Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Jun 4;15(6):e0233384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233384

Exponential increase in mortality with age is a generic property of a simple model system of damage accumulation and death

Anders Ledberg 1,*
Editor: Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez2
PMCID: PMC7272078  PMID: 32497107

Abstract

The risk of dying increases exponentially with age, in humans as well as in many other species. This increase is often attributed to the “accumulation of damage” known to occur in many biological structures and systems. The aim of this paper is to describe a generic model of damage accumulation and death in which mortality increases exponentially with age. The damage-accumulation process is modeled by a stochastic process know as a queue, and risk of dying is a function of the accumulated damage, i.e., length of the queue. The model has four parameters and the main characteristics of the model are: (i) damage occurs at random times with a constant high rate; (ii) the damage is repaired at a limited rate, and consequently damage can accumulate; (iii) the efficiency of the repair mechanism decays linearly with age; (iv) the risk of dying is a function of the accumulated damage. Using standard results from the mathematical theory of queues it is shown that there is an exponential dependence between risk of dying and age in these models, and that this dependency holds irrespective of how the damage-accumulation process is modeled. Furthermore, the ways in which this exponential dependence is shaped by the model parameters are also independent of the details of the damage accumulation process. These generic features suggest that the model could be useful when interpreting changes in the relation between age and mortality in real data. To exemplify, historical mortality data from Sweden are interpreted in the light of the model. The decrease in mortality seen between cohorts born in 1905, compared to those born in 1885, can be accounted for by higher threshold to damage. This fits well with the many advances made in public health during the 20th century.

Introduction

In many biological organisms, including humans, mortality rate (force of mortality or hazard rate) is increasing with age [e.g., 1, 2]. This increase is often taken as a defining feature of biological aging, or senescence. A remarkable empirical finding, first described almost 200 years ago, is that the rate of increase in mortality, over a substantial age range, is roughly exponential [3]; see [4] and [5] for review. This exponential relationship is found in different populations of humans as well as in a range of other organisms, including fruit flies and nematodes. Moreover, the exponential dependence between age and mortality rate is seen also under experimental conditions where environmental, and to some extent genetic, forces are kept constant [e.g., 6]. In human populations, the age range over which there is an exponential relationship between age and mortality rate varies. In Swedish data, mortality is an approximately exponential function of age from 55 years of age [7, Ch.6].

A prominent idea, often evoked in explanations of why humans and other organisms age and die, is that damage, that inevitably occur in biological systems, accumulate over time, and the accumulated damage leads to organ failure, and finally death [e.g., 2, 811]. The “damage” featuring in these accounts is of many different kinds and occur to a range of different structures, including nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, and proteins [9]. The rate of damage accumulation, and hence of aging, is thought to be a result of the balance between damage and repair. There are a range of repair mechanisms, the most well studied repair damage to the DNA [12, 13]. Many of these repair mechanisms become less efficient with age [12], which implies that the rate of damage accumulation will increase with age.

The aim of this paper is to describe a family of models of damage accumulation and death, where there is an exponential dependence between rate of dying and age, a dependence that can be shaped by a small set of parameters having a clear interpretation. The description of damage accumulation in these models is taken from the mathematical theory of queues, and the process of accumulation is shaped by the balance between the rate of damage and rate of repair. The model systems “die” at a fixed rate when the accumulated damage exceeds a threshold, and if the rate of repair decreases in a roughly linear manner with age, mortality rates can be shown to be exponential functions of age.

In the simplest instantiation of such queuing-based models, there are four parameters that shape the relation between aging and mortality rate. The way in which mortality rate depends on the parameters is shown to be independent of the details of how the system is implemented, suggesting that model systems of this type could be useful in interpreting changes in real mortality data.

The paper is organized as follows. First a model system is studied where damage accumulation is modeled by an M/M/1 queue with time-changing repair (service) rate. This queuing model is well understood, and the mortality rates are shown to be well approximated by an exponential function of age. Second, it is shown that the relation between age and mortality is approximately exponential also when more general queuing models are used to describe the damage accumulation. Moreover, it is shown that these more general models can be parameterized in the same way as the model based on M/M/1-queues, and the effects of the parameters are the same in the two models. In the following sections numerical methods are used to study two cases not covered by the theory. First the case of when rate of damage accumulation exceeds rate of repair is considered. This is followed by a discussion of how heterogeneity can be introduced in these models. Subsequently, historical mortality data from Sweden are interpreted in the light of the damage accumulation models. In the Discussion, these model systems are related to some previously suggested models of similar type. In the S1 Appendix, numerical simulations are used to verify that the theoretical approximations accurately describe the dynamics of real systems, and it is furthermore shown that the assumption of a hard threshold can be relaxed.

Damage accumulation modeled by an M/M/1 queue

In this section, a well-known model of queuing behavior, the M/M/1 queue, is used to implement a system that ages, and moreover dies with a rate which depends exponentially on age. For an introduction to queuing theory see, for example, [14].

Assume that damage to the system occurs according to a Poisson process with constant rate λ (occurrence of damage corresponds to “arrival of customers” in queuing theory). Whenever there is damage, a repair process starts, and the time it takes to repair the damage follows an exponential distribution with rate parameter μ (repair corresponds to “service” in queuing theory). Assume further that there is at most one repair process active at any time, implying that subsequent damages might accumulate, even if λ < < μ; i.e., there might be a “queue” of damage. This last assumption is made to simplify derivations but can be relaxed without changing the results qualitatively, i.e., the results in this section hold also for M/M/c queues. Since damage happen at random times, and take random amounts of time to repair, the accumulated damage, Q(t) say, is a stochastic process on the non-negative integers (“queue length” in queuing theory). If λ < μ then Q has a stationary distribution, and this distribution will play a central role in the following. In this M/M/1 model, the stationary distribution of Q only depends on the ratio of damage to repair rate, ρ=defλ/μ (“traffic intensity” in queuing theory), and takes the following simple form [14, p.62]:

Pr(Qk)=defP(Qk)=ρk.

Fig 1 illustrates samples of Q(t) for three values of ρ and the insets show the corresponding stationary distributions. It can be seen that as ρ → 1, it becomes more probable that the accumulated damage (Q(t)) takes large values.

Fig 1. Sample traces of Q(t) for three different values of ρ (λ = 1000).

Fig 1

Insets show the corresponding probability mass functions.

To turn this queuing model into a model of aging and death, two properties will be added. First, the rate of the repair process is made to decrease as a function of age (i.e., time), and, second, the risk of “death” will be linked to the accumulated damage Q(t).

To keep derivations simple, the following form for the decrease of μ is assumed:

μ(a)=μ0-βa. (1)

Here μ0 and β are constants, with μ0 > λ, and a denotes age. Accordingly, the rate of repair is decreasing linearly with age. Note that μ0 represents the initial repair capacity of the system, at age zero. If, as is the case for many human populations, the exponential dependence between mortality and age starts at an age a0 > 0, Eq 1 is replaced by μ(a) = μ0β(aa0)+, where (x)+ denotes the positive part of x.

If μ is a function of age, then the distribution of Q(t) will also depend on age, and when μ changes, it will take some time before the distribution of Q conforms to the stationary distribution corresponding to the new value of ρ (see Fig 4 for an illustration). In fact, the time it takes for the stationary distribution to be approached is a rapidly increasing function of ρ [e.g., 15]. To accommodate this fact, it is further assumed that the rate of change of μ is slow compared to the time needed to approach the steady state distribution. This is achieved when the rate of damage is high compared to the rate of change of μ, i.e., when λ > > β. With this assumption in place, the stationary distribution of Q can be parameterized by age, P(Q(a)) as

P(Q(a)k)=ρ(a)k=def(λμ(a))k. (2)

Fig 4. Hazard rates as a function of ρ, i.e., (λ/μ), close to 1.

Fig 4

The dashed region represents 95% confidence intervals (from a Poisson approximation), and the orange line represents predictions from the theory (Eq 6). Model parameters were: λ = 540, μ0 = 550, β = 0.52/365, θ = 100, and 4.0 × 105 realizations of the systems were run.

To link the accumulated damage to risk of dying, the latter is assumed proportional to the probability of the accumulated damage exceeding a fixed threshold θ. In other words, the hazard of death at age a, h(a) say, is given by

h(a)P(Q(a)θ), (3)

where the threshold, θ, is a free parameter of the model system. In the S1 Appendix it is shown that similar behavior can be obtained with a soft threshold, a sigmoid function. The qualitative behavior of the system does not depend on the constant of proportionality, and it is assumed to be equal to one in the rest of this section. In applications, this constant is determined by the time units used. Given this form of the hazard function, it follows, from standard survival analysis theory, that the corresponding probability density function, f(a) say, is given by

f(a)=ρ(a)θexp(-a0aρ(s)θds), (4)

[e.g., 16, Ch.1]. Here a0 ≥ 0 to indicate that in real data the exponential dependence between age and mortality is often a restricted to a range of ages. Now we can state the

Main result. Under these assumptions it follows that the rate of dying increases approximately exponentially with the age of the system.

To see this, let Δ = μ0 − λ and use that

ρ(a)=11+Δ-βaλ.

Insert this in the expression for the probability of Q(a) (Eq 2) and take logarithms to yield

logP(Q(a)θ)=-θlog(1+Δ-βaλ).

Taylor expansion of the logarithm gives,

logP(Q(a)θ)=θβaλ-θΔλ+higherorderterms. (5)

In the regime that is relevant here, say when P(Q(a) ≥ θ) > 0.01, the higher order terms in the above expression makes only a negligible contribution and can be ignored (see Fig 2 for an example). Thus, in this range, the logarithm of P(Q) is very well approximated by a straight line. In other words, the probability that the accumulated damage exceed a given threshold θ is an exponential function of age. Indeed, if c1 = exp(−θΔ/λ), and c2 = θβ/λ, we have

P(Qθ)c1exp(c2a), (6)

or equivalently log(P) ≃ log(c1) + c2 a. Fig 2 illustrates how the error in the approximation goes to zero as P(Qθ) → 1.

Fig 2. Probability of Q(a) ≥ θ as a function of age for a model with λ = 500, Δ = 50, β = 0.485/365, all in units of per day, and θ = 80.

Fig 2

True values from Eq 2 and approximation from Eq 6.

Note that the assumption of a perfectly linear decrease of rate of repair (Eq 1) can be relaxed. The decrease does not need to be deterministic as long as the average decrease is roughly linear.

Effects of changes in parameters

The model system has four parameters: μ0, λ, β, and θ, and the way mortality rate depends on these can be obtained by taking partial derivatives of P(Q) with respect to the parameters (e.g., using Eq 6). These dependencies are illustrated in Fig 3, which shows that changes in μ0 leads to a proportional change in the hazard rates, i.e., the hazard rate ratios between two systems that differ only in μ0 are constant. A change in the damage rate (λ) has similar effects (but with opposite sign), whereas a change in β leads to hazard rate ratios that increase with age, and a change in θ to hazard rate ratios that decrease with age.

Fig 3. Effects of changes in the parameters on P(Qθ), using Eq 2 with λ = 500, μ0 = 50, β = 0.485/365, θ = 80.

Fig 3

Since the relation between age and log mortality rate is almost linear in this model, it can be adequately be described by just two parameters (see Fig 2). This implies that the four parameters of the model cannot be uniquely fit to a single set of data. For example, if μ0, λ, and β are all multiplied by the same constant, P(Q), as given by Eq 6, will not change. However, the point is not primarily to fit the model to a single set of data, but to interpret changes in mortality rates between different contexts in terms of parameters with a clear interpretation.

Damage accumulation modeled by a G/G/1 queue

To derive the approximate exponential dependence between age and mortality (Eq 6), it was assumed that damage happened according to a Poisson process and that the repair times were exponentially distributed. In this section it is shown that mortality rate is an approximately exponential function of age also when these assumptions are relaxed.

So, assume that damage occurs according to a stationary stochastic process, where the time intervals between damages are drawn from a distribution with mean value 1/λ and standard deviation σD. Assume further that repair times are drawn from a distribution with age-dependent mean value 1/μ(a) and standard deviation σR(a). Let ID and IR denote the square of the coefficient of variation of these distributions, e.g., ID = (λσD)2. When λ/μ → 1, it can be shown that the stationary distribution of accumulated damage, for a fixed age, Q(a), is approximately exponential [e.g., 17, Ch. 8]. Indeed, in this case we have that

P(Q(a)θ)exp(-2θμ(a)-λIRμ(a)+IDλ). (7)

To show that this expression entails an approximate exponential dependence between age and mortality rate, assume that ID does not depend (strongly) on age and use that

μ(a)-λIRμ(a)+IDλ=Δ-βaIR(Δ-βa)+(IR+ID)λ=Δ-βa(IR+ID)λ-IR(Δ-βa)2IR(IR+ID)λ(Δ-βa)+((IR+ID)λ)2.

Next, we show that the second term on the right hand side in the above expression is smaller than the first term and can be ignored when (μ − λ) → 0. To do this, let r denote the ratio between the second and the first term, i.e.,

|r|=IR(Δ-βa)IR(Δ-βa)+(IR+ID)λ. (8)

The absolute value used in this expression follows from the assumption that (Δ − βa) ≥ 0. Eq 8 implies that |r| < (Δ − βa)/λ, showing that |r| → 0, when (Δ − βa) → 0, demonstrating that the contribution of the second term can be ignored when (μ(a) − λ), and hence (Δ − βa) is small. Consequently, in this regime, we can approximate Eq 7 by

P(Q(a)θ)exp(-2θΔ-βa(IR+ID)λ), (9)

which shows that the probability of damage exceeding a given threshold is approximately an exponential function of age. Note that Eq 9 express the same dependence between P(Q) and the model parameters as does Eq 6. Furthermore, since the coefficients of variation is 1 for both damage and repair distribution in the M/M/1 model above, the approximation in Eq 9 becomes, in this case, identical to that in Eq 6.

To verify that the theoretical approximations derived in this section accurately describe the behavior of the model systems, direct numerical simulations of two systems were performed and the results of these were compared to the theoretical approximations (see S1 Appendix). Fig A2 in S1 Fig shows that the approximation of Eq 9, accurately captures the dependence between age and hazard rate, in particular as the rate of damage approaches the rate of repair.

To sum up, there are two factors explaining why there is an exponential dependence between age and mortality rate in these models. The first has to do with the shape of the stationary distributions of Q(t), geometric in the M/M/1 case, and exponential in the general case. This is a property of the queuing models used to describe the damage accumulation. The second factor is that the model systems are working in a regime where μ(a) → λ, i.e., where the repair rate is approaching the damage rate. In this regime, the stationary distributions have an approximately linear dependence on age. At this abstract level it is almost self evident that real biological systems must also be operating in this regime as they age. Indeed, if the rate of repair would continue to be much higher than the rate of damage, there would not be any accumulation of damage, and consequently, no aging.

Behavior of models when λ > μ

To derive analytical results for the model systems it has, so far, been tacitly assumed that λ < μ, i.e., that the rate of repair is higher than the rate of damage. When this condition fails, there is no stationary distribution and the probability of Q exceeding any threshold becomes equal to one. In other words, damage will accumulate without bounds and the probability that Q will exceed a fixed threshold θ becomes independent of age. Since stationary theory cannot be used to derive analytical expressions in this regime, numerical simulations (see S1 Appendix) were used to illustrate the behavior. Fig 4 shows results for one set of parameters. It is clear that as ρ gets close to 1, the simulated data starts deviating slightly from the theoretical prediction. This is a consequence of that it takes more time to reach the stationary distribution when ρ → 1. It is also clear from Fig 4 that the exponential increase in hazard rate, is seemingly completely gone when ρ ≥ 1, and the hazard of death becomes, to a first approximation, independent of ρ, and hence age.

Heterogeneity

The analytical results considered so far concerns the behavior of a large number of identical units. In populations of biological organisms it is likely to exist differences between organisms that affect their longevity. For example, females tend to outlive males in many animal species, and various experimental manipulations have been shown to systematically alter longevity in animal models [e.g., 2]. Such heterogeneity can easily be incorporated into the model systems described here. For example, if the initial level or repair capacity, μ0, is a random variable such that log(μ0) has a suitable gamma distribution, the resulting model would generate hazard rates, as a function of age, almost identical to the, so-called, gamma-Gompertz model, in which heterogeneity is modeled by a proportional scaling of the hazards [e.g., 18, 19]. A perhaps more principled choice would be to let the initial repair capacity be normally distributed; this would then instead imply a log-normal proportional frailty model. Another possibility is to let the damage rate λ vary between units. Analytical results for model systems where parameters vary according to a normal distribution have not been derived yet, but using numerical simulations, some consequences of heterogeneity is studied below.

A prominent feature of the gamma-Gompertz frailty model is that the hazard rates grow less fast at older ages. The reason for this is that those that survive to older ages tend to have a lower hazard than the average of the population [e.g., 20]. To show that this effect is also observed when heterogeneity is introduced in the model systems considered here, numerical simulations were run in which the initial repair rate μ0 was allowed to vary between units. In Fig 5, hazard rates from these simulations are compared to the hazard rates from a model without heterogeneity. The hazard rates are very similar until age 75 after which the rates in the population with heterogeneity show a slower increase. Similar results are obtained by allowing λ to vary (not shown).

Fig 5. Estimated hazard rates (points) for a model system with heterogeneity in μ0.

Fig 5

The gray region represents 95% confidence intervals (from a Poisson approximation), and the orange line represents hazard rates for a model system without heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was modeled by sampling values of μ0 from a normal distribution with mean 550 and variance 4. Other model parameters were: λ = 500, β = 0.485/365, θ = 100. Results are based on 1.2 × 105 model realizations.

Heterogeneity in μ0 or λ makes sense in terms of interpretation. Differences in the repair capacity between different individuals might be a result of genetic differences, and differences in rate of damage might be caused by living conditions and/or lifestyle (e.g., smoking, drinking alcohol). The effects of heterogeneity in other parameters is left for a separate communication.

As a phenomenological model of real data

In this section the model where damage accumulation is governed by an M/M/1 queue is fit to historical mortality data from Sweden. The purpose is to illustrate how the system can be used as a phenomenological model of real data, and thereby to aid in the interpretation. A more detailed analysis and discussion of results will be communicated separately.

The data

Mortality data for persons born in Sweden were obtained from the “Swedish Book of Deaths” issued by the The Federation of Swedish Genealogical Societies. This is a database compiled from a range of sources and contains information on time and place of births and deaths for persons that have died in Sweden since 1860. The coverage is almost complete.

Birth cohorts were formed for the two years 1885 and 1905, for men and women separately (men 1885: N = 58044, 1905: N = 64602; women 1885: N = 57873), 1905: N = 63284). These birth years were selected since it is known that the mortality rates for the 1905 cohort are significantly lower than the rates of the 1885 cohort. Hazard rates were estimated with a resolution of 1 year. To find the models that best fitted these four sets of data, a two-step procedure was used. First, a linear least squares fit was made to the log hazards for each cohort separately. The linear fits were restricted to an age range of 55-99 in order to capture the interval in which there is an exponential increase of mortality in these data, and to exclude older ages where the uncertainties of the hazard-rate estimates are large. The parameters from the least squares fits (two parameters per birth year and sex) were subsequently used to find the corresponding parameters of the model systems. This was accomplished by solving numerically the following system of equations for λ and θ:

co+c155=θlog(λμ0-β55)co+c190=θlog(λμ0-β90),

where c0 and c1 are the intercept and slope from the linear least squares fit to the log hazards. The other two model parameters, μ0 and β, were held fixed at 550 and 0.485/365. All computations were made in R [21].

Fig 6 shows hazard rates for the two birth years, for men and women separately. As is well known, the mortality rates for women dropped for almost all ages (the spikes around 14 years of age in the 1905 data, and 34 in the 1885 data, are attributed to the Spanish flu which hit Sweden in the fall of 1918). For men, mortality rates reduced for ages under 55, but did not change much for older ages. The lower panels show the data restricted to ages ≥ 55. The exponential increase in mortality rates is captured by the model (solid lines). The parameters that best describe these data show that the substantial decrease in hazard rates for women, after age 55, is accounted for by an increase in threshold θ; the rate of damage, λ, remained almost exactly the same in the two cohorts (Table 1). This increase in tolerance to damage is tentatively attributed to the the improvements in health care that occurred during the second half of the 20th century, e.g., in availability of antibiotics [22], as these improvements must have benefited those born 1905 more than those born 1885. An explanation for why mortality among men did not decrease to the same extent, among those aged 55 and older, might be found in the different rates in cigarette smoking in these two cohorts, and consequences thereof. Cigarette smoking became widespread among Swedish men in the 1940s, and were picked up by the two birth cohorts to a different extent [23, 24]. For example, according to a 1955 national survey on smoking and tobacco use, 41% of men aged 50-65 (i.e., including the 1905 birth cohort) were smoking cigarettes, whereas only 20% of men older than 65 did (i.e., including the 1885 birth cohort). Smoking among women in the corresponding age groups were 20 and 11% respectively [23]. A more careful investigation of these claims is left for a separate contribution. However, the fact that the model could account for the substantial change in mortality seen in women by a change in one sensible parameter is encouraging for further application to real mortality data.

Fig 6. Hazard rates estimated from mortality data from Sweden.

Fig 6

Top panels show estimated mortality rates for men and women born 1885 and 1905. Shaded areas show extent of 95% confidence intervals of these estimates. Lower panels show the same data, but restricted to ages ≥ 55. Solid lines in lower panels show hazard rates from the model fits.

Table 1. Parameters of the models that best fit the data.

The value of the other parameters were held fixed at: μ0 = 550, β = 0.485/365. The R2 column shows the R2 value calculated over the age range 55 to 99.

Birth year Sex λ θ R2
1885 W 498.1 96.1 0.997
1905 W 498.1 107.3 0.995
1885 M 499.0 95.5 0.998
1905 M 498.9 96.7 0.996

Discussion

The model systems introduced herein accumulate damage and die with a rate that depends on the age of the system. If the decrease in the rate of repair is linear with age, mortality will increase exponentially, similarly to what is observed in many biological systems. It was shown that the exponential increase is independent of the interval distributions governing the damage and repair processes, demonstrating that this is a robust feature of these systems. The exponential dependence between age and mortality rates in these models is valid in a regime where the rate of repair becomes similar to the rate of damage as the systems age. Since aging, in both animals and humans, is associated with accumulation of damage [e.g., 2, 811], it is possible that the exponential relation between age and mortality also in these cases results from a similar balance of damage and repair.

In the current form, these model systems have four parameters, all with clear interpretations: rate of damage accumulation, initial rate of repair, rate of decrease of repair rate, and a threshold beyond which the accumulated damage can cause the system to die. Although it it possible to express the dynamics of the model with fewer parameters, such reparameterization would make the interpretation of the model harder. An important finding is that the way these parameters affect the relationship between age and mortality is independent of the details of the accumulation process. In other words, it is a generic feature of these systems. For example, an increase in the damage rate will lead to a proportional increase of the mortality rate (see Fig 3) in all models of this type. This generic property suggests that similar parameter dependencies might hold also in other (biological) systems. It was, for example, shown that the decrease in mortality rates among Swedish women born 1905, compared to those born 1885, could be well accounted for by an increase in just one parameter, θ, the threshold. This example also illustrates how model systems, where parameters have an intrinsic meaning, can be used to generate hypotheses about generative mechanisms, something that might be harder to do with descriptive (statistical) models of the data.

Apart from the exponential dependence between aging and mortality, human mortality data often show other regularities that a model should arguably be able to reproduce. One common finding is that the exponential increase in hazard rates levels off at old age, i.e., the increase in mortality with age, say after 95, becomes less fast (but this is not a universal finding, see [25]). In the models introduced here, such leveling off is achieved naturally when the rate of damage is close to, or surpasses, the rate of repair (Fig 4). Heterogeneity in the initial level of repair provides another way in which this behavior can be generated (Fig 5). Another common feature of human mortality data is a negative correlation between the intercept and slope when the log hazard is modeled as a linear function of age (i.e., a straight line), the so-called Gompertz model [26]. In the model systems considered here, such dependency is a consequence of changes in model parameters that influence both the slope and intercept of the log hazard, see Eq 6. For example, in populations were mortality rates change through a change in the threshold, there will be a strong negative correlation between the intercept and slopes in the corresponding Gompertz models. Consequently, these models give a functional explanation to why such a dependency might be found in real populations [c.f., 27].

Below I first discuss some ways in which these models can be extended. Subsequently, two conjectures concering the relation between parameters of the models and real data are put forth. Hopefully this makes the connections to real systems more clear. The paper concludes with a discussion of some related work.

Extensions

There are many ways in which the family of damage-accumulation models considered here can be extended. One immediate extension would be to consider the accumulated damage, not as an integer-valued random variable, but a continuous ditto. In fact, the diffusion approximation underlying Eq 7, is an instance of a reflected Brownian motion [17]. This means that reflected (at zero) Brownian motion with a drift μ that is increasing as a function of age (initially μ < 0) provides an alternative model of damage accumulation. If μ is increasing linearly with age, this model will also lead to exponentially increasing mortality rates. Discrete models were used in this work because the parameters in these models are more intuitive, however, a continuous formulation might be preferable for analytical work.

Another way that the models could be extended would be to allow the rate of repair to depend on the accumulated damage. Indeed, in real systems, it is likely that the decrease in the efficiency of repair with age is itself a consequence of damage accumulation. If the rate of mortality would show the same dependency on age in this case is not known, but it is likely that it would be approximately true for certain types of dependencies.

Yet another extension concerns damage and repair processes that are non-stationary. If changes in the properties of these processes are slow, compared to the average interval duration, the results will not change qualitatively [e.g., 28]. Indeed, the linear decrease in μ with age, used in the models studied herein, is exactly such a slow change. If a model system with faster changes in damage and repair would still show an exponential dependence between mortality and age, or not, likely depends on the details of these changes.

To use the model systems studied here to model the mechanisms of aging in a particular organism would require additional steps. The damage and repair in the model systems should then be put in correspondence to some processes known to occur in the real system. In biological systems accumulation of damage happens at many different levels of organization (e.g., organelles, cells, functional modules, organs, etc), at different time-scales, and probably with different rates; and a biologically realistic model should be explicit about which levels are modeled and how different levels interact. Future work will explore how hierarchical combination of simple queuing models can be used to build more biologically realistic models of aging.

Two conjectures

The main aim of this work was to show that an exponential increase in mortality rates is a generic consequence of damage accumulation in an abstract model system. Hopefully this theoretical work can contribute to more realistic models of biological mechanisms of aging. However, even at this abstract level it is possible to establish some tentative connections to real mortality data and therefore to mechanisms of aging. To this aim I will propose two testable conjectures regarding how established empirical findings relate to changes in model parameters.

Two of the four model parameters are related to external conditions of life: the rate of damage accumulation λ, and the threshold θ. It was already shown that the decrease in mortality among women born in Sweden could be fully accounted for by an increase in the threshold (Table 1). Exactly how different interventions translate to changes in the threshold is not known, but an improvement of, and increased access to, health care should correspond to a higher threshold. Thus, the increase in threshold found here is consistent with the marked improvements in health care in Sweden during the 20th century. The damage rate λ was considered constant in the models, however, in real biological systems it is likely that the rate of damage varies due to variations in external conditions. The first conjecture relates to this parameter:

  • C1 The observed seasonal variations in mortality [e.g., 29, 30] can be accounted for by seasonal variations in the rate of damage accumulation.

A quantitative test of this conjecture is under way and will be communicated separately.

The other two model parameters, initial rate of repair, μ0, and rate of decay of the repair, β, supposedly reflect intrinsic properties of the organisms. For example, these are the parameters that would account for genetic differences in longevity in different populations. The amount of variation of longevity that can be attributed to genetic factors (i.e., heritability) has been shown to be in the order of 25 percent [31, 32]. If changes in μ0 or in β best account for these inheritable differences in longevity is not known. However, by comparing mortality rates of a population selected, on the basis of family data, to have longer life span, to rates from a population selected to have shorter life span, this question can be investigated empirically. Indeed, the second conjecture is:

  • C2 The differences in mortality rates between two populations selected to have long and short life spans, respectively, can be accounted for by a change in μ0.

This conjecture can be tested on data from twin studies, for example by comparing mortality rates of those who had a twin sibling that died after reaching a given age (80 years say) with those who’s twin siblings died before this age.

Relations to previous work

A number of model systems previously described also generate mortality rates that increase more-or-less exponentially with age [e.g., 26, 3337]. From a mathematical point of view, several of these models are similar to the ones presented here in that they also model a state variable that changes due to stochastic perturbations and the system dies when the state variable exceeds some given level. In fact, one of the models considered by Sacher and Trucco [33] is a one-dimensional Brownian motion with two absorbing boundaries, very similar, in kind, to the reflected Brownian motion mentioned above. However, the continuous formulation of that, and other, models makes it harder to interpret the model parameters in an intuitive way. For example, in the models that are formulated in terms of diffusion equations [33, 35] there is no natural connection between the drift term and the diffusion term. In the queuing framework suggested here, these terms are intrinsically connected since they are derived from a common underlying model. Furthermore, the discrete queuing-based models considered here arguably provide a simpler explanation for the exponential relation between age and mortality rates.

All these models, both previously described and the ones introduced in this work, are abstract in the sense of not being committed to any real system, and therefore it is not very meaningful to compare them in terms of “best fitting the data” (most of them will fit mortality data equally well), and the choice of model should instead be dictated by other criteria such as interpretability and usefulness as a tool to understand and explain data. I hope that the relative simplicity of the model systems introduced here, together with the ease at which they can be analyzed, understood, and fit to data, are convincing arguments for them to become useful complements to existing models.

In the present model there is a state variable, the accumulated damage, Q(t), the value of which determines the probability of dying. What this state variable might correspond to in a real aging organism remains to be determined. However, it is clear that it would have to be a summary measure somehow capturing the state of the organism at a given time point. Interestingly, there is a substantial body of work from Mitnitski, Rockwood and colleagues highly related to this issue. In a series of papers they have introduced and evaluated what they refer to as a “frailty index”, a composite measure of frailty, computed from a large number of frailty indicators [e.g., 10, 38, 39]. They have shown that the frailty index predicts mortality with higher accuracy than age alone, and have suggested that it could serve as a proxy for biological age Mitnitski Rockwood2015. In modeling work from the same group, they have used a framework very similar to the one proposed here to model how the frailty index evolves over time [10, 40]. In particular, they use the average queue length to represent the frailty index. Future work should explore the connection between Q(t) and frailty index in more detail.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. Comparison with numerical simulations.

(PDF)

S1 File. Data and code for Fig 6.

(ZIP)

S1 Fig

(ZIP)

Acknowledgments

I thank Ylva Almquist for helping me acquiring the Swedish mortality data and Sveriges Släktforskarförbund for letting me use data from Dödboken.

Data Availability

All relevant data are available within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was partly financed by a grant from Statens institutionsstyrelse with number 2.6.1-1134-2017. There was no additional external funding received for this study.

References

  • 1. Comfort A. Time, Cells, and aging. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston; 1964. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Strehler BL. Time, Cells, and aging. 2nd ed New York: Academic Press; 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gompertz B. On the Nature of the Function Expressive of the Law of Human Mortality, and on a New Mode of Determining the Value of Life Contingencies. Philos Trans Royal Soc. 1825;115:513–583. 10.1098/rstl.1825.0026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Olshansky S, Carnes B. Ever since Gompertz. Demography. 1997;34(1):1–15. 10.2307/2061656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kirkwood TBL. Deciphering death: a commentary on Gompertz (1825) ‘On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies’. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2015;370(1666). 10.1098/rstb.2014.0379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Johnson TE. Increased Life-Span of age-I Mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans and Lower Gompertz Rate of Aging. Science. 1990;249:908–912. 10.1126/science.2392681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Statistics Sweden. Cohort mortality in Sweden. Mortality statistics since 1861; 2010.
  • 8. Kirkwood T. Understanding the odd science of aging. Cell. 2005;120(4):437–447. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The Hallmarks of Aging. Cell. 2013;153(6):1194–1217. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Aging as a Process of Deficit Accumulation: Its Utility and Origin In: Yashin A, Jazwinski S, editors. Aging and Health—A Systems Biology Perspective. vol. 40 Basel: Karger; 2015. p. 85–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ogrodnik M, Salmonowicz H, Gladyshev VN. Integrating cellular senescence with the concept of damage accumulation in aging: Relevance for clearance of senescent cells. Aging Cell. 2019;18(1). 10.1111/acel.12841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gorbunova V, Seluanov A, Mao Z, Hine C. Changes in DNA repair during aging. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(22):7466–7474. 10.1093/nar/gkm756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Nicolai S, Rossi A, Di Daniele N, Melino G, Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli M, Raschella G. DNA repair and aging: the impact of the p53 family. AGING-US. 2015;7(12):1050–1065. 10.18632/aging.100858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gross D, Shortie JF, Thompson JM, Harris CM. Fundamentals of Queueing Theory. 4th ed Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Abate J, Whitt W. Transient behavior of the M/M/1 queue: starting at the origin. Queuing Syst. 1987;2:41–65. 10.1007/BF01182933 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis Failure Time Data. 2nd ed Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Newell G. Applications of Queueing Theory. 2nd ed London: Chapman & Hall; 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Vaupel J, Manton K, Stallard E. Impact Of Heterogeneity In Individual Frailty On The Dynamics Of Mortality. Demography. 1979;16(3):439–454. 10.2307/2061224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Vaupel JW, Missov TI. Unobserved population heterogeneity: A review of formal relationships. Demogr Res. 2014;31:659–686. 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.22 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Yashin A, Vaupel J, Iachine I. A Duality In Aging—The Equivalence Of Mortality Models Based On Radically Different Concepts. Mech Ageing Dev. 1994;74(1-2):1–14. 10.1016/0047-6374(94)90094-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; 2016. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
  • 22. Hemminki E, Paakkulainen A. The Effect of Antibiotics on Mortality From Infectious Diseases In Sweden and Finland. Am J Public Health. 1976;66:1180–1184. 10.2105/ajph.66.12.1180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Svenska Gallup Institutet AB. Svenska folkets tobaksvanor. Stockholm: AB Svenska Tobaksmonopolet; 1955.
  • 24.Socialstyrelsen. Tobaksvanor i Sverige. Socialstyrelsen; 1986. 1986:9.
  • 25. Gavrilov LA, Gavrilova NS. New Trend in Old-Age Mortality: Gompertzialization of Mortality Trajectory. Gerontology. 2019;65(5):451–457. 10.1159/000500141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Strehler B, Mildvan A. General Theory Of Mortality And Aging. Science. 1960;132(3418):14–21. 10.1126/science.132.3418.14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Burger O, Missov TI. Evolutionary theory of ageing and the problem of correlated Gompertz parameters. J Theor Biol. 2016;408:34–41. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Newell G. Queues With Time-Dependent Arrival Rates. I. Transition Through Saturation. J Appl Probab. 1968;5(2):436–451. 10.1017/S0021900200110113 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Rau R. Seasonality in Human Mortality: A Demographic Approach. Berlin: Springer; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ledberg A. A large decrease in the magnitude of seasonal fluctuations in mortality explains part of the increase in longevity in Sweden during the 20th century. medRxiv. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31. Herskind A, McGue M, Holm N, Sorensen T, Harvald B, Vaupel J. The heritability of human longevity: A population-based study of 2872 Danish twin pairs born 1870-1900. Hum Genet. 1996;97(3):319–323. 10.1007/BF02185763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Hjelmborg J, Iachine I, Skytthe A, Vaupel J, Mcgue M, Koskenvuo M, et al. Genetic influence on human lifespan and longevity. Human Genetics. 2006;119(3):312–321. 10.1007/s00439-006-0144-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sacher G, Trucco E. Stochastic Theory Of Mortality. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1962;96(4):985–1007. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb54116.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Brown K, Forbes W. Mathematical-Model Of Aging Processes. J Gerontol. 1974;29(1):46–51. 10.1093/geronj/29.1.46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Woodbury M, Manton K. Random-Walk Model Of Human Mortality And Aging. Theor Popul Biol. 1977;11(1):37–48. 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90005-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Economos AC. Rate of aging, rate of dying and the mechanism of mortality. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1982;1:3–27. 10.1016/0167-4943(82)90003-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Gavrilov L, Gavrilova N. The reliability theory of aging and longevity. J Theor Biol. 2001;213(4):527–545. 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Mitnitski A, Song X, Skoog I, Broe G, Cox J, Grunfeld E, et al. Relative fitness and frailty of elderly men and women in developed countries and their relationship with mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(12):2184–2189. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00506.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan D, McDowell I, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Can Med Assoc J. 2005;173(5):489–495. 10.1503/cmaj.050051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Mitnitski A, Song X, Rockwood K. Assessing biological aging: the origin of deficit accumulation. Biogerontology. 2013;14(6, SI):709–717. 10.1007/s10522-013-9446-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez

20 Apr 2020

PONE-D-20-04967

Exponential increase in mortality with age is a generic property of a simple model system of damage accumulation and death

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Ledberg,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. As suggested by a reviewer we would like you to consider  and discuss a practical application of the knowledge gained by your modelling approach. We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jun 04 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

1. Thank you for including your funding statement; "This research was partly financed by a grant from SiS with number 2.6.1-1134-2017."

Please provide an amended statement that declares *all* the funding or sources of support (whether external or internal to your organization) received during this study, as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now.  Please also include the statement “There was no additional external funding received for this study.” in your updated Funding Statement.

Please include your amended Funding Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

3. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 1 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I like the idea that the Gompertz law reflects a generic property of a rather simple model of damage accumulation leading to death. I also like the idea to include the rate of repair in the model and do so in the framework of the stochastic queuing theory. I particularly like the idea that damage can be modeled by the length of the queue (look at some references below). However, I have several essential comments that if accounted might increase the quality of the manuscript.

First, several critical references are missed. (1) Assessing biological aging: the origin of deficit accumulation. Mitnitski A, Song X, Rockwood K. Biogerontology. 2013 Dec;14(6):709-17. doi: 10.1007/s10522-013-9446-3. Epub 2013 Jul 17. (2) Aging as a process of deficit accumulation: its utility and origin. Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Interdiscip Top Gerontol. 2015;40:85-98. doi: 10.1159/000364933. Epub 2014 Oct 13. Review. The model deals with the mean values (in difference with your approach) but I think that what you suggested is quite important although it will be even more important to make it more transparent for the geroscience audience. Perhaps it will be easier for theoretical biologists to understand the matter.

Another useful reference (although not directly related to the model but relevant for the context) is Kirkwood TB, Deciphering death: a commentary on Gompertz (1825) 'On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies'. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Apr 19;370(1666). pii: 20140379. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0379.

Perhaps you would update the section 7.2 tasking into account the references above.

Second, it is not clear to me how essential is the introduction of the threshold of the equation for death, although you introduced a soft threshold in appendix B. Wouldn’t be enough to use the hazard as a function of damage, not age?

Finally, you payed considerable attention to the conditions and the role of the stationary distribution in describing the damage accumulation. Indeed, in the models, the very existence of such distribution depends on the traffic intensity which has to be less than 1. I would like to attract your attention to the idea of using a quasi-stationary distribution- when the parameter changes slowly (the aging process is slow comparing to the fast process of relaxation (repair) – a way usually employed in such situations in many applications in physics and engineering. Actually, you have mentioned that in one way or other and that is why numeric simulation is important.

Reviewer #2: Honestly, this is a very difficult paper for me to review. Of course I'm intimately familiar with the underlying premise of the paper, which is that the dying out process of living things like humans, follows a characteristic path that was identified almost 200 years ago. You use mathematical modeling to address four basic principles: mortality risk is associated with the rate of damaging accumulation in the body (one of the basic ideas in our field that's been around for decades); living things evolved mechanisms for addressing this accumulated damage -- which is to repair it with some level of efficiency (repair can be to DNA or other systems); there is some initial rate of repair parameter that can be identified; and of course the repair mechanism itself ages or becomes less efficient as time passes or as the organism grows older. The idea itself is not new, but what you did was develop a purely mathematical model describing these four parameters, and then applied this to data from Sweden -- looking at two different birth cohorts to illustrate its utility. Truth be told, the math is beyond my comprehension, so I can't even comment on it -- there are other mathematical demographers that are more well suited to addressing the issue of whether the math is correct. What caught my attention here was the use of a purely mathematical model to describe an inherently biological phenomenon. This is my personal bias, and I see the utility in creating a mathematical model of the dying out process that avoids any direct connection to the mechanisms underlying the processes being observed, but then I ask myself what I've learned from this exercise. The answer is that math can, at times, be used to simplify and help understand an incredibly complex phenomenon such as biological aging. There are two things that I would have liked to have seen done with this, assuming that the math is right of course. The first is to place this mathematical model within the context of the evolutionary theory of senescence. In this regard, one would be trying to understand WHY different species have different repair capacities, and why different repair capacities and accumulated damage can be exhibited in cohorts of people born in different eras. The answer may be found in a single word -- reproduction. If duration of life is calibrated to elements of the reproductive life history of the species, then the accumulation of damage and the efficiency of the repair mechanisms and the aging of the repair mechanisms, are all calibrated life history traits that are fundamentally driven by the level of hostility in the environment. What I'm saying here is that the author is missing the big picture. Can papers like this be published without the big picture? Sure. But the problem is that it does not do much to advance the field of aging science. Again, this is my personal bias, and I don't think scientists should be penalized for not knowing the big picture when their primary goal is to simplify the big picture in the form of mathematical equations. The second thing I would like to have seen is to have you speculate on how these systems might be artificially manipulated by aging science. Researchers are trying to find a way to intervene in these processes, and the question that might be answered by this model is which of the various mechanisms in operation that influence duration of life, would be the best targets to intervene. Should we focus on the rate of repair; the aging of the repair mechanisms; addressing non-stochastic aging related events; what exactly does this tell us about what might work best? What I'm looking for here is a practical application of the knowledge gained by models like this.

Without a link to underlying mechanisms driving the entire process of aging, and without some use case, this appears as little more than an effort to generate equations to describe a biological phenomenon. Once again, there is a place for this in science of course, so I'm just letting you know what my personal bias is here. Published in its current form, the ideas will just vaporize into thin air as a mathematical exercise.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Arnold Mitnitski

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez

5 May 2020

Exponential increase in mortality with age is a generic property of a simple model system of damage accumulation and death

PONE-D-20-04967R1

Dear Dr. Ledberg,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for accounting for my comments/ concerns. I believe that the manuscript improved sufficiently. I generally like it and see potentials of further investigations.

Reviewer #2: I have no additional suggested changes to the manuscript, although I would encourage the author to familiarize himself with the literature on the evolutionary biology of aging. I believe he will find this particularly enlightening given that the actuarial and biological sciences addressed this same issue roughly 125 years apart, and the only reason evolutionary biologists didn't know about the work of Gompertz was because they didn't bother to look for it. Once you read the works of Medawar and Williams, I believe you'll be shocked at how the underlying biological mechanisms of what you're observing mathematically, were identified more than 70 years ago.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Arnold Mitnitski

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez

14 May 2020

PONE-D-20-04967R1

Exponential increase in mortality with age is a generic property of a simple model system of damage accumulation and death

Dear Dr. Ledberg:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Appendix. Comparison with numerical simulations.

    (PDF)

    S1 File. Data and code for Fig 6.

    (ZIP)

    S1 Fig

    (ZIP)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response_to_reviewers.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are available within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES