Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2020 Mar 2;117(11):5582–5587. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916978117

Coherent phonon dynamics in spatially separated graphene mechanical resonators

Zhuo-Zhi Zhang a,b,1, Xiang-Xiang Song a,b,1,2, Gang Luo a,b,1, Zi-Jia Su a,b, Kai-Long Wang a,b, Gang Cao a,b, Hai-Ou Li a,b, Ming Xiao a,b, Guang-Can Guo a,b, Lin Tian c,2, Guang-Wei Deng a,b,2, Guo-Ping Guo a,b,d,2
PMCID: PMC7084087  PMID: 32123110

Significance

The rapid development of nanotechnologies enables the possibility to use long-lifetime vibrational phonon modes for classical and quantum information processing. Despite continuous efforts in the past decade, tunable phonon-mediated transferring and processing of information between distant phonon modes remains technically challenging. Taking advantage of the excellent electronic and mechanical properties of graphene, we are able to realize electrically tunable coherent phonon dynamics between spatially separated graphene mechanical resonators. The gate-controllable resonant frequencies, coupling strengths, and coherent phonon dynamics indicate that information encoded in vibrational modes can be stored, transferred, and manipulated between spatially separated resonators. Our results not only demonstrate the transfer of information between phonons, but also provide the building blocks toward scalable phonon-based information processing.

Keywords: graphene mechanical resonator, phonon-based information processing, coherent oscillation

Abstract

Vibrational modes in mechanical resonators provide a promising candidate to interface and manipulate classical and quantum information. The observation of coherent dynamics between distant mechanical resonators can be a key step toward scalable phonon-based applications. Here we report tunable coherent phonon dynamics with an architecture comprising three graphene mechanical resonators coupled in series, where all resonators can be manipulated by electrical signals on control gates. We demonstrate coherent Rabi oscillations between spatially separated resonators indirectly coupled via an intermediate resonator serving as a phonon cavity. The Rabi frequency fits well with the microwave burst power on the control gate. We also observe Ramsey interference, where the oscillation frequency corresponds to the indirect coupling strength between these resonators. Such coherent processes indicate that information encoded in vibrational modes can be transferred and stored between spatially separated resonators, which can open the venue of on-demand phonon-based information processing.


Over the past decade, one of the major achievements in nanotechnology was the realization of phonon-state storage and transfer (19). Scalable phonon-based classical (10) and quantum (6, 7) information processing requires manipulation of highly coherent phonon modes with tunable coupling. Efforts toward phonon-state manipulation have been made in different systems, such as the dynamical control of phonon states between different modes in a single mechanical resonator (1012) or between modes in neighboring mechanical resonators (13), the observation of static phonon states of spatially separated mechanical resonators with indirect coupling (14), and routing of microwave phonons using phonon waveguide (15). Theoretical works also proposed that couplings between two spatially separated mechanical oscillators via the exchange of virtual photon pairs can be achieved (16). However, observation of tunable coherent dynamics of indirectly coupled phonon modes remains a challenge, due to the requirement on the combination of strong coupling, long coherence time, and tunability of phonon modes.

Graphene-based mechanical resonators with high-quality factors and excellent electrical control provides us with a promising platform for tunable phonon manipulations (1721). Here we use high-quality graphene-based mechanical resonators to demonstrate coherent phonon dynamics. We report the observation of coherent Rabi and Ramsey oscillations (22, 23) between spatially separated mechanical resonators in the classical regime via Raman-like indirect coupling (14). Our results indicate that phonon coherence can be maintained and controlled over distant resonators, which will shed light on scalable phonon-based information processing.

Results

Sample Characterization.

As shown in Fig. 1 A and B, a graphene ribbon with a width of ∼2.2 µm and ∼7 layers is suspended over three trenches (2 µm in width, 200 nm in depth) between four contact electrodes. This structure defines three electromechanical resonators, labeled as R1, R2, and R3 in Fig. 1A, respectively. All measurements were carried out in a dilution refrigerator at a base temperature of ∼10 mK and a pressure below 107 Torr. Similar structure was used to realize indirect coupling between mechanical resonators via a Raman-like process with static presentations (14). Here optimizing the measurements setup and the quality of the device allows us to employ this system to explore tunable coherent phonon dynamics in spatially separated mechanical resonators.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Sample structure and mode spectra of the resonators. (A) Scanning electron microscope image of a typical sample with a tilted view angle. Four contacts divide a suspended graphene ribbon into three mechanical resonators, R1, R2, and R3, in a linear chain. (B) Schematic sample structure and measurement setup. A frequency-modulated microwave signal VFM is applied through one contact of the center resonator, and a lock-in amplifier detects the mixing current Imix at the modulation frequency of the inputted FM signal at another contact. The frequencies of the resonators are tuned by dc voltages on the gates, respectively. An arbitrary waveform generator (AWG) is connected to gate g1 to provide additional burst signals for the coherent oscillations. (C) The mixing current as a function of the driving frequency fd at Vg1 = 22 V. The measured linewidth of resonator R1 is γ1/2π ∼ 1.20 kHz. Similarly, the linewidth of R2 is γ2/2π ∼ 1.16 kHz and the linewidth of R3 is γ3/2π ∼ 0.73 kHz (SI Appendix, Fig. S2) at a driving power of ∼− 60 dBm. (D) The mixing-current spectrum of resonators R1 and R2. Coupling strength as large as 11.5 MHz is observed. Here Vg2 = 17 V and Vg3 = 0 V. (E) Spectrum of all three resonators. Here R2 is far off-resonance from R3 with a detuning Δ23/2π ∼ 20 MHz, with Vg2 = 14 V, and Vg3 = 15 V. The dc voltage Vg1 is scanned over a wide range, to tune the resonant frequency of R1 to cross the frequencies fm2 and fm3. A large avoided level crossing is observed when fm1 approaches fm2. A smaller energy splitting is observed when fm1 approaches fm3 due to the indirect coupling. (F) The measured indirect coupling strength Ω13/2π between R1 and R3 as a function of Δ23/2π. D and E are obtained at a driving power of ∼− 40 dBm to have a better resolution.

We characterize each resonator separately using the one-source frequency-modulation technique (24), where a frequency-modulated (FM) signal, VFM(t)=VACcos[2πfdt+fΔfLsin(2πfLt)], is applied at a selected contact, and the mixing current Imix at frequency fL is recorded by a lock-in amplifier at another contact, as illustrated in Fig. 1B. We find that the relaxation rate of the resonators shows strong dependency on the driving amplitude. At a low driving amplitude, ∼−60 dBm, we extract the relaxation rate to be γ1/2π = 1.20 kHz from the spectrum of the mixing current Imix by fitting (24), as shown in Fig. 1C and SI Appendix, Fig. S2, which corresponds to a quality factor of Q1=fm1/γ1×2π ∼111,000 for resonator R1. Comparing to our previous work (14), observed quality factor is increased mainly due to that frequency-modulation technique allows for lower probing power (25). At a stronger driving power of ∼−45 dBm, the relaxation rate becomes γ1/2π ∼ 300 kHz, corresponding to a much lower quality factor of ∼300. The relaxation rate increases significantly with increasing driving power due to nonlinear damping, which is similar to previous reports in nanomechanical systems (26, 27). Note that we cannot estimate the magnitude of frequency fluctuations (28) and eliminate its influence in the present situation; what we obtained here is an upper bound of the relaxation rate. Here the resonant frequencies of all three resonators (fmi, i = 1, 2, and 3) can be tuned by adjusting the corresponding gate voltages Vgi (i = 1, 2, 3). Details of the characterization of the resonators can be found in SI Appendix, Figs. S1 and S2.

Strongly Coupled Mechanical Resonators.

To characterize the coupling between the resonators R1 and R2, we fix the frequency fm2 of R2 (i.e., fix the gate voltage on gate g2) and tune fm1 by adjusting Vg1. When fm1 approaches fm2, an avoided level crossing appears in Fig. 1D. By measuring the frequency splitting, the coupling strength between neighboring resonators was obtained with Ω12/2π ∼ 11.5 MHz. Here the coupling between the neighboring resonators R1 and R2 leads to a normal mode that is spatially distributed over the range of R1 and R2. Similarly, we can measure the coupling strength between the neighboring resonators R2 and R3, Ω23/2π, to be ∼9.0 MHz, as shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S3. Since both R1 and R3 are neighboring to R2, avoided level crossing between R1 and R3 mediated by R2 is observed, which can be translated to an effective coupling between the nonneighboring resonators (R1 and R3). The indirect coupling strength Ω13/2π between the spatially separated resonators R1 and R3 is shown in Fig. 1E. The Raman-like effective coupling (14) Ω13/2π decreases when the detuning Δ23 between fm2 and fm3 increases, as shown in Fig. 1F. With Ω13γ1,γ3, the system is well in the strong-coupling regime.

Cooperativity is a key parameter to characterize the coherence and the potential for coherent manipulation of coupled modes. At low driving power ∼−60 dBm, we can calculate the zero-temperature cooperativities with C12=Ω122/γ1γ2 for resonators R1 and R2 reaching 9.5×107 and C23=Ω232/γ2γ3 for resonators R2 and R3 reaching 9.6×107 (see SI Appendix, Fig. S3 for details). More importantly, with effective coupling strength, Ω13/2π ∼ 3.3 MHz, between the nonneighboring resonators R1 and R3, the zero-temperature cooperativity C13=Ω132/γ1γ3 between these spatially separated modes exceeds 1.2×107, as shown in SI Appendix, Figs. S4 and S5. Such giant cooperativity is several orders of magnitude larger than previously reported results in coupled-mechanical systems (10, 11, 13, 14, 18, 19, 2931), while for large driving power (∼−45 dBm), where we conduct measurement on the coherent oscillations (Figs. 2 and 3), the increased relaxation rate (∼300 kHz) leads to zero-temperature cooperativities of C12, C231,000, and C13100. As mentioned above, the measured relaxation rate includes the effect of frequency fluctuations, which indicates that the actual cooperativity can be much larger. It is worthy to note that when considering thermal occupation [with average thermal phonon number n¯th=1/(eω/kBT1)1.61, where kB is Boltzmann constant, T is around 10 mK], the finite-temperature cooperativity C13th=C13/n¯1thn¯3th is still sufficiently high for observing coherent phonon dynamics shown in Figs. 2 and 3.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Phonon Rabi oscillations between spatially separated resonators. (A) Spectrum of R1 and R3 at Vg2 = 17.5 V and Vg3 = 22 V with effective coupling strength Ω13/2π = 3.11 MHz. During the experiment, we first excite the coupled system to eigenmode A, then apply a microwave burst to generate rotations around the x axis, and measure the mixing current at the frequency of eigenmode A. Each sequence is repeated for over 105 times to gather the data for the average mixing current. (B) Evolution of the system on the Bloch sphere. The dashed blue arrow marks the initial state. Under the microwave burst, the system rotates around the x axis, following the red trajectory, and the burst duration τ determines the rotation angle. (C) Average mixing current as a function of burst duration with microwave amplitudes Vpp= 0.60, 0.48, 0.36, and 0.24 V, respectively. The purple lines show the damped cosinusoidal fits to the experimental data. (D) The Rabi oscillation versus the microwave amplitude Vpp. (E) Extracted Rabi frequency ΩRabi/2π as a function of microwave amplitude in comparison with a linear fitting (black line).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Phonon Ramsey interference between spatially separated resonators. (A) Pulse sequence and system evolution in the Bloch sphere during Ramsey interference experiment. The pulse sequence consists of a π/2 rotation around the x axis, a free evolution duration τwait, and a second pulse around the x axis (or a selected axis in the x-y plane). The dashed blue arrows indicate the initial state of this system. The dashed red arrows indicate the evolution trajectories. The solid blue arrows refer to the final state. (B) Average mixing current as a function of τwait with coupling strength Ω13/2π = 3.11 MHz. The solid line is the numerical fitting using a damped cosinusoidal function, which gives an oscillation frequency ΩRamsey/2π = 3.12 MHz, in good agreement with the coupling strength. (C) Ramsey interferences versus waiting time and relative phase Δφ between the two π/2 pulses.

Rabi Oscillations between Spatially Separated Resonators.

The high cooperativity between resonators R1 and R3 is the basis for high-fidelity state transfer within these spatially separated modes. To demonstrate this, we perform time-domain experiments to study such coherent oscillations. First, we bias the system at Vg1 = 18 V, Vg2 = 17.5 V, and Vg3 = 22 V. At this condition, the resonators R1 and R3 are degenerate, as indicated by the anticrossing between these modes. We initialize the coupled system to be excited at the lower eigenmode, which is labeled as A in Fig. 2A, with A being the symmetric superposition of R1 and R3. We then apply a microwave burst at the frequency fMW=Ω13/2π = 3.11 MHz on gate g1. The measured mixing current demonstrates Rabi oscillations between the lower eigenmode A and the upper eigenmode B, as a function of the duration of the burst. In analogy to a two-level system, the dynamics of the phonon excitation can be illustrated with the Bloch sphere of theses eigenmodes (Fig. 2B), where eigenmode A is the south pole of the sphere, and eigenmode B is the north pole (10, 23). Under the microwave burst, the system rotates around the x axis of the Bloch sphere and exhibits a Rabi oscillation. The population of eigenmode A oscillates with the duration τ of the burst, which generates coherent oscillation in the mixing current Imix detected at the frequency of the eigenmode A. The mixing current versus the microwave duration τ at different pulse amplitude Vpp (peak to peak) is plotted in Fig. 2 C and D. The time dependence of Imix can be fitted with a damped cosinusoidal function, Aeτ/TRabicos(ΩRabiτ), with damping time TRabi and Rabi frequency ΩRabi/2π. In the upper panel of Fig. 2C, the Rabi frequency is ∼0.25 MHz with damping time TRabi∼ 11.6 µs, with burst amplitude Vpp= 0.60 V. In Fig. 2E, the measured Rabi frequency is plotted versus the voltage amplitude Vpp and shows a linear dependence on the amplitude, in agreement with our analysis (32). Details of eigenmodes A and B and their dynamics are presented in SI Appendix, section S7.

Ramsey Interference between Spatially Separated Resonators.

Next, we study the precession dynamics between resonators R1 and R3 in a Ramsey interference experiment. The phonon excitation is initially prepared in eigenmode A, similar to that of the Rabi oscillation experiment. In the beginning of each cycle, a π/2 pulse (Vpp = 0.60 V and pulse duration ∼1.1 µs) along the x axis is applied to this system, which rotates the state to the x-y plane in the Bloch sphere. This system then undergoes a free evolution of duration τwait. During the free evolution, the system rotates around the z axis governed by Ω13/2π. A second π/2 pulse in the x axis is then applied to rotate the state. This process is illustrated in Fig. 3A. We measure the mixing current at the frequency of eigenmode A. The average mixing current versus τwait is shown in Fig. 3B, together with a damped cosinusoidal function Aeτ/TRamseycos(ΩRamseyτ) with fitting parameters TRamsey and ΩRamsey. Our result gives that TRamsey ∼ 9.5 µs and ΩRamsey/2π ∼ 3.12 MHz, which is consistent with Ω13/2π = 3.11 MHz obtained from Fig. 2A. Furthermore, we adjust the relative phase between the two π/2 pulses in the Ramsey sequence from −π to π to change the rotation axis (33, 34). In Fig. 3C, the mixing current is plotted versus the angle of the rotation axis, Δφ, as well as the waiting time, and exhibits continuous variation of the excitation population in the A mode.

Rabi and Ramsey Oscillations at Different Coupling Strengths.

The highly tunable coupling strength between resonators R1 and R3 offers promising prospect for phonon-state manipulation. We investigate the coherent dynamics under different coupling strength Ω13/2π, which can be tuned by varying the detuning between R1(R3) and R2. Our results are presented in Fig. 4 AC for Rabi oscillations and in Fig. 4 DF for Ramsey interference. The oscillation frequencies (ΩRabi/2π and ΩRamsey/2π, respectively), and damping times (TRabi and TRamsey, respectively) are extracted from the measured data. In Fig. 4 D and H, we plot the damping times as well as an effective quality factor, defined as the damping time multiplies the corresponding oscillation frequency for the Rabi oscillations or the Ramsey interference. With our parameters, ΩRabi/2π remains almost the same (∼0.25 MHz) for different coupling strength Ω13/2π, indicating that the coupling between the microwave burst to the mechanical resonators stays almost the same as the effective coupling varies. The Ramsey frequency ΩRamsey/2π remains consistent with Ω13/2π. Meanwhile, TRabi remains at ∼11 µs, and TRamsey varies from 5 to 10 µs, all having the same order of magnitude over a large range of effective coupling. Combining with the results shown in Fig. 2E, we can adjust oscillation frequencies ΩRabi/2π and ΩRamsey/2π by electrical tuning, which demonstrates tunable phonon dynamics in spatially separated graphene mechanical resonators. The coherent oscillation experiments were taken at driving power of ∼−45 dBm. Under this driving power, the relaxation rate of each mode is ∼300 kHz, leading to the damping time in the coherent oscillation experiments TRabi = TRamsey2/γi to be ∼1 µs (SI Appendix, sections S7 and S8), which is comparable with TRabi and TRamsey obtained from the experiment.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Rabi and Ramsey oscillations at different coupling strengths. Phonon Rabi oscillations (AC) and Ramsey interference (EG) between spatially separated resonators at coupling strengths Ω13/2π = 1.18, 1.68, and 2.36 MHz, respectively. Solid lines are numerical fitting using damped cosinusoidal functions. (D) Damping times of Rabi oscillations TRabi and quality factor QRabi=TRabi×ΩRabi/2π as functions of coupling rate Ω13/2π. (H) Damping times of Ramsey interference TRamsey and quality factor QRamsey=TRamsey×ΩRamsey/2π as functions of coupling rate Ω13/2π. Error bars are given by fitting fidelities. Data points for Ω13/2π = 3.11 MHz are taken from Figs. 2 and 3.

Discussions

It is worth noting that at low driving power with a quality factor up to 105, the zero-temperature cooperativity between the resonators can reach 107. The measured damping times could be improved by optimizing the measurement setup to lower driving power to decrease the influence of nonlinear damping effects (25) in the future. Moreover, frequency stabilization such as feedback technique (35) can be utilized to suppress frequency fluctuations (28). Our results provide a promising platform for coherent computation using controllable vibrational phonons. Meanwhile, taking advantages of mechanical resonators being an outstanding interface between different physical systems, such as quantum dots engineered in graphene flakes (21), our architecture can be applied to transferring and storage of information between various systems. Although the present system is still a classical one, the phonon occupation number at undriven state is ∼2 [given by n¯th=1/(eω/kBT1)1.61]. Using sideband cooling, advanced measurement setup, or resonators with higher frequency (36), our architecture can be pushed into quantum regime.

In conclusion, we studied coherent phonon dynamics between spatially separated graphene mechanical resonators. The giant cooperativity in our sample enables the study of such coherent oscillations and the fitting of the damping times. Our demonstration of coherent dynamics between mechanical modes with indirect interaction and high tunability is a key step toward on-demand state transfer and manipulation (6, 7, 33, 37) in an all-phonon platform. With the capabilities of system integrations, our architecture can be extended to large scale for phonon-based computing and long-distance information exchange in mechanical systems.

Materials and Methods

Sample Fabrication.

A layer of SiNx (50 nm) is deposited via low-pressure chemical vapor deposition on the silicon oxide layer, which covers a highly resistive silicon wafer. After electron beam lithography (EBL), three parallel trenches are etched through the SiNx layer by reactive ion etching, followed by dipping in buffered oxide etchant. The total etching depth is 200 nm. The widths of the trenches are designed as 2 µm. After a second EBL, 5 nm titanium and 20 nm gold are evaporated onto the wafer. All of the contacts are 1.5 µm in width. Finally, the graphene ribbon, exfoliated on a polydimethylsiloxane stamp, is aligned and transferred above the trenches (38).

Measurement Setup.

For data acquisition in Figs. 1 DF and 2A, an FM signal is generated by a Keysight E8257D microwave generator and applied to the source of the center resonator R2, with deviation frequency fΔ = 100 kHz, modulation frequency fL = 1.33 kHz; a Stanford Research SR830 lock-in amplifier is applied to read Imix with frequency fL at the drain of R2. For quality factor acquisition, fΔ = 1 kHz, fL = 233 Hz. In Rabi and Ramsey oscillation experiments, the driving FM signal is constantly applied at the frequency of the lower state of the superposition state, i.e., eigenmode A in Fig. 2A. Additional driving pulse is generated by a Tektronix AWG7082C arbitrary waveform generator and applied to the gate electrode of R1. Here, the lock-in amplifier is set at a time constant of 300 ms with frequency fL = 1.33 kHz. At each pulse parameter, Imix is acquired for over 40 times. The repetition rate of the waveform is 20 ∼ 50 kHz in different experiments. Hence the total average times is over 2.4 × 105 ∼ 6 × 105. Here, the measured Imix, which is averaged over many pulse cycles, can be recognized as the occupation of eigenmode A.

Data Availability.

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or the SI Appendix, with corresponding raw data deposited at Zenodo (39).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank J. Moser for fruitful discussions in sample fabrication and measurement techniques. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant 2016YFA0301700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 11625419, 61704164, 61674132, 11674300, 11575172, 61904171, and 11904351), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grants BX20180295 and 2018M640586), and the Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies (Grant AHY080000). L.T. is supported by the National Science Foundation under Award PHY-1720501, and the University of California Multicampus-National Lab Collaborative Research and Training under Award LFR-17-477237. This work was partially carried out at the University of Science and Technology of China Center for Micro and Nanoscale Research and Fabrication.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Data deposition: Raw data corresponding to the findings of this study have been deposited at Zenodo, https://zenodo.org/record/3594242#.XkXLamhKhPY.

This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1916978117/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Gustafsson M. V., et al. , Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom. Science 346, 207–211 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lecocq F., Clark J. B., Simmonds R. W., Aumentado J., Teufel J. D., Mechanically mediated microwave frequency conversion in the quantum regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 043601 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khosla K. E., Vanner M. R., Ares N., Laird E. A., Displacemon electromechanics: How to detect quantum interference in a nanomechanical resonator. Phys. Rev. X 8, 021052 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ockeloen-Korppi C. F., et al. , Stabilized entanglement of massive mechanical oscillators. Nature 556, 478–482 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Riedinger R., et al. , Remote quantum entanglement between two micromechanical oscillators. Nature 556, 473–477 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chu Y., et al. , Creation and control of multi-phonon Fock states in a bulk acoustic-wave resonator. Nature 563, 666–670 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Satzinger K. J., et al. , Quantum control of surface acoustic-wave phonons. Nature 563, 661–665 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tóth L. D., Bernier N. R., Nunnenkamp A., Feofanov A. K., Kippenberg T. J., A dissipative quantum reservoir for microwave light using a mechanical oscillator. Nat. Phys. 13, 787–793 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ockeloen-Korppi C. F., et al. , Low-noise amplification and frequency conversion with a multiport microwave optomechanical device. Phys. Rev. X 6, 041024 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Faust T., Rieger J., Seitner M. J., Kotthaus J. P., Weig E. M., Coherent control of a classical nanomechanical two-level system. Nat. Phys. 9, 485–488 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhu D., et al. , Coherent phonon Rabi oscillations with a high-frequency carbon nanotube phonon cavity. Nano Lett. 17, 915–921 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Braakman F. R., Rossi N., Tutuncuoglu G., Morral A. F. I., Poggio M., Coherent two-mode dynamics of a nanowire force sensor. Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 054045 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Okamoto H., et al. , Coherent phonon manipulation in coupled mechanical resonators. Nat. Phys. 9, 480–484 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Luo G., et al. , Strong indirect coupling between graphene-based mechanical resonators via a phonon cavity. Nat. Commun. 9, 383 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fang K., Matheny M. H., Luan X., Painter O., Optical transduction and routing of microwave phonons in cavity-optomechanical circuits. Nat. Photonics 10, 489–496 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Di Stefano O., et al. , Interaction of mechanical oscillators mediated by the exchange of virtual photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 030402 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen C., et al. , Performance of monolayer graphene nanomechanical resonators with electrical readout. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 861–867 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.De Alba R., et al. , Tunable phonon-cavity coupling in graphene membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 741–746 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mathew J. P., Patel R. N., Borah A., Vijay R., Deshmukh M. M., Dynamical strong coupling and parametric amplification of mechanical modes of graphene drums. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 747–751 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Güttinger J., et al. , Energy-dependent path of dissipation in nanomechanical resonators. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 631–636 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Luo G., et al. , Coupling graphene nanomechanical motion to a single-electron transistor. Nanoscale 9, 5608–5614 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Novotny L., Strong coupling, energy splitting, and level crossings: A classical perspective. Am. J. Phys. 78, 1199–1202 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Frimmer M., Novotny L., The classical Bloch equations. Am. J. Phys. 82, 947–954 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gouttenoire V., et al. , Digital and FM demodulation of a doubly clamped single-walled carbon-nanotube oscillator: Towards a nanotube cell phone. Small 6, 1060–1065 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moser J., Eichler A., Güttinger J., Dykman M. I., Bachtold A., Nanotube mechanical resonators with quality factors of up to 5 million. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 1007–1011 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Eichler A., et al. , Nonlinear damping in mechanical resonators made from carbon nanotubes and graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 339–342 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Manzeli S., Dumcenco D., Migliato Marega G., Kis A., Self-sensing, tunable monolayer MoS2 nanoelectromechanical resonators. Nat. Commun. 10, 4831 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sansa M., et al. , Frequency fluctuations in silicon nanoresonators. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 552–558 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Eichler A., del Álamo Ruiz M., Plaza J. A., Bachtold A., Strong coupling between mechanical modes in a nanotube resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 025503 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu C. H., Kim I. S., Lauhon L. J., Optical control of mechanical mode-coupling within a MoS2 resonator in the strong-coupling regime. Nano Lett. 15, 6727–6731 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li S. X., et al. , Parametric strong mode-coupling in carbon nanotube mechanical resonators. Nanoscale 8, 14809–14813 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Scully M. O., Zubairy M. S., Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ed. 1, 1997), p. 652. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim D., et al. , Microwave-driven coherent operation of a semiconductor quantum dot charge qubit. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 243–247 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vandersypen L. M. K., Chuang I. L., NMR techniques for quantum control and computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1037–1069 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wen Y., et al. , A coherent nanomechanical oscillator driven by single-electron tunnelling. Nat. Phys. 16, 75–82 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.O’Connell A. D., et al. , Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator. Nature 464, 697–703 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vion D., et al. , Manipulating the quantum state of an electrical circuit. Science 296, 886–889 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Castellanos-Gomez A., et al. , Deterministic transfer of two-dimensional materials by all-dry viscoelastic stamping. 2D Mater. 1, 011002 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang Z.–Z., et al. , Data from “Coherent phonon dynamics in spatially separated graphene mechanical resonators.” Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/record/3594242#.XkXKiGhKhPY. Deposited 29 December 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or the SI Appendix, with corresponding raw data deposited at Zenodo (39).


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES