Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Immunology Research logoLink to Journal of Immunology Research
. 2020 Apr 2;2020:8202067. doi: 10.1155/2020/8202067

Development and Validation of a Bordetella pertussis Whole-Genome Screening Strategy

Ricardo da Silva Antunes 1,✉, Lorenzo G Quiambao 1, Aaron Sutherland 1, Ferran Soldevila 1, Sandeep Kumar Dhanda 1, Sandra K Armstrong 2, Timothy J Brickman 2, Tod Merkel 3, Bjoern Peters 1,4, Alessandro Sette 1,4
PMCID: PMC7154976  PMID: 32322598

Abstract

The immune response elicited by the protective whole-cell pertussis (wP) versus the less-protective acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine has been well characterized; however, important clinical problems remain unsolved, as the inability of the currently administered aP vaccine is resulting in the reemergence of clinical disease (i.e., whooping cough). Strong evidence has shown that original, childhood aP and wP priming vaccines provide a long-lasting imprint on the CD4+ T cells that impacts protective immunity. However, aP vaccination might prevent disease but not infection, which might also affect the breadth of responses to Bordetella pertussis (BP) antigens. Thus, characterizing and defining novel targets associated with T cell reactivity are of considerable interest. Here, we compare the T cell reactivity of original aP and wP priming for different antigens contained or not contained in the aP vaccine and define the basis of a full-scale genomic map of memory T cell reactivity to BP antigens in humans. Our data show that the original priming after birth with aP vaccines has higher T cell reactivity than originally expected against a variety of BP antigens and that the genome-wide mapping of BP using an ex vivo screening methodology is feasible, unbiased, and reproducible. This could provide invaluable knowledge towards the direction of a new and improved pertussis vaccine design.

1. Introduction

Several studies and epidemiological evidence suggest that the immunity induced by Bordetella pertussis (BP) acellular vaccines (aP) wanes more rapidly as compared to the immunity elicited by vaccines based on whole BP cells (wP) [1–8]. In previous studies [9, 10], we have investigated potential immune correlates of this waning immunity, by dissecting immune responses in young adults, originally primed with either aP or wP vaccines. These studies were enabled by the definition of the T cell epitopes contained in the BP antigens contained in the aP vaccines (pertussis toxin, PtTox; two serotypes of fimbriae, Fim2/3; filamentous hemagglutinin, FHA; and pertactin, PRN), which was achieved following the systematic analysis of responses following the expansion of antigen-specific T cells in short-term in vitro culture [9], and the development of the activation-induced marker (AIM) assays, which allowed measurement of responses directly ex vivo without any further manipulation [11, 12].

When immune responses to aP boosters in individuals who received their initial doses with either wP or aP vaccines were compared, BP-specific memory CD4+ T cell responses were associated with Th1/Th17 versus Th2 differential polarization as a function of childhood vaccination [10]. Strikingly, after aP booster, donors originally primed with aP were associated with lower responses ex vivo and lower in vitro proliferation. These observations led to the hypothesis that lower proliferative capacity of aP might be linked to a regulatory cell population, since no difference between cohorts was noted when purified T cell subpopulations were assayed.

As mentioned above, the available data demonstrates that the BP wP vaccine is effective and prevents infection, but the total breath of responses is not known. Based on these observations, it could be expected that broad responses are elicited upon vaccination, directed against a variety of different BP antigens. These responses could be possibly blunted over time with repeated aP boosters. The data present in the literature also demonstrate that the aP vaccine despite waning over time is also effective in initial protection against whooping cough [3, 13–15], but by comparison to the wP vaccine, it could be expected that this vaccine would elicit a narrow response directed mostly against the four vaccine antigens. As a result, little or no response against non-aP vaccine BP antigens would be detected. Several lines of evidence argue against this simplistic view, which are related to the possible interplay between vaccination and natural BP exposure/infection [16]. Specifically, recent data from both baboon and mouse models [15, 17–21] suggests that aP vaccination might prevent disease but not infection or in particular nasopharyngeal subclinical colonization. This might paradoxically result in broad responses in aP and is of greater magnitude than wP because of heavier and more frequent exposure.

To specifically address this, we set out to study T cell responses from BP antigens not contained in the aP vaccine, as function of either aP or wP priming vaccination, as well as to address the feasibility of using a large-scale ex vivo methodology for T cell epitope identification specific for BP.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Subjects

We recruited 31 healthy adults from San Diego, USA (Supplementary ). All participants provided a written informed consent for participation, and clinical medical history was collected and evaluated by the clinical coordinators through questionnaires, recording dates and numbers of vaccination, including the information that no boost was administered in at least the previous four years prior to this study. All donors were from the San Diego area and originally vaccinated with either DTwP or DTaP priming vaccines in infancy (three doses at 2, 4, and 6 months and then two doses between 15-18 months and 4-6 years) and followed the recommended vaccination regimen (which is also necessary for enrollment in the California school system), which entails immunization with the acellular booster vaccine Tdap at 11-12 years and then every 10 years and during pregnancy. The pertussis (P) compounds in these vaccines (“w” for whole-cell, also wP for short, and “a” for acellular, also aP for short) are coadministered with diphtheria toxoid (D) and tetanus toxoid (T). Also, the capital and lowercase letters denote higher or lower proportions of the overall components between vaccines. Individuals who had been diagnosed with BP infection at any given time in their life were excluded. In all groups, male and female subjects were included equally.

2.2. Study Approval

This study was performed with approvals from the Institutional Review Board at La Jolla Institute for Immunology (protocols: VD-101-0513 and VD-059-0813). All participants provided a written informed consent for participation, and clinical medical history was collected and evaluated.

2.3. Peptides

Peptide selection was derived either from Bordetella pertussis (BP) whole-genome predictions from the Tohama I strain or from experimentally validated antigens included in the aP vaccines (FHA, Fim2/3, PRN, and PtTox). Experimentally validated peptides were selected from a total of 785 peptides tested from the BP strain Tohama I, encompassing 16-mers overlapping by eight residues of the full-length coverage of all antigens. The top epitopes recognized by >5% donors corresponding to 132 peptides were chosen, and the megapool (MG) of all combined peptides is described as PT (MG) hereafter [9, 10]. BP genome-wide identification was performed by scanning for the presence of predicted HLA class II promiscuous binding peptides. MHC-peptide binding predictions were performed using publicly available tools hosted by the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) Analysis Resource [22]. Specifically, the prediction of peptides was established by the 7-allele HLA class II restricted method and by using peptides 15 residues in length and overlapping by 10 residues [23, 24]. Additional filtering using an epitope cluster analysis tool [25] was performed. Briefly, the peptides from each ORF were created in an overlapping fashion, which due to a shared 9-amino acid core prediction base often had similar binding affinities (percentile score). A modified algorithm from IEDB clustering tool to remove redundant peptides sharing a stretch of 9-amino acids in 15-mers was performed. In case of peptides sharing a core, the peptides with highest binding affinities were picked. At least 2 peptides per open reading frame (ORF) were selected. The selected peptides were pooled together and underwent sequential lyophilization as described elsewhere [10] and arranged in “megapools” (MGs) of approximately 200 peptides each further divided into groups of 8 “mesopools” (MSs) of 24 individual peptides. For BP adenylate cyclase toxin (ACT), the full length of the antigen was covered and the top 20% predicted epitopes were selected to originate a 54 peptide ACT MGs. All individual peptides (Supplementary ) were synthesized by Mimotopes (Victoria, Australia) and resuspended to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL in DMSO.

2.4. PBMC Isolation

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from whole blood or leukapheresis by density gradient centrifugation according to the manufacturer's instructions (Ficoll-Paque Plus, Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) as previously described [26]. The cells were cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen and suspended in fetal bovine serum (FBS) containing 10% (vol/vol) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).

2.5. Bordetella pertussis Lysate Production

BP lysates were prepared from iron-starved bacteria (to simulate growth conditions in the natural mammalian host environment) [27–29], provided by Drs. Sandra Armstrong and Timothy Brickman (University of Minnesota Medical School, USA). Specifically, the bacteria were cultured in the iron-deficient chemically defined Stainer-Scholte medium [30, 31]. The bacterial cells were harvested at mid- to late-exponential growth phase and suspended in phosphate-buffered saline. The lysate was generated by mechanical shearing at low temperature (French press), frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then shipped to the La Jolla Institute for Immunology (CA, USA). Growth was monitored by optical density readings, and the iron starvation status of the bacteria was confirmed using siderophore detection assays [32, 33] and SDS-PAGE analysis of proteins.

2.6. AIM Assay

The activation-induced marker (AIM) assay was previously described [12]. This assay detects cells that are activated as a result of antigen-specific stimulation by staining antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells for TCR-dependent upregulation of OX40 and CD25 (AIM25) and/or PD-L1 (AIMPD) after an optimal time of 18–24 h of culture. Briefly, cryopreserved PBMCs were thawed, and 1 × 106 cells/condition were immediately cultured together with PT and ACT peptide pools (2 μg/mL), selected MS (1 μg/mL), individual peptides (10 μg/mL), or PHA (10 μg/mL; Roche) and DMSO as positive and negative controls, respectively, in 5% human serum (Gemini Bio-Products) for 24 h. To determine the memory phenotype of responding T cells, staining for CD45RA and CCR7 markers was performed and subpopulations were defined as follows: naive T cells (Tn): CD45RA+CCR7+; effector memory RA T cells (Temra): CD45RA+CCR7-; T central memory (Tcm): CD45RA-CCR7+; and T effector memory (Tem): CD45RA-CCR7-. The samples were acquired using a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using the FlowJo X software. Specific signals were all subtracted to the DMSO control displayed as % of CD4 T cells and normalized and displayed as the number of cells per 1 × 106 CD4 T cells. All flow cytometry mAb reagents for surface staining are listed in Supplementary .

2.7. ELISpot and FluoroSpot Assays

Culturing of PBMCs for in vitro expansion was performed by incubating in RPMI (Omega Scientific) supplemented with 5% human AB serum, GlutaMAX (Gibco), and penicillin/streptomycin (Omega Scientific) at 2 × 106 per mL in the presence of BP lysates at 10 μg/mL. Every 3 days, 10 U/mL IL-2 in RPMI medium was added to the cultures. After 14 days in culture with the BP lysate, the expanded T cells were tested for the recognition of the epitope pools or individual peptides as described above. As readout, the standard IFNγ/IL-5 and IL-17/IL-9 cytokine combination for ELISpot assay or IFNγ/IL-5/IL-13 cytokine combination for FluoroSpot assay was performed as described [9, 34]. For ex vivo determinations, the same combination of cytokines was used after 20 h incubation with lysate (10 μg/mL), epitope pools (2 μg/mL), or individual peptides (10 μg/mL) besides PHA (2 μg/mL) and DMSO as positive and negative controls, respectively. Consistent with these previous studies in order to be considered positive, a response in both in vitro or ex vivo modalities had to match all three different criteria: (1) eliciting at least 20 spot-forming cells (SFC) per 106 PBMCs; (2) p ≤ 0.05 by Student's t-test or by the Poisson distribution test; and (3) stimulation index (SI) ≥ 2.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Comparisons between groups were made using the nonparametric two-tailed, unpaired Mann–Whitney U or Spearman's rank correlation coefficient tests. Prism 8.0.1 (GraphPad) was used for all these calculations. All figure data in which error bars are shown are presented as median ± interquartile range when each dot represents an individual donor or as mean ± SEM when each dot represents a technical replicate. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Original aP and wP Primes Are Associated with High T Cell Reactivity for All Antigens Contained and Not Contained in aP Vaccine

There are emerging proofs of BP subclinical colonization in vaccinated individuals, including indirect evidences of asymptomatic transmission [35–38], as observed in animal models [19, 21], which could affect T cell responses against BP antigens to a greater extent than originally expected.

To address this issue, we examined memory CD4 responses to a previously defined peptide pool of BP epitopes encompassing the 4 antigens (FHA, Fim2/3, PRN, and PtTox) contained in the aP vaccine [10] in a set of PBMCs derived from 31 donors either originally vaccinated with aP (n = 16) or originally vaccinated with wP (n = 15). We used two assay formats, one is an ex vivo AIM assay that measures the antigen-specific upregulation of OX40 and CD25 markers and the other is a lysate expansion followed by an ELISpot assay. Using the lysate expansion, we found that responses in the two groups were equivalent (with a small trend towards higher response in the aP group) (Figure 1(a), top). In the same experiments, we also measured responses against a pool of BP epitopes from the adenylate cyclase toxin (ACT) antigen, a virulence factor that is not contained in the aP vaccine [39]. Interestingly, we found that aP donors also exhibited equivalent memory T cell reactivity against the ACT antigen (Figure 1(a), bottom). Importantly, the same results were corroborated when assaying responses in a different subset of donors and using the ex vivo AIM modality (Figure 1(b)). Finally, responses against the set of antigens present in the aP vaccine showed differential polarization as a function of the original priming vaccination consistent with literature [9, 10, 40, 41], but surprisingly, responses against ACT did not (Figure 1(c)). Overall, aP-vaccinated subjects are associated with immune responses against a variety of BP antigens, including antigens not present in the aP vaccine, consistent with the notion that aP prevents disease but not colonization/exposure, and this result is apparent using two different assay modalities.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Original childhood aP priming is associated with high reactivity to pertussis antigens. (a) Cytokine production was measured by ELISpot following in vitro restimulation with BP lysate. Magnitude of responses expressed by spot-forming cells (SFC) is shown for the sum of T cell responses (IFNγ, IL-5, IL-17, and IL-9) for all aP antigens (PT) or ACT between wP- and aP-primed donors (n = 12 for aP and n = 12 for wP cohorts). (b) % of BP-specific CD4+ memory T cells for PT or ACT antigens by AIM assay for donors originally primed with wP or aP vaccine (n = 15 for aP and n = 9 for wP cohorts). (c) Differential polarization of T cell responses for PT but not ACT. Each data point represents the ratio of IFNγ/IL-5 SFCs from each donor (n = 12 for aP and n = 12 for wP cohorts). Data are expressed as median ± interquartile range for each cohort with the Mann–Whitney U test comparison value.

3.2. A Genome-Wide Reactivity Screen of T Cell Reactivity to BP with Different Assay Modalities Considered

The data discussed in the previous section suggests that the definition of a full-scale genomic map of memory T cell reactivity to BP antigens in humans should be both feasible and of considerable interest [42]. Indeed, a similar genome-wide mapping of T cell responses to Mycobacterial tuberculosis antigens has been recently accomplished [43].

To explore the feasibility of a similar screen in the case of BP antigens, bioinformatic epitope predictions [42, 44] for the whole BP genome indicated the synthesis of approximately 25,000 peptides, spanning over 3300 BP putative ORFs. Here, we wanted to specifically test the practicality of a potential large-scale screening strategy, by testing a selected set of these 25,000 peptides, which would be initially arranged in approximately 130 “megapools” (MGs) of approximately 200 peptides each. Additionally, we envisioned that each MG would be further divided into 8 “mesopools” (MSs) of about 24 individual peptides. These various pools and peptides would be tested using PBMCs derived from apheresis from 20 young adults originally vaccinated with either wP or aP vaccines.

Below, we report the results of a pilot study using the selected wP and aP donors to define the screening methodology. We tested 8 MSs containing peptides that have been mapped in the whole BP genome to include the 4 antigens contained in the aP vaccine (PRN, PtTox, Fim2/3, and FHA), but also novel ORFs, not yet assayed for T cell reactivity (Supplementary ). As a positive control, we tested the previously described PT MG [10], produced with the previously identified vaccine-reactive epitopes and containing 132 peptides. The purpose of the experiments was to specifically compare the results obtained with different screening modalities, including the ex vivo ELISpot/FluoroSpot [43], the 14-day restimulation ELISpot/FluoroSpot [9], and the ex vivo AIM assay [12] (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Approaches for genome-wide screening and measurement of T cell reactivity. Schematic design for the screening of BP whole genome using different assay modalities (AIM versus ELISpot/FluoroSpot) and strategies (in vitro versus ex vivo) to capture T cell-specific responses.

3.3. In Vitro Lysate Stimulation Allows Identification of BP-Specific Responses

In the first series of experiments, we evaluated the FluoroSpot assay platform ex vivo. When we tested IFNγ, IL-5, IL-13, IL-17, IL-9, and TNF-α production in response to the 8 MSs, no positive responses were detected. The PT MG composed of known epitopes and used as a positive control also did not elicit any detectable responses (not shown). These results show that, in the case of BP, direct ex vivo screening is not feasible with the FluoroSpot platform as reported for mycobacterial tuberculosis [43].

As an alternative, and similar to the assay shown in Figure 1(a), we considered an in vitro restimulation step, to expand antigen-specific T cells. In fact, this assay modality has been successfully utilized in numerous studies where allergen extracts were employed to expand allergen-specific T cells [45–48]. In this context, we wanted to determine whether a BP lysate could be also utilized to expand BP-specific T cells and measure BP-specific responses. Accordingly, we produced a lysate prepared from iron-starved BP cultures. PBMCs were stimulated in vitro for 14 days with 10 μg/mL of the lysate, and the expanded T cells were tested in a 24 h FluoroSpot assay, where the number of cells secreting the various cytokines was recorded. The results of a pilot study utilizing PBMCs from 12 aP and 12 wP donors, respectively, are shown in Figure 3, demonstrate that the BP lysate can be used to expand cells for subsequent use in the 14-day restimulation FluoroSpot assay.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

BP lysates can be used to expand cells for assessing BP antigen reactivity. The magnitude of responses expressed by spot-forming cells (SFC) is shown for the sum of T cell responses (IFNγ, IL-5, IL-17, and IL-9) for lysate restimulation after 14 days of expansion with BP lysate (n = 12 for aP and n = 12 for wP cohorts). Data are expressed as median ± interquartile range for each cohort with the Mann–Whitney U test comparison value.

3.4. In Vitro Lysate Stimulation Allows Identification of Novel BP Antigens and Epitopes

In the next series of experiments, with the method established above, we assayed in vitro cultures from two independent donors, and after the 14-day lysate expansion, the 8 MSs were tested in the FluoroSpot assay for the most abundant cytokine production (i.e., IFNγ, IL-5, and IL-13). The MS encompassing peptides from known and novel antigens were all associated with positive signals in the restimulation FluoroSpot assay as well as the positive control (not shown). Representative data are shown for one of the two donors and one of the MSs, where the signal was deconvoluted to map the individual peptides recognized by the responding T cells (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Deconvolution of positive MS reidentifies known antigens and identifies epitopes from novel antigens. Cytokine production was measured by FluoroSpot after 14 days of in vitro restimulation with BP lysate. The magnitude of responses expressed by spot-forming cells (SFC) is shown for the sum of T cell responses (IFNγ, IL-5, and IL-13) of a representative donor for all individual peptides (n = 24) from a positive mesopool containing the known pertactin antigen. The name of the all the antigens encompassing the group of peptides is shown.

The results indicate that deconvolution of positive MS reidentified the known antigens; in the case of the representative data shown, a vigorous pertactin response was observed. Most importantly, the results indicate that the approach also identifies epitopes from novel antigens endowed with high immunoreactivity. Specifically, strong responses were noted for peptide epitopes derived from DD-transpeptidase antigen, a bacterial enzyme involved in cell wall biosynthesis [49]. Further analysis indicated that the MS responses observed were associated with the expected polarization pattern (Th2 for aP, Th1/Th17 for wP) when performing parallel intracellular staining assays (not shown). In conclusion, these results indicate that the in vitro restimulation combined with a FluoroSpot assay is a suitable methodology for the large-scale BP screen.

3.5. Ex Vivo AIM Assay Reproducibly Identifies Candidates for Deconvolution

In the next series of experiments, we evaluated the feasibility of a screening modality utilizing an ex vivo AIM assay [10–12] similar to the approach used in Figure 1(b). The results of AIM assays where PBMC from a representative donor out of 6 donors were stimulated with the eight MSs are shown in Figure 5(a). The results show data obtained in three completely independent experiments on different days. The results between different days were highly correlated with high significance (p < 0.0001) when performing a multiple linear regression analysis, regardless of whether the absolute positive cells/106 cells or SI (signal to noise ratios) were considered. Based on these results, a threshold of 100 cells and SI of 2 were provisionally set to identify MS candidates for deconvolution.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Ex vivo AIM assay pool screening on different days reproducibly identifies candidates for deconvolution. (a) % of BP-specific CD4+ T cells for the pool of aP antigens (PT) or for the 8 MSs containing peptides from the 4 individual aP antigens was measured by the AIM assay. Peptides from the 4 individual antigens are aligned by ORF position but flanked by peptides from other antigens and unequally distributed over 2 adjacent and unique MSs each. Individual circles represent an independent technical replicate of the same donor performed on a different day. A representative donor is shown. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Dotted line indicates positive response threshold of 100 cells set to identify MS candidates for deconvolution. (b) Memory subset composition of PT MG- and MS-specific responses (SI > 2) is shown as % of total CD4+ T cells gated in AIM-positive cells (Tn: CD45RA+CCR7+, Temra: CD45RA+CCR7-, Tcm: CD45RA-CCR7+, and Tem: CD45RA-CCR7-). The average data for each positive mesopool are shown (n = 5).

Parallel experiments investigated the memory phenotype of the responding cells, defined on the basis of the expression of the CD45RA and CCR7 markers as described in more detail in Materials and Methods. As expected and in a similar fashion to PT MG composed of known epitopes, the BP-specific T cells detected in the reactive MS (SI > 2) were mostly derived from the effector memory (Tem) and central memory (Tcm) subsets (Figure 5(b)).

Finally, we investigated whether the two positive MSs containing the pertactin antigen could be further deconvoluted, down to the level of individual peptides. The results shown in Figure 6 show that this is indeed the case. The deconvolution identified peptides from the known aP antigen pertactin and in addition identified epitopes from novel antigens. Specifically, strong responses were noted for peptide epitopes derived from the D-alanyl-D-alanine transpeptidase and siroheme synthase antigens, both enzymes associated with BP biosynthetic processes. The graph shows the results from three independent assays performed on different days and indicates that the assay results are associated with minimal day-to-day variability and high correlation (p < 0.0001). Further experiments also revealed a good correlation between the results of the ex vivo AIM assay and cytokine production by the Ag-reactive T cell enrichment (ARTE) assay ([50]; not shown) suggesting that peptide stimulation captures activated cells that are actively producing cytokines. In conclusion, these results indicate that the ex vivo AIM assay is also a suitable methodology for the large-scale BP screen.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Ex vivo AIM assay can reproducibly detect signals down to the peptide level. (a) Representative flow cytometry plots of CD25+OX40+ upregulation by CD4+ T cells in cells left unstimulated (Unst) or stimulated with pools of peptides (PT-megapool (n = 132 peptides) or mesopool (n = 24 peptides)) or individual peptides as well as PHA as a positive control. (b) % of BP-specific CD4+ memory T cells for each individual peptide (n = 48) deconvoluted from 2 contiguous positive MSs (PRN_1 (ms1, n = 24) and PRN_2 (ms2, n = 24)) containing among others, peptides (n = 10) from the known antigen pertactin (PRN; pink area) as measured by AIM assay. Each dot represents an independent technical replicate of the same donor performed on a different day. A representative donor is shown. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The names of the all the antigens encompassing the group of peptides whose responses were significant are shown.

3.6. Ex Vivo and In Vitro Assays Are Highly Correlated

The results presented above indicate that both the in vitro restimulation/FluoroSpot and the ex vivo AIM assays are suitable methodologies for the large-scale BP screen. Given that both assays are suitable, we next addressed the question of whether the two different assay platforms would also lead to the identification of similar epitopes. When compared, it was found (Figure 7) that the two results obtained in the in vitro restimulation/FluoroSpot and the ex vivo AIM assays were highly correlated (p < 0.0001). In general, the correlation between the two assays is high. However, it is also noted that in some instances (Figure 7(a)), peptides 10, 14, 23, and 24 are associated with high activity in the FluoroSpot assay and relatively low AIM signal. It is not clear whether this is simply within experimental error or corresponds to a true reproducible phenomenon. In any case, it is noted that in the vast majority of instances, the peptides associated with high FluoroSpot activity are still positive for the specified AIM assay threshold. Since our concern is to identify an assay to be used as primary screen, those peptides would still be identified as positive and characterized in more detail in secondary assays, regardless whether the FluoroSpot or AIM would be used as a primary screen. Overall, based on these results, it appears that the two platforms are equivalent and potentially interchangeable.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Correlation of results of the ex vivo AIM assay and 14 days restimulation assays. (a) The data show the overlay of the average of the individual peptide response as captured by either AIM or FluoroSpot assays for a selected mesopool deconvolution from a representative donor. (b) The best fit of the peptide data set is represented by a linear regression line (red) and the p value expresses Spearman's rank correlation coefficient test.

4. Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrate that both the in vitro restimulation/FluoroSpot and the ex vivo AIM assays are suitable methodologies for the large-scale BP screen. In general, both assay platforms yield reproducible results when the assays are repeated in independent experiments performed on different days, and these findings have been verified utilizing different independent donors. Based on the results, we tentatively set a threshold of 100 cells and SI of 2 to identify positive MS candidates for deconvolution.

Surprisingly, our results indicate that aP donors also exhibited equivalent memory T cell reactivity against the ACT antigen, which is not found in the aP vaccines. Higher levels of antibody against ACT have also been observed in the plasma of aP-primed donors (unpublished observations). Thus, aP-vaccinated subjects are associated with immune responses against a variety of BP antigens not just present in the aP vaccine, which is consistent with the notion that aP prevents disease but not BP colonization/exposure [18, 19, 21].

Because both assay platforms appear to yield equivalent results, the question arises related to which of the two might be preferable. The ex vivo AIM platform is more laborious on the assay day (but this step can be at least partially automated), while the in vitro restimulation step, by definition, has a longer time to completion and requires more steps. The ex vivo AIM assay has three important advantages, as (1) it is not dependent on the responding cell to secrete any particular cytokine, (2) it introduces minimal physiological perturbations, as compared to a 2-week culture period, and (3) it allows mapping of subcellular populations and further phenotypic characterization [42].

Finally, in terms of biological relevance, both assay platforms correctly reidentify known antigens such as pertactin as an important source of BP epitopes and in addition identify novel epitopes derived from novel antigens such as D-alanyl-D-alanine transpeptidase and siroheme synthase. These results further support the interest and feasibility of performing a whole-genome-wide screen of BP T cell antigens. Both the in vitro restimulation/FluoroSpot and the ex vivo AIM assays results are associated with the expected polarization patterns, further underlining the biological relevance of the observations. In an age of increasingly reported cases and outbreaks of whooping cough throughout the globe, along with imperfect protection provided by currently administrated aP vaccines, the identification of novel antigens associated with BP virulence and persistence is warranted and crucial for better control and prevention of both transmission and disease.

Acknowledgments

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers U01 AI141995, U19 AI142742, and 75N93019C00066. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We are grateful to all donors that participated in the study and the clinical studies group staff, particularly Shariza Bautista, Brittany Schwan, and Gina Levi, for all the invaluable help.

Data Availability

All The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article or included within the supplementary information associated with this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1: characteristics of the donor population. Supplementary Table 2: list of individual peptides of each megapool. Supplementary Table 3: list of antibodies used in the study.

Click here for additional data file. (19.7KB, xlsx)

References

  • 1.Diavatopoulos D. A., Edwards K. M. What is wrong with pertussis vaccine immunity? Why immunological memory to pertussis is failing. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2017;9(12) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a029553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.de Cellès M. D., Magpantay F. M. G., King A. A., Rohani P. The impact of past vaccination coverage and immunity on pertussis resurgence. Science Translational Medicine. 2018;10(434) doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaj1748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Domenech de Celles M., Rohani P., King A. A. Duration of immunity and effectiveness of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccines in children. JAMA Pediatrics. 2019;173(6):588–594. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Klein N. P., Bartlett J., Rowhani-Rahbar A., Fireman B., Baxter R. Waning protection after fifth dose of acellular pertussis vaccine in children. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;367(11):1012–1019. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Saadatian-Elahi M., Plotkin S., Mills K. H. G., et al. Pertussis: biology, epidemiology and prevention. Vaccine. 2016;34(48):5819–5826. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sealey K. L., Belcher T., Preston A. Bordetella pertussis epidemiology and evolution in the light of pertussis resurgence. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2016;40:136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.van der Lee S., Hendrikx L. H., Sanders E. A. M., Berbers G. A. M., Buisman A. M. Whole-cell or acellular pertussis primary immunizations in infancy determines adolescent cellular immune profiles. Frontiers in Immunology. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zerbo O., Bartlett J., Goddard K., Fireman B., Lewis E., Klein N. P. Acellular pertussis vaccine effectiveness over time. Pediatrics. 2019;144(1) doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bancroft T., Dillon M. B. C., da Silva Antunes R., et al. Th1 versus Th2 T cell polarization by whole-cell and acellular childhood pertussis vaccines persists upon re-immunization in adolescence and adulthood. Cellular Immunology. 2016;304-305:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2016.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.da Silva Antunes R., Babor M., Carpenter C., et al. Th1/Th17 polarization persists following whole-cell pertussis vaccination despite repeated acellular boosters. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2018;128(9):3853–3865. doi: 10.1172/JCI121309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.da Silva Antunes R., Paul S., Sidney J., et al. Definition of human epitopes recognized in tetanus toxoid and development of an assay strategy to detect ex vivo tetanus CD4+ T cell responses. PloS one. 2017;12(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dan J. M., Lindestam Arlehamn C. S., Weiskopf D., et al. A cytokine-independent approach to identify antigen-specific human germinal center T follicular helper cells and rare antigen-specific CD4+ T cells in blood. Journal of Immunology. 2016;197(3):983–993. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ausiello C. M., Cassone A. Acellular pertussis vaccines and pertussis resurgence: revise or replace? MBio. 2014;5(3) doi: 10.1128/mBio.01339-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Esposito S., Stefanelli P., Fry N. K., et al. Pertussis prevention: reasons for resurgence, and differences in the current acellular pertussis vaccines. Frontiers in Immunology. 2019;10 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kapil P., Merkel T. J. Pertussis vaccines and protective immunity. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2019;59:72–78. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2019.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miller I. F., Metcalf C. J. Vaccine-driven virulence evolution: consequences of unbalanced reductions in mortality and transmission and implications for pertussis vaccines. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2019;16(161) doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Allen A. C., Wilk M. M., Misiak A., Borkner L., Murphy D., Mills K. H. G. Sustained protective immunity against _Bordetella pertussis_ nasal colonization by intranasal immunization with a vaccine-adjuvant combination that induces IL-17-secreting TRM cells. Mucosal Immunology. 2018;11(6):1763–1776. doi: 10.1038/s41385-018-0080-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Solans L., Locht C. The role of mucosal immunity in pertussis. Frontiers in Immunology. 2019;9 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Warfel J. M., Zimmerman L. I., Merkel T. J. Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111(2):787–792. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314688110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Warfel J. M., Zimmerman L. I., Merkel T. J. Comparison of three whole-cell pertussis vaccines in the baboon model of pertussis. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2016;23(1):47–54. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00449-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wilk M. M., Borkner L., Misiak A., Curham L., Allen A. C., Mills K. H. G. Immunization with whole cell but not acellular pertussis vaccines primes CD4 TRMcells that sustain protective immunity against nasal colonization withBordetella pertussis. Emerging Microbes & Infections. 2019;8(1):169–185. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2018.1564630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dhanda S. K., Mahajan S., Paul S., et al. IEDB-AR: immune epitope database-analysis resource in 2019. Nucleic Acids Research. 2019;47(W1):W502–W506. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dhanda S. K., Karosiene E., Edwards L., et al. Predicting HLA CD4 immunogenicity in human populations. Frontiers in Immunology. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paul S., Lindestam Arlehamn C. S., Scriba T. J., et al. Development and validation of a broad scheme for prediction of HLA class II restricted T cell epitopes. Journal of Immunological Methods. 2015;422:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2015.03.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dhanda S. K., Vaughan K., Schulten V., et al. Development of a novel clustering tool for linear peptide sequences. Immunology. 2018;155(3):331–345. doi: 10.1111/imm.12984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Boyum A. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Isolation of monuclear cells by one centrifugation, and of granulocytes by combining centrifugation and sedimentation at 1 g. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. Supplementum. 1968;97:77–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bullen J. J. The significance of iron in infection. Reviews of Infectious Diseases. 1981;3(6):1127–1138. doi: 10.1093/clinids/3.6.1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ganz T., Nemeth E. Iron homeostasis and its disorders in mice and men: potential lessons for rhinos. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 2012;43(3s):S19–S26. doi: 10.1638/2011-0158.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Weinberg E. D. Iron and infection. Microbiological Reviews. 1978;42(1):45–66. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.42.1.45-66.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Armstrong S. K., Clements M. O. Isolation and characterization of Bordetella bronchiseptica mutants deficient in siderophore activity. Journal of Bacteriology. 1993;175(4):1144–1152. doi: 10.1128/JB.175.4.1144-1152.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stainer D. W., Scholte M. J. A simple chemically defined medium for the production of phase I Bordetella pertussis. Journal of General Microbiology. 1970;63(2):211–220. doi: 10.1099/00221287-63-2-211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brickman T. J., Armstrong S. K. The ornithine decarboxylase gene odc is required for alcaligin siderophore biosynthesis in Bordetella spp.: putrescine is a precursor of alcaligin. Journal of bacteriology. 1996;178(1):54–60. doi: 10.1128/JB.178.1.54-60.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schwyn B., Neilands J. B. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Analytical Biochemistry. 1987;160(1):47–56. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Birrueta G., Frazier A., Pomés A., et al. Variability in German cockroach extract composition greatly impacts T cell potency in cockroach-allergic donors. Frontiers in Immunology. 2019;10 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Althouse B. M., Scarpino S. V. Asymptomatic transmission and the resurgence of Bordetella pertussis. BMC Medicine. 2015;13(1) doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0382-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gill C., Rohani P., Thea D. M. The relationship between mucosal immunity, nasopharyngeal carriage, asymptomatic transmission and the resurgence of Bordetella pertussis. F1000Res. 2017;6:p. 1568. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11654.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Palazzo R., Carollo M., Fedele G., et al. Evidence of increased circulation of Bordetella pertussis in the Italian adult population from seroprevalence data (2012-2013) Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2016;65(7):649–657. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang Q., Yin Z., Li Y., et al. Prevalence of asymptomatic Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis infections among school children in China as determined by pooled real-time PCR: a cross-sectional study. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2014;46(4):280–287. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2013.878034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Carbonetti N. H. Pertussis toxin and adenylate cyclase toxin: key virulence factors of Bordetella pertussis and cell biology tools. Future Microbiology. 2010;5(3):455–469. doi: 10.2217/fmb.09.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ausiello C. M., Urbani F., la Sala A., Lande R., Cassone A. Vaccine- and antigen-dependent type 1 and type 2 cytokine induction after primary vaccination of infants with whole-cell or acellular pertussis vaccines. Infection and Immunity. 1997;65(6):2168–2174. doi: 10.1128/IAI.65.6.2168-2174.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ryan E. J., Nilsson L., Kjellman N. I. M., Gothefors L., Mills K. H. G. Booster immunization of children with an acellular pertussis vaccine enhances Th2 cytokine production and serum IgE responses against pertussis toxin but not against common allergens. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 2000;121(2):193–200. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01306.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tian Y., da Silva Antunes R., Sidney J., et al. A review on T cell epitopes identified using prediction and cell-mediated immune models for mycobacterium tuberculosis and Bordetella pertussis. Frontiers in Immunology. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lindestam Arlehamn C. S., Gerasimova A., Mele F., et al. Memory T cells in latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection are directed against three antigenic islands and largely contained in a CXCR3+CCR6+ Th1 subset. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vaughan K., Seymour E., Peters B., Sette A. Substantial gaps in knowledge of Bordetella pertussis antibody and T cell epitopes relevant for natural immunity and vaccine efficacy. Human Immunology. 2014;75(5):440–451. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2014.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Birrueta G., Tripple V., Pham J., et al. Peanut-specific T cell responses in patients with different clinical reactivity. PloS one. 2018;13(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.da Silva Antunes R., Pham J., McMurtrey C., et al. Urinary peptides as a novel source of T cell allergen epitopes. Frontiers in Immunology. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Oseroff C., Sidney J., Vita R., et al. T cell responses to known allergen proteins are differently polarized and account for a variable fraction of total response to allergen extracts. Journal of Immunology. 2012;189(4):1800–1811. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schulten V., Greenbaum J. A., Hauser M., et al. Previously undescribed grass pollen antigens are the major inducers of T helper 2 cytokine-producing T cells in allergic individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110(9):3459–3464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300512110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yocum R. R., Waxman D. J., Rasmussen J. R., Strominger J. L. Mechanism of penicillin action: penicillin and substrate bind covalently to the same active site serine in two bacterial D-alanine carboxypeptidases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1979;76(6):2730–2734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.6.2730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bacher P., Schink C., Teutschbein J., et al. Antigen-reactive T cell enrichment for direct, high-resolution analysis of the human naive and memory Th cell repertoire. Journal of Immunology. 2013;190(8):3967–3976. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1: characteristics of the donor population. Supplementary Table 2: list of individual peptides of each megapool. Supplementary Table 3: list of antibodies used in the study.

Click here for additional data file. (19.7KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article or included within the supplementary information associated with this manuscript.

Articles from Journal of Immunology Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES