Introduction
The primary structural component of the bacterial cell wall is peptidoglycan, which is essential for viability and whose synthesis is the target for crucial antibiotics1,2. Peptidoglycan is a single macromolecule made of glycan chains crosslinked by peptide side branches that surrounds the cell, acting as a constraint to internal turgor1,3. In Gram positive bacteria peptidoglycan is tens of nanometres thick, generally portrayed as a homogeneous structure providing mechanical strength4–6. Here we applied Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)7–12 to interrogate the morphologically distinct Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis species, using live cells and purified peptidoglycan. The mature surface of live cells is characterised by a landscape of large (up to 60 nm diameter), deep (up to 23 nm) pores constituting a disordered gel of peptidoglycan. The inner peptidoglycan surface, reflecting more nascent material, is much denser with glycan strand spacing typically less than 7 nm. Inner surface architecture is location dependent; the cylinder of B. subtilis has dense circumferential orientation, whilst in S. aureus and division septa for both species, peptidoglycan is dense but randomly oriented. Revealing the cell envelope molecular architecture frames understanding of its mechanical properties and role as the environmental interface13–14, providing information complementary to traditional structural biology approaches.
Exponentially grown S. aureus cells were immobilised in microfabricated wells15 on silicon substrates, and imaged live using small cantilever, small amplitude AFM. Large scans recapitulated known mesh (mature) and ring (freshly revealed division plane) surface architectures of S. aureus7,8 (Fig 1a). High resolution revealed the mesh (Fig 1b and Extended data ED1) to be randomly oriented strands of varying widths with pores up to 23 nm deep (Fig 1c). As the wall thickness2 is approximately 20 nm, some pores must span the majority of, if not the entire, wall. Lack of the major wall-associated polymers, wall teichoic acid (WTA)16, or lipoteichoic acid (LTA)17, did not materially alter architecture (ED1), consistent with the observed features being peptidoglycan. Individual strands (Fig 1b) have variable width (mean 6.0 ± 3.8 nm, n = 45, Fig 1g) and in some instances (e.g. green dotted arrows, Fig 1b) several individual strands coming together are resolved, so we conclude these fibres are often multi-molecular (e.g. blue arrows, 1b). The peptidoglycan areal density is surprisingly low in the outer wall, typically only 50% is filled at 11 ± 3.4 nm depth, n = 5 (Fig 1c, green area). The mature wall outer zone is therefore a porous gel i.e. a 3-dimensional solid mesh in a liquid medium.
The surface ring architecture (attributable to nascent septal material7) is initially molecularly dense (Fig 1d,e), composed of radially corrugated groups of circumferentially oriented individual strands, spaced by 2.7 ± 0.5 nm (n = 16), (Fig 1f), in the densest regions. Periodic features (spacing 3.7 ± 0.8 nm, n = 24) are sometimes observed along the strands (ED1) in agreement with the predicted helical pitch of peptidoglycan18. The observation of long glycan strands in nascent ring material supports the role of peptidoglycan hydrolases in cell growth associated wall maturation19. The interface between disordered mesh and ordered rings is sharp (ED2). Cell division occurs in consecutive orthogonal planes, so, as a ring architecture lying orthogonal to rings from a previous generation is not seen, rings transition to mesh within a single division cycle under these growth conditions.
Live cell imaging is limited to the outer surface and does not distinguish constituents. Previous work has shown that imaging extracted, purified, cell wall peptidoglycan (sacculi) in air can provide useful insights into the cell wall architecture through the cell cycle7. Here sacculi were imaged in liquid, using PeakForce Tapping, following immobilisation (see Methods). Sacculus fragments exhibit the live cell ring and mesh (previously interpreted as “knobbles”7, ED4) architectures (Fig 2a-d). Importantly, within individual sacculi, both internal and external surfaces are observed with AFM (e.g. Fig 2a). Every inner surface image obtained (n = 80) exhibited a tight, disordered mesh (Fig 2e,f), made of likely single chains (width 2.8 ± 0.8 nm, n = 45, Fig 2j) with diameters of pores covering half of the total pore area being smaller than 6.4 nm (n = 158), substantially smaller than the pores on the external surface of live cells (39 nm, n = 310) (Fig 2i, ED5, see Methods). Rings are not present on the cytoplasm facing surface of incomplete septa (Fig 2g-h), which instead have a tight disordered mesh akin to the rest of the internal surface (n = 25); for different stages of formation see ED4. The ring architecture is confined to the last generation, post division, septal outer surface. Maturation from rings to mesh likely occurs by loss and re-organisation of surface rings revealing underlying disordered mesh (ED2). The final architecture of the wall is determined by interplay between the cell wall synthesis and hydrolysis enzymes. Removal of one of the peptidoglycan synthesis enzymes, PBP4, results in a denser ring structure, occasionally persisting beyond the first generation surface (ED3). The transition from rings to porous mesh is primarily due to the action of the peptidoglycan hydrolases. Removal of the important enzyme SagB19 results in initially thinner cell walls that take longer to transition to the mature disordered mesh architecture (ED3).
Electron cryotomography5,20 of frozen hydrated S. aureus sacculi show both rough and smooth external surfaces (ED6, SI1). When directly compared, the AFM and cryoEM data are complementary and demonstrate the different capabilities of the approaches (ED6k-n). In parts of the external surface of the sacculus cryoEM tomogram, we can see pores in the wall with similar dimensions to those observed with the AFM (ED6e), albeit slightly shallower (most likely due to the resolution of the tomogram), and considerably less distinct (because of the relatively poor contrast that we would expect with cryoEM); compare ED6m/n. In other regions (e.g. bottom right of ED6a) both the inside and outside are quite smooth, with the occasional pore (ED6k). CryoEM is unable to discern the ring structure as it views in transverse section, but we suggest such smooth regions are likely “rings”. Thus, distinct imaging modalities yield corroborative architectural information.
To explore the generality of our observations, the rod-shaped B. subtilis was investigated. Exponentially grown live cells were immobilised and imaged on Cell-Tak coated mica. The cell cylinder exhibited a disordered mesh with strands of variable thickness (4.5 ± 1.9 nm, n = 111, Fig 3a,b,d), similar to S. aureus and contrary to previously proposed circumferentially oriented features5. Sequential longitudinal imaging of an individual bacterium revealed no change in architecture away from the poles (ED7). Pores up to 15 nm deep are observed along the cell cylinder (Fig 3c and ED5). B. subtilis live-cell poles are challenging to image with AFM due to their orientation relative to the probe tip, however the cylinder-pole interface reveals a pole-associated ring architecture (Fig 3e,f).
Imaging of purified B. subtilis sacculi revealed the outer surfaces of the cylinder as randomly oriented mesh (Fig 3g), and the pole as rings (Fig 3h) and mesh (ED7). Contrastingly, the sacculus cylinder inner surface exhibited features that would be oriented approximately around the circumference in vivo (Fig 3i and ED7), at length scales from apparent single glycans to larger structures, previously interpreted as “cables” in samples imaged in air21 and possibly responsible for the contrast described as “circumferentially oriented features” in CryoEM5. The internal orientation of the individual strands is circumferential around the cell, in contrast to the helical organisation we previously suggested21. Removing the MreB cell shape-determining protein family produced spherical cells with randomly oriented strands, implying that these components are responsible for this circumferential orientation (ED8, SI2)22–24. The cytoplasm facing side of the incomplete septal wall of B. subtilis has a disordered mesh architecture (Fig 3j,k), with randomly oriented strands. It also has prominent pores across its surface (ED7,9). The internal surface of the mature poles shows a disordered, relatively dense architecture (ED7) suggesting that the pores in incomplete septa are most likely back-filled independent of leading edge septal synthesis. The more complex septal architecture previously observed21 on dried samples probably comes from the interplay between the constraints imposed by “external” rings and “internal” mesh during dehydration (see ED9).
Purified mature sacculi (Peptidoglycan+WTA) of S. aureus and B. subtilis are respectively 36 ± 5.3 nm (n = 25) and 34 ± 10 nm (n = 19) in thickness when hydrated and 17 ± 2 nm (n = 25) and 9 ± 1 nm thick (n = 19) when dried (Fig 2k,l, ED4,9). Previous CryoEM4,5 shows a ~50% increase in wall thickness from live cells to extracted, hydrated sacculi. Even on the cytoplasmic facing surface of the wall, the peptidoglycan has a relatively porous structure unlike conventional representation as a dense wall18. This raises a question of how it fulfils its role containing bacterial turgor pressure. For turgor to cause lysis the membrane must bulge out through the wall, overcoming the bending modulus of the membrane. A calculation of elastic deformation energy (SI3) implies that a pore with diameter of 8 nm could support an internal turgor pressure of ~ 20 bar, i.e. the pores we observe are small enough to support the expected internal pressure on the cell membrane25,26.
The data and interpretation presented here, obtained from live cells and from sacculi imaged in liquid show significant differences from the data taken in air on dried sacculi in our previous studies7,21. Live cell images demonstrate that the mature cell wall is a porous, mesh-like hydrogel (Fig 1b). Images of sacculi in liquid show similar features to the live cell data (Fig 2b), and that there is a large increase in thickness compared to dried sacculi due to swelling upon hydration (Fig 2k,l). We believe the striking differences between our current and previous studies7,21 reflect the collapsed nature of the dried sacculi compared to the inherently 3-dimensional nature of the hydrated Gram positive cell wall. This new understanding of cell wall architecture (ED10 shows a schematic representation) sets constraints for those components required for cellular peptidoglycan dynamics. Analysis of two morphologically diverse bacteria reveals a level of commonality not previously observed.
Nascent septa have two distinct peptidoglycan architectures indicating different synthesis regimes. The septum has an external highly ordered structure of approximately concentric rings, which we hypothesise are deposited at the leading edge of the constricting cell membrane27,28 forming the post synthesis core, to be revealed during cell separation. Behind this leading edge and responsible for the majority of the septum thickness, is randomly oriented material. This is consistent with bulk peptidoglycan synthesis across the growing septal plate, not limited to the leading edge29. The internal surface of the rest of S. aureus is smooth but randomly oriented, with pores small enough to prevent membrane destabilization and subsequent plasmolysis due to internal turgor. B. subtilis is similar, apart from a circumferential orientation of material in the cylinder, likely driven by elongasome-associated peptidoglycan synthesis22–24. The external cell surface of both organisms has an architecture formed by the combination of peptidoglycan metabolism and stress due to turgor. Peptidoglycan maturation results in reorientation from septal rings (in S. aureus) and circumferential cylinder (in B. subtilis) to produce a porous surface architecture.
The cell wall is responsible for roles that have conflicting design requirements. The wall must support the membrane to maintain turgor and prevent lysis, requiring structural rigidity and precluding channels which the plasma membrane could push through. However, the cell requires access to molecules from its environment which need to pass through the wall. The external facing relatively open structure with strands that are multiple molecules thick and hence have relatively high load bearing potential allows ingress of material. However, such large pores are not compatible with preventing membrane escape. The inner wall, with its smaller pore size, but thinner strands (largely single glycan chains) prevents membrane deformation at the point where this is required, i.e. where the wall interfaces with the plasma membrane. Finally, we note that a surface with such a high specific area is ideal for maximising the possible locations for displaying surface proteins and other surface structures.
Methods
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions
S. aureus SH1000 was grown using Tryptone Soya Broth (TSB, 30g/L) / Tryptone Soya Agar (TSA, 15g/L) and B. subtilis 168 HR30 was grown using Nutrient Broth (NB) / Nutrient Agar (NA). Cells were taken from an agar plate, placed in the appropriate growth media and then grown at 37°C for 16 hours while being shaken at 250 rpm. These stationary phase cells were then re-suspended in fresh growth media to OD600 = 0.05, and grown to exponential phase OD600 = 0.3-0.6. Samples (1 ml) of the cells were then washed once by centrifugation in the imaging buffer. S. aureus ltaS, tarO, sagB, pbp3 and pbp4 mutated cells were constructed in the SH1000 background. B. subtilis mreB mbl mreBH mutated cells were constructed in an rsgL background strain35.
Purification of Peptidoglycan Sacculi
Peptidoglycan was purified as described previously7,21,32. Briefly, bacteria were grown to exponential phase then broken and treated with SDS to solubilise and wash off cellular constituents not covalently bound to peptidoglycan. The resulting material was then treated with pronase to remove covalently bound proteins, and hydrofluoric acid to remove teichoic acids (images Fig 2c,k, Fig 3g-k and all images of sacculi in the ED except where stated omit the final HF treatment). These steps ensure that only peptidoglycan is present in the sacculi, and can be imaged directly. These processes (apart from cell breaking which has a localised effect) do not affect covalent bonds within the peptidoglycan which are primarily responsible for peptidoglycan structure. However, any stretching or compression of the material in vivo by turgor is eliminated in its absence and this must be considered when interpreting data.
Preparation of Silicon Substrates
Silicon substrates were prepared as previously described15,33. Briefly silicon wafers were patterned using photolithography and dry etching to form holes in which spherical bacteria could be immobilised. Additional silicon grids of 1 μm diameter holes were custom made by NuNano (Bristol, UK) and were used to produce images ED1 e-h.
Preparation of Cell-Tak Coated Substrates
Cell-Tak glass slides were prepared by pipetting 285 ml 100 mM NaHCO3 (pH 8) onto high precision cover glass (24x24 mm2) then 10 μl of Cell-Tak (Corning, 5% (w/v) in acetic acid) and 5 μl of 1 M NaOH. This was covered and left for 20 minutes. The slide was then washed five times with HPLC grade water. The same process with proportionately smaller volumes was used for coating freshly cleaved mica.
Preparation of Poly-L-Lysine Coated Substrates
Glass coverslips or freshly cleaved mica discs were coated with 0.1% (w/v) in H2O poly-L-lysine by pipetting on 50 μl and incubating for 20 minutes. The substrate was then washed five times with HPLC grade water and dried with flowing nitrogen.
Immobilising Live S. aureus for AFM Imaging
10 μl of bacteria suspension was added to a silicon substrate (see above), left for 30 minutes then the liquid evaporated with nitrogen. Just before all of the liquid was evaporated additional imaging buffer was added. To obtain images ED1 e-h 50 μl of bacteria suspension was added to the NuNano silicon grids and spun down for 3 min at no more than 1500 rpm, then left for 30 min and dried with nitrogen. The sample was rinsed with pure water and imaging buffer added.
Immobilising Live B. subtilis for AFM Imaging
A drop of bacteria suspension was added to a Cell-Tak coated substrate. This was then incubated for 30 minutes before five washes in imaging buffer.
Immobilising Sacculi for AFM Imaging
Sacculi stocks were briefly tip-sonicated to re-suspend, then centrifuged for 30 s at 1205 x g to remove large aggregates before being diluted at ~5% volume with 10 mM Tris (pH 8) or further HPLC grade water (choice of solution did not affect image quality). The resulting suspension was incubated for 10-30 minutes (optimal time was determined empirically for each batch of sample, using 10 μl of sacculi dilution) on either a Cell-Tak or poly-L-lysine coated substrate. In some instances, the sacculi were then dried onto the substrate with flowing nitrogen and rehydrated again for imaging. Similar images were obtained both with and without drying implying minimal disruption of the sacculi from the drying process. Samples were finally washed 3 times with 10 mM Tris (pH 8) before imaging buffer was applied.
AFM Probes
FastScan-D probes (Bruker), nominal spring constant 0.25 N m-1, resonant frequency (in liquid) 110 kHz were used for all presented images taken in liquid. Tespa-V2 probes (Bruker), nominal spring constant of 37 N m-1, resonant frequency (in air) 320 kHz, were used for all experiments in air.
AFM Imaging (Liquid - JPK)
Imaging was carried out in “QI” mode driven at ~167 Hz with a typical Z length of ~ 300 nm using peak interaction forces of 2-3 nN. Images were processed with Gwyddion34.
AFM Imaging (Liquid - Dimension FastScan Bio)
Unless otherwise stated data were collected on this instrument. Live cell imaging was carried out in “Tapping Mode” under a buffer comprised of 300 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.8 using Bruker FastScanD probes driven at ~80 kHz with a typical free amplitude of ~1-2 nm and a set-point amplitude typically ~60-90% of the free amplitude35. This corresponds to average tip-sample forces ~ 100 pN. Imaging of the external surface of sacculi at high resolution with “Tapping Mode” was not achieved, possibly because of the diffuse nature of the surface when relaxed. Sacculi imaging was instead carried out in “PeakForce Tapping” mode36 with a typical amplitude of 100-200 nm, frequency of 2-8 kHz and setpoint force of 1-2 nN with buffer conditions which varied across the samples between HPLC water and 150-300 mM KCl +10mM Tris (pH 8). All images are topographic images unless otherwise stated. All 3D visuals were created using Nanoscope Analysis software.
AFM Imaging (Air - Dimension FastScan Bio)
Unless otherwise stated images were taken under liquid. For some experiments, imaging in air was required. The images were carried out in “Tapping Mode” in air using TESPA-V2, resonant frequency ~300 kHz, typical imaging free amplitude of ~10-13 nm, set-point amplitude typically ~50-70% of the free amplitude. This corresponds to time averaged tip-sample forces of 260-450 pN.
AFM image 3D details
Fig 2a z aspect ratio = 1, Pitch = 17°, Plot type = height. Fig 3e z aspect ratio = 1, Pitch = 33°, Light Pitch 72°, Light Intensity = 55%, Plot type = mixed – colour scale mixes topography and lighting.
Electron cryotomography
A volume of 3.5 μl from HF treated S. aureus sacculi mixed with BSA treated 10 nm gold was applied to Lacey carbon grids twice and double blotted before plunge freezing in liquid ethane using a Leica EM GP2 plunge freezer. Tomograms were collected on a FEI Tecnai Arctica microscope operated at 200 kV, with a Falcon III direct electron detector and Volta phase plate. Each tomogram was collected at a nominal defocus of 3 μm, with a total dose applied to the sample of 120 e/Å over ±60° in 2° increments, with a nominal pixel size of 4.3 Å. Tomograms were reconstructed with IMOD37, using weighted back projection and a final binning of 3. Tomograms were filtered with nonlinear anisotropic diffusion (NAD) in order to improve contrast.
Statistical Analyses and Reproducibility
For measurements performed on AFM images of strand widths (represented in histograms in Fig 1g, Fig 2h and Fig 3b), three manual profiles were made for each individual strand using full width at half maximum (FWHM) and then averaged. The mean value and standard deviation (s.d.) was calculated from the total number of fibres ‘n’. For fibre spacing and repetitive structures only one profile was taken for each feature and the distance peak-to-peak was measured (e.g. Fig 1g and ED 1), then the mean and standard deviation was calculated from n = 16 and n = 24 respectively. Throughout the text all numbers are presented as <value> ± <s.d.> <unit>.
The thickness of sacculi was measured from histograms of height images. Mean and standard deviation values were calculated from each group (air or liquid). To compare data between groups, paired t tests were performed: with t = 17, degree of freedom (DF) = 24 and p = 2.4×10-15 for peptidoglycan+WTA (Fig 2k, left); t = 9, DF = 9 and p = 8.3×10-6 for peptidoglycan (Fig 2k, right), t = 11, DF = 18 and p = 1.2×10-9 for B. subtilis sacculi ED9.
For measurements of pore area (diameter), the value given in the text (6.8 nm for internal and 38.4 nm for the external) was extracted from the point where the cumulative fraction of total pore area (sum of all data) was 0.5, for each distribution. It was not possible to obtain a standard deviation because both distributions are non-normal and positively skewed. The distribution for pores on the external surface can be characterized with the following parameters: Q1(25%) = 4.1 nm; Q2(50%) = 8.4 nm; Q3(75%) = 17.4 nm; Q4(90%) = 33.8; with n = 310 individual pores measured and a mode of 2.5 ≤ 3.5 ≤ 4.4 nm. The distribution on the internal surface was characterized as the following: Q1(25%) = 2.5 nm; Q2(50%) = 3.5 nm; Q3(75%) = 5.3 nm; Q4(90%) = 6.1; with n = 112 individual pores and a mode of 1.8 ≤ 2.5 ≤ 3.1 nm (see ED5 to visualize histograms and analysis method38).
All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 7.04.
Each AFM image or pair of images from living cells in Figure 1 and 3 was performed on freshly cultured cells with a total of n = 4 and 3 biological replicates respectively. The two different external morphologies of PG on cells were also detected in at least 5 other biological independent repeats for both S. aureus and B. subtilis (see repository). The sacculi images from Figure 2 and 3 were obtained from different stocks (see Reporting Summary) as a total of n = 3 and 2 biological replicates respectively. The different morphologies of sacculi were detected in at least 5 other technical independent repeats for S. aureus and B. subtilis (see ED7-9 and repository).
Extended Data
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the BBSRC (Grant no. BB/L006162/1), the EPSRC (Grant no. EP/M027430/1, EP/J500124/1), The Wellcome Trust (Grant no. 212197/Z/19/Z), the MRC (MR/N002679/1) and UKRI Strategic Priorities Fund (Grant no. EP/T002778/1). JB would like to thank The White Rose University Consortium for his studentship. LPL would like to thank The Florey Institute for her studentship. We acknowledge Jeff Errington and Angelika Grundling for provision of bacterial strains. We acknowledge Joshua Sutton for preparation of pbp3 and pbp4 sacculi samples. Electron microscopy was performed in the CryoEM Facility of the University of Sheffield.
Footnotes
Contributions
LPL, JB and RDT designed the study, performed the experiments (LPL Fig 2,3, and ED1-5,7-10, JB Fig 1,3 and ED1,2,7, RDT Fig 3 and ED 7,8,10), analysed and interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. SK, JSW and RT performed experiments (SK ED1,7,9, JSW ED 6, RT ED 7) analysed and interpreted the data. NM developed the method for Fig 1, provided support for the experiments (Fig 1, ED1,2) and wrote the manuscript. BC carried out the calculations in the paper (SI3) and wrote the manuscript. PAB designed the study, interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. SJF and JKH designed the study, interpreted the data, wrote the manuscript and directed the project.
Competing interests
The authors declare no financial or non-financial competing interests.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available in Online Research Data (ORDA) figshare from the University of Sheffield with the identifier DOI: 10.15131/shef.data.11798898.
Code Availability
The MATLAB code for determining glycan strand orientation can be found in Supplementary information 2.
References
- 1.Turner RD, Vollmer W, Foster SJ. Different walls for rods and balls: The diversity of peptidoglycan. Mol Microbiol. 2014;91:862–874. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vollmer W, Seligman SJ. Architecture of peptidoglycan: more data and more models. Trends Microbiol. 2010;18:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rojas ER, et al. The outer membrane is an essential load-bearing element in Gram-negative bacteria. Nature. 2018;559:617–621. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0344-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Matias VRF, Beveridge TJ. Native cell wall organization shown by cryo-electron microscopy confirms the existence of a periplasmic space in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2006;183:1011–1021. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.3.1011-1021.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Beeby M, Gumbart JC, Roux B, Jensen GJ. Architecture and assembly of the Gram-positive cell wall. Mol Microbiol. 2013;88:664–672. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Misra G, et al. Mechanical consequences of cell-wall turnover in the elongation of a gram-positive bacterium. Biophys J. 2013;104:2342–2352. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.04.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Turner RD, et al. Peptidoglycan architecture can specify division planes in Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Commun. 2010;1 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1025. 26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Touhami A, Jericho MH, Beveridge TJ. Atomic force microscopy of cell growth and division in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:3286–3295. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.11.3286-3295.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Saar Dover R, Bitler A, Shimoni E, Trieu-Cuot P, Shai Y. Multiparametric AFM reveals turgor-responsive net-like peptidoglycan architecture in live streptococci. Nat Commun. 2015;6 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8193. 7193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Andre G, et al. Imaging the nanoscale organization of peptidoglycan in living Lactococcus lactis cells. Nat Commun. 2010;1 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1027. 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Turner RD, Mesnage S, Hobbs JK, Foster SJ. Molecular imaging of glycan chains couples cell-wall polysaccharide architecture to bacterial cell morphology. Nat Commun. 2018;9 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03551-y. 1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Eskandarian HA, et al. Division site selection linked to inherited cell surface wave troughs in mycobacteria. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:17094. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhou X, et al. Mechanical crack propagation drives millisecond daughter cell separation in Staphylococcus aureus. Science. 2015;348:574–578. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Green ER, Mecsas J. Bacterial Secretion Systems: An Overview. in Virulence Mechanisms of Bacterial Pathogens. (Fifth Edition) 2016 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0012-2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bailey RG, et al. The interplay between cell wall mechanical properties and the cell cycle in Staphylococcus aureus. Biophys J. 2014;107:2538–2545. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Weidenmaier C, et al. Role of teichoic acids in Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization, a major risk factor in nosocomial infections. Nat Med. 2004;10:243–245. doi: 10.1038/nm991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Matias VRF, Beveridge TJ. Lipoteichoic acid is a major component of the Bacillus subtilis periplasm. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:7414–7418. doi: 10.1128/JB.00581-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim SJ, Chang J, Singh M. Peptidoglycan architecture of Gram-positive bacteria by solid-state NMR. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1848:350–362. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wheeler R, et al. Bacterial cell enlargement requires control of cell wall stiffness mediated by peptidoglycan hydrolases. MBio. 2015;6:4. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00660-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gan L, Chen S, Jensen GJ. Molecular organization of Gram-negative peptidoglycan. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:18953–18957. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808035105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hayhurst EJ, Kailas L, Hobbs JK, Foster SJ. Cell wall peptidoglycan architecture in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:14603–14608. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804138105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Domínguez-Escobar J, et al. Processive movement of MreB-associated cell wall biosynthetic complexes in bacteria. Science. 2011;333:225–228. doi: 10.1126/science.1203466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Garner EC, et al. Coupled, circumferential motions of the cell wall synthesis machinery and MreB filaments in B. subtilis. Science. 2011;333:222–225. doi: 10.1126/science.1203285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dion MF, et al. Bacillus subtilis cell diameter is determined by the opposing actions of two distinct cell wall synthetic systems. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1294–1305. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0439-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Autolytic release and osmotic properties of protoplasts from Staphylococcus aureus. J Gen Microbiol. 1957;16:184–194. doi: 10.1099/00221287-16-1-184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Daly KE, Huang KC, Wingreen NS, Mukhopadhyay R. Mechanics of membrane bulging during cell-wall disruption in Gram-negative bacteria. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin, Soft Matter Phys. 2011;84 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.041922. 041922,1-041922,4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bisson-Filho AW, et al. Treadmilling by FtsZ filaments drives peptidoglycan synthesis and bacterial cell division. Science. 2017;355:739–743. doi: 10.1126/science.aak9973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Monteiro JM, et al. Peptidoglycan synthesis drives an FtsZ-treadmilling-independent step of cytokinesis. Nature. 2018;554:528–532. doi: 10.1038/nature25506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lund VA, et al. Molecular coordination of Staphylococcus aureus cell division. Elife. 2018;7:e32057. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.De Jong IG, Beilharz K, Kuipers O, Veening JW. Live cell imaging of Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus pneumoniae using automated time-lapse microscopy. J Vis Exp. 2011;53:e3145. doi: 10.3791/3145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schirner K, Errington J. The cell wall regulator σI specifically suppresses the lethal phenotype of mbl mutants in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:1404–1413. doi: 10.1128/JB.01497-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Turner RD, Foster SJ, Hobbs JK. Atomic force microscopy analysis of bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan architecture. In: Hong HJ, editor. Bacterial Cell Wall Homeostasis: Methods and Protocols. Springer; New York: 2016. pp. 3–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kailas L, et al. Immobilizing live bacteria for AFM imaging of cellular processes. Ultramicroscopy. 2009;109:775–780. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nečas D, Klapetek P. Gwyddion: An open-source software for SPM data analysis. Cent Eur J Phys. 2012;10:181–188. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kumar S, et al. Direct Imaging of Protein Organization in an Intact Bacterial Organelle Using High-Resolution Atomic Force Microscopy. ACS Nano. 2017;11:126–133. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b05647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Su C. Mapping Quantitative Mechanical Properties at Molecular Scale Using Peak Force Tapping AFM. Microsc Microanal. 2010;16:364–365. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kremer JR, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J Structl Biol. 1996;116:71–76. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.