The regulation and timely expression of bacterial genes during infection is critical for a pathogen to cause an infection. Bacteria have multiple mechanisms to regulate gene expression in response to their environment, one of which is two-component systems (TCS). TCS have two components. One component is a sensory histidine kinase (HK) that autophosphorylates when activated by a signal. The activated sensory histidine kinase then transfers the phosphoryl group to the second component, the response regulator, which activates transcription of target genes.
KEYWORDS: Burkholderia, two-component regulatory systems
ABSTRACT
The regulation and timely expression of bacterial genes during infection is critical for a pathogen to cause an infection. Bacteria have multiple mechanisms to regulate gene expression in response to their environment, one of which is two-component systems (TCS). TCS have two components. One component is a sensory histidine kinase (HK) that autophosphorylates when activated by a signal. The activated sensory histidine kinase then transfers the phosphoryl group to the second component, the response regulator, which activates transcription of target genes. The genus Burkholderia contains members that cause human disease and are often extensively resistant to many antibiotics. The Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) can cause severe lung infections in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) or chronic granulomatous disease (CGD). BCC members have also recently been associated with several outbreaks of bacteremia from contaminated pharmaceutical products. Separate from the BCC is Burkholderia pseudomallei, which is the causative agent of melioidosis, a serious disease that occurs in the tropics, and a potential bioterrorism weapon. Bioinformatic analysis of sequenced Burkholderia isolates predicts that most strains have at least 40 TCS. The vast majority of these TCS are uncharacterized both in terms of the signals that activate them and the genes that are regulated by them. This review will highlight TCS that have been described to play a role in virulence in either the BCC or B. pseudomallei. Since many of these TCS are involved in virulence, TCS are potential novel therapeutic targets, and elucidating their function is critical for understanding Burkholderia pathogenesis.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Burkholderia is composed of Gram-negative betaproteobacteria that were originally described in the 1950s as the pathogenic cause of onion rot (1). Burkholderia species are found in the environment, often in water, soil, or in the rhizosphere of plants (1). Some members of the genus can cause disease in humans, animals, and plants, while other members have beneficial effects of agricultural or industrial importance (2). Some strains are capable of producing compounds with antifungal, antibacterial, herbicidal, or insecticidal properties (2). Certain Burkholderia strains are capable of bioremediation of hydrocarbons and heavy metals (3). One common theme among members of the Burkholderia genus is that most species are highly resistant to many antibiotics. Much of the antibiotic resistance in Burkholderia is attributed to efflux pumps, inducible beta-lactamases, and decreased permeability of the outer membrane due to the structure of the lipopolysaccharides (LPS) (4, 5). Burkholderia species can produce biofilms, which limit the ability of antibiotics to access the bacterial cell, making antibiotic treatment more difficult. The primary Burkholderia species that cause human infections are the members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) and Burkholderia pseudomallei.
BURKHOLDERIA CEPACIA COMPLEX
The BCC is a group of 20 related species that can cause severe respiratory infections in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) or chronic granulomatous disease (CGD). CF is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder in which the cftr gene contains a mutation that renders the CFTR protein with low or no activity. Lack of full CFTR function leads to dysfunction in multiple organs, but in the lungs it leads to decreased mucociliary clearance, mucus buildup, and defective host defense, which leads to chronic infection (primarily bacterial) and chronic inflammation, leading to bronchiectasis and severe lung damage (6, 7). CGD is also a genetic disorder, often X chromosome linked, in which the gene encoding NADPH oxidase is mutated. These mutations result in phagocytes that are less able to produce reactive oxygen species, making the patient more susceptible to bacterial and fungal infections (8, 9). The prevalence of BCC infection among CF patients is lower than that by more commonly seen CF pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Staphylococcus aureus, but the infections caused by certain strains of the BCC are sometimes very severe and can result in “cepacia syndrome,” which is characterized by rapid respiratory decline, bacteremia, and necrotizing pneumonia. Cepacia syndrome is a nearly uniformly fatal complication of BCC infection even with aggressive antibiotic therapy. Burkholderia cenocepacia and Burkholderia multivorans are the species most commonly seen in CF patients in the United States, and B. multivorans has emerged as the most predominant species in some regions (10–14). Outbreaks of highly pathogenic strains have occurred at CF clinics across the globe, including B. cenocepacia outbreaks in Europe (5) and Toronto (Canada) (15), and a Burkholderia dolosa outbreak in Boston (USA) (16). The overall prevalence of the BCC is 2% to 3% in North American CF patients (17). In non-CF and non-GCD patients, BCC species have also been associated with serious infections associated with contaminated medications (18–23). Some members of the BCC, such Burkholderia vietnamiensis, which is capable of fixing nitrogen, have the potential to be beneficial to plants; however, the use of BCC species in agriculture has been limited due to concerns about the risk it poses to susceptible populations, including those with CF (24, 25).
BURKHOLDERIA PSEUDOMALLEI AND BURKHOLDERIA MALLEI
B. pseudomallei is the causative agent of melioidosis, which is a serious systemic infection that can include sepsis, pneumonia, fever, and abscesses. These infections are life-threatening, and mortality can be as high as 50% (26). B. pseudomallei is found in soil and water, primarily in the tropics of Southeast Asia and Northern Australia and to a lesser extent in tropical climates across the world (26). Infection with B. pseudomallei occurs primarily via wounds or skin abrasions, although infection when contaminated water or soil is inhaled or ingested can also occur. Chronic infections (longer than 2 months) occur in ∼10% of cases, and up to 28% of acute cases have recurrence of infection after resolution of initial symptoms (26). Infections most commonly occur in individuals with an underlying condition such as immunosuppression or diabetes. In countries where B. pseudomallei is endemic, people with CF can be infected by B. pseudomallei (27). B. pseudomallei is a potential bioterrorism agent and is classified as a tier 1 agent by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Due to the nonspecific symptoms, infections caused by B. pseudomallei are likely underreported, and models predict there could be as many as 165,000 cases and 89,000 deaths per year worldwide (28). Related to B. pseudomallei is Burkholderia mallei, the causative agent of glanders, which is a disease similar to melioidosis that primarily affects horses, donkeys, and mules. Infections in humans caused by B. mallei are extremely rare and are typically associated with exposure to infected animals. Both B. mallei and B. pseudomallei are able to survive intracellularly by modulating the host response (29). One key difference between B. mallei and B. pseudomallei is that B. mallei is an obligate mammalian pathogen and is not found in the environment (30). B. mallei has been eradicated in many parts of the world, including in the United States. B. mallei, like B. pseudomallei, has the potential to be used as a bioterrorism agent, and was actually used as such during World War I (31).
OTHER PATHOGENIC BURKHOLDERIA SPECIES
Other members of the Burkholderia genus include species that are beneficial to plants, while other species can be pathogenic to plants. With the exception of some BCC species such as B. vietnamiensis (outlined above), strains that are beneficial to plants typically do not pose a risk to humans since most of these strains likely lack the virulence factors needed to cause an infection in humans (24). A subset of species outside the BCC and B. pseudomallei that are pathogenic to plants are also pathogenic to humans with CF or CGD. Burkholderia gladioli is one such example of an organism that is pathogenic to both plants and humans, and it can cause rare infections in immunocompetent individuals (32, 33). B. gladioli is also capable of producing many compounds with antibacterial or antifungal activity; one strain that was isolated from CF sputum produces a macrolide antibiotic named gladiolin that has activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (34). Burkholderia glumae is another pathogen that causes infection in rice and at least a single documented infection in an infant with CGD (35). Interestingly, BCC strains that are virulent in an alfalfa plant model are also virulent in animal models, suggesting that increased virulence can be a trait independent of host (36).
TWO-COMPONENT SYSTEMS
Two-component systems (TCS) are one of many mechanisms that bacteria use to sense and respond to their environment. In the typical TCS, one component, the sensory histidine kinase (HK), senses a signal, autophosphorylates, and then transfers the phosphoryl group to the second component, the response regulator (RR) (37, 38). Sensory histidine kinases contain a domain or domains that can sense the activating signal(s), and the sensory kinase also contains the catalytic domains that allow for the kinase activity to occur. Many RRs contain both a receiver domain that is phosphorylated and a DNA-binding domain that regulates the expression of target genes. RRs function as both transcriptional activators and repressors (38). Other RRs have an RNA-binding domain or an enzymatically active domain instead of a DNA-binding domain that is activated when the receiver domain is phosphorylated (38). In addition to transferring the phosphoryl group to the response regulator, many, but not all, sensory kinases are able to dephosphorylate the response regulator, which is critical for the regulation of signal transduction (38). Typically, both the sensory kinase and the RR are able to form dimers, and in most cases the dimer form is believed to be the active form of the protein. In the classic TCS, the sensor kinase only phosphorylates the associated RR, but cross talk between TCS is possible by the phosphotransfer and/or dephosphorylation of other RRs (39, 40). In addition to the classic TCS, there are hybrid systems in which one protein contains the sensory domain and the kinase domain typically found in HK and a receiver domain that is typically found in the RR (41). Upon stimulation, the hybrid kinase autophosphorylates and then transfers the phosphoryl group on the receiver domain on the same protein. The phosphoryl group is then transferred to a histidine phosphotransfer domain (htp), also on the same protein, and from there the phosphoryl group is then transferred to a receiver domain on a different RR, activating downstream effects of the pathway (37).
Bioinformatic analysis of sequenced Burkholderia genomes has shown that all sequenced strains contain at least 40 predicted TCS (42, 43). The majority of these systems have not been analyzed for the function they play in virulence. TCS are attractive targets for new antibiotics, as TCS are not found in animal cells and inhibition of TCS may make the pathogen less virulent (44). The rest of the review will focus on the TCS that have been studied in either the BCC or B. pseudomallei. TCS in the BCC are summarized in Table 1, and TCS in B. pseudomallei are summarized in Table 2. The majority of the genes encoding the studied TCS are conserved across the reference strains of the multiple species that make up the Burkholderia genus (43). Several of the TCS described in Burkholderia have homologs involved in virulence in other bacterial pathogens (45).
TABLE 1.
TCS in the Burkholderia cepacia complex
| System | Description | Reference(s) |
|---|---|---|
| rqpSR | Regulates production of quorum sensing and biofilm formation; required for full virulence in a murine model | 46 |
| bceSR | Regulates production of cepI; required for virulence in an alfalfa plant model | 48 |
| esaSR | Essential genes; required for resistance to several antibiotics | 51 |
| fixLJ | Under selective pressure during chronic infection; regulates biofilm formation and motility; required for survival in macrophages and virulence in murine pneumonia model; ∼11% of genome regulated by fixLJ | 58 |
| ompR | Mutations confer mucoid phenotype switch; regulates bce cluster, which regulates extracellular matrix | 60 |
| Bcen2424_1436 and Bcen2424_1438 | Mutations within Bcen2424_1436 confer wrinkly colony to smooth colony switch; regulates biofilm formation | 62 |
| BCAL2831 and BCAL2830 | Involved in heat and osmotic stress response; required for virulence in a rat infection model | 63 |
| atsRT | Hybrid TCS; regulates biofilm formation and T6SSa | 66–68 |
| cblTSR | Hybrid TCS; regulates cable pilus in ET12 B. cenocepacia | 69 |
| BCAM0227 | Hybrid TCS that responds to BDSF; regulates cable pilus; required for full virulence | 70 |
T6SS, type 6 secretion system.
TABLE 2.
TCS in B. pseudomallei
| System | Description | Reference(s) |
|---|---|---|
| virAG | Regulates T6SS; required for full virulence; activated by host glutathione within the cytosol | 72–76 |
| BPSL0127 and BPSL0128 | Required for survival in macrophages and murine infection models | 52 |
| mrgRS | Potential temp-sensing mechanism; also regulates antibiotic resistance | 79, 80 |
| bprRS | Required for virulence in a murine model; significant cross talk with other signaling pathways | 81 |
| bfmR and BPSL2025 | HK is upregulated during infection and required for virulence. RR is involved in biofilm formation by regulation of fimbriae chaperone-usher assembly genes; required for persistence in macrophages in vitro, but not required for virulence in murine models. | 83–85 |
| irlRS | Involved in heavy metal resistance, not required for virulence in macrophages or animal models | 86 |
| narXL | Regulates nitrate reductase system; required for nitrate inhibition of biofilm formation | 87 |
BURKHOLDERIA CEPACIA COMPLEX TCS
Some TCS in the BCC work in combination with other regulatory mechanisms, such as quorum sensing. One system, the RqpSR system, induces the expression of the enzymes that produce both of the quorum-sensing signaling molecules that BCC members use, cis‐2‐dodecenoic acid (BDSF) and N‐acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) (46). Disruption of either the sensory histidine kinase rpqS or the RR rqpR resulted in decreased biofilm formation, motility, toxicity to human lung epithelial cells, and virulence in a murine model (46). Interestingly, the phenotypes seen in the rpq deletion mutants appear to be due to both a quorum sensing-dependent and a quorum sensing-independent mechanism (46). This TCS was described in B. cenocepacia, but bioinformatic analysis shows that it is distributed across many Burkholderia strains, including other BCC species and B. pseudomallei, although the role of the rqpSR system in these species has not been evaluated.
The BceSR TCS is conserved across many BCC strains that are isolated from CF patients and is 38% identical to that of the GacSA system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 (47, 48). B. cenocepacia lacking bceR, which encodes the RR, had reduced swimming motility, made less protease, and had increased cepI expression. CepI produces AHL, one of the quorum-sensing molecules (49), and there was an increase in quorum sensing but no difference in the ability of the bceR deletion mutant to produce biofilm. Based on these findings, the authors concluded that despite sharing identity with P. aeruginosa GacSA, BceSR plays a different role in BCC species than GacSA does in P. aeruginosa. B. cenocepacia lacking bceR had reduced pathogenicity in the alfalfa plant model, but there was no difference seen in a nematode model (48) (mammalian models of infection have not been reported). Another study found that both of the genes encoding BceSR, BCAM1494 and BCAM1493, were upregulated in response to growth under low-oxygen conditions (50).
A study investigating the role of essential genes in B. cenocepacia by knocking down expression of these genes identified the EsaSR system as a TCS involved in antibiotic resistance (51). The RR EsaR was essential, but, when depleted, the strain became sensitive to multiple antibiotics, including chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, kanamycin, meropenem, novobiocin, and tetracycline. This increased susceptibility is potentially due to a defect observed in membrane integrity and a decrease in efflux pump activity when EsaR was depleted. Interestingly the B. cenocepacia EsaSR has a homolog in B. pseudomallei (88 to 89% protein identity) encoded by BPSL0127 and BPSL0128 that are required for virulence in murine models (52), described further below. The EsaSR system also is similar to the Bordetella PlrSR system (49 and 64% protein identity for the HK and RR, respectively). The Bordetella PlrSR system is required for virulence in the lower respiratory tract and controls the activity of the “master virulence regulator” system, BvgAS (53, 54).
Sequencing of sequential BCC isolates from chronically infected CF patients can provide insight into genes that are under selective pressure during infection. One such gene, the sensory histidine kinase encoded by fixL, was identified by sequencing over 100 B. dolosa isolates collected over a 16-year period from an outbreak among CF patients in Boston (55, 56). Interestingly, fixL was also found to be mutated in sequential B. multivorans isolates (57). These findings strongly suggest that modulation of this pathway during chronic infection is important and occurs in independent infections in different BCC species. In B. dolosa, FixL, along with its RR FixJ, is an oxygen-sensing mechanism that is activated under low-oxygen conditions, regulating multiple phenotypes that include motility, biofilm, and intracellular survival in epithelial cells and macrophages (58). Additionally, the FixLJ system is required for the full virulence of B. dolosa in a murine pneumonia model (58). The FixLJ system mediates these phenotypes through the differential regulation of a large number of genes, as mutants lacking fixLJ had differential expression of ∼11% of the genome (58).
The conversion of BCC species from a mucoid to a nonmucoid phenotype is often observed during chronic infection and is correlated with worse clinical outcomes (notably different from those with P. aeruginosa, where mucoid strains are associated with clinical decline) (59). Mutations occurring in the response regulator ompR during chronic infection with B. multivorans are a major contributor to this phenotypic switch (60). OmpR is able to regulate the transcription of 701 genes, including many of the bce genes that are involved in the production of extracellular matrix. Interestingly, the introduction of the ancestral ompR into an evolved, nonmucoid strain carrying an ompR mutation was able to restore the mucoid phenotype (60). OmpR has a homolog in Bordetella pertussis RisA (77% protein identity) that induces the expression of virulence-repressed genes and works in opposition to the BvgAS system (61).
Another TCS was identified by an in vitro evolution experiment of B. cenocepacia that selected for biofilm-adapted small colony variants reverting to a planktonic lifestyle (62). Mutations within the response regulator encoded by Bcen2424_1436 allowed for the conversion to a smooth colony phenotype from a wrinkly phenotype. This phenotypic switch was associated with decreased biofilm formation. This TCS made up of Bcen2424_1436 and the associated histidine kinase encoded by Bcen2424_1438 is conserved across Burkholderia species (62).
Another TCS was discovered to be part of a six-gene operon involved in thermal and osmotic stress response (63). This operon includes BCAL2831 and BCAL2830, which encode a RR and HK, respectively, along with a protease encoded by htrABCAL2829. Disruption of the gene encoding the response regulator led to a disruption of transcription of the entire operon and decreased ability to survive thermal and osmotic stresses, as well as a reduction in virulence, in a chronic respiratory infection model using rats. Interestingly, the authors found that the TCS likely regulated factors, in addition to the protease htrABCAL2829, that are involved in stress responses. These additional factors were not identified, nor were the activating signal(s). The RR encoded by BCAL2831 is also involved in resistance against polymyxin B in a B. cenocepacia strain with truncated LPS devoid of heptose (64). This strain with truncated LPS was used to find additional antibiotic resistance mechanisms that are masked by the robust outer membrane permeability barrier, and this strain is more sensitive to polymyxin B than an isogenic strain with intact LPS (64). Deleting the BCAL2831 gene in the heptoseless LPS strain made the mutant more sensitive to polymyxin B than the heptoseless LPS strain (64). The protein encoded by BCAL2831 has 53% protein identity with the Pseudomonas aeruginosa PmrA protein, which plays a role in resistance against polymyxin B and cationic antimicrobial peptides (65).
BCC species also use hybrid TCS to regulate virulence. The gene atsR is predicted to encode both a histidine kinase and receiver domain, making it a hybrid TCS. Deletion of atsR led to increased biofilm formation and type 6 secretion system (T6SS) activity (66). Subsequent work found that atsR also negatively regulated quorum-sensing molecules and quorum sensing-regulated virulence factors (67). Interestingly, atsR is predicted to contain transmembrane domains but no DNA binding domains, making the mechanism of atsR-regulated gene regulation unclear initially. Subsequent studies identified AtsT as a RR that is phosphorylated by AtsR, which in turn mediates the increased biofilm and T6SS activity (68).
Another hybrid TCS has been found to regulate the transcription of the cable pilus that is expressed in the B. cenocepacia epidemic ET12 lineage and is a major virulence factor in this lineage (5). This system includes 2 hybrid sensor kinases, CblT and CblS, and a response regulator, CblR, all of which are required for expression of the cable pilus (69). Another hybrid sensor, encoded by BCAM0227, was identified as a novel BDSF sensor mediating expression of the cable pilus. BCAM0227 is required for virulence in several models, including a mouse infection model (70). The hybrid sensor encoded by BCAM0227 is part of a family of diffusible signal factor (DSF) sensing molecules that are important in the virulence of other pathogens such as P. aeruginosa and are also involved in intraspecies signaling (71).
B. PSEUDOMALLEI AND B. MALLEI TCS
One of the best characterized TCS in B. pseudomallei and B. mallei is the VirAG system. The VirAG system regulates the expression of one cluster of T6SS genes that is required for virulence of both organisms in multiple animal models (72–74). In addition to the T6SS cluster, VirAG also induces the expression of a structural T6SS protein, hemolysin-coregulated protein (Hcp) (73). The expression of the T6SS system is tightly controlled and only expressed when the bacterium is in the host cytosol, where host glutathione reduces disulfide bonds in dimeric VirA (75). This leads to the formation of active VirA monomers, which in turn activates the RR VirG and subsequent transcription of T6SS genes (75). Interestingly, mutations in virA in sequential B. pseudomallei isolates taken from Australian CF patients were found, suggesting that modulation of this pathway is could be important for chronic infection (76). Further work is needed to determine if these “evolved” virA sequences make B. pseudomallei more virulent. The VirAG system is only found in B. pseudomallei and B. mallei and does not have a homolog in other Burkholderia species, including members of the BCC (43).
As mentioned above, BPSL0127 and BPSL0128 in B. pseudomallei encode a TCS with homology to the EsaSR system in the BCC. This system was identified by using a transposon mutant library to screen for genes required for resistance to predation the phagocytic amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Genes that mediate resistance to predation also contribute to survival and replication in macrophage cells (52). Disruption of the gene encoding the histidine kinase resulted in mutants that were less able to survive in macrophages, and mice infected with this mutant had decreased survival compared to mice infected with bacteria without the disruption (52). The authors speculated that the decreased virulence in B. pseudomallei BPSL0127 mutants was a result of altered gene expression, but the regulon has not been described (52). It is not clear if the EsaSR and BPSL0127/0128 systems have different functions in their respective species or if they have the same function in both species, but the phenotypes were not observed since they were not tested in the published studies. Neither esaS nor BPSL0127, encoding the HK, were essential in their respective species. However, the gene encoding the RR, esaR, and BPSL0128 are essential for growth in their respective species (77). Further investigation is needed to understand the role of the EsaSR and BPSL0127/BPSL0128 systems in both the BCC and B. pseudomallei. In most cases of melioidosis, survivors either clear the initial infection or have a relapse of symptoms. In a study of 707 melioidosis survivors, one patient was chronically colonized with B. pseudomallei without symptoms for 12 years (78). Two isolates from this patient that were isolated 139 months apart were sequenced to identify genetic changes that could contribute to long-term persistence. The RR encoded by BPSL0128 contained a nonsynonymous mutation that was predicted to be deleterious to the function of the protein in the later isolate (78). The effects of this specific mutation remain unknown, as does the contribution of the other observed mutations, but these findings suggest a role for this TCS in human infections.
Another TCS, the MrgRS system, was investigated based on its similarity to the RcsBC system of Escherichia coli that regulates capsule synthesis (79). Both the RR MrgR and the sensory kinase MrgS were found in many B. pseudomallei strains, but MrgS was not found in B. mallei strains. MrgRS was expressed poorly at 25°C compared to expression at 37°C or 42°C, suggesting that this pathway may be a temperature-sensing mechanism. Interestingly, antibodies against the response regulator MrgR were detected in convalescent-phase sera pooled from melioidosis patients, suggesting that this protein is immunogenic. The role of MrgRS in virulence may also include antibiotic resistance, since another group found that mrgS when expressed from a plasmid was able to confer high-level colistin resistance to a susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain (80). Clearly, more work is needed to understand the role the MrgRS system plays in virulence and/or antibiotic resistance.
The BprRS system was identified in a signature-tagged transposon mutagenesis screen using an acute murine pulmonary melioidosis model as having attenuated in vivo growth in B. pseudomallei (81). Disruption of either the sensor histidine kinase gene (bprS) or the RR gene (bprR) led to attenuation of virulence. However, surprisingly, deletion of both genes together did not have any decrease in virulence. Interestingly, when the transcriptomes of the single and double mutants were analyzed, only 7 genes were differentially expressed in the double mutant, whereas nearly 100 genes were differentially expressed in each of the single mutants. While these results were not confirmed by complementation, this finding suggest the prospect of extensive cross talk of the BrpRS system with other signaling pathways (81). The genes encoding the BprRS system are conserved across the Burkholderia genus, but the function of this system has not been studied in these other species. The B. pseudomallei BprRS system shares 52% protein identity with the P. aeruginosa ParSR system, which is involved in multidrug resistance in response to cationic peptides (82).
The RR encoded by bfmR with the sensor kinase BPSL2025 is a TCS that is only found in B. pseudomallei, where it is important for virulence. The sensor kinase, encoded by BPSL2025, was identified to be upregulated during infection of hamsters (83). Disruption of Bpsl2025 led to a significant decrease of virulence in the hamster model (83). When the gene encoding the RR, bfmR, was disrupted, there was a decrease in biofilm formation that correlated with a decreased expression of fimbriae chaperone-usher assembly genes (84). This bfmR mutant was also less able to grow in low-iron medium and was less able to survive within macrophages. Additionally, expression of bfmR was upregulated when wild-type B. pseudomallei cultures were grown in iron-limited conditions. Despite being less able to survive within macrophages, bfmR mutants had no deficiency in their ability to cause disease in mice (85). More investigation is needed to understand this system, specifically looking at the full range of phenotypes it mediates. The genes encoding this system are found only in B. pseudomallei and B. mallei and do not have homologs in other Burkholderia species, including members of the BCC (43).
The IrlRS TCS in B. pseudomallei was identified in a screen to find genes required to invade human lung epithelial cells (86). This system has homology to TCS in other organisms that mediate resistance to heavy metals, and B. pseudomallei irlRS mutants had increased sensitivity to both cadmium and zinc, but not to other heavy metals as seen with irlRS mutants in other bacterial species. There was no difference in the ability of irlRS mutants to survive within macrophages or cause disease in infant diabetic rat or in Syrian hamster models compared to the parental strain, suggesting that this TCS plays a limited role in disease in these acute infection models. This pathway is conserved across the Burkholderia genus, though its role in other species has not been evaluated.
The B. pseudomallei NarXL system was identified based on its homology to a nitrate-sensing system in P. aeruginosa (87). When the gene encoding either the sensor kinase NarX or the response regulator NarL was disrupted, nitrate was unable to inhibit biofilm formation. The intracellular levels of the second messenger c-di-GMP decreased when exposed to nitrate, and the authors hypothesized that NarXL may be a sensory system that regulates the expression of several genes involved in c-di-GMP metabolism. Based on what is known about homologs of this system in P. aeruginosa, the authors also predicted that NarXL regulates the expression of the adjacent nitrate reductase encoded by the narGHJI-1 operon. The role of this system in infection models was not evaluated, although its importance may be more related to the bacterium’s ability to survive within the environment.
Identification of genes that are regulated by TCS is critical for understanding the role a TCS plays in the virulence and biology of an organism. One study used a protein-binding microarray to identify the DNA binding motifs of 4 RR in Burkholderia thailandensis (88). B. thailandensis is often used as a model organism for B. pseudomallei, since B. pseudomallei is a biosafety level 3 (BSL3) pathogen. The four RRs analyzed were NarL, RisA (encoded by BTH_I2094, which is the homolog of OmpR described in B. multivorans), KdpE (which in Escherichia coli regulates a potassium uptake system to regulate homeostasis), and an uncharacterized RR. Only NarL had been studied for its role in B. pseudomallei virulence, and RisA(OmpR) had been described in B. multivorans virulence, while neither of the other two RRs have been studied in any Burkholderia species. Several of the predicted DNA binding motifs were confirmed using gel shift assays, and, interestingly, the expression of other TCS were found to be regulated by the tested RRs. TCS regulating other TCS demonstrate an interplay between different TCS, making the elucidation of these signaling pathways even more complicated. Identification of targets of the RRs using this technique is labor intensive and requires in vitro activation of the RR using beryllofluoride, which binds to the RR in a fashion that mimics phosphorylation (89). Other approaches to identify TCS targets such as chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) are also labor intensive but can potentially be done in vivo if the TCS-activating signal is known.
OTHER BURKHOLDERIA TCS
TCS in Burkholderia species that are not typically human pathogens are even less studied. One TCS in B. glumae is the system encoded by pidSR, which is required for the production of pigment in B. glumae when grown on Casamino acid-peptone-glucose agar (90). B. glumae strains lacking pidSR were less virulent than the parental strains in two plant infection models. Interestingly, pidSR genes are conserved across the genus, including in species that cause infections in humans, and the predicted amino acid sequences share more than 80% identity. Despite this conservation, the function of the PidSR system remains unstudied in other pathogenic species.
Burkholderia plantarii causes a disease in rice seedlings by the production of the phytotoxin tropolone (91). A systematic approach to identify TCS that are involved in tropolone production generated mutations in the genes encoding 55 histidine kinases and 72 RRs (91). Tropolone production was lost when troK (encoding an HK) or either troR1 or troR2 (both encoding RRs adjacent to troK) was deleted (91). Loss of tropolone production resulted in loss of virulence in a rice model (91). All three components are conserved across multiple species of Burkholderia that are pathogenic to humans. This systematic approach represents a massive undertaking to identify TCS involved in a phenotype, but by generating such a library of TCS mutants, it is possible to identify other TCS involved in other phenotypes, provided that the screen can accommodate the large number of constructs.
TCS AS THERAPEUTIC TARGETS
TCS have been tested as therapeutic targets for multiple pathogenic bacteria (44, 92, 93), although there has not yet been a published report describing inhibition of a TCS in Burkholderia as a therapeutic approach. Much of the published work on TCS inhibitors has focused on the WalKR system in Staphylococcus aureus and other Gram-positive pathogens, as well as other TCS in Escherichia coli, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and P. aeruginosa (44, 92, 93). TCS that are essential for growth and TCS that are not essential for growth have been targeted. By inhibiting essential TCS, the growth of the bacteria will be inhibited, but there also is a strong selective pressure for resistance to arise. The rationale for targeting nonessential TCS that regulate virulence is that through inhibition of these pathways the bacteria will become less virulent and less able cause disease (93). To date, there have been no clinical trials using TCS inhibitors, and identification of inhibitors has been plagued by finding compounds that nonspecifically inactivate proteins in general (44, 92, 93). High-throughput screens to identify inhibitors can be improved by a better understanding of the underlying biology of the TCS.
Several studies have identified essential genes in either the BCC or B. pseudomallei, and within the lists of essential genes were components of TCS (77, 94). Interestingly, many of these TCS that were identified to be essential have not been evaluated for their function in Burkholderia. A better understanding of these TCS will allow their potential use as therapeutic targets. Therapies that target TCS will have to overcome the same challenges that Burkholderia pose to conventional antibiotics—namely, the outer membrane permeability barrier and the efflux pumps (95). Unfortunately, less is known about the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance compared to those in more commonly studied pathogens such as P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, so more work will be needed to overcome these challenges (95).
PROSPECTS
TCS are a critical mechanism that allows bacteria to sense their environment and respond to it. Burkholderia species possess multiple TCS that regulate virulence, making these TCS potential therapeutic targets. Much progress has been made to identify and describe a number of Burkholderia TCS, but only a small fraction of the total number of TCS have been studied. One large limitation to the field is that a given TCS is typically only studied in one species or strain. Many, but not all, of the TCS are conserved across the genus, but it is unclear if they all play the same role in all species. For the EsaSR and BPSL0127/0128 systems that have been studied in two different species, it is unclear if they play the same role in both, since the phenotypes that were studied were different. Studies sequencing large number of sequential Burkholderia isolates have identified some TCS as being under positive selective pressure during chronic infection, suggesting that modulation of these pathways is critical for Burkholderia adaption to the host. In general, it is not clear what signal(s) activate most TCS, and understanding this aspect is critical for understanding the role each TCS plays in Burkholderia biology and virulence. Future work should focus on understanding the signals, as well as how these TCS interact with each other and with other gene regulation pathways and whether modulation of TCS function by small molecules can impact virulence. A greater knowledge of Burkholderia TCS will require a multidisciplinary approach and will further the understanding of this poorly studied group of pathogens.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank G. Priebe for critical reading of this minireview.
This work was supported by the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital.
Biography

Matthew M. Schaefers has been an Instructor in the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine at Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School since 2017. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota under the direction of Dr. Marnie Peterson, where his thesis project focused on understanding staphylococcal superantigen interactions with epithelial cells and the development of novel therapeutics. A postdoctoral fellowship with Dr. Gregory Priebe at Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School enabled Dr. Schaefers to investigate the role of the FixLJ system in Burkholderia. Dr. Schaefers’ current research program focuses on understanding the function and evolution of two-component systems in Burkholderia, Pseudomonas, and Mycobacterium abscessus in order to better understand their pathogenesis with the long-term goal of developing better treatments for these pathogens.
REFERENCES
- 1.Eberl L, Vandamme P. 2016. Members of the genus Burkholderia: good and bad guys. F1000Res 5:1007. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8221.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Depoorter E, Bull MJ, Peeters C, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Mahenthiralingam E. 2016. Burkholderia: an update on taxonomy and biotechnological potential as antibiotic producers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:5215–5229. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7520-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu XX, Hu X, Cao Y, Pang WJ, Huang JY, Guo P, Huang L. 2019. Biodegradation of phenanthrene and heavy metal removal by acid-tolerant Burkholderia fungorum FM-2. Front Microbiol 10:408. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sfeir MM. 2018. Burkholderia cepacia complex infections: more complex than the bacterium name suggest. J Infect 77:166–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mahenthiralingam E, Urban TA, Goldberg JB. 2005. The multifarious, multireplicon Burkholderia cepacia complex. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:144–156. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Savant AP, McColley SA. 2019. Cystic fibrosis year in review 2018, part 1. Pediatr Pulmonol 54:1117–1128. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Castellani C, Assael BM. 2017. Cystic fibrosis: a clinical view. Cell Mol Life Sci 74:129–140. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2393-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Roos D. 2016. Chronic granulomatous disease. Br Med Bull 118:50–63. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marciano BE, Spalding C, Fitzgerald A, Mann D, Brown T, Osgood S, Yockey L, Darnell DN, Barnhart L, Daub J, Boris L, Rump AP, Anderson VL, Haney C, Kuhns DB, Rosenzweig SD, Kelly C, Zelazny A, Mason T, DeRavin SS, Kang E, Gallin JI, Malech HL, Olivier KN, Uzel G, Freeman AF, Heller T, Zerbe CS, Holland SM. 2015. Common severe infections in chronic granulomatous disease. Clin Infect Dis 60:1176–1183. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.LiPuma JJ. 2003. Burkholderia and emerging pathogens in cystic fibrosis. Semin Resp Crit Care Med 24:681–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zlosnik JE, Zhou G, Brant R, Henry DA, Hird TJ, Mahenthiralingam E, Chilvers MA, Wilcox P, Speert DP. 2015. Burkholderia species infections in patients with cystic fibrosis in British Columbia, Canada. 30 years’ experience. Ann Am Thorac Soc 12:70–78. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201408-395OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lipuma JJ. 2010. The changing microbial epidemiology in cystic fibrosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 23:299–323. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00068-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Govan JR, Brown AR, Jones AM. 2007. Evolving epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the Burkholderia cepacia complex in cystic fibrosis lung infection. Future Microbiol 2:153–164. doi: 10.2217/17460913.2.2.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pope CE, Short P, Carter PE. 2010. Species distribution of Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis patients in New Zealand. J Cyst Fibros 9:442–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2010.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Blanchard AC, Tadros M, Tang L, Muller M, Spilker T, Waters V, Lipuma J, Tullis E. 2018. 1256. New acquisitions of ET-12 Burkholderia cenocepacia in adults with cystic fibrosis: role of whole genome sequencing in outbreak investigation. Open Forum Infect Dis 5:S383. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Biddick R, Spilker T, Martin A, LiPuma JJ. 2003. Evidence of transmission of Burkholderia cepacia, Burkholderia multivorans and Burkholderia dolosa among persons with cystic fibrosis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 228:57–62. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00724-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. 2019. 2018 annual data report. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Bethesda, Maryland. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dolan SA, Dowell E, LiPuma JJ, Valdez S, Chan K, James JF. 2011. An outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia complex associated with intrinsically contaminated nasal spray. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 32:804–810. doi: 10.1086/660876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Souza Dias MB, Cavassin LG, Stempliuk V, Xavier LS, Lobo RD, Sampaio JL, Pignatari AC, Borrasca VL, Bierrenbach AL, Toscano CM. 2013. Multi-institutional outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia complex associated with contaminated mannitol solution prepared in compounding pharmacy. Am J Infect Control 41:1038–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vardi A, Sirigou A, Lalayanni C, Kachrimanidou M, Kaloyannidis P, Saloum R, Anagnostopoulos A, Sotiropoulos D. 2013. An outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia bacteremia in hospitalized hematology patients selectively affecting those with acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Infect Control 41:312–316. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.04.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Antony B, Cherian EV, Boloor R, Shenoy KV. 2016. A sporadic outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteremia in pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in coastal Karnataka, South India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 59:197–199. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.182010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Glowicz J, Crist M, Gould C, Moulton-Meissner H, Noble-Wang J, de Man TJB, Perry KA, Miller Z, Yang WC, Langille S, Ross J, Garcia B, Kim J, Epson E, Black S, Pacilli M, LiPuma JJ, Fagan R, B. cepacia Investigation Workgroup. 2018. A multistate investigation of health care-associated Burkholderia cepacia complex infections related to liquid docusate sodium contamination, January–October 2016. Am J Infect Control 46:649–655. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Marquez L, Jones KN, Whaley EM, Koy TH, Revell PA, Taylor RS, Bernhardt MB, Wagner JL, Dunn JJ, LiPuma JJ, Campbell JR. 2017. An outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia complex infections associated with contaminated liquid docusate. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 38:567–573. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.11:1-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Angus AA, Agapakis CM, Fong S, Yerrapragada S, Estrada-de los Santos P, Yang P, Song N, Kano S, Caballero-Mellado J, de Faria SM, Dakora FD, Weinstock G, Hirsch AM. 2014. Plant-associated symbiotic Burkholderia species lack hallmark strategies required in mammalian pathogenesis. PLoS One 9:e83779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Magalhaes M, de Britto MC, Vandamme P. 2002. Burkholderia cepacia genomovar III and Burkholderia vietnamiensis double infection in a cystic fibrosis child. J Cyst Fibros 1:292–294. doi: 10.1016/S1569-1993(02)00101-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wiersinga WJ, Virk HS, Torres AG, Currie BJ, Peacock SJ, Dance DAB, Limmathurotsakul D. 2018. Melioidosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 4:17107–17107. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Geake JB, MelioidCF Investigators, Reid DW, Currie BJ, Bell SC, Bright-Thomas R, Dewar J, Holden S, Simmonds N, Gyi K, Kenna D, Waters V, Jackson M, O’Sullivan B, Taccetti G, Kolbe J, O’Carroll M, Campbell D, Jaksic M, Radhakrishna N, Kidd TJ, Flight W. 2015. An international, multicentre evaluation and description of Burkholderia pseudomallei infection in cystic fibrosis. BMC Pulm Med 15:116. doi: 10.1186/s12890-015-0109-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Limmathurotsakul D, Golding N, Dance DA, Messina JP, Pigott DM, Moyes CL, Rolim DB, Bertherat E, Day NP, Peacock SJ, Hay SI. 2016. Predicted global distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei and burden of melioidosis. Nat Microbiol 1:15008. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2015.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Saikh KU, Mott TM. 2017. Innate immune response to Burkholderia mallei. Curr Opin Infect Dis 30:297–302. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Whitlock GC, Estes DM, Torres AG. 2007. Glanders: off to the races with Burkholderia mallei. FEMS Microbiol Lett 277:115–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00949.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Van Zandt KE, Greer MT, Gelhaus HC. 2013. Glanders: an overview of infection in humans. Orphanet J Rare Dis 8:131–131. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Segonds C, Clavel-Batut P, Thouverez M, Grenet D, Le Coustumier A, Plésiat P, Chabanon G. 2009. Microbiological and epidemiological features of clinical respiratory isolates of Burkholderia gladioli. J Clin Microbiol 47:1510–1516. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02489-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zanotti C, Munari S, Brescia G, Barion U. 2019. Burkholderia gladioli sinonasal infection. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 136:55–56. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2018.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Song L, Jenner M, Masschelein J, Jones C, Bull MJ, Harris SR, Hartkoorn RC, Vocat A, Romero-Canelon I, Coupland P, Webster G, Dunn M, Weiser R, Paisey C, Cole ST, Parkhill J, Mahenthiralingam E, Challis GL. 2017. Discovery and biosynthesis of gladiolin: a Burkholderia gladioli antibiotic with promising activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Am Chem Soc 139:7974–7981. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b03382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Weinberg JB, Alexander BD, Majure JM, Williams LW, Kim JY, Vandamme P, LiPuma JJ. 2007. Burkholderia glumae infection in an infant with chronic granulomatous disease. J Clin Microbiol 45:662–665. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02058-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bernier SP, Silo-Suh L, Woods DE, Ohman DE, Sokol PA. 2003. Comparative analysis of plant and animal models for characterization of Burkholderia cepacia virulence. Infect Immun 71:5306–5313. doi: 10.1128/iai.71.9.5306-5313.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Capra EJ, Laub MT. 2012. Evolution of two-component signal transduction systems. Annu Rev Microbiol 66:325–347. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zschiedrich CP, Keidel V, Szurmant H. 2016. Molecular mechanisms of two-component signal transduction. J Mol Biol 428:3752–3775. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Siryaporn A, Goulian M. 2010. Chapter 1: Characterizing cross-talk in vivo: avoiding pitfalls and overinterpretation, p 1–16, Methods in enzymology, vol 471 Academic Press, Cambridge, MA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Groisman EA. 2016. Feedback control of two-component regulatory systems. Annu Rev Microbiol 70:103–124. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Raghavan V, Groisman EA. 2010. Orphan and hybrid two-component system proteins in health and disease. Curr Opin Microbiol 13:226–231. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2009.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Barakat M, Ortet P, Whitworth DE. 2011. P2CS: a database of prokaryotic two-component systems. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D771–D776. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Winsor GL, Khaira B, Van Rossum T, Lo R, Whiteside MD, Brinkman FS. 2008. The Burkholderia Genome Database: facilitating flexible queries and comparative analyses. Bioinformatics 24:2803–2804. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tiwari S, Jamal SB, Hassan SS, Carvalho P, Almeida S, Barh D, Ghosh P, Silva A, Castro TLP, Azevedo V. 2017. Two-component signal transduction systems of pathogenic bacteria as targets for antimicrobial therapy: an overview. Front Microbiol 8:1878. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Price MN, Arkin AP. 2017. PaperBLAST: text mining papers for information about homologs. mSystems 2:e00039-17. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00039-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cui C, Yang C, Song S, Fu S, Sun X, Yang L, He F, Zhang LH, Zhang Y, Deng Y. 2018. A novel two-component system modulates quorum sensing and pathogenicity in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Mol Microbiol 108:32–44. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.de Souza JT, Mazzola M, Raaijmakers JM. 2003. Conservation of the response regulator gene gacA in Pseudomonas species. Environ Microbiol 5:1328–1340. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2003.00438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Merry CR, Perkins M, Mu L, Peterson BK, Knackstedt RW, Weingart CL. 2015. Characterization of a novel two-component system in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Curr Microbiol 70:556–561. doi: 10.1007/s00284-014-0744-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fazli M, Almblad H, Rybtke ML, Givskov M, Eberl L, Tolker-Nielsen T. 2014. Regulation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas and Burkholderia species. Environ Microbiol 16:1961–1981. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sass AM, Schmerk C, Agnoli K, Norville PJ, Eberl L, Valvano MA, Mahenthiralingam E. 2013. The unexpected discovery of a novel low-oxygen-activated locus for the anoxic persistence of Burkholderia cenocepacia. ISME J 7:1568–1581. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gislason AS, Choy M, Bloodworth RAM, Qu W, Stietz MS, Li X, Zhang C, Cardona ST. 2017. Competitive growth enhances conditional growth mutant sensitivity to antibiotics and exposes a two-component system as an emerging antibacterial target in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00790-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00790-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hasselbring BM, Patel MK, Schell MA. 2011. Dictyostelium discoideum as a model system for identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei virulence factors. Infect Immun 79:2079–2088. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01233-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bone MA, Wilk AJ, Perault AI, Marlatt SA, Scheller EV, Anthouard R, Chen Q, Stibitz S, Cotter PA, Julio SM. 2017. Bordetella PlrSR regulatory system controls BvgAS activity and virulence in the lower respiratory tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E1519–E1527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609565114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kaut CS, Duncan MD, Kim JY, Maclaren JJ, Cochran KT, Julio SM. 2011. A novel sensor kinase is required for Bordetella bronchiseptica to colonize the lower respiratory tract. Infect Immun 79:3216–3228. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00005-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lieberman TD, Flett KB, Yelin I, Martin TR, McAdam AJ, Priebe GP, Kishony R. 2014. Genetic variation of a bacterial pathogen within individuals with cystic fibrosis provides a record of selective pressures. Nat Genet 46:82–87. doi: 10.1038/ng.2848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lieberman TD, Michel JB, Aingaran M, Potter-Bynoe G, Roux D, Davis MR Jr, Skurnik D, Leiby N, Lipuma JJ, Goldberg JB, McAdam AJ, Priebe GP, Kishony R. 2011. Parallel bacterial evolution within multiple patients identifies candidate pathogenicity genes. Nat Genet 43:1275–1280. doi: 10.1038/ng.997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Silva IN, Santos PM, Santos MR, Zlosnik JEA, Speert DP, Buskirk SW, Bruger EL, Waters CM, Cooper VS, Moreira LM. 2016. Long-term evolution of Burkholderia multivorans during a chronic cystic fibrosis infection reveals shifting forces of selection. mSystems 1:e00029-16. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00029-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schaefers MM, Liao TL, Boisvert NM, Roux D, Yoder-Himes D, Priebe GP. 2017. An oxygen-sensing two-component system in the Burkholderia cepacia complex regulates biofilm, intracellular invasion, and pathogenicity. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006116. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zlosnik JE, Costa PS, Brant R, Mori PY, Hird TJ, Fraenkel MC, Wilcox PG, Davidson AG, Speert DP. 2011. Mucoid and nonmucoid Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria in cystic fibrosis infections. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 183:67–72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201002-0203OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Silva IN, Pessoa FD, Ramires MJ, Santos MR, Becker JD, Cooper VS, Moreira LM. 2018. The OmpR regulator of Burkholderia multivorans controls mucoid-to-nonmucoid transition and other cell envelope properties associated with persistence in the cystic fibrosis lung. J Bacteriol 200:e00216-18. doi: 10.1128/JB.00216-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Coutte L, Huot L, Antoine R, Slupek S, Merkel TJ, Chen Q, Stibitz S, Hot D, Locht C. 2016. The multifaceted RisA regulon of Bordetella pertussis. Sci Rep 6:32774–32774. doi: 10.1038/srep32774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.O’Rourke D, FitzGerald CE, Traverse CC, Cooper VS. 2015. There and back again: consequences of biofilm specialization under selection for dispersal. Front Genet 6:18–18. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Flannagan RS, Aubert D, Kooi C, Sokol PA, Valvano MA. 2007. Burkholderia cenocepacia requires a periplasmic HtrA protease for growth under thermal and osmotic stress and for survival in vivo. Infect Immun 75:1679–1689. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01581-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Loutet SA, Mussen LE, Flannagan RS, Valvano MA. 2011. A two-tier model of polymyxin B resistance in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Environ Microbiol Rep 3:278–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00222.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.McPhee JB, Lewenza S, Hancock RE. 2003. Cationic antimicrobial peptides activate a two-component regulatory system, PmrA-PmrB, that regulates resistance to polymyxin B and cationic antimicrobial peptides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol 50:205–217. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03673.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Aubert DF, Flannagan RS, Valvano MA. 2008. A novel sensor kinase-response regulator hybrid controls biofilm formation and type VI secretion system activity in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Infect Immun 76:1979–1991. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01338-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Aubert DF, O'Grady EP, Hamad MA, Sokol PA, Valvano MA. 2013. The Burkholderia cenocepacia sensor kinase hybrid AtsR is a global regulator modulating quorum-sensing signalling. Environ Microbiol 15:372–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02828.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Khodai-Kalaki M, Aubert DF, Valvano MA. 2013. Characterization of the AtsR hybrid sensor kinase phosphorelay pathway and identification of its response regulator in Burkholderia cenocepacia. J Biol Chem 288:30473–30484. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.489914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tomich M, Mohr CD. 2004. Genetic characterization of a multicomponent signal transduction system controlling the expression of cable pili in Burkholderia cenocepacia. J Bacteriol 186:3826–3836. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3826-3836.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.McCarthy Y, Yang L, Twomey KB, Sass A, Tolker-Nielsen T, Mahenthiralingam E, Dow JM, Ryan RP. 2010. A sensor kinase recognizing the cell–cell signal BDSF (cis-2-dodecenoic acid) regulates virulence in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Mol Microbiol 77:1220–1236. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07285.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ryan RP, An S-q, Allan JH, McCarthy Y, Dow JM. 2015. The DSF family of cell-cell signals: an expanding class of bacterial virulence regulators. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004986. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Schell MA, Ulrich RL, Ribot WJ, Brueggemann EE, Hines HB, Chen D, Lipscomb L, Kim HS, Mrázek J, Nierman WC, DeShazer D. 2007. Type VI secretion is a major virulence determinant in Burkholderia mallei. Mol Microbiol 64:1466–1485. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05734.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chen Y, Wong J, Sun GW, Liu Y, Tan G-YG, Gan Y-H. 2011. Regulation of type VI secretion system during Burkholderia pseudomallei infection. Infect Immun 79:3064–3073. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05148-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Burtnick MN, Brett PJ, Harding SV, Ngugi SA, Ribot WJ, Chantratita N, Scorpio A, Milne TS, Dean RE, Fritz DL, Peacock SJ, Prior JL, Atkins TP, DeShazer D. 2011. The cluster 1 type VI secretion system is a major virulence determinant in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infect Immun 79:1512–1525. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01218-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wong J, Chen Y, Gan Y-H. 2015. Host cytosolic glutathione sensing by a membrane histidine kinase activates the type VI secretion system in an intracellular bacterium. Cell Host Microbe 18:38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Viberg LT, Sarovich DS, Kidd TJ, Geake JB, Bell SC, Currie BJ, Price EP. 2017. Within-host evolution of Burkholderia pseudomallei during chronic infection of seven Australasian cystic fibrosis patients. mBio 8:e00356-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00356-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Moule MG, Hemsley CM, Seet Q, Guerra-Assuncao JA, Lim J, Sarkar-Tyson M, Clark TG, Tan PB, Titball RW, Cuccui J, Wren BW. 2014. Genome-wide saturation mutagenesis of Burkholderia pseudomallei K96243 predicts essential genes and novel targets for antimicrobial development. mBio 5:e00926-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00926-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Price EP, Sarovich DS, Mayo M, Tuanyok A, Drees KP, Kaestli M, Beckstrom-Sternberg SM, Babic-Sternberg JS, Kidd TJ, Bell SC, Keim P, Pearson T, Currie BJ. 2013. Within-host evolution of Burkholderia pseudomallei over a twelve-year chronic carriage infection. mBio 4:e00388-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00388-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Mahfouz ME, Grayson TH, Dance DA, Gilpin ML. 2006. Characterization of the mrgRS locus of the opportunistic pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei: temperature regulates the expression of a two-component signal transduction system. BMC Microbiol 6:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kumar M, Gupta A, Sahoo RK, Jena J, Debata NK, Subudhi E. 2016. Functional genome screening to elucidate the colistin resistance mechanism. Sci Rep 6:23156. doi: 10.1038/srep23156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Lazar Adler NR, Allwood EM, Deveson Lucas D, Harrison P, Watts S, Dimitropoulos A, Treerat P, Alwis P, Devenish RJ, Prescott M, Govan B, Adler B, Harper M, Boyce JD. 2016. Perturbation of the two-component signal transduction system, BprRS, results in attenuated virulence and motility defects in Burkholderia pseudomallei. BMC Genomics 17:331. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2668-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Francis VI, Stevenson EC, Porter SL. 2017. Two-component systems required for virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiology Lett 364:fnx104. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Tuanyok A, Tom M, Dunbar J, Woods DE. 2006. Genome-wide expression analysis of Burkholderia pseudomallei infection in a hamster model of acute melioidosis. Infect Immun 74:5465–5476. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00737-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Tabunhan S, Wongratanacheewin S, Wongwajana S, Welbat TU, Faksri K, Namwat W. 2014. Characterization of a novel two-component system response regulator involved in biofilm formation and a low-iron response of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 45:1065–1079. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Neamnak J, Tabunhan S, Wongwajana S, Wongratanacheewin S, Chamgramol Y, Pairojkul C, Faksri K, Namwat W. 2014. Comparison of stress adaptation and survival rate between Burkholderia pseudomallei with mutant and wild type bfmR. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 45:346–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Jones AL, DeShazer D, Woods DE. 1997. Identification and characterization of a two-component regulatory system involved in invasion of eukaryotic cells and heavy-metal resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infect Immun 65:4972–4977. doi: 10.1128/IAI.65.12.4972-4977.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Mangalea MR, Plumley BA, Borlee BR. 2017. Nitrate sensing and metabolism inhibit biofilm formation in the opportunistic pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei by reducing the intracellular concentration of c-di-GMP. Front Microbiol 8:1353. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Nowak-Lovato KL, Hickmott AJ, Maity TS, Bulyk ML, Dunbar J, Hong-Geller E. 2012. DNA binding site analysis of Burkholderia thailandensis response regulators. J Microbiol Methods 90:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Wemmer DE, Kern D. 2005. Beryllofluoride binding mimics phosphorylation of aspartate in response regulators. J Bacteriol 187:8229–8230. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.24.8229-8230.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Karki HS, Barphagha IK, Ham JH. 2012. A conserved two-component regulatory system, PidS/PidR, globally regulates pigmentation and virulence-related phenotypes of Burkholderia glumae. Mol Plant Pathol 13:785–794. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00787.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Miwa S, Kihira E, Yoshioka A, Nakasone K, Okamoto S, Hatano M, Igarashi M, Eguchi Y, Kato A, Ichikawa N, Sekine M, Fujita N, Kanesaki Y, Yoshikawa H, Utsumi R. 2016. Identification of the three genes involved in controlling production of a phytotoxin tropolone in Burkholderia plantarii. J Bacteriol 198:1604–1609. doi: 10.1128/JB.01028-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Cardona ST, Choy M, Hogan AM. 2018. Essential two-component systems regulating cell envelope functions: opportunities for novel antibiotic therapies. J Membr Biol 251:75–89. doi: 10.1007/s00232-017-9995-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Gotoh Y, Eguchi Y, Watanabe T, Okamoto S, Doi A, Utsumi R. 2010. Two-component signal transduction as potential drug targets in pathogenic bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 13:232–239. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Wong Y-C, Abd El Ghany M, Naeem R, Lee K-W, Tan Y-C, Pain A, Nathan S. 2016. Candidate essential genes in Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 identified by genome-wide TraDIS. Front Microbiol 7:1288–1288. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Rhodes KA, Schweizer HP. 2016. Antibiotic resistance in Burkholderia species. Drug Resist Updat 28:82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2016.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
