Skip to main content
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry logoLink to Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):274–283. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_517_18

Dental Caries and Associated Factors among Primary School Children in Metropolitan City with the Largest Javanese Race Population: A Crosssectional Study

Taufan Bramantoro 1,, R Darmawan Setijanto 1, Retno Palupi 1, Achmad Zamzam Aghazy 1, Wahyuning Ratih Irmalia 1
PMCID: PMC7145260  PMID: 32308290

Abstract

Background:

Dental caries is the most prevalent and chronic oral disease, particularly in childhood age. Dental caries is a progressive infectious process with multifactorial etiology.

Aim:

The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of dental caries and its associated factors among primary school children at Surabaya, as the metropolitan city with the largest Javanese race population in Indonesia.

Materials and Methods:

A school-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Surabaya in August 2017. Cluster random sampling technique was used to select the children. Structured questionnaire by the World Health Organization (WHO) was used to interview children and/or parents to collect sociodemographic variables. Clinical dental information was obtained by experienced dentist using dental caries criteria set by the WHO. Binary and multiple logistic regression analysis were computed to investigate the factors associated with dental caries.

Results:

Of 213 children, 50.4% were boys. Majority (99%) of the children cleaned their teeth using toothbrush. The proportion of children having dental caries was 53%. Decay-Missing-Filled (DMF) score was 1, decayed-extracted-filled (def) score was 1.08, and total DMF and def score were 2.07. Toothbrush usage, soda consumption, and educational level of fathers were the associated factors for dental caries.

Conclusion:

Toothbrush usage, soda consumption, and educational level of fathers were the associated factors for dental caries. Therefore, prevention measures, such as health education on oral hygiene, dietary habits, and importance of dental visit, are obligatory for children.

Keywords: Children, dental caries, dental plaque

Introduction

Dental caries is the most prevalent and chronic oral disease, particularly in childhood age.[1,2] Carious lesion constitutes a progressive infectious process with multifactorial etiology.[3,4] Dietary habits, oral microorganisms that ferment sugars, and host susceptibility have to coexist for dental caries to initiate and develop.[3,4,5] Dental caries has high morbidity potential. Thus, it has been the main focus of dental health professionals.[6]

Dental caries is caused by dental plaque deposits on the tooth surface.[7,8] Frequency and timing of fermentable carbohydrates intake, which will be metabolized by a certain bacteria, such as Streptococcus mutans, lead to fermentation and therefore produce copious amount of acid and lower the local pH to a level where the minerals of enamel and dentine dissolve.[3,5,7,8,9,10,11,12] The frequent intake of sweets, dry mouth, and poor oral hygiene may increase the chances for developing new carious lesion.[8,13] Besides, some risk factors, such as sex, age, dietary habits, socioeconomic, and oral hygiene status, are also associated with increased prevalence and incidence of dental caries in population.[14]

Dental caries in children may cause pain, discomfort, eating disorder, tooth loss, and delayed speech. Furthermore, dental caries also affects children's concentration in school, and at times, dental treatment expense may become certain financial burden on the families.[6,15]

Although the trend is not clear in developing countries, the number of dental caries has been increasing among children due to the uncontrolled intake of sugary substances, poor oral care practices, and inadequate health service utilization.[16] Studies revealed that the prevalence of dental caries was higher among urban children.[15,17]

Indonesia faces significant challenges in relation to poor oral health in children that remain untreated until they reach teenage and even adulthood, in which more than 70% are affected by experiences related to dental caries.[18] In a review of early childhood caries in Indonesia, according to a study conducted in five urban communities of special capital region of Jakarta in 2008, it was recorded that the prevalence of early childhood caries was 52.7%.[18] Another study showed that the prevalence of early childhood caries in a group of children aged 6 months–3 years was 30.8%.[19]

Indonesia is a tropical archipelago located at Southeast Asian with more than 13,000 islands.[20] The number of Indonesian population reaches 260 million that makes Indonesia as the fifth country with the most population in the world.[21] Indonesia is characterized by enormous cultural diversity with more than 300 ethnic groups that have been described.[20] Javanese constitutes as the largest ethnic group in Indonesia that occupies 41% of the total population. The majority of Javanese lives in Java Island and most are concentrated in Central and East Java. The capital city of East Java is Surabaya which is the second-largest city in Indonesia. There are various ethnic groups live in Surabaya, yet the most of it is Javanese. Those backgrounds encouraged the authors to focus the study in Surabaya.

Although dental caries is more prevalent in school-age children to date, however, there has been no well-documented data on prevailing prevalence and associated factors in primary school children in Surabaya. Therefore, the current study was carried out to examine the prevalence of dental caries and its associated factors among primary school children in Surabaya as the metropolitan city with the largest Javanese race population in Indonesia.

Materials and Methods

Study design and area

A school-based cross-sectional study was conducted from August 2017 among primary schoolchildren in Surabaya. Surabaya is the second biggest city in Indonesia. According to the 2017 Central Statistical Agency of Indonesia's estimation, the city had a total population of 2.843.000. Urban primary school children under 12 years were accounted for 241,906. The town had a total of 2.843 urban primary schools spread into five areas, South, North, West, East, and Center of Surabaya.

Study participants

Students of primary schools aged 10–12 years old and living in Surabaya were included in the study. Children aged 12 years old or above were excluded from the study.

Sample size and sampling

The sample size was calculated using single population proportion formula with assumption of 95% confidence level, 5% degree of precision, and proportion of dental caries as much as 30.8%[18] to make the final sample size of 80. However, we obtained 213 students that provided complete response. Systematic random sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Among five areas of Surabaya, two primary schools per area were selected using systematic random sampling technique. The sample size was allocated proportionally based on the number of children in each selected school. Children were selected randomly based on their name lists taken from their rosters in the respective class.

Data collection

A structured questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographic characteristics, dietary habits, oral health problems, and oral care practices. Dental examination was carried out for all selected children by one trained dental doctor using the World Health Organization (WHO) dental caries diagnosis guideline under natural daylight. Disposable wooden spatulas were used for intraoral examination. Prior to the study, data collectors were given with intensive training on dental caries assessment based on the WHO guideline and also how to interview the children and fill the questionnaire for 2 days. Incomplete questionnaires were rejected during the data analysis. Dental caries was defined as the presence of lesion in a pit or fissure or on smooth tooth surface, detectable softened floor, and undermined enamel or softened wall. When any doubt existed, dental caries was not recorded as present. The tooth was considered missing because of caries if a person gave a history of pain and/or presence of cavity before extraction.

The presence of dental plaque was assessed by direct visual inspection and palpation of the buccal and lingual surfaces of all teeth using clean glove and spatula.[22] The plaque was recorded as being present when visible deposits were detected and then following palpation of the teeth was removed by clean-gloved hand. Moreover, the presence of both hypocalcification and incipient caries type of white spot lesions were examined by conventional diagnostic technique.[22] First, the wet teeth were inspected for the presence of hypocalcification type of white spot lesion, then the teeth were allowed to wipe cleaned and dried with gauze and compressed air to inspect incipient caries type of white spot lesion. White spot lesion was recorded as being present when a white chalky appearance spot was revealed either in dehydrated or desiccated or both types of the upper and lower anterior of enamel.

Data analysis

Data were entered and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25 (IBM, New York, USA). Frequency and percentage were computed from univariate analysis to get summary values. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was computed using logistic regression analysis to assess the presence and degree of association between dental caries and independent variables. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 (significance level 95%). For those variables that had a P < 0.05 on binary logistic regression, binary multiple logistic regression analysis was computed.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee (certificate number: 211/HRECC.FODM/IX/2017). Written consent was obtained from children's parents before the interview and dental examination. Cases of dental caries were advised to attend the nearby dental clinic.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics

A total of 213 children participated in the study. Of these, 50.4% were male. The majority of children (51%) were aged more than 10 years old. About 99% of respondents came from wealthy families based on Badan Pusat Statistik indicators. Approximately, 33% of respondents had high-educated fathers and 35% of respondents had mothers with secondary education level [Table 1].

Table 1.

Sociodemographic variables associated with caries

Sociodemographic variables Dental caries COR P

Negative (%) Positive (%)
Age (years)
 <10 22.535 26.291 1 0.820
 >10 24.413 26.761 0.940
Sex
 Male 23.786 26.699 1 0.566
 Female 21.359 28.155 1.174
Family financial status
 Wealth 0.000 0.469 1 0.670
 Poor 46.948 52.582 0.373
Father education
 No school 8.920 6.573 1 <0.0001*
 Did not pass elementary school 0.000 0.469 4.034
 Graduated from elementary school or equivalent 2.817 5.164 2.379
 Graduated junior high school/equivalent 1.878 4.225 2.839
 High school graduation/equivalent 11.737 15.023 1.714
 Graduated higher education (diploma, S1, S2, and S3) 15.962 17.840 1.501
 There are no adult men in the house 5.634 3.756 0.914
Mother education
 No school 6.103 5.634 1 0.265
 Did not pass elementary school 0.469 1.408 3.250
 Graduated from elementary school or equivalent 2.347 4.225 1.950
 Graduated Junior high school/equivalent 2.347 6.573 3.033
 High school graduation/equivalent 16.432 18.779 1.238
 Graduated higher education (diploma, S1, S2, and S3) 15.493 14.554 1.018
 There are no adult women in the house 3.756 1.878 0.542

*Significant; COR: Crude odds ratio

Practices related to oral hygiene

About 36% of respondents stated that they rarely had toothache, 30% of respondents had never visited a dentist in the past year, 33% of respondents came to the dentist due to complaints on their oral cavity, 61% admitted to brushing teeth twice or more a day, 99% of respondents used toothbrush to clean their teeth, 98% used toothpaste, and 36% of them used fluoridated toothpaste [Table 2].

Table 2.

Practices to oral hygiene variables associated with caries

Practices to oral hygiene variables Dental caries COR P

Negative (%) Positive (%)
Toothache frequency
 Often 2.817 2.347 1 0.855
 Sometimes 10.798 14.085 1.565
 Rarely 15.962 20.188 1.518
 Never 15.962 15.023 1.129
 Do not know 1.408 1.408 1.200
Dental visit
 Once 10.329 10.798 1 0.566
 Twice 6.573 7.981 1.161
 Three times 2.347 3.756 1.530
 Four times 2.817 0.469 0.159
 More than four times 2.347 1.878 0.765
 Never been to a dentist for the last 12 months 12.676 17.371 1.311
 Never received dental treatment from a dentist 3.286 2.347 0.683
 Do not know/do not remember 6.573 8.451 1.230
Dental visit caution
 Pain or there are problems with the teeth, gums, or mouth 18.994 14.525 1 0.332
 Advanced care or treatment 3.352 3.352 1.308
 Regular tooth control 8.380 10.615 1.656
 Do not know/do not remember 16.760 24.022 1.874
Toothbrushing frequency
 Never 0.939 1.408 1 0.993
 Several times a month (2-3 times) 6.573 6.103 0.619
 Once a week 0.469 0.469 0.667
 Several times a week (2-6 times) 3.286 4.225 0.857
 Once a day 7.042 7.512 0.711
 Two or more in a day 28.638 33.333 0.776
Toothbrush user
 Yes 0.469 0.000 1 0.003*
 No 46.479 53.052 3.422
Toothpick user
 Yes 38.498 47.418 1 0.122
 No 8.451 5.634 0.541
Dental floss user
 Yes 45.540 52.582 1 0.249
 No 1.408 0.469 0.289
Siwak user
 Yes 46.479 52.582 1 0.931
 No 0.469 0.469 0.884
Toothpaste usage
 Yes 0.939 0.469 1 0.488
 No 46.009 52.582 2.286
Fluoride usage
 Yes 1.878 5.164 1 0.112
 No 15.493 20.657 0.485
 Do not know 29.577 27.230 0.335

*Significant; COR: Crude odds ratio

Food consumption pattern and dietary habits

About 30% of respondents consumed fruit, 23% consumed sweets and sweet foods, and 27% consumed tea several times a week. As many as 36% of respondents consumed biscuits and 39% consumed milk everyday. As many as 30% of respondents consumed fruit, 23% consumed sweets and sweet foods, and 27% consume tea several times a week. As many as 36% of respondents consumed biscuits, 39% consumed milk, and 5% of respondents consumed soda everyday [Table 3].

Table 3.

Consumption habit variables associated with caries

Consumption habit variables Dental caries COR P

Negative (%) Positive (%)
Fruits consumption frequency
 Never 2.817 3.756 1 0.823
 Several times a month 6.573 7.042 0.804
 Once in a week 8.920 7.512 0.632
 Several times a week 12.676 17.371 1.028
 Everyday 8.920 7.981 0.671
 Several times a day 7.042 9.390 1.000
Honey consumption frequency
 Never 15.023 15.962 1 0.990
 Several times a month 11.268 12.676 1.059
 Once in a week 6.103 6.103 0.941
 Several times a week 5.634 7.981 1.333
 Everyday 4.695 5.164 1.035
 Several times a day 4.225 5.164 1.150
Gum consumption frequency 0.691
 Never 17.371 18.310 1
 Several times a month 11.737 10.798 0.873
 Once in a week 4.225 8.451 1.897
 Several times a week 6.103 7.981 1.241
 Everyday 4.225 3.756 0.843
 Several times a day 3.286 3.756 1.084
Candy consumption frequency
 Never 8.920 11.268 1 0.437
 Several times a month 8.451 9.390 0.880
 Once in a week 6.573 6.573 0.792
 Several times a week 10.798 12.207 0.895
 Everyday 8.920 6.103 0.542
 Several times a day 3.286 7.512 1.810
Milk consumption frequency
 Never 2.817 1.408 1 0.778
 Several times a month 5.164 6.103 2.364
 Once in a week 4.695 3.756 1.600
 Several times a week 7.981 11.268 2.824
 Everyday 18.310 21.127 2.308
 Several times a day 7.981 9.390 2.353
Soda consumption frequency
 Never 27.700 29.577 1 <0.0001*
 Several times a month 11.737 10.329 0.827
 Once in a week 2.817 6.103 1.946
 Several times a week 2.817 2.817 0.937
 Everyday 1.408 4.225 2.543
 Several times a day 0.469 0.000 0.312
Coffee consumption frequency
 Never 31.455 35.681 1 0.164
 Several times a month 5.634 5.634 0.882
 Once in a week 4.695 2.347 0.441
 Several times a week 2.347 5.634 2.116
 Everyday 2.347 1.408 0.529
 Several times a day 0.469 2.347 4.408
Tea consumption frequency
 Never 4.695 5.164 1 0.824
 Several times a month 6.103 7.981 1.189
 Once in a week 7.042 5.164 0.667
 Several times a week 11.737 15.962 1.236
 Everyday 9.390 11.268 1.091
 Several times a day 7.981 7.512 0.856
Biscuits consumption frequency
 Never 1.878 2.347 1 0.822
 Several times a month 2.817 3.756 1.067
 Once in a week 2.817 3.286 0.933
 Several times a week 14.085 11.268 0.640
 Everyday 15.962 20.657 1.035
 Several times a day 9.390 11.737 1.000

*Significant; COR: Crude odds ratio

Dental caries

About 53% of respondents suffered from dental caries. The average decay-missing-filled (DMF) score was 1, decayed-extracted-filled (def) was 1.08, and the total average DMF and def score were 2.07. The most missing permanent tooth was the first molar of the entire region, respectively. The most abundant primary tooth was the central incisors throughout the region, respectively [Table 4].

Table 4.

Decay, missing, and filling distribution by tooth

Tooth region Tooth type Decay (%) Missing (%) Filling (%) Mean DMF/def Mean DMF and def
Permanent tooth
 Right maxilla Central incisive 1.16 0 0 1 2.07
Lateral incisive 1.73 2.86 0
Canine 2.89 2,86 0
First premolar 1.73 14.29 0
Second premolar 1.73 0 0
First molar 10.4 2.86 0
Second molar 1.16 0 0
Third molar 0 0 0
 Left maxilla Central incisive 0.58 0 0
Lateral incisive 2.89 2.86 0
Canine 3.47 0 0
First premolar 1.73 11.43 0
Second premolar 1.16 8.57 0
First molar 12.14 5.71 0
Second molar 0.58 0 0
Third molar 0 0 0
 Left mandibular Central incisive 0 0 0
Lateral incisive 0.58 0 0
Canine 0.58 0 0
First premolar 0.58 11.43 0
Second premolar 3.47 5.71 0
First molar 23.12 8.57 16.67
Second molar 0.58 0 16.67
Third molar 0 0 0
 Right mandibular Central incisive 0 0 0
Lateral incisive 0 0 0
Canine 1.16 0 0
First premolar 2.89 17.14 0
Second premolar 2.89 0 0
First molar 19.65 5.71 50
Second molar 1.16 0 16.67
Third molar 0 0 0
Primary teeth
 Right maxilla Central incisive 28.63 0 0 1.08
Lateral incisive 0.4 4.35 0
Canine 1.61 0 0
First molar 4.84 8.7 0
Second molar 7.26 8.7 100
 Left maxilla Central incisive 11.69 0 0
Lateral incisive 0.4 4.35 0
Canine 0.4 8.7 0
First molar 4.03 8.7 0
Second molar 6.05 0 0
 Left mandibular Central incisive 10.89 0 0
Lateral incisive 0 0 0
Canine 0 0 0
First molar 1.61 8.7 0
Second molar 6.05 26.09 0
 Right mandibular Central incisive 10.48 4.35 0
Lateral incisive 0 0 0
Canine 0 4.35 0
First molar 1.21 4.35 0
Second molar 4.44 8.7 0

def: Decayed-extracted-filled; DMF: Decay-missing-filled

Risk factors associated with dental caries

Based on bivariate analysis, there was a significant relationship between caries and father education, soda consumption, and the use of toothbrush to clean teeth. Based on multivariate analysis, the three variables showed a significant relationship with P = 0.0001. Based on multivariate analysis, the three variables showed a significant relationship with P = 0.0001. Respondents, who did not brush their teeth using toothbrush, were at least 1.6 times as likely to suffer from caries compared to those who did not use toothbrushes. Respondents with daily soda consumption were at risk for caries 3.3 times compared with those who did not consume soda. Respondents with fathers who had graduated from elementary school were at risk for caries 4.5 times compared with those who did not complete primary school [Table 5].

Table 5.

Multivariate analysis using multiple logistic regression

Variables Dental caries COR AOR P

Negative (%) Positive (%)
Father education
 No school 8.920 6.573 1 1 <0.0001*
 Did not pass elementary school 0.000 0.469 4.034 4.528
 Graduated from elementary school or equivalent 2.817 5.164 2.379 2.803
 Graduated junior high school/equivalent 1.878 4.225 2.839 2.926
 High school graduation/equivalent 11.737 15.023 1.714 1.686
 Graduated higher education (diploma, S1, S2, and S3) 15.962 17.840 1.501 1.688
 There are no adult men in the house 5.634 3.756 0.914 0.854
Soda consumption frequency
 Never 27.700 29.577 1 1 <0.0001*
 Several times a month 11.737 10.329 0.827 0.853
 Once in a week 2.817 6.103 1.946 2.058
 Several times a week 2.817 2.817 0.937 0.862
 Everyday 1.408 4.225 2.543 3.301
 Several times a day 0.469 0.000 0.312 0.298
Toothbrush user
 Yes 0.469 0.000 1 1 <0.0001*
 No 46.479 53.052 3.422 1.699

*Significant. AOR: Adjusted odds ratio; COR: Crude odds ratio

Discussion

Surabaya is the second-most populous city in Indonesia with 2,848,583 people recorded in the chartered city limits in the 2015 census with the extended metropolitan development area called Gerbangkertosusila (derived from Gresik-Bangkalan-Mojokerto-Surabaya-Sidoarjo-Lamongan). It adds more than 12 million inhabitants in several cities and around 50 districts spread over noncontiguous urban areas, including Gresik, Sidoarjo, Mojokerto, and Pasuruan regencies. Although the central government of Indonesia recognizes only the metropolitan area (Surabaya, Gresik, and Sidarjo) as greater Surabaya (Zona Surabaya Raya) with a population of 8,319,229, Surabaya is now the second-largest metropolitan area in Indonesia. The city is highly urbanized with industries centralized in the city, and it contains slums. Surabaya is an old city that has expanded overtime, and its population continues to grow at roughly 0.52% per year.[23]

In Surabaya, there is a scarcity of data on dental caries in primary schoolchildren. Dental caries is a common health problem among primary schoolchildren. The prevalence of dental caries found in the present study was 53%. The caries prevalence was higher than studies carried out in Gunung Anyar Surabaya in 2014 (30.8%).[24] However, the caries prevalence was equal to the results of a study conducted in Nepal (52%)[25] but higher than the study conducted in Tanzania (17.6%),[26] Ethiopia (36.3%–48.1%),[8,27] and Nigeria (35.5%),[14] yet lower than India (77%).[28] The difference could be due to difference in knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAPs) on oral hygiene as our study was undertaken among urban school children.

The data collected in this study showed that low educational level of either parent was related to the presence of children's caries. These results corresponded to the results of similar studies which revealed an association between the presence of children's caries and the socioeconomic level of parents.[29,30] The adoption of good oral health habits in childhood often leads to positive results in the quality of the health and life of the children.[31] Previous studies have proved that children live in poverty had infrequent dental visit, therefore, had higher prevalence of dental caries.[7,32,33] However, in this study, a clear association between family income and dental caries was not observed. This was comparable with a study done in Sri Lanka.[32] Parents and responsible adults are the principal actors in the children's development in the 1st year of life. Thus, the interventions directed at parents' beliefs and attitudes about oral health may be beneficial in the prevention of oral problems such as dental caries. Sufia et al. (2009)[34] in their study stated that the younger age of the parents, higher level of educational attainment, higher income due to better occupational status and urban residence all had strong association with dental caries, and positive influence on dental health practices of the children. This can be attributed to the increased awareness regarding dental health among younger parents with higher level of educational attainment. Furthermore, better occupational status of the parents provides better accessibility to dental care.

Moreover, the usage of toothbrush for cleaning was significantly associated with dental caries. Children who had cleaned their teeth with toothbrush revealed a lower prevalence of dental caries. This may be attributed to the fact that toothbrush is more effective for the removal of plaque from the tooth surface. The low prevalence of dental caries in toothbrush users may be due to the fact that the bristles of a toothbrush could reach and clean those inaccessible areas of the oral cavity that might not be accessible to the finger and other materials. It is generally true that cleaning teeth will remove the food debris away from the oral cavity. Therefore, S. mutans cannot get enough nutrient and time for growth so that there is no acid production which causes dental caries development.[22,35]

In this study, we confirmed that children with daily consumption of soda or soft drinks were at risk for caries 3.3 times higher compared with those who did not consume soda. In addition to the effect of soft drinks on caries development, frequent soft drink consumption may also lead to the erosion of enamel.[36] The acidic nature of soft drinks does not apply only to those containing sugar but also to sugar-free (diet)-labeled soft drinks.[37] Both soft drinks and sports drinks have been proved to have a pH between 2.5 and 3.5.[38] The chronic exposure of tooth structure to beverages with a low pH may result in enamel wearing away over time.[38] An increase in consumption results in more frequent exposure to low salivary pH which may accelerate the caries process. The ideal pH of the oral cavity is neutral which ranges from 6.5 to 7.5.[39] As mentioned earlier, a pH of 5.5 or lower may result in the development of caries lesions. Various studies have evaluated the impact of pH levels on enamel. In vivo studies have shown that the oral cavity has the ability to recuperate once the pH has gone below the optimal levels.[33] However, the repeated reduction in pH levels is still significant regarding enamel demineralization.

This study has the following main limitations. The detection of dental caries using diagnostic instrument and radiology was not possible because of lack of instruments and laboratory setup. Therefore, dental caries was identified using clinical diagnosis only.

Conclusion

Dental caries is a common public health problem among primary school children in Surabaya. Toothbrush usage, soda consumption, and educational level of fathers were the associated factors for dental caries. Therefore, health education on oral hygiene, dietary habits, and dental visit should be given for children to prevent and control dental caries. Moreover, further studies, including private and rural schoolchildren using all methods of diagnosis of dental caries and assessment of KAPs of children and their parents on oral hygiene should be recommended.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Okoye L, Ekwueme O. Prevalence of dental caries in a Nigerian rural community: A preliminary local survey. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2011;1:187–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dawkins E, Michimi A, Ellis-Griffith G, Peterson T, Carter D, English G, et al. Dental caries among children visiting a mobile dental clinic in South central Kentucky: A pooled cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2013;13:19. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Franco e Franco TC, Amoroso P, Marin JM, de Avila FA. Detection of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus in dental plaque samples from Brazilian preschool children by polymerase chain reaction. Braz Dent J. 2007;18:329–33. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402007000400011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.García-Closas R, García-Closas M, Serra-Majem L. A cross-sectional study of dental caries, intake of confectionery and foods rich in starch and sugars, and salivary counts of Streptococcus mutans in children in Spain. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:1257–63. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/66.5.1257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Colak H, Dülgergil CT, Dalli M, Hamidi MM. Early childhood caries update: A review of causes, diagnoses, and treatments. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013;4:29–38. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.107257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Moses J, Rangeeth BN, Gurunathan D. Prevalence of dental caries, socio-economic old school going children of chid ambaram status and treatment needs among 5 to 15 year old school going children Of Chidambaram. J Clin Dign Res. 2011;5:146–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maher R, Khan A, Rahimtoola S, Bratthall D. Prevalence of mutans streptococci and dental caries in Pakistani children. J Pak Med Assoc. 1992;42:213–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ayele FA, Taye BW, Ayele TA, Gelaye KA. Predictors of dental caries among children 7-14 years old in Northwest Ethiopia: A community based cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2013;13:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tinanoff N, Kanellis MJ, Vargas CM. Current understanding of the epidemiology mechanisms, and prevention of dental caries in preschool children. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:543–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Amoroso P, Ávila FA, Gagliardi CM. Prevalence of different Streptococci species in the oral cavity of children and adolescents. Braz J Oral Sci. 2003;2:164–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Okada M, Soda Y, Hayashi F, Doi T, Suzuki J, Miura K, et al. Longitudinal study of dental caries incidence associated with Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus in pre-school children. J Med Microbiol. 2005;54:661–5. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46069-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Llena C, Leyda A, Forner L, Garcet S. Association between the number of early carious lesions and diet in children with a high prevalence of caries. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16:7–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ritter AV. Talking with patients. Dental caries. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16:76. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00460.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Okoye LO. Caries experience among school children in South-Eastern Nigeria. Caries Res. 2010;44:171. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang S, Liu J, Lo EC, Chu CH. Dental caries status of bulang preschool children in Southwest China. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hanioka T, Ojima M, Tanaka K, Yamamoto M. Does secondhand smoke affect the development of dental caries in children? A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:1503–19. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8051503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Udoye CI, Aguwa E, Chukezie R, Ezeokenwa M, Jerry-Oji O, Okpaji C. Prevalence and distribution of caries in the 12-15-year urban school children in Enugu, Nigeria. J Dent Sci. 2009;7:178–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sugito FS, Djoharnas H, Darwita RR. Breast feeding and early childhood caries (ECC) severity of children under three years old in DKI Jakarta. Makara J Health Res. 2008;12:86–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rahel W, Herawati, Satiti K. Prevalensi early childhood caries dan severe early childhood caries pada anak prasekolah di Gunung Anyar Surabaya. Dent J. 2014;47:186–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jayalie VF, Paramitha MS, Jessica J, Liu AC, Ramadianto AS, Trimartani, et al. Profile of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo national hospital. E J Kedokt Indones. 2016;4:156–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Indonesian Population. 2018. [Last accessed on 2018 Aug 23]. Available from: http://www.worldpopulationreview.com/countries/indonesia-population/
  • 22.Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Sturdevants the art and science of Operative Dentistry. 4th ed. Mosby Elsevier Health Science; 2000. pp. 66–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Surabaya Population. 2018. [Last accessed on 2018 Aug 23]. Available from: http://www.worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/surabaya-population/
  • 24.Sucipto RW, Herawati, Kuntari S. The prevalences of early childhood caries and severe early childhood caries in preschool children at Gunung Anyar Surabaya. Dent J. 2014;4:186–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Prasai Dixit L, Shakya A, Shrestha M, Shrestha A. Dental caries prevalence, oral health knowledge and practice among indigenous Chepang school children of Nepal. BMC Oral Health. 2013;13:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Masumo R, Bardsen A, Mashoto K, Šstrøm AN. Prevalence and socio-behavioral influence of early childhood caries, ECC, and feeding habits among 6-36 months old children in Uganda and Tanzania. BMC Oral Health. 2012;12:24. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Okubagze J. Epidemiology of dental caries in a rural high land community North West Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J. 1987;25:127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Joshi N, Rajesh R, Sunitha M. Prevalence of dental caries among school children in Kulasekharam village: A correlated prevalence survey. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2005;23:138–40. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.16887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kumar S, Tadakamadla J, Kroon J, Johnson NW. Impact of parent-related factors on dental caries in the permanent dentition of 6-12-year-old children: A systematic review. J Dent. 2016;46:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schwendicke F, Doost F, Hopfenmüller W, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Dental caries, fluorosis, and oral health behavior of children from herat, Afghanistan. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2015;43:521–31. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Abiola Adeniyi A, Eyitope Ogunbodede O, Sonny Jeboda O, Morenike Folayan O. Do maternal factors influence the dental health status of Nigerian pre-school children? Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009;19:448–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2009.01019.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Perera PJ, Abeyweera NT, Fernando MP, Warnakulasuriya TD, Ranathunga N. Prevalence of dental caries among a cohort of preschool children living in Gampaha district, Sri Lanka: A descriptive cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2012;12:49. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.AJ-Jewair TS, Leake JL. The prevalence and risks of early childhood caries in Toronto, Canada. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010;11:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sufia S, Khan AA, Chaudhry S. Maternal factors and child's dental health. J Oral Health Comm Dent. 2009;3:45–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dawani N, Nisar N, Khan N, Syed S, Tanweer N. Prevalence and factors related to dental caries among pre-school children of sadder town, Karachi, Pakistan: Across-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2012;12:59. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Roos EH, Donly KJ. In vivo dental plaque pH variation with regular and diet soft drinks. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:350–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Milosevic A. Sports drinks hazard to teeth. Br J Sports Med. 1997;31:28–30. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.31.1.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Järvinen VK, Rytömaa II, Heinonen OP. Risk factors in dental erosion. J Dent Res. 1991;70:942–7. doi: 10.1177/00220345910700060601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Anderson P, Hector MP, Rampersad MA. Critical pH in resting and stimulated whole saliva in groups of children and adults. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001;11:266–73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-263x.2001.00293.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Contemporary Clinical Dentistry are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES