Skip to main content
Biology of Reproduction logoLink to Biology of Reproduction
. 2019 Oct 16;102(3):571–587. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioz197

Analysis of the uterine lumen in fertility-classified heifers: II. Proteins and metabolites†

Joao G N Moraes 1, Susanta K Behura 1, Jeanette V Bishop 2, Thomas R Hansen 2, Thomas W Geary 3, Thomas E Spencer 1,
PMCID: PMC7331878  PMID: 31616912

Abstract

Survival and growth of the bovine conceptus is dependent on endometrial secretions or histotroph. Previously, serial blastocyst transfer was used to classify heifers as high fertile (HF), subfertile (SF), or infertile (IF). Here, we investigated specific histotroph components (proteins and metabolites) in the uterine lumen of day 17 fertility-classified heifers. Interferon tau (IFNT) was more abundant in uterine lumenal fluid (ULF) of pregnant HF than SF animals as the conceptus was longer in HF heifers. However, no differences in endometrial expression of selected classical and nonclassical interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) were observed, suggesting that IFNT signaling in the endometrium of pregnant HF and SF heifers was similar. Pregnancy significantly increased the abundance of several proteins in ULF. Based on functional annotation, the abundance of a number of proteins involved in energy metabolism, oxidative stress, amino acid metabolism, and cell proliferation and differentiation were greater in the ULF of pregnant HF than SF heifers. Metabolomics analysis found that pregnancy only changed the metabolome composition of ULF from HF heifers. The majority of the metabolites that increased in the ULF of pregnant HF as compared to SF heifers were associated with energy and amino acid metabolism. The observed differences in ULF proteome and metabolome are hypothesized to influence uterine receptivity with consequences on conceptus development and survival in fertility-classified heifers.

Keywords: conceptus, endometrium, fertility, preimplantation embryo, proteomics, uterus


Pregnancy induced changes in the uterine lumen are dysregulated in subfertile heifers.

Introduction

The uterus clearly impacts conceptus (embryo/fetus and associated extraembryonic membranes) survival and development, thus affecting pregnancy success [1–5]. After hatching from the zona pellucida (days 9–10) [6], the bovine blastocyst slowly grows into an ovoid or tubular form on days 12–14 and is then termed a conceptus [7]. Peri-implantation growth of the conceptus is highly dependent on substances present in the uterine lumen [8]. Uterine epithelia are present in the endometrium of all mammals [9], and their secretions constitute an important component of the histotroph, which is essential for preimplantation conceptus survival and development in sheep [10, 11]. Based on candidate and comprehensive analyses [12–20], histotroph in the uterine lumen of cattle is a complex mixture of amino acids, glucose, lipids, proteins, carbohydrates, vitamins, ions, cytokines, hormones, growth factors, and other substances.

In cattle, the endometrium transcriptome is greatly affected by progesterone and pregnancy, e.g., the conceptus [21]. Pregnancy-induced changes in the endometrium transcriptome are hypothesized to influence uterine lumenal secretome composition, thereby affecting conceptus development and pregnancy success [17, 22–24]. For instance, pregnancy increases the availability of basic (e.g., arginine, lysine, and histidine) acidic (e.g. aspartic acid/aspartate, glutamic acid/glutamate) and neutral amino acids (e.g., glutamine, isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and valine) in the uterine lumen during the preimplantation period in cattle and sheep [16, 25, 26]. Additionally, pregnancy modulates the availability of proteins in the uterine lumen during the preimplantation period in cattle [12, 22]. A series of studies found that interferon tau (IFNT) has distinct effects on the endometrial transcriptome and uterine histotroph in sheep and cattle [27–31]. IFNT is a type 1 IFN produced exclusively by mononuclear trophectoderm cells of the elongating conceptus in ruminants, and is secreted predominantly between days 15 and 22 in cattle [32–34]. A primary role for IFNT is to suppress development of the endometrial luteolytic mechanism [27, 35, 36]. However, the paracrine actions of IFNT also stimulate the expression of classical and non-classical interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) in the endometrium that, along with progesterone induced effects, modulate uterine gene expression, which is essential for establishing uterine receptivity in ruminants [37–40].

It has been recently demonstrated that the metabolite composition of the uterine lumen can be altered by pregnancy as early as day 7 of gestation [17], and that progesterone plays important role regulating uterine lumenal fluid (ULF) constituents around the time of onset of conceptus elongation in cattle (days 12–14) [18–20]. Alterations in the profile of uterine lumenal components during early pregnancy are a result of complex conceptus–endometrium interactions, which are required to support conceptus growth and pregnancy establishment. The conceptus–endometrium crosstalk regulates conceptus and endometrium gene expression, ensures corpus luteum maintenance, provides substrates for cell proliferation and differentiation while preventing cell damage through oxidative stress, and induces the state of uterine receptivity. In order to identify changes in the uterine lumenal constituents that are associated with increased or reduced uterine capacity to support pregnancy, the current experiment utilized heifers that were previously fertility-classified as high fertile (HF; 100% pregnancy rate), subfertile (SF; 25–33% pregnancy rate), or infertile (IF; 0% pregnancy rate) using serial transfer of a single in vitro produced blastocyst on day 7 followed by pregnancy determination on day 28 [1, 41]. Interestingly, conceptus development and survival on day 14 (7 days post-transfer) was not different among fertility-classified heifers and only minimal differences in endometrial transcriptome were observed on day 14 [41]. Subsequently, it was observed that day 17 (10 days post-transfer) pregnancy rate was higher in HF (71%) and SF (90%) than IF (20%) heifers. Although no differences in conceptus recovery rate was observed between HF and SF heifers on day 17, the conceptuses from HF heifers were on average twice as long compared to SF conceptuses [1]. Additionally, the analysis of transcriptome data generated from endometrium and conceptus revealed dysregulated conceptus–endometrium interactions in SF heifers [1]. The endometrium of SF heifers was found less responsive to pregnancy on day 17, and this was hypothesized as the main cause of embryonic mortality observed in SF heifers by day 28 [1]. Thus, in order to investigate the biology of subfertility, the present study tested the hypothesis that specific histotroph constituents in the uterine lumen is altered in fertility-classified heifers. Because differences in endometrial transcriptome can translate into differences in the components available in the uterine lumen [24], the focus of the current study was to investigate proteins and metabolites in the uterine lumen of pregnant and open fertility-classified heifers using targeted and untargeted approaches.

Materials and methods

Animals

All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Agriculture Animals in Research and Teaching and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the USDA-ARS Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory and the University of Missouri.

Collection of uterine lumenal contents

As described previously [1], fertility-classified heifers were synchronized to estrus (day 0) and received two in vivo-produced embryos on day 7 (HF, n = 21; SF, n = 10; IF, n = 5). Conceptus recovery rate was higher in HF (71%; 15/21) and SF (90%; 9/10) than IF (20%; 1/5) heifers. Additional heifers (SF, n = 4; IF, n = 1) were synchronized to estrus but no embryo transfer was performed. All heifers (HF, n = 21; SF, n = 14; IF, n = 6) were slaughtered on day 17 (10 days post-transfer or 17 days post-estrus) at the University of Missouri slaughter facility, and reproductive tracts were collected within 30 min of slaughter. Immediately after collection, the reproductive tracts were transported to the laboratory, and the uterine lumen was gently flushed with 20 ml of sterile and filtered 1X PBS (pH 7.0). The conceptuses were removed, if present, the ULF clarified by centrifugation (3000×g at 4 °C for 15 min), and the supernatant was carefully removed with a pipette, mixed, divided into aliquots, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until analyzed.

IFNT analysis

The amount of IFNT in ULF was measured in samples from pregnant (HF, n = 15; SF, n = 9; IF, n = 1) and nonpregnant (HF, n = 6; SF, n = 1; IF, n = 4) fertility-classified heifers that received two embryos on day 7. Bovine IFNT was generated as a glycosylated recombinant protein (rbIFNT) using bovine trophoblast protein 1 cDNA (bTP509) as template [42] and human HEK cells by Colorado State University in collaboration with a biopharma company (J.V. Bishop and T.R. Hansen, manuscript in preparation). Purified rbIFNT was used to generate a monoclonal antibody in mice (9.1.1.; 16.2 μg/ml) and a polyclonal antibody in goats (5.3 μg/ml), which were used as capture and biotinylated detector antibodies, respectively, in a sandwich enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The range of detection for this ELISA was 100–3000 pg and the limit of detection for this assay was 100 pg/ml. This ELISA has been validated to be specific for IFNT, and does not cross-react with IFNs omega, alpha/beta, or gamma. Uterine flush samples from open and pregnant heifers were analyzed in the same assay. Uterine flushings were analyzed as neat (undiluted) samples or at dilutions of 1:10 or 1:500 in order to detect IFNT in the linear range of the assay.

Proteomics

ULF proteomics analysis was conducted by the Proteomics Center of the University of Missouri in a subgroup of 25 heifers that were determined to be pregnant (HF, n = 5; SF, n = 5) or nonpregnant/cyclic (HF, n = 5; SF, n = 5; IF, n = 5) at day 17 slaughter. The selected 25 heifers used here are the same subgroup of animals, which we performed RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of endometrial samples in a recent publication [1]. The selection of the pregnant heifers (HF, n = 5; SF, n = 5) used in these analyzes was based on data of conceptus length and number, in an effort for selecting samples that represented well the overall data collected within each fertility group. For instance, in the complete data collected [1], 38.1% of HF heifers and 40% of SF heifers had two conceptuses, and the average conceptus length was 10.6 ± 7.6 (range: 1.2–32.2 cm) for HF heifers and 4.7 ± 4.2 (range: 1.5–13.5 cm) for SF heifers. In the selected subgroup of pregnant heifers, 2 HF and 3 SF heifers had two conceptuses, and the average conceptus size was 11.97 ± 8.14 cm (range: 1.3–25 cm) for HF and 6.38 ± 4.5 (range: 2.1–13.5 cm) for SF heifers.

Two analytical procedures were used to investigate the proteomic profile of the ULF. In the first procedure, ULF proteins were precipitated, and in-solution digestion performed. To increase the number of proteins identified, a second procedure was conducted in which precipitated proteins were first loaded in 12% acrylamide SDS–PAGE for size separation, and protein digestion was performed in slices of SDS–PAGE gels.

Description of the in-solution digestion method

Proteins in a total of 1 ml of ULF were precipitated using four volumes of 5% trichloroacetic acid in 100% of ice-cold acetone solution. Samples were vortexed and incubated at −22 °C for 24 h for protein precipitation. Samples were then centrifuged at 16 000×g for 10 min, and the supernatant discarded. Protein pellets were resuspended in a solution of urea/ammonium bicarbonate (6 M urea, 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate), digested with trypsin (www.osa.sunysb.edu/Proteomics/ProteinDigestPrep), and peptides purified by large-format, 100 μL, C18 tips (according to the manufacturer’s instructions, Pierce/Thermo Scientific).

Description of the SDS–PAGE method

The amount of protein in ULF were first determined using the Qubit Protein Assay Kit with a Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer, and variable volumes of ULF containing 200 μg of protein were aliquoted. ULF proteins were precipitated as described in the in-solution method, and the protein pellet was resuspended in 20 μL of 1X Laemmli buffer (60 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, 2% SDS, and 100 mM DTT), and loaded on one of three 12% acrylamide SDS–PAGE gels. After staining with colloidal Coomassie blue, the gels were destained in water and each lane sliced into eight pieces. Gel slices were frozen at −80 °C until processing. Samples were trypsin digested according to the available protocol (http://proteomics.missouri.edu/protocols) for digestion of Coomassie-stained 1D gel bands. Peptides were then lyophilized and resuspended in 40 μL solution of 5% acetonitrile and 1% formic acid. Half of the sample (20 μL) was transferred to autosampler vials, and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) performed using a LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

LTQ orbitrap mass spectrometry and protein identification

A full-loop injection (18 μL) of sample was loaded onto a C8 trap column (pepmap100, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Peptides were eluted from the trap column and separated on a 25 cm × 150 μm inner diameter pulled-needle analytical column packed with HxSIL C18 reversed phase resin (Hamilton Co., Reno, NV, USA) with a step gradient of acetonitrile at 400 nL/min. The Proxeon Easy nLC HPLC system is attached to an LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer. Liquid chromatography gradient conditions were initially 5% B (A: 0.1% formic acid in water, B: 99.9% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid), followed by 2 min ramp to 10% B. Gradient of 10–20% B over 35 min, gradient of 20% B to 30% B over 40 min, gradient of 30% B to 90% B over 5 min, hold at 90% B for 22 min, ramp back to (1 min) and hold at (5 min) initial conditions.

Fourier transform mass spectrometer data were collected (30 000 resolution, 1 microscan, 300–1800 m/z, profile, AGC 5e5) and then at each cycle (approximately 3 s), the nine-most-abundant peptides (ignore +1 ions, ignore trypsin autolysis ions, pick peptides with > 1000 counts) were selected for MSMS (2 m/z mass window, 35% normalized collision energy, centroid). Dynamic exclusion was applied with the following parameters: repeat count 1, repeat duration 30 s, exclusion list max 500, exclusion duration 180 s. Raw data were copied to the Sorcerer2 IDA (SageN Research Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and peak lists prepared using ReAdW. Bovine protein entries were retrieved from NCBI using a “protein” search with the keyword bovine. A total of 126 866 Bos taurus entries were downloaded in FASTA format. A reversed sequence decoy database was generated using DecoyDBCreator V0.1 (http://www.p3db.org/p3db1.0/tools/DecoyDBCreator/), in which forward and reversed sequences were linked together into a single FASTA file (253 732 total sequences). Sequest searches were performed with trypsin as enzyme, two missed cleavages allowed, carbamidomethyl cysteine as a fixed modification, oxidized methionine as variable mod, 25 ppm mass tolerance on precursor ions, and 1 Da on fragment ions.

Scaffold (version Scaffold 4.0.6.1, Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR, USA) was used to validate MS/MS-based peptide and protein identifications. Peptide identifications were accepted if they exceeded specific database search engine thresholds (XCorr > 1.5) and with a mass accuracy of less than 10 ppm. Protein identifications were accepted if they contained at least two identified peptides. The minimum number of unique peptides was set at two in order for a protein to be identified. Peptide threshold was set at 95% peptide probability, with +2 accepted charge, and parent mass tolerance of 10 ppm. Using the parameters above, the decoy false discovery rate (FDR) was calculated to be 1.1% on the protein level and 0.0% on the spectrum level [43]. Total spectrum counts for proteins were used for comparisons and statistical analysis.

Untargeted metabolomics

Global metabolomic analysis of the ULF was conducted by the Southeast Center for Integrated Metabolomics at the University of Florida (Gainesville, FL, USA) in the same 25 samples selected for proteomics. All samples were extracted following a cellular extraction procedure without pre-normalization to the sample protein content. Global metabolomics profiling was performed on a Thermo Q-Exactive Oribtrap mass spectrometer with Dionex ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) and autosampler. All samples were analyzed in positive and negative heated electrospray ionization with a mass resolution of 35 000 at m/z 200 as separate injections. Separation was achieved on an ACE 18-pfp 100 × 2.1 mm, 2 μm column with mobile phase A as 0.1% formic acid in water and mobile phase B as acetonitrile. This is a polar-embedded stationary phase that provides comprehensive coverage, but has some limitations for the coverage of very polar species. The flow rate was 350 μL/min with a column temperature of 25 °C. A total of 4 μL of each sample was injected for negative ion mode analysis and 2 μL was injected for positive ion mode analysis.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses for measurements of IFNT in ULF were conducted using SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). IFNT concentrations were assessed for normality using the UNIVARIATE procedure, and because concentrations were determined not to be normally distributed, data were rank transformed. The effect of pregnancy status (pregnant vs open), conceptus number (one vs two) and fertility classification on ULF IFNT concentrations were determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the GLM procedure. Post-test comparisons were conducted using the LSMEANS statement with the Fisher protected least significant difference (LSD) option. Pearson correlation for conceptus size and ULF IFNT concentrations were determined using the CORR procedure. Of note, for heifers with two conceptuses, conceptus length was equal to the sum of both conceptuses present in the flush.

Statistical analysis of the proteomics data was performed in Scaffold (version Scaffold 4.0.6.1, Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR, USA). Significant proteins were identified based on Fisher exact test for comparisons including two treatments (e.g., pregnant vs open), and ANOVA with Fisher LSD post-hoc adjustment for analyses containing more than two treatments (e.g., HF vs SF vs IF). Enrichment analysis (http://www.geneontology.org) was performed to identify pathways that were over-represented among significantly different proteins identified in ULF.

Statistical analysis of the metabolomics data was performed using the web server MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (http://www.metaboanalyst.ca) [44–49]. For this analysis, a table matrix of m/z peak intensities with samples in columns and features in rows were created and imported to MetaboAnalyst 4.0. Data from positive and negative ion modes were separately subjected to statistical analyses. Data filtering was performed based on the interquartile range to identify and remove low-quality data points, and then, the data were normalized by the sum method, log transformed, and scaled using the auto-scaling method. A t-test was used to investigate if features were differently expressed for comparisons including two treatments (e.g., pregnant vs open), and ANOVA with Fisher LSD post-hoc adjustment was used when the analyses contained more than two treatments (e.g., HF vs SF vs IF). Fold change (FC) analysis was conducted to detect whether the abundance of differential metabolites increased or decreased in ULF for each comparison. The calculation of FC is based on the ratio between two group means (e.g., pregnant/open), and the FC threshold of two was set for all analyses. Differential metabolites were further investigated using the metabolite set enrichment analysis (MSEA) module of MetaboAnalyst 4.0, to identify biologically meaningful pathways associated with the significantly altered metabolites. To account for multiple comparisons, a FDR < 0.05 was applied for all analyses. Additionally, using the human database of MetaboAnalyst 4.0, joint pathway analyses that combined the uterine transcriptome data from fertility-classified heifers [1] with the differential metabolites detected in the ULF were conducted, in order to further explore biological pathways that were over-represented among fertility-classified heifers during early pregnancy.

Integration of uterine lumenal secretome and endometrium and conceptus transcriptome

The present ULF data was integrated with transcriptome data from endometrium and conceptuses [1]. Gene expression data, available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under the accession number GSE107891), was reanalyzed to address comparisons not performed in the original work. Differential gene expression analysis was conducted using edgeR-robust [50], and a FDR ≤ 0.05 was used as the cutoff for determining the differently expressed genes (DEGs).

Because IFNT modulates endometrial gene expression, an analysis was conducted to investigate the expression of ISGs by the endometrium of fertility-classified heifers. Furthermore, we explored the expression of known genes regulating IFNT transcription in the conceptus and endometrium.

The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/) was used to identify genes encoding amino acid transporters, and the expression of those genes by the conceptus and endometrium was investigated. Additionally, the origin of proteins that increased in the ULF by pregnancy (conceptus versus endometrium secreted) was explored using the transcriptome data from conceptus and endometrium. Furthermore, we investigated endometrial genes (FDR < 0.05) and ULF proteins (P < 0.01) that were similarly increased by pregnancy, to identify proteins that are robustly upregulated by the endometrium during pregnancy.

The analysis performed on endometrial transcriptome included data generated from the same subgroup of pregnant (HF, n = 5; SF, n = 5) and open (HF, n = 5; SF, n = 5) heifers selected for ULF analysis. The model used to test the effect of pregnancy on endometrial gene expression was composed by gene-expression data as the dependent variable and pregnancy status (pregnant vs nonpregnant) as the independent variable. The model used to evaluate differences among only pregnant heifers (HF, n = 5; SF, n = 5) was comprised of gene-expression data of pregnant endometrium as the dependent variable and fertility group (HF vs SF) as the independent variable.

A similar approach was used to investigate the relationship of ULF composition and conceptus transcriptome. Because there is natural variation in conceptus length among conceptuses collected in the same day during the period of conceptus elongation in cattle [7, 23, 41, 51, 52] and the conceptus transcriptome changes as it develops [23], we first analyzed day 17 conceptus transcriptome data from HF (n = 15) and SF heifers (n = 7) that were either short (n = 11; mean length: 2.5 ± 0.4 cm) or long (n = 11; mean length: 14.5 ± 1.9 cm) to explore differences in the transcriptome of conceptuses that were likely due to stage of development. The model used to test the effect of conceptus length on conceptus transcriptome was composed by gene-expression data as the dependent variable and category of conceptus size (short vs long) as the independent variable. Then, the transcriptome of HF (n = 17) and SF (n = 10) conceptuses were compared for the same set of genes of interest, to investigate the influence of ULF composition on conceptus transcriptome, in order to explore the mechanisms associated to the retarded growth of SF conceptuses and reduced pregnancy success in SF heifers. The model used to test the effect of fertility-classification on conceptus transcriptome was composed by gene-expression data as the dependent variable and fertility group (HF vs SF) as the independent variable.

Results

Interferon tau

As expected, IFNT was not detected in the ULF of open heifers (Figure 1A). Among pregnant heifers, conceptus number did not influence (P = 0.22) ULF IFNT abundance (Figure 1B). Consistent with differences in conceptus length [1], IFNT was higher in in the ULF of pregnant HF than SF (P = 0.045) and IF (P = 0.02) heifers (Figure 1C). As expected, the amount of IFNT in the ULF was correlated (r = 0.82, P < 0.01) with conceptus length (Figure 1D).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Concentrations of IFNT in the ULF were measured in samples from pregnant (HF, n = 15; SF, n = 9; IF, n = 1) and nonpregnant (HF, n = 6; SF, n = 1; IF, n = 4) fertility-classified heifers receiving two embryos on day 7. Concentrations of IFNT in the ULF according to pregnancy status (A), among pregnant heifers with one versus two conceptuses (P = 0.22) in the uterine lumen (B), among pregnant fertility-classified heifers (HF vs SF P = 0.045; HF vs IF P = 0.02; SF vs IF P = 0.13) (C), and the Pearson correlation (r = 0.82, P < 0.01) between IFNT in the ULF and conceptus size (D).

Integrating ULF IFNT and transcriptome data

There were no differences in abundance of IFNT transcripts in short compared to long conceptuses (FDR = 0.98) or between HF and SF conceptuses (FDR = 0.21). The expression of select classical and nonclassical ISGs in the endometrium were also not different in pregnant HF and SF endometrium (Table 1). The expression of select genes involved with the transcriptional control of IFNT by the conceptus and endometrium [53] is presented in Table S1. Expression of POU5F1 in conceptuses was not different between short and long (FDR = 0.20) or between HF and SF conceptuses (FDR = 0.11). EOMES expression in day 17 conceptuses was very low (FPKM < 1). Interestingly, conceptuses from HF heifers had higher (FDR ≤ 0.01) expression of the IFNT transactivators DLX3 and GATA3 compared to SF conceptuses, and GATA3 and CREBBP tended (FDR < 0.1) to be higher in HF than SF conceptuses.

Table 1.

ISG expression in the endometrium of open and pregnant fertility-classified heifersa.

Classical ISGs Open FPKMa Pregnant FPKMa FDR HF pregnant FPKMa SF pregnant FPKMa FDR
STAT1 50 ± 2 252 ± 18 6.61E-85 269 ± 30 236 ± 22 0.67
STAT2 16 ± 0.3 48 ± 4 8.10E-40 52 ± 6 44 ± 6 0.35
IRF9 11 ± 1 81 ± 6 2.06E-102 88 ± 8 74 ± 7 0.39
ISG15 20 ± 10 1433 ± 185 6.22E-113 1618 ± 253 1248 ± 269 0.30
B2M 721 ± 25 1956 ± 174 3.84E-31 2106 ± 209 1807 ± 285 0.40
MIC1 11 ± 2 26 ± 3 1.50E-05 26 ± 4 25 ± 6 0.90
OAS1Y 33 ± 6 576 ± 38 1.37E-106 599 ± 51 552 ± 61 0.74
RSAD2 11 ± 4 593 ± 88 2.27E-67 663 ± 116 523 ± 136 0.52
IFIH1 11 ± 1 96 ± 9 1.63E-87 101 ± 10 90 ± 15 0.67
MX1 50 ± 11 934 ± 70 7.40E-116 1007 ± 111 862 ± 83 0.56
MX2 4 ± 2 317 ± 42 9.20E-79 361 ± 60 272 ± 57 0.34
CXCL10 6 ± 1 93 ± 18 5.62E-29 110 ± 27 76 ± 25 0.35
Non-classical ISGs
CTSL 2 ± 0.4 4 ± 1 2.43E-02 5 ± 1 3 ± 1 0.54
CST6 196 ± 21 361 ± 50 4.18E-04 408 ± 95 313 ± 35 0.93
GRP 2558 ± 518 2889 ± 171 2.98E-02 2994 ± 204 2785 ± 292 0.86
IGFBP1 79 ± 21 160 ± 27 5.71E-02 144 ± 43 177 ± 36 1.00
SLC2A1 68 ± 11 153 ± 19 1.10E-05 174 ± 35 132 ± 13 1.00
SLC5A11 0.7 ± 0.1 1 ± 0.1 2.07E-02 1 ± 0.3 1 ± 0.1 0.94

Data are presented as fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

Among factors from the uterus that stimulates conceptus IFNT production in vitro, colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) was increased (FDR ≤ 0.01) in endometrium from pregnant as compared to open heifers, but no differences were observed in the endometrium of pregnant HF and SF heifers (Table S1). Additionally, endometrial FGF2 expression on day 17 was not affected by pregnancy or different between pregnant HF and SF heifers. Of note, endometrial CSF2 and IL3 expression was very low (FPKM < 1; Table S1).

ULF proteomics

There were 699 proteins identified in the ULF using the in-solution method (Dataset S1) and 899 proteins identified using the SDS–PAGE method (Dataset S2). The expected differences in sensitivity observed between the SDS–PAGE and the in-solution methods are attributed to the up-front fractionation of proteins by size in the gel approach, and due to differences in total LC–MS acquisition time between the two approaches. The gel technique was performed using 880 min of total acquisition time per sample (8 slices × 110 min acquisition each), whereas the in-solution digestion was analyzed in a single gradient of 110 min. The increase in acquisition time results in increased number of proteins being identified. The differences in nature of proteins identified by the two procedures can also be explained by methodological differences between the two approaches. The SDS–PAGE method is detergent based, and SDS solubilize membrane associated proteins with greater efficiency than the in-solution digestion buffer, which does not contain any detergent. Nevertheless, there was a significant overlap in the proteins identified between the two procedures. The majority of the proteins identified by the in-solution method (63%; 440/699) were also detected by the SDS–PAGE method, and 51% of the significantly different proteins identified among all comparisons performed in the data generated by in-solution method were also significant in the analyses conducted in the data from the SDS–PAGE method (Table 2).

Table 2.

Proteins differentially abundant in ULF of open and pregnant fertility-classified heifers by method.

Comparisons Number of proteins significantly (P < 0.05) different among comparisons
In-solution method (699) SDS–PAGE method (899) Common different proteins
Pregnant vs open 167 446 103
HF pregnant vs open 97 341 50
SF pregnant vs open 95 212 48
Only pregnant HF vs SF 37 221 14
Only open HF, SF, IF 27 48 2

The abundance of 167 (Dataset S3) and 446 (Dataset S4) proteins were differently present in the ULF of pregnant compared to open heifers for the in-solution and SDS–PAGE methods, respectively, and 103 of those proteins were consistently different in abundance in both procedures (Table 2; Dataset S5).

Based on the 103 different proteins detected by both methods, the abundance of 62 proteins increased and 41 decreased in pregnant compared to open ULF (Dataset S5). Interestingly, pathways associated with the 62 proteins that increased in pregnant ULF using the Reactome database included amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism (CKMT1, ACADVL, ACAA1, ENO1, ALDH2, ACAT1, GOT2, P4HB, GOT1, ALDOC, AHCY, PGD, CAT, ACO2, IDH2, FABP3, ALDOA, PSPH, FH, ATIC, PSAT1, PGM2, ABHD14B, HSD17B10, and DDAH2), metabolism of carbohydrates (ENO1, GOT1, GOT2, ALDOC, PGD, ALDOA, and PGM2), and tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle) cycle (ACO2, IDH2, and FH) (Table S2). Conversely, pathways associated with the 41 proteins that increased in open compared to pregnant ULF using the Reactome database included intraflagellar transport due to the increased abundance of three cytoskeletal proteins (TUBB2B, TUBA1A, and TUBB5), and regulation of insulin secretion, due to the increased abundance of three G-protein subunits (GNAI2, GNB2, and GNAQ) in open ULF (Table S3).

Because the SDS–PAGE method was more sensitive (Table 2), the description of the subsequent results was focused on the data generated by the SDS–PAGE procedure. The abundance of selected top 10 most significant proteins that increased in ULF of pregnant versus open heifers (Table 3) included embryonic secreted factors (TKDP1, PAG11), nuclear-envelope proteins (Lamin A/C; LMNA), mitochondrial proteins (DLD, ACAA1, ACAA2, HSPD1, HSPA9, and GLUD1), and glutathione synthase (GSS). Likewise, the selected top 10 most significant proteins that increased in open than pregnant ULF (Table 3) included cytoskeletal proteins (EZR, 2P4N, and MYO1B), G-protein subunits (GNAQ, GNAI2), other membrane-bound proteins (PAS-6/7, FAM234A, RARRES1, and GPC1), and a protein of the coagulation system (Factor V).

Table 3.

Abundance of the top 10 proteins that increased or decreased in pregnant compared to open ULF.

Identified proteins GenInfo identifier Protein P-value Opena Pregnanta
Proteins increased in pregnant ULF
Pregnancy-associated glycoprotein 11 28603724 PAG11 <0.00010 0.0 5.3
Trophoblast Kunitz domain protein 1 precursor 296481028 TKDP1 <0.00010 0.0 4.7
Mitochondrial acetyl-coenzyme A acyltransferase 1 156254808 ACAA1 <0.00010 0.0 4.0
Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase 296488519 DLD <0.00010 0.0 1.1
3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, mitochondrial 121956694 ACAA2 <0.00010 0.1 5.2
Glutathione synthetase 296481143 GSS <0.00010 0.1 2.5
Bovine glutamate dehydrogenase 298508694 GLUD1 <0.00010 0.6 10.3
Heat shock 70 kDa protein 9 122144079 HSPA9 <0.00010 0.5 7.0
Lamin A/C 296489648 LMNA <0.00010 0.1 2.0
Heat shock protein 60 kDa, mitochondrial isoform X1 982914181 HSPD1 <0.00010 3.0 28.1
Proteins increased in open ULF
PAS-6 and PAS-7 proteins 1632779 PAS-6/7 <0.00010 4.5 0.1
Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(q) subunit alpha 158508558 GNAQ <0.00010 2.6 0.3
Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i) subunit alpha-2 198282135 GNAI2 <0.00010 3.4 0.4
Factor V 163038 FACTORV <0.00010 13.9 2.2
Retinoic acid receptor responder (tazarotene induced) 1 112362395 RARRES1 <0.00010 3.7 0.6
FAM234A; alternative name: ITFG3 114149324 FAM234A <0.00010 4.2 0.7
MYO1B protein 151554811 MYO1B <0.00010 9.1 1.8
Bovine tubulin (1jff) 193885177 2P4N <0.00010 49.1 10.0
Glypican 1 157279068 GPC1 <0.00010 3.6 1.0
Ezrin 27806351 EZR <0.00010 33.3 14.0

Average of total spectrum count for proteins identified in the uterine lumen flush of open and pregnant heifers.

There were 221 different proteins in ULF of pregnant HF and SF heifers of which 142 increased and 79 decreased (Dataset S6, Figure 2). Panther pathways associated with the 142 proteins that increased in ULF of pregnant HF compared to SF heifers included vitamin B6 metabolism, amino acid metabolism (asparagine and aspartate biosynthesis, serine glycine biosynthesis), energy metabolism (pyruvate metabolism, pentose phosphate pathway, ATP synthesis, and glycolysis), p38 MAPK pathway, and cytoskeletal regulation by Rho GTPase (Table S4, Figure 2). Panther pathways associated with the 79 proteins that increased in ULF of pregnant SF compared to HF heifers were related to hemostasis and included the plasminogen activating cascade and blood coagulation pathways (Table S5, Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Venn diagram showing proteins differently abundant in the ULF of pregnant HF and SF heifers according to the SDS–PAGE procedure. The blue arrows indicate the Panther pathways associated with the 142 proteins that increased or with the 79 proteins that decreased in the ULF of pregnant HF compared to SF heifers. The over-represented proteins and enriched pathways are highlighted. Panther pathways associated with the 142 proteins that increased in ULF of pregnant HF compared to SF heifers included vitamin B6 metabolism, amino acid metabolism (asparagine and aspartate biosynthesis, serine glycine biosynthesis), energy metabolism (pyruvate metabolism, pentose phosphate pathway, ATP synthesis, and glycolysis), p38 MAPK pathway, and cytoskeletal regulation by Rho GTPase. Panther pathways associated with the 79 proteins that increased in ULF of pregnant SF compared to HF heifers were related to hemostasis and included the plasminogen activating cascade and blood coagulation pathways.

There was a total of 48 differently abundant proteins in the ULF of open fertility-classified heifers (Dataset S7, Figure 3), but there were no pathways associated with the differently abundant proteins.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Venn diagram showing the differently abundant proteins among open fertility-classified heifers.

Integrating ULF proteomics with transcriptome data from the endometrium and conceptus

Among the 62 proteins commonly increased by pregnancy in both methods (Dataset S5), 56 were expressed by the endometrium based on our previously published RNA-seq data [1]. The remaining six proteins not expressed by the endometrium includes conceptus secreted factors (PAG11), a precursor for trophoblast Kunitz domain protein (TKDP1; GenInfo Identifier: 296481028) and TKDP1, a precursor of serpin A3–7-like protein (LOC784932; GenInfo Identifier: 985701132) that was neither expressed by the endometrium or conceptuses, and two proteins not well annotated (GenInfo Identifier: 89611 and 2323392). The proteins determined to be expressed exclusively by the conceptus were PAG11, TKDP1, and the TKDP1 precursor. There were also 11 proteins (ACO2, AIFM1, GDA, HSPA9, PREP, EEF2, HSD17B10, MTAP, PGM2, PSAT1, and TPI1) that increased in the ULF by pregnancy that were determined to be encoded only by genes expressed by the endometrium and not by conceptuses.

The expression of 45% (27/60) of the genes encoding proteins commonly increased in the ULF by pregnancy were found to be increased in the endometrium of pregnant than open heifers (Figure 4A, Dataset S8), indicating that these proteins are upregulated in the endometrium by pregnancy. Interestingly, the abundance of 56% (15/27) of these proteins were also increased in pregnant HF than SF ULF (LAP3, PSPH, ENO1, WARS, QPRT, ATIC, MDH2, AHCY, ACAA2, CAP1, GOT1, HSPA9, ACTN4, LOC615277, and GSS), but none of them were increased in pregnant SF than HF ULF (Dataset S6). Conversely, the expression of only 13% (5/39; FCGBP, GNAI2, SERPINF1, TUBA1A, TUBB, and two proteins not well annotated GenInfo Identifier: 7547266, 7547965) of the genes-encoding proteins that increased in open ULF were found to be increased in the endometrium of open heifers (Figure 4B, Dataset S9), suggesting that these proteins are downregulated in the endometrium by pregnancy. Of those, the abundance of FCGBP was decreased, but TUBB and TUBA1A increased in pregnant HF than SF ULF.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Summary of genes and proteins that were similarly increased by pregnancy in the endometrium and in the ULF, respectively (A). Summary of genes and proteins that were similarly decreased by pregnancy in the endometrium and in the ULF, respectively (B).

Metabolomics

A total of 1,378 metabolites were detected (122 identified and 1,256 unknown) in the positive ion mode (Dataset S10) and 551 metabolites detected (84 identified and 467 unknown) in the negative mode (Dataset S11). Identified metabolites included amino acids and amino acid derivatives, ions, carbohydrates, purines, polyphenols, lipids, and other constituents. Overall, there were 315 differential metabolites (70 identified) in the ULF of pregnant versus open heifers (Datasets S12 and S13). A striking difference was observed in pregnancy induced changes in the metabolites found in the uterine lumen of HF and SF heifers (Table 4). In HF heifers, there were 271 differential metabolites (67 identified) comparing ULF from pregnant and open heifers (Datasets S14 and S15). Surprisingly, no significant differences in metabolite composition were observed in the ULF of SF heifers that were pregnant or open.

Table 4.

Number of the differential metabolites (FDR < 0.05) identified in the uterine lumen of fertility-classified heifers for each comparison of interest.

Comparisons Identified metabolites Unknown metabolites Total metabolites
Pregnant vs open 70 245 315
HF pregnant vs open 67 204 271
SF pregnant vs open 0 0 0
Pregnant HF vs SF 1 12 13
Open HF, SF, IF 0 1 1

Additionally, there were 13 differential metabolites in the ULF of pregnant HF and SF heifers, but only one (L-Methionine) identified (Datasets S16 and S17), and its concentration increased in pregnant HF than SF ULF. Furthermore, in the comparison among only open fertility-classified heifers, there was one unidentified metabolite (m/z 109, retention time: 8.5 min) that was increased in the ULF of SF than HF and IF heifers (Dataset S18).

Results from the FC analysis of pregnant and open ULF are presented on Datasets S19 and S20, and Supplementary Figures S1A and S1B. The top 20 metabolites with highest FC differences are summarized in Table 5. Of note, the abundance of 76% (145/192) of the metabolites with FC > 2 was increased in pregnant compared to open ULF. Results of FC analysis comparing only ULF from pregnant HF and SF heifers are presented on Datasets S21 and S22, and the top 20 identified metabolites with highest differences in FC are summarized in Table 6. The abundance of 59% (102/173) of the metabolites with FC > 2 were increased in HF compared to SF ULF, further indicating that pregnancy induced changes in uterine lumenal metabolites were greater in HF than SF heifers.

Table 5.

Top 20 identified metabolites with greatest FC difference in the uterine lumen of pregnant and open heifers.

Ionization modea m/z Retention time Pregnant/open FC log2(FC) FDR
Positive mode
L-methionine 150.1 1.4 13.1 3.7 <0.01
Hypoxanthine 137.0 6.1 0.1 −2.9 <0.01
Glutathione disulfide 307.1 3.9 0.2 −2.4 0.04
Isovalerylcarnitine 246.2 8.1 4.7 2.2 0.02
R-malate 157.0 1.0 4.4 2.1 <0.01
2-Hydroxyphenylalanine 182.1 3.4 3.9 2.0 <0.01
L-histidine 156.1 0.7 3.5 1.8 <0.01
Methionine sulfoxide 166.1 0.8 3.5 1.8 <0.01
N-alpha-acetyl-L-lysine 189.1 1.2 3.3 1.7 <0.01
Phenylalanine 166.1 6.3 3.2 1.7 <0.01
Negative mode
N-methyl-L-glutamate 160.1 0.9 29.4 4.9 <0.01
3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutarate 161.0 2.9 6.3 2.7 <0.01
Inosine 267.1 6.0 0.2 −2.6 0.02
6-Keto prostaglandin G1 369.2 9.8 6.1 2.6 <0.01
N-acetylneuraminate 308.1 0.8 4.8 2.3 0.03
Fumaric acid 115.0 2.0 4.5 2.2 <0.01
Malate 133.0 1.0 4.4 2.1 <0.01
L-tyrosine 180.1 3.4 4.3 2.1 <0.01
Threonine/homoserine 118.1 0.7 3.6 1.8 <0.01
Glutarate 131.0 4.6 3.5 1.8 <0.01

Global metabolomics was conducted by UHPLC–tandem mass spectrometric (LC–MS/MS). Electrospray ionization was used to produce gas phase ions, and all samples were analyzed in the positive and negative ionization modes.

Table 6.

Top 20 identified metabolites with the greatest fold change difference in the uterine lumen of pregnant HF as compared to SF heifers

Metabolites m/z Retention time HF/SF - Fold Change (FC) log2(FC)
Increased in HF
L-Methionine 150.1 1.4 17.7 4.1
Isovalerylcarnitine 246.2 8.1 7.3 2.9
3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutarate 161.0 2.9 6.6 2.7
N-Acetylneuraminate 308.1 0.8 6.2 2.6
N-Methyl-L-Glutamate 160.1 0.9 4.6 2.2
Glutarate 131.0 4.6 3.5 1.8
N-Alpha-Acetyl-L-Lysine 189.1 1.2 3.4 1.8
Fumaric Acid 115.0 2.0 2.6 1.4
4-Imidazoleacetic Acid 127.0 1.0 2.5 1.3
Acyl-Carnitine (5-OH) 262.2 6.7 2.5 1.3
Proprionylcarnitine 218.1 6.8 2.4 1.3
2-Hydroxyglutarate 147.0 1.5 2.3 1.2
Malate 133.0 1.0 2.2 1.2
L-Glutamic Acid 146.0 0.8 2.1 1.1
Citrulline 174.1 0.8 2.1 1.1
Isobutyrylcarnitine 232.2 7.4 2.1 1.1
Nepsilon,Nepsilon,Nepsilon-Trimethyllysine 189.2 0.7 2.0 1.0
N-Acetyl-L-Alanine 154.0 2.2 2.0 1.0
Increased SF
P-Cresol Sulfate 187.0 8.4 0.4 −1.4
Adenosine 5'-Monophosphate 348.1 1.5 0.3 −1.9

MSEA identified significant pathways associated with the differential metabolites between pregnant and open ULF (Figure 5A). The top five pathways were urea cycle, glycine and serine metabolism, glutamate metabolism, and arginine and proline metabolism. Furthermore, the top five most significant pathways associated the metabolites uniquely increased in HF ULF by pregnancy were urea cycle, ammonia recycling, glycine and serine metabolism, arginine and proline metabolism, and the Warburg effect (Figure 5B). Additionally, joint pathways analysis identified several pathways which were over-represented among genes (FDR < 0.05) and metabolites (FDR < 0.05) that increased by pregnancy. These pathways included key biological events during early pregnancy, including biosynthesis and metabolism of amino acids, lipids, and carbohydrates (Dataset S23 and Figure 6A). Interestingly, pathways associated with DEGs (FDR < 0.05) and metabolites (FC > 2) between pregnant HF than SF endometrium and ULF, respectively, included amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism (e.g., phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan, glutamine, and arginine), energy metabolism (e.g., TCA cycle, pentose phosphate pathway), and lipid metabolism (e.g., metabolism of glycerophospholipids and steroid biosynthesis) (Dataset S24 and Figure 6B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Significant metabolic pathways associated with the differential metabolites between pregnant and open ULF (A), and metabolic pathways associated with the metabolites uniquely increased in HF ULF by pregnancy (B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Joint pathway analysis using DEG in the endometrium and the differential metabolites detected in the ULF of open and pregnant heifers (A). Joint pathway analysis for the DEG in the endometrium of pregnant HF and SF heifers, with the metabolites that were differently abundant in the ULF of pregnant HF and SF heifers (B). The histograms present a summary of the joint evidence from enrichment and topological analysis performed on MetaboAnalyst 4.0 using the human database. The enrichment analysis uses the input datasets of genes and metabolites to identify pathways that appear more frequently than expected by random chance. The topology analysis evaluates the importance of metabolites and genes within a given pathway based on their position in the pathway [49].

Expression of genes encoding amino acid transporters by the endometrium and conceptuses

Because the majority of the differential metabolites were associated with amino acid metabolism, we further investigated the expression of amino acid transporters by the endometrium and conceptuses. Endometrial expression of five genes encoding amino acid transporters was increased (SLC15A3, SLC7A1, SLC15A1, SLC7A9, and SLC3A2) and three genes decreased (SLC7A6, SLC7A3, and SLC6A14) by pregnancy (Dataset S25). Additionally, among pregnant heifers, the expression of SLC7A1, a transporter of cationic amino acids (arginine, lysine, and ornithine) [54], was upregulated in HF endometrium (Dataset S26).

Conceptus expression of amino acid transporters did not differ among short and long conceptuses (Dataset S27), but the expression of SLC7A6 was increased in HF conceptuses, and SLC6A19 was increased in SF conceptuses (Dataset S28). The top five most expressed amino acid transporters in day 17 conceptuses were SLC3A2, SLC15A4, SLC43A2, SLC15A1, and SLC7A8.

Discussion

In our recent work, endometrial responses to pregnancy in fertility-classified heifers were assessed by comparing the endometrium transcriptome of open with pregnant animals [1]. This analysis found 3,422 DEGs in the endometrium of HF heifers, but only 1,095 DEGs in the endometrium of SF heifers. This diminished endometrial response to pregnancy was hypothesized as the main cause of early embryo loss by day 28 in SF heifers [1, 41]. Results of the current study further support the theory of dysregulated conceptus–endometrium interactions in SF heifers, resulting in compromised conceptus development and failure to establish pregnancy. For instance, there were 271 differential metabolites in the ULF of HF heifers that were pregnant or open, but no significant changes in ULF metabolite profile were observed among SF heifers regardless of pregnancy status. Additionally, the majority of the metabolites differently abundant between the ULF of nonpregnant and pregnant heifers were increased by pregnancy. Sponchiado et al. [17] reported an overall reduction in the number of metabolites detected in the ULF of pregnant than cyclic heifers on day 7 of gestation or estrous cycle. However, crosstalk between the conceptus and endometrium increases considerably during and after maternal recognition of pregnancy on day 16 [21], and the observed increase in metabolites detected in the ULF by pregnancy, as well as in pregnant HF than SF ULF, are hypothesized to influence uterine receptivity and consequently conceptus development and survival.

In the present study, several metabolites associated with glutamine metabolism were increased in pregnant HF than SF ULF, such as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarate by 6.6-fold, N-methyl-L-glutamate by 4.6-fold, and glutarate by 3.5-fold. Although glutamine is a nonessential amino acid that can be synthesized from glucose, it is a key substrate for highly proliferative cells, and some cancer cells lines have been described as “glutamine addicted” because they cannot survive without exogenous glutamine [55, 56]. In addition to providing a carbon source for the synthesis of lactic acid during glycolysis [57], glutamine is also an important donor of nitrogen for synthesis of nonessential amino acids (that are used for synthesis of new proteins) and nucleotides, and glutamine synergizes with essential amino acids to activate the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 1 (mTORC1) [58]. Activation of mTORC1 promotes cell growth and metabolism [59] and also plays an important role in ovine conceptus elongation [60]. Progesterone can alter the ULF abundance of metabolites involved with glutamate metabolism (e.g., glutamate, glutamine, and alpha-ketoglutaramate) during the onset of conceptus elongation in cattle [20]; however, circulating progesterone concentrations did not differ among the fertility-classified heifers used in the present study [1].

Glutamate and glutamine are precursors of arginine [61]. Arginine is a precursor of nitric oxide (NO) and polyamines (putrescine, spermidine, spermine, and agmatine) that regulates key events during early pregnancy, such as angiogenesis, placentation, and embryonic development [60, 62, 63]. The secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1; also known as osteopontin), an extracellular matrix protein secreted by the uterine lumenal epithelium [11, 64], interacts with arginine and plays an important role in conceptus elongation and attachment through the activation of mTOR complexes 1 and 2 (MTORC1 and MTORC2) [60, 65]. Interestingly, in the present study, the expression of a cationic amino acid (arginine, lysine, and ornithine) transporter SLC7A1 [54] was increased in the endometrium by pregnancy, and also increased in the endometrium of pregnant HF than SF heifers on day 17. Furthermore, the concentrations of arginine and lysine in the ULF were significantly increased (FDR < 0.01) by pregnancy, and N-alpha-acetyl-L-Lysine, an amino acid derived from lysine, was increased by 3.4-fold in the ULF of pregnant HF than SF heifers. Lysine is another essential amino acid, and has been observed to induce cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo [66]. Lysine can be converted into carnitine [67], and two amino acid derivatives of carnitine were upregulated in pregnant HF than SF ULF; the abundance of isovalerylcarnitine increased by 7.3-fold, and acyl-carnitine (5-OH) by 2.5-fold. The primary role of carnitine is associated with the transport of long-chain fatty acids from the cytosol into the mitochondria for beta-oxidation, as acyl CoA (long chain fatty acid bound to coenzyme A) is not permeable to the inner mitochondrial membrane [68, 69]. The increase in acyl-carnitine, composed by carnitine bound to acyl CoA, may indicate increased abundance of long-chain fatty acid in the ULF of pregnant HF than SF heifers, and a number of long-chain (C11–20) and very long-chain (C21–25) fatty acids were increased in ULF of pregnant HF than SF heifers [124]. Additionally, L-carnitine also possesses antioxidant [70] and anti-inflammatory [71] properties, which are important biological processes during early pregnancy [72, 73].

The importance of arginine and glutamine in porcine embryo development has been demonstrated [74–76]. Knockdown of the arginine, lysine, and ornithine transporter (SLC7A1) in the ovine trophectoderm using morpholino antisense oligonucleotide retarded conceptus development [61], indicating the importance of these amino acids during conceptus growth in ruminants. In the present experiment, the expression of SLC7A6, which mediates mediates arginine efflux in exchange with glutamine [77, 78] was increased in HF than SF conceptuses, supporting the idea of abnormal arginine and glutamine metabolism in SF conceptuses.

Cancer cells and perhaps preimplantation embryos metabolize glucose preferably through aerobic glycolysis rather than oxidative phosphorylation, which is a metabolic adaptation of rapidly proliferative cells known as Warburg effect [79–82]. The main explanation for the switch from oxidative phosphorylation in normal somatic cells to aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells, is that highly proliferative cells have other critical metabolic requirements that extend beyond energy production. For instance, cells undergoing mitosis have large requirements for biomass production, as one parent cell has to duplicate all its contents to form two identical daughter cells, and this alternative glucose metabolism (Warburg effect) diverges glucose to create macromolecular precursors for synthesis of fatty acids, amino acids, and nucleotides. One of the most notable characteristics of cells undergoing the Warburg effect is that these cells uptake more glucose and produce more lactic acid than noncancer cells [81, 83]. This is a result of pyruvate being diverged from the TCA cycle and metabolized to form lactic acid [79]. Although less ATP is generated through the aerobic process (2 mol of ATP per mol of glucose compared to 38 mol of ATP for oxidative phosphorylation), this alternative glucose metabolism provides sufficient energy and anabolic precursors to support cell proliferation [79]. In fact, the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) plays a key role in this process, producing ribose sugars for nucleotide synthesis, and generating sufficient levels of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate for the biosynthesis of macromolecules [84]. Interestingly, in the present study, the abundance of two key enzymes which participate in the PPP were upregulated in the ULF of pregnant HF than SF heifers; transketolase was increased by 47-fold, and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (PGD) was increased by two-fold in the ULF of pregnant HF as compared to SF heifers. The Warburg effect was one of the most significant pathways associated with the differential metabolites identified between pregnant and open ULF, and with the metabolites uniquely increased in HF ULF by pregnancy. Thus, taken together, these results demonstrate increased availability of substrates required for conceptus development in pregnant HF than SF ULF, which likely contributed to the increased rate of development of HF conceptus, and consequently, with the higher pregnancy rate of HF heifers.

Histidine is an essential amino acid, and thus it cannot be synthesized de novo and must be provided in the diet [85]. Histidine availability in the uterine lumen during the preimplantation period has been observed to increase in cattle [16, 25] and sheep [26]. In the present experiment, histidine increased by 3.5-fold in pregnant than open ULF, and the expression of the histidine transporter (SLC15A3) increased by 4.6-fold in the endometrium by pregnancy. The SLC15A3 transporter is an ISG [25]. Although IFNT concentrations were higher in ULF of pregnant HF than SF, SLC15A3 expression by the endometrium did not differ among pregnant fertility classified heifers. L-Methionine was increased by 13-fold in the ULF of pregnant than open heifers, and by 18-fold in the ULF of pregnant HF than SF heifers. Methionine is the initiating amino acid for the synthesis of proteins in eukaryotes [86, 87]. Preimplantation bovine embryos uptake methionine from its environment [88], and the absence of methionine in the culture media reduces blastocyst development rate in bovine embryos produced in vitro [89]. Methionine is also important for controlling oxidative stress, as it can be metabolized into cysteine, that along with glutamate and glycine are precursors of glutathione (GSH) [90, 91], a major antioxidant in mammalian cells [92]. Furthermore, GSH is also a key regulator of cell proliferation [93], and therefore might play an important role during the exponential growth of the ruminant conceptus during elongation. Moreover, concentrations of GSH in the ULF have been observed to increase during early pregnancy in ewes [26], and GSH metabolism in the uterus appears to be influenced by progesterone and day of the cycle during the period of onset of conceptus elongation in cattle [20]. In the present study, GSH synthetase (GSS) was increased by 19-fold in the ULF of pregnant compared to open heifers, and by 3-fold in pregnant HF than SF ULF. Additionally, GSH disulfide (GSSG), the oxidized form of GSH, was increased by 5-fold in the ULF of open than pregnant heifers. The increase in GSSG in ULF of open heifers may be because nonpregnant heifers lack conceptus derived GSH reductase (GSR) and disulfide isomerases (PDI), which can converted GSSG back into GSH [92]. Under oxidative stress, GSH peroxidases (GPX) and peroxiredoxin 6 (PRDX6) can catalyze the oxidation of GSH by hydrogen peroxide into GSSG plus water, but GSR and PDI can convert GSSG back into GSH [92].

The overall findings from the proteomics analysis further support our theory of dysregulated endometrium response to pregnancy in SF heifers. While the pathways associated with the proteins that increased in pregnant HF than SF heifers were involved in important biological processes during early pregnancy (e.g. energy metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, cell proliferation, and differentiation), pathways associated with proteins that increased in pregnant SF than HF ULF were associated with hemostasis (plasminogen activating cascade and blood coagulation). These results strongly suggest that HF heifers have a uterine environment that is more receptive to promote conceptus growth and development than SF heifers. The present experiment also identified 27 genes and proteins that were similarly increased by pregnancy in the endometrium and uterine lumen, respectively, and therefore the expression of those genes by the endometrium is likely regulated by conceptus signaling. Interestingly, 56% of these proteins were also increased in pregnant HF than SF ULF, and are involved in crucial biological events during the preimplantation period, such as energy metabolism (ACAA2, ENO1, MDH2, LOC615277, and QPRT) [94–98], glutathione synthesis (GSS) [99], attachment between trophectoderm and uterine lumenal epithelium (HSPA9) [100], de novo purine biosynthesis (ATIC) [101], amino acid metabolism (PSPH, GOT1, LAP3, WARS, and AHCY) [102–106], and cytoskeletal organization and cell signaling (ACTN4, CAP1) [107, 108].

In this study, HF heifers had greater IFNT in the ULF than SF heifers, even though no differences in IFNT mRNA were observed between HF and SF conceptuses or between short versus long conceptuses. Longer conceptuses have a greater number of trophectoderm cells, and therefore are able to secret greater amounts of IFNT. As expected, IFNT in the uterine lumen was highly correlated with conceptus size (r = 0.82). Likewise, an earlier study reported no differences in IFNT mRNA levels between bovine conceptuses that were either long (>10 cm) or short (< 5 cm), but IFNT protein was substantially increased in the uterine flush from long conceptuses [32].

We further explored conceptus expression of genes that regulates IFNT transcription. The expression of IFNT transactivators DLX3, GATA3, GATA2, and CREBBP were found to increase in HF than SF conceptuses. Besides stimulating IFNT expression, these transcription factors also mediate important biological processes during preimplantation development. For instance, DLX3 and GATA2/3 play important role mediating gene expression in the placenta, regulating trophoblast differentiation, angiogenesis, and coordinating embryonic–extraembryonic signaling cross-talk [109–112], and CREBBP signaling controls vital cellular processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [113–115]. Among endometrial secreted factors that stimulate IFNT transcription, CSF1 expression was higher in the endometrium of pregnant than open heifers, but no differences were observed between pregnant HF and SF heifers. Despite the observed differences in ULF IFNT, IFNT signaling in the endometrium was not different in pregnant HF and SF heifers, as no differences in the endometrium transcriptome were observed for the expression of genes encoding selected classical and non-classical ISGs. This result was not unexpected, as very low amounts of IFNT and other Type I IFNs will maximally induce ISG expression based on in vitro experiments [116, 117], and the elongating conceptus produces and secretes a considerable amount of IFNT as it elongates [118]. Nonetheless, the transcriptome analysis in the present experiment was performed by bulk RNA-seq, and thus cell-type specific changes in ISG expression which could be of great importance for pregnancy establishment may not have been detected by this approach. Based on our findings, it is reasonable to speculate that IFNT actions in the endometrium to establish uterine receptivity [27, 40] were not substantially different between pregnant HF and SF heifers. However, the bovine conceptus can modulate endometrial gene expression independently of IFNT [119] but dependent on conceptus size [120], and HF conceptuses were on average twice as long than SF conceptuses [1]. Of note, the adequate conceptus size or concentrations of IFNT that are necessary to successfully induce pregnancy recognition and optimal uterine receptivity in cattle are still unknown and may vary among individual animals.

Studies in sheep and cattle support the idea that IFNT exits the uterus and induces the expression of ISGs in maternal tissues, such as on white blood cells, CL, and liver [52, 121, 122]. Interestingly, IFNT infusions into the uterine or jugular vein in sheep during days 10–13 of the estrous cycle have been shown to protect the CL against luteolysis induced on day 11 by exogenous administration of PGF2α [117]. Similarly, intrauterine infusions of low doses of PGE1 have been reported to block the luteolytic effects induced by intrauterine infusions of PGF2α in cattle [123]. Because PGE1 and PGE2 act through the same EP receptors, and PGE2 was similarly increased in the ULF of pregnant HF than SF heifers [124], it is possible that because SF heifers had shorter conceptuses [1], the concentrations of IFNT and PGE2 in the ULF may have been insufficient to effectively protect the CL against luteolysis, which consequently, contributed to the observed reduced reproductive efficiency in SF heifers.

In summary, the current study found substantial differences in uterine lumenal components of fertility-classified heifers. These differences are hypothesized to indicate dysregulated conceptus–endometrium interactions in SF heifers with consequences on conceptus growth and signaling, leading to pregnancy loss in SF animals.

Supplementary Material

Dataset_S1_ioz197
Dataset_S2_ioz197
Dataset_S3_ioz197
Dataset_S4_ioz197
Dataset_S5_ioz197
Dataset_S6_ioz197
Dataset_S7_ioz197
Dataset_S8_ioz197
Dataset_S13_ioz197
Dataset_S14_ioz197
Dataset_S15_ioz197
Dataset_S19_ioz197
Dataset_S20_ioz197
Dataset_S21_ioz197
Dataset_S22_ioz197
Dataset_S23_ioz197
Dataset_S24_ioz197
Dataset_S25_ioz197
Dataset_S26_ioz197
Figure_S1_ioz197
Table_S1_ioz197
Table_S2_ioz197
Table_S3_ioz197
Table_S4_ioz197
Table_S5_ioz197

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Brian Mooney and the Charles W. Gehrke Proteomics Center of the University of Missouri for the support with the proteomics, Dr William R. Lamberson for his help with the statistical analysis, Kenneth Ladyman and David Todd for their help caring for the animals, and Rick Disselhorst for coordinating the animal slaughter. This work was supported by NIH Grant 1 R01 HD072898 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

References

  • 1. Moraes JGN, Behura SK, Geary TW, Hansen PJ, Neibergs HL, Spencer TE. Uterine influences on conceptus development in fertility-classified animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115:E1749–E1758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Clemente M, de La Fuente J, Fair T, Al Naib A, Gutierrez-Adan A, Roche JF, Rizos D, Lonergan P. Progesterone and conceptus elongation in cattle: a direct effect on the embryo or an indirect effect via the endometrium? Reproduction 2009; 138:507–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Koot YE, van Hooff SR, Boomsma CM, van Leenen D, Groot Koerkamp MJ, Goddijn M, Eijkemans MJ, Fauser BC, Holstege FC, Macklon NS. An endometrial gene expression signature accurately predicts recurrent implantation failure after IVF. Sci Rep 2016; 6:19411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Diaz-Gimeno P, Gomez E, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Carranza F, Carrera J, Vilella F, Pellicer A, Simon C. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2013; 100:818–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bauersachs S, Wolf E. Transcriptome analyses of bovine, porcine and equine endometrium during the pre-implantation phase. Anim Reprod Sci 2012; 134:84–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Betteridge K, Fléchon J-E. The anatomy and physiology of pre-attachment bovine embryos. Theriogenology 1988; 29:155–187. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Berg DK, van Leeuwen J, Beaumont S, Berg M, Pfeffer PL. Embryo loss in cattle between days 7 and 16 of pregnancy. Theriogenology 2010; 73:250–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Spencer TE, Kelleher AM, Bartol FF. Development and function of uterine glands in domestic animals. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2019; 7:125–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Spencer TE. Biological roles of uterine glands in pregnancy. Semin Reprod Med 2014; 32:346–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Spencer TE, Gray CA. Sheep uterine gland knockout (UGKO) model. Methods Mol Med 2006; 121:85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gray CA, Burghardt RC, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. Evidence that absence of endometrial gland secretions in uterine gland knockout ewes compromises conceptus survival and elongation. Reproduction 2002; 124:289–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Forde N, McGettigan PA, Mehta JP, O'Hara L, Mamo S, Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Lonergan P. Proteomic analysis of uterine fluid during the pre-implantation period of pregnancy in cattle. Reproduction 2014; 147:575–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ulbrich SE, Schulke K, Groebner AE, Reichenbach HD, Angioni C, Geisslinger G, Meyer HH. Quantitative characterization of prostaglandins in the uterus of early pregnant cattle. Reproduction 2009; 138:371–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hugentobler SA, Sreenan JM, Humpherson PG, Leese HJ, Diskin MG, Morris DG. Effects of changes in the concentration of systemic progesterone on ions, amino acids and energy substrates in cattle oviduct and uterine fluid and blood. Reprod Fertil Dev 2010; 22:684–694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Keller ML, Roberts AJ, Seidel GE Jr. Characterization of insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins in the uterus and conceptus during early conceptus elongation in cattle. Biol Reprod 1998; 59:632–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Forde N, Simintiras CA, Sturmey R, Mamo S, Kelly AK, Spencer TE, Bazer FW, Lonergan P. Amino acids in the uterine lumenalfluid reflects the temporal changes in transporter expression in the endometrium and conceptus during early pregnancy in cattle. PLoS One 2014; 9:e100010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sponchiado M, Gonella-Diaza AM, Rocha CC, Lo Turco EG, Pugliesi G, Leroy JLMR, Binelli M. The pre-hatching bovine embryo transforms the uterine lumenal metabolite composition in vivo. Sci Rep 2019; 9:8354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Simintiras CA, Sanchez JM, McDonald M, Lonergan P. Progesterone alters the bovine uterine fluid lipidome during the period of elongation. Reproduction 2018; 157:399–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Simintiras CA, Sanchez JM, McDonald M, Lonergan P. The influence of progesterone on bovine uterine fluid energy, nucleotide, vitamin, cofactor, peptide, and xenobiotic composition during the conceptus elongation-initiation window. Sci Rep 2019; 9:7716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Simintiras CA, Sanchez JM, McDonald M, Martins T, Binelli M, Lonergan P. Biochemical characterization of progesterone-induced alterations in bovine uterine fluid amino acid and carbohydrate composition during the conceptus elongation windowdagger. Biol Reprod 2019; 100:672–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Forde N, Carter F, Spencer TE, Bazer FW, Sandra O, Mansouri-Attia N, Okumu LA, McGettigan PA, Mehta JP, McBride R, O'Gaora P, Roche JF et al. Conceptus-induced changes in the endometrial transcriptome: how soon does the cow know she is pregnant? Biol Reprod 2011; 85:144–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Forde N, Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Lonergan P. Conceptualizing' the endometrium: identification of conceptus-derived proteins during early pregnancy in cattle. Biol Reprod 2015; 92:156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ribeiro ES, Greco LF, Bisinotto RS, Lima FS, Thatcher WW, Santos JE. Biology of preimplantation conceptus at the onset of elongation in dairy cows. Biol Reprod 2016; 94:97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Brooks K, Burns GW, Moraes JG, Spencer TE. Analysis of the uterine epithelial and conceptus transcriptome and lumenalfluid proteome during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy in sheep. Biol Reprod 2016; 95:88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Groebner AE, Rubio-Aliaga I, Schulke K, Reichenbach HD, Daniel H, Wolf E, Meyer HH, Ulbrich SE. Increase of essential amino acids in the bovine uterine lumen during preimplantation development. Reproduction 2011; 141:685–695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Gao H, Wu G, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Li X, Bazer FW. Select nutrients in the ovine uterine lumen. I. Amino acids, glucose, and ions in uterine lumenal flushings of cyclic and pregnant ewes. Biol Reprod 2009; 80:86–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Hansen TR, Sinedino LDP, Spencer TE. Paracrine and endocrine actions of interferon tau (IFNT). Reproduction 2017; 154:F45–F59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Spencer TE, Hansen TR. Implantation and establishment of pregnancy in ruminants. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 2015; 216:105–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lonergan P, Forde N, Spencer T. Role of progesterone in embryo development in cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev 2016; 28:66–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Spencer TE, Forde N, Lonergan P. Insights into conceptus elongation and establishment of pregnancy in ruminants. Reprod Fertil Dev 2016; 29:84–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Spencer TE, Forde N, Lonergan P. The role of progesterone and conceptus-derived factors in uterine biology during early pregnancy in ruminants. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99:5941–5950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Robinson RS, Fray MD, Wathes DC, Lamming GE, Mann GE. In vivo expression of interferon tau mRNA by the embryonic trophoblast and uterine concentrations of interferon tau protein during early pregnancy in the cow. Mol Reprod Dev 2006; 73:470–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Forde N, Lonergan P. Transcriptomic analysis of the bovine endometrium: what is required to establish uterine receptivity to implantation in cattle. ? J Reprod Dev 2012; 58:189–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ealy AD, Yang QE. Control of interferon-tau expression during early pregnancy in ruminants. Am J Reprod Immunol 2009; 61:95–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Bazer FW, Thatcher WW. Chronicling the discovery of interferon tau. Reproduction 2017; 154:F11–F20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Robinson RS, Mann GE, Lamming GE, Wathes DC. The effect of pregnancy on the expression of uterine oxytocin, oestrogen and progesterone receptors during early pregnancy in the cow. J Endocrinol 1999; 160:21–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Spencer TE, Burghardt RC, Johnson GA, Bazer FW. Conceptus signals for establishment and maintenance of pregnancy. Anim Reprod Sci 2004; 82–83:537–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Brooks K, Burns G, Spencer TE. Conceptus elongation in ruminants: roles of progesterone, prostaglandin, interferon tau and cortisol. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2014; 5:53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC, Palmarini M. Pregnancy recognition and conceptus implantation in domestic ruminants: roles of progesterone, interferons and endogenous retroviruses. Reprod Fertil Dev 2007; 19:65–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Spencer TE, Sandra O, Wolf E. Genes involved in conceptus-endometrial interactions in ruminants: insights from reductionism and thoughts on holistic approaches. Reproduction 2008; 135:165–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Geary TW, Burns GW, Moraes JG, Moss JI, Denicol AC, Dobbs KB, Ortega MS, Hansen PJ, Wehrman ME, Neibergs H, O'Neil E, Behura S et al. Identification of beef heifers with superior uterine capacity for pregnancy. Biol Reprod 2016; 95:47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Hansen TR, Leaman DW, Cross JC, Mathialagan N, Bixby JA, Roberts RM. The genes for the trophoblast interferons and the related interferon-alpha II possess distinct 5′-promoter and 3′-flanking sequences. J Biol Chem 1991; 266:3060–3067. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Tabb DL. What's driving false discovery rates? J Proteome Res 2008; 7:45–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Xia J, Wishart DS. Web-based inference of biological patterns, functions and pathways from metabolomic data using MetaboAnalyst. Nat Protoc 2011; 6:743–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Xia J, Wishart DS. Metabolomic data processing, analysis, and interpretation using MetaboAnalyst. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2011; 14:10.Chapter 14:Unit. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Ribeiro ES, Monteiro APA, Bisinotto RS, Lima FS, Greco LF, Ealy AD, Thatcher WW, Santos JEP. Conceptus development and transcriptome at preimplantation stages in lactating dairy cows of distinct genetic groups and estrous cyclic statuses. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99:4761–4777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Xia J, Mandal R, Sinelnikov IV, Broadhurst D, Wishart DS. MetaboAnalyst 2.0: a comprehensive server for metabolomic data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:W127–W133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Chong J, Soufan O, Li C, Caraus I, Li S, Bourque G, Wishart DS, Xia J. MetaboAnalyst 4.0: towards more transparent and integrative metabolomics analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:W486–W494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Xia J, Wishart DS. Using MetaboAnalyst 3.0 for comprehensive metabolomics data analysis. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2016; 55:14 10 11–14 10 91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Zhou X, Lindsay H, Robinson MD. Robustly detecting differential expression in RNA sequencing data using observation weights. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:e91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Barnwell CV, Farin PW, Ashwell CM, Farmer WT, Galphin SP Jr, Farin CE. Differences in mRNA populations of short and long bovine conceptuses on day 15 of gestation. Mol Reprod Dev 2016; 83:424–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Ortega MS, Moraes JGN, Patterson DJ, Smith MF, Behura SK, Poock S, Spencer TE. Influences of sire conception rate on pregnancy establishment in dairy cattle. Biol Reprod 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Ezashi T, Imakawa K. Transcriptional control of IFNT expression. Reproduction 2017; 154:F21–F31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Gao H, Wu G, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Bazer FW. Select nutrients in the ovine uterine lumen. III. Cationic amino acid transporters in the ovine uterus and peri-implantation conceptuses. Biol Reprod 2009; 80:602–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Wise DR, Thompson CB. Glutamine addiction: a new therapeutic target in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci 2010; 35:427–433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Eagle H. Nutrition needs of mammalian cells in tissue culture. Science 1955; 122:501–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, Daikhin E, Nissim I, Yudkoff M, Wehrli S, Thompson CB. Beyond aerobic glycolysis: transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104:19345–19350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Young VR, Ajami AM. Glutamine: the emperor or his clothes. J Nutr 2001; 131:2449S–2459Sdiscussion 2486S-2447S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Laplante M, Sabatini DM. Regulation of mTORC1 and its impact on gene expression at a glance. J Cell Sci 2013; 126:1713–1719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Bazer FW, Wang X, Johnson GA, Wu G. Select nutrients and their effects on conceptus development in mammals. Anim Nutr 2015; 1:85–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Wang X, Frank JW, Little DR, Dunlap KA, Satterfield MC, Burghardt RC, Hansen TR, Wu G, Bazer FW. Functional role of arginine during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy. I. Consequences of loss of function of arginine transporter SLC7A1 mRNA in ovine conceptus trophectoderm. FASEB J 2014; 28:2852–2863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Hussain T, Tan B, Ren W, Rahu N, Kalhoro DH, Yin Y. Exploring polyamines: functions in embryo/fetal development. Anim Nutr 2017; 3:7–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Wu G, Bazer FW, Davis TA, Kim SW, Li P, Marc Rhoads J, Carey Satterfield M, Smith SB, Spencer TE, Yin Y. Arginine metabolism and nutrition in growth, health and disease. Amino Acids 2009; 37:153–168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW. Osteopontin: a leading candidate adhesion molecule for implantation in pigs and sheep. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2014; 5:56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Wang X, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Wu G, Bazer FW. Uterine histotroph and conceptus development. II. Arginine and secreted phosphoprotein 1 cooperatively stimulate migration and adhesion of ovine trophectoderm cells via focal adhesion-MTORC2 mediated cytoskeleton reorganization. Biol Reprod 2016; 95:71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Datta D, Bhinge A, Chandran V. Lysine: is it worth more? Cytotechnology 2001; 36:3–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Khan-Siddiqui L, Bamji MS. Lysine-carnitine conversion in normal and undernourished adult men-suggestion of a nonpeptidyl pathway. Am J Clin Nutr 1983; 37:93–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Bene J, Hadzsiev K, Melegh B. Role of carnitine and its derivatives in the development and management of type 2 diabetes. Nutr Diabetes 2018; 8:8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Rossi CR, Galzigna L, Alexandre A, Gibson DM. Oxidation of long chain fatty acids by rat liver mitochondria. J Biol Chem 1967; 242:2102–2110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Calo LA, Pagnin E, Davis PA, Semplicini A, Nicolai R, Calvani M, Pessina AC. Antioxidant effect of L-carnitine and its short chain esters relevance for the protection from oxidative stress related cardiovascular damage. Int J Cardiol 2006; 107:54–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Duranay M, Akay H, Yilmaz FM, Senes M, Tekeli N, Yucel D. Effects of L-carnitine infusions on inflammatory and nutritional markers in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21:3211–3214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Robinson DP, Klein SL. Pregnancy and pregnancy-associated hormones alter immune responses and disease pathogenesis. Horm Behav 2012; 62:263–271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Jauniaux E, Poston L, Burton GJ. Placental-related diseases of pregnancy: involvement of oxidative stress and implications in human evolution. Hum Reprod Update 2006; 12:747–755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Bauer BK, Isom SC, Spate LD, Whitworth KM, Spollen WG, Blake SM, Springer GK, Murphy CN, Prather RS. Transcriptional profiling by deep sequencing identifies differences in mRNA transcript abundance in in vivo-derived versus in vitro-cultured porcine blastocyst stage embryos. Biol Reprod 2010; 83:791–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Redel BK, Tessanne KJ, Spate LD, Murphy CN, Prather RS. Arginine increases development of in vitro-produced porcine embryos and affects the protein arginine methyltransferase-dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase-nitric oxide axis. Reprod Fertil Dev 2015; 27:655–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Chen PR, Redel BK, Spate LD, Ji T, Salazar SR, Prather RS. Glutamine supplementation enhances development of in vitro-produced porcine embryos and increases leucine consumption from the medium. Biol Reprod 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Broer A, Wagner CA, Lang F, Broer S. The heterodimeric amino acid transporter 4F2hc/y+LAT2 mediates arginine efflux in exchange with glutamine. Biochem J 2000; 349(Pt 3):787–795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Pochini L, Scalise M, Galluccio M, Indiveri C. Membrane transporters for the special amino acid glutamine: structure/function relationships and relevance to human health. Front Chem 2014; 2:61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Krisher RL, Prather RS. A role for the Warburg effect in preimplantation embryo development: metabolic modification to support rapid cell proliferation. Mol Reprod Dev 2012; 79:311–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009; 324:1029–1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 1956; 123:309–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Redel BK, Brown AN, Spate LD, Whitworth KM, Green JA, Prather RS. Glycolysis in preimplantation development is partially controlled by the Warburg effect. Mol Reprod Dev 2012; 79:262–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Warburg O, Wind F, Negelein E. The metabolism of tumors in the body. J Gen Physiol 1927; 8:519–530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Cairns RA, Harris IS, Mak TW. Regulation of cancer cell metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer 2011; 11:85–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Scalise M, Galluccio M, Console L, Pochini L, Indiveri C. The human SLC7A5 (LAT1): the intriguing histidine/large neutral amino acid transporter and its relevance to human health. Front Chem 2018; 6:243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Finkelstein JD. Methionine metabolism in mammals. J Nutr Biochem 1990; 1:228–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Brosnan JT, Brosnan ME. The sulfur-containing amino acids: an overview. J Nutr 2006; 136:1636S–1640S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Guyader-Joly C, Khatchadourian C, Menezo Y. Glycine and methionine transport by bovine embryos. Zygote 1997; 5:273–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Bonilla L, Luchini D, Devillard E, Hansen PJ. Methionine requirements for the preimplantation bovine embryo. J Reprod Dev 2010; 56:527–532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Metayer S, Seiliez I, Collin A, Duchene S, Mercier Y, Geraert PA, Tesseraud S. Mechanisms through which sulfur amino acids control protein metabolism and oxidative status. J Nutr Biochem 2008; 19:207–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Chakravarthi S, Jessop CE, Bulleid NJ. The role of glutathione in disulphide bond formation and endoplasmic-reticulum-generated oxidative stress. EMBO Rep 2006; 7:271–275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Forman HJ, Zhang H, Rinna A. Glutathione: overview of its protective roles, measurement, and biosynthesis. Mol Aspects Med 2009; 30:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Pallardo FV, Markovic J, Garcia JL, Vina J. Role of nuclear glutathione as a key regulator of cell proliferation. Mol Aspects Med 2009; 30:77–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Houten SM, Wanders RJ. A general introduction to the biochemistry of mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxidation. J Inherit Metab Dis 2010; 33:469–477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Spencer TE, Forde N, Dorniak P, Hansen TR, Romero JJ, Lonergan P. Conceptus-derived prostaglandins regulate gene expression in the endometrium prior to pregnancy recognition in ruminants. Reproduction 2013; 146:377–387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Ji H, Wang J, Guo J, Li Y, Lian S, Guo W, Yang H, Kong F, Zhen L, Guo L, Liu Y. Progress in the biological function of alpha-enolase. Anim Nutr 2016; 2:12–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Cavalcanti JH, Esteves-Ferreira AA, Quinhones CG, Pereira-Lima IA, Nunes-Nesi A, Fernie AR, Araujo WL. Evolution and functional implications of the tricarboxylic acid cycle as revealed by phylogenetic analysis. Genome Biol Evol 2014; 6:2830–2848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Youn HS, Kim TG, Kim MK, Kang GB, Kang JY, Lee JG, An JY, Park KR, Lee Y, Im YJ, Lee JH, Eom SH. Structural insights into the quaternary catalytic mechanism of hexameric human quinolinate phosphoribosyltransferase, a key enzyme in de novo NAD biosynthesis. Sci Rep 2016; 6:19681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Patil SB, Kodliwadmath MV, Kodliwadmath SM. Study of oxidative stress and enzymatic antioxidants in normal pregnancy. Indian J Clin Biochem 2007; 22:135–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Bhagwat SR, Redij T, Phalnikar K, Nayak S, Iyer S, Gadkar S, Chaudhari U, Kholkute SD, Sachdeva G. Cell surfactomes of two endometrial epithelial cell lines that differ in their adhesiveness to embryonic cells. Mol Reprod Dev 2014; 81:326–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Boutchueng-Djidjou M, Collard-Simard G, Fortier S, Hebert SS, Kelly I, Landry CR, Faure RL. The last enzyme of the de novo purine synthesis pathway 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase/IMP cyclohydrolase (ATIC) plays a central role in insulin signaling and the Golgi/endosomes protein network. Mol Cell Proteomics 2015; 14:1079–1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Iwanaga K, Nomura S, Ito T, Ikoma Y, Yamamoto E, Okada M, Itakura A, Kikkawa F, Tsujimoto M, Mizutani S. Placental leucine aminopeptidase/oxytocinase gene regulation by activator protein-2 in BeWo cell model of human trophoblast differentiation. FEBS Lett 2003; 552:120–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Kim HY, Heo YS, Kim JH, Park MH, Moon J, Kim E, Kwon D, Yoon J, Shin D, Jeong EJ, Park SY, Lee TG et al. Molecular basis for the local conformational rearrangement of human phosphoserine phosphatase. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:46651–46658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Kulecka M, Wierzbicka A, Paziewska A, Mikula M, Habior A, Janczyk W, Dabrowska M, Karczmarski J, Lazniewski M, Ginalski K, Czlonkowska A, Socha P et al. A heterozygous mutation in GOT1 is associated with familial macro-aspartate aminotransferase. J Hepatol 2017; 67:1026–1030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Ahn YH, Park S, Choi JJ, Park BK, Rhee KH, Kang E, Ahn S, Lee CH, Lee JS, Inn KS, Cho ML, Park SH et al. Secreted tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase as a primary defence system against infection. Nat Microbiol 2016; 2:16191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Wang Y, Kavran JM, Chen Z, Karukurichi KR, Leahy DJ, Cole PA. Regulation of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase by lysine acetylation. J Biol Chem 2014; 289:31361–31372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Khurana S, Chakraborty S, Lam M, Liu Y, Su YT, Zhao X, Saleem MA, Mathieson PW, Bruggeman LA, Kao HY. Familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS)-linked alpha-actinin 4 (ACTN4) protein mutants lose ability to activate transcription by nuclear hormone receptors. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:12027–12035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Zhou GL, Zhang H, Wu H, Ghai P, Field J. Phosphorylation of the cytoskeletal protein CAP1 controls its association with cofilin and actin. J Cell Sci 2014; 127:5052–5065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Morasso MI, Grinberg A, Robinson G, Sargent TD, Mahon KA. Placental failure in mice lacking the homeobox gene Dlx3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:162–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Li S, Roberson MS. Dlx3 and GCM-1 functionally coordinate the regulation of placental growth factor in human trophoblast-derived cells. J Cell Physiol 2017; 232:2900–2914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Chiu YH, Yang MR, Wang LJ, Chen MH, Chang GD, Chen H. New insights into the regulation of placental growth factor gene expression by the transcription factors GCM1 and DLX3 in human placenta. J Biol Chem 2018; 293:9801–9811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Home P, Kumar RP, Ganguly A, Saha B, Milano-Foster J, Bhattacharya B, Ray S, Gunewardena S, Paul A, Camper SA, Fields PE, Paul S. Genetic redundancy of GATA factors in the extraembryonic trophoblast lineage ensures the progression of preimplantation and postimplantation mammalian development. Development 2017; 144:876–888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Kawasaki H, Eckner R, Yao TP, Taira K, Chiu R, Livingston DM, Yokoyama KK. Distinct roles of the co-activators p300 and CBP in retinoic-acid-induced F9-cell differentiation. Nature 1998; 393:284–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Giordano A, Avantaggiati ML. p300 and CBP: partners for life and death. J Cell Physiol 1999; 181:218–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Goodman RH, Smolik S. CBP/p300 in cell growth, transformation, and development. Genes Dev 2000; 14:1553–1577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Kim MS, Min KS, Imakawa K. Regulation of interferon-stimulated gene (ISG)12, ISG15, and MX1 and MX2 by conceptus interferons (IFNTs) in bovine uterine epithelial cells. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2013; 26:795–803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Antoniazzi AQ, Webb BT, Romero JJ, Ashley RL, Smirnova NP, Henkes LE, Bott RC, Oliveira JF, Niswender GD, Bazer FW, Hansen TR. Endocrine delivery of interferon tau protects the corpus luteum from prostaglandin F2 alpha-induced luteolysis in ewes. Biol Reprod 2013; 88:144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Ashworth CJ, Bazer FW. Changes in ovine conceptus and endometrial function following asynchronous embryo transfer or administration of progesterone. Biol Reprod 1989; 40:425–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Mathew DJ, Sanchez JM, Passaro C, Charpigny G, Behura SK, Spencer TE, Lonergan P. Interferon tau-dependent and independent effects of the bovine conceptus on the endometrial transcriptomedagger. Biol Reprod 2019; 100:365–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Sanchez JM, Mathew DJ, Behura SK, Passaro C, Charpigny G, Butler ST, Spencer TE, Lonergan P. Bovine endometrium responds differentially to age-matched short and long conceptuses. Biol Reprod 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Oliveira JF, Henkes LE, Ashley RL, Purcell SH, Smirnova NP, Veeramachaneni DN, Anthony RV, Hansen TR. Expression of interferon (IFN)-stimulated genes in extrauterine tissues during early pregnancy in sheep is the consequence of endocrine IFN-tau release from the uterine vein. Endocrinology 2008; 149:1252–1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Meyerholz MM, Mense K, Knaack H, Sandra O, Schmicke M. Pregnancy-induced ISG-15 and MX-1 gene expression is detected in the liver of Holstein-Friesian heifers during late peri-implantation period. Reprod Domest Anim 2016; 51:175–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Ochoa JC, Penagaricano F, Baez GM, Melo LF, Motta JC, Guerra AG, Meidan R, Ferreira JCP, Sartori R, Wiltbank MC. Mechanisms for rescue of CL during pregnancy: gene expression in bovine CL following intrauterine pulses of prostaglandins E1 and F2alpha. Biol Reprod 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Moraes J.G.N., Behura S.K., Geary T.W., Spencer T.E.. Analysis of the Uterine Lumen in Fertility-Classified Heifers: I. Glucose, Prostaglandins and Lipids. Biology of Reproduction 2019; doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioz191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Dataset_S1_ioz197
Dataset_S2_ioz197
Dataset_S3_ioz197
Dataset_S4_ioz197
Dataset_S5_ioz197
Dataset_S6_ioz197
Dataset_S7_ioz197
Dataset_S8_ioz197
Dataset_S13_ioz197
Dataset_S14_ioz197
Dataset_S15_ioz197
Dataset_S19_ioz197
Dataset_S20_ioz197
Dataset_S21_ioz197
Dataset_S22_ioz197
Dataset_S23_ioz197
Dataset_S24_ioz197
Dataset_S25_ioz197
Dataset_S26_ioz197
Figure_S1_ioz197
Table_S1_ioz197
Table_S2_ioz197
Table_S3_ioz197
Table_S4_ioz197
Table_S5_ioz197

Articles from Biology of Reproduction are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES