Abstract
Background
Glycerophospholipids were the main components of cerebral cortex lipids, and there was a close association between lipid homeostasis and human health. It has been reported that dietary DHA-enriched phosphatidylcholine (DHA-PC) and phosphatidylserine (DHA-PS) could improve brain function. However, it was unclear that whether supplementation of DHA-PC and DHA-PS could change lipid profiles in the brain of dementia animals.
Methods
SAMP8 mice was fed with different diet patterns for 2 months, including high-fat diet and low-fat diet. After intervention with DHA-PC and DHA-PS for another 2 months, the lipid profile in cerebral cortex was determined by lipidomics in dementia mice.
Results
High-fat diet could significantly decrease the levels of DHA-containing PS/pPE, DPA-containing PS, and AA-containing PE, which might exhibit the potential of lipid biomarkers for the prevention and diagnosis of AD. Notably, DHA-PC and DHA-PS remarkably recovered the lipid homeostasis in dementia mice. These might provide a potential novel therapy strategy and direction of dietary intervention for patients with cognitive decline.
Conclusions
DHA-PC and DHA-PS could recover the content of brain DHA-containing PS and pPE in SAMP8 mice fed with high-fat diet.
Abstract graphical
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, Lipid profile, DHA, Phosphatidylserine, Phosphatidylcholine
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive multifarious neurodegenerative disorder [1]. The clinical manifestations of AD are characterized with memory impairment, aphasia, agnosia, visual spatial skills impairment, executive dysfunction, personality and behavioral changes, etc. [2]. Long-term care insurance for the dementia patients will be a serious social burden following the aging society. Alzheimer’s patients had significant lipid changes in the brain tissue along with the pathological changes. Dietary habits could affect the occurrence and development of AD, and the effect of lipids on brain pathology of AD patients has been controversial. Several studies have suggested that high-fat diet could increase the risk of AD, while others have found that specific structural lipids might have a protective effect on cognitive function via antagonizing the effects of western diet [3, 4]. The different effects of high-fat diet might be attributed to the saturation of fatty acids and the molecular types of lipids.
DHA is the most abundant omega-3 fatty acid in the brain [5]. As a major component for the growth and maintenance of nervous system, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) can cross the blood-brain barrier through the Mfsd2a to provide the raw material for the formation of neuronal cell membrane [6]. Phosphatidylcholine (PC), transported by phosphatidylcholine transporter between membranes, is the main component of biofilm. It is sufficient to activate the endogenous ligand for the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR-α) in hepatocytes [7]. Phosphatidylserine (PS) is the major acidic phospholipid class that accounts for 13–15% of the phospholipids in the human cerebral cortex, and it is localized exclusively in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane in neural tissues [8]. As part of protein docking site in signal pathways, PS can interact with Akt, Raf and protein kinase C to ensure the growth and differentiation of nerve cells [9]. It has been reported that DHA enriched phospholipids could suppress the activation of microglia and astrocytes, and ameliorate Aβ-induced neuroinflammation via inhibiting the proinflammatory factors such as IL1β and TNFα [10]. Our previous study showed that DHA-PS (DHA enriched phosphatidylserine) has more significant effect than DHA-PC (DHA enriched phosphatidylcholine) on alleviating Aβ-induced cognitive deficiency [11]. DHA was mainly integrated with PS in nervous system, total PS level in brain tissue would increase after supplementation with DHA [12]. In an open-label extension study, daily intake of 100 mg DHA-PS could improve memory and maintain cognitive level in dementia patients [13]. However, it was unclear that whether supplementation of DHA-PC and DHA-PS could change lipid profiles in the brain of dementia animals.
Lipidomics could systematically identify the key lipid biomarkers in pathological process by determining lipid profiles, and may ultimately demonstrate the functional properties in different physiological status. Various studies have revealed the momentous changes of lipids in brain tissue and serum of dementia patients during the pathological process of AD using lipidomics [14]. SAMP8 is a naturally occurring mouse line that displays a phenotype of accelerated aging and is consistent with the pathological characteristics of AD. The objective of this study was to elucidate the effects of dietary DHA-PC and DHA-PS on the changes of AD brain lipid profile, and lipidomic analysis was carried out to evaluate the lipid composition in cerebral cortex of cognitive deficiency model SAMP 8 mice fed with high-fat diet.
Materials and method
Preparation of DHA-PC and DHA-PS
Total lipid was exacted from squid (Stenoteuthis. oualaniensis) roe according to the method of Folch [15]. DHA-PC was then purified from total lipid via silica-gel column chromatography with the successively multiple elution of chloroform, acetone and methanol. DHA-PS was synthesized from DHA-PC by phospholipase D as the method described by Wang et al. [16]. The purity of DHA-PC and DHA-PS was confirmed to be 94.7 and 95.1% by HPLC-ELSD [17].
Fatty acid analysis
The fatty acid compositions of DHA-PC and DHA-PS were analyzed by gas chromatography. Extracted lipid was dissolved and methylated with 2 mol/L hydrochloric acid in methanol for 1 h before injecting into gas chromatography Agilent 7820A (Agilent Technologies Inc.) with a flame ionization detector. Nitrogen was used as carrier gas. The analysis was carried out with a capillary column Supelcowax (30 m × 0.32 mm I.D and 0.25 μm film thickness; Sigma-Aldrich Inc). The temperature of injector and detector was 230 °C and 250 °C, respectively. The temperature of oven started from 170 to 230 °C at the rate of 3 °C/min and retained at 230 °C for 20 min. The relative content of each fatty acid was shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
fatty acid composition (%) | DHA-PC | DHA-PS |
---|---|---|
Palmitic acid (C16:0) | 28.08 ± 0.26 | 28.16 ± 0.17 |
Palmitoleic acid (C16:1) | 0.54 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.02 |
Stearic acid (C18:0) | 15.56 ± 0.11 | 15.38 ± 0.14 |
Arachidonic acid | 1.54 ± 0.07 | 1.63 ± 0.08 |
Oleic acid (C18:1) | 1.37 ± 0.03 | 1.64 ± 0.05 |
EPA (C20:5) | 11.62 ± 0.09 | 12.09 ± 0.11 |
DHA (C22:6) | 35.28 ± 0.35 | 34.48 ± 0.47 |
other fatty acid | 7.55 ± 0.21 | 7.58 ± 0.19 |
Animals and diets
All male SAMP8 mice (20 ± 2 g, 8 months) were housed at SPF animal room under the temperature of 20 ± 2 °C and the humidity of 60% with a 12/12 h light/dark cycle (light starting at 8 a.m.). At the adaptation period, 8 mice were fed with low fat diet and other 24 mice were treated with high-fat diet. At the age of 10 month, the SAMP8 mice were divided into 4 groups (8 animals per group): low fat group (LF) fed with standard diet (AIN-93 M), high-fat group (HF) fed with high-fat diet, DPC group fed with high-fat diet containing 1% (w/w) DHA-PC and DPS group fed with high-fat diet containing 1% (w/w) DHA-PS. The mice were continuously treated with corresponding diets for another 2 months. The ingredients of each diet were summarized in Table 2 and all the four groups got the same treatment during animal feeding period. The study protocols were approved by the ethical committee of experimental animal care at Ocean University of China (Qingdao, China). After 2 months of intervention, animals were sacrificed and the cortex were quickly separated from brain tissue on ice, then were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C.
Table 2.
Ingredients g/kg | LF | HF | DHA-PC | DHA-PS |
---|---|---|---|---|
Casein | 140.0 | 140.0 | 140.0 | 140.0 |
Corn starch | 617.7 | 430.7 | 430.7 | 430.7 |
Sucrose | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Corn oil | 23.9 | 46.0 | 46.0 | 46.0 |
Lard | 19.1 | 184.0 | 174.0 | 174.0 |
Mineral mixa | 35.0 | 35.0 | 35.0 | 35.0 |
Vitamin mixb | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
Cellulose | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
L-cystine | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Choline bitartrate | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
t-butylhydroquinone | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 |
DHA-PC | – | – | 10.0 | – |
DHA-PS | – | – | – | 10.0 |
Note:“-”, not detected
a AIN-93 M mineral mix
b AIN-93 M vitamin mix
Cerebral cortex lipid extraction
The cerebral cortex was crushed in phosphate buffer using tissue homogenizer. The total lipid was extracted from cerebral cortex using a modified Bligh/Dyer procedure [18]. Briefly, the tissue homogenate was extracted with 20-fold volume of chloroform: methanol 2:1 (v/v) and incubated for 1 h in a thermomixer. The mixture was then centrifuged at 10000 g, 4 °C for 5 min. Deionized H2O was added to the obtained supernatant before vortex. After centrifugation, the lower organic phase were vacuumed to remove the solvent. The obtained lipids were then dissolved in water/acetonitrile/isopropanol 1:1:2 (v/v/v) for further analysis.
Lipidomic analysis
The polar lipids were separated by NP-HPLC using Phenomenex Luna 3 μm micron silica column (150 × 2.0 mm; Phenomenex Inc.) treated with mobile phase A chloroform: methanol: ammonia water (89.5:10:0.5) and mobile phase B chloroform: ethanol: ammonia water: water (55:39:0.5:5.5) at a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min. Gradient elution was performed with 5% B for 5 min, a step to 40% B until 12 min and maintained for 4 min, a linear decrease to 30% B and maintained for 15 min, and re-equilibration from 33 min to 38 min with 5% B. Mass spectrometry multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode was established for comparative analysis of various polar lipids.
All experiments were carried out by Exion UPLC-QTRAP 6500 PLUS (Sciex Inc.) liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with the analysis carried out in the electrospray ionization (ESI) mode. The conditions were as follows: curtain gas = 20 psi, ion spray voltage = 5500 V, turbo spray source temperature = 400 °C, ion source gas 1 = 35 psi, ion source gas 2 = 35 psi [19].
Statistical analysis
Results were presented as mean and standard deviation (Mean ± SD) in tables and figures. The comparison between LF and HF groups was carried out by student’s t-test *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Differences among three groups HF, DPC and DPS were tested by one-way ANOVA (Turkey’s test) and different letters (a, b, c) indicated different significance at P < 0.05.
Results
Alterations of glycerophospholipids
Glycerophospholipids, such as phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylinositol, is one of the most abundant lipid classes in cerebral cortex. After 8 weeks of DHA-PC and DHA-PS intervention, the alteration of glycerophospholipid molecular species in the cerebral cortex was shown in Fig. 1. There were only small changes with no significance in the levels of the main glycerophospholipid classes. PC and PE are the primary constituents in the cerebral cortex and account for more than 60% of the total glycerophospholipid as represented. The result indicated that the contents of PC and PE in cerebral cortex were not easily affected by exogenous phospholipids intake (Fig. 1). PS, a brain-specific nutrition, is abundant in brain tissue and is essential in terms of memory function, which account for 10–20% of total phospholipids in the brain. Nevertheless, dietary DHA-PS did not have much impact on the changes of molecular species. DHA-PC supplementation could slightly improve the PS instead of PC content but with no significance in cerebral cortex compared with DHA-PS (Fig. 1). However, the PS levels were did not changed among the four groups.
Despite relatively low abundance, lyso-phosphatidylethanolamine (LPE) exhibited the most obvious change in lipid classes (Fig. 1). Supplementation of DHA-PC and DHA-PS significantly raised the content of LPE (P < 0.05) in comparison with LF and HF groups, which might be attributed to the specialty of its direct transfer into brain tissue [20]. After digestion and absorption, glycerophospholipids were hydrolyzed to form lysophospholipid, which could be transported to various tissues and organs in the form of chylomicron in the circulatory system. Lysophospholipid could enter the brain through the blood-brain barrier and be reused to synthesize new lipids. This property might be the reason for changes of lysophospholipid content after intake of DHA enriched phospholipids.
The fatty acid composition of each glycerophospholipid
As for PS molecular species, 18:0/18:1, 18:0/20:3, 18:0/22:6 and 20:1/18:2 are the main fatty acid species as shown in Table 3. Consistent with the previous study, 18:0/22:6 has the highest abundance with the content of 28% in PS, and DHA is the predominated polyunsaturated fatty acid (Fig. 2) [21]. Although total PS level did not appreciably change after intervention with different diets for 2 months (Fig. 1), DHA-PC/PS group could significantly change the fatty acid composition of PS, especially the polyunsaturated fatty acids composition (Table 3). High-fat diet reduced the relative content of 18:0/22:6-PS. Interestingly, the level of 18:0/22:6-PS could be restored to that of LF group after supplementation with DHA enriched phospholipids.
Table 3.
Fatty Acid (%) | LF | HF | DPC | DPS |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
18:0/18:1 | 8.02 ± 0.85 | 8.67 ± 0.61a | 6.13 ± 0.11b | 8.66 ± 1.21a |
18:0/20:1 | 1.90 ± 0.64 | 2.44 ± 0.10 a | 1.49 ± 0.17 b | 2.11 ± 0.13 ab |
18:0/20:3 | 26.56 ± 1.66 | 26.03 ± 1.51 | 27.34 ± 1.60 | 25.77 ± 3.42 |
18:0/20:4 | 0.97 ± 0.56 | 1.59 ± 0.11 | 1.57 ± 0.12 | 0.95 ± 0.10 |
18:0/22:4 | 2.06 ± 0.31 | 2.51 ± 0.28 a | 1.53 ± 0.10 b | 2.10 ± 0.30 ab |
18:0/22:5 | 1.19 ± 0.10 | 2.66 ± 0.15 **a | 1.09 ± 0.12 c | 1.73 ± 0.19 b |
18:0/22:6 | 28.93 ± 1.86 | 24.98 ± 0.86*b | 28.52 ± 1.25a | 28.25 ± 1.35a |
18:1/18:1 | 1.49 ± 0.14 | 1.91 ± 0.25 | 1.55 ± 0.16 | 1.67 ± 0.08 |
18:1/20:3 | 0.88 ± 0.29 | 0.77 ± 0.13 | 0.53 ± 0.07 | 0.80 ± 0.11 |
18:1/22:6 | 0.88 ± 0.23 | 0.77 ± 0.15 | 0.49 ± 0.11 | 0.81 ± 0.12 |
20:1/18:2 | 25.65 ± 2.68 | 26.02 ± 1.91 | 28.54 ± 1.90 | 25.77 ± 1.22 |
22:4/22:6 | 1.48 ± 0.15 | 1.65 ± 0.13 | 1.25 ± 0.13 | 1.38 ± 0.30 |
The comparison between LF and HF groups was carried out by student’s t-test *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Differences among three groups HF, DPC and DPS were tested by one-way ANOVA (Turkey’s test) and different letters (a, b, c) indicated different significance at P < 0.05
In Table 4, 16:0/22:6, 18:0/18:1, 18:0/20:4, 18:0/22:6, 18:1/20:3, 18:1/22:5 make up the main fatty acid composition for PE molecular species, in which 18:0/20:4 and 18:1/20:3 exhibited significant difference between the four dietary groups. DHA-containing PE, as essential components, could increases membrane fluidity, which played an important role in the composition of membrane phospholipids and brain function. High-fat diet could decrease the level of 18:0/20:4, interestingly, 18:0/20:4 content could be recovered after DHA-PC and DHA-PS intervention. The changes of 18:1/20:3 were in accordance with 18:0/20:4 among the four groups.
Table 4.
Fatty Acid (%) | LF | HF | DPC | DPS |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
16:0/18:1 | 1.48 ± 0.09 | 1.42 ± 0.14 | 1.45 ± 0.18 | 1.48 ± 0.10 |
16:0/18:2 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | 0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.17 ± 0.05 | 0.16 ± 0.07 |
16:0/20:2 | 0.54 ± 0.08 | 1.19 ± 0.21 **a | 0.33 ± 0.16 b | 0.45 ± 0.07 b |
16:0/20:4 | 1.44 ± 0.40 | 1.28 ± 0.40 | 1.27 ± 0.15 | 1.25 ± 0.07 |
16:0/22:1 | 1.50 ± 0.33 | 1.51 ± 0.42 | 1.13 ± 0.27 | 1.24 ± 0.07 |
16:0/22:4 | 1.09 ± 0.24 | 0.35 ± 0.17 **b | 0.25 ± 0.10 b | 0.75 ± 0.06 a |
16:0/22:5 | 1.96 ± 0.08 | 2.75 ± 0.18 **a | 1.72 ± 0.39 b | 1.72 ± 0.12 b |
16:0/22:6 | 4.78 ± 1.30 | 5.27 ± 1.26 | 4.54 ± 0.40 | 5.37 ± 1.24 |
16:1/20:4 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.02 |
16:1/22:6 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.02 ab | 0.06 ± 0.02 a | 0.01 ± 0.01 b |
18:0/16:0 | 0.12 ± 0.05 | 0.14 ± 0.09 | 0.12 ± 0.06 | 0.11 ± 0.02 |
18:0/18:1 | 9.68 ± 2.22 | 9.54 ± 1.58 | 8.72 ± 0.67 | 9.36 ± 0.47 |
18:0/18:2 | 1.91 ± 0.11 | 2.34 ± 0.98 | 1.74 ± 0.26 | 1.75 ± 0.19 |
18:0/20:1 | 1.42 ± 0.28 | 1.51 ± 0.28 | 1.18 ± 0.21 | 1.24 ± 0.24 |
18:0/20:4 | 9.82 ± 1.88 | 7.13 ± 0.65b | 11.08 ± 1.05a | 9.31 ± 0.51ab |
18:0/22:4 | 1.42 ± 0.35 | 1.50 ± 0.22 | 1.13 ± 0.30 | 1.24 ± 0.11 |
18:0/22:6 | 16.05 ± 4.01 | 17.05 ± 3.08 | 16.69 ± 1.29 | 17.27 ± 1.00 |
18:1/18:1 | 3.33 ± 0.27 | 3.93 ± 1.11 | 3.14 ± 1.04 | 3.03 ± 0.59 |
18:1/18:2 | 4.69 ± 0.19 | 5.10 ± 0.92 | 5.37 ± 0.31 | 4.53 ± 0.42 |
18:1/20:3 | 9.87 ± 0.56 | 7.86 ± 0.21*b | 8.87 ± 0.88ab | 10.10 ± 1.06a |
18:1/20:4 | 1.51 ± 0.11 | 1.67 ± 0.20 | 1.46 ± 0.22 | 1.34 ± 0.23 |
18:1/20:5 | 4.57 ± 0.26 | 4.33 ± 1.13 | 5.19 ± 0.49 | 4.37 ± 0.55 |
18:1/22:4 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
18:1/22:5 | 15.08 ± 1.39 | 16.51 ± 1.13 | 15.90 ± 1.25 | 16.32 ± 0.99 |
18:1/22:6 | 1.51 ± 0.09 | 1.43 ± 0.12 | 1.51 ± 0.19 | 1.37 ± 0.13 |
18:2/20:4 | 4.57 ± 0.47 | 4.29 ± 0.69 | 5.19 ± 0.77 | 4.33 ± 0.63 |
18:2/22:6 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.64 ± 0.19 | 0.71 ± 0.25 | 0.74 ± 0.29 |
20:4/20:4 | 0.50 ± 0.13 | 0.64 ± 0.19 | 0.71 ± 0.11 | 0.74 ± 0.26 |
20:4/22:6 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.02 |
22:4/22:6 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.03 *a | 0.12 ± 0.02 b | 0.15 ± 0.02 b |
22:6/22:6 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.04 |
The comparison between LF and HF groups was carried out by student’s t-test *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Differences among two groups HF, DPC and DPS were tested by one-way ANOVA (Turkey’s test) and different letters (a, b) indicated different significance at P < 0.05
As the major component of glycerophospholipids, PC is one of the important bioactive substances. It has been reported that there existed close link between PC and disorders including cardiovascular diseases, liver diseases and nervous system diseases [22]. The predominant molecular species of PC was 16:0/18:1. In the cerebral cortex of dementia mice, different dietary conditions did not change the compositional characteristic of PC even if polyunsaturated fatty acids were ingested (Table 5). The PC with low unsaturation could endow the stability of cell membranes.
Table 5.
Fatty Acid (%) | LF | HF | DPC | DPS |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
13:0/22:5 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.08 **a | 0.10 ± 0.05 b | 0.14 ± 0.06 b |
13:0/22:6 | 1.45 ± 0.15 | 1.38 ± 0.08 | 1.52 ± 0.29 | 1.32 ± 0.18 |
15:0/18:1 | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 0.40 ± 0.07 | 0.33 ± 0.09 | 0.32 ± 0.14 |
15:0/22:6 | 4.93 ± 0.89 | 5.31 ± 1.03 | 4.67 ± 0.59 | 4.98 ± 0.95 |
15:1/20:4 | 0.21 ± 0.12 | 0.38 ± 0.05 *a | 0.10 ± 0.02 b | 0.14 ± 0.06 b |
16:0/14:0 | 0.26 ± 0.06 | 0.29 ± 0.08 | 0.24 ± 0.15 | 0.25 ± 0.03 |
16:0/15:0 | 0.27 ± 0.14 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.13 | 0.25 ± 0.06 |
16:0/16:0 | 14.72 ± 0.77 | 14.05 ± 1.77 | 14.54 ± 1.15 | 13.74 ± 1.88 |
16:0/16:1 | 2.98 ± 0.25 | 2.99 ± 0.41a | 2.19 ± 0.15 b | 2.81 ± 0.40 ab |
16:0/17:0 | 0.18 ± 0.05 | 0.20 ± 0.09 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.17 ± 0.07 |
16:0/17:1 | 0.61 ± 0.11 | 0.66 ± 0.28 | 0.56 ± 0.29 | 0.55 ± 0.16 |
16:0/18:1 | 18.34 ± 2.80 | 18.08 ± 2.90 | 19.36 ± 0.58 | 19.27 ± 1.72 |
16:0/18:2 | 1.46 ± 0.32 | 1.75 ± 0.26 | 1.69 ± 0.32 | 1.90 ± 0.05 |
16:0/19:1 | 0.23 ± 0.06 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.07 | 0.23 ± 0.09 |
16:0/20:3 | 0.33 ± 0.20 | 0.31 ± 0.10 | 0.37 ± 0.21 | 0.33 ± 0.13 |
16:0/20:4 | 5.26 ± 0.70 | 5.73 ± 0.65 | 4.44 ± 0.44 | 5.22 ± 0.76 |
16:0/22:1 | 0.18 ± 0.08 | 0.18 ± 0.05 | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 0.17 ± 0.04 |
16:0/22:6 | 5.58 ± 0.83 | 5.20 ± 1.14 | 5.92 ± 1.56 | 5.23 ± 0.84 |
16:0/24:2 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
16:1/18:2 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.02 |
16:1/19:1 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
16:1/20:4 | 0.13 ± 0.05 | 0.02 ± 0.01 * | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.02 |
16:1/22:6 | 0.15 ± 0.08 | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.15 ± 0.07 | 0.14 ± 0.03 |
16:1/24:7 | 0.11 ± 0.07 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 0.13 ± 0.02 |
17:0/20:4 | 0.08 ± 0.07 | 0.05 ± 0.04 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.02 |
17:0/24:2 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.01 |
17:1/18:1 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.03 |
17:1/20:4 | 0.34 ± 0.09 | 0.17 ± 0.04 * | 0.19 ± 0.04 | 0.13 ± 0.07 |
18:0/13:0 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
18:0/16:0 | 3.74 ± 0.26 | 3.88 ± 0.85 | 3.46 ± 0.77 | 3.70 ± 0.53 |
18:0/17:1 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
18:0/18:1 | 6.14 ± 1.23 | 6.01 ± 0.86 | 5.12 ± 0.62 | 6.10 ± 1.45 |
18:0/18:2 | 2.68 ± 0.72 | 1.96 ± 0.22 b | 2.97 ± 0.70 ab | 3.37 ± 0.13 a |
18:0/20:4 | 1.10 ± 0.10 | 0.45 ± 0.08 b | 3.18 ± 0.84 a | 0.95 ± 0.20 b |
18:0/22:1 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.02 |
18:0/22:6 | 3.53 ± 1.04 | 3.26 ± 0.32 | 3.66 ± 0.83 | 3.30 ± 0.88 |
18:0/24:1 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
18:0/24:2 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
18:1/18:2 | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 0.20 ± 0.11 | 0.23 ± 0.19 | 0.22 ± 0.17 |
18:1/18:3 | 0.90 ± 0.07 | 1.09 ± 0.21 | 0.90 ± 0.15 | 1.22 ± 0.19 |
18:1/20:4 | 1.60 ± 0.14 | 1.78 ± 0.63 | 1.35 ± 0.48 | 1.62 ± 0.31 |
18:1/22:6 | 1.28 ± 0.35 | 1.27 ± 0.23 | 1.48 ± 0.30 | 1.38 ± 0.29 |
19:0/22:1 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.02 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 |
20:0/16:0 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.04 | 0.06 ± 0.04 |
20:0/18:2 | 0.23 ± 0.10 | 0.20 ± 0.15 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.05 |
20:0/20:4 | 0.28 ± 0.06 | 0.27 ± 0.14 | 0.20 ± 0.20 | 0.22 ± 0.03 |
20:0/22:4 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
20:1/14:0 | 19.13 ± 1.23 | 20.36 ± 2.10 | 19.01 ± 3.06 | 19.40 ± 0.71 |
20:1/15:0 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
20:1/20:4 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.04 **a | 0.03 ± 0.02 b | 0.04 ± 0.01 b |
20:1/22:6 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.04 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.03 |
20:4/22:6 | 0.26 ± 0.05 | 0.26 ± 0.05 | 0.25 ± 0.14 | 0.25 ± 0.09 |
22:4/22:6 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
22:5/22:6 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.01a | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 0.00 ± 0.00b |
22:6/22:6 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.06 ± 0.03 |
The comparison between LF and HF groups was carried out by student’s t-test *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Differences among two groups HF, DPC and DPS were tested by one-way ANOVA (Turkey’s test) and different letters (a, b) indicated different significance at P < 0.05
Ether-linked phospholipid and plasmalogen have more potent biological activities in brain function compared with glycerophospholipid, however the possible underlying mechanism has not been illustrated yet. It has been reported that the levels of plasmalogen, especially those with polyunsaturated fatty acids, could significantly be decreased in the brain of Alzheimer’s patients [23]. As shown in Fig. 1, the levels of ethanolamine plasmalogen (pPE) and choline plasmalogen (pPC), as the main components of plasmalogen in the brain, did not significantly change. Notably, distinct alteration appeared in the abundance of PUFA-containing plasmalogen. Administration of high-fat diet slightly decreased14:0p/20:4 pPC in comparison with LF group, and DHA-PC instead of DHA-PS obviously recovered its level (Table 6). In the molecular species of pPE, 16:0p/22:6 and 18:0p/22:6 exhibited distinct alteration, which was consistent with DHA-containing PS (Table 7). The level of ether-linked phospholipids, including alkyl ether analog of phosphatidylcholine (ePC) and alkyl ether analog of phosphatidylethanolamine (ePE), was relatively few in glycerophospholipids and did not significantly change among the four diet-treated groups (Table 8 and Table 9).
Table 6.
Fatty Acid (%) | LF | HF | DPC | DPS |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
14:0p/20:4 | 13.28 ± 3.20 | 11.22 ± 2.42 b | 17.00 ± 1.82 a | 13.03 ± 2.38 ab |
14:0p/22:6 | 7.22 ± 1.56 | 7.71 ± 1.82 | 8.08 ± 2.36 | 7.90 ± 1.55 |
16:0p/20:4 | 9.48 ± 0.73 | 9.25 ± 2.16 ab | 7.12 ± 0.96 b | 9.96 ± 1.02 a |
16:1p/21:2 | 5.22 ± 2.99 | 4.70 ± 1.34 | 3.86 ± 0.84 | 5.92 ± 1.59 |
18:0p/19:1 | 4.93 ± 0.72 | 5.60 ± 1.54 | 3.90 ± 0.10 | 4.42 ± 0.54 |
18:2p/19:1 | 5.22 ± 0.75 | 1.94 ± 0.96 *b | 3.86 ± 1.12 ab | 5.92 ± 1.90 a |
20:0p/19:1 | 54.65 ± 5.01 | 59.59 ± 3.60 | 56.18 ± 3.93 | 52.85 ± 6.87 |
The comparison between LF and HF groups was carried out by student’s t-test *P < 0.05. Differences among two groups HF, DPC and DPS were tested by one-way ANOVA (Turkey’s test) and different letters (a, b) indicated different significance at P < 0.05
Table 7.
Fatty Acid (%) | LF | HF | DPC | DPS |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
16:0p/16:0 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.05 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 0.10 ± 0.02 |
16:0p/18:1 | 2.09 ± 0.30 | 2.23 ± 0.33 | 1.95 ± 0.17 | 2.10 ± 0.19 |
16:0p/20:4 | 2.39 ± 0.73 | 2.15 ± 0.38 | 1.73 ± 0.12 | 1.95 ± 0.13 |
16:0p/22:4 | 2.40 ± 0.47 | 2.04 ± 0.19 | 1.49 ± 0.22 | 1.84 ± 0.12 |
16:0p/22:5 | 0.84 ± 0.25 | 1.30 ± 0.25 *a | 0.12 ± 0.04 b | 0.16 ± 0.06 b |
16:0p/22:6 | 11.58 ± 1.22 | 8.55 ± 0.60*b | 10.93 ± 1.16a | 10.77 ± 1.06a |
16:0p/24:7 | 0.38 ± 0.21 | 0.38 ± 0.06 | 0.44 ± 0.07 | 0.39 ± 0.05 |
18:0p/16:0 | 0.33 ± 0.08 | 0.30 ± 0.08 | 0.24 ± 0.07 | 0.24 ± 0.06 |
18:0p/18:1 | 2.38 ± 0.26 | 2.41 ± 0.22 ab | 2.13 ± 0.36 b | 2.69 ± 0.17 a |
18:0p/20:1 | 0.58 ± 0.15 | 0.56 ± 0.18 | 0.50 ± 0.18 | 0.60 ± 0.19 |
18:0p/20:3 | 11.56 ± 3.09 | 14.76 ± 2.38 | 14.84 ± 1.74 | 14.16 ± 1.48 |
18:0p/20:4 | 3.25 ± 0.86 | 3.57 ± 0.65 | 2.81 ± 0.32 | 3.10 ± 0.37 |
18:0p/22:4 | 4.12 ± 0.95 | 3.58 ± 0.64 | 2.82 ± 0.34 | 3.36 ± 0.26 |
18:0p/22:5 | 0.27 ± 0.07 | 0.37 ± 0.16 a | 0.11 ± 0.04 b | 0.15 ± 0.03 b |
18:0p/22:6 | 15.94 ± 0.93 | 13.88 ± 0.62*b | 15.84 ± 0.75a | 15.49 ± 0.66a |
18:1p/16:0 | 1.96 ± 0.27 | 2.11 ± 0.40 | 1.84 ± 0.18 | 1.99 ± 0.24 |
18:1p/18:1 | 4.44 ± 1.23 | 5.52 ± 0.61 | 4.19 ± 0.34 | 4.76 ± 0.62 |
18:1p/20:1 | 1.13 ± 0.07 | 1.01 ± 0.18 | 0.94 ± 0.21 | 1.20 ± 0.16 |
18:1p/20:4 | 4.03 ± 0.79 | 3.89 ± 0.34 | 3.19 ± 0.94 | 3.82 ± 0.32 |
18:1p/20:5 | 10.59 ± 2.17 | 9.55 ± 1.09 | 10.56 ± 1.68 | 9.81 ± 0.38 |
18:1p/22:1 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 0.15 ± 0.04 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.14 ± 0.03 |
18:1p/22:4 | 2.36 ± 0.45 | 2.21 ± 0.10 | 1.99 ± 0.46 | 2.25 ± 0.49 |
18:1p/22:5 | 11.55 ± 1.93 | 13.56 ± 1.67 | 14.71 ± 1.45 | 13.08 ± 2.57 |
18:1p/22:6 | 5.53 ± 0.59 | 5.62 ± 0.68 | 6.36 ± 1.21 | 5.77 ± 1.09 |
18:2p/20:4 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.12 ± 0.02 **a | 0.00 ± 0.00 b | 0.08 ± 0.03 a |
18:2p/22:6 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.02 a | 0.05 ± 0.02 a | 0.01 ± 0.00 b |
The comparison between LF and HF groups was carried out by student’s t-test *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Differences among two groups HF, DPC and DPS were tested by one-way ANOVA (Turkey’s test) and different letters (a, b) indicated different significance at P < 0.05
Table 8.
Fatty Acid (%) | LF | HF | DPC | DPS |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
16:0e/16:0 | 16.18 ± 1.94 | 15.10 ± 1.85 | 17.05 ± 1.51 | 14.57 ± 2.52 |
16:0e/16:1 | 12.74 ± 2.77 | 11.48 ± 3.00 | 11.20 ± 2.12 | 11.40 ± 1.45 |
16:0e/18:1 | 32.72 ± 4.27 | 30.81 ± 4.53 | 34.32 ± 3.85 | 32.86 ± 4.60 |
16:0e/18:2 | 4.88 ± 2.15 | 4.48 ± 1.24 | 3.96 ± 1.89 | 4.52 ± 0.34 |
16:0e/19:1 | 0.75 ± 0.54 | 0.76 ± 0.22 | 0.40 ± 0.10 | 0.47 ± 0.09 |
16:0e/22:1 | 8.46 ± 1.81 | 11.21 ± 1.11a | 8.21 ± 1.43b | 8.66 ± 0.93ab |
18:0e/16:0 | 7.01 ± 2.35 | 6.13 ± 1.20 | 5.97 ± 1.51 | 5.62 ± 0.58 |
18:0e/18:1 | 1.87 ± 0.88 | 1.86 ± 0.20 | 1.87 ± 0.18 | 2.02 ± 1.46 |
18:0e/18:2 | 2.40 ± 0.33 | 2.56 ± 0.42 | 2.32 ± 0.36 | 2.90 ± 0.50 |
18:0e/22:1 | 0.88 ± 0.23 | 1.17 ± 0.45 | 0.81 ± 0.12 | 1.00 ± 0.12 |
18:0e/22:6 | 7.21 ± 1.37 | 8.56 ± 1.44 | 8.83 ± 1.40 | 10.46 ± 1.68 |
18:0e/23:2 | 0.72 ± 0.26 | 0.94 ± 0.19 | 1.12 ± 0.08 | 1.07 ± 0.50 |
20:0e/19:1 | 4.18 ± 0.49 | 4.94 ± 1.50 | 3.94 ± 0.50 | 4.45 ± 0.83 |
Differences among two groups HF, DPC and DPS were tested by one-way ANOVA (Turkey’s test) and different letters (a, b) indicated different significance at P < 0.05
Table 9.
Fatty Acid (%) | LF | HF | DPC | DPS |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
16:0e/22:4 | 44.68 ± 4.51 | 49.28 ± 3.88 | 49.34 ± 3.41 | 49.09 ± 4.45 |
18:0e/18:2 | 0.66 ± 0.30 | 0.50 ± 0.12 | 0.50 ± 0.12 | 0.73 ± 0.21 |
18:0e/20:4 | 53.32 ± 4.55 | 49.28 ± 3.99 | 49.35 ± 3.34 | 49.09 ± 4.46 |
18:0e/22:5 | 1.34 ± 0.32 | 0.94 ± 0.14 | 0.81 ± 0.11 | 1.09 ± 0.31 |
PUFA content in glycerophospholipid
The main long chain fatty acids in glycerophospholipid from cerebral cortex are arachidonic acid (AA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) and DHA, which are consistent with those of the whole brain [24]. As the main PUFA of the membrane phospholipid, AA and its metabolites possess the powerful physiological activity in nerve and immune system [25]. AA has higher content in molecular species PE, PC, pPC, pPE and ePE compared with other glycerophospholipids including PS and ePC (Fig. 2). Although there was no significant difference in the level of AA in most glycerophospholipids, such as PC, pPC, pPE and Epe, after the intervention, interestingly, high-fat diet intervention could significantly decrease the level of AA-containing PE, and both DHA enriched phospholipids groups could recover it to that of LF group (Fig. 2b). As presented in Fig. 2, DPA was mainly concentrated in PS, PE and pPE, only the DPA level in PS was different among four different dietary groups. HF and DPS groups could remarkably increase the level of DPA-containing PS, while there was no significance change between DHA-PC group and LF group.
EPA, an important source of n-3 PUFA for the whole body, can effectively prevent cardiovascular diseases and supply essential nutrients for the brain [20]. In the cerebral cortex, EPA was only detected in PE and pPE molecular species, which might be attributed to that PE and pPE were responsible for the membrane fluidity due to the presence of large amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids [26] (Fig. 2b and e). However, there were no significant differences among these four diet-treated group, indicating that the EPA level in the brain might be relatively stable.
As the most abundant long chain PUFA, DHA exhibited the high levels in the molecular species of glycerophospholipid except for ePE, meanwhile obvious changes were reflected in pPE and PS. In pPE, the relative content of DHA-containing pPE significantly decreased after dietary intake of high-fat diet, which was consistent with the previously reported results that high-fat could accelerate aging and dementia [27]. Notably, the supplementation of DHA enriched phospholipids, including DHA-PC and DHA-PS, obviously increased DHA-containing pPE and PS levels compared with HF group, which reached to that of LF group.
Discussion
Brain function depends on the homeostasis of nerve system, which was associated with the phospholipid of cellular membrane. The cerebral cortex possesses the most DHA content in the total fatty acid composition compared with hippocampus and other brain regions. More importantly, DHA, especially in the form of plasmalogen, in the cortex decreased the most during the pathological process of AD [28]. Therefore, the changes of lipid profile might be observed in the cerebral cortex under the condition of neurodegenerative disorder after different dietary patterns. In the present study, the main glycerophospholipid molecular species were not significantly changed after administration with DHA enriched phospholipids and high-fat diet for 2 months in SAMP8 mice. The reason might be that the dose of DHA enriched phospholipids was not enough to dramatically alter fatty acid composition in the brain. In our previous study, the intervention of DHA enriched phospholipids at 300 mg/kg body weight could significantly alleviate pathology symptoms in Aβ-induced AD, but not change the whole brain DHA level [11]. The brain is a closed system isolated by blood-brain barrier, and supplementation of exogenous lipids may not cause significant changes in the lipid composition of the brain.
The different cross-regionally peroxidability index are due to changes in the type of unsaturated fatty acid that participates in membrane composition. Owing to the lipid and fatty acid composition, cerebral cortex has high peroxidability index. Therefore, the PUFA content in glycerophospholipid could reflect the oxidative stress status in the brain to some extent. There were significant changes in the levels of PUFA in some specific molecular species, including DPA-containing PS, DHA-containing PS/pPE, and AA-containing PE, among the four dietary treated groups.
Plasmalogens are critical for human health and have established roles in neuronal development, the immune response and as endogenous antioxidants [29]. Plasmalogen was decreased significantly in human brain with AD, in which ethanolamine plasmalogen was the main component [30, 31]. The ethanolamine plasmalogen has good antioxidant activity owing to its vinyl ether double bond and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Although the overall level of ethanolamine plasmalogen were not observed, the level of DHA-containing pPE were significantly changed after administration with different diets.
It has been reported that both DHA-PC and DHA-PS administration could remarkably mitigate cognitive deficiency in Aβ-induced rats, in which the effect of DHA-PS was better than that of DHA-PC [11]. Moreover, Zhou et al. [32] reported that both DHA-PC and DHA-PS significantly improved the cognitive deficits in SAMP8 mice fed with high-fat diet using maze tests. DHA-PS presented more notable benefits than DHA-PC on inhibiting Aβ pathology, mitochondrial damage, neuroinflammation. In the present study, no remarkable changes were observed in the lipid profile of cerebral cortex in SAMP8 mice after administration with DHA-PC and DHA-PS for 2 months, suggesting us that the alteration of brain lipid composition might not be the main reason for their different efficiencies. The possible underlying molecular mechanism might be closely related to the different polar groups in phospholipids. Cholinergic system played an important role in the treatment for dementia and mental deterioration, and dietary intake of phosphatidylcholine could accelerate the biosynthesis of acetylcholine in vivo [33]. It has been reported that administration of egg PC could improve memory and maze-learning ability in mice with dementia by raising the acetylcholine level in brain [34]. Phosphatidylserine, as an important nutrient for cell membrane, was essential for the activation of several key signaling pathways in neuronal signal transduction. PS supplementation could improve the memory functions of the elderly with memory complaints [35], increase acetylcholine release and the activity of Na1, K1-ATPase in synaptogenesis [36]. DHA-PC could ameliorate cognitive impairment mainly through cholinergic system, while signal transduction molecules might be the main reason for the effect of DHA-PS on improving memory function.
Conclusion
Administration with DHA-PC and DHA-PS was reported to improve brain function, and there was a close association between lipid homeostasis and human health. In the present study, the lipid profile in cerebral cortex was determined by lipidomics after administration with DHA-PC and DHA-PS for 2 months in high-fat diet induced SAMP 8 mice with cognitive deficiency. Results showed that high-fat diet could significantly decrease the levels of DHA-containing PS/pPE, DPA-containing PS, and AA-containing PE. Interestingly, DHA-PC and DHA-PS remarkably recovered the lipid homeostasis compared with that of SAMP 8 mice feeding low-fat diet although the main glycerophospholipid molecular species were not significantly changed. It is necessary to find more lipid biomarkers for the prevention and diagnosis of AD. These results might provide a potential novel therapy strategy and direction of dietary intervention for patients with cognitive decline.
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- AA
Arachidonic acid
- Aβ
Amyloid beta
- AD
Alzheimer’s disease
- Akt
Serine/threonine kinase
- DHA
Docosahexaenoic acid
- DHA-PC
DHA enriched phosphatidylcholine
- DHA-PS
DHA enriched phosphatidylserine
- DPA
Docosapentaenoic acid
- EPA
Eicosapentaenoic acid
- ePC
Alkyl ether analog of phosphatidylcholine
- ePE
Alkyl ether analog of phosphatidylethanolamine
- HPLC-ELSD
High-performance liquid chromatography with evaporative light scattering detector
- IL-1β
Interleukin 1 beta
- LPE
Lyso-phosphatidylethanolamine
- LPC
Lyso-phosphatidylcholine
- PC
Phosphatidylcholine
- PE
Phosphatidylethanolamine
- PPAR-α
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors
- pPC
choline plasmalogen
- pPE
Ethanolamine plasmalogen
- PS
Phosphatidylserine
- PUFA
Polyunsaturated fatty acid
- Raf
Root abundant factor
- SAMP8 mice
Senescence accelerated mouse-prone 8
- SPF
Specific pathogen free
- TNF-α
Tumor necrosis factor alpha
Authors’ contributions
YM.W., FH.L. and CH.X. developed the concept. TT.Z., FH.L. and J.X. designed the experiments. MM.Z., LY.Z., PX.C. and YC.Z. carried out the experiments. T.Y., FH.L and NQ.C. participated in discussions of the data. YC.Z. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD0901103), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901688), Natural Science Youth Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2019QC004), National Natural Science Foundation of China-Shandong Joint Fund for Marine Science Research Centers (U1606403), Laboratory for Marine Drugs and Bioproducts of Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao, LMDBKF201807).
Availability of data and materials
All the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study protocols were approved by the ethical committee of experimental animal care at Ocean University of China (Qingdao, China).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Feng-Hai Liu, Email: Liufenghai2006@126.com.
Yu-Ming Wang, Email: wangyuming@ouc.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Drouin E, Drouin G. The first report of Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:687. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30258-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Association As 2018 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14:367–429. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cao GY, Li M, Han L, Tayie F, Yao SS, Huang Z, Ai P, Liu YZ, Hu YH, Xu B. Dietary fat intake and cognitive function among older populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prev Alzheim. 2019;6:204–211. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2019.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pistell PJ, Morrison CD, Gupta S, Knight AG, Keller JN, Ingram DK, Bruce-Keller AJ. Cognitive impairment following high fat diet consumption is associated with brain inflammation. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;219:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Singh M. Essential fatty acids, DHA and human brain. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72:239–242. doi: 10.1007/BF02859265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sun GY, Simonyi A, Fritsche KL, Chuang DY, Hannink M, Gu Z, Greenlief CM, Yao JK, Lee JC, Beversdorf DQ. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA): an essential nutrient and a nutraceutical for brain health and diseases. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2018;136:3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2017.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Moriyama T, Uezu K, Matsumoto Y, Chung SY, Uezu E, Miyagi S, Uza M, Masuda Y, Kokubu T, Tanaka T, Yamamoto S. Effects of dietary phosphatidylcholine on memory in memory deficient mice with low brain acetylcholine concentration. Life Sci. 1996;58:111–118. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(95)02321-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Svennerholm L. Distribution and fatty acid composition of phosphoglycerides in normal human brain. J Lipid Res. 1968;9:570–579. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kim HY, Huang BX, Spector AA. Phosphatidylserine in the brain: metabolism and function. Prog Lipid Res. 2014;56:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2014.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang TT, Xu J, Wang YM, Xue CH. Health benefits of dietary marine DHA/EPA-enriched glycerophospholipids. Prog Lipid Res. 2019;75:100997. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2019.100997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wen M, Ding L, Zhang LY, Zhou MM, Xu J, Wang JF, Wang YM, Xue CH. DHA-PC and DHA-PS improved a beta 1-40 induced cognitive deficiency uncoupled with an increase in brain DHA in rats. J Funct Foods. 2016;22:417–430. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.02.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Guo M, Stockert L, Akbar M, Kim HY. Neuronal specific increase of phosphatidylserine by docosahexaenoic acid. J Mol Neurosci. 2007;33:67–73. doi: 10.1007/s12031-007-0046-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vakhapova V, Cohen T, Richter Y, Herzog Y, Kam Y, Korczyn AD. Phosphatidylserine containing omega-3 fatty acids may improve memory abilities in nondemented elderly individuals with memory complaints: results from an open-label extension study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2014;38:39–45. doi: 10.1159/000357793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wood PL. Lipidomics of Alzheimer's disease: current status. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2012;4:5. doi: 10.1186/alzrt103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Folch J, Ascoli I, Lees M, Meath JA, Le BN. Preparation of lipide extracts from brain tissue. J Biol Chem. 1951;191:833–841. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang CC, Wang D, Xu J, Yanagita T, Xue CH, Zhang TT, Wang YM. DHA enriched phospholipids with different polar groups (PC and PS) had different improvements on MPTP-induced mice with Parkinson's disease. J Funct Foods. 2018;45:417–426. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2018.04.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lou QM, Wang YM, Liu XF, Xue CH. Lipid profile and fatty acid compositions in body wall of Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka) J Food Biochem. 2012;36:317–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4514.2011.00544.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37:911–917. doi: 10.1139/o59-099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lam SM, Wang R, Miao H, Li B, Shui G. An integrated method for direct interrogation of sphingolipid homeostasis in the heart and brain tissues of mice through postnatal development up to reproductive senescence. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1037:152–158. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Moloney M. The role of omega-3 fatty acids in the prevention of Alzheimer's disease in the early stages of disease presentation. J Aust Tradit-Med So. 2019;25:90. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim HY, Akbar M, Kim YS. Phosphatidylserine-dependent neuroprotective signaling promoted by docosahexaenoic acid. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2010;82:165–172. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2010.02.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fagone P, Jackowski S. Phosphatidylcholine and the CDP-choline cycle. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1831;2013:523–532. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Su XQ, Wang J, Sinclair AJ. Plasmalogens and Alzheimer's disease: a review. Lipids Health Dis. 2019;18:100. doi: 10.1186/s12944-019-1044-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Carrie I, Clement M, de Javel D, Frances H, Bourre JM. Specific phospholipid fatty acid composition of brain regions in mice. Effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid deficiency and phospholipid supplementation. J Lipid Res. 2000;41:465–472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tallima H, El Ridi R. Arachidonic acid: physiological roles and potential health benefits - a review. J Adv Res. 2018;11:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2017.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dawaliby Rosie, Trubbia Cataldo, Delporte Cédric, Noyon Caroline, Ruysschaert Jean-Marie, Van Antwerpen Pierre, Govaerts Cédric. Phosphatidylethanolamine Is a Key Regulator of Membrane Fluidity in Eukaryotic Cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2015;291(7):3658–3667. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.706523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Che HX, Zhou MM, Zhang TT, Zhang LY, Ding L, Yanagita T, Xu J, Xue CH, Wang YM. EPA enriched ethanolamine plasmalogens significantly improve cognition of Alzheimer's disease mouse model by suppressing beta-amyloid generation. J Funct Foods. 2018;41:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.12.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bascoul-Colombo C, Guschina IA, Maskrey BH, Good M, O’Donnell VB, Harwood JL. Dietary DHA supplementation causes selective changes in phospholipids from different brain regions in both wild type mice and the Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. BBA-Mol Cell Biol L. 1861;2016:524–537. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2016.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Paul Sudip, Lancaster Graeme I., Meikle Peter J. Plasmalogens: A potential therapeutic target for neurodegenerative and cardiometabolic disease. Progress in Lipid Research. 2019;74:186–195. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2019.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Han X, Holtzman DM, McKeel DW. Plasmalogen deficiency in early Alzheimer's disease subjects and in animal models: molecular characterization using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Neurochem. 2001;77:1168–1180. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00332.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Naudí A, Cabré R, Jové M, Ayala V, Gonzalo H, Portero-Otín M, Ferrer I, Pamplona R. Lipidomics of human brain aging and Alzheimer's disease pathology. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2015;122:133–189. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2015.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhou MM, Ding L, Wen M, Che HX, Huang JQ, Zhang TT, Xue CH, Mao XZ, Wang YM. Mechanisms of DHA-enriched phospholipids in improving cognitive deficits in aged SAMP8 mice with high-fat diet. J Nutr Biochem. 2018;59:64–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chung SY, Moriyama T, Uezu E, Uezu K, Hirata R, Yohena N, Masuda Y, Kokubu T, Yamamoto S. Administration of phosphatidylcholine increases brain acetylcholine concentration and improves memory in mice with dementia. J Nutr. 1995;125:1484–1489. doi: 10.1093/jn/125.6.1484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lim SY, Suzuki H. Dose-response effect of egg-phosphatidylcholine on maze-learning ability and fatty acid composition of plasma and brain in aged mice fed an n-3 fatty acid-deficient diet. Ann Nutr Metab. 2002;46:215–221. doi: 10.1159/000065410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.More MI, Freitas U, Rutenberg D. Positive effects of soy lecithin-derived phosphatidylserine plus phosphatidic acid on memory, cognition, daily functioning, and mood in elderly patients with Alzheimer's disease and dementia. Adv Ther. 2014;31:1247–1262. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0165-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Suzuki S, Yamatoya H, Sakai M, Kataoka A, Furushiro M, Kudo S. Oral administration of soybean lecithin transphosphatidylated phosphatidylserine improves memory impairment in aged rats. J Nutr. 2001;131:2951–2956. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.11.2951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.