Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2020 May 14;16(5):e1008502. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008502

Ablation of non-coding RNAs affects bovine leukemia virus B lymphocyte proliferation and abrogates oncogenesis

Roghaiyeh Safari 1,2, Jean-Rock Jacques 1,2, Yves Brostaux 3, Luc Willems 1,2,*
Editor: Bryan R Cullen4
PMCID: PMC7252678  PMID: 32407379

Abstract

Viruses have developed different strategies to escape from immune response. Among these, viral non-coding RNAs are invisible to the immune system and may affect the fate of the host cell. Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) encodes both short (miRNAs) and long (antisense AS1 and AS2) non-coding RNAs. To elucidate the mechanisms associated with BLV non-coding RNAs, we performed phenotypic and transcriptomic analyzes in a reverse genetics system. RNA sequencing of B-lymphocytes revealed that cell proliferation is the most significant mechanism associated with ablation of the viral non-coding RNAs. To assess the biological relevance of this observation, we determined the cell kinetic parameters in vivo using intravenous injection of BrdU and CFSE. Fitting the data to a mathematical model provided the rates of cell proliferation and death. Our data show that deletion of miRNAs correlates with reduced proliferation of the infected cell and lack of pathogenesis.

Author summary

BLV is a retrovirus that integrates into the genomic DNA of B-lymphocytes from a series of ruminant species (cattle, sheep, zebu, water buffalo and yack). Expression of viral proteins is almost undetectable in infected animals. In contrast, the BLV genome contains a cluster of 10 microRNAs that are abundantly transcribed in BLV-infected cells in vivo. In this report, we show that these microRNAs primarily regulate host cell proliferation. Ablation of the viral microRNAs affects BLV replication and suppresses leukemia development.

Introduction

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) is a retrovirus that naturally infects cattle, water buffalo, yak and zebu [1]. Except in Europe, BLV is a globally widespread pathogen causing significant economic losses [2, 3]. Although BLV infection is typically asymptomatic, about one third of the infected animals develop persistent lymphocytosis (PL), a stable polyclonal proliferation of non-transformed B-lymphocytes in the peripheral blood [4]. After long latency periods (7–10 years), approximately 5–10% of infected animals will die from a neoplastic B cell disease called enzootic bovine leukemia/lymphoma [5]. BLV can also be transmitted to sheep, in which the pathogenesis occurs after shorter latency periods (approximately 2–3 years) and with higher incidence (up to 100%) [6, 7].

Experimental evidence indicates that viral replication is tightly controlled by an effective immune response [8, 9]. First, ablation of lymphoid organs (i.e. spleen) accelerates pathogenesis [10]. Second, transient stimulation of viral expression ex vivo reduces life expectancy of B cells in vivo. Third, cyclosporine treatment indicates that an efficient immune response is required to control virus-expressing cells [11]. Fourth, a massive depletion of infected B cells occurs concomitantly with initiation of an immune response [12]. And finally, activation of viral expression with an HDAC inhibitor reduces the proviral loads and clears leukemia [13, 14]. Consistently, expression of viral proteins is repressed to almost undetectable levels by a still unknown mechanism [1517]. In contrast, the BLV genome encodes viral miRNAs via internal RNA polymerase III (RNAPIII) promoters and antisense transcripts (AS1S/L and AS2) from the 3'LTR [1820]. Located at the 5' end of the X region just downstream of the envelope gene, a cluster of five miRNAs hairpins is transcribed from a canonical type 2 RNAPIII promoters also driving tRNA synthesis [18, 19, 21]. Consistently with a high level of expression, the genomic DNA encompassing the miRNA cluster contains hypomethylated CpG. This organization in cluster leads to Drosha independent miRNA processing [22]. The RNAPIII promoter elements include characteristic A-B box sequences as transcription start site, transcription factor binding sites and a poly-T terminator [18, 22]. Thus, each BLV pre-miRNA is directly transcribed by RNAPIII giving rise to abundant expression of miRNAs in both leukemic and nonmalignant clones [23]. High levels of viral miRNAs are also found in the plasma of BLV-infected cows [24], suggesting a mechanism of paracrine signaling. Although polymorphisms were identified, the sequence of the miRNA cluster is well conserved among isolates, particularly in the seed region [20, 22, 25, 26]. Target genes whose transcripts are affected by the miRNAs have been identified. For example, miR-B4 is an analog to the host oncogenic miRNA miR-29 [18]. RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) revealed the complexity of miRNA targets in the bovine species. BLV miRNAs modulate the expression of genes involved in oncogenesis, cell signaling, apoptosis and immune response [24]. In particular, miR-B4 targets FOS, GZMA and PPT1 RNAs were validated by luciferase reporter assays. The serine protease GZMA expressed mostly by natural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) but also by B cells under inflammatory conditions induces caspase-independent apoptosis. FOS mediates the primary response to B-cell receptor signaling upon dimerization with c-JUN in the AP1 complex. PPT1 removes thioester-linked fatty acyl groups from cysteine residues and modulates TNFalpha signaling. Further characterization of the multiple interactions between the BLV miRNAs with the host transcriptome will help to understand the complexity of the mechanisms involved in the bovine species.

The BLV provirus also constitutively expresses alternatively spliced transcripts (AS1 and AS2) from the antisense strand [20]. The AS1 RNA can be alternately polyadenylated, generating two transcripts AS1-S and AS1-L that are retained in the nucleus suggesting a lncRNA-like role. The AS1-L transcript overlaps the microRNA cluster and is cleaved by the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) [20].

Although the function of these non-coding RNAs is still unknown, deletion of the miRNA cluster from an infectious BLV molecular clone reduces viral replication in the bovine species [24]. Short-term follow-up in the ovine model indicates that pathogenesis may also be affected in absence of viral miRNAs. To understand the mechanisms involved, we analyzed the transcriptome of sorted B cells and quantified the cell turnover in vivo using a reverse genetics model.

Results

Oncogenesis is abrogated in the absence of BLV miRNAs

Using a reverse genetics system, we have previously shown that ablation of BLV miRNAs is dispensable for infectivity but correlates with a reduction of viral replication [24]. Indeed, the short-term proviral loads were significantly lower in animals inoculated with an isogenic provirus devoid of miRNAs (pBLV-ΔmiRNA) compared to wild-type controls (pBLV-WT). Long-term follow-up validated this conclusion in the sheep animal model (p = 0.003, according to t-test, Fig 1A). Consistently, the percentages of B cells among PBMCs were significantly lower in the absence of viral miRNAs (p = 0.002, according to Mann-Whitney U test, S1A Fig). Similarly, the ability of PBMCs to spontaneously express BLV virus in culture was reduced in sheep infected with pBLV-ΔmiRNA compared to the wild-type (p = 0.01, according to Mann-Whitney U test, S1B Fig). Although there was a trend for reduced B cell counts in the absence of miRNAs, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.21, S1C and S1D Fig). Since proviral loads are among the best prediction markers of pathogenesis, onset of leukemia/lymphoma consistently occurred earlier in pBLV-WT injected animals (median survival of 3.23 years, p = 0.01 according to the Log-rank Mantel-Cox test, Fig 1B). In contrast, all sheep infected with pBLV-ΔmiRNA virus remained healthy up to 7 years post-inoculation.

Fig 1. Viral replication and pathogenesis in sheep infected with wild-type BLV and miRNA deletant.

Fig 1

(A) The proviral loads (number of copies in 100 PBMCs) were quantified in sheep infected with wild-type virus (pBLV-WT; blue lines) or miRNA-deletant (pBLV-ΔmiRNA; orange lines). p = 0.003, according to t-test. (B) The Kaplan-Meier survival curves of sheep infected with pBLV-ΔmiRNA (n = 6) and pBLV-WT (n = 12). Median survival in pBLV-WT injected animals was 3.23 years. p = 0.01, according to the Log-rank Mantel-Cox test.

We conclude that onset of leukemia/lymphoma in the highly susceptible sheep model requires integrity of the miRNAs.

Transcriptomic changes occur mostly in B cells

Soon after infection, BLV mainly replicates via the production of viral particles and infection of new cells. Then, the population of infected cells undergoes a massive depletion due to a very efficient immune clearance [12]. Thereafter, viral replication almost exclusively occurs via clonal expansion of surviving cells. It is thus predicted that cell proliferation is an important parameter of viral replication. To uncover the mechanisms associated with BLV miRNAs, we performed a transcriptomic analysis in B and non-B cells isolated from pBLV-ΔmiRNA and pBLV-WT infected animals. Details of the RNA sequencing procedures are provided in the materials and methods section. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the transcriptomics data was performed by regularized-logarithm transformation (rlog) [27] (Fig 2A). PCA revealed a clear segregation between B and non-B cell populations (Fig 2A). The PCA data from non-B cells infected by pBLV-ΔmiRNA and pBLV-WT mostly overlapped, indicating similar expression profiles independently of the type of virus and proviral load. In contrast, PC1 in B cells infected by pBLV-ΔmiRNA and pBLV-WT viruses indicated a difference in gene expression profiles.

Fig 2. Transcriptomic changes in cells isolated from sheep infected by wild-type and miRNA-deleted viruses.

Fig 2

(A) Principal component analysis of RNA sequencing data from B and non-B cells isolated from sheep infected with pBLV-ΔmiRNA (triangles) and pBLV-WT (circles). The proviral loads (PVL) are represented by a color code (from green to black). PCA was generated using DEseq2 and ggplot2 packages in R. (B) Plots of mean of normalized counts (x axis) and log fold change (y axis) in B and non-B cells. Dots are red if the adjusted p value (padj) is less than 0.1. (C) Distribution of the gene transcripts displayed in violin plots according to padj. (D) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in B cells of pBLV-ΔmiRNA and pBLV-WT-infected sheep. Data are plotted as log2 fold change (x axis) versus the -log10 of the false discovery rate (FDR) (y axis). Red dots represent significant genes with adjusted p value below 0.1.

Differential gene expression was then analyzed with the Dseq2 software. To anticipate how the log fold changes, vary with respect to the average expression levels of genes, we generated plots using shrinkage of effect size (log fold change estimates). These plots confirmed that the differentially expressed genes within B cells had a greater effect-size than those within the non-B cells (Fig 2B). Considering all data, 2158 and 67 genes were significantly differentially expressed in B and non-B cells, respectively (Fig 2C). Although most changes in gene expression occurred in B cells, there were 11 common genes between two groups (S1 Table). Comparison of B cells infected by pBLV-WT and pBLV-ΔmiRNA viruses identified 797 and 1361 significantly overexpressed genes, respectively (Fig 2D).

Overall, these analyses demonstrate that transcriptomic changes occur mostly in B cells from wild-type and miRNA-deleted viruses.

Cell division pathways are enriched in B cells from wild-type BLV infected sheep

To determine the biological functions associated with transcriptomics data, we performed an enrichment analysis of gene ontology (GO) terms using MSigDB and GSEA software [28, 29]. Analysis of the gene sets involved in biological processes (n = 4436), cellular components (n = 580) and molecular functions (n = 901) [30] yielded the enrichment map shown in Fig 3A. Based on a false discovery rates FDR<0.001, biological processes associated with cell division were significantly enriched in pBLV-WT-infected B cells (e.g. mitotic division, chromosome segregation and kinetochore in Fig 3A). This conclusion was confirmed by a statistical analysis based on a family wise-error rate FWER<0.001 (Fig 3B and enrichment plots in S2 Fig). To identify the genes driving the enrichment score in the GSEA method, we performed leading edge (LE) analysis on enriched gene sets with family wise-error rate <0.001. Chord diagrams were then generated to display the association between leading genes and enriched GO clusters [31]. Genes involved in cell mitosis (e.g. chromatid segregation, chromosome centromeric region, histone exchange, and kinetochore) were enriched in pBLV-WT-infected B cells (S3 Fig and S2 Table). Besides cell division, pathways affected by the presence of BLV miRNAs pertained to DNA repair (S3 Table). The pathways associated with the absence of miRNAs were inflammation response, immunity and cell signaling (S4 Table).

Fig 3. Gene set enrichment in B cells from sheep infected by wild-type virus compared to miRNA deletant.

Fig 3

(A) Enrichment map of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) generated by Cytoscape. Displayed sets contain between 15 and 500 genes that are enriched with a false discovery rate less than 0.001 (FDR < 0.001). Red nodes symbolize enriched GO gene sets. Node size indicates the total number of genes in each gene set. Edge thickness (blue line) indicates the number of overlapping genes between gene sets computed based on Jaccard coefficient. (B) Chord diagram of enriched gene sets in B cells from pBLV-WT-infected sheep based on family wise-error rate less than 0.001 (FWER < 0.001). The segment represents the GO gene sets and the ribbon highlights the similarity between them.

Overall, these analyses show that cell division pathways are enriched in B cells from wild-type BLV infected sheep.

The cell turnover of peripheral blood B cells is reduced in sheep infected with pBLV-ΔmiRNA

Transcriptomic analyses thus indicated that cell division is the main mechanism that segregates B cells from wild-type and miRNA-deleted infected sheep. To unravel the biological significance of this conclusion in vivo, we analyzed the cell turnover of peripheral blood B cells. For this purpose, carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) was injected intravenously in pBLV-WT and pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected animals. Since CFSE is very unstable and only labels proteins during a short period of time, this experimental protocol provides kinetic parameters of the B cell population circulating in the bloodstream [32, 33]. Upon snapshot CFSE labeling, the fluorescent dye is progressively lost mainly due to cell proliferation, death and protein turnover.

The percentages and fluorescence intensities in B cells were determined by flow cytometry at different times after CFSE injection (as illustrated in Fig 4A). Upon injection, CFSE labeled similar proportions of cells (75%). The kinetics of CFSE labeling was similar in the non-B and B cell populations of sheep infected with wild-type and miRNA-deleted viruses (p = 0.31 and 0.47, respectively, according to non-linear mixed model) (Fig 4B and 4C). In B cells, CFSE labeling was significantly different only at day 23 (p = 0.02, according to t test).

Fig 4. CFSE kinetics in peripheral blood.

Fig 4

(A) Representative flow cytometry dot plots of CFSE-labeled B cells at different times after intravenous CFSE injection. Numbers represent the percentages of CFSE+ B cells within the total B-lymphocyte population. (B) Time kinetics of percentages of CFSE-labeled non-B cells in total non-B cells. (C) Corresponding kinetics of the CFSE+ B cell population. p = 0.02 at day 23 according to t-test. All data are plotted as mean ± SEM (WT n = 3, ΔmiRNA n = 4). (D) Estimated B cell proliferation and death rates based on CFSE data modeling.

Kinetic parameters were calculated with a mathematical model based on two data sets: "I" the ratio of the (mean intensity of fluorescence (MFI) of CFSE+ cells to the MFI of CFSE- cells and "P" the percentage of CFSE+ cells [32]. By fitting this model to the data, we were able to quantify two kinetic parameters: "p" (the average proliferation rate) and "d" (the average disappearance rate). Compared to wild-type, the cell turnover of peripheral blood B cells was reduced in sheep infected with pBLV-ΔmiRNA (Fig 4D).

DNA synthesis is reduced in B cells from pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected sheep

As illustrated by previous studies [11, 34], B cell proliferation occurs mostly in lymphoid organs. To complement CFSE experiments, we next evaluated incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) into the B cell nucleic acids. Upon intravenous injection of BrdU, the percentages of BrdU-positive B cells were determined by flow cytometry (Fig 5A). At day 1, the percentage of B cells having incorporated BrdU reached a maximum (2.4% ± 0.25) in sheep infected with wild-type virus (Fig 5B). In contrast, BrdU incorporation was significantly lower in sheep infected with pBLV-ΔmiRNA at day 1 (0.8% ± 0.3, p = 0.0006, according to t-test).

Fig 5. Evaluation of proliferation rates by intravenous injection of BrdU.

Fig 5

(A) Representative flow cytometry dot plots of BrdU-labeled B cells at different times after intravenous BrdU injection. X axis corresponds to BrdU-FITC and y axis display B cells-APC. Numbers represent the percentages of BrdU-labeled B cells in the total B cell population. (B) Time kinetics of the percentages of B cells having incorporated BrdU. The arrow shows the percentage of B cells having incorporated BrdU at day 1 (p = 0.0006, according to t-test). (C) Estimated proliferation rates based on BrdU data; p = 0.02, according to Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM (WT n = 3, ΔmiRNA n = 6).

To quantify BrdU incorporation data, we used a mathematical model that considers (i) the rate of proliferation and death of the B and non-B cells, (ii) the loss of unincorporated label after injection and (iii) the dilution of the BrdU label consequent to cell division [35]. Fitting the mathematical model to the experimental data yielded significantly different average proliferation rates in sheep infected with pBLV-WT (4.9% ± 1.1) or with pBLV-ΔmiRNA (1.6% ± 0.8) (p = 0.02 according to Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test) (Fig 5C). The percentages of B cells that are generated by proliferation per day were thus approximately 3 times higher in wild-type infected animals. In contrast, no difference was observed in the non-B cell populations (p = 0.14 according to Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test).

Overall, these data demonstrate that the B cell turnover is decreased in sheep infected with the pBLV-ΔmiRNA deletant.

Proliferation is reduced in spleen and lymph nodes from pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected sheep

Since B cell proliferation occurs in lymphoid organs, we analyzed Ki67 expression by immunohistochemistry in spleen and lymph node sections of pBLV-WT and pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected animals (Fig 6A and 6C, respectively). Label quantification showed that the average of Ki67 expression in spleen sections from pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected sheep (4.1% ± 0.3) was significantly lower compared to wild-type levels (9.8% ± 0.8; p<0.0001 according to t-test; Fig 6B). The percentages of Ki67 positive cells were also decreased in lymph nodes from infected sheep (3.2% ± 0.2 in pBLV-ΔmiRNA and 7.1% ± 0.5 in pBLV-WT infected sheep; p<0.0001 according to t-test; Fig 6D).

Fig 6. Assessment of proliferation rates in spleen and lymph nodes.

Fig 6

Immunohistochemistry analysis of Ki67 in spleen (A) and in lymph node (C). Quantification of Ki67-positive cells in sections of spleen (B) (n = 7) and in lymph nodes (D) (n = 11).

These data show that proliferation is reduced in lymphoid organs of sheep infected with the pBLV-ΔmiRNA deletant.

Discussion

In this report, we have shown that BLV non-coding RNAs affect B-lymphocyte proliferation based on transcriptomic analyzes, in vivo kinetic data and immunochemistry. RNA sequencing provided a very clear view of their involvement in B cell proliferation. Indeed, twenty-two gene sets with false discovery rate less than 0.001 pertained to cell division. This observation is consistent with the paradigm of a virus that constantly attempts to proliferate under the control of a very efficient immune response [36]. Another outcome of RNA sequencing is that the transcriptome of T cells is not significantly affected in pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected sheep. For example, pathways of T-cell specific factors: CD4-specific cytokines (IL2; p = 0.6), T-reg (foxp3; p = 0.9), mediators of cytotoxic activity (granzyme; p = 0.7) are similar (S4 Fig). Since BLV infects exclusively B cells in the peripheral blood, it seems that non-coding RNAs from B cells are not transferred to T cells despite being highly expressed in the plasma. The biological role of plasmatic miRNAs, if any, is thus currently unknown. Possibly, the miRNAs only modulate the T cell response in specific tissues such as the lymph nodes of the spleen. Our data show that the BrdU kinetics of non-B cells is not significantly different in sheep infected with wild-type virus or with miRNA deletant. In fact, lack of major differences in the T cell transcriptome is concordant with similar T cell turnover rates.

Transcriptomic data in sheep thus revealed a very clear involvement of proliferation in B-lymphocytes without any major change in non-B cells. A similar approach with bovine PBMCs yielded a complex network of pathways modulated by the miRNAs including cell signaling, cancer genes and immune response [24]. In the ovine model, results from this report also highlight a role of BLV miRNAs in immune response modulatory pathways such as inflammation, leukocyte chemotaxis, cytokine secretion and receptor activity, adaptive and humoral immunity (S4 Table). Data also shows enrichment of specific signaling pathways including phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase, ERK1 and ERK2 and NF-kB in absence of miRNAs (S4 Table). Comparison between the two species is nevertheless difficult because, in our previous study in bovines, B cell populations were not sorted prior to RNA sequencing. It is therefore possible that a series of significant genes in B-lymphocytes were not identified due to the transcriptome of non-B cells. We analyzed the expression levels of genes that were previously identified as being controlled by the miRNAs in the bovine model. Among these, GZMA and PIK3CG are also significantly downregulated in the presence of BLV miRNAs in the ovine model (S5 Fig).

The gene ontology analysis (Fig 3) in B cells indicates a more specific effect of the miRNAs on mitosis than merely on proliferation. Most genes whose expression is increased in the presence of miRNAs indeed concern chromosome segregation at mitosis (S3 Fig and S2 Table). These include AURKB, the serine/threonine-protein kinase component of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC), a complex that acts as a key regulator of mitosis [37]. BIRC5 directs CPC movement to different locations from the inner centromere during prometaphase to midbody during cytokinesis and participates in the organization of the center spindle by associating with polymerized microtubules [38]. Chromobox 5 (CBX5) involved in the formation of functional kinetochore through interaction with MIS12 complex proteins [39]. The serine/threonine-protein kinase BUB1 is essential for spindle-assembly checkpoint signaling and for correct chromosome alignment [40]. The BLV miRNAs thus affect expression of several genes that regulate spindle activity and chromosome segregation during mitosis.

Our interpretation of transcriptomic data was supported by in vivo measurement of cell kinetics. Two types of data sets were collected by flow cytometry: the rates of BrdU-incorporation into B cells and the percentages of B+CFSE+ cells. Both approaches are complementary: BrdU data inform about cell proliferation occurring in lymphoid organs and CFSE labeling provides the cell turnover of peripheral blood B-lymphocytes. Based on non-linear mixed models, Fig 4 reveals that the CFSE kinetics are similar in wild-type infected sheep and miRNA deletants. Since the value at day 23 is statistically different (Fig 4C), there is nevertheless a trend to a faster decrease in the presence of miRNAs that may be biologically relevant. Indeed, the two-fold increase in BrdU incorporation that occurs in lymphoid organs should be compensated by a higher death rate in the peripheral blood. Indeed, the total number of B-cells remained relatively constant during the experiment. We have previously published a model that reconciles these apparent discrepancies [36].

It should be mentioned that kinetic parameters were calculated for the total IgM-positive B cell population. In principle, it would be possible to individually determine the cell turnover of provirus-carrying cells by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) coupled with BrdU labeling. Unfortunately, this technique yields some background that masks specific BrdU incorporation. It is noteworthy that deletant and wild-type infected animals with similar proviral loads still display differences in B cell proliferation (S6 Fig). It is thus not the level of proviral load by itself that explains the higher proliferation rate of B cells infected by wild-type virus. In any case, it is remarkable that proviral loads as little as 0.7 copies/100 PBMCs is still associated with a significant difference in cell proliferation (proliferation rate = 6.1% according to BrdU kinetics) [41, 42]. Notwithstanding, it remains unexpected that the B-cell proliferation rate differs between animals infected with wild-type and mutant virus even when the proviral loads are very similar (S6 Fig). This observation also implies that the risk of leukemia, which is significantly different (Fig 1B), might depend on the viral and/or host genotype independently of the proviral load. Analysis of the proviruses excluded that the miRNA deletion reverted to wild-type (e.g. by recombination with a virus from another sheep (S7 Fig). We were also unable to identify point mutations within the provirus that may support preferential replication. Although major histocompatibility complex class II DRB3 polymorphisms correlate with susceptibility for developing the disease [43], it is unlikely that variations in host genotypes systematically reproduce differences in B-cell kinetics (S6 Fig). Although there might be a difference in the clonal evolution of the infected cells, we favor a mechanism by which the miRNAs that are exported in the plasma affect proliferation of non-infected B cells. In fact, this mechanism possibly explains the increase of infected as well as non-infected B-cells during lymphocytosis (PL).

The best predictor of leukemia is the increase in the proviral load, followed by an inversion of the B/T ratio [44]. Our data indicate that the miRNAs contribute to oncogenesis by promoting B-cell proliferation. In contrast, the T cell response does not correlate with the proviral loads, suggesting that their stimulation by viral antigens is not a limiting step. Long-term follow-up of sheep infected with the ΔmiRNA mutant reveals that the microRNAs are required for pathogenesis in sheep (Fig 1). There was one wild-type infected sheep with slow rise in proviral load (Fig 1A), suggesting that individual variations between host's genotype may affect viral replication. Despite a long term follow up, we can also not exclude that oncogenesis will never occur in the absence of miRNAs. Indeed, one sheep (#1131) infected with a ΔmiRNA mutant currently carries high BLV proviral loads (S7 Fig). With an estimated B-cell proliferation rate of 0.08%, this sheep was infected with a ΔmiRNA deletant as illustrated in panel C of S7 Fig. In fact, we have previously experienced a similar situation with another BLV mutant devoid of R3-G4 accessory genes: only 1/20 developed leukemia/lymphoma 6 years post-inoculation [45]. Whether the miRNAs are directly involved in oncogenesis will require further follow-up of a larger number of sheep. It is noteworthy that this question is extremely difficult to address in the bovine species considering the long latency period (7–10 years) and the low frequency of leukemia/lymphoma (5–10%). Providing that, among 6 sheep, #1131 further progresses to leukemia and considering a frequency ratio of 13.33-fold (i.e. 100% in sheep / 7.5% in cows), we estimate that a follow up of 80 bovines during 8.5 years (7–10) are needed to determine whether miRNAs are required for oncogenicity in this species.

Strength of the reverse genetics approach is that the role of genetic determinants can be investigated in relevant conditions in vivo (i.e. in the context of a provirus expressed at physiological levels in the correct cell type). A potential risk is that other steps in the viral life cycle may be affected (e.g. reverse transcription, integration, infectivity, packaging or budding). We think that this possibility is unlikely because no major difference was observed at seroconversion indicating that essential steps of the viral life cycle are unaffected. Similarly, deletion of the miRNAs also affects the sequence of the antisense transcripts (AS1L and AS1S RNAs but not AS2). Specific mutations of these non-coding transcripts will be required to address this issue. In this context, it is peculiar that human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) closely related to BLV has no similar cluster of RNAPIII-driven miRNAs. As BLV AS1 and AS2, HTLV-1 nevertheless encodes a poorly translated antisense RNA (HBZ) that mostly remains in the nucleus. When the methionine initiation codon is mutated, untranslatable HBZ RNA promotes cell proliferation [46]. In this perspective, it appears that both BLV and HTLV-1 have developed strategies to affect cell proliferation using non-coding or at least poorly translated ribonucleic acids.

Other viruses, such as SFV, Marek’s disease virus type 1 (MDV), human cytomegalovirus (CMV), Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) and Epstein–Barr (EBV) express non-coding RNAs to modulate cell fate [47, 48]. KSHV encodes miRNAs to modulate replication and pathogenesis in B cell hyperproliferative disorders, including Primary Effusion Lymphoma (PEL) and some forms of Multicentric Castleman's Disease (MCD) [49, 50]. Similarly, EBV miRNAs promote cell survival and proliferation during latent infection [51]. Sharing a seed region with a host miRNA enables virus-encoded miRNAs to modulate specific functions [47]. For example, the cellular miR-155 is mimicked by pro-oncogenic miRNAs encoded by KSHV and MDV [52, 53]. Ablation of these viral miRNAs abrogates KSHV and MDV induced lymphoma [54]. Two SFV miRNAs mimics seed sequence and function of the host lymphoproliferative miRNA, miR-155 and the innate immunity suppressor miR-132 [48]. Likewise, BLV encodes a miRNA (mir-B4) an analog of cellular miR-29 that is involved in multiple oncogenic processes, including proliferation [18].

Together, our data reveal that the major function of the BLV miRNAs is to promote cell proliferation. In fact, viral replication via the infectious cycle (i.e. expression of viral particles and infection of new cells) is extremely inefficient after that the immune response is established [12]. Soon after seroconversion, the mode of viral replication switches to clonal expansion of provirus-carrying cells. This mode of replication requires that infected cells undergo mitosis more frequently than other B-lymphocytes. Alternatively, or concomitantly, infected cell clones may also expand providing that the death rates are reduced [36]. Our data of Fig 5 show that 4.9% B cells from wild-type virus infected sheep are produced by proliferation per day. This accelerated proliferation is only partly compensated by increased death. The disequilibrium between cell death and proliferation rates is predicted to enforce progressive accumulation of B cells in animals infected by wild-type virus.

In conclusion, combined bioinformatics and in vivo kinetic experiments reveal that BLV non-coding RNAs primarily promote cell proliferation of BLV-infected lymphocytes. Ablation of non-coding RNAs results in reduced proliferation of the infected cell and delayed clonal expansion as illustrated by the kinetics of proviral loads. Ultimately, absence of miRNAs is also associated with lack of pathogenesis.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All animal studies were conducted with the approval of the Institutional Committee for Care and Use of Experimental Animals under protocol number 1515. Sheep were kept under controlled condition at the animal facility CEPA of the university.

Virus inoculation into sheep and quantification of proviral loads

Construction of proviral vectors (pBLV-ΔmiRNA and pBLV-WT) and inoculation protocols were described elsewhere [24]. pBLV-ΔmiRNA is isogenic to pBLV-WT but contains a deletion of the miRNA coding region (nucleotides 6170 to 6736 according to the BLV reference genome NC_001414.1) [24]. At regular intervals of time, blood was collected by jugular venipuncture. PBMCs were isolated by Percoll density gradient centrifugation, frozen in FBS containing 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich) and kept at -80°C or liquid nitrogen.

To quantify the proviral loads, genomic DNA was extracted from PBMCs using DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen) following manufacturer's recommendations. 100ng of genomic DNA was used for real-time PCR amplification of BLV proviral sequences as described previously [24]. Proviral loads were determined from 3 independent qPCR amplifications of DNAs extracted independently.

RNA sequencing of B and non-B cell populations

To determine the percentages of B cells, PBMCs were washed twice in PBS supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and labeled with an anti-IgM monoclonal antibody (clone 1H4, 1:100 dilution of hybridoma supernatant) for 30 minutes at 4°C. After two washes, cells were incubated with Alexafluor 647 goat anti-mouse IgG1 conjugate (Thermo fisher scientific, 1: 1000 dilution) and analyzed with a FACS Aria (Becton Dickinson).

B cells were purified from the PBMCs using MACS positive selection LS columns (Miltenyi Biotec). Briefly, freshly isolated PMBCs were labeled with 1H4 antibody, washed and incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Each sample was magnetically sorted at room temperature using LS columns inserted into a QuadroMACS separator. To increase the purity of the magnetically labeled fraction, the eluted fraction was enriched by a second round of MACS. The purity of MACS-sorted cells (> 95%) was verified by flow cytometry.

RNA was isolated from MACS-separated B and non-B cells using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) following manufacturer's protocol after removal of contaminating DNA (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After determination of their concentration (Quant-IT RiboGreen, Invitrogen), samples were run on TapeStation RNA screentape (Agilent). Only high-quality RNA preparations, with RNA integrity number (RIN) greater than 7.0, were used for RNA library construction. Libraries were prepared with 1μg of total RNA using the Illumina TruSeq stranded mRNA Sample Prep kit (Illumina). The libraries were quantified using the KAPA Library Quantificatoin kit for Illumina Sequencing platforms and qualified using the TapeStation D1000 ScreenTape (Agilent Technologies). Indexed libraries were then sequenced using the NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina).

Bioinformatics

FastQC software was used for quality control, visualization, and quantification of raw data. Aligning and mapping the raw sequencing data to the sheep reference genome (Oar_v3.1) was performed by STAR v2.4.0.1 [55]. FeatureCounts was used for read quantification [56]. Normalization and differential gene analysis was performed with R packages DESeq2 [27]. For the identification of enriched transcriptomic signatures, differential gene expression list was loaded on the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) tool (v3.0) from the Broad Institute at MIT [29]. We used C5: GO gene sets from MSigDB to interpret the transcriptomic signatures. Leading edge analysis on enriched gene sets was analyzed using GSEA.

Quantification of peripheral blood B cell turnover in vivo

Twenty-five mg of 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate N-succinimidyl ester (Sanbio) dissolved in 4 ml of dimethyl sulfoxide and mixed with 1,000 U/ml heparin sodium salt (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were injected into the jugular vein of sheep as described before [10]. At regular time intervals, blood was collected by jugular venipuncture. After PBMC separation, CFSE labeling of B cells was determined by flow cytometry using 1H4 monoclonal antibody and Alexa fluor 647 goat anti-mouse IgG conjugate (Thermo fisher scientific, 1: 1000 dilution). Proliferation " p" and death " d" rates were determined according to a model described in reference [32]. In brief, we considered that CFSE labeling halved upon mitosis since the dye was distributed in each daughter cell. The model uses two pieces of data from the flow cytometry analyses: the proportion of CFSE+ cells "P" and the ratio of the mean fluorescence intensity of the CFSE+ population to the CFSE–population "I" to estimate the rate of proliferation and the rate of death of CFSE labeled B lymphocytes. The cell populations undergoing five divisions are x0 = —(p + d)x0; x1 = 2px0 - (p + d)x1,; x2 = 2px1 - (p + d)x2; x3 = 2px2 - (p + d)x3; x4 = 2px3 - (p + d)x4; x5 = 2px4 - (p + d)x5 + λ (xi being the proportion of B cells that have undergone i divisions since CFSE labeling). In the model, the cells in the x5 category are CFSE–(either because they have divided 4 to 6 times since labeling and therefore lost their fluorescence or because they were not labeled by the initial injection). The average proliferation rate of cells is "p", the average disappearance rate is "d" and the average replacement rate is λ. These equations were solved analytically and then used to find expressions for "I", the ratio of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the CFSE+ population to the CFSE–population, and "P" the proportion of CFSE+ cells. For five divisions, the relevant equations are as follows:

I=((Jx0+J/2x1+J/4x2+J/8x3+J/16x4)/(x0+x1+x2+x3+x4))/((J/32x5)/(x5))=(4(24+24pt+12p2t2+4p3t3+p4t4))/(3+6pt+6p2t2+4p3t3+2p4t4)
P=(x0+x1+x2+x3+x4)/(x0+x1+x2+x3+x4+x5)=Fe(p+d)t(1+2pt+2p2t2+4/33t3+2/3p4t4)

J is the MFI of CFSE label in undivided cells and F is the proportion of peripheral blood B cells labeled by the initial injection. These formulas were fitted to the experimental data by resolving the non linear equation system (R packages systemfit v1.1–22 and nlstools’ v1.0–2) after estimating the adequate number of divisions to reach negative status and the lymphocyte kinetics parameters estimated [57, 58].

Analysis of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine incorporation in vivo

Sheep were injected intravenously with a single dose of 400 mg BrdU (Sigma) dissolved in 5 ml 0.9% NaCl. Serial analysis at different times (1 hour and 1, 2, 3, 4,7 and 17 days) was done without the reinjection of BrdU. To evaluate BrdU incorporation into B lymphocytes, PBMCs were isolated and labeled with PIG45A monoclonal antibody (A&E Scientific) for 30 min at 4°C and, after two washes, revealed with Alexa Fluor 647 goat anti-mouse IgG2b conjugate (Thermo fisher scientific, 1: 1000 dilution). Then, cells were fixed, permeabilized and treated with DNase using BrdU flow Kit reagents according manufacturer's protocol (BD Biosciences). Finally, the cells were labeled by FITC-conjugated anti-BrdU antibody (1:50 dilution) and analyzed by flow cytometry using a FACS Aria (Becton Dickinson).

Estimation of proliferation and death rates was done as previously described. In summary, we used following differential formula to the BrdU incorporation data achieved experimentally dl/dt = 2σpu+ pl − dl where u is the proportion of unlabeled cells and l is the proportion of labeled cells, "p" presents the average proliferation rate of cells, and "d" gives the average death rate of labeled cells. σ is the probability that a proliferating cell becomes labeled. The probability that a proliferating B cell converts labeled is assumed to be an exponentially declining by time, σ = e−α t, reflecting the loss of unincorporated BrdU from the cytoplasm of cells. The differential model was fitted to the experimental data using differential equation adjustment (R package deSolve v 1.21) and the lymphocyte kinetics parameters estimated [59].

Immunohistochemistry of spleen and lymph node biopsies

Spleen and lymph nodes were fixed overnight at room temperature in PBS containing 4% formaldehyde and stored in 70% ethanol. Immunohistochemistry with antibodies directed against Ki67 was performed by the GIGA immunohistology platform using established protocols [60]. Briefly, tissue sections were subjected to heat-induced epitope retrieval using a pressure cooker, rinsed in water and incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min. After washing in PBS, non‐specific binding was reduced by incubation with normal goat serum. Then, samples were labeled with anti-Ki67 antibody (# 790–4286, Roche) for 1 hour at room temperature, washed twice with PBS and incubated with an anti-rabbit peroxidase conjugate (# K4003, Dako) for 30 minutes. Samples were revealed with diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB), washed with distilled water and observed under light microscopy with a 40× objective. Quantification of scanned images was performed with QuPath (0.1.2).

Statistics

Statistical tests were performed using R v3.6.0 or GraphPad Prism 5. The t-test was used for statistical evaluations of proviral loads. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared by the Log-rank Mantel-Cox test [61]. CFSE and BrdU kinetics were assessed by daywise paired t-test. Proliferation and death rates were compared between groups by Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.

Supporting information

S1 Fig

(A) PBMCs were isolated from sheep infected by wild-type BLV and miRNA deletant. Then, PBMCs were labeled with anti-IgM 1H4 antibody and anti-mouse IgG1 conjugate. Percentages of B cells were determined by flow cytometry. p = 0.002 according to Mann-Whitney U test. (B) After overnight culture of PBMCs, the percentages of p24-positive cells were determined by flow cytometry. The p24 viral protein was detected by sequential incubation with 4′G9 monoclonal antibody and a rat anti-mouse IgG1 conjugate. p = 0.01 according to Mann-Whitney U test. (C) Absolute number of lymphocytes determined with a ProCyte Dx Haematology Analyser. (D) Absolute numbers of B cells were calculated from the percentages of B-lymphocytes in PBMCs (panel A) and absolute numbers of lymphocytes (panel C).

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Enrichment plot of gene sets with the family wise error rate less than 0.001.

The green curve corresponds to the ES (enrichment score) curve, which is the running sum of the weighted enrichment score obtained from GSEA software. The enrichment score reveals the degree at which the genes in a gene set are overrepresented at the top or bottom of the entire ranked list of genes (y axis).

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Leading genes of the most enriched gene sets.

Chord diagram displaying leading edge analysis of enriched gene sets (FWER < 0.001) in pBLV-WT-infected sheep analyzed by GSEA. The diagram was generated by circos table viewer. Segments size shows the contribution effect.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Normalized transcriptomic counts of T-cell specific factors.

Normalized counts were obtained by DEseq2 analysis of transcriptomic data of non-B cells isolated from pBLV-WT and pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected sheep. Differences of gene expression between pBLV-WT and pBLV-ΔmiRNA are not significant according to t-test.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Normalized transcriptomic counts of GZMA, PPT1, FOS, ANXA1, MAP2K1 and PIK3CG.

(A) Normalized counts obtained from DEseq2 analysis of transcriptomic data of non-B cells isolated from pBLV-WT and pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected sheep. Differences of gene expression between pBLV-WT and pBLV-ΔmiRNA are not significant according to t-test. (B) Normalized counts obtained from DEseq2 analysis of B cells. Differences are significant for GZMA (p = 0.007) and PIK3CG (p = 0.02) according to t-test.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Evaluation of proliferation rates by intravenous injection of BrdU in animals with similar proviral loads.

(A) Time kinetics of the percentages of B cells having incorporated BrdU. (B) Proviral loads (in number of copies in 100 PBMCs) and proliferation rates corresponding to graphs of panel A.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. BrdU kinetics in preleukemic sheep #1131.

(A) Time kinetics of the percentages of B cells having incorporated BrdU in animal # 1131 infected with pBLV-ΔmiRNA (B) Proliferation rate estimated from data of panel A. (C) PCR amplification of the genomic sequences surrounding the miRNA region. (D) Kinetics of proviral loads (in number of copies in 100 PBMCs) in sheep #1131.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Differentially expressed genes that are common to B cells and non-B cells.

Genes significantly differentially expressed in B cells were compared to genes significantly differentially expressed in non-B cells. The table shows the genes that are shared by these two lists.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Leading genes of upregulated pathways in B cells of pBLV-WT infected sheep as compared to pBLV-ΔmiRNA.

Genes driving the enrichment score (Fig 3B) were identified by leading edge (LE) analysis on enriched gene sets with family wise-error rate <0.001 using the GSEA software. The list of the genes has been ordered according to log2 fold change.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Upregulated pathways in B cells of pBLV-WT infected sheep as compared to pBLV-ΔmiRNA.

Gene ontology sets that are enriched in B cells of pBLV-WT infected sheep with a false discovery rate less than 0.01 (FDR < 0.01) were calculated using GSEA and listed according to the family wise-error rates (FWER p value). The size indicates the number of genes in each GO. Enrichment Score (ES) is the degree at which the genes in a gene set are overrepresented at the top or bottom of the entire ranked list of genes. NOM p values are the normalized p values calculated by GSEA. FDR q values represent false discovery rates.

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Upregulated pathways in B cells of pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected sheep as compared to pBLV-WT.

Gene ontology sets that are enriched in B cells of pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected sheep with a false discovery rate less than 0.01 (FDR < 0.01) were calculated as described in S3 Table.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the GIGA technological platforms in particular the genotranscriptomic and immunohistology facilities. We are grateful to Becca Asquith, Catherine Charles and Benoît Charloteaux for advice and expertise in modeling and bioinformatics.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS T006014 and T026120), the Belgian Foundation against Cancer, the Télévie and the “Fondation Léon Fredericq”. RS is a fellow of the Belgian Foundation against Cancer and the Télévie. LW is research director of the FNRS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Gillet N, Florins A, Boxus M, Burteau C, Nigro A, Vandermeers F, et al. Mechanisms of leukemogenesis induced by bovine leukemia virus: prospects for novel anti-retroviral therapies in human. Retrovirology. 2007;4:18 10.1186/1742-4690-4-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bartlett PC, Sordillo LM, Byrem TM, Norby B, Grooms DL, Swenson CL, et al. Options for the control of bovine leukemia virus in dairy cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014;244(8):914–22. 10.2460/javma.244.8.914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Polat M, Takeshima SN, Aida Y. Epidemiology and genetic diversity of bovine leukemia virus. Virol J. 2017;14(1):209 10.1186/s12985-017-0876-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barez PY, de Brogniez A, Carpentier A, Gazon H, Gillet N, Gutierrez G, et al. Recent Advances in BLV Research. Viruses. 2015;7(11):6080–8. 10.3390/v7112929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gutierrez G, Rodriguez SM, de Brogniez A, Gillet N, Golime R, Burny A, et al. Vaccination against delta-retroviruses: the bovine leukemia virus paradigm. Viruses. 2014;6(6):2416–27. 10.3390/v6062416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lairmore MD. Animal models of bovine leukemia virus and human T-lymphotrophic virus type-1: insights in transmission and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2014;2:189–208. 10.1146/annurev-animal-022513-114117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Safari R, Hamaidia M, de Brogniez A, Gillet N, Willems L. Cis-drivers and trans-drivers of bovine leukemia virus oncogenesis. Curr Opin Virol. 2017;26:15–9. 10.1016/j.coviro.2017.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Florins A, Boxus M, Vandermeers F, Verlaeten O, Bouzar AB, Defoiche J, et al. Emphasis on cell turnover in two hosts infected by bovine leukemia virus: a rationale for host susceptibility to disease. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2008;125(1–2):1–7. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2008.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gazon H, Chauhan P, Hamaidia M, Hoyos C, Li L, Safari R, et al. How Does HTLV-1 Undergo Oncogene-Dependent Replication Despite a Strong Immune Response? Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2684 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Florins A, Gillet N, Asquith B, Debacq C, Jean G, Schwartz-Cornil I, et al. Spleen-dependent turnover of CD11b peripheral blood B lymphocytes in bovine leukemia virus-infected sheep. J Virol. 2006;80(24):11998–2008. 10.1128/JVI.01447-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Florins A, de Brogniez A, Elemans M, Bouzar AB, Francois C, Reichert M, et al. Viral expression directs the fate of B cells in bovine leukemia virus-infected sheep. J Virol. 2012;86(1):621–4. 10.1128/JVI.05718-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gillet NA, Gutierrez G, Rodriguez SM, de Brogniez A, Renotte N, Alvarez I, et al. Massive depletion of bovine leukemia virus proviral clones located in genomic transcriptionally active sites during primary infection. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(10):e1003687 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Achachi A, Florins A, Gillet N, Debacq C, Urbain P, Foutsop GM, et al. Valproate activates bovine leukemia virus gene expression, triggers apoptosis, and induces leukemia/lymphoma regression in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(29):10309–14. 10.1073/pnas.0504248102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Merezak C, Pierreux C, Adam E, Lemaigre F, Rousseau GG, Calomme C, et al. Suboptimal enhancer sequences are required for efficient bovine leukemia virus propagation in vivo: implications for viral latency. J Virol. 2001;75(15):6977–88. 10.1128/JVI.75.15.6977-6988.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Radke K, Sigala TJ, Grossman D. Transcription of bovine leukemia virus in peripheral blood cells obtained during early infection in vivo. Microb Pathog. 1992;12(5):319–31. 10.1016/0882-4010(92)90095-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Klener P, Szynal M, Cleuter Y, Merimi M, Duvillier H, Lallemand F, et al. Insights into gene expression changes impacting B-cell transformation: cross-species microarray analysis of bovine leukemia virus tax-responsive genes in ovine B cells. J Virol. 2006;80(4):1922–38. 10.1128/JVI.80.4.1922-1938.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kerkhofs P, Adam E, Droogmans L, Portetelle D, Mammerickx M, Burny A, et al. Cellular pathways involved in the ex vivo expression of bovine leukemia virus. J Virol. 1996;70(4):2170–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kincaid RP, Burke JM, Sullivan CS. RNA virus microRNA that mimics a B-cell oncomiR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(8):3077–82. 10.1073/pnas.1116107109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rosewick N, Momont M, Durkin K, Takeda H, Caiment F, Cleuter Y, et al. Deep sequencing reveals abundant noncanonical retroviral microRNAs in B-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(6):2306–11. 10.1073/pnas.1213842110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Durkin K, Rosewick N, Artesi M, Hahaut V, Griebel P, Arsic N, et al. Characterization of novel Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV) antisense transcripts by deep sequencing reveals constitutive expression in tumors and transcriptional interaction with viral microRNAs. Retrovirology. 2016;13(1):33 10.1186/s12977-016-0267-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Van Driessche B, Rodari A, Delacourt N, Fauquenoy S, Vanhulle C, Burny A, et al. Characterization of new RNA polymerase III and RNA polymerase II transcriptional promoters in the Bovine Leukemia Virus genome. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31125 10.1038/srep31125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Burke JM, Bass CR, Kincaid RP, Sullivan CS. Identification of tri-phosphatase activity in the biogenesis of retroviral microRNAs and RNAP III-generated shRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(22):13949–62. 10.1093/nar/gku1247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Frie MC, Droscha CJ, Greenlick AE, Coussens PM. MicroRNAs Encoded by Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV) Are Associated with Reduced Expression of B Cell Transcriptional Regulators in Dairy Cattle Naturally Infected with BLV. Front Vet Sci. 2017;4:245 10.3389/fvets.2017.00245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gillet NA, Hamaidia M, de Brogniez A, Gutierrez G, Renotte N, Reichert M, et al. Bovine Leukemia Virus Small Noncoding RNAs Are Functional Elements That Regulate Replication and Contribute to Oncogenesis In Vivo. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(4):e1005588 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Burke JM, Kincaid RP, Aloisio F, Welch N, Sullivan CS. Expression of short hairpin RNAs using the compact architecture of retroviral microRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(17):e154 10.1093/nar/gkx653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zyrianova IM, Koval'chuk SN. Bovine leukemia virus pre-miRNA genes' polymorphism. RNA Biol. 2018;15(12):1440–7. 10.1080/15476286.2018.1555406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(43):15545–50. 10.1073/pnas.0506580102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J, et al. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003;34(3):267–73. 10.1038/ng1180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504. 10.1101/gr.1239303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1639–45. 10.1101/gr.092759.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Asquith B, Debacq C, Florins A, Gillet N, Sanchez-Alcaraz T, Mosley A, et al. Quantifying lymphocyte kinetics in vivo using carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE). Proc Biol Sci. 2006;273(1590):1165–71. 10.1098/rspb.2005.3432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Debacq C, Asquith B, Reichert M, Burny A, Kettmann R, Willems L. Reduced cell turnover in bovine leukemia virus-infected, persistently lymphocytotic cattle. J Virol. 2003;77(24):13073–83. 10.1128/JVI.77.24.13073-13083.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Debacq C, Sanchez Alcaraz MT, Mortreux F, Kerkhofs P, Kettmann R, Willems L. Reduced proviral loads during primo-infection of sheep by Bovine Leukemia virus attenuated mutants. Retrovirology. 2004;1:31 10.1186/1742-4690-1-31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Debacq C, Asquith B, Kerkhofs P, Portetelle D, Burny A, Kettmann R, et al. Increased cell proliferation, but not reduced cell death, induces lymphocytosis in bovine leukemia virus-infected sheep. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(15):10048–53. 10.1073/pnas.142100999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Florins A, Gillet N, Asquith B, Boxus M, Burteau C, Twizere JC, et al. Cell dynamics and immune response to BLV infection: a unifying model. Front Biosci. 2007;12:1520–31. 10.2741/2165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Carlton JG, Caballe A, Agromayor M, Kloc M, Martin-Serrano J. ESCRT-III governs the Aurora B-mediated abscission checkpoint through CHMP4C. Science. 2012;336(6078):220–5. 10.1126/science.1217180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang H, Holloway MP, Ma L, Cooper ZA, Riolo M, Samkari A, et al. Acetylation directs survivin nuclear localization to repress STAT3 oncogenic activity. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(46):36129–37. 10.1074/jbc.M110.152777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dawson MA, Bannister AJ, Gottgens B, Foster SD, Bartke T, Green AR, et al. JAK2 phosphorylates histone H3Y41 and excludes HP1alpha from chromatin. Nature. 2009;461(7265):819–22. 10.1038/nature08448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tsukahara T, Tanno Y, Watanabe Y. Phosphorylation of the CPC by Cdk1 promotes chromosome bi-orientation. Nature. 2010;467(7316):719–23. 10.1038/nature09390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pegtel DM, Cosmopoulos K, Thorley-Lawson DA, van Eijndhoven MA, Hopmans ES, Lindenberg JL, et al. Functional delivery of viral miRNAs via exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(14):6328–33. 10.1073/pnas.0914843107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Valadi H, Ekstrom K, Bossios A, Sjostrand M, Lee JJ, Lotvall JO. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9(6):654–9. 10.1038/ncb1596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Takeshima SN, Ohno A, Aida Y. Bovine leukemia virus proviral load is more strongly associated with bovine major histocompatibility complex class II DRB3 polymorphism than with DQA1 polymorphism in Holstein cow in Japan. Retrovirology. 2019;16(1):14 10.1186/s12977-019-0476-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gatei MH, Brandon RB, Naif HM, McLennan MW, Daniel RC, Lavin MF. Changes in B cell and T cell subsets in bovine leukaemia virus-infected cattle. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1989;23(1–2):139–47. 10.1016/0165-2427(89)90116-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Florins A, Gillet N, Boxus M, Kerkhofs P, Kettmann R, Willems L. Even attenuated bovine leukemia virus proviruses can be pathogenic in sheep. J Virol. 2007;81(18):10195–200. 10.1128/JVI.01058-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Satou Y, Yasunaga J, Yoshida M, Matsuoka M. HTLV-I basic leucine zipper factor gene mRNA supports proliferation of adult T cell leukemia cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(3):720–5.43. 10.1073/pnas.0507631103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kincaid RP, Sullivan CS. Virus-encoded microRNAs: an overview and a look to the future. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(12):e1003018 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kincaid RP, Chen Y, Cox JE, Rethwilm A, Sullivan CS. Noncanonical microRNA (miRNA) biogenesis gives rise to retroviral mimics of lymphoproliferative and immunosuppressive host miRNAs. MBio. 2014;5(2):e00074 10.1128/mBio.00074-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gottwein E, Corcoran DL, Mukherjee N, Skalsky RL, Hafner M, Nusbaum JD, et al. Viral microRNA targetome of KSHV-infected primary effusion lymphoma cell lines. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;10(5):515–26. 10.1016/j.chom.2011.09.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ganem D. KSHV and the pathogenesis of Kaposi sarcoma: listening to human biology and medicine. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(4):939–49. 10.1172/JCI40567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Skalsky RL, Corcoran DL, Gottwein E, Frank CL, Kang D, Hafner M, et al. The viral and cellular microRNA targetome in lymphoblastoid cell lines. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(1):e1002484 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Skalsky RL, Samols MA, Plaisance KB, Boss IW, Riva A, Lopez MC, et al. Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus encodes an ortholog of miR-155. J Virol. 2007;81(23):12836–45. 10.1128/JVI.01804-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Costinean S, Zanesi N, Pekarsky Y, Tili E, Volinia S, Heerema N, et al. Pre-B cell proliferation and lymphoblastic leukemia/high-grade lymphoma in E(mu)-miR155 transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(18):7024–9. 10.1073/pnas.0602266103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhao Y, Xu H, Yao Y, Smith LP, Kgosana L, Green J, et al. Critical role of the virus-encoded microRNA-155 ortholog in the induction of Marek's disease lymphomas. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(2):e1001305 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. The Subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(10):e108 10.1093/nar/gkt214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Baty F, Ritz C, Charles S, Brutsche M, Flandrois J-P, Delignette-Muller M-L. A Toolbox for Nonlinear Regression in R: The Package nlstools. Journal of Statistical Software. 2015;66(5):1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Henningsen A, Hamann JD. systemfit: A Package for Estimating Systems of Simultaneous Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2007;23(4):1–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Soetaert K, Petzoldt T, Setzer RW. Solving Differential Equations in R: Package deSolve. Journal of Statistical Software. 2010;33(9):1–25.20808728 [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jalava P, Kuopio T, Juntti-Patinen L, Kotkansalo T, Kronqvist P, Collan Y. Ki67 immunohistochemistry: a valuable marker in prognostication but with a risk of misclassification: proliferation subgroups formed based on Ki67 immunoreactivity and standardized mitotic index. Histopathology. 2006;48(6):674–82. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02402.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nayak BK, Hazra A. How to choose the right statistical test? Indian J Ophthalmol. 59 India2011. p. 85–6. 10.4103/0301-4738.77005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Bryan R Cullen, Susan R Ross

17 Feb 2020

Dear Pr Willems,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Ablation of non-coding RNAs affects bovine leukemia virus B lymphocyte proliferation and abrogates oncogenesis" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. While reviewer 1 was enthusiastic, both reviewer2 and reviewer 3 felt that the results presented were somewhat predictable in light of earlier work from the same group but could be strengthened by, for example, more mechanistic insights. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments. This is subject to re-review by the same reviewers.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Bryan R. Cullen

Associate Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Susan Ross

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: It has been recognized for some years that bovine leukemia virus (BLV) encodes several RNAs that do not encode proteins, but the functions of these non-coding RNAs are not completely understood. In this paper, the authors use the well established model of infection of sheep with BLV, to compare the wildtype virus with the same strain from which the non-coding RNAs have been knocked out. They conclude that an important function of the non-coding RNAs is to promote proliferation of BLV-infected B cells in vivo. The paper is well written, the data are clearly presented and for the most part support the major conclusions drawn by the authors.

Reviewer #2: Safari et al describe the role of BLV non-coding RNAs on viral replication, leukemia development and regulation of host cell gene expression in sheep using a reverse genetic approach.

The same group has previously performed a very similar study (published in 2016) in a bovine model showing that the viral miRNAs regulate the expression of genes involved in cell signaling, cancer and immunity. As the approach used in the two studies is the same, the novelty of the data described in the current manuscript is limited. Although the sheep model allows to evaluate the long-term effects of the viral miRNAs compared to the bovine animal model, no mechanistic analyses have been included, thus limiting the impact of the new data compared to previous observations.

Reviewer #3: In this manuscript Safari et al described the role of non coding RNA in the B-cell biology after experimental infection of sheep animals with BLV. They confirmed their previous observation, showing that sheeps infected with BVL devoided of miRNA have a reduced viral load compare to infection with wt virus and survive to the infcetion while sheeps infected with virus didn't.

In this study, the deeply analyzed the role of miRNA in Bcell compartment. Using transcriptomic analysis of B-cells purified from PBMCs of sheeps infected with miRNA deletant virus or wt virus, they identified that viral miRNA mainly target B-cell and not non B-cells population and mainly genes involved in proliferation pathways. Using, in vivo labeling they further demonstrated that B-cells from wt infected animals had a higher proliferation rate than B-cells from miRNA deletant infected animals.

The use of in vivo infection and analysis of freshly purified cells is certainly an important strength of this study.

The main weaknesses are linked to the lack of mechanisms supporting the lower B-cell proliferation rate after infection with miRNA deletant. Specially, since the author have reported a role of miRNA in controlling expression of gene involved in cell signaling, cancer and immunity, it would have been interested to address whether these gene are involved in B-cell proliferation and or also upregulated in B cell from animals infected with miRNA deletant.

In addition it would be interested to determine whether the 2x increase in B cells proliferation observed in wt infected animals translated to higher B cells total count reminiscent to oncogenesis.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: 1. Throughout the paper, the emphasis presented by the authors is on the impact on proliferation of knocking out the non-coding RNAs. However, the gene ontology analysis (results summarized in Figure 3) appears to suggest a more specific effect than merely on proliferation. Most of the genes whose expression is altered in the B cell infected by the knockout virus are concerned with the mechanics of chromosome segregation at mitosis. Obviously, these changes will be associated with a change in the cell proliferation rate. But these results suggest that the microRNAs might be exerting an impact on one particular stage of mitosis, and might even suggest some candidate targets of the non-coding RNAs. The authors might comment on this, if they agree, in the Discussion. It would be very interesting to pursue this in future work.

2. Lines 254-261. It is a curious observation that the B-cell proliferation rate differed between the two groups of animals even when the proviral loads were very similar. This observation also implies that the risk of disease (leukemia), which differed between the groups (cf. survival curves, Fig. 1B), might depend on the viral genotype independently of the proviral load. In turn this raises the question whether there is a difference between the groups in the clonal composition of what is presumably a highly polyclonal infected B-cell population, i.e. whether there is selection for particular different BLV-infected B-cell clones, which differ in leukemogenic potential. Have the authors studied the clonality of these populations?

3. Line 175 and fig. 4C. It is incorrect to use the t-test (whether paired or not) to test for a possible difference between the two curves in Fig. 4C. The reason for this is that the different timepoints in each respective curve are not independent of each other: that is, the percentage of CFSE+ cells at a given timepoint is not independent of the value at the previous timepoint on that curve. One can legitimately compare the two curves at each timepoint individually, and then correct for 9 multiple comparisons (9 timepoints were examined): clearly the difference would be significant only at some timepoints, if any.

Similarly, one cannot legitimately use regression techniques to test for a difference in the location of the two curves, again because of the non-independence of the plotted points.

The analysis, interpretation and conclusions should be revised to take this into account.

Reviewer #2: Authors have identified cell division as the major pathway regulated by BLV miRNAs in infected sheep. However, authors do not provide a detailed analysis of potential key genes in this pathway which could be directly affected by miRNAs and that could explain the different phenotype caused by the WT virus and the ΔmiRNA virus. What other pathways, besides cell division, are affected by the absence/presence of viral miRNAs?

Authors mention in the discussion that in bovine PBMCs the miRNAs modulated a more complex network of pathways, but they do not discuss a more detailed comparison of the results observed in the two animal models, which would instead be interesting, e.g. is the gene expression profile in bovine and ovine cells very different? Are the pathways identified in the bovine model (cell signaling, cancer and immunity) also affected in sheep?

• Fig 4: why the 2-fold increase shown in panel A at 1 month is not reflected in panel C?

• In panels C and D, authors state that viral miRNAs significantly control B cell turnover, cell proliferation and death, but the percentage of CFSE+ cells, proliferation rate and death rate are very similar between WT and ΔmiRNA viruses, with a fold difference less than 2. It’s not clear how biologically relevant this difference is. The authors should comment on this point?

• Fig 5A:

- At what point of the study was the BrdU analysis done?

- In the material and methods section, authors state that PBMCs were isolated at different time points after BrdU injection. It would be interesting to see the BrdU incorporation data at later time points (day 2-17): does the difference between WT and ΔmiRNA viruses become more pronounced?

Reviewer #3: 1- Using the transcriptomic data set what is the B-cell and non B-cell expression of ANXA1, FOS, GZMA, PIK3CG and PPT1 that were previously shown to be controlled in PBMCs by BLV miRNA ? And what is the link of these genes with B cell proliferation ?

2- Transcriptomic pinpoint to B-cell proliferation that was confirmed by CSFE and BrdU labelling. However the total count of B-cell were not provided in these experiments. What is the total number of B-cell in animals infected with miRNA deletant compare to animals infected with wt ? Does this number correlate with the 2X increase in proliferation that was demonstrated in fig 4 and 5 ? Is B-cell proliferation also observed after in vitro culture of purified B-cells ? ARe in vitro infected B-cells with miRNA deletant also impaired in their proliferation ability compared to wt in vitro infected B-cells ?

3- does the B cell proliferation correlate with the PVL ? Specially B-cell proliferation from animals with similar low PVL after infection with miRNA deletant or wt virus should be shown (p 12 lane 254-255

4- are the B cell that proliferate infected ? since PVL and infection are lower in miRNA deletant infected animals, one could expect that lower infected cells would translate in lower proliferation rate as measured in bulk B-cell population.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: 1. Figure 1. Can the authors comment on the discrepant results in the WT animal with the slow rise in PVL?

2. line 123. The authors write that ‘There was a clear segregation of the two principal components (PC1 and PC2)...’ But in Figure 2A, PC2 appears to differ between WT and ΔmiRNA animals, whereas PC1 does not.

3. line 131. Please expand the abbreviations MA and LFC.

4. lines 238-244. Since the previous study by this group quantified RNA expression in mixed, unsorted PBMCs, it is very difficult to compare those previous results with the present results in B cells, although it is noted that there was no great difference in the transcriptome of non-B cells in this study between the WT and ΔmiRNA-infected animals (which might therefore differ from the cow).

Reviewer #2: • Fig 2C: are there common genes in the two groups? Or is the profile of non-B and B cells completely different?

• Fig 2D: same comment as for 2C. Also, do the two viruses differentially downregulate host cell genes?

• Line 283-284: It would be interesting to show the effect of miRNA depletion on different phases of the virus life cycle. The manuscript would benefit from these data.

Reviewer #3: 1- the number of animals used for each experiment must be notified. Specially for fig 4-5-6 in which it is not clear how the stats were done.

2-p19 lane 407-408 the sentence is not complete and seems to be a repetition of the previous one.

3- I suggest to show the data obtained for #1131 animal in which infection with miRNA deletant resulted to high PVL. How is the B-cell proliferation in this animal ? Does the virus revert to wt ?

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Charles Bangham

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here on PLOS Biology: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

Decision Letter 1

Bryan R Cullen, Susan R Ross

26 Mar 2020

Dear Pr Willems,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Ablation of non-coding RNAs affects bovine leukemia virus B lymphocyte proliferation and abrogates oncogenesis' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Bryan R. Cullen

Associate Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Susan Ross

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

Bryan R Cullen, Susan R Ross

1 May 2020

Dear Pr Willems,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Ablation of non-coding RNAs affects bovine leukemia virus B lymphocyte proliferation and abrogates oncogenesis," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig

    (A) PBMCs were isolated from sheep infected by wild-type BLV and miRNA deletant. Then, PBMCs were labeled with anti-IgM 1H4 antibody and anti-mouse IgG1 conjugate. Percentages of B cells were determined by flow cytometry. p = 0.002 according to Mann-Whitney U test. (B) After overnight culture of PBMCs, the percentages of p24-positive cells were determined by flow cytometry. The p24 viral protein was detected by sequential incubation with 4′G9 monoclonal antibody and a rat anti-mouse IgG1 conjugate. p = 0.01 according to Mann-Whitney U test. (C) Absolute number of lymphocytes determined with a ProCyte Dx Haematology Analyser. (D) Absolute numbers of B cells were calculated from the percentages of B-lymphocytes in PBMCs (panel A) and absolute numbers of lymphocytes (panel C).

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Enrichment plot of gene sets with the family wise error rate less than 0.001.

    The green curve corresponds to the ES (enrichment score) curve, which is the running sum of the weighted enrichment score obtained from GSEA software. The enrichment score reveals the degree at which the genes in a gene set are overrepresented at the top or bottom of the entire ranked list of genes (y axis).

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Leading genes of the most enriched gene sets.

    Chord diagram displaying leading edge analysis of enriched gene sets (FWER < 0.001) in pBLV-WT-infected sheep analyzed by GSEA. The diagram was generated by circos table viewer. Segments size shows the contribution effect.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Normalized transcriptomic counts of T-cell specific factors.

    Normalized counts were obtained by DEseq2 analysis of transcriptomic data of non-B cells isolated from pBLV-WT and pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected sheep. Differences of gene expression between pBLV-WT and pBLV-ΔmiRNA are not significant according to t-test.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Normalized transcriptomic counts of GZMA, PPT1, FOS, ANXA1, MAP2K1 and PIK3CG.

    (A) Normalized counts obtained from DEseq2 analysis of transcriptomic data of non-B cells isolated from pBLV-WT and pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected sheep. Differences of gene expression between pBLV-WT and pBLV-ΔmiRNA are not significant according to t-test. (B) Normalized counts obtained from DEseq2 analysis of B cells. Differences are significant for GZMA (p = 0.007) and PIK3CG (p = 0.02) according to t-test.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Evaluation of proliferation rates by intravenous injection of BrdU in animals with similar proviral loads.

    (A) Time kinetics of the percentages of B cells having incorporated BrdU. (B) Proviral loads (in number of copies in 100 PBMCs) and proliferation rates corresponding to graphs of panel A.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. BrdU kinetics in preleukemic sheep #1131.

    (A) Time kinetics of the percentages of B cells having incorporated BrdU in animal # 1131 infected with pBLV-ΔmiRNA (B) Proliferation rate estimated from data of panel A. (C) PCR amplification of the genomic sequences surrounding the miRNA region. (D) Kinetics of proviral loads (in number of copies in 100 PBMCs) in sheep #1131.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Differentially expressed genes that are common to B cells and non-B cells.

    Genes significantly differentially expressed in B cells were compared to genes significantly differentially expressed in non-B cells. The table shows the genes that are shared by these two lists.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. Leading genes of upregulated pathways in B cells of pBLV-WT infected sheep as compared to pBLV-ΔmiRNA.

    Genes driving the enrichment score (Fig 3B) were identified by leading edge (LE) analysis on enriched gene sets with family wise-error rate <0.001 using the GSEA software. The list of the genes has been ordered according to log2 fold change.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Table. Upregulated pathways in B cells of pBLV-WT infected sheep as compared to pBLV-ΔmiRNA.

    Gene ontology sets that are enriched in B cells of pBLV-WT infected sheep with a false discovery rate less than 0.01 (FDR < 0.01) were calculated using GSEA and listed according to the family wise-error rates (FWER p value). The size indicates the number of genes in each GO. Enrichment Score (ES) is the degree at which the genes in a gene set are overrepresented at the top or bottom of the entire ranked list of genes. NOM p values are the normalized p values calculated by GSEA. FDR q values represent false discovery rates.

    (XLSX)

    S4 Table. Upregulated pathways in B cells of pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected sheep as compared to pBLV-WT.

    Gene ontology sets that are enriched in B cells of pBLV-ΔmiRNA infected sheep with a false discovery rate less than 0.01 (FDR < 0.01) were calculated as described in S3 Table.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES