Skip to main content
PMC home page
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2020 Apr 23;142(19):9048–9056. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c03063

Visible-Light-Driven Rotation of Molecular Motors in a Dual-Function Metal–Organic Framework Enabled by Energy Transfer

Wojciech Danowski †, Fabio Castiglioni ‡, Andy S Sardjan §, Simon Krause †, Lukas Pfeifer †, Diederik Roke †, Angiolina Comotti ‡, Wesley R Browne †,§,*, Ben L Feringa †,*
PMCID: PMC7232677  PMID: 32324391

Abstract

graphic file with name ja0c03063_0005.jpg

The visible-light-driven rotation of an overcrowded alkene-based molecular motor strut in a dual-function metal–organic framework (MOF) is reported. Two types of functional linkers, a palladium–porphyrin photosensitizer and a bispyridine-derived molecular motor, were used to construct the framework capable of harvesting low-energy green light to power the rotary motion. The molecular motor was introduced in the framework using the postsynthetic solvent-assisted linker exchange (SALE) method, and the structure of the material was confirmed by powder (PXRD) and single-crystal X-ray (SC-XRD) diffraction. The large decrease in the phosphorescence lifetime and intensity of the porphyrin in the MOFs upon introduction of the molecular motor pillars confirms efficient triplet-to-triplet energy transfer between the porphyrin linkers and the molecular motor. Near-infrared Raman spectroscopy revealed that the visible light-driven rotation of the molecular motor proceeds in the solid state at rates similar to those observed in solution.

Introduction

Development of artificial molecular machines and motors allows for the design and construction of tailor-made molecular architectures capable of executing precisely controlled nanoscale structural motion.1−8 Among these artificial systems, overcrowded alkene-based molecular motors attract considerable attention due to their chirality controlled photochemically driven repetitive unidirectional rotary motion.9−11 Although it has been demonstrated that these molecules can perform various tasks in solution, such as control over the stereochemical outcome of catalytic reactions,12 Brownian motion precludes the cooperative action required to achieve functions beyond molecular dimensions.5,8,13,14 Achieving ensemble action with artificial molecular machines therefore requires that the randomizing effects of the thermal motion are eliminated by assembly on surfaces15−17 or integration into the larger systems.14 Incorporation and immobilization of these molecules in various supramolecular architectures, including organo-18 and hydrogels,19,20 polymers,21,22 liquid crystals,23−26 or self-assembled monolayers,15−17 provided a way to amplify and harness their light-induced rotational motion to form responsive materials with tunable properties, including adaptive polymers,21,22,27,28 artificial muscles,19,20 and responsive surfaces.29 For overcrowded alkene-based materials the use of UV light to drive the molecular motion limits such efforts due to limited penetration depth (due to the scattering) and potential damage by destructive photochemical processes.11,30,31 Therefore, development of reliable and practical visible-light excitation strategies that are compatible with a chosen material represents a major challenge crucial for further advancement of these dynamic systems.

The most common approaches to red shifting of the excitation wavelength of the overcrowded alkene-based molecular motors are based on HOMO–LUMO gap engineering featuring extension of the aromatic system,32 functionalization with donor–acceptor substituents,33,34 or formation of metal complexes.35 Although successful, these approaches may reduce the quantum yield of photoisomerization32 and are so far limited in the absorption shift (only to the blue part of the visible spectrum; maximum of absorption ca. 450 nm).34 Furthermore, the resulting molecular architectures are synthetically more challenging to incorporate in a given material scaffold.32,35,36 An alternative approach to achieve visible-light-driven rotation of these molecules is to take advantage of intra- or intermolecular sensitization through triplet energy transfer from a second chromophore.37 This strategy not only reduces the synthetic efforts but also allows one to tune the excitation wavelength over a broad spectral range limited only by the choice of a photosensitizer and triplet–triplet energy transfer requirements.38 Furthermore, it has been successfully applied to operate several types of photoswitches by visible light including azobenzenes,39,40 stilbenes,41,42 and dithienylethenes.43,44

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) constitute a class of hybrid materials composed of inorganic nodes and organic linkers connected in a three-dimensional crystalline, highly porous network.45−47 Due to the high inherent porosity in these structures, sufficient internal free volume is present to allow for stimuli-responsive structural transformations48−57 or rotational58−64 and translational65 motion of parts of the organic linkers organized in the crystalline solid. In addition, the structural diversity and chemical tunability of these materials makes them ideal platforms to achieve spatial co-organization of functional molecules66,67 and chromophores.68 Recent studies on light-harvesting multicomponent MOFs revealed that facile and long-distance energy migration can be achieved between light-absorbing nodes and/or linkers in MOFs of various architectures.69−72 Furthermore, the incorporation of photochromic dithienylethene struts in a layered porphyrin MOFs provided a method for photocontrol over energy transfer between adjacent chromophores and efficiency of singlet oxygen generation.73,74

Recently, we demonstrated that a molecular motor incorporated as a strut in a pillared-paddlewheel MOF is capable of performing unhindered, large-amplitude unidirectional rotary motion fueled by UV light and heat.75 In the present study, we show that such rotary motion can be driven by visible light through linker-to-linker energy transfer. The framework was constructed from two functional linkers: a porphyrin used as both linker dictating the connectivity of the framework and light-harvesting unit and a bispyridyl-derived molecular motor serving as a pillar and able to undergo rotary motion (Figure 1). In the resulting supramolecular architecture the backbone of the framework is not only a passive “scaffolding” but also plays an active role by absorbing visible light and transferring the collected energy to the molecular motor struts, thus driving its rotary motion. This dual-function MOF was obtained using a postsynthetic functionalization method from a parent Zn pillared-paddlewheel MOF bearing a palladium–porphyrin tetracarboxylic acid linker (PdTCPP) (Figure 1, top left) and bispyridyl pillars (Figure 1, bottom left). The chosen MOF scaffold provides the proximity of both linkers, allowing for efficient energy transfer between the chromophores and the large free volume that is essential for unhindered rotation of the light-driven molecular motor in the solid state (Figure 1). A key challenge, presented by this approach, is in demonstrating the functioning of the material by spectroscopic methods due to the overwhelming spectroscopic properties of the porphyrin chromophore. This unit, which is central to the visible-light-driven functionality, also precludes standard spectroscopic analysis of the motor function; however, near-infrared Raman spectroscopy (1064 nm) enables full characterization of the motor function.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Structures of PdTCPP (left, top) and bispyridyl molecular motor 1 (left, bottom) used as linkers for construction of the MOF framework, and schematic representation of the rotation of molecular motor 1 incorporated as struts in the motorized pillared-paddlewheel PdTCPP MOF driven by energy transfer from a PdTCPP sensitizer (right). Relevant approximate dimensions of the unit cell are given.

Results and Discussion

Design, Synthesis, and Characterization of a Motorized Metal–Organic Framework

For the desired MOF a zinc pillared-paddlewheel scaffold was used, related to the framework we reported recently.75 In the chosen structure, the nodes of the framework, which is the zinc paddlewheel clusters, are connected by porphyrin tetracarboxylic acid linkers (PdTCPP) forming two-dimensional layers, which are pillared by the bispyridine-derived linker 1 (Figure 1). We designed the system in such a way that the size of the PdTCPP linker will ensure sufficient lateral separation of the pillars bearing a molecular motor function, generating free volume critical for uncompromised rotation of the molecular motor (in the designed structure, the distance between the nodes in the [100] and [010] planes is approximately 17 Å, Figure 1). Furthermore, the length of bispyridyl-derived molecular motor pillar 1 (N–N distance 15.6 Å75) should separate the porphyrin layers sufficiently to prevent competing interlayer porphyrin–porphyrin exciton transport. Finally, the nodes of the framework were based on closed-shell d10 configuration Zn2+ cations in order to exclude any undesired energy transfer between PdTCPP and nodes. Since MOFs of this topology are typically synthesized under relatively harsh conditions with the presence of strong mineral acids,76 it was decided to prepare the final material using a postsynthetic method, i.e., solvent-assisted linker exchange (SALE) developed by Farha and Hupp.77−81 In this process, bispyridine-derived pillars of the pillared MOFs can be exchanged for different bispyridyl linkers of similar length under neutral conditions, which prevents side reactions and decomposition of the acid-sensitive linkers.77 Furthermore, it was demonstrated that with this method shorter pillars can also be exchanged for longer pillars, thereby making this approach suitable for fabrication of MOFs with larger unit cell parameters.79 Initial attempts to grow the desired parent structure with N,N′-di(4-pyridyl)-1,4,5,8-naphthalenetetracarboxydiimide75 were largely unsuccessful and gave mixtures of products consisting predominately of interpenetrated frameworks analogous to the previously described interpenetrated porphyrinic frameworks.82,83 To overcome this tendency of formation of the interpenetrated structure a shorter linker, meso-α,β-di(4-pyridyl) glycol (DPG, see Figure 2a for structure), was employed. A novel pillared-paddlewheel framework was synthesized in a solvothermal reaction between PdTCPP, DPG, Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, and tetrafluoroboric acid in a binary solvent mixture (DMF/EtOH) providing square-shaped crystals (Figure 2b, top). It is of note that when the reaction was carried out under less acidic conditions predominantly needle-like crystals (Figure S7a) of a 3-fold interpenetrated framework with zigzag structure were obtained (Figure S7b). Characterization by 1H NMR (d6-DMSO) spectroscopy of the digested (using D2SO4) square-shaped crystals of the pillared-paddlewheel MOF showed the expected 1:1 ratio of DPG and PdTCPP linkers (Figures S1 and S2). The initial refinement of the single-crystal (SC) X-ray diffraction data collected from the target MOF revealed the expected layered structure composed of PdTCPP and Zn cations, while the DPG pillars could not be resolved, presumably due to rotational disorder (Figure S5). Nevertheless, the interlayer distance of 9.2 Å (N–N distance between pyridyl nitrogens coordinated to paddlewheel clusters) determined from the structure corresponded well with the N–N distance (9.4 Å, see SI section 13) in the DPG linker, indicating that DPG pillars are intercalating the layers of the framework (Figure S5). The powder X-ray diffraction data (PXRD), acquired under solvent-saturated conditions, corroborated bulk crystallinity and phase purity of the sample (Figures 2d and S8). Furthermore, Pawley refinement showed negligible differences between the experimental and the simulated diffraction patterns, further indicating formation of the target pillared structure (Figures S5 and S9, Table S2). Elemental analysis corroborated the anticipated elemental composition of the parent MOF (see SI, section 2). Subsequently, the parent DPG pillars were exchanged for bispyridyl molecular motor 1 by means of SALE (Figure 2a), which was carried out by soaking the crystals of parent MOF in a DMF solution of bispyridyl molecular motor 1 at 80 °C for 48 h (the solution of 1 was replaced with a fresh solution after 24 h) to achieve full exchange as indicated by 1H NMR spectroscopy of digested crystals (Figures 2b, bottom, S1, and S3). Comparison of the Raman spectra of parent and motorized PdTCPP MOFs revealed the presence of additional bands characteristic of molecular motor 1 in the spectrum of motorized MOF, further supporting the successful exchange of the pillars (Figure 2c). As with the parent MOF, the SC X-ray structure of motorized MOF could only be partially resolved. From the refinement of the data the PdTCPP units and Zn paddlewheel clusters forming a layered structure could be confirmed, while the disorder between the layers precluded the interpretation of the electron density of the intercalating units (Figure S6). Nevertheless, the clear increase in the interlayer distance to 15.7 Å (N–N distance between pyridyl nitrogens coordinated to paddlewheel clusters) corroborated the incorporation of longer pillars, consistent with the length of the molecular motor 1 (N–N distance in DFT-optimized structure B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) 15.4 Å).75 In addition, the expansion of the elementary unit cell in the [001] direction was confirmed by the changes observed in positions of the peaks in the PXRD diffractograms. In comparison to the PXRD of the parent MOF, significant shifts to a smaller diffraction angle were observed for the peaks ascribed to reflections from planes perpendicular and oblique to the [001] direction, while peaks corresponding to reflections from planes parallel to the [001] direction remained unchanged (Figures 2d and S8). Furthermore, Pawley refinement showed good agreement between the dimensions of the targeted motorized PdTCPP MOF unit cell and the experimental PXRD pattern (Figures S8 and S9, Table S2). Finally, elemental analysis was consistent with the anticipated elemental composition of the parent MOF (see SI, section 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Synthesis of the motorized pillared-paddlewheel MOF via SALE from parent MOF bearing DPG pillars by exchange with molecular motor 1. (b) Optical micrograph of the parent PdTCPP DPG-based MOF (top) and motorized PdTCPP 1-based MOF (bottom) crystals obtained via linker exchange (SALE) (scale bar 100 μm). (c) Raman spectra of the parent pillared-paddlewheel MOF (black spectrum, 1064 nm, 250 mW), bispyridyl molecular motor (blue spectrum, 785 nm, 50 mW), and motorized pillared-paddlewheel MOF (red spectrum, 1064 nm, 250 mW). (d) Comparison of the experimental PXRD patterns of parent MOF (black, bottom pattern) and motorized MOF (red, top pattern). Miller indices of planes corresponding to the peaks are given in brackets. Vertical dashed lines indicate peaks in the PXRD pattern of motorized MOF, corresponding to (hkl) (where l ≠ 0) planes.

Energy Transfer, Photochemical, and Thermal Isomerization in Solution

Intermolecular energy transfer between the porphyrin (PdTCPP) and molecular motor 1 in solution was characterized by emission spectroscopy (Figure 3b). Deoxygenated solutions of PdTCPP excited at 530 nm show weak fluorescence at 610 nm and a strong emission band characteristic of phosphorescence at 700 nm (Figure 3b, black line) with a lifetime of ca. 221 μs (Figures S14–16, Table S3).84 For mixtures of PdTCPP and molecular motor 1 the intensity of the phosphorescence was substantially reduced with a decrease in phosphorescence lifetime to ca. 15 μs (1:1 ratio of PdTCPP:1) and ca. 5 μs (1:5 ratio of PdTCPP:1, Figures S14–16, Table S3), in line with energy transfer between triplet states of the porphyrin and motor 1 (Figure 3b, red line). Stern–Volmer plots (emission intensity and lifetime, Figures S14 and S16, respectively) with concentrations of 1 between 0.0 and 223.0 μM were linear, confirming dynamic quenching of the phosphorescence of PdTCPP, thus excluding formation of aggregates in the concentration range studied. Linear fitting of the data gave an intermolecular quenching rate constant kq = 9.0 ± 0.3 × 108 M–1 s–1 approaching the Smoluchowski limit of the diffusion-limited rate constant in DMF (7.6 × 109 M–1 s–1 at 20 °C),85 suggesting that the energy transfer between PdTCPP and 1 is likely under diffusion control (Figures S14 and S16).86

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Triplet–triplet sensitization of the light-driven rotary motion of molecular motor 1 by intermolecular energy transfer from PdTCPP. (b) Emission spectra (λexc = 530 nm) of PdTCPP (black spectrum, 44.6 μM, DMF) and a mixture of PdTCPP and molecular motor 1 (red spectrum, 1:5 molar ratio of PdTCPP:1). Emission maxima of fluorescence (610 nm) and phosphorescence (700 nm) are indicated with arrows. (c) UV–vis absorption spectra (−20 °C, 6.1 μM, DMF) of 1 (blue solid line) irradiated at 395 nm to the photostationary state (blue dashed line), a mixture of PdTCPP and 1 (1:1 molar ratio, black solid line), a mixture of PdTCPP and 1 irradiated at 530 nm to the photostationary state (red solid line), and photostationary state mixture after thermal helix inversion (red dashed line). (Inset) Changes in absorbance followed at 450 nm upon multiple irradiation and heating cycles. (d) Changes in the Raman spectrum (1064 nm, 250 mW) of a mixture of PdTCPP and 1 in DMF (black solid line), after irradiation at 530 nm at −20 °C to a photostationary state (red solid line), and after thermal helix inversion (red dashed line). Arrows indicate bands characteristic of the metastable isomer.

Intermolecular sensitization of the rotary motion of motor 1 in solution was studied with UV–vis absorption, 1H NMR, and Raman spectroscopies (Figures 3c, 3d, and S4). In the UV–vis absorption spectra the region characteristic of the main absorption band of the molecular motor 1 (maximum ≈ 400 nm, Figure 3c, blue solid line) is dominated by the strong Soret band of PdTCPP (Figure 3c, black solid line). Nevertheless, irradiation of the argon-purged solution of 1 and PdTCPP (1:1 ratio of 1:PdTCPP) at 530 nm (Q-band of the porphyrin) led to a bathochromic shift of the absorption in the region of the Soret band (Figure 3c, red solid line), consistent with formation of the metastable isomer of the molecular motor (Figure 3c, blue dashed lines). Subsequent warming of the sample led to the recovery of the original spectrum, consistent with the recovery of the stable isomer by thermal helix inversion (Figure 3b, red dashed line). An isosbestic point was maintained at 323 nm throughout both photochemical and thermal processes, as expected for unimolecular reactions (Figure S12). Furthermore, the irradiation/thermal isomerization cycles could be performed for at least five consecutive cycles without noticeable fatigue or degradation (Figure 3c, inset). The rate of the thermal helix inversion of bispyridyl motor 1 in the presence of PdTCPP in DMF was determined by following the exponential decrease of the absorbance at 440 nm over a range of temperatures (6–14 °C, Figure S13). Eyring plot analysis showed that the Gibbs free energy of activation of the thermal helix inversion of the metastable isomer of 1 in this mixture (Δ‡G(20 °C) = 88.0 ± 0.4 kJ mol–1, t1/2 = 9.1 min, Figure S13) is essentially the same as the previously determined value in DMF75 (Δ‡G(20 °C) = 87.7 ± 0.6 kJ mol–1, t1/2 = 8.0 min), thereby demonstrating that bispyridyl motor 1 can operate similarly via direct excitation and triplet sensitization. In the Raman spectra of the equimolar mixture of PdTCPP and 1 in DMF, bands characteristic of PdTCPP partially overlap and obscure bands characteristic of 1 (Figure 3d, black spectrum). Nonetheless, the features consistent with sequential photochemical and thermal isomerization of 1 could be readily observed with Raman spectroscopy. Irradiation of this mixture at 530 nm at low temperature (−20 °C, sufficient to prevent thermal helix inversion over the time scale of the experiment) led to a decrease in the Raman scattering at 1580 cm–1 with a concomitant increase at 1550 cm–1. Warming to room temperature led to gradual recovery of the initial spectrum (Figure 3d). The intermolecular energy transfer-induced photoisomerization of motor 1 was monitored with low-temperature 1H NMR spectroscopy (Figure S4). After irradiation of an equimolar mixture of 1 and PdTCPP at 530 nm and −30 °C, a new set of upfield-shifted 1H NMR resonances was observed in the aliphatic part of the spectrum, characteristic of the metastable isomer. Warming the sample resulted in full recovery of the original spectrum and hence of the stable isomer. The photostationary state ratio of metastable and stable isomers of 1, established upon irradiation at 530 nm, was approximately 1:1 (Figure S4), consistent with changes observed by Raman spectroscopy (Figure 3d), which showed a ∼50% decrease in the intensity of the bands characteristic of the stable isomer (1580 cm–1).

Energy Transfer, Photochemical, and Thermal Isomerization in the Solid State

Since pillared Zn paddlewheel MOFs are known to lose crystallinity or undergo structural collapse upon solvent removal, all of the experiments involving PdTCPP MOFs were conducted in solvent (DMF)-saturated conditions.79 The extent of the energy transfer between 1 and PdTCPP linkers in motorized MOF was determined with steady-state and time-resolved emission spectroscopy.

Upon excitation at 530 nm the parent PdTCPP MOF showed a similar emission spectrum to that of PdTCPP in DMF with a small hypsochromic shift of both fluorescence and phosphorescence (Figure 4a). Conversely, in the emission spectrum of the motorized PdTCPP MOF a strong decrease in the phosphorescence intensity was observed, consistent with the energy transfer between the linkers (Figure 4a). Furthermore, a significant drop in the porphyrin phosphorescence lifetime was observed from ca. 100 μs for the parent MOF to ca. 10 μs for the motorized MOF (Figures S17 and S18). The difference between the phosphorescence lifetimes of PdTCPP in solution and in the parent MOF originates from the effect of excessive scattering from the latter; nevertheless, the large decrease in emission lifetime between parent and motorized MOF clearly indicates energy transfer between 1 and PdTCPP linkers in MOF.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Comparison of the emission spectra (λexc = 530 nm) of DMF suspensions of parent PdTCPP MOF (black line) and motorized PdTCPP MOF (red line). (b) Changes in the Raman spectrum (1064 nm, 250 mW, 40 s integration time) of the motorized PdTCPP MOF sample (black solid line) upon irradiation at 530 nm (red solid line) and subsequent thermal isomerization (red dashed line). (Inset) Changes in the area around 1550 cm–1 followed upon multiple photochemical/thermal isomerization cycles. Label of ordinate, “Area”, refers to the integrated area between 1530 and 1551 cm–1.

The rotary motion of motor 1 inserted in the MOF scaffold was followed with NIR–Raman spectroscopy (see SI section 12 for other spectra). Previously, we demonstrated that this technique is particularly convenient to study the photochemical and thermal isomerization of rotary molecular motors in condensed phase as it allows for unambiguous correlation of spectral data with the structural changes that these molecules exhibit in response to light and heat stimuli.75 Upon exposure of the polycrystalline motorized PdTCPP MOF sample to green light (530 nm) a gradual decrease in the Raman intensity at 1580 cm–1 with concomitant increase in scattering intensity at 1550 cm–1 was observed (Figure 4b). Similar spectral features were detected upon photochemical isomerization of molecular motor 1 in solution and therefore could be ascribed to the same photochemical process. Furthermore, Raman spectroscopy showed that for thin samples the photostationary state of 1 reached via triplet sensitization in motorized PdTCPP MOF was similar to that in solution (Figure S22). Taking into consideration the molar absorptivity of PdTCPP at 532 nm and the concentration of molecular motor 1 in the crystal of the motorized MOF, the penetration depth for the excitation light in these crystals is likely no more than a few micrometers, and therefore, we envision the future application of these materials to be based on the surface-mounted MOFs (SURMOFs) or single-crystal devices.87 When the irradiation was discontinued, the initial Raman spectrum was recovered gradually, indicating thermal relaxation of the metastable to stable isomer. The barrier of the thermal relaxation at room temperature was determined by monitoring the changes in the bands area characteristic of the metastable isomer (Figures S23–25 and Table S3). The Gibbs free energy of activation for this process (Δ‡G(20 °C)) was 88.7 ± 0.8 kJ mol–1 (t1/2 ≈ 13 min) and corresponded well to the barrier determined in DMF solution (88.0 ± 0.4 kJ mol–1, t1/2 ≈ 9 min). The good agreement between the barriers in solution and the solid material shows that molecular motor 1 can perform its large amplitude rotary motion uncompromised while incorporated in PdTCPP MOF. Furthermore, irradiation/thermal relaxation steps could be repeated over five cycles (Figure 4b, inset) without any noticeable sign of fatigue or photodegradation, indicating high stability of the framework.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we established that the photoisomerization of the molecular motor pillars in a porphyrin Zn paddlewheel MOF can be driven with visible light by triplet sensitization. The desired motorized MOF was constructed by postsynthetic linker exchange (SALE) from the newly developed parent PdTCPP MOF bearing DPG pillars. Exchange of these pillars with the longer bispyridyl motor 1 resulted in the expected expansion of the elementary cell in the c direction as shown by the SC X-ray and PXRD data. Due to the spatial coarrangement of the chromophores in the motorized MOF, the energy transfer between photosensitizer (2D layers) and molecular motor (pillars) was found to be efficient, and the photochemical isomerization of the molecular motor could be achieved with green 530 nm light. Additionally, it was shown that the rate of the thermal helix inversion step of the molecular motors incorporated in the material scaffold is essentially the same as that observed in solution, owing to the large free volume present in the framework. The demonstration of visible-light-driven rotary motion of a molecular motor in a metal–organic framework opens many perspectives for future applications, such as membranes and pumps able to accelerate flow of gases or in combination with catalytic function and miniaturized chemical reactors able to accelerate inflow of reactants and outflow of products, powered by noninvasive visible light.88 Furthermore, we envision that this strategy may be used to expand the scope of photosensitizers and molecular motors to achieve an even further shift of the excitation wavelength toward red light.

Acknowledgments

Jacob Bass is acknowledged for help with acquiring PXRD data. We greatly acknowledge Sander J. Wezenberg for discussions and helpful suggestions.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.0c03063.

  • Synthetic procedures and characterization, additional UV–vis and Raman spectra, Eyring plot, details on quantum yield, and lifetime determination (PDF)

  • X-ray crystal structure of parent PdTCPP-DPG MOF (CIF)

  • X-ray crystal structure of interpenetrated PdTCPP-DPG MOF (CIF)

  • X-ray crystal structure of motorized PdTCPP-1 MOF (CIF)

  • Modeled structure of motorized PdTCPP-1 MOF (CIF)

  • Modeled structure of parent PdTCPP-DPG MOF (CIF)

This work was supported financially by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO CW), the European Research Council (ERC, advanced grant no. 694345 to B.L.F.), and the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (Gravitation Program no. 024.001.035). A.C. acknowledges MIUR grant “Dipartimenti di Eccellenza-2017 “Materials For Energy” and PRIN grant no. 20173L7W8K. S.K. acknowledges support of the Alexander von Humboldt foundation. We thank the University of Groningen for access to the Peregrine Computing Cluster.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ja0c03063_si_001.pdf (5.3MB, pdf)
ja0c03063_si_002.cif (1.4MB, cif)
ja0c03063_si_003.cif (712.2KB, cif)
ja0c03063_si_004.cif (2MB, cif)
ja0c03063_si_005.cif (17.1KB, cif)
ja0c03063_si_006.cif (7.2KB, cif)

References

  1. Dietrich-Buchecker C.; Jimenez-Molero M. C.; Sartor V.; Sauvage J.-P. Rotaxanes and catenanes as prototypes of molecular machines and motors. Pure Appl. Chem. 2003, 75, 1383–1393. 10.1351/pac200375101383. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruns C. J.; Stoddart J. F.. The Nature of the Mechanical Bond: From Molecules to Machines; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Balzani V.; Venturi M.; Credi A.. Molecular devices and machines: a journey into the nano world; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  4. Schliwa M.Molecular motors; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kinbara K.; Aida T. Toward Intelligent Molecular Machines: Directed Motions of Biological and Artificial Molecules and Assemblies. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1377–1400. 10.1021/cr030071r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Erbas-Cakmak S.; Leigh D. A.; McTernan C. T.; Nussbaumer A. L. Artificial Molecular Machines. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 10081–10206. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. García-López V.; Liu D.; Tour J. M. Light-Activated Organic Molecular Motors and Their Applications. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 79–124. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Browne W. R.; Feringa B. L. Making molecular machines work. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2006, 1, 25–35. 10.1038/nnano.2006.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koumura N.; Zijlstra R. W. J.; van Delden R. A.; Harada N.; Feringa B. L. Light-driven monodirectional molecular rotor. Nature 1999, 401, 152–155. 10.1038/43646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Koumura N.; Geertsema E. M.; Meetsma A.; Feringa B. L. Light-driven molecular rotor: Unidirectional rotation controlled by a single stereogenic center. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12005–12006. 10.1021/ja002755b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. van Leeuwen T.; Lubbe A. S.; Stacko P.; Wezenberg S. J.; Feringa B. L. Dynamic control of function by light-driven molecular motors. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1, 96. 10.1038/s41570-017-0096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang J.; Feringa B. L. Dynamic control of chiral space in a catalytic asymmetric reaction using a molecular motor. Science 2011, 331, 1429–1432. 10.1126/science.1199844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Astumian R. D. Design principles for Brownian molecular machines: how to swim in molasses and walk in a hurricane. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 5067–5083. 10.1039/b708995c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Coskun A.; Banaszak M.; Astumian R. D.; Stoddart J. F.; Grzybowski B. A. Great expectations: can artificial molecular machines deliver on their promise?. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 19–30. 10.1039/C1CS15262A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Carroll G. T.; London G.; Landaluce T. F.; Rudolf P.; Feringa B. L. Adhesion of Photon-Driven Molecular Motors to Surfaces via 1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions: Effect of Interfacial Interactions on Molecular Motion. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 622–630. 10.1021/nn102876j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. van Delden R. A.; ter Wiel M. K. J.; Pollard M. M.; Vicario J.; Koumura N.; Feringa B. L. Unidirectional molecular motor on a gold surface. Nature 2005, 437, 1337–1340. 10.1038/nature04127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kaleta J.; Chen J.; Bastien G.; Dračínský M.; Mašát M.; Rogers C. T.; Feringa B. L.; Michl J. Surface Inclusion of Unidirectional Molecular Motors in Hexagonal Tris(o-phenylene)cyclotriphosphazene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 10486–10498. 10.1021/jacs.7b05404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wezenberg S. J.; Croisetu C. M.; Stuart M. C. A.; Feringa B. L. Reversible gel–sol photoswitching with an overcrowded alkene-based bis-urea supergelator. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 4341–4346. 10.1039/C6SC00659K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen J.; Leung F. K. C.; Stuart M. C. A.; Kajitani T.; Fukushima T.; van der Giessen E.; Feringa B. L. Artificial muscle-like function from hierarchical supramolecular assembly of photoresponsive molecular motors. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 132–138. 10.1038/nchem.2887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Leung F. K.-C.; van den Enk T.; Kajitani T.; Chen J.; Stuart M. C. A.; Kuipers J.; Fukushima T.; Feringa B. L. Supramolecular Packing and Macroscopic Alignment Controls Actuation Speed in Macroscopic Strings of Molecular Motor Amphiphiles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 17724–17733. 10.1021/jacs.8b10778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li Q.; Fuks G.; Moulin E.; Maaloum M.; Rawiso M.; Kulic I.; Foy J. T.; Giuseppone N. Macroscopic contraction of a gel induced by the integrated motion of light-driven molecular motors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 161–165. 10.1038/nnano.2014.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Foy J. T.; Li Q.; Goujon A.; Colard-Itté J. R.; Fuks G.; Moulin E.; Schiffmann O.; Dattler D.; Funeriu D. P.; Giuseppone N. Dual-light control of nanomachines that integrate motor and modulator subunits. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 540–545. 10.1038/nnano.2017.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Eelkema R.; Pollard M. M.; Vicario J.; Katsonis N.; Ramon B. S.; Bastiaansen C. W. M.; Broer D. J.; Feringa B. L. Nanomotor rotates microscale objects. Nature 2006, 440, 163. 10.1038/440163a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pijper D.; Jongejan M. G. M.; Meetsma A.; Feringa B. L. Light-Controlled Supramolecular Helicity of a Liquid Crystalline Phase Using a Helical Polymer Functionalized with a Single Chiroptical Molecular Switch. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4541–4552. 10.1021/ja711283c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Orlova T.; Lancia F.; Loussert C.; Iamsaard S.; Katsonis N.; Brasselet E. Revolving supramolecular chiral structures powered by light in nanomotor-doped liquid crystals. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 304–308. 10.1038/s41565-017-0059-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zou C.; Sun J.; Wang M.; Wang J.; Wu Y.; Zhang L.; Zhu Z.; Xiong G.; Jiang L.; Ikeda T.; Yang H. A UV-Responsive Multifunctional Photoelectric Device Based on Discotic Columnar Nanostructures and Molecular Motors. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1806016. 10.1002/adma.201806016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. van Leeuwen T.; Heideman G. H.; Zhao D.; Wezenberg S. J.; Feringa B. L. In situ control of polymer helicity with a non-covalently bound photoresponsive molecular motor dopant. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 6393–6396. 10.1039/C7CC03188B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pijper D.; Feringa B. L. Molecular transmission: Controlling the twist sense of a helical polymer with a single light-driven molecular motor. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3693–3696. 10.1002/anie.200604941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen K. Y.; Ivashenko O.; Carroll G. T.; Robertus J.; Kistemaker J. C. M.; London G.; Browne W. R.; Rudolf P.; Feringa B. L. Control of surface wettability using tripodal light-activated molecular motors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 3219–3224. 10.1021/ja412110t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Russew M.-M.; Hecht S. Photoswitches: From Molecules to Materials. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3348–3360. 10.1002/adma.200904102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lubbe A. S.; van Leeuwen T.; Wezenberg S. J.; Feringa B. L. Designing dynamic functional molecular systems. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 4837–4848. 10.1016/j.tet.2017.06.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. van Leeuwen T.; Pol J.; Roke D.; Wezenberg S. J.; Feringa B. L. Visible-Light Excitation of a Molecular Motor with an Extended Aromatic Core. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1402–1405. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. van Delden R. A.; Koumura N.; Schoevaars A.; Meetsma A.; Feringa B. L. A donor–acceptor substituted molecular motor: unidirectional rotation driven by visible light. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 33–35. 10.1039/B209378B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pfeifer L.; Scherübl M.; Fellert M.; Danowski W.; Cheng J.; Pol J.; Feringa B. L. Photoefficient 2nd generation molecular motors responsive to visible light. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 8768–8773. 10.1039/C9SC02150G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wezenberg S. J.; Chen K.-Y.; Feringa B. L. Visible-Light-Driven Photoisomerization and Increased Rotation Speed of a Molecular Motor Acting as a Ligand in a Ruthenium(II) Complex. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 11457–11461. 10.1002/anie.201505781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Roke D.; Wezenberg S. J.; Feringa B. L. Molecular rotary motors: Unidirectional motion around double bonds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018, 115, 9423–9431. 10.1073/pnas.1712784115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Cnossen A.; Hou L.; Pollard M. M.; Wesenhagen P. V.; Browne W. R.; Feringa B. L. Driving Unidirectional Molecular Rotary Motors with Visible Light by Intra- And Intermolecular Energy Transfer from Palladium Porphyrin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 17613–17619. 10.1021/ja306986g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Perego J.; Pedrini J.; Bezuidenhout C. X.; Sozzani P. E.; Meinardi F.; Bracco S.; Comotti A.; Monguzzi A. Engineering Porous Emitting Framework Nanoparticles with Integrated Sensitizers for Low-Power Photon Upconversion by Triplet Fusion. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1903309. 10.1002/adma.201903309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sakamoto R.; Kume S.; Sugimoto M.; Nishihara H. trans - cis Photoisomerization of Azobenzene-Conjugated Dithiolato-Bipyridine Platinum(II) Complexes: Extension of Photoresponse to Longer Wavelengths and Photocontrollable Tristability. Chem. - Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1429–1439. 10.1002/chem.200801593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Venkataramani S.; Jana U.; Dommaschk M.; Sonnichsen F. D.; Tuczek F.; Herges R. Magnetic Bistability of Molecules in Homogeneous Solution at Room Temperature. Science 2011, 331, 445–448. 10.1126/science.1201180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mercer-Smith J. A.; Whitten D. G. Photosensitization of stilbene isomerization by palladium and platinum porphyrins, an intermolecular quantum chain process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2620–2625. 10.1021/ja00477a006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Serreli V.; Lee C. F.; Kay E. R.; Leigh D. A. A molecular information ratchet. Nature 2007, 445, 523–527. 10.1038/nature05452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jukes R. T. F.; Adamo V.; Hartl F.; Belser P.; De Cola L. Photochromic Dithienylethene Derivatives Containing Ru(II) or Os(II) Metal Units. Sensitized Photocyclization from a Triplet State. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 2779–2792. 10.1021/ic035334e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yam V. W.-W.; Ko C.-C.; Zhu N. Photochromic and Luminescence Switching Properties of a Versatile Diarylethene-Containing 1,10-Phenanthroline Ligand and Its Rhenium(I) Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12734–12735. 10.1021/ja047446q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Howarth A. J.; Liu Y.; Li P.; Li Z.; Wang T. C.; Hupp J. T.; Farha O. K. Chemical, thermal and mechanical stabilities of metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 1–15. 10.1038/natrevmats.2015.18. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Li H.; Eddaoudi M.; O’Keeffe M.; Yaghi O. M. Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework. Nature 1999, 402, 276–279. 10.1038/46248. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Furukawa H.; Cordova K. E.; O’Keeffe M.; Yaghi O. M. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 2013, 341, 1230444. 10.1126/science.1230444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Jones C. L.; Tansell A. J.; Easun T. L. The lighter side of MOFs: structurally photoresponsive metal–organic frameworks. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 6714–6723. 10.1039/C5TA09424K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Castellanos S.; Kapteijn F.; Gascon J. Photoswitchable metal organic frameworks: Turn on the lights and close the windows. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 4006–4012. 10.1039/C5CE02543E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. McGonigal P. R.; Deria P.; Hod I.; Moghadam P. Z.; Avestro A.-J.; Horwitz N. E.; Gibbs-Hall I. C.; Blackburn A. K.; Chen D.; Botros Y. Y.; Wasielewski M. R.; Snurr R. Q.; Hupp J. T.; Farha O. K.; Stoddart J. F. Electrochemically addressable trisradical rotaxanes organized within a metal–organic framework. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112, 11161–11168. 10.1073/pnas.1514485112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Chen Q.; Sun J.; Li P.; Hod I.; Moghadam P. Z.; Kean Z. S.; Snurr R. Q.; Hupp J. T.; Farha O. K.; Stoddart J. F. A Redox-Active Bistable Molecular Switch Mounted inside a Metal-Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 14242–14245. 10.1021/jacs.6b09880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Williams D. E.; Martin C. R.; Dolgopolova E. A.; Swifton A.; Godfrey D. C.; Ejegbavwo O. A.; Pellechia P. J.; Smith M. D.; Shustova N. B. Flipping the Switch: Fast Photoisomerization in a Confined Environment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 7611–7622. 10.1021/jacs.8b02994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Dolgopolova E. A.; Galitskiy V. A.; Martin C. R.; Gregory H. N.; Yarbrough B. J.; Rice A. M.; Berseneva A. A.; Ejegbavwo O. A.; Stephenson K. S.; Kittikhunnatham P.; Karakalos S. G.; Smith M. D.; Greytak A. B.; Garashchuk S.; Shustova N. B. Connecting Wires: Photoinduced Electronic Structure Modulation in Metal-Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 5350–5358. 10.1021/jacs.8b13853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Brown J. W.; Henderson B. L.; Kiesz M. D.; Whalley A. C.; Morris W.; Grunder S.; Deng H.; Furukawa H.; Zink J. I.; Stoddart J. F.; Yaghi O. M. Photophysical pore control in an azobenzene-containing metal–organic framework. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 2858. 10.1039/c3sc21659d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Furlong B. J.; Katz M. J. Bistable Dithienylethene-Based Metal-Organic Framework Illustrating Optically Induced Changes in Chemical Separations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13280–13283. 10.1021/jacs.7b07856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zheng Y.; Sato H.; Wu P.; Jeon H. J.; Matsuda R.; Kitagawa S. Flexible interlocked porous frameworks allow quantitative photoisomerization in a crystalline solid. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1–6. 10.1038/s41467-017-00122-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Nikolayenko V. I.; Herbert S. A.; Barbour L. J. Reversible structural switching of a metal-organic framework by photoirradiation. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 11142–11145. 10.1039/C7CC06074B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Gould S. L.; Tranchemontagne D.; Yaghi O. M.; Garcia-Garibay M. A. The Amphidynamic Character of Crystalline MOF-5: Rotational Dynamics in a Free-Volume Environment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3246–3247. 10.1021/ja077122c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Bracco S.; Castiglioni F.; Comotti A.; Galli S.; Negroni M.; Maspero A.; Sozzani P. Ultrafast Molecular Rotors and Their CO2 Tuning in MOFs with Rod-Like Ligands. Chem. - Eur. J. 2017, 23, 11210–11215. 10.1002/chem.201702930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Vogelsberg C. S.; Uribe-Romo F. J.; Lipton A. S.; Yang S.; Houk K. N.; Brown S.; Garcia-Garibay M. A. Ultrafast rotation in an amphidynamic crystalline metal organic framework. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114, 13613–13618. 10.1073/pnas.1708817115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Jiang X.; Duan H.-B.; Khan S. I.; Garcia-Garibay M. A. Diffusion-controlled rotation of triptycene in a metal-organic framework (MOF) sheds light on the viscosity of MOF-confined solvent. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 608–613. 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Vukotic V. N.; Harris K. J.; Zhu K.; Schurko R. W.; Loeb S. J. Metal-organic frameworks with dynamic interlocked components. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 456–460. 10.1038/nchem.1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhu K.; Vukotic V. N.; O’Keefe C. A.; Schurko R. W.; Loeb S. J. Metal-organic frameworks with mechanically interlocked pillars: Controlling ring dynamics in the solid-state via a reversible phase change. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7403–7409. 10.1021/ja502238a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Vukotic V. N.; O’Keefe C. A.; Zhu K.; Harris K. J.; To C.; Schurko R. W.; Loeb S. J. Mechanically Interlocked Linkers inside Metal - Organic Frameworks: Effect of Ring Size on Rotational Dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9643–9651. 10.1021/jacs.5b04674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhu K.; O’Keefe C. A.; Vukotic V. N.; Schurko R. W.; Loeb S. J. A molecular shuttle that operates inside a metal-organic framework. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 514–519. 10.1038/nchem.2258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Deng H.; Doonan C. J.; Furukawa H.; Ferreira R. B.; Towne J.; Knobler C. B.; Wang B.; Yaghi O. M. Multiple Functional Groups of Varying Ratios in Metal-Organic Frameworks. Science 2010, 327, 846–850. 10.1126/science.1181761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kong X.; Deng H.; Yan F.; Kim J.; Swisher J. A.; Smit B.; Yaghi O. M.; Reimer J. A. Mapping of Functional Groups in Metal-Organic Frameworks. Science 2013, 341, 882–885. 10.1126/science.1238339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Lee C. Y.; Farha O. K.; Hong B. J.; Sarjeant A. A.; Nguyen S. T.; Hupp J. T. Light-Harvesting Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs): Efficient Strut-to-Strut Energy Transfer in Bodipy and Porphyrin-Based MOFs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15858–15861. 10.1021/ja206029a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kent C. A.; Mehl B. P.; Ma L.; Papanikolas J. M.; Meyer T. J.; Lin W. Energy Transfer Dynamics in Metal-Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12767–12769. 10.1021/ja102804s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhang X.; Ballem M. A.; Hu Z.-J.; Bergman P.; Uvdal K. Nanoscale Light-Harvesting Metal-Organic Frameworks. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5729–5733. 10.1002/anie.201007277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Son H.-J.; Jin S.; Patwardhan S.; Wezenberg S. J.; Jeong N. C.; So M.; Wilmer C. E.; Sarjeant A. A.; Schatz G. C.; Snurr R. Q.; Farha O. K.; Wiederrecht G. P.; Hupp J. T. Light-Harvesting and Ultrafast Energy Migration in Porphyrin-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 862–869. 10.1021/ja310596a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. So M. C.; Wiederrecht G. P.; Mondloch J. E.; Hupp J. T.; Farha O. K. Metal–organic framework materials for light-harvesting and energy transfer. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 3501–3510. 10.1039/C4CC09596K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Williams D. E.; Rietman J. A.; Maier J. M.; Tan R.; Greytak A. B.; Smith M. D.; Krause J. A.; Shustova N. B. Energy Transfer on Demand: Photoswitch-Directed Behavior of Metal–Porphyrin Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11886–11889. 10.1021/ja505589d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Park J.; Feng D.; Yuan S.; Zhou H.-C. Photochromic Metal-Organic Frameworks: Reversible Control of Singlet Oxygen Generation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 430–435. 10.1002/anie.201408862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Danowski W.; van Leeuwen T.; Abdolahzadeh S.; Roke D.; Browne W. R.; Wezenberg S. J.; Feringa B. L. Unidirectional rotary motion in a metal–organic framework. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14, 488–494. 10.1038/s41565-019-0401-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Farha O. K.; Malliakas C. D.; Kanatzidis M. G.; Hupp J. T. Control over Catenation in Metal- Organic Frameworks via Rational Design of the Organic Building Block. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 950–952. 10.1021/ja909519e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Madrahimov S. T.; Atesin T. A.; Karagiaridi O.; Sarjeant A. A.; Farha O. K.; Hupp J. T.; Nguyen S. T. Metal-organic frameworks containing (alkynyl)gold functionalities: A comparative evaluation of solvent-assisted linker exchange, de novo synthesis, and post-synthesis modification. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 6320–6324. 10.1021/cg501066s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Karagiaridi O.; Bury W.; Mondloch J. E.; Hupp J. T.; Farha O. K. Solvent-assisted linker exchange: An alternative to the de novo synthesis of unattainable metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4530–4540. 10.1002/anie.201306923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Karagiaridi O.; Bury W.; Tylianakis E.; Sarjeant A. A.; Hupp J. T.; Farha O. K. Opening Metal-Organic Frameworks Vol. 2: Inserting Longer Pillars into Pillared-Paddlewheel Structures through Solvent-Assisted Linker Exchange. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 3499–3503. 10.1021/cm401724v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Bury W.; Fairen-Jimenez D.; Lalonde M. B.; Snurr R. Q.; Farha O. K.; Hupp J. T. Control over catenation in pillared paddlewheel metal-organic framework materials via solvent-assisted linker exchange. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 739–744. 10.1021/cm303749m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Burnett B. J.; Barron P. M.; Hu C.; Choe W. Stepwise Synthesis of Metal–Organic Frameworks: Replacement of Structural Organic Linkers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 9984–9987. 10.1021/ja201911v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Martinez-Bulit P.; O’Keefe C. A.; Zhu K.; Schurko R. W.; Loeb S. J. Solvent and Steric Influences on Rotational Dynamics in Porphyrinic Metal-Organic Frameworks with Mechanically Interlocked Pillars. Cryst. Growth Des. 2019, 19, 5679–5685. 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b00669. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Chung H.; Barron P. M.; Novotny R. W.; Son H. T.; Hu C.; Choe W. Structural variation in porphyrin pillared homologous series: Influence of distinct coordination centers for pillars on framework topology. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 3327–3332. 10.1021/cg900220g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Vinogradov S. A.; Wilson D. F. Phosphorescence Lifetime Analysis with a Quadratic Programming Algorithm for Determining Quencher Distributions in Heterogeneous Systems. Biophys. J. 1994, 67, 2048–2059. 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80688-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Montalti M.; Credi A.; Prodi L. P.; Gandolfi M. T.. Handbook of photochemistry, 3rd ed.; CRC/Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  86. Lakowicz J. R.Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy; Lakowicz J. R., Ed., Springer: Boston, MA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  87. Heinke L.; Wöll C. Surface-Mounted Metal-Organic Frameworks: Crystalline and Porous Molecular Assemblies for Fundamental Insights and Advanced Applications. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1806324. 10.1002/adma.201806324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Evans J. D.; Krause S.; Feringa B. L.. Cooperative and synchronized rotation in motorized porous frameworks: Impact on local and global transport properties of confined fluids. Faraday Discuss. 2020. 10.1039/D0FD00016G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja0c03063_si_001.pdf (5.3MB, pdf)
ja0c03063_si_002.cif (1.4MB, cif)
ja0c03063_si_003.cif (712.2KB, cif)
ja0c03063_si_004.cif (2MB, cif)
ja0c03063_si_005.cif (17.1KB, cif)
ja0c03063_si_006.cif (7.2KB, cif)

Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES