Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Chemistry logoLink to Frontiers in Chemistry
. 2020 Feb 28;8:132. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00132

Catalytic Oxidations in a Bio-Based Economy

Roger A Sheldon 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC7059178  PMID: 32181241

Abstract

The role of bio- and chemo-catalytic aerobic oxidations in the production of commodity chemicals in a bio-refinery is reviewed. The situation is fundamentally different to that in a petrochemicals refinery where the feedstocks are gaseous or liquid hydrocarbons that are oxidized at elevated temperatures in the vapor or liquid phase under solvent-free conditions. In contrast, the feedstocks in a biorefinery are carbohydrates that are water soluble solids and their conversion will largely involve aerobic oxidations of hydroxyl functional groups in water as the solvent under relatively mild conditions of temperature and pressure. This will require the development and use of cost-effective and environmentally attractive processes using both chemo- and biocatalytic methods for alcohols and polyols.

Keywords: bio-based economy, biomass, biocatalysis, catalytic oxidation, alcohol oxidases, carbohydrates, waste valorization

Introduction

One of the grand challenges of the twenty-first century is the implementation of the transition from an unsustainable economy based on fossil resources–oil, coal, and natural gas—to a sustainable, carbon-neutral economy based on the use of renewable biomass. This switch to a so-called bio-based economy is urgently required in order to mitigate global warming caused by increasing carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere. First generation (1G) renewable raw materials, exemplified by corn starch, sugar cane, and sugar beet, are not perceived as sustainable options in the long term as their utilization involves, directly, or indirectly, competition with food production. In contrast, the use of second generation (2G) renewable biomass, in the form of waste polysaccharides, such as lignocellulose (Liguori and Faraco, 2016; Zhang et al., 2017) and pectin, from agricultural and forestry residues and food supply chain waste (Dahiya et al., 2018), is perceived as a sustainable long term option for producing biofuels and commodity chemicals (Sheldon, 2014, 2016, 2018; Horváth et al., 2017). Looking further afield, third generation (3G) aquatic biomass, such as micro- and macro-algae and cyanobacteria, has additional advantages (John et al., 2011; Al Abdallah et al., 2016; Shuba and Kifle, 2018). For example, there is no requirement for arable land and fresh water for their production and they have much higher growth rates than terrestrial plants. On the other hand, there are substantial technical problems associated with their production and conversion which, in the short term, represent a significant hurdle to be overcome for commercial viability.

Carbohydrates to Commodity Chemicals in a Biorefinery

In a petrochemical refinery the basic chemicals are lower olefins (ethylene, propylene, and butenes) and aromatics (BTX: benzene, toluene, and xylenes), together with carbon monoxide and hydrogen (syn gas). The hydrocarbons are gases or hydrophobic liquids. They are converted with petrochemical catalytic technologies, particularly catalytic oxidation with dioxygen, to a variety of commodity chemicals, usually in solvent-free systems. In contrast, the basic chemicals in a bio-refinery will be C6 and C5 sugars produced by hydrolysis of polysaccharide feedstocks, and/or syn gas produced by their gasification. The carbohydrates are hydrophilic, water soluble solids. Several scenarios can be envisaged for further conversion to commodity chemicals (Figure 1):

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Conversion of polysaccharides to biofuels and commodity chemicals in a biorefinery.

  1. Syn gas could be converted to commodity chemicals by applying existing catalytic technologies used in petrochemical refineries or by fermentation (Phillips et al., 2017; Asimakopoulos et al., 2018).

  2. Monosaccharides such as glucose could be converted to a variety of lower alcohols, diols, carboxylic acids, and dicarboxylic acids by fermentation. Indeed, fermentation is already the commercially most viable route to many of these products with lactic acid, 1,3-propane diol and 1,4-butane diol as prominent examples.

  3. Bioethanol, produced as a carbon neutral fuel, could be converted to ethylene and a variety of other products using established technologies (see Figure 1), including catalytic aerobic oxidations.

  4. Chemo- or bio-catalytic conversion of monosaccharides, such as glucose, to commodity chemicals will require in many cases removal of oxygen, by hydrogenolysis and/or dehydration. Catalytic oxidations in a biorefinery involve oxidation of alcoholic OH groups in monosaccharides, or even the polysaccharide precursors, or their downstream products and further oxidation of the resulting carbonyl compounds.

Catalytic Oxidations

A key reaction in organic synthesis is the oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols to give the corresponding aldehydes or carboxylic acids and ketones, respectively. Traditionally these transformations were performed with stoichiometric quantities of inorganic oxidants, notably chromium (VI) compounds such as the Jones reagent (CrO3 and sulfuric acid). However, such procedures are not atom efficient and lead to the formation of copious amounts of toxic, chromium-containing waste, i.e., high E factors and problematic waste disposal issues. Consequently, in the last two decades such methods have been increasingly replaced by atom efficient catalytic alternatives involving dioxygen or hydrogen peroxide as the terminal oxidant.

Interestingly, the history of catalytic oxidations of carbohydrates (Arts et al., 1997) predates the oxidations of lower olefins and aromatics that form the basis of the petrochemical industry. The aerobic oxidation of mannose over a platinum black catalyst, for example, dates from 1861 (von Gorup-Besanez, 1861) and many supported noble metal catalyzed aerobic oxidations of carbohydrates were developed in the first half of the last century. At the turn of the century, we developed an aqueous biphasic system for the aerobic oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols to the corresponding aldehydes and ketones, respectively, in a solvent free system using a water-soluble palladium complex of bathophenanthroline (ten Brink et al., 2000). This system could also be effective in the aerobic oxidation of water soluble alcohols, including carbohydrates. Indeed, there are many examples of the aerobic oxidation of alcohols catalyzed by precious metals such as palladium, platinum and gold (Stahl, 2004; Parmaggiani and Cardona, 2012). However, in the context of the conversion of carbohydrates to large volume, low-priced commodity chemicals, precious metals such as palladium have the disadvantage that the future availability of these scarce, “endangered elements” at cost-effective prices is rather unpredictable. Indeed, in contrast to most materials, their price tends to increase with increasing usage. Another disadvantage of noble metal catalyzed oxidations is their functional group intolerance. First row, more earth abundant metals tend to be more functional group tolerant.

Consequently, alternative methods have been developed that use “earth abundant” metals, such as copper and iron, as catalysts. One method with broad applications in the selective oxidation of primary alcohols to aldehydes, even in the presence of secondary alcohols, involves the combination of a Cu(II)-bipyridine (Cu-bpy) complex with a base, such as potassium hydroxide, a stable nitroxyl radical, exemplified by 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidine-N-oxyl (TEMPO) and its derivatives, at ambient temperature with air in aqueous acetonitrile (Figure 2; Gamez et al., 2003; Sheldon and Arends, 2004; Marais and Swarts, 2019). The generally accepted mechanism involves as the key, rate determining step, abstraction of a hydrogen atom from an alkoxide ligand by a coordinated nitroxyl radical analogous to that involved in the aerobic oxidation of primary alcohols catalyzed by the copper-dependent oxidase, galactose oxidase (Dijksman et al., 2003). An improved procedure, using Cu(I) salts with TEMPO and bipy in combination with N-methylimidazole as a base in acetonitrile as solvent was subsequently described by Stahl and coworkers (Hoover and Stahl, 2011). Furthermore, extensive mechanistic studies confirmed the copper-centered galactose oxidase-like mechanism for these systems (Geiβlmeir et al., 2005; Hoover et al., 2013).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Aerobic oxidation of primary alcohols catalyzed by Cu/TEMPO.

The lack of reactivity of secondary alcohols was attributed to steric hindrance in the abstraction of an α-hydrogen atom from a coordinated alkoxide by a coordinated TEMPO ligand. Consequently, the use of sterically less hindered nitroxyl radicals such as AZADO and ABNO, respectively, in combination with Cu(I) complexes, were developed by the groups of Iwabuchi (Shibuya et al., 2006, 2011; Iwabuchi, 2013) and Stahl (Steves and Stahl, 2013), for the aerobic oxidation of secondary alcohols (Figure 3), including sterically demanding alcohols such as menthol and a variety of unprotected amino alcohols (Sasano et al., 2014).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Catalytic aerobic oxidation of secondary alcohols with Cu (I)/nitroxyl catalysts.

More recently, Ma and coworkers reported the use of an Fe(III)/4-hydroxyTEMPO/NaCl combination as a catalyst for the aerobic oxidation of both primary and secondary alcohols (Jiang et al., 2016, 2019). Other metals, including manganese, cobalt and vanadium, have also been used in combination with nitroxyl radicals (Cao et al., 2014) Transition metal free nitroxyl systems have also been described, usually involving nitrogen dioxide as the active co-catalyst. The commercially most attractive source of the NO2 cocatalyst is nitric acid (Kuang et al., 2010). For example, nitric acid or NaNO2 or a mixture of both was used, in combination with ABNO or keto-ABNO, for the selective aerobic oxidation of secondary alcohols (Figure 4; Lauber and Stahl, 2013). Interestingly, the combination of nitric acid and NaNO2 catalyzes the aerobic oxidation of alcohols even in the absence of a stable nitroxyl radical. The reaction involves an alkyl nitrite intermediate which decomposes to the carbonyl compound and HNO which is reoxidized by dioxygen (Aellig et al., 2011). Unfortunately, the greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide (N2O), can be irreversibly formed as a byproduct.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Nitric acid catalyzed aerobic oxidation of alcohols.

Catalytic Oxidations in a Bio-based Economy

Although these various nitroxyl radical-based catalysts have been widely used in the aerobic oxidations of alcohols they have generally involved relatively simple primary and secondary alcohols in organic solvents, sometimes mixed with water. This was done with the development of green syntheses of, for example, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and flavors and fragrances, in mind. However, in a bio-based economy it is of interest to use these methodologies in the selective oxidation of renewable carbohydrates or key alcohols, diols, and polyols derived from them, and this involves in many cases aqueous solutions of solid substrates.

Water has both advantages and limitations as a solvent for aerobic oxidations. For example, oxidations with oxygen are much safer as there is no formation of explosive mixtures of oxygen with volatile organic solvents in the gas phase. In a typical process oxygen is supplied by bubbling air through the solution. However, the transfer of oxygen from the gas to the liquid phase is notoriously slow owing to its low solubility in water under typical operating conditions (0.268 mM at 25°C and 1 bar air) which limits the maximum space time yield to 200 mmol/L/h (Pedersen et al., 2015). This problem was alleviated in the Cu/TEMPO system by using air-microbubble techniques to facilitate gas absorption into the liquid phase (Mase et al., 2011). Alternatively, the rates of enzymatic aerobic oxidations were increased by a factor of 100 in continuous flow operation compared to the conventional batch operation (Chapman et al., 2018; Hone and Kappe, 2019). Another disadvantage of water as a solvent is that its relatively high heat capacity, compared to volatile organic solvents, translates to high energy costs for its removal by distillation.

A pertinent example, from the viewpoint of the bio-based economy, is the use of acetylamino-TEMPO (AA-TEMPO) together with nitric acid as the cocatalyst for the aerobic oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols to the corresponding aldehydes and ketones, respectively, in acetic acid or water as the solvent (Dingerdissen et al., 2011). The method was particularly useful for the oxidation of the key biomass-derived diol, isosorbide, to the corresponding diketone (Figure 5; Klasovsky et al., 2015). This is particularly surprising because of the low reactivity of the shielded endo OH group in isosorbide.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Aerobic oxidation of isosorbide to the corresponding diketone. (A) AA-TEMPO/HNO3 in HOAc. (B) Laccase/Tempo in HOAc.

Isosorbide is a commercially interesting platform chemical produced by hydrogenation of glucose to sorbitol followed by dehydration (Figure 6). It has interesting features as an industrial monomer based on its rigidity, chirality, and non-toxicity (Fenouillot et al., 2010). For example, reaction with dicarboxylic acids (or esters) affords polyesters. Alternatively, oxidation to the corresponding diketones, followed by reductive amination, affords the corresponding bis-primary amine (Figure 5) which can be converted to polyamides by reaction with dicarboxylic acids (esters).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Isosorbide as a platform chemical.

Biocatalysis in aqua: The Natural Solution

As was noted elsewhere, biocatalysis is green and sustainable (Hollmann et al., 2011; Sheldon and Woodley, 2018), conforming to 10 of the 12 principles of green chemistry, and the catalyst is non-toxic, biocompatible and biodegradable. Moreover, enzymatic reactions are generally performed in water, a particularly suitable medium for conversions of polysaccharides in a bio-based economy. Furthermore, carbohydrates tend to be ideal substrates and generally have a stabilizing effect on enzymes. In contrast with precious metal catalysts, the long term availability and price stability of enzymes is assured since they are produced from inexpensive, readily available biomass. Moreover, industrial scale oxidations employing precious metal catalysts often involve a costly purification step to remove traces of the metal in the product. In contrast, no costly removal of trace amounts of enzymes are needed in enzymatic oxidations and any enzyme ending up in aqueous effluent undergoes facile biodegradation.

Laccase/Nitroxyl Radical Combinations

Laccases (EC 1.10. 3.2) are a diverse group of extracellular, copper-dependent oxidases. They are produced, for example, by white rot fungi, and play a key role in the delignification of lignocellulose in vivo (Rochefort et al., 2004). There is considerable commercial interest in the use of laccases in the pulp and paper industry and in waste water remediation in general (Gasser et al., 2014; Singh et al., 2018; Unuofin et al., 2019). They have broad substrate specificity and use dioxygen to oxidize a wide variety of, inter alia, phenols and aromatic amines in vivo. In combination with so-called mediators, notably TEMPO, they are able oxidize alcohols as was first shown by Fabbrini et al. (2001). These reactions involve one-electron oxidation of the TEMPO by the laccase to give the oxoammonium cation which is the active oxidant (Arends et al., 2006a). The reduced form of laccase is then reoxidized by dioxygen.

The laccase/TEMPO system was shown to catalyze the aerobic oxidation of primary and secondary aliphatic alcohols and 10 mol% was sufficient to give good conversions and excellent selectivities (Arends et al., 2006b). Interestingly, Ying and coworkers (Zhu et al., 2014) obtained superior results with 5 mol% laccase/AZADO, especially in the aerobic oxidation of complex and highly functionalized alcohols. Suicide inactivation is a problem with laccases since at high substrate conversions the oxoammonium cation can oxidize reactive groups in the protein or in the associated glycosyl moieties on the periphery of the enzyme (laccases are glycosylated enzymes). The stability of laccases under the reaction conditions can be significantly increased by immobilization as cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) (Matijosyte et al., 2010).

The laccase/TEMPO system also catalyzed the aerobic oxidation of the renewable diol, isosorbide to the corresponding diketone (see section Catalytic Oxidations and Figure 5B) in >99% yield (Gross et al., 2014). Similarly, 1,4 and 1,5-diols were oxidized to the corresponding lactones (Figure 7, Diaz-Rodriguez et al., 2012) and immobilization of the laccase as cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) enabled multiple recycling (Sheldon et al., 2013).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Laccase/TEMPO catalyzed oxidation of diols and polyols.

Copper and Flavin Dependent Alcohol Oxidases

As shown in Figure 8, there are two types of alcohol oxidases: Cu-dependent and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD). Both generate an equivalent of hydrogen peroxide as the coproduct and catalase is added to decompose it back to oxygen and water. Alternatively, catalase can be used to generate oxygen in situ. A major shortcoming of wild-type oxidases is their substrate specificity. For example, galactose oxidase (GOase) and glucose oxidase (GOX) and are very specific for galactose and glucose, respectively. Indeed, these enzymes have evolved in vivo to be very efficient in converting their natural substrate. However, in order to be useful in organic synthesis they need to be active and selective with a variety of alcohol substrates, particularly highly functionalized alcohols. Fortunately, this can be achieved with protein engineering using in vitro evolution.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Types of alcohol oxidases.

For example, Turner and coworkers used directed evolution techniques to produce GOase variants that catalyze the oxidation of secondary alcohols (Figure 9A; Escaletters and Turner, 2008) and amino alcohols (Herter et al., 2015; Figure 9B). Similarly, a GOase variant catalyzed the aerobic oxidation of lactose, a disaccharide formed as a waste stream (whey) in cheese manufacture, to form the dialdehyde (Figure 9C; Cosgrove et al., 2019). The latter is of interest as a raw material for polymers. Interestingly, a GOase variant was also shown to catalyze the synthesis of nitriles by ammoxidation of primary alcohols (Figure 9D; Vilim et al., 2018).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Biocatalytic aerobic oxidation of (A) 1-phenylethanol, (B) an amino alcohol, (C) lactose, and (D) ammoxidation of a primary alcohol.

Structure directed evolution was also used to develop variants of the FAD-dependent choline oxidase that catalyze the aerobic oxidation of a broad range of primary alcohols to the corresponding aldehydes (Figure 10; Heath et al., 2019). Similarly, FAD-dependent HMF oxidase was engineered to effectively catalyze all three oxidation steps in the conversion of HMF to FDCA (see later).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Aerobic oxidations catalyzed by FAD-dependent alcohol oxidase variants.

Another reaction of industrial interest is the aerobic oxidation of glucose to glucaric acid. A hypothetical process involving two steps with a mixture of GOX and a GOase variant which is able to accept gluconolactone as a substrate is shown in Figure 11. Alternatively, it can be produced by aerobic oxidation of glucuronic acid, a building block derived from (waste) pectin (see section Acid-Catalyzed Dehydration of Carbohydrates to Furan Derivatives). Glucaric acid is of interest as an industrial monomer in itself (Wu et al., 2019) and can also be hydrogenated to adipic acid, the raw material for Nylon 6.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Open in a new tab

Hypothetical biocatalytic oxidation of glucose to glucaric acid.

Alcohol Dehydrogenases

Alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs) catalyze the oxidation of alcohols by utilizing a nicotinamide cofactor which has to be regenerated in situ using an excess of a co-substrate (Kroutil et al., 2004a; Weckbecker et al., 2010). Alternatively, NAD(P)H oxidase (NOx) can be employed to catalyze reoxidation of the cofactor by oxygen (Kroutil et al., 2004b; Zhang et al., 2016). Yet another possibility is to couple the oxidation step with a reduction step, to afford an overall redox neutral process by employing so-called hydrogen borrowing, a concept which itself was borrowed from chemocatalysis literature (Hamid et al., 2007). For example, combination of an ADH with an amine dehydrogenase (AmDH) affords a redox-neutral conversion of a racemic alcohol to a single enantiomer of the corresponding amine (Figure 12; Mutti et al., 2015). Ironically, it requires the use of an aselective ADH (Thompson and Turner, 2017) because it has to catalyze the oxidation of both alcohol enantiomers, which is not a simple task as most ADHs are highly enantioselective. The overall efficiency of the process, which constitutes a conversion of an OH to an NH2 group, was improved by co-immobilization of the ADH and AmDH (Böhmer et al., 2018). When the alcohol, or polyol, is readily available this would be an industrially attractive way to produce the corresponding (poly)amine. A pertinent example is the conversion of isosorbide to the diamine discussed in section Catalytic Oxidations.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Open in a new tab

Enzymatic conversion of an alcohol to an amine.

Direct Oxidation of Polysaccharides

It is also of commercial interest to oxidize polysaccharides, e.g., starch and cellulose, directly to the corresponding polycarboxylic acids. Carboxystarch, for example, has potential applications as a biodegradable water super absorbent. Polysaccharides can be readily oxidized using NaOCl as the stoichiometric oxidant and TEMPO or derivatives as the catalyst (Ponedel'kina et al., 2010). However, for a commercially and environmentally attractive process it should preferably use oxygen as the stoichiometric oxidant. The laccase/TEMPO system (see above) catalyzes the aerobic oxidation of the primary alcohol moieties in starch affording carboxystarch (Viikari et al., 1999) but the relatively high enzyme costs, owing to its instability under the oxidizing reaction conditions, form an obstacle to commercialization. The stability was improved by immobilization as a cross-linked enzyme aggregate (CLEA) (Matijosyte et al., 2010).

Acid-catalyzed Dehydration of Carbohydrates to Furan Derivatives

Acid catalyzed dehydration of pentoses and hexoses produces furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) (Tong et al., 2010), respectively. Furfural is an important commodity chemical (Lange et al., 2012) and HMF has the potential to become one (van Putten et al., 2013; Kucherov et al., 2018). Initial isomerization of D-glucose to D-fructose is followed by acid catalyzed dehydration (Figure 13) but in yields that are not conducive to commercial viability owing to the limited stability of HMF in the acidic reaction medium (Wang et al., 2017). However, according to a recent report HMF can be obtained in 95% yield by conducting the reaction with D-fructose under continuous flow conditions (Galaverna et al., 2018).

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Open in a new tab

Acid catalyzed dehydration of xylose and glucose.

Polyethylene furandicarboxylate (PEF), which was developed by Avantium1 is produced from furan-2,5-dicarboxylic acid (FDCA) and ethylene glycol It is seen as a renewable alternative for fossil-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET). In addition to reducing CO2 emissions, PEF has superior mechanical, thermal, and gas barrier properties to PET. The key raw material, FDCA, can be produced in excellent yields by aerobic oxidation of HMF using supported precious metal catalysts (Liu et al., 2015; Zhang and Deng, 2015; Zheng et al., 2017; Motagamwala et al., 2018) or an engineered flavin-dependent alcohol oxidase (Dijkman et al., 2015) or whole cell biocatalysts (Koopman et al., 2010) in aqueous media (Figure 14).

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Open in a new tab

Catalytic aerobic oxidation of HMF to FDCA.

FDCA can also be produced from uronic acids present in various agricultural residues. D-galacturonic acid, for example, is available in large quantities from the pectin in sugar beet pulp (Leijdeckers et al., 2013) and D-glucuronic acid is one of the main constituents of pectin in certain soft- and hardwoods. Aerobic oxidation of uronic acids over gold catalysts (van Es et al., 2013) affords the corresponding aldaric acids that can subsequently be dehydrated to FDCA (Figure 15; Miller et al., 2017). Alternatively, uronic acids can be isomerized to the corresponding 5-keto aldonic acids which can be converted to FDCA dimethyl ester by acid catalyzed cyclodehydration to the methyl ester of 5-formyl-2-furoic acid in methanol followed by Au/C catalyzed aerobic oxidation (van der Klis et al., 2017).

Figure 15.

Figure 15

Open in a new tab

Alternative routes to FDCA.

Finally, we note that this review is focused on the conversion of the carbohydrate fractions of feedstocks to commodity chemicals in a biorefinery. In practice, for commercial viability both the carbohydrate and the lignin fractions will be converted to both commodity chemicals and biofuels and this will involve both chemo- and biocatalytic methods in water (Rinaldi et al., 2016; Bugg et al., 2019).

Conclusions and Prospects

Remarkable progress has been made in the last two decades in the development of green and sustainable catalytic methodologies for the aerobic oxidations of primary and secondary alcohols to aldehydes and ketones, respectively. However, a cursory perusal of the literature reveals that we have hardly scratched the surface with regard to the application of such catalytic methodologies to the valorization of bio-based feedstocks and key platform chemicals in biorefineries. Recent developments in the engineering of oxidative enzymes, such as copper- and flavin-dependent alcohol oxidases, using directed evolution techniques, strongly suggest that industrially viable methods for catalytic oxidations relevant to a bio-based economy will be forthcoming in the near future.

One could say that glucose is the new ethylene, and possibly propylene and butenes all rolled into one. In the words of Primo Levi: “It is the destiny of wine to be drunk and it is the destiny of glucose to be oxidized.”

Author Contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

References

  1. Aellig C., Girard C., Hermans I. (2011). Aerobic alcohol oxidations mediated by nitric acid. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 12355–12360. 10.1002/anie.201105620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al Abdallah Q. A., Nixon B. T., Fortwender J. R. (2016). The enzymatic conversion of major algal and cyanobacterial carbohydrates to bioethanol. Front. Energy Res. 4:36 10.3389/fenrg.2016.00036 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arends I. W. C. E., Li Y. X., Ausan R., Sheldon R. A. (2006a). Comparison of TEMPO and its derivatives as mediators in laccase catalysed oxidation of alcohols. Tetrahedron 62, 6659–6665. 10.1016/j.tet.2005.12.076 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arends I. W. C. E., Li Y. X., Sheldon R. A. (2006b). Stabilities and rates in the laccase/TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of alcohols. Biocat. Biotransform. 24, 443–448. 10.1080/10242420601040683 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arts S. J. H. F., Mombarg E. J. M., van Bekkum H., Sheldon R. A. (1997). Hydrogen peroxide and oxygen in catalytic oxidation of carbohydrates and related compounds. Synthesis 597–613. 10.1055/s-1997-1406 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Asimakopoulos K., Gavala H. N., Skiadis I. V. (2018). Reactor systems for syngas fermentation processes: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 348, 732–744. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Böhmer W., Kraus T., Mutti F. (2018). Hydrogen-borrowing alcohol bioamination with coimmobilized dehydrogenases. ChemCatChem. 10, 731–735. 10.1002/cctc.201701366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bugg T. D. H., Williamson J. J., Rashid G. M. M. (2019). Bacterial enzymes for lignin depolymerisation: new catalysts for generation of renewable chemicals from biomass. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 55, 26–33. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cao Q., Dornan L. M., Rogan L., Hughes N. L., Muldoon M. J. (2014). Aerobic oxidation catalysis with stable radicals. Chem. Commun. 50, 4524–4543. 10.1039/C3CC47081D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chapman M. R., Cosgrove S. C., Turner N. J., Kapur N., Blacker N. J. (2018). Highly productive oxidative biocatalysis in continuous flow by enhancing the aqueous equilibrium solubility of oxygen. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57,10535–10539. 10.1002/anie.201803675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cosgrove S. C., Mattey A. P., Riese S., Chapman M. R., Birmingham W. R., Blacker J. A., et al. (2019). Biocatalytic oxidation in continuous flow for the generation of carbohydrate dialdehydes. ACS Catal. 9, 11658–11662. 10.1021/acscatal.9b04819 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dahiya S., Kumar A. N., Sravan J. S., Chatterjee S., Sarkar O. (2018). Food waste biorefinery: sustainable strategy for circular economy. Bioresour. Technol. 248, 2–12. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Diaz-Rodriguez A., Lavandera I., Kanbak-Aksu S., Sheldon R. A., Gotor V., Gotor-Fernandez V. (2012). From diols to lactones under aerobic conditions using a laccase/TEMPO catalytic system in aqueous medium. Adv. Synth. Catal. 354, 3405–3408. 10.1002/adsc.201200892 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dijkman W. P., Binda C., Fraaije M. W., Mattevi A. (2015). Structure-based enzyme tailoring of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural oxidase. ACS Catalysis 5, 1833–1839. 10.1021/acscatal.5b00031 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dijksman A., Arends I. W. C. E., Sheldon R. A. (2003). Cu(II)-Nitroxyl radicals as catalytic galactose oxidase mimics. Org. Biomol. Chem. 1, 3232–3237. 10.1039/b305941c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dingerdissen U., Pfeffer J., Tacke T., Haas T., Schmidt H., Klasovsky F., et al. (2011). Method for Producing Aldehydes and Ketones From Primary and Secondary Alcohols. US 2011/0251399 A1. Essen: Evonik Degussa GmbH. [Google Scholar]
  17. Escaletters F., Turner N. J. (2008). Directed evolution of galactose oxidase: generation of enantioselective secondary alcohol oxidases. ChemBioChem. 9, 857–860. 10.1002/cbic.200700689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fabbrini M., Galli C., Gentili P., Machitella D. (2001). An oxidation of alcohols by oxygen with the enzyme laccase and mediation by TEMPO. Tetrahedron Lett. 42, 7551–7553. 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)01463-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fenouillot F., Rousseau A., Colomines G., Saint-Loup R., Pascault J. P. (2010). Polymers from renewable 1,4:3,6-dianhydrohexitols (isosorbide, isomannide and isoidide): a review. Progr. Polym. Sci. 35, 578–622. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.10.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Galaverna R., Breitkreitz M. C., Pastre J. C. (2018). Conversion of D-fructose to 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural: evaluating batch and continuous flow conditions by design of experiments and in-line FTIR monitoring. ACS Sust. Chem. Eng. 6, 4220–4230. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04643 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gamez P., Arends I. W. C. E., Reedijk J., Sheldon R. A. (2003). Copper(II)- catalysed oxidation of primary alcohols. Chem. Commun. 2414–2415. 10.1039/b308668b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gasser C. A., Ammann E. M., Shahgaldian P., Corvini P. F. X. (2014). Laccases to take on the challenge of emerging organic contaminants in wastewater. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 9931–9952. 10.1007/s00253-014-6177-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Geiβlmeir D., Jary W. G., Falk H. (2005). The TEMPO/copper catalyzed oxidation of primary alcohols to aldehydes using oxygen as stoichiometric oxidant. Monatsh Chem. 136, 1591–1599. 10.1007/s00706-005-0349-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gross J., Tauber K., Fuchs M., Schmidt N. G., Rajagopalan A., Faber K., et al. (2014). Aerobic oxidation of isosorbide and isomannide employing TEMPO/Laccase. Green Chem. 16, 2117–2121. 10.1039/C3GC41855C [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hamid M. H. S. A., Slatford P. A., Williams J. M. J. (2007). Borrowing hydrogen in the activation of alcohols. Adv. Synth. Catal. 349, 1555–1575. 10.1002/adsc.200600638 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Heath R. S., Birmingham W. R., Thompson M. P., Taglieber A., Daviet L., Turner N. J. (2019). An engineered alcohol oxidase for the oxidation of primary alcohols. ChemBioChem. 20, 276–281. 10.1002/cbic.201800556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Herter S., McKenna S. M., Frazer A. R., Lehmkαhler S., Carnell A. J., Turner N. J. (2015). Galactose oxidase variants for the oxidation of amino alcohols in enzyme cascade synthesis. ChemCatChem. 7, 2313–2317. 10.1002/cctc.201500218 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hollmann F., Arends I. W. C. E., Buehler K., Schallmey A., Bühler B. (2011). Enzyme-mediated oxidations for the chemist. Green Chem. 13, 226–265. 10.1039/C0GC00595A [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hone C. A., Kappe C. O. (2019). The use of molecular oxygen for liquid phase aerobic oxidations in continuous flow. Top. Curr. Chem. 377:2 10.1007/s41061-019-0233-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hoover J. M., Ryland B. L., Stahl S. S. (2013). Copper/TEMPO- catalyzed aerobic oxidation of alcohols: mechanistic assessment of different catalyst systems. ACS Catal. 3, 2599–2605. 10.1021/cs400689a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hoover J. M., Stahl S. S. (2011). Highly practical copper(I)/TEMPO catalyst system for chemoselective aerobic oxidation of primary alcohols. J Am Chem Soc. 133, 16901–16910. 10.1021/ja206230h [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Horváth I. T., Cséfalvay E., Mika L. T., Debreczeni M. (2017). Sustainability metrics for biomass-based carbon chemicals. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 5, 2734–2740. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b03074 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Iwabuchi Y. (2013). Discovery and exploitation of AZADO: the highly active catalyst for alcohol oxidation. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 61, 1197–1213. 10.1248/cpb.c13-00456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jiang X., Liu J., Ma S. (2019). Iron-catalyzed aerobic oxidation of alcohols: lower cost and improved selectivity. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 23, 825–835. 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00374 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jiang X., Zhang J., Ma S. (2016). Iron catalysis for room-temperature aerobic oxidation of alcohols to carboxylic acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 8344–8347. 10.1021/jacs.6b03948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. John R. P., Anisha G. S., Nampoothiri K. M., Pandey A. (2011). Micro and macroalgal biomass: a renewable source for bioethanol. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 186–193. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Klasovsky F., Haas T., Tacke T., Pfeffer J. C., Rimbach M., Volland M., et al. (2015). Continuously Operable Method for Producing Carbonyl Compounds by Means of a Catalyst Containing a Nitroxyl Radical. US 8,981,159 B2. Essen: Evonik Degussa GmbH. [Google Scholar]
  38. Koopman F., Wiercxk N., de Winde J. H., Ruijssenaaars H. J. (2010). Efficient whole-cell biotransformation of 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural into FDCA, 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 6291–6296. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kroutil W., Mang H., Edegger K., Faber K. (2004a). Biocatalytic oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols. Adv. Synth. Catal. 346, 125–142. 10.1002/adsc.200303177 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kroutil W., Mang H., Edegger K., Faber K. (2004b). Recent advances in the biocatalytic reduction of ketones and oxidation of sec-alcohols. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8, 120–126. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kuang Y., Rokubuichi H., Nabae Y., Hayakawa T., Kakimoto M. (2010). A nitric acid assisted carbon-catalyzed oxidation system with nitroxide radical cocatalysts as an efficient and green protocol for selective aerobic oxidation of alcohols. Adv. Synth. Catal. 352, 2635–2642. 10.1002/adsc.201000366 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kucherov F. A., Romashov L. V., Galkin K. I., Ananikov V. P. (2018). Chemical transformations of biomass-derived C6-furanic platform chemicals for sustainable energy research, materials science and synthetic building blocks. ACS Sust. Chem. Eng. 6, 8064–8092. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00971 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lange J. P., van der Heide E., van Buijtenen J., Price R. (2012). Furfural - a promising platform for lignocellulosic biofuels. ChemSusChem. 5, 150–166. 10.1002/cssc.201100648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lauber M. B., Stahl S. S. (2013). Efficient aerobic oxidation of secondary alcohols at ambient temperature with an ABNO/NOx catalyst system. ACS Catal. 3, 2612–2616. 10.1021/cs400746m [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Leijdeckers A. G. M., Bink J. P. M., Geutjes S., Schols H. A., Gruppen H. (2013). Enzymatic saccharification of sugar beet pulp for the production of galacturonic acid and arabinose; a study on the impact of the formation of recalcitrant oligosaccharides. Bioresour. Technol. 128, 518–525. 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Liguori R., Faraco V. (2016). Biological processes for advancing lignocellulosic waste biorefinery by advocating circular economy. Bioresour. Technol. 215, 13–20. 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu B., Ren Y., Zhang Z. (2015). Aerobic oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural into 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid in water under mild conditions. Green Chem. 17, 1610–1617. 10.1039/C4GC02019G [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Marais L., Swarts A. J. (2019). Biomimetic Cu/Nitroxyl catalyst systems for selective alcohol oxidation. Catalysts 9, 1–28. 10.3390/catal9050395 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mase N., Mizumori T., Tatemoto Y. (2011). Aerobic copper/TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of primary alcohols to aldehydes using a microbubble strategy to increase gas concentration in liquid phase reactions. Chem. Commun. 47, 2086–2088. 10.1039/c0cc04377j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Matijosyte I., Arends I. W. C. E., de Vries S., Sheldon R. A. (2010). Preparation and use of cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) of laccases. J. Mol. Catal. B 62, 142–148. 10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.09.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Miller D. J., Peereboom L, Wegener E., Gattinger M. (2017). Formation of 2,5-Furandicarboxylic Acid From Aldaric Acids. US 9701652 B1 2017. Board of Trustees of Michigan State University. [Google Scholar]
  52. Motagamwala A. H., Won W., Sener C., Alonso D. M., Marvelias C. T., Dumesic J. A. (2018). Toward biomass-derived renewable plastics: production of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid from fructose. Sci Adv. 4, 1–8. 10.1126/sciadv.aap9722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mutti F. G., Knaus T., Scrutton N. S., Breuer M., Turner N. J. (2015). Conversion of alcohols to enantiopure amines through dual-enzyme hydrogen-borrowing cascades. Science 349, 1525–1529. 10.1126/science.aac9283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Parmaggiani C., Cardona F. (2012). Transition metal based catalysts in the aerobic oxidation of alcohols. Green Chem. 14, 547–564. 10.1039/c2gc16344f [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pedersen A. T., Birmingham W. R., Rehn G., Charnock S. J., Turner N. J., Woodley J. M. (2015). Process requirements of galactose oxidase catalyzed oxidation of alcohols. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 19, 1580–1589. 10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00278 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Phillips J. R., Huhnke R. L., Atiyeh H. K. (2017). Syngas fermentation: a microbial conversion process of gaseous substrates to various products. Fermentation 3:28 10.3390/fermentation3020028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ponedel'kina I. Y., Khaibrakhmanova E. A., Odinokov V. N. (2010). Nitroxide-catalyzed selective oxidation of alcohols and polysaccharides. Russ. Chem. Rev. 79, 63–75. 10.1070/RC2010v079n01ABEH004074 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Rinaldi R., Jastrzebski R., Clough M. T., Ralph J., Kennema M., Bruijnincx P. C. A., Weckhuysen B. M. (2016). Paving the way for lignin valorization: recent advances in bioengineering, biorefining and catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 8164–8215. 10.1002/anie.201510351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rochefort D., Leech D., Bourbonnais R. (2004). Electron transfer mediator systems for bleaching of paper pulp. Green Chem. 6, 614–624. 10.1039/b311898n [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Sasano Y., Nagasawa S., Yamazaki M., Shibuya M., Park J., Iwabuchi Y. (2014). Highly chemoselective aerobic oxidation of amino alcohols into amino carbonyl compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 3236–3240. 10.1002/anie.201309634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sheldon R. A. (2014). Green and sustainable manufacture of chemicals from biomass: state of the art. Green Chem. 16, 950–963. 10.1039/C3GC41935E [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sheldon R. A. (2016). Green chemistry, catalysis and valorization of waste biomass J. Mol. Catal. A 422, 3–12. 10.1016/j.molcata.2016.01.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sheldon R. A. (2018). The road to biorenewables: carbohydrates to commodity chemicals. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 4464–4480. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00376 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sheldon R. A., Arends I. W. C. E. (2004). Organocatalytic oxidations mediated by nitroxyl radicals Adv. Synth. Catal. 346, 1051–1071. 10.1002/adsc.200404110 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sheldon R. A., van Pelt S., Kanbak-Aksu S., Rasmussen J., Janssen M. H. A. (2013). Cross-linked enzyme aggregates in organic synthesis. Aldrichimica Acta, 46, 81–93. [Google Scholar]
  66. Sheldon R. A., Woodley J. M. (2018). Role of biocatalysis in sustainability. Chem. Rev.118, 801–838. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Shibuya M., Osada Y., Sasano Y., Tomizawa M., Iwabuchi Y. (2011). Highly efficient, organocatalytic aerobic alcohol oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 6497–6500. 10.1021/ja110940c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Shibuya M., Tomizawa M., Suzuki I., Iwabuchi Y. (2006). 2-Azaadamantane N-Oxyl (AZADO) and 1-Me-AZADO: highly efficient organocatalysts for oxidation of alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 8412–8413. 10.1021/ja0620336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Shuba E. S., Kifle D. (2018). Microalgae to biofuels: ‘Promising' alternative and renewable energy, review. Renew Sust. Energy Rev. 81, 743–755. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Singh J., Saharan V., Kumar S., Gulati P., Kapoor R. K. (2018). Laccase grafted membranes for advanced water filtration systems: a green approach to water purification technology. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 38, 883–901. 10.1080/07388551.2017.1417234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Stahl S. S. (2004). Selective oxidation of organic compounds by direct dioxygen-coupled turnover. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 3400–3420. 10.1002/anie.200300630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Steves J. E., Stahl S. S. (2013). Copper/ABNO catalyzed aerobic alcohol oxidation. Alleviating steric and electronic constraints of Cu/tempo catalyst systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15742–15745. 10.1021/ja409241h [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. ten Brink G. J., Arends I. C. W. E., Sheldon R. A. (2000). Green, catalytic oxidation of alcohols in water. Science 287,1636–1639. 10.1126/science.287.5458.1636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Thompson M. P., Turner N. J. (2017). Two-enzyme hydrogen-borrowing amination of alcohols enabled by a cofactor-switched alcohol dehydrogenase. ChemCatChem. 23, 3833–3836. 10.1002/cctc.201701092 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Tong X., Ma Y., Li Y. (2010). Biomass into chemicals: conversion of sugars to furan derivatives by catalytic processes. Appl. Catal. A 385, 1–13. 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.06.049 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Unuofin J. O., Okoh A. I., Nwodo U. U. (2019). Aptitude of oxidative enzymes for treatment of wastewater pollutants: a laccase perspective. Molecules, 24:2064. 10.3390/molecules24112064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. van der Klis F., van Haveren J., van Es D. S., Bitter J. H. (2017). Synthesis of furan dicarboxylic acid esters from nonfood feedstocks without concomitant levulinic acid formation. ChemSusChem, 10, 1460–1468. 10.1002/cssc.201700051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. van Es D. S., van Haveren J., Raaijmakers H. W. C., van der Klis F., van Engelen G. P. F. M. (2013). Catalytic Oxidation of Uronic Acids to Aldaric Acids. WO 2013/151428 A1. Wageningen: Stichting Dienst Landbouwkundig Onderzoek. [Google Scholar]
  79. van Putten R. J., van der Waal J. C., de Jong E., Rasrendra C. B., Heeres H. J., de Vries J. G. (2013). Hydroxymethylfurfural, a versatile platform chemical made from renewable resources. Chem. Rev. 113, 1499–1597. 10.1021/cr300182k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Viikari L., Niku-Paavola M. I., Buchert J., Forssell P., Teleman A., Kruus K. (1999). Method of Producing Oxidized Starch. Helsinki: Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus, WO 99/23240. [Google Scholar]
  81. Vilim J., Kraus T., Mutti F. (2018). Catalytic Promiscuity of galactose oxidase. a mild synthesis of nitriles from alcohols, air and ammonia. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 14240–14244. 10.1002/anie.201809411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. von Gorup-Besanez E. F. (1861). Ueber die producte der einwirkung des platinmohrs auf mannit. Ann Chem. 118:257 10.1002/jlac.18611180302 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Wang J., Xi J., Xia Q., Liu X., Wang Y. (2017). Recent advances in heterogeneous catalytic conversion of glucose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural via green routes. Sci. China Chem. 60, 870–886. 10.1007/s11426-016-9035-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Weckbecker A., Gröger H., Hummel W. (2010). Regeneration of nicotinamide coenzymes: principles and applications for the synthesis of chiral compounds. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 120, 195–242. 10.1007/10_2009_55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Wu Y., Enomoto Y., Masaki H., Iwata T. (2019). Synthesis of polyamides from sugar derived d-glucaric acid and xylylenediamines. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 136, 1–6. 10.1002/app.47255 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zhang J. D., Cui Z. M., Fan X. J., Wu H. L., Chang H. H. (2016). Cloning and characterization of two distinct water-forming NADH oxidases from Lactobacillus pentosus for the regeneration of NAD. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 39, 603–611. 10.1007/s00449-016-1542-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Zhang Z., Deng K. (2015). Recent advances in the catalytic synthesis of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid and its derivatives. ACS Catal. 5, 6529–6544. 10.1021/acscatal.5b01491 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhang Z., Song J., Han B. (2017). Catalytic transformation of lignocellulose into chemicals and fuel products in ionic liquids. Chem. Rev. 117, 6834–6880. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Zheng L., Zhao J., Du Z., Zong B., Liu H. (2017). Efficient aerobic oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfufural to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid on Ru/C catalysts. Chem. Sci. China 60, 950–957. 10.1007/s11426-016-0489-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhu C., Zhang Z., Ding W., Xie J., Chen Y., Wu J., et al. (2014). A mild and highly efficient laccase-mediator system for aerobic oxidation of alcohols. Green Chem. 16, 1131–1138. 10.1039/C3GC42124D [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES