Skip to main content
PMC home page
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2018 Oct 25;51(2):e13187. doi: 10.1111/and.13187

Comparison of the clinical characteristics of patients with varicocele according to the presence or absence of scrotal pain

Seung Ryong Baek 1,2, Hyun Jun Park 1,2,✉, Nam Cheol Park 1,2
PMCID: PMC7379187  PMID: 30357879

Abstract

We investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with varicocele according to the presence or absence of scrotal pain. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent varicocelectomy. The age, body mass index, grade, laterality of varicocele, testicular volume difference, time to hospital visit, serum testosterone level and semen parameters were evaluated. A total of 954 patients were included. The painful group had lower mean age, lower BMI, higher grade of varicocele, smaller testicular volume difference and shorter time to hospital visit than the painless group. In addition, the median serum total testosterone level and total sperm count, concentration and motility were higher in the painful group than in the painless group. In multivariate analysis, there were significant differences between the two groups in age, grade of varicocele, testis volume difference, time to hospital visit, total sperm count and concentration. Patients with painful varicocele visited hospital earlier because of the pain and tended to start treatment sooner. They were also younger, had smaller testis atrophy and had higher sperm concentration, even though they had a higher grade of varicocele than patients without pain. Although scrotal pain in varicocele patients is difficult to treat, it leads to early diagnosis and treatment.

Keywords: pain, scrotum, testis, varicocele

1. INTRODUCTION

Scrotal pain is not a symptom in all patients with varicocele. It is seen in only some patients and is characterised by intermittent occurrence (Owen, McCormick, Figler, & Coward, 2017; Tan & Levine, 2017). However, varicocele‐induced scrotal pain does not respond well to medication, and some patients have pain after surgery (Park, Lee, & Park, 2011). Consequently, physicians find it difficult to manage patients with painful varicocele (Tan & Levine, 2016, 2017).

The first step in the management of painful varicocele is to distinguish varicocele‐induced pain from the various other causes of scrotal pain. Diseases that can cause scrotal pain include tumour, torsion, varicocele, hydrocele, spermatocele, inguinal hernia, epididymo‐orchitis and stones (Tan & Levine, 2017). After an accurate diagnosis confirms that the scrotal pain is caused by a varicocele, initial conservative management is recommended, including limitation of physical activities, scrotal elevation and treatment with nonsteroidal, anti‐inflammatory analgesics before surgery. However, these often do not result in successful pain management (Park et al., 2011). Varicocelectomy is an alternative treatment for patients with painful varicocele who do not show enough improvement after conservative management (Lundy & Sabanegh, 2018). Because varicocele is not a disease that can be cured by medication, it is difficult to predict the effect of medical treatment for scrotal pain confirmed to be induced by varicocele. Therefore, varicocelectomy should be considered, but guidelines have focused on the surgical indication for varicocele as it relates to infertility (Dohle et al., 2005; Roque & Esteves, 2016). Nevertheless, many studies have investigated the efficacy of surgical treatment of painful varicocele and reported various therapeutic outcomes. However, not all studies consistently show satisfactory surgical results (Elzanaty & Johansen, 2015; Karademir et al., 2005; Maghraby, 2002; Park et al., 2011; Schlegel & Goldstein, 2011). On the other hand, many studies have revealed the characteristics of patients with painful varicocele who show satisfactory outcomes after surgical treatment (Altunoluk, Soylemez, Efe, & Malkoc, 2010; Elzanaty & Johansen, 2015; Kim, Song, & Moon, 2012; Park et al., 2011). This means that appropriate patient selection is important for the successful treatment of painful varicocele. The main reasons patients with painless varicocele present to their physician include lumps in the scrotum and fertility problems. Therefore, diagnosis of varicocele in patients without scrotal pain is often delayed. In other words, the presence of pain can cause discomfort to the patient but can increase the likelihood of an early diagnosis of varicocele, a condition that may impair future fertility. We postulated that if the duration of varicocele before treatment varies depending on the presence of pain, it might be associated with significant parameters, including sperm quality in patients with varicocele.

With this background, we investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with varicocele according to the presence or absence of scrotal pain.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Subjects

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent varicocelectomy in a single centre from 1997 to 2016. Patients who received varicocelectomy were divided into those with scrotal pain and those without pain. Scrotal pain was defined as continuous or intermittent discomfort or pain of any of the organs in the scrotum forcing the patient to seek medical assistance. Patients who had other causes of scrotal pain, such as epididymitis, orchitis, sexually transmitted disease, urinary tract infection, urolithiasis, prostatitis, inguinal hernia, testicular torsion, testicular tumour or trauma or a history of inguinal surgery, were excluded from the study.

2.2. Methods

To investigate the clinical characteristics according to the presence or absence of pain between the two groups, the parameters to be investigated were selected for comparison. The parameters included age, body mass index (BMI), grade and laterality of varicocele, testis volume difference, time to hospital visit, serum total testosterone level and semen analysis. We compared each parameter in both groups. In addition, patients in each group were subdivided by parameters for comparison: age at surgery (<18 or ≥18 years), BMI (<18.5, 18.5–22.9, 23–24.9, or ≥25.0 kg/m2), location (left, right, or bilateral), grade of the varicocele, time to visit hospital (<6, 6–12, or >12 months), testicular volume difference (<1, 1–3, or >3 ml) and serum total testosterone level (<350 or ≥350 ng/dl). The varicocele was graded according to criteria defined by Lyon, Marshall, and Scott (1982): grade I, palpable only with the Valsalva manoeuvre; grade II, palpable without the Valsalva manoeuvre; and grade III, visible from a distance. The testicular volume was determined using a Prader orchidometer.

2.3. Ethics statement

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Pusan National University Hospital (IRB No. 1712–016–062). Informed consent was waived by the IRB.

2.4. Statistical analyses

We compared the baseline characteristics of patients. The independent sample t test was used for parametric continuous data, the Mann–Whitney U test for nonparametric continuous data and the chi‐squared test for categorical data. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® for Windows, version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

3. RESULTS

A total of 954 patients were included, of which 404 had painful varicocele and 550 had painless varicocele. The mean patient age was 26.2 ± 9.8 years. Grade III varicocele was most prevalent, occurring in 637 patients (66.8%), whereas grade II occurred in 253 patients (26.5%) and grade I in 64 patients (6.7%). Left‐sided unilateral varicoceles were recorded in 859 patients (90.0%); 9 patients (0.9%) had a right varicocele and the remaining 86 patients (9.1%) had bilateral varicocele. The median time to hospital visit was 12 (interquartile ratio [IQR] 3–24) months (Table 1).

Table 1.

Patients' characteristics

Characteristic

Total

(N = 954)

Painful group

(N = 404)

Painless group

(N = 550)

 p‐value
Age (years)
Mean ± SD 26.2 ± 9.8 24.2 ± 9.7 27.7 ± 9.6 0.002*,a
<18 225 (23.5%) 106 (26.2%) 119 (21.6%) 0.098c
≥18 729 (76.5%) 298 (73.8%) 431 (78.4%)
BMI (kg/m2)
Mean ± SD 22.5 ± 3.2 21.9 ± 2.7 22.9 ± 3.4 0.001*,a
<18.5 96 (10.0%) 37 (9.2%) 59 (10.7%) 0.041c
18.5–22.9 470 (49.3%) 239 (59.2%) 231 (42.0%)
23–24.9 196 (20.6%) 76 (18.8%) 120 (21.8%)
≥25 192 (20.1%) 52 (12.8%) 140 (25.5%)
Varicocele grade
I 64 (6.7%) 7 (1.7%) 57 (10.4%)
II 253 (26.5%) 69 (17.1%) 184 (33.5%) 0.001*,c
III 637 (66.8%) 328 (81.2%) 309 (56.1%)
Varicocele laterality
Left 859 (90.0%) 359 (88.8%) 500 (90.9%)
Right 9 (0.9%) 7 (1.7%) 2 (0.3%) 0.472c
Bilateral 86 (9.1%) 38 (9.5%) 48 (8.8%)
Testis volume difference (ml)**
Median [IQR] 2 [0–3] 0 [0–3] 2 [0–4] 0.001*,b
<1 267 (30.7%) 208 (56.8%) 59 (11.7%) 0.001*,c
1–3 331 (38.1%) 101 (27.6%) 230 (45.8%)
>3 270 (31.2%) 57 (15.6%) 213 (42.5%)
Time to hospital visit (months)
Median [IQR] 12 [3–24] 3 [2–7] 24 [18–30] 0.001*,b
<6 329 (34.5%) 271 (67.0%) 58 (10.5%) 0.002*,c
6–12 260 (27.2%) 94 (23.2%) 166 (30.1%)
>12 365 (38.3%) 39 (9.8%) 326 (59.4%)
Serum total testosterone (ng/dl)
Median [IQR] 431 [324–541] 471[347–570] 412 [314–520] 0.002*,b
<350 367 (38.4%) 157 (38.8%) 210 (38.1%) 0.174c
≥350 587 (61.6%) 247 (61.2%) 340 (61.9%)
Semen analysis, median
Count, million [IQR] 30.8 [10.0–64.7] 44.1 [17.5–79.1] 26.3 [6.0–58.0] 0.010*,b
Concentration, million/mL [IQR] 12.4 [4.3–22.9] 14.8 [6.3–26.6] 10.0 [3.3–20.0] 0.014*,b
Motility, % [IQR] 40 [15–60] 45 [25–65] 30 [6–57] 0.001*,b
Open in a new tab

BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation.

a

sample t test.

b

Mann–Whitney U test.

c

Chi‐squared test.

*Statistically significant.

**Unilateral varicocele.

In a comparison of the two groups, the patients with painful varicocele had a lower mean age, lower BMI, higher grade of varicocele, smaller testicular atrophy and shorter time to hospital visit than patients with painless varicocele. In addition, the median serum total testosterone level, total sperm count and sperm concentration and motility were higher in patients with painful varicocele. In multivariate analysis, there were significant differences between the two groups in age, grade III varicocele, testis volume difference, time to hospital visit, total sperm count and sperm concentration (Table 2).

Table 2.

Relationships between variables and presence of scrotal pain according to univariate and multivariate analyses

Variable Univariate Multivariate
OR (95% CI) p‐valuea OR (95% CI) p‐valuea
Age (years) 0.962 (0.949–0.976) 0.001* 0.897 (0.864–0.970) 0.003*
BMI (kg/m2) 0.908 (0.872–0.947) 0.042* 0.942 (0.832–1.067) 0.349
Varicocele grade
I Reference Reference
II 3.054 (1.328–7.019) 0.009* 1.860 (0.413–8.376) 0.419
III 8.644 (3.883–19.240) 0.001* 14.354 (3.247–63.459) 0.002*
Varicocele laterality
Left Reference Reference
Right 1.879 (0.097–23.603) 0.149 1.562 (0.084–29.015) 0.765
Bilateral 0.427 (0.205–1.723) 0.668 0.547 (0.128–2.331) 0.415
Testis volume difference (ml)** 0.833 (0.779–0.890) 0.001* 0.686 (0.636–0.741) 0.001*
Time to hospital visit (months) 0.235 (0.207–0.264) 0.001* 0.107 (0.049–0.235) 0.001*
Serum total testosterone (ng/dl) 1.002 (1.001–1.003) 0.002* 1.002 (1.000–1.004) 0.104
Semen analysis
Count, million 1.008 (1.005–1.012) 0.005* 1.007 (1.001–1.015) 0.038*
Concentration, million/ml 1.020 (1.009–1.031) 0.001* 1.020 (1.009–1.031) 0.006*
Motility, % 1.017 (0.998–1.023) 0.402 1.010 (0.996–1.025) 0.167
Open in a new tab

BMI, body mass index.

a

regression analysis.

*Statistically significant.

**Unilateral varicocele.

4. DISCUSSION

Over the past several decades, a number of studies have been conducted on the mechanism by which varicocele induces male infertility (Harrison, Lewis, & Roberts, 1986; Hurt, Howards, & Turner, 1987; Pryor, Krieg, Evans, Batson, & Turner, 1989). However, the exact mechanism that causes this abnormality remains to be determined. Although most plausible mechanisms have been derived from animal experiments, these theories include an increase in apoptosis, increased sperm DNA damage, oxidative stress, tissue hypoxia, degenerative changes in the seminiferous tubule, immunological infertility, hormone dysfunction, scrotal hyperthermia and the retrograde flow of adrenal or renal metabolites (Clavijo, Carrasquillo, & Ramasamy, 2017; Zhang et al., 2018).

Clinical and animal model studies have identified a relationship between varicoceles and testicular endocrine and exocrine dysfunction (Pastuszak & Wang, 2015). The main mechanism is via varicoceles, which induce increased cytoplasmic vacuolisation and atrophy in Leydig cells and decrease the number of Leydig cells (Sirvent et al., 1990). An induced varicocele rat model demonstrated a significant decrease in intratesticular testosterone levels, suggesting a direct effect on Leydig cell function (Zheng et al., 2008). Sertoli cell dysfunction is also observed through decreased androgen‐binding protein and transferrin levels in animal models (Li et al., 1999). Serum levels of follicle‐stimulating hormone and testosterone are lower in patients with a varicocele and tend to recover following varicocelectomy (Cayan et al., 1999). Inhibin B levels also often improve after a varicocelectomy, suggesting reversible Sertoli cell dysfunction (Fujisawa et al., 2001).

The prevalence of varicocele is generally known to be 4.4% to 22.6%. In particular, the prevalence rate of varicocele among patients with infertility has been reported to be as high as 80% (Will et al., 2011). However, the proportion of patients complaining of pain in varicocele is not well known. Most patients with varicocele are known to be asymptomatic, and pain is reported to be present in approximately up to 10% (Chung & Lee, 2018; Owen et al., 2017).

To date, the primary indication for varicocelectomy has been focused on men with varicocele with poor semen quality and a normal female partner. The evidence for this indication is that improved testicular function and semen parameters have been identified in many studies after varicocelectomy. After varicocelectomy, the semen parameter was improved in 30% to 60% of patients (Locke, Noparast, & Afshar, 2017), and fertility was recovered in 35% to 46% of patients (Spinelli, Giacomo, Lo Piccolo, Martin, & Messineo, 2010).

Thus, the role and effects of varicocelectomy on male reproductive function are relatively well known and firmly established. However, the results of studies on the therapeutic effect of varicocelectomy on scrotal pain vary among researchers and are inconsistent (Paick & Choi, 2018). After varicocelectomy, the pain resolution rate has been reported to be about 48% to 90%. Although the rate of symptom improvement is high, the complete pain resolution rate is low (Mehta & Goldstein, 2013; Park et al., 2011). Approximately 10%–50% of patients are reported to have pain still after surgery (Park et al., 2011). Therefore, patients who do not have satisfactory results from both conservative and surgical treatments are in great frustration and pain, and physicians have a great deal of difficulty in managing these patients.

To overcome these difficulties, researchers have been studying predictive parameters for pain resolution after varicocelectomy. Peterson et al. (Peterson, Lance, & Ruiz, 1998) reported that surgical outcomes were poor in patients with sharp or radiating pain towards the femoral or inguinal area. Yaman, Ozdiler, Anafarta, and Gogus (2000) reported that the failure rate was associated with a high varicocele grade before surgery. In this study, we did not report information about post‐operative pain resolution. However, we reported complete resolution in 52.8% of patients who underwent varicocelectomy with scrotal pain, partial resolution in 41.5% and failure in 5.7%. In addition, the success rate was higher when duration of pain before varicocelectomy was less than 6 months (Park et al., 2011).

In the present study, the time to hospital visit by patients with painless varicocele was significantly longer than that of patients with painful varicocele. This can be explained by the fact that the patients with painless varicocele do not have any distinctive symptom of scrotal pain; thus, there is no motivation to visit their physician before they accidentally find a lump in the scrotum or suspect a fertility problem.

Physicians should be concerned about the time to hospital visit because the effect of varicocele on testicular function may be gradual (Gorelick & Goldstein, 1993). Although there is controversy regarding the progressive detrimental effect of varicocele on the testes, it is obvious that varicocele is found more frequently in infertile men, especially in those with secondary infertility (Kantartzi, Goulis, Goulis, & Papadimas, 2007). In line with this, our results show that patients with painful varicocele had better semen parameters than patients with painless varicocele even though they had a higher grade of varicocele. This may be related to the shorter time before visiting the hospital.

The aetiology of scrotal pain associated with varicocele is not completely understood. Proposed mechanisms include compression of nearby neural fibres by the dilated venous complex, increased scrotal temperature, oxidative stress to the testicular parenchyma and tissue ischaemia secondary to venous stasis (Khera & Lipshultz, 2008). In our study, the grade of varicocele in patients with pain was significantly higher than in the painless group, which seems to support this hypothesis.

We thought that the lower mean age of patients with painful varicocele was related to earlier visits to the hospital by recognition of varicocele due to scrotal pain. In addition, the reason for the larger testis volume difference and lower sperm count and concentration in patients with painless varicocele seems to be related to the longer period of time between abnormality recognition and hospital visit. These findings suggest that although scrotal pain induced by varicocele is difficult to treat, it may lead to an earlier diagnosis and treatment and provide an opportunity to avoid impairment of future fertility. However, further studies are needed to determine whether the final pregnancy rate among patients with pain is higher after treatment than among patients without pain.

There are several important limitations to this study. First, this is a single‐centre, retrospective study. The lack of an even distribution of patients with regard to ethnicity, comorbidities and location of varicocele may have resulted in bias. Second, we did not analyse the quality or severity of the pain. Although we measured the severity of pain using an analog visual pain scale at the interview of the patient and recorded the quality of the pain, we could not obtain enough data for the final analysis. Third, due to the lack of data in the sperm functional assay (i.e., hypoosmotic swelling test, eosin‐nigrosin stain) and pregnancy rates among the patients with painful varicocele, we could not compare those parameters between the two groups. Finally, this study lacked further analysis of the reasons for late visits to the hospital even after painless patients became aware of the varicocele.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to Dr. Jinmi Kim, Research Professor in the Department of Biostatistics, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, for statistical assistance.

Baek SR, Park HJ, Park NC. Comparison of the clinical characteristics of patients with varicocele according to the presence or absence of scrotal pain. Andrologia. 2019;51:e13187 10.1111/and.13187

REFERENCES

  1. Altunoluk, B. , Soylemez, H. , Efe, E. , & Malkoc, O. (2010). Duration of preoperative scrotal pain may predict the success of microsurgical varicocelectomy. International Brazilian Journal of Urology, 36(1), 55–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cayan, S. , Kadioglu, A. , Orhan, I. , Kandirali, E. , Tefekli, A. , & Tellaloglu, S. (1999). The effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on serum follicle stimulating hormone, testosterone and free testosterone levels in infertile men with varicocele. BJU International, 84(9), 1046–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chung, J. M. , & Lee, S. D. (2018). Current issues in adolescent varicocele: Pediatric urological perspectives. World J Mens Health, 36(2), 123–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clavijo, R. I. , Carrasquillo, R. , & Ramasamy, R. (2017). Varicoceles: Prevalence and pathogenesis in adult men. Fertility and Sterility, 108(3), 364–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dohle, G. R. , Colpi, G. M. , Hargreave, T. B. , Papp, G. K. , Jungwirth, A. , & Weidner, W. (2005). EAU guidelines on male infertility. European Urology, 48(5), 703–711. 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elzanaty, S. , & Johansen, C. E. (2015). Microsurgical varicocele repair on men with Grade III lesions and chronic dull scrotal pain: A Pilot Study. Current Urology, 8(1), 29–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fujisawa, M. , Dobashi, M. , Yamasaki, T. , Kanzaki, M. , Okada, H. , Arakawa, S. , & Kamidono, S. (2001). Significance of serum inhibin B concentration for evaluating improvement in spermatogenesis after varicocelectomy. Human Reproduction, 16(9), 1945–1949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gorelick, J. I. , & Goldstein, M. (1993). Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertility and Sterility, 59(3), 613–616. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harrison, R. M. , Lewis, R. W. , & Roberts, J. A. (1986). Pathophysiology of varicocele in nonhuman primates: Long‐term seminal and testicular changes. Fertility and Sterility, 46(3), 500–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hurt, G. S. , Howards, S. S. , & Turner, T. T. (1987). The effects of unilateral, experimental varicocele are not mediated through the ipsilateral testis. Journal of Andrology, 8(6), 403–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kantartzi, P. D. , Goulis, C. D. , Goulis, G. D. , & Papadimas, I. (2007). Male infertility and varicocele: Myths and reality. Hippokratia, 11(3), 99–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Karademir, K. , Senkul, T. , Baykal, K. , Ates, F. , Iseri, C. , & Erden, D. (2005). Evaluation of the role of varicocelectomy including external spermatic vein ligation in patients with scrotal pain. International Journal of Urology, 12(5), 484–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Khera, M. , & Lipshultz, L. I. (2008). Evolving approach to the varicocele. Urologic Clinics of North America, 35(2), 183–189, viii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim, H. T. , Song, P. H. , & Moon, K. H. (2012). Microsurgical ligation for painful varicocele: Effectiveness and predictors of pain resolution. Yonsei Medical Journal, 53(1), 145–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, H. , Dubocq, F. , Jiang, Y. , Tiguert, R. , Gheiler, E. L. , & Dhabuwala, C. B. (1999). Effect of surgically induced varicocele on testicular blood flow and Sertoli cell function. Urology, 53(6), 1258–1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Locke, J. A. , Noparast, M. , & Afshar, K. (2017). Treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 13(5), 437–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lundy, S. D. , & Sabanegh, E. S. Jr (2018). Varicocele management for infertility and pain: A systematic review. Arab Journal of Urology, 16(1), 157–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lyon, R. P. , Marshall, S. , & Scott, M. P. (1982). Varicocele in childhood and adolescence: Implication in adulthood infertility? Urology, 19(6), 641–644. 10.1016/0090-4295(82)90019-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Maghraby, H. A. (2002). Laparoscopic varicocelectomy for painful varicoceles: Merits and outcomes. Journal of Endourology, 16(2), 107–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mehta, A. , & Goldstein, M. (2013). Microsurgical varicocelectomy: A review. Asian Journal of Andrology, 15(1), 56–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Owen, R. C. , McCormick, B. J. , Figler, B. D. , & Coward, R. M. (2017). A review of varicocele repair for pain. Translational Andrology and Urology, 6(Suppl 1), S20–S29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Paick, S. , & Choi, W. S. (2018). Varicocele and testicular pain: A review. World Journal of Mens Health. 36, e12850 10.5534/wjmh.170010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Park, H. J. , Lee, S. S. , & Park, N. C. (2011). Predictors of pain resolution after varicocelectomy for painful varicocele. Asian Journal of Andrology, 13(5), 754–758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pastuszak, A. W. , & Wang, R. (2015). Varicocele and testicular function. Asian Journal of Andrology, 17(4), 659–667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Peterson, A. C. , Lance, R. S. , & Ruiz, H. E. (1998). Outcomes of varicocele ligation done for pain. Journal of Urology, 159(5), 1565–1567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pryor, J. L. , Krieg, R. J. Jr , Evans, W. S. , Batson, J. , & Turner, T. T. (1989). Luteinizing hormone secretion by male rat pituitary cells perifused in vitro: Effect of experimental left varicocele and orchiectomy. Journal of Andrology, 10(5), 372–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Roque, M. , & Esteves, S. C. (2016). A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and best practice statements for the diagnosis and management of varicocele in children and adolescents. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18(2), 262–268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schlegel, P. N. , & Goldstein, M. (2011). Alternate indications for varicocele repair: Non‐obstructive azoospermia, pain, androgen deficiency and progressive testicular dysfunction. Fertility and Sterility, 96(6), 1288–1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sirvent, J. J. , Bernat, R. , Navarro, M. A. , Rodriguez, T. J. , Guspi, R. , & Bosch, R. (1990). Leydig cell in idiopathic varicocele. European Urology, 17, 257–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Spinelli, C. , Di Giacomo, M. , Lo Piccolo, R. , Martin, A. , & Messineo, A. (2010). The role of testicular volume in adolescents with varicocele: The better way and time of surgical treatment. Journal of Urology, 184(4 Suppl), 1722–1726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tan, W. P. , & Levine, L. A. (2016). An overview of the management of post‐vasectomy pain syndrome. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18(3), 332–337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tan, W. P. , & Levine, L. A. (2017). What can we do for chronic scrotal content pain? World Journal of Mens Health, 35(3), 146–155. 10.5534/wjmh.17047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Will, M. A. , Swain, J. , Fode, M. , Sonksen, J. , Christman, G. M. , & Ohl, D. (2011). The great debate: Varicocele treatment and impact on fertility. Fertility and Sterility, 95(3), 841–852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yaman, O. , Ozdiler, E. , Anafarta, K. , & Gogus, O. (2000). Effect of microsurgical subinguinal varicocele ligation to treat pain. Urology, 55(1), 107–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, J. , Jin, P. P. , Gong, M. , Guo, J. H. , Fang, K. , Yi, Q. T. , & Zhu, R. J. (2018). Roles of Fas/FasL‐mediated apoptosis and inhibin B in the testicular dysfunction of rats with left‐side varicocele. Andrologia, 50(2), e12818 10.1111/and.12850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zheng, Y. Q. , Zhang, X. B. , Zhou, J. Q. , Cheng, F. , Rao, T. , & Yao, Y. (2008). The effects of artery‐ligating and artery‐preserving varicocelectomy on the ipsilateral testes in rats. Urology, 72(5), 1179–1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Andrologia are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES