Genome-wide identification and characterization of cucumber bHLH family genes and the functional characterization of CsbHLH041 in NaCl and ABA tolerance in Arabidopsis and cucumber

Abstract

Background

The basic/helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor family exists in all three eukaryotic kingdoms as important participants in biological growth and development. To date, the comprehensive genomic and functional analyses of bHLH genes has not been reported in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).

Results

Here, a total of 142 bHLH genes were identified and classified into 32 subfamilies according to the conserved motifs, phylogenetic analysis and gene structures in cucumber. The sequences of CsbHLH proteins were highly conserved based on the results of multiple sequence alignment analyses. The chromosomal distribution, synteny analysis, and gene duplications of these 142 CsbHLHs were further analysed. Many elements related to stress responsiveness and plant hormones were present in the promoter regions of CsbHLH genes based on a cis-element analysis. By comparing the phylogeny of cucumber and Arabidopsis bHLH proteins, we found that cucumber bHLH proteins were clustered into different functional clades of Arabidopsis bHLH proteins. The expression analysis of selected CsbHLHs under abiotic stresses (NaCl, ABA and low-temperature treatments) identified five CsbHLH genes that could simultaneously respond to the three abiotic stresses. Tissue-specific expression profiles of these five genes were also analysed. In addition, 35S:CsbHLH041 enhanced the tolerance to salt and ABA in transgenic Arabidopsis and in cucumber seedlings, suggesting CsbHLH041 is an important regulator in response to abiotic stresses. Lastly, the functional interoperability network among the CsbHLH proteins was analysed.

Conclusion

This study provided a good foundation for further research into the functions and regulatory mechanisms of CsbHLH proteins and identified candidate genes for stress resistance in cucumber.

Background

Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors form one of the largest families of TFs and exist widely in all three eukaryotic kingdoms [1, 2]. The bHLH TFs are named for their own structural characteristics [3], which are mostly composed of conserved 60 amino acid residues. According to the different functions, they can be divided into two parts: the basic region and the HLH region [4]. The basic region is distributed at the N-terminus of the bHLH conserved domain and contains approximately 15 to 20 residues, which are related to DNA binding [5, 6]. The HLH domain is distributed at the C-terminus of the gene sequence, composing of two amphipathic α-helices mainly constituting of hydrophobic residues linked by a loop region of variable sequence and length. The HLH domain is an essential structure for the formation of homologous or heterologous dimers in bHLH TFs [6, 7].

According to the evolutionary origin, sequence similarity, DNA binding patterns, and functional types, in animals, bHLH transcription factors are mainly divided into six categories, A-F, containing 45 subgroups [8, 9]. In plants, the bHLH gene family has been divided into 15–26 groups [10], and even up to 32 groups when atypical bHLH proteins are included [2]. In Arabidopsis, 167 bHLH proteins are divided into 21 subfamilies [2, 11]; the 165 bHLH family members in rice are classified into 22 subfamilies [12]; and the 159 bHLH proteins are divided into 21 subfamilies in tomato [13]. Currently, increasing numbers of bHLH proteins have been found in plants, and their functional research is gradually increasing.

In plants, the bHLH genes are involved in processes such as metabolic regulation, plant growth and development, and response to environmental signals. The first member of the bHLH family discovered was the maize R gene, which was shown to play a key role in anthocyanin synthesis [14]. Subsequently, an increasing number of bHLHs have been shown to be involved in a wider range of physiological pathways. For example, Phytochrome Interacting Factors (PIFs) have been reported to respond to light signals [15]; overexpression of PRE1 activates gibberellin-dependent responses in Arabidopsis thaliana [16]; AtGL3, AtEGL3 and AtTT8 have been demonstrated to be involved in anthocyanin and PA biosynthesis [17, 18]; while AtGL3, AtEGL3 and AtMYC1 also regulate trichome formation and root hair patterning [19]. In addition, some bHLH TFs are also considered to be able to respond to a variety of abiotic stresses and improve plant stress tolerance, including tolerance to drought tolerance, salt and cold. In wheat, overexpression of bHLH39 increases tolerance to salt stress [20]. The bHLH TFs often function by forming homodimers or heterodimers with other proteins. For example, MYC3 and MYC4 transcription factors all can interact with multiple JAZ proteins (such as JAZ1, JAZ4, and JAZ9) to jointly regulate the JA signalling pathway [21]. The MYB-bHLH-WD40 complexes are involved in different processes, such as the biosynthesis of anthocyanins and PAs, leaf trichome formation and root hair patterning [22]. In summary, bHLH in plants can form homologous or heterologous complexes with bHLH proteins or other proteins to extend their biological functions.

Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) is an economically important crop cultivated worldwide [23]. The functions of the AtbHLH family have been widely studied in Arabidopsis thaliana [2]. However, genome-wide information on members of the CsbHLH family has not been reported. In this study, we identified and characterized 142 bHLH family genes in cucumber. They were classified into 32 subgroups and could be distributed over seven chromosomes. Their gene structures, conserved motifs, synteny analysis, gene duplications and cis-elements in promoters also have been investigated. In addition, the expression levels of some CsbHLH genes were measured by qRT-PCR to study their responses to low temperature (4 °C), salt (NaCl) and ABA stress, for which all tested genes were stress-responsive. The protein interaction network among the CsbHLH proteins was predicted, which could help to understand the possible functional mechanism of CsbHLH proteins. Furthermore, overexpression of CsbHLH041 showed increased salt resistance and ABA resistance compared with controls in cucumber and Arabidopsis. We hope that this work will provide useful resources for further studies on the functions and regulatory mechanisms of a potentially important CsbHLH protein, which plays a crucial role in the regulation of abiotic stress responses in cucumber.

Results

Identification and analysis of cucumber bHLH genes

To identify CsbHLH family genes in cucumber, we used the BlastP programme to search against the cucumber genome database by using 166 Arabidopsis bHLH proteins [2, 10] and the consensus protein sequences of the bHLH domain, with Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile (PF00010) as queries. We obtained 164 putative members of the CsbHLH family. To confirm the reliability of the bHLH genes in the cucumber genome, we used Pfam (http://pfam.janelia.org/) and SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) [24] to search for the presence of the bHLH domain in the amino acid sequences of the 164 proteins. Only 142 proteins had the corresponding conserved bHLH domain, which were named CsbHLH1 to CsbHLH142 according to their sequence similarity and phylogenies with individual AtbHLH proteins. Finally, the specific information for the 142 typical bHLH genes, including the gene ID, amino acids length, chromosomal locations, and gene length were present in Table 1. The lengths of the CsbHLH protein sequences varied from 84 residues (CsaV3_1G005290) to 960 residues (CsaV3_1G043790), and the isoelectric points (pI) varied from 4.57 (CsaV3_2G030090) to 11.79 (CsaV3_6G028530).

Table 1.

bHLH genes in Cucumber

CsbHLH	Gene ID	Location	Gene length	Amino acid length	pI
001	CsaV3_1G005290	Chr1:3503806–3,504,411	1909	84	5.04
002	CsaV3_1G011300	Chr1:6972358–6,976,069	4167	236	5.78
003	CsaV3_3G022420	Chr3:19737551–19,739,874	958	502	5.7
004	CsaV3_3G049150	Chr3:40071324–40,074,834	1400	689	5.11
005	CsaV3_3G001710	Chr3:1295970–1,297,898	5601	643	6.21
006	CsaV3_3G000850	Chr3:656062–658,628	6057	448	8.65
007	CsaV3_1G039580	Chr1:24945063–24,953,384	1684	319	5.78
008	CsaV3_2G007370	Chr2:3725743–3,731,272	605	707	6.09
009	CsaV3_4G032110	Chr4:22635255–22,641,052	3486	551	6.25
010	CsaV3_1G043790	Chr1:28804330–28,811,620	6167	960	6.4
011	CsaV3_2G015700	Chr2:13017831–13,023,291	1802	336	5.64
012	CsaV3_6G000530	Chr6:351129–356,108	2050	645	5.51
013	CsaV3_3G007980	Chr3:6919411–6,921,670	2306	650	5.83
014	CsaV3_2G010120	Chr2:6877325–6,878,870	2524	323	6.02
015	CsaV3_7G025510	Chr7:14980031–14,984,292	3589	533	6.06
016	CsaV3_6G009090	Chr6:7311297–7,315,687	3711	486	6.35
017	CsaV3_2G028950	Chr2:18953613–18,956,324	3528	348	8.3
018	CsaV3_7G007460	Chr7:4647975–4,650,800	3316	335	6.64
019	CsaV3_6G044570	Chr6:26373287–26,375,739	3723	330	5.3
020	CsaV3_6G044560	Chr6:26366139–26,368,813	11,538	309	5.81
021	CsaV3_5G026500	Chr5:21650877–21,655,135	2678	624	5.04
022	CsaV3_6G044730	Chr6:26485325–26,487,050	1415	342	4.86
023	CsaV3_2G030090	Chr2:19685080–19,689,447	4059	363	4.57
024	CsaV3_6G043370	Chr6:25541506–25,544,586	8321	416	5.2
025	CsaV3_6G044580	Chr6:26382822–26,384,588	3478	276	6.05
026	CsaV3_2G035250	Chr2:23586273–23,591,605	3855	239	6.77
027	CsaV3_2G008770	Chr2:5179234–5,186,154	7290	246	4.92
028	CsaV3_6G008940	Chr6:7177946–7,179,613	5695	432	5.42
029	CsaV3_6G014370	Chr6:10430376–10,432,021	6113	308	4.98
030	CsaV3_5G033960	Chr5:27092009–27,094,880	4184	372	5.77
031	CsaV3_6G036080	Chr6:20032486–20,036,831	1493	242	9.03
032	CsaV3_1G033410	Chr1:20481133–20,483,811	5529	256	9.24
033	CsaV3_1G009900	Chr1:6174783–6,178,372	6920	551	5.6
034	CsaV3_2G001440	Chr2:370393–376,506	1545	543	8.37
035	CsaV3_1G031920	Chr1:18957508–18,969,046	2275	242	5.03
036	CsaV3_7G004510	Chr7:3234760–3,236,331	1320	211	6.77
037	CsaV3_4G034440	Chr4:24394485–24,395,550	3489	239	7.1
038	CsaV3_4G029740	Chr4:19342473–19,344,831	5460	253	6.17
039	CsaV3_3G000950	Chr3:733695–738,681	1011	773	5.11
040	CsaV3_2G026610	Chr2:18201502–18,202,748	2627	240	7.26
041	CsaV3_1G040580	Chr1:25826012–25,829,490	1816	492	7.03
042	CsaV3_6G037080	Chr6:20849605–20,855,801	4137	651	5.91
043	CsaV3_6G041730	Chr6:24304724–24,306,996	1246	235	6.42
044	CsaV3_1G003910	Chr1:2423148–2,424,832	2711	266	6.87
045	CsaV3_3G013690	Chr3:10293079–10,294,740	2245	191	8.64
046	CsaV3_1G006280	Chr1:4002735–4,008,902	4367	566	9.01
047	CsaV3_1G002260	Chr1:1450554–1,451,954	1411	261	6.16
048	CsaV3_3G039100	Chr3:32125102–32,130,846	2115	370	5.74
049	CsaV3_5G033600	Chr5:26846039–26,850,063	5332	571	6.09
050	CsaV3_1G006650	Chr1:4277323–4,279,125	2566	279	6.1
051	CsaV3_6G001900	Chr6:1303975–1,307,218	4986	248	9.26
052	CsaV3_1G037610	Chr1:23567571–23,568,986	1928	309	4.78
053	CsaV3_6G037070	Chr6:20836169–20,845,986	5647	263	6.08
054	CsaV3_2G026190	Chr2:17969523–17,971,339	1844	330	5.15
055	CsaV3_3G034600	Chr3:29292016–29,296,383	2259	695	5.24
056	CsaV3_3G044120	Chr3:35995420–35,997,451	4852	272	5.09
057	CsaV3_2G005070	Chr2:2751170–2,752,663	3663	318	5.74
058	CsaV3_2G014750	Chr2:12321166–12,324,655	1661	343	6.2
059	CsaV3_7G027630	Chr7:17195587–17,199,883	1509	317	6
060	CsaV3_2G025890	Chr2:17778099–17,780,726	3295	342	6.26
061	CsaV3_2G030500	Chr2:20027274–20,029,389	2181	372	4.71
062	CsaV3_3G015900	Chr3:11810548–11,813,843	2822	547	6.88
063	CsaV3_7G000080	Chr7:185656–189,146	2627	457	5.85
064	CsaV3_1G000190	Chr1:132006–133,915	2323	276	7.03
065	CsaV3_3G028610	Chr3:25161463–25,169,489	3059	540	5.7
066	CsaV3_2G003660	Chr2:1833037–1,837,221	6474	422	6.1
067	CsaV3_4G002800	Chr4:1745825–1,749,669	8026	168	7.65
068	CsaV3_1G045830	Chr1:31650489–31,656,184	4367	395	6.39
069	CsaV3_4G026430	Chr4:15704947–15,706,451	3065	196	6.51
070	CsaV3_3G007090	Chr3:6381666–6,383,510	5744	359	5.94
071	CsaV3_3G049050	Chr3:40003473–40,010,806	1802	322	7.73
072	CsaV3_1G005810	Chr1:3727778–3,731,264	2031	443	9.02
073	CsaV3_2G026540	Chr2:18154564–18,158,701	3855	380	5.01
074	CsaV3_4G035310	Chr4:24884098–24,888,333	2900	403	5.7
075	CsaV3_3G020750	Chr3:16961726–16,964,548	7333	248	7.09
076	CsaV3_5G018750	Chr5:14293739–14,297,926	3510	534	5.2
077	CsaV3_4G034660	Chr4:24537693–24,539,435	1700	409	6.38
078	CsaV3_7G026520	Chr7:16047841–16,051,016	3844	490	6.04
079	CsaV3_1G001960	Chr1:1286661–1,290,828	5186	196	7.64
080	CsaV3_5G040480	Chr5:31836009–31,840,665	2228	245	5.67
081	CsaV3_6G002130	Chr6:1472037–1,473,566	1504	161	5.12
082	CsaV3_1G028780	Chr1:15708212–15,711,935	2358	423	6.34
083	CsaV3_5G024030	Chr5:18711066–18,713,891	3741	285	6.21
084	CsaV3_4G000380	Chr4:228607–230,307	5797	342	4.89
085	CsaV3_4G034980	Chr4:24696914–24,698,535	1065	245	6.18
086	CsaV3_3G014190	Chr3:10642450–10,643,959	1742	203	7.81
087	CsaV3_7G035000	Chr7:22142359–22,144,409	1621	394	6.54
088	CsaV3_2G016810	Chr2:14091802–14,092,813	4235	216	9.77
089	CsaV3_6G012850	Chr6:8973920–8,976,038	2826	262	9.23
090	CsaV3_5G031540	Chr5:25725825–25,732,273	1729	679	7.3
091	CsaV3_2G011050	Chr2:8296805–8,299,080	1004	496	5.5
092	CsaV3_2G013060	Chr2:10626443–10,627,763	5030	280	9.14
093	CsaV3_3G048260	Chr3:39394424–39,397,324	4187	326	4.94
094	CsaV3_1G039160	Chr1:24662874–24,666,933	2825	359	5.94
095	CsaV3_7G008580	Chr7:5322491–5,324,405	2588	254	7.22
096	CsaV3_2G029940	Chr2:19575197–19,577,442	4258	308	6.01
097	CsaV3_3G011010	Chr3:8707121–8,711,973	6448	382	5.08
098	CsaV3_3G021970	Chr3:19073471–19,076,098	2460	377	5.08
099	CsaV3_6G028530	Chr6:16812784–16,815,830	2030	207	11.79
100	CsaV3_6G037460	Chr6:21181685–21,184,516	4024	299	5.66
101	CsaV3_4G029750	Chr4:19361035–19,364,776	2871	211	9.21
102	CsaV3_6G033930	Chr6:18737868–18,742,274	1923	333	5.71
103	CsaV3_6G036240	Chr6:20141242–20,142,683	4656	97	9.18
104	CsaV3_3G012210	Chr3:9421374–9,425,037	4979	227	5.7
105	CsaV3_3G022870	Chr3:20405212–20,408,271	3243	236	6.13
106	CsaV3_3G042970	Chr3:34884792–34,886,594	1529	244	8.4
107	CsaV3_6G018830	Chr6:13512926–13,515,085	1667	253	7.06
108	CsaV3_2G030310	Chr2:19895721–19,897,132	4390	240	9.2
109	CsaV3_1G002670	Chr1:1668618–1,674,219	2118	359	8.65
110	CsaV3_3G045440	Chr3:37108680–37,112,535	1645	430	6.69
111	CsaV3_5G012430	Chr5:7900420–7,905,450	2159	451	6.33
112	CsaV3_1G011460	Chr1:7106592–7,110,120	3046	360	4.75
113	CsaV3_7G008090	Chr7:5057906–5,059,973	4406	255	6.11
114	CsaV3_5G026380	Chr5:21538651–21,541,239	4345	173	9.15
115	CsaV3_UNG229040	scaffold115:93241–95,547	1441	274	9.42
116	CsaV3_3G027730	Chr3:24067204–24,073,678	9817	529	5.88
117	CsaV3_7G003870	Chr7:2853486–2,854,424	6196	313	5.32
118	CsaV3_3G016560	Chr3:12365460–12,367,641	2831	253	8.6
119	CsaV3_1G012350	Chr1:7668571–7,671,887	2272	205	6.16
120	CsaV3_5G003430	Chr5:2204438–2,205,442	3080	256	7.75
121	CsaV3_6G047120	Chr6:27815147–27,818,761	2674	337	6.13
122	CsaV3_1G042640	Chr1:27559193–27,563,048	2452	438	7.72
123	CsaV3_3G005540	Chr3:4716554–4,722,201	1766	439	6.41
124	CsaV3_6G046660	Chr6:27537459–27,541,954	1725	357	8.44
125	CsaV3_5G003420	Chr5:2191536–2,193,265	1497	261	5.59
126	CsaV3_5G003410	Chr5:2180337–2,183,163	4495	252	7.01
127	CsaV3_6G049510	Chr6:28902722–28,905,982	3614	405	5.35
128	CsaV3_4G003860	Chr4:2368080–2,373,266	3260	357	8.51
129	CsaV3_7G031270	Chr7:19779388–19,783,470	749	420	8.28
130	CsaV3_3G039080	Chr3:32107556–32,110,621	3490	367	9.16
131	CsaV3_6G045070	Chr6:26672336–26,673,833	938	229	10.26
132	CsaV3_6G051560	Chr6:29996501–29,997,250	1571	250	5.66
133	CsaV3_7G027460	Chr7:17033739–17,042,484	2825	692	5.66
134	CsaV3_5G037950	Chr5:30085680–30,087,603	1391	92	9.09
135	CsaV3_1G002240	Chr1:1440343–1,441,301	2067	93	9.09
136	CsaV3_5G032530	Chr5:26313766–26,315,796	1914	96	9.17
137	CsaV3_1G009880	Chr1:6153304–6,155,828	4261	373	6.61
138	CsaV3_7G033460	Chr7:21082838–21,087,117	3175	298	6.78
139	CsaV3_7G007860	Chr7:4913547–4,914,938	8745	211	6.35
140	CsaV3_4G010010	Chr4:7769516–7,771,744	4296	333	5.11
141	CsaV3_1G003270	Chr1:2026829–2,032,886	4082	619	9.19
142	CsaV3_5G031750	Chr5:25868912–25,871,372	4279	365	5.84

Phylogenetic analysis, gene structure and conserved motif analysis of CsbHLH gene family

To confirm the structural characteristics of CsbHLH proteins, we performed multi-sequence alignment (MSA) analysis on 142 CsbHLH proteins. All 142 CsbHLH proteins contained the characteristic regions of bHLH: two helix regions, one loop region and one basic region (Fig. 1). Additionally, the conserved amino acids with a sequence identity greater than 50% in bHLH domains, were present as light blue or purple colour (Fig. 1a). Sequence logos were produced using the 142 CsbHLH homologous domain amino acid sequences (Fig. 1b). The CsbHLH proteins in cucumber contained 17 conserved amino acids of bHLH domain, which were present in the bHLH gene family of Arabidopsis and Moso bamboo [2, 25]. As shown in Fig. 1b, we could clearly observe that key amino acid residues Arg-10, Arg-11, Leu-21 and Leu-53 were highly conserved (92, 87, 96, and 90%, respectively) in the 142 CsbHLH proteins. Subsequently, a phylogenetic tree was constructed on the 142 CsbHLH proteins, which were divided into 32 subgroups (C1-C32) based on the clades over 50% bootstrap support (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 1.

Conserved amino acids and multiple sequence alignment schematic diagrams of the CsbHLHs bHLH domains. (a) Multiple sequence alignments of CsbHLH proteins. The CsbHLH conserved sequences were marked with a purple background for an amino acid identity greater than 75% and a light blue background for an amino acid identity greater than 50%. The bHLH domains were labelled. (b) Sequence logo of CsbHLH domains. The overall height of each stack represented the conservation of the sequence at that position

Fig. 2.

Phylogenetic relationships, gene structure and conserved protein motifs in bHLH genes from cucumber. (a) The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the full-length protein sequences of 142 CsbHLH proteins using MEGA 7.0 software. The tree showed the 32 phylogenetic subgroups (C1-C32) with high bootstrap value. (b) Conserved motifs in CsbHLH proteins. The motifs, numbers 1–10, were displayed in different coloured boxes. The sequence logos and E values for each motif were shown in Fig. S1. (c) Exon-intron structure of CsbHLH genes. Exons and introns were indicated by green boxes and single lines, respectively. Blue boxes represented upstream or downstream. The length of each gene was listed in Table 1

We then performed gene structure analysis of CsbHLH gene to support the phylogenetic analysis, which showed that CsbHLHs in the same subgroups presented similar numbers of exons and introns, and regardless of intron sizes, the CsbHLH genes in the same subgroups had similar intron-exon gene structures (Fig. 2c).

To further investigate the specific motifs of CsbHLH proteins in the same subgroup, we used the MEME tool to identify 10 conserved motifs. The different numbers of conserved motifs were present in 142 CsbHLH proteins (Fig. 2b). Moreover, a similar motif existed in CsbHLH proteins of the same subgroup. For instance, all proteins of subgroup 23 contained motifs 1, 2, 4 and 6, and motif 5 was identified in most CsbHLH proteins. We also found that certain motifs were absent in certain subgroups. For example, motif 4 was absent in all proteins of the 1, 2 and 3 subgroups (Fig. 2b).

In general, the results of conserved motif and gene structure analyses further confirmed the results of the phylogenetic analysis, indicating that proteins within the same subgroup may have similar functions.

Synteny analysis of bHLH genes in cucumber, Arabidopsis and tomato

Through the analysis of the genome distribution of CsbHLH genes, we found the 142 CsbHLHs (except CsaV3_UNG229040) all could be located on chromosomes 1–7 (Fig. 3a; Table 1; Fig. S2). According to the description reported by [26] to determine the duplication of CsbHLH genes, we analysed the syntenic regions. The cucumber genome contained 231 segmental duplication blocks and 1468 tandem duplication gene pairs. We obtained five tandem duplication gene pairs (CsbHLH019 / CsbHLH020; CsbHLH019 / CsbHLH025; CsbHLH120 / CsbHLH125; CsbHLH125 / CsbHLH126; CsbHLH038 / CsbHLH101) and seven segmental duplication gene pairs (CsbHLH112 / CsbHLH127; CsbHLH040 / CsbHLH037; CsbHLH054 / CsbHLH085; CsbHLH060 / CsbHLH074; CsbHLH001 / CsbHLH135; CsbHLH141 / CsbHLH046; CsbHLH050 / CsbHLH044) in cucumber CsbHLH family (Fig. 3a; Table S1).

Fig. 3.

Gene duplication and synteny analysis of CsbHLH genes. (a) Schematic representations of the chromosomal distribution and interchromosomal relationships of CsbHLH genes. Different line colours represented different segmental duplicated CsbHLH gene pairs, among which the two genes of the same segmental duplicated gene pair were labelled in the same colour. The red lines in the outer ring indicated tandem duplication gene pairs. (b) Synteny analysis of bHLH genes between cucumber and Arabidopsis and tomato. Blue lines indicated collinear blocks of the bHLH gene within the cucumber and Arabidopsis and tomato genomes

In order to further illuminate the phylogenetic mechanisms of CsbHLH family, we constructed a comparison of the syntenic map of cucumber related to tomato and Arabidopsis, respectively (Fig. 3b). We found that CsbHLH024, CsbHLH040 and CsbHLH054 genes were associated with more than two syntenic gene pairs between cucumber and tomato. Moreover, for instance, CsbHLH020 and CsbHLH049 genes were also corresponded to two syntenic gene pairs between cucumber and Arabidopsis, indicating that these bHLH genes may play a key role in evolution. In addition, we found certain collinear pairs were present between cucumber and both Arabidopsis and tomato (such as CsbHLH132, CsbHLH135 and CsbHLH136) (Fig. 3b; Table S2), illustrating that before the ancestral divergence, these orthologous pairs might have already present. Meanwhile, some CsbHLH genes were not associated with syntenic gene pairs in Arabidopsis or tomato, indicating that they might have been peculiar to cucumber during the course of evolution.

Cis-elements in the promoters of CsbHLH genes in cucumber

According to the studies reported by [27], many bHLH genes may be able to respond to a variety of abiotic stresses. We isolated the 2-kb promoter regions of the CsbHLH genes to identify the potential cis-elements (Table S3), in which a number of CsbHLH genes particularly presented elements associated with plant hormones (such as auxin, abscisic acid and gibberellic acid) and stress responsiveness (such as drought inducibility and low temperature). Moreover, the promoter regions of some CsbHLH genes contained an MYB binding site involved in flavonoid biosynthetic gene regulation, which might be involved in the synthesis of flavonoid in cucumber (Fig. S3; Table S3). In addition, the promoter regions of CsbHLH genes contained G-Box and Box-4 elements related to light responsiveness. The cis-regulatory elements in CsbHLH promoters included the plant light-responsive elements, plant growth- and development-responsive elements, and responding to diverse stresses (Table S3).

To further analyse whether there is co-expression of CsbHLH genes with the same cis-elements, we constructed a co-expression network of CsbHLH genes, based on the available RNA-seq data of 10 cucumber tissues regarding correlations between cucumber bHLH genes [26]. The co-expression network containing 23 CsbHLH genes (nodes) and 191 correlations (edges) showed that each of the CsbHLH genes had multiple co-expression genes with same cis-elements (Fig. S4; Table S3). The result indicated the co-expression of genes may be related to the same cis-elements in their promoter regions.

Function prediction of CsbHLHs based on phylogenetic analyses

Previous studies have identified and verified the function of numerous bHLH proteins in Arabidopsis [28, 29]. However, the biological functions of CsbHLHs are known little in cucumber. In this study, we performed phylogenetic analyses of 166 AtbHLHs and 142 CsbHLHs proteins to identify the genetic relationship of the bHLH proteins in cucumber and Arabidopsis, so as to preliminarily explore the functions of CsbHLH proteins [2, 10] (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Evolutionary tree analysis (circle tree) and subfamily classifications of bHLHs proteins in cucumber and Arabidopsis thaliana. The evolutionary tree was constructed using the Neighbour-Joining method with 1000 bootstrap replication. The evolutionary distances were computed using poisson correction. The analysis involved 142 cucumber bHLH protein sequences and 166 Arabidopsis thaliana bHLH protein. Red stars represented the CsbHLH proteins and blue represented the AtbHLH proteins

Finally, we divided the 308 bHLH proteins into 23 subfamilies, and predicted the functions of CsbHLHs according to their verified functional homologs in the same subfamily (Table S4). As shown in Table S4, most of the proteins of subfamilies 1, 2, 4, 10, 13, 14 and 18 responded to different biotic and abiotic stresses [30, 31], such as drought [32], cold [33] and salt [34]. Some of the proteins in subfamilies 4 and 10 might be involved in iron regulation, regulating the iron homeostasis [35]. The proteins of subfamilies 19 and 23 have been identified to regulate flower development [36], and the members of subfamilies 3, 8, 9, 16 and 21 might participate in the development of multiple plant organs [37–39]. There were PIFs in subfamily 17, related to light signal transduction and protect the normal growth and development of plants [15]. The members of subfamily 5 regulate the flavonoid biosynthesis and cell differentiation of root epidermis [22]. The detailed possible functions of CsbHLHs are listed in Table S4.

In general, although the evolutionary relationships could not be clearly deciphered for the functions of all genes, the analysis was meaningful and necessary.

Expression analysis of CsbHLH genes under different stress conditions and in different tissues

To identify which CsbHLH genes play important roles in abiotic stress responses, we carefully screened 21, 20 and 25 bHLH genes based on the cis-acting elements containing low temperature, defense and stress responsive and abscisic acid (ABA) elements in the promoters of bHLH genes, respectively, and detected their transcriptional changes with treatments of low temperature (4 °C), salt (NaCl) and ABA, respectively. As expected, all the CsbHLH genes screened responded to stress treatments under the respective stress conditions (Fig. 5). For example, the expression levels of the 20 CsbHLHs were all positive in response to salt stress, and many of them were upregulated after one hour of salt treatment and achieved the highest expression level 3 h later, and then gradually declined. The expressions of CsbHLH033, CsbHLH041 and CsbHLH082 were the highest after NaCl treatment for just 1 h, but the expressions levels of CsbHLH136 reached its maximum after 12 h. CsbHLH041 was the most susceptible to salt stress (increased by approximately 37-fold) (Fig. 5a). Under ABA treatment, the transcriptional levels of CsbHLH020, CsbHLH041 and CsbHLH064 were more than 10-fold higher than those of untreated level (CsbHLH020: the highest nearly 61-fold; CsbHLH041: the highest nearly 55-fold; CsbHLH064: the highest nearly 19-fold). In contrast, the expression levels of four of the CsbHLHs genes were significantly down-regulated under ABA treatment (CsbHLH011, CsbHLH033, CsbHLH034 and CsbHLH077), as could be seen in Fig. 5b. The expression levels of 20 of the 21 CsbHLH were up-regulated at some time points after the 4 °C treatment, while only CsbHLH032 was decreased (Fig. 5c). We found the CsbHLH020, CsbHLH064, CsbHLH086, CsbHLH093 and CsbHLH112 genes could simultaneously respond to the three abiotic stresses (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Relative expression analysis of the CsbHLH genes under different stress conditions and different tissues. Expression patterns of CsbHLH genes under NaCl (100 mM) treatment (a), ABA (100 μM) treatment (b) and low temperature (4 °C) treatment (c). (d) Tissue-specific expression profiles of five cucumber bHLH genes. Total RNA was isolated from roots (R), stems (S), young leaves (YL), male flowers (MF), ovary (O) and tendrils (T), respectively. The cucumber β-actin gene was performed as an internal control, and three independent samples were used for these experiments. Error bars indicated standard errors (SE)

The expression patterns of genes under different conditions are often related to their functions. Therefore, we used qRT-PCR to detect the expression patterns for CsbHLH020, CsbHLH064, CsbHLH086, CsbHLH093 and CsbHLH112 abiotic stress-responsive CsbHLHs in different tissues. The expression patterns of the five CsbHLH genes showed different tissue specificities (Fig. 5d). For instance, CsbHLH093 and CsbHLH112 had higher expression levels in ovaries and roots, but lower expression levels in tendrils and male flowers (Fig. 5d). On the contrary, both CsbHLH064 and CsbHLH086 were highly expressed in tendrils and male flowers. The expression levels of CsbHLH020 in young leaves and roots were higher than that in other tissues (Fig. 5d). These results suggested that CsbHLH genes might play key roles in plant developmental and physiological processes.

CsbHLH041 enhanced tolerance to NaCl and ABA in transgenic Arabidopsis and cucumber

CsbHLH041 expression was significantly induced by salt and ABA in cucumber (Fig. 5a-b). Therefore, we used Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation of cucumber cotyledons to clarify CsbHLH041 tolerance to salt and ABA. After 0.5 h of 100 mM NaCl treatment, serious wilting occurred in the seedlings overexpressing 35S empty vector compared with over-expression CsbHLH041, and the wilting difference was more obvious after 3 h of NaCl treatment (Fig. 6a). After 12 h, the survival rate of the transgenic seedlings (24%) was markedly higher than that of the 35S empty vector seedlings (6%), showing that over-expression of CsbHLH041 resulted in significant salt resistance (Fig. 6c). After 6 h of ABA treatment, the transgenic seedlings were more vigorous than 35S empty vector seedlings (Fig. 6b). With the extension of ABA treatment time, the 35S cucumber seedlings showed visible symptoms of ABA-induced damage, such as drying, wilting, and even death, with survival of only 12%. While some CsbHLH041 transgenic plants remained green with expanded cotyledons, and the survival rate was up to approximately 40% (Fig. 6b-c).

Fig. 6.

Overexpression of CsbHLH041 increased salt and ABA tolerance in cucumber seedlings. Phenotypes of 35S empty vector and 35S:CsbHLH041 cucumber seedlings treated with 100 mM NaCl (a) and 100 μM ABA (b) at different time periods during hydroponic growth. (c) Survival of 35S empty vector and 35S:CsbHLH041 cucumber seedlings after 12 h of salt and ABA treatments. Comparison of the antioxidant enzyme activity between 35S empty vector and 35S:CsbHLH041 cucumber seedlings under salt and ABA treatment: (d) peroxidase (POD) activity, (e) superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, (f) catalase (CAT) activity. The bars showed the SE. * and ** indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively

To clarify the possible factors underlying the enhanced NaCl and ABA resistance, we examined the enzymatic activities in the ROS clearance system under NaCl and ABA treatments, respectively. Without the NaCl or ABA treatment, the enzymatic activities of POD, SOD and CAT in 35S and 35S:CsbHLH041 transgenic seedlings were no significant difference (Fig. 6d-f). Nevertheless, both NaCl treatment and ABA treatment could significantly activate more enzymatic scavenging activities in the CsbHLH041 transgenic plants than in the 35S empty vector seedlings (Fig. 6d-f).

To further explore the function of CsbHLH041 resistance to abiotic stress in plants, transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing CsbHLH041 driven by the CaMV35S promoter were generated. Two independent homozygous lines with relatively high expression levels, CsbHLH041 OX1 and CsbHLH041 OX2, were selected for the analysis (Fig. 7a). The salt and ABA tolerance of CsbHLH041 transgenic plants were assessed. There were no differences in seed germination between WT and CsbHLH041 transgenic Arabidopsis on 1/2 MS (Control) (Fig. 7b). However, the germination ratio of transgenic plants seeds was markedly higher than WT seeds in 1/2 MS medium containing 100 mM NaCl or 2 μM ABA (Fig. 7b-d). Subsequently, the 3-week-old seedlings of CsbHLH041 transgenic lines and wild-type (WT) plants were treated with 200 mM NaCl and 100 μM ABA, respectively. The leaves of WT plants turned severely yellow after 4 days of 200 mM NaCl or 100 μM ABA treatment, while CsbHLH041 transgenic lines were still growing with green leaves (Fig. 7e-f). After 8 days, the difference in NaCl or ABA resistance between WT plants and CsbHLH041 transgenic lines was more obvious, which suggested that CsbHLH041 transgenic plants were more tolerant to salt and ABA stresses than WT.

Fig. 7.

CsbHLH041 transgenic Arabidopsis showed enhanced salt and ABA tolerance. (a) Relative expression of CsbHLH041 in Col-0 (WT) and two T3 generation transgenic lines by semi-quantitative PCR. The actin8 gene was used as an internal control. The original, uncropped gel image was provided as Additional file 9. (b) Germination of WT seeds of Col-0 and CsbHLH041 transgenic lines OX-1, OX-2 on 1/2 MS supplemented with 100 mM NaCl and 2 μM ABA after 7 days of cultivation at 22 °C. (c) and (d) Seed germination rate for the corresponding (b), respectively. Three biological replications were performed. Asterisks indicated a significant difference **p < 0.01 compared with the corresponding controls. The growth of Col-0 (WT) and CsbHLH041 transgenic lines after 200 mM NaCl (e) and 100 μM ABA (f) treatments

The protein interaction network predictions for CsbHLH orthologs in Arabidopsis that were crucial for the abiotic stress response

Network interaction analysis has been demonstrated to be an effective method to analyse the gene function [40]. We used the software STRING 10 to predict the protein interaction network among the 142 CsbHLH proteins (Fig. 8a). Numerous CsbHLH transcription factors interacted with multiple CsbHLHs, consistent with previous reports demonstrating that the binding activity of specific DNA sequences depends on the homodimers or heterodimers formed by the interactions of bHLH proteins [2]. As shown in Fig. 8a, there were 21 proteins that had correlation with more than four other bHLH proteins, which may make them play important roles in regulating plant stress responses and growth, and detailed informations about these orthologs were showed in Table S6.

Fig. 8.

Protein interaction network for CsbHLHs based on CsbHLH orthologs in Arabidopsis. Protein interaction network predictions of CsbHLHs (a) and CsbHLH041 (b). Red lines indicated proteins that were predicted to interact with more than four other bHLH proteins. CsbHLH proteins were shown next to Arabidopsis orthologs

In our study, CsbHLH041 responded significantly to salt and ABA treatments, and CsbHLH041 could enhance tolerance to NaCl and ABA in transgenic Arabidopsis and cucumber (Fig. 5a-b; Fig. 6; Fig. 7). The function of bHLH proteins are mainly realized through the formation of heterodimers or homodimers with other transcription factors, which are essential for their binding to downstream target genes [2]. AT5G56960, the CsbHLH041 homologous gene, was at the centre of the protein association network, indicating that it played main roles in regulating different functional proteins (Fig. 8b; Table S6). For example, EP3 might play a role in both normal plant growth and disease resistance [41]. VSP1 and VSP2 are anti-insect proteins and respond to methyl jasmonate and wounding, in which their defense function were correlated with its acid phosphatase activity [42, 43]. The predicted gene association network provides useful resources for subsequent research.

Discussion

Characterization of the cucumber bHLH family

The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor family is the second largest family in eukaryotes [10, 44] and extensive studies of bHLH families have been identified in various plants [2]. For example, 166 bHLH genes have been identified in Arabidopsis [2, 10], 115 bHLH genes in Nelumbo nucifera [45], 188 bHLH genes in apple [40], 167 bHLH genes in rice [12] and 159 bHLH genes in tomato [13]. The bHLH TFs have been involved in multiple biological processes in plants, especially in regulating defense against biotic and abiotic stresses [46]. However, we know very little about bHLHs in cucumber. In our study, 142 bHLH cucumber genes were identified and characterized. According to phylogenetic analyses, the 142 CsbHLHs were divided into 32 subgroups (Fig. 2a), and multiple sequence analysis indicated that the conserved bHLH domains existed in all 142 CsbHLH proteins (Fig. 1). For instance, the two amino acid residues Leu-21 and Leu-53 were relatively conserved in the helical region that are essential for the formation of dimers. Moreover, the conservative sequence analyses indicated that almost all 142 CsbHLH proteins had the conserved 1 and 2 motifs. The analyses of gene structure and the motif further supported the phylogenetic relationship for the 142 CsbHLH genes (Fig. 2b-c). To sum up, these results showed that all 142 CsbHLHs had the characteristics of the bHLH family, confirming the reliability of the bHLH genes discovered in cucumber.

Phylogenetic analysis and evolution of cucumber bHLH genes

In the model plant Arabidopsis, the bHLH gene family has been systematically analysed [2, 11]. To explore the evolutionary relationships between 142 CsbHLH proteins in cucumber and 166 AtbHLH proteins in Arabidopsis, a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the protein of 308 bHLHs, which clustered into 23 subfamilies (Fig. 4). There are differences in anatomy and physiology between cucumber and Arabidopsis, so some clades may have different modes of expansion in the bHLH family of cucumber and Arabidopsis. As shown in Fig. 4 and Table S4, not all bHLH members in cucumber were included in these 23 subfamilies, which suggested that there were differences between cucumber and Arabidopsis during the process of evolution.

Studies had shown that gene duplication events played a crucial role in the rapid expansion and evolution of gene families [26]. In the cucumber genome, we identified 231 segmental duplication events and 1468 tandem duplication gene pairs (Table S1). Seven segmental duplication events and five tandem duplication gene pairs were found in the CsbHLH family (Fig. 3a). In general, the gene functions of a clade are highly conserved among different plant species, but it is not absolute. Therefore, it is of great significance to accurately identify the true orthologs between plant species based on synteny analysis. The results showed that the cucumber genome had extensive synteny with the Arabidopsis and tomato genomes, and 944 and 983 syntenic blocks between the cucumber and Arabidopsis and tomato genome were identified, respectively (Table S5). Many CsbHLH genes showed a linear relationship with the tomato and Arabidopsis genes, respectively (Fig. 3b; Table S2).

Previous studies have shown that orthologous genes are usually distributed in the same clade, and have similar functions. In our study, many CsbHLH proteins were grouped into some functional clades of Arabidopsis, providing valuable information for studying the functions of CsbHLHs. CsMYC1 and CsbHLH042 were grouped into subfamily5 along with AtGL3, AtEGL3, AtMYC1 and AtTT8, and were highly homologous to these proteins. In Arabidopsis, AtGL3, AtEGL3 and AtTT8 have been demonstrated to be key regulators of anthocyanin and PA biosynthesis [22]. Moreover, AtGL3, AtEGL3 and AtMYC1 were shown to regulate trichome formation and root hair patterning [19, 47]. Therefore, it is possible that CsMYC1 and CsbHLH042 may control trichome formation and PA biosynthesis in cucumber.

Cucumber bHLH genes may play important roles in abiotic stress tolerance

In the process of plant response to abiotic stress, bHLH TFs act as regulatory genes to regulate the expression changes of related stress genes, thus playing an important role in stress responses. Many studies have shown that bHLH TFs can respond to a range of stresses. For example, in addition to being involved in the morphogenesis of stomata, the TFs INDUCER OF CBF EXPESSION1 (ICE1) and ICE2 in Arabidopsis and their homologous genes in other species can play key roles in the response to low temperature stress [31, 46]. RERJ1 is upregulated in the event of physical damage and drought stress to plants [48]. All these examples indicate that bHLH TFs can play a certain role in response to abiotic stress. However, little is known about the functions of the bHLH gene family in cucumber. To better analyse the protein functions of the bHLH gene family in cucumber, we conducted a preliminary analysis of three aspects to reveal the functions of the CsbHLH gene family.

How cis-elements in the promoters of the bHLH genes respond to the environment will affect their roles in stimulating and regulating gene expression. Cis-element analyses indicated that there were a wide range of elements on the gene promoters of CsbHLH responding to different stresses, such as TCA-element, MBS and LTR (Fig. S3). MYB binding site involved in drought-inducibility existed in many CsbHLH gene promoters (Table S3), indicating that MYB TFs may regulate CsbHLHs expression in drought stress. The TC-rich and ABRE elements related to ABA-dependent or independent stress tolerance also appeared in some CsbHLH gene promoters [49]. In general, according to the cis-acting element contained on the promoters, these CsbHLH genes might play key roles responsing to various stresses in cucumber. In addition, the functions of 50 CsbHLHs were predicted, which were mainly related to stress responses and development processes (Table S4). For the third aspect, the regulatory networks for 142 CsbHLH genes were predicted, suggesting that a number of genes could respond to stimuli (Table S6). For example, bHLH093 and ICE1 were involved in the ABA signalling pathway, which were crucial for abiotic stress responses in plants [49, 50]. These results suggested that the bHLH gene family may also be involved in the response to stress, metabolic regulation, and plant development in cucumber, consistent with previous research [10, 12]. Subsequently, we analysed and screened CsbHLH genes that might respond to stress, as it is very important to improve stress tolerance of cucumber. According to cis-element analyses, the promoter regions of 60 CsbHLHs were rich in TC-rich cis-elements, suggesting that they may be involved in stress responses and defense (Fig. S3). Moreover, the promoters of 106 CsbHLHs contained the ABA-responsive element, responding to ABA stress and 41 CsbHLHs contained the LTR element, responding to cold stress. The phylogenetic analyses between Arabidopsis and cucumber further showed that 25 CsbHLHs might respond to abiotic stresses, such as ABA, salt, cold and drought (Table S4). Through comprehensive analysis, we carefully screened 21, 20 and 25 bHLH genes that were likely to respond to low temperature (4 °C), salt (NaCl) and ABA, respectively. The screened CsbHLH genes all responded to stress treatments under the respective stress conditions (Fig. 5). CsbHLH041 was induced by salt and ABA (Fig. 5a-b), and 35S:CsbHLH041 transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana and transient transformed cucumber cotyledons were shown to have enhanced tolerance to salt and ABA (Fig. 6; Fig. 7). In general, these results provided a good reference for further functional studies of CsbHLH gene family in cucumber.

Conclusions

Our study investigated the bHLH family genes in detail in cucumber. We also performed expression analyses of the selected genes under different stress treatments, and detailed functions of CsbHLH041 using the transgenic method. This work provides new insights into the functions and regulatory mechanisms of CsbHLH proteins in cucumber abiotic stress tolerance and growth and development.

Methods

Genome-wide identification of the CsbHLH genes in cucumber

To identify the CsbHLH gene family members from the entire cucumber genome database, 166 Arabidopsis bHLH proteins were used as query sequences and BlastP searches against the predicted cucumber proteins. In addition, the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile of the bHLH domain (PF00010) from the Pfam database (available online: http://pfam.janelia.org) was also applied as a query to search the bHLH genes. We further examined the bHLH domains of all candidate bHLH genes as described by [24].

Phylogenetic analysis and multiple sequence alignment

The sequence logos for bHLHs were obtained by submitting the multiple alignment sequences to the website (http://weblogo.berkeley.edu/logo.cgi) [51]. A phylogenetic tree was constructed with the aligned fully predicted protein sequences of 142 bHLH genes using MEGA7 (https://www.megasoftware.net/) [52]. The neighbour-joining (NJ) method was used with the following parameters: Poisson correction, pairwise deletion, and bootstrap (1000 replicates; random seed). The phylogenetic tree was visualized by plotting it using the EvolView tool (http://www.evolgenius.info). Classification of the CsbHLH genes was then performed according to their phylogenetic relationships with their corresponding Arabidopsis bHLH genes. Multiple sequence alignments were performed as described by [26].

Conserved motif and gene structure analysis

The 142 CsbHLH gene structures were analysed as described by [53]. Conserved motif structures in CsbHLHs were identified using MEME (http://meme-suite.org/index.html) [26].

Gene duplication and chromosomal distribution

The gene duplication events were assessed as described by [54]. According to the physical location information in the cucumber genome database, 142 CsbHLH genes were mapped to cucumber chromosomes as described by [26], and the syntenic analysis maps were completed using TBtools [26].

Analysis of the bHLH gene promoter in cucumber

We downloaded the entire cucumber genome sequence from the cucumber genome database (Chinese Long 9930) and extracted the 2-kb long sequences upstream of the transcription start site of these 142 CsbHLH genes. The cis-acting elements on the promoter regions of these genes were analysed using PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) software [55].

Plant materials and growth conditions

Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv ‘Xintaimici’) seeds, provided by Professor Chenxing Cao (Shandong Agricultural University), were germinated on moist filter paper in an incubator at 28 °C for 1 day. The germinated seeds were sown into soil mixture in an ordinary illuminated incubator at Shandong Agricultural University. After 10 days, batches of 12 seedlings were transferred to a plastic tank filled with an aerated nutrient solution (pH 6.0–6.5) containing the following: Ca (NO₃)₂: 3.5 mM, KNO₃: 7 mM, KH₂PO₄: 0.78 mM, MgSO₄: 2 mM, H₃BO₃: 29.6 μM, MnSO₄: 10 μM, Fe-EDTA: 50 μM, ZnSO₄: 1.0 μM, H₂MoO₄: 0.05 μM and CuSO₄: 0.95 μM. The experiment was carried out as previously described [56].

RNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was isolated from cucumber and Arabidopsis plants using an RNAprep pure Plant Kit (TianGen, Beijing, China), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, reverse transcribed using the PrimeScript®1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Japan). The qRT-PCR reactions were performed using the UltraSYBR Mixture (with ROX I; Cwbiotech) with the iCycler iQ5 system (BioRad, CA, USA). The results were normalized to those of the cucumber ACTIN gene. Three biological replicates were used for each analysis. The primers used in this study are provided in Table S7.

Overexpression vector construction, Arabidopsis transformation and transient transformation in cucumber cotyledons

The full-length coding sequence of CsbHLH041 was recombined into the pCAMBIA1300 vector. The construct was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404, which was used for transformation of Arabidopsis plants and 8-d-old cucumber cotyledons [57]. The Arabidopsis seeds were Colombia (Col-0), which were bred in our laboratory. Homozygous T3 transgenic Arabidopsis lines were identified by hygromycin (300 mg/L) selection.

Abiotic stress tolerance assays and ABA sensitivity analysis

For Arabidopsis salt stress and ABA treatment, the seeds of CsbHLH041 T3-generation homozygous lines and Col-0 (WT) were sown in vermiculite soil in pots and cultured under normal conditions at 22 °C for 3 weeks. For salt treatment, the 3-week-old seedlings were watered with 200 mM NaCl solution every other day, and the growth of Col-0 (WT) and CsbHLH041 transgenic lines was observed every 4 days. For ABA treatments, the 3-week-old seedlings were watered with 100 μM ABA solution every other day, and phenotypes were evaluated every 4 days. To check the seed germination rate in response to salt stress and ABA treatment, the seeds of Col-0 (WT) and transgenic lines were surface sterilized and sown in 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 2 μM ABA or 100 mM NaCl, respectively, under normal conditions at 22 °C in a growth chamber. The germination rate was scored on the 7th day after culturing on the plates.

To determine the salt tolerance and ABA sensitivity in cotyledons of 8-d-old cucumber seedlings with transient infiltration of 35S and 35S:CsbHLH041, selected seedlings with equivalent growth were transferred to 6 L nutrient solution for hydroponic growth. Hoagland nutrient solution was used for culture, and the seedlings were grown hydroponically for 2 days before salt and ABA treatment. They were then treated with salt and ABA, and the final concentration in the medium was 100 mM and 100 μM, respectively. To ensure the reliability of the experiment, the cucumber seedlings with transient infiltration of 35S and 35S:CsbHLH041 were cultured in the same hydroponic box. The changes in transgenic and control seedlings were observed at different time periods.

Determination of physiological parameters

The cucumber cotyledons of 35S empty vector and 35S:CsbHLH041 seedlings were collected at different time points during salt and ABA stress treatment, then frozen in liquid nitrogen for subsequent experiments. The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) were determined as previously described [58].

The functional annotations and protein association network predictions

We submitted the 142 CsbHLH protein sequences to the online server (version 10.0; http://string-db.org). For details was as described by [40].

Abbreviations

bHLH

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix

At

Arabidopsis thaliana

Cs

Cucumis sativus L

MS

Murashige and Skoog

qRT-PCR

Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR

CDS

Coding Sequence

ABA

Abscisic acid

pI

Isoelectric point

WT

Wild type

Authors’ contributions

JL and ZR conceived and designed the experiments. JL, TW and JH performed the experiments. JL analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. ZR revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by fundings from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672170 and 31872950), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (JQ201309), the Shandong “Double Tops” Program (SYL2017YSTD06) and the ‘Taishan Scholar’ Foundation of the People’s Government of Shandong Province (ts20130932). The funds played no role in study design, data analysis, and manuscript preparation.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the results are included within the article and its additional files. Other relevant materials are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12870-020-02440-1.