Skip to main content
ACR Open Rheumatology logoLink to ACR Open Rheumatology
. 2020 May 26;2(6):371–377. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11132

Modifiable Lifestyle Factors Associated With Response to Treatment in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Zoe Brown 1, Robert Metcalf 1, Jana Bednarz 2, Llewellyn Spargo 1, Anita Lee 1, Catherine Hill 3, Mihir Wechalekar 4, Christiana Stavrou 5, Michael James 1, Les Cleland 3, Susanna Proudman 3,
PMCID: PMC7301874  PMID: 32453505

Abstract

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the associations between response to algorithm‐directed treat‐to‐target conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug therapy and potentially modifiable lifestyle factors, including dietary fish oil supplementation, body mass index (BMI), and smoking history in a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) inception cohort.

Methods

Patients with RA with a duration of less than 12 months were reviewed every 3 to 6 weeks to adjust therapy according to disease response. All patients received advice to take fish oil supplements, and omega‐3 status was measured as plasma levels of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). Lifestyle factors and other variables potentially prognostic for 28‐joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) remission and DAS28 low disease activity (LDA) at the 12‐month visit were included in multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

Of 300 participants, 57.7% reached DAS28 LDA, and 43.7% were in DAS28 remission at 1 year. Increase in plasma EPA was associated with an increase in the odds of being in LDA (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.27; P < 0.0001) and remission (adjusted OR = 1.21; P < 0.001). There was some evidence that the effect of BMI on LDA might be modified by smoking history. An increase in BMI was associated with a decrease in the odds of being in LDA in current and former smokers but had no impact on LDA in patients who had never smoked. There were no meaningful associations between BMI or smoking history and remission.

Conclusion

Omega‐3 status, BMI, and smoking history are potential predictors of outcome in early RA. The possibility of an effect modification by smoking on the predictive value of BMI merits further investigation.


Significance & Innovations.

  • Fish and fish oil intake, body mass index (BMI), and smoking are potentially modifiable factors associated with response to drug treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

  • Plasma omega‐3 levels were strongly and favorably associated with the response to treatment in early RA.

  • There was some indication of effect modification by smoking history on the relationship between BMI and disease outcomes.

  • The results on the BMI/smoking interaction are novel and are a prompt for analysis with other data sets.

INTRODUCTION

There is evidence that potentially modifiable lifestyle factors, such as dietary omega‐3 fats 1, 2, 3, smoking status 4, 5, 6, and body mass index (BMI) 7, 8, 9, have a role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) outcomes.

A double‐blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated a beneficial effect of dietary fish oil supplements on American College of Rheumatology (ACR)–defined remission in early RA (1). In that study, plasma levels of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), the main omega‐3 fatty acid in fish oil, were directly associated with ACR‐defined remission (2). Another cross‐sectional analysis of baseline data from a cohort study showed that increased fish consumption was associated with lower 28‐joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) scores and C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels (3).

Meta‐analyses of case‐control and cohort studies reported that smoking is a risk factor for the development of RA. Smokers have a higher risk for developing rheumatoid factor (RF)–positive and anti–citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)–positive disease 6, 10, and there is a dose response for risk with pack‐years of smoking (5). Although current guidelines recommend that patients with RA be advised to cease smoking (11), the evidence of a role for smoking in the progression or activity of RA remains equivocal 12, 13, 14, 15.

A meta‐analysis showed reduced attainment of minimal disease activity (MDA) in patients with obesity and RA compared with normal‐weight patients with RA, but there was no adjustment for smoking (8). In two UK early RA cohorts, adjustment for potential confounders, including smoking status, slightly strengthened the relationship between obesity and less frequent low disease activity (LDA) (16). In a Canadian early RA cohort, adjustment for potential confounders, including smoking status, had little to no effect on the relationship between reduced sustained remission in patients with RA who have obesity and overweight (9). In RCTs involving golimumab, obesity but not overweight status decreased the rate of remission using the DAS28, but again there was no adjustment for smoking history (17). When measured continuously, BMI was not associated with DAS28 remission at 6 months after rituximab treatment, although no correction was made for smoking history (18). Overall, few studies have examined BMI as a continuous variable.

There is evidence from both RCT data and long‐term observational data for improved clinical and patient‐reported outcomes associated with treat‐to‐target (T2T) strategies in the management of RA (19). With the exception of the fish oil supplementation RCT (1), to our knowledge, none of the other studies that involved fish intake, smoking, and body weight were done in the context of modern T2T approaches applied uniformly in the study cohort. Also, there have been no data on these three potentially modifiable lifestyle factors collected simultaneously from a single cohort that allow for the examination of interactions between them. The possibility of effect modification between these modifiable factors would be important to understand for purposes of tailoring patient advice. We examined the effect of these lifestyle factors on the response to treatment in an early RA cohort that used protocolized T2T conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) therapy (20).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Participants

Consecutive patients with recent onset polyarthritis who were attending the Early Arthritis Clinic at the Royal Adelaide Hospital were assessed. Those with disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)–naïve RA (according to the 1987 revised ACR criteria) with polyarthritis of less than 12 months’ duration for whom the decision had been made to commence triple therapy with the csDMARDs sulfasalazine (SSZ), hydroxychloroquine, and methotrexate (MTX) and who provided consent were included in this cohort. Within this cohort of 300 patients, which accrued over 17 years of clinic activity, were 139 patients who had participated in an RCT of fish oil supplementation that was embedded in the usual clinic practice (1). Recruitment was balanced throughout this period, with 15.8 ± 4.4 (mean ± SD) participants enrolled per year, and the same clinicians were involved in the assessment of patients over this period.

Treatment

Treatment in this clinic is protocol driven and has been described elsewhere (20). Both the RCT participants and the observational cohort patients were treated according to the same protocol, which had a T2T intent with the target being a DAS28–erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of less than 2.6 (remission). Triple csDMARD therapy was initiated and escalated according to an algorithm that is responsive to disease activity (Figure 1). It is also standard practice for all patients in this clinic to receive a recommendation to take 10 to 15 ml of fish oil per day, and this will provide at least 3 g of combined EPA and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) per day, which is considered an anti‐inflammatory dose 21, 22. The extent to which this advice is followed is a matter of patient preference. Those in the RCT were randomized to receive either 5.5 or 0.4 g combined EPA and DHA per day in a blinded and masked fashion (1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Treatment of recent onset rheumatoid arthritis in the Royal Adelaide Hospital Early Arthritis Clinic. DAS28, 28‐joint Disease Activity Score; DMARD, disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug; MTX, methotrexate; SSA, sulfasalazine.

Study outcomes

Patients were assessed every 3 to 6 weeks until the target DAS28 level was reached, after which reviews occurred every 3 months. RA outcomes included the routine assessment of DAS28 scores employing ESR, in which remission is defined as a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 2.6 and a DAS28 LDA score of less than or equal to 3.2 (23). Blood was taken at each clinic visit for plasma EPA, which was measured as a percentage of total fatty acids as described previously (24).

Statistical methods

DAS28 remission at 12 months (score of less than or equal to 2.6) included DAS28 LDA (score of less than or equal to 3.2). Prognostic variables for DAS28 remission and DAS28 LDA at 12 months were identified using multivariable logistic regression models. Prognostic variables evaluated in the models included sex, baseline BMI, baseline age, baseline smoking status (current, former, or never), baseline RF, anti–citrullinated protein antibody status, shared epitope, and mean plasma EPA level over 1 year. Associations between variables were described using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All analyses were performed using Stata software version 15 (StataCorp).

RESULTS

Participants had recent onset RA with a median duration of 16.0 weeks, and the baseline DAS28 score was 5.4 ± 1.3 (mean ± SD) (high disease activity) (Table 1). Of 300 participants, 179 (57.6%) were in DAS28 LDA and 136 (43.7%) were in DAS28 remission at 1 year. Patient group (RCT or clinic) was examined but excluded from the multivariable logistic model because it was not related to either DAS28 remission or LDA at 1 year.

Table 1.

Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics

Patient Characteristics Results
Age at onset, mean ± SD, y 55.5 ± 14.9
Female sex, n (%) 211/300 (70.3)
Duration of polyarthritis, median (IQR), wk 16.0 (11.1‐24.6)
RF +ve, n (%) 181/299 (60.5)
ACPA +ve, n (%) 156/289 (54.0)
Shared epitope +ve, n (%) 191/197 (64.3)
BMI, median (IQR) 27.3 (24.3‐31.1)
Smoking history, n (%)  
Current smoker 51 (17.0)
Former smoker 99 (33.0)
Never smoked 143 (47.7)
Unknown 7 (2.3)
DAS28‐ESR, mean ± SD 5.4 ± 1.3

Abbreviation: ACPA, anticitrullinated protein antibody; BMI, body mass index; DAS28, 28‐joint Disease Activity Score; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; IQR, interquartile range; RF, rheumatoid factor; +ve, positive.

The variability in uptake of advice to take fish oil supplements led to a wide range of plasma EPA levels among clinic patients who did not take part in the RCT. The variability in plasma EPA levels in the RCT participants overlapped with that of the other clinic patients, and the data from the two groups were pooled in the analyses (Figure 2). A higher mean plasma EPA level (measured as a percentage of total fatty acids) was associated with an increase in the odds of being in DAS28 LDA at 1 year (adjusted OR = 1.27; 95% CI 1.12‐1.45; P < 0.0001) and DAS28 remission at 1 year (adjusted OR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.08‐1.36; P < 0.001) (Table 2). All two‐way interactions involving BMI, sex, and EPA were examined one at a time in separate multivariable logistic regression models. There was no evidence of an interaction between plasma EPA and any of the other variables.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mean plasma eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) (percentage of total fatty acid) for clinic patients who did not participate in the randomized controlled trial (RCT) and for those who did take part in the RCT, which had low‐dose and high‐dose fish oil arms. Horizontal bars represent medians.

Table 2.

Adjusted odds ratios of DAS28 low disease activity at 1 y after commencing treatmenta

Variable Odds Ratio Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI P
Plasma EPA 1.268 1.116 1.440 0.003
Smoking 0.106b
BMI 0.936b
Interaction of BMI x smoking history 0.066c
BMI (current smoker) 0.803 0.670 0.962 0.017
BMI former smoker 0.913 0.842 0.991 0.029
BMI never smoked 1.004 0.919 1.097 0.936
Shared epitope status        
Positive 1.215 0.637 2.319 0.555
Anti‐CCP status at baseline        
Positive 1.378 0.642 2.957 0.410
RF status at baseline        
Positive 1.188 0.586 2.406 0.633
Female sex 0.583 0.290 1.170 0.129
Age at baseline, y 0.986 0.965 1.007 0.198
Cohort        
RCT 0.601 0.335 1.077 0.087
Non‐RCT 1

Abbreviation: anti‐CCP, anti–citrullinated protein antibody; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval, EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RF, rheumatoid factor.

a

Odds ratios are adjusted for all other variables shown in the model.

b

Main‐effect P value should be ignored when an interaction term is present.

c

Global P value.

Bold indicates significant value P < 0.05.

There was evidence for an interaction between smoking status and BMI on DAS28 LDA. An increase in BMI was associated with a decrease in the odds of being in DAS28 LDA in current and former smokers, but BMI had no impact on LDA in patients who had never smoked (Table 2) (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Predicted probability of 28‐joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) low disease activity at 1 year by body mass index (BMI) and smoking status.

Smoking history was not associated with DAS28 remission. There was a modest association of BMI with DAS remission (OR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.89‐0.99; P = 0.034).

Neither shared epitope or RF ACPA positivity appeared to be associated with either DAS28 remission or LDA.

DISCUSSION

These results, which combine data from our early RA cohort treated according to our standard T2T practice and an RCT nested within this standard practice, demonstrate a strong positive association between plasma levels of EPA and odds of achieving DAS28 LDA and DAS28 remission. They provide evidence for the efficacy of fish oil supplementation as an adjunct to T2T therapy in the management of patients with early RA. They are consistent with a recent review and meta‐analysis of fish oil supplementation in RA that concluded that fish oil has an important role in the management of RA when used in conjunction with other pharmacotherapy (25).

Importantly, there is biological plausibility for these observations. EPA exerts anti‐inflammatory effects by competitively inhibiting the production of pro‐inflammatory prostaglandins and leukotrienes and by its conversion to E‐resolvins, which suppress inflammation 26, 27. Resolvins derived from both EPA and DHA, the two main omega‐3 fatty acids in fish oil, can suppress inflammatory cytokine production, including tumor necrosis factor α (TNF‐α) (28), and have been shown to suppress inflammation in animal models (29).

Related to the effect of omega‐3 fatty acids on disease activity are reports that increased omega‐3 fatty acid intake is associated with decreased risk for onset of RA. This was seen in a cohort of US women aged less than or equal to 55 years but not more than 55 years (30) and in a Swedish cohort of women in whom the risk was adjusted for age (31). In a sample selected for ACPA positivity from a public RA screening in Colorado, red blood cell omega‐3 fatty acid content was inversely associated with the incidence of inflammatory arthritis (32).

Smoking is a risk factor for the development of RA, especially seropositive disease 5, 6, 10. Even though current guidelines for RA treatment recommend cessation of smoking, the effect of smoking status on disease outcome is less clear than that on RA incidence. Analysis of a North American registry comprising recent onset and established RA (Corrona) indicated that disease activity at baseline was worse in smokers relative to nonsmokers but that there was no difference in the change in the Clinical Disease Activity Index for those who ceased smoking vs. those who continued smoking (12). In an early RA Spanish clinic, there was no difference between smokers and nonsmokers in the clinical disease response to treatment (33). In an early RA French cohort, smoking had no effect on clinical disease response to treatment, and radiographic disease progression was less in current smokers compared with nonsmokers (15). However, current smoking at baseline predicted a poor European League Against Rheumatism response to treatment at 12 months in a Swedish early arthritis cohort (34). Although there have been some specific smoking cessation studies in RA, they were concerned with the success/failure of smoking cessation and did not measure clinical outcomes 35, 36.

In the absence of adjustment for smoking history, BMI was not found to be associated with DAS28 remission at 6 months after rituximab treatment (18). There have been few studies with BMI as a continuous variable, with most studies of body weight using categories for analysis. Secondary analysis of data from two RCTs involving golimumab intervention indicated that obesity, but not overweight status, decreased the rate of DAS28 remission at 24 weeks, but there was no correction for smoking history (17). A meta‐analysis also showed that relative to normal weight, attainment of MDA was lower for patients with RA and obesity but not for patients who had overweight. Again, no adjustment was made for smoking (8). Data from two early RA inception cohorts (the Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Study [ERAS] and Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Network [ERAN]) show that obesity was associated with decreased DAS28 LDA compared with normal/overweight in groups at 2 years but not at 5 years and that adjusting for potential confounders, including smoking status, increased the magnitude of the association (16). Unlike our current study, treatment was not standardized, and SSZ was the main starting DMARD in the late 1980s (ERAS), with a gradual switch to MTX as the starting DMARD after 2002 (ERAN), and there was little use of combination therapy (37). In a Canadian early RA cohort, patients with obesity and overweight had decreased sustained remission compared with normal body weight groups; adjustment for potential confounders, including smoking, had little effect on the hazard ratios (9).

Overall, the published literature has discrepant reports for the effect of smoking on disease response to treatment. The interaction between smoking and BMI on response to treatment in early RA in the present study suggests that future studies of smoking and RA outcomes should be adjusted for BMI and assessed for effect modification by BMI. Also, those studies that primarily examine the effect of BMI on RA outcomes should be adjusted for smoking history. It is difficult to explain an interaction between smoking and BMI for RA outcomes by considering mechanistic interactions, especially because the mechanism for the poorer outcomes in individuals with obesity and increased incidence in smokers are speculative.

Excess adipose tissue can produce inflammatory adipokines as well as TNF‐α and interleukin 6, and circulating levels of these cytokines are elevated in obesity (38). In support of excess adipose tissue being causal, weight loss, especially that after bariatric surgery, reduced the plasma ESR and CRP level and improved RA disease activity 39, 40.

The risk of smoking relates mainly to RA incidence rather than disease severity, and it does not appear to be a general or broad toxicity agent. The shared epitope genotype increases the smoking‐related risk for RA in patients who are ACPA positive, strongly suggesting that smoking is a trigger for an adaptive immune response (10). A proposed two‐step model for smoking/shared epitope/ACPA linkage leading to inflammatory arthropathy involves the interaction of ACPA and locally generated citrullinated peptides within the joint space, with the formation of immune complexes (41). Because ACPA status precedes clinical RA by several years and does not change during the disease 41, 42, it is unlikely that cessation of smoking in this group would decrease disease activity, and this has been observed (12). Thus, the possibility of a mechanistic interaction between smoking and body weight cannot be proposed given current knowledge. An alternative explanation would be that smoking and BMI are proxies for another factor, such as socioeconomic status or medication adherence, for example, that influences outcomes in RA.

The strengths of the present study include the reporting of objective and validated outcome measures. Patients enrolled in the cohort were well characterized regarding nonmodifiable and modifiable factors, including a biomarker of fish and fish oil intake, and received contemporary, protocolized T2T therapy. The limitations of this study are that it is an observational study, and causal relationships are precluded. A prospective intervention study would be needed to assess whether weight loss in smokers would improve clinical outcomes. A further limitation is that relevant potential confounders are not captured. As stated above, smoking and BMI may be proxies for socioeconomic status, physical activity, and medication adherence, for example, and these were not measured.

Omega‐3 status in patients with early RA receiving T2T is positively associated with increased odds of achieving DAS28 LDA at 1 year. The effect modification by smoking status on the association of BMI with treatment outcomes in early RA is novel and requires exploration with other data sets. If it is supported by further studies, it could inform lifestyle counseling for patients with RA. At this time, it is clear that modifiable factors are associated with RA outcomes, and the impact of potentially modifiable factors should be taken into account in the routine care of patients with RA.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors were involved in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and all authors approved the final version to be published. Dr. Proudman had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study conception and design

Brown, James, Cleland, Proudman.

Acquisition of data

Brown, Lee, Hill, Wechalekar, Stavrou, Cleland, Proudman.

Analysis and interpretation of data

Metcalf, Bednarz, Spargo, James, Proudman.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Ms Leah McWilliams who performed metrology and co‐ordination for this study is acknowledged with thanks.

Supported by an unrestricted research grant from Melrose Health, Mount Waverley, Victoria, Australia.

1Zoe Brown, MBBS, Robert Metcalf, PhD, Llewellyn Spargo, BSc, Anita Lee, PhD, FRACP, Michael James, PhD: Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; 2Jana Bednarz, BPsych, GDip: University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; 3Catherine Hill, MD, FRACP, Les Cleland, MD, FRACP, Susanna Proudman, FRACP: Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; 4Mihir Wechalekar, PhD, FRACP: Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia; 5Christiana Stavrou, BMBS, MRCP: University College London Hospital, London, UK.

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Proudman SM, James MJ, Spargo LD, Metcalf RG, Sullivan TR, Rischmueller M, et al. Fish oil in recent onset rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double‐blind controlled trial within algorithm‐based drug use. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:89–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Proudman SM, Cleland LG, Metcalf RG, Sullivan TR, Spargo LD, James MJ. Plasma n‐3 fatty acids and clinical outcomes in recent‐onset rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Nutr 2015;114:885–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Tedeschi SK, Bathon JM, Giles JT, Lin TC, Yoshida K, Solomon DH. Relationship between fish consumption and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018;70:327–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Costenbader KH, Feskanich D, Mandl LA, Karlson EW. Smoking intensity, duration, and cessation, and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis in women. Am J Med 2006;119:503.e1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Di Giuseppe D, Discacciati A, Orsini N, Wolk A. Cigarette smoking and risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a dose‐response meta‐analysis. Arthritis Res Ther 2014;16:R61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sugiyama D, Nishimura K, Tamaki K, Tsuji G, Nakazawa T, Morinobu A, et al. Impact of smoking as a risk factor for developing rheumatoid arthritis: a meta‐analysis of observational studies. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:70–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Liu Y, Hazlewood GS, Kaplan GG, Eksteen B, Barnabe C. Impact of obesity on remission and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:157–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lupoli R, Pizzicato P, Scalera A, Ambrosino P, Amato M, Peluso R, et al. Impact of body weight on the achievement of minimal disease activity in patients with rheumatic diseases: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Arthritis Res Ther 2016;18:297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Schulman E, Bartlett SJ, Schieir O, Andersen KM, Boire G, Pope JE, et al. Overweight, obesity, and the likelihood of achieving sustained remission in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicenter prospective cohort study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018;70:1185–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Klareskog L, Padyukov L, Alfredsson L. Smoking as a trigger for inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2007;19:49–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Combe B, Landewe R, Daien CI, Hua C, Aletaha D, Alvaro‐Gracia JM, et al. 2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:948–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Fisher MC, Hochberg MC, el‐Taha M, Kremer JM, Peng C, Greenberg JD, et al. Smoking, smoking cessation, and disease activity in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2012;39:904–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lu B, Rho YH, Cui J, Iannaccone CK, Frits ML, Karlson EW, et al. Associations of smoking and alcohol consumption with disease activity and functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2014;41:24–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gianfrancesco MA, Trupin L, Shiboski S, van der Laan M, Graf J, Imboden J, et al. Smoking is associated with higher disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal study controlling for time‐varying covariates. J Rheumatol 2019;46:370–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Vesperini V, Lukas C, Fautrel B, Le Loet X, Rincheval N, Combe B. Association of tobacco exposure and reduction of radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from a French multicenter cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013;65:1899–906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Nikiphorou E, Norton S, Young A, Dixey J, Walsh D, Helliwell H, et al. The association of obesity with disease activity, functional ability and quality of life in early rheumatoid arthritis: data from the Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Study/Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Network UK prospective cohorts. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018;57:1194–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. George MD, Ostergaard M, Conaghan PG, Emery P, Baker DG, Baker JF. Obesity and rates of clinical remission and low MRI inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1743–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ottaviani S, Gardette A, Roy C, Tubach F, Gill G, Palazzo E, et al. Body mass index and response to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2015;82:432–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Stoffer MA, Schoels MM, Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Breedveld FC, Burmester G, et al. Evidence for treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: results of a systematic literature search update [published erratum appears in Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:946]. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:16–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Proudman SM, Keen HI, Stamp LK, Lee AT, Goldblatt F, Ayres OC, et al. Response‐driven combination therapy with conventional disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs can achieve high response rates in early rheumatoid arthritis with minimal glucocorticoid and nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug use. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2007;37:99–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Cleland LG, James MJ, Proudman SM. Fish oil: what the prescriber needs to know [published erratum appears in Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:402]. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Proudman SM, Cleland LG, James MJ. Dietary omega‐3 fats for treatment of inflammatory joint disease: efficacy and utility. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2008;34:469–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Schipper LG, van Hulst LT, Grol R, van Riel PL, Hulscher ME, Fransen J. Meta‐analysis of tight control strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: protocolized treatment has additional value with respect to the clinical outcome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:2154–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Metcalf RG, James MJ, Mantzioris E, Cleland LG. A practical approach to increasing intake of n‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: use of novel foods enriched with n‐3 fats. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57:1605–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Petersson S, Philippou E, Rodomar C, Nikiphorou E. The Mediterranean diet, fish oil supplements and rheumatoid arthritis outcomes: evidence from clinical trials. Autoimmun Rev 2018;17:1105–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Serhan CN, Savill J. Resolution of inflammation: the beginning programs the end. Nat Immunol 2005;6:1191–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Calder PC. Omega‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and inflammatory processes: nutrition or pharmacology? [in review]. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2013;75:645–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Chiurchiù V, Leuti A, Dalli J, Jacobsson A, Battistini L, Maccarrone M, et al. Proresolving lipid mediators resolvin D1, resolvin D2, and maresin 1 are critical in modulating T cell responses. Sci Transl Med 2016;8:353ra111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Serhan CN, Chiang N, van Dyke TE. Resolving inflammation: dual anti‐inflammatory and pro‐resolution lipid mediators. Nat Rev Immunol 2008;8:349–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sparks JA, O'Reilly EJ, Barbhaiya M, Tedeschi SK, Malspeis S, Lu B, et al. Association of fish intake and smoking with risk of rheumatoid arthritis and age of onset: a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019;20:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Di Giuseppe D, Wallin A, Bottai M, Askling J, Wolk A. Long‐term intake of dietary long‐chain n‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective cohort study of women. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1949–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Gan RW, Bemis EA, Demoruelle MK, Striebich CC, Brake S, Feser ML, et al. The association between omega‐3 fatty acid biomarkers and inflammatory arthritis in an anti‐citrullinated protein antibody positive population. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017;56:2229–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ruiz‐Esquide V, Gomez‐Puerta JA, Canete JD, Graell E, Vazquez I, Ercilla MG, et al. Effects of smoking on disease activity and radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2011;38:2536–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Soderlin MK, Petersson IF, Bergman S, Svensson B, BARFOT study group . Smoking at onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its effect on disease activity and functional status: experiences from BARFOT, a long‐term observational study on early RA. Scand J Rheumatol 2011;40:249–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Aimer P, Treharne GJ, Stebbings S, Frampton C, Cameron V, Kirby S, et al. Efficacy of a rheumatoid arthritis‐specific smoking cessation program: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:28–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Naranjo A, Bilbao A, Erausquin C, Ojeda S, Francisco FM, Rúa‐Figueroa I, et al. Results of a specific smoking cessation program for patients with arthritis in a rheumatology clinic. Rheumatol Int 2014;34:93–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Young A, Dixey J, Williams P, Prouse P, Cox N, Kiely P, et al. An evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of a register of newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis, 1986–2010. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011;50(1):176–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Ouchi N, Parker JL, Lugus JJ, Walsh K. Adipokines in inflammation and metabolic disease. Nat Rev Immunol 2011;11:85–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Kreps DJ, Halperin F, Desai SP, Zhang ZZ, Losina E, Olson AT, et al. Association of weight loss with improved disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis using electronic medical record data. Int J Clin Rheumatol 2018;13:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Sparks JA, Halperin F, Karlson JC, Karlson EW, Bermas BL. Impact of bariatric surgery on patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015;67:1619–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Klareskog L, Catrina AI, Paget S. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2009;373:659–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Rönnelid J, Wick MC, Lampa J, Lindblad S, Nordmark B, Klareskog L, et al. Longitudinal analysis of citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (anti‐CP) during 5 year follow up in early rheumatoid arthritis: anti‐CP status predicts worse disease activity and greater radiological progression. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:1744–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACR Open Rheumatology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES