Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 May 19;23(7):670–679. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.05.016

Nowhere to hide: The significant impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) measures on elite and semi-elite South African athletes

Lervasen Pillay a,, Dina C Christa Janse van Rensburg a,b, Audrey Jansen van Rensburg a, Dimakatso A Ramagole a, Louis Holtzhausen a,c, H Paul Dijkstra c,d, Tanita Cronje e
PMCID: PMC7235602  PMID: 32448749

Abstract

Objectives

To describe the perceptions of South African elite and semi-elite athletes on return to sport (RTS); maintenance of physical conditioning and other activities; sleep; nutrition; mental health; healthcare access; and knowledge of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Design

Cross- sectional study.

Methods

A Google Forms survey was distributed to athletes from 15 sports in the final phase (last week of April 2020) of the level 5 lockdown period. Descriptive statistics were used to describe player demographic data. Chi-squared tests investigated significance (p < 0.05) between observed and expected values and explored sex differences. Post hoc tests with a Bonferroni adjustment were included where applicable.

Results

67% of the 692 respondents were males. The majority (56%) expected RTS after 1–6 months. Most athletes trained alone (61%; p < 0.0001), daily (61%; p < 0.0001) at moderate intensity (58%; p < 0.0001) and for 30–60 min (72%). During leisure time athletes preferred sedentary above active behaviour (p < 0.0001). Sleep patterns changed significantly (79%; p < 0.0001). A significant number of athletes consumed excessive amounts of carbohydrates (76%; p < 0.0001; males 73%; females 80%). Many athletes felt depressed (52%), and required motivation to keep active (55%). Most had access to healthcare during lockdown (80%) and knew proceedings when suspecting COVID-19 (92%).

Conclusions

COVID-19 had physical, nutritional and psychological consequences that may impact on the safe RTS and general health of athletes. Lost opportunities and uncertain financial and sporting futures may have significant effects on athletes and the sports industry. Government and sporting federations must support athletes and develop and implement guidelines to reduce the risk in a COVID-19 environment.

Keywords: COVID-19, Return to sport, SARS-CoV-2 virus, Athletes, Lockdown impact

Practical implications

  • 1.

    Implement a culture of education for athletes and support staff regarding hygiene, wearing masks, social distancing measures and self-isolation to improve health literacy and promote required behaviours.

  • 2.

    Consider health, nutritional and psychological support and education during the remainder of the lockdown period.

  • 3.

    Reduce the injury risk by implementing a progressive training load and allowing for maximum adaptation before competition is re-introduced.

  • 4.

    Sleep hygiene and its effects on performance should become an imperative part of athletic education.

  • 5.

    Athletes returning to sport should require thorough medical assessment including nutrition assessment prior to resumption of high intensity sporting activity.

  • 6.

    Mental health aspects form an important part of athlete performance and should be recognised and acted on timeously through life/performance coaches or psychologists.

  • 7.

    Stimulate athletes to become saving and investment-wise, and plan their future in time for a career/business/life after sport.

1. Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) resulted in a global pandemic with unprecedented consequences. Many scientific articles (peer-reviewed and non-peer reviewed) have been published regarding epidemiology,1 pathogenesis,2 complications3 and treatment.4 The COVID-19 pandemic forced governments to implement unparalleled measures to curb the rapid spread of the disease including strict lockdown, banning of all organised and social gatherings (including sports events) and restricting non-essential travel, with a significant effect on the sports industry and athletes. In South Africa, level 5 lockdown measures were enforced from 26 March to 30 April (5 weeks). Only essential services, travel and shopping were allowed and exercise outside individual property boundaries was not allowed,5 likely having a psychological impact on all, including athletes.6 Our current understanding of these lockdown measures on training, nutrition and mental health of athletes are limited. This study aims to investigate the perceptions of South African elite and semi-elite athletes on (1) return to sport (RTS); (2) maintenance of physical conditioning and other activities; (3) sleep; (4) nutrition; (5) mental health; (6) healthcare access; and (7) knowledge of the COVID-19 disease.

2. Methods

A cross-sectional study was designed, based on input from researchers and clinicians looking after athletes, regarding the challenges they experienced during the lockdown period. Survey questions were adapted from validated questionnaires on maintenance of activity,7 nutrition8 and mental state.9 The survey was piloted by 20 healthcare workers including sports physicians, physiotherapists and biokineticists. Following ethics approval from the Ethical Committee of the University of Pretoria (REC 274/2020), a link to the online Google Form survey was distributed to a convenience sample of athletes via WhatsApp. Athletes were asked to read the description and need for the study and click on the link to proceed after giving consent. Participants from 15 sports (soccer, hockey, rugby, cricket, athletics, netball, basketball, endurance running, cycling, track and field, swimming, squash, golf, tennis, karate) were recruited through the databases of the researchers, sports medicine healthcare professionals and administrators affiliated with the research team. The inclusion criteria was (1) elite and semi-elite athletes based in South Africa, (2) >18 years of age. Recreational athletes were excluded. The survey was live for 72 h during the level 5 lockdown period, from 28 April to 30 April 2020 and took 10–15 min to complete. Data were collected from Google Forms and exported to a csv file for data analysis. The data consisted of categorical feedback, hence the descriptive statistics consisted of frequencies and percentages which described the feedback received. We used the Chi-square goodness of fit test to investigate if a significant difference, tested at a 5% level of significance, existed between the observed and expected values. The Chi-square test of independence was used to explore sex specific associations. Post hoc analyses were included with a Bonferroni adjustment where applicable. As questions were single or multiple choice options. It should be noted that proportions do not add up to 100% for the questions with multiple responses. Multiple choice options on risk reduction behaviour were listed as per the World Health Organization (WHO)10 and National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD)11 documents regarding the most important aspects.

3. Results

From a total of 1080 distributed surveys, 692 athletes responded. The response rate was 64% and respondents consisted of 67% males (Table 1 ). Some (presumably university level semi-elite athletes, n  = 55; 8%) reported participation in two or more sports. Four respondents preferred not to reveal their sex.

Table 1.

Athlete demographics: sex and sport involvement.

Type of sport involvement Total surveys distributed n = 1080 Female n = 225 (33%) Male n = 463 (67%) Responses n = 769
(Respondents n = 692)
Response rate within each sport
n % % % %
Soccer 250 5 37 26 72
Hockey 150 19 14 16 74
Rugby 130 4 17 13 69
Cricket 110 4 16 12 77
Athletics 100 15 8 10 72
Netball 80 31 10 86
Basketball 80 17 6 9 81
Endurance running 50 10 4 6 78
Cycling 20 4 2 3 90
Track and field 30 3 1 2 43
Swimming 30 3 1 2 37
Squash 15 0 1 1 40
Golf 15 0 1 1 33
Tennis 10 1 0.5 30
Karate 10 1 0.3 20

Respondents n = 692: completed responses received back.

Responses n = 769: athletes reported participation in two or more sports.

Most respondents were from soccer (26%), followed by hockey (16%) and rugby (13%). Most males participated in soccer (37%), while most females played netball (31%).

Regarding return to competitive sport, 35% athletes expected to RTS within 1–3 months whilst 31% felt unsure, and no sex difference was observed (p  = 0.0740). Only 50% athletes were comfortable with RTS when allowed by authorities, and results are comparable between males and females (p  = 0.6901). The athletes are willing to compete behind closed doors (p  < 0.0001), while male athletes are more willing than females (p  < 0.0001) (Table 2 ).

Table 2.

Athlete responses to return to competitive sport during the lockdown period.

Return to competitive sport during lockdown
When do you think you will be competing again? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
% % % %
1 montha 8 11 10 <0.0001*
1–3 monthsb 30 38 35
3–6 monthsc 24 19 50 21
>6 monthsd 4 3 3
Unsureb 34 29 50 31



As you are aware, the SARS-CoV-2 virus will not simply “disappear” and maybe around for some time. Should regulations and authorities allow return to sport, would you be comfortable to return to your sport? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yesa 48 51 25 50 <0.0001*
Nob 16 14 50 15
Maybec 36 35 25 35



If you answered “No” or “Maybe”, please say what would make you comfortable to return to sport
Maybe Femalen = 82 Malen = 160 PNTSn = 1 Totaln = 430 (% of 243) p- value
I am assured that protocols have been put in place to significantly reduce my chances at contracting the virus 59 53 54 <0.0001*
Risks must be reduced by 100% 40 39 100 40
My sporting federation and government must be happy with guidelines to protect athletes 44 36 38
The international sporting world must be moving in the same direction 24 32 29
I am enabled financially or equipment-wise by my federation to take the precautionary measures implemented 9 13 12



No Femalen = 35 Malen = 65 PNTSn = 2 Totaln = 174
(% of 102)
p- value
Risks must be reduced 100% 54 62 100 60 <0.0001*
I am enabled financially or equipment-wise by my federation to take the precautionary measures implemented 11 9 43
The international sporting world must be moving in the same direction 17 34 27
My sporting federation and government must be happy with guidelines to protect athletes 23 29 26
I am assured that protocols have been put in place to significantly reduce my chances at contracting the virus 49 40 50 10



Would you compete behind closed doors but televised? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yes 72 86 50 82 <0.0001*
No 28 14 50 18

PNTS: Prefer not to say.

ab When significance tests indicated that differences existed between the counts within each question, the superscripts indicate which options reported similar results. These represent the post hoc results.

*

Significant difference < 0.05.

For exercise maintenance and other activities, more athletes trained alone (p  < 0.0001), compared to those training alone but digitally directed by a trainer, or a medical person or using technology like Zoom together with other athletes. More males used Zoom to train with other athletes than females (p  < 0.0001). Most athletes trained daily vs alternative days or ≤3× a week (p  = 0.0001). More males trained daily compared to females (p  = 0.0059). Sessions consisted mainly of own body weight (males 73%) and cardio exercises (females 70%). Athletes could train outside without breaking the law (p  < 0.0001) (male vs female p  = 0.3779), at a reduced training intensity (p  < 0.0001) (male vs female p  = 0.6972) and sessions lasted mostly 30–60 min (males vs females p  = 0.6351). Sports specific equipment is used significantly more (p  < 0.0001) than treadmills, steppers, stationary bikes, swimming. Males and females had comparable results (p  = 0.0899). Sedentary behaviour above active behaviour was preferred during leisure time (p  < 0.0001). Sedentary behaviour largely favoured watching television, and males significantly favoured electronic gaming compared to females (p  < 0.0001) (Table 3 ).

Table 3.

Athlete responses to exercise maintenance and other activities during the lockdown period.

Exercise maintenance during lockdown
How are you maintaining activity during lockdown?# Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 897 (% of 692) p- value
% % % %
Alonea 57 63 75 61 <0.0001*
Directed digitally by a Fitness or Personal trainerb 31 23 25 25
Directed digitally by a medical person (Physiotherapist/Biokineticist/Sports Scientist)b 30 20 25 24
Using technology like Zoom etc. with other athletesb 10 24 20



How often do you train in a week? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Dailya 53 65 75 61 <0.0001*
Every alternate dayb 27 23 25 24
3× or less a weekc 20 12 15



What do your sessions consist of?# % of Female % of Male % of PNTS Totaln = 2031
(% of 692)
p- value
Own body weight strengtha 66 73 50 71 <0.0001*
Cardio (running/stepper/cycle/treadmill) a 70 65 25 67
Sport specific exercises that are functionalb 62 48 50 52
Resisted strength work (use of elastics and/or weights)b 43 52 25 49
Flexibilityc 31 30 25 31
Proprioception (balance)c 24 24 25 24



Are you able to exercise outside without breaking the law? (e.g. in your backyard) Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yes 85 82 25 83 <0.0001*
No 15 18 75 17



Have you reduced your training load and intensity during this lockdown period? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yes 76 74 75 75 <0.0001*
No 24 26 25 25
At what intensity do you exercise? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Higha 36 36 25 36 <0.0001*
Moderateb 57 58 75 57
Lowc 7 6 7



When you do exercise, how long are your sessions? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
<30 mina 11 12 50 11 <0.0001*
30–45 minb 35 31 25 33
45–60 minb 40 39 39
>60 minc 14 18 25 17



Do you have any of the following equipment you use at home to assist you with exercise?# % of Female % of Male % of PNTS Totaln = 1609
(% of 692)
p- value
Sports specific equipment (soccer ball/rugby ball/tennis ball, etc.)a 56 67 75 63 <0.0001*
Resistance bandsab 53 52 75 52
Free weightsb 41 48 50 46
Swimming poolc 31 28 29
Stationary bike (or any equipment to allow for indoor cycling)c 28 20 23
Stepperd 8 11 25 10
Treadmilld 10 9 10



Other activities during lockdown
Aside from exercise, what else do you do to keep busy during the lockdown?# % of Female % of Male % of PNTS Totaln = 2693
(% of 692)
p- value
Active <0.0001*
Fix things at home or spring cleana 58 49 50 52
Games outdoors (playing with kids, etc.) b 21 28 25 25
Sedentary
Watch televisiona 72 71 75 72
Social mediaa 61 57 75 58
Read a bookbc 50 41 75 44
Electronic gaming (play station etc.) bcde 11 51 75 38
Cell phone gamingcde 29 40 25 36
Work remotely on your other business venturesde 37 27 30
Board gamese 24 31 29
Drink alcoholf 3 5 4

PNTS: Prefer not to say.

ab When significance tests indicated that differences existed between the counts within each question, the superscripts indicate which options reported similar results. These represent the post hoc results.

#

Questions were open to select more than one option i.e. percentages may add up to >100.

*

Significant difference < 0.05.

More athletes reported changes in sleep-wake times during the lockdown period (p  < 0.0001), but they still experienced restful sleep (p  < 0.0001) and did not experience constant fatigue (p  < 0.0001). There were no sex differences in sleep-wake times (p  = 0.6045) and restful sleep (p  = 0.2455), however, a significantly larger proportion of females felt more fatigued than males (p  = 0.0213) (Table 4 ).

Table 4.

Athlete responses to sleep, nutrition and mental state during the lockdown period.

Sleep during lockdown
Have you been sleeping and waking up at your normal times as before the lockdown? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
% % % %
Yes 20 22 21 <0.0001*
No 80 78 100 79



Is your sleep restful? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yes 70 75 25 73 <0.0001*
No 30 25 75 27



Are you feeling constantly fatigued during the lockdown? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yes 48 38 100 42 <0.0001*
No 52 62 58



Nutrition during lockdown
Has your diet worsened or improved during the lockdown? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Improved 36 53 25 47 0.1486
Worsened 64 47 75 53



If your diet has worsened, in what way?# Femalen = 143 Malen = 219 PNTSn = 3 Totaln = 686 (% of 365) p- value
Excessive carbohydrates (includes sweets/chocolates/rice/bread etc.)a 80 73 100 76 <0.0001*
Fizzy drinksb 24 41 67 34
Poor hydration during exercise and after exerciseb 34 33 67 34
Excessive processed foodsc 16 22 33 20
Excessive red meatcd 10 17 67 15
Alcohold 12 8 33 10



Are you using any supplements to assist in boosting your immune system? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yes 36 30 32 <0.0001*
No 64 70 100 68



If yes to the above question, what supplements?# Femalen = 82 Malen = 173 PNTSn = 0 Totaln = 219 p- value
Multivitamina 39 27 36 <0.0001*
Vitamin Cb 46 23 36
Otherab 24 17 23
Proteinb 10 14 15
No information suppliedc 1 6 5
Zincc 5 2 4



Mental state during lockdown
Do you feel depressed? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yes 60 48 75 52 0.3230
Yes, all of the time 4 2 3
Yes, on very few occasions 29 27 27
Yes, sometimes 27 19 75 22
No 40 52 25 48
No 40 52 25 48



Do you feel you have a loss of “energy” daily? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yes 53 42 100 46 0.0275*
No 47 58 54



Do you struggle to keep yourself motivated to exercise? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yes 60 52 75 55 0.0150*
No 40 48 25 45



Have you re-adapted to developing a new routine daily with lockdown? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yes 62 69 50 66 <0.0001*
No 38 31 50 34



Has your libido (sexual appetite)...during lockdown Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Decreaseda 14 13 25 13 <0.0001*
Increasedb 13 38 25 30
Stay the samec 73 49 50 57



Are you aware of several psychological and mental health programmes available online and via skype should you need it? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yes 60 47 50 51 0.6483
No 40 53 50 49



Have you been sleeping and waking up at your normal times as before the lockdown? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
% % % %
Yes 20 22 21 <0.0001*
No 80 78 100.00 79



Is your sleep restful? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Total p- value
Yes 70 75 25 73 <0.0001*
No 30 25 75 27



Are you feeling constantly fatigued during the lockdown? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Total p- value
Yes 48 38 100 42 <0.0001*
No 52 62 58

PNTS: Prefer not to say.

ab When significance tests indicated that differences existed between the counts within each question, the superscripts indicate which options reported similar results. These represent the post hoc results.

#

Questions were open to select more than one option i.e. percentages may add up to >100.

*

Significant difference < 0.05.

Even though not statistically significant, more than half of the athletes admitted to the worsening of their diet (p  = 0.1486), with females significantly more than males (p  < 0.0001). Excessive carbohydrate consumption was significantly more (p  < 0.0001) than excessive fizzy drinks, poor hydration during and after exercise, processed foods, and red meat (Table 4).

Observing mental state, 52% of the athletes felt depressed at some time (p  = 0.3230), and females reported a significantly (p  < 0.0001) higher rate. While 54% of all athletes did not report energy loss, and 55% struggled to keep motivated; female athletes reported higher energy loss (p  = 0.0084) and lack of motivation (p  = 0.0358) compared to males. Most felt they adapted to the new routine (males vs females p  = 0.0765). Libido stayed the same for most respondents, but significantly more males reported increased libido compared to females (p  < 0.0001). Many athletes were not aware of online psychological and mental health programmes, however, females are significantly more mindful (p  = 0.0020) (Table 4).

A significant number of athletes had access to healthcare (p  < 0.0001; males vs females p  = 0.5934). Both males and females accessed telehealth opposed to physical consultations (p  < 0.0001), via WhatsApp (65% males vs 52% females) or telephone (60% males vs 56% female). More athletes had access to general practitioners and physiotherapists for medical assistance compared to other healthcare professionals (p  < 0.0001). Males and females differed significantly towards choice of health access (p  < 0.0001) (Table 5 ).

Table 5.

Athlete responses to healthcare and knowledge on COVID-19 during lockdown.

Questions on healthcare during lockdown
Do you have easy access to your healthcare professionals? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
% % % %
Yes 81.33 79.27 75.00 79.91 <0.0001*
No 18.67 20.73 25.00 20.09



Is your access via# % of Female % of Male % of PNTS Totaln = 1246
(% of 692)
p- value
Telehealth <0.0001*
Whatsappa 52 65 50 61
Telephonea 56 60 25 59
Social mediab 15 19 17
Other electronic meansb 13 13 25 13
Physical
Physical consultations 40 25 25 30



Which professionals do you have access to?# % of Female % of Male % of PNTS Totaln = 1168
(% of 692)
p- value
General Practitionera 52 44 50 47 <0.0001*
Physiotherapista 30 46 25 41
Otherb 39 23 28
Biokineticistb 27 28 50 28
Sports Physicianb 16 30 26



Knowledge on COVID-19 during lockdown
Where do you gain your knowledge from regard COVID-19?# % of Female % of Male % of PNTS Totaln = 2265
(% of 692)
p- value
Television newsb 73 74 25 73 <0.0001*
News websitesab 72 68 100 70
Social mediabc 59 58 25 58
Official government websites and social media sitesc 60 48 75 52
Radiod 27 24 25
A friendefg 15 14 25 15
My doctorefg 9 16 14
Community forumsfg 13 9 25 10
My physiog 2 12 9
My bankerb 1 2 2



What are the most important aspects in reducing risk at contracting the coronavirus?# % of Female % of Male % of PNTS Totaln = 4181
(% of 692)
p- value
Social distancing of 2 md 61 57 50 58 <0.0001*
Handwashing with soap and watera 89 83 100 85
Coughing/sneezing into a flexed elbowcd 72 70 100 71
Not rubbing eyes/nose/mouthbc 80 75 100 77
Cloth masksij 20 25 23
Hand sanitising with alcohol content 70ab 84 84 100 84
Sneezing/coughing into a handkerchiefefh 38 40 50 40
Wearing glovesefg 43 43 50 43
Social distancing of 1 mfgh 33 41 50 39
Surgical masksfgh 38 39 39
FFP1/FFP2/N95 masksghi 31 30 50 31
Disposing of clothes when returning from shops etc.j 17 15 25 16



What are the main symptoms of the coronavirus that should prompt you to get a medical opinion?# % of Female % of Male % of PNTS Totaln = 1980
(% of 692)
p- value
Fevera 79 79 100 79 <0.0001*
Dry Coughb 61 65 100 64
Shortness of breathc 78 85 100 83
Sore throatb 56 63 75 61



Should you think you have coronavirus symptoms do you know how to proceed? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yes 92 92 100 92
No 8 8 8



If your answer is yes to the above question how would you proceed?# % of Female % of Male % of PNTS Totaln = 1190
(% of 692)
p- value
Contact a doctora 71 74 75 73 <0.0001*
Phone the toll-free NICD numberb 52 50 50 51
Go to a lab and ask them for testing for COVID-19c 24 24 24
Search on google or social mediad 7 10 9
Just arrive at a doctors rooms for a consultatione 1 2 2
Speak to your pharmaciste 0 2 2



Do you have easy access to your healthcare professionals? Femalen = 225 Malen = 463 PNTSn = 4 Totaln = 692 p- value
Yes 81.33 79.27 75.00 79.91 <0.0001*
No 18.67 20.73 25.00 20.09



Is your access via# % of Female % of Male % of PNTS Totaln = 1246
(% of 692)
p- value
Telehealth <0.0001*
Whatsappa 52 65 50 61
Telephonea 56 60 25 59
Social mediab 15 19 17
Other electronic meansb 13 13 25 13
Physical
Physical consultations 40 25 25 30



Which professionals do you have access to?# % of Female % of Male % of PNTS Totaln = 1168
(% of 692)
p- value
General Practitionera 52 44 50 47 <0.0001*
Physiotherapista 30 46 25 41
Otherb 39 23 28
Biokineticistb 27 28 50 28
Sports Physicianb 16 30 26

PNTS: Prefer not to say.

ab When significance tests indicated that differences existed between the counts within each question, the superscripts indicate which options reported similar results. These represent the post hoc results.

#

Questions were open to select more than one option i.e. percentages may add up to >100.

*

Significant difference < 0.05.

Television news, news websites, social media and government sites were the sources of knowledge on COVID-19 used as opposed to radio, friends, doctors, community forums, physiotherapists and bankers (p  < 0.0001) and no sex difference was observed. Handwashing with soap and water and hand sanitising with >70% alcohol content were rated as the most important (p  < 0.0001; males vs females p  = 0.8127). Most athletes were aware that shortness of breath, fever, dry cough and sore throat were the main symptoms of COVID-19 (p  < 0.0001; males vs females p  = 0.8402). Shortness of breath was identified by 85% male vs 78% female athletes as the main symptom of COVID-19. Most athletes knew how to proceed on symptom development (p  < 0.0001; males vs females p  = 1.000). On suspicion of COVID-19 symptoms, a significant difference existed in accessing healthcare via contacting their doctors, or opting for contacting the National Institute of Communicable Diseases (NICD) hotline, as opposed to going to a laboratory for testing, searching the web or social media or going to the doctor's rooms (p  < 0.0001). Both males and females knew proceedings (p  = 1.000), and would contact a doctor (Table 5).

4. Discussion

The COVID-19 pandemic lockdown measures significantly impacted elite and semi-elite athletes in South Africa. One of our key findings is that despite high levels of uncertainty regarding RTS guidelines, most athletes are continuing to train daily. Two out of three athletes trained alone with only a minority of athletes using digital guidance by a professional. There are certain risks to unsupervised training,12 including an inadvertent lapse into poor technique and posture, which may predispose athletes to injuries.13 Solo training and a lack of sport- specific training may also be challenging for athletes who participate in team and very technical (e.g. pole vault) sports. More than half of the athletes were training at a moderate exercise intensity for 30–60 min per day, at a lower training load than normal. Moderate training loads allow for recovery14 and this is important during the COVID-19 pandemic to avoid blunting of the immune system.15, 16, 17 Even though the additional recovery time came at an opportune time (e.g. Olympics was 4 months away), deconditioning is bound to occur, posing challenges in reconditioning and safe RTS.12 The majority of athletes engaged in own bodyweight strength training, cardio workouts, and functional sport-specific training, resembling appropriate active rest phase modalities.18 Only a small number of athletes included proprioception in their programmes. Good proprioception plays an important role in accurate movement patterns and can prevent injuries and recurrence of injuries.19 Such exercises are easy to do indoors and even in confined spaces, and should be recommended. Athletes had considerable access to equipment, including sports specific equipment, treadmills, steppers, free weights, swimming pools and stationary bikes, providing good opportunities for cross-training, which we also recommend to assist with whole-body maintenance and to add variety.20

Leisure time activities with possible lifestyle changes during lockdown were of concern. The majority chose sedentary behaviour, especially watching television. Males engaged more in electronic and cell-phone gaming, possibly contributing to sleep alteration and feelings of fatigue. Few partook in alcohol-related activities during this period. The detrimental effects of sedentary behaviour on both physical and mental health is beyond dispute.21, 22 Realistic changes to decrease sedentary behaviour during the lockdown needs to be advocated by health care professionals. Athletes are also exposed to the negative psychological consequences of COVID-19 like anxiety and stress reported across the wider society, where people are overwhelmed by the constantly changing alerts and media reports about the virus spread. Home confinement not only affect the physiological status of athletes,23, 24 but the inability to compete may also influence athlete mental health.25 We found that one in two athletes was depressed, with energy loss and lack of motivation to train. Females are more affected in all these spheres, with potentially profound adverse effects on their mental health.26, 27 A recent consensus document on athlete mental health stressed the importance of mental wellbeing for optimal performance.25 Access to psychological support to maintain their mental health during and after lockdown is paramount. A significant proportion of athletes reported a change in sleep routine, even though still restful. Nevertheless, almost half of the respondents reported feeling chronically fatigued. Quality and quantity of sleep have a significant impact on injury incidence and recovery post-exercise.28 Sleep allows for the immune system to regenerate and recuperate.29 Compromised immunity increases the risk of viral illness (including COVID-19), this is particularly important given the imminent winter of the southern hemisphere. Social isolation, exercise reduction, sedentary behaviour, and changes in nutrition have a psychological consequence and can impact sleep and fatigue. Athletes need to be educated regarding the psychological impact on sleep and fatigue20 and re-adjust their sleeping patterns on RTS.

More than half of the athletes reported deterioration in eating habits, especially a significant increase in carbohydrate ingestion. Impaired nutrition may result in a myriad of issues upon RTS including deteriorated performance, lifestyle-related concerns and affecting weight category sport.30 Athletes are generally believed to consume substantial amounts of supplements,31 but a large percentage of athletes in our study did not consume supplements. Only one in three athletes used a combination of vitamin C, multivitamins, zinc, vitamin B, protein and other unclassifiable supplements. During the COVID-19 pandemic some authors have advised taking supplements including vitamin C, zinc and vitamin D for immune enhancement.4, 20 Most athletes can train outside without breaking regulations, exposing them to natural light to allow vitamin D synthesis.32 Given the significant inadequacies in nutrition during the lockdown, it seems appropriate to implement nutritional guidance by a sports nutritionist, both during the lockdown and afterward.

The majority of athletes had access to healthcare professionals, mostly through telehealth. With the implementation of the lockdown and dangers of COVID-19, the Health Professionals Council of South Africa relaxed its regulations on the use of telehealth, making it more accessible.33 Only one in four had access to a sports physician, perhaps due to financial or travelling constraints. The athletes accessed traditional and social media to gain knowledge on COVID-19 demonstrating the ability of these platforms to reach wide audiences to deliver key public health messages. It appears that doctors or other evidence-based platforms were poorly utilised for this purpose possibly because healthcare professionals did not reach out to the athlete population. Nevertheless, athletes had good knowledge about COVID-19 preventative measures and presenting symptoms. They identified handwashing with soap and water or the use of alcohol-based hand sanitisers as a priority in reducing their risk of contracting the virus. Applying respiratory hygiene was rated high while only one in two athletes recognised social distancing of >2 m as important. Even though athletes were aware of how to mitigate the risk, they lacked awareness of the priorities of risk modification.10 The timing of the survey may have contributed to athletes favouring the use of surgical and FFP1/FFP2/N95 masks (which should be reserved for healthcare professionals), instead of a cloth mask. Cloth masks have shown some potential to reduce the risk of viral transmission.34 This information was shared by the government shortly before the start of the survey, which may have biased the responses.35 The athletes also correctly recognised the most significant symptoms of COVID-19 as communicated by the World Health Organisation,10 NICD11 and National Department of Health,36 being shortness of breath, fever, dry cough and a sore throat. Almost all athletes knew how to proceed if they suspected having contracted the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Three out of four athletes know they should either contact their doctors, or the NICD toll- free number for guidance. These findings underline the vital role and efficacy of high quality messaging in traditional and social media in a pandemic.

Athletes are keen to RTS, and the majority of athletes are even prepared to do so behind closed doors.37 However, one in three athletes were unsure when to RTS, possibly owing to global uncertainty about the pandemic, lack of communication by national and international federations and sport governing bodies. One out of two athletes were comfortable to RTS when advised, the other half was unsure or would not return. Established protocols, risk mitigation strategies, guidance from sports federations and government following international trends, and financial support from federations and/or provision of protective equipment were some of the requirements identified by the athletes. Continuous athlete education to promote required behaviours, preparing the environment and health screening to evaluate COVID-19 status prior to RTS is needed.38 Physiological readiness to RTS should include re-evaluating weight, blood pressure, liver function, glucose, glycated haemoglobin and lipid profiles.39 Then a stepwise and sport-specific return to training, synchronised with the expected gradual lifting of restrictions of movement and social distancing is advised.38

High load, training load fluctuations that negatively impact acute:chronic load ratios are known injury risk factors.13, 14 Accelerated RTS after the lockdown of NFL athletes in 2011, subsequently lead to high injury rates.12 Ongoing monitoring of training loads, injury and illness upon RTS and addressing any deficits regarding the level of conditioning, strength, proprioception, neuromuscular activation and sport-specific conditioning following this period of lockdown, is recommended.40, 41, 42 Further, nutrition, sleep, mental and general health issues related to restriction of movement should be addressed40, 41, 42 and supported through the RTS process.43 It is also important to control the possible spreading of the virus during RTS, as well as managing the progress of the pandemic by early detection and management of new cases in the sports community to mitigate a second wave.23, 38

The majority of our study participants were males, with the sex distribution of our participants being representative of the current South African athlete population.44 Convenience sampling was used and team sports were overrepresented, thus the findings may not be generalisable to individual sports. We did not require athletes to report pre-lockdown sleep patterns, mental status or supplement use thus findings cannot be comparable to pre-lockdown habits. We did not specifically differentiate between guided or unguided training programmes, even though there was an option to indicate guidance by professionals. The study was open for only 72 h and may have limited the response rate. This short access period was necessary to allow timely data analyses and planning of implementation measures and advice before RTS. Additionally owing to availability of resources, we were unable to verify the level of evidence of websites, social media platforms or other sources of information used by athletes. We also did not specifically ask why athletes opted for advice from non-medical experts or how finances were affected.

5. Conclusion

COVID-19 has significant physical and mental effects on athletes including physical deconditioning, altered sleep patterns, worsening nutrition, uncertainty on RTS and feelings of depression. Athletes are well informed on the COVID-19 disease, however, the need remains to provide them with easy access to reliable evidence-based resources. Closer medical, nutritional and psychological support during and after the lockdown is recommended. Further, lost opportunities and uncertain financial and sporting futures may have long-lasting effects on both athletes and the sports industry. Re-adjustment to normal life and RTS will undoubtedly be challenging. Even though the international focus seems to be on RTS, this study shows that there are many other lifestyle challenges needing to be overcome prior to returning to a pre-COVID-19 normality. Governments and sporting federations should develop and implement regional and sport-specific evidence-based guidelines for safe RTS in a COVID-19 environment to minimise risk of community transmission and preserve public health.

Funding

No funding received.

Authors’ contribution

LP: responsible for the overall content as guarantor, study concept, study planning, data collection, content contribution, data interpretation, manuscript (first draft), manuscript editing. DCJvR: study planning, manuscript planning, content contribution, data interpretation, manuscript (first draft), manuscript editing. AJvR: manuscript planning, content contribution, data interpretation, manuscript (first draft), manuscript editing. DAR: data interpretation, manuscript (first draft), manuscript editing. LH: data interpretation, manuscript (first draft), manuscript editing. HPD: data interpretation, manuscript (first draft), manuscript editing. TC: manuscript planning, data analysis including statistical analysis, data interpretation, manuscript editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest pertaining to this manuscript.

Data sharing statement

No additional data are available.

Acknowledgements

The authors made available all contact numbers and data-free websites for the DOH, NICD as well as several pharmaceutical and private based companies providing telephonic support for depression.

The authors would like to thank the following medical colleagues, athletes and sport administrators for distributing the survey: Dr Kevin Subbhan, Cheryl Roos, Zac van Heerden, Lance Stevens, Belinda Waghorn, Denise Polson, Calvin Shipley, Nick Brink, Josh Smith, Tim Vadachallam, Denis Riehbok, Kelvin Ndhlomo, John Williams, Warren Engelbrecht, Kutlwano Molefe, Christy Cronin, Neline Hoffman, Bernadette Costons, Rayno Rayepen, Dr Janesh Ganda, Fanie de Klerk, Dr Abdullah Moola, Elana Meyer, Nolene ConradJacques Durand, Steven Ball, Marianne Viljoen, Jason Fyfer, Setty Ndaba, Siphesihle Mthembu, Non Pongolo, Ryan Rickelton, Mangaliso Mosehle, Nolene Conrad, Rene Kalmer, Raisibe Ntokizane, Craig Cynkin, Shannon Naidoo, Granald Scott, Rooi Mahamutsa, Ludwe Mpakupaku.

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Mrs Madeleen Scheepers for the upload of all publications to Endnote library.

Footnotes

Rapid response papers and have not undergone the full peer review process.

References

  • 1.Zhou P., Yang X.-L., Wang X.-G. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579(7798):270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rothan H.A., Byrareddy S.N. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun. 2020:102433. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jiang F., Deng L., Zhang L. Review of the clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) J Gen Intern Med. 2020:1–5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05762-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Richards G., Mer M., Schleicher G. COVID-19 and the rationale for pharmacotherapy: a South African perspective. Wits J Clin Med. 2020;2(1):11–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.President Cyril Ramaphosa: South Africa's response to Coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic. South Africa: South Africa Government Newsroom Speeches; 2020. Available at: https://www.gov.za/speeches/president-cyril-ramaphosa-south-africas-response-coronavirus-covid-19-pandemic-23-apr-2020.
  • 6.Qiu J., Shen B., Zhao M. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gen Psychiatry. 2020;33(2) doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thomas S., Reading J., Shephard R.J. Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q) Can J Sport Sci. 1992;17(4):338–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Segal-Isaacson C., Wylie- Rosett J., Gans K.M. Validation of a short dietary assessment questionnaire: the Rapid Eating and Activity Assessment for Participants short version (REAP-S) Diabetes Educ. 2004;30(5):774–781. doi: 10.1177/014572170403000512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Krueger R.F., Derringer J., Markon K.E. Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Med. 2012;42(9):1879–1890. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.World Health Organization. Coronavirus. Available at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_3.
  • 11.Guidelines for case-finding, diagnosis, management and public health response in South Africa, Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis and Outbreak Response, National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD) of the National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS) and the National Department of Health, South African Government, South Africa, 2020. Available at: https://www.nicd.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/NICD_DoH-COVID-19-Guidelines-10March2020_final.pdf.
  • 12.Myer G.D., Faigenbaum A.D., Cherny C.E. JOSPT, Inc.; JOSPT, 1033 North Fairfax Street, Suite 304, Alexandria, VA: 2011. Did the NFL lockout expose the Achilles heel of competitive sports? [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aicale R., Tarantino D., Maffulli N. Overuse injuries in sport: a comprehensive overview. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1017-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maupin D., Schram B., Canetti E. The relationship between acute: chronic workload ratios and injury risk in sports: a systematic review. Open Access J Sports Med. 2020;11:51. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S231405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Matthews C.E., Ockene I.S., Freedson P.S. Moderate to vigorous physical activity and risk of upper-respiratory tract infection. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(8):1242–1248. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200208000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Soligard T., Steffen K., Palmer D. Sports injury and illness incidence in the Rio de Janeiro 2016 Olympic Summer Games: a prospective study of 11,274 athletes from 207 countries. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:1265–1271. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schwellnus M., Soligard T., Alonso J.-M. How much is too much? (Part 2) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(17):1043–1052. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.de Oliveira Neto L., Elsangedy H.M., de Oliveira Tavares V.D. Training in home – home-based training during COVID-19 (SARS-COV2) pandemic: physical exercise and behavior-based approach. Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia do Exercício. 2020;19(2) [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ogard W.K. Proprioception in sports medicine and athletic conditioning. Strength Cond J. 2011;33(3):111–118. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0b013e31821f3ae. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jukic I., Calleja-González J., Cos F. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; 2020. Strategies and solutions for team sports athletes in isolation due to COVID-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Farren G.L., Zhang T., Gu X. Sedentary behavior and physical activity predicting depressive symptoms in adolescents beyond attributes of health-related physical fitness. J Sport Health Sci. 2018;7(4):489–496. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2017.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.de Oliveira R.G, Guedes D.P. Public Library of Science; 2016. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, cardiorespiratory fitness and metabolic syndrome in adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational evidence. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.COVID-19 and Sporting Activity . The Australian Institute of Sport; Australia: 2020. AIS framework for rebooting sport. Available at: https://ais.gov.au/health-wellbeing/covid-19#ais_framework_for_rebooting_sport. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sarto F., Impellizzeri F., Spörri J. 2020. Impact of potential physiological changes due to COVID-19 home confinement on athlete health protection in elite sports: a call for awareness in sports programming. Available at: https://osf.io/preprints/sportrxiv/4zb3a/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reardon C.L., Hainline B., Aron C.M. Mental health in elite athletes: International Olympic Committee consensus statement (2019) Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(11):667–699. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Trojian T. Depression is under-recognised in the sport setting: time for primary care sports medicine to be proactive and screen widely for depression symptoms. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:137–139. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tolentino J.C., Schmidt S.L. DSM-5 criteria and depression severity: implications for clinical practice. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:450. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nédélec M. Recovery strategies in elite sport: focus on both quantity and quality of sleep. Rev Med Liege. 2020;75(1):49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Haspel J.A., Anafi R., Brown M.K. Perfect timing: circadian rhythms, sleep, and immunity – an NIH workshop summary. J Clin Invest Insight. 2020;5(1) doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.131487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thomas D.T., Erdman K.A., Burke L.M. Nutrition and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48:543–568. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Maughan R.J., Depiesse F., Geyer H. The use of dietary supplements by athletes. J Sports Sci. 2007;25(S1):S103–S113. doi: 10.1080/02640410701607395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grant W.B., Lahore H., McDonnell S.L. Evidence that vitamin D supplementation could reduce risk of influenza and COVID-19 infections and deaths. Nutrients. 2020;12(4):988. doi: 10.3390/nu12040988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kwinda M.A. Health Professions Council of South Africa; South Africa: 2020. Guidance on the application of telemedicine guidelines during the covid-19 pandemic. Available at: https://www.hpcsa.co.za/Uploads/Events/Announcements/APPLICATION_OF_TELEMEDICINE_GUIDELINES.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Greenhalgh T., Schmid M.B., Czypionka T. Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis. BMJ. 2020;369:m1435. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.National Department of Health, COVID-19, online resource and news portal, South Africa, 2020. Available at: http://www.health.gov.za/index.php/component/phocadownload/category/631.
  • 36.COVID-19 Corona Virus South African Resource Portal, 2020. Available at: https://sacoronavirus.co.za/.
  • 37.Lillicrap S. Sportsman HQ; England: 2020. Behind closed doors: what impact can these coronavirus hit games have on players? Available at: https://www.thesportsman.com/articles/behind-closed-doors-what-impact-can-these-coronavirus-hit-games-have-on-players. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hughes D., Saw R., Perera N.K.P. The Australian Institute of sport framework for rebooting sport in a COVID-19 environment. J Sci Med Sport. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.05.004. Available at: https://www.jsams.org/article/S1440-2440(20)30527-2/fulltext. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Varaeva Y.R., Livantsova E.N., Polenova N.V. Characteristics of blood lipid profiles of professional athletes: a literature review. Curr Pharm Des. 2020;26(1):98–102. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666191213115232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Soligard T., Schwellnus M., Alonso J.-M. How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(17):1030–1041. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gabbett T.J. The training – injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder? Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(5):273–280. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Carmody S., Borodina M.A., Gouttebarge M. When can professional sport recommence safely during the COVID-19 pandemic? Risk assessment and factors to consider. Br J Sports Med. 2020 doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102539. Available at: https://blogs.bmj.com/bjsm/2020/04/30/when-can-professional-sport-recommence-safely-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-risk-assessment-and-factors-to-consider/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.AIS Whitepaper on load, Prescription of training load in relation to loading and unloading phases of training. Executive Summary, Version 1, 4 May 2015, 2020. Available at: http://runpure.com.au/wp- content/uploads/2016/02/AIS_White_paper_- _Loads_and_risks_following_troughs250615.pdf.
  • 44.Eminent Persons Group on Transformation in Sport (EPG), Sport transformation status report. A comparative & sport code specific assessment & introduction to school sport structure, Published by the Department of Sport & Recreation, South Africa, 2016/2017. Available at: https://www.srsa.gov.za/sites/default/files/Transformation %20Status%20Report%20-%202016-2017%20EPG%20-FINAL.pdf.

Articles from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES