Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2020 Apr 14;14(4):e0008233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008233

The estimated burden of scrub typhus in Thailand from national surveillance data (2003-2018)

Tri Wangrangsimakul 1,2,*, Ivo Elliott 2,3, Supalert Nedsuwan 4, Rawadee Kumlert 5, Soawapak Hinjoy 6, Kittipong Chaisiri 7, Nicholas P J Day 1,2, Serge Morand 8
Editor: Husain Poonawala9
PMCID: PMC7182275  PMID: 32287307

Abstract

Background

Scrub typhus is a major cause of acute febrile illness in the tropics and is endemic over large areas of the Asia Pacific region. The national and global burden of scrub typhus remains unclear due to limited data and difficulties surrounding diagnosis.

Methodology/Principal findings

Scrub typhus reporting data from 2003–2018 were collected from the Thai national disease surveillance system. Additional information including the district, sub-district and village of residence, population, geographical, meteorological and satellite imagery data were also collected for Chiangrai, the province with the highest number of reported cases from 2003–2018. From 2003–2018, 103,345 cases of scrub typhus were reported with the number of reported cases increasing substantially over the observed period. There were more men than women, with agricultural workers the main occupational group affected. The majority of cases occurred in the 15–64 year old age group (72,144/99,543, 72%). Disease burden was greatest in the northern region, accounting for 53% of the total reported cases per year (mean). In the northern region, five provinces–Chiangrai, Chiangmai, Tak, Nan and Mae Hong Son–accounted for 84% (46,927/55,872) of the total cases from the northern region or 45% (46,927/103,345) of cases nationally. The majority of cases occurred from June to November but seasonality was less marked in the southern region. In Chiangrai province, elevation, rainfall, temperature, population size, habitat complexity and diversity of land cover contributed to scrub typhus incidence.

Interpretation

The burden of scrub typhus in Thailand is high with disease incidence rising significantly over the last two decades. However, disease burden is not uniform with northern provinces particularly affected. Agricultural activity along with geographical, meteorological and land cover factors are likely to contribute to disease incidence. Our report, along with existing epidemiological data, suggests that scrub typhus is the most clinically important rickettsial disease globally.

Author summary

Scrub typhus, caused by the bacterium Orientia tsutsugamushi, is a major cause of fever in tropical and subtropical Asia. Symptoms can be similar to other common infections such as malaria, dengue, leptospirosis or typhoid, making it difficult to diagnose. Laboratory tests to diagnose scrub typhus are often unavailable, inaccurate, impractical, or too costly. Consequently, the true burden of scrub typhus disease remains unknown. Here, we collected data on the number of reported cases of scrub typhus in Thailand for 2003–2018 from the national surveillance system. There were 103,345 cases reported with incidence rising significantly over the study period. More men than women were affected, agricultural workers were the main occupational group (45%) and most cases (72%) were in adults of working age. The disease was seasonal with the cases mainly occurring during the rainy season from June to November. Five northern provinces were particularly affected with Chiangrai being the province with the highest number of cases. In Chiangrai, agricultural activity, elevation, rainfall, temperature and land cover factors contribute to disease burden. These results improve our understanding of the distribution and burden of scrub typhus in Thailand and help to identify factors that may contribute to disease incidence.

Introduction

Scrub typhus in Asia, Australia and the Islands of the Indian and Pacific Oceans is a major cause of acute non-malarial febrile illness and a potentially severe but treatable zoonotic disease caused by the obligate intracellular Gram negative bacterium Orientia tsutsugamushi [14]. The disease is prevalent across an area of at least 13,000,000 km2, encompassing large tracts of the Asia Pacific region, with emerging reports from the Middle East, South America, Africa and Europe suggesting the disease is more widespread than previously thought [59]. Median mortality rates have been estimated at 6.0% and 1.4% for untreated and treated disease, respectively, with a wide range of 0–70% depending on the study and the region [10, 11]. Transmission occurs through the bite of an infected larval stage (chigger) of the trombiculid mites [12]. Disease incidence may be related to seasonal variation in temperature, rainfall and humidity; socioeconomic factors, terrain, agricultural or other activities exposing humans to suitable habitat or transitional land cover type (mixed cropland and wild vegetation) favouring increased rodent and vector chigger density [1316]. Although the disease is more prevalent in rural regions, cases from urban centres continue to be reported [17].

The incubation period ranges from 6 to 21 days and clinically, scrub typhus is characterised by fever, eschar, maculo-papular rash, headache, cough, nausea, vomiting, myalgia and lymphadenopathy [18]. The eschar at the site of the mite bite is the most characteristic feature but is not always present, being dependent on the degree of pre-existing immunity to the infecting Orientia tsutsugamushi strain [19, 20]. Severe disease may present with complications affecting multiple organ systems [18]. The standard antibiotic treatment is doxycycline for 7 days with alternative options including tetracycline, chloramphenicol, azithromycin and rifampicin [21, 22]. In the majority of patients, fever will clear within 48–72 hours of treatment initiation. Reports of scrub typhus infections poorly responsive to treatment in northern Thailand and the lack of effective preventative measures, mainly vaccines with long-term multi-strain protection, remains a concern [23, 24].

Efforts to estimate the global burden of scrub typhus are hindered by limited data and difficulties surrounding diagnosis [11]. The frequently quoted estimate of one million cases annually lacks supportive evidence [25]. In Thailand, the first human case of scrub typhus was reported in 1952 although captured records from World War II suggest that cases among Japanese troops occurred from 1943 to 1944 [26, 27]. Subsequently, the disease has been shown to be highly prevalent and a major cause of acute febrile illness in the country [4, 2830]. It is notifiable to the National Disease Surveillance System (R506), Bureau of Epidemiology (BoE), Department of Disease Control (DDC), Ministry of Public Health (MoPH), with government and private healthcare facilities in each province reporting to the public health office [31]. There are 76 provinces in Thailand (plus Bangkok, a special administrative area), grouped into 4 administrative regions (North, Northeast, Central and South), with each province being further divided into districts, sub-districts and villages. Within each province, the population is served by a central provincial hospital, district hospitals and primary care or health promoting units located in every sub-district. There has been an increase in notified cases reported from other countries with established passive notification systems such as South Korea, China and Bhutan, while results from Japan and more recently Taiwan suggest the disease incidence has stabilised [15, 3237].

To date, limited data have been published on the national burden of scrub typhus in Thailand. In this study, we describe the burden of disease using national surveillance data from 2003–2018 and investigate the effect of geography, population, rainfall, temperature, habitat complexity and diversity of land use/land cover on disease incidence.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Publically available disease reporting data were obtained from the National Disease Surveillance System (R506), Bureau of Epidemiology (BoE), Department of Disease Control (DDC), Ministry of Public Health (MoPH). All data analysed were anonymised.

Data collection

Detailed data for scrub typhus from 2003–2018 were obtained from the National Disease Surveillance System (R506) [31]. Brief annual summary reports from 1980–2002 were also available and collected. Probable and confirmed cases were reported according to the case definition, based on ICD-10: A75.3, and outlined in Table 1 below.

Table 1. Scrub typhus reporting criteria.

Clinical criteria Acute febrile illness and an eschar with at least one other symptom including:
- Headache
- Myalgia
- Arthralgia
- Ocular or orbital pain
- Petechial rash
Laboratory criteria General findings suggestive of scrub typhus:
- Low white count
- Normal or low platelet count
Disease-specific:
- Detection of a four-fold rise in scrub typhus antibodies in paired sera by haemagglutination inhibition assay or antibodies detected at a cut-off titre of >1:1,280 in a single sample or,
Detection of scrub typhus IgM antibodies by ELISA or,
Orientia tsutsugamushi PCR or culture positive from blood
Case classification:
• Probable case Fulfil clinical criteria and has general laboratory findings suggestive of scrub typhus or epidemiological link to confirmed cases
• Confirmed case Fulfil clinical and disease-specific laboratory criteria

[ELISA–enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay, PCR–polymerase chain reaction]

Cases were reported from governmental healthcare facilities including provincial hospitals, district hospitals and primary care units. Reporting from private healthcare facilities also occurred, albeit to a lesser extent. Reports for each year from 2003–2018 were obtained and collated into a single dataset. Information on the number of cases per province each month, population, annual incidence rate per 100,000 population (AIR), age groups, sex and occupation were collected. Additionally, less detailed information from annual summary reports from 1980–2002 were extracted and data collated into the main dataset. Regional administrative boundaries were obtained from the National Statistical Office, Ministry of Information and Communication Technology. As a case study, we obtained detailed reporting data for Chiangrai province from the Ministry of Public Health, the province with the highest number of reported cases from 2003–2018. Data included patient demographics, location and type of healthcare facilities, and residential data to the sub-district and village level. Administrative boundaries of the province including districts and sub-districts as well as population size were obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Thailand (2012).

Average monthly temperature (°C) and total monthly rainfall (mm) data for Chiangrai at a central representative weather station were obtained from the Thai Meteorological Department, Ministry of Information and Communication Technology. Land use information was obtained from the GlobCover 2009 with a resolution of 1 km (European Space Agency, http://due.esrin.esa.int/page_globcover.php, classification given in S1 Document and S1 Fig). Data were obtained at different administrative levels for Chiangrai province: scrub typhus incidence at village level, population size at sub-district level, rainfall at provincial level and land use at 1 km resolution. We integrated all data at the sub-district level, aggregating human cases obtained at village level and cropping raster data (land use) using sub-district boundaries.

Statistical analyses

Proportions, percentages and averages (median and interquartile range [IQR] or mean and standard deviation [SD] as appropriate) were calculated controlling for any missing data. Seasonality was assessed by calculating proportions of cases (and 95% confidence intervals) reported during discrete time-periods and assessing for overlap as well as performing two-sample test of proportions. These descriptive analyses were performed using STATA 15 software (College Station, Texas, USA). Spatio-temporal analyses were conducted using R software (R Core Team, 2018) [38]:

  1. Spatial autocorrelation of scrub typhus incidence and spatial interpolation using Gaussian process regression (kriging).

  2. Temporal incidence and temporal autocorrelation of scrub typhus cases.

  3. Spatiotemporal distribution of incidence using autocorrelation method, wavelet analysis and correlation between scrub typhus cases, rainfall and temperature.

  4. Analysed the links between scrub typhus cases and the agro-environmental data set using general linear modelling (GLM).

  5. Performed general additive modelling (GAM), taking into account the spatiotemporal dynamics obtained from I, II and III and starting with the initial model that retained the potential explanatory factors of IV.

Further details on spatio-temporal analyses are outlined in S2 Document. Maps were drawn using mapchart.net ©, tmap and tmaptools [39, 40].

Results

National burden of scrub typhus in Thailand

From 2003–2018, there were a total of 103,345 cases of scrub typhus reported to the national disease surveillance system. During this period, the number of cases per year ranged from 2,928 in 2005 to 10,952 in 2013 and the annual incidence rate/100,000 population (AIR) ranged from 4.71 in 2005 to 17.09 in 2013. The median male to female ratio (IQR) was 1:0.74 (0.71–0.76) and the largest groups by occupation (median, IQR) were agricultural workers at 44.80% (42.65–45.88), labourers at 17.95% (15.77–19.22) and students at 14.83% (13.89–16.04). Data on the annual number of cases from 1980–2002 and incidence rate/100,000 population from 1985–2002 were also obtained. Cases per year ranged from 17 in 1980 to 5,094 in 2001 and AIR rose from 0.53 in 1985 to 8.2 in 2001. Sex and occupational groups were inconsistently reported from 1980–2002 but from the available data, the median (IQR) male to female ratio was 1:0.67 (0.56–0.76) and the percentage of agricultural workers was 51.35% (49.01–55.72). To visualise the trend over time, the total annual reported cases and AIR were plotted in (Fig 1A and 1B, respectively).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Trend in the annual number of reported scrub typhus cases (A) from 1980–2018 and annual incidence rate per 100,000 population (B) from 1985–2018.

Age group data were available from 2004–2018 (S2 Fig). The age groups with the highest number of cases per year (mean and SD) were 45–54 years at 1,126 (519) cases, 35–44 years at 1,086 (402) cases and 25–34 years at 972 (303) cases. The majority of cases reported from 2004–2018 were in the 15–64 year old age bracket (72,144/99,543, 72.48%). Indeed, the proportion of cases age <15 years old has been gradually falling from 825/3,290 (25.08%) of cases in 2004 to 1,396/9,756 (14.31%) of cases in 2018.

Cases per month from 2003–2018 were plotted in Fig 2. The months with the highest average number of cases (mean, SD) were October, July and September at 809 (361), 772 (315), and 757 (342) cases, respectively. The majority occurred between June and November, corresponding to the rainy and early cool or dry seasons in Thailand. The proportion of cases (95% CI) from June to November and December to May were calculated: 0.678 (0.675–0.681) and 0.322 (0.319–0.325), p<0.001.

Fig 2. Scrub typhus cases by month from 2003–2018.

Fig 2

Regional and provincial burden of scrub typhus

From 2003–2018, the greatest burden of disease was in the northern region which accounted for approximately half the total cases (see Fig 3 for map of administrative regions). The percentage of cases (mean, SD) from the north per year was 52.55% (7.49%) despite the region contributing only 18.60% (SD 0.36%) of the total population during this period. This is reflected in the mean AIR of 29.40 (SD 13.39) cases for the study period. The mean percentage of cases per year (SD) and mean AIR (SD) from 2003–2018 for the northeast, south and central regions were 30.92% (6.97%) and 9.01 (3.94) cases, 12.40% (2.54%) and 8.94 (4.04) cases, and 4.12% (2.49%) and 0.99 (0.30) cases, respectively.

Fig 3. Administrative regions of Thailand [National Statistical Office, Ministry of Information and Communication Technology; reprinted from mapchart.net under a CC BY license, with permission from Minas Giannekas original copyright 2019].

Fig 3

Detailed occupational data to the regional and provincial level were available from 2006–2018. In the North, agricultural workers made up the largest percentage of cases (median, IQR) at 40.35% (39.72–42.29), followed by labourers at 19.36% (18.79–20.94) and students at 16.45% (15.10–19.10). In the Northeast, there was a larger percentage of agricultural workers at 57.78% (52.82–60.93), followed by labourers and students at 11.31% (10.36–12.57) and 10.47% (9.56–13.79), respectively. A similar pattern was seen in the South, albeit to a lesser extent, with agricultural workers at 33.33% (31.67–33.70), labourers at 22.72% (20.74–25.37) and students at 15.71% (13.68–17.65). A difference was seen in the central region where labourers made up 40.59% (38.06–42.51) of the cases, followed by students at 18.54% (16.48–21.36) and agricultural workers at 12.57% (10.71–13.95).

Regional differences were also observed in the seasonality of cases reported from 2003–2018 as shown in Fig 4. In all four regions, average monthly reported cases were at their lowest from February to April before rising in May. In the North and Northeast, cases peaked in July and October, respectively, before falling in November and December, reaching a trough from February to April. In the southern and central regions, the decline in cases at the end of the year was interrupted by another peak in January prior to falling to a nadir in April. Seasonality of scrub typhus cases was less marked in the southern region when compared to other regions. From 2003–2018, the proportion of cases (95% CI) from June to November and from December to May were calculated for the northern, northeastern, central and southern regions: 0.687 (0.683–0.691):0.313 (0.309–0.317), p<0.001; 0.726 (0.721–0.731):0.274 (0.269–0.279), p<0.001; 0.618 (0.601–0.634):0.382 (0.366–0.399), p<0.001; and 0.538 (0.530–0.547):0.462 (0.453–0.470), p<0.001, respectively.

Fig 4. Seasonality of scrub typhus cases by month per region from 2003–2018.

Fig 4

At the provincial level, the greatest burden of scrub typhus was in the northern provinces (Fig 5). Indeed, the five provinces with the highest average (mean, SD) cases per year from 2003–2018 were Chiangrai– 716 (378), Chiangmai– 684 (435), Tak– 609 (361), Nan– 488 (292) and Mae Hong Son– 437 (221). These five provinces accounted for 46,927 reported cases over the 16 year study period which represents 46,927/55,872 (83.99%) of cases from the northern region, or 46,927/103,345 (45.41%) of cases nationally. The highest AIRs (mean, SD) from 2003–2018 were seen in Mae Hong Son– 173.14 (85.62), Tak– 111.40 (64.54), Nan– 102.07 (61.20), Chiangrai– 58.61 (30.80) and Phang Nga—47.98 (27.85) provinces. Of these, only Phang Nga province (southern region) is outside of northern Thailand.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Map of Thailand depicting: (A) the geography with elevation, provincial boundaries and location of Chiangrai province; (B) total scrub typhus cases from 2003–2018 per district; and (C) interpolation of scrub typhus cases at sub-district level by kriging using semi-variogram based on the centroids of geographical coordinates of each sub-district (for clarity, only provincial boundaries are shown) [created using tmap and tmaptools in R software–R Core Team 2018 [3840]].

Single province case study–Chiangrai province

Chiangrai province was chosen as it represented the province with the highest average number of scrub typhus cases per year along with the 4th highest disease incidence rate per 100,000 population. The province is the northernmost province in Thailand and is divided into 18 districts, 124 sub-districts and 1,816 villages. From 2003–2018, there were a total of 11,444 scrub typhus cases reported to the provincial public health office. The male to female ratio was 1:0.81. The age groups with the highest mean (SD) number of cases per year were 45–54 years at 115 (65) cases, 35–44 years at 109 (55) cases and 25–34 years at 91 (44) cases while the percentage of paediatric cases (age <15 years old) has fallen from 34.01% in 2003 to 21.55% in 2018. The months with the highest average number of cases (mean, SD) were July, August and June at 110 (73), 95 (49), and 90 (55) cases, respectively. The proportion of cases (95% CI) from June to November and December to May for Chiangrai province from 2003–2018 were calculated: 0.716 (0.708–0.7205) and 0.284 (0.275–0.292), p<0.001, respectively.

The main occupations reported were agricultural workers at 35.63%, labourers at 22.76% and students at 20.06%. The majority of scrub typhus patients attended district hospitals 75.26% or the provincial hospital 22.51% while a very small number of cases were reported from private health facilities 1.69%. The majority of patients (66.89%) were managed as outpatients.

From 2003–2018, Mae Fah Luang district had the highest total number of reported cases with 2,413 cases, followed by Mae Suai district with 2,014 cases and Mueang district with 1,431 cases. These 3 districts, located mainly to the west of the province, contributed to around half the total provincial burden over the 16 year period (5,858/11,444–51.19%) despite contributing a combined population of 423,063/1,326,865 (31.88%) of the entire province. Highest average AIR were seen in Mae Fah Luang (212.84), Mae Suai (131.45) and Wiang Pa Pao (96.25) districts.

I. Spatial autocorrelation, semi-variogram and kriging interpolation of scrub typhus cases

A weak spatial autocorrelation was observed when pooling scrub typhus cases for 2003–2018 for Chiangrai province but was no longer significant after 30 km (S3 Fig). The spatial distribution of the scrub typhus cases among sub-districts was analysed using semi-variogram analysis and depicted in Fig 6B. The kriging interpolation, using the results of the semi-variogram analysis, is represented in Fig 6C. Spatial interpolation of scrub typhus cases showed hotspots of cases in high elevation area of the province (Fig 6A and 6C).

Fig 6.

Fig 6

Chiangrai province with: (A) the geography with elevation, main rivers and sub-district boundaries; (B) scrub typhus cases from 2003–2018 per sub-district; and (C) interpolation of scrub typhus cases at sub-district level by kriging using semi-variogram based on the centroids of geographical coordinates of each sub-district [created using tmap and tmaptools in R software–R Core Team 2018 [3840]].

II. Time series analysis of scrub typhus cases, rainfall and temperature

There was an increasing trend in reported scrub typhus cases per month for Chiangrai from 2003 to 2018 with a marked increase after 2010 (Fig 7). There was a strong seasonal pattern with large numbers of scrub typhus cases during the rainy season. The wavelet analysis (S4 Fig) confirmed a seasonal pattern starting in 2008. A strong seasonal pattern for both rainfall and temperature was also observed (Fig 7). A slight increase in average temperature from an average of 24.5°C in 2003 to 25.5°C in 2018 was observed, coinciding with the increase in reported cases. Wavelet power spectrum (S4 Fig) confirmed the above time series analyses by revealing significant 12-month periodicity over the entire study period.

Fig 7.

Fig 7

Time series analysis of (A) reported monthly scrub typhus cases, (B) total monthly rainfall in mm and (C) average monthly temperature in°C for Chiangrai province.

III. Cross temporal correlation analysis

Cross-correlation analysis among pairs of univariate series revealed moderate correlation between rainfall and scrub typhus cases (R = 0.46) with a lag time of one month and moderate correlation between temperature and scrub typhus cases (R = 0.55) with a lag time of two months (S5 Fig).

IV. Association between scrub typhus cases and explanatory variables using General Linear Modelling (GLM)

A GLM analysis was performed using the following explanatory variables: habitat complexity, habitat fragmentation, forest cover (%), forest open cover (%), grassland open cover (%), mosaic habitat cover (%), rain-fed cropland cover (%), flooded-irrigated land cover (%), population size, rainfall and temperature (S2 Document). The top best model selected showed that scrub typhus cases per sub-district per month were significantly associated with all variables included in the initial model supported by an Akaike weights (wr) value of 0.36 (S2 Document, Table 2).

Table 2. Results of the best global GLM with binomial negative link function (p<0.001), with theta = 2.12 (standard deviation = 0.026), explaining the number of scrub typhus cases in Chiangrai province from 2003–2018 by sub-district and by month with explanatory geographical and meteorological variables in the initial model.

Estimate and standard deviation (SD) were given for each selected explanatory variables, with P value and VIF (Variance Inflation Factor). For the best selected model the log likelihood = -8925.35 with degree of freedom (DF) = 12, null deviance = 3497.2, R2 estimated by maximum likelihood (R2ML) = 0.25, wr = 0.36 and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) = 17875 (see S6 Fig).

Explanatory variables Estimate (SD) P value VIF* Odds ratio (CI 2.5%- 97.5%)
Population size 0.00002 (0.000001) <0.0001 1.45 1.45 (1.38–1.53)
Total monthly rainfall 0.001 (0.0001) <0.0001 1.53 1.02 (1.01–1.02)
Average monthly temperature 0.025 (0.005) <0.0001 1.53 1.87 (1.44–2.42)
Forest cover (%) -4.19 (0.53) <0.0001 1.44 0.81 (0.77–0.86)
Forest open cover (%) 0.45 (0.22) 0.046 22.55 1.56 (1.01–2.41)
Grassland open cover (%) -0.0004(0.0001) <0.0001 4.91 0.84 (0.78–0.90)
Mosaic habitat cover (%) -0.78 (0.20) 0.0001 7.60 0.79 (0.70–0.89)
Rain-fed land cover (%) -0.73 (0.18) <0.0001 8.89 0.80 (0.72–0.89)
Flooded-irrigated land cover (%) -0.99 (0.32) 0.002 2.09 0.88 (0.81–0.95)
Habitat complexity 0.14 (0.013) <0.0001 5.11 1.51 (1.40–1.62)
Habitat fragmentation -0.02 (0.004) <0.0001 1.28 0.80 (0.74–0.87)

(*value of VIF > 10 for continuous variables may indicate problems with collinearity)

Multi-collinearity assessed using Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) showed that most VIF values were inferior to 10, suggesting lack of collinearity, except for forest open cover with a VIF value of 22.55, suggesting high collinearity with other land use characteristics. The percentage of deviance explained by this model was estimated by maximum likelihood R2 to 0.25 indicating a good prediction of this best model.

A positive association was found between population size and scrub typhus cases. The number of cases were also positively correlated with temperature and rainfall. Higher numbers of scrub typhus cases were found associated with habitat complexity characterised by large cover of open forested habitat. Lower numbers of scrub typhus cases were associated with fragmented habitat characterised by mosaic habitat or open grassland habitat. Negative associations were also observed between scrub typhus cases and forested, rain-fed and flooded-irrigated lands. The above relationships are depicted in S6 Fig.

V. Association between scrub typhus cases and explanatory variables using General Additive Modelling (GAM)

An initial GAM model was developed that took into account the spatiotemporal dynamics of scrub typhus cases, the temporal dynamics of rainfall and temperature, and the potential explanatory variables selected by the GLM, with the exception of open forested habitats (due to high VIF value), using a negative binomial function (with theta estimated as above). The best GAM model selected using Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) is shown in Table 3 and Fig 8, which did not include the variables habitat fragmentation and grassland open cover (%).

Table 3. Results of general additive modelling (GAM) explaining the number of cases of scrub typhus per sub-district in Chiangrai province using a negative binomial link (theta = 2.12), with approximate significance of smooth terms.

For the best selected model, the deviance explained = 50.4%, R2 = 0.37, maximum likelihood = 8868.2, AIC = 17689.8 (see Fig 8).

Explanatory variables Estimated degrees of freedom Reference DF Chi square P value
Longitude and latitude 16.71 29 117.1 <0.0001
Total monthly rainfall 11.36 24 155.5 <0.0001
Average monthly temperature 0.97 20 1.9 0.10
Population size 2.89 9 87.2 <0.0001
Habitat complexity 1.14 9 6.6 0.002
Rain-fed land cover (%) 1.76 9 8.8 0.001
Mosaic habitat cover (%) 0.86 4 3.3 0.027
Flooded-irrigated land cover (%) 0.84 9 3.3 0.024
Fig 8. Results of the best General Additive Modeling (GAM) explaining the number of scrub typhus cases in Chiangrai province over 2003–2018 by sub-district and by month, using a binomial negative link function (theta = 2.12).

Fig 8

The smoothed variables selected in the best GAM were (A) the geographical distribution of sub-district (longitude and latitude of the centroid), (B) total monthly rainfall (mm), (C) temperature (°C), (D) population size, (E) rain-fed land cover, (F) flooded land cover, (G) habitat complexity and (H) mosaic land cover.

The model explained 50.4% of the deviance (R2 = 0.37) with a better performance than the above best GLM. The best GAM model confirmed the different results obtained above with a significant influence of geography (matrix of geographic coordinates of sub-districts), rainfall, temperature, population, habitat complexity, mosaic habitat, rain-fed and flooded-irrigated lands (Table 3, Fig 8).

Discussion

The results of this study reveal a high burden of scrub typhus in Thailand that has increased significantly over the last two decades. Although cases have been reported from all 77 provinces from 2003–2018, the burden of disease is not uniform with a handful of northern provinces particularly affected. We have also shown that within Chiangrai province, scrub typhus is highly prevalent in the rural and mountainous areas to the western, northwestern and, to a lesser extent, eastern parts of the province.

Our results from Thailand are not unexpected when compared to other countries with reported surveillance data. There have been increases in scrub typhus cases reported in South Korea (2001–2013, 70,914 cases), China (2006–2014, 54,558 cases) and Bhutan (2011–2014, 778 cases), but not Japan (2006–2017, 4,185 cases) or Taiwan (2003–2018, 6,746 cases) where the burden has remained stable [3236, 41]. Similar to Thailand, there were more cases in men than women in Japan and Taiwan but the opposite was seen in China and South Korea. In Thailand, the disease burden was highest in adults of working age while the proportion of children affected continues to fall, reflecting the accelerated increase in disease burden in adults compared to children. Scrub typhus was more common in older age groups in the other five countries, particularly Japan and South Korea with its ageing farming communities [42]. Unsurprisingly, high disease incidence among farmers in China, eastern Taiwan and South Korea were also described and in conjunction with our data, highlights the ongoing risk of disease in agricultural workers [3234]. Increasing urbanisation of scrub typhus has recently been reported from Seoul, South Korea, which may either reflect increased human exposure to rural habitats as urban centres expand or the increase in development of parkland and gardens within municipal boundaries [17].

Seasonality of scrub typhus was observed in China, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan. In Japan, the disease incidence peaked in November and December with a smaller peak in May and June [36]. South Korea reported a disease peak from October to December with lower latitudes associated with a later peak in incidence [15, 32]. In Taiwan, the disease incidence was biphasic with the main peak in June and July and a second smaller peak in September and October [41]. In mainland China, intra-country variation in seasonality was observed with cases in the northern provinces occurring mainly in autumn and early winter while in the southern provinces, the scrub typhus “season” began in spring and extended to the end of the year [33]. The disease pattern in southern China and Taiwan most closely resemble the results from northern and northeastern Thailand which is not unexpected given their similar latitudes. However, our study clearly demonstrates the change in disease seasonality in Thailand as latitude decreases. This effect was more pronounced than the study from South Korea and may reflect Thailand’s proximity to the equator along with its greater latitude range [15]. In southern Thailand, there are two main seasons (wet and dry) and the temperature range is narrower than northern Thailand. Rainfall tend to be higher in the South, with the southwest monsoon affecting the west coast of the peninsula earlier in the season (April to October) while the east coast tends to have higher rainfall later (September to December). In higher latitudes, winters are frequently cold and summers hot, the temperature range affecting the population of vector chiggers [43]. This is demonstrated in Japan, where monthly incidence is more evenly distributed moving southwards [44]. In tropical regions, temperature varies less and here rainfall appears to influence chigger abundance and thus human risk [45, 46].

In Chiangrai province, modelling revealed the partial contribution of geography (elevated or mountainous areas), rainfall, temperature, population size, habitat complexity and diversity of land cover to the number of reported scrub typhus cases per sub-district. The lag time of 2 months for temperature and 1 month for rainfall in the cross correlation analysis could be explained by agricultural activity, such as the clearing of scrub or new vegetation prior to planting in June/July, or chigger activity during the rainy season. Habitats characterised by growth of new or transitional vegetation and associated with the presence of infected rodents and chigger mites are important ecological factors [27, 47]. These habitats are diverse and include virgin forests, gardens, fringe habitats or scrubland, water-meadows, beachheads, rice paddies, bamboo patches and oil palm or rubber plantations, many of which are present in Chiangrai. Although there was a significant effect of population on disease incidence, the proportion of the population exposed to the habitats described is likely to be more predictive but will be harder to obtain. The association of elevation and scrub typhus incidence in our study reflect findings from southern China [16]. This may reflect the reduced accessibility and greater habitat complexity of these regions. In addition, an increase in average monthly temperature from 24.5°C in 2003 to 25.5°C in 2018 correlated with an increase in scrub typhus incidence. This finding is also similar to reports from southern China and together, are suggestive of the influence of climate change on disease burden [16, 48, 49].

Diagnostic capabilities for scrub typhus at district hospitals are limited and most provincial hospitals are not able to perform confirmatory assays in-house, requiring the aid of reference laboratories for confirmation of diagnosis [50]. Antibody detection-based rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for scrub typhus have been introduced (e.g. since 2008 in Chiangrai province) but are sub-optimal [51]. The majority of scrub typhus cases reported in Thailand are probable cases based on the clinical criteria of fever and eschar (with or without positive RDT results). This combination of clinical findings has a sensitivity and specificity of 47% and 81% in adults and 60% and 92% in children for scrub typhus in Chiangrai [52, 53]. Despite this weakness, a scrub typhus surveillance system based on a similar clinical criteria for probable cases can play a valuable role in allowing the disease burden to be extrapolated, particularly in regions where scrub typhus is the dominant eschar-associated disease (alternatives include spotted fever rickettsial infections or necrotic spider bite wounds).

Other limitations include the passive nature of the surveillance system and the effect of healthcare-seeking behaviour on the data used in this study. Passive surveillance systems are reliant on facilities and healthcare and public health staff for data completeness and quality. Although reporting data from private healthcare facilities are included in the analysis, it is unclear whether cases are consistently reported from the private sector. These limitations suggest that the burden of scrub typhus reported in this study is likely to be a gross underestimate of the true disease burden. Additionally, we were unable to measure the influence of other factors including the increase in disease awareness, availability of diagnostic tests, agricultural activity, human behaviour, and chigger abundance and activity in influencing the impressive rise in reported cases since 1980. Finally, although the data on patients’ villages of residence were collected, accurate geolocation data proved particularly difficult to obtain which limited the utility of this high-resolution data. However, the data will allow public awareness and engagement programmes to target villages and sub-districts with the highest burden of scrub typhus. Paradoxically, despite the high incidence of scrub typhus in these areas, awareness among community health workers remains low and is almost completely absent in villagers.

In this report, we have estimated burden of scrub typhus in Thailand from national surveillance data for 2003–2018. Considering that currently available epidemiological data are limited, these results should contribute significantly towards our understanding of the burden of disease both locally and globally. Additional work on the epidemiology of scrub typhus and the development of accurate and cost-effective diagnostic tests should be prioritised. The single province case study has shown how geography, rainfall, temperature and landscape complexity may partly contribute to disease incidence. Further data collection and analyses to investigate the impact of geographical and meteorological factors on disease incidence for the remaining provinces are ongoing. The burden of scrub typhus from Thailand and other countries within and beyond the traditional endemic region suggest it is the most clinically important rickettsial disease globally.

Supporting information

S1 Document. Land use–land cover classification for Chiangrai province.

GlobCover 2009 with a resolution of 1 km was used (http://due.esrin.esa.int/page_globcover.php).

(DOCX)

S2 Document. Details of spatio-temporal analyses performed on reported scrub typhus data, geographical data and meteorological data from Chiangrai province.

(DOCX)

S3 Document. STROBE checklist.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Classification of land use–land cover for Chiangrai province.

GlobCover 2009 satellite imagery was used.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Age-group data of reported scrub typhus cases for Thailand from 2004–2018.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Spatial autocorrelation (distance in km) of reported scrub typhus cases for Chiangrai province from 2003–2018.

(TIF)

S4 Fig

Wavelet analysis for Chiangrai province depicting (A) seasonal pattern of scrub typhus cases from 2008 onwards, (B) significant 12-month periodicity of total monthly rainfall from 2003–2018 and (C) significant 12-month periodicity of average monthly temperature from 2003–2018.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Cross temporal correlation analysis for scrub typhus cases, total monthly rainfall (mm) and average monthly temperature (°C) for Chiangrai province.

Significant correlation was seen between rainfall and scrub typhus cases (R = 0.46, A) with a lag time of one month along with temperature and scrub typhus cases (R = 0.55, B) with a lag time of two months.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Results of the best General Linear Modeling (GLM) explaining the number of scrub typhus cases in Chiangrai province over 2003–2018 by sub-district and by month, using a binomial negative link function (with theta = 2.12).

The smoothed variables selected in the best GLM were (A) habitat complexity, (B) population, (C) habitat fragmentation, (D) forest cover, (E) forest open cover, (F) grassland open cover, (G) mosaic habitat cover, (H) rain-fed land cover, (I) flooded-irrigated land cover, (J) average monthly temperature in°C and (K) total monthly rainfall in mm.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr Pawinee Doung-ngern and other staff at the Communicable Disease Unit, Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health for their help with data collection and permission to utilise the data. We thank staff at the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment and Thai Meteorological Department, Ministry of Information and Communication Technology for their help with data collection. Additionally, we thank Nidanuch Tasak and Piangnet Jaiboon for their role in obtaining data for Chiangrai province.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

TW and NPJD are funded by the Wellcome Trust, UK, as part of the MORU Tropical Health Network institutional funding support. IE is funded by the Wellcome Trust, UK, as part of a Clinical Training Fellowship (grant number 105731/Z/14/Z). SM, RK and KC are supported by the French ANR FutureHealthSEA (ANR-17-CE35-0003-02) “Predictive scenarios of health in Southeast Asia: linking land use and climate changes to infectious diseases”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Mayxay M, Castonguay-Vanier J, Chansamouth V, Dubot-Pérès A, Paris DH, Phetsouvanh R, et al. Causes of non-malarial fever in Laos: a prospective study. The Lancet Global Health. 2013;1(3):e46–e54. 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70008-1 PMC3986032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chheng K, Carter MJ, Emary K, Chanpheaktra N, Moore CE, Stoesser N, et al. A prospective study of the causes of febrile illness requiring hospitalization in children in Cambodia. PloS one. 2013;8(4):e60634 10.1371/journal.pone.0060634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brown GW, Shirai A, Jegathesan M, Burke DS, Twartz JC, Saunders JP, et al. Febrile illness in Malaysia—an analysis of 1,629 hospitalized patients. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 1984;33(2):311–5. 10.4269/ajtmh.1984.33.311 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Suttinont C, Losuwanaluk K, Niwatayakul K, Hoontrakul S, Intaranongpai W, Silpasakorn S, et al. Causes of acute, undifferentiated, febrile illness in rural Thailand: results of a prospective observational study. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2006;100(4):363–70. 10.1179/136485906X112158 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Weitzel T, Dittrich S, Lopez J, Phuklia W, Martinez-Valdebenito C, Velasquez K, et al. Endemic Scrub Typhus in South America. The New England journal of medicine. 2016;375(10):954–61. 10.1056/NEJMoa1603657 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Balcells ME, Rabagliati R, Garcia P, Poggi H, Oddo D, Concha M, et al. Endemic scrub typhus-like illness, Chile. Emerging infectious diseases. 2011;17(9):1659–63. 10.3201/eid1709.100960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Izzard L, Fuller A, Blacksell SD, Paris DH, Richards AL, Aukkanit N, et al. Isolation of a novel Orientia species (O. chuto sp. nov.) from a patient infected in Dubai. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2010;48(12):4404–9. 10.1128/JCM.01526-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jiang J, Richards A. Scrub Typhus: No Longer Restricted to the Tsutsugamushi Triangle. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2018;3(1):11 10.3390/tropicalmed3010011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kelly DJ, Fuerst PA, Ching WM, Richards AL. Scrub typhus: the geographic distribution of phenotypic and genotypic variants of Orientia tsutsugamushi. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2009;48 Suppl 3:S203–30. 10.1086/596576 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Taylor AJ, Paris DH, Newton PN. A Systematic Review of Mortality from Untreated Scrub Typhus (<italic>Orientia tsutsugamushi</italic>). PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2015;9(8):e0003971 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bonell A, Lubell Y, Newton PN, Crump JA, Paris DH. Estimating the burden of scrub typhus: A systematic review. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2017;11(9):e0005838 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005838 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lewthwaite R. Scrub-typhus: a disease of man transmitted by mites. Br Med Bull. 1945;3(9–10):227 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071927 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kuo CC, Huang JL, Ko CY, Lee PF, Wang HC. Spatial analysis of scrub typhus infection and its association with environmental and socioeconomic factors in Taiwan. Acta tropica. 2011;120(1–2):52–8. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.05.018 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wardrop NA, Kuo CC, Wang HC, Clements AC, Lee PF, Atkinson PM. Bayesian spatial modelling and the significance of agricultural land use to scrub typhus infection in Taiwan. Geospat Health. 2013;8(1):229–39. 10.4081/gh.2013.69 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jeung YS, Kim CM, Yun NR, Kim SW, Han MA, Kim DM. Effect of Latitude and Seasonal Variation on Scrub Typhus, South Korea, 2001–2013. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2015. 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0474 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zheng C, Jiang D, Ding F, Fu J, Hao M. Spatiotemporal patterns and risk factors for Scrub Typhus from 2007 to 2017 in southern China. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2018. Epub 2018/12/12. 10.1093/cid/ciy1050 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Park S-W, Ha N-Y, Ryu B, Bang JH, Song H, Kim Y, et al. Urbanization of Scrub Typhus Disease in South Korea. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2015;9(5):e0003814 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003814 PMC4441427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rajapakse S, Weeratunga P, Sivayoganathan S, Fernando SD. Clinical manifestations of scrub typhus. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2017;111(2):43–54. 10.1093/trstmh/trx017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Smadel JE, Ley HL Jr., Diercks FH, Paterson PY, Wisseman CL Jr., Traub R. Immunization against scrub typhus: duration of immunity in volunteers following combined living vaccine and chemoprophylaxis. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 1952;1(1):87–99. 10.4269/ajtmh.1952.1.87 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Paris DH, Chattopadhyay S, Jiang J, Nawtaisong P, Lee JS, Tan E, et al. A Nonhuman Primate Scrub Typhus Model: Protective Immune Responses Induced by pKarp47 DNA Vaccination in Cynomolgus Macaques. Journal of immunology. 2015;194(4):1702–16. 10.4049/jimmunol.1402244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Panpanich R, Garner P. Antibiotics for treating scrub typhus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(3):CD002150 10.1002/14651858.CD002150 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wee I, Lo A, Rodrigo C. Drug treatment of scrub typhus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2017;111(8):336–44. 10.1093/trstmh/trx066 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Watt G, Chouriyagune C, Ruangweerayud R, Watcharapichat P, Phulsuksombati D, Jongsakul K, et al. Scrub typhus infections poorly responsive to antibiotics in northern Thailand. Lancet. 1996;348(9020):86–9. 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)02501-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Valbuena G, Walker DH. Approaches to vaccines against Orientia tsutsugamushi. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2012;2:170 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00170 PMC3539663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Watt G, Parola P. Scrub typhus and tropical rickettsioses. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2003;16(5):429–36. 10.1097/00001432-200310000-00009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Trishnananda M, Vasuvat C, Harinasuta C. Investigation of Scrub Typhus in Thailand. J Trop Med Hyg. 1964;67:215–9. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Audy JR. A summary topographical account of scrub typhus 1908–1946. Bull Inst Med Res Malaya No 1 (New series). 1949:1–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chanyasanha C, Kaeburong K, Chenchittikul M, Sujirarat D. Seroprevalence of scrub typhus infection in patients with pyrexia at some malaria clinics in three western provinces of Thailand. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 1998;16(2–3):119–25. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Leelarasamee A, Chupaprawan C, Chenchittikul M, Udompanthurat S. Etiologies of acute undifferentiated febrile illness in Thailand. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet. 2004;87(5):464–72. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Suputtamongkol Y, Suttinont C, Niwatayakul K, Hoontrakul S, Limpaiboon R, Chierakul W, et al. Epidemiology and clinical aspects of rickettsioses in Thailand. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1166:172–9. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04514.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Scrub typhus, National Disease Surveillance (Report 506): Bureau of Epidemiology, DDC, MoPH. Available from: http://www.boe.moph.go.th/boedb/surdata/disease.php?ds=44.
  • 32.Lee HW, Cho PY, Moon SU, Na BK, Kang YJ, Sohn Y, et al. Current situation of scrub typhus in South Korea from 2001–2013. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:238 10.1186/s13071-015-0858-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wu YC, Qian Q, Magalhaes RJ, Han ZH, Haque U, Weppelmann TA, et al. Rapid Increase in Scrub Typhus Incidence in Mainland China, 2006–2014. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2015. 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0663 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee YS, Wang PH, Tseng SJ, Ko CF, Teng HJ. Epidemiology of scrub typhus in eastern Taiwan, 2000–2004. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2006;59(4):235–8. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tshokey T, Choden T, Sharma R. Scrub typhus in Bhutan: a synthesis of data from 2009 to 2014. WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health. 2016;5(2):117–22. 10.4103/2224-3151.206248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID): Scrub typhus and Japanese spotted fever in Japan 2007–2016. Infectious Agents Surveillance Report (IASR). 2017;38:109–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Minahan N, Chao C-C, Tsai K-H. The Re-Emergence and Emergence of Vector-Borne Rickettsioses in Taiwan. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2018;3(1):1 10.3390/tropicalmed3010001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.R:CoreTeam. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna; 2018. Available from: https://www.R-project.org. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tennekes M. tmap: Thematic Maps in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2018a;84(6):1–39. 10.18637/jss.v084.i0630450020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tennekes M. tmaptools: Thematic Map Tools. R package version 2.0–1. 2018b. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tmaptools.
  • 41.Scrub Typhus, Nationwide, Indigenous, 1996–2018 Taiwan National Infectious Disease Statistics System: Centers for Disease Control, Republic of China (Taiwan); 2019 [cited 2019 17 May]. Available from: https://nidss.cdc.gov.tw/en/SingleDisease.aspx?dc=1&dt=4&disease=0812.
  • 42.Ma CJ, Oh GJ, Kang GU, Lee JM, Lee DU, Nam HS, et al. Differences in agricultural activities related to incidence of scrub typhus between Korea and Japan. Epidemiol Health. 2017;39:e2017051 10.4178/epih.e2017051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Van Peenen PF, Lien JC, Santana FJ, See R. Correlation of chigger abundance with temperature at a hyperendemic focus of scrub typhus. J Parasitol. 1976;62(4):653–4. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sasa M. Comparative epidemiology of Tsutsugamushi disease in Japan. Jpn J Exp Med. 1954;24(6):335–61. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Philip CB, Traub R, Smadel JE. Chloramphenicol in the chemoprophylaxis of scrub typhus; epidemiological observations on hyperendemic areas of scrub typhus in Malaya. American journal of hygiene. 1949;50(1):63–74. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a119346 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Frances SP, Watcharapichat P, Phulsuksombati D, Tanskul P. Occurrence of Orientia zhengtsutsugamushi in chiggers (Acari: Trombiculidae) and small animals in an orchard near Bangkok, Thailand. J Med Entomol. 1999;36(4):449–53. 10.1093/jmedent/36.4.449 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Traub R, Wisseman CL Jr. The ecology of chigger-borne rickettsiosis (scrub typhus). J Med Entomol. 1974;11(3):237–303. 10.1093/jmedent/11.3.237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Li T, Yang Z, Dong Z, Wang M. Meteorological factors and risk of scrub typhus in Guangzhou, southern China, 2006–2012. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:139 10.1186/1471-2334-14-139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wei Y, Huang Y, Li X, Ma Y, Tao X, Wu X, et al. Climate variability, animal reservoir and transmission of scrub typhus in Southern China. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2017;11(3):e0005447 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Koh GC, Maude RJ, Paris DH, Newton PN, Blacksell SD. Diagnosis of scrub typhus. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2010;82(3):368–70. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Blacksell SD, Paris DH, Chierakul W, Wuthiekanun V, Teeratakul A, Kantipong P, et al. Prospective evaluation of commercial antibody-based rapid tests in combination with a loop-mediated isothermal amplification PCR assay for detection of Orientia tsutsugamushi during the acute phase of scrub typhus infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19(3):391–5. 10.1128/CVI.05478-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wangrangsimakul T, Althaus T, Mukaka M, Kantipong P, Wuthiekanun V, Chierakul W, et al. Causes of acute undifferentiated fever and the utility of biomarkers in Chiangrai, northern Thailand. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2018;12(5):e0006477 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wangrangsimakul T, Greer RC, Chanta C, Nedsuwan S, Blacksell SD, Day NPJ, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Children Hospitalized With Scrub Typhus in an Area of Endemicity. Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. 2019. Epub 2019/03/14. 10.1093/jpids/piz014 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008233.r001

Decision Letter 0

Hélène Carabin, Husain Poonawala

26 Jan 2020

Dear Dr. Wangrangsimakul,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "The estimated burden of scrub typhus in Thailand from national surveillance data (2003-2018)" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLoS NTD. We request that you kindly respond to the reviewers comments and resubmit a revised manuscript

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.  

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. 

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Husain Poonawala

Guest Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Hélène Carabin

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLoS NTD. We request that you kindly respond to the reviewers comments and resubmit a revised manuscript

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: The objectives of the study are clearly articulated, and study design is appropriate to address the objectives. The population is clearly described in appropriate and there are no ethical concerns.

Reviewer #2: The methods carried out for the investigation of the burden of scrub typhus in Thailand are clearly described and appropriate to the objective of the study.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: The results are clearly in presented and the figures are of sufficient quality for clarity.

Reviewer #2: The results are clearly described and appropriate.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: The authors' conclusions are supported by the data and the limitations are clearly described. The public health relevance is well presented.

Reviewer #2: The conclusions are supported by the data presented, which are helpful in our understanding of the extent and the diversity of scrub typhus in Thailand. This information will be very helpful to the public health of Thailand and to countries of Southeast Asia. Limitations of the study are provided.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: accept

Reviewer #2: I recommend accepting the manuscript for publication with only very minor suggested changes.

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Extensive data related to scrub typhus epidemiology and Thailand with additional emphasis on the province with the highest incidence are presented. It is an impressive analysis of scrub typhus in Thailand, and the region of highest incidence. Clearly the evidence is that the disease is increasing in incidence. Extensive statistical analyses documented correlations with elevation, rainfall, temperature, habitats complexity, and diversity of land cover.

Reviewer #2: This manuscript is very well written and provides needed results with appropriate conclusions that readers will appreciate.

A very few minor suggested changes, comments, and questions are provided below:

Introduction:

Line 72: Would suggest that you include the area of scrub typhus that you are talking about. That is “Scrub typhus in Asia, Australia and the Islands of the Indian and Pacific Oceans, is a potentially severe but . . .”

Line 77: Would suggest that you include with the estimated mortality rate “with a wide range (min-max) of 0–70%”. This would give the reader a better understanding that the mortality rate can be quite severe in certain locations (possibly due to variation of virulence among different strains of O. tsustsugamushi- which is not dissimilar with what has been seen with RMSF).

Line 79: Would suggest that you put “(chigger)” after the words larval stage. That is … infected larval stage (chigger) of trombiculid mites [12].

Line 462: Do you have a ref(s) for this statement (and the same statement made at the end of the abstract)? I don’t disagree with these statements, and do believe the statements should be stressed.

General comments/concerns/questions:

Was there any way of capturing whether laborers in certain locations may have worked in large urban centers (e.g. Bangkok) but would come home for rice harvesting?

Was there a difference in the number of rice crops per year in the different regions assessed? I would think if there were, you would guess more scrub typhus cases would be found. But if the highest incidence is in areas with only a single season, then that would suggest other behavior, ecology, epidemiology is more important.

Do you expect the number of cases to decrease with larger rice fields managed? Similarly, even in the individual rice farms that are harvested by machinery would suggest the cases of scrub typhus would decrease. If this is not the case, then again other factors then rice farming come into play.

Is land use data from 2009 appropriate for your scrub typhus incidence data collected for the subsequent 10 years?

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008233.r002

Decision Letter 1

Hélène Carabin, Husain Poonawala

18 Mar 2020

Dear Dr. Wangrangsimakul,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'The estimated burden of scrub typhus in Thailand from national surveillance data (2003-2018)' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Husain Poonawala

Guest Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Hélène Carabin

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

Thank you for submitting your revised manuscript. We are glad to inform you that we have accepted your manuscript for publication.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008233.r003

Acceptance letter

Hélène Carabin, Husain Poonawala

7 Apr 2020

Dear Dr. Wangrangsimakul,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "The estimated burden of scrub typhus in Thailand from national surveillance data (2003-2018)," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Serap Aksoy

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Shaden Kamhawi

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Document. Land use–land cover classification for Chiangrai province.

    GlobCover 2009 with a resolution of 1 km was used (http://due.esrin.esa.int/page_globcover.php).

    (DOCX)

    S2 Document. Details of spatio-temporal analyses performed on reported scrub typhus data, geographical data and meteorological data from Chiangrai province.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Document. STROBE checklist.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Fig. Classification of land use–land cover for Chiangrai province.

    GlobCover 2009 satellite imagery was used.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Age-group data of reported scrub typhus cases for Thailand from 2004–2018.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Spatial autocorrelation (distance in km) of reported scrub typhus cases for Chiangrai province from 2003–2018.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig

    Wavelet analysis for Chiangrai province depicting (A) seasonal pattern of scrub typhus cases from 2008 onwards, (B) significant 12-month periodicity of total monthly rainfall from 2003–2018 and (C) significant 12-month periodicity of average monthly temperature from 2003–2018.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Cross temporal correlation analysis for scrub typhus cases, total monthly rainfall (mm) and average monthly temperature (°C) for Chiangrai province.

    Significant correlation was seen between rainfall and scrub typhus cases (R = 0.46, A) with a lag time of one month along with temperature and scrub typhus cases (R = 0.55, B) with a lag time of two months.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Results of the best General Linear Modeling (GLM) explaining the number of scrub typhus cases in Chiangrai province over 2003–2018 by sub-district and by month, using a binomial negative link function (with theta = 2.12).

    The smoothed variables selected in the best GLM were (A) habitat complexity, (B) population, (C) habitat fragmentation, (D) forest cover, (E) forest open cover, (F) grassland open cover, (G) mosaic habitat cover, (H) rain-fed land cover, (I) flooded-irrigated land cover, (J) average monthly temperature in°C and (K) total monthly rainfall in mm.

    (TIF)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES