Abstract
Hair cells, the mechanosensory receptors of the inner ear, are responsible for hearing and balance. Hair cell death and consequent hearing loss are common results of treatment with ototoxic drugs, including the widely used aminoglycoside antibiotics. Induction of heat shock proteins (HSPs) confers protection against aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death via paracrine signaling that requires extracellular heat shock 70-kDa protein (HSP70). We investigated the mechanisms underlying this non–cell-autonomous protective signaling in the inner ear. In response to heat stress, inner ear tissue releases exosomes that carry HSP70 in addition to canonical exosome markers and other proteins. Isolated exosomes from heat-shocked utricles were sufficient to improve survival of hair cells exposed to the aminoglycoside antibiotic neomycin, whereas inhibition or depletion of exosomes from the extracellular environment abolished the protective effect of heat shock. Hair cell–specific expression of the known HSP70 receptor TLR4 was required for the protective effect of exosomes, and exosomal HSP70 interacted with TLR4 on hair cells. Our results indicate that exosomes are a previously undescribed mechanism of intercellular communication in the inner ear that can mediate nonautonomous hair cell survival. Exosomes may hold potential as nanocarriers for delivery of therapeutics against hearing loss.
Keywords: Cell Biology, Neuroscience
Keywords: Apoptosis survival pathways, Neurodegeneration
Introduction
Disabling hearing loss affects approximately 6.1% of the global population (1). Most hearing loss is due to death of sensory hair cells of the inner ear. These mechanosensitive receptor cells mediate hearing and balance functions in the cochlea and vestibular organs, respectively. A variety of stresses can kill hair cells, including aging, noise trauma, and clinical treatment with platinum-based cancer chemotherapeutics or aminoglycoside antibiotics, so-called ototoxic drugs. Ototoxic drugs cause permanent hearing loss in approximately 500,00 people annually in the US alone (2). In patients treated with aminoglycoside antibiotics, hearing loss is caused by direct hair cell damage. Aminoglycosides enter hair cells via both hair cell–specific membrane channels and endocytosis, resulting in intracellular accumulation and subsequent cytotoxicity (3–7). Activation of the heat stress response improves hair cell survival and preserves hearing in animal models of ototoxicity (2, 8–11). Elucidation of the mechanisms underlying this protective effect will advance both the basic science of cochlear function and the clinical development of therapies to prevent or reverse hearing loss.
Sensory hair cells are surrounded by glia-like supporting cells, named for their ability to support normal hair cell function. Supporting cells can mediate both the death and survival of hair cells (12–18). Our previous work demonstrated that supporting cells promote hair cell survival through paracrine signaling that requires extracellular heat shock 70-kDa protein (HSP70) (18). Here, we tested the hypothesis that HSP70-dependent paracrine protection of hair cells is mediated by exosomes. Studies in other systems have demonstrated extracellular release of HSP70 via incorporation into exosomes (19, 20) and frequently identified HSP70 as a protein component of purified exosomes (21). Exosomes are small (50- to 150-nm) extracellular vesicles (EVs) that are released from most cell types and can mediate intercellular communication via receptor signaling or cargo delivery to recipient cells (22). Our data indicate a crucial function for HSP70-containing exosomes in the inner ear stress response and in mediating non–cell-autonomous protection of hair cells.
Results
HSP70 is induced in glia-like supporting cells after heat shock.
Activation of the heat stress response in the inner ear protects sensory hair cells from ototoxic drug exposure (2, 8–11), and this pro-survival effect is mediated through paracrine signaling that requires HSP70 (18). Using whole organ cultures of utricles (a vestibular organ) from adult mice, we previously demonstrated that heat shock results in HSP70 upregulation in glia-like supporting cells with negligible induction in sensory hair cells (18). Here, we confirmed induction of HSP70 in supporting cells after heat shock using additional Abs and improved imaging methods. Utricles were heat shocked at 43ºC for 30 minutes and upregulation of the inducible forms of HSP70 (HSPA1A and HSPA1B) was assessed 6 hours later (Figure 1). We found that HSP70 was induced in supporting cells with little to no induction in hair cells in both whole-mount (Figure 1, A and B) and cryosectioned (Figure 1C) utricles after heat shock. These results are consistent with our previous study (18), which also demonstrated that HSP70 is secreted from heat-shocked utricles. Importantly, this extracellular HSP70 was protective against hair cell death caused by the ototoxic antibiotic neomycin, confirming that HSP70 acts non–cell autonomously.
Heat shock induces the release of exosomes from inner ear tissue.
HSP70 is secreted from many cell types via exosomes (18, 23–27). To determine whether HSP70-dependent intercellular communication in the inner ear is facilitated by exosomes, we explored the relationship between heat stress and EV release. Utricles were cultured in serum-free media for 24 hours, and the utricle-conditioned media were analyzed for exosome-sized particles by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), a method for real-time quantification of particles in liquids (ref. 28 and Figure 2A). Conditioned media from control utricles contained exosome-sized (~50–150 nm) particles. Heat shock increased exosome release by 2.38-fold (95% CI = 1.74–2.82) (Figure 2A).
Exosomes released from heat-shocked utricles were isolated using an established procedure of differential ultracentrifugation (refs. 29, 30 and schematized in Figure 2B) and visualized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Consistent with previously described exosomes from other systems (31, 32), TEM analysis of the final exosome-containing fraction showed small vesicles (90- to 100-nm diameter, 40- to 200-nm range) with a cup-shaped morphology (Figure 2C). Together, these results indicate that control utricles constitutively release exosomes and that heat shock substantially increases exosome release.
Identification of proteins in utricle-derived exosomes.
Exosomes can carry a variety of cargo, such as proteins (including HSP70), lipids, and nucleic acids (21). We used tandem mass spectrometry to identify proteins associated with exosomes released from heat-shocked utricles. To yield high-purity samples, exosomes were separated from soluble proteins and protein complexes in utricle-conditioned media by ultrafiltration followed by size exclusion chromatography (33). We analyzed chromatographic fractions containing vesicles as the “exosome” sample and the remaining fractions as the “non-exosomal fraction” sample (analogous to the supernatant resulting from purification of exosomes by ultracentrifugation). We identified 291 protein families in exosomes, only 56 of which were also present in the non-exosomal fraction (Figure 3A). A Mascot database search using the peptides that were exclusively detected in the exosome sample identified several proteins commonly enriched in exosomes (Table 1), confirming that the utricle-derived vesicles were exosomes. These established exosomal markers included tetraspanin proteins (CD9, CD63, and CD81), as well as tumor susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101), a member of the endosomal sorting complex required for transport I (ESCRT-I) complex, and programmed cell death 6–interacting protein/ALG-2–interacting protein X (ALIX), an ESCRT accessory protein (reviewed in ref. 34). Notably, the peptide matches for members of the HSP70 family were more abundant in the exosome fraction than in the non-exosomal fraction, suggesting that HSP70 family proteins, including the inducible forms (HSPA1A/HSPA1B), may be specifically enriched in exosomes.
Table 1. Common exosome markers.
We performed Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis on proteins identified in utricle-derived exosomes using the Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships (PANTHER) classification system (version 13.1) (35, 36), followed by removal of redundant ontology terms using Reduce and Visualize Gene Ontology (REVIGO) (37). Analysis by cellular component classes identified enrichment of 35 GO terms, with the most statistically significant being “extracellular exosomes” (Figure 3B, GO:0070062). Analysis by biological process identified enrichment of 69 GO terms, with terms associated with inner ear tissue (“sensory perception of sound,” GO:0007605; “sensory perception of mechanical stimulus,” GO:0050954) being among the top 5 statistically significant results (Figure 3C).
The integrin family of transmembrane adhesion receptors control various fundamental cellular functions, including proliferation and cell survival (38, 39). Integrins are heterodimers composed of α and β subunits. In exosomes, integrins are embedded in the membrane, where they mediate intercellular communication. Specifically, the complement of exosomal integrins specifies the target organs or cell types with which an exosome interacts (40). Three α subunits (α-3, α-7, and α-V) and 1 β subunit (β-1) were identified in exosomes from utricles, suggesting that they may specify exosomal tropism in the inner ear (Table 2).
Table 2. Exosome-associated integrins.
Isolated exosomes improve hair cell survival.
We next investigated whether the HSP70-carrying exosomes are protective against aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death. Cultured utricles were heat shocked and exosomes purified from conditioned media via differential ultracentrifugation (Figure 4A). Both the pelleted exosome fraction and the non-exosomal fraction (containing extracellular, soluble proteins and nucleic acids not associated with exosomes) were tested for their ability to protect hair cells from ototoxicity. Treatment of recipient utricles with the aminoglycoside antibiotic neomycin killed approximately 48% of hair cells (Figure 4, B and C). Application of utricle-derived exosomes significantly reduced neomycin-induced hair cell death, whereas the non-exosomal (supernatant) fraction was not protective (Figure 4, B and C). Thus, utricle-derived exosomes are protective against aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death.
Exosome biogenesis is required for the protective effect of heat shock.
We assessed the necessity of exosomes for the protective effect of heat stress through pharmacological inhibition of exosome biogenesis. Exosomes are generated as intraluminal vesicles that bud into a multivesicular body, a process that requires the sphingolipid ceramide (Figure 5A and ref. 41). Spiroepoxide is a selective and irreversible inhibitor of neutral sphingomyelinase II (N-SMase), the enzyme that catalyzes cellular production of ceramide (42, 43). NTA of conditioned media revealed that spiroepoxide treatment resulted in a significant decrease in the number of exosomes released by heat-shocked utricles (0.5 × 109 vs. 1.5 × 109 exosomes/mL) (Figure 5B). Importantly, neither heat shock alone nor heat shock in the presence of spiroepoxide resulted in hair cell death relative to control utricles (Figure 5C). Therefore, the reduced quantity of exosomes released from spiroepoxide-treated utricles cannot be attributed to cell death. We next used spiroepoxide to determine whether exosome biogenesis is required for the pro-survival effect of heat shock in utricles. Neomycin killed approximately 40% of hair cells, whereas heat shock significantly (P = 0.020) improved hair cell survival. Notably, inhibition of exosome biogenesis using spiroepoxide abolished the protective effect of heat shock (Figure 5D). Thus, ceramide is necessary for the formation of utricular exosomes, and inhibition of ceramide production using spiroepoxide inhibits exosome release from cultured utricles. Together, these data demonstrate that the hair cell protection induced by heat stress in utricles requires exosomes.
Supporting cells produce more exosomes compared with hair cells.
We next investigated the cellular source(s) of protective exosomes in the utricle. Utricles contain several cell types, predominantly sensory hair cells and glia-like supporting cells. Additional cell types include macrophages, fibroblasts, and transitional epithelium. We used a differential fluorescence labeling approach to determine the contributions of hair cells and supporting cells to the total exosome population (Figure 6A). mTmG global double-fluorescent reporter mice express membrane-targeted (myristoylated) tandem dimer Tomato (mtdTomato) protein in all cells and myristoylated green fluorescent protein (mGFP) following Cre-mediated excision of mtdTomato (44). Myristoylation of both fluorophores resulted in their incorporation into lipid membranes, including exosome membranes. NTA of conditioned media from heat-shocked mTmG utricles and utricles of age-matched control (WT) mice confirmed that lipid modification of the fluorophores did not interfere with exosome production or release (Figure 6B). mTmG mice were crossed with mice expressing Cre recombinase under control of the growth factor–independent 1 (Gfi1) promoter to generate mice in which 96% of hair cells expressed mGFP, whereas all other cell types expressed mtdTomato (Figure 6C). We used an established microscopy-based technique (45, 46) to detect and quantify fluorescent exosomes. This method does not rely on resolving exosomes, which are below the resolution limit of a standard confocal microscope (~200 nm); instead, it allows detection of exosome-associated fluorescent proteins (mtdTomato or mGFP). The size of the fluorescent puncta (Airy disks) sampled on the microscope’s photodetector is not equivalent to the size of the exosomes but instead is related to the fluorescence intensity of the point source. Using this method, 17.4% ± 1.% (mean ± SEM) of exosomes purified from heat-shocked utricles from mTmG mice crossed with Gfi1-Cre mice were identified as mGFP positive, indicating that they originated from hair cells (Figure 6, C–F). In the complementary experiment, mTmG mice were crossed with mice expressing tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase (CreER) under control of the glial high-affinity glutamate transporter (GLAST, Slc1a3) to produce mice in which 65% of supporting cells expressed mGFP, whereas all other cell types expressed mtdTomato (Figure 6G). We found that 25.3% ± 2.0% of exosomes isolated from these utricles after heat shock were mGFP positive (i.e., originated from supporting cells) (Figure 6, H–J). We adjusted for the efficiency of recombination by the 2 Cre lines (96% efficiency for Gfi1-Cre; 65% efficiency for GLAST-CreER) and found that approximately 38% of utricle-derived exosomes originated from supporting cells, approximately 18% from hair cells, and approximately 44% from other cell types including macrophages, fibroblasts, and transitional epithelium (Figure 6K). These data demonstrate that both hair cells and supporting cells release exosomes, with supporting cells releasing about twice as many exosomes as hair cells.
HSP70 is required for the pro-survival effect of exosomes.
We previously reported that extracellular HSP70 is required for the protective effect of heat shock against neomycin-induced hair cell death (18). Here, we show that (a) HSP70 was associated with utricle-derived exosomes (Table 1); (b) exosomes were essential for the protective response induced by heat stress (Figure 4, B and C, and Figure 5D); and (c) the non-exosomal fraction was not protective (Figure 4, B and C). Together, these data support the hypothesis that exosome-associated HSP70 is required for the heat shock–induced pro-survival effect.
To directly test this hypothesis, we first confirmed HSP70 distribution by Western blot analysis (Figure 7A; see complete unedited blots in the supplemental material, available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI128867DS1). Exosomes and the non-exosomal supernatant fraction were isolated from heat-shocked utricles by differential ultracentrifugation (Figure 2B), and the macromolecules in the non-exosomal fraction were further concentrated using a centrifugal filtration device (3000 molecular weight cutoff [MWCO]). Total protein concentrations for each sample were determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay. We analyzed equivalent protein amounts by Western blotting and found that HSP70 and the canonical exosome marker CD81 were exclusively detected in exosomes and absent from the non-exosomal fraction. These data are in agreement with our proteomics analyses (Table 1) and indicate that HSP70 released from utricles is exosome associated.
We next used immunoelectron microscopy to visualize exosomal HSP70. Exosomes from heat-shocked utricles showed positive immunogold labeling for HSP70, with gold particles clustered around the exosome membrane (Figure 7, B and C). Control samples treated with only the gold-conjugated secondary Ab showed no HSP70 immunoreactivity (data not shown). These results confirm our proteomics and Western blot data demonstrating that utricle-derived exosomes carry HSP70 (Table 1), and they suggest that HSP70 is associated with the exosomal membrane, either directly by integration into the lipid bilayer or indirectly by formation of complexes with transmembrane proteins, as has been reported for HSP70 in exosomes from other systems (26, 47–50).
We used a function-blocking Ab (fbAb) against HSP70 (51, 52) to determine whether exosome-associated HSP70 is required for the protective effect of exosome application (Figure 7D). Utricles exposed to neomycin showed significant death of hair cells, which was again reduced by the application of isolated exosomes. This protective effect was abolished when isolated exosomes were pretreated with a fbAb against HSP70. The HSP70 fbAb alone had no effect on hair cell survival (Figure 7D). These data indicate that HSP70 is critical for the protective effect of exosomes and that HSP70 is at least partially exposed on the exosome surface, where it is accessible by the anti-HSP70 Ab.
To examine whether non-exosomal HSP70 is sufficient for protection, we applied soluble HSP70 to neomycin-treated utricles (Figure 7E). We performed a stringent quantification of hair cell density by manually counting surviving hair cells in the entire posterior region of treated utricles (average area: 80,000 μm2). Although application of exosomes isolated from heat-shocked utricles again improved hair cell survival in neomycin-treated utricles, addition of exogenous HSP70 (i.e., HSP70 not associated with exosomes) was not protective (Figure 7E). These results indicate that association of HSP70 with exosomes is required to induce a pro-survival response in hair cells, and they imply that additional exosomal properties and/or cargo also contribute to the protective effect of exosome application.
Together, our data indicate that HSP70 is associated with the membrane of utricle-derived exosomes and that this exosomal HSP70 is required for the protective effect of exosomes against neomycin-induced hair cell death.
Exosomes interact with TLR4 on hair cells.
Extracellular HSP70 is an endogenous ligand of TLR4 (53–56). Binding of HSP70 to TLR4 mediates protection from ischemia/reperfusion injury in cardiomyocytes and from lethal hyperoxic lung injury (57–59). We therefore explored the role of TLR4 signaling in exosome-mediated hair cell protection in utricles exposed to ototoxic stress. To specifically investigate whether TLR4 is required in hair cells, B6(Cg)-Tlr4tm1.1Karp/J (TLR4-loxP) mice were crossed with B6.Cg-Tg(Atoh1-Cre)1Bfri/J mice expressing Cre recombinase under the control of atonal bHLH transcription factor 1 (Atoh1) (Atoh1-Cre) to produce offspring in which TLR4 was conditionally deleted from hair cells (TLR4-cKO mice). In utricles from littermate control mice [B6(Cg)-Tlr4tm1.1KarpxB6.Cg; referred to herein as WT mice], the application of exosomes from heat-shocked utricles improved hair cell survival following neomycin exposure (Figure 8A), similar to our data from CBA/J mice (Figure 4, B and C). However, when applied to TLR4-cKO utricles, exosomes did not improve hair cell survival in the presence of neomycin. These results indicate that exosome-mediated protection requires TLR4 expression in hair cells.
A proximity ligation assay (PLA) was used to assess whether HSP70 and TLR4 interact in utricles. Two proteins were detected using primary Abs from different species, which were subsequently visualized using secondary Abs conjugated to short DNA oligonucleotides. If the 2 antigen-Ab complexes were in proximity (30–40 nm apart), the conjugated DNA oligonucleotides participated in rolling circle PCR amplification. We visualized the DNA product with labeled oligonucleotide probes to mark the sites of protein-protein interaction. The well-characterized interaction between HSP70 and its co-chaperone HSP40 was used as a positive control paradigm to validate PLA in utricles. Punctate fluorescence, indicating HSP70-HSP40 interaction, was detectable in control utricles, and the number of HSP70-HSP40 puncta increased after heat shock (Figure 8, B and E). Similarly, we observed a baseline number of puncta for the interaction of HSP70 with TLR4 under control conditions, and the number of puncta increased significantly after heat shock (Figure 8, B and F). Importantly, this heat shock–induced increase in HSP70-TLR4 puncta was abolished in the presence of 2 different HSP70 fbAbs but not in the presence of control IgG (Figure 8, B and F), confirming the specificity of the HSP70-TLR4 interaction.
To further corroborate that HSP70 specifically interacts with TLR4 on hair cells, we used a PLA to examine the HSP70-TLR4 interaction in utricles from TLR4-cKO mice. As expected, we observed puncta indicating interaction for both HSP70-HSP40 (positive control) and HSP70-TLR4 in WT utricles (Figure 8C). Both of these interactions increased significantly after heat shock (Figure 8C). In contrast, interaction between HSP70 and TLR4 was not detected above background levels in TLR4-cKO mice under control or heat shock conditions (Figure 8, C and G). Together, these data demonstrate that exosomal HSP70 interacts with TLR4 at the hair cell surface, and the specificity of this interaction was confirmed by our data showing that either blockade of HSP70 or genetic deletion of TLR4 from hair cells abolished this interaction.
Discussion
Exosomes are mediators of the heat stress response in the inner ear.
Our data reveal a biological function for exosomes in the inner ear. Previous work has shown that activation of the heat stress response improves hair cell survival in the face of toxic stress. We present evidence that exosomes are critical intercellular mediators of the protective effect of heat shock against aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death. Heat stress induced exosome release in the inner ear, consistent with data in other systems showing that heat stress affects both the quantity of exosomes released and their HSP content (26, 27, 60). Consequently, our analyses of utricle-derived exosomes by TEM and tandem mass spectrometry revealed that they share both morphology and common protein markers with exosomes from other systems (reviewed in refs. 31, 61).
Two lines of experimentation demonstrated the critical roles of exosomes in non–cell-autonomous protection in the inner ear. First, utricle-derived exosomes protected against neomycin-induced hair cell death, whereas the non-exosomal fraction of the conditioned media was not protective. This was not due to a general increase in global protein abundance in the exosomal fraction, since both our proteomics data and our BCA analyses indicated 5- to 10-fold higher total protein content in the supernatant fraction compared with that in the exosomal fraction (data not shown). Second, inhibition of N-SMase using spiroepoxide demonstrated that exosome biogenesis is required for the protective effect of heat shock. Thus, our data indicate that exosomes are both necessary and sufficient for protection against hair cell death caused by neomycin.
Inner ear exosomes carry HSP70.
Extracellular HSP70 promotes survival of hair cells exposed to ototoxic drugs; however, the mechanism by which HPS70 is secreted has been unclear (18). Our data indicate that HSP70 is released from inner ear cells by incorporation into exosomes. We detected HSP70 in isolated exosomes via tandem mass spectrometry, Western blotting, and immunoelectron microscopy. Immunoelectron microscopy showed that HSP70 appeared to be associated with the exosomal membrane. This idea was further supported by the observation that incubation of purified exosomes with a fbAb against HSP70 abolished their protective activity, suggesting that HSP70 was at least partially exposed on the exosome surface and thus accessible for Ab binding. Our results join the growing body of literature demonstrating that HSP70 is secreted via exosomes (20, 23, 62, 63). Exosomal HSP70 affects target cell protein homeostasis (64), and HSP70 on the exosome surface has repeatedly been implicated in immune cell activation, particularly in the context of cancer (26, 47–50, 63). Notably, functional exosome-associated HSP70 appears to be important for interaction with immediate downstream receptor(s) in the inner ear, since Abs against HSP70 inhibited HSP70-TLR4 interaction in hair cells (Figure 8). This finding is in agreement with data on myeloid-derived suppressive cells, in which targeting membrane-associated HSP70 with an aptamer blocked the ability of exosomes to bind to TLR2 (65).
This work identified exosome-associated HSP70 as an indispensable factor for hair cell survival in the presence of ototoxic drugs. In addition, our proteomics analysis identified numerous other proteins associated with exosomes released from heat-shocked utricles, some of which may have key roles in the pro-survival activity of inner ear exosomes.
Model for exosome-mediated protection of hair cells.
Our data are consistent with a model in which utricle-derived exosomes carry surface-associated HSP70, and this exosomal HSP70 interacts with TLR4 on hair cells to promote their survival (Figure 9). Though our data suggest that a significantly greater number of exosomes were derived from supporting cells relative to hair cells, extremely limited exosome yield from mouse utricle explants precluded the sorting and analysis of subpopulations of exosomes according to their cell type of origin. Given that the isolated exosomes in this study represented the total population of exosomes released from all cells of the utricle, it is unclear whether the exosomes that promoted hair cell survival were specifically those released by supporting cells. However, our previous work (18) as well as the data presented here (Figure 1) show that heat stress induces HSP70 primarily in supporting cells, and thus it seems reasonable to posit that HSP70-positive exosomes may be released by this cell type.
Our data show that exosomes interact with TLR4 on hair cells, but the pro-survival signaling events downstream of this interaction remain unknown. The pro-survival activity of exosomal HSP70 may be independent of the chaperone function of HSP70, as has been demonstrated in hyperoxia-induced lung injury, where extracellular HSP70 acts as a TLR4 ligand to exert a cytoprotective effect in both endothelial cells and lung tissue (59). Of interest, the protective mechanism of HSP70-containing inner ear exosomes displayed similarities to cardioprotection by plasma-derived exosomes carrying HSP70. Here, surface-associated exosomal HSP70 interacted with TLR4 on cardiomyocytes, stimulating the downstream signaling kinases ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK to activate HSP27 (HSPB1). This exosome-driven, HSP70/TLR4-induced signaling cascade protects cardiomyocytes against ischemia/reperfusion injury (58, 66). A similar mechanism may underlie the protective effect of exosomes against hair cell death. Ongoing analysis of the transcriptomic changes induced in exosome-treated hair cells may illuminate the pro-survival responses within hair cells.
Exosomes as inner ear therapeutics.
Death of sensory hair cells is the central event leading to permanent hearing loss caused by ototoxic drugs, noise exposure, and aging (67, 68). Identification of the mechanisms that promote hair cell survival will inform the rational design of therapies to prevent hearing loss. Here, we present evidence that exosomes mediate intercellular communication in the inner ear and protect against ototoxicity. Thus, exosomes may represent a means of clinical intervention to protect hair cells in vivo during cellular stress. Future experiments will determine whether exosome-mediated hair cell protection extends to protection against other ototoxic stressors.
We identified the protein cargo of utricle-derived exosomes using tandem mass spectrometry and demonstrated that HSP70 is a critical component of this exosomal cargo (Figure 7D and Figure 8B). These data may allow for the scalable production of hair cell–protective exosomes in vitro. Exosomes have garnered significant interest in recent years for the therapeutic delivery of proteins, nucleic acids, and small molecules (69–73), and our data indicate that they may be leveraged as nanocarriers to deliver therapeutics to treat inner ear disorders. In contrast to viral and nonviral delivery systems, exosomes have the advantages of a large packaging capacity, biocompatibility, nonimmunogenicity, and the innate ability to cross biological membranes, including the blood-brain barrier (61). Like the brain, the inner ear is separated from systemic circulation by a semipermeable, multicomponent barrier (blood-labyrinth barrier) (74, 75). Engineered exosomes can deliver designer cargo to the brain following systemic administration (76). Similar results may be achievable in the inner ear using specific targeting proteins identified in our proteomics analysis. The complement of integrins on exosomes determines their tissue tropism in other systems (40). Integrin subunits, α-3, α-7, α-V, and β-1 were detected in our proteomics analysis, and their assembly into heterodimers may direct exosomes to specific inner ear cell types. Exosomes may also increase the delivery efficiency of locally administered inner ear therapies, as has been demonstrated for exosome-associated adeno-associated virus (AAV), which improved hair cell infectivity as compared with naked AAV (77).
Taken together, our results indicate that exosomes represent a previously undescribed mechanism of intercellular communication in the inner ear that can mediate nonautonomous survival signaling and protect sensory hair cells against lethal stresses. Exosomes may be engineered to deliver therapeutic molecules to the inner ear to prevent or reverse hearing loss.
Methods
Mice.
Four- to 8-week-old CBA/J mice (The Jackson Laboratory, stock no. 000656) were used as controls throughout, except in experiments using TLR4-cKO mice, in which either littermates or C57BL/6J mice (as indicated) were used as controls. Approximately equal numbers of male and female mice were used in each experiment.
Transgenic ROSA26mT/mG mice [Gt(ROSA)26Sortm4(ACTB-tdTomato,-EGFP)Luo/J, The Jackson Laboratory, stock no. 007676], referred to as mTmG mice, were used for visualization of EVs. These Cre-reporter mice express membrane-targeted (myristoylated) tandem dimer Tomato (mtdTomato) before Cre recombination and mGFP after Cre-mediated excision of tdTomato (44). Both fluorophores are myristoylated, promoting their ubiquitous insertion into membranes. To differentially label EVs derived from hair cells and supporting cells, 2 complementary breeding schemes were used. To label hair cells with mGFP and supporting cells with mtdTomato, hair cell–specific Gfi1Cre/+ mice (generated by Lin Gan, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA, and provided by Ronna Hertzano, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA) were used. Gfi1Cre/+ mice express Cre recombinase in the Gfi1 locus, which is required for hair cell differentiation and survival (78). Offspring were backcrossed with ROSA26mTmG/mTmG to produce Gfi1Cre/+ ROSA26mTmG/mTmG mice. To label supporting cells with mGFP and hair cells with mtdTomato, supporting cell–specific GLAST-CreER mice [Tg(Slc1a3-Cre/ERT)1Nat, The Jackson Laboratory, stock no. 012586] were used. GLAST-CreER mice express tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase under control of the GLAST promoter (79). GLAST-CreER ROSA26mTmG/+ offspring were backcrossed with ROSA26mTmG/mTmG mice to obtain GLAST-CreER ROSA26mTmG/mTmG offspring. Cre recombination was induced at P21 by intraperitoneal injection of tamoxifen (0.225 mg/g BW; MilliporeSigma). Cre recombination efficiency was established by crossing either Gfi1-Cre mice or GLAST-CreER mice with a transgenic reporter mouse line [B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm14(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J; The Jackson Laboratory, stock no. 007914], followed by quantification of either tdTomato-positive hair cells (Gfi1-Cre, 96% recombination efficiency) or tdTomato-positive supporting cells (GLAST-CreER, 65% recombination efficiency) in utricle explants (80).
Hair cell–specific TLR4-cKO mice were generated by crossing B6.Cg-Tg(Atoh1-cre)1Bfri/J mice (The Jackson Laboratory, stock no. 011104) with B6(Cg)-Tlr4tm1.1Karp/J mice (The Jackson Laboratory, stock no. 024872). In B6.Cg-Tg(Atoh1-cre)1Bfri/J mice, the mouse Atoh1 regulatory sequences direct Cre recombinase expression in all hair cells and a small percentage of supporting cells (81). B6(Cg)-Tlr4tm1.1Karp/J mice contain loxP sites flanking exon 3 of the Tlr4 gene. Offspring that inherited the Atoh1-Cre transgene had Tlr4 conditionally deleted from hair cells and are referred to herein as TLR4-cKO mice. Offspring that did not inherit the Atoh1-Cre transgene were used as littermate controls.
Utricle culture.
Explanted mouse utricles were used as an in vitro preparation of inner ear hair cells and supporting cells. Mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation followed by decapitation. Utricles were excised and cultured as previously described (82, 83). Briefly, the bony labyrinth was removed and placed in Medium 199 (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C, and utricles were dissected under sterile conditions before transfer to 1 mL complete medium (DMEM/F12 with Phenol Red, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 5% heat-inactivated FBS (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 50 U/mL penicillin G (MilliporeSigma). Utricles were cultured overnight in a 24-well tissue culture plate at 37°C and 5% CO2 before any experimental manipulation.
As FBS contains large numbers of exosomes (84), experiments in which vesicles were to be isolated and/or analyzed were performed in serum-free culture medium (DMEM/F12, 50 U/mL penicillin G). Utricles initially cultured in serum-containing media were rinsed and transferred to serum-free medium. Imaging of fluorescently labeled exosomes was performed in serum-free medium without phenol red.
Heat shock.
Utricles and their culture medium (1 mL) were transferred to sterile microcentrifuge tubes and placed into a 43°C water bath for 30 minutes. Control (no heat shock) utricles were transferred into microcentrifuge tubes and placed in the incubator at 37°C for 30 minutes. Following incubation, all utricles were transferred to complete medium in a tissue culture plate and returned to the incubator under standard culture conditions for 2 hours.
NTA.
NTA was performed using a NanoSight NS300 controlled by NTA software, version 3.1 (Malvern Panalytical), to measure the concentration and size distribution of EVs. Samples were pushed through a fluidics flow chamber at a constant flow rate using a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus). The scattered light from vesicles illuminated with a 488-nm laser was recorded at 30 frames per second using a sCMOS camera 3 times for 60 seconds (Figure 2A and Figure 5B) or 5 times for 30 seconds (Figure 6B). The camera sensitivity for each capture was kept identical within the same experiment (15 in Figure 2A and Figure 5B and 13 in Figure 6B). The detection threshold for particle analysis was set at 3.
Exosome purification.
Samples were of 2 categories: (a) minimally processed conditioned media or (b) purified and concentrated exosomes. Minimally processed conditioned media were analyzed to characterize the total population of EVs released from utricles (Figure 2A and Figure 6B). To remove large particles and cellular debris before NTA, conditioned medium was processed either by centrifugation (2000 ×g for 10 minutes; Figure 2A) or filtration (0.2-μm syringe filter; Figure 6B).
Exosomes were purified from conditioned medium either by ultracentrifugation or size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Ultracentrifugation provided a higher yield and was used for most experiments. SEC was performed to generate high-purity samples for proteomics analysis (Figure 3 and Tables 1 and 2).
Ultracentrifugation method.
Exosomes were isolated from utricle-conditioned medium using an abbreviated version of a previously described protocol (29). Cells and large cellular debris were removed by centrifugation (300 ×g, 10 minutes, 4°C), followed by sedimentation of large vesicles and additional cellular debris (10,000 ×g, 30 minutes, 4°C). Exosomes were pelleted by subjecting the supernatant from the second spin to a high-speed centrifugation step (100,000 ×g, 70 minutes, 4°C) in polycarbonate tubes (349622, Beckman Coulter) using a TLA-100.3 rotor and an Optima MAX-XP ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter). The exosome pellet was resuspended in PBS or culture medium by trituration with a micropipette.
Exosomes for proteomics analysis were purified by ultrafiltration and SEC. Cellular debris and large vesicles were removed from conditioned medium by filtration through a 0.22-μm PVDF syringe filter (Millex Durapore, MilliporeSigma). Vesicles were concentrated using a centrifugal concentrator (5000 MWCO, Sartorius VS15T11 Vivaspin Turbo 15) at 3000 ×g. The concentrated sample (250–500 μL) was separated on a Superose 6 Increase 10/300 GL SEC column (equilibrated with PBS, pH 7.4) using an ÄKTA Pure 25 chromatography system (both from GE Healthcare Life Sciences) at 4°C. A constant flow rate of 0.5 mL/min was maintained throughout, and UV absorbance (280 nm) was continuously recorded. Eluted sample fractions were collected every 1 mL for column volumes of 0 to 1 and every 2 mL for column volumes of 1 to 1.5. Exosome-containing fractions were identified according to the UV absorption and by NTA of each fraction. The exosomal and non-exosomal fractions (containing secreted proteins and protein complexes) were separately pooled and concentrated using centrifugal concentrators (3000 MWCO, Sartorius VS15T91 Vivaspin Turbo 15) before proteomics analysis.
TEM and immunoelectron microscopy.
TEM was used to visualize purified utricle exosomes. Fixation and embedment were performed as previously described (29). Briefly, isolated exosomes were resuspended in 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA), deposited as droplets onto Formvar/carbon-coated grids, and rinsed in PBS before fixation in 1% glutaraldehyde. Samples were rinsed in double-distilled H2O (ddH2O), contrasted in uranyl-oxalate solution (pH 7), and embedded in 2% methyl cellulose and 4% uranyl acetate at a ratio of 9:1. Excess solution was blotted on filter paper, and grids were air dried.
Immunoelectron microscopy was used to visualize the association of HSP70 with utricle-derived exosomes. Exosomes were fixed and deposited on Formvar/carbon-coated grids. Grids were rinsed twice by placing them onto a 100-μL drop of PBS, followed by 2 washes in 50 mM glycine in PBS. Samples were blocked in 5% BSA (A3294, MilliporeSigma) in PBS for 10 minutes before incubation with an HSP70 Ab (sc-33575, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and then diluted 1:5 in blocking solution for 2 hours. Control samples were incubated in blocking solution alone. Samples were rinsed 3 times in wash buffer (0.1% BSA in PBS). Secondary staining was performed for 30 minutes using 10 nm gold-conjugated goat anti–rabbit IgG F(ab′)2 (H+L) Ab (15731, BBI Solutions/Ted Pella), diluted 1:40 in blocking solution. Samples were rinsed 4 times in PBS, fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde in PBS, and then rinsed 4 times in ddH2O. Samples were contrasted and embedded as described above.
Images were collected using a JEM-2100 transmission electron microscope (JEOL) equipped with an Orius SC1000B camera (Gatan) and DigitalMicrograph software. Post-acquisition processing was performed using ImageJ2 software (NIH) (85).
Tandem mass spectrometry.
Utricles (n = 160) were dissected and cultured in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 50 U/mL penicillin G and G-5 serum-free supplement (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as a chemically defined substitute for FBS. Utricles were heat shocked, and exosomes were purified from conditioned media via the SEC-based method described above. Samples were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C. Samples were essentially processed and analyzed as in normal high-sensitivity, bottom-up proteomics using sodium dodecanoate (86) with postextraction clean-up using STop And Go Extraction (STAGE) tips (87).
Raw data were abstracted to the mgf format using MSConvert from the ProteoWizard 3.0.6839 package. These files were entered into the Mascot search engine against the MaxQuant common contaminants database (Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry) and the SWISS-PROT protein sequence databases for Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, and Pichia pastoris (02-27-2018 release). GO term enrichment analyses were performed in PANTHER, version 13.1 (35, 36). Redundancy within lists of enriched GO terms was minimized using REViGO (37), with similarity set to 0.5.
Modeling ototoxicity in vitro.
Utricles were treated with neomycin to induce hair cell death. Neomycin sulfate solution (140 mg/mL, VetOne) was added to culture medium to a final concentration of 2.5 mM. Neomycin-containing culture medium was equilibrated in the incubator (37°C, 5% CO2) for at least 2 hours before use.
Application of exogenous exosomes.
Twenty to 24 utricles were cultured, heat shocked, and transferred to serum-free culture medium. Conditioned medium was collected 24 hours later and processed via differential ultracentrifugation as described above, resulting in a pellet containing exosomes and a supernatant containing extracellular macromolecules not associated with exosomes (non-exosomal fraction). The exosome pellet was resuspended in serum-free, neomycin-containing medium to create neomycin plus exosomes culture medium. Neomycin was added to the non-exosomal fraction to create neomycin plus non-exosomal fraction culture medium. Culture media were allowed to equilibrate for 2 hours in the incubator. Following equilibration, freshly dissected utricles were transferred to each culture medium, incubated for 24 hours, and then fixed and processed as detailed below.
Pharmacologic inhibition of exosome biogenesis.
Utricles were treated with spiroepoxide (282108-77-4, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), an inhibitor of N-SMase, to inhibit exosome biogenesis. N-SMase catalyzes production of ceramide, which is necessary for exosome production in some systems (41). Spiroepoxide was dissolved in DMSO and added to culture medium at a final concentration of 0.375 μM. Simultaneous exposure to neomycin and spiroepoxide was performed by addition of both drugs to the culture medium, followed by equilibration of the media for 2 hours, after which utricles were incubated with the media for 24 hours. Control utricles were exposed to DMSO (vehicle control). After 24 hours, utricles were fixed and processed as detailed below.
Immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy.
Utricles were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS for 30 minutes at room temperature and then incubated for 2 hours at room temperature in blocking solution (0.5% Triton X-100, 2% BSA, and 0.8% normal goat serum [NGS] in PBS). Hair cells were labeled overnight at 4°C with mouse anti–myosin VIIa Ab (1:100, MYO7A 138-1, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), followed by Alexa Fluor 546–conjugated goat anti–mouse IgG (1:500, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 4 hours at room temperature. F-actin was labeled with Alexa Fluor 647 Phalloidin (1:60, Molecular Probes) for 45 minutes at room temperature, and nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (1:500, Molecular Probes) for 5 minutes. All incubation steps were performed in blocking solution.
Labeled utricles were mounted in Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech) and imaged using a ×40 1.4 NA Plan-Apochromat oil objective and an Axiovert 200M inverted microscope with a confocal scan head (LSM780) equipped with a GaAsP detector and controlled by Zen software (all from Zeiss). All samples were imaged under identical acquisition settings. Surviving hair cells within the extrastriolar region of each utricle were counted manually within 5 regions of interest (ROI) and averaged to reflect the mean hair cell density per utricle. For consistency throughout the manuscript, hair cell density was normalized to the average hair cell count per 900-μm2 utricle area (except in Figure 7E).
Quantification of labeled exosomes.
Utricles from Gfi1Cre/+ ROSA26mTmG/+ and tamoxifen-treated GLAST-CreER ROSA26mTmG/mTmG mice (described above) had differentially labeled hair cells and supporting cells. The membrane-associated reporter fluorophores incorporate into exosomes and report the cell type of origin of a particular exosome. The relative abundance of fluorescent hair cell– and supporting cell–derived EVs in conditioned medium from heat-shocked Gfi1Cre/+ ROSA26mTmG/+ utricles was determined using laser scanning confocal microscopy.
Utricles (n = 9–11 per biological replicate) were dissected, heat shocked, rinsed, and transferred to 40 μL of phenol red–free, serum-free medium on a 96-well tissue culture plate. Conditioned medium was collected 24 hours later, and cellular debris was removed by centrifugation (10,000 ×g, 10 minutes). The exosome-containing supernatant was imaged using a ×63 1.4 NA Plan Apochromat oil objective and an Axiovert 200M inverted microscope with a confocal scan head (LSM780) controlled by Zen software (all from Zeiss) as previously described (45, 46). Briefly, a 10-μL droplet was placed on a 35-mm glass coverslip-bottomed culture dish (MatTek) and covered. Two sequential images of exosomes adherent to the coverslip were captured, with the mtdTomato signal imaged first and the mGFP second. Image acquisition was reversed for the next 2 images to account for potential photobleaching. For each sample, a second 10-μL exosome droplet was imaged using the same parameters, resulting in 8 images per sample.
Using ImageJ2, images were split into separate channels and smoothed, and the threshold was applied manually. Thresholding settings were kept constant for all images in an experiment. Exosomes in each channel were automatically quantified using the “analyze particles” function, with the minimum particle area set to 2 pixels2 and no circularity restrictions (0.00–1.00). The resulting exosome counts in each channel were averaged across the 8 images collected for each sample. The experiment was repeated 3 times.
Western blot analyses.
Twenty-two utricles were cultured, heat shocked, and transferred into serum-free culture medium. Conditioned culture medium was collected 24 hours later and processed via differential ultracentrifugation (see Exosome purification), resulting in a pellet containing the exosomes, and supernatant containing extracellular proteins not associated with exosomes. The exosome-depleted supernatant was further concentrated with a centrifugal filter unit (3000 MWCO; MilliporeSigma) at 4000 ×g and 4ºC. Both the concentrated non-exosomal supernatant and the purified exosomes were processed as follows: samples were resuspended in 1× RIPA lysis buffer (MilliporeSigma) supplemented with cOmplete Mini EDTA-Free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche), vortexed for 1 minute, and denatured at 95ºC for 5 minutes in 1× Laemmli buffer (Bio-Rad). Protein concentration was analyzed with a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), using half of each sample. The remaining sample was denatured at 95ºC for 5 minutes in 1× Laemmli buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE using NuPAGE 4% to 12% Bis-Tris gels followed by protein transfer to a 0.45-μm pore PVDF membrane (both from Thermo Fisher Scientific). Membranes were blocked in 1% BSA in TBS with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T). Washes were performed with TBS-T. All Abs were diluted in 1% BSA in TBS-T. The primary Abs used were HSPA1 (PA5-28003, 1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and CD81 (D5O2Q, 1:500, Cell Signaling Technology). HRP-linked secondary Ab: Anti-rabbit IgG (7074S, 1:10,000, Cell Signaling Technology). Membranes were incubated with 2% NaN3 between primary Abs to inactivate HRP (88). Protein bands were visualized by chemiluminescence using SuperSignal West Femto Duration Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad).
HSP70 function–blocking Ab.
Utricles (n = 40–44) were cultured and processed as described above (see Western blot analyses) to generate a pellet containing the exosomes and supernatant containing extracellular macromolecules not associated with exosomes. The pelleted exosome fraction was resuspended in serum-free, neomycin-containing medium to create culture medium containing neomycin plus exosomes. This medium was equilibrated for 2 hours in the incubator and divided into two 1-mL aliquots. Rabbit anti-HSP70/anti-HSC70 (sc-33575, H-300, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was added at a concentration of 1 μg/mL to 1 aliquot to create culture medium containing neomycin plus exosomes plus HSP70 fbAb. Control medium was prepared by adding anti-HSP70/HCS70 Ab at the same concentration to equilibrated serum-free, neomycin-containing culture medium (neomycin plus HSP70 fbAb). Naive utricles were transferred to each experimental culture medium and incubated for 24 hours, following by fixation, staining, and imaging as described above (see Immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy).
Application of exogenous HSP70.
Utricles (n = 22) were cultured and processed as above (see Western blot analyses) to generate a pellet containing the exosomes. The pelleted exosomes were resuspended in serum-free, neomycin-containing culture medium to create culture medium containing neomycin plus exosomes. Recombinant human HSP70 (5 μg; ADI-ESP-555, Enzo Life Sciences) was resuspended in serum-free, neomycin-containing culture medium to create culture medium containing neomycin plus HSP70. Culture media were equilibrated for 2 hours at 37°C. Naive utricles were transferred to each experimental culture medium and incubated for 24 hours, after which they were fixed, stained, and imaged as detailed above (see Immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy). Quantification was performed by counting surviving hair cells in the entire posterior region of the treated utricles, followed by normalization of hair cell counts to the utricle area.
PLA.
A Duolink PLA (DUO92014, MilliporeSigma) was used to visualize interaction between HSP70 and TLR4. Utricles from TLR4-cKO or WT control mice were heat shocked. Six hours later, utricles were fixed in 3% PFA for 30 minutes, rinsed in PBS, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 minutes, rinsed in PBS, and blocked (2% BSA plus 10% NGS in PBS) for 3 hours at room temperature. Utricles were incubated overnight at 4°C with mouse anti-HSP70 Ab (C92F3A-5, Enzo Life Sciences) and rabbit anti-HSP40 Ab (ADI-SPA-400-F, Enzo Life Sciences) (control) or with mouse anti-HSP70 Ab (C92F3A-5, Enzo Life Sciences) and rabbit anti-TLR4 Ab (MAB27591, R&D Systems). HSP70 was blocked with either rabbit HSPA1A Ab (PA5-28003, Thermo Fisher Scientific) or rabbit-HSP70 Ab (sc33575, H-300, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) using rabbit IgG isotype (31325, Thermo Fisher) as a control. Abs were used at a final concentration of 1 μg/mL. One utricle per well was transferred onto Nunc MiniTrays (136528, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and treated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, utricles were incubated in secondary solution (15 μL) containing anti-rabbit PLUS and anti-mouse MINUS probes for 1 hour at 37°C. Utricles were rinsed and incubated in ligation solution (15 μL) for 30 minutes at 37°C and then rinsed and incubated in amplification solution (15 μL) for 100 minutes at 37°C. After a final wash, F-actin was labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (1:50), and nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (1:15,000, both from Molecular Probes) in PBS for 30 minutes at room temperature. Utricles were imaged using either a ×60 lambda 1.4 NA Plan-Apochromat oil objective or a ×60 TIRF 1.49 NA Plan Apochromat oil objective and an Eclipse Ti-E inverted microscope with a hybrid confocal scan head (resonant and galvano; A1R HD) equipped with a GaAsP detection unit controlled by NIS-Elements C software (all from Nikon); or a ×63 1.4 NA DIC Plan Apochromat oil objective and an Axiovert 200M inverted microscope with a confocal scan head (LSM780) equipped with an Airyscan detection unit controlled by Zen software (all from Zeiss). Identical settings for pinhole, gain, and offset were used between samples on each microscope. Acquired Airyscan data sets were processed using Zen Desk software (Zeiss). All data sets were processed for PLA puncta quantification in ImageJ as follows: image channels were separated, and a maximum z projection of the z sections containing the PLA signal was performed. The threshold was applied manually, and PLA puncta were automatically quantified using the “analyze particles” function, with the minimum particle area set from 0.2 to 1 μm2, with no circularity restrictions (0.00–1.00). Puncta were counted for 2 to 3 ROIs per utricle, averaged across the utricle, and normalized to a 1000-μm2 area.
Statistics.
All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software). The Shapiro-Wilks test was used to analyze data sets for normality. For multiple comparisons, statistical significance was determined by 1-way ANOVA followed by a Holm-Šídák multiple comparisons test (89) for data with equal variances or otherwise by Brown-Forsythe and Welsh ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test. Comparisons of multiple groups with independent variables was performed by 2-way ANOVA followed by a Holm-Šídák multiple comparisons test. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
Study approval.
All animal procedures were approved by the IACUCs of the NIDCD and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (protocol no. 1327).
Author contributions
AMB, LAM, MJAW, and LLC conceived the project. AMB, LAM, MB, NCW, SPF, and LLC planned the experiments. AMB, LAM, NJAW, SPF, TQC, LW, DEA, RSP, YXW, and MB performed the experiments and interpreted the data. AMB, MB, and LLC wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. TBF, MJAW, and LLC supervised the project. The assignment of the authorship order for the first 3 authors on this manuscript is essentially chronological: AMB started the project and worked in close collaboration with LAM, who designed and performed several of the critical experiments. Together, they produced the first submitted version of the manuscript. After AMB and LAM left the laboratory, MB completed additional important experiments, performed extensive new analyses, and rewrote the manuscript.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Version 1. 02/06/2020
In-Press Preview
Version 2. 04/20/2020
Electronic publication
Version 3. 05/01/2020
Print issue publication
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Imre Mäger and Samir El Andaloussi for guidance regarding exosome purification and analysis techniques. We thank Erina He for the illustrations in Figure 1D, Figure 5A, Figure 6, C and G, and Figure 9. We thank Matthew Kelley and Wade Chien for helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the Division of Intramural Research of the NIDCD (1ZIADC000079, to LLC, 1ZICDC000081, to RSP, and DC000039, to TBF).
Conflict of interest: Matthew Wood is a founder and director of Evox Therapeutics.
Copyright: © 2020, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2020;130(5):2657–2672.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI128867.
See the related Commentary at Exosome-mediated protection of auditory hair cells from ototoxic insults.
We are grateful to Imre Mäger and Samir El Andaloussi for guidance regarding exosome purification and analysis techniques. We thank Erina He for the illustrations in Figure 1D, Figure 5A, Figure 6, C and G, and Figure 9. We thank Matthew Kelley and Wade Chien for helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the Division of Intramural Research of the NIDCD (1ZIADC000079, to LLC, 1ZICDC000081, to RSP, and DC000039, to TBF).
Contributor Information
Andrew M. Breglio, Email: andrew.breglio@gmail.com.
Lindsey A. May, Email: lindzmay@gmail.com.
Melanie Barzik, Email: melanie.barzik@nih.gov.
Nora C. Welsh, Email: Nora.C.Welsh.GR@dartmouth.edu.
Shimon P. Francis, Email: shimon@akouos.com.
Tucker Q. Costain, Email: tucker.costain@nih.gov.
Lizhen Wang, Email: Lizhen.wang@nih.gov.
D. Eric Anderson, Email: DavidA@intra.niddk.nih.gov.
Ronald S. Petralia, Email: petralia@nidcd.nih.gov.
Ya-Xian Wang, Email: wangyx@nidcd.nih.gov.
Thomas B. Friedman, Email: friedman@nidcd.nih.gov.
Matthew J.A. Wood, Email: matthew.wood@dpag.ox.ac.uk.
Lisa L. Cunningham, Email: lisa.cunningham@nih.gov.
References
- 1. World Health Organization. WHO Global Estimates on Prevalence of Hearing Loss. http://www.who.int/deafness/estimates/en Accessed March 6, 2020.
- 2.Francis SP, Kramarenko, Brandon CS, Lee FS, Baker TG, Cunningham LL. Celastrol inhibits aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity via heat shock protein 32. Cell Death Dis. 2011;2:e195. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2011.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Francis SP, et al. A novel role of cytosolic protein synthesis inhibition in aminoglycoside ototoxicity. J Neurosci. 2013;33(7):3079–3093. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3430-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hailey DW, Esterberg R, Linbo TH, Rubel EW, Raible DW. Fluorescent aminoglycosides reveal intracellular trafficking routes in mechanosensory hair cells. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(2):472–486. doi: 10.1172/JCI85052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Huth ME, Ricci AJ, Cheng AG. Mechanisms of aminoglycoside ototoxicity and targets of hair cell protection. Int J Otolaryngol. 2011;2011:937861. doi: 10.1155/2011/937861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Marcotti W, van Netten SM, Kros CJ. The aminoglycoside antibiotic dihydrostreptomycin rapidly enters mouse outer hair cells through the mechano-electrical transducer channels. J Physiol (Lond) 2005;567(Pt 2):505–521. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.085951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Warchol ME. Cellular mechanisms of aminoglycoside ototoxicity. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;18(5):454–458. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32833e05ec. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yoshida N, Kristiansen A, Liberman MC. Heat stress and protection from permanent acoustic injury in mice. J Neurosci. 1999;19(22):10116–10124. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-22-10116.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cunningham LL, Brandon CS. Heat shock inhibits both aminoglycoside- and cisplatin-induced sensory hair cell death. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006;7(3):299–307. doi: 10.1007/s10162-006-0043-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Taleb M, Brandon CS, Lee FS, Lomax MI, Dillmann WH, Cunningham LL. Hsp70 inhibits aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death and is necessary for the protective effect of heat shock. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2008;9(3):277–289. doi: 10.1007/s10162-008-0122-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Baker TG, et al. Heat shock protein-mediated protection against cisplatin-induced hair cell death. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015;16(1):67–80. doi: 10.1007/s10162-014-0491-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hawkins JE. Comparative otopathology: aging, noise, and ototoxic drugs. In: Hawkins JE, Lawrence M, Work WP, eds. Otophysiology. Basel, Switzerland: Karger Publishers; 1973:125–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bohne BA, Rabbitt KD. Holes in the reticular lamina after noise exposure: implication for continuing damage in the organ of Corti. Hear Res. 1983;11(1):41–53. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(83)90044-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Forge A. Outer hair cell loss and supporting cell expansion following chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res. 1985;19(2):171–182. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(85)90121-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Leonova EV, Raphael Y. Organization of cell junctions and cytoskeleton in the reticular lamina in normal and ototoxically damaged organ of Corti. Hear Res. 1997;113(1-2):14–28. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00130-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bird JE, Daudet N, Warchol ME, Gale JE. Supporting cells eliminate dying sensory hair cells to maintain epithelial integrity in the avian inner ear. J Neurosci. 2010;30(37):12545–12556. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3042-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Monzack EL, May LA, Roy S, Gale JE, Cunningham LL. Live imaging the phagocytic activity of inner ear supporting cells in response to hair cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22(12):1995–2005. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.May LA, et al. Inner ear supporting cells protect hair cells by secreting HSP70. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(8):3577–3587. doi: 10.1172/JCI68480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mambula SS, Calderwood SK. Heat shock protein 70 is secreted from tumor cells by a nonclassical pathway involving lysosomal endosomes. J Immunol. 2006;177(11):7849–7857. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.11.7849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.De Maio A. Extracellular Hsp70: export and function. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2014;15(3):225–231. doi: 10.2174/1389203715666140331113057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim DK, et al. EVpedia: a community web portal for extracellular vesicles research. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(6):933–939. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Colombo M, Raposo G, Théry C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:255–289. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lancaster GI, Febbraio MA. Exosome-dependent trafficking of HSP70: a novel secretory pathway for cellular stress proteins. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(24):23349–23355. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M502017200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Peinado H, et al. Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat Med. 2012;18(6):883–891. doi: 10.1038/nm.2753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Takeuchi T, et al. Intercellular chaperone transmission via exosomes contributes to maintenance of protein homeostasis at the organismal level. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(19):E2497–E2506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412651112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lv LH, et al. Anticancer drugs cause release of exosomes with heat shock proteins from human hepatocellular carcinoma cells that elicit effective natural killer cell antitumor responses in vitro. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(19):15874–15885. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.340588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Clayton A, Turkes A, Navabi H, Mason MD, Tabi Z. Induction of heat shock proteins in B-cell exosomes. J Cell Sci. 2005;118(Pt 16):3631–3638. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Filipe V, Hawe A, Jiskoot W. Critical evaluation of nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) by NanoSight for the measurement of nanoparticles and protein aggregates. Pharm Res. 2010;27(5):796–810. doi: 10.1007/s11095-010-0073-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Théry C, Amigorena S, Raposo G, Clayton A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2006;Chapter 3:Unit 3.22. doi: 10.1002/0471143030.cb0322s30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gardiner C, et al. Techniques used for the isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles: results of a worldwide survey. J Extracell Vesicles. 2016;5:32945. doi: 10.3402/jev.v5.32945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wu Y, Deng W, Klinke DJ. Exosomes: improved methods to characterize their morphology, RNA content, and surface protein biomarkers. Analyst. 2015;140(19):6631–6642. doi: 10.1039/C5AN00688K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Raposo G, Stoorvogel W. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol. 2013;200(4):373–383. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201211138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nordin JZ, et al. Ultrafiltration with size-exclusion liquid chromatography for high yield isolation of extracellular vesicles preserving intact biophysical and functional properties. Nanomedicine. 2015;11(4):879–883. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kowal J, Tkach M, Théry C. Biogenesis and secretion of exosomes. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2014;29:116–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mi H, et al. PANTHER version 11: expanded annotation data from Gene Ontology and reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D183–D189. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Thomas PD, et al. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res. 2003;13(9):2129–2141. doi: 10.1101/gr.772403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(7):e21800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zutter MM. Integrin-mediated adhesion: tipping the balance between chemosensitivity and chemoresistance. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;608:87–100. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-74039-3_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell. 2002;110(6):673–687. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00971-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hoshino A, et al. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature. 2015;527(7578):329–335. doi: 10.1038/nature15756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Trajkovic K, et al. Ceramide triggers budding of exosome vesicles into multivesicular endosomes. Science. 2008;319(5867):1244–1247. doi: 10.1126/science.1153124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hannun YA. Functions of ceramide in coordinating cellular responses to stress. Science. 1996;274(5294):1855–1859. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5294.1855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Arenz C, Giannis A. Synthesis of the first selective irreversible inhibitor of neutral sphingomyelinase. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2000;39(8):1440–1442. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(20000417)39:8<1440::AID-ANIE1440>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Muzumdar MD, Tasic B, Miyamichi K, Li L, Luo L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis. 2007;45(9):593–605. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Heusermann W, et al. Exosomes surf on filopodia to enter cells at endocytic hot spots, traffic within endosomes, and are targeted to the ER. J Cell Biol. 2016;213(2):173–184. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201506084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lai CP, et al. Visualization and tracking of tumour extracellular vesicle delivery and RNA translation using multiplexed reporters. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7029. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gastpar R, et al. Heat shock protein 70 surface-positive tumor exosomes stimulate migratory and cytolytic activity of natural killer cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65(12):5238–5247. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vega VL, et al. Hsp70 translocates into the plasma membrane after stress and is released into the extracellular environment in a membrane-associated form that activates macrophages. J Immunol. 2008;180(6):4299–4307. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.6.4299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cho JA, Lee YS, Kim SH, Ko JK, Kim CW. MHC independent anti-tumor immune responses induced by Hsp70-enriched exosomes generate tumor regression in murine models. Cancer Lett. 2009;275(2):256–265. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chalmin F, et al. Membrane-associated Hsp72 from tumor-derived exosomes mediates STAT3-dependent immunosuppressive function of mouse and human myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(2):457–471. doi: 10.1172/JCI40483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Roué G, Pichereau V, Lincet H, Colomer D, Sola B. Cyclin D1 mediates resistance to apoptosis through upregulation of molecular chaperones and consequent redistribution of cell death regulators. Oncogene. 2008;27(36):4909–4920. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li CJ, Ning W, Matthay MA, Feghali-Bostwick CA, Choi AM. MAPK pathway mediates EGR-1-HSP70-dependent cigarette smoke-induced chemokine production. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007;292(5):L1297–L1303. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00194.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jheng HF, et al. Albumin stimulates renal tubular inflammation through an HSP70-TLR4 axis in mice with early diabetic nephropathy. Dis Model Mech. 2015;8(10):1311–1321. doi: 10.1242/dmm.019398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Vabulas RM, Ahmad-Nejad P, Ghose S, Kirschning CJ, Issels RD, Wagner H. HSP70 as endogenous stimulus of the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor signal pathway. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(17):15107–15112. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111204200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Luong M, et al. Stimulation of TLR4 by recombinant HSP70 requires structural integrity of the HSP70 protein itself. J Inflamm (Lond) 2012;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-9-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Asea A, et al. Novel signal transduction pathway utilized by extracellular HSP70: role of toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR4. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(17):15028–15034. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200497200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.de Oliveira AA, Faustino J, de Lima ME, Menezes R, Nunes KP. Unveiling the interplay between the TLR4/MD2 complex and HSP70 in the human cardiovascular system: a computational approach. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(13):E3121. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Vicencio JM, et al. Plasma exosomes protect the myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(15):1525–1536. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhang Y, Zhang X, Shan P, Hunt CR, Pandita TK, Lee PJ. A protective Hsp70-TLR4 pathway in lethal oxidant lung injury. J Immunol. 2013;191(3):1393–1403. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chen T, Guo J, Yang M, Zhu X, Cao X. Chemokine-containing exosomes are released from heat-stressed tumor cells via lipid raft-dependent pathway and act as efficient tumor vaccine. J Immunol. 2011;186(4):2219–2228. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.EL Andaloussi S, Mäger I, Breakefield XO, Wood MJ. Extracellular vesicles: biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12(5):347–357. doi: 10.1038/nrd3978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.De Maio A, Vazquez D. Extracellular heat shock proteins: a new location, a new function. Shock. 2013;40(4):239–246. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182a185ab. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Elsner L, et al. The heat shock protein HSP70 promotes mouse NK cell activity against tumors that express inducible NKG2D ligands. J Immunol. 2007;179(8):5523–5533. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Takeuchi T, et al. Intercellular chaperone transmission via exosomes contributes to maintenance of protein homeostasis at the organismal level. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(19):E2497–E2506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412651112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Gobbo J, et al. Restoring anticancer immune response by targeting tumor-derived exosomes with a HSP70 peptide aptamer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(3):djv330. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Davidson SM, et al. Cardioprotection mediated by exosomes is impaired in the setting of type II diabetes but can be rescued by the use of non-diabetic exosomes in vitro. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(1):141–151. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Furness DN. Molecular basis of hair cell loss. Cell Tissue Res. 2015;361(1):387–399. doi: 10.1007/s00441-015-2113-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lanvers-Kaminsky C, Zehnhoff-Dinnesen AA, Parfitt R, Ciarimboli G. Drug-induced ototoxicity: mechanisms, pharmacogenetics, and protective strategies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;101(4):491–500. doi: 10.1002/cpt.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Batrakova EV, Kim MS. Using exosomes, naturally-equipped nanocarriers, for drug delivery. J Control Release. 2015;219:396–405. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bunggulawa EJ, et al. Recent advancements in the use of exosomes as drug delivery systems. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2018;16(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12951-018-0403-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Conlan RS, Pisano S, Oliveira MI, Ferrari M, Mendes Pinto I. Exosomes as Reconfigurable Therapeutic Systems. Trends Mol Med. 2017;23(7):636–650. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2017.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Murphy DE, et al. Extracellular vesicle-based therapeutics: natural versus engineered targeting and trafficking. Exp Mol Med. 2019;51(3):32. doi: 10.1038/s12276-019-0223-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.van Dommelen SM, et al. Microvesicles and exosomes: opportunities for cell-derived membrane vesicles in drug delivery. J Control Release. 2012;161(2):635–644. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Neng L, Zhang F, Kachelmeier A, Shi X. Endothelial cell, pericyte, and perivascular resident macrophage-type melanocyte interactions regulate cochlear intrastrial fluid-blood barrier permeability. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013;14(2):175–185. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0365-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zhang W, et al. Perivascular-resident macrophage-like melanocytes in the inner ear are essential for the integrity of the intrastrial fluid-blood barrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(26):10388–10393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205210109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Alvarez-Erviti L, Seow Y, Yin H, Betts C, Lakhal S, Wood MJ. Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(4):341–345. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.György B, et al. Rescue of hearing by gene delivery to inner-ear hair cells using exosome-associated AAV. Mol Ther. 2017;25(2):379–391. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2016.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Matern M, et al. Gfi1Cre mice have early onset progressive hearing loss and induce recombination in numerous inner ear non-hair cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42079. doi: 10.1038/srep42079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Heng JS, et al. Hypoxia tolerance in the Norrin-deficient retina and the chronically hypoxic brain studied at single-cell resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(18):9103–9114. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821122116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Stone JS, Wisner SR, Bucks SA, Mellado Lagarde MM, Cox BC. Characterization of adult vestibular organs in 11 CreER mouse lines. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018;19(4):381–399. doi: 10.1007/s10162-018-0676-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Yang H, Xie X, Deng M, Chen X, Gan L. Generation and characterization of Atoh1-Cre knock-in mouse line. Genesis. 2010;48(6):407–413. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Cunningham LL. The adult mouse utricle as an in vitro preparation for studies of ototoxic-drug-induced sensory hair cell death. Brain Res. 2006;1091(1):277–281. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Brandon CS, Voelkel-Johnson C, May LA, Cunningham LL. Dissection of adult mouse utricle and adenovirus-mediated supporting-cell infection. J Vis Exp. 2012;(61):3734. doi: 10.3791/3734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Shelke GV, Lässer C, Gho YS, Lötvall J. Importance of exosome depletion protocols to eliminate functional and RNA-containing extracellular vesicles from fetal bovine serum. J Extracell Vesicles. 2014;3:24783. doi: 10.3402/jev.v3.24783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Schindelin J, Rueden CT, Hiner MC, Eliceiri KW. The ImageJ ecosystem: An open platform for biomedical image analysis. Mol Reprod Dev. 2015;82(7-8):518–529. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Lin Y, et al. Sodium laurate, a novel protease- and mass spectrometry-compatible detergent for mass spectrometry-based membrane proteomics. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e59779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Rappsilber J, Mann M, Ishihama Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(8):1896–1906. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Kaufmann SH. Reutilization of immunoblots after chemiluminescent detection. Anal Biochem. 2001;296(2):283–286. doi: 10.1006/abio.2001.5313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 1979;6(2):65–70. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.