Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomaterials. 2019 Dec 18;232:119707. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119707

Recent Advances in Porphyrin-Based Nanocomposites for Effective Targeted Imaging and Therapy

Navid Rabiee 1, Mohammad Tavakkoli Yaraki 2,3, Soha Mokhtari Garakani 4, Shima Mokhtari Garakani 4, Sepideh Ahmadi 5,6, Aseman Lajevardi 7, Mojtaba Bagherzadeh 1, Mohammad Rabiee 8, Lobat Tayebi 9, Mohammadreza Tahriri 9,#, Michael R Hamblin 10,11,12,*
PMCID: PMC7008091  NIHMSID: NIHMS1547174  PMID: 31874428

Abstract

Porphyrins are organic compounds that continue to attract much theoretical interest, and have been called the “pigments of life”. They have a wide role in photodynamic and sonodynamic therapy, along with uses in magnetic resonance, fluorescence and photoacoustic imaging. There is a vast range of porphyrins that have been isolated or designed, but few of them have real clinical applications. Due to the hydrophobic properties of porphyrins, and their tendency to aggregate by stacking of the planar molecules they are difficult to work with in aqueous media. Therefore encapsulating them in nanoparticles (NPs) or attachment to various delivery vehicles have been used to improve delivery characteristics. Porphyrins can be used in a composite designed material with properties that allow specific targeting, immune tolerance, extended tissue lifetime and improved hydrophilicity. Drug delivery, healing and repairing of damaged organs, and cancer theranostics are some of the medical uses of porphyrin-based nanocomposites covered in this review.

Keywords: Porphyrin, Nanoparticle, Nanocomposite, Drug Delivery, Theranostics

Impact statement

Porphyrin nanocomposites are increasingly being used as rationally designed theranostic systems. This timely review gathers together diverse reports of these applications especially for cancer diagnosis and therapy.

1. Introduction

In the past, intravenous injection of pharmaceuticals containing insoluble suspensions was considered impossible due to the danger of embolisms. Nowadays, improvements in nanoparticle (NP) suspensions including nano-drugs has increased the therapeutic index. Nanodrugs with improved activity, reduced toxicity and the ability to target the diseased tissues have emerged [13]. However, many nanoparticles are still solid macromolecular constructions, which are too disperse, not necessarily polymers, and generally less than 200 nm in diameter [1, 46]. Since the late seventies, the use of nanoparticles as drug targeting vehicles has faced the problem of the lack of the biodegradability of polymers [7]. Development of nano-vehicles depends on polymers with good biocompatibility and biodegradability properties, which has been helped by the introduction of albumin [8], polyalkyl cyanoacrylate [9], polylactate and glycolate [10], lipids in solid form [11], and chitosan [12] NPs. Overall these nanovehicles were proposed for the treatment of different diseases of the liver or reticuloendothelial system (as well as cancer or infectious disease) because of the ability to concentrate in these tissues. The biodistribution of NPs is goverened by the natural opsonization process that appears after intravenous injection, and the next level was specific targeting to tissues and organs [13, 14].

It is worth mentioning that the targeting of NPs via specific antibodies that recognize cancer cells was utilized in the early eighties [15]. Recent bioconjugation methods, like the Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction (named “click chemistry”), are suitable for NP construction [16]. Targeted delivery is considered the most likely option to improve the treatment of many diseases. Targeted delivery gives us three valuable advantages that traditional systemic delivery lacks: (1) the therapeutics will act at the intended action site, limiting off-target effects, including the damaging side-effects of chemotherapy; (2) the lower dose needed with targeted delivery can better focus the therapeutic agent to the target site, and reduce systemic side effects; (3) targeted delivery can transport the therapeutics to places that are not easily accessible by traditional drugs. The first attempt at improving delivery were carriers attached to antibodies. Two FDA-approved examples were Brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) and Trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla)], while some others are still in clinical testing [17]. However, some limitations of this approach cause problems, such as structural heterogeneity, inconsistent preparation, and restricted solubility [17, 18]. Drugs that contain antibodies are generally useful only in some cases. Additionally, other NP delivery vehicles (such as liposomes, polymer based NPs, metal based NPs, and protein based NPs), have the potential to carry out more effective and more reliable delivery due to encapsulating therapeutic cargos within the particle with a higher cargo to carrier ratio [3, 16].

Porphyrins belong to a class of heterocyclic macrocycles. These organic compounds are constructed from four conjugated pyrrole rings arranged in a circle. The pyrrole α-carbon atoms are connected with methylene bridges [19]. Porphyrins have a total of 26 π-electrons, of which 18 π-electrons are in a planar, continuous macrocycle [20]. The basic chemical structure of porphyrin and its main family members are summarized in Fig. 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Basic chemical structure of porphyrins and the main family members

The understanding of porphyrin structures has advanced appreciably in recent years, and many publications have described detailed structures for porphyrin and metalloporphyrin molecules and their different roles in biomedical applications. Generally, porphyrins are a class of tetrapyrrole macrocycles with a 1-D or 2-D or sometimes 3-D skeleton. By replacing the α, β and other carbon atoms of porphyrins, by nitrogen atoms and the other alternatives, their properties can change dramatically, and also their biomedical applications. In addition, aspects of the chemistry of porphyrins are related to their acting as ligands in coordination complexes, depending on their structural properties which are controlled by bond angles and bond distances, as well as the nature of the metal and also the presence of functional groups. Generally, by using members of the first row of transition metals in the structure of porphyrins, toxicity is decreased to the minimum, however some second and third row transition metals such as Pt, Pd and Ru also have low cellular toxicity. By using amine-based ligands or linkers as the substitutents, the biomedical applications of these compounds in photodynamic therapy, drug delivery and gene delivery are widened. However, carboxy-based linkers are also efficient for drug delivery, due to their potential bonding affinity with several drugs via hydrogen bonds[2124]. In this review article, a logical perspective about the relationship between the structural chemistry of porphyrins and their biomedical applications is presented.

Recently, porphyrin-based nanomaterials have received much attention due to various photophysical and photochemical properties of porphyrins [25, 26]. The porphyrins can be extended to form other molecules using a central metalation process, which further tunes the photophysical properties of the porphyrins. Although the porphyrin family is famous for their light-mediated generation of highly reactive oxygen species, especially singlet oxygen, most porphyrin-based chemicals also have good fluorescence properties and photoacoustic properties, which make them potential candidates for simultaneous imaging/therapy applications called “theranostics” [2729]. In this review, we summarize the latest advances in preparation and delivery of porphyrin nanosystems and their biomedical applications.

2. Cancer theranostics using porphyrin-based nanomaterials

2.1. Cancer Theranostics

Investigators have been interested in porphyrins and the related compounds for their powerful photosensitizing properties, their ability to selectively accumulate inside tumors and other abnormal tissues and cells, and their ability to remain inside tissues for long periods. These properties have enabled them to be used in biomedical applications from imaging for diagnosis (like fluorescence and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) to therapeutic uses (e.g. photodynamic, sonodynamic, boron neutron capture, [30], and radiation therapy (RT)). Among them, PDT (photodynamic therapy), SDT (sonodynamic therapy) and BNCT (boron neutron capture therapy) are binary cancer therapies that require the simultaneous localization of the compound to the targeted tissue and the local (spatially confined) application of physical energy such as light (in PDT), ultrasound (in SDT) or a low-energy neutron beam (in BCNT). Therefore, porphyrins and their derivatives can be used in therapies that have potential for local control of tumors with fewer side effects than surgery or other cancer therapies (like radiotherapy, and chemotherapy). Also, since porphyrins are effective as metal chelators, they can transport metallic radioisotopes for use in cancer radiotherapy. Moreover, most porphyrins are hydrophobic and prefer an aggregated form, which may affect the therapeutic outcome resulting in a reduction in singlet O2 generation and lower fluorescence quantum yields; therefore, many porphyrin nanocarriers have been investigated as photosensitizers for PDT applications [30]. Photofrin is one of the porphyrin derivatives used as a photosensitizing agent in cancer therapy. Another porphyrin derivative is Visudyne (benzoporphyrin dervative mono acid ring A), which has been approved as a pharmacological agent in ophthalmology by the Food and Drug Administration of United States (FDA). However, porphyrins and related derivatives still have the limitation of low aqueous solubility, making them hydrophobic and prone to aggregate. This aggregation is the main reason for the decrease in therapeutic efficacy, because generally only the monomeric species are photochemically active. However, porphyrins prefer to accommodate in tumors because of the unusual properties of cancer neovasculature. The highly permeable endothelium of tumor capillaries and the deficiency of lymphatic drainage in tumors allows selective accumulation in tumors over time after intravenous injection. However the selectivity of porphyrins for tumors is variable, and porphyrin cytotoxicity has to be considered that could affect healthy cells. Recently, with the advances made in nanotechnology for biomedical applications, a variety of NPs (i.e. inorganic and hybrid nanoparticles, liposomes, and polymeric micelles) have been applied to incorporate porphyrins, which generally improves their behavior in aqueous media. These nanocarriers should have suitable biocompatibility, biodegradability and should allow simple preparation and modification for the desired goals [30]. Porphyrins loaded inside NPs could solve some of the difficulties that have been mentioned above, and provide improved diagnostic and therapeutic properties. The use of porphyrins as multimodality imaging agents can impact the modern drive towards personalized medicine, monitoring and predicting the success of therapy, and yielding a better comprehension of disease states [30].

New porphyrin derivatives and their immobilization on iron oxide NPs were found to provide promising nanotools for PDT. Specifically, a zinc porphyrin derivative, ZnPR-COOH, was synthesized, characterized and immobilized onto prior synthesized iron oxide NPs via oleylamine. Characterization of this novel nanosystem (ZnPR-IONP) was achieved using different methods, such as UV-Vis spectrophotometry, fluorescence, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). To explore the potential of the photosensitizer for PDT they quantified the singlet oxygen yield of ZnPR-IONP and the free ligand ZnPR-COOH, using 9, 10-anthracenedipropionic acid (ADPA) [31]. The results showed an increased singlet oxygen quantum yield after the porphyrin was attached to IONP (ZnPR-IONP). Furthermore, another porphyrin derivative called PR-TRIS3OH, combining various polar groups (TRIS), for improved water solubility was synthesized and immobilized in nanosystems. The singlet oxygen yield was measured, and was similar to ZnPR-COOH/ZnPR-IONP, and more than two-fold higher in the form of PRTRIS-IONP nanoparticles. The impressive singlet oxygen yield of PRTRIS-IONP along with with its water solubility, suggests that these new nanotools could be used in PDT.

Although iron oxide based nanosystems that can be used PDT have been known for a decade, the production of new water-soluble porphyrin-based ligands has allowed iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) to be investigated for new medical uses. A zinc porphyrin derivative containing a phenoxy and three phenyl groups, with a carboxylic acid group at the meso location, was produced (ZnPR-COOH) and attached to the IONP surface to enhance the water-solublity of the NPs (ZnPR-IONPs). The hydrophilic porphyrin derivative possessed three TRIS groups (PRTRIS3OH). The ligand with high water solubility was immobilized on the IONPs surface to produce water stable NPs. The photosensitizer drugs and the NP conjugate were characterized, and the good singlet oxygen yield suggested they could be a candidate for PDT of cancer [32].

Gemcitabine hydrochloride is a chemotherapeutic drug with FDA-approval, used in the treatment of various cancers. Gemcitabine suffers from several problems. Firstly, it has a short in vivo half-life (about 8–17 min), secondly, it is rapidly excreted by the kidneys, and thirdly, its poor membrane permeability, all taken together suggest a nano-delivery method would be advantageous. Penon and coworkers [33] prepared periodic mesoporous organosilica NPs (PMOs) for light-activated for delivery of gemcitabine for cancer treatment. They used porphyrins as photosensitizers which were incorporated inside the PMO pores. Additionally, the ability of gemcitabine to be loaded into the mesoporous structure was investigated. They used both one-photon, and two-photon activation depending on the photosensitizer structure and its aggregation state. Ethylene-based PMOs were covalently attached to a tetrasilylated porphyrin (PS1) and the resulting J-aggregates in the mesostructure were suitable for two-photon PDT. The researchers found that the monosilylated porphyrin (PS2) did not form J-aggregates, although it could mediate one photon PDT. Synergistic cancer cell killing was observed by two-photon excited PDT plus gemcitabine delivery.

The commercially available tetra-amino porphyrin (PSa) was monosilylated by isocyanatopropyltriethoxysilane [33] and together with the tetrasilylated compound [34] formed from aminophenylporphyrin (PSb) provided EPMO (ethylene-based periodic mesoporous organosilica) NPs by a sol-gel process using bis-(triethoxysilyl)ethane and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). Co-condensation of bis-(triethoxysilyl)ethane gave the silylated photosensitizers PS1 or PS2. These two compounds produced PS1-EPMOs and PS2-EPMOs, respectively (Fig. 2). PDT was mediated by two-photon irradiation (800 nm) and combined with gemcitabine delivered via PS1-EPMOs NPs killed 62 % of the cells, showing potential efficacy for cancer treatment [35] (Fig. 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

PS1-EPMO and PS2-EPMO nanoparticles and their HRTEM micrographs, respectively (a and b). Images exhibit usual mesoporosities. Photosensitizer precursors and their visible UV-spectrum via their NPs in EtOH (c and d) [35].

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

PS1, PS2 and their photosensitizer precursors Silylation (a and b). ethanephotosensitizer via PMO nanoparticles production by Sol-gel (c). Functions of PMO nanoparticles for drug delivery and photodynamic therapy (synergistic manner) (d) [35].

Despite the availability of many different kinds of nanoscale materials, only a small number can be finely tuned for biomedical applications. It was shown that Zr(IV) incorporated in a porphyrinic MOF (metal–organic framework) formed NPs that could be used for targeted PDT. Using a bottom-up method, the MOF nanoparticle size can be precisely determined by tuning the functional motifs that are used to construct the MOF components The type of porphyrinic linker employed in the metal–organic framework NPs affect the properties irrespective of their size. Moreover, the size-dependent theranostic potential of these MOF clusters was studied in cancer cell models [36].

A porphyrinic Zr-MOF, called PCN-224 was suggested to be a strong candidate because of its good chemical stability and possession of nanoporous channels, permitting effective diffusion of photogenerated singlet oxygen [3739]. The cubic phase of PCN-224 crystals would permit isotropic growth of crystals, enabling clearer size determination without interference from other variables (e.g., aspect ratio, and thickness) that would apply in a rod or a plate-shaped morphology (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

PCN-224 construction Image. (a) a cluster of Zr6 with the open formula of (Zr6O4 (OH) 4(H2O) 6(OH) 6(COO) 6), tetratopic linker with the open formula of (tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin with the open formula of (H2TCPP)), and image of PCN-224 as the 3D nanoporous framework. (b) A PCN-224 cubic unit and a schematic image of spherical PCN-224 NPs in cubic units structure form, potential to make various sizes [36].

Penon et al. produced a porphyrin-based gold NP conjugate that was water soluble including an antibody that recognizes the erbB2 receptor that is overexpressed on the surface of specific cancer cells. They used a monophasic technique to produce NPs that could photo-generate a high quantity of singlet oxygen, and the anti-erbB2 antibody bound to erbB2 receptors that were expressed on SK-BR-3 human breast cancer cells. The water-soluble, antibody-porphyrin NP conjugates were suggested to be useful for targeted PDT [40].

2.1.1. X-PDT (X-ray-activated photodynamic therapy)

Popovich et al. [41] reported that a LuAG:Pr3+@SiO2-PpIX nanocomposite could mediate X-ray activated PDT. It was prepared using a three-stage procedure: (a) the Lu3Al5O12:Pr3+ (LuAG:Pr3+) core was by prepared by photo-induced precipitation, (b) the amorphous silica covering was applied by a sol-gel method; and (c) protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) was chemically conjugated to the surface. The three-layered nanocomposite allowed X-ray activation of the Pr3+ to emit red luminescence; alternatively the energy transfer non-radiatively excited PPIX to produce singlet oxygen. The fluorescent probe 3′-(p-aminophenyl) fluorescein was activated by reaction with singlet oxygen and confirmed the X-ray activated PDT.

3. Different Porphyrin-based Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles can be engulfed by macrophages leading to accumulation inside the liver and the spleen after intravenous administration leading to their rapid removal from the bloodstream. Covering the NPs by poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) extends the circulation time in the blood, leading to increased the accumulation inside tumors. One study prepared a theranostic nanoconstruct via the coating of Au nanoshells with poly(lactic acid) to form NPs that could be loaded with doxorubicin. They subsequently attached a Mn-porphyrin to the Au shell using PEG linkers. The final construct showed good colloidal stability and an extended blood circulation time because of the introduction of PEG. Linking the Mn-porphyrin to the NP gave a high value of relaxivity (r1 value of 22.18 mM−1 s−1 of Mn3+), desirable for magnetic resonance imaging of cancer. Irradiation with a near-infrared laser allowed photothermal tumor destruction. The synergistic combination with doxorubicin chemotherapy suggested this nanoconstruct could function as an anti-cancer theranostic agent [14, 42].

A report from Jimenez et al. described a zinc porphyrin compound containing eight triethoxysilyl groups attached by covalent bonds to mesoporous organosilica nanoparticles via the CuAAC-click reaction. They have showed that this compound could mediate doxorubicin delivery and the imaging of breast cancer cells by a two-photon imaging technique [43].

3.1. Liposomal Porphyrins for Cancer Theranostics

Liposomes are spherical vesicles with an aqueous core surrounded a lipid bilayer. The use of liposomes to load and transport porphyrin molecules is of interest due to their ability to increase the solubility of PDT agents, and easy post-modification of the surface to enhance the accumulation and release in the cancer cells [44]. It has been proven that the formation of liposomes could decrease the dark cytotoxicity but enhance the PDT efficiency of the porphyrin, due to their ability to dissolve the hydrophobic PDT drugs inside the lipid bilayer [45, 46]. Liposomes were first demonstrated in 1960, and are one of the few nanoparticle systems that have been successfully enmployed in clinical studies [4750], showing their potential to be used for delivery of PDT drugs, especially porphyrins [51, 52].

Tedesco et al. [53] synthesized liposome-based zinc phthalocyanine encorporating a nitrosyl ruthenium complex and using liposomes based on dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and cholesterol. Their results showed a dramatic enhancement of the PDT effect against B16/F10 melanoma cells. The high efficiency of this system was explained by the interaction between the excited zinc phthalocyanine and the nitrosyl ruthenium complex, leading to release of NO radicals due to an electron transfer process which was enabled by the formation of the liposomes. Hiraka et al. [54] prepared pH-sensitive liposomes using a combination of anionic and cationic lipids plus Fe-porphyrin. The resulted liposomes showed remarkable PDT efficiency against MKN28 cells. Managa et al. [55] investigated the photophysical properties of liposomes based on F127 polymer, Zn-porphyrin, combined with graphene quantum dots (GQDs). The results indicated a synergistic effect of the GQDs and the porphyrin on singlet oxygen generation, as well as the high stability of the nanoconstruct due to π-π stacking. The formation of the liposomes led to enhanced cell uptake [56], and finally pH-responsive drug release due to changes in environmental pH [57].

The applications of porphyrin-based liposomes are not limited to PDT. One group of researchers prepared a theranostic construct composed of porphyrin dyad nanoparticles (TPD NPs) to allow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as PDT for cancer treatment. The liposomal NPs contained two different porphyrins, a non-metal porphyrin lipid, and a conjugated Mn–porphyrin. The metal-free porphyrin acted as a photosensitizer for PDT, while the Mn–porphyrin acted as a contrast agent for MRI. The theranostic porphyrin dyad nanoparticles (~60 nm) could accumulate inside tumors and were taken up by the tumor cells. 24 hours after intravenous injection, MRI images of the tumor area were much brighter than the surrounding healthy tissue, allowing laser irradiation of the tumor location for PDT [58].

3.2. Cerasomal Porphyrins and Cancer Photodynamic Theranostics

Researchers are studying ways of improving the physical and chemical stability of liposomes [59], to overcome problems of short shelf-life and the rapid clearance from the blood circulation. Liposomes with a PEG coating have longer blood circulation times [60], but may have problems with skin toxicity [61, 62] and in addition anti-PEG IgM formation may lead to accelerated blood clearance (ABC). Moreover, the larger overall size and hydrophilic nature of PEGylated liposomes can decrease the interaction with cells and prevent the porphyrin uptake into cancer cells [63].

Cerasomes are a new type of hybrid nanoparticle that can be thought of as partially silica-coated liposomes. Cerasome-forming lipids (CFLs) are composed of three basic components: hydrophobic alkyl chains, hydrophilic lipid molecules with triethoxysilane headgroups, and a connector unit. The siloxane coating provides cerasomes with greater mechanical and thermal stability compared to notrmal liposomes, and the bi-layer construction makes them less dense and more flexible than silica NPs [64]. Cerasomes can be stored in a water-based solution for months at 4 °C without any change in size [45]. Cerasomes exhibit better biocompatibility than silica NPs due to the liposomal architecture and have been used as drug delivery systems [65, 66]. Liang et al. [67] reported the preparation of porphyrin containing cerasomes by a sol-gel self-assembly process based on porphyrin-organoalkoxysilylated lipids. The resulted cerasomes showed good tumor accumulation, better stability, and enhanced biodistribution. Moreover, the porphyrin molecules still were able to produce singlet oxygen after irradiation with 400–700 nm light.

3.3. Porphysomes for Cancer Theranostics

Mineral-based nanoparticles have the potential for nano-oncology, but their possible toxicity is a source of concern. Multifunctional porphysomes that are derived from porphyrins and phospholipids have been introduced as photothermal, photodynamic and photoacoustic imaging agents [6870] (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

(a) A typical scheme for porphysome, containing porphyrin and long-chain lipid. The phospholipid headgroup (red) and porphyrin (blue) are highlighted in the subunit (left) and assembled nanovesicle (right). (b), Electron micrographs of negatively stained porphysomes (5% PEG-lipid, 95% pyropheophorbide-lipid). (c), Absorbance of the porphyrin-lipid subunits added in porphysomes formed from pyropheophorbide (blue), zinc-pyropheophorbide (orange) and bacteriochlorophyll (red) in PBS. (d), Resonance light scattering spectra ratio between gold nanorods and pyropheophorbide porphysomes. Nanorod and porphysome concentration was adjusted to have equal optical density at 680 nm. (e), Dynamic light scattering size profiles of indicated porphysomes recorded in PBS. [71]

Porphysomes are another kind of nanocarrier that are produced by self-assembly of porphyrin-lipid conjugates into bi-layered vesicles. They show fluorescence self-quenching but also specialized photophysical properties like photoacoustic and photothermal. The sensitive imaging of the lymphatic system by photoacoustic tomography was made possible by the use porphysomes. When the porphysomes are biodegraded in the tissue, the fluorescence self-quneching is released, generating intense near-infrared fluorescence for low-background. fluorescence imaging. Porphysomes have minimal acute toxicity in mice, up to intravenous doses of 1000 mg kg−1. Tumor xenograft-bearing mice accumulate porphysomes, allowing photothermal tumor destruction by laser irradiation. Porphysomes have a multifunctional capability for biophotonic imaging and therapy [70]. They can be used for fluorescence and spectroscopic tracking, and for photothermal and photodynamic tumor destruction [7274]. Porphyrin-containing NPs have a role as agents in techniques like photoacoustic tomography (also named optoacoustic tomography) [75, 76], optical frequency domain imaging [77] and multifunctional approaches [78]. Another method is quantum dots which function as fluorescent probes with absorption coefficients of 105-106 M−1cm−1 [79]. Gold NPs have even higher extinction coefficients (109-1011 M−1cm−1) [80].

Nanospheres, polymersomes, liposomes, lipoproteins, and micelles are all organic NP which have been used as drug delivery systems with good biocompatibility [8185]. While organic NPs cannot generally be used as optical agents, because they lack near-infrared spectral absorption peaks, when they are combined with porphyrins they often produce self-assembled nanoparticles with high absorption of light. However these structures are often not suitable as biophotonic probes because of they lack stability, solubility or biological compatibility [86]. Porphysomes, are self-assembled organic NPs that also possess liposome-like properties such as the potential to be loaded with drugs, near-infrared light absorption, fluorescence quenching, and good biocompatibility. Lysophosphatidyl choline could be conjugated to pyropheophorbide by an acylation reaction, leading to the production of a supramolecular porphysomes assembly. Two absorption peaks, (400 nm and 680 nm) are seen in pyropheophorbide porphysomes. Another porphyrin structure which is similar to bacteriochlorophyll, formed porphysomes with an absorption peak about 760 nm. Shifting the absorption bands (440 nm and 670 nm) is a result of inserting metal ions into the porphyrin-lipid conjugate, and demonstrated that porphysomes could form metal-chelating bilayer vesicles. In vivo toxicity studies of porphysomes in mice, showed that after two weeks there were no changes in hepatic function, endogenous porphyrin metabolism, or the number of white blood cells. They also reported there were no changes in heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney tissues, removed at necroscopy and stained with H&E (hematoxylin and eosin). The properties of porphysomes like, tunable absorption coefficients and their ability to function as photothermal and photoacoustic sensitizers make them promising for multimodal imaging and theranostic applications [8790].

Researchers demonstrated that porphysomes could be utilized for targeted PDT by conjugating folic acid which is recognized by the folate receptor that is over-expressed in many cancer cell lines [91, 92]. Microbubbles containing porphysomes exhibited multipurpose photoacoustic and ultrasonic properties, due to their porphyrin-lipid structure containing a gas bubble which could be used in ultrasound imaging. Researchers have transformed these microbubbles into nanoparticles with varying (from 5 nm to 500 nm) Instead of drugs releasing. Their small sizes enable better penetration into tissue but has a negative effect on their acoustic reflectivity. The delivery of drugs can be followed by image guidance based on ultrasound imaging, and measuring the drug concentration in the tissue by fluorescence imaging [93]. In another study, Carter et al. [94] modified the porphyrin molecule with a long chain lipid based on results obtained from molecular dynamics simulation. The results showed 10 mol % porphyrin–phospholipid was sufficient to allow light-trigged membrane permeabilization. Xu et al.[95] developed a reduced glutathione (GSH)-responsive porphyrin derivative that could form porphysomes with high DOX loading capacity. The porphysome structure is destroyed upon penetration into the cell due to the presence of high amounts of GSH. Hence, the DOX drug will be released, and the fluorescence of the porphyrin will be recovered. Nathan et al. [96] have also shown that the modification of porphyrins using a L-glutamide lipid chain led to the formation of porphysomes with better PDT efficiency compared to the usual liposomal formulations.

3.4. Coated Membrane NCs for Targeted Delivery

Nanocarriers (NCs) can be used for targeted delivery of cancer therapy, when they are coated with a preparation derived from cell membranes (CCMCNCs). Bose et al. reported the preparation of CCMCNCs, and their direct delivery of therapeutics to cancerous tissue. CCMCNCs are coated with a variety of molecules such as proteins with different functions, such as recognizing tumor cells, enhanced adhesiveness, and extended blood circulation times. This allows improved targeting, increased intra tumoral permeability, and better binding of the NCs to specific tumors [43]. Cells provide the building blocks of CMCNCs as a hybrid nano-platform containg both synthetic and natural components [97]. The core has the potential to be loaded with therapeutics, such as genes, drugs, or a combination of both drugs and genes, as well as imaging agents. Proteolipid structures originating from cell membranes sources make up the external structure [98100]. Different combinations of glycan Q4 structures, proteins and lipids compose these proteolipid structures [101]. In addition, targeting ligands such as lymphocyte surface receptors (like CD44), immunoglobulin superfamily members, integrins, cadherins, and selectins can all be incorporated encouraging cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions [102, 103].

The well-studied cadherins are protein molecules that participate in cell-cell adhesion, regulation of genes by bata-catenin pathways, migration of cells, and cell signaling by the EMT (epithelial-to mesenchymal transition) [104]. Unlike the cadherins, integrins have roles both in ECM (cell-extracellular membrane) and cell-cell interactions, and have tissue-specific and cell-specific functions. Integrins, such as integrin alpha-1 (ITa1), integrin alpha-2 (ITa2), integrin alpha-5 (ITa5), integrin beta-1 (ITb1), integrin beta-3 ( ITb3), integrin beta-4 (ITb4), and integrin beta-5 (ITb5), are widely expressed on the plasma membrane of different cancer cells [105]. Coating these proteins upon the surface of the nanocarrier may improve tumor targeting, extend blood circulation time, and reduce toxicity [106]. Nano-theranostics, such as semiconducting QDs (like CdSe), metal–organic frameworks, metallic nanoparticles (e.g., Au), magnetic nanoparticles (e.g., Fe3O4), are often used in cancer diagnosis and treatment [4, 6, 107, 108].

Porphyrins can play a role in CCMCNCs as nano-theranostics and nano-therapeutics. Li et al. created a new biomimetic nano-platform named TPZ@PCN@Mem. It contained the bioreductive drug, tirapazamine (TPZ) loaded into the porphyrinic metal–organic framework PCN-224 to produce the CCMCNC for tumor-targeted combination therapy. The TPZ@PCN@Mem nano-theranostic structure avoided recognition by the immune system, and accumulated inside tumor tissues [109]. TPZ@PCN@Mem produced a massive quantity of ROS (reactive oxygen species) upon laser irradiation that could destroy cells or tumors. However PDT of hypoxic tumors, can be limited by photochemical depletion of available oxygen. Tumors that have high metabolism and become hypoxic, adapt by triggering the Warburg effect [110]. Delivery of the bioreductive drug TPZ allows production of a cytotoxic agent only when oxygen concentrations are very low [111].

Ying et al. used a “cascade bioreactor” nanoconstruct by incorporated the enzymes glucose oxidase (GOx) and catalase inside the CCMC porphyrin-based Zr-MOF PCN-224. When the lipid vesicles were engulfed by the cells, the GOx depleted the glucose stores thus starving the cellular metabolism, while at the same time the catalase produced oxygen from the hydrogen peroxide formed in the GOx reaction, thus increasing the oxygen available for singlet oxygen production upon PDT by laser irradiation [112].

3.5. Virus-Like Particles (VLPs)

Viral capsids function as non-infectious protein-based nanoparticles – known as VLPs (virus-like particles) [113]. Although the first oncolytic viral therapy was approved by U.S. FDA, but no recent virus-derived remedies for delivery of genes have been approved. VLPs have many advantages including low cost, natural construction, and the potential to carry large amounts of cargo large compared to other types of NPs. In addition, numerous copies of protein receptors helps VLPs to be recognized by bacteria and mammalian cells. Also, their encapsulated viral genomes could be useful as a therapeutic cargo [114, 115]. Because VLPs are natural, they provide easy surface functionalization via different surface chemistry approaches that have been well discussed in the literature [116].

Researchers have suggested that reactive amino acids could be applied to couple the cargo and ligands either on the inside or the surface of the capsids or VLPs. These VLPs may have lower toxicity than metal nanoparticles, greater stability compared with liposomes, and are more uniform compared to polymeric nanoparticles. The delivery efficiency of the vehicles depends on surface functionalization, and the surface can be decorated with different biomolecules. Also, specific cellular targeting decreases immune responses, and may potentially encourage extravasation. Many methods require covalent attachment to either natural or non-natural reactive amino acids (Fig. 6), however, phage-display technology can allow expression of peptides or proteins by genetic programming of the primary sequence of amino acids [117, 118].

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

A different approach for surface modification of VLPs; (a) Primary amines (lysines, N-termini): NHS-ester conjugation (left, black) is most common. Thioimidate conjugation (green, right) has recently been described and is based on the reaction of imidoesters. (b) Thiols (cysteines): maleimides are mainly employed for covalent bonding. Thiols can also form disulfide bonds under mild oxidative conditions. (c) Carboxylic acids (glutamic acid, aspartic acid): carbodiimide activates the acid to react with primary amines. (d) Phenol (tyrosine): oxidation of the ligand moiety to diazonium permits for ortho-attachment to the phenol group. (e) Alkynes (uAA): alkynes react with azides in the presence of Cu(I). (f) P-aminophenylalalnine (uAA): the reaction is similar to that displayed with tyrosine (d), but remains completely orthogonal. (g) Azides (uAA): azides can undergo the Staudinger ligation (left, green), Cu(I)-catalyzed click chemistry (e) or Copper-free click chemistry (black, right). The Staudinger ligand has fallen out of favor becuase of kinetic limitations and has not recently been utilized for VNP functionalization. The reaction of the cyclooctyne or other copper-free click chemistry reagent has yet to be ascertained employing VNPs and is displayed only to conceptualize how click chemistry can become copper-free [116]

One type of cargo that can be loaded into VLPs is small molecules, and porphyrins fall into this category [16, 119]. This approach involves both covalent and non-covalent methods. Non-covalent approaches do not require chemistry, while covalent approaches have the benefit of efficient encapsulation and stability of the loaded cargo. VLPs derived from plant-based viruses are considered to be safer than those from animal-based viruses. A CCMV preparation was loaded with polystyrene sulfonate by non-covalent electrostatic interaction with coat proteins [120, 121]. Fluorescent probes and antibiotics have been non-covalently iconnected to CPMV using small molecules that bind to the RNA genome by electrostatic interactions [122]. However, there are difficulties in loading and preserving these small cargoes [123, 124]. Non-covalent loading of photosensitizers into VLPs has been used to develop multifunctional nanoconstructs. For example, Masarapu et al. [125] used the Physalis mottle virus (PhMV) coat protein, which was expressed in Escherichia coli to develop VLPs. Then, doxorubicin, rhodamine B or Zn-EpPor molecules were loaded as a chemotherapeutic drug, fluorescent compound, or photosensitizer to make multifunctional VLPs. The covalent approach is of interest due to the stronger binding between the photosensitizer molecules and the ligands in the VLP. For example, Rhee et al. [126] first synthesized an azide-tailed metalloporphyrin derivative and used click-chemistry to attach it to the ligands of bacteriophage Qβ VLP as a functionalized glycan to be used for specific PDT of cells bearing the CD22 receptor.

3.6. Stem Cells and Extracellular Vesicles

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could be used as nanocariers of drug molecules due to: 1) ability to be isolated from the bone marrow or other tissue of patients [127, 128]; 2) ability to be further functionalized chemically or genetically to enhance their selectivity [129]; 3) good biocompatibility and avoidance of immune rejection by the body [130]; and 4) high tumor affinity with long retention time in tumors in-vivo [131, 132]. Porphyrin-lodad MSCs have also been applied for delivery of porphyrins as photosensitizers into cancer cells for photodynamic therapy. Cao et al.[133] loaded hydrophobic purpurin-18 (PP-18) molecules into silica nanoparticles (SNPs), and the PP-18-SNPs were later loaded into MSCs. The designed PP-18-SNPs-MSCs were used for in-vitro PDT of breast cancer cells and for in-vivo PDT of breast tumors in rats. In another study, porphyrin molecules were first loaded into fluorescent dye-labeled poly-methyl methacrylate(PMMA) nanoparticles, and then loaded into MSCs. The obtained nanocarriers were used for successful simultaneous fluorescence imaging and in-vitro PDT of osteosarcoma [134].

Extracellular vehicle (EVs) are cell-derived membrane vesicles that can penetrate cells via an endogenous mechanism. EVs are capable of functionally transferring biological information, and since this discovery, the potential use of EVs as carriers for drug delivery has attracted scientific interest. EVs may have several benefits over other drug delivery carriers, such as their ability to overcome natural barriers, inherent cell targeting properties, and stability in the circulation. However, because of the lack of methods for scalable isolation of EVs and their efficient loading with drugs, the applications of EVs as drug delivery systems has been limited. Furthermore, their inherent cell targeting features could be improved via EV engineering in order to accomplish better targeted drug delivery [135, 136]. Vader et al. [137] reported the possibility of loading EVs with large proteins, but it is yet to be ascertained how their immunogenicity is affected by the sonication or separation processes, or by saponin treatment. Fuhrmann et al. carried out a comparison of strategies for loading hydrophilic and hydrophobic porphyrins into EVs, and compared these to free drug or porphyrin-loaded liposomes in terms of cellular uptake. Treating cancer cells with porphyrin loaded EVs followed by irradiation showed reductions cell viability. Nevertheless, finding the most suitable approach for clinical use is yet to be determined [138, 139].

3.7. Porphyrin Polymeric Nanoparticles

Polymerization of porphyrins is another approach to enhance their therapeutic effects and overcome some common drawbacks of porphyrins (i.e., their low absorption coefficients, poor water-solubility, and leaching from delivery carriers). The polymerization of porphyrins (i.e., introducing porphyrins into the polymer backbone) could modulate the HOMO-LUMO energy bandgap and, consequently change the balance between radiative decay rate, non-radiative-decay rate and intersystem crossing rate in the excited porphyrin molecules [140, 141]. Therefore, porphyrin-based conjugated polymers could serve as theranostic materials with light-harvesting properties and enhanced efficiency in either photodynamic therapy (PDT) or photothermal therapy (PTT) as well as NIR fluorescence emission.

For example, Wu and Xu reported that a >9-fold enhancement of emission after one-photon excitation (at 380 nm) and 30-fold enhancement after two-photon excitation (at 800 nm) were observed for an anionic hematoporphyrin (HP) electrostatically conjugated to a cationic conjugated polymer (PFB) due to the occurrence of FRET from PFB to HP [142]. In another study, Xing et al.[143] reported that a block-co-polymer containing cationic conjugated polythiophene and porphyrin could carry out simultaneous fluorescence imaging and in-vitro PDT of pulmonary adenocarcinoma cells (A549) and renal cell carcinoma (A498). Cheng et al.[144] synthesized polymer-dots containing a co-polymer of polyfluorene derivative (PFBT) and tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP). These polymer-dots showed bright fluorescence with a good singlet oxygen quantum yield for image-guided PDT of xenograft tumors in Balb/c nude mice. As mentioned above, non-radiatve decay rates could also be modulated through polymerization of the porphyrins. In order to further increase the non-radiative rate, a donor-acceptor pair contained in a structured porphyrin-conjugated polymer was reported by Guo et al.[145] for efficient PTT in vitro and in vivo. The D–A structure introduced intramolecular charge transfer along the backbone, resulting in broadened absorption peaks, red-shifted Q band, and increased extinction coefficient (4.23×104 mol−1cm−1 at 800 nm) as compared to the porphyrin photothermal agent alone.

4. Microporous Organic Polymers

In recent decades, microporous organic polymers (MOPs) with high surface area have been Investigated in some industrial processes, such as gas absorption, catalysis, electronics, and recently for controlled drug release [146, 147]. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are crystalline hybrid MOPs. In COFs the organic ligands are covalently bonded to each other [148, 149], while in MOFs polydentate organic linkers are coordinated to transition metal cations [150152]. Both COFs and MOFs have been extensively used as nanocarriers for different biomedical applications[153, 154]. In particular, porphyrins-loaded COFs and MOFs are discussed in the following section.

4.1. Covalent-Organic Frameworks (COFs)

COFs have been used to deliver porphyrin molecules into cancer cells and tumors, and have shown enhanced therapeutic efficiency compared to free porphyrins. For example, Tao et al.[155] synthesized fluorinated COFs by crosslinking the photosensitizer meso-5, 10, 15, 20-tetra (4-hydroxylphenyl) porphyrin (THPP) with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and perfluorosebacic acid (PFSEA) via a one-pot esterification. The developed porphyrin-loaded COFs were used for simultaneous oxygenation and PDT of solid tumors. Another porphyrin-COF nanocomposite was synthesized using 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-aminophenyl)porphine (Tph) and 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzenedicarboxaldehyde (Dha). The obtained porphyrin-loaded COF nanoparticles possessed high photothermal conversion efficiency (21.7%) with a good singlet oxygen quantum yield, and were used for simultaneous PTT (at 808 nm) and PDT (at 650 nm) of HeLa cancer cells [156]. Recently, 3-D porphyrin-based COFs were synthesized by Lin et al.[157]. They found that the microporous material possessed a high surface area and could generate singlet oxygen, while metalation of the porphyrin rings caused a decrease in its photosensitization ability.

Covalent triazine frameworks (CTFs) are members COFs with triazine unit, with exceptional porosity, good chemical stability, and can be fabricated with both crystalline and amorphous constructions[158]. Luo et al. investigated two porphyrin-based porous covalent bonded triazine frameworks (PCTFs). The porphyrin was attached using the Friedel–Crafts reaction. The CTFs possessed a large Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area (up to 1089 m2 g−1 area) and absorbed CO2 up to 139.9 mg g−1 at 273 K/1.0 bar. They also had selective absorption of CO2/CH4 up to 6.1 mg g−1 at 273 K/1.0 bar. The researchers described new attempts to produce porphyrin-based covalent bond triazine frames (PCTFs) using a single-step Friedel–Crafts reaction with (NCCl)3 and a tetra-reactive 5, 10, 15, 20-tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP). (NCCl)3 was used as an electron-deficient monomer for the polymerization, and the porphyrin nucleus provided a coordination site for metal ions [146]. PCTF drugs have a large surface area and the capacity for CO2 absorption, good drug loading, and tailorable drug release (Fig. 7). The reaction needs only moderate conditions without poisonous or costly catalysts, to reduce the expense for construction of novel MOPs. The chemical composition of PCTFs was proved by spectral charcaterization (FTIR and 13C NMR). For FTIR spectra, the bands appeared at 1620 and 1400 cm−1 assigned to the quadrant and stretching of the semicircular triazine ring, in line with prvious reports [146]. There was a peak near 800 cm−1 for the ring of para-substituted benzene. In PCTF the Mn-porphyrin showed a peak at 1040 cm2 for the N-Mn in-plane bending. These porous PCTFs have the potential to be used as drug carriers in biomedical applications [159].

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Schematic demonstration of the PCTF and PCTF-Mn producing [146]

Recently, a porphyrin nanocage-embedded polymer was synthesized as single molecule nanoparticles (34.6±1.8 nm by dynamic light scattering) and used for fluorescence imaging (red emission with a quantum yeild of 6.9% in water) of U87MG cells, and was also labeled by radioactive 64Cu for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. They were able to monitor the delivery, pharmacokinetic behavior, biodistribution, and excretion of the nanoparticles in animal models in real time [160].

4.2. Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs)

Metal–metalloporphyrin frameworks (MMPFs) are a new class of nanomaterials that have received much attention due to their versatile functionality. The MMPFs compose a coordination that can be custom-designed metalloporphyrin ligands. The porphyrin core enables the synthesis of different types of metalloporphyrin cores via a metalation process. The MMPFs could be synthesized via different approaches. The direct synthesis approach includes crystal engineering [161, 162], pillared-layer strategy [163, 164], nanoscopic metal–organic polyhedrons (MOP) [165167], and indirect synthesis based on the post-modification of the MOFs based on porphyrin-based ligands [168, 169].

Numerous studies have been done on metallic-organic frameworks as carriers of drugs, especially porphyrin-based compounds, for biomedical applications [170178]. For example, Zheng et al. [179] reported the synthesis of a metal–organic framework@porous organic polymer (MOF@POPs) using a post-modification approach which is illustrated in Fig. 8. The synthesized MOF@POP with a size of 165 nm showed better PDT effects compared to the porphyrin-loaded POPs alone. The PDT application of MOF-based porphyrins is not limited to colloidal system. Zhou et al.[180] developed a thin polymer using a MOF-templating approach which contained porphyrin molecules and showed PDT effects against E. coli.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

(a) the MOF@POPs based on UiO-AM and polyaniline as MOF and porous organic polymer, respectively [179] and (b) Developing water-soluble MOF-templated porphyrin polymer thin film with high PDT effect against bacteria [180]

A key factor in the effective delivery of MOF-based porphyrin nanocomposites is surface modification, which leads to the targeted delivery of the nanocomposites. MOF UiO-66 is a zirconium terephthalate which can be loaded with cargo, forming ~200 nm coated nanoparticles synthesized by functionalized linkers, and covalently surface modified using mild reactions to attach chains of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). At pH 7.4 the PEG chains provide enhanced stability to phosphates and overcome the “burst release” phenomenon, while at pH 5.5, stimuli-responsive drug release is achieved. Furthermore, the cellular uptake is governed by the NP surface chemistry, so that PEGylated UiO-66 escapes lysosomal degradation [181].

Moreover, MOF nanoparticles with attached polymer chains such as polyaniline-modified UiO-66 could be used in anticancer photothermal therapy [182]. Zr porphyrin-based MOFs formed 90 nm diameter NPs that were taken up by HeLa cells [36]. The versatility of the click assembly protocol could help a variety of MOFs to show selective cell targeting [183].

A discrete organoplatinum(II) metallocage was recently reported by Yu et al.[184]. They used the chemotherapeutic drug cis-(PEt3)2Pt(OTf)2 as a building block to construct this metallocage to be loaded with porphyrin molecules. This new design prevented the aggregation of the porphyrins (i.e., due to π-π stacking) and improved the singlet oxygen quantum yeild. The metallocage-loaded NPs showd tri-modal functionality, and could be used for simultaneous fluorescence imaging (red emission), chemotherapy and PDT.

5. Porphyrin-based Nanomaterials Combined with other therapeutic methods

5.1. Chemotherapy

Bioluminescence and fluorescence imaging can be used to monitor drug release using advanced theranostic techniques. Fluorescence imaging reporters over a wide spectral range can be incorporated into the nanoplatforms. A bi functional fluorescence and anti-tumor drug delivery system was produced by encapsulating doxorubicin (DOX) inside the hydrogel formed from porphyrins with a four-arm copolymer of PEG-PCL as a drug carrier. The imaging ability was improved because the drug and the fluorescence signals were separated via the hydrogel. The inhibition of tumor growth could be followed through bioluminescence imaging [185, 186]. Other researchers have prepared fluorescent copolymers to overcome the shortage of fluorescent porphyrin-compounds [187]. In vivo fluorescence imaging with the four-arm PEG-PCL copolymer (POR-PEG-PCL) demonstrated that the porphyrin-hydrogel could be used as an implant as a systemically administered nanogel-probe [187]. The POR-PEG-PCL hydrogel functioned as a drug carrier for Dox anti-tumor drug delivery which is a dual fluorescent therapeutic nanosystem. Other fluorescent drug delivery systems have been monitored using rhodamine to monitor the biodistribution after intratumoral injection [188]. Tumors that have been stably transfected with the luciferase enzyme were grown in the liver of tumor of nude mice were used for dual bioluminescence and multispectral fluorescence imaging to follow the tumor response in real-time [189]. Hydrogels are increasingly being used for drug delivery or as tissue engineering platforms [190, 191].

Bera et al reported a novel nanocarrier based on the tetrasodium salt of meso-tetrakis(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphyrin (TPPS) attached to gold nanoparticles (TPPS-AuNPs). The nanocarrier was loaded with the antitumor drug doxorubicin (DOX) and was selectively internalized by tumor cells compared to normal cells. The attachment of TPPS onto the gold nanosurface provided excellent stability and biocompatibility. Porphyrin interacted with the gold nanosurface forming a strong association complex. DOX-loaded nanocomposite (DOX@TPPS-AuNPs) demonstrated enhanced cellular uptake with significantly reduced drug efflux in MDR brain cancer cells, with increased retention time. It caused 9 times greater apoptosis via triggered release at acidic pH. DOX was loaded on the porphyrin-modified gold NPs with high encapsulation efficacy (~90%) but was capable of releasing ~81% of DOX at low-pH. DOX-loaded TPPS-AuNPs exhibited higher inhibition of cellular metastasis, invasion, and angiogenesis [192].

5.2. Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy (RT) is an efficient method to treat many types of cancer. However, debilitating side effects are often observed due to high X-ray doses (50–75 Gy). To overcome this limitation, developing new therapeutic nanomaterials with dual-functional capability could be a new strategy [193196]. Recently, radiotherapy agents based on porphyrin co-loaded nanomaterials have received attention due to the possibility of simultaneous radiotherapy and radiodynamic therapy of different cancers. For example, a nanoscale MOF was developed using either Hf12 or Hf6 secondary building units (SBUs) and Ir(2,2′-bipyridine)[2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-5 (trifluoromethyl)pyridine]2+ based ligands. This nanoscale MOF showed efficient production of hydroxyl radicals as well as singlet oxygen and superoxide anions under X-irradiation and carried out radiotherapy and radiodynamic therapy [197]. The same group developed another nanoscale MOF based on Hf-DBB-Ru [DBB-Ru=bis(2,2′-bipyridine)(5,5′-di(4-benzoato)-2,2′-bipyridine) ruthenium(II) chloride], whiche could target the mitochondria of MC38 cells. The designed nanomaterial showed both radiotherapy and radiodynamic therapy effects due to efficient generation of hydroxyl radicals (i.e., by Hf6 SBUs) and singlet oxygen (i.e., by DBB-Ru photosensitizers)[198]. A similar concept was also applied to prepare a indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase inhibitor-loaded nanoscale MOF to enhance checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. It has been proposed that nanoscale MOFs could be utilized for delivery of different therapeutic agents, such as porphyrin and radiotherapy agents than could effectively kill cancer cells via a combination of different modalities. These structures could be further modified with other therapeutic agents for developing newer generations of therapeutic nanomaterials.

6. Porphyrin-based Nanomaterials Combined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Porphyrin molecules and magnetic-resonance agents could be loaded into the nanocarrier and provide a dual-functional theranostic nanomaterial. As an example, Mn(III)- meso-tetrakis (4-sulphonatophenyl) porphyrin (Mn(III)-TPPS) was loaded on hydrophiobic polymethyl methacrylate nanoparticles with further surface modification with anionic molecules for simultaneous sonodynamic therapy and MR imaging of rat breast tumor. The ROS generation initiated by irradiation of shock waves and MRI enabled to monitor the tumor size and treatment progress [199].

7. Conclusions and future work

Porphyrins display good photochemical properties, especially singlet oxygen generation, which makes them a suitable candidate for PDT. However, porphyrins suffer from low water-solubility. Hence, efficient delivery of porphyrins requires a proper nanoscale formulation. Therefore, different types of nanoparticles have been proposed to transport the hydrophobic porphyrin molecules in biological media. Moreover, other nanocarriers such as metal–organic frameworks and extracellular vesicles are of increasing interest.

Furthermore, porphyrins undergo an aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ) effect which quenches their photophysical properties such as fluorescence and singlet oxygen generation, when the local concentrations reaches a certain level and they become aggregated. To address this issue, porphyrin-based aggregation-induced emission (AIE) dyes have been developed and investigated [189, 200, 201]. These AIE dyes are not emissive in their individual solubilized molecular state, but their fluorescence is turned on in an aggregated state. This property makes them suitable for high loading into different nanocarriers. Hence, it is expected that by a combination of porphyrins and AIE-active moieties, a new generation of porphyrins with a variety of properties suitable for bioapplications such as fluorescence imaging, photoacoustic imaging (PA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), photodynamic therapy (PDT), photothermal therapy (PTT), and recently radiotherapy (RT) and radiodynamic therapy (RDT) could be produced.

The multifunctional nature of porphyrins and their derivatives is expected to play a vital role in future clinical therapy. The deep exploitation of novel porphyrins and their derivatives has recently gained increasing scientific interest. Developing new porphyrins with different properties is of importance for many bioapplications.

Acknowledgments

Funding

Michael R Hamblin was supported by US NIH Grants R01AI050875 and R21AI121700.

Footnotes

Data availability statement.

Not applicable

Conflicts of interest

Michael R Hamblin is on the following Scientific Advisory Boards

Transdermal Cap Inc, Cleveland, OH

BeWell Global Inc, Wan Chai, Hong Kong

Hologenix Inc. Santa Monica, CA

LumiThera Inc, Poulsbo, WA

Vielight, Toronto, Canada

Bright Photomedicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Quantum Dynamics LLC, Cambridge, MA

Global Photon Inc, Bee Cave, TX

Medical Coherence, Boston MA

NeuroThera, Newark DE

JOOVV Inc, Minneapolis-St. Paul MN

AIRx Medical, Pleasanton CA

FIR Industries, Inc. Ramsey, NJ

UVLRx Therapeutics, Oldsmar, FL

Ultralux UV Inc, Lansing MI

Illumiheal & Petthera, Shoreline, WA

MB Lasertherapy, Houston, TX

ARRC LED, San Clemente, CA

Varuna Biomedical Corp. Incline Village, NV

Niraxx Light Therapeutics, Inc, Boston, MA

Dr Hamblin has been a consultant for

Lexington Int, Boca Raton, FL

USHIO Corp, Japan

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Philips Electronics Nederland B.V.

Johnson & Johnson Inc, Philadelphia, PA

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Dr Hamblin is a stockholder in

Global Photon Inc, Bee Cave, TX

Mitonix, Newark, DE.

The other authors declare no conflicts of interest

MRH declares the following potential conflicts of interest. Scientific Advisory Boards: Transdermal Cap Inc, Cleveland, OH; BeWell Global Inc, Wan Chai, Hong Kong; Hologenix Inc. Santa Monica, CA; LumiThera Inc, Poulsbo, WA; Vielight, Toronto, Canada; Bright Photomedicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Quantum Dynamics LLC, Cambridge, MA; Global Photon Inc, Bee Cave, TX; Medical Coherence, Boston MA; NeuroThera, Newark DE; JOOVV Inc, Minneapolis-St. Paul MN; AIRx Medical, Pleasanton CA; FIR Industries, Inc. Ramsey, NJ; UVLRx Therapeutics, Oldsmar, FL; Ultralux UV Inc, Lansing MI; Illumiheal & Petthera, Shoreline, WA; MB Lasertherapy, Houston, TX; ARRC LED, San Clemente, CA; Varuna Biomedical Corp. Incline Village, NV; Niraxx Light Therapeutics, Inc, Boston, MA. Consulting; Lexington Int, Boca Raton, FL; USHIO Corp, Japan; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Philips Electronics Nederland B.V. Eindhoven, Netherlands; Johnson & Johnson Inc, Philadelphia, PA; Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Stockholdings: Global Photon Inc, Bee Cave, TX; Mitonix, Newark, DE.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • [1].Birrenbach G, Speiser P, Polymerized micelles and their use as adjuvants in immunology, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences 65(12) (1976) 1763–1766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Rabiee N, Safarkhani M, Rabiee M, Ultra-sensitive electrochemical on-line determination of Clarithromycin based on Poly (L-Aspartic Acid)/Graphite Oxide/Pristine Graphene/Glassy Carbon Electrode, Asian Journal of Nanosciences and Materials 1 (2018) 61–70. [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Farjadian F, Moghoofei M, Mirkiani S, Ghasemi A, Rabiee N, Hadifar S, Beyzavi A, Karimi M, Hamblin MR, Bacterial components as naturally inspired nano-carriers for drug/gene delivery and immunization: Set the bugs to work?, Biotechnology advances (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Vafajoo A, Rostami A, Parsa SF, Salarian R, Rabiee N, Rabiee G, Rabiee M, Tahriri M, Vashaee D, Tayebi L, Early diagnosis of disease using microbead array technology: A review, Analytica chimica acta (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Nasseri B, Soleimani N, Rabiee N, Kalbasi A, Karimi M, Hamblin MR, Point-of-care microfluidic devices for pathogen detection, Biosensors and Bioelectronics (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Ghasemi A, Rabiee N, Ahmadi S, Lolasi F, Borzogomid M, Kalbasi A, Nasseri B, Dezfuli AS, Aref A, Karimi M, Optical Assays Based on Colloidal Inorganic Nanoparticles, Analyst (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Couvreur P, Tulkenst P, Roland M, Trouet A, Speiser P, Nanocapsules: a new type of lysosomotropic carrier, FEBS letters 84(2) (1977) 323–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Marty J, Nanoparticles-a new colloidal drug delivery system, Pharm. Acta Helv 53 (1978) 17–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Couvreur P, Kante B, Roland M, Guiot P, Bauduin P, Speiser P, Polycyanoacrylate nanocapsules as potential lysosomotropic carriers: preparation, morphological and sorptive properties, Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology 31(1) (1979) 331–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Gurny R, Peppas N, Harrington D, Banker G, Development of biodegradable and injectable latices for controlled release of potent drugs, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 7(1) (1981) 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Siekmann B, Westesen K, Submicron-sized parenteral carrier systems based on solid lipids, Pharm. Pharmacol. Lett 1(3) (1992) 123–126. [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Calvo P, Remuñán-López C, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso M, Novel hydrophilic chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanoparticles as protein carriers, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 63(1) (1997) 125–132. [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Illum L, Jones P, Baldwin R, Davis S, Tissue distribution of poly (hexyl 2-cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles coated with monoclonal antibodies in mice bearing human tumor xenografts, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 230(3) (1984) 733–736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Ahmadi S, Rabiee N, Rabiee M, Application of Aptamer-based hybrid molecules in Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: From the Concepts toward the Future, Current diabetes reviews (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Couvreur P, Nanoparticles in drug delivery: past, present and future, Advanced drug delivery reviews 65(1) (2013) 21–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Rohovie MJ, Nagasawa M, Swartz JR, Virus-like particles: Next-generation nanoparticles for targeted therapeutic delivery, Bioengineering & translational medicine 2(1) (2017) 43–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Casi G, Neri D, Antibody–drug conjugates and small molecule–drug conjugates: Opportunities and challenges for the development of selective anticancer cytotoxic agents, J. Med. Chem 58(22) (2015) 8751–8761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Dawidczyk CM, Kim C, Park JH, Russell LM, Lee KH Pomper MG, Searson PC, State-of-the-art in design rules for drug delivery platforms: lessons learned from FDA-approved nanomedicines, Journal of Controlled Release 187 (2014) 133–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Ivanov AS, Boldyrev AI, Deciphering aromaticity in porphyrinoids via adaptive natural density partitioning, Organic & biomolecular chemistry 12(32) (2014) 6145–6150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Lash TD, Origin of aromatic character in porphyrinoid systems, Journal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines 15(11n12) (2011) 1093–1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Dolphin D, The Porphyrins V5: Physical Chemistry, Elsevier; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Lipscomb LA, Zhou FX, Presnell SR, Woo RJ, Peek ME, Plaskon RR, Williams LD, Structure of a DNA- porphyrin complex, Biochemistry 35(9) (1996) 2818–2823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Imran M, Ramzan M, Qureshi AK, Khan MA, Tariq M, Emerging applications of porphyrins and metalloporphyrins in biomedicine and diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging, Biosensors 8(4) (2018) 95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Yang W, Zhang B, Porphyrin-based nanocomposites for tumor photodynamic therapy, MRS Bulletin 44(3) (2019) 189–194. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Biesaga M, Pyrzyńska K, Trojanowicz M, Porphyrins in analytical chemistry. A review, Talanta 51(2) (2000) 209–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Ethirajan M, Chen Y, Joshi P, Pandey RK, The role of porphyrin chemistry in tumor imaging and photodynamic therapy, Chem. Soc. Rev 40(1) (2011) 340–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Luo S, Zhang E, Su Y, Cheng T, Shi C, A review of NIR dyes in cancer targeting and imaging, Biomaterials 32(29) (2011) 7127–7138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Bonnett R, Photosensitizers of the porphyrin and phthalocyanine series for photodynamic therapy, Chem. Soc. Rev 24(1) (1995) 19–33. [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Celli JP, Spring BQ, Rizvi I, Evans CL, Samkoe KS, Verma S, Pogue BW, Hasan T, Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization, Chem. Rev 110(5) (2010) 2795–2838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Zhou Y, Liang X, Dai Z, Porphyrin-loaded nanoparticles for cancer theranostics, Nanoscale 8(25) (2016) 12394–12405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Lindig BA, Rodgers MA, Schaap AP, Determination of the lifetime of singlet oxygen in water-d2 using 9, 10-anthracenedipropionic acid, a water-soluble probe, Journal of the American Chemical Society 102(17) (1980) 5590–5593. [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Penon O, Marín MJ, Amabilino DB, Russell DA, Pérez-García L, Iron oxide nanoparticles functionalized with novel hydrophobic and hydrophilic porphyrins as potential agents for photodynamic therapy, Journal of colloid and interface science 462 (2016) 154–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Biswas S, Ahn H-Y, Bondar MV, Belfield KD, Two-photon absorption enhancement of polymer-templated porphyrin-based J-aggregates, Langmuir 28(2) (2011) 1515–1522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Lerouge F, Cerveau G, Corriu RJ, Stern C, Guilard R, Self-organization of porphyrin units induced by magnetic field during sol-gel polymerization, Chemical Communications (15) (2007) 1553–1555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Aggad D, Jimenez CM, Dib S, Croissant JG, Lichon L, Laurencin D, Richeter S, Maynadier M, Alsaiari SK, Boufatit M, Gemcitabine Delivery and Photodynamic Therapy in Cancer Cells via Porphyrin-Ethylene-Based Periodic Mesoporous Organosilica Nanoparticles, ChemNanoMat 4(1) (2018) 46–51. [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Park J, Jiang Q, Feng D, Mao L, Zhou H-C, Size-controlled synthesis of porphyrinic metal–organic framework and functionalization for targeted photodynamic therapy, Journal of the American Chemical Society 138(10) (2016) 3518–3525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Feng D, Chung W-C, Wei Z, Gu Z-Y, Jiang H-L, Chen Y-P, Darensbourg DJ, Zhou H.-C.J.J.o.t.A.C.S., Construction of ultrastable porphyrin Zr metal–organic frameworks through linker elimination, 135(45) (2013) 17105–17110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Feng D, Gu ZY, Li JR, Jiang HL, Wei Z, Zhou HCJACIE, Zirconium-metalloporphyrin PCN-222: mesoporous metal–organic frameworks with ultrahigh stability as biomimetic catalysts, 51(41) (2012) 10307–10310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Morris W, Volosskiy B, Demir S, Gándara F, McGrier PL, Furukawa H, Cascio D, Stoddart JF, Yaghi O.M.J.I.c., Synthesis, structure, and metalation of two new highly porous zirconium metal–organic frameworks, 51(12) (2012) 6443–6445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Penon O, Marín MJ, Russell DA, Pérez-García L, Water soluble, multifunctional antibody-porphyrin gold nanoparticles for targeted photodynamic therapy, Journal of colloid and interface science 496 (2017) 100–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Popovich K, Tomanová K, Čuba V, Procházková L, Pelikánová IT, Jakubec I, Mihóková E, Nikl M, LuAG: Pr3+-porphyrin based nanohybrid system for singlet oxygen production: Toward the next generation of PDTX drugs, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 179 (2018) 149–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Jing L, Liang X, Li X, Lin L, Yang Y, Yue X, Dai Z, Mn-porphyrin conjugated Au nanoshells encapsulating doxorubicin for potential magnetic resonance imaging and light triggered synergistic therapy of cancer, Theranostics 4(9) (2014) 858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Mauriello-Jimenez C, Croissant J, Maynadier M, Cattoën X, Man MWC, Vergnaud J, Chaleix V, Sol V, Garcia M, Gary-Bobo M, Porphyrin-functionalized mesoporous organosilica nanoparticles for two-photon imaging of cancer cells and drug delivery, Journal of Materials Chemistry B 3(18) (2015) 3681–3684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Ghosh S, Carter KA, Lovell JF, Liposomal formulations of photosensitizers, Biomaterials 218 (2019) 119341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Jiang F, Lilge L, Grenier J, Li Y, Wilson MD, Chopp M, Photodynamic therapy of U87 human glioma in nude rat using liposome-delivered photofrin, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery 22(2) (1998) 74–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Zhan C, Wang W, McAlvin JB, Guo S, Timko BP, Santamaria C, Kohane DS, Phototriggered local anesthesia, Nano Lett. 16(1) (2015) 177–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Pattni BS, Chupin VV, Torchilin VP, New developments in liposomal drug delivery, Chem. Rev 115(19) (2015) 10938–10966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Barenholz YC, Doxil®—the first FDA-approved nano-drug: lessons learned, J. Controlled Release 160(2) (2012) 117–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Petre CE, Dittmer DP, Liposomal daunorubicin as treatment for Kaposi’s sarcoma, International journal of nanomedicine 2(3) (2007) 277. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Fan W, Yung B, Huang P, Chen X, Nanotechnology for multimodal synergistic cancer therapy, Chem. Rev 117(22) (2017) 13566–13638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Ricchelli F, Jori G, Gobbo S, Tronchin M, Liposomes as models to study the distribution of porphyrins in cell membranes, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes 1065(1) (1991) 42–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Skupin-Mrugalska P, Szczolko W, Gierlich P, Konopka K, Goslinski T, Mielcarek J, Düzgüneş N, Physicochemical properties of liposome-incorporated 2-(morpholin-4-yl) ethoxy phthalocyanines and their photodynamic activity against oral cancer cells, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 353 (2018) 445–457. [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Maranho DS, De Lima RG, Primo FL, Da Silva RS, Tedesco AC, Photoinduced nitric oxide and singlet oxygen release from ZnPC liposome vehicle associated with the nitrosyl ruthenium complex: synergistic effects in photodynamic therapy application, Photochem. Photobiol 85(3) (2009) 705–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Hiraka K, Kanehisa M, Tamai M, Asayama S, Nagaoka S, Oyaizu K, Yuasa M, Kawakami H, Preparation of pH-sensitive liposomes retaining SOD mimic and their anticancer effect, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 67(1) (2008) 54–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Managa M, Achadu OJ, Nyokong T, Photophysical studies of graphene quantum dots-Pyrene-derivatized porphyrins conjugates when encapsulated within Pluronic F127 micelles, Dyes and Pigments 148 (2018) 405–416. [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Takeuchi Y, Kurohane K, Ichikawa K, Yonezawa S, Ori H, Koishi T, Nango M, Oku N, Polycation liposome enhances the endocytic uptake of photosensitizer into cells in the presence of serum, Bioconjugate Chem. 14(4) (2003) 790–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Finikova O, Galkin A, Rozhkov V, Cordero M, Hägerhäll C, Vinogradov S, Porphyrin and tetrabenzoporphyrin dendrimers: tunable membrane-impermeable fluorescent pH nanosensors, Journal of the American Chemical Society 125(16) (2003) 4882–4893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Liang X, Li X, Jing L, Yue X, Dai Z, Theranostic porphyrin dyad nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging guided photodynamic therapy, Biomaterials 35(24) (2014) 6379–6388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Puri A, Loomis K, Smith B, Lee J-H, Yavlovich A, Heldman E, Blumenthal R, Lipid-based nanoparticles as pharmaceutical drug carriers: from concepts to clinic, Critical Reviews™ in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems 26(6) (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Allen T, Hansen C, Martin F, Redemann C, Yau-Young A, Liposomes containing synthetic lipid derivatives of poly (ethylene glycol) show prolonged circulation half-lives in vivo, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes 1066(1) (1991) 29–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Cao Z, Ma Y, Yue X, Li S, Dai Z, Kikuchi J, Stabilized liposomal nanohybrid cerasomes for drug delivery applications, Chemical Communications 46(29) (2010) 5265–5267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Gordon KB, Tajuddin A, Guitart J, Kuzel TM, Eramo LR, Vonroenn J, Hand-foot syndrome associated with liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin therapy, Cancer 75(8) (1995) 2169–2173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Ishida T, Ichihara M, Wang X, Kiwada H, Spleen plays an important role in the induction of accelerated blood clearance of PEGylated liposomes, Journal of Controlled Release 115(3) (2006) 243–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Dai Z, Advances in Nanotheranostics, Springer; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Matsui K, Sando S, Sera T, Aoyama Y, Sasaki Y, Komatsu T, Terashima T, Kikuchi J.-i., Cerasome as an infusible, cell-friendly, and serum-compatible transfection agent in a viral size, Journal of the American Chemical Society 128(10) (2006) 3114–3115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Yue X, Dai Z, Recent advances in liposomal nanohybrid cerasomes as promising drug nanocarriers, Advances in colloid and interface science 207 (2014) 32–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Liang X, Li X, Yue X, Dai Z, Conjugation of porphyrin to nanohybrid cerasomes for photodynamic diagnosis and therapy of cancer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 50(49) (2011) 11622–11627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Ehlerding EB, Chen F, Cai W, Biodegradable and renal clearable inorganic nanoparticles, Advanced Science 3(2) (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Ng KK, Takada M, Jin CC, Zheng G, Self-sensing porphysomes for fluorescence-guided photothermal therapy, Bioconjugate Chem. 26(2) (2015) 345–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Jin CS, Lovell JF, Chen J, Zheng G, Ablation of hypoxic tumors with dose-equivalent photothermal, but not photodynamic, therapy using a nanostructured porphyrin assembly, ACS nano 7(3) (2013) 2541–2550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Lovell JF, Jin CS, Huynh E, Jin H, Kim C, Rubinstein JL, Chan WC, Cao W, Wang LV, Zheng G, Porphysome nanovesicles generated by porphyrin bilayers for use as multimodal biophotonic contrast agents, Nat. Mater 10(4) (2011) 324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Dolmans DE, Fukumura D, Jain RK, Photodynamic therapy for cancer, Nature reviews cancer 3(5) (2003)380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].O’Neal DP, Hirsch LR, Halas NJ, Payne JD, West JL, Photo-thermal tumor ablation in mice using near infrared-absorbing nanoparticles, Cancer letters 209(2) (2004) 171–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Huang X, El-Sayed IH, Qian W, El-Sayed MA, Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using gold nanorods, Journal of the American Chemical Society 128(6) (2006) 2115–2120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Oraevsky AA, Esenaliev RO, Jacques SL, Tittel FK, Laser optoacoustic tomography for medical diagnostics: Principles, Biomedical Sensing, imaging, and Tracking Technologies I, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1996, pp. 22–32. [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Wang LV, Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography, Nat. Photon 3(9) (2009) 503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Vakoc BJ, Lanning RM, Tyrrell JA, Padera TP, Bartlett LA, Stylianopoulos T, Munn LL, Tearney GJ, Fukumura D, Jain RK, Three-dimensional microscopy of the tumor microenvironment in vivo using optical frequency domain imaging, Nature medicine 15(10) (2009) 1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Weissleder R, Pittet MJ, Imaging in the era of molecular oncology, Nature 452(7187) (2008) 580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Klostranec JM, Chan WC, Quantum dots in biological and biomedical research: recent progress and present challenges, Advanced Materials 18(15) (2006) 1953–1964. [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Yguerabide J, Yguerabide EE, Light-scattering submicroscopic particles as highly fluorescent analogs and their use as tracer labels in clinical and biological applications: I. Theory, Analytical biochemistry 262(2) (1998) 137–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Ghosh P, Han G, De M, Kim CK, Rotello VM, Gold nanoparticles in delivery applications, Advanced drug delivery reviews 60(11) (2008) 1307–1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Lewinski N, Colvin V, Drezek R, Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles, small 4(1) (2008) 26–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N, Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel, science 311(5761) (2006) 622–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R, Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy, Nature nanotechnology 2(12) (2007) 751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Ghafelehbashi R, Akbarzadeh I, Tavakkoli Yaraki M, Lajevardi A, Fatemizadeh M, Heidarpoor Saremi L, Preparation, physicochemical properties, in vitro evaluation and release behavior of cephalexin-loaded niosomes, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 569 (2019) 118580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Drain CM, Varotto A, Radivojevic I, Self-organized porphyrinic materials, Chemical reviews 109(5) (2009)1630–1658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Kim D, Osuka A, Directly linked porphyrin arrays with tunable excitonic interactions, Accounts of chemical research 37(10) (2004) 735–745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Huynh E, Lovell JF, Helfield BL, Jeon M, Kim C, Goertz DE, Wilson BC, Zheng G, Porphyrin shell microbubbles with intrinsic ultrasound and photoacoustic properties, Journal of the American Chemical Society 134(40) (2012) 16464–16467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Kubát P, Mosinger J, Photophysical properties of metal complexes of meso-tetrakis (4-sulphonatophenyl) porphyrin, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 96(1–3) (1996) 93–97. [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Zenkevich E, Sagun E, Knyukshto V, Shulga A, Mironov A, Efremova O, Bonnett R, Songca SP, Kassem M, Photophysical and photochemical properties of potential porphyrin and chlorin photosensitizers for PDT, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 33(2) (1996) 171–180. [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Jin CS, Cui L, Wang F, Chen J, Zheng G, Targeting-Triggered Porphysome Nanostructure Disruption for Activatable Photodynamic Therapy, Advanced healthcare materials 3(8) (2014) 1240–1249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Cui L, Lin Q, Jin CS, Jiang W, Huang H, Ding L, Muhanna N, Irish JC, Wang F, Chen J, A PEGylation-free biomimetic porphyrin nanoplatform for personalized cancer theranostics, ACS nano 9(4) (2015) 4484–4495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Huynh E, Leung BY, Helfield BL, Shakiba M, Gandier J-A, Jin CS, Master ER, Wilson BC, Goertz DE, Zheng G, In situ conversion of porphyrin microbubbles to nanoparticles for multimodality imaging, Nature nanotechnology 10(4) (2015) 325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Carter KA, Shao S, Hoopes MI, Luo D, Ahsan B, Grigoryants VM, Song W, Huang H, Zhang G, Pandey RK, Porphyrin-phospholipid liposomes permeabilized by near-infrared light, Nat. Commun 5 (2014) 3546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Xu X-D, Zhao L, Qu Q, Wang J-G, Shi H, Zhao Y, Imaging-Guided Drug Release from Glutathione-Responsive Supramolecular Porphysome Nanovesicles, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter 7(31) (2015) 17371–17380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Nathan E, Vijayashree K, Harikrishna A, Takafuji M, Jintoku H, Ihara H, Rao N, A novel photosensitizer: An l-glutamide lipid conjugate with improved properties for photodynamic therapy, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci 15(12) (2016) 1476–1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Bose RJ, Paulmurugan R, Moon J, Lee S-H, Park H, Cell membrane-coated nanocarriers: the emerging targeted delivery system for cancer theranostics, Drug discovery today (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Kroll AV, Fang RH, Zhang L, Biointerfacing and applications of cell membrane-coated nanoparticles, Bioconjugate chemistry 28(1) (2016) 23–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Bose RJ, Lee S-H, Park H, Biofunctionalized nanoparticles: an emerging drug delivery platform for various disease treatments, Drug discovery today 21(8) (2016) 1303–1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Zhai Y, Su J, Ran W, Zhang P, Yin Q, Zhang Z, Yu H, Li Y, Preparation and Application of Cell Membrane-Camouflaged Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy, Theranostics 7(10) (2017) 2575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Cooper G, Hausman R, The cytoskeleton and cell movement, The cell: a molecular approach, 2nd edn. ASM Press; Sinauer Associates, Washington, DC Sunderland, Mass, pp xxiv 689 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • [102].Rezayat S, Boushehri S, Salmanian B, Omidvari A, Tarighat S, Esmaeili S, Sarkar S, Amirshahi N, Alyautdin R, Orlova M, The porphyrin-fullerene nanoparticles to promote the ATP overproduction in myocardium: 25Mg2+-magnetic isotope effect, European journal of medicinal chemistry 44(4) (2009) 1554–1569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Yoshida T, Andersson B, Evidence for a receptor recognizing antigen complexed immunoglobulin on the surface of activated mouse thymus lymphocytes, Scandinavian journal of immunology 1(4) (1972) 401–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [104].Hirohashi S, Kanai Y, Cell adhesion system and human cancer morphogenesis, Cancer science 94(7) (2003) 575–581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [105].Ziegler YS, Moresco JJ, Tu PG, Yates III JR, Nardulli AM, Plasma membrane proteomics of human breast cancer cell lines identifies potential targets for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, PloS one 9(7) (2014) e102341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [106].Jiao M, Zhang P, Meng J, Li Y, Liu C, Luo X, Gao M, Recent advancements in biocompatible inorganic nanoparticles towards biomedical applications, Biomaterials science (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [107].Chowdhury MR, Schumann C, Bhakta-Guha D, Guha G, Cancer nanotheranostics: Strategies, promises and impediments, Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 84 (2016) 291–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [108].Kievit FM, Zhang M, Cancer nanotheranostics: improving imaging and therapy by targeted delivery across biological barriers, Advanced materials 23(36) (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [109].Li S-Y, Cheng H, Qiu W-X, Zhang L, Wan S-S, Zeng J-Y, Zhang X-Z, Cancer cell membrane-coated biomimetic platform for tumor targeted photodynamic therapy and hypoxia-amplified bioreductive therapy, Biomaterials 142 (2017) 149–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [110].Phan LM, Yeung S-CJ, Lee M-H, Cancer metabolic reprogramming: importance, main features, and potentials for precise targeted anti-cancer therapies, Cancer biology & medicine 11(1) (2014) 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [111].Fang RH, Kroll AV, Gao W, Zhang L, Cell membrane coating nanotechnology, Advanced Materials (2018) 1706759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [112].Li S-Y, Cheng H, Xie B-R, Qiu W-X, Zeng J-Y, Li C-X, Wan S-S, Zhang l., Liu W-L, Zhang X-Z, Cancer cell membrane camouflaged cascade bioreactor for cancer targeted starvation and photodynamic therapy, ACS nano 11(7) (2017) 7006–7018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [113].Schwarz B, Uchida M, Douglas T, Biomedical and catalytic opportunities of virus-like particles in nanotechnology, Advances in virus research, Elsevier; 2017, pp. 1–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [114].Sansone V, Frairia R, Brañes M, Romeo P, Catalano MG, Applefield RC, Current Applications and Future Prospects of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy, Shockwave Medicine, Karger Publishers; 2018, pp. 140–157. [Google Scholar]
  • [115].Yin H, Kanasty RL, Eltoukhy AA, Vegas AJ, Dorkin JR, Anderson DG, Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy, Nature Reviews Genetics 15(8) (2014) 541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [116].Smith MT, Hawes AK, Bundy BC, Reengineering viruses and virus-like particles through chemical functionalization strategies, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol 24(4) (2013) 620–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [117].Peyret H, Gehin A, Thuenemann EC, Blond D, El Turabi A, Beales L, Clarke D, Gilbert RJ, Fry EE, Stuart DI, Tandem fusion of hepatitis B core antigen allows assembly of virus-like particles in bacteria and plants with enhanced capacity to accommodate foreign proteins, PLoS One 10(4) (2015) e0120751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [118].Phelps JP, Dang N, Rasochova L, Inactivation and purification of cowpea mosaic virus-like particles displaying peptide antigens from Bacillus anthracis, Journal of virological methods 141(2) (2007) 146–153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [119].Czapar AE, Steinmetz NF, Plant viruses and bacteriophages for drug delivery in medicine and biotechnology, Current opinion in chemical biology 38 (2017) 108–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [120].Comellas-Aragones M, de la Escosura A, Dirks AJ, van der Ham A, Fuste-Cune A, Cornelissen JJ, Nolte RJ, Controlled integration of polymers into viral capsids, Biomacromolecules 10(11) (2009) 3141–3147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [121].Hu Y, Zandi R, Anavitarte A, Knobler CM, Gelbart WM, Packaging of a polymer by a viral capsid: the interplay between polymer length and capsid size, Biophysical journal 94(4) (2008) 1428–1436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [122].Vader P, Mol EA, Pasterkamp G, Schiffelers RM, Extracellular vesicles for drug delivery, Advanced drug delivery reviews 106 (2016) 148–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [123].Sehlstedt U, Kim SK, Carter P, Goodisman J, Vollano JF, Norden B, Dabrowiak JC, Interaction of cationic porphyrins with DNA, Biochemistry 33(2) (1994) 417–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [124].Lee EJ, Lee NK, Kim I-S, Bioengineered protein-based nanocage for drug delivery, Advanced drug delivery reviews 106 (2016) 157–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [125].Masarapu H, Patel BK, Chariou PL, Hu H, Gulati NM, Carpenter BL, Ghiladi RA, Shukla S, Steinmetz NF, Physalis mottle virus-like particles as nanocarriers for imaging reagents and drugs, Biomacromolecules 18(12) (2017) 4141–4153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [126].Rhee J-K, Baksh M, Nycholat C, Paulson JC, Kitagishi H, Finn M, Glycan-targeted virus-like nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy, Biomacromolecules 13(8) (2012) 2333–2338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [127].Wang J, Wang L, Li X, Mao C, Virus activated artificial ECM induces the osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells without osteogenic supplements, Sci. Rep 3(1) (2013) 1242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [128].Zhu H, Cao B, Zhen Z, Laxmi AA, Li D, Liu S, Mao C, Controlled growth and differentiation of MSCs on grooved films assembled from monodisperse biological nanofibers with genetically tunable surface chemistries, Biomaterials 32(21) (2011) 4744–4752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [129].Gandra N, Wang D-D, Zhu Y, Mao C, Virus-Mimetic Cytoplasm-Cleavable Magnetic/Silica Nanoclusters for Enhanced Gene Delivery to Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 52(43) (2013)11278–11281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [130].Sonabend AM, Ulasov IV, Tyler MA, Rivera AA, Mathis JM, Lesniak MS, Mesenchymal Stem Cells Effectively Deliver an Oncolytic Adenovirus to Intracranial Glioma, STEM CELLS 26(3) (2008) 831–841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [131].Ren Y-J, Zhang H, Huang H, Wang X-M, Zhou Z-Y, Cui F-Z, An Y-H, In vitro behavior of neural stem cells in response to different chemical functional groups, Biomaterials 30(6) (2009) 1036–1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [132].Kidd S, Spaeth E, Dembinski JL, Dietrich M, Watson K, Klopp A, Battula VL, Weil M, Andreeff M, Marini FC, Direct Evidence of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Tropism for Tumor and Wounding Microenvironments Using In Vivo Bioluminescent Imaging, STEM CELLS 27(10) (2009) 2614–2623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [133].Cao B, Yang M, Zhu Y, Qu X, Mao C, Stem Cells Loaded with Nanoparticles as a Drug Carrier for In Vivo Breast Cancer Therapy, Adv. Mater 26(27) (2014) 4627–4631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [134].Duchi S, Sotgiu G, Lucarelli E, Ballestri M, Dozza B, Santi S, Guerrini A, Dambruoso P, Giannini S, Donati D, Ferroni C, Varchi G, Mesenchymal stem cells as delivery vehicle of porphyrin loaded nanoparticles: Effective photoinduced in vitro killing of osteosarcoma, J. Controlled Release 168(2) (2013) 225–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [135].Andaloussi SE, Mäger I, Breakefield XO, Wood MJ, Extracellular vesicles: biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities, Nat. Rev. Drug Disc 12(5) (2013) 347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [136].Raposo G, Stoorvogel W, Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends, J. Cell Biol 200(4) (2013) 373–383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [137].Vader P, Mol EA, Pasterkamp G, Schiffelers R.M.J.A.d.d.r., Extracellular vesicles for drug delivery, 106 (2016) 148–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [138].Fuhrmann G, Serio A, Mazo M, Nair R, Stevens MM, Active loading into extracellular vesicles significantly improves the cellular uptake and photodynamic effect of porphyrins, Journal of Controlled Release 205 (2015) 35–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [139].Van Veen J, Van Baar J, Kroese C, Coolegem J, De Wit N, Colijn H, Oxygen Reduction on Transition-Metal Porphyrins in Acid Electrolyte I. Activity, Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie 85(9) (1981) 693–700. [Google Scholar]
  • [140].Wu W, Mao D, Xu S, Kenry F. Hu, Li X, Kong D, Liu B, Polymerization-Enhanced Photosensitization, Chem 4(8) (2018) 1937–1951. [Google Scholar]
  • [141].Wu W, Bazan GC, Liu B, Conjugated-Polymer-Amplified Sensing, Imaging, and Therapy, Chem 2(6) (2017) 760–790. [Google Scholar]
  • [142].Wu C, Xu Q-H, Enhanced One- and Two-Photon Excitation Emission of a Porphyrin Photosensitizer by FRET from a Conjugated Polyelectrolyte, Macromol. Rapid Commun 30(7) (2009) 504–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [143].Xing C, Liu L, Tang H, Feng X, Yang Q, Wang S, Bazan GC, Design Guidelines For Conjugated Polymers With Light-Activated Anticancer Activity, Adv. Funct. Mater 21(21) (2011) 4058–4067. [Google Scholar]
  • [144].Chang K, Tang Y, Fang X, Yin S, Xu H, Wu C, Incorporation of Porphyrin to π-Conjugated Backbone for Polymer-Dot-Sensitized Photodynamic Therapy, Biomacromolecules 17(6) (2016) 2128–2136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [145].Guo B, Feng G, Manghnani PN, Cai X, Liu J, Wu W, Xu S, Cheng X, Teh C, Liu B, A Porphyrin-Based Conjugated Polymer for Highly Efficient In Vitro and In Vivo Photothermal Therapy, Small 12(45) (2016) 6243–6254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [146].Luo Y, Liu J, Liu Y, Lyu Y, Porphyrin-based covalent triazine frameworks: Porosity, adsorption performance, and drug delivery, Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry 55(16) (2017) 2594–2600. [Google Scholar]
  • [147].Lajevardi A, Hossaini Sadr M, Tavakkoli Yaraki M, Badiei A, Armaghan M, A pH-responsive and magnetic Fe3O4@silica@MIL-100(Fe)/β-CD nanocomposite as a drug nanocarrier: loading and release study of cephalexin, New Journal of Chemistry 42(12) (2018) 9690–9701. [Google Scholar]
  • [148].Côté AP, Benin AI, Ockwig NW, O’Keeffe M, Matzger AJ, Yaghi OM, Porous, Crystalline, Covalent Organic Frameworks, Science 310(5751) (2005) 1166–1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [149].Yan X, Song Y, Liu J, Zhou N, Zhang C, He L, Zhang Z, Liu Z, Two-dimensional porphyrin-based covalent organic framework: A novel platform for sensitive epidermal growth factor receptor and living cancer cell detection, Biosens. Bioelectron 126 (2019) 734–742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [150].James SL, Metal–organic frameworks, Chem. Soc. Rev 32(5) (2003) 276–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [151].Rowsell JLC, Yaghi OM, Metal–organic frameworks: a new class of porous materials, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 73(1) (2004) 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  • [152].Lajevardi A, Tavakkoli Yaraki M, Masjedi A, Nouri A, Hossaini Sadr M, Green synthesis of MOF@Ag nanocomposites for catalytic reduction of methylene blue, J. Mol. Liq 276 (2019) 371–378. [Google Scholar]
  • [153].Castaldo R, Ambrogi V, Gentile G, 2 - Microporous Organic Polymer Nanocomposites for Adsorption Applications, in: Kyzas GZ, Mitropoulos AC (Eds.), Composite Nanoadsorbents, Elsevier; 2019, pp. 25–47. [Google Scholar]
  • [154].Merino S, Martín C, Kostarelos K, Prato M, Vázquez E, Nanocomposite Hydrogels: 3D Polymer–Nanoparticle Synergies for On-Demand Drug Delivery, ACS Nano 9(5) (2015) 4686–4697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [155].Tao D, Feng L, Chao Y, Liang C, Song X, Wang H, Yang K, Liu Z, Covalent Organic Polymers Based on Fluorinated Porphyrin as Oxygen Nanoshuttles for Tumor Hypoxia Relief and Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy, Adv. Funct. Mater 28(43) (2018) 1804901. [Google Scholar]
  • [156].Shi Y, Liu S, Liu Y, Sun C, Chang M, Zhao X, Hu C, Pang M, Facile Fabrication of Nanoscale Porphyrinic Covalent Organic Polymers for Combined Photodynamic and Photothermal Cancer Therapy, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter 11(13) (2019) 12321–12326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [157].Lin G, Ding H, Chen R, Peng Z, Wang B, Wang C, 3D Porphyrin-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks, Journal of the American Chemical Society 139(25) (2017) 8705–8709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [158].Liu M, Guo L, Jin S, Tan B, Covalent triazine frameworks: synthesis and applications, J. Mat. Chem. A 7(10) (2019) 5153–5172. [Google Scholar]
  • [159].Wei P, Zhou J, Pang X, Liu H, Deng K, Wang G, Wu Y, Chen B, Effects of dislocation mechanics on diffusion-induced stresses within a spherical insertion particle electrode, Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2(4) (2013) 1128–1136. [Google Scholar]
  • [160].Yu G, Cen T-Y, He Z, Wang S-P, Wang Z, Ying X-W, Li S, Jacobson O, Wang S, Wang L, Lin L-S, Tian R, Zhou Z, Ni Q, Li X, Chen X, Porphyrin Nanocage-Embedded Single-Molecular Nanoparticles for Cancer Nanotheranostics, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 58(26) (2019) 8799–8803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [161].Moulton B, Zaworotko MJ, From molecules to crystal engineering: supramolecular isomerism and polymorphism in network solids, Chem. Rev 101(6) (2001) 1629–1658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [162].Desiraju GR, Crystal engineering: a holistic view, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 46(44) (2007) 8342–8356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [163].Choi E-Y, Barron PM, Novotny RW, Son H-T, Hu C, Choe W, Pillared Porphyrin Homologous Series: Intergrowth in Metal- Organic Frameworks, Inorg. Chem 48(2) (2008) 426–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [164].Sun D, Tham FS, Reed CA, Boyd PD, Extending supramolecular fullerene-porphyrin chemistry to pillared metal–organic frameworks, PNAS 99(8) (2002) 5088–5092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [165].Wang X-S, Meng L, Cheng Q, Kim C, Wojtas L, Chrzanowski M, Chen Y-S, Zhang XP, Ma S, Three-dimensional porous metal-metalloporphyrin framework consisting of nanoscopic polyhedral cages, Journal of the American Chemical Society 133(41) (2011) 16322–16325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [166].Beletskaya I, Tyurin VS, Tsivadze AY, Guilard R, Stern C, Supramolecular chemistry of metalloporphyrins, Chem. Rev 109(5) (2009) 1659–1713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [167].Nakamura Y, Aratani N, Osuka A, Cyclic porphyrin arrays as artificial photosynthetic antenna: synthesis and excitation energy transfer, Chem. Soc. Rev 36(6) (2007) 831–845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [168].Wang XS, Chrzanowski M, Wojtas L, Chen YS, Ma S, Formation of a Metalloporphyrin-Based Nanoreactor by Postsynthetic Metal–Ion Exchange of a Polyhedral-Cage Containing a Metal–Metalloporphyrin Framework, Chemistry–A European Journal 19(10) (2013) 3297–3301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [169].Gao W-Y, Chrzanowski M, Ma S, Metal–metalloporphyrin frameworks: a resurging class of functional materials, Chem. Soc. Rev 43(16) (2014) 5841–5866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [170].Lu K, He C, Lin W, Nanoscale metal–organic framework for highly effective photodynamic therapy of resistant head and neck cancer, Journal of the American Chemical Society 136(48) (2014) 16712–16715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [171].Wang L, Zheng M, Xie Z, Nanoscale metal–organic frameworks for drug delivery: a conventional platform with new promise, J. Mat. Chem. B 6(5) (2018) 707–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [172].Lu K, He C, Guo N, Chan C, Ni K, Weichselbaum RR, Lin W, Chlorin-based nanoscale metal–organic framework systemically rejects colorectal cancers via synergistic photodynamic therapy and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy, Journal of the American Chemical Society 138(38) (2016) 12502–12510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [173].Wang C, Liu D, Lin W, Metal–Organic Frameworks as A Tunable Platform for Designing Functional Molecular Materials, Journal of the American Chemical Society 135(36) (2013) 13222–13234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [174].Della Rocca J, Liu D, Lin W, Nanoscale Metal–Organic Frameworks for Biomedical Imaging and Drug Delivery, Acc. Chem. Res 44(10) (2011) 957–968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [175].He C, Liu D, Lin W, Nanomedicine Applications of Hybrid Nanomaterials Built from Metal–Ligand Coordination Bonds: Nanoscale Metal–Organic Frameworks and Nanoscale Coordination Polymers, Chem. Rev 115(19) (2015) 11079–11108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [176].Wu M-X, Yang Y-W, Metal–Organic Framework (MOF)-Based Drug/Cargo Delivery and Cancer Therapy, Adv. Mater 29(23) (2017) 1606134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [177].Horcajada P, Gref R, Baati T, Allan PK, Maurin G, Couvreur P, Férey G, Morris RE, Serre C, Metal–Organic Frameworks in Biomedicine, Chem. Rev 112(2) (2012) 1232–1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [178].Ibrahim M, Sabouni R, A Husseini G, Anti-cancer drug delivery using metal organic frameworks (MOFs), Current medicinal chemistry 24(2) (2017) 193–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [179].Zheng X, Wang L, Pei Q, He S, Liu S, Xie Z, Metal–organic framework@ porous organic polymer nanocomposite for photodynamic therapy, Chem. Mater 29(5) (2017) 2374–2381. [Google Scholar]
  • [180].Zhou W, Begum S, Wang Z, Krolla P, Wagner D, Bräse S, Wöll C, Tsotsalas M, High Antimicrobial Activity of Metal–Organic Framework-Templated Porphyrin Polymer Thin Films, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter 10(2) (2018) 1528–1533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [181].Lázaro IA, Haddad S, Sacca S, Orellana-Tavra C, Fairen-Jimenez D, Forgan RS, Selective Surface PEGylation of UiO-66 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Stability, Cell Uptake, and pH-Responsive Drug Delivery, Chem 2(4) (2017) 561–578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [182].Wang W, Wang L, Li Y, Liu S, Xie Z, Jing X, Nanoscale Polymer Metal–Organic Framework Hybrids for Effective Photothermal Therapy of Colon Cancers, Advanced Materials 28(42) (2016) 9320–9325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [183].Calik M, Sick T, Dogru M, Döblinger M, Datz S, Budde H, Hartschuh A, Auras F, Bein T, From Highly Crystalline to Outer Surface-Functionalized Covalent Organic Frameworks: A Modulation Approach, Journal of the American Chemical Society 138(4) (2016) 1234–1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [184].Yu G, Yu S, Saha ML, Zhou J, Cook TR, Yung BC, Chen J, Mao Z, Zhang F, Zhou Z, Liu Y, Shao L, Wang S, Gao C, Huang F, Stang PJ, Chen X, A discrete organoplatinum(II) metallacage as a multimodality theranostic platform for cancer photochemotherapy, Nat. Commun 9(1) (2018) 4335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [185].Lv F, Mao L, Liu T, Thermosensitive porphyrin-incorporated hydrogel with four-arm PEG-PCL copolymer: preparation, characterization and fluorescence imaging in vivo, Materials Science and Engineering: C 43 (2014) 221–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [186].Dong X, Chen H, Qin J, Wei C, Liang J, Liu T, Kong D, Lv F, Thermosensitive porphyrin-incorporated hydrogel with four-arm PEG-PCL copolymer (II): doxorubicin loaded hydrogel as a dual fluorescent drug delivery system for simultaneous imaging tracking in vivo, Drug delivery 24(1) (2017) 641–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [187].Dong X, Wei C, Lu L, Liu T, Lv F, Fluorescent nanogel based on four-arm PEG-PCL copolymer with porphyrin core for bioimaging, Materials Science and Engineering: C 61 (2016) 214–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [188].Dong X, Wei C, Liu T, Lv F, Qian Z, Real-time fluorescence tracking of protoporphyrin incorporated thermosensitive hydrogel and its drug release in vivo, ACS applied materials & interfaces 8(8) (2016) 5104–5113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [189].Guo B, Cai X, Xu S, Fateminia SMA, Liu J, Liang J, Feng G, Wu W, Liu B, Decoration of porphyrin with tetraphenylethene: converting a fluorophore with aggregation-caused quenching to aggregation-induced emission enhancement, J. Mat. Chem. B 4(27) (2016) 4690–4695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [190].Song F, Li X, Wang Q, Liao L, Zhang C, Nanocomposite hydrogels and their applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering, Journal of biomedical nanotechnology 11(1) (2015) 40–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [191].Zhu G, Zhang Y, Wang K, Zhao X, Lian H, Wang W, Wang H, Wu J, Hu Y, Guo H, Visualized intravesical floating hydrogel encapsulating vaporized perfluoropentane for controlled drug release, Drug delivery 23(8) (2016) 2820–2826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [192].Bera K, Maiti S, Maity M, Mandal C, Maiti NC, Porphyrin–Gold Nanomaterial for Efficient Drug Delivery to Cancerous Cells, ACS Omega 3(4) (2018) 4602–4619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [193].Thariat J, Hannoun-Levi J-M, Sun Myint A, Vuong T, Gérard J-P, Past, present, and future of radiotherapy for the benefit of patients, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 10(1) (2013) 52–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [194].Chen W, Zhang J, Using Nanoparticles to Enable Simultaneous Radiation and Photodynamic Therapies for Cancer Treatment, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 6(4) (2006) 1159–1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [195].Schaue D, McBride WH, Opportunities and challenges of radiotherapy for treating cancer, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 12(9) (2015) 527–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [196].Luksiene Z, Juzenas P, Moan J, Radiosensitization of tumours by porphyrins, Cancer Letters 235(1) (2006) 40–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [197].Lan G, Ni K, Veroneau SS, Song Y, Lin W, Nanoscale Metal–Organic Layers for Radiotherapy–Radiodynamic Therapy, Journal of the American Chemical Society 140(49) (2018) 16971–16975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [198].Ni K, Lan G, Veroneau SS, Duan X, Song Y, Lin W, Nanoscale metal–organic frameworks for mitochondria-targeted radiotherapy-radiodynamic therapy, Nat. Commun 9(1) (2018) 4321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [199].Varchi G, Foglietta F, Canaparo R, Ballestri M, Arena F, Sotgiu G, Guerrini A, Nanni C, Cicoria G, Cravotto G, Engineered porphyrin loaded core-shell nanoparticles for selective sonodynamic anticancer treatment, Nanomedicine 10(23) (2015) 3483–3494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [200].Guo B, Feng G, Manghnani PN, Cai X, Liu J, Wu W, Xu S, Cheng X, Teh C, Liu B, A Porphyrin-Based Conjugated Polymer for Highly Efficient In Vitro and In Vivo Photothermal Therapy, Small 12(45) (2016) 6243–6254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [201].Pandey RK, Chitgupi U, Lakshminarayanan V, Porphyrin aggregates in the form of nanofibers and their unusual aggregation induced emission, J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 16(09) (2012) 1055–1058. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES