Skip to main content
Nutrients logoLink to Nutrients
. 2020 Apr 30;12(5):1271. doi: 10.3390/nu12051271

Elevated Glucose and Insulin Levels Decrease DHA Transfer across Human Trophoblasts via SIRT1-Dependent Mechanism

Jay S Mishra 1, Hanjie Zhao 1, Sari Hattis 1, Sathish Kumar 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC7284516  PMID: 32365792

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) results in reduced docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) transfer to the fetus, likely due to placental dysfunction. Sirtuin-1 (SIRT1) is a nutrient sensor and regulator of lipid metabolism. This study investigated whether the high glucose and insulin condition of GDM regulates DHA transfer and expression of fatty acid transporters and if this effect is related to SIRT1 expression and function. Syncytialized primary human trophoblasts were treated with and without glucose (25 mmol/L) and insulin (10−7 mol/L) for 72 h to mimic the insulin-resistance conditions of GDM pregnancies. In control conditions, DHA transfer across trophoblasts increased in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Exposure to GDM conditions significantly decreased DHA transfer, but increased triglyceride accumulation and fatty acid transporter expression (CD36, FABP3, and FABP4). GDM conditions significantly suppressed SIRT1 mRNA and protein expression. The SIRT1 inhibitor decreased DHA transfer across control trophoblasts, and recombinant SIRT1 and SIRT1 activators restored the decreased DHA transport induced by GDM conditions. The results demonstrate a novel role of SIRT1 in the regulation of DHA transfer across trophoblasts. The suppressed SIRT1 expression and the resultant decrease in placental DHA transfer caused by high glucose and insulin levels suggest new insights of molecular mechanisms linking GDM to fetal DHA deficiency.

Keywords: gestational diabetes, DHA, fatty acid transport, lipid metabolism, CD36, FABP3, FABP4, SIRT1, trophoblast

1. Introduction

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic disorder affecting 5–20% of all pregnancies, depending on the diagnosis method and ethnicity [1]. GDM is characterized by glucose intolerance diagnosed for the first time during pregnancy caused due to reduced responsiveness to insulin [2]. This insulin resistance (IR) induces alterations in lipid metabolism leading to dyslipidemia in GDM women [3]. GDM increases perinatal morbidity and increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus later in life [4,5,6]. Moreover, children born to mothers with poor gestational glucose control suffer neurobehavioral and cognitive dysfunction compared to children born to non-diabetic women [7,8].

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6 n − 3) is a long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid that is essential for neurogenesis and brain development during the early stages of fetal life [9,10]. The neurodevelopmental dysfunctions observed in children of mothers with GDM is suggested to be as a result of lower DHA transfer from the mother to the fetus [11,12]. Maternal DHA is the main source of DHA for the fetus, as the fetus and placenta have little or no ability to synthesize DHA [13]. The placenta can preferentially uptake DHA from the maternal circulation and transfer it to the fetus, and this is shown by higher DHA levels in cord blood than maternal circulation [14].

Seven out of nine case-controlled studies show that cord blood levels of DHA are lower in GDM pregnancies than in non-diabetic pregnancies [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Specifically, maternal DHA levels are found to be 11–44% higher in GDM, while cord blood levels are lower compared to non-diabetic pregnancies [24]. Supplementation of DHA in GDM women increased DHA in maternal plasma but failed to increase DHA in cord blood [25]. Collectively, these observations indicate reduced transplacental transport of DHA to the fetus in GDM. The exact mechanism for the reduced placental transport of DHA in GDM pregnancies is not clear. Specifically, how IR affects DHA transport across syncytiotrophoblasts, the primary barrier between maternal and fetal circulations, is not well understood. The transport of fatty acid through the syncytiotrophoblasts is regulated by many proteins, such as fatty acid transport proteins (FATP)-1-6, cluster of differentiation 36 (CD-36), and fatty acid-binding proteins (FABP) -1, 3, 4, 5, 7 [26]. In the GDM placenta, the expression of FATP-1 and FATP-4 were found to be decreased, while the expression of CD36 and FATP6 was increased compared to nondiabetic pregnancies [27].

Sirtuin1 (SIRT1) is a ubiquitously-expressed nutrient sensor, which closely correlates with lipid metabolism and metabolic fluxes [28,29]. The expression of SIRT1 is found to be downregulated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of individuals with impaired glucose tolerance [30,31]. In vitro cell culture studies and animal experiments demonstrate that SIRT1 deficiency in hepatocytes induces lipid deposition and fatty liver disease [32,33]. Conversely, SIRT1 activation/overexpression protected against lipid accumulation and steatosis [34]. This suggests that the expression and function of SIRT1 directly relates to lipid metabolism. SIRT1 is highly expressed in trophoblasts [35], and Sirt1-null embryos are consistently growth-restricted [36,37,38]; however, its regulatory role in placental nutrient transport is yet to be studied. In this study, we investigated SIRT1’s role in placental nutrient transport, with a focus on transcellular DHA transport in trophoblasts from normal and insulin-resistant GDM conditions. We hypothesized that the high glucose and insulin condition of GDM regulates DHA transfer and expression of fatty acid transporters and that this effect is related to SIRT1 expression and function. This study, using primary human trophoblasts for the first time, shows that the GDM conditions induce the accumulation of triglycerides and increase the expression of fatty acid transporters. Yet, the DHA transfer across the trophoblasts was significantly reduced. The suppressed SIRT1 expression caused by GDM conditions plays a role in contributing to the decreased DHA transfer, as SIRT1 activation restored the decreased DHA transfer caused by GDM conditions. These findings provide new insights of molecular mechanisms linking GDM to fetal DHA deficiency.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Primary Human Trophoblast Culture

Isolated primary human trophoblast cells were purchased from ScienCell (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The cells were cultured in proprietary trophoblast medium with fetal bovine serum, growth supplements, and antibiotics (penicillin/streptomycin) (ScienCell) in a humidified incubator under a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. Trophoblasts were seeded at a density of 0.5 × 106 cells/cm2 and 0.1 × 106 cells/cm2 in 6-well plates or 12-well Transwell plates coated with human placental collagen (0.01% w/v). The medium was replenished every day for seven days to allow syncytialization of cells, which was confirmed by hPL and hCG mRNA expression and secretion of hCG, as described previously [39,40]. The insulin-resistant GDM trophoblast cell model was established by treating day four culture with 25-mmol/L glucose and 10−7-mol/L insulin for 72 h, as described previously [41]. Control cells were cultured with physiological glucose concentrations (5 mmol/L) and no insulin. The development of IR was evaluated by examining the mRNA expression of IR-related genes (IRS-1, IGF-1/2 and leptin). Changes in DHA transport across trophoblasts, triglyceride content, and fatty acid transporter mRNA and protein expression were measured and compared between cells cultured under standard (control) and high glucose and insulin conditions (referred as GDM conditions).

2.2. Transport of DHA across Trophoblasts

The transcellular DHA transport was assessed using 14C-DHA (Moravek Inc., Brea, CA, USA) in trophoblasts grown on Transwell inserts. 14C-DHA was added to the apical compartment (“maternal side”), and their transfer across the trophoblast monolayer to the basal chamber (“fetal side”) was measured by collecting medium samples from the basal chamber at specific time points. The samples were mixed with 5 mL of the scintillation cocktail (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA), and radioactivity was measured using a Tri-carb 2100TR Liquid Scintillation Counter (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Trans-epithelial electrical resistance values and barrier integrity of trophoblast layers were monitored before and after the experiment using a Millicell ERS-2 Volt-Ohm Meter (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) [40]. The permeability properties across the trophoblast monolayer were evaluated by measuring the passage of the fluorescence dye Lucifer yellow (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) [40]. In some experiments, the cells were treated with SIRT1 inhibitor (EX527, 1 µmol/L), recombinant SIRT1 (500 ng/L), or SIRT1 activator (SIRT1729, 1 µmol/L) for 24 h, and then the 14C-DHA transfer assay was done.

2.3. Quantification of Triglycerides

Intracellular triglyceride levels were quantified using a colorimetric assay that is based on enzymatic hydrolysis of the triglycerides to produce glycerol and free fatty acids, following manufacturer’s instructions (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The triglyceride content was normalized to the protein content that was measured using the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted as per the manufacturer’s instructions (RNeasy mini kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). RNA integrity and quantity were determined using a DS-11 spectrophotometer (DeNovix, Wilmington, DE, USA). Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed using an iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). After dilution, cDNA corresponding to 100 ng of RNA was amplified by qRT-PCR using a CFX96 real-time thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) with Lightcycler Fast-Start DNA Sybr Green 1 master mix (Roche, Branford, CT, USA). Primers were designed to analyze genes related to IR: (IRS-1, IGF-1/2 and leptin); fatty acid transporters: FAT/CD36, FATP1, FATP2, FATP4, FATP6, FABP3, and FABP4; and SIRT1. Primer sequences are shown in Table 1. The 2−ΔΔCT method was used for calculation, and the results were expressed as fold change of the gene of interest in treated versus control samples. All reactions were performed in duplicate, and GAPDH was used as an internal control.

Table 1.

Quantitative real-time PCR primer sequence.

Gene Forward Reverse
IRS-1 TGGGGACTACAAGGTAGGGG ATGCCACCTGGCTGAATGAA
IGF-1 AGAGCCTGCGCAATGGAATA GAGATGCGAGGAGGACATGG
IGF-2 ACACCCTCCAGTTCGTCTGT GGGGTATCTTGGGGAAGTTGT
Leptin GCTGGAGAAGCTCACCCAAT CAAAGTGCAAGCAGGGTTCC
FAT/CD36 TTGGAGACCTGCTTATCCAGAAGACAATT AAACTGTCTGTAAACTTCTGTGCCTGTTTTAAC
FAT/P1 TGTCTCATCTATGGGCTGACAGTCG GTACTGAACCACCGTGCAGTTGTACT
FAT/P2 CGTCACTGTCATTCAGTATATCGGTGAAC ATTTCCCAGTGCCAGTCTCACTTTATGA
FAT/P4 TCTTTGGCAGCGAAATGGCCTCAG AGAGCAGAAGAGGCTGAGCGA
FAT/P6 TGGAGAACTTTGTCGCTACCTTTGCAAA CACTCCGTATGCCATTTCCAATTGCC
FABP3 TGAGACAACAGCAGATGACAGGAAGG ATCAATTAGCTCCCGCACAAGTGTG
FABP4 GGTACCTGGAAACTTGTCTCCAGTGA TCACATCCCCATTCACACTGATGATCATG
SIRT1 TCTTCCCTCAAAGTAAGACCAGTAGCACTA CTACATCAAAATGCAGATGAGGCAAAGGT

2.5. Western Blotting

The cells were washed, scraped, harvested by microcentrifugation, and resuspended in an ice-cold RIPA buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) containing a protease inhibitor tablet and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail-2 and -3 (Sigma). Cell lysates were centrifuged (14,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C), and the BCA assay kit (Pierce) was used to quantify protein concentration. The supernatant was resuspended in NuPAGE lithium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer and reducing agent (Invitrogen; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Proteins (30 μg) were mixed with NuPAGE lithium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer and reducing agent (Invitrogen; Thermo Scientific) and resolved on 4–12% gradient NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen) at 100 V for 2–3 h at room temperature alongside negative control and Precision Plus Standard (Kaleidoscope; Bio-Rad). After separation on the gel, proteins were transferred onto Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) at 100 V for 2 h. The membrane was blocked with 5% (wt/vol) nonfat dried milk for 1 h at room temperature. Blots were incubated overnight at 4 °C with respective primary antibodies against CD36, FABP3, FABP4, SIRT1 and β-actin (Cell Signaling Technologies or Sigma), and then for one hour with secondary antibody (anti-rabbit conjugated with horseradish peroxidase) prior to development with the Pierce ECL detection kits (Thermo Scientific). The densitometric analysis was done using Image J software. The results were expressed as ratios of the intensity of a specific band to that of β-actin.

2.6. Data Analysis

GraphPad Prism was used for Statistical analyses (San Diego, CA, USA). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. The two groups were compared using unpaired Student t-tests. Multiple group comparisons were performed using ANOVA, followed by Newman–Keuls tests. Repeated measures of ANOVA were done for experiments performed over time. Statistically significant differences were reported when p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of GDM Conditions on the Expression of IR-Related Genes in Trophoblasts

Consistent with previous studies [41], incubation of trophoblasts with glucose (25 mmol/L) and insulin (10−7 mol/L) caused IR, as evidenced by significant alterations (p < 0.05) in the expression of IR-related genes. Exposure to GDM conditions inhibited insulin signaling, as evidenced by the downregulation of IRS-1 (37% decrease) and upregulation of IGF-1 (2-fold increase) compared with the controls (Figure 1). The placenta is an important source of leptin during pregnancy. The results indicated that leptin expression was significantly increased in the IR trophoblasts (1.4-fold of the control), which could explain the high serum leptin level in GDM patients (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Changes in mRNA levels of genes related to insulin signaling in trophoblasts exposed to control and GDM conditions. Primary human trophoblasts were cultured in standard conditions or medium containing 25-mmol/L glucose and 10−7-mol/L insulin for 72 h, and real-time PCR was used to assess gene expression. Values are expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. control.

3.2. Effect of GDM Conditions on DHA Transport across Trophoblasts

We next evaluated the rate of transport of DHA across the trophoblasts exposed to control and GDM conditions. In controls, 14C-DHA (1 µCi/mL) was found to transfer across the trophoblast monolayer in a time-dependent manner with a maximal effect observed at 24 h (p < 0.05) (Figure 2a). Furthermore, the 14C-DHA transfer rates across the trophoblasts increased with increasing concentrations of 14C-DHA added to the apical side (p < 0.05) (Figure 2b). In contrast, 14C-DHA transport rates across the trophoblasts were significantly reduced (p < 0.05) in the trophoblasts exposed to GDM conditions compared with trophoblasts maintained at physiological conditions (Figure 2b). GDM conditions decreased DHA transfer across trophoblasts by 15%, 23%, 28%, and 41% when 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 µCi 14C-DHA/mL were added to the apical side (Figure 2b).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Changes in DHA transfer through the trophoblasts exposed to control and GDM conditions. Primary human trophoblasts were cultured in Transwell inserts in standard conditions or with medium containing 25-mmol/L glucose and 10−7-mol/L insulin for 72 h. Transfer of 14C-DHA from the apical to the basal chamber was measured using liquid scintillation counting. (a) Time-dependent increase in the transfer of 14C-DHA (1 μCi/mL) to the basal chamber. * p < 0.05 vs. zero time point. (b) Dose-dependent transfer of 14C-DHA to the basal chamber after 24 h. * p < 0.05 vs. respective time point in control. Values are expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments.

3.3. Intracellular Triglyceride Levels

We then sought to confirm whether the lipid metabolism is altered in trophoblasts exposed to GDM conditions by assessing the effect on triglyceride content in trophoblasts. The data presented in Figure 3 shows that GDM conditions promote triglyceride accumulation in trophoblasts; levels were 2-fold greater (p < 0.05) in trophoblasts exposed to GDM conditions versus trophoblasts maintained at physiological conditions.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Changes in triglyceride content in the trophoblasts exposed to control and GDM conditions. Primary human trophoblasts were cultured in standard conditions or with medium containing 25-mmol/L glucose and 10−7-mol/L insulin for 72 h. The intracellular triglyceride level in the cells was quantified with a colorimetric assay. Values are expressed as means ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. control.

3.4. Expression of Fatty Acid Transport Genes in Trophoblasts

Next, we investigated whether the GDM conditions-mediated decrease in DHA transfer and increase in intracellular triglyceride levels in trophoblasts was a consequence of an altered uptake or transport of fatty acids. To determine the effect of GDM conditions on fatty acid uptake and transport in trophoblasts, we compared mRNA expression of the key genes involved in these processes. The results showed that mRNA levels of genes for fatty acid uptake and transport, such as CD36, FABP3, and FABP4, were significantly increased in trophoblasts from GDM conditions (1.3-, 1.6-, and 1.9-fold, respectively) compared with controls (p < 0.05) (Figure 4a). Consistent with elevated mRNA levels, immunoblotting also revealed a significant increase in CD36 (1.2-fold), FABP3 (1.2-fold), and FABP4 (1.6-fold) protein in trophoblasts from GDM conditions compared with controls (p < 0.05) (Figure 4b). Protein expression of FABP3 and FABP4 in trophoblasts from GDM conditions were negatively correlated with DHA transport.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Changes in mRNA and protein levels of genes related to fatty acid transport in the trophoblasts exposed to control and GDM conditions. Primary human trophoblasts were cultured in standard conditions or with medium containing 25-mmol/L glucose and 10−7-mol/L insulin for 72 h. (a) Real-time PCR was used to assess mRNA levels, and quantitation of mRNA expression was normalized relative to GAPDH. (b) Western blotting was used for protein quantification. Representative blots for proteins are shown at the lefr; blot densities obtained from densitometric scanning of proteins normalized to β-actin are shown at the right. Values are expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. control.

3.5. Effect of GDM Conditions on SIRT1 Expression

SIRT1 is an enzyme that regulates cellular lipid metabolism. SIRT1 expression and activity are increased under fasting or calorie restricted conditions and attenuated by a high energy environment [42,43]. SIRT1 mRNA and protein levels were significantly reduced by 30% and 68%, respectively, in the trophoblasts from GDM conditions relative to controls (p < 0.05) (Figure 5a,b), which indicates that IR reduces SIRT1 expression in trophoblasts.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Changes in mRNA and protein levels of SIRT1 in the trophoblasts exposed to control and GDM conditions. Primary human trophoblasts were cultured in standard conditions or with medium containing 25-mmol/L glucose and 10−7-mol/L insulin for 72 h. (a) Real-time PCR was used to measure SIRT1 mRNA levels. (b) Western blotting was used for the quantification of SIRT1 protein. Representative blots for SIRT1 is shown at the top; blot density obtained from densitometric scanning of SIRT1 normalized to β-actin is shown at the bottom. Values are given as means ± SD three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. control.

3.6. Effect of SIRT1 Expression on DHA Transport

We next studied the regulatory effect of SIRT1 on DHA transport capacity in trophoblasts. To verify the role of decreased SIRT1, we treated trophoblasts cultured under standard conditions with a SIRT1 inhibitor (EX527, 1 µmol/L). Significantly reduced levels of DHA transport across the trophoblasts were found in EX527-treated trophoblasts (41% decrease) compared with the vehicle-treated trophoblasts in control conditions (Figure 6), indicating that SIRT1 facilitates DHA transport. EX527 treatment did not alter DHA transport in trophoblasts from GDM conditions.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effect of SIRT1 on DHA transfer through the trophoblasts exposed to control and GDM conditions. Primary human trophoblasts were cultured in Transwell inserts in standard conditions or with medium containing 25-mmol/L glucose and 10−7-mol/L insulin for 72 h. Cells cultured in control conditions were treated with SIRT1 inhibitor (EX527, 1 µmol/L) for 24 h. Cells cultured under GDM conditions were treated with recombinant SIRT1 (50 ng/L) or SIRT1 activator (SIRT1729, 1 µmol/L) for 24 h. Transfer of 14C-DHA (1 μCi/mL) from the apical to the basal chamber was measured using liquid scintillation counting. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. vehicle in control conditions. # p < 0.05 vs. vehicle in GDM conditions.

3.7. Effect of SIRT1 on DHA Transport in GDM Conditions

To further study the effect of SIRT1 in trophoblasts from GDM conditions, we treated these cells with the SIRT1 activator (SIRT1720, 1 µmol/L) and recombinant SIRT1 (50 ng/L). As shown in Figure 6, significantly increased DHA transport levels were found in SIRT1720-treated trophoblasts from GDM conditions. Similarly, enhanced DHA transport was observed in recombinant SIRT1-treated cells (Figure 6). SIRT1 and SRT1720 did not significantly alter DHA transport in control trophoblasts. Together, these studies demonstrate that SIRT1 restores DHA transfer across trophoblasts during GDM conditions.

4. Discussion

This study, for the first time, investigated the impact of insulin-resistant GDM conditions on DHA transport across primary human (syncytio)trophoblasts. Our study demonstrates that elevated glucose and insulin levels decrease DHA transfer across trophoblasts despite increased triglyceride accumulation and increased expression of fatty acid transporter genes. The reduced DHA transfer was associated with decreased SIRT1 expression in the trophoblasts. Inhibition of SIRT1 decreased DHA transport in control trophoblasts, while activation of SIRT1 restored DHA transfer in trophoblasts exposed to GDM conditions. Therefore, we suggest that SIRT1 plays an important role in the regulation of DHA transport across the placenta, and the suppressed SIRT1 expression and function might contribute to reduced transplacental transfer of DHA during GDM pregnancies.

GDM is characterized by IR in peripheral tissues [44], but few studies have examined how IR could alter placental nutrient transport. The patients with GDM have severe glucose intolerance with associated maternal hyperglycemia and insulinemia [45]. During GDM, the glucose transport through the placenta is unaffected as GLUT-1, the main carrier of glucose through the placenta, acts independent of insulin [46]. Thus, maternal hyperglycemia leads to fetal hyperglycemia, which then results in fetal hyperinsulinemia [47].

In contrast, knowledge on adaptations of placental fatty acid metabolism in response to GDM is sparse. Insulin receptors are expressed in the placenta, and maternal insulin can activate the insulin receptor-related signaling, thus affecting placental metabolism [48]. In this study, exposure of trophoblasts to elevated glucose and insulin levels to mimic the state of the cells in the GDM placentas, induced an effect that is reminiscent of IR with decreased IRS-1 and increased IGF1 and leptin mRNA, similar to that established in BeWo trophoblast cells [41]. Our finding of decreased DHA transport through trophoblasts exposed to GDM conditions indicates that IR can directly compromise the ability of trophoblasts to transport DHA through them. These findings corroborate previous reports relating to reduced DHA transport in placentas from women with GDM [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].

Trophoblasts cultured in GDM conditions had higher triglyceride content, suggesting that under such circumstances, there is increased fatty acid esterification for the storage of fatty acids in the form of triglycerides. We found a higher expression of CD36 in trophoblast from GDM conditions. The higher CD36 indicates increased uptake of DHA and other fatty acids from the maternal circulation into the trophoblasts [49]. The fatty acids that are present in the serum used for culturing could have been taken up by the trophoblasts and esterified for storage in the form of triglycerides in GDM conditions. The finding of increased CD36 expression and higher triglyceride content in trophoblasts exposed to GDM conditions is similar to that observed in the placenta from GDM patients [27,50,51].

The expression of FABP3 and FABP4 were increased in trophoblasts from GDM conditions. FABP3 and FABP4 are among the major fatty acid-binding proteins that function as intracellular lipid chaperones to shuttle fatty acids from the maternal side of the plasma membrane to target organelles (i.e., to mitochondria for oxidation and for storage as lipid droplets) or to the basal side of the membrane for delivery to the fetus [52,53,54]. FABP3 and FABP4 have been shown to have a higher binding affinity to DHA and other long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids [55,56]. The knockdown of FABP3 decreased DHA transport across BeWo trophoblasts [52]. Thus, increased expression of FABP3 is expected to enhance the transport of DHA across the trophoblast cells. However, it is surprising why DHA transport decreased despite increased FABP3 and FABP4 expression in trophoblasts from GDM conditions. Oxidative stress is known to reduce the binding affinity of FABP4 to DHA [55]. Since GDM conditions are known to induce oxidative stress, this could compromise the ability of FABP3 and FABP4 to bind with DHA and shuttle them to the fetal side. Another possibility is that increased FABP3 and FABP4 may preferentially direct fatty acids for deposition into lipid droplets. This notion is supported by the reports of FABP4 promoting esterification and lipid accumulation in trophoblasts [57], macrophages [58], and cardiomyocytes [59]. Another underlying question is what contributes to the increased FABP3 and FABP4 expression in trophoblasts from GDM conditions. FABP4 promoter has a binding site for insulin, fatty acids, and hypoxia-inducible factor [60,61], and these are all increased in GDM conditions [45,62,63], possibly contributing to FABP3 and FABP4 promoter activation and upregulation. Consistent with our findings, increased placental FABP3 and FABP4 expression and a strong correlation of circulatory FABP4 levels with GDM have been reported [27,64].

Varied levels of FATP expression have been reported in the placenta of GDM pregnancies [27,65]. The finding of unaltered FATP1, FATP2, FATP4, and FATP6 expression in trophoblasts exposed to GDM conditions suggest that changes solely to the glucose and insulin environment are unlikely to alter the expression of these transporters. Rather, any such alterations could be the consequence of a compensatory response that occurs in an in vivo setting or maybe a response to composite changes to the metabolic milieu, including altered cytokine profile reflective of systemic inflammation in GDM [66]. Collectively, our findings of increased fatty acid transporter expression (CD36, FABP3, and FABP4), enhanced triglyceride accumulation, and concomitant reduction in DHA transport in GDM conditions suggest that the DHA is taken up by the trophoblasts and retained after esterification into triglycerides instead of being transferred to the fetus. Consistent with this notion, the placenta of GDM women are found to have higher DHA and triglycerides [51].

In search of the mechanism for the decreased DHA transport through the trophoblasts, we identified that SIRT1 expression was significantly reduced in trophoblasts exposed to GDM conditions. There have not been any studies on alterations of placental SIRT1 expression in the setting of GDM, which would be interesting to examine in the future. SIRT1 expression is highly regulated by energy status. Calorie restriction increases SIRT1 expression, and high energy status decreases SIRT1 expression [67,68]. Thus, the hyperglycemic GDM conditions could contribute to the decreased SIRT1 expression, as reported in macrophages [69]. However, the novel finding of our study is that the SIRT1 inhibitor decreased DHA transfer through trophoblasts cultured under physiological conditions. This finding suggests that SIRT1 has a direct regulatory role in controlling DHA transport across the placenta during normal pregnancy. The decreased SIRT1 expression in trophoblasts from GDM conditions indicates that the reduced DHA transfer across trophoblasts in GDM conditions could be consequent to decreased SIRT1 expression and function. Indeed, the primary role of SIRT1 mediating DHA transfer is further strengthened by our data that treatment with the recombinant SIRT1 and SIRT1 activator resulted in the enhancement of DHA transport across trophoblasts exposed to GDM conditions. It is important to note that Sirt1-null mice embryos are growth restricted with abnormalities in fetal heart development [37]. Although it is tempting to postulate that abnormal placental lipid metabolism and decreased DHA transport to the fetus in the Sirt1-null embryos as a probable cause of fetal growth restriction, additional in vivo studies are required to determine the extent to which suppressed SIRT1 expression and function contributes to this phenotype. Additionally, the exact mechanism by which SIRT1 regulates DHA transport and if SIRT1 also regulates the transport of other fatty acids needs to be clarified in the future.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that high glucose and insulin levels of the GDM environment decrease DHA transport through the trophoblasts via decreased SIRT1-mediated signaling, providing a molecular mechanism linking gestational diabetes and decreased transplacental DHA transport. Although caution should always be observed in extrapolating the findings of in vitro studies directly to humans, the present result provides a mechanistic understanding worthy of investigation in in vivo studies. Strategies that target activation of SIRT1 could have a role mitigating fatty acid dyslipidemia in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes.

Author Contributions

J.S.M. performed experimental work, data analysis and drafted the manuscript; H.Z. performed experimental validation and data curation; S.H. participated in experimental work; S.K. conceived the conception and study design, obtained funding, provided important intellectual support, and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial Support from the National Institute of Health (NIH) through grants HL119869 and HL134779, awarded to S.K., is greatly appreciated. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIH. The funding agency was not involved in the design, analysis, or interpretation of the data reported.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Summary of Revisions: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:S4–S6. doi: 10.2337/dc20-Srev. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Buchanan T.A., Xiang A., Kjos S.L., Watanabe R. What is gestational diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2007;30(Suppl. 2):S105–S111. doi: 10.2337/dc07-s201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Herrera E., Ortega-Senovilla H. Disturbances in lipid metabolism in diabetic pregnancy—Are these the cause of the problem? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010;24:515–525. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2010.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kawasaki M., Arata N., Ogawa Y. Obesity and abnormal glucose tolerance in the offspring of mothers with diabetes. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018;30:361–368. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim C., Newton K.M., Knopp R.H. Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1862–1868. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.10.1862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dabelea D., Hanson R.L., Lindsay R.S., Pettitt D.J., Imperatore G., Gabir M.M., Roumain J., Bennett P.H., Knowler W.C. Intrauterine exposure to diabetes conveys risks for type 2 diabetes and obesity: A study of discordant sibships. Diabetes. 2000;49:2208–2211. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.12.2208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rizzo T., Metzger B.E., Burns W.J., Burns K. Correlations between antepartum maternal metabolism and intelligence of offspring. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991;325:911–916. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109263251303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sousa R.A.L., Torres Y.S., Figueiredo C.P., Passos G.F., Clarke J.R. Consequences of gestational diabetes to the brain and behavior of the offspring. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2018;90:2279–2291. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201720170264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Innis S.M. Dietary (n-3) fatty acids and brain development. J. Nutr. 2007;137:855–859. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.4.855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kawakita E., Hashimoto M., Shido O. Docosahexaenoic acid promotes neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Neuroscience. 2006;139:991–997. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Devarshi P.P., Grant R.W., Ikonte C.J., Hazels Mitmesser S. Maternal Omega-3 Nutrition, Placental Transfer and Fetal Brain Development in Gestational Diabetes and Preeclampsia. Nutrients. 2019;11:1107. doi: 10.3390/nu11051107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Judge M.P., Casavant S.G., Dias J.A., McGrath J.M. Reduced DHA transfer in diabetic pregnancies: Mechanistic basis and long-term neurodevelopmental implications. Nutr. Rev. 2016;74:411–420. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuw006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gil-Sanchez A., Demmelmair H., Parrilla J.J., Koletzko B., Larque E. Mechanisms involved in the selective transfer of long chain polyunsaturated Fatty acids to the fetus. Front. Genet. 2011;2:57. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2011.00057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Berghaus T.M., Demmelmair H., Koletzko B. Essential fatty acids and their long-chain polyunsaturated metabolites in maternal and cord plasma triglycerides during late gestation. Neonatology. 2000;77:96–100. doi: 10.1159/000014201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Prieto-Sanchez M.T., Ruiz-Palacios M., Blanco-Carnero J.E., Pagan A., Hellmuth C., Uhl O., Peissner W., Ruiz-Alcaraz A.J., Parrilla J.J., Koletzko B., et al. Placental MFSD2a transporter is related to decreased DHA in cord blood of women with treated gestational diabetes. Clin. Nutr. 2017;36:513–521. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zornoza-Moreno M., Fuentes-Hernandez S., Carrion V., Alcantara-Lopez M.V., Madrid J.A., Lopez-Soler C., Sanchez-Solis M., Larque E. Is low docosahexaenoic acid associated with disturbed rhythms and neurodevelopment in offsprings of diabetic mothers? Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014;68:931–937. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yee J.K., Mao C.S., Ross M.G., Lee W.N., Desai M., Toda A., Kjos S.L., Hicks R.A., Patterson M.E. High oleic/stearic fatty-acid desaturation index in cord plasma from infants of mothers with gestational diabetes. J. Perinatol. 2014;34:357–363. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhao J.P., Levy E., Fraser W.D., Julien P., Delvin E., Montoudis A., Spahis S., Garofalo C., Nuyt A.M., Luo Z.C. Circulating docosahexaenoic acid levels are associated with fetal insulin sensitivity. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e85054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ortega-Senovilla H., Schaefer-Graf U., Meitzner K., Abou-Dakn M., Graf K., Kintscher U., Herrera E. Gestational diabetes mellitus causes changes in the concentrations of adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein and other adipocytokines in cord blood. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2061–2066. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dijck-Brouwer D.A., Hadders-Algra M., Bouwstra H., Decsi T., Boehm G., Martini I.A., Rudy Boersma E., Muskiet F.A. Impaired maternal glucose homeostasis during pregnancy is associated with low status of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCP) and essential fatty acids (EFA) in the fetus. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids. 2005;73:85–87. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2005.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Min Y., Lowy C., Ghebremeskel K., Thomas B., Bitsanis D., Crawford M.A. Fetal erythrocyte membrane lipids modification: Preliminary observation of an early sign of compromised insulin sensitivity in offspring of gestational diabetic women. Diabet. Med. 2005;22:914–920. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01556.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thomas B.A., Ghebremeskel K., Lowy C., Offley-Shore B., Crawford M.A. Plasma fatty acids of neonates born to mothers with and without gestational diabetes. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids. 2005;72:335–341. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2005.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wijendran V., Bendel R.B., Couch S.C., Philipson E.H., Cheruku S., Lammi-Keefe C.J. Fetal erythrocyte phospholipid polyunsaturated fatty acids are altered in pregnancy complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus. Lipids. 2000;35:927–931. doi: 10.1007/S11745-000-0602-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Leveille P., Rouxel C., Plourde M. Diabetic pregnancy, maternal and fetal docosahexaenoic acid: A review of existing evidence. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31:1358–1363. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1314460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhou S.J., Yelland L., McPhee A.J., Quinlivan J., Gibson R.A., Makrides M. Fish-oil supplementation in pregnancy does not reduce the risk of gestational diabetes or preeclampsia. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012;95:1378–1384. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.033217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gil-Sanchez A., Koletzko B., Larque E. Current understanding of placental fatty acid transport. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2012;15:265–272. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3283523b6e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Segura M.T., Demmelmair H., Krauss-Etschmann S., Nathan P., Dehmel S., Padilla M.C., Rueda R., Koletzko B., Campoy C. Maternal BMI and gestational diabetes alter placental lipid transporters and fatty acid composition. Placenta. 2017;57:144–151. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2017.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Houtkooper R.H., Pirinen E., Auwerx J. Sirtuins as regulators of metabolism and healthspan. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;13:225–238. doi: 10.1038/nrm3293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yang T., Fu M., Pestell R., Sauve A.A. SIRT1 and endocrine signaling. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2006;17:186–191. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2006.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Balestrieri M.L., Servillo L., Esposito A., D’Onofrio N., Giovane A., Casale R., Barbieri M., Paolisso P., Rizzo M.R., Paolisso G., et al. Poor glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients reduces endothelial progenitor cell number by influencing SIRT1 signalling via platelet-activating factor receptor activation. Diabetologia. 2013;56:162–172. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2749-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.de Kreutzenberg S.V., Ceolotto G., Papparella I., Bortoluzzi A., Semplicini A., Dalla Man C., Cobelli C., Fadini G.P., Avogaro A. Downregulation of the longevity-associated protein sirtuin 1 in insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome: Potential biochemical mechanisms. Diabetes. 2010;59:1006–1015. doi: 10.2337/db09-1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tobita T., Guzman-Lepe J., Takeishi K., Nakao T., Wang Y., Meng F., Deng C.X., Collin de l’Hortet A., Soto-Gutierrez A. SIRT1 Disruption in Human Fetal Hepatocytes Leads to Increased Accumulation of Glucose and Lipids. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0149344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wu T., Liu Y.H., Fu Y.C., Liu X.M., Zhou X.H. Direct evidence of sirtuin downregulation in the liver of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2014;44:410–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pfluger P.T., Herranz D., Velasco-Miguel S., Serrano M., Tschop M.H. Sirt1 protects against high-fat diet-induced metabolic damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:9793–9798. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802917105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lappas M., Mitton A., Lim R., Barker G., Riley C., Permezel M. SIRT1 is a novel regulator of key pathways of human labor. Biol. Reprod. 2011;84:167–178. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.086983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang R.H., Sengupta K., Li C., Kim H.S., Cao L., Xiao C., Kim S., Xu X., Zheng Y., Chilton B., et al. Impaired DNA damage response, genome instability, and tumorigenesis in SIRT1 mutant mice. Cancer Cell. 2008;14:312–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cheng H.L., Mostoslavsky R., Saito S., Manis J.P., Gu Y., Patel P., Bronson R., Appella E., Alt F.W., Chua K.F. Developmental defects and p53 hyperacetylation in Sir2 homolog (SIRT1)-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:10794–10799. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1934713100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.McBurney M.W., Yang X., Jardine K., Hixon M., Boekelheide K., Webb J.R., Lansdorp P.M., Lemieux M. The mammalian SIR2alpha protein has a role in embryogenesis and gametogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003;23:38–54. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.1.38-54.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kallol S., Huang X., Muller S., Ontsouka C.E., Albrecht C. Novel Insights into Concepts and Directionality of Maternal(-)Fetal Cholesterol Transfer across the Human Placenta. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:2334. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Huang X., Luthi M., Ontsouka E.C., Kallol S., Baumann M.U., Surbek D.V., Albrecht C. Establishment of a confluent monolayer model with human primary trophoblast cells: Novel insights into placental glucose transport. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2016;22:442–456. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaw018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li G., Lin L., Wang Y.L., Yang H. 1,25(OH)2D3 Protects Trophoblasts Against Insulin Resistance and Inflammation Via Suppressing mTOR Signaling. Reprod. Sci. 2019;26:223–232. doi: 10.1177/1933719118766253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Qiao L., Lee B., Kinney B., Yoo H.S., Shao J. Energy intake and adiponectin gene expression. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011;300:E809–E816. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00004.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Picard F., Kurtev M., Chung N., Topark-Ngarm A., Senawong T., De Oliveira R.M., Leid M., McBurney M.W., Guarente L. Sirt1 promotes fat mobilization in white adipocytes by repressing PPAR-gamma. Nature. 2004;429:771–776. doi: 10.1038/nature02583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Catalano P.M. Trying to understand gestational diabetes. Diabet. Med. 2014;31:273–281. doi: 10.1111/dme.12381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Powe C.E. Early Pregnancy Biochemical Predictors of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2017;17:12. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0834-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ruiz-Palacios M., Ruiz-Alcaraz A.J., Sanchez-Campillo M., Larque E. Role of Insulin in Placental Transport of Nutrients in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2017;70:16–25. doi: 10.1159/000455904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lassance L., Miedl H., Absenger M., Diaz-Perez F., Lang U., Desoye G., Hiden U. Hyperinsulinemia stimulates angiogenesis of human fetoplacental endothelial cells: A possible role of insulin in placental hypervascularization in diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013;98:E1438–E1447. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hiden U., Maier A., Bilban M., Ghaffari-Tabrizi N., Wadsack C., Lang I., Dohr G., Desoye G. Insulin control of placental gene expression shifts from mother to foetus over the course of pregnancy. Diabetologia. 2006;49:123–131. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-0054-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Xu S., Jay A., Brunaldi K., Huang N., Hamilton J.A. CD36 enhances fatty acid uptake by increasing the rate of intracellular esterification but not transport across the plasma membrane. Biochemistry. 2013;52:7254–7261. doi: 10.1021/bi400914c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Visiedo F., Bugatto F., Sanchez V., Cozar-Castellano I., Bartha J.L., Perdomo G. High glucose levels reduce fatty acid oxidation and increase triglyceride accumulation in human placenta. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013;305:E205–E212. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00032.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bitsanis D., Ghebremeskel K., Moodley T., Crawford M.A., Djahanbakhch O. Gestational diabetes mellitus enhances arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acids in placental phospholipids. Lipids. 2006;41:341–346. doi: 10.1007/s11745-006-5104-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Islam A., Kagawa Y., Sharifi K., Ebrahimi M., Miyazaki H., Yasumoto Y., Kawamura S., Yamamoto Y., Sakaguti S., Sawada T., et al. Fatty Acid Binding Protein 3 is Involved in n-3 and n-6 PUFA transport in mouse trophoblasts. J. Nutr. 2014;144:1509–1516. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.197202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Makkar A., Mishima T., Chang G., Scifres C., Sadovsky Y. Fatty acid binding protein-4 is expressed in the mouse placental labyrinth, yet is dispensable for placental triglyceride accumulation and fetal growth. Placenta. 2014;35:802–807. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Haggarty P. Placental regulation of fatty acid delivery and its effect on fetal growth—A review. Placenta. 2002;23(Suppl. A):S28–S38. doi: 10.1053/plac.2002.0791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Furuhashi M., Fuseya T., Murata M., Hoshina K., Ishimura S., Mita T., Watanabe Y., Omori A., Matsumoto M., Sugaya T., et al. Local Production of Fatty Acid-Binding Protein 4 in Epicardial/Perivascular Fat and Macrophages Is Linked to Coronary Atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2016;36:825–834. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Storch J., McDermott L. Structural and functional analysis of fatty acid-binding proteins. J. Lipid Res. 2009;50(Suppl.):S126–S131. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R800084-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Scifres C.M., Chen B., Nelson D.M., Sadovsky Y. Fatty acid binding protein 4 regulates intracellular lipid accumulation in human trophoblasts. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011;96:E1083–E1091. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jiang Y., Ma S., Zhang H., Yang X., Lu G.J., Zhang H., He Y., Kong F., Yang A., Xu H., et al. FABP4-mediated homocysteine-induced cholesterol accumulation in THP-1 monocyte-derived macrophages and the potential epigenetic mechanism. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016;14:969–976. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rodriguez-Calvo R., Girona J., Rodriguez M., Samino S., Barroso E., de Gonzalo-Calvo D., Guaita-Esteruelas S., Heras M., van der Meer R.W., Lamb H.J., et al. Fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) as a potential biomarker reflecting myocardial lipid storage in type 2 diabetes. Metabolism. 2019;96:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2019.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Furuhashi M. Fatty Acid-Binding Protein 4 in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2019;26:216–232. doi: 10.5551/jat.48710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jadoon A., Cunningham P., McDermott L.C. Regulation of fatty acid binding proteins by hypoxia inducible factors 1alpha and 2alpha in the placenta: Relevance to pre-eclampsia. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids. 2015;93:25–29. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2014.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Li H.P., Chen X., Li M.Q. Gestational diabetes induces chronic hypoxia stress and excessive inflammatory response in murine placenta. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2013;6:650–659. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Meyer B., Calvert D., Moses R. Free fatty acids and gestational diabetes mellitus. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1996;36:255–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1996.tb02705.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ning H., Tao H., Weng Z., Zhao X. Plasma fatty acid-binding protein 4 (FABP4) as a novel biomarker to predict gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol. 2016;53:891–898. doi: 10.1007/s00592-016-0867-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Diaz P., Dimasuay K.G., Koele-Schmidt L., Jang B., Barbour L.A., Jansson T., Powell T.L. Glyburide treatment in gestational diabetes is associated with increased placental glucose transporter 1 expression and higher birth weight. Placenta. 2017;57:52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2017.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jawerbaum A., Gonzalez E. Diabetic pregnancies: The challenge of developing in a pro-inflammatory environment. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006;13:2127–2138. doi: 10.2174/092986706777935302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Qiao L., Guo Z., Bosco C., Guidotti S., Wang Y., Wang M., Parast M., Schaack J., Hay W.W., Jr., Moore T.R., et al. Maternal High-Fat Feeding Increases Placental Lipoprotein Lipase Activity by Reducing SIRT1 Expression in Mice. Diabetes. 2015;64:3111–3120. doi: 10.2337/db14-1627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chen D., Bruno J., Easlon E., Lin S.J., Cheng H.L., Alt F.W., Guarente L. Tissue-specific regulation of SIRT1 by calorie restriction. Genes Dev. 2008;22:1753–1757. doi: 10.1101/gad.1650608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jia Y., Zheng Z., Wang Y., Zhou Q., Cai W., Jia W., Yang L., Dong M., Zhu X., Su L., et al. SIRT1 is a regulator in high glucose-induced inflammatory response in RAW264.7 cells. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0120849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nutrients are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES