Abstract
Sharing information about oneself, or self-disclosing, is a fundamental interpersonal process that facilitates the attainment of key developmental milestones during adolescence. Changes in self-disclosure behaviors may reflect or support the social reorientation that sees children become increasingly reliant on peers for social and emotional support. Neuroimaging research has highlighted protracted maturation of the structure and function of brain regions that support social cognitive and reward processes underlying self-disclosure during adolescence. This review explores behavioral and neural trends in self-disclosure during adolescence, including research that uses novel experimental paradigms to extend the field beyond self-report measures. Findings show that certain aspects of self-disclosure behavior have adapted to changing social environments, but they remain intrinsically valued across the adolescent period and are essential for relationship development, identity formation and overall self-worth and well-being.
Adolescence is characterized by marked psychosocial changes that support the transition from parental reliance during childhood to autonomy and independence as young adults. Foundational to this developmental process is the changing nature of communication; relationships that are often based around shared activities during childhood evolve to be characterized by greater time spent in conversation with one another during adolescence [1]. This is exemplified by current use of social networking sites [2], but is also characteristic of ‘offline’ behaviors [3]. An important aspect of these conversations is that they often involve sharing information about the self or self-disclosing. This review explores the behavioral trends in self-disclosure during adolescence, as well as the underlying neurobiological development that supports these psychosocial changes.
Self-disclosure is a fundamental interpersonal process that is influenced by a range of factors, such as the targets of disclosure (e.g. parents versus peers), depth or type of information to be conveyed (e.g. intimacy and/or valence of personal exchanges), as well as breadth or amount of information (e.g. the number of topics that are disclosed) [4]. A number of theories on self-disclosure have been proposed, including its role in supporting self-expression, social validation and/or control, and relationship development [5–8]. Adolescents need to articulate their sense of self when sharing personal information, and feedback from others not only helps them validate the appropriateness of their feelings, thoughts and behaviors, but also supports the development of close relationships through building patterns of reciprocity [9,10]. These goals, while relevant across the lifespan, are particularly important in the context of adolescence as they are essential to forming a coherent sense of self or self-identity and developing intimate connections with peers and romantic partners [11,12]. Consequently, self-disclosure during adolescence has also been associated with positive developmental outcomes such as well-being [13–15].
A small set of studies have gone beyond self-report and parent-report questionnaires to highlight the intrinsic value of self-disclosure using experimental paradigms. Using adaptations of the ‘pay-per-view’ or monetary choice task, pioneering research in adults showed that humans are willing to forfeit monetary rewards in order to share information about themselves with others [16,17]. We have found that adolescents exhibit similar behavioral valuation of disclosure to adults, suggesting that sharing self-referential information may be a form of subjective reward across development [18••,19••]. Moreover, value for certain types of disclosure is also associated with greater self-worth in adolescents [19••], highlighting some degree of convergence across different methods in self-disclosure research.
Behavioral trends of adolescent self-disclosure
One important moderator of self-disclosure behavior during adolescence is the target audience. It is often postulated that adolescence is a period of social reorientation, characterized by decreased reliance on, and increased independence from, parental figures [20,21]. However, the self-disclosure literature provides equivocal support for the changing role of parents as targets of disclosure, with some research indicating reductions in the amount of information that is shared with parents during adolescence (specifically age 12–18 years) [22,23] but others suggesting consistent amounts of sharing [24–26]. Disclosure to parents is also moderated by gender, with female adolescents disclosing more than males [22,26], and particularly for disclosure to mothers [24].
Adolescence also places increased reliance on peers and romantic partners for emotional support [27]. Consistently, self-report on disclosure behaviors suggests that peers increasingly become the targets of disclosure over adolescence [1,28,29,30••]. While romantic partners play a lesser role during adolescence (either due to lack or instability of such relationships), they appear to replace parents as the primary targets of disclosures by young adulthood [25]. Disclosure to peers (as with parents) is moderated by gender, with female adolescents engaging in greater self-disclosure than their male counterparts [1]. Taken together, there appears to be some support (again, from research utilizing self-report measures) for the notion that the targets of disclosure transition from parents during childhood to peers and romantic partners over the course of adolescence. However, our experimental research suggests that the intrinsic value of disclosing to both parents and close friends remains stable between early and late adolescence [18]. Thus although the frequency of disclosure to parents may decrease over this period, they likely continue to remain an important source of emotional support. Interestingly, we also found that mid-adolescents, and particularly males in this age range, preferentially disclose to unfamiliar peers compared to either parents or close friends [18]. There are likely to be a number of influences on preferences for disclosing to unfamiliar peers, including the importance of peer groups and ‘crowd’ affiliation [31]. We also speculate that these results may be influenced by digital technology that has changed both the medium and targets of disclosure in recent decades.
Indeed, while a long history of research highlights increased engagement in peer-directed self-disclosure during adolescence, the medium of communication has drastically changed over time. Social networking sites (SNS) play a prominent role, with adolescents engaging in online self-disclosure more than the past [32]. While adolescents are exposed to a larger network of unfamiliar peers through SNS, they primarily use SNS to communicate with offline friends and maintain existing relationships [1], and as such, online social networks often reflect offline networks [33,34]. In fact, interactive engagement with SNS (i.e. texting or instant messaging a specific person) is the preferred method of communicating with friends [32], and has been shown to produce better quality friendships via engagement in intimate self-disclosure [35••,36]. While early studies suggested negative consequences of online disclosure and SNS use more broadly, for example [37], recent studies predominantly find positive functional outcomes, similar to offline disclosure. This includes increased initiation of relationships, better friendship quality, and greater perceived social support, social self-esteem, and feelings of belonging [38–41,42••]. Moreover, the benefits of online disclosure extend to offline relationships, with longitudinal data showing that it increases the initiation of offline friendships [43••]. The greater ease and controllability of communicating personal or potentially embarrassing information online is thought to underlie the relationship between online disclosure and social connectedness [10,40]. This is particularly true for adolescents who are shy or experience social anxiety [44]. While findings are mixed regarding the impact of social media use more broadly on adolescent outcomes [45,46], engaging in self-disclosure through online venues appears to facilitate the development and maintenance of positive social relationships during adolescence.
Another important factor in the decision process for self-disclosure is the type of information that is communicated. Social penetration theory argues that the breadth of disclosure (range of topics shared) often increases early in relationship initiation, while the depth of disclosure (intimacy of shared information) increases later and helps form closer bonds. For emerging adult samples in the family context, increased depth and breadth of communication with siblings has been associated with relationship closeness [47], while increased depth and frequency of communication with parents has been associated with stronger bonds [48]. Meanwhile, in samples including but not limited to adolescents, a recent meta-analysis revealed that offline communication is generally characterized by greater depth of intimacy compared to online communication [49••], yet increased depth (but not breadth) in online communication is still associated with closer friendships [41].
We have also found important behavioral differences in the valuation of disclosure based on the depth of exchanges during adolescence. Not only do early adolescents disclose superficial information more often than intimate information with close friends, they are willing to give up more money to do so [19]. This finding may be driven by superficial disclosure being the prototypic form of personal exchanges during the transition from childhood to adolescence [50,51], but differences may also suggest a potential ‘cost’ of communicating personal and affectively charged information, even to close friends, which may reflect the increased risk of embarrassment and rejection [4]. Increased rates of gossiping and spreading of rumors during early adolescence is also likely to engender caution when sharing such intimate information [52]. This may be further compounded by rising peer sensitivity and anxiety regarding negative social evaluations during this period [53,54]. However, similar cost-benefit analyses may be engaged by adults during disclosure [4], and further research is needed to understand which developmental trends and features in valuation of intimate and superficial self-disclosures may be unique to adolescence.
Neural correlates of adolescent self-disclosure
Research in adults using monetary choice paradigms has shown that self-disclosure activates regions involved in reward processes, such as the ventral striatum [VS], ventral tegmental area [VTA], and ventromedial [vm] PFC, as well as those involved in social cognitive processes, such as the dorsomedial [dm]PFC, precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex [PCC], and anterior temporal cortex [ATC] [16,17,55]. An extensive literature highlights structural maturation of these brain regions during adolescence [56–58], which are implicated in perspective-taking skills [59], increased consideration of others’ intentions [60], and the quality of peer relationships [61]. Interestingly, the size of the vmPFC [62], ATC [63] and superior temporal sulcus [STS] [64] has been found to correlate with the size of social networks in adults, further supporting the association between brain structure and social behaviors.
A growing body of research also highlights activational changes in these regions during adolescence, using a number of different social and affective functional neuroimaging paradigms. Age-related changes in the dmPFC, inferior frontal gyrus, STS and other regions in the social cognitive network have been identified when engaging in peer interactions [65,66], responding to peer feedback [67–70], and making attributions about others’ emotional states [71,72]. Reward-related activity in the VS also changes during adolescence [73,74], with longitudinal research supporting a mid-adolescent peak [75,76]. There is also increased neural activation when engaging in self-evaluative processes (particularly within the vmPFC and VS) [77–79] as well as self-conscious processes (in the rostromedial PFC) [80] during adolescence. Increased engagement of the VS has also been identified in late adolescents and emerging adults when viewing self versus other images on a virtual social medial platform, suggesting that self-presentation is rewarding [81,82•]. Taken together, these neuroimaging studies suggest that adolescence is characterized by extensive changes in the structure and function of brain regions that have been associated with self-disclosure, with important implications for social and affective behavior.
However, minimal research has specifically examined the neural correlates of self-disclosure during adolescence; to our knowledge, this is limited to two studies by our group. Focusing on self-disclosure of superficial information to different target groups (i.e. parents and peers) in a sample of late adolescents (college freshmen), we found greater activation of the VS when sharing information relative to keeping it private, across different target audiences [83]. Activation of the vmPFC, precuneus and PCC was strongest when sharing information with a friend, followed by a parent, while keeping answers private elicited the weakest response [83]. Thus consistent with adult studies, self-disclosure by late adolescents engages regions implicated in reward, social cognitive and self-evaluative processes, but findings also highlight heightened peer sensitivity in certain regions during this phase of development. A similar pattern of response was also identified in the perigenual ACC, which suggests an affective response in adolescents that is strongest when sharing with friends.
Our next study extended this research by examining whether the neural correlates of self-disclosure differed as a function of the depth of information that is shared, specifically comparing superficial and intimate types of self-disclosure [19••]. Findings revealed more extensive engagement of the dmPFC, precuneus, bilateral ATC and temporoparietal junction, and left posterior STS when engaging in intimate relative to superficial disclosure to friends. Intimate disclosure also uniquely recruited the left ventrolateral PFC and bilateral dorsolateral PFC. Overall, these results suggest greater engagement of social cognitive and emotion regulatory processes when sharing intimate information with peers, consistent with more extensive processing of the subjective utility and risk of sharing sensitive and potentially embarrassing information [4]. However, important individual differences in neural response were also identified, as adolescents with closer friendships (with the target of the disclosure) exhibited greater recruitment of reward regions (i.e. VS and vmPFC) when engaging in intimate disclosure [19••]. Overall, these studies confirm the intrinsic value of self-disclosure during adolescence using neural indices instead of self report; importantly, they also suggest that the targets and types of disclosure alter the potential intrinsic value, thereby impacting the likelihood of sharing information about oneself.
Conclusion
While self-disclosure is important across the lifespan, we suggest it is fundamental during adolescence for the attainment of key developmental goals. Changes in self-disclosure behaviors support the social reorientation that sees children dependent on their parents become increasingly reliant on peers for social and emotional support. Certain aspects of self-disclosure behavior have evolved over time in adaptation to changing social environments, but it remains essential for relationship development, identity formation and overall self-worth and well-being. A growing body of neuroimaging studies also highlight protracted maturation of relevant brain regions during adolescence, including reward and social cognitive systems. Moreover, novel functional paradigms are revealing neurodevelopmental processes that directly support changes in self-disclosure behavior, as well as providing unique indices of valuation of disclosure and moving the field beyond a reliance on self-report measures. Adaptations of these paradigms provide the opportunity to further investigate developmental changes in the valuation of different aspects of self-disclosure behavior, as well as their importance for positive adolescent outcomes.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 MH107418; PI Pfeifer).
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement
Nothing declared.
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
- 1.Valkenburg PM, Sumter SR, Peter J: Gender differences in online and offline self-disclosure in pre-adolescence and adolescence: adolescents’ online and offline self-disclosure. Br J Dev Psychol 2011, 29:253–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pew Research Center: Social Media Use in 2018. 2018.
- 3.Nguyen M, Bin YS, Campbell A: Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: a systematic review. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2012, 15:103–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Omarzu J: A disclosure decision model: determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 2000, 4:174–185. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Altman I, Taylor DA: Social Penetration: the Development of Interpersonal Relationships. Holt: Rinehart & Winston; 1973. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Baumeister RF: A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychol Bull 1982, 91:3–26. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Derlega V, Grzelak J: Appropriateness of self-disclosure In Self-disclosure: Origins, Patterns, and Implications of Openness in Interpersonal Relationships. Edited by Chelune G Jossey Bass; 1979:151–176. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Worthy M, Gary AL, Kahn GM: Self-disclosure as an exchange process. J Pers Soc Psychol 1969, 13:59–63. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Davis K: Friendship 2.0: adolescents’ experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online. J Adolesc 2012, 35:1527–1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Valkenburg PM, Peter J: Social consequences of the internet for adolescents: a decade of research. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2009, 18:1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Meeus W: The study of adolescent identity formation 2000–2010: a review of longitudinal research. J Res Adolesc 2011, 21:75–94. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Smith R: A Correlational Study: the Influence of Personal Online Communication on Adolescents’ Self-disclosure. California State University; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ko H-C, Chen T-K: Understanding the continuous self-disclosure of bloggers from the cost-benefit perspective. 2009 2nd Conference on Human System Interactions 2009:520–527 10.1109/HSI.2009.5091033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Valkenburg PM, Peter J: Online communication and adolescent well-being: testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. J Comput Commun 2007, 12:1169–1182. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Valkenburg PM, Peter J, Schouten AP: Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006, 9:584–590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tamir DI, Mitchell JP: Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:8038–8043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tamir DI, Zaki J, Mitchell JP: Informing others is associated with behavioral and neural signatures of value. J Exp Psychol Gen 2015, 144:1114–1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. ••.Mobasser A, Vijayakumar N, Tamir DI, Pfeifer JH: Intrinsic Value of Self-Disclosure Across Adolescence 2019. 10.31234/osf.io/bdqrk [DOI] [Google Scholar]; Using a forced choice behavioral paradigm, this study found that across adolescence, individuals valued self-disclosure to a variety of targets (parents, friends, and unknown peers). Mid-adolescents (but not early-adolescents or late-adolescents) valued sharing with unfamiliar peers more than with parents or best friends. Similar patterns were identified in males, but not females. Self-disclosure value was also associated to externalizing behaviors in male adolescents.
- 19. ••.Vijayakumar N et al. : Getting to Know Me Better: an fMRI Study of Intimate and Superficial Self-disclosure to Friends During Adolescence. 2019. 10.31234/osf.io/h8gkc [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Using a forced choice fMRI paradigm, this study found that early adolescents valued superficial disclosure more than intimate disclosure to their best friends. Intimate disclosure recruited brain regions involved in social cognition and emotion regulation more than superficial disclosure. Depth of self-disclosure was also related to individual differences in self-worth and friendship quality.
- 20.Nelson EE, Jarcho JM, Guyer AE: Social re-orientation and brain development: an expanded and updated view. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2016, 17:118–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nelson EE, Leibenluft E, McClure E, Pine D: The social re-orientation of adolescence: a neuroscience perspective on the process and its relation to psychopathology. Psychol Med 2005, 35:163–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Finkenauer C, Engels RCME, Meeus W: Keeping secrets from parents: advantages and disadvantages of secrecy in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 2002, 31:123–136. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Keijsers L, Frijns T, Branje SJT, Meeus W: Developmental links of adolescent disclosure, parental solicitation, and control with delinquency: moderation by parental support. Dev Psychol 2009, 45:1314–1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Noller P, Callan VJ: Adolescents’ perceptions of the nature of their communication with parents. J Youth Adolesc 1990, 19:349–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rimé B: Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: theory and empirical review. Emot Rev 2009, 1:60–85. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Soenens B, Vansteenkiste M, Luyckx K, Goossens L: Parenting and adolescent problem behavior: an integrated model with adolescent self-disclosure and perceived parental knowledge as intervening variables. Dev Psychol 2006, 42:305–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meeus W: Parental and peer support in adolescence The Social World of Adolescents: International Perspectives. Walter De Gruyter; 1989:167–183. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bauminger N, Finzi-dottan R, Chason S, Har-even D, Ilan B: Intimacy in adolescent friendship: the roles of attachment, coherence, and self-disclosure. J Soc Pers Relat 2008:409–428. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schouten AP, Valkenburg PM, Peter J: Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents’ online self-disclosure: developing and testing an “Internet-Attribute-Perception” model. Media Psychol 2007, 10:292–315. [Google Scholar]
- 30. ••.Villalobos Solís M, Smetana JG, Comer J: Associations among solicitation, relationship quality, and adolescents’ disclosure and secrecy with mothers and best friends. J Adolesc 2015, 43:193–205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Using daily diaries, this study found that adolescents disclosed more to both mothers and best friends on days that they reported better relationship quality, greater time spent together, and when others solicited information from them. However, solicited information by mothers, but not friends, was also associated with more secrecy.
- 31.Brown BB, Eicher SA, Petrie S: The importance of peer group (‘crowd’) affiliation in adolescence. J Adolesc 1986, 9:73–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Common Sense Media: Social Media, Social Life: Teens Reveal Their Experiences. 2018.
- 33.Gross EF: Adolescent Internet use: what we expect, what teens report. J Appl Dev Psychol 2004, 25:633–649. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Reich SM, Subrahmanyam K, Espinoza G: Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: overlap in adolescents’ online and offline social networks. Dev Psychol 2012, 48:356–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. ••.Desjarlais M, Joseph JJ: Socially interactive and passive technologies enhance friendship quality: an investigation of the mediating roles of online and offline self-disclosure. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2017, 20:286–291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Using an online survey of late adolescents and emerging adults, the authors show that social technology use was related to better quality of close friendships by increased online self-disclosures that in turn promoted offline disclosures.
- 36.Valkenburg PM, Peter J: The effects of instant messaging on the quality of adolescents’ existing friendships: a longitudinal study. J Commun 2009, 59:79–97. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kraut R et al. : Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am Psychol 1998, 53:1017–1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Antheunis ML, Schouten AP, Krahmer E: The role of social networking sites in early adolescents’ social lives. J Early Adolesc 2016, 36:348–371. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Desjarlais M, Gilmour J, Sinclair J, Howell KB, West A: Predictors and social consequences of online interactive self-disclosure: a literature review from 2002 to 2014. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2015, 18:718–725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shapiro LAS, Margolin G: Growing up wired: social networking sites and adolescent psychosocial development. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2014, 17:1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Valkenburg PM, Peter J: Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Dev Psychol 2007, 43:267–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. ••.Valkenburg PM, Koutamanis M, Vossen HGM: The concurrent and longitudinal relationships between adolescents’ use of social network sites and their social self-esteem. Comput Human Behav 2017, 76:35–41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study found a positive (cross-sectional) relationship between adolescents’ use of social networking sites(SNS)and their social self-esteem, which was explained by positive feedback received from close friends and acquaintances.WhileSNSusedidnotinfluencefutureself-esteem(examined longitudinally), initial self-esteem did predict future SNS use.
- 43. ••.Gomez-Baya D, Rubio-Gonzalez A, Matos MGde: Online communication, peer relationships and school victimisation: a one-year longitudinal study during middle adolescence. Int J Adolesc Youth 2018, 0:1–13 [Google Scholar]; This longitudinal study of 13–16 year olds showed that online, more than offline, communication was positively associated with quality of peer relationships and negatively associated with peer victimization. More frequent text messaging was also related to greater ease of making friends in the future.
- 44.Bardi CA, Brady MF: Why shy people use instant messaging: loneliness and other motives. Comput Human Behav 2010, 26:1722–1726. [Google Scholar]
- 45.George MJ, Odgers CL: Seven fears and the science of how mobile technologies may be influencing adolescents in the digital age. Perspect Psychol Sci 2015, 10:832–851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.McCrae N, Gettings S, Purssell E: Social media and depressive symptoms in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review. Adolesc Res Rev 2017, 2:315–330. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rocca KA, Martin MM: The relationship between willingness to communicate and solidarity with frequency, breadth, and depth of communication in the sibling relationship. Commun Res Rep 1998, 15:82–90. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jiang LC, Yang IM, Wang C: Self-disclosure to parents in emerging adulthood: examining the roles of perceived parental responsiveness and separation–individuation. J Soc Pers Relat 2017, 34:425–445. [Google Scholar]
- 49. ••.Ruppel EK et al. : Reflecting on connecting: meta-analysis of differences between computer-mediated and face-to-face self-disclosure. J Comput Mediat Commun 2017, 22:18–34 [Google Scholar]; This meta-analysis found that overall self-disclosures were greater in face-to-face (FtF) than computer-mediated (CM) contexts. This was particularly so when considering depth (but not breath) of disclosures, and when CM was text (but not video) based. Implications for theories of CM communication are discussed.
- 50.Dolgin KG, Kim S: Adolescents’ disclosure to best and good friends: the effects of gender and topic intimacy. Soc Dev 1994, 3:146–157. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jones GE, Dembo MH, Jones GP: Age and sex role differences in intimate friendships during childhood and adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Q 1989, 35:445–462. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Archer J, Coyne SM: An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2005, 9:212–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.van den Bos E, de Rooij M, Miers AC, Bokhorst CL, Westenberg PM: Adolescents’ increasing stress response to social evaluation: pubertal effects on cortisol and alpha-amylase during public speaking. Child Dev 2014, 85:220–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Westenberg PM, Gullone E, Bokhorst CL, Heyne DA, King NJ: Social evaluation fear in childhood and adolescence: normative developmental course and continuity of individual differences. Br J Dev Psychol 2007, 25:471–483. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Meshi D, Tamir DI, Heekeren HR: The emerging neuroscience of social media. Trends Cogn Sci (Regul. Ed.) 2015, 19:771–782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Herting MM et al. : Development of subcortical volumes across adolescence in males and females: a multisample study of longitudinal changes. Neuroimage 2018, 172: 194–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mills KL, Lalonde F, Clasen LS, Giedd JN, Blakemore S-J: Developmental changes in the structure of the social brain in late childhood and adolescence. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2014, 9:123–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wierenga LM, Langen M, Oranje B, Durston S: Unique developmental trajectories of cortical thickness and surface area. NeuroImage 2014, 87:120–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tamnes CK et al. : Social perspective taking is associated with self-reported prosocial behavior and regional cortical thickness across adolescence. Dev Psychol 2018, 54:1745–1757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sul S, Güroğlu B, Crone EA, Chang LJ: Medial prefrontal cortical thinning mediates shifts in other-regarding preferences during adolescence. Sci Rep 2017, 7:8510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ferschmann L et al. : Prosocial behavior relates to the rate and timing of cortical thinning from adolescence to young adulthood 2018. 10.31234/osf.io/v6pc9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lewis PA, Rezaie R, Brown R, Roberts N, Dunbar RIM: Ventromedial prefrontal volume predicts understanding of others and social network size. Neuroimage 2011, 57:1624–1629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Von Der Heide R, Vyas G, Olson IR: The social network-network: size is predicted by brain structure and function in the amygdala and paralimbic regions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2014, 9:1962–1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kanai R, Bahrami B, Roylance R, Rees G: Online social network size is reflected in human brain structure. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 2012, 279:1327–1334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Schreuders E, Klapwijk ET, Will G-J, Güroğlu B: Friend versus foe: neural correlates of prosocial decisions for liked and disliked peers. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2018, 18:127–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.vanden Bos W, van Dijk E, Westenberg M, Rombouts SARB, Crone EA: Changing brains, changing perspectives: the neurocognitive development of reciprocity. Psychol Sci 2011, 22:60–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Guyer AE, Choate VR, Pine DS, Nelson EE: Neural circuitry underlying affective response to peer feedback in adolescence. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2012, 7:81–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.van der Meulen M et al. : Brain activation upon ideal-body media exposure and peer feedback in late adolescent girls. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2017, 17:712–723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Van Hoorn J, Van Dijk E, Güroğlu B, Crone EA: Neural correlates of prosocial peer influence on public goods game donations during adolescence. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2016, 11:923–933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Welborn BL et al. : Neural mechanisms of social influence in adolescence. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2016, 11:100–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gunther Moor B et al. : Neurodevelopmental changes of reading the mind in the eyes. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2012, 7:44–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Overgaauw S, van Duijvenvoorde ACK, Gunther Moor B, CroneEA: A longitudinal analysis of neural regions involved in reading the mind in the eyes. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2015, 10:619–627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Galván A: The teenage brain: sensitivity to rewards. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2013, 22:88–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Silverman MH, Jedd K, Luciana M: Neural networks involved in adolescent reward processing: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage 2015, 122:427–439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Braams BR, van Duijvenvoorde ACK, Peper JS, Crone EA: Longitudinal changes in adolescent risk-taking: a comprehensive study of neural responses to rewards, pubertal development, and risk-taking behavior. J Neurosci 2015, 35:7226–7238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Schreuders E et al. : Contributions of reward sensitivity to ventral striatum activity across adolescence and early adulthood. Child Dev 2018, 89:797–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Jankowski KF, Moore WE, Merchant JS, Kahn LE, Pfeifer JH: But do you think I’m cool? Developmental differences in striatal recruitment during direct and reflected social self-evaluations. Accid Anal Prev 2014, 8:40–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Pfeifer JH, Berkman ET: The development of self and identity in adolescence: neural evidence and implications for a value-based choice perspective on motivated behavior. Child Dev Perspect 2018, 12:158–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Pfeifer JH et al. : Longitudinal change in the neural bases of adolescent social self-evaluations: effects of age and pubertal development. J Neurosci 2013, 33:7415–7419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Somerville LH et al. : Medial prefrontal cortex and the emergence of self-conscious emotion in adolescence. Psychol Sci 2013, 24:1554–1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sherman LE, Greenfield PM, Hernandez LM, Dapretto M: Peer influence via instagram: effects on brain and behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. Child Dev 2018, 89:37–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. •.Sherman LE, Payton AA, Hernandez LM, Greenfield PM, Dapretto M: The power of the like in adolescence: effects of peer influence on neural and behavioral responses to social media. Psychol Sci 2016, 27:1027–1035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This fMRI study found that adolescents more often liked Instagram photos with many versus few likes. Such popular photos also elicited more activation in brain regions involved in social cognition, reward processings, and attention. Findings highlight the mechanisms of peer influence during adolescence.
- 83.Moore WE III: Sharing all the way to the Bank: A Neuroimaging Investigation of Disclosure, Reward, and Self. University of Oregon;2015. [Google Scholar]