Abstract
Sleep is essential for both cognition and maintenance of healthy brain function. Slow waves in neural activity contribute to memory consolidation, while cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) clears metabolic waste products from the brain. Whether these two processes are related is not known. We used accelerated neuroimaging to measure physiological and neural dynamics in the human brain. We discovered a coherent pattern of oscillating electrophysiological, hemodynamic, and CSF dynamics that appears during non-rapid eye movement sleep. Neural slow waves are followed by hemodynamic oscillations, which in turn are coupled to CSF flow. These results demonstrate that the sleeping brain exhibits waves of CSF flow on a macroscopic scale, and these CSF dynamics are interlinked with neural and hemodynamic rhythms.
One sentence summary:
During sleep, slow oscillating neural activity precedes coupled waves of blood and cerebrospinal fluid flow in the brain.
Sleep is crucial for both high-level cognitive processing and also basic maintenance and restoration of physiological function. During human non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, the electroencephalogram (EEG) exhibits low-frequency (<4 Hz) oscillatory dynamics that support memory and neural computation (1-8). In addition, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies measuring blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) signals have demonstrated widespread hemodynamic alterations during NREM sleep (9-15). Sleep is also associated with increased interstitial fluid volume and clearance of metabolic waste products into the CSF (16), and clearance is stronger in sleep with more low-frequency EEG oscillations (17). Why these diverse physiological processes co-occur within this state of low arousal is not known. In particular, it remains unclear how CSF dynamics change during sleep, and how they relate to the major changes in neural activity and hemodynamics.
We simultaneously measured BOLD fMRI dynamics, EEG, and CSF flow during human sleep. To achieve high temporal resolution imaging, we acquired fMRI data at fast rates (TR<400 ms). While fMRI is often used to detect local oxygenation changes, fast acquisition paradigms also enable detection of fluid inflow: fresh fluid arriving at the edge of the imaging volume has high signal intensity, because it has not yet experienced radiofrequency pulses (Fig. S1). By placing the boundary edge of the imaging volume at the fourth ventricle (Fig. 1a), CSF flow into the brain was detected as increased signal in the lower slices (Fig. 1b), allowing us to measure dynamics of CSF flow simultaneously with BOLD fMRI. We combined this imaging with simultaneous EEG (n=13 subjects) and identified continuous segments of clear stable wake or NREM sleep with low motion (Fig. S2, see Methods), to enable analysis of continuous low-frequency dynamics.
We first asked whether sleep was associated with distinct CSF flow dynamics (Fig. 1c-e). During wakefulness, the CSF signal exhibited a small-amplitude rhythm synchronized to the respiratory signal at ~0.25 Hz (Fig. 1e,g), consistent with previous studies (18, 19). In contrast, during NREM sleep we observed a large oscillation in the CSF signal at 0.05 Hz (Fig. 1e,g). We analyzed this CSF signal across all sleep segments, confirming that identified sleep segments exhibited low-frequency EEG signatures of NREM sleep (Fig. 1f). We found a 5.52 dB increase in the CSF signal peaking at 0.05 Hz during sleep (Fig. 1g,h, Fig. S2; 95% confidence interval (CI)=[2.33 7.67]; p=0.003, signed-rank test), suggesting that large waves of CSF inflow occur approximately every ~20 s. We additionally analyzed nearby non-CSF regions-of-interest (ROIs) with matched slice positioning and saw no such effect (change=−0.03 dB, CI=[−2.7 1.3]; p=0.003 for difference, signed-rank test), suggesting this sleep-associated pattern was specifically driven by physiological signals in the ventricle (Fig. 1i).
Because inflow signals are caused by fluid flowing into the acquisition volume, CSF flow signals should be brightest in edge slices, and decay as fluid passes into central slices (Fig. 2a,b, Fig. S1). We indeed observed a gradient of signal amplitudes across the slices (Fig. 2c,d). Some large inflow events exhibited equally bright amplitudes across the lower slices (Fig. 2d), suggesting the CSF flow velocity had exceeded the imaging critical velocity (11.4 mm/s for slice 2). Together, these results identified large-amplitude pulsatile flow of CSF at 0.05 Hz that appears during NREM sleep.
We next asked whether these slow macroscopic CSF oscillations were linked to hemodynamic signals. Previous studies have proposed microscopic arterial pulsation, corresponding to the ~1 Hz cardiac cycle, as a mechanism for driving interstitial fluid flow (20-23). To test what might generate the much slower macroscopic CSF rhythm we observed, we analyzed the changes in BOLD signal during sleep. We observed an increase in BOLD signal amplitude in the cortical gray matter fMRI signal during sleep, as compared to wakefulness (Fig. 3a vs. b,c; mean=3.28 dB; CI=[0.09 6.54]; p=0.032, signed-rank test) consistent with previous reports of low-frequency BOLD fluctuations during sleep (9, 10, 24). Furthermore, the CSF signal was tightly temporally coupled to the cortical gray matter BOLD oscillation during sleep (Fig. 3a,b), exhibiting a strong anticorrelation (Fig. S3, max R=−0.48 at lag=2s, p<0.001, shuffling).
This anticorrelation suggested a possible alternation of blood flow and CSF flow during sleep. We hypothesized that the BOLD oscillations corresponded to an oscillation in cerebral blood volume, and that due to constant intracranial volume, more CSF flows into the head when less volume is occupied by the blood (25, 26). This hypothesis predicts that the CSF signal should approximately match the negative derivative of the BOLD oscillation, after setting negative values to zero (see Methods). Consistent with this hypothesis, the CSF timeseries and the thresholded derivative BOLD were strongly correlated (Fig. 3d,e; max R=0.59 at lag −1.8 s; p<0.001, shuffling).
We next examined whether neural activity was linked to these coupled hemodynamic and CSF oscillations during sleep. In conventional fMRI, the BOLD response is elicited by neural activity, which drives flow of oxygen-rich blood (27, 28), and EEG oscillations are associated with hemodynamic signals (29-32). We therefore hypothesized that the large, slow-delta (0.2–4 Hz) electrophysiologic oscillations characteristic of NREM sleep could be coupled to oscillations in blood volume, and in turn displacement effects on CSF flow. We analyzed the instantaneous amplitude of slow-delta EEG relative to the peak of the CSF waves, and found that neural, BOLD, and CSF waves were coupled (Fig. 4a-c; Fig. S4). The neural waves preceded the CSF waves, with a peak in slow-delta EEG occurring 6.4 s prior to the CSF peak (peak amplitude=21%, p<0.001, shuffling). We calculated the best-fit impulse response between the EEG and CSF (Fig. 4d), and found that convolving the EEG with this impulse response yielded significant prediction of CSF dynamics (zero-lag R=0.23, Fig. S5a, cross-validated R=0.22±0.07). To examine whether this EEG-CSF coupling was specifically linked to the appearance of CSF waves during sleep, we tested how well the EEG predicted CSF dynamics in the segments with the largest CSF waves. Performance was higher in segments with larger CSF waves (zero-lag R=0.54, Fig. S5b,c, p<0.001, shuffling), suggesting that the EEG was more strongly linked to CSF in the sleep segments richest in CSF waves.
The coherent dynamics of the EEG, BOLD, and CSF signals thus exhibited a specific timing sequence, with neural rhythms preceding subsequent BOLD and CSF waves. To test whether these observed correlations and delay patterns could arise from biophysical mechanisms, we constructed a computational model using established models of hemodynamic coupling (Fig. 4e, Fig. S6). We extracted the envelope of slow-delta EEG, expected to correlate with decreases in CBF signal due to its associated suppression of neural activity (2). The neural oscillation was then used to predict the timecourses of blood flow, blood volume, and CSF (33, 34). The model first used previously reported physiological parameters (35) with no additional parameter fitting, to test whether our observations were consistent with established biophysical coupling between these signals. This model performed as well as the best-fit impulse response (zero-lag R=0.22; CI across segments=[0.16 0.27]; p<0.001, shuffling; Fig. S6, S7). The model prediction was significantly larger than the maximal correlation between the original EEG envelope and CSF across all lags (max R=0.15, p<0.05), demonstrating that our data were consistent with biophysical coupling between neural activity, hemodynamics, and CSF.
We conclude that human sleep is associated with large coupled low-frequency oscillations in neuronal activity, blood oxygenation, and CSF flow. While electrophysiological slow waves are known to play important roles in cognition (1), our results suggest that they may also be linked to the physiologically restorative effects of sleep, as slow neural activity is followed by brainwide pulsations in blood volume and CSF flow.
These results address a key missing link in the neurophysiology of sleep. The macroscopic changes in CSF flow we identified are expected to alter waste clearance, as pulsatile fluid dynamics can increase mixing and diffusion (20, 21, 36). Neurovascular coupling has been proposed to contribute to clearance (37), but why it would cause higher clearance rates during sleep was not known. Our study suggests slow neural and hemodynamic oscillations as a new possible contributor to this process, in concert with other physiological factors. Studies in animals could next test for causal relationships between these neural and physiological rhythms.
Our identification of sleep-associated CSF fluid dynamics also suggests a new biomarker to be explored in clinical conditions associated with sleep disturbance. Memory impairment in aging is associated with suppressed slow waves (38); our model suggests this slow wave loss would in turn be associated with decreased CSF flow. Furthermore, our results hint at a potential bridge between recent findings that tau CSF levels and amyloid beta depend on sleep and neural activity (39-41) and that oscillatory neural activity leads to reduced tau (42) — coherent neural activity might signal higher protein aggregate clearance. Taken together, our results identify waves of CSF flow that appear during sleep, and show that slow rhythms in neural activity are interlinked with these CSF waves, with hemodynamic oscillations as an intermediate mechanism through which the two processes are coupled.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments:
We are grateful to Dr. Thomas Witzel for contributing to the imaging, Dr. Jakob Voigts and Dr. Caroline Robertson for comments, and Stephanie Williams, Kanupriya Gupta, and Molly Albrecht for assistance.
Funding: National Institutes of Health R00-MH111748, R01-EB019437, P41-EB015896, R01-MH111419, R01-MH048832, R01-EB024343, R01-MH111438, R21-NS106706, S10-RR023043, S10-OD010759, and the Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging.
Footnotes
Competing interests: L.D.L., B.R.R., and J.R.P. are inventors on a patent coversheet.
Data availability: The ROI and EEG timeseries reported here will be uploaded upon acceptance to Figshare.
References:
- 1.Diekelmann S, Born J, Nat Rev Neurosci. 11, 114–126 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Steriade M, Nunez A, Amzica F, J Neurosci. 13, 3252–3265 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Massimini M, Huber R, Ferrarelli F, Hill S, Tononi G, J Neurosci. 24, 6862–6870 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marshall L, Helgadóttir H, Mölle M, Born J, Nature. 444, 610–613 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Destexhe A, Contreras D, in Sleep and Anesthesia, Hutt A, Ed. (Springer Science+Business Media, 2011), p. 258. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Van Someren EJW, Van Der Werf YD, Roelfsema PR, Mansvelder HD, da Silva FHL, Progress in Brain Research. 193, 3–15 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vyazovskiy VV, Harris KD, Nat Rev Neurosci. 14, 443–451 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Watson BO, Levenstein D, Greene JP, Gelinas JN, Buzsáki G, Neuron. 90, 839–852 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fukunaga M et al. , Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 24, 979–992 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Horovitz SG et al. , Human brain mapping. 29, 671–682 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mitra A, Snyder AZ, Tagliazucchi E, Laufs H, Raichle ME, eLife. 4 (2015), doi: 10.7554/eLife.10781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Boly M et al. , Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 109, 5856–5861 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dang-Vu TT et al. , Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105, 15160–15165 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kaufmann C et al. , Brain. 129, 655–667 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Larson-Prior LJ et al. , Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106, 4489–4494 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xie L et al. , Science. 342, 373–377 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hablitz LM et al. , Sci Adv. 5, eaav5447 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dreha-Kulaczewski S et al. , J Neurosci. 35, 2485–2491 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kiviniemi V et al. , J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 36, 1033–1045 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schley D, Carare-Nnadi R, Please CP, Perry VH, Weller RO, J. Theor. Biol 238, 962–974 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Iliff JJ et al. , J Neurosci. 33, 18190–18199 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mestre H et al. , Nature Communications, 1–9 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Harrison IF et al. , eLife. 7 (2018), doi: 10.7554/eLife.34028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Özbay PS et al. , Neuroimage. 176, 541–549 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Scouten A, Constable RT, Magn. Reson. Med 59, 308–315 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Piechnik SK, Evans J, Bary LH, Wise RG, Jezzard P, Magn. Reson. Med 61, 579–586 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW, Proc Natl Acad Sci. 87, 9868–9872 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kwong KK et al. , Proc Natl Acad Sci. 89, 5675–5679 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, Trinath T, Oeltermann A, Nature. 412, 150–157 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.He BJ, Raichle ME, Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed). 13, 302–309 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mateo C, Knutsen PM, Tsai PS, Shih AY, Kleinfeld D, Neuron, 1–17 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schölvinck ML, Maier A, Ye FQ, Duyn JH, Leopold DA, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107, 10238–10243 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Buxton RB, Uludağ K, Dubowitz DJ, Liu TT, Neuroimage. 23, S220–S233 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Friston KJ, Mechelli A, Turner R, Price CJ, Neuroimage. 12, 466–477 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Simon AB, Buxton RB, Neuroimage. 116, 158–167 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Asgari M, de Zélicourt D, Kurtcuoglu V, Scientific Reports. 6, 38635 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Diem AK, Carare RO, Weller RO, Bressloff NW, PLoS ONE. 13, e0205276 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mander BA et al. , Nature Neuroscience. 16, 357–364 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Holth JK et al. , Science. 363, 880–884 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shokri-Kojori E et al. , Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 115, 4483–4488 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kang J-E et al. , Science. 326, 1005–1007 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Iaccarino HF et al. , Nature. 540, 230–235 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Prerau MJ et al. , PLoS Comput Biol. 10, e1003866 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Luo Q, Huang X, Glover GH, Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 233, 137–149 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.van der Kouwe AJW, Benner T, Salat DH, Fischl B, Neuroimage. 40, 559–569 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Setsompop K et al. , Magn. Reson. Med. 67, 1210–1224 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Allen PJ, Josephs O, Turner R, Neuroimage. 12, 230–239 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chowdhury MEH, Mullinger KJ, Glover P, Bowtell R, Neuroimage. 84, 307–319 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Glover GH, Li TQ, Ress D, Magn. Reson. Med. 44, 162–167 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Iber C, Ancoli-Israel S, Chesson AL, Quan SF, The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events (American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Westchester, Illinois, ed. 1, 2007). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Greve DN, Fischl B, Neuroimage. 48, 63–72 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fischl B, Neuroimage. 62, 774–781 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kim S, Parker DL, in Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Principles and Applications, Carr JC, Carroll TJ, Eds. (Springer; ). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bokil H, Andrews P, Kulkarni JE, Mehta S, Mitra PP, Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 192, 146–151 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gao JH, Miller I, Lai S, Xiong J, Fox PT, Magn. Reson. Med. 36, 314–319 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mandeville JB et al. , J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 19, 679–689 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.