Abstract
Although, antibiotics are effective in the treatment of bovine mastitis, they do not address the regeneration of mammary glandular tissue and have been associated to the increment in antimicrobial resistance worldwide. Considering the necessity of alternative therapies for this disease of high economic impact and the reported regenerative and antibacterial effects of mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs), we evaluated the safety and efficacy of an allogenic MSC-based intramammary therapy in dairy cows with experimentally induced Staphylococcus aureus clinical mastitis. In a safety trial, heifers were inoculated intramammarily with a 2.5 × 107-suspension of bovine fetal AT-MSCs on experimental days 1 and 10. Animals were evaluated clinically on a daily basis during a 20-day experimental period and blood samples were collected for hemogram determination and peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) isolation. In an efficacy trial, Holstein Friesian cows were inoculated with S. aureus and treated intramammarily with vehicle (NEG; days 4 and 10), antibiotics (ATB; days 4 and 5) or a suspension of 2.5 × 107 AT-MSCs (MSC; days 4 and 5). Cows were clinically evaluated daily and milk samples were collected for somatic cell count (SCC) and colony forming units (CFU). Blood samples were collected for serum haptoglobin and amyloid A determination. Intramammary administration of two doses of bovine fetal AT-MSCs in healthy cows did not induce changes in clinical or hematological variables, and gene expression profiles in PBLs associated to activation (CD4, CD8, CD25, CD62L and CD69) and proinflammatory cytokines (CCL2, CCL5, IL2, CXCL3, IFNγ, and TNFα). Quarters of MSC group of cows had similar SCC log/mL in milk compared to infected quarters of ATB or NEG cows. However, quarters of MSC cows had lower CFU log/mL in milk compared to quarters of NEG cows. Intramammarily inoculation of repeated doses of 2.5 × 107 allogenic AT-MSCs did not induce clinical or immunological response in healthy cows. Moreover, MSC-intramammary treatment reduced bacterial count in milk of cows with S. aureus clinical mastitis compared to untreated cows. This work provides initial evidence for the safety and efficacy of an allogenic MSC-based intramammary therapy for the treatment of bovine mastitis.
Subject terms: Animal biotechnology, Stem-cell biotechnology, Bacterial infection
Introduction
Currently, the treatment of bovine mastitis is based on the use of antibiotics, which seeks to control the growth of bacteria responsible for the infection of the mammary gland. Although, antibiotic therapy is the most efficient treatment to control mastitis, they do not address the regeneration of mammary glandular tissue, whose integrity is fundamental in terms of milk production. Moreover, antibiotic use in dairy cows is under continue scrutinization due to eventual association to the increment in antimicrobial resistance and the presence of antibiotic residues in milk. Considering that the development of alternative or complementary therapies for the treatment of bovine mastitis is imperative, the recent scientific advances in the area of regenerative medicine represent a potential tool that deserves to be evaluated.
Staphylococcus aureus is a contagious pathogen involved in persistent intramammary infection with a prevalence in heifers that range from 0 to 15%1. This pathogen is part of the natural skin flora, making its eradication from herds impossible. Some of the mechanisms of virulence include adhesion to mammary epithelial cells and production of exotoxins, biofilms, bacterial super-antigens, and proteases2. In addition, some strains are capable of suppressing phagocytosis and cellular immunity, producing an enzyme that inactivates the vast majority of penicillin-based treatments3. Moreover, S. aureus can survive inside the epithelial cells and phagocytes, so few antimicrobial agents are able to reach the entire affected area4. Cure rates of most therapies against S. aureus is around 50% with reinfections usually due to primary infectious organism rather than to new pathogens5. Consequently, antibiotic therapy against S. aureus is often ineffective and results in chronic udder infections6. Thus, development of alternative or complementary treatments for S. aureus intramammary infection is required in order to reduce bacterial resistance and increase cure rates in lactating dairy cows.
Regenerative medicine is a growing area that uses stem cell populations or their secreted products to treat a variety of disease states in both humans and animals. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent progenitor cells located in several tissues including adipose (AT-MSCs). Evidence indicates that MSCs correspond to perivascular cells known as pericytes with the capacity to detach from vessels when tissues are damaged or inflamed7. Although MSCs have capacity for differentiation into medodermal lineages including osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic, their therapeutic potential is based on production of immunomodulatory, angiogenic and antibacterial factors8. We have recently reported that stimulation of bovine fetal AT-MSCs with inflammatory interferon γ (IFNγ) induce up-regulation of immunomodulatory factors indolamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and interleukin 6 (IL-6)9. In addition, bovine fetal AT-MSCs are able to induce angiogenesis under in vitro conditions, which may be mediated by expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin 1 (ANGPT1)10. Moreover, conditioned media from bovine fetal AT-MSCs induce an anti-proliferative effect against mastitis-causing S. aureus, which may be mediated by antibacterial peptides (AP) defensin β1 (DEFβ1) and NK Lysin11. These studies suggest that bovine fetal AT-MSCs are able to produce several factors that may be useful to control a variety of infectious conditions including bovine mastitis.
The potential use of MSCs in cell therapy is also based on their reduced immunogenicity known as the immune evasive potential that enable MSC allogenic transplantation12. Reduced expression of major histocompatibility complexes I and II (MHC-I and II), and lack of T-cell costimulatory molecules CD80 suggest that bovine fetal AT-MSCs might display immune evasive potential as well9. Reduced immunogenicity, together with their immune regulatory abilities aforementioned, would allow bovine fetal AT-MSCs to evade recognition by immune system in recipients, and thus may be used as an allogenic therapeutic strategy. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety of an MSC intramammary therapy in healthy cows and its efficacy in dairy cows with experimentally induced S. aureus clinical mastitis.
Material and Methods
Bovine fetal AT-MSC isolation and culture
AT-MSCs were harvested from fetal AT present in the abdominal omentum from male bovine fetuses (n = 9; 7–8 months of gestation) collected at a local abattoir9–11. Approximately 10 g of AT were isolated under aseptic conditions and deposited in PBS supplemented with 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 2.5 μg/mL amphotericin B (Hyclone, Thermo Fisher Scientific, UT, USA). AT samples from three fetuses were pooled and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Hyclone) and twice with high glucose (4.5 g/L) Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Gibco, Grand Islands, NY, USA) supplemented with 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 2.5 μg/mL amphotericin B (Hyclone,). Then, AT was digested in 0.5% collagenase I (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO, USA) (1 ml/g of AT) for 45 min. Collagenase I activity was neutralized with DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco), 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 2.5 μg/mL amphotericin B (expansion medium). The disrupted tissue was filtered through 40 μm pores and subsequently centrifuged at 400 × g for 5 min. The cell pellet was washed once in DMEM, suspended in expansion medium and plated. The sediment was resuspended in expansion medium, then transferred to 175 cm2 cell culture flasks. The cultures of MSCs derived from adipose tissue were incubated at 38 °C under a humid atmosphere with 5% CO2. After 48 hours, the cells not adherent to the plastic were removed by means of a change of culture medium. Upon reaching 80 to 90% confluence, AT-MSC passages were made by removal with trypsin/EDTA, supplemented with 250 μg/mL of amphoterecin B, 100 IU/mL of penicillin and 100 μg/mL of streptomycin.
Safety study design
All experimental procedures have been approved and were performed in accordance with guidelines and regulations of the Bioethical Committees of the Scientific and Technological Development Support Fund from Chile (Fondef) and the Faculty of Animal and Veterinary Sciences at University of Chile (Certificate N° 04-2015). Clinically healthy Holstein heifers (n = 8) of approximately 15 months of age, weighing an average of 445 kg, belonging to a commercial dairy located in the Valparaíso Region of Chile, were used in the safety trial (Fig. 1). Heifers were managed under confinement and fed a total mixed ration based on silage of corn, alfalfa hay and concentrate. On experimental days 1 and 10, a 2.5 × 107-suspension of bovine fetal AT-MSCs in 3 mL of ringer lactate was administered via the teat canal in two randomly selected mammary quarters. In the remaining two mammary quarters, a 3 mL solution of ringer lactate was administered as control (vehicle). Animals were evaluated clinically on a daily basis during a 20-Day experimental period. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and rectal temperature (RT) were determined. The clinical evaluation of the mammary gland was based on a previously published method that includes the observation of volume increase, firmness, signs of pain and milk secretion13. In addition, the mammary surface temperature (MST) of each quarter was quantified using a portable thermograph (Fluke VT02 Washington, USA). Mammary temperature difference (MTD) was calculated by subtracting MST from quarters inoculated with AT-MSCs from quarters inoculated with vehicle. Blood samples were collected from the coccygeal vein on days 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 for hemogram determination and peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) isolation. Hemogram was analyzed in a commercial laboratory (LQCE, Santiago, Chile).
Isolation of peripheral blood leukocytes
Blood samples were transferred to the laboratory and the blood was mixed with PBS (Corning, NY, USA) in equal parts (1:1). Subsequently, the same volume of histopaque (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was added at room temperature and blood mixed with PBS was added slowly and unmixed over this solution14. Subsequently, the solution was centrifuged at 900 × g for 35 min, to achieve a separation in four phases: (1) plasma with PBS, (2) peripheral blood mononuclear cells, (3) histopaque solution and (4) granulocytes and red blood cells. The PBLs was extracted, mixed with PBS and centrifuged at 1100 × g for 10 min. The pellet was resuspended in PBS and centrifuged at 800 × g for 5 min. Finally, the new pellet was resuspended in RPMI (Biological Industries, Beit Haemek, Israel) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) and 250 μg/mL of amphoterecin B, 100 IU/mL of penicillin and 100 μg/mL of streptomycin (Corning). Subsequently, the PBL pellet was seeded in petri dishes with RPMI medium and incubated at 38.5 °C with 5% CO2 for two hours. To conserve the PBLs, the non-adherent cells were removed from the plastic and centrifuged at 800 × g for 5 min. The cell pellet was fixed in lysis buffer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with 2β-Mercaptoethanol (1:50, Sigma-Aldrich) and were frozen at −20 °C until further analysis.
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and quantitative PCR
Purification of total RNA from PBLs was performed using a GeneJET purification kit (Thermo Scientific, Vilnus, Lithuania), following the manufacturer’s instructions9–11. Total RNA was extracted using GeneJET RNA purification kit (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was eluted in 50 mL of RNase free water. The concentration and purity of the RNA in each sample was determined using Qubit RNA assay kit (Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA), and genomic DNA was removed using RNase-free DNase I (Thermo Scientific). Samples were subjected to complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis using a Brilliant II SYBR Green QRT-PCR AffinityScript Master Mix, 2-step kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The reaction protocol consisted of incubation for 5 min at 25 °C, 15 min at 42 °C, 5 min at 95 °C, and hold at 4 °C using a TC1000-G gradient thermocycler (SciLogex, Rocky Hill, CT, USA). Samples were analyzed for expression of lymphocyte activation marker genes CD4, CD8, CD25, CD62L and CD69, proinflammatory cytokine marker genes IL2, IFNγ, TNFα, CCL2, CCL5 and CXCL3, and endogenous genes βACTIN and GAPDH15 by quantitative-PCR (Q-PCR) (Table 1). Primers were designed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database to find the required nucleotide sequences (Table 1). Subsequently, the NCBI primer design tool was used and the performance of the primers for (Q-PCR) was verified using the Premier Biosoft particle analysis software. Equivalence of amplification efficiencies among all primer-probe sets was confirmed using serial 3-fold dilutions of PBL cDNA. Each PCR reaction (10 µL) contained the following: 2X Brilliant II SYBR Green QPCR master mix (5 µL), target forward primer (200 nM), target reverse primer (200 nM), cDNA synthesis reaction (1 µL), and nuclease-free PCR grade water to adjust final volume. The PCR amplification was carried out in an Eco Real-Time PCR System (Illumina Incorporated, San Diego, CA, USA). Thermal cycling conditions were 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 repetitive cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, and 60 °C for 1 min. Amplifications were followed by dissociation (melting) curves to ensure specificity of the primers. In each experiment, amount of gene expression was recorded as CT values that corresponded to the number of cycles where the fluorescence signal can be detected above a threshold value. The CT averages for each biological replicate were calculated and transformed into relative values denominated quantity (Q) through ∆∆CT formula16. Then, the relative quantification in the expression of target genes for each sample was estimated as the quotient between Q value of the target gene and a normalization factor (NF), which was calculated based on the geometric mean of housekeeping gene Q values.
Table 1.
Gene | Nucleotide sequence (5′-3′) | Accession number |
---|---|---|
Endogenous genes | ||
β- ACTIN |
Forward CGCACCACTGGCATTGTCAT Reverse TCCAAGGCGGACGTAGCAGAG |
NM_173979.3 |
GAPDH |
Forward CCTTCATTGACCTTCACTACATGGTCTA Reverse CCTTCATTGACCTTCACTACATGGTCTA |
NM_001034034.2 |
Lymphocyte activation genes | ||
CD4 |
Forward TTCCTTCCCACTCACCTTCG Reverse ATCTTGTTCACCTTCACCTCTC |
XM_024991418.1 |
CD8 |
Forward AAGGCATACCACAAGGGTTATC Reverse CACAGCCAGGTTCTGAGAATAG |
NM_174015.1 |
CD25 |
Forward GGAAAGCCCTAACACTGATGTA Reverse AGAGGCTTGGAAAGGACTTATG |
NM_174358.2 |
CD62L |
Forward TACGAAAGGACGGAGCAAAG Reverse GAGCATAATCCAGACCCACAG |
NM_174182.1 |
CD69 |
Forward GGGTCCATTCAAGTTCCTATCC Reverse TGTACTGGCCCACTGATAGA |
NM_174014.2 |
Proinflammatory cytokine genes | ||
IL2 |
Forward GGGAACACAATGAAAGAAGTGAAG Reverse GAGCTTGAGGTTCTCAGGATTT |
NM_180997.2 |
IFNɣ |
Forward AACACAGGAGCTACCGATTTC Reverse AAGCCCACAGAGCAGTAAAG |
NM_174086.1 |
TNFɑ |
Forward GCCAACTCCCTCTGTTTATGT Reverse GACACCTTGACCTCCTGAATAA |
NM_173966.3 |
CCL2 |
Forward TCGCCTGCTGCTATACATTC Reverse CACAGCCTCTTTAGGACACTT |
NM_174006.2 |
CCL5 | Forward CCTGCTGCTTTGCCTATATCT | NM_175827.2 |
Reverse GCGCTTCTTCCTGGTGATAA | ||
CXCL3 | Forward ACATAACCCAGTCCTGATTGTT | NM_001046513.2 |
Reverse CACAGAGCCTGGCACTTTAT |
Efficacy study design
The efficacy trial was performed in facilities of the Faculty of Animal and Veterinary Sciences at University of Chile. Clinically healthy Holstein Friesian cows (n = 15) at first lactation were used in the study (Fig. 1). Animals were fed alfalfa hay and concentrate. Cows were milked twice a day using a separate milking unit and the milk production was quantified after each milking. Only cows with three consecutive negative cultures were used in the study. At 29.8 ± 7.1 days of lactation, cows were inoculated in the two left quarters with a suspension of S. aureus and were randomly assigned to three experimental groups of 5 animals each. The NEG group (without therapy) was treated intramammarily in the two infected mammary quarters with an solution of 5 mL of ringer lactate (vehicle) on experimental days 4 and 10. The ATB group (antibiotic therapy) was treated intramammarily in the two infected mammary quarters with a commercial suspension of 50 mg of pirlimycin (Pirsue, Pfzier, NY, USA) on experimental days 4 and 5. The MSC group (therapy with AT-MSCs) was treated intramammarily in the two infected mammary quarters with a suspension of 2.5 × 107 of MSCs in 3 mL of ringer lactate on experimental days 4 and 10. Right quarters were inoculated at day 1 with 1 mL of PBS as a control (CON). From the day of challenge and daily for 15 days, cows were evaluated by clinical examination that included determination of HR, RR, RT and MST. The clinical evaluation of the mammary gland was performed as described above. Abnormalities in the appearance of the milk were evaluated at the beginning of milking using a strip cup with dark surface to classify the secretion as normal, aqueous, viscous, with the presence of flakes or lumps, blood or pus. Milk samples prior to milking were aseptically collected for somatic cell count (SCC) and colony forming units (CFU) from all cows following the protocols of the International Dairy Federation17 from three consecutive days prior to the experimental challenge and daily during the 15 days of the study. A cow was considered to be cured when all infected and noninfected quarters at pre-treatment samplings were negative for S. aureus at the 3 post-treatment daily cultures. Blood samples (10 ml) were collected from the coccygeal vein from day 1 to 5 and on days 10 and 15 into vacutainers for serum haptoglobin and amyloid A determination.
Preparation of S. aureus inoculum
Three bacterial cultures of milk were performed to rule out the presence of intramammary infections. The strain of S. aureus UACH-7018 was kindly provided by Dr. Armin Mella from the Institute of Biochemistry and Microbiology of the Faculty of Sciences of the Austral University of Chile. Once thawed, the strain was seeded on blood agar and incubated overnight at 37 °C in aerobiosis. A bacterial colony was then incubated in 5 mL of brain heart broth in a 15 mL tube for 10 hours at 37 °C. Subsequently, eight dilutions of the broth were prepared in PBS and 100 μL of blood agar was seeded in duplicate from each dilution. Using a sterile rake, the inoculum of each dilution was distributed on the surface of each plate. The plates were incubated overnight in aerobiosis at 37 °C. Subsequently, duplicate plate colonies containing between 30–300 CFU were counted and averages were obtained. To calculate the number of CFU/mL, the following formula was used: Number of colonies × (10)(number of dilution + 1) = CFU/mL. The volume needed to obtain a bacterial suspension with a concentration of 1000 CFU/mL in 1 lt of PBS was then calculated. Cows approximately 30 days postpartum, were challenged by intracisternal inoculation of two left mammary quarters using 1 mL of a suspension of 1000 CFU/mL of S aureus UACH-70. Right quarters were inoculated with 1 mL of PBS as a control (CON).
Somatic cell count and colony forming unit determination
Milk samples were collected from all the cows in 50 mL plastic tubes with bronopol as a preservative and refrigerated at 4 °C. The samples were sent under refrigeration to a commercial laboratory (Labsur, Osorno, Chile) for determination of SCC. The cell count was performed using a Fossomatic flow cytometer (FC 5000, Foss, Denmark). Additional milk samples were collected in sterile 15 mL tubes and frozen at −20 °C. Bacteriological analyzes were performed according to accepted standards and recommended by the National Mastitis Council, USA19. An aliquot of 0.01 mL of each fresh milk sample was grown on blood agar plates (Oxoid Diagnostic Reagents, UK) supplemented with 5% sheep blood. The presumptive colonies of S. aureus based on their morphology were subcultured in a new blood agar plate and tested for coagulase production by means of a test tube with rabbit plasma with EDTA (Bactident Coagulase, Merck, Germany). For the identification of S aureus was used in rapid kit Staphytect Plus (Oxoid Diagnostic reagents, UK).
Haptoglobin and amyloid A determination
Blood was allowed to coagulate at room temperature for 1 h and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C, and serum was stored at −20 °C until assay. The levels of haptoglobin in serum were measured using an ELISA kit (Life Diagnostics, Inc., West Chester, PA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The amounts of serum amyloid A were determined using a semi-quantitative test (EquiCheck from Accuplex Diagnostics, Maynooth, Ireland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Analysis of data
The normality of the data on clinical and hemogram variables, milk yield, gene expression, and haptoglobin and amyloid A levels was evaluated using the Shapiro Wilks normality test. Accordingly, SCC and CFU values were not normally distributed and were log-transformed. For the safety trial, clinical, hemogram and gene expression values were evaluated as dependent variables and the day of sampling was evaluated as independent variable using repeated measures ANOVA. For the efficiency trial, clinical, milk yield, haptoglobin and amyloid A values were evaluated as dependent variables and the day of sampling and treatments groups were evaluated as independent variable using repeated measures ANOVA. The mean of values between days of sampling and treatments groups were analyzed using Duncan’s multiple comparison test (P < 0.05). For the efficacy trial, the SCC and CFU values were compared between groups using a linear mixed model with treatment, day of sampling and mammary quarters as fixed effects and cow as random effects. Statistical analyzes were performed using the software Info Stat (Córdoba, Argentina, 2008).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All procedures have been approved by the Bioethical Committees of the Scientific and Technological Development Support Fund (FONDEF) Grant ID15I10129, Government of Chile and the University of Chile.
Consent for publication
All authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual contents and approved the final manuscript.
Results
Intramammary administration of bovine fetal AT-MSCs in healthy heifers did not induce clinical effect, immune rejection or memory
In order to determine the potential immunogenic effect of an allogenic bovine fetal AT-MSC intramammary therapy in dairy cows; clinical and hematological variables in cows, and gene expression profiles in PBLs were evaluated every five days during a 20-day experimental period. Healthy dairy heifers were treated intramammarily with two doses of AT-MSCs separated by 10 days (Days 1 and 10) with the aim to evaluate if MSCs were able to generate immune rejection and memory. Clinical variables including RR, HR, and RT were within reference intervals and were not affected (P > 0.05) by intramammary inoculation of AT-MSCs (Table 2). Moreover, MTD in quarters were not different (P > 0.05) during the experimental period. Hematological variables including erythrocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils, monocytes, and platelets counts, and hemoglobin, PCV, fibrinogen and globulin levels were within reference intervals and were not different (P > 0.05) between sampling days. In addition, gene expression profiles of lymphocyte activation markers CD4, CD8, CD25, CD62L and CD69 and of proinflammatory cytokine markers CCL2, CCL5, IL2, CXCL3, IFNγ, and TNFα in PBLs were not significantly different between sampling days (Fig. 2).
Table 2.
Itema | Referenceb | Days | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0c | 5 | 10c | 15 | 20 | P | ||
RR (bpm) | 12–36 | 54.7 ± 3.7 | 55.5 ± 4.4 | 60.7 ± 8.8 | 54.0 ± 16 | 51.3 ± 5.5 | 0.6 |
HR (bpm) | 40–80 | 84.0 ± 3.1 | 80.3 ± 7.2 | 82.3 ± 7.1 | 71.7 ± 5.8 | 74.0 ± 2.0 | 0.15 |
RT (°C) | 38–39 | 38.9 ± 0.1 | 39.2 ± 0.1 | 39.3 ± 0.2 | 38.5 ± 0.4 | 38.9 ± 0.3 | 0.13 |
MTD (°C) | 0.8 | −1,1 | −0.4 | 0.8 | −0.5 | 0.08 | |
Erythrocytes (1 × 106/L) | 5–10 | 6.2 ± 0.34 | 6.4 ± 0.12 | 5.8 ± 0.17 | 5.8 ± 0.1 | 6.4 ± 0.17 | 0.14 |
Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 8–15 | 10.2 ± 0.5 | 10.2 ± 0.2 | 9.2 ± 0.4 | 10.1 ± 0.1 | 10.2 ± 0.2 | 0.12 |
PCV (%) | 24–46 | 29.1 ± 1.7 | 29.6 ± 0.5 | 26.8 ± 1.0 | 29.1 ± 0.3 | 29.4 ± 0.7 | 0.5 |
Leukocytes (1 × 103/µL) | 4–12 | 6 ± 0.5 | 7.5 ± 0.3 | 8.2 ± 0.4 | 8.3 ± 0.5 | 8.4 ± 0.6 | 0.14 |
Neutrophils (1 × 103/µL) | 0.6–4 | 2.88 ± 0.21 | 2.77 ± 0.19 | 2.71 ± 0.22 | 2.85 ± 0.18 | 2.89 ± 0.21 | 0.34 |
Lymphocytes (1 × 103/µL) | 2.5–7.5 | 4.1 ± 0.2 | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 4.5 ± 0.3 | 4.4 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 0.4 |
Eosinophils (1 × 103/µL) | 0–2.4 | 1.46 ± 0.75 | 1.12 ± 1.7 | 1.1 ± 0.67 | 1.18 ± 1.81 | 1.7 ± 1.36 | 0.16 |
Monocytes (1 × 103/µL) | 0.025–0.84 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.40 |
Platelet count (1 × 10−3/L) | 100–800 | 407 ± 16.2 | 402 ± 10.4 | 403 ± 10.98 | 402 ± 10.21 | 406 ± 8.24 | 0.29 |
Fibrinogen (mg/dL) | 200–500 | 369 ± 23.8 | 265 ± 44.9 | 330 ± 31.4 | 248 ± 48.3 | 306 ± 32.7 | 0.28 |
Globulin (g/dL) | 2.9–4.9 | 3.4 ± 0.13 | 3.5 ± 0.11 | 3.5 ± 0.11 | 3.5 ± 0.14 | 3.4 ± 0.1 | 0.14 |
aRR = respiratory rate; HR = heart rate; RT = rectal temperature; MTD = mammary temperature difference; PCV = packed cell volume.
bSmith et al., 2014. c2,5 × 107 AT-MSCs were administered intramammarily on Days 0 and 10.
Intramammary administration bovine fetal AT-MSCs in cows with mastitis caused by S. aureus did not induce changes in clinical variables or haptoglobin and amyloid A serum concentrations
In order to evaluate the therapeutic potential of an allogenic bovine fetal AT-MSCs intramammary treatment in dairy cows with experimentally induced S. aureus mastitis; clinical variables, milk yield, haptoglobin and amyloid A in serum, SCC and UFC in milk were evaluated daily during a 15-Day experimental period. RR and HR were among the reference interval considered for adult Holstein cows (RR: 12–36 breaths per min, bpm; HR:40–8 beats per min, bpm, Table 3)20 and no significant differences were detected between experimental groups. Mean RT values were among the reference interval considered for adult Holstein cows (38–39 °C)20; however, at the end and middle of the trial, mean RT of ATB and MSC groups of cows had values below the reference interval. No significant differences were detected in mean MTD during that experimental period. Average surface temperatures between infected and control quarters were (range, max-min °C) 37.5–30.4 and 36.9–30.4 in NEG cows, 37–29.8 and 36.9–28 in ATB cows, and 36.9–31.8 and 37.2–30.9 in MSC cows. Moreover, difference in average surface temperatures between infected and control quarters were (range, max-min °C) 2.3–0.7 in NEG cows, 0.7–0.2 in ATB cows, and 1.6–0.1 in MSC cows (Table 3).
Table 3.
Itema | Treat. | Days post-infection | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4a,c | 5c | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10b | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | P | ||
RR (bpm) | NEG | 37.6 ± 3.8 | 27.5 ± 2.1 | 31 ± 4.5 | 27.5 ± 3.8 | 29 ± 3.1 | 31 ± 3 | 28.5 ± 1.5 | 34.5 ± 3.5 | 26.5 ± 1.3 | 31 ± 2.2 | 31 ± 2.2 | 30.5 ± 2.6 | 28 ± 1.2 | 32 ± 2.4 | 32 ± 3.2 | 0.32 |
ATB | 31.2 ± 4.8 | 29.2 ± 1.9 | 29.6 ± 2.7 | 30 ± 4.8 | 25.2 ± 2.3 | 26 ± 2.3 | 27.4 ± 1.5 | 30.8 ± 2.5 | 29.6 ± 1.6 | 28.8 ± 2.7 | 28 ± 1.8 | 29.2 ± 2.2 | 26.8 ± 2.2 | 27.3 ± 1.9 | 30.6 ± 2.7 | 0.15 | |
MSC | 29.6 ± 2.7 | 32 ± .2.2 | 32 ± 2.8 | 30.4 ± 2.4 | 28 ± 1.3 | 28.8 ± 3.6 | 31.2 ± 1.9 | 30.8 ± 2.6 | 30 ± 2.7 | 29.6 ± 1 | 30 ± 1.5 | 29.2 ± 2.3 | 33.2 ± 2.1 | 29 ± 1.7 | 32.5 ± 2.9 | 0.2 | |
HR (bpm) | NEG | 56 ± 1.8 | 62.5 ± 3 | 57.5 ± 2.8 | 60 ± 2.8 | 60 ± 4.9 | 59 ± 1.9 | 66 ± 4.2 | 61.5 ± 5.2 | 57.5 ± 3.6 | 56 ± 2.3 | 54.5 ± 2.2 | 56 ± 3.7 | 57.3 ± 2.1 | 59 ± 3.1 | 60 ± 2.2 | 0.10 |
ATB | 53.6 ± 3.5 | 57.6 ± 3.5 | 58.4 ± 5.3 | 56.8 ± 3.9 | 51.2 ± 2.3 | 51.6 ± 2.4 | 52 ± 2.2 | 56.4 ± 4.1 | 54.4 ± 2 | 53.6 ± 1 | 50.8 ± 1.2 | 50.8 ± 1.5 | 51.2 ± 0.8 | 46.7 ± 1 | 48 ± 0.8 | 0.25 | |
MSC | 50.4 ± 0.4 | 54.8 ± 2.6 | 56.8 ± 1.9 | 55.2 ± 3.9 | 51.2 ± 2.7 | 50.4 ± 3.9 | 54.4 ± 3.2 | 53.6 ± 2.9 | 54.4 ± 2 | 51.6 ± 2.4 | 53.6 ± 0.7 | 53.6 ± 1.6 | 53,2 ± 2.4 | 52.5 ± 2.5 | 52.5 ± 1.5 | 0.32 | |
RT (°C) | NEG | 38.3 ± 0.1 | 38.2 ± 0.1 | 38.2 ± 0.1 | 38.3 ± 0.1 | 38.2 ± 0.1 | 38.1 ± 0.1 | 38.2 ± 0.2 | 38.4 ± 0.2 | 38.2 ± 0.2 | 35.5 ± 0.1 | 38.3 ± 0.1 | 38.2 ± 0.1 | 38.2 ± 0.2 | 38.2 ± 0.1 | 38.1 ± 0.2 | 0.14 |
ATB | 38.6 ± 0.5 | 38.0 ± 0.1 | 38.2 ± 0.2 | 38.7 ± 0.4 | 38.2 ± 0.2 | 38.4 ± 0.2 | 38.2 ± 0.3 | 38.3 ± 0.2 | 38.1 ± 0.3 | 38.1 ± 0.3 | 38.0 ± 0.3 | 38.3 ± 0.2 | 37.7 ± 0.3 | 37.8 ± 0.2 | 37.8 ± 0.2 | 0.18 | |
MSC | 38.1 ± 0.1 | 38.0 ± 0.1 | 37.6 ± 0.2 | 38.0 ± 0.2 | 37.9 ± 0.2 | 37.7 ± 0.2 | 37.8 ± 0.2 | 37.6 ± 0.2 | 37.7 ± 0.3 | 37.9 ± 0.2 | 38.0 ± 0.1 | 37.6 ± 0.3 | 37.8 ± 0.3 | 38.1 ± 0.1 | 38 ± 0.1 | 0.9 | |
MTD (°C) | NEG | 0.46 | 0.63 | 0.96 | −0.06 | 0,28 | −0,65 | 0.19 | 0.025 | 0.53 | 2.33 | 1.04 | 1.21 | 0.39 | 0.2 | 0.35 | 0.12 |
ATB | −0.17 | 0.65 | 0.43 | 0.51 | −0.11 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.66 | −0.05 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.14 | |
MSC | 0.1 | 1.45 | 0.71 | 0.32 | 0.68 | 1.63 | 0.74 | 0.49 | 0.61 | 1.64 | 0.6 | 1.26 | 0.32 | 0.78 | 0.22 | 0.22 | |
MY (lts) | NEG | 17.7 ± 1.1 | 18.1 ± 1.8 | 18.0 ± 1.3 | 17.1 ± 1.4 | 17.6 ± 0.7 | 20.3 ± 2.6 | 13.5 ± 1.3 | 15.3 ± 2.4 | 15.9 ± 0.8 | 16.6 ± 2.4 | 19.0 ± 1 | 17.1 ± 1.6 | 17.8 ± 1.9 | 20.0 ± 1.8 | 16.3 ± 2 | 0.13 |
ATB | 17.9 ± 1.9 | 17.5 ± 2.2 | 15.7 ± 2.3 | 17.9 ± 1.8 | 17.5 ± 1 | 16.3 ± 2 | 15.8 ± 1.8 | 16.9 ± 1.4 | 16.0 ± 1.5 | 17.4 ± 1.6 | 16.3 ± 1.4 | 16.5 ± 1.6 | 16.5 ± 1.5 | 15.6 ± 1.8 | 16.8 ± 1.9 | 0.18 | |
MSC | 16.8 ± 2.4 | 16.0 ± 2.5 | 15.8 ± 2.2 | 16.3 ± 2.2 | 14.3 ± 1.8 | 16.8 ± 2.3 | 17.2 ± 1.9 | 16.9 ± 1.3 | 16.7 ± 1.8 | 17.4 ± 1.7 | 19.2 ± 2.3 | 16.6 ± 1.9 | 15.6 ± 1.6 | 18.3 ± 2.2 | 17.8 ± 2.5 | 0.1 |
aRR = respiratory rate; HR = heart rate; RT = rectal temperature; MTD = mammary temperature difference; MY = milk yield. bNEG and MSC groups were administered intramammarily on Days 4 and 10 with PBS and 2,5 × 107 AT-MSC, respectively. cATB group was administered intramammarily on Days 4 and 5 with Pirlimycin.
Using a strip cup with dark surface test before each milking we found no traces of blood in milk; however, flakes or lumps were detected in milk from all cows at Day 2 post-challenge and intermittently until the end of the study. Average milk yield values were (range, max-min lts) 20.3 ± 2.6–13.5 ± 1.3 in NEG cows, 17.8 ± 2.5–15.6 ± 1.6 in ATB cows, and 19.2 ± 2.3–14.3 ± 1.8 in MSC cows (Table 3). Milk yield averages were no different (P < 0.05) between days post-infection or experimental groups. Significant changes in serum haptoglobin concentrations occurred over time for each challenge group (Table 4). Mean serum haptoglobin concentrations for NEG, ATB and MSC groups increased (P < 0.05) from day 1 (4.3 ± 0.4, 6.4 ± 4.4 and 4.6 ± 0.9, respectively) until day 2 (10.6 ± 0.4, 13.1 ± 5.9 and 13.3 ± 3.5, respectively) and day 5 (32.4 ± 11.4, 27.1 ± 2.3 and 24.2 ± 5.2, respectively); however, not significant treatment differences were observed. In comparison, serum amyloid A concentrations were not different (P > 0.05) between experimental days or treatments groups of cows.
Table 4.
Item | Treat | Days post-infection | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 41,2 | 52 | 6 | 101 | 15 | P | ||
Haptoglobin (µg/mL) | NEG | 4.3 ± 0.4a | 10.6 ± 0.4b | 8.4 ± 4.1b | 7.3 ± 4.1b | 32.4 ± 11.4c | 22.3 ± 8.4c | 10.1 ± 5b | 8.1 ± 4b | 0.02 |
ATB | 6.4 ± 4.4a | 13.1 ± 5.9b | 12.4 ± 5.8b | 9.8 ± 4.6b | 27.1 ± 2.3c | 9.8 ± 9.4b | 11.1 ± 6.5b | 10.4 ± 4.9b | 0.04 | |
MSC | 4.6 ± 0.9a | 13.3 ± 3.5b | 10.9 ± 5.5b | 10 ± 5.2b | 24.2 ± 5.2c | 11.5 ± 6.4b | 6.7 ± 2.3a | 12.1 ± 4.5b | 0.02 | |
Amyloid A | NEG | 3.3 ± 0.25 | 3.3 ± 0.25 | 2.7 ± 0.23 | 2.3 ± 0.47 | 2.5 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 0.47 | 3.6 ± 0.25 | 3.5 ± 0.29 | 0.19 |
ATB | 3.4 ± 0.4 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 2.8 ± 0.6 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 2.4 ± 0.43 | 2.8 ± 0.49 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.54 | 0.21 | |
MSC | 3.6 ± 0.24 | 3.3 ± 0.42 | 2.8 ± 0.73 | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 3 ± 0.45 | 2.3 ± 0.51 | 1.9 ± 0 | 2 ± 0.24 | 0.32 |
aNEG and MSC groups were administered intramammarily on Days 4 and 10 with PBS and 2,5 × 107 AT-MSCs, respectively. bATB group was administered intramammarily on Days 4 and 5 with Pirlimycin. a,bIndicate significant (P < 0.05) difference among groups of cows. a-c Indicate significant (P < 0.05) difference between experimental days and treatments.
Intramammary administration bovine fetal AT-MSCs in cows with mastitis caused by S. aureus resulted in lower bacterial count in milk compared to cows treated with vehicle
From the day of the challenge and daily for 15 days, milk samples were collected from NEG, ATB and MSC mammary quarters to determine SCC and CFU numbers. Mean SCC log/mL from NEG, ATB and MSC infected mammary quarters were higher (Days 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15; P < 0.05) compared to CON un-infected quarters (Fig. 3). However, no differences were detected in mean SCC log/mL between treatment groups (P > 0.05) or sample periods (P > 0.05), and no significant interaction was noted between mean SCC log/mL of treatment groups and sample periods (P > 0.05). Mean CFU log/mL in infected quarters of NEG treatment were higher (Days 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10; P < 0.05) compared to values in mammary quarters of ATB and MSC treatments. Moreover, mean CFU log/mL in infected quarters treated with ATB were lower (Days 7, 8, 9; P < 0.05) compared to quarters treated with MSC. During the 15-day sample period, mean CFU log/mL in milk from infected quarters of NEG, ATB and MSC were (3.7 ± 1.5, 0.4 ± 0.7 and 2 ± 1.7, respectively). No significant interaction was detected between mean CFU log/mL of treatment groups and sample periods (P > 0.05). Bacteriological cure rates for NEG, ATB and MSC groups of cows were 0, 60 and 20%, respectively.
Discussion
In the present study, we hypothesized that intramammary administration of AT-MSCs in cows with mastitis, would allow the delivery of MSC-derived bioactive factors at sites of lesion, where they may exert immunomodulatory control on the local immune response, strength the antimicrobial activity against mastitis pathogen and subsequently support the endogenous regenerative function of the damaged glandular tissue. This regenerative effect may reduce the therapeutic period for recovery of dairy cows and milk withhold, conforming an alternative or complement for the antibiotic therapy.
To our knowledge this is the first report that has evaluated the effect of the intramammary administration of MSCs for the treatment of bovine mastitis. Considering the absence of previous references and the lack of consensus on the appropriate dosage of MSCs for local therapy, the number of cells used in the present study (2,5 × 107) was established according to previous reports in other large animal models including intra-articular administration in horses21,22, intra-uterine inoculation in mares23,24 and intra-myocardial injection in pigs25. After inoculation, MSCs exert their “homing” capacity by migrating to injured tissue, in response to chemotactic factors including stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES)26.
The use of allogenic MSCs is interesting in order to dispose of an “off-the-shelf” therapeutic product and avoid the period (4–6 weeks) associated with isolation and expansion of autologous MSCs. In this respect, abattoir-derived bovine fetal AT represent an abundant source for generating pools of AT-MSCs, allowing reduction in individual variations for therapeutic applications and offering the possibility to select the most suitable donors according to proliferation rate, differentiation ability or immunoregulatory properties. Nevertheless, failure of MSCs to activate immunosuppressive capacity may leave MSCs functioning much like antigen-presenting cells and able to promote inflammation in vivo12. In this scenario, the immunogenic recognition of MSCs may induce activation of T lymphocytes that trigger inflammatory response and cytolytic activity27. The helper (Th) (CD4+) and cytotoxic T (CD8+) lymphocytes may interact with alloantigens, which regulate the expression of selected molecules involved in the alloresponse28. This response is mediated by increased expression of interleukin 2 receptor (CD25), essential for the proliferation and differentiation of T lymphocytes29 and CD69, a marker of early activation that participates in the regulation of lymphocyte distribution30. In addition, the alloresponse downregulates the expression of L-Selectin (CD62L), which is involved in the adhesion of lymphocytes to peripheral lymph nodes31. Once the T lymphocytes are activated by the direct and indirect mechanisms, the release of various cytokines is generated, including IL-2, IFN-ɣ, and TNF-ɑ, and chemokines such as CCL2, CCL5 and CXCL3, that mediate an intense infiltration of macrophages and proliferation of T lymphocytes28.
In a safety trial, we found that administration of two repeated doses of allogenic AT-MSCs, separated by 10 days, did not induce changes in clinical and hematological variables in healthy cows during a 20-Day period. Moreover, we found no significant variation in gene expression profiles associated to PBL activation (CD4, CD8, CD25, CD62L and CD69) and proinflammatory cytokines (CCL2, CCL5, IL2, CXCL3, IFNγ, and TNFα). As it has been demonstrated in other species and diseases, application of repeated doses of MSCs is important in order to strength the therapeutic effect of MSCs32,33. However, recent reports have indicated that infusion of allogenic MSCs can induce immune memory in recipients34,35. Despite this, anti-donor response has been observed in some clinical trials, no major adverse events have been associated to administration of repeated doses of allogenic MSCs, which is considered a common therapeutic approach in commercial MSC-based therapies36. Overall, our data indicate that intramammary administration bovine fetal AT-MSCs in two doses separated by 10 days, did not induce local clinical effect in the mammary gland or activate systemic immune response in heifers.
In an efficacy trial, we found that quarters inoculated with S. aureus had higher SCC compared to non-infected quarters. Moreover, presence of flakes in milk with no swelling of the gland or systemic illness indicate that experimental inoculation of S. aureus resulted in mild clinical mastitis. This diminished inflammatory reaction, possible associated to reduced immune response, corresponds to the in vivo model recently described for induced mastitis after S aureus udder infection37. Among infected quarters, treatment with AT-MSCs resulted in similar SCC compared to treatment with antibiotics or vehicle. During inflammation, predominant types of SC are neutrophils followed by macrophages and lymphocytes, which enters the mammary gland from blood38. MSCs have been shown to induce immunomodulatory control on neutrophils, macrophages and lymphocytes by secretion of several factors including cytokines IL-6, IL-10, PGE2 and IDO39–42. We previously reported that bovine fetal AT-MSCs responds to inflammatory stimulation by up-regulation of IDO and IL-69. This data generated under in vitro conditions suggested that AT-MSCs would be able to reduce SCC in quarters with mastitis. However, in vivo results from the present study indicate that AT-MSC intramammary inoculation in quarters with mastitis caused by S. aureus did not affect SCC in milk. S aureus has been reported to elicit a subtle immune reaction in the host after infection, through several mechanisms that include attenuation of NF-κB activation in mammary epithelial cells and TNFα, IL-6 and IL-8 in the mammary gland43,44. A subtle immune response in the mammary gland may have reduced the potential inflammatory activation of AT-MSC. Moreover, despite cows with intramammary infection by S. aureus increased haptoglobin levels over time, no significant differences were detected between treatment groups. Previously it has been reported that haptoglobin levels in milk and serum correspond with SCC, which support its use as a biomarker for mastitis detection45,46. Contrary to haptoglobin, amyloid A production is higher in the mammary tissue compared to the liver, which may explain the reduced sensitivity of the semi-quantitative test in serum and the lack of significant differences between treatment groups. Overall these results suggest that inflammatory conditions in the mammary gland were not able to induce secretion of immunomodulatory factors in AT-MSCs or secreted factors were insufficient to control inflammation mediated by migration of leukocytes from blood to milk and haptoglobin and amyloid A production in the mammary gland and liver.
Interestingly, in the efficacy trial, cows with mastitis caused by S. aureus and treated with bovine fetal AT-MSCs had lower CFU levels in milk compared to cows treated with vehicle. In a previous study, we reported that conditioned media from bovine fetal AT-MSCs has the capacity to reduce relative growth of mastitis causing S. aureus under in vitro conditions and that this antibacterial effect may be mediated by DEFβ1 and NK Lysin11. DEFβ1 is cysteine rich, cationic peptide, found in cow milk, that is capable of killing a broad spectrum of pathogens including S. aureus47–49. Moreover, a positive relationship has been described between SCC in milk and DEFβ1 gene expression, which was localized in epithelial cells of cow mastitic tissue50. NK Lysin is a cationic AP produced by cytotoxic T and NK cells that was isolated for the first time from porcine small intestine51. All four synthetic forms of NK-lysin peptides in the bovine had antibacterial capacity against S. aureus52. Despite levels of DEFβ1or NK Lysin were not analyzed in milk of cows treated with AT-MSCs, our results indicate that cells may exert an antibacterial effect against S. aureus in the mammary gland, which results in lower CFU in milk in MSC- compared to NEG-treated cows.
Conclusions
Intramammary administration of repeated doses of allogenic bovine fetal AT-MSCs did not induce immune rejection or memory in healthy dairy heifers. Moreover, administration of this therapy to cows with mastitis caused by S. aureus resulted in lower bacterial count in milk compared to cows treated with vehicle. Overall, these results represent the foundation for the potential development of MSC-based therapy for the treatment of bovine mastitis; however, further studies are required in order to optimize the beneficial effects and determine the underlying mechanisms.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Dr. Monica De los Reyes from the Veterinary School of University of Chile for their technical assistance in the flow cytometric analyses. This study was supported by grant ID15I10129 from the Scientific and Technological Development Support Fund (FONDEF) and grant 1191114 from the National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (FONDECYT) from the Ministry of Education, Goverment of Chile.
Author contributions
The authors responsibilities were as follows: O.A.P. and C.G.T. obtained financial support, conceived and designed the study, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. C.C., C.V., I.M. and S.S. performed cell isolation and culture expansion. I.M., S.S. and M.D. performed safety study of MSC-therapy in healthy cows. C.C., C.V., M.J.T. and A.M. performed efficacy study of MSC-therapy in cows with experimentally-induced mastitis. T.T. and P.M. applied haptoglobin and amyloid analyses on serum samples. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and the additional files.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Fox LK. Prevalence, incidence and risk factors of heifer mastitis. Vet. Microbiol. 2009;134:82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sutra L, Poutrel B. Virulence factors involved in the pathogenesis of bovine intramammary infections due to Staphylococcus aureus. J. Med. Microbiol. 1994;40:79–89. doi: 10.1099/00222615-40-2-79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Oliveira M, et al. Biofilm-forming ability profiling of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis mastitis isolates. Vet. Microbiol. 2006;118:133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pu W, et al. High incidence of oxacillin-susceptible mecA-positive Staphylococcus aureus (OS-MRSA) associated with bovine mastitis in China. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088134.eCollection. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barkema HW, Schukken YH, Zadoks RN. Invited review: The role of cow, pathogen, and treatment regimen in the therapeutic success of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:1877–1895. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72256-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pellegrino M, et al. Experimental trial in heifers vaccinated with Staphylococcus aureus avirulent mutant against bovine mastitis. Vet. Microbiol. 2008;127(1-2):186–190. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Caplan AI. MSCs: the sentinel and safe-guards of injury. J. Cell. Physiol. 2016;231:1413–1416. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Caplan AI. New MSC: MSCs as pericytes are sentinels and gatekeepers. J. Orthop. Res. 2017;35:1151–1159. doi: 10.1002/jor.23560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Huaman O, et al. Immunomodulatory and immunogenic properties of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bovine fetal bone marrow and adipose tissue. Res. Vet. Sci. 2019;124:212–222. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jervis M, et al. Comparative analysis of in vitro proliferative, migratory and pro-angiogenic potentials of bovine fetal mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue. Vet. Res. Commun. 2019;43:165–178. doi: 10.1007/s11259-019-09757-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cahuascanco B, et al. Bovine fetal mesenchymal stem cells exert antiproliferative effect against mastitis causing pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. Vet. Res. 2019;50:25. doi: 10.1186/s13567-019-0643-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ankrum JA, Ong JF, Karp JM. Mesenchymal stem cells: immune evasive, not immune privileged. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;32:252–260. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wenz J, Garry F, Barrington G. Comparison of disease severity scoring systems for dairy cattle with acute coliform mastitis. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2006;229:259–262. doi: 10.2460/javma.229.2.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mavropoulou A, Guazzetti S, Porghetti P, De Angelis E, Quintavalla C. Cytokine expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of dogs with mitral valve disease. Vet. J. 2016;211:45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Anstaett OL, Brownlie J, Collins ME, Thomas CJ. Validation of endogenous reference genes for RT-qPCR normalization in bovine lymphoid cells (BL-3) infected with Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus (BVDV) Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2010;137(3–4):201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vandosempele J, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data bygeometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3:1–12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.International Dairy Federation (IDF). Milk and Milk Products—Methods of Sampling. International Standard 50B, Brussels (1985).
- 18.Mella, A., et al. Evaluation of a new vaccine against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy herds of southern Chile. I. Challenge trial. Austral J. Vet. Sci. 49, 3; 10.4067/S0719-81322017000300149.
- 19.Hogan, J. S. et al. Laboratory handbook on bovine mastitis. (1st ed.) National Mastitis Council, Madison, WI (1999).
- 20.Smith, B. P. Large Animal Internal Medicine. (5th ed.) Elsevier (2014).
- 21.Ardanaz N, et al. Inflammatory response to the administration of mesenchymal stem cells in an equine experimental model: effect of autologous, and single and repeat doses of pooled allogeneic cells in healthy joints. BMC Vet. Res. 2016;31:65. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0692-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bertoni L, et al. Intra-articular injection of 2 different dosages of autologous and allogeneic bone marrow- and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells triggers a variable inflammatory response of the fetlock joint on 12 sound experimental horses. Stem Cells Int. 2019;2019:9431894. doi: 10.1155/2019/9431894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mambelli LI, et al. Changes in expression pattern of selected endometrial proteins following mesenchymal stem cells infusion in mares with endometrosis. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e97889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alvarenga, et al. F. Feasibility and safety of endometrial injection of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in mares. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;42:12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.03.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kim MC, et al. Intramyocardial injection of stem cells in pig myocardial infarction model: the first trial in Korea. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2017;32:1708–1712. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.10.1708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Eggenhofer E, Luk F, Dahlke MH, Hoogduijn MJ. The life and fate of mesenchymal stem cells. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:148. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Eliopoulos N, Stagg J, Lejeune L, Pommey S, Galipeau J. Allogeneic marrow stromal cells are immune rejected by MHC class I- and class II-mismatched recipient mice. Blood. 2005;106:4057–4065. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shipkova M, Wieland E. Surface markers of lymphocyte activation and markers of cell proliferation. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413(17–18):1338–1349. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ingulli E. Mechanism of cellular rejection in transplantation. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2010;25:61–74. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-1020-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ahn J, Hamilton M, Davis W, Park Y. Cloning of bovine CD69. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2002;88:43–48. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2427(02)00125-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Waters W, et al. Expression of L-selectin (CD62L), CD44, and CD25 on activated bovine T cells. Infect Immun. 2003;71:317–326. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.1.317-326.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.van Velthoven CT, Kavelaars A, van Bel F, Heijnen CJ. Repeated mesenchymal stem cell treatment after neonatal hypoxia-ischemia has distinct effects on formation and maturation of new neurons and oligodendrocytes leading to restoration of damage, corticospinal motor tract activity, and sensorimotor function. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:9603–9611. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1835-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hatsushika D, et al. Repetitive allogeneic intraarticular injections of synovial mesenchymal stem cells promote meniscus regeneration in a porcine massive meniscus defect model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22:941–950. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nauta AJ, et al. Donor-derived mesenchymal stem cells are immunogenic in an allogeneic host and stimulate donor graft rejection in a nonmyeloablative setting. Blood. 2006;108:2114–2120. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-011650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Badillo AT, Beggs KJ, Javazon EH, Tebbets JC, Flake AW. Murine bone marrow stromal progenitor cells elicit an in vivo cellular and humoral alloimmune response. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:412–422. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2006.12.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lalu MM, et al. Safety of cell therapy with mesenchymal stromal cells (SafeCell): a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. PLoS One. 2012;7:e47559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Alhussien M, et al. A comparative study on the blood and milk cell counts of healthy, subclinical, and clinical mastitis Karan Friesian cows. Vet World. 2015;8:685–689. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.685-689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Raffaghello L, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells inhibit neutrophil apoptosis: a model for neutrophil preservation in the bone marrow niche. Stem Cells. 2008;26:151–162. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nemeth K, et al. Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate sepsis via prostaglandin E2- dependent reprogramming of host macrophages to increase their interleukin-10 production. Nat. Med. 2009;15:42–49. doi: 10.1038/nm.1905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mellor AL, Munn DH. IDO expression by dendritic cells: tolerance and tryptophan catabolism. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004;4:762–774. doi: 10.1038/nri1457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Günther J, et al. Differentiating Staphylococcus aureus from Escherichia coli mastitis: S. aureus triggers unbalanced immune-dampening and host cell invasion immediately after udder infection. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):4811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05107-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Krampera M, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibit the response of naive and memory antigen-specific T cells to their cognate peptide. Blood. 2003;101:3722–3729. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Eckersall PD, et al. Acute phase proteins in bovine milk in an experimental model of staphylococcus aureus subclinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 2005;89:1488–1501. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72216-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Thomas FC, et al. The major acute phase proteins of bovine milk in a commercial dairy herd. BMC Vet. Res. 2015;11:207. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0533-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Selsted ME, Ouellette AJ. Mammalian defensins in the antimicrobial immune response. Nat. Immunol. 2005;6:551–557. doi: 10.1038/ni1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Isobe N, Nakamura J, Nakano H, Yoshimura Y. Existence of functional lingual antimicrobial peptide in bovine milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:2691–2695. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yang W, et al. Bovine TLR2 and TLR4 properly transduce signals from Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli, but S. aureus fails to both activate NF-kappaB in mammary epithelial cells and to quickly induce TNF alpha and interleukin-8 (CXCL8) expression in the udder. Mol. Immunol. 2008;45(5):1385–1397. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Günther J, et al. Comparative kinetics of Escherichia coli- and Staphylococcus aureus-specific activation of key immune pathways in mammary epithelial cells demonstrates that S. aureus elicits a delayed response dominated by interleukin-6 (IL-6) but not by IL-1A or tumor necrosis factor alpha. Infect. Immun. 2011;79(2):695–707. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01071-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Taha-Abdelaziz K, et al. Bactericidal activity of tracheal antimicrobial peptide against respiratory pathogens of cattle. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2013;152:289–294. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2012.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Swanson K, et al. Expression of a b-defensin mRNA, lingual antimicrobial peptide, in bovine mammary epithelial tissue is induced by mastitis. Infect. Immun. 2004;72:7311–7314. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.12.7311-7314.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Andersson M, et al. NK-lysin, a novel effector peptide of cytotoxic T and NK cells. Structure and cDNA cloning of the porcine form, induction by interleukin 2, antibacterial and antitumour activity. EMBO J. 1995;14:1615–1625. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07150.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chen J, Lee MO, Womack JE. Genetic variation and gene conversions within the bovine NK-lysin gene family. Anim. Genet. 2017;48:225–227. doi: 10.1111/age.12521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and the additional files.