Abstract
Real-time PCR or quantitative PCR (QPCR) is a powerful technique that allows measurement of PCR product while the amplification reaction proceeds. It incorporates the fluorescent element into conventional PCR as the calculation standard to provide a quantitative result. In this sense, fluorescent chemistry is the key component in QPCR. Till now, two types of fluorescent chemistries have been adopted in the QPCR systems: one is nonspecific probe and the other is specific. As a brilliant invention by Kramer et al. in 1996, molecular beacon is naturally suited as the reporting element in real-time PCR and has been adapted for many molecular biology applications. In this chapter, we briefly introduce the working principle of QPCR and overview different fluorescent chemistries, and then we focus on the applications of molecular beacons-like gene expression study, single-nucleotide polymorphisms and mutation detection, and pathogenic detection.
Keywords: Polymerase Chain Reaction Product, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, TaqMan Probe, Molecular Beacon, Pathogenic Detection
Introduction
Soon after MBs were first introduced, they found important application in real-time PCR [1, 2], which requires prompt signal production with high specificity. In this chapter, some basic principles of real-time PCR are discussed, and the applications of MBs in single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyping and pathogenic detection are summarized.
Basic Principles of Real-Time PCR
The emergence of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has enabled the amplification of one or many copies of DNA isolated from cell, tissue, or blood samples, subsequently sparking a revolution in biology. Nonetheless, standard PCR is only designed for positive recognition of the amplicons. Post-PCR analysis should be performed in order to characterize both the size and sequence of the product. A DNA gel electrophoresis to measure the size and the quantity of the amplicon is simple and inexpensive. However, it is not easy to discriminate among different amplicons having similar size by gel. Also, gel is not accurate enough to assess the starting target by visualizing the final PCR product with nucleic acid intercalating dyes, although, to some extent, more initial target leads to more PCR product. This can be explained by studying the kinetics of PCR [3].
A conventional PCR usually consists of three phases: exponential, nonexponential, and plateau. At the beginning, all the reagents are sufficient to guarantee good PCR efficiency, and amplification occurs in an exponential manner, with the initial DNA doubling after every cycle. As the cycles progress and reagents are consumed, the reaction starts to slow down. At this point, the PCR product is no longer doubled in every cycle, and nonexponential amplification dominates. Finally, after another several rounds of amplification, the PCR reaction no longer generates templates as a result of the lack of critical components in the reaction. This is commonly known as the plateau phase, or end point, of the PCR reaction [4]. In this sense, the final yield of PCR product is not primarily dependent on the target sequence in the sample.
Real-time PCR, which combines amplification and quantification of a target DNA molecule in a single assay, is now a routine and robust technique in molecular biology. By detecting the products generated every cycle in a “real-time mode” at the early exponential phase, real-time PCR can differentiate the three stages and also save time since it is not necessary to wait until the reaction terminates. Real-time PCR allows the PCR product to accumulate during every cycle to allow measurement through different fluorescent chemistries.
Fluorescent Measurements for Real-Time PCR
There are generally two types of measurements to acquire the fluorescent signal from the PCR product. The first type relies on DNA binding dyes, such as SYBR Green I, which binds nonspecifically to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and emits an enhanced fluorescence [5]. The other type is a probe-based approach. These probes are sequence specific, and most of them use fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) as the reporting mechanism [6] and use the 5′-exonuclease activity of the DNA polymerase [7] to detect PCR amplification in real time.
DNA Intercalating Dyes, SYBR Green I (SG I)
SG I shows a low fluorescence background when it is free in solution, while the fluorescence signal could increase up to 1,000-fold once it binds dsDNA (Fig. 3.1). This works universally for all dsDNA. Thus real-time PCR that utilizes SG I as reporter [5] is the most straightforward method by eliminating the complicated design of specific probes and reducing the cost of both time and money. As the PCR proceeds, more amplicons accumulate; accordingly, more SG I molecules are bound. The change in fluorescence can then be monitored using a thermocycler equipped with fluorescence detector. In other words, the fluorescence intensity is proportional to the amount of PCR products.
Fig. 3.1.

A schematic of the working principle of SG I in real-time PCR
However, since SG I recognizes dsDNA in a nonspecific manner, nonspecific amplification products cannot be differentiated. Optimization of primers and template is therefore essential. First, the primers should be designed to generate amplicons with a suitable length (normally, 100–400 bp). Second, the concentration of primers should not be too high in order to achieve a high ratio of specific amplification versus primer-dimer signal. Third, the template should not include complicated secondary structures because this would contribute to the fluorescence signal. After real-time PCR is finished, a melting curve is usually recorded. If PCR generates a homogeneous sequence, only one transition point should be observed. Otherwise, nonspecific products or contaminants may exist. Most commonly, SG I is used for assays for which probe chemistry cannot be used or those assays which do not require high accuracy. SG I can also be used for optimization of primers prior to ordering the sequence-specific probe.
Probe-Based Chemistry
In probe-based chemistries, short oligonucleotides are used as an internal probe to hybridize with the region to be amplified. All these probes possess a quencher in close proximity to the reporter dye, where FRET occurs. In most cases, as the products form, the linkage between the quencher and dyes will be cut off, leading to a fluorescence enhancement. Compared to SG I, all probes are more specific since the hybridization only happens between probes and correct amplified products.
TaqMan Probe
TaqMan probe is a short single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) with a fluorophore at the 5′ end and a quencher at the 3′ end [8]. This DNA is complementary to the sequence within the template. Since the DNA is usually 20–30 bases in length, FRET is efficient when the probe is in free form. At this time, the fluorescence is quenched. It is only after the probe hybridizes to the template and is digested by Taq DNA polymerase (Taq polymerase is known to have 5′-exonuclease activity), as it extends the amplification primers, that the linkage between dye and quencher is cleaved, subsequently restoring fluorescence of the dye molecule (Fig. 3.2). Similar to SG I, the fluorescence increases in proportion to the amount of PCR products, since more probes will hybridize and will be cleaved. The advantages of the TaqMan probe include (1) analysis in real time without the need for post-PCR handling, thus reducing labor and cost; (2) specific hybridization-based detection, which eliminates nonspecific signal; and (3) labeling with different dyes with monitoring of different sequence amplifications in one tube. At the same time, however, TaqMan probes have some challenges, including (1) limited use in different assays and (2) limited design parameters. Normally, the probe should be designed close to the 5′ end to give a quick response. The length should be controlled in order to achieve sufficient FRET efficiency. In addition, guanine should not be placed next to the fluorescent dye since it is also an effective quencher.
Fig. 3.2.

Different states of TaqMan probe in real-time PCR: left – annealing; right – extension (Reprinted with permission from PREMIER Biosoft. Copyright ©1994–2013)
FRET Hybridization Probes
The FRET probe system consists of two single-stranded fluorescent oligonucleotides such that probe 1 is labeled with a donor dye at the 3′ end, while probe 2 is labeled with an acceptor dye at the 5′ end [9, 10], typically having a 1–5 bases gap between them. During the annealing step, both probes will hybridize to the target, putting the donor in close proximity to the acceptor. The fluorescence signal of acceptor will then be detected, and the increase will be proportional to the products amplified (Fig. 3.3). Although this two-probe system gains specificity, it also increases the difficulty of hybridization.
Fig. 3.3.

The working principle of FRET hybridization probes (Reprinted with permission from PREMIER Biosoft. Copyright ©1994–2013)
Molecular Beacons
The molecular beacons are the ideal hybridization-based probe for short oligonucleotide detection, and, thus, it is a suitable probe for real-time PCR [11]. In real-time PCR, MB hybridizes with template DNA at the annealing step and produces the fluorescent signal directly. Therefore, it does not need a polymerase with exonuclease activity, which is essential for the TaqMan probe. In the extension step, the polymerase will extend the sequence and displace the MB, returning it to the stem-loop conformation. In this case, the probe can be reused in the remaining cycles. MBs should be designed to hybridize 7–10 °C higher than primers, to ensure detection before primers are extended. Therefore, the stem should be just short enough to guarantee full hybridization, but not so short that can refold to the stem-loop structure after displacement of the molecular beacon by primer extension. Despite the difficulty in designing and optimizing a suitable MB, MB real-time PCR assays are simple, fast, sensitive, and accurate, allowing a high-throughput format and enabling the multiplexing detection in one tube using different labeling probes. MB-based PCR technique has been widely used in SNP analysis, real-time nucleic acid detection and quantitation, allele discrimination, and other clinical assays.
Scorpion Probe
The Scorpion probe is similar to molecular beacons in that it consists of a stem-loop structure when it is in free form. However, the Scorpion incorporates a primer into the sequence at the 3′ end, next to the quencher, via a blocker [12]. This blocker is a non-amplified monomer, which prevents the PCR from reading through the probe. In the extension stage, the polymerase binds the primer and synthesizes the complementary strand of target sequence just as it works in regular PCR. During the annealing step in next cycle, the loop will hybridize to the complementary strand within the same DNA. This separates the fluorophore and quencher, and an enhanced fluorescent signal is instantaneously observed (Fig. 3.4). Because the probe and primer are in the same molecule, the reaction kinetics is extremely fast. Also, intramolecular interaction is more favorable than intermolecular hybridization. This enables the Scorpion probe to provide a higher signal than other bimolecular systems, including either TaqMan or MB, but the design of the Scorpion is more difficult. Specifically, it reduces flexibility in probe design where the loop should be engineered such that it is not too far from the complementary part to ensure high hybridization efficiency. Similarly, the stem should be long enough to stabilize the hairpin structure. The stem’s Tm should be 5–10 °C higher than that of the primer-target hybrid.
Fig. 3.4.

The working principle of the Scorpion probe (Reprinted with permission from PREMIER Biosoft. Copyright ©1994–2013)
MB Used in Real-Time PCR for SNPs and Mutation Detection Assays
The human genome consists of ten million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). While most SNPs have no effect on health, some SNPs are believed to be related to the development of diseases [13]. Therefore, highly specific, simple, and accessible methods are needed for high-throughput SNPs detection (Fig. 3.5). MB-based assays provide a solution for screening SNPs in homogeneous assays [14]. Most of these assays require PCR to gain enough DNA targets, while MBs can specifically recognize these targets and present detectable signals in real time. Although other probes can also be used in real-time PCR, MBs have been demonstrated to be superior to them in certain aspects. For example, MBs have been proven to have better specificity than TaqMan probe in a detailed research report [15], and MBs have less complexity than Scorpion probe in design. Therefore, RT-PCR using MBs is perfect for SNPs analysis.
Fig. 3.5.

Principle of spectral genotyping by PCR, exemplified by detection of a SNP in codon 325 of the estrogen receptor gene (Reprinted from Ref. [14]. Copyright 2001, with permission from Elsevier)
A key point for MBs in SNPs genotyping is to discriminate perfect match targets from single-base mismatch targets. The range of temperatures within which discrimination between the two targets is possible is wider for molecular beacons than it is for the corresponding linear probes. This is known as the window of discrimination, which is the basis for SNPs detection in homogeneous assays and is discussed at length in 10.1007/978-3-642-39109-5_4.
Early in 1998, 2 years after the MB was reported, Kramer et al. proposed the method of spectral genotyping human alleles using MB [11]. In their design, two MBs with different labeling were used: one specific for wild-type allele with green fluorophore and another for mutant allele labeled with red dye. The appearance of green, red, and both signals represented the homozygous wild type, homozygous mutant, and heterozygote, respectively.
Later in 1998, in another report [16], they proved that MB-based sequence analysis could be adopted as an accurate assessment of DNA sequence. Five MBs, each complementary to a short fragment, were combined with 1–3 bases overlapped to span an 81 bp core region on the rpoB gene. This assay is simple and rapid. Most importantly, no contamination was observed since the tubes were not opened throughout the entire assay. Seventy-five clinical DNA isolates were correctly identified as drug susceptible or drug resistant. A broad range of point mutations, insertions, and deletions were detected successfully. Furthermore, in their paper in 1999 [17], up to four MBs, each with a different color, were used to explore four variants which differed from one another only by one base position. In four tubes, all the MBs were added with only one target variant. After PCR, only one fluorescence response was observed in each tube. This result indicates the extraordinary specificity of MB.
Since organic dyes often overlap each other in their emission spectra, 3–4 different dyes are the maximum that can be used at the same time. Another limitation comes from the instrument. Traditional thermal cyclers often have fixed excitation/emission filters. Under this condition, two dyes, which can be separate on a fluorometer, might not be able to be distinguished in PCR assays due to the lack of appropriate filters. Tyagi et al. proposed the construction of wavelength-shift MB [18], which emitted different fluorescent colors, but was excited with monochromatic light. This was realized by attaching a second fluorophore next to the fluorophore of a normal MB, which still contains a nonfluorescent quencher. In this design, one dye served as a harvester with strong absorption in the range of the light source. The other dye accepted the emission transferred from the harvester and emitted the desired color of fluorescence. This shift in emission spectrum is due to the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) from the harvester fluorophore to the emitter fluorophore. This only happened in opened probes that are bound to targets, and quencher has been separated from the fluorophores. By this method, the multiplex genetic analysis can be improved to be more simple and reliable.
MB Used in Real-Time PCR for Pathogenic Detection
Current techniques used to identify microbial pathogens usually rely on culturing and screening the samples to monitor the presence of pathogenic organisms, which are already well established. However, these suffer from a number of drawbacks. The assays are laborious, time-consuming, and expensive and require labile natural products [19]. More importantly, these routine tests do not directly characterize virulence factors. Efforts to overcome these problems in pathogenic detection have led to the development of DNA-based diagnosis. Today, culture-based methods for pathogen detection are rapidly being replaced by faster and more specific real-time PCR assays that discriminate different microorganisms based on a signal from specific nucleic acid sequences. Real-time PCR pathogen detection assays amplify target nucleic acid sequences from select microbes present in samples collected from complex biological environments. Specific amplification of target sequences is achieved by custom-designed primers and probes.
As pioneers in the study of molecular beacons, Kramer and colleagues described a multiplex MB assay to determine four pathogenic retroviruses [20]. Since then, scientists have applied this real-time PCR assay to detect all types of pathogenic organisms (Table 3.1).
Table 3.1.
The utilization of MBs to detect different pathogens
| Pathogens | Species | References |
|---|---|---|
| Bacteria and Fungus | Aspergillus fumigatus | [21] |
| Bordetella pertussis | [22] | |
| Candida dubliniensis | [23] | |
| Chlamydophila felis | [24] | |
| Chlamydophila pneumoniae | [25] | |
| Clostridium | [26, 27] | |
| Escherichia coli | [28–31] | |
| Legionella pneumophila | [32] | |
| Mycobacterium tuberculosis | [33–44] | |
| Nitrifying bacteria | [45] | |
| Paracoccidioides brasiliensis | [46] | |
| Salmonella | [47–53] | |
| Scedosporiosis | [54] | |
| Staphylococcus | [55–58] | |
| Streptococcus | [59] | |
| Vibrio cholerae | [60] | |
| Viruses | T-cell leukemia virus | [61] |
| Adenovirus | [62, 63] | |
| Bluetongue virus | [64] | |
| Coronavirus | [65] | |
| Cytomegalovirus | [66] | |
| HAV | [67, 68] | |
| HBV | [69–74] | |
| HCV | [75–77] | |
| HPV | [78] | |
| Human immunodeficiency virus | [75, 79–83] | |
| Iridovirus | [84] | |
| Phage | [85] | |
| Plant virus | [86] | |
| Retrovirus | [20] | |
| Swine virus | [87] | |
| Syncytial virus | [88] | |
| West Nile virus | [89] |
Unlike assays that detect specific human DNA sequences present in samples, real-time PCR pathogenic detection assays must target genetic material from multiple microbial species in a single sample. This requires an assay which is capable of discriminating among the sequences from species of interest and other sequences from even the nearest evolutionary neighbors of the target species. Therefore, the detection of specific microorganisms requires the selection of an optimum target sequence to amplify. However, since many microbial sequences are unknown or have not yet been deciphered, the selection will be complicated and has no principle to rely on yet.
Conclusions
Real-time PCR represents one of the most important techniques in modern molecular biology, and it has become a routine and robust laboratory assay for gene expression analysis. In this chapter, different fluorescent chemistries applied in real-time PCR were summarized, reflecting the prominent role of MBs in this area. Based on the capacity to distinguish perfect match target from false targets, MBs are naturally suited for SNPs and mutation detection. Similarly, MBs can be used to detect all kinds of pathogens, which may only differ by a few bases in the gene sequences. With the increasing use of real-time PCR in gene transcription studies, disease-related diagnostics, and food safety assessment, MBs will continue to play an irreplaceable role in this field and aid the development of real-time PCR.
Contributor Information
Chaoyong James Yang, Phone: +86865922182240, Email: cyyang@xmu.edu.cn.
Weihong Tan, Email: tan@chem.ufl.edu.
Chunming Wang, Email: cmwang@xmu.edu.cn.
Chaoyong James Yang, Email: cyyang@xmu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Heid CA, Stevens J, Livak KJ, Williams PM. Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res. 1996;6(10):986–994. doi: 10.1101/gr.6.10.986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jung R, Soondrum K, Neumaier M. Quantitative PCR. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000;38(9):833–836. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2000.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Higuchi R, Fockler C, Dollinger G, Watson R. Kinetic PCR analysis: real-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions. Biotechnology. 1993;11(9):1026–1030. doi: 10.1038/nbt0993-1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kainz P. The PCR plateau phase – towards an understanding of its limitations. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1494(1–2):23–27. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4781(00)00200-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Becker A, Reith A, Napiwotzki J, Kadenbach B. A quantitative method of determining initial amounts of DNA by polymerase chain reaction cycle titration using digital imaging and a novel DNA stain. Anal Biochem. 1996;237(2):204–207. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hiyoshi M, Hosoi S. Assay of DNA denaturation by polymerase chain reaction-driven fluorescent label incorporation and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Anal Biochem. 1994;221(2):306–311. doi: 10.1006/abio.1994.1417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Holland PM, Abramson RD, Watson R, Gelfand DH. Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by utilizing the 5′–3′ exonuclease activity of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(16):7276–7280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Morris T, Robertson B, Gallagher M. Rapid reverse transcription-PCR detection of hepatitis C virus RNA in serum by using the TaqMan fluorogenic detection system. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34(12):2933–2936. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.12.2933-2936.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cardullo RA, Agrawal S, Flores C, Zamecnik PC, Wolf DE. Detection of nucleic acid hybridization by nonradiative fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85(23):8790–8794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.8790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lay MJ, Wittwer CT. Real-time fluorescence genotyping of factor V Leiden during rapid-cycle PCR. Clin Chem. 1997;43(12):2262–2267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kostrikis LG, Tyagi S, Mhlanga MM, Ho DD, Kramer FR. Spectral genotyping of human alleles. Science. 1998;279(5354):1228–1229. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5354.1228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Whitcombe D, Theaker J, Guy SP, Brown T, Little S. Detection of PCR products using self-probing amplicons and fluorescence. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17(8):804–807. doi: 10.1038/11751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.What are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)? http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/genomicresearch/snp
- 14.Mhlanga MM, Malmberg L. Using molecular beacons to detect single-nucleotide polymorphisms with real-time PCR. Methods. 2001;25(4):463–471. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tapp I, Malmberg L, Rennel E, Wik M, Syvanen AC. Homogeneous scoring of single-nucleotide polymorphisms: comparison of the 5′-nuclease TaqMan assay and Molecular Beacon probes. Biotechniques. 2000;28(4):732–738. doi: 10.2144/00284rr02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Alland D, Piatek AS, Tyagi S, Pol AC, Telenti A, Miller LP, Kramer FR. Molecular beacon sequence analysis for detecting drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Biotechnol. 1998;16(4):359–363. doi: 10.1038/nbt0498-359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marras SAE, Kramer FR, Tyagi S. Multiplex detection of single-nucleotide variations using molecular beacons. Genet Anal-Biomol E. 1999;14(5–6):151–156. doi: 10.1016/S1050-3862(98)00018-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tyagi S, Marras SAE, Kramer FR. Wavelength-shifting molecular beacons. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18(11):1191–1196. doi: 10.1038/81192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Del Campo FJ, Lazcka O, Munoz FX. Pathogen detection: a perspective of traditional methods and biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron. 2007;22(7):1205–1217. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vet JAM, Majithia AR, Marras SAE, Tyagi S, Dube S, Poiesz BJ, Kramer FR. Multiplex detection of four pathogenic retroviruses using molecular beacons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(11):6394–6399. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Perlin DS, Nascimento AM, Goldman GH, Park S, Marras SAE, Delmas G, Oza U, Lolans K, Dudley MN, Mann PA. Multiple resistance mechanisms among Aspergillus fumigatus mutants with high-level resistance to itraconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(5):1719–1726. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1719-1726.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Poddar SK, Le CT. Bordetella pertussis detection by spectrofluorometry using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and a molecular beacon probe. Mol Cell Probe. 2001;15(3):161–167. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.2001.0357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Perlin DS, Park S, Wong M, Marras SAE, Cross EW, Kiehn TE, Chaturvedi V, Tyagi S. Rapid identification of Candida dubliniensis using a species-specific molecular beacon. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(8):2829–2836. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.8.2829-2836.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Helps C, Reeves N, Tasker S, Harbour D. Use of real-time quantitative PCR to detect Chlamydophila felis infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(7):2675–2676. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2675-2676.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gullsby K, Storm M, Bondeson K. Simultaneous detection of Chlamydophila pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae by use of molecular beacons in a duplex real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(2):727–731. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01540-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Belanger SD, Boissinot M, Clairoux N, Picard FJ, Bergeron MG. Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile in feces by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(2):730–734. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.2.730-734.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Paillard D, McKain N, Rincon MT, Shingfield KJ, Givens DI, Wallace RJ. Quantification of ruminal Clostridium proteoclasticum by real-time PCR using a molecular beacon approach. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;103(4):1251–1261. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03349.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chen W, Fortin NY, Mulchandani A. Use of real-time polymerase chain reaction and molecular beacons for the detection of Escherichia coli O157: H7. Anal Biochem. 2001;289(2):281–288. doi: 10.1006/abio.2000.4936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McKillip JL, Drake M. Molecular beacon polymerase chain reaction detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in milk. J Food Prot. 2000;63(7):855–859. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-63.7.855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ram S, Vajpayee P, Shanker R. Rapid culture-independent quantitative detection of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in surface waters by real-time PCR with molecular beacon. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(12):4577–4582. doi: 10.1021/es703033u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Singh J, Batish VK, Grover S. A molecular beacon-based duplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for simultaneous detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes in milk and milk products. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2009;6(10):1195–1201. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2009.0310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Templeton KE, Scheltinga SA, Sillekens P, Crielaard JW, van Dam AP, Goossens H, Claas EC. Development and clinical evaluation of an internally controlled, single-tube multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of Legionella pneumophila and other Legionella species. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(9):4016–4021. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4016-4021.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chakravorty S, Aladegbami B, Motiwala AS, Dai Y, Safi H, Brimacombe M, Helb D, Alland D. Rifampin resistance, Beijing-W clade-single nucleotide polymorphism cluster group 2 phylogeny, and the Rv2629 191-C allele in Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(8):2555–2560. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00666-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dawes SS, Warner DF, Tsenova L, Timm J, McKinney JD, Kaplan G, Rubin H, Mizrahi V. Ribonucleotide reduction in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: function and expression of genes encoding class Ib and class II ribonucleotide reductases. Infect Immun. 2003;71(11):6124–6131. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.11.6124-6131.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tyagi JS, Haldar S, Chakravorty S, Bhalla M, De Majumdar S. Simplified detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum using smear microscopy and PCR with molecular beacons. J Med Microbiol. 2007;56(10):1356–1362. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47265-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kumar P, Nath K, Rath B, Sen MK, Vishalakshi P, Chauhan DS, Katoch VM, Singh S, Tyagi S, Sreenivas V, Prasad HK. Visual format for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. bovis in clinical samples using molecular beacons. J Mol Diagn. 2009;11(5):430–438. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Larsen MH, Vilcheze C, Kremer L, Besra GS, Parsons L, Salfinger M, Heifets L, Hazbon MH, Alland D, Sacchettini JC, Jacobs WR., Jr Overexpression of inhA, but not kasA, confers resistance to isoniazid and ethionamide in Mycobacterium smegmatis, M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol. 2002;46(2):453–466. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03162.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Manganelli R, Dubnau E, Tyagi S, Kramer FR, Smith I. Differential expression of 10 sigma factor genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol. 1999;31(2):715–724. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01212.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mathema B, Bifani PJ, Driscoll J, Steinlein L, Kurepina N, Moghazeh SL, Shashkina E, Marras SA, Campbell S, Mangura B, Shilkret K, Crawford JT, Frothingham R, Kreiswirth BN. Identification and evolution of an IS6110 low-copy-number Mycobacterium tuberculosis cluster. J Infect Dis. 2002;185(5):641–649. doi: 10.1086/339345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Papaparaskevas J, Houhoula DP, Siatelis A, Tsakris A. Molecular-beacon-based real-time PCR for detection and quantification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(9):3177–3178. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00903-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shi L, Jung YJ, Tyagi S, Gennaro ML, North RJ. Expression of Th1-mediated immunity in mouse lungs induces a Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcription pattern characteristic of nonreplicating persistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(1):241–246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0136863100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Singh A, Singh Y, Pine R, Shi L, Chandra R, Drlica K. Protein kinase I of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: cellular localization and expression during infection of macrophage-like cells. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2006;86(1):28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2005.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Varma-Basil M, El-Hajj H, Colangeli R, Hazbon MH, Kumar S, Bose M, Bobadilla-del-Valle M, Garcia LG, Hernandez A, Kramer FR, Osornio JS, Ponce-de-Leon A, Alland D. Rapid detection of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from India and Mexico by a molecular beacon assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(12):5512–5516. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5512-5516.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yesilkaya H, Meacci F, Niemann S, Hillemann D, Rusch-Gerdes S, Barer MR, Andrew PW, Oggioni MR. Evaluation of molecular-Beacon, TaqMan, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer probes for detection of antibiotic resistance-conferring single nucleotide polymorphisms in mixed Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA extracts. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(10):3826–3829. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00225-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Harms G, Layton AC, Dionisi HM, Gregory IR, Garrett VM, Hawkins SA, Robinson KG, Sayler GS. Real-time PCR quantification of nitrifying bacteria in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37(2):343–351. doi: 10.1021/es0257164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Buitrago MJ, Merino P, Puente S, Gomez-Lopez A, Arribi A, Zancope-Oliveira RM, Gutierrez MC, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Cuenca-Estrella M. Utility of real-time PCR for the detection of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis DNA in the diagnosis of imported paracoccidioidomycosis. Med Mycol. 2009;47(8):879–882. doi: 10.3109/13693780802713208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bhagwat AA, Patel J, Chua T, Chan A, Cruz SR, Aguilar GA. Detection of Salmonella species in foodstuffs. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;429:33–43. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-040-3_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chen W, Martinez G, Mulchandani A. Molecular beacons: a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detecting Salmonella. Anal Biochem. 2000;280(1):166–172. doi: 10.1006/abio.2000.4518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hadjinicolaou AV, Demetriou VL, Emmanuel MA, Kakoyiannis CK, Kostrikis LG. Molecular beacon-based real-time PCR detection of primary isolates of Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella enteritidis in environmental and clinical samples. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jyoti A, Ram S, Vajpayee P, Singh G, Dwivedi PD, Jain SK, Shanker R. Contamination of surface and potable water in South Asia by Salmonellae: culture-independent quantification with molecular beacon real-time PCR. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408(6):1256–1263. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Patel JR, Bhagwat AA, Sanglay GC, Solomon MB. Rapid detection of Salmonella from hydrodynamic pressure-treated poultry using molecular beacon real-time PCR. Food Microbiol. 2006;23(1):39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2005.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Patel JR, Bhagwat AA. Rapid real-time PCR assay for detecting Salmonella in raw and ready-to-eat meats. Acta Vet Hung. 2008;56(4):451–458. doi: 10.1556/AVet.56.2008.4.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Uyttendaele M, Vanwildemeersch K, Debevere J. Evaluation of real-time PCR vs automated ELISA and a conventional culture method using a semi-solid medium for detection of Salmonella. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2003;37(5):386–391. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01415.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Castelli MV, Buitrago MJ, Bernal-Martinez L, Gomez-Lopez A, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Cuenca-Estrella M. Development and validation of a quantitative PCR assay for diagnosis of scedosporiosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(10):3412–3416. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00046-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chen L, Mediavilla JR, Oliveira DC, Willey BM, de Lencastre H, Kreiswirth BN. Multiplex real-time PCR for rapid Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(11):3692–3706. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00766-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Huletsky A, Giroux R, Rossbach V, Gagnon M, Vaillancourt M, Bernier M, Gagnon F, Truchon K, Bastien M, Picard FJ, van Belkum A, Ouellette M, Roy PH, Bergeron MG. New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(5):1875–1884. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.1875-1884.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kreiswirth BN, Sinsimer D, Leekha S, Marras SAE, Koreen L, Willey B, Naidich S, Musser KA. Use of a multiplex molecular beacon platform for rapid detection of methicillin and vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(9):4585–4591. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4585-4591.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Warren DK, Liao RS, Merz LR, Eveland M, Dunne WM., Jr Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(12):5578–5581. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5578-5581.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bergeron MG, Ke D. New DNA-based PCR approaches for rapid real-time detection and prevention of group B streptococcal infections in newborns and pregnant women. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2001;3(27):1–14. doi: 10.1017/S1462399401003805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gubala AJ, Proll DF. Molecular-beacon multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of Vibrio cholerae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(9):6424–6428. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02597-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Besson G, Kazanji M. One-step, multiplex, real-time PCR assay with molecular beacon probes for simultaneous detection, differentiation, and quantification of human T-cell leukemia virus types 1, 2, and 3. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(4):1129–1135. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02006-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Claas EC, Schilham MW, de Brouwer CS, Hubacek P, Echavarria M, Lankester AC, van Tol MJ, Kroes AC. Internally controlled real-time PCR monitoring of adenovirus DNA load in serum or plasma of transplant recipients. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(4):1738–1744. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.4.1738-1744.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Poddar SK. Detection of adenovirus using PCR and molecular beacon. J Virol Methods. 1999;82(1):19–26. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0934(99)00074-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Orru G, Ferrando ML, Meloni M, Liciardi M, Savini G, De Santis P. Rapid detection and quantitation of Bluetongue virus (BTV) using a Molecular Beacon fluorescent probe assay. J Virol Methods. 2006;137(1):34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hadjinicolaou AV, Farcas GA, Demetriou VL, Mazzulli T, Poutanen SM, Willey BM, Low DE, Butany J, Asa SL, Kain KC, Kostrikis LG. Development of a molecular-beacon-based multi-allelic real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection of human coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV): a general methodology for detecting rapidly mutating viruses. Arch Virol. 2011;156(4):671–680. doi: 10.1007/s00705-010-0906-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Jebbink J, Bai X, Rogers BB, Dawson DB, Scheuermann RH, Domiati-Saad R. Development of real-time PCR assays for the quantitative detection of Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus, comparison of TaqMan probes, and molecular beacons. J Mol Diagn. 2003;5(1):15–20. doi: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60446-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Abd El Galil KH, El Sokkary MA, Kheira SM, Salazar AM, Yates MV, Chen W, Mulchandani A. Combined immunomagnetic separation-molecular beacon-reverse transcription-PCR assay for detection of hepatitis A virus from environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(7):4371–4374. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4371-4374.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Chen W, Yeh HY, Hwang YC, Yates MV, Mulchandani A. Detection of hepatitis A virus by using a combined cell culture-molecular beacon assay. Appl Environ Microb. 2008;74(7):2239–2243. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00259-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lewin SR, Ribeiro RM, Walters T, Lau GK, Bowden S, Locarnini S, Perelson AS. Analysis of hepatitis B viral load decline under potent therapy: complex decay profiles observed. Hepatology. 2001;34(5):1012–1020. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.28509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ntziora F, Paraskevis D, Haida C, Magiorkinis E, Manesis E, Papatheodoridis G, Manolakopoulos S, Beloukas A, Chryssoy S, Magiorkinis G, Sypsa V, Hatzakis A. Quantitative detection of the M204V hepatitis B virus minor variants by amplification refractory mutation system real-time PCR combined with molecular beacon technology. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(8):2544–2550. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00045-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Paraskevis D, Beloukas A, Haida C, Katsoulidou A, Moschidis Z, Hatzitheodorou H, Varaklioti A, Sypsa V, Hatzakis A. Development of a new ultra sensitive real-time PCR assay (ultra sensitive RTQ-PCR) for the quantification of HBV-DNA. Virol J. 2010;7:57. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-7-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Pas SD, Noppornpanth S, van der Eijk AA, de Man RA, Niesters HG. Quantification of the newly detected lamivudine resistant YSDD variants of Hepatitis B virus using molecular beacons. J Clin Virol. 2005;32(2):166–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lai CL, Sum SSM, Wong DKH, Yuen MF, Yuan HJ, Yu J, Ho D, Zhang LQ. Real-time PCR assay using molecular beacon for quantitation of hepatitis B virus DNA. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(8):3438–3440. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3438-3440.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Waltz TL, Marras S, Rochford G, Nolan J, Lee E, Melegari M, Pollack H. Development of a molecular-beacon assay to detect the G1896A precore mutation in hepatitis B virus-infected individuals. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(1):254–258. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.254-258.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chung RT, Blackard JT, Komurian-Pradel F, Perret M, Sodoyer M, Smeaton L, St Clair JB, Chapman S, Taylor LE, Paranhos-Baccala G. Intrahepatic cytokine expression is downregulated during HCV/HIV co-infection. J Med Virol. 2006;78(2):202–207. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Komurian-Pradel F, Perret M, Deiman B, Sodoyer M, Lotteau V, Paranhos-Baccala G, Andre P. Strand specific quantitative real-time PCR to study replication of hepatitis C virus genome. J Virol Methods. 2004;116(1):103–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2003.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Morandi L, Ferrari D, Lombardo C, Pession A, Tallini G. Monitoring HCV RNA viral load by locked nucleic acid molecular beacons real time PCR. J Virol Methods. 2007;140(1–2):148–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Takacs T, Jeney C, Kovacs L, Mozes J, Benczik M, Sebe A. Molecular beacon-based real-time PCR method for detection of 15 high-risk and 5 low-risk HPV types. J Virol Methods. 2008;149(1):153–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2007.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kostrikis LG, Touloumi G, Karanicolas R, Pantazis N, Anastassopoulou C, Karafoulidou A, Goedert JJ, Hatzakis A. Quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 DNA forms with the second template switch in peripheral blood cells predicts disease progression independently of plasma RNA load. J Virol. 2002;76(20):10099–10108. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.20.10099-10108.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Markowitz M, Lewin SR, Vesanen M, Kostrikis L, Hurley A, Duran M, Zhang L, Ho DD. Use of real-time PCR and molecular beacons to detect virus replication in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infected individuals on prolonged effective antiretroviral therapy. J Virol. 1999;73(7):6099–6103. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.7.6099-6103.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ho DD, Zhang LQ, Lewin SR, Markowitz M, Lin HH, Skulsky E, Karanicolas R, He YX, Jin X, Tuttleton S, Vesanen M, Spiegel H, Kost R, van Lunzen J, Stellbrink HJ, Wolinsky S, Borkowsky W, Palumbo P, Kostrikis LG. Measuring recent thymic emigrants in blood of normal and HIV-1-infected individuals before and after effective therapy. J Exp Med. 1999;190(5):725–732. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.5.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gonzalez E, Bamshad M, Sato N, Mummidi S, Dhanda R, Catano G, Cabrera S, McBride M, Cao XH, Merrill G, O’Connell P, Bowden DW, Freedman BI, Anderson SA, Walter EA, Evans JS, Stephan KT, Clark RA, Tyagi S, Ahuja SS, Dolan MJ, Ahuja SK. Race-specific HIV-1 disease-modifying effects associated with CCR5 haplotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(21):12004–12009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.21.12004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Martinson JJ, Hong L, Karanicolas R, Moore JP, Kostrikis LG. Global distribution of the CCR2-64I/CCR5-59653T HIV-1 disease-protective haplotype. AIDS. 2000;14(5):483–489. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200003310-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Wang XW, Ao JQ, Li QG, Chen XH. Quantitative detection of a marine fish iridovirus isolated from large yellow croaker, Pseudosciaena crocea, using a molecular beacon. J Virol Methods. 2006;133(1):76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kirs M, Smith DC. Multiplex quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR for F + −specific RNA coliphages: a method for use in microbial source tracking. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(3):808–814. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00399-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Eun AJ, Wong SM. Molecular beacons: a new approach to plant virus detection. Phytopathology. 2000;90(3):269–275. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.3.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.McKillen J, Hjertner B, Millar A, McNeilly F, Belak S, Adair B, Allan G. Molecular beacon real-time PCR detection of swine viruses. J Virol Methods. 2007;140(1–2):155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.O’Shea MK, Cane PA. Development of a highly sensitive semi-quantitative real-time PCR and molecular beacon probe assay for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus. J Virol Methods. 2004;118(2):101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Lee DH, Mathew J, Pfahler W, Ma D, Valinsky J, Prince AM, Andrus L. Individual donor nucleic acid amplification testing for detection of West Nile virus. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(10):5111–5116. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.5111-5116.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
