Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2020 Feb 18;16(2):e1008633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008633

Control of clathrin-mediated endocytosis by NIMA family kinases

Braveen B Joseph 1,, Yu Wang 2,3,, Phil Edeen 1, Vladimir Lažetić 1, Barth D Grant 2, David S Fay 1,*
Editor: Jeremy Nance4
PMCID: PMC7048319  PMID: 32069276

Abstract

Endocytosis, the process by which cells internalize plasma membrane and associated cargo, is regulated extensively by posttranslational modifications. Previous studies suggested the potential involvement of scores of protein kinases in endocytic control, of which only a few have been validated in vivo. Here we show that the conserved NIMA-related kinases NEKL-2/NEK8/9 and NEKL-3/NEK6/7 (the NEKLs) control clathrin-mediated endocytosis in C. elegans. Loss of NEKL-2 or NEKL-3 activities leads to penetrant larval molting defects and to the abnormal localization of trafficking markers in arrested larvae. Using an auxin-based degron system, we also find that depletion of NEKLs in adult-stage C. elegans leads to gross clathrin mislocalization and to a dramatic reduction in clathrin mobility at the apical membrane. Using a non-biased genetic screen to identify suppressors of nekl molting defects, we identified several components and regulators of AP2, the major clathrin adapter complex acting at the plasma membrane. Strikingly, reduced AP2 activity rescues both nekl mutant molting defects as well as associated trafficking phenotypes, whereas increased levels of active AP2 exacerbate nekl defects. Moreover, in a unique example of mutual suppression, NEKL inhibition alleviates defects associated with reduced AP2 activity, attesting to the tight link between NEKL and AP2 functions. We also show that NEKLs are required for the clustering and internalization of membrane cargo required for molting. Notably, we find that human NEKs can rescue molting and trafficking defects in nekl mutant worms, suggesting that the control of intracellular trafficking is an evolutionarily conserved function of NEK family kinases.

Author summary

In order to function properly, cells must continually import materials from the outside. This process, termed endocytosis, is necessary for the uptake of nutrients and for interpreting signals coming from the external environment or from within the body. These signals are critical during animal development but also affect many types of cell behaviors throughout life. In our current work, we show that several highly conserved proteins in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, NEKL-2 and NEKL-3, regulate endocytosis. The human counterparts of NEKL-2 and NEKL-3 have been implicated in cardiovascular and renal diseases as well as many types of cancers. However, their specific functions within cells is incompletely understood and very little is known about their role in endocytosis or how this role might impact disease processes. Here we use several complementary approaches to characterize the specific functions of C. elegans NEKL-2 and NEKL-3 in endocytosis and show that their human counterparts likely have very similar functions. This work paves the way to a better understanding of fundamental biological processes and to determining the cellular functions of proteins connected to human diseases.

Introduction

The cuticle of C. elegans is a flexible apical extracellular matrix consisting of cross-linked collagens, non-collagenous proteins, linked carbohydrates, and lipids [1, 2]. The cuticle is essential for providing a protective barrier from the environment, for maintaining the proper shape and integrity of the organism, and for facilitating muscle-based locomotion by functioning as an exoskeleton [3]. Remodeling of the cuticle occurs at the end of each of four larval stages (L1–L4) through a process called molting. During molting, a new cuticle is synthesized under the old cuticle, which is then shed [35]. Molting enables organismal growth and allows for changes in the composition and organization of the cuticle at different life stages. Molting defects can occur when synthesis of the new cuticle is compromised or when shedding of the old cuticle is incomplete. A sizeable number of factors have been implicated in C. elegans molting including proteins involved in cuticle structure, protein modification, protein degradation, cell signaling, transcription, and intracellular trafficking [4, 6].

During each molt, an accumulation of ribosomes, Golgi bodies and RNA is observed within the epidermal cells that produce the new cuticle, consistent with increased protein synthesis [1, 2, 5, 7]. The secretion of essential structural proteins, along with the enzymatic activities required for cuticle replacement, is accomplished through exocytosis. Consistent with this, inhibition of sec-23, which encodes a component of COPII-coated vesicles required for the transport of proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi, leads to molting defects [8]. At the same time, endocytosis is required to balance exocytosis and thus maintain a relatively constant volume/area of apical plasma membrane. In addition, the recycling of old cuticle components may be enabled through the process of endocytosis.

Endocytosis by the epidermis is also essential for the uptake of sterols from the environment, which provide building blocks for the hormonal cues that drive molting [4, 6, 912]. Consistent with this, worms deprived of cholesterol fail to molt [1315]. Sterol uptake by the epidermis is thought to be dependent in part on LRP-1 (human LRP2), which belongs to the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family of integral membrane proteins. Inhibition of LRP-1 and other trafficking components required for LRP-1 uptake, such as the adapter protein DAB-1 (human DAB1/2), also lead to defective molting [1519].

We previously reported that knockdown of NEKL-2 (human NEK8/9) or NEKL-3 (human NEK6/7), two conserved members of the Never-In-Mitosis-A (NIMA) protein kinase family, leads to molting defects in C. elegans [20, 21]. In addition, loss of function in the conserved ankyrin repeat proteins MLT-2 (human ANKS6), MLT-3 (human ANKS3), and MLT-4 (human INVS), leads to molting defects that are identical to those of nekl mutants. The NEKL–MLTs form two distinct complexes (NEKL-2 with MLT-2–MLT-4 and NEKL-3 with MLT-3), and the MLTs are required for the correct subcellular localization of the NEKLs [21]. Importantly, these physical and functional interactions between NEKLs and MLTs appear to be highly conserved [2225].

We previously showed that NEKL–MLTs are expressed in punctate patterns in the major syncytial epidermis of the worm, hyp7, suggesting that NEKL–MLTs localize to one or more trafficking compartments [20, 21]. In addition, we found that molting-defective nekl–mlt larvae exhibit abnormal morphology and/or localization of multiple trafficking markers in the apical region of hyp7, including a multi-copy clathrin heavy chain reporter [20, 21]. However, it was unclear as to whether the apparent defects in clathrin-mediated endocytosis were a primary cause of the observed molting defects in nekl–mlt mutants or a secondary consequence of physiological effects caused by the presence of a double cuticle and the inability of the worms to feed.

Clathrin-mediated endocytosis is a highly regulated stepwise process involving dozens of factors that act temporally to control the initiation, maturation, and internalization of clathrin-coated pits/vesicles [2632]. Among these are the components of the clathrin scaffold itself, multiple triskelion units containing three heavy chains and an associated light chain. In addition, clathrin-mediated endocytosis requires numerous adapter proteins that link clathrin to the plasma membrane and to integral membrane cargo. Chief among these is the conserved plasma membrane adapter protein complex, AP2 [29, 3335]. AP2 consists of four subunits, termed α, β, μ, and σ, and exists in at least two functionally distinct structures, broadly termed the open/active and closed/inactive conformations [27, 29, 3639]. Allosteric regulators of AP2 conformation include FCHo1/2, which promotes the open state of AP2 [40, 41], and NECAP1/2, which promotes the closed conformation [42]. In addition, protein kinases have been implicated in the regulation of AP2 through phosphorylation of the μ subunit [39, 43].

Here we demonstrate that NEKL–MLTs regulate clathrin-mediated endocytosis within the context of an intact developing organism. We show that the function of NEKL–MLTs in trafficking is highly sensitive to the balance between the open and closed AP2 conformations and that AP2-associated phenotypes are also responsive to NEKL activity. In addition, we demonstrate that loss of NEKL functions leads to defects in LRP-1/LRP2 endocytosis, a cargo that is physiologically relevant to molting. Our combined findings indicate that defects in endocytosis are likely to be a major underlying basis for the observed molting defects in nekl mutants. Finally, we show that mammalian NEK6 and NEK7 can partially rescue endocytosis and molting defects in nekl-3 mutant worms.

Results

nekl–mlt defects are suppressed by decreased function of the AP2 clathrin-adapter complex

We previously described a genetic and bioinformatic approach to identify suppressors of larval lethality in strains deficient for NEKL kinase activity [44]. Our screen makes use of weak aphenotypic alleles of nekl-2(fd81) and nekl-3(gk894345), which, when combined in double mutants, lead to penetrant larval arrest due to molting defects [44, 45]. Homozygous nekl-2(fd81); nekl-3(gk894345) mutants (hereafter referred to as nekl-2; nekl-3 mutants) can be propagated only in the presence of a nekl-2+ or nekl-3+ rescuing extrachromosomal array, whereas strains that acquire a suppressor mutation no longer require the array for viability (Fig 1A and 1B).

Fig 1. Loss of AP2 complex activity suppresses nekl–mlt molting defects.

Fig 1

(A) Merged DIC and fluorescence images of nekl-2(fd81); nekl-3(gk894345) worms. The rescuing extrachromosomal array (fdEx286) expresses wild-type nekl-3 and the SUR-5::GFP reporter. White arrow indicates a growth-arrested nekl-2; nekl-3 larva that failed to inherit the array and exhibits a “corset” morphology, characteristic of nekl–mlt molting defects (inset in A). The bracket marks the constricted mid-body region, which contains a double cuticle. Bar size in A = 100 μm (for A and B); in inset, 20 μm. (B) DIC image of nekl-2; nekl-3 adult worm containing the suppressor mutation dpy-23(fd155). (C) Graphic representation of AP2 tetramer complex containing four subunits. (D) Gene structure diagram of dpy-23/μ including the locations of mutations. Point mutations (fd155, fd277, fd279) are indicated by arrows; indel (fd261) by the line ending in a small bracket. (E) Protein domain diagram of DPY-23/μ with corresponding allelic changes; fd261 is missing ~30 bp of the proximal 5’UTR including a predicted SL1 transplice site and the start codon. The amino acid (aa) locations of the two domains are indicated. (F–I) Bar plots showing suppression of molting defects in nekl–mlt mutants by reduction in AP2 activity. Assays F–H were carried out in nekl-2(fd81); nekl-3(gk894345) double mutants. (G,I) RNAi was carried out in the indicated backgrounds using injection methods; control indicates non-injected siblings. (F–I) Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals; p-values were determined using Fischer’s exact test where proportions were compared to the wild-type allele (F,H) or to the RNAi control (G,I): ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001. (J) Guide to nekl–mlt alleles used in this study. Raw data are available in S1 File.

Among nekl-2; nekl-3 animals containing the fd155 suppressor mutation, 98% progressed to adulthood versus only 1–2% for the parental nekl-2; nekl-3 strain (Fig 1B and 1F). We showed the fd155 causal mutation to be a T-to-A transversion in the 11th exon of dpy-23, which leads to a S434T substitution in a serine that is highly conserved (Fig 1D and 1E). A second independent mutation (fd277) was identified as a T to G transversion in the 8th exon of dpy-23, leading to a Y275D substitution in a highly conserved tyrosine residue (Fig 1D and 1E). Both mutations, as well as a CRISPR/Cas9-generated predicted null allele of dpy-23 (fd279) (S1 Table), led to a high percentage of viable adults in the nekl-2; nekl-3 background (Fig 1D–1F), and partial suppression was observed in nekl-2; nekl-3 strains treated with dpy-23(RNAi) (Fig 1G).

dpy-23 (also known as apm-2) encodes the μ subunit (also termed μ2) of the C. elegans AP2 complex [46, 47]; the other three subunits are encoded by apa-2 (α), apb-1 (β), and aps-2 (σ) (Fig 1C) [29, 48]. AP2 binds to phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) lipids on the plasma membrane and functions as an adapter, linking cytoplasmic clathrin to plasma membrane cargo [29, 48]. In C. elegans, AP2 subunits form two partially independent hemicomplexes composed of μ/β and α/σ [49]. Although normal levels of clathrin-mediated endocytosis occur only when all four subunits are functional, C. elegans strains containing either the μ/β or α/σ hemicomplex are nevertheless viable, as demonstrated by the ability to propagate homozygous null mutants of apa-2/α, dpy-23/μ, or aps-2/σ [46, 47, 49]. Strains containing strong loss of function in apb-1, however, are embryonic lethal because of the role of APB-1/β1/2 in both AP2 and AP1 complexes, the latter of which function in clathrin-mediated trafficking from the trans-Golgi network and from endosomes [35, 4951].

To determine if depletion of the other AP2 subunits could suppress nekl molting defects, we carried out RNAi in nekl-2; nekl-3 animals. RNAi of apa-2/α or aps-2/σ allowed ~40% of nekl-2; nekl-3 animals to reach adulthood (Fig 1G). Furthermore, a CRISPR-generated null allele of apa-2/α (fd280) led to a slightly higher proportion of nekl-2; nekl-3 animals reaching the adult stage (Fig 1H, S1 Table). Attempts to suppress nekl-2; nekl-3 arrest by apb-1(RNAi) were unsuccessful due to early embryonic lethality, as expected. Our findings indicate that suppression of nekl-2; nekl-3 molting defects are not specific to individual AP2 subunits or hemicomplexes, although loss of the μ/β hemicomplex may provide a higher level of suppression than loss of α/σ (Fig 1F and 1H).

We next determined if suppression of nekl-2; nekl-3 double mutants by inhibition of AP2 was specific to either the NEKL-2 or NEKL-3 pathways. For these tests, we first carried out aps-2(RNAi) in nekl–mlt backgrounds containing moderate-to-strong loss-of-function alleles (Fig 1I and 1J) that exhibit 100% larval arrest as single mutants [20, 45]. Downregulation of aps-2/σ led to significant suppression of larval lethality in moderate-to-strong loss-of-function alleles of nekl-2, nekl-3, and mlt-4 (Fig 1I), with weakest suppression observed for fd90, a relatively strong nekl-2 allele. In contrast, no suppression was observed in strains containing a null allele of nekl-3(gk506) (Fig 1I).

Failure to observe suppression of nekl–mlt null alleles using RNAi to knockdown AP2 may be due to incomplete inactivation of the targeted subunit. We therefore determined if null alleles in apa-2/α or dpy-23/μ could suppress larval arrest in null nekl–mlt backgrounds. In the case of apa-2/α, we failed to observe any suppression in null nekl-2, nekl-3, and mlt-3 backgrounds (n > 1000 for each strain), indicating that complete loss of the α/σ hemicomplex is not sufficient to overcome the requirement for NEKL-2 and NEKL-3. Attempts to score suppression of nekl–mlt null alleles with dpy-23(e840), however, were not successful because the generated compound mutants were very sick and slow growing.

Loss of FCHO-1, an activator of AP2, suppresses nekl–mlt defects

Among nekl-2; nekl-3 animals containing the fd131 suppressor mutation, 87% progressed to adulthood (Fig 2A and 2E). Prior genetic characterization of fd131 indicated the causal mutation to be recessive and autosomal [44]. We determined the fd131 causal mutation to be a C-to-T transition in the 13th exon of fcho-1, which introduces a premature stop codon following amino acid (aa) 903 (Q904Stop; Fig 2C and 2D, S1 Table). This mutation is predicted to truncate the 963-aa FCHO-1 protein within the conserved Mu-Homology domain (Fig 2C and 2D). Consistent with this, CRISPR-generated truncations within the Mu-Homology domain (fd211 and fd212) led to a high percentage of viable adults in the nekl-2; nekl-3 background, as did a null deletion allele of fcho-1 (ox477; Fig 2C–2E;; S1 Table). In addition, partial knockdown of fcho-1 by RNAi resulted in ~40% of nekl-2; nekl-3 mutants reaching adulthood (Fig 2F).

Fig 2. Loss of fcho-1 activity suppresses nekl–mlt molting defects.

Fig 2

(A) DIC image of nekl-2(fd81); nekl-3(gk894345) adult worm containing the suppressor mutation fd131. Bar size in A = 100 μm. (B) Model of AP2 allosteric regulation by FCHO-1. (C) Gene structure diagram of fcho-1 including the locations of mutations. The point mutation fd131 is indicated by the arrow, indels (fd211, fd212) by the line ending in a small bracket, and deletions (ox477, fd262) by horizontal gray lines. (D) Protein domain diagram of FCHO-1 with corresponding allelic changes. The amino acid (aa) locations of the three domains are indicated. (E–G) Bar plots showing suppression of molting defects in nekl–mlt mutants by reduction of FCHO-1 activity. (E) Assays were carried out in nekl-2(fd81); nekl-3(gk894345) double mutants using the indicated fcho-1 alleles. (F) RNAi was carried out in the indicated backgrounds using injection methods; control indicates non-injected siblings. (G) Assays were carried out in strong/null nekl–mlt backgrounds using the null fcho-1(ox477) allele. (E–G) Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. p-Values were determined using Fischer’s exact test where proportions were compared to the wild-type allele (E,G) or to the RNAi control (F); ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001. Raw data are available in S1 File.

FCHO-1 is a member of the muniscin protein family, members of which have important roles in clathrin-mediated endocytosis and are recruited to nascent pits early during endocytic vesicle formation [27, 32, 52, 53]. Orthologs of FCHO-1 contain three characterized functional domains: an N-terminal F-BAR domain, a C-terminal Mu-homology domain, and an internal AP2 Activator domain (Fig 1D). The F-BAR domain binds to lipid bilayers and aids in membrane curvature, whereas the Mu-homology domain binds to cargo and other endocytic adapter proteins. The AP2 Activator domain has recently been shown to facilitate the allosteric opening/activation of AP2 (Fig 2B), and loss of fcho-1 activity in C. elegans leads to a decrease in the levels of open/active AP2 [3941].

Similar to AP2 subunits, suppression of nekl–mlts by fcho-1(RNAi) was not specific to either the NEKL-2 or NEKL-3 pathways (Fig 2F). Also like the AP2 subunits, fcho-1(RNAi) failed to suppress strong loss-of-function alleles of nekl-2 and nekl-3 (Fig 2F). Interestingly, unlike AP2 subunits, a null deletion allele of fcho-1 (ox477) was able to suppress strong/null alleles of nekl-2, nekl-3, and mlt-3 (Fig 2G).

The above findings imply that decreasing the amount of open/active AP2, either by reducing gross AP2 levels or by inhibiting its allosteric activation, can bypass the requirement for NEKL–MLT activity. As a further test of this model, we used CRISPR to generate an in-frame fcho-1 deletion (fd262), which is predicted to specifically remove the AP2 activator domain of FCHO-1 without affecting the F-BAR or Mu-Homology domains (Fig 2C and 2D) [40, 41]. Importantly, fcho-1(fd262) strongly suppressed molting defects in nekl-2; nekl-3 mutants (Fig 2E), consistent with suppression by fcho-1 occurring through a reduction in AP2 activity.

Excess open AP2 enhances nekl–mlt molting defects

Given that decreasing the amount of open AP2 led to the suppression of nekl–mlt defects, we next tested if increasing the levels of open AP2 could enhance molting defects in weak nekl–mlt loss-of-function backgrounds. ncap-1 encodes the C. elegans ortholog of the mammalian adaptiN Ear-binding Coat-Associated Proteins (NECAP1 and NECAP2), which function in several different aspects of clathrin-mediated endocytosis [42, 5457]. Recently, C. elegans NCAP-1 was shown to allosterically regulate AP2 to promote the closed/inactive conformation, and loss of ncap-1 suppresses the slow-growth phenotype of fcho-1 strains [42]. Thus, NCAP-1 acts in opposition to FCHO-1 to regulate AP2 conformation and activity (Fig 3A) [39].

Fig 3. Excess open AP2 enhances nekl–mlt molting defects.

Fig 3

(A) Model depicting the allosteric regulation of AP2 by FCHO-1 and NCAP-1. DPY-23/μ open mutants cause AP2 to remain in the open/active state. (B,D,E) Bar plots showing enhancement of molting defects by mutations in ncap-1 (B) and dpy-23/μ open mutants (D,E). RNAi feeding was carried out for the indicated genes; control RNAi feeding targeted GFP. (C) Bar plot showing partial reversion of suppression in nekl-2(fd81); fcho-1(fd131); nekl-3(gk894345) triple mutants after ncap-1(RNAi) was carried out using injection methods. Control indicates non-injected siblings. (B–E) Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. p-Values were determined using Fischer’s exact test where proportions were compared to the RNAi controls; ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001. Raw data are available in S1 File.

To test for enhancement of molting defects, we carried out RNAi of nekl–mlts in wild-type and ncap-1(mew39) deletion backgrounds using “weak” RNAi feeding methods, which cause only a partial reduction in nekl–mlt activities [20, 21]. Whereas RNAi feeding of nekl–mlts in wild type resulted in little or no defective molting, significantly elevated levels of molting arrest were detected in the ncap-1(mew39) background (Fig 3B). These findings imply that increased levels of open AP2 exacerbate nekl–mlt loss-of-function phenotypes. Correspondingly, RNAi of ncap-1 mitigated suppression conferred by loss of fcho-1 in nekl-2; nekl-3 mutants (Fig 3C). These results are consistent with the reported opposing functions for NCAP-1 and FCHO-1 and support the model that suppression of nekl–mlts by fcho-1 and AP2 mutations is due to reduced levels of open AP2.

Because mammalian NECAPs have been suggested to have several distinct functions during endocytosis [5456, 58], we carried out additional tests to determine if increased open AP2 could enhance nekl–mlt defects. For these studies, we made use of several missense mutations in dpy-23/μ that shift the balance of AP2 toward the open state (“open mutants”) [40]. As with ncap-1, we observed strong enhancement of molting defects after nekl–mlt RNAi feeding in dpy-23/μ strains containing E306K or T160A substitutions (Fig 3D–3E). The somewhat stronger findings observed for the E306K mutation correlates with biochemical assays showing that E306K leads to higher levels of open AP2 than the T160A substitution [40]. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that reducing the level of open AP2 suppresses nekl–mlt molting defects whereas increasing the level of open AP2 exacerbates defects.

Loss of NEKL–MLT activity suppresses AP2-associated defects

Loss of function of non-essential AP2 subunits (μ, α, and σ) and fcho-1 leads to reduced growth rates and the accumulation of fluid between the cuticle and epidermis [40, 49]. This latter defect visibly manifests in adult-stage worms as bilateral bulges located near the junction of the hyp6 and hyp7 epidermal syncytia in the region of the neck (the “Jowls” phenotype; Fig 4A). Strikingly, we observed that loss of function in NEKL–MLT activity significantly suppressed the Jowls phenotype of fcho-1 and AP2 mutants (Fig 4A–4F). Specifically, partial suppression of Jowls was observed in the fcho-1(ox477) null mutant background, as well as in the presence of null alleles of apa-2/α and dpy-23/μ, and in aps-2(RNAi) animals (Fig 4C–4F). Moreover, suppression was observed in strains with reduced or abolished function in either the NEKL-2 or NEKL-3 pathways (Fig 4C and 4F). Our observation that simultaneous loss of AP2 and NEKL–MLT activities leads to the mutual suppression of both molting-defective and Jowls phenotypes underscores the tight functional connection between NEKL–MLT and AP2 activities in vivo.

Fig 4. The AP2-associated Jowls phenotype is suppressed by nekl–mlt mutants.

Fig 4

(A,B) Representative DIC images of fcho-1(ox477) (A) and fcho-1(ox477); nekl-3(gk506) (B) adults. White arrowheads mark the location of Jowls in fcho-1(ox477) mutants. Bar size in A = 5 μm (for A and B). (C–F) The percentage of adult animals exhibiting the Jowls phenotype was assayed in the indicated genetic backgrounds; “+” indicates that no nekl–mlt mutations were present. (C) Assays were carried out in strong/null nekl–mlt backgrounds using the null fcho-1(ox477) allele. (D) Assays were carried out using the dpy-23/μ null alleles fd261 (in the + background), and fd279 (in the nekl-2(fd81); nekl-3(gk894345) background). (E) Assays were carried out using the apa-2 null alleles fd282 (in the + background) and fd280 (in the nekl-2(fd81); nekl-3(gk894345) background). (F) RNAi was carried out in the indicated backgrounds using injection methods. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. p-Values were determined using Fischer’s exact test where proportions were compared to the corresponding wild-type nekl–mlt allele (+) (C,D,E) or non-injected controls (F); ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, *p < 0.05. Raw data are available in S1 File.

Molting-defective nekl mutants exhibit changes in epidermal clathrin that are suppressed by inhibition of fcho-1 and AP2

Given the strong genetic data linking the NEKL–MLTs to AP2, we next examined the role of NEKL–MLTs in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. We previously showed that molting-defective nekl–mlt mutants exhibit abnormal localization of a multi-copy clathrin heavy chain reporter [20, 21, 59]. To visualize clathrin at physiological levels, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to generate a clathrin heavy chain reporter construct with an N-terminal GFP tag (GFP::CHC-1), which showed the expected punctate localization pattern in the hyp7 epidermal syncytium (Fig 5A). Consistent with our previous findings, GFP::CHC-1 localization was altered in molting-defective nekl-2; nekl-3 larvae (Fig 5A and 5B). Specifically, the average mean intensity of GFP::CHC-1 was increased by 2.2-fold in the apical region of hyp7 in nekl-2; nekl-3 larvae arrested at the L2/L3 molt relative to wild-type late-stage L2 larvae (Fig 5B). In addition, the percentage of GFP-positive pixels (above a uniformly applied threshold) was increased by 1.3-fold in nekl-2; nekl-3 molting-defective larvae relative to wild type, which may reflect an increase in the density and/or size of apical GFP::CHC-1 puncta (Fig 5A–5C).

Fig 5. Clathrin defects in nekl-2; nekl-3 mutants are suppressed by reduced AP2 activity.

Fig 5

(A) Representative confocal images of L2–L3 larvae expressing CRISPR-tagged GFP::CHC-1 within the apical region of the hyp7 epidermal syncytium. GFP::CHC-1 localization is shown for wild-type, nekl-2(fd81); nekl-3(gk894345), nekl-2(fd81); fcho-1(fd131); nekl-3(gk894345), and nekl-2(fd81); dpy-23(fd155) nekl-3(gk894345) strains. Inverted fluorescence images are shown to aid clarity. Bar size in A = 5 μm (for A–D). Background subtraction was performed using the same parameters for all images; minimum and maximum pixel values were kept consistent for all images. (B,C) For individual larvae of the indicated genotypes, the mean GFP::CHC-1 intensity (B) and the percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold (C) were determined in the apical region of hyp7. Both the group mean and 95% confidence interval (error bars) are shown. p-Values for compared means were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests; ****p < 0.0001, **p < 0.01. Raw data are available in S1 File.

We next determined if clathrin defects in nekl-2; nekl-3 larvae could be suppressed by a reduction in FCHO-1 and AP2 activities. Relative to nekl-2; nekl-3 mutants, the average mean intensity of apical GFP::CHC-1 was reduced by 1.5-fold in nekl-2; fcho-1(fd131); nekl-3 late-stage L2 larvae, and the percentage of positive pixels was reduced by 1.4-fold (Fig 5A–5C). A similar trend was observed for nekl-2; dpy-23(fd155) nekl-3 animals, which exhibited a 1.2-fold decrease in both the GFP::CHC-1 mean intensity and in the percentage of pixels above threshold relative to nekl-2; nekl-3 animals, although the observed change in mean intensity was not statistically significant (Fig 5A–5C). Together, our findings suggest that reduced AP2 activity mitigates both molting and clathrin-localization defects in nekl-2; nekl-3 larvae.

Loss of NEKLs in adults leads to changes in clathrin that are independent of molting defects

Although our above findings suggest that the NEKLs regulate epidermal clathrin, the analysis of trafficking in nekl–mlt mutants is problematic because of potential secondary effects caused by the double cuticle and larval arrest phenotype. To circumvent this obstacle, we engineered regulatable NEKL kinases using the auxin-induced degradation system [60, 61]. Importantly, by depleting NEKLs after the final molt, we eliminated the possibility that changes in clathrin localization could be an indirect consequence of defective molting. Proteins tagged with an auxin-inducible degron (AID) are responsive to auxin, which binds to the AID motif leading to ubiquitination by the TIR1–SCF E3-ligase complex and degradation by the proteosome (Fig 6A).

Fig 6. Clathrin localization is altered in NEKL-depleted adults.

Fig 6

(A) Model of auxin-inducible degradation of NEKL kinases containing the auxin inducible degron (NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID). The addition of auxin triggers ubiquitination of NEKL::AID proteins followed by proteolysis. (B) Western blot showing complete loss of the full-length NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID proteins after auxin treatment. (C) Bar plot showing the percentage of molting defects among NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID strains in the presence and absence of auxin. p-Values were determined using Fischer’s exact test; ****p < 0.0001. (D–K) CRISPR-tagged GFP::CHC-1 localization was analyzed in NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID strains in the presence and absence of auxin (20 h) in day-2 adults. (D,G) Representative confocal images of day-2 adults expressing GFP::CHC-1 within the apical region of the hyp7 epidermal syncytium. Background subtraction was performed using the same parameters for all images; minimum and maximum pixel values were kept consistent for all images. Inverted fluorescence was used to aid clarity. Bar size in D = 5 μm (for D and G). (E,F,H,I) Mean GFP::CHC-1 intensities (E,H) and the percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold (F,I) were determined for individual adults. (J,K) Summary comparison of data from panels E,F,H,I and S2 Fig (B,C). (E,F,H–K) The group mean and 95% confidence interval (error bars) are shown. p-Values were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests; ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01. Raw data are available in S1 File.

Exposure of CRISPR-tagged NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID day-1 adults to auxin led to the complete loss of both full-length tagged proteins within 20 h (Fig 6B). Consistent with NEKL loss of function, 100% of NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID L1 larvae exposed to auxin from hatching arrested with molting defects (Fig 6C) and displayed abnormal accumulation of apical GFP::CHC-1 (S1 Fig). We note that whereas auxin treatment resulted in the complete disappearance of any detectable NEKL-3::AID protein, we often observed a more rapidly migrating band in samples from auxin-treated NEKL-2::AID worms, suggesting that a partial fragment of NEKL-2::AID may be resistant to further degradation.

To determine the effects of auxin-induced NEKL::AID depletion on clathrin localization in adults, we exposed day-1 adults to auxin for 20 h prior to GFP::CHC-1 localization analysis. In control experiments with wild-type adults, auxin treatment alone did not significantly affect apical hyp7 GFP::CHC-1 localization (Fig 6J and 6K, S2 Fig; S1 and S2 Movies). Strikingly, we observed 2.5-fold and 3.6-fold increases in the average mean intensities of apical GFP::CHC-1 in auxin-treated NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID adults, respectively, relative to auxin-treated wild-type animals (Fig 6D, 6G and 6J; S3 and S4 Movies). Likewise, auxin-treated NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID adults displayed 1.4-fold and 1.7-fold increases, respectively, in the percentage of pixels above threshold relative to auxin-treated wild-type animals (Fig 6D, 6G and 6K). These data demonstrate that loss of NEKLs leads to abnormal apical clathrin localization through a mechanism that is independent of the molting cycle. The stronger effects observed for NEKL-3 could be due to an incomplete loss of NEKL-2 activity after auxin treatment (Fig 6B) or to different requirements for NEKL-2 and NEKL-3 in clathrin-mediated endocytosis.

While conducting these studies, we also observed a clear effect of the AID tag on the activities of NEKL-2 and NEKL-3 even in the absence of auxin. Both mean GFP::CHC-1 levels and the percentage of pixels above threshold were increased in the apical hyp7 region of untreated NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID adults relative to untreated wild-type controls (Fig 6J and 6K; S5 and S6 Movies). The effect of the AID tag was strongest in the NEKL-3::AID strain, consistent with our observation that ~20% of untreated NEKL-3::AID worms displayed molting defects (Fig 6C, 6J and 6K). Higher baseline levels in the untreated NEKL::AID strains resulted in somewhat less-dramatic fold changes in comparisons of untreated versus auxin-treated NEKL::AID adults. For example, the average intensity of GFP::CHC-1 increased by 1.6-fold and 1.8-fold in NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID auxin-treated strains, respectively, compared with age-matched untreated NEKL::AID controls (Fig 6E and 6H). Correspondingly, the percentage of pixels above threshold was increased by 1.2-fold and 1.3-fold in auxin-treated NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID adults, respectively, relative to untreated controls (Fig 6, 6F and 6I). The observed effects in untreated NEKL::AID strains could be due to the 45-aa AID tag sterically interfering with activities of the NEKL proteins. Alternatively, some auxin-independent activity of the TIR1–E3 ubiquitin-ligase complex could lead to reduced levels of NEKL::AID proteins relative to wild type.

NEKL depletion preferentially affects apical clathrin localization

To examine if NEKL depletion principally affects apical clathrin localization, we analyzed GFP::CHC-1 localization in medial planes of hyp7. Consistent with NEKLs having a primary effect on apical clathrin, NEKL depletion led to only modest changes in GFP::CHC-1 localization in more medial planes, ~1.2 μm from the apical membrane (S2 Fig; S1S6 Movies). Specifically, GFP::CHC-1 average mean intensity increased 1.2-fold in auxin-treated NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID adults relative to untreated NEKL::AID worms, and no significant differences were detected in the percentage of pixels above threshold (S2 Fig).

As an additional test, we simultaneously examined clathrin (GFP::CHC-1) and a marker for AP2, Phyp7::mScarlet::DPY-23/μ2, in auxin-treated wild-type and NEKL-3::AID adults. Notably, the mean intensity and percentage of positive pixels increased for both clathrin and DPY-23/μ2 in NEKL-3::AID worms relative to wild type (Fig 7A–7I). The greater increase in mean intensity observed for clathrin versus DPY-23/μ2 may reflect the redistribution of clathrin to the apical surface from other compartments within the cell (Fig 7H). In contrast, the large majority of DPY-23/μ2 is expected to reside close the apical surface in wild type. We also note that the Pearson’s r coefficient, which is a measure of CHC-1–DPY-23/μ2 colocalization, was significantly greater in auxin-treated NEKL-3::AID animals versus wild type (Fig 7G), also consistent with an increase in apical clathrin. Conversely, we observed a slight decrease in the extent of co-localization between clathrin and a marker for AP1, Phpy7::mScarlet::APM-1/μ1, a subunit of the clathrin adapter complex acting in the trans-Golgi compartment (S3 Fig). Altogether our findings indicate that loss of NEKLs leads to increased accumulation of apical clathrin, reflecting increased recruitment or retention of clathrin at or near the plasma membrane.

Fig 7. AP2-associated clathrin is mislocalized in NEKL-depleted adults.

Fig 7

(A–F) Representative images of (A,D) GFP::CHC-1, (B,E) Phyp7mScarlett::DPY-23/μ2, and merged images (C,F) in auxin-treated (A–C) wild-type and (D–F) NEKL-3::AID adults. mScarlet is represented as magenta, overlap is white. (A’–F’) Magnified inserts of indicated regions in (A–F). Bar sizes in A and A’ = 5 μm (for A–F and A’–F’). (G) Pearson’s r coefficients are shown for the indicated strains; circles correspond to images from individual worms. (H,I) Mean intensities and the percentage of positive pixels above threshold were calculated for (H) GFP::CHC-1 and (I) mScarlet::DPY-23/μ2 for auxin-treated wild-type and NEKL-3::AID adults. p-Values were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests; ****p < 0.0001, *p < 0.05. Raw data are available in S1 File.

Depletion of NEKLs greatly reduces clathrin exchange on apical membranes of the epidermis

Our results above show overaccumulation of clathrin on apical hyp7 epidermal membranes after depletion of NEKL-2 or NEKL-3. Such an overaccumulation could be due to a higher rate of coated pit formation, a reduced rate of coated pit release from the plasma membrane, or a reduced rate of clathrin-coated vesicle uncoating. One way to differentiate among these possibilities is to measure clathrin exchange between the membrane-associated and cytoplasmic pools via fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) assays using GFP::CHC-1. If coated pit assembly rates were increased in animals lacking NEKLs we would expect to observe increased recovery rates for GFP::CHC-1 after photobleaching. Conversely, if NEKL depletion leads to a decrease in the disassembly of coated vesicles, as occurs after auxilin depletion, we would expect to observe a decrease in recovery after photobleaching [62]. In addition, certain perturbations that block endocytosis in vivo (e.g., exposure to hypertonic sucrose media or intracellular potassium depletion) lead to the genesis of abnormal “clathrin microcages” just below the surface of the plasma membrane, which also block recovery from photobleaching [63]. Moreover, perturbation of the scission enzyme dynamin, which results in failed pinching off of clathrin-coated vesicles, does not affect GFP-clathrin recovery from photobleaching, even though coated pits over-accumulate on the plasma membrane [63]. Therefore, no change in recovery after photobleaching could indicate a role for the NEKLs in vesicle scission.

To determine if the NEKLs affect clathrin dynamics, we carried out FRAP in NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID strains ~20 h after exposure to auxin. In the case of wild-type controls, the mobile fraction of GFP::CHC-1 in the apical hyp7 region appeared to be slightly higher in untreated (75%) versus auxin-treated (64%) animals, although this difference was at most marginally significant (p = 0.071; Fig 8A, S4 Fig, S7 and S8 Movies). Strikingly, the GFP::CHC-1 mobile fraction in NEKL-3::AID adults was reduced to only 20% in auxin-treated worms, a more than 3-fold reduction relative to auxin-treated wild-type animals (Fig 8E, 8F and 8H, S4 Fig, S9 Movie). Similarly, the mobile fraction in NEKL-2::AID strains was just 44% in auxin-treated animals, a 1.5-fold reduction relative to auxin-treated wild type (Fig 8C, 8F and 8G, S4 Fig, S10 Movie). Thus, loss of either NEKL-2 or NEKL-3 results in a strong reduction in clathrin exchange. We note that some bleached spots exhibited homogenous recovery within the bleached area whereas others exhibited nonhomogeneous recovery. This was true for both NEKL-2::AID and NEKl-3::AID auxin-treated worms, although nonhomogeneous recovery was observed more frequently in NEKL-2::AID (16/21) than in NEKL-3::AID (5/17) samples.

Fig 8. Clathrin dynamics are altered in NEKL-depleted adults.

Fig 8

(A–E) Representative time-lapse confocal images of FRAP assays performed using the indicated strains in the presence and absence of auxin (20 h). Images show day-2 adults expressing GFP::CHC-1 within the apical region of the hyp7 epidermal syncytium. Background subtraction was performed using the same parameters for all images; minimum and maximum pixel values were kept consistent for all images. Inverted fluorescence was used to aid clarity. Each panel series contains images at the pre-bleach stage together with images at 0 s, 15 s, 30 s, 90 s, and 180 s after bleaching. Red dashed circles indicate the region of photobleaching. Bar size in A = 5 μm (for A–E). (F–H) Corresponding fluorescence recovery curves of GFP::CHC-1 after photobleaching. Normalized average mean intensities of the photobleached regions were plotted as a function of time using 5-s intervals; error bars denote SEM. (F) Fluorescence recovery curves for wild-type, NEKL-2::AID, and NEKL-3::AID adults in the absence of auxin. (G,H) Fluorescence recovery curves for NEKL-2::AID (G) and NEKL-3::AID (H) strains in the presence and absence of auxin. Raw data are available in S1 File.

Similar to what we observed for GFP::CHC-1 mean intensities and pixels above threshold (Fig 6), the AID tag appeared to cause a partial loss of NEKL-2 and NEKL-3 activities, even in the absence of auxin; the mobile fraction in untreated NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID worms was 61% and 49%, respectively (Fig 8B, 8D and 8F–8H, S4 Fig, S11 and 12 Movies). In addition, the more robust effects observed for NEKL-3::AID versus NEKL-2::AID adults are consistent with the stronger effects observed for NEKL-3::AID in the GFP::CHC-1 localization assays (Fig 6). Overall, our FRAP data demonstrate that NEKLs strongly affect clathrin exchange in the apical epidermis. Coupled together, our findings indicate that loss of NEKLs leads to the increased stability of clathrin structures located at or near the apical hyp7 surface, a defect consistent with reduced rates of clathrin uncoating and/or the formation of clathrin microcages.

Clathrin defects in adults are suppressed by reduced activity of AP2

We next determined if clathrin defects associated with adult NEKL::AID loss in adults could be rescued by fcho-1 and AP2 suppressor mutations. Consistent with our findings in nekl-2; nekl-3 larvae (Fig 5), mutations in fcho-1 and apa-2/α suppressed apical clathrin localization defects in auxin-treated NEKL-2::AID adults (Fig 9A and 9D). In fact, there were no statistically supported differences between auxin-treated and untreated adults with respect to GFP::CHC-1 mean intensities or the percentage of pixels above threshold in worms containing the fcho-1 or apa-2/α suppressors (Fig 9B, 9C, 9E and 9F). Likewise, loss of fcho-1 activity was found to strongly reduce effects on clathrin induced by auxin treatment of NEKL-3::AID strains, although the extent of suppression was less than that observed in NEKL-2::AID strains (S5 Fig).

Fig 9. NEKL-associated clathrin defects are rescued by loss of AP2 activity.

Fig 9

(A,D) Representative confocal images of day-2 adults expressing GFP::CHC-1 within the apical region of the hyp7 epidermal syncytium. Assays were performed on NEKL-2::AID animals containing null alleles of (A–C) fcho-1(fd296) and (D–F) apa-2(fd283) in the presence and absence of auxin (20 h). Background subtraction was performed using the same parameters for all images; minimum and maximum pixel values were kept consistent for all images. Inverted fluorescence was used to aid clarity. Bar size in A = 5 μm (for A and D). (B,C,E,F) For individual adults, the mean GFP::CHC-1 intensities (B,E) and the percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold (C,F) were determined. (G) Fluorescence recovery curves of NEKL-2::AID fcho-1(fd296) day-2 adults in the presence and absence of auxin. Normalized average mean intensities of photobleached regions were plotted as a function of time using 5-s intervals; error bars denote SEM. (H) Bar plot showing the mobile fractions from FRAP analyses of wild-type, NEKL-2::AID, and NEKL-2::AID fcho-1(fd296) adults. (B,C,E,F) The group mean and 95% confidence intervals (error bars) are shown. (H) Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. p-Values were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests; **p < 0.01]. Raw data are available in S1 File.

In addition, we assayed GFP::CHC-1 mobility using FRAP in NEKL-2::AID strains containing the fcho-1(fd296) suppressor mutation. Untreated day-2 adults exhibited an average mobility of 72%, similar to what we observed for untreated wild type (74%; Figs 8A, 8F, 9G and 9H, S4 Fig). Most notably, auxin treatment had little or no effect on clathrin mobility in NEKL-2::AID adults that contained fcho-1(fd296); we observed a 1.1-fold reduction in mobility that was not statistically significant (Fig 9G and 9H). This is in strong contrast to the 1.5-fold reduction in mobility observed in auxin-treated NEKL-2::AID adults (p < 0.01; Figs 8G and 9H, S4 Fig). Moreover, one-way ANOVA did not indicate statistically significant differences between the GFP::CHC-1 mobilities of wild-type (Auxin +/–), NEKL-2::AID (Auxin–), and NEKL-2::AID fcho-1(fd296) (Auxin +/–) adults (p = 0.20). Likewise, loss of fcho-1 activity strongly suppressed clathrin mobility defects in auxin-treated NEKL-3::AID adults (S5 Fig). Taken together, our results indicate that reduced AP2 activity strongly suppresses nekl-associated clathrin defects in both larvae and adults. Moreover, the suppression of clathrin defects in adults demonstrates that the restoration of normal trafficking in the suppressor strains is not merely a consequence of alleviating molting defects.

Loss of NEKLs leads to defects in the trafficking of a physiologically relevant membrane cargo

The observed effects on clathrin localization and dynamics following NEKL::AID depletion led us to investigate the role of NEKLs in regulating plasma membrane cargo. LRP-1 is orthologous to human LDL receptor related protein 2 (LRP2), is expressed in hyp7, and is required for normal molting [15]. LRP-1 is thought to bind to and transport low-density lipoproteins into the epidermis from the extracellular space between the epidermis and cuticle. Once internalized, the release and breakdown of LDLs may provide a key source of sterols, which are required for generating hormonal cues necessary for the molting process [4, 13].

Consistent with previous reports, LRP-1::GFP was expressed in wild-type in a punctate pattern in the apical epidermis of larvae and adults (Fig 10A and 10C) [15, 64]. Moreover, these puncta correspond to clathrin-coated pits or vesicles based on co-localization with a marker for AP2 (S6 Fig). Notably, depletion of NEKL-3::AID with auxin led to a dramatic change in the localization pattern of LRP-1::GFP in the apical hyp7 region of adults (Fig 10A and 10B; S13 and S14 Movies). Specifically, LRP-1::GFP localization became highly diffusive in the plane of the apical membrane after NEKL-3::AID depletion. This effect was reflected by a 3-fold increase in the percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold in auxin-treated wild-type versus NEKL-3::AID adults (Fig 10A and 10B). Furthermore, no overlap in values between auxin-treated wild type and NEKL-3::AID worms was observed (Fig 10B), indicating that apical LRP-1::GFP localization provides a particularly strong readout for NEKL defects. Consistent with previous data, a modest increase in the percentage of positive pixels was observed in untreated NEKL-3::AID adults as compared with wild type (Fig 10B). In addition, we observed a modest increase in the percentage of LRP-1::GFP-positive pixels in medial planes of hyp7 in both treated and untreated NEK-3::AID adults relative to wild type (S6 Fig; S13 and S14 Movies). Together, our data suggest that NEKL-3 is required for the apical endocytosis of LRP-1–consistent with our findings of severe dysfunction in clathrin-coated pit/vesicle dynamics upon loss of NEKL-3.

Fig 10. Cargo trafficking is disrupted in NEKL-depleted adults.

Fig 10

(A,C) Representative confocal images of day-2 adults expressing LRP-1::GFP in the apical region of the hyp7 epidermal syncytium. Background subtraction was performed using the same parameters for all images; minimum and maximum pixel values were kept consistent for all images. Inverted fluorescence was used to aid clarity. Bar sizes in A,C = 5 μm. (B,D) The percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold was determined for individual auxin-treated (20 h) wild type and NEKL-3::AID adults (B) and untreated wild-type, ncap-1(mew39), and dpy-23(mew74) (C) adults. The group mean and 95% confidence interval (error bars) are shown. p-Values were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests; ****p < 0.0001, **p < 0.01. Raw data are available in S1 File.

NEKLs affect trafficking through a mechanism that is distinct from that of NCAP-1

Several pieces of genetic data suggest that the NEKLs could function through a molecular mechanism that is similar to that of NCAP-1. For example, mutations in ncap-1 and the nekls all suppress the phenotype of AP2 loss-of-function mutants (Fig 4) [42], as do mutations in dpy-23/μ that promote the open AP2 conformation [40]. Furthermore, loss of ncap-1 or dpy-23/μ open mutants strongly enhanced molting defects in partial loss-of-function nekl backgrounds (Fig 3), which can occur when proteins act in a common pathway or process.

To determine if NCAP-1 and the NEKLs might act through a similar mechanism, we first examined CHC-1::GFP in ncap-1(mew39) null mutants. Although mean levels of apical GFP::CHC-1 were increased by 1.2-fold in ncap-1(mew39) mutants (Fig 11A and 11B), these changes were far less pronounced than the ~2- or 3-fold increases observed between auxin-treated wild-type and NEKL::AID adults (Fig 6). Moreover, no statistical difference was detected in the percentage of GFP-positive pixels between wild-type and ncap-1(mew39) worms (Fig 11C). Consistent with a lack of strong effects observed for ncap-1 mutants, we detected no differences in GFP::CHC-1 mean intensity and pixels above threshold between wild type and dpy-23(mew74) open mutants (Fig 11A–11C). Likewise, we failed to detect statistical differences in clathrin localization in ncap-1(mew39); dpy-23(mew74) double mutants, although there appeared to be a trend towards a reduced number of the larger clathrin puncta and an increased number of smaller puncta in this strain (Fig 11A–11C).

Fig 11. NEKLs and NCAP-1 likely affect trafficking through distinct mechanisms.

Fig 11

(A) Representative confocal images of day-2 adults expressing GFP::CHC-1 within the apical region of the hyp7 epidermal syncytium. Background subtraction was performed using the same parameters for all images; minimum and maximum pixel values were kept consistent for all images. Inverted fluorescence was used to aid clarity. Bar size in A = 5 μm. (B,C) For individual adults, the mean GFP::CHC-1 intensity (B) and the percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold (C) were determined. The group mean and 95% confidence interval (error bars) are shown. p-Values were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests; *p < 0.05. (D,E) Fluorescence recovery curves of GFP::CHC-1 after photobleaching showing ncap-1(mew39) (D) and dpy-23(mew74) (E) day-2 adults. Normalized average mean intensities of photobleached regions were plotted as a function of time using -5 s intervals; error bars denote SEM. (F) Bar plot showing the percent mobile fraction from FRAP analyses; error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Raw data are available in S1 File.

As an additional test, we examined GFP::CHC-1 recovery after photobleaching in ncap-1(mew39) and dpy-23(mew74) mutants. Notably, whereas NEKL::AID auxin-treated worms showed a pronounced reduction in the mobile GFP fraction relative to wild type (Fig 8, S4 Fig), we observed no significant differences between wild-type, ncap-1(mew39), and dpy-23(mew74) worms (Fig 10D–10F). Thus, an increase in the level of open/active AP2 does not appear to result in a marked change in the mobility of clathrin at the apical plasma membrane in hyp7.

We next examined LRP-1::GFP localization in ncap-1(mew39) and dpy-23(mew74) adults. Although we observed a modest increase in the percentage of pixels above threshold (1.2- to 1.5-fold) in these strains relative to wild type, the effects were again much weaker than what we observed in auxin-treated NEKL-3::AID worms (Figs 10C, 10D and 6). These findings strongly suggest that the NEKLs act through a mechanism that is fundamentally different than NCAP-1 and are therefore unlikely to regulate the conformation of AP2 (e.g., to promote the closed state). Nevertheless, our collective data demonstrate that the NEKLs affect a trafficking process that is highly sensitive to the balance between open and closed AP2 conformations.

The mammalian NEKL-3 orthologs, NEK6 and NEK7, rescue molting and clathrin defects associated with nekl-3 loss

The human NIMA kinase (NEK) family of proteins includes two closely related orthologs of NEKL-3, NEK6 and NEK7, which are ~70% identical and ~85% similar to NEKL-3 and ~80% identical and 90% similar to each other [20]. Given their high degree of conservation, we wanted to determine if the human homologs could rescue molting and clathrin-associated defects in nekl-3 loss-of-function backgrounds.

We generated transgenes expressing human NEK6 and NEK7 cDNAs under the control of the wild-type nekl-3 promoter. Our constructs included C-terminal fusions of the NEKs to an intron-containing GFP cassette as well as cDNA-only constructs that lack the GFP tag. Notably, both Pnekl-3::NEK6::GFP and Pnekl-3::NEK7::GFP were able to rescue molting defects in null nekl-3(gk506) and hypomorphic nekl-3(sv3) mutants, although their level of rescue was weaker than what was obtained using a ~5-kb region derived from the nekl-3 genomic locus (Fig 12A; S7 Fig) [20]. In addition to full rescue to the adult stage, which was observed in ~50% of nekl-3(gk506) worms expressing human NEK::GFP transgenes (Fig 12A), many transgene-positive worms exhibited at least partial rescue based on their size and stage of arrest (S7 Fig).

Fig 12. The human orthologs of nekl-3, NEK6 and NEK7, rescue molting and trafficking defects.

Fig 12

(A,B) Bar plots showing rescue of molting defects in nekl-3(gk506) (A) and NEKL-3::AID (B) strains with the indicated transgenes. NEK6::GFP and NEK7::GFP refer to Pnekl-3::NEK6::GFP and Pnekl-3::NEK7::GFP, respectively. NEK6 and NEK7 refer to Pnekl-3::NEK6 and Pnekl-3::NEK7, respectively. p-Values were determined using Fischer’s exact test; ****p < 0.0001. (C,D) For individual adults, the mean GFP::CHC-1 intensity (left graphs) and the percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold (right graphs) were determined for animals expressing wild-type nekl-3 (C) or NEK6 (D). The group mean and 95% confidence interval (error bars) are shown. p-Values were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (E,F) Fold-changes (ratios) of auxin-treated (20 h) versus untreated day-2 NEKL-3::AID adults expressing the indicated transgenes were determined for apical hyp7 GFP::CHC-1 mean intensities (E) and the percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold (F). Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. The dashed red line at 1.0 indicates no change in auxin-treated versus untreated worms. Statistical analyses for ratios were carried out as described in the Materials and Methods; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Raw data are available in S1 File.

A NEK6 cDNA-only construct (Pnekl-3::NEK6) also provided significant rescue in both backgrounds, albeit to a lesser degree than the NEK6::GFP fusion (Fig 12A; S7 Fig). In contrast, a NEK7 cDNA-only construct (Pnekl-3::NEK7) failed to rescue molting defects in either background (Fig 12A; S7 Fig). The reduced rescuing activity of both the NEK6 and NEK7 cDNA-only constructs is likely due to weak expression, as intron-containing markers boost the expression of cDNAs in C. elegans and other systems [65, 66]. Consistent with our rescue data for nekl-3 mutants, Pnekl-3::NEK6, but not Pnekl-3::NEK7, was able to partially rescue molting defects following auxin treatment of NEKL-3::AID strains, although rescue was again less robust than for wild-type nekl-3 (Fig 12B).

We next tested if wild-type nekl-3 and Pnekl-3::NEK6 could rescue GFP::CHC-1 localization defects in NEKL-3::AID strains. As shown in Fig 6, auxin-induced NEKL-3::AID depletion led to a 1.8-fold increase in mean apical GFP::CHC-1 intensity relative to untreated NEKL-3::AID worms. Furthermore, as expected, expression of the wild-type NEKL-3 protein fully rescued clathrin defects in auxin-treated NEKL-3::AID worms (Fig 12C, 12E and 12F). Specifically, no increase was observed in the mean intensity of GFP::CHC-1 or in the percentage of pixels above threshold in treated versus untreated NEKL-3::AID—nekl-3+ worms. Notably, NEKL-3::AID worms expressing NEK6 displayed only a 1.2-fold increase in the mean intensity of GFP::CHC-1 relative to untreated NEKL-3::AID—NEK6+ controls (Fig 12D) and this fold change was significantly lower than NEKL-3::AID worms containing no transgene (Fig 12E). NEK6 expression did not, however, rescue the percentage of positive pixels above threshold relative to the no-transgene control (Fig 12D and 12F). We note that direct comparisons of GFP::CHC-1 localization data in Figs 6 and 12 were not possible because of differences in marker composition and thresholding procedures. Nevertheless, our findings demonstrate that both human NEK6 and NEK7 can rescue molting defects in nekl-3 mutants and that NEK6 can partially rescue clathrin defects in strains with reduced NEKL-3 function. These findings strongly suggest that the trafficking functions demonstrated for NEKL-3 are conserved across species.

Discussion

NEKLs regulate clathrin-mediated endocytosis

In this study, we have demonstrated the NEKLs to be novel regulators of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. More specifically, depletion of NEKL-2 or NEKL-3 at the adult stage led to a strong increase in the levels of clathrin and to a dramatic decrease in the mobility of clathrin at the apical surface of hyp7. These findings demonstrate that endocytic defects following NEKL depletion occur independently of molting defects and are thus not merely a secondary consequence of defective molting. The physiological relevance of our findings is further bolstered by our approach to studying NEKLs within their native context and within an intact developing organism. Moreover, given the requirement for endocytic trafficking factors in the molting process [4], our findings indicate that molting defects in nekl–mlt mutants are likely to be a consequence of abnormal trafficking.

Additional evidence to support a direct role of the NEKLs in trafficking includes our finding that both molting and trafficking defects associated with reduced NEKL–MLT activity are strongly suppressed by mutations that decrease the levels of open/active AP2. This includes loss-of-function mutations of individual AP2 subunits as well as mutations in an allosteric activator of AP2, FCHO-1. Likewise, mutations that increase the levels of open/active AP2 strongly enhanced nekl–mlt defects, including dpy-23/μ open mutants and loss of function of NCAP-1, an allosteric inhibitor of AP2. Additionally, defects in clathrin localization and mobility after NEKL-2 and NEKL-3 depletion in adults were rescued by mutations that decrease the levels of open/active AP2. Finally, depletion of NEKL-3 in adults led to dramatic defects in LRP-1/LRP2 endocytosis, which is required for normal molting and is internalized in multiple systems via clathrin-mediated endocytosis [64, 67]. Taken together, our findings indicate that loss of NEKLs leads to defects in the internalization of cargo that is required for normal molting.

Given our specific findings for AP2 and FCHO-1, a question arises as to whether mutations in other genes connected to early steps of endocytosis can suppress defects in nekl–mlts. Notably, loss of function in itsn-1/intersectin and ehs-1/EPS15, which have been shown to physically and functionally interact with FCHO–AP2 [29, 48, 53, 6870], failed to suppress molting defects in nekl-2; nekl-3 mutants (S8 Fig). In fact, mutations in itsn-1 and ehs-1 were found to enhance the penetrance of molting defects following partial loss of nekl–mlt function by RNAi (S8 Fig). Likewise, similar enhancement effects were observed in strains containing mutations in other core clathrin-pathway components including unc-11/PICALM, unc-57/endophilin A2, sel-5/AAK1, and lst-4/SNX9/18/33 (S8 Fig). These results indicate that nekl–mlts are suppressed specifically by a reduction in AP2 activity and not by the generic impairment of the endocytic pathway. In addition, these findings are consistent with our model that depletion of NEKL activity reduces the uptake of plasma membrane cargo (e.g., LRP-1), a defect that can be further aggravated by inhibiting other components of the endocytic pathway.

Determining the role of NEKLs in clathrin-mediated endocytosis

One explanation to account for a number of our genetic and cell biological observations is that the NEKLs could promote the closed state of AP2. However, several observations argue against this model. (1) In contrast to clathrin localization in nekl mutants and NEKL-depleted adults, clathrin localization in ncap-1 and dpy-23-open mutants was largely unaffected. (2) Unlike clathrin mobility in NEKL-depleted adults, clathrin mobility in ncap-1 and dpy-23-open mutants was indistinguishable from that of wild type. (3) Defects in LRP-1 localization in ncap-1 and dpy-23-open mutants were much less severe than those observed after depletion of NEKL-3. (4) We failed to observe molting defects in ncap-1(mew39), dpy-23(mew74) and ncap-1(mew39); dpy-23(mew74) double mutants, indicating that increased levels of open/active AP2 alone are not sufficient to induce molting defects. These observations indicate that the NEKLs act through a mechanism that is distinct from that of NCAP-1. Although it remains possible that the NEKLs may carry out multiple functions in endocytosis, including a role in AP2 regulation, we favor a model whereby the NEKLs control a trafficking step that is highly sensitive to the balance between open and closed AP2 conformations.

Based on our FRAP and localization data of clathrin, we suggest that the NEKLs may promote the uncoating of clathrin from internalized coated vesicles. Disassembly of the clathrin coat following membrane scission is carried out by the conserved uncoating ATPase Hsc70, together with its co-chaperone(s), auxilin/GAK [29, 71]. Auxilin bound to clathrin recruits Hsc70 to clathrin-coated vesicles, and Hsc70 then interacts with the clathrin heavy chain to alter the conformation of the triskelia, leading to coat disassembly. Notably, inhibition of DNJ-25, the C. elegans ortholog of auxilin, leads to increased clathrin accumulation within the hyp7 epidermis, decreased clathrin mobility (in coelomocytes), and molting defects [62], all of which are observed in nekl–mlt mutants. These observations are consistent with the NEKLs acting either in parallel or upstream of Hsc70–auxilin to promote uncoating, models that will be tested in future studies.

Importantly, we observed that altering the balance between open and closed AP2 conformations led to strong genetic modulation of the molting and clathrin-associated phenotypes in nekl–mlt mutants. How might altering the balance of open/closed AP2 impact the efficiency of clathrin uncoating? It is well established that the conformational opening of AP2 promotes clathrin assembly at membranes and the subsequent formation of coated pits [26, 27, 29, 30]. As such, one appealing hypothesis is that the conformational closing of AP2 may in turn facilitate the uncoating of clathrin from internalized vesicles. Although this kind of reciprocal function for AP2 in both the coating and uncoating of clathrin has not, to our knowledge, been directly demonstrated, it is consistent with much of our genetic and cell biological data.

Notably, auxilin can bind to both clathrin and AP2 [72], providing a possible mechanism by which uncoating could be coupled to the conformation of AP2. In addition, it has been suggested that clathrin uncoating may require the disruption of contacts between AP complexes and clathrin [73] and that clathrin and AP2 uncoating are linked [74]. Furthermore, the levels of PIP2 in membranes affect clathrin uncoating [7577], despite the absence of direct binding of clathrin to membranes. In contrast, AP2 contains a PIP2-binding site that is available for membrane interactions only in the open conformation [27, 38, 39], suggesting that the conformation of AP2 could affect clathrin uncoating.

A number of early studies using cell culture systems, however, demonstrated that clathrin and AP2 uncoating/exchange can take place largely independently of each other. For example, clathrin release can occur in the absence of AP2 release from membranes [7881]. In addition, cytosolic AP2 can be exchanged with membrane-bound AP2 in vesicles containing a stabilized clathrin coat [74, 82, 83]. Moreover, we failed to observe reduced recovery of clathrin after photobleaching in ncap-1 and dpy-23-open mutants, suggesting that, in an otherwise wild-type background, shifting the AP2 balance toward the open/active conformation does not detectably alter the kinetics of clathrin exchange. Additional studies will be necessary to elucidate the precise mechanism behind AP2 suppression of nekl–mlt phenotypes.

We also note that that the reduced mobility of clathrin observed in NEKL-depleted strains could be due to the formation of structures termed “clathrin microcages”. Microcages are extremely small, sharply curved, unusual polymers of clathrin that lack any membrane [84]. Microcages have been observed in mammalian cells that overexpress an inactive form of Hsc70 [85], when potassium or ATP has been depleted from cells, or when cells are exposed to hypertonic sucrose [63, 84]. Similar to what we observed in NEKL-depleted worms, the fluorescence recovery of clathrin after photobleaching was strongly impaired in cells with abundant microcages [63, 74]. These microcages may in fact sequester cytosolic clathrin, leading to reduced clathrin availability and lower levels of endocytosis. Consistent with this, conditions that induce microcages also lead to the dispersal of LDL receptors on the membrane surface [84], a phenotype we observed for the LDL receptor, LRP-1, in NEKL-depleted strains. Future EM studies will determine the ultrastructure of the exchange-resistant clathrin foci in NEKL-depleted worms.

Trafficking functions of NIMA kinase family members are likely conserved across species

Our rescue of nekl-3 molting defects with constructs expressing human NEK6 and NEK7 strongly indicates that these proteins carry our similar functions in diverse organisms. Moreover, we observed rescue of clathrin mislocalization defects in nekl-3 mutants with human NEK6. Although the large majority of papers on NEK6 and NEK7 have focused on functions associated with cell division, a high-throughput analysis of the human kinome by Zerial and colleagues indicated that clathrin-mediated endocytosis is strongly decreased in cells when NEK6 or NEK7 is targeted by siRNAs [86]. Likewise this study also identified moderate defects in endocytosis following siRNA treatment of NEK8 and NEK9, the closest human homologs of nekl-2. A second large-scale study by the Zerial group also reported abnormal trafficking after knockdown of NEK6 and NEK8 based on multiple parameters [87]. In addition, there is some evidence to suggest that NIMA family members in A. nidulans and S. cerevisiae carry out functions connected to endocytosis [88]. Lastly, protein association studies of NEK6 and NEK7 have identified factors connected to both trafficking (e.g., AP2A1 and AP2B1) and to cytoskeletal factors that impact endocytic functions (e.g., CDC42 and actin) [8991], although the functional significance of these interactions was not explored.

Given these collective observations, we propose that the control of intracellular trafficking may be an ancient and conserved function for members of the NIMA kinase family. This would represent a role for mammalian NEK kinases that has been largely overlooked but could be relevant to their involvement in diseases including cancer and ciliopathies [23, 92106]. Future studies in both C. elegans and mammalian systems will be important to establish the precise functions of NIMA-related kinases in cellular trafficking and human disease processes.

Materials and methods

Strains and maintenance

C. elegans strains were maintained according to standard protocols [107] and were propagated at 22°C. Strains used in this study are listed in S2 Table.

CRISPR/Cas9

CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins in combination with the dpy-10 co-CRISPR method [108110] was used to generate genomic lesions except for the pw27(nekl-2::aid) and pw29(nekl-3::aid) alleles, which were created using the self-excising cassette method [111]. pw27(nekl-2::aid) and pw29(nekl-3::aid) guide RNA and repair template plasmids were created from existing plasmids pDD268 and pDD268, respectively [21], using Gibson assembly to directly replace mNeonGreen sequences with AID sequences. Cas9 enzyme was purchased from University of California, Berkeley, whereas, crRNA, tracrRNA, and the repair templates were brought from GE Healthcare Dharmacon, Inc. Briefly, 7.8 μl Berkeley Cas9 (6.4 μg/μl), 0.75 μl 3 M KCl, 0.75 μl 200 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 5 μl 0.17 mM tracrRNA, 0.8 μl 0.3 mM dpy-10 crRNA, 2 μl 0.3 mM target crRNA, and 0.75 μl of distilled water were mixed and incubated at 3°C for 15 minutes. After incubation, 16 μl of dpy-10 repair template and 1.6 μl of 10 μM target repair template was added, and the mixture was injected into the gonads of adult worms of the desired strains. See S1 Text for information on the sequences of oligos used for all CRISPR/Cas9 studies; sequence information on the obtained CRISPR/Cas9 lesions is indicated in S1 Table.

Western blot analysis

L4 animals were picked to NGM plates with or without 1mM auxin and harvested after 20 hrs at 20°C. For each lane 100 young adult animals of each genotype/condition were handpicked into 30 μl of lysis buffer (100 mM Tris pH 6.8, 8% SDS, 20 mM β-mercaptoethanol) and incubated at 37°C for 60 min in a thermocycler. Then 5 μl of 6X Laemmli sample buffer was added, and the samples were further incubated at 100°C for 5 min. Extracted proteins were separated by 4–20% gradient ExpressPlus PAGE gel (Genscript) and blotted to nitrocellulose using Genscript MOPS buffer. After blocking in 5% non-fat milk for 60 min, the blot was rinsed and probed with mouse Monoclonal ANTI-FLAG M2 (Sigma, 1:1000 dilution) followed by HRP-conjugated Goat anti-mouse antibody (1:10,000). Signals were detected using Supersignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Scientific) and exposure to film. The blot was then stripped and probed with rabbit anti-actin antibody (Sigma A2066, 1:1000) followed by HRP-conjugated Goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:10,000).

NEK transgenic rescue

Transgenic strains used in these studies were obtained by microinjecting ~100 ng/μl of the plasmid of interest and ~50 ng/μl of pTG96.2 (sur-5::RFP) into worm gonads [112]. Plasmids for NEK-6::GFP and NEK-7::GFP expression were generated by inserting a ~2 kb promoter region from nekl-3 (LGX 12391550–12393472) into pPD95.75 using PstI and XbaI restriction sites (pDF225). cDNAs for NEK6 and NEK7 were inserted into pDF225 using XbaI and KpnI sites to generate pDF241 and pDF244, respectively. The GFP cassette was removed from pDF241 and pDF244 by digesting with KpnI and EcoRI, blunting with T4 DNA Polymerase, and re-ligating to give plasmids pDF421 (NEK6) and pDF422 (NEK7).

Marker transgenes

Single copy miniMos transgenes were generated to express markers for plasma membrane clathrin-coated pits (DPY-23/APM-2/μ2) and Trans-Golgi Network clathrin-coated pits (APM-1/μ1) in the hypodermis [113]. Genomic DNA for apm-1, and a published minigene for dpy-23, was cloned into a customized version of miniMos vector pCFJ910, including the hyp7-specific promoter from gene Y37A1B.5 (Phyp7), red fluorescent protein wrmScarlet-I (mScarlet), and the 3’UTR from gene let-858 [40, 114, 115].

RNAi

dsRNAs corresponding to apa-2, dpy-23, aps-2, ncap-1, and fcho-1 were generated using standard methods [116], followed by injection at 0.8–1.0 μg/μl into worm gonads (see S1 Text for oligo sequences). For molting enhancement studies, RNAi feeding was performed using bacterial strains from Geneservice following standard protocols [117]. Worm strains were first grown for one (Fig 3B and 3D) or two (Fig 3E) generations on lin-35(RNAi) plates to increase RNAi susceptibility [118]. Gravid adults were then transferred to experimental RNAi plates and allowed to lay eggs for ~24 h, and F1 progeny were scored for molting defects after an additional ~72 h. Because mlt-3(RNAi) induced a high percentage of molting defects in wild type, mlt-3(RNAi) bacteria were diluted 1:10 with the control gfp(RNAi) strain.

Image acquisition

Fluorescence images were acquired using an Olympus IX81 inverted microscope with a Yokogawa spinning-disc confocal head (CSU-X1). Excitation wavelengths were controlled using an acousto-optical tunable filter (ILE4; Spectral Applied Research). MetaMorph 7.7 software (MetaMorph Inc.) was used for image acquisition. z-Stack images were acquired using a 100×, 1.40 N.A. oil objective; FRAP time-lapse images were acquired using a 60×, 1.35 N.A. oil objective. DIC images were acquired using a Nikon Eclipse epifluorescence microscope using 10×, 0.25 N.A. and 40×, 0.75 N.A. objectives. Image acquisition was controlled by Openlab 5.0.2 software (Agilent Inc.). Animals were immobilized using 0.1 M levamisole in M9 buffer. Supplementary movies 1–6 and 13, 14 are Z-stack images (0.2 μm steps).

For FRAP assays, anesthetized worms were analyzed immediately after being placed on slides (<10 min). The apical region of hyp7 was brought into focus, and a circular spot (7.272 μm in diameter) was photobleached using an iLas2 system (BioVision Technologies) with a 56-ms pulse of a 405-nm laser set at 50% power. After photobleaching, GFP::CHC-1 FRAP was detected by imaging every 5 s for a total of 180 s. Data acquired for Figs 8 and 11 were carried out at the same time using the same microscope and acquisition procedures. For this reason, some identical control data is present in these figures. Supplementary movies 7–12 are 200 s long and have been condensed 25× (8 s).

Image analysis

To quantify the mean intensity and the percentage of fluorescence-positive pixels above threshold (Figs 5,6 and 811), background fluorescence was subtracted from z-stack images using Fiji software (NIH) available at https://imagej.net/Fiji/Downloads). For a given z-plane of interest, the polygon selection tool was used to demarcate the region of hyp7 followed by mean intensity measurement. The percentage of fluorescence-positive pixels for the region of interest was determined after thresholding, and the same thresholding algorithm was used for strain comparisons.

FRAP time-lapse images were aligned to correct for any movement of the worms by using the “Rigid Body” Transformation method in the StackReg plugin (available at https://imagej.net/StackReg). Next, the time-lapse images were background subtracted and analyzed using the custom-written Stowers plugin (available at http://research.stowers.org/imagejplugins), which can be used with the Fiji software. The photobleached region was selected and mean intensities were quantified before photobleaching and after photobleaching for each time point. Fitting of FRAP curves was performed using batch FRAP fit in the Stowers plugin. Fitted curves were then normalized to prebleach mean intensities and then averaged to obtain final recovery curves. Mobile fractions were quantified using the values obtained from the fitted curves. The mobile fraction is determined by the following equation: amplitude/(prefrap-baseline) (see https://research.stowers.org/imagejplugins/ImageJ_tutorial2.html).

Auxin treatment experiments

Auxin was purchased as indole-3-acetic acid from Alfa Aesar. In these experiments, L4-stage worms were transferred to plates and left to develop into adults (~20 h). A 0.4 M (100×) stock auxin solution was made by dissolving 0.7 g of auxin in 10 mL 100% ethanol. Each plate containing day-1 adults was treated with a mixture of 25 μl of stock auxin solution and 225 μl of distilled water.

Statistics

Statistical tests were performed as indicated using software from Prism GraphPad. Statistical tests comparing fold change ratios (Fig 12; S5 Fig) were carried out as described by Fay and Gerow [119].

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Clathrin localization in NEKL::AID-depleted larvae.

Representative images of untreated (Auxin–) and auxin-treated (Auxin +; 20 h) NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID arrested larvae expressing GFP::CHC-1. Inverted fluorescence images are shown to aid clarity. Background subtraction was performed using the same parameters for all images; minimum and maximum pixel values were kept consistent for all images. Bar in upper left panel = 5 μm (for all panels).

(TIFF)

S2 Fig. Supplemental GFP::CHC-1 expression data.

(A–F) Representative images of untreated (Auxin–) and auxin-treated (Auxin +; 20 h) wild-type day-2 adults expressing GFP::CHC-1. (G–L) Representative images of similarly treated NEKL-2::AID (G–I) and NEKL-3::AID (J–L) day-2 adults expressing GFP::CHC-1. Inverted fluorescence was used to aid clarity. Background subtraction was performed using the same parameters for all images; minimum and maximum pixel values were kept consistent for all images. Bar in A = 5 μm (for all panels). Mean GFP::CHC-1 intensities (B,E,H,K) and the percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold (C,F,I,L) were determined for day-2 adults. Panels A–C show data for the apical region of hyp7; panels D–L show data for a medial region of hyp7. (B,C,E,F,H,I,K,L) Both the group mean and 95% confidence interval (error bars) are shown. Note that wild-type showed small but statically significant increases in medial GFP::CHC-1 intensity and pixels above threshold after exposure to auxin, suggesting that auxin itself could exert a weak effect on GFP::CHC-1 localization. p-Values were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests; **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. Raw data are available in S1 File.

(TIFF)

S3 Fig. AP1-associated clathrin is reduced in NEKL-3-depleted adults.

(A–F) Representative images of (A,D) GFP::CHC-1, (B,E) PY37A1B.5APM-1::mScarlet, and merged images (C,F) in auxin-treated (A–C) wild-type and (D–F) NEKL-3::AID adults. Bar size in A = 5 μm (for A–F). (G) Pearson’s r coefficients are shown for the indicated strains; circles correspond to images from individual worms. (H,I) p-Values were determined using student’s T-Test; *p < 0.05. Raw data are available in S1 File.

(TIFF)

S4 Fig. Supplemental NEKL::AID FRAP data.

(A,B) Fluorescence recovery curves for wild-type (A,B), NEKL-2::AID (A), and NEKL-3::AID (B) day-2 adults in the presence and absence of auxin (20 h). Analyses were carried in the apical hyp7 region with GFP::CHC-1. Normalized average mean intensities of the photobleached regions were plotted as a function of time using 5-s intervals; error bars denote SEM. (C) Mobile fractions from FRAP data in panels A and B; error bars show 95% confidence intervals. (D) p-Values for all possible comparisons for data in panel C were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Raw data are available in S1 File.

(TIFF)

S5 Fig. Loss of FCHO-1 activity partially suppresses NEKL-3::AID defects.

Mean GFP::CHC-1 intensities (A) and the percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold (B) were determined for individual adults. (C) Comparative fold changes for mean intensities (M.I.) and positive pixels above threshold (P.P) are shown for the indicated genotypes in the presence (+) and absence (–) of auxin. (D) Fluorescence recovery curves of NEKL-3::AID fcho-1(fd296) day-2 adults in the presence and absence of auxin. Normalized average mean intensities of photobleached regions were plotted as a function of time using 5-s intervals; error bars denote SEM. (E) Bar plot showing the mobile fractions from FRAP analyses of wild-type, NEKL-3::AID, and NEKL-3::AID fcho-1(fd296) adults. (C,F) Error bars show 95% confidence intervals. The dashed red line at 1.0 indicates no change in auxin-treated versus untreated worms. Statistical analyses for ratios (C) were carried out as described in the Materials and Methods; **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. Raw data are available in S1 File.

(TIFF)

S6 Fig. Supplemental LRP-1 data.

(A) Representative images showing strong colocalization of LRP-1::GFP and a marker for AP2, Pdpy-7::mScarlet::DPY-23. mScarlet is represented as magenta, overlap is white. (B) Representative confocal images of LRP-1::GFP in auxin treated wild-type and NEKL-3::AID adults. Images show the medial plane of hyp7 (also see S13 and S14 Movies). Inverted fluorescence was used to aid clarity. Bar size in A,B = 5 μm. (C) Percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold were determined for individual adults. p-Values were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests; ****p < 0.0001. Raw data are available in S1 File.

(TIFF)

S7 Fig. Supplemental NEK rescue data.

(A,B) Bar plot showing rescue of molting defects in nekl-3(sv3) strains with the indicated transgenes. NEK6::GFP and NEK7::GFP refer to Pnekl-3::NEK6::GFP and Pnekl-3::NEK7::GFP, respectively. NEK6 and NEK7 refer to Pnekl-3::NEK6 and Pnekl-3::NEK7, respectively. p-Values were determined using Fischer’s exact test; ****p < 0.0001. (B) Bar plot showing the percentage of L1/L2 versus L2–L4 arrested larvae in transgene-positive nekl-3(gk506) mutants. Note that ~40–60% of transgene-positive arrested larvae bypass the L1/L2 arrest point, whereas the large majority of transgene-minus worms arrest at L1/L2. Given ~50% rescue to adulthood by the NEK6::GFP and NEK7::GFP transgenes (Fig 12A), partial-to-full rescue occurs at a frequency of ~75% in transgene-positive nekl-3(gk506) mutants.

(TIFF)

S8 Fig. Inhibition of many early-endocytic pathway genes enhance nekl defects.

(A) Bar plot showing failure to suppress molting defects in nekl-2(fd81); nekl-3(gk894345) double mutants by RNAi of ehs-1, itsn-1, and ehs-1; itsn-1, using dsRNA injection methods. (B–E) RNAi feeding of the nekl-2, nekl-3, and mlt-2 was carried out in the indicated backgrounds. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals; p-values were determined using Fischer’s exact test where proportions were compared to the wild-type allele. ****p < 0.0001, Raw data are available in S1 File.

(TIFF)

S1 File. This excel file contains the raw data used for all quantitative data panels presented in Figs 111, including supplementary Figs.

(XLSX)

S1 Text. This MS Word file contains information describing the generation of all CRISPR alleles used in this study including sgRNAs, repair templates, and sequencing oligos.

(DOCX)

S2 Text. This MS Word file contains detailed information regarding specific author contributions for each figure.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. This MS Word file contains relevant genomic sequencing data of all CRISPR alleles generated in this study.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. List of all C. elegans strains used in this study.

(DOCX)

S1 Movie. Z-stack of wild-type (RT3402) day-2 adults; GFP::CHC-1; untreated.

(AVI)

S2 Movie. Z-stack of wild-type (RT3402) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; auxin treated (20 h).

(AVI)

S3 Movie. Z-stack of NEKL-2::AID (RT3607) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; auxin treated (20 h).

(AVI)

S4 Movie. Z-stack of NEKL-3::AID (RT3608) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; auxin treated (20 h).

(AVI)

S5 Movie. Z-stack of NEKL-2::AID (RT3607) day-2 adults; GFP::CHC-1; untreated.

(AVI)

S6 Movie. Z-stack of NEKL-3::AID (RT3608) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; untreated.

(AVI)

S7 Movie. FRAP of wild-type (RT3402) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; untreated.

(AVI)

S8 Movie. FRAP of wild-type (RT3402) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; auxin treated (20 h).

(AVI)

S9 Movie. FRAP of NEKL-3::AID (RT3608) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; auxin treated (20 h).

(AVI)

S10 Movie. FRAP of NEKL-2::AID (RT3607) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; auxin treated (20 h).

(AVI)

S11 Movie. FRAP of NEKL-2::AID (RT3607) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; untreated.

(AVI)

S12 Movie. FRAP of NEKL-3::AID (RT3608) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; untreated.

(AVI)

S13 Movie. Z-stack of wild-type (LH191) day-2 adults, LRP-1::GFP; auxin treated (20 h).

(AVI)

S14 Movie. Z-stack of NEKL-3::AID (WY1562) day-2 adults, LRP-1::GFP; auxin treated (20 h).

(AVI)

Acknowledgments

We thank Amy Fluet for editing and the G. Hollopeter Laboratory for strains and scientific input. Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. Raw data for all figures is contained in S1 File.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Institutes of General Medicine (NIGMS) GM066868 to DSF. This publication was also made possible by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Grant # 2P20GM103432, which partially supported BJ and VL. Some strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC), which is funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Johnstone IL. The cuticle of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: a complex collagen structure. Bioessays. 1994;16(3):171–8. Epub 1994/03/01. 10.1002/bies.950160307 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Johnstone IL. Cuticle collagen genes. Expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Trends Genet. 2000;16(1):21–7. Epub 2000/01/19. 10.1016/s0168-9525(99)01857-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Page AP, Johnstone IL. The cuticle. WormBook. 2007:1–15. Epub 2007/12/01. 10.1895/wormbook.1.138.1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lazetic V, Fay DS. Molting in C. elegans. Worm. 2017;6(1):e1330246 Epub 2017/07/14. 10.1080/21624054.2017.1330246 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Singh RN, Sulston JE. Some observations on the moulting of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nematologica. 1978;24(1):63–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Frand AR, Russel S, Ruvkun G. Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans molting. PLoS Biol. 2005;3(10):e312 Epub 2005/08/27. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030312 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cox GN, Kusch M, DeNevi K, Edgar RS. Temporal regulation of cuticle synthesis during development of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1981;84(2):277–85. Epub 1981/06/01. 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90395-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Roberts B, Clucas C, Johnstone IL. Loss of SEC-23 in Caenorhabditis elegans causes defects in oogenesis, morphogenesis, and extracellular matrix secretion. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14(11):4414–26. Epub 2003/10/11. 10.1091/mbc.E03-03-0162 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hayes GD, Frand AR, Ruvkun G. The mir-84 and let-7 paralogous microRNA genes of Caenorhabditis elegans direct the cessation of molting via the conserved nuclear hormone receptors NHR-23 and NHR-25. Development. 2006;133(23):4631–41. Epub 2006/10/27. 10.1242/dev.02655 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kouns NA, Nakielna J, Behensky F, Krause MW, Kostrouch Z, Kostrouchova M. NHR-23 dependent collagen and hedgehog-related genes required for molting. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;413(4):515–20. Epub 2011/09/14. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.08.124 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Monsalve GC, Frand AR. Toward a unified model of developmental timing: A "molting" approach. Worm. 2012;1(4):221–30. Epub 2013/09/24. 10.4161/worm.20874 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martin R, Entchev EV, Kurzchalia TV, Knolker HJ. Steroid hormones controlling the life cycle of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: stereoselective synthesis and biology. Org Biomol Chem. 2010;8(4):739–50. Epub 2010/02/06. 10.1039/b918488k . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Entchev EV, Kurzchalia TV. Requirement of sterols in the life cycle of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2005;16(2):175–82. Epub 2005/03/31. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2005.01.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Merris M, Wadsworth WG, Khamrai U, Bittman R, Chitwood DJ, Lenard J. Sterol effects and sites of sterol accumulation in Caenorhabditis elegans: developmental requirement for 4alpha-methyl sterols. J Lipid Res. 2003;44(1):172–81. Epub 2003/01/09. 10.1194/jlr.m200323-jlr200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yochem J, Tuck S, Greenwald I, Han M. A gp330/megalin-related protein is required in the major epidermis of Caenorhabditis elegans for completion of molting. Development. 1999;126(3):597–606. Epub 1999/01/07. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Roudier N, Lefebvre C, Legouis R. CeVPS-27 is an endosomal protein required for the molting and the endocytic trafficking of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Traffic. 2005;6(8):695–705. Epub 2005/07/07. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00309.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Holmes A, Flett A, Coudreuse D, Korswagen HC, Pettitt J. C. elegans Disabled is required for cell-type specific endocytosis and is essential in animals lacking the AP-3 adaptor complex. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(Pt 15):2741–51. Epub 2007/07/20. 10.1242/jcs.03474 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kamikura DM, Cooper JA. Lipoprotein receptors and a disabled family cytoplasmic adaptor protein regulate EGL-17/FGF export in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 2003;17(22):2798–811. Epub 2003/11/25. 10.1101/gad.1136103 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Conner SD, Schmid SL. Identification of an adaptor-associated kinase, AAK1, as a regulator of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J Cell Biol. 2002;156(5):921–9. Epub 2002/03/06. 10.1083/jcb.200108123 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yochem J, Lazetic V, Bell L, Chen L, Fay D. C. elegans NIMA-related kinases NEKL-2 and NEKL-3 are required for the completion of molting. Dev Biol. 2015;398(2):255–66. Epub 2014/12/20. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.12.008 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lazetic V, Fay DS. Conserved ankyrin repeat proteins and their NIMA kinase partners regulate extracellular matrix remodeling and intracellular trafficking in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2017;205:273–93. 10.1534/genetics.116.194464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Czarnecki PG, Gabriel GC, Manning DK, Sergeev M, Lemke K, Klena NT, et al. ANKS6 is the critical activator of NEK8 kinase in embryonic situs determination and organ patterning. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6023 Epub 2015/01/21. 10.1038/ncomms7023 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hoff S, Halbritter J, Epting D, Frank V, Nguyen TM, van Reeuwijk J, et al. ANKS6 is a central component of a nephronophthisis module linking NEK8 to INVS and NPHP3. Nat Genet. 2013;45(8):951–6. Epub 2013/06/26. 10.1038/ng.2681 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ramachandran H, Engel C, Muller B, Dengjel J, Walz G, Yakulov TA. Anks3 alters the sub-cellular localization of the Nek7 kinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;464(3):901–7. Epub 2015/07/19. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.07.063 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shiba D, Manning DK, Koga H, Beier DR, Yokoyama T. Inv acts as a molecular anchor for Nphp3 and Nek8 in the proximal segment of primary cilia. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2010;67(2):112–9. Epub 2010/02/20. 10.1002/cm.20428 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hemalatha A, Mayor S. Recent advances in clathrin-independent endocytosis. F1000Res. 2019;8 Epub 2019/02/19. 10.12688/f1000research.16549.1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kadlecova Z, Spielman SJ, Loerke D, Mohanakrishnan A, Reed DK, Schmid SL. Regulation of clathrin-mediated endocytosis by hierarchical allosteric activation of AP2. J Cell Biol. 2017;216(1):167–79. Epub 2016/12/23. 10.1083/jcb.201608071 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lacy MM, Ma R, Ravindra NG, Berro J. Molecular mechanisms of force production in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. FEBS Lett. 2018;592(21):3586–605. Epub 2018/07/15. 10.1002/1873-3468.13192 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mettlen M, Chen PH, Srinivasan S, Danuser G, Schmid SL. Regulation of Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2018;87:871–96. Epub 2018/04/18. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012644 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Smith SM, Baker M, Halebian M, Smith CJ. Weak Molecular Interactions in Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis. Front Mol Biosci. 2017;4:72 Epub 2017/12/01. 10.3389/fmolb.2017.00072 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sochacki KA, Taraska JW. From Flat to Curved Clathrin: Controlling a Plastic Ratchet. Trends Cell Biol. 2019;29(3):241–56. Epub 2019/01/02. 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.12.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Taylor MJ, Perrais D, Merrifield CJ. A high precision survey of the molecular dynamics of mammalian clathrin-mediated endocytosis. PLoS Biol. 2011;9(3):e1000604 Epub 2011/03/30. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000604 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Keen JH. Clathrin assembly proteins: affinity purification and a model for coat assembly. J Cell Biol. 1987;105(5):1989–98. Epub 1987/11/01. 10.1083/jcb.105.5.1989 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pearse BM, Robinson MS. Purification and properties of 100-kd proteins from coated vesicles and their reconstitution with clathrin. EMBO J. 1984;3(9):1951–7. Epub 1984/09/01. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Park SY, Guo X. Adaptor protein complexes and intracellular transport. Biosci Rep. 2014;34(4). Epub 2014/07/01. 10.1042/BSR20140069 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Matsui W, Kirchhausen T. Stabilization of clathrin coats by the core of the clathrin-associated protein complex AP-2. Biochemistry. 1990;29(48):10791–8. Epub 1990/12/04. 10.1021/bi00500a011 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rapoport I, Miyazaki M, Boll W, Duckworth B, Cantley LC, Shoelson S, et al. Regulatory interactions in the recognition of endocytic sorting signals by AP-2 complexes. EMBO J. 1997;16(9):2240–50. Epub 1997/05/01. 10.1093/emboj/16.9.2240 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jackson LP, Kelly BT, McCoy AJ, Gaffry T, James LC, Collins BM, et al. A large-scale conformational change couples membrane recruitment to cargo binding in the AP2 clathrin adaptor complex. Cell. 2010;141(7):1220–9. Epub 2010/07/07. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.006 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Beacham GM, Partlow EA, Hollopeter G. Conformational regulation of AP1 and AP2 clathrin adaptor complexes. Traffic. 2019. Epub 2019/07/18. 10.1111/tra.12677 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hollopeter G, Lange JJ, Zhang Y, Vu TN, Gu M, Ailion M, et al. The membrane-associated proteins FCHo and SGIP are allosteric activators of the AP2 clathrin adaptor complex. Elife. 2014;3 Epub 2014/10/11. 10.7554/eLife.03648 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Umasankar PK, Ma L, Thieman JR, Jha A, Doray B, Watkins SC, et al. A clathrin coat assembly role for the muniscin protein central linker revealed by TALEN-mediated gene editing. Elife. 2014;3 Epub 2014/10/11. 10.7554/eLife.04137 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Beacham GM, Partlow EA, Lange JJ, Hollopeter G. NECAPs are negative regulators of the AP2 clathrin adaptor complex. Elife. 2018;7 Epub 2018/01/19. 10.7554/eLife.32242 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Smythe E. Regulating the clathrin-coated vesicle cycle by AP2 subunit phosphorylation. Trends Cell Biol. 2002;12(8):352–4. Epub 2002/08/23. 10.1016/s0962-8924(02)02333-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Joseph BB, Blouin NA, Fay DS. Use of a Sibling Subtraction Method for Identifying Causal Mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans by Whole-Genome Sequencing. G3 (Bethesda). 2018;8(2):669–78. Epub 2017/12/15. 10.1534/g3.117.300135 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lazetic V, Fay DS. Conserved Ankyrin Repeat Proteins and Their NIMA Kinase Partners Regulate Extracellular Matrix Remodeling and Intracellular Trafficking in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2017;205(1):273–93. Epub 2016/11/02. 10.1534/genetics.116.194464 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pan CL, Baum PD, Gu M, Jorgensen EM, Clark SG, Garriga G. C. elegans AP-2 and retromer control Wnt signaling by regulating mig-14/Wntless. Dev Cell. 2008;14(1):132–9. Epub 2007/12/28. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.12.001 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gu M, Schuske K, Watanabe S, Liu Q, Baum P, Garriga G, et al. Mu2 adaptin facilitates but is not essential for synaptic vesicle recycling in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol. 2008;183(5):881–92. Epub 2008/12/03. 10.1083/jcb.200806088 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.McMahon HT, Boucrot E. Molecular mechanism and physiological functions of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12(8):517–33. Epub 2011/07/23. 10.1038/nrm3151 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gu M, Liu Q, Watanabe S, Sun L, Hollopeter G, Grant BD, et al. AP2 hemicomplexes contribute independently to synaptic vesicle endocytosis. Elife. 2013;2:e00190 Epub 2013/03/14. 10.7554/eLife.00190 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Boehm M, Bonifacino JS. Adaptins: the final recount. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12(10):2907–20. Epub 2001/10/13. 10.1091/mbc.12.10.2907 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shim J, Sternberg PW, Lee J. Distinct and redundant functions of mu1 medium chains of the AP-1 clathrin-associated protein complex in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11(8):2743–56. Epub 2000/08/10. 10.1091/mbc.11.8.2743 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Henne WM, Boucrot E, Meinecke M, Evergren E, Vallis Y, Mittal R, et al. FCHo proteins are nucleators of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Science. 2010;328(5983):1281–4. Epub 2010/05/08. 10.1126/science.1188462 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ma L, Umasankar PK, Wrobel AG, Lymar A, McCoy AJ, Holkar SS, et al. Transient Fcho1/2Eps15/RAP-2 Nanoclusters Prime the AP-2 Clathrin Adaptor for Cargo Binding. Dev Cell. 2016;37(5):428–43. Epub 2016/05/31. 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.003 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ritter B, Murphy S, Dokainish H, Girard M, Gudheti MV, Kozlov G, et al. NECAP 1 regulates AP-2 interactions to control vesicle size, number, and cargo during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. PLoS Biol. 2013;11(10):e1001670 Epub 2013/10/17. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001670 software to collect images and analyze the data. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Murshid A, Srivastava A, Kumar R, Presley JF. Characterization of the localization and function of NECAP 1 in neurons. J Neurochem. 2006;98(6):1746–62. Epub 2006/08/02. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04066.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ritter B, Denisov AY, Philie J, Allaire PD, Legendre-Guillemin V, Zylbergold P, et al. The NECAP PHear domain increases clathrin accessory protein binding potential. EMBO J. 2007;26(18):4066–77. Epub 2007/09/01. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601836 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chamberland JP, Antonow LT, Dias Santos M, Ritter B. NECAP2 controls clathrin coat recruitment to early endosomes for fast endocytic recycling. J Cell Sci. 2016;129(13):2625–37. Epub 2016/05/22. 10.1242/jcs.173708 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ritter B, Philie J, Girard M, Tung EC, Blondeau F, McPherson PS. Identification of a family of endocytic proteins that define a new alpha-adaptin ear-binding motif. EMBO Rep. 2003;4(11):1089–95. Epub 2003/10/14. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400004 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lazetic V, Joseph BB, Bernazzani SM, Fay DS. Actin organization and endocytic trafficking are controlled by a network linking NIMA-related kinases to the CDC-42-SID-3/ACK1 pathway. PLoS Genet. 2018;14(4):e1007313 Epub 2018/04/03. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007313 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Holland AJ, Fachinetti D, Han JS, Cleveland DW. Inducible, reversible system for the rapid and complete degradation of proteins in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(49):E3350–7. Epub 2012/11/15. 10.1073/pnas.1216880109 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhang L, Ward JD, Cheng Z, Dernburg AF. The auxin-inducible degradation (AID) system enables versatile conditional protein depletion in C. elegans. Development. 2015;142(24):4374–84. Epub 2015/11/11. 10.1242/dev.129635 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Greener T, Grant B, Zhang Y, Wu X, Greene LE, Hirsh D, et al. Caenorhabditis elegans auxilin: a J-domain protein essential for clathrin-mediated endocytosis in vivo. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(2):215–9. Epub 2001/02/15. 10.1038/35055137 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wu X, Zhao X, Baylor L, Kaushal S, Eisenberg E, Greene LE. Clathrin exchange during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J Cell Biol. 2001;155(2):291–300. Epub 2001/10/18. 10.1083/jcb.200104085 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kang YL, Yochem J, Bell L, Sorensen EB, Chen L, Conner SD. Caenorhabditis elegans reveals a FxNPxY-independent low-density lipoprotein receptor internalization mechanism mediated by epsin1. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24(3):308–18. Epub 2012/12/18. 10.1091/mbc.E12-02-0163 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Okkema PG, Harrison SW, Plunger V, Aryana A, Fire A. Sequence requirements for myosin gene expression and regulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1993;135(2):385–404. Epub 1993/10/01. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gallegos JE, Rose AB. The enduring mystery of intron-mediated enhancement. Plant Sci. 2015;237:8–15. Epub 2015/06/20. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.04.017 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hussain MM. Structural, biochemical and signaling properties of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene family. Front Biosci. 2001;6:D417–28. Epub 2001/03/07. 10.2741/hussain1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wang L, Johnson A, Hanna M, Audhya A. Eps15 membrane-binding and -bending activity acts redundantly with Fcho1 during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2016;27(17):2675–87. Epub 2016/07/08. 10.1091/mbc.E16-03-0151 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Huttlin EL, Bruckner RJ, Paulo JA, Cannon JR, Ting L, Baltier K, et al. Architecture of the human interactome defines protein communities and disease networks. Nature. 2017;545(7655):505–9. Epub 2017/05/18. 10.1038/nature22366 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hein MY, Hubner NC, Poser I, Cox J, Nagaraj N, Toyoda Y, et al. A human interactome in three quantitative dimensions organized by stoichiometries and abundances. Cell. 2015;163(3):712–23. Epub 2015/10/27. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.053 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sousa R, Lafer EM. The role of molecular chaperones in clathrin mediated vesicular trafficking. Front Mol Biosci. 2015;2:26 Epub 2015/06/05. 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00026 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Scheele U, Kalthoff C, Ungewickell E. Multiple interactions of auxilin 1 with clathrin and the AP-2 adaptor complex. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(39):36131–8. Epub 2001/07/27. 10.1074/jbc.M106511200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Shih W, Gallusser A, Kirchhausen T. A clathrin-binding site in the hinge of the beta 2 chain of mammalian AP-2 complexes. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(52):31083–90. Epub 1995/12/29. 10.1074/jbc.270.52.31083 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wu X, Zhao X, Puertollano R, Bonifacino JS, Eisenberg E, Greene LE. Adaptor and clathrin exchange at the plasma membrane and trans-Golgi network. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14(2):516–28. Epub 2003/02/18. 10.1091/mbc.E02-06-0353 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Cremona O, Di Paolo G, Wenk MR, Luthi A, Kim WT, Takei K, et al. Essential role of phosphoinositide metabolism in synaptic vesicle recycling. Cell. 1999;99(2):179–88. Epub 1999/10/27. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81649-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gad H, Ringstad N, Low P, Kjaerulff O, Gustafsson J, Wenk M, et al. Fission and uncoating of synaptic clathrin-coated vesicles are perturbed by disruption of interactions with the SH3 domain of endophilin. Neuron. 2000;27(2):301–12. Epub 2000/09/14. 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00038-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Stenmark H. Cycling lipids. Curr Biol. 2000;10(2):R57–9. Epub 2000/02/09. 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00279-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Schlossman DM, Schmid SL, Braell WA, Rothman JE. An enzyme that removes clathrin coats: purification of an uncoating ATPase. J Cell Biol. 1984;99(2):723–33. Epub 1984/08/01. 10.1083/jcb.99.2.723 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Heuser JE, Keen J. Deep-etch visualization of proteins involved in clathrin assembly. J Cell Biol. 1988;107(3):877–86. Epub 1988/09/01. 10.1083/jcb.107.3.877 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Greene LE, Eisenberg E. Dissociation of clathrin from coated vesicles by the uncoating ATPase. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(12):6682–7. Epub 1990/04/25. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Buxbaum E, Woodman PG. Selective action of uncoating ATPase towards clathrin-coated vesicles from brain. J Cell Sci. 1995;108 (Pt 3):1295–306. Epub 1995/03/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hannan LA, Newmyer SL, Schmid SL. ATP- and cytosol-dependent release of adaptor proteins from clathrin-coated vesicles: A dual role for Hsc70. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9(8):2217–29. Epub 1998/08/07. 10.1091/mbc.9.8.2217 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Semerdjieva S, Shortt B, Maxwell E, Singh S, Fonarev P, Hansen J, et al. Coordinated regulation of AP2 uncoating from clathrin-coated vesicles by rab5 and hRME-6. J Cell Biol. 2008;183(3):499–511. Epub 2008/11/05. 10.1083/jcb.200806016 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Heuser JE, Anderson RG. Hypertonic media inhibit receptor-mediated endocytosis by blocking clathrin-coated pit formation. J Cell Biol. 1989;108(2):389–400. Epub 1989/02/01. 10.1083/jcb.108.2.389 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Newmyer SL, Schmid SL. Dominant-interfering Hsc70 mutants disrupt multiple stages of the clathrin-coated vesicle cycle in vivo. J Cell Biol. 2001;152(3):607–20. Epub 2001/02/07. 10.1083/jcb.152.3.607 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Pelkmans L, Fava E, Grabner H, Hannus M, Habermann B, Krausz E, et al. Genome-wide analysis of human kinases in clathrin- and caveolae/raft-mediated endocytosis. Nature. 2005;436(7047):78–86. Epub 2005/05/13. 10.1038/nature03571 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Collinet C, Stoter M, Bradshaw CR, Samusik N, Rink JC, Kenski D, et al. Systems survey of endocytosis by multiparametric image analysis. Nature. 2010;464(7286):243–9. Epub 2010/03/02. 10.1038/nature08779 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Govindaraghavan M, McGuire Anglin SL, Shen KF, Shukla N, De Souza CP, Osmani SA. Identification of interphase functions for the NIMA kinase involving microtubules and the ESCRT pathway. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(3):e1004248 Epub 2014/03/29. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004248 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.de Souza EE, Meirelles GV, Godoy BB, Perez AM, Smetana JH, Doxsey SJ, et al. Characterization of the human NEK7 interactome suggests catalytic and regulatory properties distinct from those of NEK6. J Proteome Res. 2014;13(9):4074–90. Epub 2014/08/06. 10.1021/pr500437x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Meirelles GV, Perez AM, de Souza EE, Basei FL, Papa PF, Melo Hanchuk TD, et al. "Stop Ne(c)king around": How interactomics contributes to functionally characterize Nek family kinases. World J Biol Chem. 2014;5(2):141–60. Epub 2014/06/13. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Vaz Meirelles G, Ferreira Lanza DC, da Silva JC, Santana Bernachi J, Paes Leme AF, Kobarg J. Characterization of hNek6 interactome reveals an important role for its short N-terminal domain and colocalization with proteins at the centrosome. J Proteome Res. 2010;9(12):6298–316. Epub 2010/09/30. 10.1021/pr100562w . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Nassirpour R, Shao L, Flanagan P, Abrams T, Jallal B, Smeal T, et al. Nek6 mediates human cancer cell transformation and is a potential cancer therapeutic target. Mol Cancer Res. 2010;8(5):717–28. Epub 2010/04/22. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0291 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Wang R, Song Y, Xu X, Wu Q, Liu C. The expression of Nek7, FoxM1, and Plk1 in gallbladder cancer and their relationships to clinicopathologic features and survival. Clin Transl Oncol. 2013;15(8):626–32. Epub 2013/01/30. 10.1007/s12094-012-0978-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zhou L, Wang Z, Xu X, Wan Y, Qu K, Fan H, et al. Nek7 is overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma and promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Oncotarget. 2016;7(14):18620–30. Epub 2016/02/28. 10.18632/oncotarget.7620 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Choudhury AD, Schinzel AC, Cotter MB, Lis RT, Labella K, Lock YJ, et al. Castration Resistance in Prostate Cancer Is Mediated by the Kinase NEK6. Cancer Res. 2017;77(3):753–65. Epub 2016/12/03. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0455 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.He Z, Ni X, Xia L, Shao Z. Overexpression of NIMA-related kinase 6 (NEK6) contributes to malignant growth and dismal prognosis in Human Breast Cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2018;214(10):1648–54. Epub 2018/08/30. 10.1016/j.prp.2018.07.030 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Jeon YJ, Lee KY, Cho YY, Pugliese A, Kim HG, Jeong CH, et al. Role of NEK6 in tumor promoter-induced transformation in JB6 C141 mouse skin epidermal cells. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(36):28126–33. Epub 2010/07/03. 10.1074/jbc.M110.137190 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Kasap E, Gerceker E, Boyacioglu SO, Yuceyar H, Yildirm H, Ayhan S, et al. The potential role of the NEK6, AURKA, AURKB, and PAK1 genes in adenomatous colorectal polyps and colorectal adenocarcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(3):3071–80. Epub 2015/10/02. 10.1007/s13277-015-4131-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Quarmby LM, Mahjoub MR. Caught Nek-ing: cilia and centrioles. J Cell Sci. 2005;118(Pt 22):5161–9. Epub 2005/11/11. 10.1242/jcs.02681 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Grampa V, Delous M, Zaidan M, Odye G, Thomas S, Elkhartoufi N, et al. Novel NEK8 Mutations Cause Severe Syndromic Renal Cystic Dysplasia through YAP Dysregulation. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(3):e1005894 Epub 2016/03/12. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005894 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Rajagopalan R, Grochowski CM, Gilbert MA, Falsey AM, Coleman K, Romero R, et al. Compound heterozygous mutations in NEK8 in siblings with end-stage renal disease with hepatic and cardiac anomalies. Am J Med Genet A. 2016;170(3):750–3. Epub 2015/12/25. 10.1002/ajmg.a.37512 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Manning DK, Sergeev M, van Heesbeen RG, Wong MD, Oh JH, Liu Y, et al. Loss of the ciliary kinase Nek8 causes left-right asymmetry defects. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(1):100–12. Epub 2013/01/01. 10.1681/ASN.2012050490 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zalli D, Bayliss R, Fry AM. The Nek8 protein kinase, mutated in the human cystic kidney disease nephronophthisis, is both activated and degraded during ciliogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(5):1155–71. Epub 2011/11/23. 10.1093/hmg/ddr544 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Otto EA, Trapp ML, Schultheiss UT, Helou J, Quarmby LM, Hildebrandt F. NEK8 mutations affect ciliary and centrosomal localization and may cause nephronophthisis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(3):587–92. Epub 2008/01/18. 10.1681/ASN.2007040490 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Mahjoub MR, Trapp ML, Quarmby LM. NIMA-related kinases defective in murine models of polycystic kidney diseases localize to primary cilia and centrosomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(12):3485–9. Epub 2005/11/04. 10.1681/ASN.2005080824 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Casey JP, Brennan K, Scheidel N, McGettigan P, Lavin PT, Carter S, et al. Recessive NEK9 mutation causes a lethal skeletal dysplasia with evidence of cell cycle and ciliary defects. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(9):1824–35. Epub 2016/02/26. 10.1093/hmg/ddw054 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Stiernagle T. Maintenance of C. elegans. WormBook. 2006:1–11. Epub 2007/12/01. 10.1895/wormbook.1.101.1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Arribere JA, Bell RT, Fu BX, Artiles KL, Hartman PS, Fire AZ. Efficient marker-free recovery of custom genetic modifications with CRISPR/Cas9 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2014;198(3):837–46. Epub 2014/08/28. 10.1534/genetics.114.169730 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Paix A, Wang Y, Smith HE, Lee CY, Calidas D, Lu T, et al. Scalable and versatile genome editing using linear DNAs with microhomology to Cas9 Sites in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2014;198(4):1347–56. Epub 2014/09/25. 10.1534/genetics.114.170423 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Paix A, Folkmann A, Rasoloson D, Seydoux G. High Efficiency, Homology-Directed Genome Editing in Caenorhabditis elegans Using CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Complexes. Genetics. 2015;201(1):47–54. Epub 2015/07/19. 10.1534/genetics.115.179382 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Dickinson DJ, Pani AM, Heppert JK, Higgins CD, Goldstein B. Streamlined Genome Engineering with a Self-Excising Drug Selection Cassette. Genetics. 2015;200(4):1035–49. Epub 2015/06/06. 10.1534/genetics.115.178335 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Mello CC, Kramer JM, Stinchcomb D, Ambros V. Efficient gene transfer in C.elegans: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences. EMBO J. 1991;10(12):3959–70. Epub 1991/12/01. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Frokjaer-Jensen C, Davis MW, Sarov M, Taylor J, Flibotte S, LaBella M, et al. Random and targeted transgene insertion in Caenorhabditis elegans using a modified Mos1 transposon. Nat Methods. 2014;11(5):529–34. Epub 2014/05/14. 10.1038/nmeth.2889 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.El Mouridi S, Lecroisey C, Tardy P, Mercier M, Leclercq-Blondel A, Zariohi N, et al. Reliable CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Engineering in Caenorhabditis elegans Using a Single Efficient sgRNA and an Easily Recognizable Phenotype. G3 (Bethesda). 2017;7(5):1429–37. Epub 2017/03/11. 10.1534/g3.117.040824 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Kohnlein K, Urban N, Guerrero-Gomez D, Steinbrenner H, Urbanek P, Priebs J, et al. A Caenorhabditis elegans ortholog of human selenium-binding protein 1 is a pro-aging factor protecting against selenite toxicity. Redox Biol. 2019;28:101323 Epub 2019/09/27. 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101323 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1998;391(6669):806–11. Epub 1998/03/05. 10.1038/35888 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ahringer J. Reverse Genetics, WormBook. 2005.
  • 118.Wang D, Kennedy S, Conte D Jr., Kim JK, Gabel HW, Kamath RS, et al. Somatic misexpression of germline P granules and enhanced RNA interference in retinoblastoma pathway mutants. Nature. 2005;436(7050):593–7. Epub 2005/07/29. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Fay DS, Gerow K. A biologist’s guide to statistical thinking and analysis. WormBook. 2013:1–54. Epub 2013/08/03. 10.1895/wormbook.1.159.1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Gregory P Copenhaver, Jeremy Nance

7 Oct 2019

Dear Dr Fay,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'Control of clathrin-mediated endocytosis by NIMA family kinases' to PLOS Genetics. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important problem, but raised some substantial concerns about the current manuscript. Based on the reviews, we will not be able to accept this version of the manuscript, but we would be willing to review again a much-revised version. We cannot, of course, promise publication at that time.

Should you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration here, your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. In particular, Reviewer 1 raises an important concern about specificity of the suppression phenotypes, and the Reviewers shared concerns about the sub-cellular resolution and interpretation of the clathrin imaging experiments.  An editorial comment also raised by several of the reviewers: the text and references would benefit from editing to shorten the manuscript and increase its accessibility.  We will require a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

If you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration at PLOS Genetics, please aim to resubmit within the next 60 days, unless it will take extra time to address the concerns of the reviewers, in which case we would appreciate an expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments are included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see our guidelines.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool.  PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, use the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

We are sorry that we cannot be more positive about your manuscript at this stage. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any concerns or questions.

Yours sincerely,

Jeremy Nance

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory P. Copenhaver

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: Joseph et al. report on a potential endocytic role for the NIMA-like kinases NEKL-2 and NEKL-3. The general function of these kinases has not been well-described, although this group has published several papers reporting the molting defects and suppression of the NEKL phenotypes by CDC42 and related actin regulators. The manuscript largely relies on a genetic analysis of the NEKL phenotype and suppression of the phenotype by reducing the function of AP2 subunits or the AP2 activator FCHO. The manuscript is a genetic tour-de-force: the number of alleles, CRISPR-driven domain mutations, and careful measurement of phenotypic penetrances and backgrounds is impressive. Certainly the degree to which the manuscript uses genetics makes it an excellent candidate for PLoS Genetics. There is very little cell biology and no biochemistry, which makes me somewhat uncomfortable with the specificity of some of the manuscript’s conclusions. It is an absolutely huge manuscript in every respect (10 figures, 8000 word main text, 139 references) – I know PLoS Genetics has no word limit, but some editing for conciseness would make the manuscript much more approachable. Statistics and N numbers appear to be well-done and reported. In the end, I am concerned about some of the reported interpretations, so would like to know more about how specific the AP2 suppression of the NEKL mutants is, as well as additional details of the Clathrin:GFP and LRP:GFP localization.

1) Perhaps the biggest concern is that the authors strongly tie NEKL function to CME/AP2 due to the functional suppression of the NEKL phenotype. As the authors state, various perturbations of membrane trafficking pathways (for example, even perturbation of ER-Golgi trafficking) can cause molting defects. If NEKL or other molting mutants simply reflect a sensitivity of molting to trafficking defects, I would be concerned about how directly the authors tie NEKL function to clathrin uncoating (a very specific model based largely, but not only, on genetics). To test this, does general disruption of endocytosis suppress NEKL phenotypes, or does decreasing exocytosis (exocyst mutants, secretory Rab mutants) enhance these phenotypes? Would Dynamin mutants produce a similar AP2-like suppression? The NCAP-1 data is interesting, but since it acts in opposition to FCHO-1, these data do not appear to address this issue.

2) Along with the above, the second main part of the argument for NEKL controlling clathrin uncoating are the alterations in clathrin levels and LRP localization. I am sure that there are limitations in the worm system, but the degree of characterization of these defects is somewhat poor. The authors should point out what Clathrin structures they think are aberrantly changing. It appears that there are quite large, intense puncta, which I would be doubtful are true surface endocytic CCPs due to their size. There are other, much less intense, and hard-to-make-out signals that may constitute the major increase in signal in NEKL mutants. Is this true? What are the structural changes? Are the larger (or smaller) puncta Golgi or endosomes? How deep of a focal plane are the authors sampling? A dextran-uptake experiment would be a good addition and would reveal whether endocytic rates are changed, and if the dextran is trapped in the “still caged” clathrin vesicles. Also, does sec-23 cause similar changes in Clathrin localization? Absent some refinement of the data as suggested in points #1 and #2 I would be concerned about how molecularly-specific the authors' model of NEKL function is.

3) Similarly to the above, please point out the relevant LRP:GFP puncta – the manuscript says these puncta are “likely clathrin-coated pits” or “endosomes”, but this isn’t shown. Can colocalization with Clathrin or AP2 or some CME marker not be done? Even dextran-uptake could partially address this. The degree to which there is inference of compartmental identity based on little-to-no data is concerning.

4) The NEKL-AID experiments use wild-type as a control – is there a generic AID-containing strain that could be used for a more appropriate control?

5) The Discussion, like the rest of the manuscript, is extensive. I am not sure that the connection between CDC42 and clathrin uncoating is appropriate. Although CDC42-driven F-actin certainly has been implicated in scission and early endocytic events, these do not necessarily connect to the uncoating phenotype (or the authors should feel free to suggest more specifics on this).

Minor notes:

a) As noted above, the manuscript is enormous. It would be improved if it was edited down a bit. The Introduction meandered, and it wasn’t always clear why certain topics were being discussed. It also didn’t seem necessary to include some of the discussed information.

b) Please consider including the relevant mammalian homologs next to the worm gene names throughout, or in many more places – I was constantly going back and needing to look up which endocytic protein a particular worm gene encoded for.

Reviewer #2: Control of clathrin-mediated endocytosis by NIMA family kinases

This work corresponds to a follow-up study of the role and positioning of the NIMA family kinases which the Fay lab had initially characterized. Here the authors position the NEKL-2/3 proteins within the endocytic pathway by showing (i) that nekl-2; nekl-3 lof molting defects can be suppressed by mutations affecting AP-2 subunits of proteins required for AP-2 activation; (ii) conversely that mutations in proteins favoring AP-2 closed conformation enhance the phenotype of a weal nekl-2 or nekl-3; (iii) that nekl-2: nekl-3 loss affects clathrin recycling and induces plasma an accumulation of lipoprotein LRP-1 in vesicles or the plasma membrane apically. The authors conclude that NEKL-2/3 act in the endocytic pathway to favor through a process that remains to be characterized at the molecular level AP-2 closed conformation, perhaps by favoring clathrin uncoating from internalized vesicles.

I enjoyed reading this very well documented and written manuscript. I believe that it should be of interest to a wide audience and I therefore enthusiastically recommend for publication once some issues have been solved.

The main issue that the authors should address is to perform one more experiment to test their prediction regarding the role of NEKLs in uncoating clathrin from internalized coated vesicles. This would require EM (which they mention) to define is uncoated vesicles accumulate, or probably easier to implement examine the genetic interactions between nekl-2/3 lof and auxilin and/or Hsc70.

Another recommendation would be to speculate on the potential molecular target of NEKLs and avenues to test them. If needed the discussion on the actin phenotype of nekl-2/3 mutants could be trimmed down since actin is not brought up in the results but was part of a previous study. Of note, some v-ATPase subunits also undergo a complete reorganization during molting.

Minor points:

- Please number pages

- Please make a separate supplementary table of all strains (it is currently very difficult to read in the M&M)

- Consider reducing the number of references (nice to have a complete listing, but it takes room – I leave it to the Editor to decide)

- An s missing at the very top of page 20 (in the PDF downloaded from the PLoS website) in “statically“

- In movie S4, the recovery after FRAP does not appear to be homogeneous since there are clear dots appearing in a background of slow recovery, which I didn’t spot in other conditions. Could this tell us something about NEKL-2 function?

Reviewer #3: The manuscript by Joseph et al describes the role of the NEKL kinases in regulating endocytosis in the C. elegans epidermis. They first use a lethal phenotype to demonstrate the genetic interactions between nekl-2/-3 and AP2 subunits or AP2 regulators (fcho-1 and ncap-1), using in particular precise gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9; the results are then confirmed with the analysis of the Jowls phenotype. These genetic interactions are further confirmed by examining the localisation of an endogenous reporter for clathrin and an auxin-based degron system. To better understand how NEKL kinases control clathrin dynamics and endocytosis they next use FRAP experiments and examine the localisation of LRP-1, an apical transmembrane protein. They conclude that NEKL kinases regulates an AP2 dependent trafficking step. Finally they show that human homologs can also be implicated in trafficking.

This a very well written manuscript, easy to follow, and most experiments are carefully done and analyzed. In particular the use of gene editing and endogenously expressed markers makes the results quite convincing. The conclusions of the study are well supported by the experimental data.

I only have a few points to raise:

1) The most important one is the quantification of clathrin and LRP-1 localisation. A punctate staining can be tricky to analyze based solely on mean intensity and % of positive pixels, as you can in theory get similar results with very different patterns. If some results are quite convincing (eg Fig5), others are less obvious (Fig9C and Fig10A). For instance in Fig 10 the authors found no difference in clathrin localisation while the pictures they show look different between control and the ncap-1;dpy-23 double mutant. I recommend that the authors use a more detailed quantification method, analyzing the number of puncta, their intensity and their size in all ambiguous situations as this could reveal more subtle changes.

2) While the expression pattern of NEKL-2 and NEKL-3 has been described by the same group previously (Lažetić and Fay, 2017), the authors do not attempt to colocalize these proteins with either clathrin or AP2 subunits. Given their conclusions on NEKL-2/-3 possible function, it would be interesting to observe a possible colocalization.

3) FRAP controls look very similar in Fig 7F and Fig 10D-E. If they are identical it should be mentioned, and the reason for using the same control justified in the M&M section.

Minor points:

Remove a ; in the CRISPR § of the M&M section.

Briefly describe the western blot conditions in M&M

As far as I am aware the original apb-1 loss of function phenotype was first described by Shim et al 2000 in an MBoC paper which could be added to the references.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Michel Labouesse

Reviewer #3: Yes: Grégoire Michaux

Decision Letter 1

Gregory P Copenhaver, Jeremy Nance

28 Jan 2020

Dear Dr Fay,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Control of clathrin-mediated endocytosis by NIMA family kinases" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional accept, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about one way to make your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Jeremy Nance

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory P. Copenhaver

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: The revised manuscript from Joseph et al. is nicely improved – in my opinion, the authors respond in depth and appropriately to the reviewer issues raised. The manuscript continues to be a genetic tour-de-force, with the number of alleles, CRISPR-driven domain mutations, and careful measurement of phenotypic penetrances and backgrounds being impressive. The authors are very thoughtful in their discussions, and I think the manuscript is appropriate for publication in PLOS Genetics. Thanks to the authors for the resubmission comments. My only small critique would be that I thought the added lines 411-414 didn’t add anything to the manuscript, and instead made me wonder what these different structures might be (with no explanation offered). They also obscured a nice summary sentence that was above, so I would consider removing them. Congrats to the authors on a very nice manuscript (and good luck performing EM – it will be very interesting to see the results!).

Reviewer #2: Although the authors could not properly address my concerns, at least they tried and I accept that sometimes experiments cannot be performed as hoped. On the other hand, they made great efforts to address those raised by R#1, and should be praised for this.

Altogether, the additional experiments strengthened their global conclusions that the NIMA-like kinases of C. elegans control clathrin-mediated endocytosis, independently of molting. I thus remain convinced that this work should be accepted for publication in PLoS Genetics as it addresses the role of these kinases in vivo in a physiological context.

Reviewer #3: This revised version of the Joseph et al manuscript is a significant improvement. I recognize that quantification of some markers can be difficult. I still think that there should be better ways to quantify punctate staining in C. elegans but this is probably beyond the scope of this manuscript and could be tackled by the community in the future. I also agree that given the result, there is no need to show the (absence of) colocalization between NEKL-2/3 and clathrin/AP-2.

Finally I agree with the other reviewers that the manuscript was too long and although it has already been shortened, I feel that it could be further edited to make it more easily readable.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Grégoire Michaux

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly: 

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-19-01501R1

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.

Acceptance letter

Gregory P Copenhaver, Jeremy Nance

12 Feb 2020

PGENETICS-D-19-01501R1

Control of clathrin-mediated endocytosis by NIMA family kinases

Dear Dr Fay,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Control of clathrin-mediated endocytosis by NIMA family kinases" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Matt Lyles

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Clathrin localization in NEKL::AID-depleted larvae.

    Representative images of untreated (Auxin–) and auxin-treated (Auxin +; 20 h) NEKL-2::AID and NEKL-3::AID arrested larvae expressing GFP::CHC-1. Inverted fluorescence images are shown to aid clarity. Background subtraction was performed using the same parameters for all images; minimum and maximum pixel values were kept consistent for all images. Bar in upper left panel = 5 μm (for all panels).

    (TIFF)

    S2 Fig. Supplemental GFP::CHC-1 expression data.

    (A–F) Representative images of untreated (Auxin–) and auxin-treated (Auxin +; 20 h) wild-type day-2 adults expressing GFP::CHC-1. (G–L) Representative images of similarly treated NEKL-2::AID (G–I) and NEKL-3::AID (J–L) day-2 adults expressing GFP::CHC-1. Inverted fluorescence was used to aid clarity. Background subtraction was performed using the same parameters for all images; minimum and maximum pixel values were kept consistent for all images. Bar in A = 5 μm (for all panels). Mean GFP::CHC-1 intensities (B,E,H,K) and the percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold (C,F,I,L) were determined for day-2 adults. Panels A–C show data for the apical region of hyp7; panels D–L show data for a medial region of hyp7. (B,C,E,F,H,I,K,L) Both the group mean and 95% confidence interval (error bars) are shown. Note that wild-type showed small but statically significant increases in medial GFP::CHC-1 intensity and pixels above threshold after exposure to auxin, suggesting that auxin itself could exert a weak effect on GFP::CHC-1 localization. p-Values were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests; **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. Raw data are available in S1 File.

    (TIFF)

    S3 Fig. AP1-associated clathrin is reduced in NEKL-3-depleted adults.

    (A–F) Representative images of (A,D) GFP::CHC-1, (B,E) PY37A1B.5APM-1::mScarlet, and merged images (C,F) in auxin-treated (A–C) wild-type and (D–F) NEKL-3::AID adults. Bar size in A = 5 μm (for A–F). (G) Pearson’s r coefficients are shown for the indicated strains; circles correspond to images from individual worms. (H,I) p-Values were determined using student’s T-Test; *p < 0.05. Raw data are available in S1 File.

    (TIFF)

    S4 Fig. Supplemental NEKL::AID FRAP data.

    (A,B) Fluorescence recovery curves for wild-type (A,B), NEKL-2::AID (A), and NEKL-3::AID (B) day-2 adults in the presence and absence of auxin (20 h). Analyses were carried in the apical hyp7 region with GFP::CHC-1. Normalized average mean intensities of the photobleached regions were plotted as a function of time using 5-s intervals; error bars denote SEM. (C) Mobile fractions from FRAP data in panels A and B; error bars show 95% confidence intervals. (D) p-Values for all possible comparisons for data in panel C were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Raw data are available in S1 File.

    (TIFF)

    S5 Fig. Loss of FCHO-1 activity partially suppresses NEKL-3::AID defects.

    Mean GFP::CHC-1 intensities (A) and the percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold (B) were determined for individual adults. (C) Comparative fold changes for mean intensities (M.I.) and positive pixels above threshold (P.P) are shown for the indicated genotypes in the presence (+) and absence (–) of auxin. (D) Fluorescence recovery curves of NEKL-3::AID fcho-1(fd296) day-2 adults in the presence and absence of auxin. Normalized average mean intensities of photobleached regions were plotted as a function of time using 5-s intervals; error bars denote SEM. (E) Bar plot showing the mobile fractions from FRAP analyses of wild-type, NEKL-3::AID, and NEKL-3::AID fcho-1(fd296) adults. (C,F) Error bars show 95% confidence intervals. The dashed red line at 1.0 indicates no change in auxin-treated versus untreated worms. Statistical analyses for ratios (C) were carried out as described in the Materials and Methods; **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. Raw data are available in S1 File.

    (TIFF)

    S6 Fig. Supplemental LRP-1 data.

    (A) Representative images showing strong colocalization of LRP-1::GFP and a marker for AP2, Pdpy-7::mScarlet::DPY-23. mScarlet is represented as magenta, overlap is white. (B) Representative confocal images of LRP-1::GFP in auxin treated wild-type and NEKL-3::AID adults. Images show the medial plane of hyp7 (also see S13 and S14 Movies). Inverted fluorescence was used to aid clarity. Bar size in A,B = 5 μm. (C) Percentage of GFP-positive pixels above threshold were determined for individual adults. p-Values were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests; ****p < 0.0001. Raw data are available in S1 File.

    (TIFF)

    S7 Fig. Supplemental NEK rescue data.

    (A,B) Bar plot showing rescue of molting defects in nekl-3(sv3) strains with the indicated transgenes. NEK6::GFP and NEK7::GFP refer to Pnekl-3::NEK6::GFP and Pnekl-3::NEK7::GFP, respectively. NEK6 and NEK7 refer to Pnekl-3::NEK6 and Pnekl-3::NEK7, respectively. p-Values were determined using Fischer’s exact test; ****p < 0.0001. (B) Bar plot showing the percentage of L1/L2 versus L2–L4 arrested larvae in transgene-positive nekl-3(gk506) mutants. Note that ~40–60% of transgene-positive arrested larvae bypass the L1/L2 arrest point, whereas the large majority of transgene-minus worms arrest at L1/L2. Given ~50% rescue to adulthood by the NEK6::GFP and NEK7::GFP transgenes (Fig 12A), partial-to-full rescue occurs at a frequency of ~75% in transgene-positive nekl-3(gk506) mutants.

    (TIFF)

    S8 Fig. Inhibition of many early-endocytic pathway genes enhance nekl defects.

    (A) Bar plot showing failure to suppress molting defects in nekl-2(fd81); nekl-3(gk894345) double mutants by RNAi of ehs-1, itsn-1, and ehs-1; itsn-1, using dsRNA injection methods. (B–E) RNAi feeding of the nekl-2, nekl-3, and mlt-2 was carried out in the indicated backgrounds. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals; p-values were determined using Fischer’s exact test where proportions were compared to the wild-type allele. ****p < 0.0001, Raw data are available in S1 File.

    (TIFF)

    S1 File. This excel file contains the raw data used for all quantitative data panels presented in Figs 111, including supplementary Figs.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Text. This MS Word file contains information describing the generation of all CRISPR alleles used in this study including sgRNAs, repair templates, and sequencing oligos.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Text. This MS Word file contains detailed information regarding specific author contributions for each figure.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Table. This MS Word file contains relevant genomic sequencing data of all CRISPR alleles generated in this study.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. List of all C. elegans strains used in this study.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Movie. Z-stack of wild-type (RT3402) day-2 adults; GFP::CHC-1; untreated.

    (AVI)

    S2 Movie. Z-stack of wild-type (RT3402) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; auxin treated (20 h).

    (AVI)

    S3 Movie. Z-stack of NEKL-2::AID (RT3607) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; auxin treated (20 h).

    (AVI)

    S4 Movie. Z-stack of NEKL-3::AID (RT3608) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; auxin treated (20 h).

    (AVI)

    S5 Movie. Z-stack of NEKL-2::AID (RT3607) day-2 adults; GFP::CHC-1; untreated.

    (AVI)

    S6 Movie. Z-stack of NEKL-3::AID (RT3608) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; untreated.

    (AVI)

    S7 Movie. FRAP of wild-type (RT3402) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; untreated.

    (AVI)

    S8 Movie. FRAP of wild-type (RT3402) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; auxin treated (20 h).

    (AVI)

    S9 Movie. FRAP of NEKL-3::AID (RT3608) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; auxin treated (20 h).

    (AVI)

    S10 Movie. FRAP of NEKL-2::AID (RT3607) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; auxin treated (20 h).

    (AVI)

    S11 Movie. FRAP of NEKL-2::AID (RT3607) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; untreated.

    (AVI)

    S12 Movie. FRAP of NEKL-3::AID (RT3608) day-2 adults, GFP::CHC-1; untreated.

    (AVI)

    S13 Movie. Z-stack of wild-type (LH191) day-2 adults, LRP-1::GFP; auxin treated (20 h).

    (AVI)

    S14 Movie. Z-stack of NEKL-3::AID (WY1562) day-2 adults, LRP-1::GFP; auxin treated (20 h).

    (AVI)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLoS_Response.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. Raw data for all figures is contained in S1 File.


    Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES