Abstract
Hydroxytyrosol is an antioxidant free radical scavenger that is biosynthesized from tyrosine. In metabolic engineering efforts, the use of the mouse tyrosine hydroxylase limits its production. Here, we design an efficient whole-cell catalyst of hydroxytyrosol in Escherichia coli by de-bottlenecking two rate-limiting enzymatic steps. First, we replace the mouse tyrosine hydroxylase by an engineered two-component flavin-dependent monooxygenase HpaBC of E. coli through structure-guided modeling and directed evolution. Next, we elucidate the structure of the Corynebacterium glutamicum VanR regulatory protein complexed with its inducer vanillic acid. By switching its induction specificity from vanillic acid to hydroxytyrosol, VanR is engineered into a hydroxytyrosol biosensor. Then, with this biosensor, we use in vivo-directed evolution to optimize the activity of tyramine oxidase (TYO), the second rate-limiting enzyme in hydroxytyrosol biosynthesis. The final strain reaches a 95% conversion rate of tyrosine. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of sequentially de-bottlenecking rate-limiting steps for whole-cell catalyst development.
Subject terms: High-throughput screening, Sensors and probes, X-ray crystallography, Metabolic engineering
Whole-cell catalyst-based hydroxytyrosol production is low. Here, the authors increase the efficiency of its production in E. coli by de-bottlenecking two enzymatic steps catalyzed by monooxygenase and tyramine oxidase using structure-based enzyme redesign or in vivo-directed evolution with the aid of a newly developed biosensor.
Introduction
Whole-cell catalysts have been frequently used for natural product biosynthesis owing to their stability, recycleability and environmental friendliness. Whole-cell catalysts harboring multiple-step biosynthetic pathways avoid the time-consuming catalyst preparation process in in vitro catalysis1. For combinatorial whole-cell biocatalysts, the biosynthetic pathway efficiency is the most important factor influencing catalyst productivity. Besides the metabolic engineering strategies used for directing the carbon flux into a targeted pathway, the pathway enzymes are crucial for driving the pathway rates, selectivity, and overall productivity2,3. High-efficient pathway enzymes, especially those catalyzing rate-limiting steps, are critical for the end product productivity4. Rate-limiting steps of the biosynthetic pathways in combinatorial whole-cell catalysts might not be the same as those in the original hosts, due to the different protein expression levels, enzymatic activities and substrate or cofactor levels in the engineered host cells. When one rate-limiting step is unblocked, most probably another rate-limiting step will appear. A high-efficient whole-cell catalyst can be developed when all rate-limiting steps are sequentially solved.
Besides the conventional method of overexpressing enzymes catalyzing the rate-limiting steps, protein engineering is a frequently used strategy. The activity, specificity, selectivity, and allosteric property of the pathway enzymes have been engineered to improve pathway performance4–6. An alternative solution is to redesign the pathways to bypass rate-limiting steps or allow shortcuts for synthesis. To facilitate pathway optimization in whole-cell catalysts, the end-product biosensors are powerful tools, allowing rapid selection of hyper-producing cells7. The strategy of in vivo-directed evolution combined with biosensor screening is more advantageous than in vitro engineering by better adapting to the intracellular environment, including the concentration of substrates, intermediates, and cofactors, enabling the selection of hyper-producing whole-cell catalysts under real in vivo environments8–10. Development of customized biosensors for targeted products is challenging.
Hydroxytyrosol is a powerful antioxidant scavenger of free radicals that confers cell protection11,12. The hydroxytyrosol biosynthetic pathway, which uses tyrosine as a substrate, was first reported by Satoh13. In this pathway, the tyrosine hydroxylation step catalyzed by mouse tyrosine hydroxylase using the cofactor tetrahydromonapterin (MH4) severely limits biosynthetic efficiency, resulting in <20% hydroxytyrosol yield. Chung et al.14 used the aromatic aldehyde synthase AAS and the 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid 3-hydroxylase HpaBC to turn tyrosine to hydroxytyrosol in Escherichia coli, however the titer of hydroxytyrosol is only 208 mg L−1. Li et al.15 established an artificial pathway for hydroxytyrosol biosynthesis from tyrosine by using the ketoacid decarboxylase KDC, the alcohol dehydrogenase ADH and also the 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid 3-hydroxylase HpaBC, and finally obtained a hydroxytyrosol titer of ~1243 mg L−1 in fed-batch experiment.
In this study, we aim to demonstrate the feasibility of developing a powerful hydroxytyrosol whole-cell catalyst using E. coli, by sequentially solving the activities of enzymes catalyzing the rate-limiting steps of the pathway. Strategies of structure-based enzyme redesign and in vivo-directed evolution are adopted, until all the rate-limiting steps are solved and the conversion rate of end product reaches 95%.
Results
Development of a high-active microbial tyrosine hydroxylase
To improve the low efficiency of the tyrosine hydroxylation step catalyzed by mouse tyrosine hydroxylase13, a microbial tyrosine hydroxylase was redesigned by engineering HpaBC, a two-component flavin-dependent monooxygenase from E. coli. HpaBC catalyzes the first step in the 4-hydroxyphenylacetate (4-HPA) degradation pathway, producing 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetate (HPC). In spite of a broad substrate spectrum, HpaBC exhibits extremely low activity on tyrosine (approximately 5% of its activity on 4-HPA)16.
To explore the mechanism of the catalytic versatility of HpaBC, we modeled an active HpaBC bound with FAD and 4-HPA based on the reported structures of EcHpaBC (E. coli)17 and ThHpaBC (Thermus thermophiles)18. We hypothesized that the binding of 4-HPA to HpaBC, like its homolog in ThHpaBC, would induce a conformational change in loop β32-33 (Supplementary Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 1a, the hydroxyl group of 4-HPA would form hydrogen bonds with the side chains of R113, Y117, and H155, which are highly conserved and involved in the catalytic reaction. The carboxyl group of 4-HPA is predicted to be coordinated by the side chain of S210 through two hydrogen bonds. The flexibility of loop β32-33 is likely to define the substrate selectivity of HpaBC. Therefore, we chose residues S210, A211 and Q212 for saturation mutagenesis in order to evolve HpaBC into a highly active tyrosine hydroxylase which can efficiently convert tyrosine into l-DOPA.
A high-throughput screening method was developed according to the hydroxylase activity of HpaBC19. As shown in Fig. 1b, when reacted with sodium periodate, l-DOPA turned brown, whereas tyrosine exhibited no color change. OD400 can be used to quantify this colorimetric difference, and a positive linear correlation was observed between OD400 and l-DOPA concentrations. Therefore, the sodium periodate assay was used for high-throughput screening of the l-DOPA formation activity of HpaBC in 96-well plates (Fig. 1c). The saturation mutagenesis library was transformed into strain BW25113 and subjected to high-throughput screening. From ~50,000 clones, 12 mutant strains that exhibited improved tyrosine hydroxylation capability compared with that of the strain expressing the wild-type enzyme were selected (Supplementary Fig. 2). The mutant HpaBC expressed by mutant strain exhibiting the highest hydroxylation activity, 23F9, was purified for activity assay, along with the wild-type enzyme. As shown in Fig. 1d, the relative hydroxylase activity of the 23F9 mutant on tyrosine was ~12-fold higher than that of the wild-type enzyme. To further improve the tyrosine hydroxylation activity, a random mutagenesis library was constructed based on mutant 23F9. High-throughput screening of this library resulted in six mutant strains showing increased absorbance at 400 nm (Supplementary Fig. 3a) and produced high titers of l-DOPA (Supplementary Fig. 3b), compared with those of strain expressing the 23F9 mutant. The HpaBC mutant 23F9-M4 exhibited a 1.8-fold higher hydroxylation activity on tyrosine than that of the 23F9 mutant (Fig. 1d). Furthermore, the hydroxylation activity of these HpaBC mutants on the original substrate 4-HPA reduced considerably (Fig. 1d). The plasmids expressing these HpaBC mutants were purified from the selected mutant strains and used to retransform strain BW25113, and enhanced l-DOPA yields was confirmed. The yield of l-DOPA from strains expressing mutant 23F9 and 23F9-M4 was found to increase by ~10- and 15-fold, respectively, compared with that of the strain expressing wild-type HpaBC (Fig. 1e). The l-DOPA yield from strain expressing the mouse tyrosine hydroxylase and the MH4 regeneration cycle constructed according to Satoh et al.13 was ~21%, around 4-fold of that of the strain expressing wild-type HpaBC (Fig. 1e). The sequencing results revealed amino acid substitutions in the selected HpaB mutants (Table 1). Therefore, a highly active microbial tyrosine hydroxylase was successfully redesigned to replace mouse tyrosine hydroxylase.
Table 1.
Protein | Amino acid substitutions | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HpaBC | 15 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 284 |
Wild-type | T | S | A | Q | D |
23F9 | T | F | K | F | D |
23F9-M4 | P | F | K | F | E |
VanR | 103 | 148 | 168 | ||
Wild-type | Y | R | Y | ||
HyT5 | K | I | L | ||
HyT12 | L | L | M | ||
HyT19 | N | V | P | ||
HyT31 | P | V | N | ||
HyT55 | G | R | P | ||
HyT134 | I | S | P | ||
HyT172 | T | M | W | ||
TYO | 33 | 60 | 103 | 149 | 238 |
Wild-type | E | H | D | D | V |
YM9 | E | Q | Y | E | V |
YM9-2 | D | Q | Y | E | E |
Redesign of the hydroxytyrosol bi3osynthetic pathway
The HpaBC mutant 23F9-M4 was used to redesign the hydroxytyrosol biosynthetic pathway, with the removal of the regeneration system of cofactor MH413 (Fig. 1f). The redesigned pathway was constructed via a plasmid expressing an operon consisting of genes encoding mutant 23F9-M4, l-DOPA decarboxylase (DODC), and tyramine oxidase (TYO), as well as the E. coli endogenous alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH). As the knockout of gene feaB has been reported to be essential to achieve high yield and high purity of hydroxytyrosol13, we knocked out the feaB gene in strain BW25113 to obtain strain BHYT19. The plasmid copy number and the order of the three genes in the operon were optimized, in order to improve the hydroxytyrosol biosynthesis efficiency (Fig. 1g). Plasmid P2 carrying the RSF3010 replication origin resulted in high hydroxytyrosol production compared with that of the plasmid carrying the p15A replication origin. The gene order in plasmid P6 presented the highest hydroxytyrosol production (Fig. 1g). It was found that with the redesigned tyrosine hydroxylation step with plasmid P6, the tyrosine conversion rate reached 95%, which indicated that it was no longer a rate-limiting step. Although this rate-limiting step was solved, the hydroxytyrosol yield of the whole pathway was only around 50%. By analyzing the intracellular concentrations of biosynthetic intermediates, it was found that dopamine accumulated in large amounts in strain BHYT harboring plasmid P6 (Fig. 1g), indicating that the oxidation of dopamine to 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl acetaldehyde (3,4-DHPAA) was insufficient. This reaction was catalyzed by TYO, and it has become the rate-limiting step of the redesigned pathway. As this reaction generated NH3 and H2O2 which are toxic to the cell in high amounts, to avoid toxic intermediate accumulation, balanced activities between TYO and downstream pathway enzymes are critical for efficient hydroxytyrosol biosynthesis. Therefore, in vivo-directed evolution was performed to optimize the TYO activity. To minimize the negative effect of the toxic intermediates on biosynthesis, a high-throughput screening tool of the end product would help. Thus, a hydroxytyrosol biosensor was developed by engineering the regulatory protein VanR.
Crystal structure of VanR with bound vanillic acid
A regulatory protein from C. glutamicum, VanR, was chosen for effector specificity engineering to develop a hydroxytyrosol-responsive regulator. VanR belongs to the PadR family of regulatory proteins and has been proved to specifically respond to its effetor vanillic acid, a hydroxytyrosol analog20. As shown in Fig. 2a, vanillic acid binds to VanR with moderate affinity (Kd = 6.99 μM), but no binding was observed between hydroxytyrosol and VanR.
To facilitate VanR engineering, we determined the crystal structure of VanR complexed with vanillic acid (Supplementary Table 1). VanR functions as a homodimer and each monomer consists of an N-terminal winged helix-turn-helix (wHTH) domain which interacts with operator DNA, and a C-terminal homodimerization domain (Fig. 2b). Electronic densities of vanillic acids were found in the interface of two subunits (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 4a, b, Supplementary Fig. 5). Vanillic acid binds to a hydrophobic interdomain pocket formed by V29, Y168, M133, L145, and H142 from subunit A and Y103 of subunit B (Fig. 2d). Besides hydrophobic interaction, polar contacts largely contribute to the recognition of vanillic acid by VanR. Specifically, the carboxyl group of vanillic acid is electrostatically stabilized by salt bridges with R148 of subunit A and by hydrogen bond with the side chain of Y103 of subunit B. Furthermore, the hydroxyl and methoxyl groups on the benzene ring of vanillic acid form two hydrogen bonds with the side chains from Y168 of subunit A (Fig. 2d). Those three residues were highly conserved in different bacteria (Supplementary Fig. 4c), suggesting they are essential for ligand recognition.
Development of a hydroxytyrosol-responsive VanR mutant
In C. glutamicum, VanR regulates the expression of the vanABK operon, which is responsible for the catabolism of vanillic acid. In the absence of vanillic acid, the VanR protein binds to a 28-bp operator sequence downstream of +1 position of the PvanABK promoter and represses the transcription of the vanABK operon. When vanillic acid is present, it binds to the VanR protein, inducing a conformational change which releases the promoter DNA, thus activating the operon transcription20. Directly introducing the whole promoter region (95-bp) into E. coli cells could not initiate downstream gene transcription (data not shown). To adapt a functional VanR regulatory system in E. coli, after sequence analysis, the −10 region of promoter PvanABK (CAATAT) was replaced with the −10 region of the tac promoter (Ptac) (TATAAT) frequently used in E. coli (Fig. 3a) to generate promoter PvanABK’. The resultant promotor successfully regulated the downstream rfp gene expression in response to vanillic acid in the presence of the constitutively expressed VanR protein in E. coli, with plasmid pVanR (Supplementary Figs. 6, 7).
To alter the effector specificity of VanR, amino acid residues Y103, R148, and Y168, were chosen for simultaneous site-saturation mutagenesis (Fig. 2d). The library was constructed using plasmid pVanR and used to transforming strain E. coli BW25113 (3.5 × 105 transformants). The transformants were screened by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). One round of negative screening was performed by sorting the least fluorescent cells (2.8 × 105) in the presence of 1 mM each of tyrosine, l-DOPA, dopamine and 3,4-DHPAA, in order to remove the VanR variants responsive to the substrate and intermediates in hydroxytyrosol biosynthesis. One round of positive screening was then performed by sorting the most fluorescent cells (3.5 × 103) in the presence of 1 mM hydroxytyrosol (Fig. 3b). After seven rounds of dual screening, seven variants responsive to hydroxytyrosol but not the substrate and intermediates were selected. Among them variant HyT12 exhibited the highest induction fold towards hydroxytyrosol and was used for downstream characterizations (Fig. 3c). The sequencing results revealed amino acid substitutions (Y103L, R148L and Y168M) in HyT12. Figure 3d depicts RFP fluorescence of strain BW25113 expressing variant HyT12, as a function of hydroxytyrosol concentration. Approximately 6-fold induction of RFP expression was achieved over a hydroxytyrosol concentration range of 0–10 mM, with half-maximal induction occurring at ~0.5 mM. Wild-type VanR exhibited no response towards hydroxytyrosol. The induction effects of the biosynthetic substrate tyrosine and the intermediates l-DOPA, 3,4-DHPAA and dopamine, as well as the original inducer vanillic acid, were determined individually, by comparing with those of hydroxytyrosol. As shown in Fig. 3e, the HyT12 variant showed a good specific response towards hydroxytyrosol, compared with that of the other tested compounds, indicating that negative screening using a mixture of the biosynthetic substrate and intermediates was definitely effective. This induction specificity is critical for the application of HyT12 variant as a hydroxytyrosol biosensor for high-throughput screening. Additionally, we modeled the binding of hydroxytyrosol to the VanR mutants. As shown in the modeling data in Supplementary Fig. 8a, we found a significantly higher Rosseta function score of HyT12 than that of the other mutants, indicating a considerable conformational change in HyT12 to accommodate the ligand. As depicted in Supplementary Fig. 8b, hydroxytyrosol would form hydrogen bond with the side chain of T144 and H142, and the hydroxyl tail was accommodated by a hydrophobic cavity formed by V32, K164, A167, M168 from subunit A and A102 and L103 from subunit B. The amino acid substitutions in various VanR variants are shown in Table 1.
Application of a whole-cell hydroxytyrosol biosensor
As depicted in Fig. 4a, strain H2 was constructed by integrating the constitutively expressed HyT12 and the PvanABK’-lacZ construct into the chromosome of strain BHYT. We used β-galactosidase encoded by lacZ as a reporter to facilitate the subsequent screening on agar plates. Strain H2 was then transformed with plasmid P6 or the control plasmid without the tyo gene absent. As shown in Fig. 4b, the results indicated that the developed whole-cell hydroxytyrosol biosensor could effectively report intracellular hydroxytyrosol production.
In vivo-directed evolution was used to optimize the activity of TYO in the biosynthetic pathway and the hydroxytyrosol whole-cell biosensor was used for high-throughput screening. A random mutagenesis library of TYO was constructed with plasmid P6 and was used to transform strain H2. The deep blue colonies, which were supposed to be hydroxytyrosol hyper-producers, were selected on agar plates supplemented with 3 mM tyrosine and 40 µg mL−1 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-d-galactopyranoside (X-GAL). Twelve clones were selected from 1.0 × 106 transformants screened, and they were re-screened by quantifying hydroxytyrosol production from liquid culture. Variant YM9 was found to produce the highest amount of hydroxytyrosol (Supplementary Fig. 9a). To further optimize the TYO activity, a random mutagenesis library was constructed using variant YM9 as a template, and the library was subjected to high-throughput screening as described above except with 6 mM tyrosine supplementation. Six clones exhibiting high hydroxytyrosol production were selected, and variant YM9-2 produced the highest amount of hydroxytyrosol (Supplementary Fig. 9b). As shown in Fig. 4c, when cultured in the presence of 1 mM tyrosine, clones YM9 and YM9-2 displayed a ~1.49- and 2.02-fold increase in hydroxytyrosol production, respectively, compared with that of the strain harboring pathway expressing wild-type TYO. The hydroxytyrosol yield of clone YM9-2 reached 95%. Sequencing results revealed amino acid substitutions in the mutated TYOs (Table 1).
As shown in Fig. 4d-f, the time course of the concentration of hydroxytyrosol and intermediates, as well as the consumption of tyrosine, was determined, with strain BHYT harboring plasmids P6, P8 (plasmid P6 expressing TYO YM9), and P9 (plasmid P6 expressing TYO YM9-2) cultured in a 5-L fermentor. The strains were cultured in the presence of 15 mM tyrsosine. For strain harboring plasmid P6, the hydroxytyrosol yield was 50% and a large amount of dopamine was accumulated. In strain harboring plasmid P8 (pathway expressing the TYO mutant YM9), dopamine accumulation was alleviated and hydroxytyrosol production was improved. As for strain harboring plasmid P9 (pathway expressing the TYO mutant YM9-2), the accumulation of dopamine was considerably reduced and the hydroxytyrosol yield reached 90% (Fig. 4f), comparing with 33.3% in the presence of wild-type TYO (Fig. 4d).
Fed-batch fermentation and whole-cell biotransformation were both performed to produce hydroxytyrosol from tyrosine. In fed-batch fermentation, strain harboring plasmid P9 was cultured in a 5-L fermentor in the presence of 1 mM l-arabinose, and 7.5 mM of tyrosine was fed with at 0, 12, 24 and 36 h. The time course of hydroxytyrosol production was analyzed (Supplementary Fig. 10). It was found that after 48 h at 37 °C, the hydroxytyrosol production was ~3,373 mg L−1. In whole-cell biotransformation, cells harboring plasmid P9 was resuspended in 1 L (OD600 = 50) of 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) with 15 mM tyrosine. An additional 30 mM of tyrosine was supplemented at 12 h and the biotransformation was extended to 48 h at 37 °C. A rotating speed of 100 rpm and air flow rate of 1.0 vvm were used, with pH maintained at 7.5. The final hydroxytyrosol production reached 4,690 mg L−1, which was higher than reported so far.
Analysis and characterization of wild-type and mutant TYOs
The genes encoding wild-type or mutant TYOs were cloned into the pET28a vector and expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) as N-terminal His-tagged fusion proteins. The enzymes were then purified for activity assay and kinetic parameter determination. As shown in Fig. 4g, the TYO variants YM9 and YM9-2 exhibited ~1.3- and ~1.6-fold increase in specific activity, respectively, relative to that of the wild-type enzyme. This corresponded well with hydroxytyrosol productions (Fig. 4c). The results indicated that the improved activity of the rate-limiting enzyme, TYO, underlies enhanced hydroxytyrosol productions in the selected hyper-producing strains. The kinetic parameters of the mutant TYOs were determined, along with the wild-type enzyme (Table 2). Our data revealed that the affinity of the mutant enzymes for substrate dopamine increased. The catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of the mutant enzymes YM9 and YM9-2 showed ~1.7- and ~3.3-fold improvements compared with that of the wild-type enzyme, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2.
Enzymes | Km | kcat | kcat/Km |
---|---|---|---|
TYO wild-type | 8.48 ± 1.06 | 115.11 ± 21.95 | 13.52 ± 1.22 |
TYO YM9 | 6.67 ± 0.72 | 156.71 ± 16.99 | 23.48 ± 0.27 |
TYO YM9-2 | 4.30 ± 0.37 | 194.42 ± 16.43 | 45.20 ± 0.45 |
± values represent standard deviations from three independent data points. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Discussion
Tyrosine hydroxylase is the key enzyme in the biosynthesis of catecholamines dopamine, epinephrine and norepinephrine in animals, which are hormones and neurotransmitters in both the central and peripheral nervous systems21. Tyrosine hydroxylase uses tetrahydrobiopterin as a cofactor, and its activity is regulated by phosphorylation and also feedback inhibited by the catecholamine neurotransmitters22. Due to its complicated regulation properties and the necessity for cofactor regeneration cycle, acting as the first catalytic step, it severely reduces the biosynthesis efficiency of the hydroxytyrosol pathway13. To redesign this pathway, a non-natual microbial tyrosine hydroxylase was developed by engineering substrate specificity of the two-component flavin-dependent monooxygenase, HpaBC, from E. coli strain BL21(DE3). The wild-type HpaBC showed negligible activity on tyrosine16. By engineering its substrate-binding pocket, a highly active tyrosine hydroxylase was obtained, which possessed no allosteric inhibitory property and was expressed very well in E. coli cells. Thus, it was suitable for replacing the animal-sourced tyrosine hydroxylase for hydroxytyrosol biosynthesis in E. coli. The conversion rate of tyrosine significantly increased in the presence of this microbial tyrosine hydroxylase.
Innate transcriptional regulatory protein (TRP)-based biosensors are widely-used in natural product high-throughput screening23–26. However, under most circumstances, innate transcription factors responsive to targeted compounds are not available. Studies on development and application of non-natural transcription factors with altered specificity are limited8–10. Since there is no regulatory protein responsive to hydroxytyrosol reported so far, a non-natural hydroxytyrosol biosensor has been customized by altering the induction specificity of VanR regulatory protein. The specificity of a biosensor used as a high-throughput screening tool to optimize the pathway efficiency is critical, because it should not respond to the biosynthetic substrate or intermediates. However, performing negative screenings for each of substrate and intermediates in hydroxytyrosol biosynthetic pathway is time-consuming. Thus, a mixture of these compounds was used in a single round of negative screening, while hydroxytyrosol was used in the positive screening. A VanR mutant specifically responsive to hydroxytyrosol was successfully selected, indicating the effectiveness of this screening strategy. Thus the strategy for customizing biosensors for small molecules synthesized through multiple-step pathways has been advanced.
Structural information provides key clues for redesigning proteins including enzymes, sensors, and probes. Polar contacts between ligand and protein, including hydrogen bond and salt bridge, are very critical for redesigning. The crystal structures of both HpaBC and VanR are essential for the development of this redesigned synthetic pathway of hydroxytyrosol. Binding of substrate to HpaBC induced a conformational transition of loop from an open state to a closed state. The flexibility of this loop probably allows different analogs to enter the catalytic pocket. Changes in amino acids of this loop probably result in a different selectivity of substrates. In our model, S210 had a polar contact with 4-HPA, however, A211 and Q212 could also be involved in the recognition of ligands due to flexibility. T196 and A197 of ThHpaBC, located at similar positions as S210 and A211 of EcHpaBC would form hydrogen bond with 4-HPA. As for VanR, all three residues had polar contacts with vanillic acid and were chosen to engineer in our screening. Although HyT12 showed the highest response to the ligand, the other six variants also demonstrate comparable effects. Interestingly, we found the highest Rosetta function score in HyT12 that showed the highest response to ligand. This indicates that changes in the overall conformation of VanR might be important for its function, as the highest response of HyT12 might come from the release of DNA in the DBD domain upon ligand binding. Compared to rational design, the semi-rational design might be more efficient in our case.
Balancing pathway enzyme activities has been proved critical for pathway efficiency23,24. The reaction catalyzed by TYO, the rate-limiting enzyme of the redesigned hydroxytyrosol pathway, generated ammonia and hydrogen peroxide25,26, thus, an optimal activity instead of extremely high activity would benefit the whole pathway efficiency. In vivo-directed evolution combined with high-throughput screening of the end product is a good strategy for optimizing this enzyme to achieve improved hydroxytyrosol biosynthetic efficiency, by avoiding the toxicity caused by intermediate accumulation. In vivo-directed evolution is advantageous for pathway engineering because it better optimizes the metabolic fluxes by adapting to the intracellular environment, which could not be well managed by in vitro protein engineering strategies. On the contrary, for the rate-limiting enzymes with extremely low activity, it is more rapidly to improve the pathway efficiency by simply replacing them with redesigned enzymes, for example, the redesigned microbial tyrosine hydroxylase described above.
Engineering pathway rate-limiting enzyme to improve biosynthetic efficiency has been adopted in combinatorial biosynthesis. However, unblocking one rate-limiting step does not necessarily solve the overall efficiency of the whole-cell catalysts, especially when the catalytic steps are more than three. Subsequent rate-limiting steps usually come into being. Sequentially identifying and solving these steps until the overall conversion rate reaches close to 100% is the final goal and crucial task of whole-cell catalyst development. The strategies for de-bottlenecking rate-limiting steps can be diverse, depending on the features of the steps. Apart from the two strategies used in this study, other strategies include cofactor regeneration, branch pathway blocking, and so on.
As a value-added compound with a variety of biological activities, hydroxytyrosol biosynthesis has been reported through various pathways13–15,19. Previously, with tyrosine as substrate, hydroxytyrosol productions of 29.29 mg L−1 (~19% yield)13, 208 mg L−1 14, 1243 mg L−1 (~48% yield)15 and 1890 mg L−1 (82% yield)19 have been achieved. l-DOPA is used for treating Parkinson’s disease and also a precursor for synthesizing valued benzylisoquinoline alkaloids27,28. Various biotechnological approaches have been applied for l-DOPA production, including microbial fermentation, immobilized tyrosinase as well as electroenzymatic system29. Previous studies have revealed an over 3.5 mg L−1 of l-DOPA production from glucose in yeast, using a tyrosine hydroxylase developed from a cytochrome P450 l-DOPA oxidase30,31. In our study, hydroxytyrosol production from fed-batch fermentation has reached ~3373 mg L−1. Whole-cell transformation further improved the production to ~4690 mg L−1. Furthermore, the HpaBC mutant 23F9-M4, which synthesized 443.7 mg L−1 l-DOPA from 3 mM tyrosine, is also potentially applicable for l-DOPA production.
In conclusion, in this study, the first rate-limiting enzyme in the hydroxytyrosol biosynthetic pathway, mouse tyrosine hydroxylase, was replaced with an artificially designed high-efficient microbial tyrosine hydroxylase. This redesigned step converted 95% of tyrosine to l-DOPA, and the rate-limiting step of the pathway moved to dopamine oxidation catalyzed by TYO. The second rate-limiting step was optimized by in vivo-directed evolution, with the aid of a hydroxytyrosol biosensor. The crystal structure of the regulatory protein VanR from C. glutamicum complexed with its inducer was elucidated based on which a hydroxytyrosol biosensor was developed by altering the induction specificity of VanR. With this biosensor as an end product high-throughput screening tool, the TYO activity was optimized, further improving the hydroxytyrosol yield to 95%, the highest as reported to date13–15,19. This study has demonstrated that a powerful whole-cell biocatalyst can be developed by sequentially de-bottlenecking the rate-limiting steps, which should be generally applied in other combinatorial biosynthesis studies.
Methods
General
The biosynthetic substrate, product and intermediates used in this study were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). The T4 polynucleotide kinase, T4 DNA ligase, restriction enzymes and DNA polymerase used in this study were obtained from Takara Bio (Dalian, China). Hieff Clone Plus Multi One Step Cloning Kit was obtained from YEASEN Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Life Technologies (Shanghai, China).
E. coli strains MC1061 and BL21(DE3) were used for cloning and protein overexpression, respectively. Strains were grown at 37 °C in the indicated medium. Ampicillin (100 μg mL−1) and kanamycin (50 μg mL−1) were supplemented when required. Hydroxytyrosol biosynthesis was performed in yeast extract M9Y medium (M9 minimal salts, 1% (w/v) glucose, 5 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM CaCl2 supplemented with 0.025% (w/v) of yeast extract)13, while other cultures were done in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium if not specially indicated.
Plasmid construction
All plasmids and primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Data 1 and 2, respectively. The dodc gene encoding l-DOPA decarboxylase (Genbank accession No. BK006920.1) was amplified from the genome of strain Pseudomonas putida KT2440. The tyo gene from Micrococcus luteus encoding tyramine oxidase (Genbank accession No. AB010716.1) was synthesized after codon optimization19. The purified gene fragments hpaB23F9-M4C, dodc, tyo, tyoMUT1, tyoMUT1-22 were assembled with the vector fragment of pFA or pRSF19, using Hieff Clone Plus Multi One Step Cloning Kit (YEASEN, Shanghai, China), resulting in plasmids pFA-hpaB23F9-M4C-dodc-tyo (P1), pRSF- hpaB23F9-M4C-dodc-tyo (P2), pRSF- hpaB23F9-M4C-tyo-dodc (P3), pRSF-dodc-tyo- hpaB23F9-M4C (P4), pRSF-dodc- hpaB23F9-M4C-tyo (P5), pRSF-tyo- hpaB23F9-M4C-dodc (P6), and pRSF-tyo-dodc- hpaB23F9-M4C (P7), pRSF-tyoMUT1- hpaB23F9-M4C-dodc (P8), pRSF-tyoMUT1-22- hpaB23F9-M4C-dodc (P9). The genes were cloned in different orders in the operons.
The th gene encoding tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) from mouse (Genbank accession No. NP_033403), the pcd gene encoding pterin-4α-carbinolamine dehydratase (PCD) from human (Genbank accession No. NP_000272) and the dhpr gene encoding dihydropteridine reductase (DHPR) from human (Genbank accession NO.P09417) were synthesized by General Biosystems (Chuzhou,China) after codon optimization (Supplementary Data 3). The DNA fragments containing genes th, pcd, dhpr and vector pRSF19 were amplified using primer pairs th-Gibson-1/th-Gibson-2, pcd-Gibson-1/pcd-Gibson-2, dhpr-Gibson-1/dhpr-Gibson-2 and pRSF-Gibson-1/pRSF-Gibson-2, respectively, and then were assembled using Hieff Clone Plus Multi One Step Cloning Kit (YEASEN, Shanghai, China), resulting in plasmid pRSF-th-pcd-dhpr.
The fragment containing promoter region of vanABK operon (PvanABK) was amplified using the genome of strain C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 as template with primers PvanABK-Gibson-1 and PvanABK-Gibson-2. The vector fragment was amplified using plasmid pSHYa as template with primers pSHYa-backbone-Gibson-1 and pSHYa-backbone-Gibson-2. The two purified fragments were assembled using Hieff Clone Plus Multi one Step Cloning Kit (YEASEN, Shanghai, China), resulting in plasmid pVan. The mutations in the promoter region were introduced with Stratagene QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies Inc, Santa Clara, USA).
The fragment containing the vanR gene encoding transcriptional regulatory protein (Genbank accession No. 1020332) was amplified using the genome of strain C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 as template with primers vanR-Gibson-1 and vanR-Gibson-2. Using plasmid pVan as template, amplification was performed with primers pVanR-backbone-Gibson-1 and pVanR-backbone-Gibson-2. The two purified fragments were assembled using Hieff Clone Plus Multi One Step Cloning Kit, resulting in plasmid pVanR.
The wild-type or mutant vanR genes were amplified using plasmid pVanR as template with primers VanR-for-EcoRI and VanR-rev-XhoI, and ligated into plasmid pGEX-6p-1 after digestion with EcoRI and XhoI, resulting in plasmid pGEX-6p-1-vanR carrying wild-type or mutant vanR gene.
Strain construction and culture conditions
The lacZ gene was amplified from the genomic DNA of strain MG1655 with primers lacZ-for-KpnI and lacZ-rev-BglII and ligated into plasmid pVanR carrying gene encoding the VanR mutant HyT12, after digestion with KpnI and BglII. Then the fragment containing PvanABK’ controlled lacZ (PvanABK’-lacZ) and gene encoding the VanR mutant HyT12 was amplified with primers pAH156-PvanABK’-for and pAH156-PvanABK’-rev, and assembled with the PCR fragment amplified with primers vanR-pAH156-for and pAH156-PvanABK’-rev using the CRIM plasmid pAH15632 as template, by Gibson Assembly. The construct was then integrated into the chromosome of strain BHYT using helper plasmid pAH6932, resulting in strain H2. The integration was verified by PCR.
Library construction
A site-saturation mutagenesis library of HpaBC with amino acid residues S210, A211 and Q212 in the HpaB component randomized was constructed on plasmid pFA-hpaBC19 with primers hpaBC-Saturated-for and hpaBC-Saturated-rev19. Around 105 transformants were collected for downstream screening.
To construct a random mutagenesis library based on the HpaB mutant 23F9, Error-prone PCR was performed using plasmid pFA-hpaB23F9C as template with primers hpaB-ErrorProne-for and hpaB-ErrorProne-rev. The PCR reaction was done as described19. The PCR products obtained, containing randomly mutated hpaB23F9 gene, were used as the megaprimer to perform the MEGAWHOP PCR33 using plasmid pFA-hpaB23F9C as template. DpnI (20 U) digestion was performed at 37 °C for 2 h and then inactivated at 80 °C for 20 min. Then the PCR products were used to transform strain E. coli MC1061 and around 105 transformants were recovered. Randomly picked clones from the libraries were sequenced, and an average of 2.5 nucleotide mutations per clone was confirmed. All colonies from the agar plates were used for plasmid isolation to prepare the plasmid library.
To construct the site-saturation mutagenesis library of VanR, two parallel PCR reactions were performed with plasmid pVanR as template using the following two sets of primers: vanR1-for/vanR1-rev and vanR2-for/vanR2-rev. The two amplified fragments, vanR-F1 and vanR-F2, contained the site-saturation mutagenesis at positions 103, 143 and 168. Equimolar aliquots of the two fragments (1.6 nmole each) were PCR-assembled without primers, and then primers vanR-F0-for and vanR-F0-rev were added to amplify the PCR products. The PCR products were used as megaprimer to perform MEGAWHOP PCR using pVanR as template as described above. Around 5×104 transformants were recovered. Randomly picked clones from the library were sequenced, and the mutations at the indicated positions were confirmed with no additional point mutations.
The construction of the random mutagenesis library of TYO was similar to the HpaBC random mutagenesis library as described above, except that primer pairs tyo-ErrorProne-for/tyo-ErrorProne-rev and template plasmid pRSF-tyo-hpaB23F9-M4C-dodc carrying the gene encoding TYO wild-type or mutant MUT1 were used. A total of 104 transformants were recovered and randomly picked clones were sequenced and contained an average of 3 (library of wild-type tyo) or 2.5 (library of tyo-mut1) nucleotide mutations per clone.
High-throughput screening of the mutagenesis libraries
The HpaBC library was screened with the periodate assay method34. Single colonies of strain BHYT harboring mutants from the site-saturation mutagenesis library of HpaB or random mutagenesis library of HpaB mutant 23F9 were grown in 0.6 mL M9Y medium in 96-well plates at 37 °C for 24 h, induced with 1 mM l-arabinose and supplemented with 3 mM tyrosine as substrate. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (1840 × g, 10 min, 4 °C). 180 μL of the supernatant was added into 20 μL of 100 mM sodium periodate, and OD400 of the reaction mixture was determined by a SynergyMx Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (BioTek, Vermont, USA). Mutants showing higher absorbance than the parent enzymes were selected.
The VanR plasmid library was used to transform strain BW25113 (3.5 × 105 transformants were recovered). FACS screening was performed on a FACSAria II sorter (BD, San Jose, USA). Fluorescence was excited at 561 nm and the fluorescence emission was detected using a 610/20 nm band-pass filter. In the first round of negative screening, cells were precultured overnight in LB medium and then diluted to OD600 = 0.2 in the same medium in the presence of 1 mM tyrosine, 1 mM l-DOPA, 1 mM dopamine and 1 mM 3,4-DHPAA. The cells were then grown for 12 h and the least fluorescent 2.8 × 105 cells were collected from a total of 3.5 × 105 cells, to eliminate clones that were induced by substrate and biosynthetic intermediate compounds. The collected cells were then induced with 1 mM hydroxytyrosol and grown for 12 h to enable positive screening, in which the most fluorescent 3.5 × 103 cells were sorted from a total of 3.5 × 105 cells (Supplementary Fig. 11). These itinerary screens were repeated for seven times, and seven clones were selected for rescreening in test tubes.
The TYO random mutagenesis libraries were screening on agar plates. The libraries were used to transform strain H2. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h on YM9 agar supplemented with 3–6 mM tyrosine, 1 mM l-arabinose, 20 μg mL−1 X-GAL and 50 μg mL−1 kanamycin, the darkest blue colonies (by the eye) were selected for quantification of hydroxytyrosol productions in liquid culture.
HPLC quantification
A colony of strain BW25113 harboring plasmid pFA-hpaBC19 carrying wild-type or mutant hpaBC gene, or strain BHYT harboring the hydroxytyrosol biosynthetic pathway, was grown in M9Y medium at 37 °C till OD600 = 0.6, then the cells were induced with 1 mM l-arabinose and 3 mM tyrosine was supplemented. After further grown at 37 °C for 24 h, the cell culture was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min, and the supernatant was filtrated through a 0.22 μm filter and analyzed with HPLC. Concentrations of l-DOPA, tyrosine and hydroxytyrosol were determined by HPLC19. The concentrations of dopamine were determined after derivation with dansylcholoride, detected at 254 nm, by HPLC19.
Protein expression and purification
A single colony of strain BL21(DE3) harboring plasmid pGEX-6p-1-vanR carrying wild-type or mutant vanR (Y103L, R148L and Y168M), was grown in LB medium at 37 °C till OD600 = 0.6, then induced with 0.4 mM IPTG. Full length of wild-type and mutant VanR were expressed as GST fusion protein in strain BL21(DE3). Proteins were purified using a glutathione Sephararose 4B column. After the GST-tag was cleaved by PreScission protease (GE Healthcare), the proteins were further purified by a second glutathione Sephararose 4B column, the collected fractions containing target proteins were then loaded into MonoQ column for further purification with a linear gradient elution, and fractions containing VanR or mutant VanR from MonoQ were finally purified through Supperdex 75 (GE Healthcare) column equilibrated with buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT). The wild-type and mutant VanR were concentrated to 10 mg mL−1 and stored at −80 °C for use.
The purification of HpaB and HpaC were performed using nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) column (Qiagen, Valencia, USA)19. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was used to assess the protein purity. Protein concentration was assayed with Bradford method35.
Crystallization and structure determination
Purified VanR was concentrated to 7 mg mL−1. VanR and vanillic acid were incubated for on ice 2 h before crystallization. Crystal was obtained in 0.2 M magnesium chloride, 0.1 M Tris pH 8.0, 12% PEG4000 by hanging drop method at 18 °C. Then the crystal was flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen to −170 °C. The diffraction data were collected at 100 K at the synchrotron radiation at beam line of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility. The diffraction data sets were integrated and scaled with XDS package36,37. The structure of VanR complexed with vanillic acid was solved by molecular replacement using the structure of smu.1604c from Streptococcus mutants UA159 (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/3L9F) as the initial model with Phaser38. Refmac 5 and Coot9 in CCP4 suite were used for the refinement and model building39,40.
Isothermal titration calorimetry
For isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC measurement), the purified wild-type or mutant VanR was dialysis overnight at 4 °C against 20 mM phosphate buffer containing 150 mM sodium chloride, pH 7.4. Vanillic acid was dissolved in the same buffer. Isothermal titration calorimetry was carried out at 25 °C on an ITC200 system (MicroCal). 200 μM vanillic acid was titrated into 20 μM VanR. A titration of vanillic acid into buffer was carried out as a control. Data were fitted and analyzed using Origin 7 (MicroCal).
Molecular modeling
To generate the active HpaBC complexes with FAD and 4-HPA, we modeled an active structure using ThHpaBC (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/2YYJ) as a template by Modoller 9.2018,41. We replace the loop of apo HpaBC (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6QW0) with the previously modeled loop (residues 206–218) by YASARA. Then the model was further minimized using GROMACS under force field gromacs 9642. Finally, FAD and 4-HPA were docked to model by Autodock Vina43.
The structures of screened VanR mutants were manually generated in Coot44. Then Rosseta ligand docking45,46 was used to calculate the binding model. The conformation with lowest docking score were choose as final model, and Rosseta functions were used to evaluate the change of mutant proteins.
Activity assay of HpaBC and TYO
The activity assay of TYO was performed at 37 °C by monitoring the absorbance increase at 240 nm which indicates the formation of H2O247. A reaction mixture (200 μL) for the assay contained 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.75 mM dopamine and 0.002 mg mL−1 purified TYO protein. Reaction was performed at 37 °C for 10 min. The H2O2 formation was monitored at 240 nm, with a SynergyMx Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (BioTek, USA). One unit of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the production of 1 μM of H2O2 per min.
The HpaBC activity was assayed by quantifying the product formation with HPLC. One unit of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme catalyzing the conversion of 1 mM tyrosine per minute under the assay conditions19.
Kinetic parameters determination
The kinetic parameters of TYO enzyme were determined by Lineweaver-Burk plots. TYO activity assay was performed as described above at different dopamine concentrations (0.75~1.50 mM).
Measurement of β-galactosidase activities
The β-galactosidase activity was measured using the substrate o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG)48. Crude enzyme extracts were prepared by ultrasonication, and 10 μL of the crude enzyme extract was incubated with 140 μL of McIlvaine buffer (200 mM Na2HPO4, 100 mM citric acid, pH 6.0) containing 1 mM ONPG at 37 °C for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 150 μL of 200 mM Na2CO3. The absorbance increase at 420 nm resulted from the release of o-nitrophenol (ONP) was measured. One unit (U) of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to liberate the equivalent of 1 μmoL of ONP perminute under the assay conditions.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Junying Jia and Dr. Shuang Sun from Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences for FACS screening. Financial support was provided by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant 2018YFA0900701) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31961133016, 31870072, 31971382 and 31971337).
Source Data
Author contributions
S.-Y.T., H.S., W.C., and J.-M.J conceived the idea and supervised the research. J.Y. and W.C. did the construction of strains, plasmids and libraries. Y.H. did molecular modeling. J.Y. did the screening of HpaBC variants and TYO variants. Y.H., N.S., and S.B. did protein expression, purification, crystallization and structure determination. C.W. did the screening of VanR variants and the construction of biosensor. J.Y. and W.C. did the HPLC analysis. J.Y. did enzyme activity assay and kinetic parameters determination. Y.H. did isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). W.C. did flux analysis. Y.T. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools for fed-batch fermentation as well as whole-cell biotransformation and critically reviewed the manuscript. S.-Y.T., H.S., W.C., and J.-M.J performed data analysis and wrote the paper. All of the authors reviewed, approved and contributed to the final version of the manuscript.
Data availability
A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary Information file. Data supporting the findings of this work are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files. The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Structure of VanR complexed with vanillic acid has been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code of 6LG2 [https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6LG2]. The source data underlying Figs. 1b, d, e, g, 3c-e, and 4b-g, Table 2, as well as Supplementary Figs. 2, 3, 7, 8a, 9, and 10 are provided as a Source Data file.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Michael Jensen and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Jun Yao, Yang He.
Contributor Information
Jian-Ming Jin, Email: jinjianming@btbu.edu.cn.
Wei Chen, Email: chenw@im.ac.cn.
Haiwei Song, Email: haiwei@imcb.a-star.edu.sg.
Shuang-Yan Tang, Email: tangsy@im.ac.cn.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-020-14918-5.
References
- 1.Wachtmeister J, Rother D. Recent advances in whole cell biocatalysis techniques bridging from investigative to industrial scale. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2016;42:169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dhamankar H, Prather KLJ. Microbial chemical factories: recent advances in pathway engineering for synthesis of value added chemicals. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2011;21:488–494. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mir R, Jallu S, Singh TP. The shikimate pathway: review of amino acid sequence, function and three-dimensional structures of the enzymes. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2015;41:172–189. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2013.813901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Erb TJ, Jones PR, Bar-Even A. Synthetic metabolism: metabolic engineering meets enzyme design. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2017;37:56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.12.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lv XM, et al. Combinatorial pathway optimization in Escherichia coli by directed co-evolution of rate-limiting enzymes and modular pathway engineering. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016;113:2661–2669. doi: 10.1002/bit.26034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Machovina MM, et al. Enabling microbial syringol conversion through structure-guided protein engineering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:13970–13976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820001116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tang SY, et al. Screening for enhanced triacetic acid lactone production by recombinant Escherichia coli expressing a designed triacetic acid lactone reporter. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:10099–10103. doi: 10.1021/ja402654z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xiong DD, et al. Improving key enzyme activity in phenylpropanoid pathway with a designed biosensor. Metab. Eng. 2017;40:115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li H, et al. Monitoring in vivo metabolic flux with a designed whole-cell metabolite biosensor of shikimic acid. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017;98:457–465. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen W, et al. Design of an ectoine-responsive AraC mutant and its application in metabolic engineering of ectoine biosynthesis. Metab. Eng. 2015;30:149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Granados-Principal S, Quiles JL, Ramirez-Tortosa CL, Sanchez-Rovira P, Ramirez-Tortosa MC. Hydroxytyrosol: from laboratory investigations to future clinical trials. Nutr. Rev. 2010;68:191–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bernini R, MSG Montani, Merendino N, Romani A, Velotti F. Hydroxytyrosol-derived compounds: a basis for the creation of new pharmacological agents for cancer prevention and therapy. J. Med. Chem. 2015;58:9089–9107. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Satoh Y, Tajima K, Munekata M, Keasling JD, Lee TS. Engineering of L-tyrosine oxidation in Escherichia coli and microbial production of hydroxytyrosol. Metab. Eng. 2012;14:603–610. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2012.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chung D, Kim SY, Ahn JH. Production of three phenylethanoids, tyrosol, hydroxytyrosol, and salidroside, using plant genes expressing in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:2578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02042-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li XL, et al. Establishing an artificial pathway for efficient biosynthesis of hydroxytyrosol. ACS Synth. Biol. 2018;7:647–654. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Prieto MA, Perezaranda A, Garcia JL. Characterization of an Escherichia coli aromatic hydroxylase with a broad substrate range. J. Bacteriol. 1993;175:2162–2167. doi: 10.1128/JB.175.7.2162-2167.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shen XL, et al. Structural insights into catalytic versatility of the flavin-dependent hydroxylase (HpaB) from Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:7087. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43577-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim SH, et al. Crystal structure of the oxygenase component (HpaB) of the 4-hydroxyphenylacetate 3-monooxygenase from Thermus thermophilus HB8. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:33107–33117. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703440200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen W, et al. Promiscuous enzymatic activity-aided multiple-pathway network design for metabolic flux rearrangement in hydroxytyrosol biosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:960. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08781-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Heravi KM, Lange J, Watzlawick H, Kalinowski J, Altenbuchner J. Transcriptional regulation of the vanillate utilization genes (vanABK operon) of Corynebacterium glutamicum by VanR, a PadR-like repressor. J. Bacteriol. 2015;197:959–972. doi: 10.1128/JB.02431-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Daubner SC, Le T, Wang SZ. Tyrosine hydroxylase and regulation of dopamine synthesis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2011;508:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2010.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Maass A, Scholz J, Moser A. Modeled ligand-protein complexes elucidate the origin of substrate specificity and provide insight into catalytic mechanisms of phenylalanine hydroxylase and tyrosine hydroxylase. Eur. J. Biochem. 2003;270:1065–1075. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03429.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rogers JK, et al. Synthetic biosensors for precise gene control and real-time monitoring of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:7648–7660. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Skjoedt ML, et al. Engineering prokaryotic transcriptional activators as metabolite biosensors in yeast. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016;12:951–958. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu YF, et al. Biosensor-based evolution and elucidation of a biosynthetic pathway in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth. Biol. 2017;6:837–848. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yu H, et al. Engineering transcription factor BmoR for screening butanol overproducers. Metab. Eng. 2019;56:28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2019.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Barbeau A. L-Dopa therapy in Parkinsons disease: a critical review of nine years experience. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1970;101:59–68. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hagel JM, Facchini PJ. Benzylisoquinoline alkaloid metabolism: a century of discovery and a brave new world. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013;54:647–672. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pct020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Min K, Park K, Park DH, Yoo YJ. Overview on the biotechnological production of L-DOPA. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2015;99:575–584. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6215-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.DeLoache WC, et al. An enzyme-coupled biosensor enables (S)-reticuline production in yeast from glucose. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015;11:465–471. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Savitskaya J, Protzko RJ, Li FZ, Arkin AP, Dueber JE. Iterative screening methodology enables isolation of strains with improved properties for a FACS-based screen and increased L-DOPA production. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:5815. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41759-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Haldimann A, Wanner BL. Conditional-replication, integration, excision, and retrieval plasmid-host systems for gene structure-function studies of bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 2001;183:6384–6393. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.21.6384-6393.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Miyazaki K. Megawhop cloning: A method of creating random mutagenesis libraries via megaprimer PCR of whole plasmids. Method Enzymol. 2011;498:399–406. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385120-8.00017-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Orenes-Pinero E, Garcia-Carmona F, Sanchez-Ferrer A. A new process for obtaining hydroxytyrosol using transformed Escherichia coli whole cells with phenol hydroxylase gene from Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius. Food Chem. 2013;139:377–383. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.12.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bradford MM. A Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kabsch W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2010;66:125–132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909047337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Evans P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2006;62:72–82. doi: 10.1107/S0907444905036693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mccoy AJ, et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2007;40:658–674. doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2004;60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Murshudov GN, et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2011;67:355–367. doi: 10.1107/S0907444911001314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Webb B, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma. 2014;47:5.6.1–32. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0506s47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pronk S, et al. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:845–854. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Trott O, Olson AJ. Software news and update AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2010;31:455–461. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2010;66:486–501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lyskov S, et al. Serverification of molecular modeling applications: the Rosetta online server that includes everyone (ROSIE) PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e63906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.DeLuca S, Khar K, Meiler J. Fully flexible docking of medium sized ligand libraries with Rosetta ligand. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0132508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yumoto I, Fukumori Y, Yamanaka T. Purification and characterization of catalase from a facultative alkalophilic Bacillus. J. Biochem. 1990;108:583–587. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a123246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liang CN, Xiong DD, Zhang Y, Mu SS, Tang SY. Development of a novel uric-acid-responsive regulatory system in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2015;99:2267–2275. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6290-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary Information file. Data supporting the findings of this work are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files. The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Structure of VanR complexed with vanillic acid has been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code of 6LG2 [https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6LG2]. The source data underlying Figs. 1b, d, e, g, 3c-e, and 4b-g, Table 2, as well as Supplementary Figs. 2, 3, 7, 8a, 9, and 10 are provided as a Source Data file.