from various sources. These included electronic databases PubMed, Medline and Science Direct. The search was performed using a combination of the following terms: intervertebral disc, degenerative disc disease, fibrous annulus, nucleus pulposus, degenerative disease and lumbar spine. The articles were selected in correlation with the study objective and their scientific relevance.

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CIRCUMSTANCES

The incidence of low back pain varies widely among different reports. It is the fifth most common cause for the visit to the doctor and affects 7.6 to 37% of patients (1-3). Long lasting pain and movement difficulties are experienced by 10% of patients (1). The degeneration of intervertebral disc tissue starts sooner that the degeneration of other muscular and skeletal tissues and is in many cases asymptomatic. It has been reported that the initial degeneration of intervertebral disc may be present as early as in the adolescence, when 20% of young people have mild signs of the disease (4, 5). With age, the incidence rises. It affects 10% of male population at the age of 50 years and up to 50% at the age of 70 years. In some reports, the degenerative disease of the intervertebral disc may be present in 90% of people; many of them have no signs of the disease (2, 3, 6, 7).

Low back pain is strongly connected to the degenerative process of the intervertebral disc. The height of the intervertebral disc gradually falls and the consequence is changed dynamics in the affected segment of the spine. This accelerates the degeneration of other, nearby segments as well as other spinal structures, such as ligaments, joints and muscles. In the long term, this leads to narrowing of the spinal canal with the compression of neural tissues due to spinal stenosis, which is the main cause of pain, especially among the elders. With increase of elderly population, this problem is gaining significance (4, 5).

4.2. THE PROCESS OF THE INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION

The intervertebral disc is composed of three layers: I) fibrous annulus with its outer and inner part, II) central pulpous nucleus and III) terminal plates (4, 5). The disc is avascular, structure, made of fibrous tissue and cartilage. Microscopically, it is composed of scarce fibroblast-like cells, located in the extracellular matrix, accounting or the most of the disc structure. Both cells and matrix are fundamental for normal function of the intervertebral disc (4).

Many mechanical factors, depending on duration, severity, type and position of load, affects the state of the intervertebral disc and thus the biological response to these factors (4, 8, 9). The border between the annulus of the intervertebral disc and it nucleus becomes more and more pronounce during the organism growth. The degenerative processes encompass the structural damage of the intervertebral disc and the changes in number and composition of cells. With aging and advancing degeneration, the nucleus is primary affected. It becomes more fibrous and less elastic. Tiny concentric breaks emerge in the outer part of the disc from where they extend into the nucleus.

The amount of fibrous tissue rises, composition and quantity of proteoglycans changes and number of cells changes due to apoptosis. Different factors such as mechanical, traumatic, genetic and nutritional play an important role in the degenerative process (7-9). The fibres in the fibrous annulus become increasingly disoriented and the network made of elastin and collagen fibres gradually deteriorates. Cells in the nucleus are affected by apoptosis and later on by necrosis, on the other hand they tend to proliferate excessively. These degenerative cascades are frequent and in an adult intervertebral disc, up to 50% of cells may be necrotic (10, 11).

The main factor in the degeneration of the intervertebral disc is the loss of proteoglycans. These large molecules are degraded to smaller fragments that are lost from disc tissue (12,13). The consequence is fall in osmotic pressure in the disc matrix and loss of water molecules, which affects the mechanical properties of the disc (12, 14, 15). As degenerated intervertebral discs contain less water and have therefore inferior capabilities for sustaining pressure, they bulge and loss height. Proteoglycan loss affects also movement of other molecules into and out of the disc matrix. Serum proteins and cytokines diffuse into the matrix, affect the cells and accelerate the process of the degeneration (5, 13, 15).

With the matrix degeneration is connected also the quantity of collagen and its composition. Orientation, location and types of collagen fibres are most affected, total quantity of collagen to a lesser extent, however (5, 6). Old collagen fibres become denatured, although new fibres are being synthesised in early the process of degeneration. Enzyme activity has an important role in the process of collagen, fibronectin and proteoglycan denaturation and breakdown. Matrix metalloproteinases and cathepsins are the most important among others (5, 6, 16).

Degenerative changes of the intervertebral disc are connected to damage of nearby structures, such as ligaments, joints and vertebral muscles. This leads to functional changes and greater susceptibility to injuries. Due to overloading, a degenerated intervertebral disc is lower than normal and apophyseal joints need to bear higher loads (5, 16). The consequence is osteoarthritic degeneration. Strength of yellow ligaments decreases, which leads to their hypertrophy and protrusion of the ligaments into the spinal canal with consequent narrowing and compression of neural structures (17). The causes for pain in the course of the degenerative process are complex and in many cases a fair combination of structural and mechanical deformation as well as activity of inflammatory mediators. Frequently, spinal nerve radices are involved in the degenerative cascade, which causes chronic pain mainly due to their compression and partly due to ingrowths of tiny neural endings into the degenerated disc ant their activation due to constant release of inflammatory mediators (5, 17).

4.3. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION

Prolapsed or herniated disc are one of the most frequent reasons for presentation to the orthopaedist or neurosurgeon. Herniation is bulging of the disc due to partial or complete rupture of the outer fibrous annulus. The bulging may involve anterior, posterolateral or posterior direction (18). The last two directions are particularly important as they cause compression of the neural structures in the vertebral canal (18, 19). Occasionally, spontaneous resorption of the disc may occur, leading to improvement or even cessation of lumbar pain. Although disc herniation is most commonly caused due to mechanical injury and consequent rupture of the fibrous annulus, some extent of initial degeneration is necessary in order to allow the pulpous nucleus to herniate through fibrous bands of annulus into the vertebral canal (17-19]. For a healthy disc to rupture, an enormous force is necessary. In many cases, the terminal plate of the vertebrae fails sooner than the fibrous belt (11, 20, 21).

4.4. MECHANICAL STRESS

Abnormal mechanical loads and continuous microscopic injuries lead to disc degeneration through faster wear and tear of both cellular and acellular components, involving the processes described above. The most common clinical consequence is chronic pain (22, 23). The most important risk factors include heavy physical labour, smoking (through atherosclerosis of minute vessels that supply the terminal plates), obesity, inappropriate flexed posture and lack of physical activity (13, 22, 24-26).

4.5. GENETIC FACTORS

There is also genetic basis for the degenerative process of the intervertebral disc. Certain genetic polymorphisms for matrix molecules define the integrity of the extracellular matrix and these polymorphisms may also influence the course of the degenerative process (27, 28). Mutations in genes coding for matrix molecules lead to alterations of matrix morphology, consequently affecting the function and biochemical processes of the disc (27, 29). However, genes alone are not the only reasons for disc disease as environmental factors are also involved, showing that intervertebral disc degeneration is probably a multifactorial disease (30-32).

4.6. DISC DEGENERATION DUE TO NUTRITIONAL DISORDERS

For normal function and structure of the disc, the cells need sufficient nutritional supply. One of the important reasons for the degenerative process is, therefore, also nutritional disorder of the intervertebral disc (33). As the disc is an avascular structure, its supply depends mainly on diffusion. Capillaries arising in the vertebral bodies extend only to the subhondral area of the disc terminal plate. This means that gasses and nutrients must diffuse through extracellular matrix in order to reach the cells. A fall in nutritional supply causes a fall in oxygen quantity and a rise in lactate concentration with consequent pH alteration, affecting the cell function and synthesis of extracellular matrix. In long term, this leads to degenerative process (33, 34).

5. CONCLUSIONS

Degenerative disease of the intervertebral disc remains a significant health problem, still not understood and solved sufficiently. Besides standard conservative and surgical treatment, techniques of regenerative therapy are very promising, although at the moment of writing still in the experimental phase. Regenerative therapy aims to restore the degenerated disc matrix by two approaches: with growth factors enhancing extracellular matrix synthesis by the disc cells and with agents inhibiting cytokines that normally cause matrix loss.

Author’s contribution:

NK gave substantial contributions to the conception, design, acquisition of data, revising, final approval of the version; LG and TV gave substantial contributions to design, acquisition of data, interpretation of data, drafting the article, revising, final approval of the version.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Financial support and sponsorship:

Nil.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hall JA, Konstantinou K, Lewis M, Oppong R, Ogollah R, Jowett S. Systematic Review of Decision Analytic Modelling in Economic Evaluations of Low Back Pain and Sciatica. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019;17(4):467–491. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00471-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cheung KM, Karppinen J, Chan D, Ho DW, Song YQ, Sham P, et al. Prevalence and pattern of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging changes in a population study of one thousand forty- three individuals. Spine. 2009;34(9):934–940. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a01b3f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kanayama M, Togawa D, Takahashi C, Terai T, Hashimoto T. Cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging study of lumbar disc degeneration in 200 healthy individuals. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;11(4):501–507. doi: 10.3171/2009.5.SPINE08675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cheung KM, Orlansky AS, Sen K, Elliot DM. Reduced nucleus pulposus glycosaminoglycan content alters intervertebral disc dynamic viscoelastic mechanics. J Biomech. 2009;42(12):1941–1946. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Colombini A, Lombardi G, Corsi MM, Banfi G. Pathophysiology of the human intervertebral disc. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40(5):837–842. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kalichman L, Kim DH, Li L, Guermazi A, Hunter DJ. Computed tomography-evaluated features of spinal degeneration: prevalence, intercorrelation, and association with self-reported low back pain. Spine J. 2010;10(3):200–208. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miller J, Schmatz C, Schultz A. Lumbar disc degeneration: Correlation with Age, Sex, and Spine Level in 600 Autopsy Specimens. Spine. 1988;13(2):173–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hanımoğlu H, Cevik S, Yılmaz H, Kaplan A, Calış F, Katar S, et al. Effects of Modic Type 1 Changes in the Vertebrae on Low Back Pain. World Neurosurg. 2019;121:426–432. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gubitz R, Lange T, Gosheger G, Heindel W, Allkemper T, Stehling C, et al. Influence of Age, BMI, Gender and Lumbar Level on T1ρ Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Lumbar Discs in Healthy Asymptomatic Adults. Rofo. 2018;190(2):144–151. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-115898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hsieh AH, Twomey JD. Cellular mechanobiology of the intervertebral disc: New directions and approaches. J Biomech. 2010;43(1):137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Setton LA, Chen J. Mechanobiology of the intervertebral disc and relevance to disc degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(2):52–57. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Roughley PJ. Biology of intervertebral disc aging and degeneration: involvement of the extracellular matrix. Spine. 2004;29(23):2691–2699. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146101.53784.b1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Patil P, Niedernhofer LJ, Robbins PD, Lee J, Sowa G, Vo N. Cellular senescence in intervertebral disc aging and degeneration. Curr Mol Biol Rep. 2018;4(4):180–190. doi: 10.1007/s40610-018-0108-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vo NV, Hartman RA, Patil PR, Risbud MV, Kletsas D, Iatridis JC, et al. Molecular mechanisms of biological aging in intervertebral discs. J Orthop Res. 2016;34(8):1289–1306. doi: 10.1002/jor.23195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Singh K, Masuda K, Thonar EJ, An HS, Cs-Szabo G. Age-related changes in the extracellular matrix of nucleus pulposus and anulus fibrosus of human intervertebral disc. Spine. 2009;34(1):10–16. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818e5ddd. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brown S, Rodrigues S, Sharp C, Wade K, Broom N, McCall IW, et al. Staying connected: structural integration at the intervertebral disc-vertebra interface of human lumbar spines. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(1):248–258. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4560-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Grignon B, Grignon Y, Mainard D, Braun M, Netter P, Roland J. The structure of the cartilaginous end-plates in elder people. Surg Radiol Anat. 2000;22(1):13–19. doi: 10.1007/s00276-000-0013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fields AJ, Ballatori A, Liebenberg EC, Lotz JC. Contribution of the endplates to disc degeneration. Curr Mol Biol Rep. 2018;4(4):151–160. doi: 10.1007/s40610-018-0105-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Veres SP, Robertson PA, Broom ND. The morphology of acute disc herniation: a clinically relevant model defining the role of flexion. Spine. 2009;34(21):2288–2296. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a49d7e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chang CW, Lai PH, Yip CM, Hsu SS. Spontaneous regression of lumbar herniated disc. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009;72(12):650–653. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70449-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Manchikanti L, Derby R, Benyamin RM, Helm S, Hirsch JA. A systematic review of mechanical lumbar disc decompression with nucleoplasty. Pain Physician. 2009;12(3):561–572. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GL, Datoo G, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, et al. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(2):338–345. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000337574.58662.E2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kalichman L, Hunter DJ. The genetics of intervertebral disc degeneration. Familial predisposition and heritability estimation. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75(4):383–387. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liuke M, Solovieva S, Lamminen A, Luoma K, Leino-Arjas P, Luukkonen R, et al. Disc degeneration of the lumbar spine in relation to overweight. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005;29(8):903–908. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang S, Kim W, Choi KH, Yi YG. Influence of occupation on lumbar spine degeneration in men: the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010-2013. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016;89(8):1321–1328. doi: 10.1007/s00420-016-1166-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Määttä JH, Karppinen J, Paananen M, Bow C, Luk KD, Cheung KM, et al. Refined Phenotyping of Modic Changes: Imaging Biomarkers of Prolonged Severe Low Back Pain and Disability. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95(22):3495. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Määttä JH, Kraatari M, Wolber L, Niinimaki J, Wadge S, Karppinen J, et al. Vertebral endplate change as a feature of intervertebral disc degeneration: a heritability study. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(9):1856–1862. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3333-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sebastine IM, Williams DJ. Current developments in tissue engineering of nucleus pulposus for the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007:6401–6406. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang Y, Sun Z, Liu J, Guo X. Advances in susceptibility genetics of intervertebral degenerative disc disease. Int J Biol Sci. 2008;4(5):283–290. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.4.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kennon JC, Awad ME, Chutkan N, DeVine J, Fulzele S. Current insights on use of growth factors as therapy for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. Biomol Concepts. 2018;9(1):43–52. doi: 10.1515/bmc-2018-0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Battié MC, Videman T, Levalahti E, Gill K, Kaprio J. Genetic and environmental effects on disc degeneration by phenotype and spinal level: a multivariate twin study. Spine. 2008;33(25):2801–2808. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818043b7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Alini M, Roughley PJ, Antoniou J, Stoll T, Aebi M. A biological approach to treating disc degeneration: not for today, but maybe for tomorrow. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(2):215–220. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0485-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Urban JP, Smith S, Fairbank JC. Nutrition of the intervertebral disc. Spine. 2004;29(23):2700–1709. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146499.97948.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Grunhagen T, Wilde G, Soukane DM, Shirazi-Adl SA, Urban JP. Nutrient supply and intervertebral disc metabolism. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(2):30–35. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Archives are provided here courtesy of The Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina

RESOURCES